Document Mgpm99jyDJeKZxOwgy378J9M

FILE NAME Owens Corning OC DATE 1968 Mar 15 DOC OC406 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Internal Report - Alternate Processes for Manufacture of High Temperature Insulation INIKA LUMPANT { ea . - Mr. B. E. Boyd Toleds R. F. Shannon Granville PEASIBILITY STUDY - ALTERNATE PROCESSES FOR MANUFACTURE OF HIGH TEPERATURE INSULATION Deto March 1968 fo tc ; . . Mr. E. Gay Tolod Mr. R. S. Grant Toled Mr. M. Hardwick Berlin Mr. R. J. McEvoy Granville Mr. C. G. Staslin Toled Mr. R. P. Witschen Toledo Central Files , Last January you asked me to take a good hard look at the various processes under consideration for the new Southwest Kaylo facility N a : our Attached is a copy of my report which summarizes study of every known process As you will note I reduced the list to just three processes which at merit further consideration for installation the new facility They include pan pouring filter pressing bonded aggregate and ; Silihoff The most important question which must be resolved before any final selection of process is made relates to the use of asbestos Because of - this problem I also included an evaluation of Multi in my report After all it is the only asbestos free product available - -_ - - or Unfortunately I had to compare the various processes strictly on a technical basis I am not in the position at the moment to make a recommendation as to the process combination of processes we should select for the new facility because of the lack of cost data As soon as cost projections are completed by Gay and Brooks on all of the processes still under considera- tion we will be able to at least take a recommendation as to which process we feel offers OCF the best product and gross margins in the years to come overload I am sure are already aware of the advantages and disadvantages of Berlin's pan p uring process Filter pressing has a lot of merit It a stronger better looking product the product is precision molded produces Bonded aggregate products and the process itself is highly automated as they now exist on the market have serious shortcomings They break still want to considor easily in transit and when handled Why then would we this process The reason is if Philip Carey ever solves their breakage problem they will have the best product on the market It is precision molded lends itself to automation is water repellent higher temperature resistant and is a autoclaved product Last but not least is the fact it has the best chance of being made asbestos free The only reasons for considering Multi are the facility is already avaofiltahbelecutrhreentproodvuecrtload is free of asbestos fibers and it could relieve some at Berlin especially in the block market It is my hope this report and disadvantages of each a much better position of best for the new facility gives you a better insight process Once we get cost making a recommendation as and for the 1970+ market as to the advantages data we will be in to which process is * - . moe, . a oom os . N. PLAINTIFF'S Bayone EXHIBIT 2911 v Bi? pooh . 7 | ee att INTRODUCTION The expanding market for Kaylo pipe and block has made it necessary for OCF not only to expand the Berlin operation again in 1968 but also to consider building a new facility in the Southwest The problem facing Management today is defining the type of process to be installed at the new facility Should it be Berlin's pan pouring process one of the more automated processes developed by our competitors or a combination of processes Also to be considered by Management is whether Multi has a place in the high temperature market of the future , To help Management decide which process or combination of processes is most suitable for installation at the new Southwest facility Kaylo R & D carried out an intensive evaluation of all known processes for the manufacture of high temperature insulation products A lack of cost data on competitive processes made it necessary for us to limit this study to strictly a technical comparison rather than a more preferred technical evaluation SUMMARY oe d The Kaylo R & D study confirmed the fact no other product can compete with Kayl block made by the pan pouring process It is by far the best on the market Block made by the filter press process tends to delaminate bonded aggregate block crumbles It should also be noted that neither the filter press process nor the bonded aggregate process can be used to produce structural 17 type core for the UL fire rated door market af To maintain our position in the block and core markets we must continue to by produce such products the pan pouring process Management must decide whether block and core products are to be produced at the new Southwest facility If the answer is yes a pan pouring flatware line will then have to be installed The second decision Management must make relates to the type of process qr combination of processes to be installed at the Southwest facility for the production other than sufficient the timing of pipe insulation If the decision is made to go to a process pan pouring technology will have to be purchased There is not time to develop from scratch an alternate process and still meet for construction of the Southwest facility Management has a number of process options to chose from for the production of pipe insulation at the new Southwest facility They include 1 a filter press or bonded aggregate process to produce all sizes of pipe up to and including 30 inch OD 2 a pan pouring process to produce the smaller pipe sizes and a filter press or bonded aggregate process for the production of large size sectional pipe and 3 a pan pouring process to produce the smaller pipe sizes and a Multi facility located anywhere for the production of large size sectional pipe With our current level of technology the pan pouring should not be considered for pouring large size sectional pipe at the process new facility -2- SUMMARY Cont) for indicates that from a technical standpoint no one process The Kaylo R & D study for the manufacture of has a distinct advantage over other known processes each also has a -/ high temperature pipe insulation Each has its advantages cost analysis is made on ~^' number of disadvantagbees ablOenlytoafdteecridea wchoimcphrehpernoscievses or combination of processes each process will we is most suitable the new Southwest facility technical evaluation of all known processes for the manufacture Our intensive insulation products indicates there are only three processos the Southwest of high temperature installation at of further consideration for possible filter worthy Kanville's facility They include the Berlin pan pouring process All of the other press process and Philip Carey's bonded aggregate process exception of Multi- considered during this study with the possible suitable processes because 1 the process would not yield a product Temp were rejected not sufficiently developed to meet the for OCF's needs or 2 the process was The Crosfield schedule for installation in the new Southwest facility time autoclaved process failed on both accounts Multi filter press considered for the production of large size sectional pipe and should only be additional facility for the production of high temperaturetemperature possibly as an block when Berlin becomes overloaded decision is made by Management as to the process they will market Before a final and the product they will adopt for installation at the Southwest facilitynumber of basic questions relating in the 1970's and 1950's they must consider a of a higher need for automation need for a product to rising labor costs the asbestos fiber health threat This report will attempt quality level and and acted on before the final to outline the questions which must be consideredwill also provide for Manage- decision as to process is reached This report for each of and disadvantages ment's consideration uandleirstconofsidteherataidovnantfaogresthe new Southwest facility the processes still RECOMMENDATIONS Research Center has already been made to appraise A visit to Manville's This visit must be followed by an OCF prepared the filter press process visit A visit should also be made t Philip cost projection and a plant It too should be followed- Carey to appraise their bonded aggregate process visit up by a cost projection and if possible a plant the filter press bonded aggregate Cost projections must be made or updated on fair comparison cost pan pouring and Multi processes To achieve a made a more automated for the pan pouring process should be on since projections exists at Barlin The latter is a reasonable request process than now to reduce labor and batch major & plant proghriagmheris dceugrrreeentolfy auuntdoemrawtaiyon of the pan pouring process costs and to achieve a to must be on the filter press and bonded aggregate processes Cost projections of activity One cost projection should be based on prepared at two levels will be used to the assumption the filter press or bondaendd aigngcrleugdaitneg p2r4ocexss" The second cost produce the entire line of pipe up REICHNENTATIONS REICHNETAIONS REICHNENTATIONS Cont ) | pouring should be based on the assumption the filter press or bonded aggregate pprroocjesesctiwoinll be limited to the production of large size sectional pipe only these conditions it must be tied in with the cost projection covering Under of the smaller sizes of pipe The Multi cost projection should pan pouring be limited to large size sectional pipe only It too must be tied in with the projection covering the pan of the smaller sizes of pipe To get economic picture of the various options available to us cost projections : should be prepared on the following process combinations Oction ANMEM ANMEM ANMEM ANMEM ANMEM Block Fan Pan Pan Far Fan poured poured poured poured poured Pire Filter pressed. Bonded aggregate Small sizes pan poured Small sizes pan poured Small sizes pan poured large large large sizes sizes sizes filter pressed bonded aggregate Multi facility It is possible the new Southwest will be limited to the production of pipe Kayls block would all be produced at Berlin and stockpiled at various distribution centers in the Southwest and West Since this is a possible Management option cost projections should also be made on the five pipe process combinations listed above minus the pan pouring facility for block In deciding the type of process to be installed in the new Southwest facility Management will have to give serious consideration to the asbestos health threat What effect if any will it have on the future growth of the overall high temperature insulation market and our share of the market in particular particular particular particular particular It could be the most important decision we face in deciding which process to install in the Southwest facility The only asbestos free Multi All three product on the market during the past 5-10 years was consideration consideration pan pouring filter filter press and and bonded bonded aggregate now under consideration for proceses processes pan pouring contain the new facility contain asbestos The probability of removing asbestos from the autoclaved bonded aggregate product is far greater than it is from products made by either the Manville filter press or OCF's pan pouring process both of which require autoclaving and are based on highly alkaline batch compositions a In the event Management decides to install the Berlin pan pouring process for and block at the new Southwest facility Kaylo R & D still recommends both pipe either the filter press or bonded aggregate also be that an alternate process This should installed on limited basis either at Berlin or at the new facility be further supported by an & D program on the chosen alternate process at These recommendations are being made because it is our opinion Granville to face the process dilemma we the company should not have again demand a product made by a process are now facing If future market conditions we will have the technology knowhow and experience other than pan pouring to the new without delay to convert our manufacturing facilities over process . 1 Regardless of the decision west facility the major R the pan pouring process at as to the process to be installed at the now South- & plant program currently underway to automate Berlin should proceed full speed ahead especially for the processing of Kaylo block a SIENTATIONS SIENTATIONS SIENTATIONS SIENTATIONS SIENTATIONS am my SIENTATIONS Pee SIENTATIONS SIENTATIONS Cont Cont Cont Cont . Nv During this planning period many have suggested two profcoerssbelosckbe aindnstsamlallelder the new Southwest facility the panthepoumrainnugfapcrtourceessof larger sizes of sectional sizes of pipe and a filter press for and the which must be resolved is will our customers pipe The first question If the answer and C Marketing Division accept two types of pipe products if it is yes the second question is would the market also accept Multi were limited to the larger sizes of sectional pipe If the only reason for purchasing a filter press or bonded aggregate process is for the manufacture of large size sectional from one of our competitors i.e. sizes in the 13 to 24 inch ID range then we must ask whether it size sectional wpoiupled be better to direct a major effort toward producing large at acceptable gross margin levels rather pipe by the pan pouring process and technology than direct such a major effort and expense toward a new process been little for such a small portion of the overall market Actually there has technical effort directed directed toward learning how to pan pour large size any To achieve such a result changes sectional pipe with adequate gross margins and handling in mold design as well as new techniques of pouring prefardening be developed If Multi pipe is acceptable to the market and gross must when limited to large size sectionals margins are projected as being adequatea process and a facility available to only then CCF already has a product service the large size sectional pipe market DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION DISCUSSION -0f Asbestos which must be resolved is the use of asbestos as the rein- The firstfiqbueerstioTnoday all high temperature insulations contain asbestos asbestos forcing In fact during the past 10 years the only known reinforcement the market was Multi a product free high temperature insulation on is the stli for a brief period of time by OCF To emphasize how important fiber reinforcement I would like to call to your problem of asbestos as a dated October 9 1967 to D. M. Barthold concern- attention D. W. Ladd's letter Quoting from Mr. Ladd's memo I think ing asbestos and Kaylo expansion to this whole other consideration which is of paramount importance there is no well aware the government will probably blow the whistle subject As tyhoeu ua se re of asbestos in the not too distant future and before we relative to at Berlin and consider putting embark upon a substantial expansion program that we have an Southwest we had better be damn sure facility in the Work has been done on this in the past and answer to the asbestos threat to date there has been no successful answer asbestos fibers in calcium silicate products probability of replacing has been found by 50/50 problem rated at best at No solution to this Manville told us recently they too have had no success in getting OCF survive the autoclave process If the decision is to install at glass glass fiters to procespsrocess process process process process or or the the Manville filter press process the Berlin Berlin pan pouring the Berlin Berlin Berlin Berlin Berlin pan pan pouringpouring pouring pouringpouring process process process pouring process Berlin the fact the reinforcement used will thethe Southwest facility we are accepting the next modifying probably probably be asbestos unless a breakthrough is made by R & fiber's to survive the alkali D during and the autoclaving probably in modifying modifying class Asbestos Asbestos Asbestos Cont Cont Cont , If Management decides the asbestos threat is still with us then careful - consideration should be given to the bonded aggregate process It does not involve the highly alkaline calcium silicate batch which attacks glass and does not require as part of the process the use of expensive autoclaves which which which which which which which which which dissolve glass Although Careytemp Philip Carey's bonded aggregate Anghigh high high temperature insulation contains some asbestos the probability of develop- high Ang a bonded aggregate product reinforced with 100 percent glass fibers remains Ang Ang quite quite quite quite high high high JohnsJohns Johns Johns Johns G ManvilMaenville Manville Manville Manvile Manville told us during our recent meeting in Manville New Jersey they surprised were were were surprised we never followed on our high temperature glass fiber insulation product productproduct product concerned concerned concerned conerd line would concerned concerned concerned would would would and real is insulation and insulation insulation & insulationD effort eeffortort to adequate adequate adequate Temp By the tone of the conversation they seemed to be this product If it were to be placed back on the market bebe the only asbestos free product available If the astestos threat a serious threat to OCF's participation in the high temperature market market future then should consider directing a major effort effort effort or process modifications to raise gross margins adequate adequate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate Alternate If If a decision decision decision decision decision decision Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest Southwest facility facility facility devlop devlop time time time timetime to to develop develop develop for for construction construction construction construction construction construction construction construction construction probaly probably probablyprobably probably probably probably probably and and and its its its must must must must all all all mean mean mean mean adverse adverse adverse adverseadverse carefully carefully is made to install a process other than pan pouring at the new facility technology will have to be purchased There is not sufficient from scratch an alternate process and still meet the timing the new facility Since the purchase of technology will taking out a license from a competitor the cost of the license effect on gross margins and competitive position in the market . carefully considered . OCF already plus a patent months in mechanizing will will will be be block and block block at block has the yearsyears or more of technology on pan pouring and several years on Multi Major strides have been made in recent mechanizing the pan pouring process at Berlin No costs for licensing the par pouring process is chosen for producing both pipe new facility The same is true if large size sectional pipe are produced produced produced by the Multi process Competitive Competitive Competi ve Competitive Processes Before tabulating the major advantages and disadvantages for each of the processes still for Multi under consideration for I would like to compare installation briefly each in the new facility process against the three and others major problems with products made by the pan pouring process include they are not as strong as products made by the filter press process 2 they have a visual appearance inferior to both filter press and bonded aggregate products 3 not being precision molded dimensional and nesting problems result in customer complaints and 4 products made by pan pouring involve considerable hand labor to produce Labor costs for the production of pan poured pipe constitutes nearly 40 percent of the total manufacturing cost With labor costs rising rapidly pipe rade by the pan pouring process could bo i . ( ae Compet Processes Cont at in the future with pipe made by one of placed a competitive disadvantage bonded aggrogate It automated processes such as filter press or the past 5 the more unfortunate OCF did not place the same emphasis during is quite as our competitors competitors 10 years on automating our panpopsosuirbilengwe prwoocuelsds not be today in the theirs If we had it is quite having to take a license from one of our competitors does have a number of advantages over Kaylo made by the pan pouring process include 1 the ability to aii other products on the market today They and heavy density one both light density heat insulation produse by process material 2 the tremendous flexibility of the daily mix of structural core desired various sizes and thick- goods coupled with the ability to expedite best service shipping cycle in the of both pipe and block 3 the costs of resses industry 4 the versatility of batch composition to achieve lower the bbaatcthch on cubic foot basis 5 production of the best block products on insulation and structural Market and 6 production of light density heat core with maximum temperature resistance of 1800 F. the filter press developed by Kanville As to competitive processes interest from OCF personnel There is no doubt it has a has drawn the most over both the pan pouring and bonded aggregate processes nicer of advantages have considerably higher flexural compressive Products made by this process better visual appearance than Kaylo and like and impact strengths It has a pipe and block products which are precision of large the bonded aggregate process produaclesso lends itself to the production molded The filter press process OD Field breakage of filter size sectional pipe up to and including 30 inches now developed by pressed products is extremely low Finally the process as made by the bonded Manville is highly automated When compared to products products have two distinct advantages higher aggregate process filter pressed characteristics physical strengths and lower breakage has number of disadvantages when compared directly The filter press process a include 1 shipping delivery cycles are with the pan pouring process They mix of goods is poor 3 2 flexibility in the daily of fittings fabrication considerably longer batch costs are higher 4 does not lend itself to the when moisture 5 product densities are higher 6 has a tendency to delaminate structural core 8 produces block products is absorbed 7 will not produce efficiencies due to a 5 to less acceptable to the market and 9 operating low compared to operating hour period for mold change over are still very efficiencies for the pan pouring process as developed by Philip Carey has many advantages The bonded agagregate gregate process If and when Philip over both the the pan pouring and filter press processes will have by far solves their handleability and breakage problems they the bonded Carey Some of the major advantages of the best product on the market low manufacturing cost 2 a very low aggregate process include 1 a very 4 ability to use glass fiber investment cost 3 a autoclaved product molded product 6 a 5 ability to produce a precision investment costs as reinforcement rates at low which lends itself to high production p7 roceass1500 to 1600 F temperature resistant product and 8 water repellency Competitive Competitive Processes Processes Cont Cont When compared directly directly with filter pressing the bonded aggregate process has t major disadvantages It produces a product with lower strengths and one that is susceptible to breakage when roughly handled On the other hand it has a number of advantages over filter pressed products Overall process costs are lower batch costs are substantially lower the product can be marketed for higher temperature applications 1500 vs 1200 F it is water repellent fittings can be fabricated from the product investment costs are much lower no autoclaves and it probably can be made free of asbestos The ability to use glass fibers as reinforcement in this product when combined with the tremendous glass fiber knowhow available to OCF personnel makes it mandatory mandatory our Management give careful consideration to the bonded aggregate process before rejecting it in favor of a process which requires asbestos as the reinforcing . fiber Where does the Multi product and process fit in the overall picture The product as we currently know it does not yield adequate gross margins to compete across the board with pan poured filter pressed or bonded aggregate products products However one must remember it is a glass fiber product one that is for OCF to market and one that could be produced at any of our were to be placed back on the market it would be the only product on the market today ShouldShould ShouldShould Should wewe go install install the the pan pouring process at the new Southwest proces to process facilityfacility facility facility facility facility facility ratherrather rather the filter press or bonded bonded aggregate This is facility facility a decision decision decision decision decision decision decision which which which which Management Management Management must make If the filter press or bonded aggregate processprocess process process process process is is Management chosen produce the complete range of products at the new facility then then then then there there is is no need to reconsider Multi at this time If and only if asbestos asbetos asbetos thethe the asbestos asbestos asbestos asbestos asbestos asbestos asbestos threat reaches the danger point would asbestos asbestos free free product such as Multi for the ar market market market market market market we then want to reconsider reconsider reconsider high temperature insulation If for for for some some reason such high cost of licensing Management decides to install the the pan the decidngdeciding deciding of Multi decidng decidng MultiMulti Multi - pouring deciding pouring Temp Temp pouring process in the new facility we will again be facing the problem how to produce large size sectional pipe Under such circumstances could be the answer Even if Management decides to go with the pan pouringpouring pouring pouring pouring pouring pouring license license license license license license license license license procesproces process process for all production the the filter press or bonded except large size aggregate process sectional and choses to to produce these products we must must must license license license license license license license raise raise raise raise raise the question whether it is worth all the problems and costs to another another another another another another process from one of our competitors for such a small percentage of of the the market market market market market market . We must market large site sectional pipe to remain competitive competitive not to license another process we would have three choices ; 1 size sectional pipe as we do now at Berlin 2 start up a If we chose fabricate crash program learn how to pour large size sectional pipe at pouring process or 3 could market a line pipe Only under those conditions where all adequate of Large size sectional production except large Multisize sectional pipe is to be made by the pan pouring process at the new Southwest Berlin facility would I recommend we reconsider Multi Limited to the production to of large size sectional pipe and block when Berlin block producing facilities . @. . oh a rae -8- Competitive Processes Cont total become over taxed as they are today Multi may have a place in today's sectional pipe by the Multi- market It may be cheaper to produce large size used at Berlin It Temp process than by the current fabrication technique would increase our share share of the market immediately Pan Pouring Havi 1 The highest mix of goods flexibility This flexibility results in the lowest workable finished goods inventory for any of the processes now in use for the manufacture of high temperature insulation products 2 The best shipping cycle in the high temperature insulation industry with normal inventories acknowledged is the acknowledged leader 3. Block produced by the pan p uringprocess the market today of all flatware high temperature insulations on is an established process at OCF Plant personnel are &. Pan pouring 20+ working background with year well trained as to process We have a this process Various t permits considerable versatility as to batch composition additives and extenders can be added to reduce costs 6. Kayl contains an extremely extremely low percentage of soluble chloride Meets AEC and military spec requirements daily production of pieces are procurable in the the same sizes 7. Higher and block when needed for for expediting and thicknesses for both pipe shipments than in any of the competitive manufacturing manufacturing processes / improve the service cycle The 1968 expansion at Berlin will further further It is already better than the service cycle of any of our competitors 9. 10 11 11 11 12. Kaylo has high acceptance among owners distributors Pan pouring is the only process which lends itself to of structural core Only one with UL fire ratings the production products 20 pipe and block products produced produced by the pan pouring proprocess cess are can be used at temperatures temperatures ir class by themselves K 20 products up to 1800 F. 4 Batch mixing for pan pouring is the least complicated No gelling of batch required . Fan Pouring Pouring Way20 Cont) Advantages Cont) 13. Drying costs are currently lower for pan poured products than for products produced by any other process This advantage will soon be lost since the SID cylinder patent expired in January 1968 Densities of par poured products are lower than densities of filter pressed products 4 In general thermal conductivities of pan poured products are lower than for competitive products Pan pouring operating efficiencies are considerably higher than they are for filter pressing . Fittings can be cut and fabricated from ipnrteossfpirtotdiuncgtss delaminate yhen attempts pan are poured products made to fabricate Filter them No license would be involved if the decision is to install a pan pouring process at the new Southwest facility Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages Disadvantages 1. Physical strengths of pan poured products are lower than those obtained from filter pressed products | Visual appearance of surface is inferior to both aggregate products filter press and and bonded bonded Pan pouring is not a precision process Problems of dimensional stability and field nesting of ware show up from time to time in the field field field sume With current level of technology large size sectional pipe cannot be poured with adequate gross margins by the pan pouring process ] Like filter pressed products pan poured products are reinforced with asbestos fibers With current level of technology glass fibers ! cannot be used in either process . aa 6. Pan pouring requires the use of expensive autoclaves SID's and Dowtherm units 1 1 7. Pan poured 10 products have a maximum temperature application of 1200 F vs 1500 to 15000 F for bonded aggregate products 8. Pan poured products have higher breakage losses while in transit and when handled at the job site than filter pressed products Ne -10- Fan Pouring Male Cont Disadvantages Disadvantages Cont ) considerable hand labor Labor costs to produce *. 9. Pan pouring involvesaveraging 40 percent of total manufacturing costs . pipe are currently low Level of automation at Berlin is still very 13 Process job efficiencies for the those for competitive processes handling in the plant pan pouring process because of the high are lower degree of than 11 Pan poured products are not water repellent Only bonded aggregated products and Multi are water repellent today Filter Press Manville and Rubers . e | a a Advantages Advantages d have higher physical strengths in all three 1 Filter pressed products and impact strengths categories B compressive 2. OD and ID surfaces are smooth and free of air holes . Has an excellent . visual appearance Manville is a highly automated 3. Filter pressing as developed by of total manufacturing cost Labor costs as a percentage . process are are quite quite low low low lends itself to the The filter press process sectional pipe up to and including 24 x 3 molding of large size \ product contains no amosite asbestos only 7 5. The Manville percent chrysotile little in transit and job site 6. Filter pressed products suffer very , breakage percent Process job efficiencies efficiencies efficiencies are extremely high 7. developed by Manville filter press process as for the induration of green ware is greater for filter 8. Cylinder capacity for This is because filter pressed products than for pan fprooumretdheprmooldducptrsior to autoclaving pressed ware can be stripped have fewer broken corner problems during 9 Filter pressed products , processing 10. Very little waste material in the Manvil, le process legs of pipe are trimmed Only -_ -1- Disadvantares } 1. Shipping cycles are considerably longer than those for pan poured products flexibility in the daily mix of goods Products Products contain asbestos fibers With With current level of technology fibers fibers cannot be used as reinforcement pressed pressed products are not water repellent wet Tend to delaminate Manville probably do chloride content not meet Mil Specs because of high Process involves the use of expensive autoclaves * of Filter Filter pressed products have maximum temperature applications 1200 F vs 1500-1600 F for bonded aggregate products Iter Block produced by the Iter to pan poured block andand has press process process a tendency to is substantially delaminate inferior StructuralStructural Structural No UL fire core core products cannot rated rated rated pprroodduuctcsts products be made by the filter press process process to delaminate when moisture Filter press products have a tendency Operating efeffficieinciecs iencies efficiencies still remain low 65 percent due to 5 to 6 i hours required for mold change over Batch costs are considerably higher than process Not flexible concerning use of costs those for additives the pan pouring to lower batch Densities of filter pressed products are higher than densities of pan poured products products aes" A very large inventory of finished of the llimitied mlimitied ted range of the mix of goods must be goods maintained because Production rates of same sizes of ware is usually less per hour for filter press than for pan pan pan pouring - Skilled craftsmen are required to change the precision mold equipment Fittings cannot be fabricated from filter pressed ware -~ problem is one of delamination i Philio Carey -12- No autoclave required to produce bonded aggregate products Low investment costs / Precision molded product - good dimensional stability - nests well Smooth surface - no air holes Can be reinforced with glass Product is water repellent Temperature 1500 1500 are 15 150000 to limitations for 161600 00 F 300 33000 0 to filter pressed products bonded aggregate Careytemp products 400 400 higher F higher higher than than for pan poured and Bonded aggregate offers potential of being a highly automated process -- potential potential potential l looww labor cost cost process process Batch costs are lower than those for the filter press process aggregate process is capable of producing large size Pipe fittings can be fabricated from bonded aggregate products Disadvantages Bonded aggregate products are quite fragile break easily when handled Has lower physical properties than calcium silicate type products Flexibility in the daily mix of goods is rather p r Like filter press products shipping cycles would be much longer than those for the pan pouring process Bonded aggregate block is inferior to Kaylo block handled Crumbles when Borded agaggreggateregaggregateate process will not yield structural for the product to crumble makes it unsuitable for rated door applications core use in in The tendency fire UL fire Large inventories of finished goods must be maintained because of the limited range of the mix of goods Bonded aggregate products do not fabricate as well as pan poured products due to breakage from sawing and cutting , - . t -23- Multi Temp OCF Advantages 1. Multi is a product made from Fiberglas the basic product of It is free of asbestos fibers the Corporation 1 to decentralized operations adaptable to any General 2 It lends itselitfself insulation Products plant capable of making Fiberglas pipe aed and snow resistant and water repellent in that ' 3. The product is rain capacity 4 The saturation process is not a complicated one to operate efficiently 5. Multi pipe has an acceptable K value 6. Multi pipe can be applied to 1000 F surfaces 7. Large size sectional sectional pipe can be produced by the Multi process 8. Breakage due to rough handling would be nominal 9. 10 10 Easy to cut good fabrication characteristics Excelent Excellent Excelent Excellent EExcexlenctellent Excellent ExcellentExcelent grossgross margins 33 percent projected for block was 1000 F rather 1. The maximum temperature resistance of the product ; - than 1200 F for 10 Kaylo 2. The ends and edges were susceptible to in transit and handling damage more dusty than competitive materials 3 Multi products were were lower than those 4. Projected gross margins for Multi pipe projected for Kaylo pipe facility job efficiencies efficiencies were very low 5 In the Newark pilot plant of offware were excessive due to excessive offware Major causes and burn ware in and rough handling improper operation of process the oven to carrying inventories of two different types 6. Distributors objected called for additional warehouse of high temperature insulation which space 7 Softer product than the calcium silicate and bonded aggregate type products 22