Document MM8BbojM1x29Zd8GVMv6Xj3VL
jCU.
Inter Oflice
May 9, 1980
ChMl Engineering
To: cc: Subject:
J. W. Durstine 0. E. Adams Carcinogens Task Force Report
The report tends to indicate that strategies, work planB, etc. are in placeV
at the Product Engineering Offices to develop substitutes for asbestos,
'
chromium and benzene. While a preliminary start has been made. Company
management should not be led to believe that there have been significant
accomplishments.
Under Recommendations in the Executive Summary (Page 2), Item #6 should
Group B as needing funding --------- ------------- -- -----------`
The proposed actions on Page 13 cover the Group A applications; sho
Groups B and C also be included?
._
The comment in Exhibit II that Chassis does not participate is untrue. Chassis does not use Form 1464 since some of the required information is not readily available to Chassis Engineers and the form has been revised four or more times. Also, the Product Engineering Offices have no approved PEP 3-189 Chassis has forwarded to Engineering and Research Staff all information required for new material number assignments and approved source additions.
Over-reaction to elimination of carcinogens must not prevent the Company from
jproceeding on an orderly basis. The strategy, n ... to proceed to eliminate
these three carcinogens by Job #1, 1985 ... 11 seems to be rigorous and inflexible. A more extensive analysis of the effects of this strategy is needed.
EFF:ah
\V Ni
J. De Velte * 3o <
Please see attached marked-up pages.
800* 0383 SCF-FORD-1895
8004 0384
11 r C. JUIYIIVIAUT
(Continued)
Strategy and Workplan
Tho scorch for asbestos, chromium compounds and benzene defined the number of pnrts nnd
moterials containing those substances os listed in the table below. Where possible, 'the
i
applications wore divided into three croups: A - Known substitute motcriol without major redesign, U - Known substitute material with major redesign nnd C * No known substitute or
advanced engineering roquired. Tho dutu is directional only. Tticre remum muny suspect
applications which require time-consuming analyses for identification.
'
Bulk Materials and Parts
\
Production 3 3 3" TotoT
Nonnroduction 3 B C TotaT
Asbestos Chromium Compounds Benzene
34 49 22 - - 25
- - 15
105 25 IS
8--
8
98 81 34 213
3 - 5 8
\
Strategies have been formulated to eliminate or control these substances. The recommended strategy Is to proceed now to eliminate these three carcinogens by Job II, 1985, in light of competitive and regulatory pressures, and Company experience. Where elimination cannot be contained, Institute controls on design, process and exposure. It is judged that the elimination timetable is practical for Group A asbestos, chromium compounds and benzene-containing parts and materials. For those applications requiring major redesign (Group D, e.g., drum brako linings) the elimination timetuble would have to be adjusted to reflect Company cycle plans although G.M. has stated an intent to eliminate asbestos by 1985. Finally, where no known substitute exists (Group C), advanced engineering
will have to be completed before a elimination timetable can be established.
A generalized workplan has been prepared on the basis of the evaluation of the carcinogens
already referred to. The workplan roqulres central program management, with action imple
mentation by NAAO/DPO Product Engineering Offices, Purchasing activities, Vehicle acti
vities and the Manufacturing and Supply Staffs, it is judged that approximately a year is
required to complete the sorting of the three carcinogens into the known substitute, major
redesign and advanced project groups. It is judged that one additional year would be
required to Implement the most feasible product actions not requiring major redesign.
Substitution requiring redesign would take 33 months for vehicle or major powertrain pro
grams.
N
Recommendations
. Achievement of the recommended strategy requires an integrated approach throughout the Company and a sustained effort over a number of years. The Task Force recommends:
v
r.
1. Establish a Hazardous Substanco Control Committee chaired by Environmental and Safety Engineering Staff. The Task Force would be discontinued.
2. Assign Caroinogon Program manager control responsibility to Environmental and Safety Engineering Staff.
3. Request Environmental and Safety Staff to establish carcinogen elimination timetables for the 67 known carcinogens for review and approval by the subcommittees. (The Tosk Force has requested General Managers and Chief Engineers to recommend directional timetables.)
$XI >
Vi
4. Direct oil affeeted organizations to proceed with the elimination of Group A asbestos, chromium compounds and benzeno for Job 81, 1985.
Request that NAAO Product Engineering Offices nnd Manufacturing Staff present to tho subcommittee specific action plans and timing for tho Group A applications identified.
Provide advance program funding to develop designs and/or materials for new parts to
identify reliability, cost and weight implications of alternative designs (Croup C).
Adopt as the Company carcinogen listing the 67 current OSIlA-rcgiilatod and proposed
l
Category I substances. Establish the top eight priorities proposed by the Tosk Forco as
Company priorities.
vVVi
Gf-fec'k --
a n Vcbn no/" hiJJt'ifooS
b Fo/tf
/ nor 4~i> / A <
Engineering Staff - EARS Manufacturing Staff
s ewjAwr^ / Av-A
i*
May 2, 1980 . k/A eC. j*i
bout/
Li
DRAFT
PIlOPOSr.D PRIORITY ACTIONS
Achievement of the recommended strategy to proceed now to eliminate OS1IA Category I carcinogens by Job #1, 1985, with control of design, process and exposure wheic elimination cannot be contained, requires an integrated approach throughout l/.c Company and a sustained
effort over a number of years. The Task Force on Carcinogens 1:1 the Workplace recommends that:
1. Establish a Hazardous Substances Control Commit'.co chaired by the Director Environmental Control Office. The Task Force would ne discontinued.
2. Assign Carcinogen Program Manager control responsibilities to the Compliance and Liaison Department, Environmental and Safety Engineering Staff.
3. Request Environmental and Safety Staff to establish carcinogen elimination timetables for the 67 known carcinogens for review and approval by this Subcommittee.
4. Request that NAAO/DPO Product Engineering Offices and Manufacturing srtaff J
Jpresent to the Subcommittee specific neiion plans and timing for the Group A
applications identified.
u-i..<
j*. , > .
*
5. Adopt as the Company carcinogen listiig, current OSHA regulated Category I sub
stances (26) and proposed for regulation substances (41). Establish the top eight prior ities proposed by the Task Force as Company priorities.
o
6. Direct all affected organizations to proceed with the elimination of Group A asbestos, \
chromium compounds and benzene by Job #1, 1985, as outlined in the workplan.
**
c
c
-13-
May 2, I960
AFT
CARCINOGEN SEARCH Materials and Toxicology System (MATS)
EX IIIDir II
o e r n *r>no
To overcome the deficiencies of manual and seml-eomputerized search methods, the Material'!
and Toxicology System (MATS), under development, will consolidate four materials approvul
systems into one common data base. The four systems ore: the CATALOG of Hazardous
Materials (PicO Staff) containing materials, their toxicological evaluation for worker/consumer
protection and'the chemical composition, the Engineering Material Approved Source List
(E&RS) containing the material specification title and the materials approved to that
specification; the Nonproduction Material Approved Source List (Manufacturing Staff)
containing the nonproduction material standard and the approved materials; und the
Environmental & Process Review System (Manufacturing Staff) containing the wasto disposal,
treatability, und facility engineering cautions on all materials approved to Engineering
Specifications and Manufacturing Standards.
,
Carcinogen Search Strategy
Developing the links between the above systems will, in the future, provide a method for locat- ing suspect carcinogens in nonproduction materials and production parts and bulk materials. The search methodology is numbered on the facing page to correspond to the following search steps:
1. The Chemical Abstracts Service numbers of the suspect carcinogens and its compounds are identified by IHdcT. The system will then generate a list of materials which contain that chemical.
2. Utilizing the NAAO supplier code, the specification number and the product name, the system will then identify other suspect materials and specifications.
3. The Engineering Specification can then be passed to the NortK American Engineering Product Information System (NAEPIS) which contains the engineering notices from all of the product engineering offices. The NAEPIS system will then produce a cross reference list of all parts which use that material.
4. The list of production parts can then be matched to Purchasing's Procurement system to determine current sources to be queried for control and elimination of carcinogens. The same list can be matched to the AAD Process Sheet system to determine where and how the part or material is handled in AAD.
Functions
The primary function' of MATS is to maintain and produce the Approved Source List for non production and production materials including the toxicology and environmental clearances for use by Purchasing. The system also produces the CATALOG of Hazardous Materials as either a full companywide print or as a plant specific print. The CATALOG is used by health and safety and plant doctors, and is required to be furnished to the UAW under the current contract. The system is also available to the plants and the Poison Control Center at the Rouge to be searched by supplier or specification for complete medical, handling, shipping, waste treatment and disposal instructions on a material.
The system also produces the Michigan DNR Critical Materials report for the consumption of materials which contain a Michigan defined "critical component" e.g., chromium.
Affected Activities f
All Corporate Staffs concerned with materials/toxicological/envlronment controls ore currently
involved in using/dcvcloping the system. All NAAO/DPO plants arc planned to have access to
the system by third quarter 1980. All NAAO/DPO Engineering activities arc ulso participating
with the exception of Chassis which currently docs not participate in material control as
required by PEP 3-189. 1 '
.,, May 2,1980