Document MM1Le0gQ8V0jyYOmpZw24YXXM

cc STATUS OF SHAC ACTIVITIES PMSB REPORT - SEPTEMBER, 1982 Hourly Safety Committee --Attendance was seven of eight members. --Gene Tromblee reviewed 1982 Y-T-D safety performance, the 1982 Annual Safety and Housekeeping Inspection plans, and the STOP Program status. --Assignments were made to HSC members to gather information for promotion of physical fitness. --Assignment was made to HSC to solicit U/C teams to come up with ladder tiedown method (at rungs) which all crafts could use without compromising ladder function. --Plantwide concerns: Fire/spill code not heard at N68. Sample cans are overfilled at control lab. Material Handling fire extinguishers are too heavy to carry safely on to a barge. New interpretation of jobs requiring an electrical work permit is excessive. Many extension ladders in Zone 5 were observed without being tied down at the top. Quarterly Safety/Housekeeping Inspection and Competition Program See Attachment 1982 Annual Safety/Housekeeping Inspection Theme Good Safety and Housekeeping Counts Inspection Report The Inspection Committee will document the results of the inspection for transmittal to Earl Brasfield. Promotion The Office Safety Committee has been charged with developing an inspection promotion for each week in the four weeks prior to the inspection. Examples include "Dennis the Menace" cartoon, cafeteria display case. Main Gate handout, etc. SC 003214 LaM004228 C Status of SHAC Activities c Page -2- Preparation Plan September 13 to 24 September 27 to 29 October 5 October 12 Quarterly Inspections SHAC Takes Slides Expanded Staff PMSB Inspection Extension Ladder Securement The HSC has solicited to develop (through unit/craft organization) a device to secure the ladder rungs together without interfering with the ladder function or safety. Expect response September 28. Safety Shower/Eyebath Standards --J. W. Bullock is awaiting the double eyebath vendor drawings before conpletion of plant standards. --Chocolate Bayou, Queeny, and Krummrich plants were surveyed with regard to methods used for safety shower and eyebath visibility. All plants use green lights and signs at a minimum. Some locations used long painted paths or bright florescent paints on the shower piping. S&PP intends to issue new standards which will continue to require green lights and signs at all safety showers/eyebaths. SHAC recommends that the Texas City plant continue with the green light and sign for visibility. The signs and sign holders should be standardized to allow sign replacement without requiring use of multiple crafts. SHAC will continue to work with Purchasing to improve sign durability. Unfinished Items --Sample storage in offices. --Sample bottle disposal. --Crowsfeet use in process. --Safety shower alarm bypassing. --Work permit covering breaking and entering equipment, and vehicle entry. 9-13-82 SC 003215 LAM004229 cc QUARTERLY SAFETY/HOUSEKEEPING INSPECTION AND COMPETITION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES o Promote competition among similar groups, o Recognize achievement/needs. o Improve quality of quarterly inspections and feedback. o Promote continuing improvement. o Improve consistency - inspection ratings - application of safety programs/procedures o Competition with simple and credible ranking criteria. INSPECTION o Last month of each quarter. o Unannounced inspections (two week time frame pre-announced). o Each unit, craft area, lab building, office building, and service building will receive a rating: Excellent, Good, or Unsatisfactory. o Team will issue inspection report of deficiencies and will include inspection rating. Must respond with written memo to SHAC. o The rating is decided by the inspection team based on the inspection obser vations only. COMPETITION o Units will compete with units and craft shops with craft shops. o Qualifications for quarterly best award are no recordable injuries in last four months, and units must be one of the six units with best total injury trends and fewest major incidents. o Units not qualifying for the best award automatically qualify for the worst award, o Competition evaluation is comprised of: 1. Safety Performance --Recordable injuries in last four months --Total injury trend --Major incidents 2. Housekeepinq/Safety Level of Area --As determined by inspection team 3. Unit Safety Improvement Program --Use of plantwide programs (STOP, etc.) --Unit programs --Determined by Inspection Team safety meetings, U/C support SC 003216 LAM004230 CC Quarterly Safety/Housekeeping Inspection and Competition Program Page -2- o Quarterly award is passed on to the new winner (or new loser) each quarter. o Annually the unit and craft shop with the best overall safety record/inspection rating is given a permanent plaque. o Publicity: Plant News, the plant manager gives award each quarter. INSPECTION TEAMS o Membership: Units/Craft Shops: PMSB, SHAC, Contact Supervisor, HSC, Safety Inspector Labs : PTSC, Lab SC, Superintendent/Supervisor (lab or PT), Safety Inspector Service Buildings: PMSB, SHAC, Contact Supervisor, HSC Offices : Office Superintendent, OSC, PTSC o Organization --Two unit inspection teams will tour 13 units (1-1/2 days each). One team inspects the six units qualified for best award (no recordables this quarter, best TIF trend (LP&S charts) and fewest major incidents). One team inspects the seven units with either recordable injuries (this quarter), worst TIF trend for the quarter, and greatest number of major incidents. From this group the "worst" is chosen. --One craft shop inspection team (one afternoon). --One lab inspection team (one afternoon). --Two service inspection teams (one afternoon each). TIMING o First competition to be held in December quarterly inspection, o November publicity in Plant News, entrance sign, HSC presentation, etc. o To be a long-term program with worst, award to be added in 1983. 9-1-82 SC 003217 LA A/1004231 Of HJ (S (D 3 (Ti 3 3 (D (D 0> 3 r v id ID3 OJ 0) 33 to Team 7 QUARTERLY SAFETY/HOUSEKEEPING INSPECTION COMPETITION PROGRAM T o ta l P la n t 2 h rs. P e rip h e ra l p la n t (N68, e tc .). U1 tHr iQa0 F* U1 0F0CcnD) FCtcnDr* H GO cn 0:r can c5Ffcnt- 3ui z c3fFt- t(>0 o o rHr- 0hti cn o3(fl - Ui UI Ui HO H WID O ja H Fcn ET rr Fcn cfn F3cn* =r Fcn ET cFn (cfFD- IhgDa XF NO nCDs oHi O3 UJ. (D chni hi F- CD Orcnt M N O 33CMD Of*cDn > 2'OfHFOPti* F* O30 fO \Ln n n w *o* X oX XPF3 i>3 3fD O3 TQFD)- 'Dw X fPti F F3(ftl *oCrFaDt03 F Pfti H3 iQ 0s1 IFSD' cn ea tKj' 0 0X0 oF (IcDfl XF' 3s Hcn r0e)r FH(D crnt P i nRJ uaa cn pHii CrDr D ID Bs) cfnt cn rt cn ID oS' 0 FC(fDt prti Ccn CD IcDn OPHi XPFi3 CPftDi 0 > 03 o *CD <C*D FD(ft7 Fl 3(A 0 0rt F03 F PrFri3 iQ SC 003218 f--* n PO 0 3ft UJ F FO* w3 F* < \ Ptri H a> (cDn F3* CPDi CT F O ET Fl c3n 0 ort F* 03 F 0ft F* tQ3 cn O3" *i0n P3ai w r3cnt H 3(ft CF* x *PfF3ti* n 03 3 T3 0 F FCMD* <ar r >pFoi 031 oS' Fl 03 t03 Oft F03- 0ft0tr 0F0Hfti Fl *030 00ft F0 3 F0fFt3 0F00 ft 00 3 ar0r 0 F 3F* 300 0* CSD"3' XM 3Pi UJ. ft 0ft 3CD-3* 1I0D-)3 3 M Cf3Ft* cn 03ft fstr FCOiQPFrCri CD F 0 F F* O3FfaC3Dt cn pFi* F-3l rFCDr 3a <Ti C fc3Fnt* Ff<t* ET F- 3cn TCofJDt CD 03) a 3o Hi CD Ccr<nDt CtcDnr rr a >FCP(AD> Fl 3cn tCJD 0ft 0CL C3Fft- C3Fft* 0t0rrt >0H3a 0 00 F F \cn 0rt 0 0 X F* O0F* 0FO- c3 0 3 < < F- ft 0 0 ft 0 3F0* F* Hi 30 F 0 0 3 a >00 0 3 0rt ofFt03 F 0F03ft* F f3t* 00 0 C 0F 3F* 300 0f>t BJ ipf- 3 ifl a3: > a0Kcn1 o> 3 \oai 0VrH1rl3Q* LAM004232 -- In s p e c tio n r a t in g (PM o r PMSB o p in io n ) . cc .CAPITAL PROJECTS CONTRACTORS TOTAL INJURY CASES RECORDABLE CASES LOST WORK DAY CASES DAYS AWAY CASES 1982 YTD 26 4 2 TOTAL MANHOURS WORKED (MHW) FREQUENCY RATES/200.000 MHW 157,476 TOTAL INJURY RATE TOTAL RECORDABLE INJURY RATE TOTAL LOST WORKDAY RATE TOTAL DAYS AWAY RATE 33.0 5.1 2.5 Aug 82 6 0 0 24,548.5 1981'Totals 22 4 2 161,709 48.9 0.0 0.0 27.2 4.9 2.4 SC 003219 LAM004233 Cummulative In ju rie s Cummulative TIR r 32 Safety - Capital Proje^ ^ ^ T o t al Injuries Recordable Injuries Recordable Injury Rate SC 003220 LAM004234 nmulative Recordable In ju rie s Cum m ulative RIR cc CED CONSTRUCTION TEXAS CITY PLANT ACCIDENT STATISTICS NUMBER OF CASES Lost Workdays (Days Away) Fatalities Total Injury Total Recordable FREQUENCY RATES Total Injury Total Recordable Total Lost Workdays KAN110URS WORKED 8/82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,346 YTD 8/31/82 5 0 50 9 29.6 5.3 2.9 337,589 SC 003221 LAM004235