Document MJr5pm7VQk1qwLREkGKo8YJba

BOARD OF DIRECTORS Tuesday, June 17, 1975, at 3:30 A.11. at Innisbrook, Tarpon Springs, Florida DIRECTORS PRZSZI-T J. E. Greenen ?. E. Uessier IT. Sinon, Vice-President R. 11. Lloalii L. R. Zacharias S. S. Conway J. E. Clegg " '- OFFICERS PP-ESEITT F. T. Gatl:a, President A. .A. Laus, Treasurer Z. jrislane, Secretary R. ?. Goman, Counsel coiiiiitze ceaifiia:' ?rzsz~ R. E. '.'elson (Drake Performance) ilaresont Corporation 3endlx Corporation Bras sb esc os Manufacturing Corp. Raylastaj-lif.nhattan, Ir. Carlisle Corporation Abes Corporation ' ' * S. II. T'ellnaa Corporation Catlte Corporation Harenont Corporation Friction Materials Standards Institute Clepp c Zisenberp Abe>: Cornoration R. Jcir. Federation of European Manufacturers of Friction Materials (FETID Hr. P. 7. Gatks, President, called the Meetinr. to order at 2:30 A.II. I- OF PREVIOUS MEETIMG ..-.e -Minuter :f the Meeting held ".arch 13, 1075 had been distributed. Do terracticr.3 '.'are sucrestcd. Unon notion duly nade, seconded, and unanimously ..-.at the Minutes of the hart':; 13, 19 75 "eetir.- be accented as ::ritter.. nutes of the Meetin*, of the Board of Directors 10 - June 17, 1975 Upon notion culv naae, seconded and unanimously passed it was That the report of the Quality Control Sub-Committee be accented as written. SBESTOS STUDY COrC'.ITTEE REPORT Mr. Drislane read the report for the Chairman, Mr. I. H. Meaver. Please refe to Exhibit 9. Mr. '.'eaver's report expressed concern on the accusations that have been press against the industry concerning the asbestos standards. - He reviewed some of activities of the regulatory agencies over the past year. The last four pars graphs in Mr. Weaver's report aroused sone controversy. One director suggest that the last four paragraphs be deleted. There is a serious question as to whether the OSHA 2 fiber per cc Unit (whic is to be effective July 1, 1976) can be met by friction material manufacturer Mr. Weaver Indicated in his report chat installers of friction material are t coming under the surveillance of Dr. Selikoff and other proponents of strong* regulation. Several senbers brought up the point that even with the rugulati there is a great difficulty in getting labor to help in compliance. Even whc it is written into the law and instructions are placed in the work place the working people do r.oc cooperate. Counsel vias questioned as to the contents of this report where Mr. Weaver indicated that he did not see any justification for a change in the attitude the regulatory agencies. It was stated that this was !ir. Weaver's viewpoint Legal Counsel stated that this is not a legal matter and does not expose the Institute. It '.'as questioned whether sections of this report as written cou. in any way ham the Institute. Legal Counsel indicated that this was not th. case. . Upon notion duly made, seconded and passed, with five affirmative and r-jo negative, it was LZCTL7ED: To accept the report of the Asbestos Study Committee as written. o r nnaH r *' a 3UOD crt of c'r nsmbers. June 1975 ASBESTOS STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT Mrs" industrial managers are well aware of the increasing amount c:' tine they --ust devote to problems relating to occupational and environmental hazards. In recent years new government agencies have been created which have broad powers to investigate, regulate and control industrial operations. During the same period the mandates of traditional agencies also have been broadened in respect to environmental concerns, and frequently there are duplicate and sometimes conflicting functions. Coincidentally, the scientific community been producing an increasing volume of evidence regarding hitherto unsuspected health hazards associated with various raw materials, cnemicals and manufactur ing methods. Adding further to the burdens these developments place on industrial managers is a far more militant union attitude on occupational hee .th matters. Union spokesmen, such as I. W. Abel, Tony Mazzochi and Sheldon Samuels, freely admit they have been negligent in facing these issues in the past. However, recently a new attitude has been in evidence and it is exemplified by Mazzochi's state ment that, "We live in a nation of corporate law breakers." Samuels has not been as charitable; he prefers to use the term "Corporate Murderers." The present union objective, as stated by Mazzochi, is to "use professionals to educate laborers to understand health hazards" and to "use collective bargaining to get legislation necessary to obtain good occupational health care." The JUFL- CIO has an active campaign to use the news media to get the message across to the general public as well as to their members. The friction materials industry position with respect to the asbestos health issue is almost unique. Few other industries are as heavily dependent upon asbestos for the successful performance of their products, and proper handling of occupational and environmental problems associated with the use of asbestos is essential to the survival of manufacturers of asbestos-based friction materials. During the past year your Asbestos Study Committee has worked closely with CSHA, I?A, NIOSH and their subcontractors as well as with AIA./NA regarding new standards and regarding changes to existing standards and guidelines for regulation oi* asbestos as well as other materials. We have sought to keep abreast of new in formation regarding asbestos health effects, control methods and regulations emanating from ahe medical/scientific communities, various government offices and ether sources. 7ne following highlights should be of interest. CSHA Proposed r.ew saar.dards for arsenic and for ketones present new formats with emphasis on the action level concept, on work practices and cn improved medical surveillance. Expected revisions to ahe asbestos saar.dard probably will follow one of ahese formats. Little or no c.aar.ae is exaected ir. remissible airborne concentrations or in ncr.i- Tr.e erroneous assumption by CSHA that the friction materials industry could immediately comply with the 2 fpcc standard hopefully has been ccrr^c-S-. 2- - Hazardous material labeling is under study by an CSHA advisory committee, and labor members have called for changes in asbestos product labeling. NIOSK A new electron microscope laboratory has been provided at Cincin nati and is being used to investigate the quantity and size distribution of asbestos fibers and other aerosols in occupational environments. Emphasis is on submicron particles and fibers less than 5 microns long. EPA EPA is undertaking a thorough investigation of the presence of asbt stos in all areas of the environment. The work involves con tract studies, in-house research and joint activities with other government agencies. There is considerable concern regarding the effectiveness of the ''no visible emissions" standard in protecting the public from airborne asbestos. Pressure is on EPA from labor representatives and medical and environmental groups for a "no detectable level" regulation. EPA proposed waste disposal restrictions would create problems for some friction materials manufacturers. FDA A delay has been imposed on FDA's proposal to ban use of asbestos in filters for beverages and food products until they can conduct experiments to determine if long term exposure to ingested asbestos fibers represent a definitive hazard to human health. A four million dollar animal feeding study has been approved for dezernination of health effects from ingesting various doses of various kinds of asbestos. FTC Study is in progress in response to a petiai group) in regard to labeling of asbestcs-ccr CSPI (Kaaer rrocucts. There is r.o kr.ov.-n action by this agency ir. regard to asbestos at this cine. <~r -3 - CDC This agency of HEW has issued a report indicating adverse effects on pulmonary function due to exposure to asbestos at two locations one of which was a textile based friction material plant in New England. MEDICAL Selikoff continues predictions of epidemic of asbestos related . death and disease in years to came. He emphasizes the mesotheli oma hazard and the fact no known dose level is "safe" and is pointing to the possible health significance of shorter, smaller fibers or particles not now covered by standards. Selikoff people have been actively promoting hazards associated with asbestos emissions from brake lining wear and from brake service operations. Acknowledgment of association between asbestos exposure and in creased GI cancer has become accepted practice during the past year. ' The above and other activities and publicity during recent months offers ample evidence that controversy and concern over asbestos has in no way slackened. Many seem to think the fact that OSHA, EPA, NIOSH and others recently have been devot ing considerable attention to other toxic materials has taken same of the beat off asbestos. While this may be true as far as the over-all environmental and occupational health picture is concerned, I see no significant change in tbe attitude of regulatory agencies, medical researchers, labor, or environmental groups in regard to the hazards of asbestos. Nor do I see any justification for such change.* The friction Materials industry should pursue all available r.pns for achieving compliance with the 2 fiber per cubic millileter standard and all other require ments of the OSHA asbestos regulations as promptly as possible. It should be kept in nind the promulgated regulations are a "minimum standard." Wherever possible more protection than that afforded by the standard should be provided for friction materials workers exposed to asbestos dust. Emphasis should be given to worker instruction and training in methods for reduc ing airborne dust generation and for minimizing exposure to dust that is generated. Product labeling and other means should be employed to thoroughly inform/: ; customers and the public of the dangers associated with improper use, fabriction, handling or disposal of asbestos-containing friction materials. In-plant antisnckirg campaigns would be laudable. Your committee solicits comments and questions concerning ins mast and future activities, and 'will endeavor to follow events in cite above nentioned areas and all other aspects of the asbesccs/health controversy during mhe following year. Respectfully submitted, e Chairman 07652 *> u BOARD OF DIRECTORS Tuesday, June 17, 1975, ac 3:30 A.21. at Innisbrook, Tarpon Springs, Florida DIRECTORS PZESEbT . F. Greenen . E. ZJessier M. Sinon, Tice-Fresident 1:. 11. iloalii E. R. Zacharias S. S. Conway J. Z. Clegg "- OFFICERS pp.is e:.t F. T. Gatke, President A. A. laus. Treasurer Z. jr is lane, Secretary Z. ?. Goman, Counsel coizmizz cf-aiem-ai: preset: ' Z. Z. Zeis on (Drake Performance) liarenont Corporation Bendix Corporation Brassbestos Zanufacturdng Corp. RayEastaj-Ii'.nhattan, Ir*c. Carlisle Corporation Abes Corporation S. Z. TTellman Corporation Gatke Corporation Zarenont Corporation Friction Materials Standards Institute Clapp a Zisenberp Abe?: Corporation Z. Jcir. Federation of European Manufacturers of Friction Materials (FET!1) larks, President, called eke Zeetin- to order at 2:30 A.!'.. ZliTJTZS OF PREVIOUS ZZZTIZC- .r.2 -Z_r.uce: cf the Zeecing held ".arch 13, 1175 had been distributed. Zo carre triers `-are suggested, "non notion duly made, seconded, and unanimously 7 II11' ZD: Zr.ac the Ziruces cf the hare'". 12, 1075 heating be accepted as -.-ritter.. Hinutes of the I'.eetin0 of the Board of Directors 10 June 17, 19 75 Upon notion duly trade, seconded and unanimously passed it was RESOLVED: mat the report of the Duality Control Sub-Committee be accented as written. SBESTOS STUDY COIE'.ITTEE DEPORT Ilr. Drislane read the report for the Chairman, Dr. I. H. 'leaver. Please refer to Exhibit 9. Dr. '-leaver's report expressed concern on the accusations that have been pressed against the industry concerning the asbestos standards. He reviewed some of the activities of the regulatory agencies over the past year. The last four para graphs in ?lr. Weaver's report aroused some controversy. One director suggested that the last four paragraphs be deleted. There is a serious question as to whether the OSHA. 2 fiber per cc limit (which is to be effective July 1, 1976) can be net by friction material manufacturers. 'Ir. Weaver indicated in his report that installers of friction material are now cooing under the surveillance of Dr. Selikoff and other proponents of stronger regulation. Several members brought up the point that even with the regulations there is a great difficulty in getting labor to help in compliance. Even when it is written into the law and instructions are placed in the work place the working people do not cooperate. Counsel was questioned as to the contents of this report where !lr. Weaver indicated that he did not see any justification for a change in the attitude of the regulatory agencies. It was stated that this was !Jr. Weaverfs viewpoint. Legal Counsel stated that this is not a legal matter and does not expose the . Institute. It was questioned whether sections of this report as written could in any way ham the Institute. Legal Counsel indicated that this was not the case. . Upon notion duly made, seconded and passed, with five affirmative and tr-ro negative, it was LISDIVED: To accept the report of the Asbestos Study Cored tree as written. .*.t the Larch 13, 1975 Meeting of the Beard of Directors, the Secretary was discussing possible financial assistance to the Association. !!r. Drislane wrote r. ..erer.ess, Secretary of AIA after the meeting and had just received a reply. Ir. Hr. Dereress7 reply he indicated his appreciation and that of his Executive Cortcittee for the offer by the Institute. However, the Association c one cz t: for a su be beets' Associat: need the ~i .mutes cf the Meeting cf the Beard of Directors -11 - June 17, 1975 Mr. Drislar.s displayed sons posters that had been sent by Mr. Mereness of the Asbestos Information Association. These posters had been received at Innlsbrook. These pescars had hints such as "If you don't smoke no*", don't start. If you do smoke cult.'' ar.d"7acuum dust spills--never dry sweep. ' There were others to ha Ip deliver the warning to workers concerning the asbestos dust problem. A point chat has been raised several tines is that the workers should be advised cf the seriousness cf the problem. These posters are an assist in setting this message across. It was suggested that participation in the Asbestos Information Association as renbers would help friction materials manufacturers trith the asbastes problem. The Secretary was advised to send a copy of Mr. Mereness letter of June 12, 1975 to the membership-, indicating the AIA's invitation to have them join their asso ciation. At this point it was stated that the Asbestos Study Committee had passed a resolution as follovs: 'That the Committee requests guidance from the Board of Directors concerning the problem of the two fiber/cc limit and the lack of reliability of the membrane filter method for measurement of. fiber counts.1* The Asbestos Srucy Committee members ware concerned that while the membrane filter technique is the only nethod new available for measuring asbestos concentrations it is a most unreliable tool for enforcement of the two fibers/cc limit. In searching for guidance for the Committee one Director stated that our objection zc urn of this method for enforcement would not be constructive. It uouldxjust stir -attars up without providing an alternative. Some regulatory authorities are receptive where suggestions are made for improvement. Simply indicating our dissatisfaction with the raetirane filter nethod for enforcement might be considered as a negative attitude. A Direct or stated that the hygienists will use common sense and realize the failleil ity of the membrane filter technique. It is fairly well known in industry and government that this technique is fallible. Mhile the directors expresse d concern ever the use of this as an enforcement tool, they do nor feel that any Institute position should be expressed to 321LA concerning its use. It .as felt that those enforcing the OS.-L-. relations are aware of the disparity in usir.c this tschnicue. At this point Mr. Jcir. of the DDIuM indicated that work, had been done in Europe tontemir.; ter.plir.; end counting. He said that his asbestos association Chanbre `yr.-itele it 1' .'uni ante (rrar.ee), had an expert working for the association in the sampling end ttuntin;. area. Members exchange dices ar.c see how the counts tone cut. "e is waiting zcr a report or. this study. Tt was suggested that there is nc ether moms r: measuring the asbestos concentration and it is most likely .5>11 *ill :-tsy with this method regardless of any input from the Institute or a movie which had been shewn in Great Britain by Granada Dust--A Standard '.Mstake? ' Tris mtvia had interviews with "hr. of T3A, ar.c Dr. "elih.off of Mount Sinai. They discussed . several veers sre that resulted in. the 2 fibers/cc limit, cf data by Dr. Lwdnsohn indicated tc Dr. Selikoff that the it r.ct be satisfactory. Tr.e controversy between Dr. 'ir.scbs "as shown in this film. Tr.e argument centered on a statistics. It was reto-r.cr.ded that the movie be shown '.iautes of the Meeting of the Board of Directors 12 - June 17, 1975 The Secretary brought up for discussion the fact that a Congresswoman froaa lieu Jersey (Mrs. Millicent Fenwick) has proposed legislation for the sale of Cnrysotile asbestos from the national stockpile. Some Individual asbestos users and the Asbestos Information Association supported llrs. Fenwick in this legislation. The purpose of the legislation is to help industry reduce un employment brought on by the asbestos shortage. The number of tons that might be released is about 10,000. It is not felt that this is really significant but in any case its release cannot hurt. The Secretary was directed to write a letter to llrs. Fenwick in support of this legislation. ANNUAL MEETING COMMITTEE Mr. Drislane read the report for the Chairman of the Annual Meeting Committee, Mr. Barton. See Exhibit 1A. In summary, the report recommended a return to Innisbrook in June that was not satisfactory, the Fhoenix-Scottsdale area. *4. - Upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously passed ic was 1976, and if T.ESOLVED: That the report of the Annual Meeting Committee be accepted as written. HISTORICAL SALES REPORTER? The Secretary read a report on Historical Sales which is Exhibit 13. In essence, perticipation was good with 15 of 19 members reporting. The reporting has been moved to a quarterly basis as of March 31, 1975. (This V7as decided at the 3oard of Directors Meeting on March 13, 1975). Immediately prior to the meeting, the accountants advised that the !iarch 31 report was ready and would be distributed to the membership. At this point, the subject of listing those reporting in each category was brought up._ At the present time, the names of the companies reporting in at least one category are listed at the bottom of the report, and the number of companies (but not the names) reporting in each particular category also is listed, e.g., X number of members reported brake linings, T number of members reperted brake blocks, etc. It had been suggested that the names of the members repenting ir. each of these categories also be listed, so that the composite sales figures in each category will be more meaningful. The objection to listing the members reporting in each category is that the Institute must be ' careful if sales data is passed out to members. It is apparent that if only two members v;ere reporting in a category one member would know the quantities of the other reporting member. At a level of three reporting, one might get a pratty good handle. At four and above the data probably could not be broken qc.t. to individual members. Legal Counsel was queried concerning this problem. He indicated that there should be no problem if at least four were reporting in each category. Uocm motion duly made, seconded and unanimously passed it was r.ZSDLVID: That the Board of Directors recommends that the Historical Sales Deport list the names of those reporting in each category when there are at least four reporting in that category. ' qj - `linutes of the Heetinr of the Doard of Directors 16 - // S75 '.Jhile Hr. Sinon *;as suppestiny that ascijnncnts should be nade for the Ainco ' drilled versions. Hr. ".'.orHi did not concur. Hr. I'oalli stated chat: (1) these are not original equipment releases. (2) Further we have not indicated shoe drilling whether it was drun cr disc ir. the past. (3) Further, if the Institute were to set up numbers based on Ainco's drilling patterns we would be setting up Ainco as a standard. Hr. i'oalli felt that if we were to take such action, it would put Ainco Industries in a position above others who might decide on drilling for replacement narket shoes. The Directors supported the Data Book and Technical Committee position of not providing F11SI assignnents to parts made by a replaceacnt earlier supplier such as Ainco. . The Institute arripnrients "ill continue to he based on criminal eruipment releases. ** Thai a beiru, r.c further business -bre ugh t ts the rttentror. of the Board of Directors, upon notion duly Bade, seconded and unanimously passed it was nZSOLvTD Adj ourned: 4:DO V adjourn E. ". Frisians Secretary