Document M4J7O03e7Jb2xEez66Ya730jx

In re: A ll Asbestos Litigation Filed by Simmons Cooper, Circuit Court, Third Judicial District, Madison Cty., IL ; 11/17/05. In re: A ll Asbestos Litigation Filed by Simmons Cooper, Circuit Court, Third Judicial District, Madison Cty., IL ; 11/17/05. PRICING & TERMS Listed below are five scenarios for standard brake position, four of which were proposed by IH and one proposed by Eaton. SUMMARY OF SCENARIOS A. I'taintalning current business split B. Obtaining standard position at Springfield and Chatham C. Business split awarding Eaton standard position on premium models only 0.. Business split which gives Eaton standard position on 9670 and S series tractors only E. Business split which gives Eaton standard position at Springfield Scenario E is proposed by Eaton and involves Eaton being standard on Springfield production. Eaton's proposed pricing for each of the scenarios is as follows: (A) 1986 1967 1988 1989 16.5 X 7 L.W. 16.5 X 7 Cast 16.5 X 6 18 X 7 $ 91.99 95.07 89.36 197.64 $ 89.23 92.21 86.68 191.71 $ 87.45 90.37 84.95 187.88 $ B6.57 89.47 84.10 186.00 15 X A 16.5 X 5 16.5 X 6 92.20 98.A6 100.92 89.43 95.50 97.89 87.65 93.59 95.94 86.77 92.66 94.98 PRODUCTIVITY 0% 3% 2% 1% (B) 16.5 X 7 L.W. 16.5 X 7 Cast 16.5 X 6 18 X 7 $ 15 X A 16.5 X 5 16.5 X 6 PRODUCTIVITY 1986 8A.A7 87.29 82.05 181.A7 88.38 90. AO 92.66 0% 1987 $ 81.93 84.67 79.59 176.03 85.72 87.69 89.88 3% 1988 $ 79.47 82.13 77.20 170.75 83.15 85.06 87.19 3* 1989 $ 77.09 79.66 74.89 165.62 80.66 82.51 84.57 3* (2) EAB 066837