Document MJQgZxx0pz0M9JX9xapywG8V7

OC: R. A, Moore The Sherwin-Williams Co. ; j. ><5> Kingston . ; clidden-Durhee Div. SCM. corporation 10, 1973 ij&aiitato ^ : jjfc/.: rui s>V '.wKK4* ^Ak* ' ':|SwSpiWB. ''9%4. id ^eteeSjafn^aieili^Oid MWwt&f national paint a coetiag Washington, o,c. ^ J000S bear mm ' ...' 2 have reviewed Or. Dross1 report, again and agree that a better title could be selected, h o w about * literature survey a the yoxlelty-of in paints'' "5, perhaps the fail Tmk force can agree m a title when wo neat **rt wash* two other questions should be reviewed* 1. All lsad coiapounda are classed the same on page" 74,' we all hnow that lead chrowate is mwed ' fonllvl ' than laad' , or vsed ag,.i.a . sw mfoiMfrA whAfritiWeit In feWi* ynfeWrtfr Italy *$&m *e*w ; weve^w- /A'*^gpee^e *pe ^ee'P"ewe -^^deeieeeee OSSOeir nf all lead aomBCtandi no be^Pv. the' aams.wpP'P swee^enp gr i raeoafaista "that idiieea 'Sp ^^^ewnwas.sppsnpap^^p sewn^^P'se sogsHPieoe table la a general classification, bat does or. gross really want to cUss all ooeusound* together. 3. Rage 41 * so we really want to reetognlao or propagate the proposed 0.06% lead limit 'suggested by the FDA. N38282 ^ i<:::: : V! J:-i. X' ' SS^lcSjL-^SiW!: :. ___,, ,T mm fife tfert rmffixm fc&ia. limit sad, as tj^i 'IjMMUpi^.:' dd' 4.flk ifrdt'SSfrfrsdtdfe ^*fc- ^fc^ss- :Sfpa*l:;^<<!l4:4rtJl of satiti a uit. xf ns laavs sai* in, pssbaps ys ^sufslid add a clarifying ssntsnos. X SgfJfSS wlfc}| tt*M- H^SiyS%*Wft fcftafc y^ffp*nAp%^ii^!a should tbs dslstsd. ftosre aeaa so & m aaad tft-isoMi"" thsss fos? ^sassraX disfcifilwsfciou Sid ym md Bidk Ssoids tS Isavs oat ths .pfast . M '* flwaitt* 4Br nefMd . P.S. Minor correction - Pg. 11 MI6 is JMBsfcioan coafaraaos. of m^mwm*% industrial iiftisiiisis - DUP050049599