Document M4qjdzE5yO3zZ5QLDLD2DRn1k

} Gr a ha mcBd g a r DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH LTHYL Ga s o l i n e Co r p o r a t i o n Ch r y s l e r Bu il d in g 135 E a s t 42TM St r e e t Xe w Tork July 20, 1934* Dr* Willard Machle, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio* My dear Machlet I enclose a file concerning a suit vfcioh has been brought against the Texas Company by one I have told idle Texas Company that if their a t t o m e ^ ^ ^ H ^ ^ t in contact with you, you would advise them in the matter* papers. I also gave the Texas Company reprints of Dr* Kehoe*3 Please keep me informed of any action you may take in this matter* Very truly yours, ge/lrj Enes* Graham Edgar, COPY THE TEXAS COMPANY 135 E, 42nd St,, New York City July 16, 1934 VS, THE TEXAS COMPANY Dr, 0, Edgar, Ethyl Gasoline Corporation, 135 East 42nd Sto, New York, N.Y. Dear Sirt Enclosed is a memorandum of the case which va discussed this morning. Our file is rather slim end this is about all the informa tion we are able to give, I understand you will pass -the memorandum to your Dr, Machle at Cincinnati and I have taken the liberty of saying to our insurers that Dr, Machlo will assist them and their attorneys as much as possible. Our insurers are the U, S, Fidelity & Guaranty Company, The attorneys are Trabue, Hume and Armstead, American Trust Building, Nashville, Tenn, The pamphlets which, you handed me have been passed along to the insurers and I think they will be very helpful. Your assistance is very much appreciated. Yours very truly, RCS/CD R.C. Schaefer .... . Hew York, July 16, 1?34. MEMORANDUM hrs. THE TEXAS 00. The above party was employed by M s father, in the capacity of warehouseman at the bulk distri buting station ope .o',tod. by 1. sf. DuBois at Cookeville, Tenu. At the time of the accident in question he approximately 26 years of age. It is claimed that was partially over come while unloading a tank car of gasoline early in the summer of 1932 and that a serious-throat and mouth infection subsequently set in, resulting in his death. (The complaint filed in connection with the litigation further alleges that his nose, chest, kidneys, liver and other parts of the body were seriously infected). As to the cause of the infections, the complaint alleges that he "came in contact with rnnch of the fumes and vaport froia said gasoline which contained a mixture of lead and other poisonous substances". The particular acts of negligence charged are that end others working around the premises were not informed of the dangerous and deadly character of the fumes end vtpors of the gasoline and' were not furnished with masks. |d_ oonoil At the outset the father of the de ceased coatended that the doctor and local undertaker both attributed the b e y 's death to lead poisoning and he was in formed by a representatire of'another oil company that 21 employes of that company had died from similar causes with in ?, the past year, fhe doctor who attended the young man during his last illness dis ~ the'death as due to acute lymphatic leukemia but did not/^the cause of the leukemia. The death certificate shows death to have been due to "Acute lymphatic Leukemia". SCo-OD H.C.SCaAEFEH j//. 0 0 1 1 0 1 2