Document M0xdRE0yaywVea5o11Zwk2XV

r BULLSTIN Ii O. 4f.2 StilIJEC!, Stll<V'l'n'- OSHA WEUNG lttgt'In:J:E:lTS :m Hove:mber6. 1972 ve aent out a request for il:l.for=atiQll. aliI! i.tl1:erprl!t.al:1Ctl of the OSll.Aregulations ton.carning labelil:>g requinl1lletltll for asbe$f.oll type brake lininr. ell dutch fat:1l>g ..hipmenta, \/here aubsequetu: pc:hilling (cuttitlg, rrinding, ddlUug. chamfering, groCll'i1tg) was likl!l,. to be dOD"" theae prOdUl::tll. lwl!nry-five questionnaires \fare lI!!Drout. Eleven replies ",ere reeeived. lhrpliu ve:l'e reee1ved frw a reasonable ero$lI-aeetion c>f the llIelllbership. A:; the repliu "en eotl.fidlmtial. the forms sublilitted by the llI8lllherahave been destroyed. The 5UTYeywill be a tool W1ed at ehe next Ashur". St:ucl:y Co1lr:tI:irteelie.tint. It is S\lgge.sted that lII8llll>erollf the Cmtt::d.ttee auen,Un! the Dext meeeing be versed in their own ColllpllDy'. POdtiOll 0lI Illbel1ng. eel A$bestOll Study COllllltlttee E. V. Drtalane. Exe<::lltive Director -_.. PFMSI OClB PLAINTIFF'S I EXHIBIT WV-66626 WV-06026  ""'''''ASllESTOS S':t'U'i:>YCOM:'lI'1'Ttt - LAlln.ING '2S Re<!uesu 11/6/12., 11 repl1e$ 12/6/72) gu"stion 1.1 ,,01<1 llWel tel'lacelHne ship",ent:S 1.1 IiOI' lahe.l O.E.Y.. snipments 1.1 Plan to label r .... placem..nt shipl!Ieots? 2.2- nan to label O..Y., sh1plent$? 3.1 Interpret asH.'. to require label:lng vhere sllbsequetlt machining 1-11- e:q>ected? ill l!.!:. Undecided 1 , 1 s, sa a , , 1 lint Applieable 1 1 C_nt '.J A. Hemer replyUlg n:S, SlOatu: "If suc:b praetiee is required anlifo'!" adapted,by 001." t. ~1.I!JlCreerplying ..NO. seates: "Our III.Ilter:lalhas be"" treated with a binder - therefore 1>0raw asbestos is present." C. ~jl!llii>er replying US, states: "WI!wi.ll label if it h deupu-nlJd that cu.t bOlldiug Or b:ll>d1ng _tensl does not lM'H the st.andare."