Document N2LobpdL4NOZz2DpEvv1b4MgV

(conoco) Technical Service Report Report No. 148--80--839--0 Conoco Inc. Research and Development Department Analytical Research Section Ponca City, Oklahoma; To From Date J. D. Meyers, Corporate Services Section J. W. Wimberley and M. J. Whitaker December 9, 1980 I--" ': - c Subject ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES LCVCM-I-80-111, -112, and -113 BY THE RCRA PROCEDURES -TIAL i:;c. The attached table contains the data. Since the samples were solids, pHs were not measured, and corrosivity testing was not applicable. We did, however, note that the pHs after adding water were 11.5, 8.5, and 12.7, respectively, for the three samples. References Research Notebook 4318, p. 10. Chemical Analysis Method 11.062-80 taken from "Test Methods for the Evaluation of Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods," SW-846, U.S., E.P.A. Office of Solid Waste. J. W. Wimberley Senior Research Scientist Chemical Analysis Group M. J. Whitaker Associate Chemist . Chemical Analysis Group - es Distribution: FK JLR PLW CMS RLH CCR 0000398A2 DATE n/ao/gO CUSTOMER PflOL RCRA ANAL. NO. SAMPLE NUMBER REFERENCE 52S2T <h3ll- (<3 52-530 525 3 l -Hz. "Hi MtS-tb RCRA ANALYSIS REPORT FORM Z/^ ADDRESS Xfl ft ALBS, PROJECT NO. g 37 ~ O FLASH POINT NA HA ha CORROSIVITY MILS/YEAR HA MA HA TOXIC METALS. PPM REACTIVITY PH a? Ba Cd Cr Pb Hq Se As S" PRESENT CN' PRESENT HA c.oj 31 *,0(5 *.ot id. 052 2. 0 HG.G HA *.o3 1.4 .o9y ^.01 *.052 <:.o H& HA *,.o3 .17 i.ofS *.03 <*5 c./ A. <.00 2j ti& HC- t 0000 O O r> 10-6-80 a c *- ANALYST 4- frT5~W APPROVED BY