Document MJrmYdLOaRq438bdp9Qax4Xz

AGENDA CMA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, April 8, 1980 The Madison (Executive Room No. 3) Washington, D- C. 9:00 a. m. 9:01-9:02 9:02-9:05 9:05-9:15 9:15-9:20 9:20-9:50 9:50-10:30 10:30-10:45 10:45 1. Call to Order -- Chairman Morley 2. Minutes of Last Meeting -- B. M. Barackman 3. Treasurer's Report -- G. C. Herrman 4. Presentation of Finalized Fiscal 1980-81 Budget for Approval -- J. Earl Burrell 5. Report of the Nominating Committee -- J. M. Henske 6. Labeling Report -- Roger P. Batchelor, Jr. 7. Association Activities a. Recommendations concerning committee structure -- R. A. Roland b. Technical and Functional Committee Nominations -R. A. Roland 8. New Business 9. Adjournment TAB 1 2 3 4 CMA 062728 MINUTES OF MEETING CMA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The Madison, Washington, D. C. April 8, 1980 1. The meeting was called to order by Board Chairman Henske. There were present: John M, Henske, Acting Chairman J. Earl Burrell Louis Fernandez Vincent L. Gregory, Jr. Richard J. Hughes William C. Krumrei Paul F. Oreffice Robert A. Roland William G. Simeral Raymond C. Tower Bruce M. Barackman, Secretary Edmund B. Frost, General Counsel Gary C, Herrman, Treasurer By Invitation: Peter R. Agnew, CMA Roger P. Batchelor, Jr. , Diamond Shamrock Corporation Geraldine V, Cox, CMA Richard F. Gold, Stauffer Chemical Company Stephen L. Goldstein, Olin Corporation Conrad Kent, Stauffer Chemical Company Victor H. Peterson, CMA Edward B. Poliak (SOCMA), Olin Corporation George F. Polzer, Witco Chemical Corporation James N. Sites, CMA William M. Stover, CMA 2. Minutes of the Last Meeting The minutes of the March 11, 1980 meeting, as distributed, were approved. 2. Report on New Member Mr. Barackman advised that Columbian Chemicals Company, a 100% subsidiary of Cities Service Company, would be recommended for election to membership in the Association at the Board meet ing later in the day. 4- Treasurer's Report Mr. Herrman reported that the monthly Treasurer's Report would be mailed as soon as it was completed. He indicated that projected year-end results, as reflected in the budget documents, show CMA 062729 2- - estimated revenue of $10.5 million, expenses of $9.4 million and a contribu tion to reserves of $1.1 million. Year-end reserves are estimated at $2.7 million. Year-end results should be better than originally budgeted due primarily to interest income and revenues from an insurance settlement on a previous legal action. 5. Proposed Budget Mr. Burrell, Finance Committee Chairman, described the events leading up to finalization of the proposed budget for fiscal year 1980-81 which was mailed to the Board for their comments. He then reviewed the comments received. Mr. Herrman followed with a sum marization of the proposed budget as contained in Exhibits A, B, and C. Mr. Burrell, on behalf of the Finance Committee, recommended that the proposed budget of $14, 373, 200 be approved for presentation to the Board and that the level of fees be as set forth in the present fee schedule, Exhibit D. The recommendation was approved. 6. Report of the Nominating Committee Reporting as the Chairman of the Nominating Committee on which Messrs. Morley and Krumrei also served, Mr. Henske presented the slate listed in Exhibit E. Between now and the next Executive Committee meeting the Nominating Committee will contact the companies designated and obtain the individual nominees to stand for election. The slate was approved. Mr. Henske then invited attention to the established practice of inviting the immediate past Chairman of the Board to continue attending meetings for one year to provide continuity. The Nomi nating Committee now proposes that following a year off the Board, the past Chairman be named to a new term on the Board in order not to lose the involve ment with CMA affairs developed within his company during the term in office. 7. Labeling Report Mr. Batchelor's report is attached as Exhibit F. 8. Superfund Policy Group Report Dr. Fernandez advised that in dustry executives have contacted committee members on the Senate side, as requested, and they now express serious reservations about proposed Super fund legislation. While the Senate has been quiescent during the past month, renewed activity is expected when the Easter recess ends. On the House side, although the Association has made available to Rep. Florio's staff language acceptable to us regarding funding (no industry funding) we weren't given his proposed language concerning scope and liability despite his promise to do so. Just before Easter recess Rep. Florio dropped his bill in the hopper. Meanwhile CMA has continued to convey the message that our position on scope, liability and funding is a united one; we are not opposed to appro priate legislation dealing with orphan sites; and we are willing to work with CMA 062730 -3- taff to develop such legislation. Liaison with other associations continues in order to try to present a common position. During discussion the Executive Committee reaffirmed the established official position of CMA. If new developments were to suggest the desirability of changing policy, a recommendation to that effect will be presented for con sideration of the Executive Committee. Distributed by General Counsel to those present was an analysis which compared the CMA Superfund position with H. R. 7020 (Florio) and H. R. 6931 (Eckhardt). Mr. Henske announced that a letter would be sent to CMA Executive Contacts clearly setting forth the Association's unchanged posture in regard to Superfund. 9. Association Activities Mr. Roland requested and received clarification that the Ad Hoc Committee on State Activities, chaired by Mr. George F, Polzer, would present recommendations on how CMA can work more effectively not only with CIC'.sbut also at the grass roots level on state legislative and regulatory problems. Semiannual Meeting Sites -- Mr. Roland briefly reviewed the program planned for the 1980 meeting on Monday and Tuesday, October 27 and 28 at the Galleria Plaza Hotel, Houston, Texas. He then presented proposed future semiannual meeting sites for early November or late October as follows: November 2-3, 1981, Hyatt Regency Hotel (Capitol Hill), Washington, D. C. ; October 4-5, 1982, The New Orleans Hilton, New Orleans, LA; 1983 New York; 1984, Houston; 1985, Washington, D. C. ; and 1986, NewOrleans. The list was approved except for the 1982 New Orleans site. Due to the reported circumstances relating to the recent death of Mr. Max A. Minnig, it was directed that the 1982 New Orleans meeting be cancelled, stating the reasons for this action, and that the 1986 New Orleans commitment be made only on a tentative basis. Accept able assurances are to be requested from responsible government officials that effective steps are being taken to ensure that New Orleans will be a safe place to meet. The situation will be reviewed and a final decision made in 1986 on that year's meeting. Chicago was then proposed as the 1982 meeting site. White House Conference -- Mr. Roland advised that a White House Conference on the Administration's voluntary wage-price program has been called for Friday, April 11. Some 30 chemical industry executives have been invited. Mr. Stover has a background paper prepared on the voluntary wage-price program relating to the U. S. chemical industry which is available to anyone having an interest in it. CMA 062731 Committee Structure (a) The recommendation of staff to discontinue the Insurance Committee, Exhibit G, was approved. (b) Mr. Roland recommended that the Patents and Information Re trieval Committee be discontinued and that a Patent and Trademark Group and a Chemical Information Group be established in its place. The administration of the former within CMA would be shifted to the General Counsel's office; administration of the latter would be transferred to the Technical Department. Additional nominees as needed would be added to present members to make a total of 15 in each group. The activities and organizational aspects of both groups would be reevaluated at the end of one year and such adjustments as may be appropriate would be made at that time. The recommendation was approved. Technical and Functional Committee Nominations -- The nominations contained in Exhibit H, were approved after deleting paragraph eight, Patents and Information Retrieval Committee, consistent with the action taken above to discontinue that committee. Staff was asked to review the practice of selecting the chairman from the membership of the committee. Consideration should be given to modifying this in order to provide greater flexibility in selection of chairmen. Results of CMA Meeting on Proposed ASTM Committee on Toxic Effects -- Dr. Cox briefly reviewed the meeting of Apiril 11, and the recommendations resulting from it. During discussion there was a distinct lack of unanimity on the subject of ASTM testing in the area of mammalian toxicity standards. The Executive Committee felt that this issue was not sufficiently understood and while there were arguments in favor of industry participating in a consensus arrange ment to develop such test methods, the problems attendant to dding this kind of work outside of the formal regulatory process could present unacceptable difficulties. The final recommendation was to communicate our desire that no new committee be established at this time and that, if possible, additional opportunity be provided for in dustry to study the proposal and generate further comment for ASTM consideration and guidance. Mr. Roland was instructed to communi cate with the ASTM officials in an effort to defer further action for a limited period of time while additional study is made. CMA 062732 - 3- Discussion of the previously considered CMA embryo-fetotoxins document as a potential industry guideline then followed. This centered on CMA writing industry standards. A need to identify industry practices which could lead to regulation was expressed. It was suggested that consideration be given to the sharing of responsible companies' practices with other member companies through workshops or informal exchanges of communications. Mr. Roland was requested to ask CMA committee chairmen for their views to be presented for consideration by the Executive Committee. Certified correct; S' CMA Executive Committee Bruce M, Barackman Secretary CMA 062733 Exhibit A CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION SUMMARY TOTALS OF REVENUE, DIRECT PROGRAM AND '-'ANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT ACTIVITIES Current Year 3udget i Projection, Proccsed PY 00/31 iudget, Estimated Future /ears REVENUE: Membership Oues Chemical Communications Action Program (CHEMCAP) Investment Revenue Puol ication Sales Meetings (net of expenses) Overhead Reimbursement Special Projects All Other TOTAL REVENUE Aczuai FY 73/79 Results AoDroved FY 79/30 3udaet Projected FY 79/30 Actual Results ''cocsed FY 3C/31 3uaaet S3 ,515,3003. 7,298,3005 7,296,100S 3,677,300 710,300 120,900 115,200 1,563,200 355,500 153,700 129,000 1,563,200 300,000 21,700 103,600 4,491,300 700,000 22,000 117,200 "0uc 3TE0 r'. "JRE -I, . . "'Ll 'Cm i FY 31/52 , - iz-'32 FY J2/24 Estimated \ Estimated Esv?.at9d FY - - : * $9,545,000 l 510,499,500 Sll,349,50ci 512,704,AOO i i-- 700,000 24,000 700,000 26,200 700,000 ! 28,SOC 70o,:co 3i,:oo 127,700 139,100 151,500 155,100 137,000 5,630 354s800 368,000 152.000 4GO,000 12.000 $4,754,300310,155,000310,504,S00$14,420,300 436,000 12.000 475,200 12,000 518,000 12,000 564,700 i:.:cc $10,344,7COS11,352.000 $12,959,600 |S 14, ITT, 320 DIRECT PROGRAM ACTIVITIES: General Counsel 3 Government Relations International Trade 4 Economics Comnunications & Public Relations Chemical Communications Action Program (CHEMCAP) Health, Safety 4 Chemical Regulations Distribution, Energy, Engineering, 4 Insurance Environmental Activities Hazardous Waste Technical Center Chemical Transportation Emergency Center (CHEMTREC) Special Research Projects External Legal 4 Technical Consulting Fees TOTAL S -- _ _ ,, -- -- N/A 3 410,100 3 424,000 3 633,700 S 582,200 $ 443,300 469,800 660,400 705,aoo 740,400 S 766,000 1 f t 303,90(3 S 331,300 372,100 903,000 142,900 350,500 155,100 717,600 200,300 965,300 214,000 1,040,200 232,000 1,131,000 252,100 1 ; 1,220,400 i 273,50C 1,337,roc 1,563,200 1,663,200 4,491,800 439,800 477,900 519,600 564,30C 656,900 491,200 560,600 595,200 640,900 590,900 745.20C 341,800 348,900 319,000 414,300 394,900 535,300 422,600 572,600 453,800 621,500 498,200 674,700 540.3CC 722,90C 244,600 131,200 263,800 282,700 307,000 333,600 362.30C 440,600 367,600 486,600 382,500 534,900 487,700 574,000 520,200 623,300 564,400 677,200 612,700 736.30C 664.90C 2.490.000 2,434,800 2,793,000 2,800,000 2,800,000 2.300,00a 2.300.30C 38,400,400 $8,139,300312,527,200 58,849,300 S 9,363,200 5 9,924,60C $10,533.20C UNALLOCATED MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL SUPPORT ACTIVITIES: Relocation Cost 4 Furniture s Executive Department Finance, Accounting, Business and Library Services Printing 4 Distribution -- -- TOTAL s N/A 3 S ~ $ 146,000 $ 46,000 5 46,000 $ 46,00C 5 46,30C 656,300 677,300 891,000 955,500 1,037,900 1,128,IOC l,225,aOC 341,600 174,400 353,300 226,300 519,300 289,700 31,172,300 SI,257,400 $1,846,000 553,800 306,000 601,100 331,500 651,60C 359,20C 706.70C 389,IOC $1,861,300 5 2,016,500 5 2,184,90C S 2,367,50C TOTAL EXPENSES ADDITION TO OR (REDUCTION OF) CMA RESERVES 35 ,449,600 39,572,700 $9,396,700514,373,200 $10,710,500 511,379,700 S12,109,50C S12,90Q,30C S (694,800)3 582,300 $1,107,900 $ 47,100 5 134,100 5 472,300 $ 350,IOC 5 1.275.40C jPERSONNEL COMPLEMENT 1 93 124 126 135 135 135 135 I 135 ____________ 1 CMA EC-4/8/80 CMA 062734 CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 3ELOW-THE-LINE BUDGET ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED FY 30/81 BUDGET OR WITHIN ESTIMATED FJTURS 'EAR TOTALS Exhibit B --------^-- ITEMS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 3UT j SUBJECT TO POLICY REVIEW: I Prooosed FY 30/81 Budget ESTIMATED FUTURE YEARS FY 31/32 Estimated FY 32/83 Estimated FY 33/34 Estimates Fv 34/35 Estimated a National Economics Research Associates TSCA economic impact study. $ 200,000 S 250,000 S 100,000 S 3 Chemical Industry Communications Action Program (ChemCAP) -- 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 S 200,000 54,250,000 S4,100,000 34,000,000 34,000,000 POSSIBLE FUTURE PROGRAM INCREASES: Expansion of CMA activities to include limited State level legislative and regulatory programs S 498,800 S 543,700 S 592,600 5 546,000 5 704,100 Installation and study of CHEMTREC upgrade, phase III 30,000 170,000 135,000 202,000 220,200 S 528,800 S 713,700 $ 777,600 $ 848,000 5 924,300 EXCLUSIONS BASED ON LIMITED RESOURCES: Technical Consulting Fees J 505,500 $ 505,500 S 505,500 $ 505,500 $ 505,500 Changes in Authorized Staff Positions 464,000 505,800 551,300 600,900 655,000 S 969,500 $1,011,300 SI,056,800 51,106,400 $1,160,500 TOTAL NOT INCLUDED 51,698,300 55,975,000 55,934,400 55,954,400 $6,084,300 () CMA EC-4/8/80 CMA 062735 Exhibit C CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION STATE RECOMMENDATIONS, FUNDING, AID RESERVE CONSIDERATIONS FRELDEDURY BUDGET FT SO/SI 1. The preliminary FT 80/81 expense budget totals $14,373,200 and sets forth staff's initial recamsandatimzs on program expenses for Che coming year. If approved at the March 10 and 11 Iloanee and Executive Committee meetings, the budget will be finalized and presented to the !A Board of Directors at its April meeting. 2. Staff recommends, and the preliminary budget incorporates, no change in the schedule of membership fees as approved during the past year. If the existing fee schedule is approved, CiA reserves are projected to be as follows: Actual Reserves on May 31, 1979 FT 79/80 FT 30/81 FT 81/82 FT 32/83 FT 83/84 FT 84/85 Estimated Increase In Reserves $1,107,900 47,100 134,100 472,300 850,100 L,276,400 Estimated May 31 Total Reserve 3alance $1,576,700 2,684,600 2,731,700 2,365,800 3,338,100 4,188,200 5,464,600 Estimated Reserves in Furniture 4 Equipment $ - (610,000)* (610,000) (610,000) (610,000) (610,000) Approximate Cash Reserves $1,576,700 2,684,600 2,121,700 2,255,300 2,728,100 3,578,200 4,354,600 Cast Reserves as a I of EXQTi^es 391 46t 2ST 2FT 321 381 48T C21A policy has been that reserves should not fall below 25X and should be built up to a level of 507, of committed or fixed expenses. Fixed expenses for purposes of this definition are represented by total expenses less estimated payments to outside counsel, consultants, advertising and public relations firms, and similar types of payments. The preliminary budget as submitted should permit the continued rebuilding of reserves toward the 501 level. *During FT 80/81, CMA will shift from a cash to an accrual basis of accounting. Furniture and equipment requirements for the new headquarters facility are estimated by our spaca planners at $460,000 and continued upgrading of axisting equipment is estimated at S150,Q00 as detailed in che capital equipn^ct request. After removing estimated furniture and equipment balances included in total reserves, the approximate cash reserves are as shown above. CMA EC-4/8/80 CMA 062736 CHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP FEE CLASSIFICATION (Chemical Sales Basis) Fiscal Year Beginning June 1,1979 The following schedule of fees was established by the Board of Directors as provided under the CMA Bylaws Article IV, Section 2. This schedule indudes an 85% increase over the prior year and represents the first increase in the CMA fee schedule since 1966. Chemical Sales Calendar Year 1978 $ Million Under - 1.0 1.0 - 2.5 2.5 - 5.0 5.0 - 7.5 7.5 - 10.0 10.0 - 15.0 15.0 - 25.0 25.0 - 50.0 50.0 -100.0 100.0 -400.0 Over -400.0 Membership Fee $ 745 1,495 2,565 3,630 4,275 5,340 6,410 0.0257% *** 0.0235%' 0.0214%' 0.0192%" * Uo to but not more than the membership fee which would be obtained by multiplying the nunimuRi amount of the next higher chemtcai sales bracket by the percentage factor applicable to the higher bracket. ** Maximum Pee S240.500 Canadian Members S 1.495 (flat fee) ** Maximum Fee increases to $259,000 in FY 80/81 and to $277,500 for FY 81/82 ominating Committee Report for year beginning June 1, 1980 Exhibit ^ Chairman of the Board Vice Chairman of the Board Chairman of the Executive Committee President H. Barclay Morley Chairman of the Board and CEO Stauffer Chemical Company To be confirmed PaulF. Oreffice President The Dow Chemical Company Robert A. Roland New Directors to be nominated from the following companies: Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. |\merican Cyanamid Company Church & Dwight Co. , Inc. Diamond Shamrock Corporation GAF Corporation W. R. Grace & Co. Hercules Incorporated Mallinckrodt, Inc. Merck & Co. , Inc. National Starch and Chemical Corporation Polysar Limited Shell Chemical Company, A Division of Shell Oil Company Soltex Polymer Corporation Sun Company Ventron Division of Thiokol Corporation Virginia Chemicals Inc. Alternates: Mobay Chemical Corporation Univar Corporation CMA EC-4/8/80 CMA 062738 Exhibit F Special Report of the Intercommittee Task Group on Hazard Communications To The Executive Committee April 8, 1980 The Intercommittee Task Group on Hazard Communications is a special committee formed by CMA on May 29, 1979, to represent the combined interests of CRAC, OSHC, and the Distribution Committee. The Task Group is specifically chartered to oversee and appropriately respond to EPA and OSHA proposed labeling rules to be published this Spring. Other trade associations have been invited to participate in the Task Group's activities to gain a broad base preliminary consensus on labeling issues raised by the agencies' draft rules. We are now in phase one of the three phase regulatory pro cess, which includes drafting a rule, notice of proposed rulemaking and public comment, and publishing the final rule. We have reviewed the drafts now being polished by OSHA and EPA and our meeting attendees have reached preliminary agreement on objectionable legal issues raised by the drafts. Unresolved issues will need to be addressed in formal comments and possible litigation after the rules are published in May or June. The latest drafts of both agencies are in many ways com patible; however, OSHA seems to view the EPA's rule as one setting minimum requirements to be expanded upon as products move from commerce into the workplace. For instance, EPA's draft does not require chemical identification on labels; however, OSHA intends to require disclosure of specific chemical identity on the product containers and elsewhere in the workplace. EPA now intends to publish a two-part rule, one for substances with acute hazards based on the ANSI 2 129.1 - 1976 standard but without an exclusion for chemicals which do not present unreasonable risk under their particular conditions of use and exposure. A second part will list chemicals with known carcinogenic effects where each substance requiring labeling would be dealt with on a chemical-by-chemicai basis. OSHA, on the other hand,.intends to publish only one rule combining acute and chronic hazard warnings. Their rule uses broad definitions of toxic and hazardous that could apply to virtually any sub stance listed on the TSCA inventory or on the NIOSH Registry of Toxic Substances. -1CMA 062739 Under the proposed rules, when labeling is required, it would cover all the smallest containers and would include pro cess vessels and mobile transfer equipment. Our Task Group has found OSHA particularly ur.receptive to protection of proprietary chemical formulas and limitations on the definition of hazardous substance. In a letter (Fall of 1979) from Mr. George Taylor (AFL-CIO) to Mr. Douglas Costle .(EPA) , Mr. Taylor recounts earlier "commitments" and understand ings reached during a meeting between him and Mr. Costle and Dr. Bingham. In that-letter Mr. Taylor states that it is organized labor's understanding that EPA and OSHA are committed to the expeditious publication of coordinated labeling regula tions. Mr. Taylor points out that there are fewer constraints on requiring full disclosure of chemical identities under OSHA than under TSCA and states that all chemicals whose identities can be determined must be covered by the regulation. He adds that an approach that would allow generic name identification is totally unacceptable to the AFL-CIO. Action required: None. For information only. CMA EC - 4/8/80 -2- CMA 062740 Exhibit G STAFF RECOMMENDATION ON INSURANCE COMMITTEE STATUS Recommendation: Discontinuance of CMA Insurance Committee. Current CMA interests relative to product liability legis lation, workers' compensation and Superfund risk management are being covered well by other CMA groups such as the lawyers1 group on tort law reform, the Occupational Safety & Health Committee and the Environmental Management Committee. Members of these other groups can review risk management aspects with their company insurance counterparts as the need occurs. The Insurance Committee members and many other member insurance contacts would be willing to serve on a task group to provide assistance in dealing with specific issues. Background: The original Committee purpose follows: With respect to the major areas and causes of accidental loss of significance to the chemical manufacturing industry and methods of controlling and financing such loss through indus trial insurance or other means, the Committee will: serve as a forum for discussion of chemical manufacturing industry concerns; develop and recommend to the Executive Committee policies and positions on legislative, regulatory, and technical questions; and provide support for authorized Association programs. In 1979, the Committee reviewed proposed legislation and formulated recommendations for CMA's positions on Alternatives to Product Liability Insurance and Workers' Compensation. How ever, member company participation at scheduled seminars declined as follows: October 1978 seminar May 1979 " 30 member companies represented 26 " " " October 1979 " Cancelled due to apparent lack of interest A telephone survey of about 70 member company insurance contacts indicates that the insurance function is only a part-time endeavor, so they would only be inclined to attend local meetings. Action Required: Approval of above recommendation. CMA EC-4/8/80 CMA 062741 Exhibit H TECHNICAL AND FUNCTIONAL COMMITTEE NOMINATIONS Effective June 1, 1980: 1. Chemical Regulations Advisory Committee Chairman: Lee Starr, Celanese Corporation Term ending May 31, 1983: George Y. Brokaw, Tennessee Eastman Company Bruce H. Brubaker, Diamond Shamrock Corporation E. Hamilton Hurst, Nalco Chemical Company A. W, Lawrence, Koppers Company, Inc. Thomas W. Mooney, The Procter & Gamble Company 2. Distribution Committee* * 3 4 Chairman: Lowell E. Anderson, Amoco Chemicals Corporation (re-elecrion Term ending May 31, 1983: C. Duane Carley, Hooker Chemical Company Arthur C. Fennimore, American Cyanamid Company P. R. Malcolm, El Paso Products Company T. J. Regan, IMC Chemical Group, Inc. James M. Roberts, Phillips Chemical Company 3. Energy Committee Chairman: Hugh R. Irvine, Exxon Chemical Company U. S. A. (re-election) Term ending May 31, 1983: James D. Beatty, The Procter & Gamble Company Ernest C. Fredericks, Engelhard Minerals & Chemicals Corporation Charles P. Fullerton, Monsanto Company Daniel M. Greeno, Stauffer Chemical Company E, K. Grigsby, Phillips Chemical Company 4. Engineering Advisory Committee Chairman: Walter G. Canham, Monsanto Company Term ending May 31, 1983; J. C. Arnold, El Paso Products Company Thomas W. Booth, Tennessee Eastman Company James J. Jackson, Borg-Warner Chemicals, Borg-Warner Corporation Robert L. Klausmeier, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company Bertram B. Pearlman, Stauffer Chemical Company CMA 062742 2- - 5. Environmental Management Committee Chairman: Charles L. Sercu, Dow Chemical U. S. A. (re-election) Term ending May 31, 1983; J. H. Davis, Ashland Oil, Inc. James C. Edwards, Tennessee Eastman Company Walter E. Jackson, United States Steel Corporation Edward L. Lantz, IMC Chemical Group, Inc. Robert Reichardt, E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company 6. Government Relations Committee Chairman: William C. Lowrey, Shell Oil Company Term ending May 31, 1983; Carl F. "Fritz" Emde, Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. Peter Jarowey, Cabot Corporation J. Wilson Malloy, Jr., Eastman Chemical Products, Inc. Robert L. Shafer, Pfizer Inc. Cecil Timberlake, Phillips Petroleum Company 7. Occupational Safety and Health Committee Chairman; Richard L. O'Connell, M. D., Olin Corporation (re-election) Term ending May 31, 1983; Patrick McNulty, Rohm and Haas Company Myrl E. Miller, IMC Chemical Group, Inc. Jonathan Plaut, Allied Chemical Corporation Gloria portela-Cubria, The Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Jerry Robertson, Exxon Chemical Company U.S.A. 8. Patents and Information Retrieval Committee Chairman: Richard G. Waterman, Dow Chemical U. S. A. Term ending May 31, 1983: Leon Chasan, Exxon Chemical Company Anthony Costanzo, ARCO Chemical Company Kathryn Donovan, pennwalt Corporation Donald J. Quigg, Phillips Petroleum Company T. E. Tinkler, Diamond Shamrock Corporation NOTE: Item 8 above was deleted by action of the Executive Committee upon discontinuing the Patent and Information Retrieval Com mittee. CMA 062743 -3- 9* Tax Policy Committee Chairman: Wallace J. Clarfield, Olin Corporation (re-election) Term ending May 31, 1983; Eldin H. Glanz, Hercules Incorporated Paul Glaser, Engelhard Minerals Chemicals Corporation McCarter Middlebrook, Gulf Oil Corporation John Skelly, Pennwalt Corporation Clement Wydra, Diamond Shamrock Corporation B. Effective April 8, 1980; 1. Communications Committee Kevin J. O'Leary, Olin Corporation (for term ending May 31, 1981) 2. Occupational Safety and Health Committee John R. Venable, M. D. , Dow Chemical U.S. A. (to fill the unexpired of Benjamin B. Holder, M. D. - term ending May 31, 1981) CMA EC-4/8/80 BD-4/8/80 CMA 062744