Document MG4KvmMy8k9qOQB4RM0XKxBXM

l 005828 1200 . OCamson `BroxunsvUU, Tc.\as 78520 (512)544-6881 FIELD FOOTAGE LOG PACE 1--OF X_ rnoouciioM/rnoJECT darbd* das# ~T*p< &/*i DATE (? iZ'9.,L SCEME TAKE time shot DEscmnioH COMMENTS ep X/ -' <r-e ' la^pf-X/ 33Zl{fytito/( U',oJ) 03 5 ^()CA.r^l /*tf~ -4#! tf.jii/- 5-h-i 0vtS4ja;,, Ait*// P-i@3(-o* (z-liftrib. (p-M-i) .3 Ttp if4tj^?3 2! G 3&?\7t[cifla ^^0 ($7 Zjfcg. f/)aWJrnJ H XV?77 Y#ri3%o{k ifklk- 'bal Tjt fl-R &y u t'.'Zl.ZX (y ZpJL 3 t:31: *3 M 1f < V %-T,P-fi.Z-Q /-X * P'L. 3 /r.t* 1:31:1/ /"i * ^ ' / 11 1_ l P-L'h PA foUb 4'<d8>tt fid-ffw (l,,wk* -iLtn ~bk ^izii SMnr-vy tfu:6& Z-J + T-O _L hahtijS'rfl f. I'mwiih!h!/b<lJba*9.. -H* 4**L 4 J3LL Z-fl 4 Pan h/4' M;tt. >/ /' <sif ^ '0j Ubi * Z X X jLL f*'}: it- Ueb f>t,S0^ Q 'j) /,h 4/jh/ f}tM X // it,,,j4^21 Jlffi/Mru 4ka "t-ft f-sv n >< " //t 'i. / r fDitt , r?-'0n (z--Tib/. ->\ *59:zi. LsLjlkt~-/<n/X/-3 Pi 1-7 i-z-zp P-L t-1 XL J ^n u --rfj'tf,' i * D' J t , 7.-0 L i'*9'w far*!**, pf /nffql b-(4At4 P-LsZ-Z'-Z^ z-Q* DE 006829 mEMMMMIMMiMmSi-1 1200 . ZCanison 2Iroxt/nsvifft, Tt^as 78520 (512) 5H-6881 FIELD FOOTAGE LOG rnoDUcnoM/rnoJicT LPT/IrlJt.lLfL SCENE TAKE TIME ' SHOT DESCRIPTION "i *ML PAQE __ OF 2L- DATE C'/2'tL COMMENTS ' (, 4 *5#.`a? LtdrpOs/^f M fbo*' 1 , 7-7T// Leckk* Pcnm/ed 4mL "beM "4 P-C.zo.z-VM*P> 7-&-CZ. yu /< >> " z-x-*r-> ? &'& /4 M 4o btod4) dtPf})' 7 / 8WZ4 dt* rdb/ch. 4) 4**ifoO.*>k** ded) P-uU 2- %$:& h .A l< /( PH. Z-7 5 btk do brav/i 4adt> 'Z-0r'Z. JTr Z O H ?;?5S2 fZ> ~fik ^3?tj (Lk4,*'I /IfrM) -k (p )$phfieb fiy-'/o fh'ti 4mk ^392! do 3~4i*h> A flL,Zr iah:/z " 7 M&'07 H i tolm ." '* Ltohi'f, A^Pi J-0 l~3ipl\-f/'f H /, /, /{ t-r. Z-O/Z-T- Z-0 ' " -kik.l&.Uu) fll.Z-J.-2r0 ----------- * * L*e>k^c, uhd -In UrnnUjlJ Jon 4 2-// Z-O. Z-7 AZD _i_ n;&:co 11 ** u 4o a-nc^efe PP.ZT-tZ-D // forte* *' M -- M m i, ii z-J,P-p. ZO / HWi9 *i M Ukw 4) c.'Mct l/(h. --Z-Tf,- Z-f) zrf / iiwy " n n>:$rm " /9'fTn --_______________ " " l i-sLftL+ S.l/ ^3 MX. (y..\ -Z O^ zn 7-r -> .-T ---------- DE 006830 u iff iu utd J y .^ih neunf&f_____ 7 -- --11 11 > .' ,,f,JLi O 7-/0 ~r /7-dA- 4) LEGAL PRODUCTIONS 1200 ". Jfanison 'BroxunsvilU, Tertis 78520 (512)544-6881 FIELD FOOTAGE LOG PMOUCTION/PnOJECT SCENE TAKE TIME "Tape Pl'Z. SHOT DESCRIPTION PAGE J_0F 3 DATE g-/g- 9/ COMMENTS zrTt)3 (jlshn* _P_____b__d/blf'oVtj<____f_4__n__n_L__^_^__3__ti_ 4 N'&H ~b rmMsJdft*^____ ft 1z :r4ti VUG. 11 " 4o \f&<>5\5mill6lJk. fil Z-d.L'? ef fiL,Z-f,Z-0 (zM% Ktc:iy ScAk VaM lt>U(j4. P-i.ZX-ffL. Z-Q jL tU(-0(/ K*'\l I U> khl'-ZL k / *< 44?n l-\/.IV.zJI^ Mlv.\V.W. ! u i 4fl / . - . I i/A j * -|^h(< Aah, \M y---------- = ?-X* 2-<3 z-iz-o IQ k.yi'm ~3\a MA>A_____ ^ IL fo.k*j $^fy -I^ i <kF o-^Area^A <?(^^Wv<; lav van (Z.-3)frf) tea. LfckitoUlM iA. c<OaA <wA$feUfUs ___ (liXAj) ts\IE.' pH \&L./iYji IjypuVJ'jfr U.1?01^4>rf Omo\V fm^<-fcff_e.)*a'i>WgTS Ta Mem (^3)^ 3) [I*f1f^ rlfrtlfwI A.w\ i i. I i-v i iTN ^ a a.a;;n -Ifttvjut, <*4 gy\ ^>wJi fra\Q(5) *A*ft I *# | I uwie i<*4^ UW44foWlw<^ rtrJfr (9)4fVttff. ]i\ ^ (z )Ya-^\ faX2>\ if ___ &/-*f jgjg, ^/-Z-__________________ 0E 006831 DE 006832 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET SENDING TO FACSIMILE NO. Ti'IX'?' 'S ! ~ C^r^P.i TO: <W/3/h>>7 7. _________________ CC:____________________________ PROM: RE: K-MiU 'YTtI/lJ.il . OATE: ofTotel number pages including this pacet ._ Call A'H ___________on telephone no. /* * 1 If you do not receive All of the pages. Our Facsimile Number is 203-794*3133. 5055R/41 "VT \ ~i i mow D-Ni -m i.ryoe-artra^ri mot Kin DE 006833 22 S00 0S/2T/20 TO: B. Adler F. H. Cone DATE: February 9, 1990 CC: B. Cortez C. R. Kline J. Smith 0. B. Smith, II M. E.Tapp R. 1. Womack. SUBJECT: Brownsville Site Exit Plan Update In accordance with your request, I have prepared the following outline and summary of the continuation of our efforts to develop an optimal series of actions for the final closing of and withdrawal from the Brownsville Plant Site which meets corporate environmental policies, mlnlmizies (JCC&Ps long term risk, and evaluates the cost/benefit trade offs. This updated version was developed at a team meeting on January 30. 1990. The key plan components include the following activities: Definition of the site soil and water condition. Definition of a site remediation plan. Disposition of the land upon which the plant facilities are located. Disposition of buildings and structures. Disposition of machinery and equipment. Consideration of the above Issues in light of the ongoing litigation. Preparation of two accruals, one for the ongoing commercial and legal activities and the other for all environmental activities. The issues and actions associated with each of the above components are discussed below. Set? DE 006834 Hark Tapp estimates that the'effort to define the site, soil and ground water conditions and to develop a remediation plan will be completed by the end of 1993. During this period the site manning and resources should remain at current levels. The activities of one employee. Dub Barnett, are solely devoted to environmental Issues and will be reflected in the budgets and accruals as such. After 1993, we will need to continue to have personnel at the site to manage the remediation projects and these costs will be Included in the environmental accrual once they are defined. The Ball Mill Residue Basin Closure plan Is based on the continuation of a non-RECRA designation. Maintaining a non-RECRA designation is critical to meeting the project's projected expenditures and timetable through 1994. During the closure of the Ball Hill Residue Basin, we discovered that a significant portion of the waste appears to have been generated by Amoco. Further investigation of the site revealed additional areas within the plant containing Amoco generated waste. We plan to notify Amoco of our findings and request that they participate In the remediation. ' Once the site, soil and water surveys are completed and the remediation plans are developed, the team will choose one of the several options for the disposition of the land upon which the plant is located. There are at least three options for the land disposition: Terminate the lease and return the land to the Brownsville Navigation District (BN0>. ",, Continue to lease all or a portion of the site on a long term basis until remediation is completed. Purchase all or appropriate portions, of the site. Combinations of the above. The choice of the land disposition option will depend on the balancing of the following considerations: remediation time, future land use, risk, and cost. Implementation of any option requires negotiation with the 6ND. The Brownsville Plant environmental expenditure forecast is shown in Table 1. The forecast lists the various environmental projects and their anticipated expenditures through 1994. These expenditures total S8450M from January 1, 1990 through December 31, 1994. Future remediation costs will be projected for each project when defined. The remediation may take many years to complete depending on their nature. RWL/5400m/2 2/9/90 DE 006835 r* i -3- * * < \ v 1** *v ? The action Hems developed for the environmental portion of the site exit pi an 1nclude i ' Actions Prepare site maps (which are grided) showing: Those areas we believe will require further study Those areas were Amoco generated waste is located. Those areas designated RECRA and non-RECRA. Rasoonsibi11 tv A. 8ooth Comp1tion pate 3/8/90 Prepare a letter to notify Amoco of their environmental responsibilities at the plant site. F. H. Cone/ B. Adler Ask the real estate department for assistance R. W. Lasher/ in valuing the land at the plant site. F. H. Cone B. Disposition of the Structures Located on the Site 3/8/90 3/8/90 The disposition of the structures located on the plant site will depend upon the option choosen for disposal of the land. At a minimum, the translte buildings (which contain asbestos) should be removed and properly landfilled, along with any transit* siding. The concrete frames for the oxygen compressor building can remain on-site and should be tested for waste products and remediated if necessary. The estimated cost of the translte removal and disposal is approximately $250M. At the appropriate time, discussions should be held with the BND to determine those structures and equipment which may benefit the port such as docks and other general facilities. Obviously, if the land is returned to the 8ND the permanent buildings will he part of the negotiated package. The action items developed for disposition of the structures include: Actions Resoonslbl1itv Completion Date Explain the site exit plan to the BNO. R. W. Lasher/ B. Cortez When Appropriate Determine if the BND wants the docks, equipment located on them and other general facilities. R. H. Lasher/ B. COrtez When Appropriate Determine if the BNO is Interested in selling the plant site and negotiate any land, building * facility and other site Issues with the 8ND to achieve the exit plan. R. M. Lasher/ B. Cortez When Appropriate i i v?#5l Actions , Investigate the remaining permanent buildings for asbestos. * Oetermine If the BNO can use any clean concrete for fill. C. Disposition of the Machinery and Equipment Responsibility B. Cortez R. W. Lasher/ B. Cortez Completion Date 4/2/90 When Appropriate The team is of the opinion that the machinery and equipment located on the site should be dlsmantled-.and used'at another Union Carbide location or sold tothlrd parties and removed from the site. Theequipment dismantlement is to Include the removal and disposal of asbestos installation and all other cleanup activities. Investment recovery will have the responsibility for this portion of the exit* . plan. Investment Recovery estimates.-the net dismantlement cost at S1255M. The basis for the cost estimate is shown In Table 3. The timing of the dismantlement activities Is dependent upon the TexasSupreme Court ruling whether.they will'hear RIO's appeal of the trial and appellate courts' decisions, which held, as a matter of law, that RIO Systems. Inc. has no right,- title or interest In the Brownsville Plant. The Texas Supreme' Court should rule by late March, 1990. This ruling Is the Key regarding UCC&P's undisputed ownership of the plant. If the court chooses to hear.RIO's appeal then the timing of the dismantlement Is unKnown.' If the court denies to hear the appeal, which Is the most HKely outcome, then the dismantlement can begin. The actions required to initiate these activities are shown below: Actions Prepare a surplus property declaration. Include any environmental Issues associated with the dismantlement and specify disposal instructions. Responsibility B. Cortez/ M. Tapp Completion Date 3/8/90 Investment Recovery will contract for the dismantlement and the sale or transfer of the equipment. J. Smith 2Q90 Inform universal Process Equipment and Louisiana Chemical Equipment of the dismantlement plans. R. H. Lasher When Appropriate 3Z5&-. v-v*. V- DE 006837 o:f: Preparation of Accrual s'ffk^r ... ------------- ---..i*- -- -V* J J*" *' S ' ** * : Tha projected costs-associated wlth .the definition of the site soil ' and water conditions and the subsequent.definition of site remediation plans are listed by project in an environmental accrual In Table 1. The total cost is estimated at S8450M through 1994. This accrual does not Include long term remediation activities which are not yet defined and may continue into the 21st Century. The activities at the plant site should switch from disposition of the equipment, buildings and land to solely environmental activities by the beginning of 1994. Consequently;- site activities other than environmental are budgeted through 1993 at an estimated cost of S6462M. Table 2 Itemizes these.costs while Table 3 Itemizes the equipment and building dismantlement costs along with the key assumptions. ; E. Summary The development and Implementation of a site exit plan for the Brownsville Plant requires coordination of many Interrelated activities, several of which are outside of UCC&P's control. The environmental remediation plan must be accepted by the Texas Water Commission and will ultimately determine the duration of our presence on the site. The BND will play a role regarding the site disposition options and the associated cost, finally, the outcome of RIO's appeal to the Texas Supreme Court will determine the timing of the dismantling of the equipment and transite structures. The plan will be updated as significant events occur and these activities and costs can be reasonably estimated so the accrual can be adjusted with some degree of precision.' Best regards. RWL/wg/S 5400ffl D R. W. Lasher J. DE 006838 TABLE 1 Brow nsville Plant Environmental Forecast *-- OOll A v-- M | o-- ooot itno CM ItTo) cn U*l CM CM Oo\t| OO Ocnl --O o U"l <M s o o ooooooo g r- s cm oo cn Ctl O s M s p-- mCM a>i[ s s o o | CM ocn* N<J\ mtNo N*+ ttoo lVOO r--0 o nM o* c -- s* xs > mo -** * 35 -- -- --o Ua * * ou ^C *4t* H** cW4> 9X uor *rcLd X rWd H Oo <d o> vwO*f auow. QSw4l1 +* S TO 8 CM 40cn*t J * ' 0cn -- omm <M m* 0- O 01 01 tn n o oi 3 S om -- ?in s5- aO' owr a wa; VfdJ o0 4- --+Uo>+r T051 rUQ kU01- 4aT >or ocj o u m 0T Or O or a uUwO w*Q v u *--a a cl 9C. oa>t >C9w0<1 O ** O O. #0 *V4- S0/ ut ou to/ri v* & 0*0**^ "U5 a * Scc o %o.<our aMc- &- a Or va cbr Cxl Q W 09 u-- < --e-o OuC-2va* U w41 -wO -o = -3SU IV IIIII -- (vimdui mmCO cm at 1989 Actual Labor (Excludes Garnett) $44 Contract Security Contract Services 152 l'i'9* Utilities 20 Property Taxes 48 Lease Payments 102 Miscellaneous 2 Sub-Total 487 . Litigation 398 Exxon Pipeline Lease 4,621 Dismantlement Total $5,108 1990 $47 k 162' 80 18. 48 102 17 474 400 2,760 755 $4,534 $M 1991 $50 1992 $53 1993 $53 Total i $203 172 127 M* 127 588 85 62 (* 62 289 20 10 10 58 48" \ 6 ** 6 108 102 ISO 150 504 10 10 j.>10 47 487 418 418 1,797 250 0 o- . ' - ,,v .. f:`.` -0 * ' ' 0 0 650 2.760 500 1,255 $1,237 $418 $418 $6,462 <1) Reduce guard force by 2 full time guards. on evening, nights and weekends. <2) Brown & root reduced to 2 full time employees. (3) Taxes are estimated on my estimate of the value of the remaining buildings - this might still be high. (4) Assumes favorable decision from Texas Supreme Court and trial court. Costs projected for limited issues. (5) For 1990 through 1993 only. RHL/2S59H/1 2/9/90 DE 006840 TABLE 3 Brownsville Dismantlement Cost Estimate Dismantle everything except brick and metal buildings, substations and the dock area. Fryablo asbestos and translte buildings will be removed and properly landfilled. Estimated Cost SM Dismantlement Cost Equipment & Scrap Credit Asbestos Removal Cost Translte Buildings Removal Cost Concrete Removal and Dlsosal Residual Product Removal andDisposal Subtotal Contingency 9 lOt Total S755M (700) 436 250 200 200 S1.141M 114 S1.255H The project Is scheduled to be completed In 1991. See attached list of assumptions. Wfi RWL/2559H/2 2/9/90 006841