Document MoBKbDoE8GX2NpL45Z9weN97

/.'ETALS DIVISION P. 0. BOX 579 -4G25 ROYAL AVE.. NIAGARA FALLS. NEW YORK *.43C To (Name) Division Location Mr. J. L. Myers UCC - Metals Niagara Falls, NY oate originating oept. February 19, 1980 "Calidria" Asbestos Copy to Messrs. T. W. Carmody-- W. B. DeAtley/ K. S. Lane / P. W. McDaiyiel 0. J. Malacarne Answering letter date SubieCt Review of King City Plant Monitoring and Medical Records J. 0. Si,bley/R. F. X. Fusaro / l This Tetter summarizes the status of the above-noted project following meetings at King City and with Dr. Lane and Mr. McDaniel in New York City. The monitoring data files at King City have been assembled in one place. We have exposure information going back to 1963. The early data are by midget impinger and are sporadic in today's terms, but at least a modest number of facts seem to be available. Personal, sampling started in 1970 and sampling detail, frequency and scope has increased substantially since that time. Examples of this type of data available at various points in time are attached for reference. It also appears that Dick Marsden has good chronological records of changes that have been made in the plant equipment. These include changes affecting the levels of asbestos dustso we should be able to relate the changes to the observed levels of airborne asbestos dust. The information available to relate workers to job locations is very extensive. Weekly time cards which show the hours spent in each plant department appear to be available for everyone who has ever worked in the plant. Examples of these cards are attached for reference. Medical records are also available for all past and present employees. Based on this information two projects can be defined: 1. Summarize the exposure data and relate it to the corresponding changes made in plant equipment to reduce dust levels. 2. Put the exposure and work location information in a form where exposure histories and cumulative exposure can be obtained readily for each individual employee. This is obviously a computer program and storage task. Medical records would also be coded for prompt recall. Mr. J. L. Myers -2- February 19, 1980 Regarding the first of these tasks, there are about 16 plant locations that are now monitored with some regularity. A substantial proportion of these have been tested to some extent back to 1963. Since monitoring seldom occurred more than once a month and often only once or twice a year, it is a substantial but still manageable task to prepare a graphical-summary by month of all of the daily TWA data. Bill DeAtley is now preparing such a summary. The mechanical changes relating to dust levels from Dick Marsden will also be.shown. . When completed, we will have a good historical-picture of our efforts-to control exposure and the results^achieved;- - It will also show clearly the amount and kind of exposure dataiavailable. The second task relating to individual exposure and medical histories is much more substantial.^. For epidemiology-it would be most desirable to.relate the time spent by each employee in each location to the corresponding exposure records to give a cumulative exposure.:-- It appears that our ability to relate time-in-location far exceeds our ability to estimate exposure. Nevertheless,it appears that the total amount of information available substantially exceeds that used in most asbestos epidemiological studies published in the past. It is well recognized that asbestos related diseases generally take a minimum of twenty years to develop and the latency period can be much longer than this for low exposures. Also, out of approximately 200 past and present employees at King City, only five have as much as 16 years exposure. The medical records show no evidence of asbestos related disease. It can be concluded that the cohort here is too small and the exposure period has been too brief to make an epidemiological study worthwhile at this time. On the other hand, however, there are several good reasons to put the data in "epidemiology" form now and store future data in the same form. These include: 1. In order to protect our employees it is very desirable to know their exposure history and cumulative exposure. Recent literature is providing estimates of risk based on cumulative exposure. We need to be sure that our employees are not being exposed to excessive risk. 2. The total records involved include only about 200 employees for a maximum time of employment of only about 16 years. It appears to be a reasonable sized effort to code this quantity of information now. Entry of future data annually would be quite simple. 3. We are faced with demands from EPA and other regulatory agencies for increasingly detailed exposure information. There is little doubt that such information will be required in the future. We are in the best position to interpret our data accurately. The alternative is likely to be the supplying of the "raw" data to NI0SH or EPA for their analysis. Mr. J. L. Myers -3- February 19, 1980 The obvious question is how much time and effort would be required to write the programs and code the available information into the computer. I am pursuing this matter actively and hope to have definite information in the next several weeks. /rmm Attachments Harrison B. Rhodes UC 14P-2 INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION To (Nan*) Company Location Mr. Kenneth Lentz Union Carbide Corporation Nuclear Division p. 0. Box 613 King City, California Copy to Mr. C. E. Brown Mr. L. B. Emlet 0 s. foftflttAn I am attaching two copies of Mr. McDaniel's report on the mine and plant , operation during his visit September 10 rD* through September 13. I think the report is self-explanatory, and we would concur with Mr. McDaniel's recommendations. I hope it will be possible to obtain equipment for the plant site for dust counts, etc., since it is very difficult to transport equip ment every time a visit is made. Mr-. McDaniel reports that he did meet with the medical group in King City and was able to present to them some picture of what we are trying to do in industrial hygiene. I believe this was of educational value to the group. Thank you very much for the courtesies shown Mr. McDaniel on his visit. Very truly yours. Thomas W. Nale, M.D. vm enclosures Medical Director \y \ / Report of Investigation Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 This was the first formal evaluation of the working environment for conditions that might be hazardous to health at the new plant and mine. -It was concerned primarily.with airborne dust. Air samples were collected at both the mine and mill by a technique in which the dust was-retained by impingement in liquid. Particle concentration was then determined by count using light-field microscopy and a magnification of 100 diameters. This is in accord with the standard procedures of the U. S. Public Health'Service. Results are given in the accompanying table. For safety, all particles were considered to be fibrous. While it is recognized that other materials may be present, studies of airborne material at Sterling Forrest by electron microscopy have shown that the fiber-bearing particles do not always have the familiar fiber shape, and positive distinction is possible only through elaborate and expensive techniques that are impractical for a dust control program. Further,, in view of the very limited information available on the toxicity of short fiber asbestos, a conservative approach is indicated. Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 Recommendations Mine: 1. Require that caterpillar operators engaged in cleaning and scraping mine site wear respirators, approved by the _U: S. Bureau of Mines for.toxic dusts. A relatively inexpensive respirator that resembles the non-approved mask now available, but which has been found adequate, is American Optical Co., Sure-Guard, No. R9100T. 2. The recommended maximum allowable.dust concentration for long-term exposure at the mine is 5 million particles per cubic foot of air. Evaluate environ ment periodically to determine If exposures are controlled. _ Mill; 1. The recommended maximum allowable dust concentration for mill work areas is 3 million particles (total) per cubic foot of air. Plan dust control to meet that limit. 2. Initiate a program-for routine evaluation of dust concentrations at various operations at the mill site. The actual number of samples that must be collected for reliable evaluation and other details Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 of the program will be defined as experience is gained in developing mill operations. For the early stages of operation, sampling should be conducted at monthly intervals until a good background of information is obtained and until experience shows that a longer interval-is Justified. Obtain laboratory equipment necessary for routine dust evaluation. A list of equipment is shown below. a.) Microscope. Bausch and Lomb model FBR-3(No. 31200423) with mechanical stage and Abbe condenser (N.A. 1.25) This is a monocular microscope that can be readily converted to a binocular type and is supplied with 10X, 43X, and 97X achromatic objectives, and 5X and 10X Huygenian eyepieces. Cost--approximately $430. Source--laboratory supply house or directly from Bausch and Lomb. A similar microscope of Japanese make that lias been found acceptable at Grand Junction is obtainable from Unitron Instrument Co., 66 Needham Street^ ft Newton Highlands 6l, Massachusetts. The model number is MLU. It is equipped with essentially the same accessories as the B&L model (including Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 10X, 40X, and 100X objectives, and 5X, 10X and 15X eyepieces). In addition, it has a built-in light. Cost--approximately $270. I have asked that a catalog be sent to King City., . b.) Microscope Light (if B&L microscope is purchased). B&L Optilume for monocular microscopes. Price-- approximately$8.50. Source--laboratory supply.house. c.) Whipple Micrometer Disc. For use in microscope eyepiece. Price--approximately $7.50. Source-- laboratory supply houses. d.) 6 Sedgwick-Rafter (A.P.H.A.) Counting Cells. Price--$9.00 each. Source--Laboratory supply houses. e.) Isopropyl alchol as discussed during the visit. 4. Obtain air sampling equipment. Literature on < available equipment will be forwarded as soon as received. Probable'cost--$250. Detailed Findings Mine No mining was being performed during this visit but operations involved with the transportation of ore to the mill and general cleaning of the mine site were in progress. Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 Dust counts were not found to be excessive except on the caterpillars dressing the mine site. Concentrations alongside the operators were about twice the recommended maximum of 5 million particles per cubic foot of air and indicated a .need for improved protection of personnel. It was recommended that these people be supplied with respirators approved by the U. S. Bureau of Mines. The amount of dust found in the open cab of a pick-up truck during travel from the mine site to the public road was higher than at some points at the mine but not to a significant degree. With further improvement to the road, concentrations in moving trucks should drop. Mill Only the front end of the process (ore treatment up to filtration) was operated during this visit. The remainder of the process will be investigated later in the year when the installation is completed. Dust concentrations at various points -of operation are shown in the table. None exceeded 5 million particles per cubic foot of air, but it was apparent that very careful control of the dry material was necessary to prevent a significant increase in airborne particles. Thus as production Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 rises to mill capacity additional control measures may be indicated. In view of the toxicity of asbestos and the low permissable air concentration, it was recommended,that a,program for routine periodic appraisal of the work environment be established, and that necessary ..equipment be obtained. While much of the program (sampling location, number of samples, and the number of investigations required per unit of time) cannot be defined until the mill is in normal operation, it was felt that initially plans should be made for monthly investigations. Information on sampling equipment needed for the program will be forwarded as soon as descriptive literature is received from the supplier. The basic laboratory equipment for dust appraisal and its approximate cost is listed in the recommendations. The microscope selected need not be one of the makes listed but should have the same features and a complete line of available accessories. The question of imported or American-made is a matter for local decision which should consider in addition to cost the availability of parts and service. The other recommended laboratory supplies are more or less standard items in American dust control Dractice. PWM/en Paul W. McDaniel Industrial Hygiene Engineer Dust Concentrations Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 Sampling Location and Operation Date (1) MPPCF Remarks Mine Site Alongside wobbler during loading trucks. 9/10/63 Riding caterpillars cleaning mine site. 9/10/63 Walking across ore pile Riding pick-up with windows open on road from mine. 9/10/63 9/IO/63 4.2 3.8 3.3 3.9 9.6 10.9 11.3 11.8 3.2 3.4 4.7 6.0 Variable wind direction and speed so that sampling location is upwind of dust part of time. Much large, nonrespirable material noted. Light breeze (5 MPH) from west and south. Deep dust on portions of road. Mill Site Deck around Corn-Bin feeder and screen 204 Same Location 9/11/83 9/11/63 Walkways from screen 204 to shaking tables 'Deck around screen 204 and Corn-Bin feeder Same Location 9/11/63 9/12/63 9/12/63 2.3 Wind from south (102.7 15 MPH). No ore moved from stockpile. 3.1 Wind from north (103.7 15 MPH) and ore loaded on conveyor belt feedin Corn-Bin feeder. 1.7 1.9 2.6 No ore moved from 2.5 Stockpile. Very little wind. 3.8 Ore loaded on conveyor 3.6 belt feeding Corn-Bin feeder. Dust Concentrations Nuclear Division Union Carbide Corp. King City, California Sept. 10-13, 1963 Mill Site (cont'd) Walking over ore pile as pile was dressed by front loader In front loader cab while dressing ore pile. 9/12/63 1.7 Not visibly dusty 9/12/63 1 2.5 Not visibly dusty (l) MPPCF--Millions of particles per cubic foot of air. UC / pi internal correspondence MINING AND METALS DIVISION P. 0. BOX K, KING CITY, CALIFORNIA 93930 To OlvIJaii Copy # Mr. Paul A. McDaniel Union Carbide Corporation 270 Park Avenue Hew York, New York 0mU Feb. 1, 1967 o.i9,na,,,v o.,,. tmttme dole Svbjecf Dear Mr. McDaniel: Here are the latest series of dust counts. As you may notice, they have decreased from last time. This, I believe is due to high moisture in the product. Personnel were wearing respirators in the bagging room. 1-24-67 Location PPM End of Bag Conveyor Same as above Bagging Room Same as above Rock Fiber Area Refiner Area General Mill Same as above Maintenance Bldg. Inside Michigan Loader Car Loading Operation Same as above Blank 2,6 2.2 3.8 4.2 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.5 1.0 1.1 212 2.1 5 Weather: Cloudy, light riln - High Purity Open - High moisture. Very truly yours, D. S. Kamens DSK/Jcb cc; J. A. Riddle r J. L. Myers - ! INTERNAL correspondence MINING AND METALS DIVISION ~ To (Hom,) dm*,, loeaffom p# w. McDaniel HS & EA 22nd Floor New York, MY Copy to W. B. DeAtleyx"^ R. J. Kronkhyte 0. J. Malacarne E. A. Piersall J. C. Settlemoir p. o. box k, king city, California 93930 Dai, December 21, 1979 Ong!floiifl0 Dpi> Answrfi)0 /ilftr date SubJ*f PERSONAL AIR SAMPLES TAKEN FOR THE M3NTH OF DECEMBER 1979 Subject Job Classification Sampling Time min. Average + 5m/ml Harry Roof 038 Bagger Operator 21-69 1.46 Thomas Moore RG-244 Bagger Operator 60-71 0.74 Clyde Bailey Press-Dryer Circuit Operator 56-87 0.21 Isabel Flores, Sr. Outside Operator 53-78 0.78 Andy Anderson Adene Andrade Shift Supervisor Labor Operator 59-74 21-64 0.33 1.69 es C. Settlemoir ,ality Control Technician /dm 12/20/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: Time 8:57 A.M---- 9:35 A.M. 9:36 A.M. - 10:13 A.M. 10:14 A.M. - 10:54 A.M. 10:55 A.M. - 11:35 A.M. 11:36 A.M. - 11:57 A.M. 12:33 P.M. - 1:40 P.M. l:4l P.M. - 2:50 P.M. Harry Roof - 038 Bagger Operator Main Bagging Rocm 1) rull bagging, shrink wrapping, palletizing operation on Super Visbestos. 2) light forklift traffic. . 3) 5-10 xnph wind from the south all day. 4) Clear to cloudly day, west door open. 5) Upper bagger enclosure partly filled with product from an inspection door being loose. 6) Circuit down due to maintenance repairs. Work Performed Circuit down, moyed-pallets of SVC around bagging roan for double wrap ping. Average + 5m/ml O.98 Started circuit; worked around bagging 3.39 room; took a break. Circuit down; vacuumed inside the upper 1.70 bagger enclosure. Same as above until 11:15. 2.07 Checked around bagging room. 1.12 Put plastic bags into drums; moved pallets from the east door to the palletizer area. o.4o Placed SSG press cake in sample drums. 0.54 Total 6 Drums. Average 1.46 12/18/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: Time 9:25 A.M. - 10:25 A.M. 10:26 A.M. - 11:28 A.M. 11:29 A.M. - 12:40 P.M. 1:00 P.M. - 2:03 P.M. 2:03 P.M. - 3:03 P.M. Thomas Moore - RG-244 Bagger Operator. BO-244 Bagging Boom 1) Full bagging, shrink vrappping, palletizing operation on BG-244. 2) North door open, fair day. . 3) 5-10 mph wind from south all day. 4) New product return system to Baymond mill. 5) Moved pallets from KG-bagging room to storage area and took samples to the laboratory. 6) He was wearing a respirator. 7) Bulk car fill pipe plugged up at 1:50 P.M. Work Performed Normal conditions. ." " " * " " " " " , took break. Average + 5p/p1 0.64 0.44 0.67 1.09 0.88 Average 0.74 12/18/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: Time 9:15 A.M. - 10:20 A.M. 10:21A.M. - 11:17 A.M. 11:18 A.M. - 12:45 P.M. 12:46 P.M. - 2:09 P.M. 2:10 P.M. - 3:10 P.M. Clyde Bailey - Press-Dryer Circuit Operator Press-Dryer Circuit 1) Usual mill operating conditions. 2) East/south door closed; 5 - 10 ph vind from the south all, day. Work Performed Normal conditions. "" " " , lunch for 30 min. "" V" Average + 0.18 0.26 0.l4 0.16 0.37 Average 0.21 12/18/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: Time 9:42 A.M. - 10:35 A.M. 10:36 A.M. - 11:39 A.M. 11:40 A.M. - 12:46 P.M. 12:47 P.M. - 2:05 P.M. 2:06 P.M. - 3:07 P.M. Isabel Flores, SR. - Outside Operator Mill, Mill Ore Loading System l) Usual m operating conditions. 2) Loaded ore into Feed hopper. 3) Worked in EG-244 bagging roan and took a bulk car sample to laboratory every hour. 4) Bulk car fill pipe plugged causing a pellet dust spill;- 5 - 7 mph wind from south. 5) He was wearing a respirator. Work Performed Normal conditions. II II " " ft It tl , changed bulk car. Average Average + 5m/ml 0.84 0.61 1.08 0.71 O.67 0.78 12/18/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: 1 Time 9:32 A.M. - 10:32 A.M. 10:33 A.M. - 11:32 A.M. 11:33 A.M. - 12:37 P.M. 12:38 P.M. - 1:52 P.M. 1:53 P.M. - 3:04 P.M. Andy Anderson - Shift Supervisor Mill and Office 1) Usual mill operating conditions. 2) He vas wearing a respirator as needed. 3) Main circuit down all day. Work Performed Normal conditions. ff It n tt t* tf Checked bulk car for plugged up, normal conditions.. Average Average + 5/ml 0.28 0.24 0.28 0.36 0.47 0.33 12/19/79 Subject: Area: Conditions: Time 9:37 A.M. - 10:30 A.M, 10:47 A.M. - 11:08 A.M, 11:09 A.M. - 11:30 A.M. 11:32 A.M. - 11:59 A.M. 12:33 P.M. - 1:25 P.M. 1:26 P.M. - 2:30 P.M. 3:00 P.M. 3:57 P.M. Adene Andrade - Labor Operator Storage and Shipping Area. 1) Usual loading trucks operating conditions. 2) 10-15 mph wind from the south in the morn-ing and 0-7 mph wind from the south in the afternoon. 3) Cloudy day. 4) She was wearing a respirator as needed. Work Performed Filter Hand loading containers of (25mm) HPFEX with wrapped bags. Same as above. (35mm) Same as above until 11:20* (35mm) Cleaned up around storage (35mm) area. Moved bulk car to a pick (35mm) up area. Cleaned up around storage (35mm) area. Same as above; took all empty paraplex drums to treasure (35mm) island. Average Average + 5m/ml Too much dirt 4.19 2.06 2.06 0.52 .. 0.94 1.11 1.69 ro r* o o frt t>3 <$ 0 D o M i A o CJ .9 "J A o 3" b H3 0 *A 6o < Xi to 1 6o6 j 8 t4 9 J .*>> o i *s> 6 U o o *r**C> O -> o c \ <T c AA A 3 o n 6b oo A 0 b 6 ; ) * a***. r r r~ 3 A ? o * *A 3 CC o o r o r <r -* o 0 1 A 3 cr -a i o o ^ Ji .1 6 ooN oo 4? -Zoj - r "Q) *) A MooO 1 ac > o a 6 b1 l 1 i L* +* ^ v0J *vj A c. A 0 A b*bA C* 6 s ri 5 1 1 3s c w * v. v, * / r> -:3o I - <S I i* vA j . SJ i ,, i: - c*. }\ \ \ O \--N \5 X LX| \ S-v - >1 t SV Jo i i aa cS o * VV p C, > it S3 o) i2 . `<f3i -- ~.A4Ct- J; s<. j 4J A/>> /V a k 3d $ 1 --i A -t d cV V,V<Jr \l ,3 4* d i|: h / 1 o<ymy 't -<> > ix; oi H ~ . tiiii i -rM r # <\ * Qo o 1 ** d <Ar O j j o ffl o do o o l c d iox ri Irt a * o Vi < d *ro o <4 O r d S d A 0 w O' 6d 1 i o vf*i A o wc o o 0K 6 0 r o tf" <r c G* i -J- A * o cd t* 0 A * dr d 0 A 00 o * * AO M dd V. U VI 6o 1 - 1 J M VAi : A %A o > A r* f; o a* A Vo* i l V i o <C O Vi * f : r&*0 A o cO OC J3 M *i o d 6 rJ 6 i t i -i .... . -- P lffcS onrtU A ll*. d gi i $I 1 155 1 5I f* o _- i4 k c S ao kd 4 --e Ao '3 US. 0* i0T V 4 N$r* < Va s* \> i r* '4 CO a O <5 jt utJ t d i-.,/ t *1 t* <^1 \ i V 9 rVt u 1v s* T B o A /O < i VI a9 f. A A 8 a 0 . -- VI .i < oj V >5 o w 3 J V 4 t d? O & "tj d i a 0 i + r-4<J > i 4 _d 4 > 4 ci 0 l/J t 4> "3 IBc J> u uu 0 O - ---- 4t 0 0 M>V47\ALY `u U M b A A ^ Y O f P tftS O N M . MR f ! A U P i- t,:> SUMMARY OF JOB EXPOSURES Page ? o f ^ Report Period Z^~//Al /9 7 9 um v0>1 Coi uo I^ COJ Voi 1 u<v oCM w9OCX- ^ c*o H>jJ * 4J ^ 5> 3 Oa MpX -oturl000>xX11-*CPX>a0OJ -- xUOO- o uaE aa o oX oOf 11 *% f L* V 11 l 0 <si 15 t Q> <5S \ r X 1 4 6 i * i1 <5 * a * ft I fe % 1 *V $ $ . ft ?v i? < 0* ** <ift ftft to $ 0 <3 4 4. KK 'S $ >% CS <s < a ft ft 4 ft ft ft $ .% % > * % Q< %% i % ft % to co o i o i-i * Vi z <0 o c Vi O 3 Q to 4J sc Z CO l-l o CJ CM CO CJ o o o < z> 0) 1 1 1 u V9Oi H CM CO CO I * Rn i>* (0 o c i o CM+se CoO ii eo 6o V9i a C3 O 6 e XMo0-J! Ol jococ n>o TVocco3d* et cc o D CO Range o f Measurements (u n its } B ide, No, -- xZJaZ>-3i Zeao1> vox X0C9J aVoafi 0 o 0 0 <si M t4 CuouaBa9 >C' A ir Contaminants and/or Physical Hazards v 4 4coJ ^XCOB 4J oC B O o *9o o Vi - 1 N% %a x ft CO V9i CV (9 03 0) 0 d> CJ XJ Xoiv* ^ CO Bu, uo ^ Vi V) /fie T A ^S --oa eXaa>J. XocVoaaoII.^. . MQ -oaa k! * f 4 x' i % V, ft 4 j5. V X <M --COI XOJ o i>o M Vl J2 s Cl xi pe sSCCSy Oa> Bn> aJUS _I Cf *--x C sxxe Q nIi M OO cj T *M * 0 It ! V, I * > .5 1 1 --1fet 1 1 tv ll y t u*x o> uHo> JUa3S o oa P lvtsion F a cility 4 4l 1 4 1 Job D escription or T itle S I fr 0o o ..jprU01t. XI <0 VoI t<o8 e0)x p* Pi V Range o f Geometric Geom etric C u rre n t S td . Dev. TLV (GSD)' (u n its ) Exposure as 7. o f TLV Comments or Notes ftK & *iu***J. : . Vm $g I| 25 SSI t. ^ .1 ^K I sis 2j ? co Mo o M * uZ m o Vi 2 co a CO u * PS CO M 1 c? O <vo 1 v> N` 0 \ *<Q$ N 1 * K U4 to o CJ O o<z 1 1 \ aI t 1 o u H CM CO o * ** >4 x 1 V t t ***t X * \ * % t X\ o CO 1 Fn is 4J (AO c C o j-- (3 s o 1 <ov ft X% 3% <X\3Xx I <sx I XX * V% . i % % W X X% 0+ CoO c cX oc r* CM S cc + V- >a 0 c t c a u C6a et iGJ CO urements ( u n its ) (CM) Code O p e ra tio n a n d /o r P h y s ic a l o f Meoo- Measurements Mean SUMMARY OF JOB EXPOSURES D e s c rip tio n ID D ept, a /o A ir Contaminants, Number Mto PQ * *N *N 'H s oooo6 K. 1\ j 5* XV %* * d VI u <wX-s60GMDS --* 0e6(D> Co> -3a Eo 0) Vi 3Vi CX aiosi .xCoii Hazards CM ^X <(U0 > <M>< X M *< V(0I o eg oi r-t o o . r i * St Io * \ 4 I1 ! 4 oM Vl JS 03) XeI S > 1>9 JU0C) eiCiJ a a_c * 2xxe j_r _T_itl_e __ c F 't* ii 1 X. u4 01 si * H 1 it ?5 s ii * 1 I3t NS' i t* i it cl o *0 1 1 5 II ti Vi Vi XI 01 0> JS (0E0J1 3 S' Comments or Motes i 3 Kkn OA K%> * VCdl UO4 >^ A vs > 0* * 0 *l Oc, CXO H 1*0 $ .<$ < ' 1\ NI - 0xa -a ~~*04 10 0 P* * > OXVMa03I nH.>J ^^X33I 4 i -- % -- k __ >% !i 1 tJ A60m1*0 . OO* p05 TA(|QB41*J| 0 01 0 O>01 ttiJoi ^^GtOo <s * 4* V. 5. 1 % %V %% - "0T^ oe) 0 dco X01 ^X ^0 $ <s * sS S t4 >e0 *4% <$ K *N O01 <3k V> 3 $ 0 Range o f %% 5* * - %X ' A N > V l * Z0 -too N N N. P3 NN 's N urements (u n its ) SUMMARY OF JOB EXPOSURES !? I <3 ** V V % % %\ ; V a n d /o r P h y s ic a l o f Meas Measurements A ir Contaminants, Number Hazards J*\V ^0C0 *A<OrJ3l -; aU0O1. VO01ls 0 3 * f * * OI 0M tC0OjJ D escription or T itle <itn SC -cO1rr4/3l rx0X->4^iI> ou --C>. 0 f0x ii * ti ^ i * <1! % t VV-. > 1 1 CO Jl 5| V tf X 1 til As.--->J-- -- h ii I iP 1 ^ v Ii to v> 0 ' i 0 t-l Vi z m *0 c 0 # u 0 SS CO ii VC rc to M t a2 U u iu to C_> 0 0 0 < 33 01 1 1 0 Vi H CM <n O O CO 1 * Fn IS (0 o C o CoO C Tuoo-l N Ol S >o O Ho uCC&d5 et to eo 6 o OC4Q O<eu ,CaC9 Cl o tOot D > uU0> c > uBoo rsdcud0B1i w C 0 B u 3 TJ O ^X o 0u uo. CO 3 (031 a<o j0e ^ 6 0 xi ^XN to G xi ^ o U IS a X * r- oO . >' M 14 JS 1 03 Ue S > > J= C<a OB s0 x-* xe c xuUi V0* X0I .C0 OB 3 u0