Document M4bJgrMwvky11d9n1b6ZeRV07
-5EXPERIMENTAL AND METHODS
SampIeB Herring Oil Heron Eggs
Arochlor 1254
Supplied by van den Berghs and Jurgens Ltd., Purfleet, Essex. Collected from Heronry at Tumby, Woodstide, Lincolnshire, March 1967, by Toxic Chemical's Section, Nature Conservancy, Monks Wood, Supplied by Monsanto Ltd,
Reagents Dimethylformamide (DMF) Hexane
Florisil
Acetic acid, glacial
Nitric acid
Sulphuric acid
Acetone
Sodium sulphate
Redistilled under vacuum at 50C.
Petroleum fraction SBP 60-70.
Redistilled and fraction boiling between
collected.
Synthetic silicic acid - magnesia adsorbent
manufactured by Ploridin Co. Activated. Heat to 120C overnight.
.
Deactivated. Activate as above, cool and
add 3% w/v distilled water. (See Appendix)
Analytical Reagent Grade,
Analytical Reagent Grade, SG 1.42 Analytical Reagent Grade, SG - 1,84
'
Redistilled.
.
General Purpose Reagent, anhydrous, granular:
washed with hexane prior to use.
Extraction and "clean-up11 of samples for gas-liquid
chromatography - mass spectral analysis
Fish Oil
The crude herring oil (220 g) was dissolved in 500 ml of hexane
and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate.
Eggs The total egg weight was 67 g and the final hexane extract volume prior to the DMF partition was 100 ml.
DSW 152663
STLCOPCB4040007
-6-
Chromatographic "clean-up"
.
Fish Oil
The solution in hexane was concentrated to-50 ml and percolated
through a column 1 cm wide containing 20 g of activated Florisil.
The column was eluted with hexane until there was no further elution
of peaks corresponding to those occurring in the first fraction of
routinely analysed samples (see Appendix A). The resulting eluate
was concentrated to 10 ml and passed down an activated Florisil column
(6 g) eluted with hexane and fractions collected until no further
peaks were eluted, as shown by GLC electron capture. This process
was repeated three times.
The hexane eluate obtained as above contains pp'-DDT and its congeners polychlorinated biphenyls, non-oxygenated "drin" insecti cides. The more polar compounds such as HEOD, endrin and heptachlor epoxide are not eluted under these conditions. The solvent was evap orated from the eluate and the residue was nitrated with a mixture of nitric and sulphuric acid 4 : 1 v/v. The acid mixture was poured into water and extracted with hexane. The resulting hexane solution was again chromatographed through activated Florisil and the eluate was evaporated to 1 ml.
Heron Egg
'
Purification of the heron egg extract, following DMF partition, was
achieved by chromatography down a deactivated Florisil column (25 g)
using hexane (150 ml) as eluent. The concentrated eluate (10 ml)
was further purified by chromatography down activated Florisil (6 g)
using hexane as eluent.
Portions of the above samples were examined by gas-liquid chroma tography with electron capture detection, micro-coulometric detection and mass spectrometric and flame ionisation detection.
Standards of Arochlor 1254 were also examined by GLC with the same column conditions and detection procedures.
DS\N 152664
STLCOPCB4040008
-7-
Gag chromatographic operating conditions for electron capture detection and micro-coulometric detection were as follows
. Instrument: Column:
Inlet pressure: Temperature: Carrier Gas: Electron capture detector:
Microcoulometric detector:
Electrolyte Oxygen flow rate:
Pye 104
152 cm x 0.3 cm glass tube packed
with 3.8% SE30 on Diatoport S. 18 psi, 185C. .
Oxygen free Nitrogen. 63 Ni source with pulsed DC supply
and 150 microsecond pulse interval. Inlet temperature 200C
Furnace temperature 900C
70% glacial acetic acid : 3% water.
60 ml/minute
.
The GLC/mass spectrometer operating conditions were:-
Instrument;
Chromatographic column:
Carrier gas: Flow rate Temperature Ionisation voltage
Pye 104 chromatograph with flame ionisation detector and 1 : 1 split
between detector.and mass spectrometer, an AEI MS 12.
152 cm x 0.3 cm glass column packed with 2% Silicone SE30 and 0.2%
Epikote 1001 on 85-100 mesh
Diatoport S.
Helium
`
40 ml/minute 184C
70 volts..
DSW 152665
STLCOPCB4040009
-8-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Chromatograms of extracts of heron egg and herring oil and Arochlor 1254' obtained by gas-liquid chromatography and electron capture detec tion are given in Figures 2-4 respectively. The chromatograms obtained by microcoulometric detection are given in Figures 5-7. These show that many of the components of the live samples respond both to electron _ capture and microcoulometric detection and are probably halogenated compounds.
Mass spectral - GLC examination was carried out using a gas chroma
tograph with a SE30 column identical to that used for electron capture,
the gas chromatograph waB coupled to a MS12 mas spectrometer with .
a Watson-Biemann separator. The chromatogram was recorded with a flame
ionisation detector such that there was a 1:1 gas flow split between
the detector and the separator. The chromatograms obtained are given
in Figures 8-10 and portions of the mass spectra in Figures 11-13.
The extracts were also examined by thin layer chromatography
and the R^ values obtained together with those of various chlorinated
insecticides are given in Table 2,
.
The isotopes of chlori*ne, Cl35 and Cl37 , occur in a ratio of
3 to 1 (precisely 75.4 : 24.6) and a compound containing one Cl atom
per molecule will exhibit a doublet parent peak one doublet- corresponding
to an ion with a Cl chlorine atom of mass 35 and -the other to an ion
with a chlorine atom mass 37. Further, the intensity of these peaks
will be in the ratio of 3:1. Generally the expression for the probability of ions of the type R Cl3n5_a Clf3l7 is:-
Tdror (0-75>n"a <*25>a
(where n * number of chlorine atoms per ion). Using this expression it is possible to calculate the number and relative intensity of the peaks in the group due to a chlorinated ion existing in these several isotopic forms. This is illustrated in Figure 13 and illustrates
DSW 152666
STLCOPCB4040010
-9 -
how the number of chlorine atoms per ion may be determined from a characteristic peak pattern, The assignment of the chlorine atoms* per molecule and the molecular weight for compounds in each peak is given in Table 3 and the number of Cl atoms associated with each peak is illustrated in Figures 7-9, From the results obtained there can be no doubt that the interference encountered in the determination of organochlorine insecticides was due to polychlorinated biphenyls,
A comparison of the relative retention values of Arochlor 1254, heron egg and herring oil extract and some organochlorine insecticides is given in Table 4 and this illustrates that with SE 30 it is virt ually impossible to separate the insecticides of the. DDT group from some of the components of Arochlor 1254,
The separation of Arochlor 1254 from the less polar insecticides
such as aldrin and pp'-DDE is also not possible by the technique of
thin layer adsorption chromatography, and column chromatography em
ploying adsorption is not likely to prove any more helpful. However,
the determination of organochlorine residues in environmental samples
requires that some separation procedure is employed prior to gas-
liquid chromatography. The routine analysis of samples in Tunstall
Laboratory makes use of the difference in polarity between compounds
containing the oxirane group, heptachlor epoxide, HEOD and endrin
and the non-oxygenated chlorine compounds to separate the two groups
of compounds (See Appendix), Since the non-oxygenated compounds are
eluted in the first fraction by hexane there is no interference in
the determination of oxygenated chlorine insecticides by the poly
chlorinated biphenyls. This is not the case in all analytical tech
niques for the determination of organochlorine insecticides, for example, that of the Government Chemists (13). where all the i.nsect.i
cides are eluted in one fraction. Although different stationery phases
are then used to overcome this difficulty they are not completely
successful
,
The occurrence of chlorinated biphenyls in the environment raises questions as to the source of such pollution, how long this pollution
DSW 152667
STLCOPCB4040011
\
- 10 -
has existed, its relationship to changes in particular ecosystems and the possibility of pollution by other chlorinated compounds.
The causes of pollution are less obvious but it is possible that direct discharge into the environment occurs directly into the atmos phere as in jet turbine lubrication, or directly into rivers by in dustrial waste disposal. Once in the environment the polychlorinated biphenyls are biologically very hard and will persist for some years.
Polychlorinated biphenyl pollution has not been detected or
inferred prior to 1963 but it would appear likely that it has occurred
previously. If this pollution had been recognised earlier it is likely
that there would not have been the pressure against the DDT group
of insecticides. It seems very likely that with the analytical pro
cedures employed for organochlorine insecticide determination at
that time any interference in the region of DDT would be reported
as DDT and hence in some of the predatory birds particularly fish
eating birds they appeared to have high organochlorine insecticide
. levels.
The toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls has been studied with
respect to rat and guinea-pigs
. The compounds studied would appear
to be at least as toxic as DDT. Also Risebrough, et al^^ state
that these compounds are more powerful inducers of hepatic microsomal enzymes than is DDT.
Since polychlorinated biphenyls occur in the environment it is to be expected that compounds with similar industrial usage will also occur. These include the chlorinated paraffins and the chlorin ated naphthalenes. The chlorinated naphthalenes also interfere with the determination of organochlorine insecticides.
DSW 152668
STLCOPCB4040012
- 11 -
APPENDIX 1
The determination of organochloririe insecticides in animal products
The method described is suitable for the determination of mixed insecticide residues in animal products. It is suitable for the determination of ybHC, HHDN, heptachlor, pp'-DDE, pp'-TDE, pp'-DDT, heptachlor epoxide, endrin and HEOD at concentrations of one part per hundred million in animal tissues, fats, oils and eggs. The pro cedure consists of extraction with hexane or hexane/acetone followed by clean-up with dimethylformamide., hexane partition, liquid solid chromatography on Florisil and determination of the chlorinated insecti cides by gas liquid chromatography with electron capture detection.
Method Apparatus Separating funnels
Volumetric flasks: Graduated stoppered cylinders Soxhlet extraction apparatus Filter funnel Chromatographic column:
High speed homogeniser Centrifuge Beakers
100 ml and 250 ml and 1 litre
capacity.
100 ml, 50 ml, 25 ml, 20 ml
and 10 ml capacity.
25 ml capacity.
.
4" short stem (for buffer). The column consists of thick wall glass tubing 55 cm long x 0.5 cm bore. A female S29 ball joint is fused at the bottom. The outlet of the column is made from a female S13 joint. The top of the column is connected to a S29 male joint which fits to an air line.
DSW 152669
STLCOPCB4040013
- 12
Reagents
^
` Sodium sulphate, anhydrous granular. General purpose reagent.
Wash with hexane prior to use,
Hexane petroleum fraction SBP 60-70 Redistill and collect fraction boiling between 64 and 66C,
Acetone, General purpose reagent, redistilled.
Sand, Horticultural Sharp sand. Hexane washed.
Diethyl ether. Analytical reagent. Florisil 60-100 mesh. Activate by heating overnight at 120C.
Deactivate by addition of 3Z v/w distilled water into conical
flash stopper and shake for 30 minutes.
Distilled water. Potassium oxalate. General purpose reagent.
Methanol, Analytical reagent grade.
All reagents and apparatus should be examined by gas liquid chromatography of a hexane extract to ensure freedom from contamination
Extraction
Animal Fats, muscle tissue, kidney, liver and brain.
Freeze sample by storing in polystyrene box with Cardice. With
sharp knife chop up frozen sample, mix well and weigh 4 g into
a 250 ml beaker. Add 10 g of sand and grind with a heavy glass
rod with flattened end, add sufficient sodium sulphate and
grind again to give a dry uniform granular mass. Warm the ground
material with successively 50, 20, and then 20 ml portions of
hexane on a steam bath until it is gently boiling, stir carefully,
decant the solution through a Whatman No. 1 filter paper into
a 100 ml volumetric flask and carefully transfer the solid to O
the filter paper. Wash the beaker, filter paper and its contents
with a further 10 ml warm hexane, cool the flask and its contents
to 20C and make up to the mark with hexane.
Treat a 25 ml solution of this by DMF partition.
Butter, Dissolve 1 g of clarified butter in 10 ml hexane, Trans fer to 1.00 ml separating funnel using 15 ml hexane for transfer and washing. Carry out DMF partition on this solution.
DSW 152670
STLCOPCB4040014
- 13 -
Eggs,. If the eggs are fluid incorporate sufficient sodium sulphate to give a granular mass. If the contents are dehydrated and
solid grind them with sand and sodium sulphate. Transfer the granular mass to a suitable extraction thimble and extract for
26 hours in a Soxhlet extractor with acetone - hexane (1 + 2). Cool the extract, filter through a filter paper containing sodium
sulphate into a concentrator filter with a tube. Concentrate '
to a small volume and transfer to 100 ml flask. Make up to volume
9
with hexane. Take the volume equivalent of 1 g weight for DMF partition.
Fish Oil. Dissolve 4 g of fish oil in hexane in graduated 100 ml
flask and make up to volume with hexane. Take 25 ml for DMF
partition.
..
Milk1. Weigh 100 g milk into a 250 ml beaker. Transfer the sample to a 1 litre separating funnel. Rinse the beaker several times . with water and add the water washings to the milk. Add 10 ml of 5% aqueous potassium oxalate solution and mix. Add 200 ml diethyl ether and shake for 2 minutes. Add 100 ml redistilled hexane and shake for one minute. Allow the mixture to stand for ten minutes discard the lower layer, stand for a further minute and discard the remaining aqueous layer. Filter the solvent layer through a 4" funnel plugged with glass wool which is covered with granular sodium sulphate into a 600 ml beaker. Wash the separating funnel with three volumes of hexane 15 ml, and filter into the 600 ml beaker. Evaporate to dryness, dissolve the residue in 10 ml hexane and transfer to 100 ml volumetric flask. Make up to volume with hexane. Add 10 ml of this solution and 15 ml hexane to a 100 ml separating funnel for the DMF partition procedure.
Liquid-liquid partition process Place 10 ml of DMF in a 100 ml separating funnel. Allow a little of this to run through into the lower 100 ml separating funnel such that both taps are lubricated by clean DMF. This ensures that any leaking taps can be discarded without loss of sample. Place 25 ml
DSW 152671
STLCOPCB4040015
of the hexane extract into the upper 100 ml separating funnel, shake vigorously for 1 minute, allow the layers to separate and run off the DMF phase into the lower 100 ml separating funnel. Shake the hexane extract with two further 10 ml of DMF and add these to the first DMF extract. Discard the hexane phase. Wash the combined extracts with 10 ml of hexane saturated with DMF and run off the DMF layer into a 250 ml separating funnel. Shake the aqueous sodium sulphate/DMF/hexane mixture and allow to settle for 40 minutes. Run off the aqueous phase and wash the hexane with two further 20 ml of distilled water. Dry the hexane extract by using a small quantity of sodium sulphate before the next clean up procedure.
Liquid-solid chromatography Using a plug of hexane washed cotton wool as a support add to the column 3 g of Florisil and top this.with 1 cm of sodium sulphate.
Run on to the column the hexane solution obtained from the DMF partition and wash in with a little hexane. Using a 25 ml graduated flask as a receiver elute with hexane to a volume of 20 ml. Replace the receiver with another 25 ml flask and elute with 25 ml of 10% diethyl ether in hexane.
These two eluates are examined by gas-liquid chromatography. Hie first fraction will contain any yBHC, heptachlor, HHDN, pp'-DDE, pp*-DDD and pp'-DDT which may be present in the original extract. The second fraction contains any heptachlor epoxide, HEOD and endrin which may be present.
Gas-liquid chromatography
Instrument conditions for 1st fraction:
Column:
1 m x 3 ran id, all glass
Column packing:
3,8% SE30 on Diatoport S 80-100 mesh
Carrier gas: Inlet pressure:
oxygen free 1.75 kg/cm^
Detector:
. Electron capture
Temperature:
184C
DSW 152672
STLCOPCB4040016
\
- IS -
Instrument conditions for 2nd fraction:
Column:
1.5 ix 3 m i.d. all glass
Column packing:
2% Oronite polybutene + 0.2%
Epikote 1001 on Celite 85-100
mesh
Carrier gas: Inlet pressure:
N* oxygen free 1.75 kg/cm^
Detector:
Electron capture
Temperature:
184C
Standard solutions: Standard 1 (a) A hexane solution containing 0.004 y/ml yBHC, 0.004 y/ml HHDN and 0.04 y/ml pp'-DDT.
Standard 1 (b)
A hexane solution containing 0.004 y/ml heptachlor
0.02 y/ml pp'-DDE and 0.02 y/ml pp'-DDD.
Standard 2. A hexane solution containing 0,01 y/ml heptachlor epoxide, 0.02 y/ml HEOD and 0,02 y/ml endrin.
Method
.
Inject 40 yl of sample into the appropriate column and record the
chromatogram. The sample then may be diluted or concentrated to give
a peak of the same height as in appropriate standard.
Due to the decrease ih sensitivity of the detector during pro longed running it is impracticable to construct a calibration curve for the estimation of insecticide present. To overcome this difficulty it is essential to inject a standard after every two samples and to mean the two standard peak heights for calculating the concentration of the insecticide in the egg samples between the standard samples.
DSW 152673
STLCOPCB4040017
5 - 16 -
Calculation: Let mass of egg
B wg
Initial volume of hexane containing W g
M 100 ml'
Volume taken for clean up
m 5 ml
Final volume after clean up m Z ml (20 or 25 ml)
Volume of standard * volume
of sample injected
B 40 pi
Concentration of standard
- C y/ml
Dilution or concentration
m D`
of final volume
'Z
Mean peak height of standard at
B ps cm
Peak height of sample at R^,
PE cm
Then ppm of each component
B PE x 100 ---------------------- --------------- ppm
Pg x W x 4 x Z
ds\n 152674
STLCOPCB4040018
- 17 REFERENCES
1. Lovelock, J., (1961), Nature, 189, 729.
2. y Roburn, J,, (1965), Analyst, jK>, 467.
.
.
3. Eidelman, M., (1963), Jo Asso Off. Agric Chem., .46, 182.
4. Harrison, R. B., (1966), J. Sci. Fdo Agrico, JL7, 10,,
'
5o Jensen, S., (1966), v New Scientist, ^2, 612,
6o Holmes, D. C,, Simmons, J, U, and Tatton, J. O'G., (1967), * Nature, 216, 227.
7. j Holden, A. V. and Marsden, K,, (1967), Nature, 216, 1274.
8. Robinson, J.
_
9. Koeman, J., (in press).
10. / Risebrough, R. W,, et al, (1968), Nature, 220, 1098.
11. Quayle, A,, (1956), Thornton Research Report R.722.
12. Weingarten, H., et al, (1962), Analytics. Chim, Acta,, 26, 391,
STLCOPCB4040019
\
18 13, </ de Faubert Maunder, M, J,, et al, (1964),
Analyst, 89, 168, 14, Simmons, J, H,, and Tatton, J, O'G., (1967),
J, Chromatography, j7, 253, 15. Treon, J. F., et al, (1956),
American Industrial Hygiene Assoc, Quarterly, 17:2, 204,
A5 osnN
STLCOPCB4040020
- 19 -
Table 1 - Assignment of molecular weioht and number of chlorine atoms per molecule to components separated by gas-1lould chromatography
Peak No.
R.R.V. DDE " 1.0
Aroclor 1254
1 0.42 2 0,50
3 0.53 4 0.70 5 .0,82 6 1.00 7 1.07 8 1.30 9 1.58 10 1.85 II 2,25
Fish Oil
I 2 3 4 5
6
7 8 9 10 11
0.42 0.50 0.53 0.70 0.82
1.00
1.07 1.30 1.58 1.85 2.22
Heron Eg_q
I 2 3 4
5
6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13
0.35 0.45 0.69 0.81
1.00
1.30 1.52 1.84 2.05 2.42 2.76 3.07 3.75
No. of Cl2
atoms/mol
3 and 4 4 5 5 5 5 and 6 5 and 6 5 and 6 6 6 6 and 7
4 N.D.
5 5 4
5 6 6 6
7 7
.
3. 4 4 and 5
4
5 6 and 5 and 4
6 and 5 6 6
7 and 6 and 5 8 and 7 and 6 7 and 6 and 5 7 and 6 and 5
N.D, = Not determined.
Molecular weight
256 - 290 290 324 324 324 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
290 N.D. 324 324 316 = DDE 324 N.D. 358 N.D. 392 392
256 290 324
316 - DDE 324 358 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D.
DSW 152677
{'
STLCOPCB4040021
\ - 20 -
Table 2 - Rf values of Aroclor 1254, oroanocnlorine insecticides and heron eoa extract
Solvent: Hexane Adsorbent Alumina Type E (Merck)
Aroclor 1254 Heron Egg pp'-DDE pp'-DDT HHDN Heptachlor yBh'C Endrin HEOD
Rf
0,63 0.55 - 0.76 (Streak)
0.62 0.50 0.67 0.59 0.26 0.20 0.15
Table 1 - Relative retention volumes DDE 1.0 of Aroclor 1254, Heron egg. Herring Oil and some oroanochlorine Insecticide
Microcoulometric Detection
Column: 4 ft x
3*8% SE30 on Dlatoport S.
- T - 190C
yBHC HHDN Heptachlor HEOD pp'-DDE Endrin pp'-TDE pp'-DDT
0.27 0.45
0.55 0.96 1.00
1.09 1.28
1.77
Aroclor 1254
0.50 0.57 0.75 0.95 1.07 1.22 1.56 1.70
Fish Oil
0.40 0.54 O.72 0.79 1.00 1.25 1.45 1.71 2.02 2.28
Heron Egg
0.36 0.51 0.61 0.85 1.00 1.23 1.40 1.76 2.02
DSW 152678
STLCOPCB4040022
Cl
ALDRIN
Cl Cl
HEPTACHLOR
ci
LINDANE
Cl Cl
HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE
Fig 1 Structural Formulae of Nine Chlorinated Hydrocarbon Pesticides DSW 1526/9
STLCOPCB4040023
Fig 3 G.L.C.-E.C. Chromatogram Herring oil extract DSW 152680
STLCOPCB4040024
Fig 4 G.L.C.-E.C. Chromatogram Aroclor 1264 DSW 152681
STLCOPCB4040025
DDE
Fig 5 G.L.C.-M.C. Chromatogram Heron egg extract
Fig 6 G.L.C.-M.C. Chromatogram Herring oil extract
DSW 152682
STLCOPCB4040026
Fig 7 G.LC.-M.C. Chromatogram Aroclor 1254
DSW 152683
STLCOPCB4040027
Fig 8 Heron egg F.I.D.-M.S. split
Fig 9 Herring oil F.I.D.-M.S. split
Fig 10 Arodor 1254 F.t.D.-JVI.S. split
STLCOPCB4040028
Heron egg mass spectrum of peak 2 (SCI)
Fig 11 Mass Spectrum of Herott egg
0S\N ^52685
STLCOPCB4040029
m (sci)
Herring oil mass spectrum of peak 4
Fig 12 Mass Spectrum of Herring oil DSW 152686
STLCOPCB4040030
288 (4C.I)
324 (SCI) -
Fig 13 Mass Spectrum of Aroclor 1254
DSW 152687
STLCOPCB4040031
TLGR.0013.69
ORGANOCHLORINE COMPOUNDS OTHER THAN INSECTICIDES IN. THE ENVIRONMENT
DISTRIBUTION
Central Offices, The Hague
. MF/02
Suggested further distribution by SIRM
RST KSLA
Central Offices, London
.
CMKD/6114
MDL
MKC/24
RSTL/3
MKD/23 - Mr. A. Tunstall
MKD/21 - Mr. G. G. Price
MKD/21 - Mr. J. W. Pearson
RSL/54
.
.
Laboratories
Egham Laboratories Thornton R.C.
Woodstock ARC
Dr, R. A. E. Galley Mr. V. W. David Analytical Chemistry Division Technical Information Division Technical Service Laboratory
7
1 1
2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1
1 .I
'
1 1 1 2 1
DSW 152688
STLCOPCB4040032
I I I
V A A. 0334/836/DE09/1146/1/DH/QZQ
WR RICHARD
ST LOUIS
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF BIODEGRADATION OF DI AND TRI CHLORINATED ,
ISOMES SHOWS DEGREDATION OF SELECTED ISOMERS WHEN SUPORTED BY /
BIPHENYL AS TRIGGER SUBSTRATE STOP CONFIRMATION OF THESE .
'
RESULTS-SHOULD DE AVAILABLE WITHIN TWO WEEKS ADDITIONAL TESTS
ON 1242 ARE BEING INITIATED
jf
.
HA VODDEN RUABON
9 DEC
1145
. ( ( o
t
r
1 sk OJ 03 > Ou oo o o* o3 > 5" VI TJ 0 O a -t
r S 5t I
r j; r
DH83 6/DE09/1146
| |i| iitiiiij|iii(y)ni|i;p,ii>"i nijwiwi
...
ir
'' iw.y..'.^"'rT y^**1--*'
DSW 152689
i f W