Document LyOK2rvapLjLzK5boV7X8ZOX

Exhibit B GARLOCK ASBESTOS-CONTAINING PRODUCT LIST PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT G-543 STYLE PRODUCT 7021 7705 900T 901 902 903 8038 850 1000W 7003 7006 7008 7009 702 IT 7022 7028 70___ 7226 7228 7405 7735 7738 7819 7844 8746 8748 8053 8057 8058 9531 Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet with Wire Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE TYPE ASBESTOS BINDER TYPE Chrysotile Crocidolite Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 85-86 85 75-85 76-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR Neoprene Neoprene SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR SBR CESSATION OF MANUFACTURING YEAR Still Manufacturing 1983 Still Manufacturing Still Manufacturing Still Manufacturing 1991 1991 Still Manufacturing Still Manufacturing 2000 2000 2000 1988 Still Manufacturing 1957 1991 1991 1988 Still Manufacturing 2000 1992 1991 1991 1981 2000 Still Manufacturing 1991 2000 1991 2000 Page 1 of 8 STYLE PRODUCT 9532 Compressed Sheet 9533 Compressed Sheet 950 Compressed Sheet / Gasket 961 Compressed Sheet / Gasket 1674 Compressed Sheet 7098 Compressed Sheet 7772 Compressed Sheet 270 Compressed Sheet 300 Compressed Sheet 400 Compressed Sheet 200 Compressed Sheet 424 Compressed Sheet 425L Compressed Sheet 450 Compressed Sheet 459W1 Compressed Sheet 480 Compressed Sheet 480L Compressed Sheet 4101 Compressed Sheet 4102 Compressed Sheet 4121 Compressed Sheet 4122 - Compressed Sheet .4124 Compressed Sheet 1202 Compressed Sheet 1400 Compressed Sheet 7085 Compressed Sheet 8800 Compressed Sheet 7070 Compressed Sheet 7278 Compressed Sheet 7346 Compressed Sheet 7486 Compressed Sheet 7640 Compressed Sheet 7647 Compressed Sheet ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE TYPE ASBESTOS BINDER TYPE CESSATION OF MANUFACTURING YEAR Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 2000 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 2000 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR Still Manufacturing Chrysotile 75-85 SBR Still Manufacturing Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 2000 Chrysotile 75-85 Neoprene 1974 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1986 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 2000 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 2000 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1996 Chrysotile 75-85 Neoprene 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1996 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1996 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1992 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1992 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1992 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1992 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1992 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1960 Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75-85 SBR 2000 ? 1962 Chrysotile 75-85 Nitrite 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 ? 1956 Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75-85 Polacrylate 1991 ? 1991 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1956 Chrysotile 75-85 SBR 1956 Page 2 of 8 STYLE PRODUCT 7860 (red) 7651 7679 8500 8554 Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet 8614 8688 9529 9582 8806 8388 8553 9151 9164 9731 9055 9209 9256 8082 8090 8126 8285 (red) 804 8400 7904 8940 8157 555 Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compress Asb, Direct Compress Asb. Direct Compress Asb. Direct Compress Asb. Direct Compress Asb. Direct / Gasket Compress Asb. Direct / Gasket Unaured Style 7021 Compressed Sheet SW Cane Treated Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet Compressed Sheet / Gasket Flue Duct Expansion Joint Chevron Packing Chevron Packing Chevron Packing Spiral Wound Gasket ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE TYPE ASBESTOS BINDER TYPE Chrysotile 75-85 SBR CESSATION OF MANUFACTURING YEAR 1991 Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 75-85 SBR ? Natural Poly neoprene ? SBR ? Neoprene Neoprene SBR SBR SBR SBR Neoprene SBR Natural SBR SBR SBR SBR 1991 1956 1972 1991 1956 1951 2000 1991 1980 1991 1959 1956 1991 1960 2000 1962 1958 2000 1956 1979 1956 Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75 40-50 40-50 40-50 10 SBR UNK. Teflon Teflon Teflon Paper 1991 1980 1981 1981 1981 1988 X:\MAHONEV\Ganock-Anchor.gefl\Texas\Gartock Product Ust.l.wpd Page 3 of 8 STYLE 17 PRODUCT Alabostine Packing 87 Extra Diagonal Packing 111 Rubber Pump Valves 114 Wire Wound Coil Packing 115 Beaver Packing Round 116 Wire Wound Ring Packing 117 Beaver Packing Round 127 Compressor Packing 144 Palmyra Coil Packing 150 High Pressure Spiral Packing 161 Molded Valve Ring 163 Molded Valve Ring 166 Molded Valve Ring 176 Hot Oil Packing 220 Compressor Coil Packing 221 Compressor Spiral Packing 222 Compressor Spiral Packing ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE BINDER/ CESSATION OF TYPE ASBESTOS LUBRICANT MANUFACTURING YEAR Chrysotile 87 Natural Rubber 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Petrolatum Wax & Graphite 1980 Chrysotile 25 Chrysotile 17 Natural Rubber SBR, Paraffin & Graphite 1981 1961 Chrysotile Unk. Petrolatum & 1957 Graphite Chrysotile 20 SBR, Paraffin & Graphite 1957 Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 42 51 Unk. Chrysotile Unk. Graphite SBR Natural Rubber & Glycerin Natural Rubber, SBR, Glycerin & Graphite 1965 1980 1980 1980 Chrysotile 32 Paraffin & Graphite 1980 Chrysotile 64 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite Chrysotile Unk. Chrysotile 79 Nitrite & Graphite Natural Rubber & Graphite 1983 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1976 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1976 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1976 Page 4 of 8 STYLE PRODUCT ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE BINDER / CESSATION OF TYPE ASBESTOS LUBRICANT MANUFACTURING YEAR 230 Square Braided Packing Crocidolite 55-69 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite 231 Square Braided Ring Crocidolite 55-69 Petrolatum & Graphite 1980 233 Derby Coil Packing Chrysotile 55-69 Petrolatum 1980 234 Rolopac Coil Packing Chrysotile 57 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite 235 Derby Ring Packing Chrysotile 55-60 Petrolatum 1980 237 Thorndyke Coil Packing Chrysotile 47-50 Glycerin & Graphite 1980 238 Thorndyke Coil Packing Chrysotile 47-50 Glycerin & Graphite 1980 239 Rolopac Coil Packing Chrysotile 54 Petrolatum & 1958 Graphite 243 Derby Coil Packing Round Chrysotile 56 Petrolatum & 1968 Graphite 244 Rolopac Coil Packing Chrysotile 55 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite 245 Derby Ring Packing Chrysotile 56 Petrolatum & 1958 Graphite 248 Mill Coil Packing Chrysotile Unk. Copper Wire 1959 249 Rolopac Ring Packing Wire Chrysotile Unk. Petrolatum 1957 251 Mill Ring Packing Chrysotile Unk. Copper Wire 1958 252 Furnace Door Packing Chrysotile 85 Copper Wire 1980 256 Expansion Joint Packing Chrysotile 75 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite 257 Cold Oil Packing Chrysotile Unk. Glycerin 1957 258 Blue Asbestos Packing Chrysotile 75 Vegetable Lubricant & Graphite 1962 266 Rolopac Packing Chrysotile 60-72 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite 356 "0" Center Forged Packing Coil Chrysotile Unk. SBR & Glycerin 1965 357 "0" Center Forged Packing Chrysotile Unk. SBR, Graphite & Glycerin 1965 358 "0" Center Forged Packing Chrysotile Unk. SBR & Glycerin 1965 Page 5 of 8 STYLE 377 PRODUCT Metal Marine Packing 530 Chevron Packing 531 Chevron Packing 605 Woven Asbestos Sheet Packing 610 Asbestos Gasketing Tubular 612 Asbestos Tape 625 Autoline Sheet Packing 644 Pacific Semi Metallic Coil Packing 730 Lattice Braided Packing 731 Lattice Braided Packing 732 Lattice Braided Packing 733 Lattice Braided Packing 734 736 813 813 - a 900 908 Lattice Braided Packing Lattice Braid Blue Asbestos Packing Molded Cups Power Rules Gears Molded Cups--Power Reverse Gears Compressed Asbestos Sheet Packing Dry Plastic Packing 909 Dry Plastic Packing ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE BINDER / CESSATION OF TYPE ASBESTOS LUBRICANT MANUFACTURING YEAR Chrysotile Unk. SBR & Graphite 1980 Chrysotile 45-50 SBR & Mineral Oil 1974 Chrysotile 45-50 Neoprene 1974 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1981 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber & Graphite 1981 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber & Graphite (Wire?) 1981 Chrysotile 85 Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Lubricant & Graphite 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Lubricant & Graphite 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Oil 1980 & Graphite Chrysotile Unk. Petrolatum & 1980 Graphite Chrysotile Unk. Glycerin 1980 Crocidolite Unk. Petrolatum & 1965 Graphite Chrysotile 45-50 SBR 1980 Chrysotile 45-50 Neoprene 1980 Chrysotile 85 SBR 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Chrysotile Unk. Neoprene & SBR Neoprene & SBR 1980 1980 Page 6 of 8 STYLE 910 PRODUCT Dry Plastic Packing 917 Pleated Lead Foil 918 926 927 928 930 931 1200 Lead Fill Packing Asbestos Cord Plastallic Packing Plastallic Packing Plastallic Packing Plastallic Packing Plastallic Packing Power Reverse Gear Cyl 1700 2200 5008 5246 Locomotive Cob Look Packing Locomotive Air Pump Packing Gas Generator Door Packing Furnace Door Packing 5336 5861 7051 7085 8035 7130 Braided Lead Foil Packing Teflon" Treated Asbestos Packing Asbestos Gasketing Wire Insured Compressed Sheet / Gasket Compressed Sheet / Gasket Chlorine Valve Ring Packing 7228 7815 7954 Neoprene Compressed Asbestos Sheet Packing Chevron Packing Asbestos Tinning Machine Brushes # ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE BINDER/ CESSATION OF TYPE ASBESTOS LUBRICANT MANUFACTURING YEAR Chrysotile Unk. Neoprene & SBR 1980 Chrysotile 8 Vegetable Oil, Graphite & Lead Foil 1980 Chrysotile 28 Vegetable Oil 1980 & Graphite Lead Foil Chrysotile 28 Petrolatum 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Oil 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Oil 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Vegetable Oil 1980 Chrysotile Unk. SBR 1961 Chrysotile Unk. Molded Rubber & Graphite 1964 Chrysotile Unk. Graphite 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber 1979 Chrysotile 42 Graphite 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Jacket of Braided Copper 1980 Chrysotile 14 Graphite 1972 Chrysotile 64 Teflon 1980 Chrysotile Unk. Chrysotile Chrysotile Chrysotile 75-85 75-85 Unk. Chrysotile 8 Natural Rubber & Graphite SBR SBR SBR, Beeswax Graphite Neoprene 1991 2000 1974 1981 Still Manufacturing Chrysotile 40-50 Chrysotile Unk. Natural Rubber None 1991 1975 Page 7 of 8 STYLE PRODUCT 8240 Neoprene Asbestos Gasketing 8380 Neoprene Asbestos Tinning Machine 8525 Neoprene Asbestos Tinning Machine Brushes 5298 Asbestos Packing 5299 Asbestos Packing 5880 Asbestos Packing 5884 Asbestos Packing ASBESTOS PERCENTAGE BINDER/ CESSATION OF TYPE ASBESTOS LUBRICANT MANUFACTURING YEAR Chrysotile Chrysotile Unk. Unk. Neoprene None 1980 1970 Chrysotile Unk. None 1980 Crocidolite Crocidolite Crocidolite Crocidolite 60 50 60 50 Teflon Lube Teflon Lube Teflon Teflon Lube 1980 1980 1980 1980 X.\MAHONEY\Gartock*Anchor.gen\Texas\Gartock Product List 2 Revised.wpd Page 8 of 8 v. GARLOCKINC, et al,, JURISDICTION Plaintiffs, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) GARLOCK INC'S EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURE GARLOCK INC ("Garlock") discloses the following expert witnesses who may be called to testify at trial: CARL MANGOLD. C.I.H. Mr. Mangold is an industrial hygienist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to issues involving reentrainment and fiber drift. He may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. He may complete asbestos exposure assessments on individual plaintiffs. ROBERT GAY. Ph.D. Mr. Gay is an environmental consultant and chemist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to issues involving reentrainment and fiber drift. He may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. 6x - D DONNA M. RINGO. C.I.H. Ms. Ringo is a Certified Industrial Hygienist. She may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. She may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. She may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. She may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. She may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. She may complete asbestos exposure assessments on individual plaintiffs. LARRY LIUKONEN. C.I.H. Mr. Liukonen is a Certified Industrial Hygienist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. He may complete asbestos exposure assessments on individual plaintiffs. FREDERICK WILLIAM BOELTER. C.I.H. Mr. Boelter is an industrial hygienist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to issues involving reentrainment and fiber drift. He may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. He may complete asbestos exposure assessments on individual plaintiffs. JOHN SPENCER. C.I.H. Mr. Spencer is an industrial hygienist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to issues involving reentrainment and fiber drift. He may testify as to work practices regarding various types of occupations using products that contained asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. He may complete asbestos exposure assessments on individual plaintiffs. J. LEROY BALZER. PH.D.. C.I.H. Mr. Balzer is a Certified Industrial Hygienist. He may give testimony regarding the level of fiber release, if any, from gasket and packing products in the occupational setting. He may testify regarding threshold limit values and permissible exposure levels as promulgated by private organizations and government agencies. He may testify as to issues involving reentrainment and fiber drift. He may testify as to work practices regarding asbestos. He may testify as to the applicability of the OSHA and EPA's guidelines as they relate to various types of products including gaskets and packings. He may testify as to exposure that may result from the use of other types of asbestos products. ROBERT SAWYER. M.D. Dr. Sawyer may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Sawyer's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical literature concerning asbestos-related disease. STANLEY FIEL. M.D. Dr. Fiel may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Fiel's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical literature concerning asbestos-related disease. JAMES CRAPO. M.D. Dr. Crapo may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Crapo's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical literature concerning asbestos-related disease. ILAN ALLAN FEINGOLD. M.D. Dr. Feingold may testily, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Feingold's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical literature concerning asbestos-related disease. ROBERT W. MORGAN. M.D.. S.M. HYG. Dr. Morgan may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Morgan's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the literature concerning asbestos-related disease. PETER BARRETT. M.D. Dr. Barrett is a practicing radiologist and a B-reader certified by NIOSH. His testimony will relate to his interpretation of chest films taken of the plaintiffs, as disclosed in reports produced and made available to the plaintiff. It is anticipated that Dr. Barrett will testify generally as to his interpretation of the plaintiffs chest films, the presence of any asbestos-related condition as evidenced on the chest film, and the presence of other abnormalities or conditions unrelated to any exposure to asbestos. Dr. Barrett may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. With respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of xray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether the condition is progressive and whether other disease or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Barrett's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical literature concerning asbestos-related disease. ANDREW CHURG. M.D. Dr. Churg is a board certified pathologist who may give testimony regarding the pathological diagnosis of the medical condition of any plaintiff and in the case of a deceased plaintiff, may give testimony as to the cause of death. He will further testify as to whether any given plaintiff or plaintiffs decedent had a condition or illness caused by asbestos exposure. He may also testify on the latency period related to various asbestos-related diseases and the carcinogenic properties of different types of asbestos fibers. Dr. Churg may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. MICHAEL GRAHAM. M.D. Dr. Graham is a board certified pathologist who may give testimony regarding the pathological diagnosis of the medical condition of any plaintiff and in the case of a deceased plaintiff, may give testimony as to the cause of death. He will further testify as to whether any given plaintiff or plaintiffs decedent had a condition or illness caused by asbestos exposure. He may also testify on the latency period related to various asbestos-related diseases and the carcinogenic properties of different types of asbestos fibers. Dr. Graham may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. JOHN CRAIGHEAD. M.D. Dr. Craighead is a board certified pathologist who may give testimony regarding the pathological diagnosis of the medical condition of any plaintiff and, in the case of a deceased plaintiff, may give testimony on the medical condition which caused plaintiffs death. He will further testify as to whether any given plaintiff or plaintiffs decedent had a condition or illness caused by asbestos exposure. He may also testify on the latency period related to various asbestos-related diseases and the carcinogenic properties of different types of asbestos fibers. Dr. Craighead may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. PHILIP CAGLE. M.D. Dr. Cagle is a board certified pathologist who may give testimony regarding the pathological diagnosis of the medical condition of any plaintiff and in the case of a deceased plaintiff, may give testimony as to the cause of death. He will further testify as to whether any given plaintiff or plaintiffs decedent had a condition or illness caused by asbestos exposure. He may also testify on the latency period related to various asbestos-related diseases and the carcinogenic properties of different types of asbestos fibers. Dr. Cagle may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. VICTOR ROGGLI. M.D. Dr. Victor Roggli will generally testify concerning asbestos related diseases and the effects of exposure to various asbestos-containing products upon persons in occupational settings. He may further testify regarding the epidemiology of asbestos diseases, the criteria for diagnosis of asbestos related disease, as well as the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos related diseases. He may also testify regarding asbestos-containing products, including their asbestos fiber content and use and their respective ability to cause or contribute to disease. He may further testify regarding the propensity of various asbestos fiber types to contribute to mesothelioma or other disease. He may also testify regarding the determination of the relative risks of suffering personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos in occupational settings. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to, pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer, where applicable. He may further testify on whether any asbestos related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products, government regulation applicable to these products and whether these products are unreasonably dangerous. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking and the relationship between smoking and alleged asbestos related diseases. Generally and with respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of x-ray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether a condition is progressive and whether other diseases or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Roggli's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical and scientific literature and various air sampling studies, where applicable, as well as review of medical records, chest films, and pathology materials. MARK WICK. M.D. Dr. Mark Wick will generally testify concerning asbestos related diseases and the effects of exposure to various asbestos-containing products upon persons in occupational settings. He may further testify regarding the epidemiology of asbestos related diseases, the criterial for diagnosis of asbestos related disease, as well as the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos related diseases. He may also testify regarding asbestos-containing products, including their asbestos fiber content and use and their respective ability to cause or contribute to disease. He may further testify regarding the propensity of various asbestos fiber types to contribute to mesothelioma or other disease. He may also testify regarding the determination of the relative risks of suffering personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos in occupational settings. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to, pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer, where applicable. He may further testify on whether any asbestos related diseases allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products, government regulations applicable to these products and whether these products are unreasonably dangerous. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking and the relationship between smoking and alleged asbestos related diseases. Generally and with respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of x-ray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether a condition is progressive and whether other diseases or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Wick's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical and scientific literature and various air sampling studies, where applicable, as well as review of medical records, chest films, and pathology materials. BRUCE CASE. M.D. Dr. Bruce Case will generally testify concerning asbestos related diseases and the effects of exposure to various asbestos-containing products upon persons in occupational settings. He may further testify regarding the epidemiology of asbestos diseases, the criteria for diagnosis of asbestos related disease, as well as the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos related diseases. He may also testify regarding asbestoscontaining products, including their asbestos fiber content and use and their respective ability to cause or contribute to disease. He may further testify regarding the propensity of various asbestos fiber types to contribute to mesothelioma or other disease. He may also testify regarding the determination of the relative risks of suffering personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos in occupational settings. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to, pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastrointestinal cancer, where applicable. He may further testify on whether any asbestos related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products, government regulation applicable to these products and whether these products are unreasonably dangerous. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking and the relationship between smoking and alleged asbestos related diseases. Generally and with respect to particular plaintiffs, he may testify as to review and interpretation of x-ray films, review and interpretation of pulmonary function testing, the nature and extent of any impairment or disability, whether a condition is progressive and whether other diseases or conditions are present in plaintiffs. Dr. Case's testimony will be based on his training, experience, education and review of the medical and scientific literature and various air sampling studies, where applicable, as well as review of medical records, chest films, and pathology materials. RICHARD J. LEE. Ph.D. Dr. Richard Lee is President of R.J. Lee Group, Inc. He has a Ph.D. in Theoretical Solid State Physics and his fields of specialization include phased contrast microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, computer controlled scanning electron microscopy, environmental asbestos analysis and quantitative materials characterization. He will testify regarding the appropriate analytical method (PCM) for the measurement of airborne asbestos fibers in occupational settings. He will also testify that the TEM Indirect Method is not a reliable method for measurement of exposure to airborne asbestos fibers in the occupational setting. He will also testify that the tyndallization effect is not a useful scientific tool for evaluating the amount of respirable asbestos fibers in the air. He may also critique the sampling and analytical method employed by William Longo in experiments involving Garlock gasket and packing products. HARRY PEMQPOULOS. M.D. Dr. Demopoulos will testify regarding the state of the scientific and medical knowledge concerning asbestos. His testimony may include, but is not limited to, discussions regarding the respiratory system, asbestos-related diseases and the effect of other substances on the respiratory system. Dr. Demopoulos may testify, in general, concerning asbestos-related diseases and the effects of exposure to asbestos upon persons in occupational settings, including the epidemiology of asbestos-related diseases and the criteria for diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease. He may also testify regarding the existence or non-existence of any asbestos-related disease in the plaintiffs, including, but not limited to pleural changes, asbestosis, lung cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, esophageal cancer and stomach cancer. He may also testify on whether any asbestos-related disease allegedly suffered by plaintiffs was medically or proximately caused by exposure to asbestos-containing gasket and packing products. He may also testify on the existence of a dose response relationship between exposure to asbestos and asbestos-related disease. He may also testify on increased risk of cancer issues and whether a particular plaintiff has a reasonable fear of cancer due to exposure to asbestos. He may also testify on the health consequences of smoking. Garlock reserves the right to adopt the testimony of any and all experts identified by other defendants in this case, to the extent the testimony of said expert is not inconsistent with the defenses asserted by Garlock. Garlock reserves the right to call all treating and/or consulting physicians identified in discovery and reserves the right to call any individual with knowledge of the physical or mental condition of the plaintiff. Garlock further identifies all witnesses named by any other party and reserves the right to call any such witness in their case. Respectfully Submitted, SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD. One of the Attorneys for Garlock Inc Edward J. McCambridge, Esq. William F. Mahoney, Esq. segal McCambridge singer & mahoney, ltd. One IBM Plaza - Suite 200 Chicago, Illinois 60611 (312) 645-7800 Spatial Meeting of-the....... held at.Ralnyxa.... day of. Qftfnhar .190 at... Present, the following: O.J.&arlock on the --18 th. .22.....o'clock. Presiding. The Garlock Packing Co.ajgrded to advance flOOCTTOO for experimental purposes In connection with a Rubber and Asbestos Packing with the . understanding that they could have two fifths of the Btock in a company : to be formed for manufacturing such sheet if successful' SjJA-Olfll- Mecting of tke- B.oe.Td. of Directors held nt -- .................Palmyra..' ............................. .on the. J dav of- August________________ _______ 190 J, at............ 9L..Q.Q........o'clock..............A A/. .......... ...... . .Q..J. ftarlockPresiding. J present, the following: 28' th t --Easolxed,. To move the building now used for storage and the manufacture of Asbestos 3-askets to a location East of Factory A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of The Garlock Packing Company was held at the home office of the Company, *402 East Main Street, Palmyra, New York, Tuesday, March 19, I935, at 10:30 JL.M. eastern standard time. The gross profit ratio of Snyder has Been amout 50It is anticipated that this can he somewhat increased hy diverting production to the Oarlock factory. There will also he some indirect advantage in the usage of additional quantities of asbestos yarn from the textile department. A luncheon resting of the executive committee of the board of directors was held at'the Genesee 7alley Club in Rochester, K. Y. coi fencing at 12:2'0 p.n. on Friday, July 15, i960. Hr. ltcFullen stated that he had expected to bring before the meeting a recommen dation for purchase from 3. F. Goodrich of used equipment for manufacture of compressed asbestos sheet, which Goodrich is discontinuing; and reported that final exploration of the Canadian market, usage of the equipment for which by Yale at Kincardine had been intended, will not support the project. He indicated that therefore the recommendation will not be submitted. , A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held at the office of the Corporation, Division Street, Falnyra, Kew York, on Wednesday, August I960 at 11:00 o'clock a.m., e.d.t. \ The President reported that a study is being made of ways to increase our direct sales of asbestos textiles to achieve fuller utilization of our present loom capacity required for internal use of woven asbestos. The Organization meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held at the principal office of the Corporation, Division Street, Palmyra, Hew York, on Wednesday, April 3/ 1963, at 1:30 p.m., e.s.t. -Appropriation The President requested approval of the Board for the ex penditure of the sum of $46,000 for the purpose of rebuilding certain asbestos textile equipment which had been in use continuously over a period of many years. This approval, he stated, was required in accordance with an informal policy requiring approval of the Board for expenditures in excess of $25,000. After discussion of the need for the proposed expenditure, upon motion duly made, seconded and unanimously carried the President was authorized to expend $46,000 for the purposes stated above. Asbestos Products A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Conference Room of Marine Midland Bank, 1 Marine Midland Plaza, Rochester, New York on Wednesday April 25, 1973 at 10:30 A.M., EST. At the request of the Chairman, G. P. Wiess reported that management was looking into the possibility of building a new asbestos textile mill in Quebec, Canada. Canadian Federal Government grants and a Quebec Government loan would be available for such a project. The estimated project cost to Garlock would be about $1,500,000. A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York, on Wednesday, May 30, 1973 at 10:00 A.M., EDT. Quebec Project At the Chairman's request, Mr. Wiess reported that he is working on the proposed asbestos plant project in Quebec and has sent an application for a govern ment grant. Asbestos Manufacturing was held pursuant to call of the '-narrman at tne Executive Offices of the Company at Rochester, New York, on Wednesday, November 28, 1973 at 10:00 A.M. EST. ' The Chairman led a discussion of Mr. Cook's back ground memorandum to the Board dated November 16, 1973 concerning the corporation's problems and plans relative to the manufacture of asbestos products in the United States (at Palmyra, New York), Mexico (at Mexico City), Spain (at Barcelona), and Canada (at Toronto, and planned for Sherbrooke in Quebec Province) . The Chairman explained the overall situation in the following terms. The corporation manufactures four asbestos products, compressed sheet, braid, yarn, and cloth. The manufacture of two of these products, compressed sheet and braid, does not involve to a substantial degree the re lease of particles of asbestos fiber, and hence does not create a potential problem of compliance with existing or anticipated governmental standards for the release of such particles to the atmosphere. By contrast, the manufacture of yarn and cloth does create a potential problem of compliance. At present the corporation in its manufacture of asbestos products outside the United States - that is, in Mexico, Spain, and Canada - is in compliance with the environmental standards in effect in those countries. Those standards are now less stringent than those in effect in the United States but are expected to be brought over a period of several years to levels approximating those in effect now in the United States. The corporation intends to make from time to time any changes to its foreign manufacturing facilities required in order to stay ahead of anticipated changes in foreign envdron- mental standards. As to its United States facilities, at Palmyra, the corporation is in compliance with the Federal standards promulgated under the Occupa tional Safety and Health Act and the corresponding New York State standards with respect to compressed sheet and braid, and by virtue of agreements in the nature of waivers obtained from state and federal safety authorities will be in compliance until . June 30, 1975 with respect to yarn and cloth. The corporation has two choices regarding the manufacture of yarn and cloth at Palmyra: either to make the substantial investment neces sary to bring the Palmyra facilities to full compliance by June 30, 1975, or to discontinue manufacture of yarn and cloth at Palmyra by that date. Management plans to make the latter choice and to transfer Palmyra's manufacture of yarn and cloth to the proposed new plant in Quebec, assuming that the corporation's application for a grant to assist in construction of the plant is acted upon favorably. New facilities can be equipped with the required safety features more economically than can long-existing facilities such as those at Palmyra. The Board then raised questions about the health of employees working with asbestos at Palmyra. Mr. Wiess stated that liability against the corporation has recently been found in one workmen's compen sation case of total disability of a Palmyra ex employee caused by asbestos and that two other such alleged cases are pending. In the case where liability has been found, payments of some $25,000 over five years will be due to the ex-employee for the corporation's account, and the ultimate total cost to the corporation including possible premium increases may be from $80,000 to $100,000. After discussion, the Chairman stated that the health procedures and tests administered for many years by the company doctor at Palmyra, by personnel of the Clifton Springs Hospital and Newark Medical Center, and by our insurance carrier. Employers Mutual Insurance Company of Wausau, for screening of new employees and monitoring of exposure to asbestos dust of present employees are con stantly reexamined and are believed to be adequate. n 3' I A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York on Wednesday, December 19, 1973 at 10:00 A.M. (EST) Asbestos Manufacturing The Chairman reported that management was reexamining the health procedures and tests administered at Palmyra relative to screening of new employees and monitoring of present employees working with asbestos products. A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York on Friday, January 25, 1974 at 10:00 A.M. Suit Against Asbestos Textile Institute The Chairman stated that the Corporation, which is a member of a trade association named the Asbestos Textile Institute, had received a letter dated January 18, 1974 from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, counsel to the Institute. A copy of the letter was given to each director present. The letter stated that on January 2, 1974 seven individuals who either had worked at Pittsburgh Corning Corporation's formerly operative asbestos plant at Tyler, Texas, or were spouses of such workers had brought a class action in the Federal District Court in that city against that company, its parents PPG Industries, Inc. and Corning Glass Works, Incorporated, the Industrial Health Foundation, Inc. and the Institute. The complaint charged, among other things, that the Institute impeded the flow of information con cerning the health hazards involved in asbestos manufacture and thereby contributed toward the pulmonary diseases and, in some cases, deaths of workers at the plant. The Chairman stated that there was no indication at present that Garlock can or will be brought into the suit in any way. A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York, on Friday, March 1, 1974 at 10:00 A.M. At the Chairman's request, Mr. Wiess reported that the Canadian Government had offered a grant of $182,400 outright and $276,000 as a subsidy for 92 jobs at $3,000 each, for a total of $458,000, to facilitate the Company's proposed asbestos plant in Quebec, and that he would shortly meet with the Company's consulting engineers to discuss plans. Mr. Abell suggested that an additional grant be sought from the Province of Quebec and indicated the availability of an interest subsidy for certain loans. The Chairman stated that the conditions attached to the offered grant were being studied and that the project was under active consideration. Quebec Project . A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York, on Wednesday, May 29, 1974 at 10:00 A.M. The Chairman stated that the proposed asbestos plant project in Quebec was rapidly coming to the point of decision and that the Canadian Government had in creased the size of its grant offered to the Company under the terms of a law expiring June 30, 1974 from 15% to 25% of the total capital cost. Mr. Abell stated that the Government of the Province of Quebec had funds to invest in commercial enterprises and that, if the project went forward, it might be ap propriate later in the summer to discuss with the provincial Government the possibility of its taking an equity position in the project, with the Company obtaining contracts to manage the project and to market the products. The Chairman stated that management was completing a report on the economics of the project and that he would like to convene a special meeting of the Board to consider the report and to decide whether to accept the offered grants and proceed with the project. After a discussion, the meeting was set for Monday, June 17, 1974 at 10:30 A.M. . A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York, on Monday, June 17, 1974 at 10:30 A.M. The Chairman discussed the report entitled "Asbestos Textile Facility - Sherbrooke, Quebec," dated June 10, 1974, of which a copy had been forwarded to each director prior to the meeting. Mr. Cook stated that the Company's objective was to build the best and cleanest asbestos-processing plant in the world. Mr. Gearhart recommended that a long-term contract be negotiated with an asbestos mine company to ensure the continued availability of raw material; Mr. Waggershauser stated that there was no shortage of raw material that would justify such a contract. In response to a question from Mr. Wells, Mr. McMullen stated that there was little prospect that asbestos packing would become obsolescent. Mr. McMullen stated that management favored establishing the new plant as a separate corporation and selling , 50% of the equity to the Province of Quebec. Mr. Grady discussed financing of the project, the advisability of seeking long-term fuel and electricity contracts, and the possibility of obtaining approval for remission of import duty that would normally be charged on the machinery on order from West Germany. In summary, on behalf of management Mr. McMullen proposed to the Board that it approve the project as presented, specifically, that it approve (1) acceptance of the development incentives grant offered by the Canadian Government as explained at the May 29, 1974 Board meeting; (2) investment by the Company in the project of $1,761,000 of new money plus about $400,000 in working capital to be transferred from Palmyra upon the closing of asbestos textile operations there in mid-1975; (3) cancellation of R/A No. 21-11,438 for DM 1,454,513 (about $576,000), approved by the Board on April 24, 1974, for certain equipment for E.R.I.C.A., because this equipment will now be diverted to the Quebec project and its cost is included in the $1,761,000 of new money proposed to be invested in the Quebec project; and (4) negotiation with officials of the Province of Quebec and other appropriate governmental officials to seek additional development incentives and the sale of up to 50% of the equity to the Province. After discussion, the Board unanimously approved the Quebec project as presented. Quebec Project A meeting of the Board: of Directors of Garlock Inc was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Oak Hill Country'club, Rochester, New York, on Friday, July 26, 1974 at 10:30 A.M. The Chairman reported that pursuant to the dis cussion at the previous Board meeting Garlock of Canada Ltd. had formally accepted the development incentives grant offered by the Canadian Govern ment in the estimated amount of $Cdn 894,250 to assist the proposed asbestos processing venture in Sherbrooke, Quebec. Mr. Wiess reported that oral discussions with officials of the Province of Quebec regarding further incentives and investment were proceeding favorably. Quebec Project A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Holiday Inn in Longview, Texas, on Tuesday, October 1, 1974 at 8:30 A.M. The Chairman stated that the Quebec project was proceeding as summarized in his memorandum to the Board of September 16, 1974, with a few changes in detail. He stated that Robert Pilmer, President of Garlock of Canada Ltd., would also be president of the new company, and that Mr. Pilmer together with Mr. Wiess planned to attend a ground-breaking ceremony at the site of the proposed factory in Sherbrooke, Quebec, on October 8, 1974, at which time Mr. St. Pierre, Quebec Minister of Business and Industry, would announce the project. Quebec Project A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company at Rochester, New York, on Friday, October 25, 1974 at 10:00 A.M. Mr. Cook stated that the company that is to own and operate an asbestos textile factory in Sherbrooke, Quebec, as previously approved by . the Board has been incorporated under Quebec law as Amiante de Sherbrooke Limitee. He stated that, as anticipated in Mr. McMullen's memorandum to the Board of September 16, 1974, the Quebec Industrial Development Corporation has now, by a letter of October 18, 1974 to the new company, offered to pay $576,000 for a 48% equity interest in the company and to provide an interest subsidy of up to $360,000 for a $1.2 million loan to be obtained by the company from a Canadian bank, probably the Bank of Nova Scotia. He stated the QIDC offer is subject to execution of a detailed agreement. The consensus of the Board was that the project should proceed as previously approved, with Garlock of Canada Ltd. obtaining in due course a 50% equity interest in the company and private Canadian in vestors obtaining the remaining 2% equity interest. Quebec Project A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Company, 1250 Midtown Tower, Rochester, New York on Friday, January 24, 1975 at 10:00 A.M. The Chairman reported that construction of the factory for Amiante de Sherbrooke Limitee in Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, was approximately on schedule. A meeting of the Board of Directors of Garlock Inc. was held pursuant to call of the Chairman at the Executive Offices of the Corporation in Rochester, New York, on Friday, July 25, 1975 at 10:00 A. M. Amiante de Sherbrooke Limitee The Chairman reminded the Board that at the October 25, 1974 meeting approval had been given for Garlock of Canada Ltd. to obtain a 50% interest in the company, named Amiante de Sherbrooke Limitee, that was to own and operate an asbestos textile factory in Sherbrooke, Quebec and for Amiante to borrow $1.2 million from a Canadian bank, probably The Bank of Nova Scotia. He stated that said Bank had indicated willingness to make the loan, provided that Garlock Inc., as the parent of Amiante's 50% owner, would indicate its approval of the loan and would agree (a) to arrange any addi tional financing that Amiante might require to complete the construction, equipping, and bringing into operation of the Sherbrooke factory and (b) pending receipt by Amiante of a Canadian government grant of approximately $900,000, to advance, directly or through a subsidiary, the funds (approximately $500,000) for purchase of equipment and the funds (approximately $400,000) for working capital required by Amiante (all amounts in Canadian dollars) . After a discus sion, the Board approved the acceptance by Garlock Inc. of said conditions imposed by said Bank. Page 1 DEPOSITION & TRIAL TESTIMONY GIVEN ON BEHALF OF GARLOCK INC By Company Representatives. In Re: Asbestos Litigation James E. Heffron 1 CAPTION In Re: B&B Fulton Co. McManus v. Anchor Hart v. Garlock In Re: B&B Fulton Co. COURT Superior Court, Trial Court Superior Court, Trial Court Supreme Court, St. Lawrence Co. Superior Court, Trial Court STATE GA MA NY GA DATE 9/10/99 9/29/99 11/22/99 11/30/99 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1998CV02684 96-4393 101569/98 1998 CV 02684 G. Elwood Houghton CAPTION COURT Overby v. Raymark Circuit Court, City of Chesapeake Re: Asbestos Cases Circuit Court, Madison County STATE VA IL DATE 12/4/86 6/9/88 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2055-M - Harold Hughes CAPTION Sadowsky v. Anchor COURT Circuit Court, Oconto County STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. Wl 3/22/95 91-CV-275 Clayton M. Jewett CAPTION COURT STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. Bailey v. J-M U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. VA 10/26/78 76-155-NN et al. Matthew v. J-M Court of Common Pleas, PCCP PA 10/23/79 4052(1 /97);AC#1 -71 Pennell v. J-M Supreme Court, Albany County NY 10/18/83 L-57219-8 Jakupko v. Alloy Superior Court, Middlesex County NJ 12/9/83 NA Pratt v. Optical U.S. Dist. Court, Western Dist. TX 4/27/84 EP-83-CA-288.406 EP-82-CA-366 Adgate v. Keene Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. PA 6/25/84 N-3080 Atkins v. Garlock U.S. Dist. Court, Southern Dist. GA 5/23/88 CV288-52 Chancey v. Garlock U.S. Dist. Court, Northern Dist. GA 5/23/88 CV286-178 Bigpond v. Fibreboard U.S. Dist. Court, Northern Dist. OK 9/14/88 87-C-1223-E Bigpond v. Fibreboard U.S. Dist. Court, Northern Dist. OK 10/13/88 87-C-1223-E Hoell v. Garlock Circuit Court, Sheboygan County Wl 2/26/92 90CV667 Armistead v. Celotex U.S. Dist. Court, Calcasieu Parr. LA 3/2/92 91-400 Delong v. Garlock Superior Court, New Castle Co. DE 4/21/92 88C-NO-110 West v. Garlock Superior Court, New Castle Co. DE 4/21/92 89C-SE-123 Lukowski v. Garlock Superior Court, New Castle Co. DE 4/21/92 87C-JN-84 Kenny v. Garlock Superior Court, New Castle Co. DE 4/21/92 86C-AU-70 Deschenes v. Fibreboar Superior Court, Orange County CA 5/29/92 573285 Abercrombie v. Abex Superior Court, San Francisco Co CA 9/4/92 941345 Hellquist Supreme Court, Los Angeles Co. CA 10/19/93 BC-072504 Malone v. Garlock District Court, Brazoria County TX 11/15/93 7868 * = Cases consolidated tor discovery purposes Excel: R:\Testify\Garlock Dep&tri Company Reps Revised 02/15/00 6* Page 2 Clayton M. Jewett, continued: | CAPTION COURT Baltimore City Asb. Lit. Circuit Court, for Baltimore City Pi's v. Borden Inc. Civil Dist. Court, Orleans Parish Ml Board of Education Circuit Court, Wayne County Ml Board of Education Circuit Court, Wayne County Potter, Et Al District Court, Orleans Parish Abate, Et Al (Phase 11) Circuit Court, Baltimore City Boyd (Phase 1) Circuit Court, Common Pleas Osick (Phase 1) Circuit Court, Common Pleas Chappell Circuit Court, Baltimore City Cozie/Zong/Springer Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. STATE MD LA Ml Ml LA MD PA PA MD PA DATE 6/29/94 7/11/94 8/16/94 8/17/94 8/11/95 1/19/95 10/26/95 10/26/95 5/29/96 1/30/97 CIVIL ACTION NO. 94095701 91-18397 84-429-634-NP 84-429-634-NP 88-16051 93-076701 91-3806 91-2571 95-213501 2584/1135/3357 Kanwal Kapur I CAPTION McGuire V. J-M COURT U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 6/22/79 CP77-1 ;CS77-68-NN Wilbur Klotz CAPTION McGuire V. J-M COURT U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 6/22/79 CP77-1 ;CS77-68-NN Alexander Kuzmuk CAPTION COURT Bailey v. J-M U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. Matthews v. J-M Common Pleas, Philadelphia Co. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 10/27/78 76-155-NN et al. PA 10/23/79 4025(Jan 79);AC1-71 Gordon Leroy CAPTION Matthews v. J-M COURT STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. Common Pleas, Philadelphia Co. PA 10/23/79 4025(Jan 79);AC1 -71 Thomas Mills CAPTION Hutton V. Raymark Mehegan V. Celotex Smith, H. v. Raymark COURT STATE Superior Court, Middlesex County NJ Superior Court, Middlesex County NJ Superior Court, Middlesex County NJ DATE 9/22/88 9/22/88 9/22/88 CIVIL ACTION NO. L-014451-87 L-025167-86 L-88932-85 Walter Rooney CAPTION Re: Asbestos Cases Patrick V. J-M COURT U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 4/26/79 CP-#77-1 VA 4/26/79 ALN#2330 * = Cases consolidated for discovery purposes Excel: R:\Testify\ Garlock Dep&trl Company Reps Revised 02/15/00 Page 3 Herbert Schaefer I CAPTION McGuire v. J-M COURT U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 6/22/79 CP77-1; CS77-68-NN George Townsend I CAPTION COURT McGuire v. J-M U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE DATE CIVIL ACTION NO. VA 6/21/79 CP77-1; CS77-68-NN Roy Whittaker CAPTION Durski v. Celotex Lee v. Am. Cyan. Sholtis v. Am. Cyan. Sharp v. II. C.G. RR Bruce v. II. C.G. RR Douglas v. Garlock Judy v. Armstrong Vogel v. Armstrong Hurlow v. Armstrong Delong v. Garlock West v. Garlock Lukowski v. Garlock Kenney v. Garlock Morgan v. Garlock Abate v. Garlock Dolan, Thomas W. Huff/Fowler v. Garlock McDonald v. U.P. RR Layton v. Garlock Granski v. Garlock Balonis v. Garlock Norman, Mike Chariot v. Garlock Fertig v. Garlock Brannan v. Acands Jackson, R. B. Swindler, Jr. Eitemiller v. Acands Aaron, Johnny B. Neary & McAnany Fisk & Graves Finocchio Homung & Steffancavage Nelson [Excerpt only] MON MASS II Scribner Boyd/Collins/Conger Greenleaf COURT Superior Court, Middlesex County Superior Court, Middlesex County Superior Court, Middlesex County U.S. Dist. Court, Southern Dist. U.S. Dist. Court, Western Dist. U.S. Dist. Court, Southern Dist. Circuit Court, Monongalia County Circuit Court, Monongalia County Circuit Court, Monongalia County Superior Court, New Castle Co. Superior Court, New Castle Co. Superior Court, New Castle Co. Superior Court, New Castle Co. Superior Court, New Castle Co. Circuit Court, Baltimore City Superior Court, Middlesex Co. Superior Court, King County District Court, Cameron County Superior Court, Middlesex County Circuit Court, Baltimore City Circuit Court, Baltimore City Circuit Court, Wayne County District Court, Orleans Parish Circuit Court, Baltimore City Circuit Court, Baltimore City District Court, Harris County District Court, Orleans Parish Circuit Court, Baltimore City District Court, Brazoria County Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. Common Pleas, Philadelphia Co. Circuit Court, Baltimore City Circuit Court, Monogalia County Circuit Court, Baltimore City Common Pleas, 1st Judicial Dist. U.S. Dist. Court, Eastern Dist. STATE NJ NJ NJ KY KY NY WV WV WV DE DE DE DE DE MD MA WA TX NJ MD MD Ml LA MD MD TX LA MD TX PA PA PA PA MD WV MD PA PA DATE 7/21/87 7/21/87 7/21/87 1/27/88 1/27/88 2/29/88 10/30/91 10/30/91 10/30/91 4/21/92 4/21/92 4/21/92 4/21/92 8/30/93 9/29/93 4/13/94 8/1/94 12/6/94 7/19/95 12/6/95 12/6/95 12/13/95 3/27/96 4/11/96 4/11/96 4/17/96 6/5/96 9/24/96 5/1/97 5/15/97 5/27/97 6/18/97 11/13/97 11/18/97 1/14/98 10/30/98 ? 17/24/97 CIVIL ACTION NO. L-063301-86 L-019976-84 L-069326-85 86-3749 C87-0229P(J) - CA 88-C-147 CA 86-C-832 CA 86-C-764 88C-NO-110 89C-SC-123 87C-JN-84 86C-AU-70 CA89C-OC-185 9236705 93-6001 94-2-02492-2 94-01 -497-E W02605788 95-020502 95-261701 94-421061 91-18397 94-032501 92-153501 87-37068 (?) 95-15916 96-176701 94-C-2110-2 975 & 3666 4276 & 4348 1484 Nos. 2681 & 2679 97-314701 Mon Mass II 95-284501 Nos. 3834, 0760 & 4476 90-1557 * = Cases consolidated for discovery purposes Excel: R:\Testify\Garlock Dep&trl Company Reps Revised 02/15/00 2 : 24PM ; S N'j~4 j x ivipv i cj G Ot W) O O fl Jm abo V at H a C/3 cd 0 c +-i O co rH ffi Coltec Industries JRN-21-2000 1.4:35 3155973039 9S5C P.02 NAME Clemons, Vera Baylord, Grace Bacon, Clara Bohner, Elsie Honore, Martin D. Bills, Arthur Nichols, Charles Zabliski, Raymond A. Bailey, Omar H. Sr. West, Sam Thurley, David Garnsey, Catherine Worker's Compensation Claims Updated 09/22/99 DATE OF CLAIM 11/26/48 11/14/57 1/20/71 6/7/73 3/13/80 6/4/82 7/24/85 2/22/89 11/26/92 9/18/96 2/18/97 7/1/99 DIAGNOSIS Pulmonary Fibrosis; Asbestosis Pulmonary Fibrosis; Pulmonary Asbestosis Asbestosis Secondary Asbestosis Thickened Pleura Asbestosis; Pulmonary Fibrosis Asbestosis; Emphysema; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Heart Disease Silicosis (disputed) Lung Cancer Mesothelioma Mesothelioma Lung Cancer payment; JOB OR BENEFIT TOTAL WORK llllllliiiiiilll DATES $ 6,086.15 Textile Dept. 1918-1943 (Intermittent Total 13-14 Yrs) $ 2,400.00 Textile Dept. 1923-1957 (Employment Intermittent - Total 22 years) $ 18,000.00 Textile Dept. 1943-1970 No Payment Braiding Dept. 1951-1973 $ 6,753.00 $ 105.00 per week since 6/7/82 $ 9,754.85 & $271.38/wk to widow No Records Probably misc. duties in San Francisco Ware house & Gasket Shop Textile Dept. Cut Gasket Dept Textile Dept. Braiding Yard 1959-1960 1950-1970 1970-1982 1947-1972 1972-1973 1973-1983 In Litigation Shipping Dept. $ 10,000.00 Currently denied In Litigation Currently denied In Litigation In Litigation Compression Packing Supervisor Metal Parts Finisher Graphiter, Hyd/Mech Press Operator Exp. Jt. Builder Sheeter Oper. Maint. Yard Scrap Fibre Prep Mach Oper Sander-washer Oper Metal Parts Finisher Spinning Frame Op. Insp. Packer Shipper Parts Coordinator Rubber Belt Finisher 1959-1984 1956-1984 1973-1993 1968-1996 1974-1984 r:\workcomp.xls zr. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Products Liability Outline 2. June 7, 1977 Product Liability Committee Minutes 3. July 26, 1977 Product Liability Committee Minutes 4. August 30, 1977 Product Liability Committee Minutes 5. September 27, 1977 Product Liability Committee Minutes 6. October 25, 1977 Product Liability Committee Meeting 7. October 25, 1977 Product Liability Committee Minutes 8. June 15, 1978 Product Liability Committee Meeting 9. June 15, 1978 Product Liability Committee Minutes 10. July 27, 1978 Product Liability Committee Meeting 11. July 25, 1978 Product Liability Committee Minutes 12. November 9, 1978 Product Liability Committee Minutes 13. December 14, 1978 Product Liability Committee Minutes 14. January 18, 1979 Product Liability Committee Minutes 15. February 15, 1979 Product Liability Committee Minutes 16. March 15, 1979 Product Liability Committee Minutes 17. August 15, 1979 Product Liability Committee Minutes 18. Employee Asbestos Handbook PRODUCTS LIABILITY 11/9/76 L J INDEX Products Liability Risk Criteria Warranties Complaint and Claims Procedures Records Retention ., Audits New Product Review PRODUCTS LIABILITY Traditionally, production and quality control have been in a battle. Quality control was considered to be too conservative in rejecting parts and products for shipment. Production was . considered to be too liberal with prime interests being to put the product in the hands of the customer quickly to keep back log down. But, now things are changing. Production and sales depart ments perhaps did not consider the impact of "product liability" and mw they must. Every product which comes off the shipping dock creates the possibility of "product liability" suits. Courts are becoming more liberal in their interpretation of who is at fault. Customers are becoming aware of their rights if a product fails and causes them bodily harm. The bandwagon effect of increased individual claims means that typical lawsuits against manufacturers have moved from $50,000 per claim to $2 million. Product failures can result with such suits as: 1. $400,000 awarded to an employee who was burned by hot oil after being told by the foreman to proceed with the job because there probably was no danger. 2. $2.5 million dollars pending against a manufacturer by a male employee whose long hair was caught in a machine, causing him head injuries. ' 3. A manufacturer changed the compound mixture for "0" rings and did not advise the customer of the change. The rings failed in the braking system of a snow mobile. The suit is pending, (not Garlock) 4. A bottle containing a liquid clearly stated that it was poison, but an adult who could not read or write drank the liquid and died. The manufacturer stated that he did all that was necessary to warn people that the product was poison. The court held other wise, however, saying that the manufacturer should have placed a skull and crossbones on the bottle for the benefit of those who could not read. At a recent seminar in Hartford, Connecticut with Colt and Aetna two attorneys made presentations on the subject of "product liability." The plaintiff attorney made the following general comments: 1. A company's general awareness of a problem or potential problem could cost the company $2.5 million dollars. . Facilities that have a high potential of fire are likely to be sued success fully if it can be demonstrated that they did not take all possible steps to protect the employees in the event they were burned. Where there is a suspicion or probable problem which could affect the lungs of an employee in a facility, another successful suit is likely to result if it can be demonstrated that the company did not take every conceivable measure to investigate the possible damage to lungs and set up appropriate counter . measures to protect the employee. 2. A company or manufacturer must anticipate how its products will be used and misused. The plaintiff attorney indicated that a company, must warn poten tial users of possible danger. Additionally, he felt that companies had a continuing duty to warn users of possible problems. The presentation made by the defense attorney included a number of points as follows: 1. A manufacturer must make every conceivable effort to assure that the product was perfect when it left the plant for shipment. 2. He agreed with the plaintiff attorney that a company must anticipate how the product will be used and mis used. For example, he indicated that when a company ships its product to a distributor, agent, or other intermediary, the manufacturer continues to be libel for where that product is used. The manufacturer must investigate to make sure that his product is being used for what it was designed to do. 3. Where there is a margin of doubt, the court will ` generally support the plaintiff if the impression was that the manufacturer did not really care about the potential risk of using his product. 4. Generally speaking, if there are any alterations made on your product, this can be an excellent defense for the manufacturer. -2-  5. Care must be used with the records that are kept. If the records show that the manufacturer was more inter ested in stock price than the consumer, the records are likely to be used against the manufacturer because it demonstrates that he did not seem to care enough to find out about potential problems when the product gets in the hands of the consumer. 6. If a manufacturer does not warn potential users and his defense is that it would have been too costly to conduct a warning, the court is likely to rule against the manur facturer. The attorney used General Motors as an example. Last year, General Motors spent $50 million dollars on recalls. The $50 million dollars came right out of profits, but they actually had no other choice but to recall. Not to have gone through with this procedure could have resulted in individual suits which would have exceeded the $50 million dollars spent. General Comments and Trends: 1. Claims are on the increase and come in two, three, four, and five years later than what would be assumed. ' 4 2. Dollar claims are on the increase. Colt expects to pay in excess of one million dollars in 1976. 3. In some states, like Mississippi, employees can sue individual managers if it is determined that they were lax in seeing to it that the employee's health was protected. 4. Executives are the only ones covered by our insurance carrier. There is no coverage for lower levels such as middle-management. . 5. Employees, as well as customers, must be made aware of potential risks to them. 6. Every manufacturer should set up a program to anticipate and avoid potential "product liability" suits. Steps include: a. What are the highest risk products? . b. Warnings to be included in all literature, and on products if at all possible to do so. c. Develop a program of "awareness" directed toward engineering, manufacturing, marketing departments, etc. This "awareness" program would include management at all levels. -31 d. Each manufacturing facility should create a "product liability" committee. Members of the committee should include the highest management level from each of the departments, such as manufacturing, marketing, engineering, etc. Representation from design engineering, quality control, and purchasing is also recommended. The . committee's responsibility would be to investigate products in terms of potential liability and when this is determined, recommend solutions or intel ligent choices which will resolve potential problems. B. .Two hundred ten member companies participated in a Machinery and Allied Products Institute survey with the following results: 1. Claims are on the increase; 156 of the 210 companies indicated that in the ten year period 1965 through 1975, "product liability" suits amounted to $826 million (estimated). . We called MAPI to find out what the dollar amount of actual settlements was and they indicated that there was no data available on what the direct settlements or out of court settlements might be. They estimated, however, the ratio would be about 1 to 10. For example, in a $1 million suit, the settlement would probably be about $100,000. 2. Sixteen percent (16%) indicated that the upsurge in claims has inhibited the development of new products or contributed to the discontinuance of existing . products. We asked if the discontinuance of products was a result of potential liability suits or lack of profit from individual products. The response was that no one could be sure. 3. Many companies and individuals complain about govern mental involvement in business and industrial matters; and yet, a good sized group of the firms participating indicated that legislation is indispensable to the solution. -4- RISK CRITERIA Purpose: Identify those products which pose a significant risk for potential loss; subject those products to more stringent design, manufacturing, and marketing controls. A. Definitions 1. "Product" means any product which is: a. ready for end use; b. processed further by a customer into an end product; c. sold as a component for an end product; or d. processed by a customer into a component for an end . product. 2. "Dangerous" means a physical condition or prospective use . which may cause harm or major economic loss unless dealt with carefully. B. Risk Criteria A product is to be classified as having significant risk when ever one of the following conditions exists: 1. The product is inherently dangerous. 2. The product can become dangerous either because of physical characteristics which deteriorate with time, or prolonged use. ' 3. The product conceivably be used in an improper manner, rendering it inherently dangerous, or dangerous in its mechanical applications. 4. The product will probably be used functionally in a mechanical application or in an activity which is dangerous. 5. The product, by the nature of its installation, will not be accessible, except at potentially great cost, and may be subjected to deteriorating conditions which cannot be observed. 6. The product, because of heavy use or long service life, provides a base for major economic loss in the event of unreliable performance. ' 7. The product, if defectively designed or manufactured, is dangerous. The division Product Liability Committed should review the quality control procedures for all significant risk products and assure that the quality of processing, inspection, and testing is con sistent with the risk. -5- i warranties Highly competitive markets are exerting an increasing pressure for expressed, product guarantees, and subtly prompting implied guarantees through promotional brochures, advertising copy, sales presentations, rendering of technical advice, and other customer contact. At the same time, changes in the law of product liability have im posed stringent responsibility on the manufacturer for product quality control, especially when expressed or implied representations are made concerning quality, useful life, or fitness of a product for a par ticular purpose. This makes it necessary to give special attention to the issuance of guarantees and.the review of all product literature. It is essential to keep the following points in mind when reviewing existing materials or developing literature for new products. 1. Standard Terms and Conditions of Sale guarantee that . products will be "merchantable", that is, of good material and workmanship. No representation should be made concerning the fitness of a product for a particular purpose or use. 2. Any guarantee (beyond merchantability), whether verbal or written, express or implied, shall be reviewed first by the " Legal Department, and then submitted to the Group Vice President for approval. Requests for guarantee approval will be accompanied by convincing technical data and reports which precisely and quantitatively demonstrate the validity of warranty representations. 3. . When expressed guarantees have been approved for specific products, each employee who has customer contact or pre pares written material for customer distribution must be familiar with the scope as well as the limitations of such guarantees. Certificates should be obtained through the Legal Department. 4. All advertising copy, sales brochures, press releases, and other product promotional literature shall be submitted to the Legal Department for review and approval before release or publication. 5. Employees must exercise cautious judgment in making verbal representations concerning product quality in general. (As a rule, understatement is preferred to overstatement.) Particularly in the area of technical advice, limitations on accuracy or sufficiency should be stressed. Any doubts concerning the implementation of this policy should be resolved by inquiring through the Legal Department. -6- COMPLAINT AND CLAIMS PROCEDURES Purpose: Develop a system that provides for prompt and equitable settlement, as well as effective follow-up to minimize the possibility of recurrences. The division Product Liability Committee should develop a written complaint and claims procedure which: 1. Assures a prompt and equitable response. . 2. Minimizes the customer's and company's economic loss. 3. Provides identification of high risk product claims. 4. Obtains field information which will enable improvement of products and processes. 5. Alerts the Insurance Department and Legal Department in the event of property damage or personal injury. The need for promptly alerting these departments is stressed. -7- RECORDS RETENTION Purpose: Establish criteria for developing records and record retention systems, emphasizing high risk products, to improve defense position. The division Product Liability Committee should assure that records are developed in the specific areas related to product safety and liability. It shall develop a list of the specific documents (with titles and form numbers). Th.e general categories of records which need to be considered are: 1. Customers' stated requirements, Results of review of customers' specifications. 2. Development records. 3. Manufacturing instructions and records. 4. Inspection procedures, standards and results. 5. Material review records. . 6. Results of process, product and systems audits.- / 7. Quality Summary Reports. 8. Customer claims correspondence and dispositions. 9. Verbal communications with customers pertinent to require ments, product applications and claims. 10. Trip reports. 11. Corrective action taken. The division Product. Liability Committee, in cooperation with Records Management, will establish retention schedules for docu ments deemed relevant to product liability. -8- AUDITS Purpose: Verify effective implementation of the policy. The division Product Liability Committee should develop plans for implementing the policy and submit them to the Group Vice President for review. The plans shall'include a procedure by which the division audits its own compliance. . -9- NOW PRODUCT REVIEW Purpose: Control design safety and functional adaptability. Each division Product Liability Committee should review all product design specifications to insure compliance with association standards, government codes and customer requirements. It is suggested that the committee: 1. Develop the systems necessary to implement the product review objective. This will include: a. definition of "new product"; ' b. an administrative system at the plants and contribu tions from staff groups to assure that all new products are brought to the committee's attention; c. a documentation system which substantiates that thorough reviews have been made and that confirming copies are sent to the Group Vice President. 2. Develop a design review procedure by which the designer is required to submit a complete description of: the product, ' its intended use, expected life, service environment, the testing performed during product development, potential' defects and potential hazards in the use of the product, and estimated market potential. 3. Develop a manufacturing control plan, to include review of: a. the manufacturing plan; b.- the inspection and testing plan, including documentation; c. raw material control plans; . d. process control procedures; e. material review procedures; f. rework and repair controls; g. control of design changes; . h. investigation of safety-related complaints; i. corrective action plan. 4-. Develop a procedure to review product liability losses which may suggest the need for changes within the division. At the outset, the committee should identify all the significant risk products and subject those products to the review provided above. -10- t O ^ri'/ED / // j: ^577 ' &LFAftUINr -Xi.CC'N INC. RE: DATE: -/ \ -<'{-. C /-/t q ry . t-i~ ' .*?- / /i / PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 7, 1977 - 9:00 am In Attendance: R Guild ' J Guffey D Holmes A Kuzmuk G LeRcy M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay : -s. // ( 1. Hie Product Liability Ccnmittee will ccnsist of the following people: John Guffey - Compression Packing Division David Holmes - Controllers Ernie Kuhnen - Hydraulic Components Alex Kuzmuk - Construction Products i Garden LeRcy - Engineering . Mike Panarites - Personnel; Product Liability Chairman Herb Schaefer - MRP Operations Ren Stay - Marketing ' 2. Mini-conniittees will be set up under the above ccmnittee. 3. A brief review of the following subjects was given by Mr. Panarites What is Products Liability? Risk Criteria Warranties . Complaint and Claims Procedures Records Retention Audits New Product Review ` 4. A slide presentation was shown which gave a brief history of product liability and the problems that industry is now facing with the new legislation. 5. General Discussion Areas: (a) OSHA Caution Warning - this is very important in the asbestos industry. It is something that we have not been doing ' ) (b) We do not control end use of products. We do not print on cur packaging product info because there are too many different uses far our particular product. (c) We do very limited testing on the products we sell. 'isrn PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 7, 1977 (d) Information on product failures should be kept. (e) What product claims do we have right new. (f) Installation Instructions - are the complete or should they be revised. 6. Preparation for next monthly meeting - set up mini eemhittees. 7. Next meeting to be held on Tuesday, July 26th. r- -V . ME Panarites/bld ' Chairman, Product Liability Ccnmittee Lav; O.V.V^eNT GAALOCK Inc. RE DATE: PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES July 26, 1977 - 9:00 am In Attendance: G Barlis M Burdulis J Guffey R Guild D Holmes B Keep E Kuhnen G LeRqy J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay 1. Mini-cannittees. Sane of the product centers have set up their minicaimittees; others have not. There was sane question as to just what these camnttees should be doing. 2. Discussion cn the rating of cur products as far as the importance in becoming involved in a product liability claim. Should the products be categorized as to (1) potential physical injury to a perscn and (2) danage to equipment. Can we categorize our products without the knowledge of what the end use is for our product? 3. Biggest area of exposure far us now is 'asbestos1. It /was agreed that we would work on this particular product first and through our experiences, apply than to our other products. a. Bill Price and John Guffey were assigned the responsibility by Mr. Townsend to chair a labelling program in asbestos. They are to see that our labelling program satisfies all cur objectives and it is to be implemented by January 1, 1978. b. Mr. Guffey brought up the point that most companies have lost 'product liability suits because of their 'failure to warn'. After sane discussion, it was the unanimous opinion of the oamdttee that we ismediately begin to label all advertising of cur products that certain asbestos with the following phrase: CAUTION Contains asbestos fibers. Avoid creating dust. Breathing asbestos dust may cause serious bodily harm. Mr. Stay was assigned the responsibility of seeing this label is cn all advertising of asbestos products. It was also de cided that all catalogs that have already been printed should be labelled with the warning before being sent out. (This warning to be only on products that contain asbestos.) PRODUCT LIABILITY COftCTTEE MINUTES Page 2 7/26/77 c. Other areas in which labelling should be done are: (1) CA Sheet (2) Spool heads of braided asbestos material. (3) Labels inside boxes of our products that are sent to our distributors. d. It was suggest that letters be sent to all of our distributers . stating the following: "Ihclosed please find 'Caution' labels which we strongly recaimend that you, as our distributor, pass cn to all end users of our products containing asbestos." There was a discussion as to which phrase should be used cn these labels: (1) CAUTION Contains asbestos fibers. Avoid creating dust. Breathing asbestos dust may cause serious bodily ham. (2) DANGER Cancer hazard. Contains asbestos fibers. Avoid creating dust. From a marketing point of view, it was suggested that the lumber (1) phrase be used for all labelling. However, Mr. Lynn is to contact our legal department at corporate headquarters to find out which one they feel we should use. After an answer is received from Mr. Lynn, Mr. Stay will proceed in having these letters/labels sent out. e. Mr. Schaefer was concerned as to how the asbestos sheets should be labeled. Also, whether those sheets which did not show a Garlock trademark, did they need to show a warn ing label. ' It was decided that all sheets will be imprinted with the warning label as soon as Mr. Lynn finds out which one to use. Also, all sheets presently in inventory should be labeled in sans way with the warning. PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 3 7/26/77 4. Items to be discussed at next meeting: a. Each Product Center manager to list all products and find out what their end use is. Not necessarily in order of liability. b. Review of our labelling program for asbestos. c. Warranty d. Sales training. e. Requests from customers (Material Information Sheets) as to what materials our products contain. f. Proposed regulations on acrylonitrile. 5. Next meeting to be held on Tuesday, August 30, 9:00 a.m., Personnel Conference Room, bldg. 6-1. 6. Any additions or changes in these minutes should be brought to the attention of Mr. Fanarites. SEP 277 LAW DEPARTMENT GARLOCK INC. RI PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMIT!!!: MINUTES DATE: August 30, 1977 - 9:00 a.m. In Attendance: Not Attending: M Eurdulis P DeRosa R Guild D Holmes A Kuznuk J Guffey E Kuhnen J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer L Sementilli C Terr G LeRoy R Stay IJ-V . 1. Labelling Program - Messrs. Guffey and Price are working on the overall labelling program and will have a report for the next Product Liability meeting. labelling Program for Asbestos - A. Advertising - Advertising for Hydraulic Components and Compression Packing are now carrying the 'CAUTION1 label on it. Mr. Stay was not in attendance,therefore, we do not lenow what other steps have been taken to label advertising now in-house or other types of advertising. B. C/A Sheet - Labels have been ordered for C/A sheet and should be received shortly. They are approximately 1" x 2" in size. C. Spool Heads - Mr. Burdulis, who was attending for Mr. Guffey, said that a definite decision had not been made as to hew they would be labelling the spool heads for braided asbestos material. However, they had talked about having it printed on the spool head instead of stamping it on. D. Labels on boxes that package our products. Nothing has been done on this yet. E. Letters to Distributors - Mr. Stay was not in attendance and there fore we were unable to find out if this had been done as yet. Hr. Lynn informed us that according to our corporate legal department that the "CAUTION" label should be used and not the "DANGER" label. 3. Each Product Center was to list all products and find out what the,ir ) end use is. As of this meeting, none of the product centers liad accomplished this. rj-oi/jcr liabilit/ml; Amis rage 2 8/30/77 4. Material Data Sheets - Mr. Panarites stated that per Mr. Townsend's request that we were not to complete and return any Material Data Sheets that we received from customers. If a customer insisted ori this information and wuuld not place an order with us unless we com plied then Mr. Panarites should be informed and it would be discussed further. Mr. Panarites asked that the committee inform all their people the- these MDS sheets should not be completed. 5. -Acrylonitrile Regulations - There was a brief discussion on acrylonitrile but the consensus of the group was tliat nothing should be done until definite regulations or decisions were made regarding the manufacture of tliis product. 6. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, September 27th, 8:00 a.m. in the Personnel Conference Room, bldg. 6-1. 7. Any additions or changes in these minutes should be brought to the attention of Mr. Panarites, Chairmen. ) /bid )  -j / v 7 r X" DATE: PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES September 27, 1977 - 8:00 a.m. In Attendance: J Guffey B Keep E Kuhnen G LsRoy J Lynn Not Altending: D Holmes A Kazmuk M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay C Terr 1. Labelling Program - A. Advertising.- All pages of the Industrial Catalog that contains products that have asbestos in it have the "Caution" label in - ) .serted on them. B. C/A Sheet Labels - Copy of one attached to minutes. These labels are being put on each sheet. Labels are also being sent to dis tributors so when they cut the material down they can attach labels to the product. C. Labels an Baxes - labels are being put on the boxes that we ship cur products in until they are reprinted. D. Letters to Distributors - Mr. STay said that a letter- would be sent cut to the distributors explaining the labeling, etc. within the next week. .2 List of all Products and Did Use - It was decided that we could use the new Industrial Catalog to obtain infconation needed on all products. 3. Are we labeling and warning about our asbestos products properly and enough ? General consensus was yes for new but probably within the next 6 months, new guidelines will be issued. 4. Material Data Sheets - Harold Hughes is answering these if approval has been obtained from Mr, Townsend, 5. Brief discussion regarding aerosol/propellants. Product called ) Chinilubewill not contain flurocarbons. Will use CO or hydro carbons. Omniluhr is non-flamible. Companies asking for MDS sheets. Must obtain permission from Mr. Townsend. All MDS sheets should be sent to Jack Lynn. /'nn+'ini \aA #* ' PRODUCT LIABILITY COfftTTTEE MINUTES Page 2 9/27/77 ( 6. Topics for next north: Warranties Guarantees; Training of Field Salespersons. 7. Next meeting will be held on Tuesday, October 25, 8:00 a.m. in the Personnel Conference Room, bldg. 6-1. 8. Any.additions or changes in these minutes should be brought to the attention of Mr. P&narites, Chairman. /bid C r :*>S>K>-\.... ,s^...... >''>>>*>*#: TO: FROM: RE: J Guffey D Holmes E Kuhnen A Kuzimok G LeRoy J Lynn H Schaefer R Stay C Terr October 18, 1977 Chairman, Product Liability Ccrrmittee PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING The Product Liability Coirnuttee meeting to be held on Tuesday, October 25th, will be at 9:30 a.m. instead of 8:00 a.m. The change in time is because we have two guests flying in frcm New York: Joe Holwerda - Director, Safety and Security for Colt and Bill Rudolph - General Counsel for Colt. Both men are very involved in Product Liability. Should you be unable to attend, please let me knew as soon as possible. :/ fU w Attachment ^^VFD 77 lock Inc. RE: DATE: PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES October 25, 1977, 9:30 a.m. In attendance: Not attending: Guests: J Guffey R Guild H Hughes A Kuzmuk D Holmes E Kuhnen R Stay P Hanke J Holwerda J Maher W Rudolph G Leroy J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer 1. For the benefit of our guests, Mr. Panarites reviewed what the conmittee had accomplished since the first meeting that took place in June. Copies of the minutes of all the meetings were given to the guests. ' 2. Mr. Guffey recently attended an A.T.I. Conference (Asbestos Technical Institute) and he enlightened us on the new regula tions in California which requires the end user to register with the state when any hazardous materials are used. The state does not consider all farms of asbestos as hazardous in themselves but does consider any asbestos products labeled with the "Caution" label as hazardous. Therefore any product that we (Garlock) new label would be considered hazardous and would require the end user to register. Raybestos-Manhattan received a lot of feedback from their custo mers that indicated they would lose business to companies who do not label. They have converted to a new warning label which: A. California does not require to be registered. B. Continues to satisfy the goal of warning users of their products. This new label (Shown below) will be used on all dust supressed cloth. Compression Packings and Compressed sheet at Garlock. It will be used in all locations rather than having separate inven tories for California. continued PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 2 10/25/77 NOTICE This asbestos product is manufactured with a dust supressing binder for the express purpose of locking-in fibers during normal use. Care should be used while handling all asbestos products so as to avoid abuse and excessive dust emission. For detailed information consult the recorrmended work practices handbook Use and Handling of Asbestos Textile Products published by the Asbestos Information Association. A copy will be sent to you on request. CompKZM-ion Packing VivZsion GafiZock Inc Sodtn, New Voxk 14505 Mr. Hanke asked that Mr. Guffey contact Johns/Manville to see what they are doing and also to contact R/M and find out who they contacted in California to get the okay on the above notice. This information to be forwarded to Mr. Hanke. The question, "If a distributor does not use the labeling and we don't know about it, will we be held liable?" Probably not, however, if we do know and we don't do anything about it, we would most likely be liable. General consensus was that the sales persons should check out our distributors once in a while to see if they are labeling like they are suppose to. The sales person should report back by way of a letter as to what he found so we have record of it. 3. Messrs. LeRoy, Schaefer, Stay and Lynn met previously to this meeting to discuss putting products in proper "risk criteria". Because of the hundreds of various products we make, it pre sented many complications as to how this could be done and therefore, Mr. Panarites asked Mr. Holwerda if from his ex perience at other divisions could he help us out. Mr. Holwerda pointed out that at one of the divisions they set up their risk criteria by the number of law suits for a particular product. Mr. Guffey said that Compression Packing was new recording case histories of product applications (i.e. when a part was installed and how long it lasted). As was pointed out, the products we make 'wear out'........ we rrake replacement parts. Therefore, at what point does our liability cease because the part should have been replaced. Mr. Rudolph said there were too many variables to this question and it would depend on the particular incident. Some discussion regarding special meetings of our distributors and sales people regarding product liability and their involvement with it. PRODUCT LIABILITY CCKITTEE MINUTES Page 3 10/25/77 4. Many distributors have been sending in letters requesting whether Garlock would carry them under their Product Liability Insurance. All of these letters are being referred to Mr. Smith for reply. 5. Mr. Holwerda pointed out that the Consumer Protection Safety Corrmission requires that a report be issued should an injury occur to someone when using a "consumer product". This report must be filed within 10 days to the commission by the companywho made the product. After some discussion, it was decided that we, Garlock, do not make a "consumer product"; we only maker parts that go into a consumer product and therefore this would not apply to us. 6. The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m. 7. The next meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 29, 1977, 8:00 a.m. in the Personnel Conference Room, bldg. 6-1. 8. Any additions or changes in these minutes should be brought to the attention of Mr. Panarites, Chairman. /bid PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE June 15, 1978 8:30 am AGENDA I. Warranties - Jack Lynn II. Warnings & Labeling - John Guffey **(**(-- III. IV. Material Data Sheets / Design, Development, and Engineering (see attachment) received JUN7 78 LAW DEPARTMENT GARLOCK INC. II Design, Development, and Engineering A product begins with its design, and that is also where the exposure of products liability begins. Most complaints initiating prod ucts liability suits contain a count alleging defective design. If the plaintiff can persuade the court and/or the jury that the design of the product which caused the injury or damage was defective and that the injury or damage was caused by the defect, in most jurisdictions he will have proven his case. As a manufacturer proceeds through design, prototyping, testing, and engineering, he would do well to keep in mind such questions as those set out below. Design 1. What is the product's purpose? What will it do? 2. Where, how, and by whom will it be used? In what environment? For how long? 3. Do you, have established qualifications--education and/or experience--for design engineers? Training programs? 4. Are design engineers sufficiently indoctrinated in potential products liability hazards and their consequences? 5. Does your company have a formal design review program? If so, who participates? 6. Do you have a system of "feedback" to take advan tage of the performance history of the same or similar product? 7. In building to the customer's design, what special consideration is given to your possible responsi bility for the finally approved design? Have you consulted with the customer on the design? What of your obligation--as a manufacturer experienced in the field--to warn the customer of potential hazards in following his design? 8. Can the product be manufactured and sold at a profit and still meet or exceed: RECEIVED JUN 7 78 law department GARLOCK INC. 9 a. Labels or warnings plates: prominent location, legibility, understandability, durability; and b. Review and approval of warning labels or plates by law, engineering, and safety departments and/or by Products Reliability Committee. 16. Does design incorporate purchased parts? From re liable and time-tested vendors? Does vendor maintain records sufficient to trace shipments from him by shipment, batch, or lot number? Does vendor carry products liability insurance? Have you inspected vendor's manufacturing facilities and quality control system? Does your purchase order require vendor to certify compliance of his part or component with applicable safety standards? 17. Does the design allow for human error? (E.g., errors arising from fatigue, boredom, insufficient training, emotional or physical upset, etc.) Does the design require a human factors analysis? 18. Does your design review require a failure mode and effects analysis, fault-free analysis or other systems-type approach? 19. Does your system of design review and evaluation provide for recheck and reevaluation prior to ap proval for production? Some manufacturers employ a three-ply system of design review: preliminary design review, intermediate design review, and final design review. 20. Are your design reviews and evaluations recorded and this documentation preserved against the possi bility of its use in connection with some future claim? NOTE: We reemphasize that these questions are merely suggestive of the kinds of questions that manufacturers must ask themselves as they design new or Improved products. We hope they may encourage the development of design review and checklists tailor-made to the individual company and product situation. Testing 1. Is a prototype of the product necessary? 2. What tests should be conducted? Who defines stan dards for testing? (NOTE: It is most important to define in detail the standards applicable to the product. Tests TO: FILE MEMO FROM: Counsel-Mechanical Rubber Div. RE: Product Liability Committee Meeting ^ LP 120:2:6 27 October 1977 (Diet. 26 Oct.) Outside Suppliers-Insurance Coverage of Garlock LP 100:1 On Tuesday, 25 October, a meeting of the Product Liability Commitee was held in bldg. 6-2 from 9:00-12:00 a.m. There were fourteen people present which -included, in addition to the "regulars", Pete Hanke, Bill Rudolph (Asst. General Counsel, Colt), Jack Maher, Joe Holwerda (Director of Insurance, Colt) and George Townsend. I took notes of that meeting which are in the file. Two of the subjects discussed involved problems assigned to Law Department and these are: 1. Special warning label or statement for California customers . John Guffey haa written a letter a few days before outlining the situation in California which now has a rule requiring everyone in the state who buys products containing asbestos must register that fact with some State agency. He learned this at a recent meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute. This has caused considerable confusion and is resulting in the loss of business by asbestos products suppliers who, under the existing Federal rule, have to put a caution label on such products. This automatically triggers the requirement that the buyer must thus report that to the State. Many asbestos product suppliers are not labeling their produets and therefore customers are switching to them in order to avoid this registra tion problem. Raybestos-Manhattan has designed a statement, which^will go on all their asbestos products which explains that/product is held together by a binder and there is very little likelihood of any dust being released in normal usage. They feel that this will reassure their customers. Guffey feels we ought to adopt the same wording. PS Hanke felt that we should make sure the wording is acceptable to the State so Guffey is going to find out what agency in the State should be contacted to get that information. Then, either he or Law Department will make the contact and get the ruling. In any case, apparently we are going to do that on all our products, not just those that go into California. 2. "Named Insured" coverage of Garlock on suppliers product liability insurance policies - In the general discussion of product liability insurance, mention was made of many requests we get from distributors to put their names on our policy as a "named insured". It was pointed nut that Colt has a policy against that and will not do so. The reason for this is that doing this would relieve the distributor from all liability and the 2 2. "Named Insured" Coverage (cont'd) necessity for getting his own product liability insurance. It would cover any product failures and damages/injuries caused thereby, even though the fault may lie with the distributor and his handling of the product. All Colt will do is furnish us Certificate of Insurance to such distributors. However, later in the meeting we got on to the can goods line and the spray can situation. In products which we buy and resell "as is" such as lubricants, etc. in this line, we should ask the manufacturer of the cans (Spray-On, etc.) to make us a "named insured" on their product liability policy. It was decided that Law Department would provide Purchasing Department with the form letter to use in those cases. I have been given that assignment and will follow through. However, I must consult with Colt frr PS Hanke or ?) to make sure that the letter reads properly. Then I will get together with Ed Hardy and we will establish a procedure. be: HD Retting RB Steinmetz, Jr HT Schaefer Product Liability LP 120:2:6 Paralegal March 13, 1931 This refers to your nemo of llarch 4, 19S1 under the above reference. I have discussed your memo with Hal Retting and he endorses the reactivation of a Product Liability Committee and he expects to attend at least some of the meetings of the Divisional Committee. I will plan to attend at least those meetings which Hal is unable to be here for and I will see that questions which need his attention are passed along to him. /. Hal did indicate that he would like to have any information that is available on the planned agenda for Divisional Committee meet ings. This will enable him to have a better handle on when matters of particular legal concern are planned for discussion. He also feels that all the committees should maintain "minutes" of their proceedings and he would like to receive copies. These can be forwarded directly to him or via this office, whichever you prefer. - RW Watson:ik Colt Industries Gariock Mechanical Packing Olvision 1666 Division Slreal Palmyra. New York 14522 315/597-4811 I Interoffice To. See Distribution Subject: Product Liability From: H. T. Schaefer Date: March 4, 1981 It has been two or three years since we have had an active Product Liability Committee. During the time of 1977 to 1979 the previous committee did a great deal of positive work in asbestos labeling and determining direction for asbestos products. Ve are in an era of product liability suits for actual or perceived product failure. It would seem that everyone has their lawyer waiting impatiently in the wings. It therefore behooves us to take the offense in terms of labeling, product design, information and modern ized sales education in all aspects in order to minimize product liability costs. / Rather than have one committee which meets every month, it is my proposal that each Profit Center set up its own committee. Each Profit Center Committee would be made up of the General Manager, Chief Engineer, Quality Manager and the Marketing Manager. The Finance, Personnel and Legal Departments and Vice President of Sales should be considered as part of each committee. They do not neces sarily have to be present for each and every meeting, but should be consulted for help and guidance. The Divisional Committee which is made up of the recipients of this letter will convene once a quarter, or it can be called in an emergency if there is a specific problem to be solved by the Division or a unit within the Division. Each unit Product Liability Committee will keep notes and send copies to this office. I would like to suggest, to begin with, that you have frequent meetings and I would like to see your schedules. In the files of each of the Profit Centers I am certain you will find Product Liability information referring to our 1977/79 committee. However, I am attaching some information to help you get started with each of your committees. GR Bird DISTRIBUTION: JM Cook JF Hurley WA Johengen ES Kuhnen P Loomis HD Retting RJ Stay D.. Vogel ^RW Watson cc: Joseph G. Holwerda Director, Risk Management . . II Design. Development, and Engineering A product begins with its design, and that is also where the exposure of products liability begins. Most complaints initiating prod ucts liability suits contain a count alleging defective design. If the plaintiff can persuade the court and/or the jury that the design of the product which caused the Injury or damage was defective and that the injury or damage was caused by the defect, in most jurisdictions he will have proven his case. As a manufacturer proceeds through design, prototyping, testing, and engineering, he would do well to keep in mind such questions as those 6et out below. . Design 1. What is the product's purpose? What will it do? 2. Where, how, and by whom will it be used? In what environment? For how long? 3. Do you have established qualifications--education and/or experience--for design engineers? Training programs? 4. Are design engineers sufficiently indoctrinated in potential products liability hazards and their * consequences? 5. Does your company have a formal design review program? If so, who participates? 6. Do you have a system of "feedback" to take advantage of the performance history of the same or similar product? . 7. In building to the customer's design, what special consideration is given to your possible responsi bility for the finally approved design? Have you consulted with the customer on the design? What of your obligation--as a manufacturer experienced in the field--to warn the customer of potential hazards in following his design? ' 8. Can the product be manufactured and sold at a profit and still meet or exceed: 7 8 a. Performance requirements? b. Industry certification, standards? (E.g., Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc. (UL), National Electrical Manufacturers Associ ation (NEMA), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), etc.) c. Applicable federal, state, and local safety requirements? (E.g., Occupational Safety and Health Act, Consumer Product Safety Act, Federal Coal Mine Safety Act, etc.) d. The extremes of potential environmental influences such as heat or cold, humidity, altitude, vibration, gases or fluids, cor rosive ambients, etc.? e. Expected customer requirements of use, reliability, maintenance, etc.? 9. With present factory capability, can the design be achieved in production? 10. Does the design minimize installation and mainte nance problems? 11. What parts or components are critical to safety of the product? What will happen if these parts fail? 12. Will the design result in a product that is safely useable? Maintainable? Reparable? Does design provide for incorporation of all necessary safety devices? Are moving parts guarded? 13. Is the rated capacity of the machine shown on the machine by an attached permanent notice (e.g., metal plate, cast legend, stamping, etc.)? 14. When operated in accordance with instructions and within prescribed limitations (such as capacity, velocity, rpms, etc.), what damage can the product cause to persons or property? To itself? What damage may it cause if prescribed limitations are exceeded? What are the foreseeable consequences of misuse? 15. What dangers should users of the product be warned of? Is the warning adequate? Could the need for a warning be obviated by feasible redesign? 9 a. Labels or warnings places: prominent location, legibility, underscandability, durability; and b. Review and approval of warning labels or plates by law, engineering, and safety departments and/or by Products Reliability Committee. 16. . . Does design incorporate purchased parts? From re liable and time-tested vendors? Does vendor maintain records sufficient to trace shipments from him by shipment, batch, or lot number? Does vendor carry products liability insurance? Have you inspected vendor's manufacturing facilities and quality control system? Does your purchase order require vendor to certify compliance of his part or component with * applicable safety standards? 17. Does the design allow for human error? (E.g., errors arising from fatigue, boredom, insufficient training, emotional or physical upset, etc.) Does the design require a human factors analysis? 18. Does your design review require a failure mode and effects analysis, fault-free analysis or other systems`type approach? .... 19. Does your system of design review and evaluation ' provide for recheck and reevaluation prior to ap proval for production? Some manufacturers employ a three-ply system of design review: preliminary design review, intermediate design review, and final design review. . 20. Are your design reviews and evaluations recorded . and this documentation preserved against the possi bility of its use in connection with some future claim? NOTE: We reemphasize that these questions are merely suggestive of the kinds of questions that manufacturers must ask themselves as they design new or Improved products. We hope they may encourage the development of design review and checklists tailor-made to the individual company and product situation. Testing 1. Is a prototype of the product necessary? 2. What tests should be conducted? Who defines stan dards for testing? (NOTE: It is most important to define in detail the standards applicable to the product. Tests 10 should confirm choc Che.produce conforms to Che standard in each case.) 3. By whom should tests be conducted? In-house or by independent testing laboratory? Is independent testing required for product certification? 4. What records are to be made of results of testing? By whom authenticated? Have you a formalized I program for evaluation of test results? How are l! lessons of testing translated into redesign or abandonment of the project? 5. To whom are test results distributed? R&D? Engineering? Top management? Law? Risk manage ment/insurance? Marketing? Products Reliability Committee? Others? 6. What records are prepared on tests conducted and results obtained? 7. Where and for how long are records of test results preserved? Design Changes and Modifications 1. Rave you a policy and procedure covering necessary design changes where "bugs" are discovered in prod ucts already in the distribution chain? a. Products in transit and in hands of customers or distributors? ' (1) If product's size, customer's require ments, etc., prevent recall, have you developed a procedure for field change over? . b. Work in process? c. Inventory? (NOTE: Engineering changes and deviations (a deviation differs from an engineering change in that it represents a deviation in dimension or material in a production part from a current blueprint) should receive the same multifunction review as a total design. The attention given any such engineering change or deviation may, ! of course, vary with the degree of risk involved.) ---- T l. : ' ..... / ' ;' ' J Colt Industries ^ RECEIVED JUN 2 1 78 GARLOCK w ~ C To: See Distribution Subject: pR0DUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES 1-3 o : c Garlock Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Street Palmyra. New York 14522 315/597-4811 Interoffice From. Michael E. Panarites Da,e: June 21, 19 7 8 Date Time of Meeting: June 15, 1978 - 8:30 am In Attendance: Not Attending: ) H Hughey J Kosowski G LeRoy J Lynn M Panarites J Guffey D Holmes E Kuhnen A Kuzmuk H Schaefer K Schoenfelder R Stay C Terr 1. Warranties Jack Lynn Contract between buyer and seller. Don't rely on warranties as a defense in a Product Liability case. A question was raised if we should acknowledge all incoming orders and in quiries on our own acknowledgement order which has our warrant inprinted on the back. Yes...because if a product liability suit is brought against Garlock, our warranty would have precedent over customer's warranty. Acknowledgements need not be sent to our distributors because we already have a signed agreement with them. Discussed whether all our products we ship out have installation instructions in them. In most cases, installation instructions are packed with shipment, however, only one instruction is sent out with each box or package. Therefore, when a distributor sells just one piece out of the package, there is not an in stallation instruction to go along with it. It was decided that we send additional copies of our installation instructions to each distributor for them to hand out. Since Garlock is showing good intent by supplying these instructions to the ) distributor, should a product liability suit occur, the onus would be placed on the distributor. 2. Warnings Labeling - John Guffey Tabled until next meeting. PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 2 6/21/78 3, Material Safety Data Sheets - Harold Hughes All requests for completion of MSD sheets should be forwarded to Harold Hughes, He will supply the requesting company with information except of a proprietary nature, Mr. Hughes said that we are not required to fill out an MSD sheet unless the material is considered hazardous according to OSHA. However we have been receiving many Quests along with revised OSHA-20 MSD forms that are requesting information that we should not be giving out. These forms have been attached for your information. 4, Design, Development and Engineering - ME Panarites All units should have their engineering people review this section and come to the next meeting prepared to discuss items that apply to us. Example; are we keeping records; we have a formal design review program, etc, do 5, General Information Hon Stay stated that because all the problems and law suits Johns. Manville has been haying with asbestos, they are banning smoking in all their plants. The question was brought up whether we should be doing the same at our facilities in Palmyra and Sodus. Mr, Guffey is attending an Asbestos Institute meeting in Quebec and this subject will be discussed at that time. Mr. Guffey will report back to the committee at the next meeting. Allied Chemical has taken the stand that anytime one of their employees is involved in handling hazardous material, including compressed asbestos sheet, etc, , for every 20 hot they work with the hazardous material, they will have 40 minutes off. Also, they will take a shower and change clothes every hour and are closely watched by full-time supervision. In otherwords, in a period of four hours they only work 8Q minutes. It costs approximately $600 to change a flange gasket, 6, Booklet entitled ''Company Programs to Reduce Products Liability" have been ordered and should be available to everyone by the next meeting, 7, The next meeting will be held on Thursday, July 20, 1978, 8;3Q am, Personnel Conference Room, 8, Any additions or changes to these minutes should be brought to the attention of ME Panarites, Distributioni J Guffey D Holmes H Hughes J Kosowski E Kuhnen A Kuzmuk G LeRoy J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer K Schoenfelder R Stay C Terr Colt Industries RECEIVED JUL 17 78 To: Subject: See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY P / .C o Co Garlock Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Street Palmyra. New York 14522 315/597-4811 Interoffice From: Michael E. Panarites Date July 14, 1978 The Product Liability meeting scheduled for Thursday, July 20th has been changed to Thursday, July 27th, 8:30 am, Personnel Conference Room. We have attached an agenda for that meeting. Also, for your information, there will be a special program on television this evening entitled "Way to Dusty Death" produced by Jules Bergman. It can be seen at 10 pm on channel 13. It is about asbestos. If you have a chance to watch it please do so. ME Panarites/bld Attachment Distribution: Guffey Holmes Hughes Kuhnen Kuzmuk LeRoy * {ttt ' / / //,, , a .'VlwV . J Lynn ~ H Schaefer R Stay C Terr '/ / r iV PRODUCT LIABILITY OMTTEE July 27, 1978 I. II. III. IV. WARNINGS & LABELING - John Guffey (see previous Minutes) ENGINEERING - Review Engineering Section of "booklet") REPORT ON ASBESTOS INSTITUTE MEETING - John Guffey DISTRIBUTE BOOKLETS ENTITLED "Company Programs to Reduce Products Liability" RECEIVED JUL1778 LA.. 2.V ?.*CNT SA^LOC* INC. Colt Industries i 5 78 ... A.fUMENt GARLOCK INC* See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MOTIVES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 O'vision Street Palmyra. New Vork 14522 315/597-4811 Interoffice From: Michael E. Panarites Date: August 1, 1978 Date and Time of Meeting: July 25, 1978 In Attendance; P DeRosa J Guffey P Hanke H Hughes J Kbsowski A Kuzmuk G LeRoy M Panarites H Schaefer C Terr R Whittaker Guests: J Holwerda J Peck Not Attending: D Holmes E Kuhnen 1. Warnings S Labeling - Referencing minutes of the October *77 meeting Mr. Guffey wrote several letters to the Occupational Cancer Control Unit at Berkeley, California referencing labeling of asbestos pro ducts in industry (like Raybestos-Manhattan was doing). After several phone calls, we finally received letters from three different departments of the Department of Health located in Sacramento, Cali fornia (copies attached), which in essence give instructions for labeling of asbestos containing wastes being disposed of, but say nothing regarding restrictions on the use of asbestos fibers in industry. It was therefore determined that our standard form of hazard label for asbestos products was acceptable for shipments. 2. Asbestos Information Association - Mr. Guffey reviewed information he had received from the AIA pertaining to Secretary of HEW Califarc's announcement that several steps would be taken to "inform doctors, workers and others about the increased risks of asbestos exposure." These steps are shown on the attached sheets from AIA. : Mr. Guffey suggested that perhaps the Garlock Legal Department and a representative from Colt become more involved with the AIA. PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINITJES July 25, 1978 Page 2 8/1/78 3. Review Engineering Section of Product Liability Booklet Mr. Gordon LeRoy said that his department had reviewed this section of the P/L booklet and felt that we should begin to define and categorize our products as follows: 1. Made to customer specifications and designs. 2. Garlock design made to specifications of ASTM, RMA, etc. (compressed asbestos sheet) 3. Garlock design but not to any specifications (GyIon) Mr. LeRoy would be setting up a product review ccnmittee and felt that each profit center should set up their own corrmittee. There would be further discussion regarding the engineering aspects of product liability at our next meeting. 4. Effective September 1st, smoking privileges at the Garlock de Sherbrooke plant would be abolished. Also, no one would be hired who presently smokes. This is also being done by Johns/Manville. 5. Mr. Holwerda reported on legislation related to product liability in the various states and its affect on industry. He also dis cussed hold-harmless agreements. 6. Ary additions or changes to these minutes should be brought to the attention of ME Ranarites. Distribution: cc: F DeRosa J Guffey P Hanke D Holmes H Hughes J Kosowski E Kuhnen A Kuanuk G LeRoy M Ifenarites H Schaefer C Terr J Holwerda R Whittaker Colt Industries See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Street Palmyra. New York 14522 315/597-4811 Interoffice From: Michael E. Panarites 0a,e: November, 1978 Date and Time of Meeting: November 9, 1978, 8:30 am In Attendance: Not Attending: J Guffey H Hughes A Kuzmuk E Kuhnen G LeRoy D Holmes J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay C Terr 1. Regularly scheduled meetings will be held on a monthly, basis. Everyone must attend or send a representative. The next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, December 14 at 8:00 am in the Personnel Conference Room (6-1). 2. Product Liability Claim - State of Louisiana (prison) suing Belmont Distributor (Garlock Inc.) regarding an explosion of a pressure cooker. Our insurance carrier is Aetna and they have obtained local counsel in Baton Rouge. We are in the process of getting our papers to . gether. Mr. Lynn will keep us informed. 3. Asbestos Booklet - It was the general consensus of the committee that the booklets should only be given out to those employees who work with asbestos. When an employee enters into a job in asbestos area he will be given an asbestos booklet during his orientation and asked to sign a card saying that he has read it. Mr. Panarites was to talk with Mr. George Townsend to get his approval on the above. 4. Labeling Program - Mr. Guffey said the program is going along well. 5. Gordon LeRoy spoke about the Product Review Committee they set up in Industrial Packing. They broke it down into three categories: PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINTUES November, 1978 (a) Molded Rubber - Listed all auto parts. Got out all customer specifications and reviewed kinds of testing required by customer and found that we had relaxed our requirements and in doing M/C testing. We reinstated many tests because of the liability aspects of it. (b) Garlock Design Products - ASTM, RMA specs, etc. We have developed many new compounds, therefore, we must completely reverify that our products meet all requirements that we specify in the cata logs. (c) Garlock Design - Klozures, etc. - company has never had a formal program. Most testing done by custo mers. Do not have formal program. Very difficult to test returned goods from customers. The other groups (Constructin Products, Hydraulic Components, Compression Packing), have not formed a Product Review Committee as yet and were requested to do so before the next meeting. 6. At our next meeting we would discuss the "Manufacturing" portion of the green booklet. 7. There was some discussion regarding a non-asbestos pro duct pamphlet for company's who will not use asbestos products. 8. OSHA is looking at cotton dust. We do buy a lot of cotton products, but are looking into buying more polyester. 9. Any additions or changes to these minutes should be brought to the attention of ME Panarites. Distribution: cc: J Guffey H Hughes A Kuzmuk D Holmes E Kuhnen G LeRoy J Lynn M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay C Terr J Holwerda Colt Industries \ RECEP'F^ DEC 19 LAW Cr'` 1 ga.-l-;-:.- To: Subject: See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Sifeet Palmyra. New York 14522 315/597-4811 Interotllce From: Michael E. Panarites Oate: December, 1978 Date and Time of Meeting: December 14, 1978 - 8:00 am In attendance: J Guffey H Hughes E Kuhnen A Kuzmuk J Lynn ) M Panarites C Terr Not Attending: G LeRoy D Holmes H Schaefer R Stay />/ *; "V t . 1, Product Liability Claim - State of Louisiana - Mr. Lynn said there was nothing further to report. //- \ It would probably be a while before it goes into / - court, / /' / 2, Asbestos Booklet - Mr. Panarites said that Mr,/Townsend agreed that the asbestos booklet should be passed out to those employees working with asbestos and those who are hired into the asbestos positions. It was decided that we would use the book issued by Lake Asbestos since we had a supply on hand. A committee would be formed to decide the best method to pass these booklets out. 3. Product Review Committee - / / \ Hydraulic Components has formed a committee headed up ft ) by Charlie Terr, Compression Packing - Mr, Roy Whittaker is chairman of their committee with Dave White (Engineering), Tom Crannell (Marketing) and George Hayes (Manufacturing) as members. They will meet the first Tuesday of every month. \ PRODUCT LIABILITY COMMITTEE MINUTES Page 2 12/1978 Construction Products has set up their committee and will be meeting next month. 4. A question was raised whether it would be possible for the salaried personnel who work around the asbestos could have a yearly x-ray like the hourly personnel. Mr. Panarites said he was sure this could be done and for them to check with the Medical Department to get it set up. 5. Mr. Panarites said that each group should write up reports on how their committees are doing, i.e. engineering, manufacturing, etc., relative to the product liability to keep the whole Product Liability committee abreast of all happenings. 6. The next meeting will be held on THURSDAY, JANUARY 18, 1979, 8:00 am, Personnel Conference Room (Bldg. 6-1). 7. Any additions or changes to these minutes should be brought to the attention of ME Panarites. Distribution: cc: J Guffey H Hughes A Kuzmuk D Holmes E Kuhnen G LeRov J Lynn j M Panarites H Schaefer R Stay C Terr J Holwerda Colt Industries To: Subject: See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY MINUTES LP o'. & y Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Street Palmyra New York 14522 315/597-4811 Interoffice From. Dale: Michael E. Panarites January, 1979 Date and Time of Meeting: January 18, 1979 - 8:00 am In Attendance: H Hughes G Leroy A Kuzmuk J Lynn M Panarites C Terr \ R Whittaker Not Attending: J Guffey D Holmes E Kuhnen H Schaefer R Stay 1. Asbestos Booklet - After a meeting between Alex Kuzmuk, John Guffey and Mike Panarites, it was decided that we would use the wording from the Resinold booklet and incorporate the Garlock/Colt name with a few minor changes. Mr. Panarites is to work with the Advertising Department to get the l>ooks printed up. There was also discussion on having health work rules put into the "Plant Rules". If the rules were violated, than disciplinary action could be taken. This will be under consideration and will be discussed at our next meeting. 2. There are several films available on the discussion of smoking and working in asbestos (Johns Manville and the FSA have produced them). These films will be looked at by the committee to see if they would be worth showing to our employees. -continued on back- Colt Industries :--rr -yr[J '?. 9 79 To: Sub9Ct: see Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY MINUTES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Sireei Palmyra New York 14522 315 592-4811 Interoffice From: Michael E. Panarites Date: February, 1979 Date and Time of Meeting: February 15, 1979 - 8:00 am In Attendance: H. Hughes ^^^THynn M. Panarties R. Stay C. Terr R. White- Not Attending: ) J. Guffey D. Holmes E. Kuhnen A. Kuzmuk G. LeRoy H. Schaefer 1. Asbestos Booklet - It was decided that we would be making up our own booklet and using some of the ideas from Resinold and some of our own to make it more personal. Mr. Panarties would be getting to gether with Advertising to have them make up a booklet for us to see at the next meeting before going to press. 2. It was brought to the attention of the Committee that Nicolett was charged by their union that they were discriminating against the employees by requesting a no smoking ban in their plant. The case was taken to arbitration and the arbitrator found in favor of the union. Mr. Panarites said that this decision is not binding to other companies. 3. Ron Stay said the marketing department had set up a reporting system from the salesmen to tell them what companies were not going to buy any asbestos products in the future. Mr. Stay had a notebook filled with these reports which probably con tained around 200+ companies. We, as a company, are not condemning the asbestos products we make, but tell our customers we do have ) alternatives. Kind of a 'soft-sell* - alternatives do not las as long and cost more, etc. continued Colt Industries 79 See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY MINUTES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Oiision 1S66 OirS'On Sheet Palmyra New York MS22 3IS 597-48H Interoffice From Michael E. Panarites Date February, 1979 Date and Tine of Meeting: February 15, 1979 - 8:00 am In Attendance: H. Hughes ^^iXfnn M. Panarties R. Stay C. Terr R. White Not Attending: J. Guffey D. Holmes E. Kuhnen A. Kuzmuk G. LeRoy H. Schaefer 1. Asbestos Booklet - It was decided that we would be making up our own booklet and using some of the ideas from Resinold and some of our own to make it more personal. Mr. Panarties would be getting to gether with Advertising to have then mahe up a booklet for us to see at the next meeting before going to press. 2. It was brought to the attention of the Committee that Nicolett was charged by their union that they were discriminating against the employees by requesting a no smoking ban in their plant. The case was taken to arbitration and the arbitrator found in favor of the union. Hr. Panarites said that this decision is not binding to other companies. 3. Ron Stay said the marketing department had set up a reporting system from the salesmen to tell them what companies were not going to buy any asbestos products in the future. Mr. Stay had a notebook filled with these reports which probably con tained around 200+ companies. We, as a company, are not condemning the asbestos products we make, but teii our customers we do have alternatives. Kind of a 'soft-sell' - alternatives do not las as long and cost more, etc. continued PRODUCT LIABILITY MINUTES Page 2 2/1979 4. Discussion of labeling process - it is felt that the labeling of our products with the asbestos warning has not hurt us in the business. 5. Jack Lynn informed us that there are approximately 70 new court cases on asbestos against Garlock. 6. Mr. Panarites asked that those units who have commitees to review the 'green book' and that we would be going over the marketing area at our next meeting. Mr. Panarites also stated that most of the work we had done was in the area of asbestos and that we should begin to expand into other areas. 7. The next meeting would be held on Thursday, March 15, 1979 at 8:00 am in the 6-1 conference room. 8. Any additions or changes to these minutes should be brought to the attention of ME Panarites. cc: J Eolwerda P Hanke Colt Industries APR i; 73 GAPLOCK INC See Distribution PRODUCT LIABILITY MINUTES Garlock Inc Mechanical Packing Division 1666 Division Sireet Palmyra New York 14622 315 597-481 1 Interollice From: Michael E. Panarites Da,e: March 19 7 9 Date and Time of Meeting: March 15, 1979 - 8:00 am In Attendance: J Clement H Hughes A Kuzmuk J Lynn M Panarites C Terr Not Attending: J Guffey D Holmes E Kuhnen G LeRoy H Schaefer R Stay A Johengsn 1. Xerox copies of the Colt/Garlock Asbestos booklet were passed out at the meeting for everyone to look over and offer the opinion on any changes or corrections that should be made. For those not attending the meeting, copies will be sent out with the minutes. After all changes/corrections have been made and the "brown copy" has been approved by the committee, it will be forwarded to Colt in New York for approvals by the safety and legal departments before going to press. 2. Mr. Terr from Hydraulic Components stated that they had given out copies of excerpts from the green booklet on marketing/sales to their sales people. It was suggested that other units do the same. 3. Joan Clement, Manager of Advertising, was our guest and spoke about the information that is printed in the catalogs on the chemical content, what the product is capable of doing, etc. should be approved and made sure it is correct by each unit before it is submitted to the advertising department for printing. It is not the responsibility of the advertising department to do this. continued PRODUCT LIABILITY MEETING March 1979 Page 2 4. Because there was limited attendance at the meeting, it was adjourned. 5. The next meeting will be held on Thursday, April 12, Personnel Conference (6-1) at 8:00 a.m. 6.. Any corrections or additions to these minutes should be brought to the attention of Michael Panarites. cc: J Holwerda P Hanke Attachment / RECEIVED AUS 2 '"1 79 " .r ,r L nc ' * /? (` < . ; ->*/<' a r- '-' GARLOCK c ' ' - AtZ.t L~ . ' rw-t-T.^ 72^ */ r*/< 5 _?/- ^ss/e/. fv > /Vr Compression Packing Product Liability Committee Minutes of Meeting: Attended by: Wednesday, August 15, 1979 KM Artl TJ Donovan GD Hayes JD Lynn,, FA Piccola RE White Discussion centered around class action suits involving compression packing products and the amount of our liability in application recommendations made by our people. In regards to asbestos, there has not yet been a Colt policy set forth. We are bound, however, to conform to all labeling and OSHA regulations. All dry asbestos styles have been dropped; any asbestos products produced by GARLOCK are encapsulated for safe handling. No orders are being accepted for dry asbestos products. When customers inquire as to why we no longer carry dry asbestos, we need only tell them that the line has been dropped for convenience. Should advise them, however, to discontinue use of dry asbestos unless they are willing to take the necessary precautions for safe handling. Our labeling system advises our customers of their responsibility to take precautions in the handling of all asbestos products by their employees or customers. Most lawsuits currently on the books are for shipyards? others for our customers' customers. No employee suits. No case has gone to court- as yet. Under our "Conditions of Sale," legally we are bound only to replace or refund customer's money if our product fails. It must be proven that our product failed and that failure was not the customer's improper installation. We are bound to supply customer with a product that will work under the conditions outlined. If an order is received with the application information on the order, it is our responsibility to advise the customer that the product is not meant for the application if such is the case. Our distributors are acting as GARLOCK representatives and are assumed to have all the application information we do. It is our responsibility to keep them informed. i^es^where we buy our products from a supplier for resale, both GARLOCK and supplier are liable for failure of product. . V" Product Liability Committee Meeting - August 15, 1979 Page 2 When supplying a customer with a sample of a new product on which all testing has not been completed, it is advised that evidence, in writing, be provided that states, "supplied for evaluation only ... no test data available." It is GARLOCK's responsibility and not our distributors' to include this written evidence. Also, it is recommended that we have a follow-up system to collect the name of the end-user and results of using the new product for our product file and future use. This should be done on every sample or sale of service order. GARLOCK distributors must be informed that when breaking up a package of material that had contained a warning, the partial package must still contain the warning when sold to the end-user. If necessary, additional warning tags should be supplied by GARLOCK. Once notice has been given to distributors, it was recommended that GARLOCK salesmen check to be sure distributors comply with this requirement. GARLOCK currently has the cleanest, safest methods of handling asbestos products in the industry. The question arose as to whether we receive additional business because of it. The employee manual regarding hazardous materials is in the hands of ME Panarites in order to get Colt approval before distribution. GARLOCK has not made any decision at this time in regard to smoking employees working with asbestos products. All Material Safety Data Sheets distributed by Compression Packing are currently written by HR Hughes of the Lab in Palmyra. Next meeting to be held Wednesday, September 12, 1979 at 10 o'clock a.m. KM Artl 8/17/79 r There are Seme Things Yeu Should Know... Every person employed at GARLOCK where asbestos fiber is used should know that breathing excessive amounts of asbestos causes certain health problems I GARLOCK has taken many steps to f protect you from exposure to harmful amounts of asbestos fiber. To make these steps effective, you must follow safe working rules on the |ob. ll Tiie health problems I i The health problems that have been connected with exposure to asbestos are these: Breathing excessive amounts of fiber in the air might result in a disease caeteed asbestosis -- a scarring of the lung tissue, which when severe makes it difficult to breath properly. Persons who smoke cigarettes and inhale excessive amounts of asbestos dust are at a greater risk of developing lung cancer. Asbestos alone does not appear to cause this disease, but it can make people who smoke cigarettes more likely to develop this cancer. Studies show that if you don't smoke cigarettes, asbestos exposure does not increase your risk of getting lung cancer. Persons exposed to excessive amounts of asbestos have a greater risk of developing Mesothelioma which is a rare cancer of the lining of the chest or abdomen. There also is some indication from uncon firmed studies that there might be a greater incidence of cancer of the digestive tract in persons exposed to excessive amounts of airborne asbestos. The health problems Yuu wili be required to do certain things on the job to help us protect you. Some of these are: ' You must do everything you can to prevent 1 dust or getting asbestos fiber into the air where it could be inhaled. ! In some areas you may at times be required to wear a respirator temporarily or other forms of personal protective equipment. You must wear this equipment properly when ever it is necessary. You will be requested not to smoke on the job if you might be exposed to asbestos. You will be urged for your health's sake to quit smoking completely. ) 4t You will not be permitted to take any r i asbestos material home from the plant in ) f order to prevent exposing others. You will use facilities provided to change work clothes, and wash before going home. f 5t1i If equipment is not working correctly, you must report it to your supervisor immediate ly- 1 Be concerned -- not alarmed. Present cases of health problems we mentioned are related to working conditions that existed many years ago. As we became aware of risks, we began spending considerable sums of money to upgrade dust control systems to prevent excessive asbestos exposures. We are confident that as long as employees follow safe work rules and equipment is operated properly, no employee will be exposed to hazardous amounts of asbestos fiber in our operations. To assure continued control of risk, the company will regularly check asbestos-using operations with trained personnel. You must cooperate with these trained employees when they check your work areas. Government inspections may be made of our facilities to make sure you are not being exposed to hazardous levels of asbestos. The government has set standards that limit how much asbestos you can be exposed to. We have taken steps to abide fully with those regulations. Be concerned, not alarmed VIOLATION OF HEALTH WORK RULES CAN RESULT IN DISMISSAL. After you begin work, you will be given an opportunity to learn more about the potential health risks of asbestos and wha: the company is doing to protect you on the job. You will be taught how to use personal protective equipment and other methods of protecting yourself. Because of the efforts of GARLOCK and your own efforts, it is likely that you will be as safe working for GARLOCK as in any other occupation or endeavor. That is the way we want it. We will not take chances with your health and we won't allow you to take chances with it. Violation of health work rules can result in dismissal. Mtea* wrk w Do you understand that smoking cigarettes increases the health risks connected with asbestos? _____________ Yes No Do you understand that you will have to follow certain work rules set by the company to protect you? _____________ Yes No Please sign your name and put today's date below. Signed Date tIf ; I: REFER TO THIS BOOKLET OFTEN s>o we can be sure you have read this booklet and know about the potential risks connected with your job and the strict rules you must follow, we would like you to fill out the form at the right and return it to us. The form must be forwarded to your supervisor before your first pay period ends. Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute 'rT \ */ ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE 1975 ANNUAL MEETING October 8, 1375 Savannah Inn and Country Club, Savannah, Georgia LIST OF DELSGATES_ AMATEX CORPORATION VI. Kaaskant M. J. Scanlan J. L. Rainey H. H. Via Iter GARLOCK INC. P. S. Hanke, Esq. A. Kuzmuk R. 3. Pilmer (Garlock of Canada Ltd.) RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, M. N. Brooks P. G. Dolan G. Ferrucci R. M. Gordon J. VJ. Hawkins C. A. Kennedy VI. Krucke R. O. Moebius M. Q. Scowcroft J. P. vlronski INC. SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. 3ratt D. E. Childers J. vl. Echerd ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. G. F. A. Brink H. Devriasa P. E. Loclarc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. VI. H. Smith CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO. LTD. H. M. Hay A. R. Morrill CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. N. Gritzuk R. A. Kuntze (ORP) P. Steen LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. B. A. Farrell C. E. Stiofken (ASARCO) NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. K. Mori S. Shima TBA INDUSTRLAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson FRL/AN ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CO. S. Golub ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE J. D. Officer, Esq., Legal Counsel Cadwalader, Vlickersham & Taft D. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary Total attendance during the three-day 1375 Annual Meeting was 57 people: 34 members, 20 spouses, 1 guest, 1 legal counsel and 1 secretary; representative of 11 member companies, FRL and ATI, more Page 2 - ATI i:7S Annual Hooting - ' 7/3/75 HJIO n 1.. CALL TO ORDER: Tha 1976 Annual General Hooting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President Kuzrauk at 9:00 .m., October 8, 1976, at the Savannah Inn and Country Club^ Savannah, Georgia. 2. READING OF MINUTES: Upon the calling for a reading of the Minutes of the last stated meeting, it was moved by Mr. Scanlan, seconded by Mr. Bratt, and unanimously approved, to dispense with the reading thereof. 3. FINANCIAL REPORT; Treasurer Scanlan presented the Financial Report of the Litigation Defense Fund as of August 31, 1976. After receipts, expenditures and. liabilities, the actual net worth of the Fund at the end of the Fiscal Year was $3,735.80. The financial records were audited by Dreslin and Company, Certified Public Accountants, and were found to be in order. The Treasurer's Report is appended hereto as Attachment I. 4. SPECLAL ASSESSMENT #3: President Kuzmuk advised the members that the Ad Hoc Committee had recommended to the Board of Governors that a third Special Assessment was in order for the Litigation Defense Fund to cover anticipated near-future costs of the Tyler Litigation. After due consideration, however, the Board decided there should be sufficient money in the Fund for the time being and that the matter would be reviewed again at the next meeting in February 1977. _5. COMPANY LIABILITY: President Kuair.uk reported that Cadwalader, Nickorsham & Taft will prepare a memorandum dealing with the extent of liability of member companies in the Tyler Litigation or in any future lawsuits in which ATI is named as a defendant. . TYLER LITIGATION: Attorney Officer reported that nothing much has happened in the Tyler Litigation insofar as ATI is concerned. The judge still has not ruled on ATI's motion for dismissal issued about two years ago and Cadwalader, Wickarsham & Taft is about to make another attempt to have the Institute dismissed from the law suits. 2. MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION: Upon noting a large number of pending lawsuits involving claims of personal injuries resulting from exposure to asbestos, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued a show-cause order listing 40-50 cases (including the Tyler Litigation) and calling for a response by September 1, 1975, as to why the cases should not be consolidated for pretrial proceedings. The responses were overwhelmingly opposed to consolidation of the cases. The Panel decided to take no action at the time and the more Page 3' - ATI 1975 Annual Keating - 10/3/7 5 scheduled hearing v;as suspended until further notice. It is quite possible, however, that a similar attempt toward consolidation will be made again in the near future. J3. ADJCUAMMZNT: There being no further business to be brought be fore the general membership, a motion to adjourn at 9:15 a.m. was made by Mr. Leclerc, seconded by Mr. Stieflcen, and so carried. pectfully submitted. Doris m. ragan, Lbcecutive Secretary Attachment I: Litigation Defense Fund as of 8/31/76 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND FISCAL YEAR 1975-76 ESTABLISHED: APRIL 1, 1374 REPORT OF FUNDS FOP. PERIOD MAY 1, 197S THRU AUGUST 31, 1373 BALANCE ON HAND - MAY 1, 197S RECEIPTS: 6/30/76 - Interest on Savings 8/31/75 - Interest on Savings $ 90.67 ____ 33.70 TOTAL RECEIPTS ............................................................ ..... DISBURSEMENTS: 6/11/76 - To ATI Inc for Cadwalader, 7Jic?C3*ri-,;:ai-a & Taft Shove ! ration......................... 7 327- 59 5/11/76 To AT; for Karr, iJattles & R i - 1 - Shouo Litigation 1,549.09 6/28/76 Cada-a .c'c r, "7ickarsham & Taft - Tyi-jr Litigation - 1st 3tr 76 570.28 5/28/76 Hathaway S Jackson - Tyler Litigation - 10/15/75-4/30/75 1,599.00 8/31/75 Cadwalader, Jickarshan &. Taft Tyler Litigation - 2nd Qtr 75 293.06 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ........................................................................... CASH BALANCE ON HAND - AUGUST 31, 1375 .................... Accounts Payable - To ATI Inc for Office Expenses 5/1-3/31/75 . ACTUAL NET YJORTH - AUGUST 31, 1976 .................... $ 0,757.91 + 124.37 $ 8,882.28 $ 5,039.02 $ 3,843. 25* - 107.46 $ 3,735.80 Checking Account: Savings Account: $ 89.04 +3,754. 22 $3,843.25 Atta chinent I ^ uor\>e_ ^ \ t ^ 6 u v > ^ (<-: faL Am&vey'} A^uo^G* 7j4tT "P&jOJceY? V l-WC-&>/^e> \A CCsJw(<?4l_ a^ 't^-cA-^ u*4 **~v- J cc_ ^rdtoiislij ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING JUNE 3, 1976 i f , j*JLU. 4 MX. {S' | * * V-<^ sAr# ^ <4 ^ V> ^r; (O-m -vt Dei 6w Vi *4~. Rv'W- . u* J ASBESTOS TACTILE INSTITUTE AD HOC COMMITTEE MEETING Jana 3, 1976 Stouffer's National Center Inn, Arlington, Virginia Chairman: Vice Chairman: D. H. Markusson, Esq., Johns-Hanville Corporation E. C. Eratt, Southam Asbestos Company IN ATTENDANCE: Aratex Corporation -- M. J. Scan! an Asarco Inc. -- It. J. tilth. Esq. Garlock Inc. -- A. Kuzmul: Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. -- S. Shima Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. -- C. D. Colson; P. G. Dolan, vt. A. Suanthar, Esq.; C. A. Kennedy; M. Q. Scowcroft Southern Asbestos Company -- E. C. Eratt T3A Industrial Products Ltd. -- B. J. Corson W. 3. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., ATI Trial Counsel, -- Cadwalader, Wickershan & Taft ' D. a. Marlrusson, Esq. -- Johns-Manville Corporation D. M. Pagan, ATI Executive Secretary MINUTES ,1. TYLE?. LITIGATION: No remarkable change in the Tyler Litigation is anticipated during the next 3-5 months and very little has happened with the case. ATI's posture remains unchanged. Basically the situation can be summed up by saying that the court is remaining open for additional plaintiffs to join the lawsuit. Plaintiffs are still coming in and are being given a reasonable time for discovery. The court will not address the jurisdictional issues, including ATI's motion to dismiss, until all discovery is completed. As far as our request for a voluntary dismissal is concerned, plaintiffs' counsel will not decide until discovery is completed. 2. SHOUP LITIGATIONi A complaint was filed in March in Detroit, Michigan, by William Carl Shoup against Johns-ftanville Products Corporation, ot al, including The Asbestos Textile Institute, a Pennsylvania corporation. more Paga 2 - Minutes of ATI Ad Hoc Ccnraittae Heating - 6/3/76 a) Cf special interest is that this is tha first time Afl has been made a party in a litigation involving an insulation worker, as opposed to factory workers as is the case in the Tyler Litigation. Tho Shoun action represents the first attempt to draw ATI, as a trade association, rather than a product manu facturer into user-type litigation. Hr. Alcorn was quite correct in filing a motion to dismiss -- and before the motion was heard he './as able to successfully negotiate a voluntary dismissal. The volunatary dismissal is "without prejudice," which means that at any time until tha Statute cf Limitations runs out, ATI cun be rejoined as a party defendant. However, tho likelihood of that happening is remote. Tha plaintiff has a number cf good, solid, viable defendants who did supply insulation products and there is no question Mr. Shoup was e:rposed to those products. There is very little involvement that would warrant tne rejoinder cf ATI or of any of tho trade associations. b) Of interest are the allegations as to trade associations in a "user" case. The plaintiff acknowledges that* The organizations are trade associations* Bach is engaged in research and development and in tl\o collection, promulgation and dissemination of informa tion to its members, to users of its products and to the public-at-large and ultimate consumers; The defendants are involved in the trade associations that, collectively, had knowledge for many years as to the hazards of the inhalation cf asbestos dust and thare wa3 a suppression or misrepresentation of that icnoulodga. The above is alternatively pleaded that either the trade associa tions ongaged in a suppression of tha knowlodge of the hazard or they misrepresented the nature of the hazard. The other allega tion is that they did suppress or misrepresent the knowledge but they did so in the form of a civil conspiracy with the other defendants. Tha civil conspiracy aspect is not too alarming bocauso it is a difficult thing to prove. However, a chargo of suppression or misrepresentation of knowledge is one of which trade associations must be cognizant and cn guard. The reason ing behind this statement is that since the companies are the source of the information for tho trade associations, tho asso ciations become operational arms cf tha companies. This might be construed that tha members of the associations are liable in that they were negligent in not doing enough investigation and in not pursuing tho leads indicated by medical literature. o _) Pago 3 - Minutes of ATI Ad Hoc Ccnmittoe Wanting - 6/3/76 * I As a practical natter, however, the likelihood of that happening in the Chcup case is somewhat remote. It is difficult for the plaintiff tc prove and thera is little pragmatic reason for him to attempt to do so. Ea already has planty of defendants; why worry about the trade associations. c) It is becoming incraasingly clear how peoplo aro thinking in "user-typo* cases -- and that is a collective organization of defendants suppressing or misrepresenting information and the duly-elected representatives in tho trade associations being negligent in their duties of pursuing tho information and of investigating it -- and that loads to such questions ass After a certain cccsnittea is formed and active, v/hat did it do with the information it gathorod? tfhy did it take or not take a par ticular course of action? It seems evident there will bo mere attempts to join trade associations with "user-type* litigations. 2. A product E30STOE LITISATIC&t A case that went to trial in Louisville, Kentucky, is of interest in that it is the typo of litigation that could more directly involve, if not a trade association such as ATI, at least its member companies. It is quite unlike the usual insulation case because it involves the use of a finished product that someone other than 'the original manufacturer (in this case, Jchns-i-Ianville) had further fabricat ed cr processed. The plaintiff had worked in a factory for seme years, was e::pesed to the product, contracted mesothelioma and, subsequently, died. '. a) The case was tried by a jury. Counsel for the defendants proceeded with a state-of-the-art defense to indicate what knowledge wa3 hold by the companies at what point in time. Tho defendant lost the case but tho verdict was very "small* -- 510,000 for a 51-year-old man for lost wages during time of illness and fer pain and suffering and medical e:m>onses; and $80,000 to the widow for What should have been tho remainder of the plaintiff's lifetime, TIor'aaon's Compensation totaled about $22,000. The outcome reflocts a minimal liability on the part c tho primary manufacturer. b) In analyzing the caso, two points boccno clear. It is os:trjnely difficult to sell jurors on a state-of-the-art defense since they are net familiar with the situation nor with the literature. The problem is translating tc the year 1973 that working with asbestos was a hazard in factories in the United Kingdom in tho 1920's. All the literature tands to bo effec tively lumped together by tho plaintiffs and there is little mere O3 Page 4 - Minutes of ATI Ad Hoc Carmittee Heating - 6/3/76 segregation of points in time vhon tho data became meaningful in the insulation trada -- v/han there began to bo an awareness of bronchogenic cancer cr mesothelioma. c) A surprising fact was tha sophisticatad reasoning of the jury. They saamed to ask was it really reascnabla to expect companies in `he past to be concerned with tlv' health ha*.; rd -- nobocy *'3'-. v.M dj J-t:arc sting reaction on thf5 : o\ < ots vns t.us, ./.though Uv-v were aware of vor?%na:\: s vj-pensrv! :a. they dir. f'.-o'*. strnacly -..hat the employe:* sbjr .ir held i.t ->*p. They K* nor. feel tha -n-loyar should bo t^absolved. but there was co way to ho-d him liable becau&a .-* the structure of the complaint. Thoy felt thoro was someth\_v inherently unfair about an employee spending his entire workiuj life in a factory/ ? l becoming ill and dying as a result of conditions at the factory -- and than a third party who did nothing cut supply raw -- materials was charged with the whole burden, especially when the casa boiled down to whether or not the manufacturer Knew of a hazard and laboled his products accordingly. The jury was fairly well convinced that proper labeling would have had little consequence. ' -- e) Factually the case shaped up rather well. Unfortunately, the jury had difficulty working with tho instructions given it by the court. The instructions did not deal with labeling but with whether cr not there was Icnowledgo and if so there was an accompanying duty -- and thora was failure to satisfy the duty. f) The decision is being appealed on the grounds that the manufacturer defendant was successful in getting the court to submit an interrogatory to the jury which asked* Do you find from the evidence that the defendant gave adequate warning to tho defendant's employer? Tho jury's answer v/as "yos." To clarify, there is a series of cases under Kentucky law, primarily in the mining industry involving dynamito, that says* Warning ' to the employer is warning to the craployoe. This is not tha rule in ail jurisdictions but thoro is a growing body of lav; leaning this way. If this is so in the Kentucky courts, it will sot up, based cn tho evidence that there vns an intervening cause by another party, te wit, the employer. This would absolve the manufacturer from liability. g} Tho rosults of tho case have a bright side. Tho asbestos industry ha3 a story to toll. It i3 a stcry that, whan told. more  O- 3 Togo 5 - Minutes off ATI Ad Sec Ccmittoo locating - S/3/76 doesn't coco out sounding half bad. It is doubtful that anyone, absent a runaway jury, will be able to shew willful or wanton misconduct cn the part of the asbestos industry. When the information was put together and presented to tho jury, ns one on the'jury said the asbestos industry had gone out of i*= way to hurt people. On the contrary, they felt there had be r\ a r o'r-rrt by the industry. Unfortunr.l ely.. rue*-, uhav o,nvW. vns based cn wrong informal wn. Tho y iadv.-tr*' m-. ivepara r responsible, honest dstance, cm vhrl on .'lid. aot. t ied to ljotreaf'ous financial ur'viear, A . 'nr;!.: 'a'53 Ate" of interest i* ohe c'von rc; i..o. ma in >. v >:..:/ involving Poybeetcs-Hnnhatto/:. I?,, am -.to dra iner employees at Pascal a. A notion is pondi.v- to have sane certified a3 a class action and briefs have r*.;en filed in opposition. It is oxpected the class actio", will bo donis-d and the case will proceed as a multiple pinintidx litigation. Informal meetings with tho court indicate the defendant Canadian companies will be hold in the case. Discovery is continuing and depositions cf seme of the plaintiffs have been taken. The injuries thus far appear to be minimal and the case seems to be diminishing in proportion. 5. OCliPAITy DOCTGSS* In the news recently have been reports of several cases in California involving company doctors. They involve Johns-Ibnvilla plant contract physicians, i.e., private practitioners in tho local community who havo ccntracto with tho ccnpany to provide limited tine for pre--jmploymont physicals, annual check-ups and minor nodical problems. The situation arose from a case about two years ago vh^re an employee sued the company doctor on a straight malpractice complaint for failure on tho part of the doctor to disclose to the pationt the nature cf his pulmonary illness. Tho jury imposod about $385,000 on the doctor and the case vns closed. Subsequently, six other employees have filed similar cases against tho doctor who, in turn, has impleaded Jchnc-Manvilla on tho grounds it was not his rcopensibility to disclose the information to the employee. a) Thera is another group of casos in California involving large punitive damage claim, where the omplcyeos have brought actions directly against Johnc-flanville and the doctor -- J-M on the theory cf gross, willful and wanton negligence? the doctor on tho theory of malpractice, lha effort is to try to got the casos cut of the purview of wor!an's compensation; the general rule being that v/orlaaon's compensation is a complete bar on negligence but is not a complete bar if it is a willful action on the part cf the employer. Oj Togo S - Minutes c ATI Ad Sac Coenittao Mooting - 5/3/76 b) Thoro has boon a great deal of union involvement in tha caaos and mere of these types of occupational disease lawsuits are anticipated -- at least 20 or 30 in California alone. It would behoove employers to review with house counsel and the doctor e::actly what are the ground rules in getting nodical data from the doctor's office either to the employee or hie fam'Ly physician. TJhat makes the situation a'/eward is tl.-'' peculiar VtJ.ec no a doctor-patient relationship, Cne way or anvwhcr, tho p--orlers all filter through to tun doctor. OS"A mi ti'verrJ .r-rprosoarativos aro well aware c.T: _hc. perl 1'v.r.s and realize \s! tb rif.uit*. an. ''ontinuas it bececc- in"' va jka.rly ciff.'-trit to f'ud gned physicians wi.l 11 a,* T o".v :*x hl_- d aJ crrvftirol `t.-diciiA. It is indeed a 3c:r"in iOraedy industry or finding physicians reluctant to voocme orowo-r* doctors and if a company is successful in ?;*>viring one, ' .o doctor wants full insurance coverage from first dollr.:-. To robe it even more difficult# first dollar coverage is not avail able in the marketplace; it cannot be bought. 3 FETUTCIAL D2PC3T* As of April 30# 1576# the cash balance on hand in tha Litigation Defense Fund totaled $3,757.91. From that total# the following bills will be maid by the end of June 1576* . Tyler -- Hathaway; 10/15/75 thru 4/30/75 $1,599.00 ^ler -- Cadvalader;First Quarter 1976 - 570.23 Shoup --- Kerr#'Tattles and Hus sell " 1,549.09 Shcum -- Cadwaladar, Wickershaa & Taft 927.59 ' $4,745.93 * Based on tho above known disbursements# the orrpected cash balance at June 30# 1975# will be $4,011.95# deened by the Ccsmittee to bo sufficient through the end of this Fiscal Year. The Financial Deport as of April 30# 1976# is attached to these Minutes as Attachment I. 7. FUTOD2 MSOTIHSSt It was agreed that although a low profile is boing maintained in tho Tyler Litigation# it would be helpful to all Committee nembors to continue to meet at least twice a year. Doing so would enable all nembors to keep abroast of other litigations that are concerned with asbestos. It was decided that when there are sufficient data of interest to ATI member companies# the Chairman of tha Ad Hoc Committee will call a meeting. a. AXA/I3A L3S\L ADVISORY CCT2HTT22: Tho Board of Directors cf tho Asbestos Information Association/ilorth America has approved tho Page 7 -- Minutes of ATI Ad Hoc Ccmittce Hooting - 'S/2/7 S establishment cf a Legal Advisery Coasnitteo that will cs.jplcy counsel to address the broad spectrum of tho various typos of Advisory Cemittea will offor coca degree of colloborac'.r.i. in the a} The C Chr.irmon ci rincnete. I of Tonas-Ju ?uybestos-v parat ion; C. Wilson, Zsq., of Jia Whiter v'c-r/oratioa; and a representative c tho snail member cccrparias. ' b) Part of tho scope cf tho Cocnittao's initial discussions . .-/ill be tha area of coo70ration, primarily agr-occant anor.gs i insurance carriers as to v/ho will handle a given segment of a product liability lawsuit. c) Via a comment from tha floor, tha hopa was oppressed that tha Ccanittoa could halp teward forming a positive approach that would assist in avoiding tho hind of davisivo battling that is geing on in tho machine tool industry -- where machine tool manufacturers ara being pitted against their customers. Perhaps tho problem could ba resolved by mailing worlaaon's compensation tha principal avanua cf recourse and having sellar and user cooperate in limiting ccor.cn law liability cf all kinds outsida voriaaen's compensation. d) Thera is activity afoot as to suggasting setno alternative remedies for third party lawsuits -- a legislative solution. If that garminatas, it is something to which tha AIA/HA Committoo could address itself. It is a matter that cannot be resolved in tha courts but must be settled in Congress. S. JOJWJAHTJ2NT* There being no further items to bo discussed by tha ATI Ad Hoc Committee, the`mooting was adjeumod at 3il5 p.ra. Itospectfully submitted. Doris M, ?agan, S.:ecutivj Secretary .ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITuTE LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND ) ESTABLISHED: APRIL 1, 1974 PERIOD: JANUARY 1, 1976, THRU APRIL 30, 1976 ~ FISCAL YEAR*1975-76 BALANCE ON HAND - January 1, 1976 .............................................. S 9,364.96 RECEIPTS: 2/13/76 - Bank Service Charge/Waived ... $ .96 3/25/76 - Bank Service Charge/Waived ... .46 3/31/76 - Interest on Savings ....................... 116.02 TOTAL RECEIPTS................................................................ + 117.44 . $ 9,482.40 DISBURSEMENTS: 1/30/76 - Bank Service Charge....................... $ .96 . 2/23/76 - Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft -- 4th Quarter 1975 ....................... 646.56 2/ 2/76 - Bank Service Charge....................... .46 4/ 6/76 - C. P. Stober/Sundry Services re DMF Affidavit in Shoup Case . . 15.18 4/30/76 - Office Expenses - 12/75-4/76 . . 61.33 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ................................................................-$ 724.49 BALANCE ON RAND - APRIL 30, 1976 ............................ $ 8,757.91* Checking Accoun-t: $ 300.47 Savings Account: +8,457.44 JW7ISTT5T* Signedt ^_________ anlan, ATI Treasurer Prepared as of 4/2fo/76 by D. M. Fagan, Assistant Treasurer. Subject to Audit- (?) 'Jit/ J? , Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute JUN i '976 A3BG3TCS TBHTILC IHSTITUTI 1975 SPRING M CTTIHG June 1, IS73 Gtouffer's National Centar Inn, Arlington, Virgirjia. T TCrp "\nr . ngno AMATEM corporation 17. Maaskant J. L. Rainey I-I. J. Scanlan II. 3. . 7a Iter GARLCCK INC. ^ -j. D ami l, A. Ruzmuk 17. B. rilr.ier (3a"lock of Canada Ltd. ) iat/bsstcs-maniiattait, C. D. Colson P. 3. Dolan J. 17. Hawkins C. A. Hennedy . -7. I true': a R. C. iTcekius I-i. Q. Scowcroft inc. SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt D. B. Childers J. .7. Bcherd ASBESTOS TEMTIL, G.A. D. B. Barois CBLL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. /. >1. Smith CANADIAN JCHHS-MAMVILLE COc ltd. H. M. Hay D. H. Markusson, Esq. (J.-K) A. R. Morrill CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. A. A. Huntz3 (CRN) LAME AG BBSTOC ON QUEBEC LTD. 3. A. Darrell R. J. Muth, Esq. (Asarco) C. E. Stiofken (Asurco) NIPPON AGBBSTOS CO. LTD. 3. Shir,a TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION/NA H. Maranesc, lizec. Director B3TG3 CBBTILB INSTITUTE A. B. Alcorn, Jr., Bsq., ATI Legal Counsel (Cadwalader, T7iekershara 3 Taft) D. 11. Na-jan, ATI Bnec. Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 1973 Spri; ,g Meeting was 31 peopie: 23 mergers, 1 guest, 1 legal counsel and 1 secretary; representative o 1 11 marker corpanie s, AIA/NA and ATI. Page 2 - ATI 1975 Spring Masting - 5/4/7S M INUT 3 3 1. CALL TO CRDE.2: The 197 5 Spring General Mee-ting of tlas Asbestos tils Ins tituts './as called to order by PresicLent Nuzr.uk at 1:00 n.r .., Juna 4, 1375, at Stouffsr's National Cantar Inn, Arlington, Virginia. READING OF MINUTES: Upon the calling for a reading of the Minutes of tha last statsd meeting, it '/as moved by Mr. Dixi t, ssccndsd by Mr Stiefken, and unanimously approved, to dispense 1with the reading thereof. _3. FINANCIAL REPORT: Treasurer Scanlan presented the Financial Report on the Litigation Defense Fund as of April 30, 1376. The balance on hand at January 1, 1975 was $3,354.35, receipts for the four months to April 30, 1375, totaled $117.44 and disbursements amounted to $724.43 -- leaving a cash balance at April 30, 1975, of $8,737.31. Additional expenses of $4,745.35 to be paid in June indicate an anticipated cash balance at the end of June 1375 of $4,011.33. It '/as noted the funds available are expected to be sufficient to cover known expenses to the end c-f this Fiscal Year. The entire Report as of April 30, 1375, which is subject to audit, is appended hereto as Attachment I. 4. TYLER LITIGATION: Mr-. Markus son announced that insofar as ATI was concerned, nothing had happened in the Tyler Litigation except the continuing intervention of additional plaintiffs. No action is expected on ATI's motions until after all discovery is in. 5. NEICT MEETING: President Kuzmuk advised the membership that the 1375 Annual Meeting of the Institute will be held October 5-8, 1975, at Savannah Inn and Country Club, Savannah, Georgia. 5. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to be brought before the general membership, a motion to adjourn was made by Mr. Farrell, seconded by Mr. Dixit, and so carried. The meeting //as adjourned at 1:15 p.n. Ac s poct ful1y subni11 ed, Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary asbesvco teatile institute LITISATICN 3EPEMSE BUND E3 TA3L IS HED: APRIL 1, 1974 PERIOD: JANUARY 1, 1975, THRU .APRIL 30, 1975 -- FISCAL YEAR 1975-75 3ATANCE ON HAND - January 1, 1975 .....................................................$ 9, 354.95 RECEIPTS: 2/13/75 - Dank Service Charge/Jaived ... $ .55 3/25/76 - Bank Service Charge/Naived ... .46 3/31/76 - Interest on Savings ...... 116.02 TOTAL RECEIPTS.................................................................................... + 117.44 DISBURSEMENTS $ 9,432.40 1/30/76 - Bank Service Charge........................... $ .95 2/23/75 - Cadv/aladcr, IJickershan & Taft -- 4th Quarter 1975 ........................... 546.55 2/ 2/75 - Bank Service Charge........................... .46 4/ 5/76 - C. P. Stober/Sundry Services re DPI? Affidavit in Shcup Case . . 15.18 4/3C/75 - Office Expenses - 12/7 5-4/75 . . 61.33 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS .......................................................................... - 724.49 BALANCE ON HAND - APRIL 30, 1976 ................................$ 8,757.91* *Chec':ing Account: $ 300.47 Savings .Account: +3,457.44 $3,757.91* 3ignod: M. J. Scanlan, ATI Treasurer repared as of 4/30/75 by D. M. Pagan, Assistant Treasurer, tobject to Audit Attachment I cu co Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute FEB $ \97$ ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE LITIGATION DEFENSE FUND ESTABLISHED* APRIL 1, 1974 PERIOD: SEPTEMBER 1, 197 5, THRU DECEMBER 21, 157 5 PA 127*5-76 BALANCE CIT HAND - ScTton-kor 1, 157 0 . I PTC: 12/10/7 5 - Bank Service Charge/OJaive>7. .34 12/31/75 - Interest on Savings . . 157.97 TOTAL RECEIPTS.......................................................................... + 15C.C1 $ 13,242.74 DISBURSEMENTS : 10/31/75 - To ATI, Inc., for Office Spences 9/1/75-10/31/7 5 . $ 4.51 11/14/7 5 - Cack/a lacier,Jiekershain&Taft 1,4-50.00 11/14/75 - Hathaway &. Jackson .... 2,388.93 11/23A5 - Bank Service Charge .34 12/15/75 - To ATI, Inc., for Office Expenses - Novankor 1975. . 33.40 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ................................................................ - 3.S77.78 3ALANCB ON HAND - DECEMBER 31, 1975 .... $ 9,354.55* `Checking Account Savings Account: $ 323.54 *9.041.42 59,254.95 Attachment I Pago 2 .VjlI 127-3 Vinter Mooting - 2/5/73 M I L7 U T 2 3 The 1075 Vinter General Hooting ! f the Asbestos To:-: .ilo Institute -./as called to order by President A. I'uzmuk at 1:00 p.m , February 5, 197 S, at tbo Ghcraton national Mote Motel, Arlington, Virginia. 2* Upon the calling for a reading of the Minutes of the last s tated siocting, it was moved by 3. G. Dixit, seconded by L. 2, Moody, and unanimously approved., to dispense with the reading thereof. 3. In the absence of Treasurer M. J. Scanlan, President ICuz.v.uh pre sented the Financial Report of the Litigation Defense Fund as of December 31, 1975. The balance on hand at September 1, 1975, was 513,033.93, receipts to dato totaled $153.31 and disbursements amounted to $3,377.73 -- leaving a cash balance at December 31, 197 5, of $3,354.95. It was noted the funds available are expected to bo sufficient to cover anticipated. expenses between now and the Spring Meeting in June of this year, The entire Deport is attached hereto as Attachment I. 4. President Muzmuh announced that insofar a s ATI was concerned, the only activities that have been occurring in the Tyler Litigation wore the intervention of additional plaintif fs. Consequently, the responsibilities of Attorneys Alcorn and Mathaway arc presently limited to answering the complaints. This situation is not expectcd to change during the coming four months. _5. As advised by President Kuzmuh, the next General Meetinr Asbestos Textile Institute will be hold Ju nc 3-4, 1975, Stauffer1s national Center Inn, Arlington, Virginia. the 6. There b-cing no further business to be brought before the general a.m.-borship, a motion to adjourn was made by P. 2 Loclerc, seconded by n o.: nnedy, and so moved, lie me was adjourned at 1:15 Respectfully submitted, Deris li. Fagan, 2xocutive Secretary ^gdestcs textile institute 137 o HINTER MEETING February/ 0, 1976 LIST OF DELEGATES AHATEX CORPORATION 77. I laa ska at J. L. Rainey I-# J* >-> Cell'll Call II. I-I. Ualtor ASDESTOS CORPORATION LTD. 17. 3. Collar. P. S. Loclorc ATLAS TEXTILE COMPANY 17. :-I. Johnston DELL ASDESTOS HINES LTD. J. II. Lotlend. 17. H. Smith. CANADIAN JOHN3-MANVILLE CO. LTD. H. M. Hay P. Power GARLOCX INC. S. G. Di::it A. Kuzioul: NIPPON A33ESTOS CO, LTD Y. Sato S. Shina RAYDE3 TOS-MALOATTAN, c. D. Colson J. "7. Hawkins c. A. Kennedy 77. Krv[ C*313 R. 0. Moebius H. Q. Scowcrcft INC. SOUTHEROI ASDESTOS COHPA] c.E. Ida. u u D. E. Childers J. 77. L. E. Hccdy T3A INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS rt uTT Corson ASDESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE "7. 3. Alcorn, Jr., Esq,, ATI Legal Counsel, CacTwalnC.or, Nickershan Taft D. M. Pagan, ATI Executive Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 197G 77intor Hooting '..as 2G peo ple: 23 members, 1 legal counsel, and 1 secretary -- representative of 10 member companies, plus ATI* more t' oVoia Sheraton National ii-tor Hotel, Arlington, Virginia t LIST CF DELEGATES ATATEX CORPORATION W askant J. L. Rainey M. J. Scanlan E. H. Walter AS32STCS CORPORATION LTD. W. D. R, Callan P. E. Leclerc ATLAS TEXTILE COMPANY W. H. Johnston 3SLL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. J. 1L. Leblond W. H. Smith CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILL2 CO. LTD. E. M. Hay J. P. Power GARLOCX INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk RAYEESTOS-I1ANHATTAH, INC. C. D. Colson J. W. Hawkins C. A. Kennedy W. ICrucke R. O. Moebius M. Q. Scowcroft SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Eratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody TEA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson * ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE, INC. W. D. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., ATI Legal Counsel, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Sato S, Shiraa D. M. Fagan, ATI Executive Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 1976 Winter Meeting was 22 people j 26 mcr.'hers, 1 legal counsel, and 1 secretary -- representative of 10 camber companies, plus ATI, MINUTES JL. The 1976 Winter General lieeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute, Inc., was called to order by President A. Kuznuk at 1:15 p.m., Febru ary , 1975, at the Sheraton National Motor Hotel, Arlington, Virginia. SORE. *- . Page: 2 - ATI INC. 197->Jwintor locating - 2/3/73 J 2. President Kuzmuk welcomed Ell members to the Mooting and ashed each member to rise and give his name and company affiliation. The complete list of delegates appears on page 1 of these Minutes. _3. Upon a call for the reading of the Minutes of the last meeting, it v.^as moved by S. G. Diz:it, seconded by L. E. Moody, and unanimous ly approved, to dispense with the reading of sane. 4. In the absence of Treasurer Scanlan, a report on the financial status cf 'the Corporation was presented by President ICusnuk. On September 1, 1975, the balance on hand was $3,599.21. Added to this figure were total receipts of $11,024.49, the most notable being $9,750.00 from Members' dues and $748.90 from sales of the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual, 3rd edition. Total esependitures were $5,031.99, leaving a cash balance at the end of December of . $13,551.71. Talcing into account known assets and liabilities, the total net worth of the Corporation at December 31/ 1975, amounted to $15,256.32. The entire Report of Funds, which will be filed for audit, is attached to those Minutes as Attachment I. 5. The Fiber Producers'' Report was presented by P. E. Leclerc. To tal shipments for 1975 of asbestos by member companies of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association show a decline of 42.5% from 1974. For Group 3 grades, the decline was S9?. At year-end, inventories of Group 3 grades were 65% lower than a year ago. The 7-month-strike at the Quebec asbestos mines is partially responsible for the de crease. The supply situation of the longer spinning grades is tight. Demand and supply of the regular spinning grades appear to be in balance. See Attachment II for the Fiber Producers' Report in its entirety. 6. Technical Committoo Member J. W. Hawkins reported that his group met February 5 and 6 to review several ASTt-i Standards and a Military Specification. ... Mr. Haw?:ins announced that the Technical Commit tee, which had S members about 5 years ago, has been reduced to 3 members. Additional members are needed in order to have an active, on-going group. *Eio Committee is suggesting that representatives be sent from John3-Manvi1le Corporation and Garlock Inc. Others that can give technical assistance are requested to volunteer. ... It was advised that the ATI Technical Committee and ASTM Sub-Concnittoe D13.14 wore one in the same with the exception of P. O. Nicodemus who servos as Chairman of D13.14 and as liaison between ASTil and ATI. Mr. nicodemus is in ill health and is not in position to travel, but he has agreed to continue with these responsibilities for the time being. When the time comes that he becomes unable to be active, the ATI Technical Committee lias decided that the Chairman of both the ASTI! and the ATI Committees should bo the same person -- rotating at two-year intervals. See Attachment III for the complete Technical Committee Report. more Page 3 - ATI INC. 1975 Winter Heating - 2/G/76 7. In the absence of Chairman It, A. Kuntze, a report on the activi ties of 'the Fiber Research & Tasting Subcommittee was given by D. E. Childers. A comparison test is underway on dust counting, using the membrane filter method. Test results thus far indicate the labora tories involved did not.use the same counting procedure. Therefore, a second Round-Robin test will be run and it will be emphasized that all those participating should use the CSHA method of counting. See Attachment IV for the entire Fiber Research & Testing Subcommittee Report. A. Chairman L. E. ibody adviced that the special Environmental Task Group met on February 4-5 to carry out the project assigned to it by the ATI Board of Governors -- which was to define each piece of asbestos textile manufacturing equipment; to determine how an asbes tos fiber becomes airborne at each location; to describe the current means to capture and control airborne asbestos fiber; and to report on the effectiveness of the present controls. Chairman Moody will shortly issue a report to the Secretary on the findings of the Task Group. The Report, in turn, will be submitted to the Board of Gov ernors. Ultimately, the information will become a part of the ATI Position Paper which will serve as the Institute's comments to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration on the proposal to revise the "Asbestos Standard." . 9. As reported by Chairman Moody,- the Environmental Committee met on February 5 during which it received a presentation and demonstration by 1-Jr. Robert S. Hagdclain on Nilfish vacuum cleaning equipment. Secondly, a discussion was held on the events of the meeting hold on February 4 by the Asbestos Information Association/North America re the Industry Response it is preparing to the proposed revision of the "Asbestos Standard." Lastly, the Committee reviewed several sections of the afore-mentioned Standard, specifically those relat ing to record]cooping, facility requirements such as showers, regu lated areas, and mechanical ventilation systems. See Attachment V for tho entire Environmental Committee Report. 10. President Iiuznuk advised that the Secretary would soon be sending response forms to all member companies, requesting them to indicate their acceptance or non-acceptance of the new membership structure which becomes effective September 1, 1975, and which wa3 fully de fined in tho Minutes of the 1975 Annual General Meeting of ATI, Inc., in paragraphs 11 and 12 on page 4. It was reiterated that tho Institute is opening its membership to a greater number of companies so they may become Regular Healers and serve on the Board of Gover nors. The purpose of the mailing piece is to enable the Board to determine who will become Regular Members at the start of the nerct fiscal year. President Itizmuh requested all number companies to more Page 1 u ATI UK. 1376 Winter Mcating 2/5/73 ) -respond promptly so all of the data will be available to the Board at its Meeting on Juno 3, 1975. ' 11.It v;as regrettably announced by President ICu.zir.uI: that as a result of a corporate decision. Uniroyal, Inc., had resigned as a Member of the ATI. He stated the Board had accepted the resignation with a great deal of regret as the various representatives of Uniroyal had been a great asset to the Institute over the years, having performed effectively in its many activities, both administratively and at Committee level. 12.Because of Uniroyal's resignation from the Institute, vacancies were created in the Office of Vice-President and in the Chairmanship of the Technical Committee. President ICuzmuh announced that through the remainder of this fiscal year and until the 1976 Annual Meeting, Treasurer Scanlan will taho on the additional duties of Vice President of the Institute. W. Iiaashant will serve as Acting Chair man of the ATI Technical Committee. 13. President Kuzmuh informed the membership that the dates of the nm:t General Meeting of ATI, Inc., remained at Juno 3--1, 1976, although the site had been changed to Stouffar's National Center Inn, Arlington, Virginia. The move was made in the interest of economy when it was learned that Twin Bridges Marriott in Arlington (the previously- scheduled site) had established, new prices for meeting space -that seemed exorbitant and an unnecessary cirpensc. 11. It was reported by President Muzm.uk that the ATI Position Paper had been reviewed at this meeting. It is about ready for final draft form, and should be coi.rsleted and approved by the Board for submission to OCHA by the deadline which presently is April 9, 1976. The ATI Position Paper will incorporate the outcome of discus sions at the special mooting held by the Institute on November 13, 1975; data received and compiled following that meeting; and the findings cf the Environmental Tasb Group (referred to in paragraph 6 of these Minutes). It will be concerned specifically with the posi tion of the asbestos textile manufacturing industry in the U.S. In addition, ATI is coordinating with AIA/I5A in its project tc\/ard pre paring and submitting a total Asbestos Industry Response to OCHA. 15. There ing no further business to b brought before the member ship, it was moved by P. E. Leclorc and seconded by C. A. Kennedy that the meeting bo adjourned. The motion \/so carried and the moat ing adjourned at 2:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, iYl Doris IS. Pagan, U Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITu-fE, INC. Fiscal Year-ending August 31. 1976 Report of Funds_____________________ Period: September 1. 1975, thru December 31, 1976 BALANCE ON HAND - September 1, 1975: Checking Account Savings Account Petty Cash Account Less Litigation Defense Fund ^ S 700.48 20,936.45 46.21 $ 21,683.14 13,083.93 TOTAL ON HAND - September 1, 1975 ............................... RECEIPTS: ` Booklet Sales Test Manual Sales Members' Dues Interest on Savings ATI Heeting Expense Reimbursement Reimbursement from Litigation Defense Fund/Supplies TOTAL RECEIPTS ....................................................................... $ 46.65 748.90 9,750.00 388.93 112.00 38.01 DISBURSEMENTS: Legal Services s Expenses Incorporation Expenses Secretary's Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI. Inc. ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Postage--Test Manual Rental of Office Space Accountant/Caruso/1974-75 Booklet Sale Refunds $ 1,154.01 356.35 871.00 46.49 2,016.65 267.79 234.65 391.26 139.50 80.04 165.00 300.00 9.25 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS ............................................................... BALANCE ON HAND - December 31. 1975 .................. BALANCE ON HAND - December 31, 1975: Checking Account Savings Account Petty Cash Account $ 1,583.08 12,068.30 .33 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS - December 31, 1975 . ASSETS AS OF December 31, 1975: Total Funds As Listed Above ................................................. $ 13,651.71 Accounts Receivable -- Members' Dues ............................... 1,875.00 Charged Expenses ....................... 24.72 Furniture Equipment/Nominal Value ................................ 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ............................................................... LIABILITIES AS OF December 31, 1975: Accrued Taxes.............................................................. .... $ TOTAL LIABILITIES ...................................................... 296.11 TOTAL NET WORTH AS OF DECEMBER 31. 1975 $ 8,599.21 + 11,084.49 $ 19,683.70 - 6,031.99 $ 13,651.71 $ 13,651.71 $ 15,552.43 - 296.11 S 15,256.32 Attachment I / Presented by Paul S. Lcclarc, Sales Director, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., at the 1976 Winter General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute, Inc., Sheraton National liotor Hotel, Arlington, Virginia -- February 6, 1575 Total shipments of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association member companies for 1975 show a decline of 42.5% from 1974. For group 3, the decline was 69%. The seven-months' strike in the Thetford- 31a ck Lake-East 3rouchton area is partially responsible for this drop. At the end of 1975 the combined inventory of the QAHA members was the lowest ever; the stocks on hand of group 3 grades were 55% lower than they were the previous year; total stocks wore 59% lower as wall -- and I should add that 50% of the inventor^ was made up ox group 7 grades. The supply situation of the longer spinning grades such as 3F, Gassier AAA and Cassiar AA is rather tight. The demand and supply of the regular spinning grades appear to be in balance at this time. Grades in groups 4, 5 and 6 are very much in demand, and definitely in short supply. The demand for grades in group 7 continues to be good, particularly in the "open type" grades. Attachment II o) technical cG'Ehttizz ncponT ASCSSTCS TEXTILE INSTITUTE. INC. February 5-6. 1976 Sheraton National Motor Hotel, Arlington, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: A'latex Corporation -- M, Maaskant, Acting Chaiman Reybestos-Manhattan, Inc. -- J. W. Hawkins Southern Asbestos Company -- D. E. Childers; J. W. Echerd 1. ASTM D-1113--Magnetic Rating -- Editorial changes approved by letter of ballot and will bo incorporated in ne::t annual issue. 2. ASTI! D-315--Asbestos Tape, Woven and ASTM D-1571---Asbestos Cloth, Woven -- Proposed statement on precision and accuracy being sent out for review; upon return, comments will bo analyzed and pro posed statements will- be submitted for letter of ballot. 3. ASTM D-191G-72--Asbestos Content -- This method is ne:ct on the agenda for revision. At this time, no editorial changes are suggested. ', 4. ASTiyATI relationship was discussed and, in view of the retire ment frem General Electric of Hr. P. O. Nicodemus, Chairman of ASTM Sub-Committoe D13.14 on Asbestos, it was decided to await the outcome of the Juno 1976 ATI meeting as to what steps to take in the future. Since Mr. 3arnwell of Uniroyal, Inc., no longer is active due to the resignation of Uniroyal from ATI, Hr. W. Maaskant will act as Chairman of the ATI Committee until the June meeting. ... It \/as unanimously agreed to request Mr. Nicodonus to stay on as Chairman of AST3I D13.14. 5. Specification MIL-I-15349C--Thermal Insulation Tape -- The con tents of Table II were questioned. The nominal weight in the Table was recommended to be changed to minimum weight. ReybestosIhnhetten end Southern Asbestos v/ill consult with each other and, . if needed, will propose the change as follows: 3.6.3 - Change to 7Cft and also, as stated above, the weight in Table II from nominal to minimum; In the event Roybostcc-IManhattan and Southern Asbestos decide that a change is definitely necessary, either Mr. Hawkins or Mr. Echord will write to NAV3EC in Kyattsville, Maryland. more Attachment Ill/pago 1 of Z Pago 2 -- -ATI, Inc.* 'technical Ccraaitteo Report - 2/5-5/76 6. Technical Corrrittoe Membership -- Due to the low participation in this Cermittee, it \/as requested while the President of ATI, Mr. A. ICuznuJc, and the Secretary, 11s. D. M. Pagan, were present, to extend the Committee by adding at least one permanent member from Gerloc!: Inc. and from Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. Mr. Kuzr.uk promised to loo!: into the natter concerning Garlock and Mr. J. P. Power './ill choc!: with C.J-M. 11s. Pagan will folio'./ through. 7. Specification HH-T-1732--Asbestos Tape -- This Specification is superseding the former'Standard HIL-T-4117A. Members of the Committee found that Government Procurement Agencies are still making reference to the old Specification. Due to the uncertain ty as to whether or not the Government will discontinue the use of asbestos products, it was suggested to not recommend changes in either Specification. C. ASTM D-299--Yarn -- When next up for revision by ASTM Sub committee D13.14, it should bo determined what type of change is advisable to Section 10--Yarn Humber. The weight of plied yam calculation is not clear. Also, a plied yam tolerance for v/eight should bo added under paragraph 7.1.1. ' * S. The next meeting will be hold Ju ne 3-4, 197S, at Stouffar's National Center Inn, Arlington, Virginia. Respectfully submitted, T7. Maaskant. Acting Chairman Attachment Ill/oaoo 2 of 7 uJ FIDS?. RESEARCH & TESTING SUDCC 3IITTES REPCR.T ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE. INC. February 5-S, 1575 Sheraton national Motor Hotel/ Arlington, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: Asbestos Corporation Ltd* -- Ml, 3. R. Callan Dell Asbestos Mines Ltd. -- Mi, S* Smith Southern Asbestos Company -- D. E. Childers 1, The Chairman, Dr. R. A. ISuntzc, could not bo present, thus he ashed D. E. Childers to report on the activitos of the group. 2. At the lost Resting, it was decided to run a comparison tost on dust counting using the Membrane Filter Method. The participants were instructed to use the sane counting procedure. However, test results received front three laboratories indicated the sane counting procedure was not used. In ono instance, the fiber count between laboratories ranged frcct 5.3 to 2.5 'fibc-rs/cc, and in another instance the counts ranged front 16.7 to 4.3 fibors/cc. 3. It was decided to begin another Hound-Robin tost. In the tost, it will bo emphasized that everyone use the OSIIA method (NICSH, August 1972). Mr. Childers will prepare now samples for the new test. A copy of the OS3V. procedure will bo sent to all partici pants. Each laboratory should count the sane slides and send then to the no::t person in the sane order as listed belot/. * Please send all test results to Dr. R. A. limtze. D. *7 Childers R. A. Runtzo G. ?. A. Brin!: Ml, H. Smith J. P. TJronsI:i c. Stiufhcn V* Lincoln Respectfully submitted, D. E. Childers, Acting Chairman Attachment IV OJ EiT/inomrriTira combrec report AS3CSTQ3 TEXTILE INSTITUTE, INC. February 4--5, 1976 Sheraton National Nctor Hotel, Arlington, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE* ' Amatos: Corporation -- 17, l-iaas?:ant; H* H. Walter Atlas Tactile Company --- W. H. Johnston Canadian Johns-Hanville Co, Ltd. -- H. M. Hay? J, P, Power Kirloch Inc, -- S. G. Dixit; A* Kuzrnsh Nippon Asbestos Co, Ltd, -- Y, Sato; S, Shina Eaybestoo-Uarihattan, Inc. -- J. W, Kavdcinsj C, A, Kennedy W, Krucke; R. O. Moebius; H. Q, Scowcroft Southern Asbestos Company *-- J, W, Echerd; L, E. Moody Wednesday, February 4, 1975 -- A short evening session v;as held to describe the project assigned to a Task Group of the Ccrraitteo -- "to define, by each piece of manufacturing equipment used in the processing of asbestos tex tiles, how asbestos fibers become airborne, hcv airborne fiber is captured or controlled to dust collection and hcv; effectively presently controlled.* Attended by S. G. Dixit, D. 1-3. Fagan, 3, lb Hay, C, A. Kennedy, W. Krucho, A. Kunmuk, L. E, IJoody, J, P. Power and H. H, Walter, Thursday, February 5, 197S -- !Eie Task Group net frsra C:30 a.m, through 2s00 p#m. A discus sion of machinery usod and means of airborne asbestos fiber capture and control utilized the entire period, A separate re port v/ill bo submitted. Friday, February S, 1976 -- A meeting of the full Environmental Ccrx.iittoe ua3 held. following items made up the meeting agenda, The a) Presentation and demonstration of Hilfis!: vacuum cleaning equipment was given by R. S, Megdolain of Hilfiol: of America, Inc, The program included now, morc-cfficicnt air-filtering means, and ways of attaining larger quantities or volume per dump cycle. ` more Attachment V/oaoo 1 of 2 UJ Pago - - ATI, Inc., Environmental Cor..T.iittoo report - 2/4-6/76 b) Discussion of tho ALVNA mooting hold on February 4 concern ing the proposed "Asbestos Standard#" c) Drier review of parts of tho proposed Standard (other than the 0.5-fibor portion) such as recordhoeping, sanitary facili ties requirements, regulated areas and mechanical ventilation systems. Pospectfully submitted. L. E. Iioody, Chairman Attachment V/page 2 of 2 Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute OCT 3 1975 asbestos textile institute 1975 ANNUAL MEETING October 3, 1975 Amelia Island Plantation, Amelia Island, Florida, LIST^TTELEGATES AMATEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant J. L. Rainey H. J. Scanlan H. H. Walter ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. G. F. A. Brink P. E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. W. H. Smith CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO. LTD. J. P. Power CASSIAR ASEESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kuntze (Ontario Research Foundation) GARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk R. B. Pilmer (Garlock of Canada Ltd.) L:iKE ASBESTOS OF QUEEEC LTD. C. E. Stiefken (Asarco Inc.) NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Sato S. Shima RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. N. Brooks C. D. Colson R. M. Gordon J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew R. 0. Moebius M. Q. Scowcroft . SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody TEA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson UNIROYAL, INC. C. S. Barnwell B. E. Carden E. A. Morris ASEESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE, INC. W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., Legal Counsel; Cadwalader,Wickersham & Taft D. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary Total attendance during the three-day 1975 Annual Meeting was 59 people; 30 members, 23 spouses, 1 legal counsel, 1 secretary and 4 guests; representative of 12 member companies plus ATI, Inc. Page 2 ATI 1975 Annual .Meeting 10/3 /75 1. The 1975 Annual General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Insti tute was called to order by President A. Kuzmuk at 8:00 a.p., October 3, 1975, at the Tennis Center, Racquet Park, Amelia Island Plantation, Amelia Island, Florida. 2. Upon calling for a reading of the Minutes of the 1975 Spring Meeting of the Institute, it was moved by S. G. Dixit, seconded by C. E. Stiefken, and so carried, to dispense with the reading thereof. 2.. In the absence of Treasurer M. J. Scanlan, the Financial Report as of August 31, 1975, was presented by Vice President E. A. Morris. The cash balance as of September 1, 1974, amounted to $14,051.44. During the fiscal year under review, receipts totaled $53,045.38 and expenditures were $33,205.50 for general purposes and $12,208.18 for the Litigation Defense Fund, leaving $21,683.14 as the cash balance on August 31, 1975. Taking assets and liabilities into account, the actual net worth between the two organizations at yearend was $21,615.74 ($8,599.21 earmarked for the Corporation and $13,083.93 in the Litigation Defense Fund). Please note that no funds had been transferred to the Corporation as of August 31, 1975. Vice President Morris advised that the financial records for the fiscal year had been audited by Dreslin and Company, Certified Public Accountants, and had been found to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis con sistent with that of the preceding year. President Kuzmuk reported that since there was a balance of approximately $13,000.00 in the Litigation Defense Fund, the Board of Governors does not currently anticipate the need for another assessment on the members. The complete Report of Funds as of August 31, 1975, is appended to these Minutes as Attachment I. /f. In presenting Remarks of Legal Counsel, W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, reported that little had happened since the last meeting in the Tyler Litigation except for the inter vention of some additional plaintiffs and of two insurance compan ies who paid workmen's compensation claims to the workers who are now plaintiffs in the case. The two insurance companies who inter vened against the defendants, including ATI, are asking for indem nification and reimbursement for the claims they have paid. The prospect of a voluntary dismissal for ATI still exists -- in return for ATI voluntarily making documents from its files available to the plaintiffs. It is possible the Institute will be dismissed by either the February or the June 1976 meeting. Respectfully submitted, Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Fiscal Year ending August 31,1975 Report of Funds Period: September 1, 1974, thru August 31,1975 Balance on Hand - September 1, 1974 General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total on Hand at 9/1/74 $ 1,416.S3 12,601.66 32.75 $ 14,051.44 Receipts General Fund Reserve Fund Book Sales Magnetite Samples Sales Charged Expenses Test Manual Sales Members' Dues Interest to 6'30/75 Litigation Defense Fund $ 20.73 5.00 30. SO 7.00 21,536.76 13,116.25 1,123.69 17.203.13 Total Receipts . . + 53.045.36 $ 67,096.62 Disbursements Legal Services/Expen a $ 4,320.73 Secretary's Gross Vs gen 2,100.00 Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI 163.76 ATI Ifeeting Expense 907.52 Secretary's Travel Expense 426.29 Telephone 397.90 Printing/Office Supplies 624.12 Postage 467.45 Revision of Test Manual 322.13 Test Manual/Printing & Shipping Costs 22,165.06 Rental of Office Space 540.00 Accountant 'Caruso/1973-74 300.00 ASTM Dues for Year 1975 25.00 Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc 111.60 Insurance 60.00 Charged Expenses 31.72 Litigation: Legal Services/Expenses ATI Meeting Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Deposition Transcripts Transcripts/reproducing; binding; postage 10,936.16 66.54 120.95 141.51 133.35 565.56 242.07 $ 33,205.50 + 12,206.16 Total Disbursements 45.413.66 more BALANCE ON HAND 6/31/75 ... $ 21,663.14 - Attachment I/page 1 of 2 Page 2 - ATI Report of Funds Period: 9/1/74 thru 8'31/75 F/Y ending 8/31/75 Funds as of August 31, 1975 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ -700.AS 20,936.45 46.21 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS AUGUST 31, 1975 ... $ 21,683.14 Assets as of August. 31, 1975 -- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable - Book Sales Charged Expenses Furniture & Equipment/Nominal Value , $ 21,683.14 23.35 24.72 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ..... $ 21,732.21 Liabilities as of August 31, 1975 -- Accrued Taxes $ 116.47 TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . - 116.47 TOTAL NET WORTH AS OF AUGUST 31, 1975 ... $ 21,615.74 Total Available Funds 3-'31/75: $21,683.14 Litigation Defense Fund: -13.083.93 ACTUAL NET WORTH: $ 8,599.21 Attachment i/page 2 of 2 Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute JUN 6 1975 MEMO =, -..I THE DESK OF Doris M. Fiigjn Dear ATI Member: Legal Counsel's Address, as presented by Mr. Wendell B. Alcorn to the general membership on June 6, 1975, will be sent you shortly. When it arrives, please attach it to the back of your General Meeting minutes. Thank you. . ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE asbestos textile institute 1975 SPRING MEETING June 6, 1975 Stouffer's Atlanta Inn, Atlanta, Georgia lTSt 'of ' delegates AMATEX-CORPORATION W. Maaskant M. J. Scanlan H. H. Walter ASBERIT S/A II. Cattaneo ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. P. E. Leclerc ASBESTOS TEXTIL S.A. D. Barois F. Ize ATLAS TEXTILE COMPANY W. H. Johnston . BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. * W. H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kuntze (Ontario Research Foundation) GARLOCK INC. A. Kuzmuk NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Sato RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. C. D. Colson J. W. Hawkins J. F. Maclachlan R. T. Matthew R. 0. Moebius M. W. Oliver M. Q. Scowcroft SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt D, E. Childers J. W. Echerd TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson UNIROYAL, INC. D. T. Austin (Retired) C. S. Barnwell B. E. Carden A. C. Link (Retired) E. A. Morris JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION D. H. Markusson, Esq. LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq. Legal Counsel D. M. Fagan Executive Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 1975 Spring Meeting was 39 people 31 members, 6 wives, 1 legal counsel and 1 secretary; representative of 15 member companies plus ATI. ' MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Stouffers Atlanta. Inn, Atlanta, Georgia June 6, 1975 The regular spring meeting of the ATI Environmental Committee was called to order by Acting Chairman R. T. Matthew, with representa tion from ten (10) member companies present. Those in attendance included: Amatex Corporation -- H. H. Walter Asberit S^A -- M. Cattaneo Asbestos Textil S.A. -- F. Ize Atlas Textile Company -- W. H. Johnston Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. -- E. A. Farrell Nippon Asbestos Co.-Ltd. -- Y. Sato Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. -- J; F. Maclachlan, R. T. Matthew, R. 0. Moebius, M. W. Oliver, M. Q. Scowcroft Southern Asbestos Company -- e. C. Bratt TEA Industrial Products Ltd. -- H.' J. Corson Uniroyal, Inc. -- B. E. Carden Mr. Matthew explained that for this meeting he was acting as chair man for L. E. Moody who is recovering from a recent heart attack. The film, ''Living With Dust" -- produced by 3M Company -- was shown and several members of other ATI committees sat in with the Environ mental group for the showing of the film. The Committee then discussed respirators for asbestos dust -- who was using what type and where and why. Some companies are using approved "single-use" respirators for up to one week while others are using "reusable" permanent-type respirators with the cleaning and sanitizing program required by the OSHA Asbestos Standard. Nocne indicated that they had had experience with approved "poweredair-purifying respirators1 required for the higher dust concentra tions. The proposed new noise standard was discussed briefly because there appeared to be no new factual information as to when the "final" revision of the proposed standard will be published or what it will contain. The proposed new asbestos standard was discussed but again no factual information was available. However, two opinions obtained from a Washington source were: (1) that the proposed standard would not be published in the Federal Register until late summer; and (2) that the format will be like the recent arsenic and ketone standards with an "action level" (where certain requirements become mandatory) at about one half the allowable time-weighted average. Attachment IV/page 1 of 2 Minutes/ATI Environmental Committee 6 /6/75 Members were asked about recent OSHA activity-plant visits, etc. The only activities reported were a visit to one plant and a tele phone call to another -- both to obtain information about their work practices and dust control procedures for receiving, storing and handling asbestos before processing. After discussion, the Committee approved the following resolutions to the ATI Board of Governors: (la) That the ATI advise OSHA through appropriate channels that, in the opinion of the membership of the Institute, an accurate S-hour, time-weighted average of fiber concentra tion can be obtained only by the method detailed in (l)and (2) of the Minutes of this Committee's February 7, 1975, meeting. (lb) That OSHA Compliance Officers be instructed to follow this procedure when sampling for a time-weighted average. (lc) That a betterdefinition, including a uniform practical sampling time, be obtained from OSHA for ceiling concentra tion. (2) That the ATI, through its Technical Committee or the Fiber Research & Testing Subcommittee, make every effort to find a better method than the "membrane filter" method for mea suring airborne concentrations of asbestos fiber. The Committee discussed briefly the "special clothing," "change rooms" and "clothes lockers" section of 1910.93a (now 1910.1001). This discussion will be continued at the next meeting of the Commit tee. Members desiring discussion, interpretation or clarification of other sections of the Asbestos Standard should notify the Chairman, preferably in writing, well before the next meeting. Respectfully submitted, R. T. Matthew, Acting Chairman Attachment IV/page 2 of 2 AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE June 6, 1975 Presented by Chairman Dennis H. Markusson, Esq., Johns-Manville Corporationi at the ATI 1975 Spring Meeting held at Stouffer's Atlanta Inn, Atlanta, Georgia. . As reported at earlier meetings, the Asbestos Textile Institute has filed motions in the United States District Court in Tyler, Texas, in the Yandle and Kay cases seeking to be dismissed from such law suits on the grounds that the court does not have any jurisdiction over ATI. The court has still not ruled on such motions. The court has established a schedule for discovery whereby the par ties by means of interrogatories and depositions can seek facts and documents relevant to the law suit. At the present time some of this discovery is being directed to jurisdictional questions as there are other defendants who, as ATI, feel they are not proper parties to the law suit. There is no particular timetable on this discovery and it is our present judgment that the court will not rule on-any jurisdictional questions, including ATI's motion to dismiss, until all jurisdictional discovery is completed. We remain confident that our contention that there is no jurisdic tion over ATI in these cases is well taken and will be favorably acted upon by the court when it is finally considered. From a procedural standpoint there is nothing more to be done on our motion to dismiss except wait for the court's ruling. Separate and apart from the formal motion to be dismissed as a party to the law suit the Institute through its Trial Counsel, Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., has undertaken negotiations with plain tiff's counsel to be voluntarily dismissed as a party defendant in the pending law suits. Through Mr. Alcorn's efforts, there appears a strong likelihood that plaintiffs will consent to dismiss ATI as a party defendant. If this happens our formal motion to be dis missed becomes moot. In the area of discovery on matters other than jurisdictional questions, depositions have been taken of Dr. Lee Grant, defendant Pittsburgh Corning Corporation's Medical Director, and Dr. William Johnson, formerly with the United States Public Health Service, who inspected the Tyler plant. These depositions are helpful to ATI as they indicate Pittsburgh Corning had full knowledge of the condi tions prevailing at the Tyler plant and was fully aware of the state of the medical art relative to exposure to asbestos fibers. There fore, anything ATI did or failed to do would become immaterial and not causally connected to any of the alleged injuries suffered by more Attachment V/page 1 of 2 ATI Ad Hoc Committee Report 6 '6 '75 the plaintiffs. In other words, these depositions help .establish that if there be any negligence on the part of ATI, which *we deny, that there was intervening negligence by other defendants which exonerates ATI. At this point in time ATI has effectively established its juris dictional arguments and developed evidence favorable to it on the merits by means of the Grant and Johnson depositions. Accordingly, there is little need for any formal activity in these cases by ATI at the. present time. We will continue to maintain a low profile and monitor all activities. Mr. Alcorn will continue his negotia tions with plaintiff's counsel and his efforts to have ATI voluntarily dismissed as a party defendant. Your Ad Hoc Committee will continue to supervise and monitor this litigation and report to you any significant developments. At the present time I feel it is fair to report that everything is as well under control as can be expected, and Mr. Alcorn is to be commended on his efforts on the Institute's behalf. - end - Attachment V/page 2 of 2 Page 2 ATI 1975 Spring Meeting 6 '6 '75 Prior to the meeting the members were given the opportunity to view the 30-minute Eritish television film ifKiller Dust--A Standard Mis take ?" It discusses asbestos dust concentrations at the asbestos textile plant at Rochdale, England, operated by TBA Industrial Prod ucts Ltd., a member of Turner & Newall Ltd., and challenges the validity of the "2-fiber" asbestos standard which is associated with the British Asbestos Regulations of 1969. Subsequent to the showing of the film, distribution was made among the membership of "AIC Newsletter No. 5,n a publication of the U.K. Asbestos Information Committee, which comments on the film. Further comments as stated by TBA Joint Managing Director R. A. Wells, were reviewed by A. Kuzmuk, President of the ATI. H T HUTE 3 1. The 1975 Spring Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President A. Kuzmuk at 1:00 p.m., June 6, 1975. 2. President Kuzmuk welcomed all delegates and guests and made spe cial note of the following esteemed attendees: a) D. T. (Tex) Austin, Uniroyal, Inc., Retired; b) A. C. (Mike) Link, Uniroyal, Inc., Retired; c) Marcello Cattaneo, Asberit S/A, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; d) Denis Barois, Asbestos Textil S.A., Naucalpan, Mexico; e) Francisco Ize, Asbestos Textil S.A., Naucalpan, Mexico. 3.. President Kuzmuk announced, with deep sadness, the passing on May 2*6, 1975, of Dr. Tsunemasa Watanabe, President of Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan. The genuine condolences of the entire mem bership are extended to Dr. Watanabe*s many friends and associates. 4. Upon the calling for a reading of the Minutes of the 1975 Winter Meeting, it was moved by E. A. Morris, seconded by E. A. Farrell, and so carried, to dispense with the reading thereof. 5. The Financial Report of the Institute as of April 30, 1975, was presented by M. J. Scanlan, Treasurer. As of September 1, 1974, the balance on hand was $14,051.44. Added to that figure are receipts of $50,365.52 ($20,737.63 for Test Manual sales and $16,373.13 lor the Litigation Defense Fund). Disbursements totaled $3$,623.35, leaving a cash balance on hand at April 30, 1975, of $26,293.61. It was moved by P; E. Leclerc, seconded by E. C. Bratt, and unanimously approved, that the Financial Report be accepted as pre sented. The complete Report of Funds as of April 30. 1975, is appended to these Minutes as Attachment I and will be filea for audit. more Page 3 ATI 1975 Spring fleeting 6/6/75 6. The Fiber Producers' Report was presented by P. E. Leclerc, Sales Director, Asbestos Corporation Ltd. For the four months from January through April 1975, overall tonnage was down 37.7$., Group 3 fiber production was down 44.4$. The decrease, of course, re flects the situation caused by the strike of Quebec asbestos mine workers, leaving Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. as the only com pany operating in the Province at the present time. See Attachment II for the Fiber Producers' Report in its entirety. 7. Technical Committee Chairman C. 3. Barnwell reported on the activities of his working group. He discussed various AST?! Stand ards and Military Specifications; a joint meeting with the Fiber Research & Testing Subcommittee; and a proposal by P. 0. Nicodemus concerning dielectric properties. See Attachment III for the com plete Technical Committee Report. 3. Fiber Research & Testing Subcommittee Chairman R. A. Kuntze rei terated that his group, in conjunction with the Technical Committee, will set up a Round-Robin program for surface area and Bauer MeNett. Concerning a proposal by the ATI Board of Governors that a cataloging of information be prepared on the varieties of asbestos minerals, it was suggested by C. E. Stiefken that the information is probably available from the Asbestos Information Association./North America. If not, Mr. Stiefken has offered to search for the data sought by the Governors. 9. The Environmental Committee report was given by Acting Chairman R. T. Matthew in the absence, due to illness, of L. E. Moody. Fol lowing a showing of the 3M film ''Living With Dust," the Committee discussed the use of respirators in asbestos dust environs; the proposed new noise standard; the proposed new asbestos standard; and recent OSHA activity-plant visits. See Attachment IV for the com plete Environmental Committee report. 10. Ad Hoc Committee Chairman D. H. Markusson, Esq., reported on TtI's present status in the Tyler litigation and briefly discussed the depositions of Dr. Lee B. Grant and Dr. William M. Johnson. He advised that ATI will continue to maintain a low profile and to monitor all activities of the litigation. See Attachment V for the complete Ad Hoc Committee report. 11. President Kuzmuk advised that the Board of Governors is serious ly considering passing a resolution to broaden the membership by extending it beyond the boundaries of the United States to encompass the whole of the asbestos textile manufacturing world. 12. Concerning incorporation of the Institute, President Kuzmuk informed the members that it is anticipated the ATI will become a corporation effective September 1, 1975. more Page 4 ATI 1975 Spring Meeting 6 '6 '75 13 The attendees were reminded by the President of the coming Annual-Meeting to be held October 1-3, 1975, at Amelia Plantation Island, Amelia Island, Florida. It was advised that at that gath ering the Institute will again follow the pleasant tradition it had followed for a number of years and will hold a Grand Finale Luncheon on Friday as the closing event of the Annual Meeting -- all members and their wives cordially invited. 14. In presenting Remarks of Legal Counsel, W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., reviewed the depositions of Dr's. Grant and Johnson, stating that the answers given in the interrogations indicate that whatever ATI did or did not do really had nothing to do with or had any cause and effect in Tyler, Texas. Based upon those two depositions, upon confidential negotiations on behalf of the ATI with plaintiffs' counsel, and upon the direction that plaintiffs' counsel has taken in the Tyler litigation insofar as not going after ATI but rather pursuing the real defendants in the case, Mr. Alcorn's professional opinion is that ATI has nothing more to worry about in the Tyler litigation even if it does not get out in the near future -- which he expects it to. He then discussed coming depositions in the Tyler litigation and other completely separate law suits. A landmark decision that is expected to come out of one of the pending cases in Texas is whether or not the Texas Longarm Statute can reach Canadian miners when they sell f.o.b. the shipping dock in Canada. This is an open legal question that is now being argued in Texas. In addition, Mr. Alcorn discussed the benefits which will be derived by the ATI becoming incorporated and the proposed expanding of the definition of membership in the Institute to include manufac turers outside the U.S. The full text of the Remarks of Legal Counsel are appended to these Minutes as Attachment VI. 15. There being no further business-to be brought before the member ship, it was moved by P. E. Leclerc, seconded by M. W. Oliver, that the meeting be adjourned. The motion was carried unanimously and the meeting adjourned at 2:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, uons m. ragan, Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds Fiscal Year ending August 31, 1975 Period: 9/1/74 thru 4/30/75 Balance on Hand September 1, 1974 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total on Hand at 9/1/74 Receipts General Fund - Reserve Fund - Book Sales Magnetite Samples Book Sales Test Manual Sales Members1 Dues Interest to 3/31/75 Litigation Defense Fund Total Receipts . , $ 1,416.83 12,601.86 32.75 $ 20.73 5.00 16.63 20,787.63 12,368.25 789.15 16,878.13 Disbursements Legal Services/Expenses Secretary's Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Revision of Test Manual Test Manual Printing/Shipping Costs Rental of Office Space Accountant/Caruso/1973-74 ASTM Dues for Year 1975 Gifts, Flowers, Plaques, etc. Insurance Litigation: Legal Services/Expenses ATI Meeting Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Transcripts of Depositions $ 3,383.28 1,448.00 123.10 579.11 239.10 254.72 472.06 333.81 172.17 22,185.06 405.00 300.00 25.00 111.80 60.00 $ 7,823.87 30.60 111.98 120.94 118.17 325.58 $ 30,092.21 + 8,531.14 Total Disbursements BALANCE ON HAND APRIL 30, 1975 .... Funds as of April 30, 1975 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 505.10 - 25,756.59 _______ 31.92 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS APRIL 30, 1975. . $ 14,051.44 $ 50,865.52 $ 64,916.96 - 38,623.35 $ 26,293.61 $ 26,293.61 more Page 2 - ATI Report of Funds Period: 9/1/74 thru 4/30/75 F/Y ending 8/31/75 Assets as of April 30, 1975 -- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable - 1975 Members' Dues Book Sales Furniture fi Equipment/Nominal Value $ 26,293.61 750.00 3.80 1.00 , TOTAL ASSETS $ 27,048.41 TOTAL LIABILITIES Q,TOTAL NET WORTH APRIL 3 1975 ... $ 27,048.41 Total Available Funds 4/30/75: $26,293.61 Litigation Defense Fund: -16,435.97 ACTUAL NET WORTH: $ 9,857.64 EXPENSES AGAINST BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1974-75 (EXCLUDES ALL LITIGATION-RELATED COSTSPERIOD: 9/1/74 THRU 4/30/75 Legal Services/Expenses Secretary's Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Revision of Test Manual Test Manual Overrun Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso) ASTM Dues Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc. Insurance Expended To Date $ 3,383.28 1,448.00 123.10 579.11 239.10 254.72 472.06 333.81 172.17 . 405.00 300.00 25.00 111.80 60.00 $ 7,907.15 Annual Budget $ 4,800.00 2,100.00 160.00 1,000.00 600.00 600.00 700.00 600.00 100.00 1,200.00 540.00 300.00 25.00 100.00 160.00 $ 12,985.00 Budgeted to 8/31/75..................... ..$ 12,985.00 Expended to 4/30/75...;............ 7,907.15 Available to 8/31/75................... ..$ 5,077.85 NOTE: Above figures do not include the $22,185.06 expended for the Test Manual nor the $20,787.63 received via orders for the Test Manual. Normal disbursements of $30,092.21 less Test Manual Costs - $7,907.15. FIBER PRODUCERS11 REPORT Presented by P. E. Leclerc, ?ales Director, Asbestos CorporationLtd., at the 1975 Spring Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute, held at Stouffer's Atlanta Inn, Atlanta, Georgia -- Juliet, 1975. Because of the asbestos workers' strike which has been in effect since 12:01 a.m., Z4arch 17, 1975, Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. is the sole asbestos mining company operating in the Eastern Townships of the Province of Quebec. This means that the only firms currently producing asbestos in the whole of Canada are C.J-M at Asbestos, Quebec; Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. at Cassiar, British Columbia, and at Clinton Creek, Yukon Territory; and Advocate Mines Ltd., at Baie Verte, Newfoundland. Statistically, for the first four months of 1975 overall tonnages (shipments) were down 37.7$. A categorical breakdown for the same period shows a decrease of 44.4$ for Group 3 and-increases of 11.3$ for Group 6 and 20$ for Group 7. Group 3 fibers, of course, do not include strictly asbestos textile fibers as much of the product from that Group is not suited to textiles but is exported around the world for use in the manufacture of asbestos-cement pipe. Asbestos Corporation's mine at Ungava, Quebec, is operating and is expected this year-to ship enough concentrate to its processing plant at Nordenham, West-Germany, to produce over 100,000 metric tons of Group 4 asbestos, .specially designed for the asbestos-cement industry. There appears to be no rush on the part of the idle workers to set tle the strike. They are back to their original wage demands which exceed those granted by C.J-M to its workers. There are two unions in Thetford and they have made what is known as a common front. Signs of an early settlement are not evident and there is presently no way of knowing how long the strike will last. The outcome of meetings and discussions to date between the companies and the unions are not encouraging. The strike has not only stopped produc tion at the mines in Thetford, it also is preventing shipments of any kind as the warehouses are on the mine properties and the companies are not permitted into or out of the storage facilities. Attachment II _1 I N U T 3 S TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Stouffer's Atlanta Inn* Atlanta, Georgia June 5 & 6, 1975 IN ATTENDANCE Amatex Corporation -- W. Maaskant Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. --- J. W. Hawkins Southern Asbestos Company -- J. W. Echerd Uniroyal, Inc. -- C. S. Barnwell (Chairman) Asbestos Textil, S.A. -- Denis B. Barois; Francisco Ize Fiber Research & Testing Subcommittee Asarco Incorporated -- C. E. Stiefken Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd. -- W. H. Smith Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. -- R. A. Kuntze Southern Asbestos Company -- D. E. Childers (Chairman) At the request of P. 0. Nicodemus (General Electric Company; ASTM Liaison), the Committee reviewed the article authored by Mr. Nicode mus titled "Present and Proposed Methods for Testing Asbestos Mater ials for Electrical Insulating Purposes (February & March 1975 ASBESTOS) -- with the idea of considering the adoption of the sec tion on dielectric properties as an ASTM Standard Method. After complete discussion the matter was deemed sufficiently complex to warrant a greater-detailed study before reaching a firm decision. The Committee received statistical data complete enough to make the following ASTM Specifications ready for acceptance: D-315 on Woven Asbestos Tape, D-1571 on Woven Asbestos Cloth and D-62S on Asbestos Tubular Sleeving. . . . Several questions of an editorial nature concerning ASTM Specification D-lllS on Magnetic Rating of Asbestos Fiber and Textile Products were discussed and acted upon. The group proposes to review several Military Specifications to en sure they reflect the Committee's current thinking on how they should be written. Included are Federal Specifications HH-T-17&2 on Asbestos Tape, SS-C-17S3 on Asbestos Cloth and HH-T-41C on Asbes tos Rope, Packing Material and Military Specification MIL-1-3953 on Treated & Untreated Asbestos-Fiber Electrical Insulation. The Technical Committee met briefly with the Fiber Research & Test ing Subcommittee primarily to discuss a proposed Round-Robin to correlate laboratory and test procedures. The two items to be studied are surface area tests and wet classification tests concerning fiber lengths. The Subcommittee has agreed to spearhead this pro ject toward establishing procedures for the Technical group to follow in interlaboratory testing. . Respectfully submitted, . Carroll S. Barnwell, Chairman Attachment III Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute FEB 7 - 1975 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE 1975 WINTER MEETING February 7, 1975 Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania LIST OF DELEGATES AMATEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant J. L. Rainey H. H. Walter J. W. Weber, Jr. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. P. E. Leclerc ' BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. W. H. Smith ATLAS TEXTILE COMPANY W. H. Johnston CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. J. D. Christian R. A. Kuntze GARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzm.uk JOHIIS-MANVILLE CORPORATION A. C. F. Finkbiner, III, Esq. W. B. Reitze LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell J. Gifford (Asarco) wTCOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. G. G. Gabrielson, Jr. NIPPON ASBESTOS COMPANY LTD. I. Sato RAYEESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. R. M. Gordon J. W. Hawkins D. L. Juhl J. F. Maclachlan R. T. Matthew M. Q. Scowcroft I. H. 'Weaver SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson UNIROYAL, INC. E. A. Morris AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS N. McGrath P. 0. Nicodemus (GeneralElectric) P. Shenker ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq. Legal Counsel D. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 1975 Winter Meeting was 39 people: 30 members, 1 legal counsel, 1 secretary, 3 from ASTM and 4 spouses; representative of 14 member companies plus ASTM and ATI. Pago 2 ATI 1975 Winter Meeting 2/7/75 MINUTES 1. The 1975 Winter Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President Alex. Kuzrn.uk at 1:00 p.m., February 7> 1975* 2. The following special members and guests were welcomed by the President: a) Robert H. Gordon, President, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; b) J. F. Maclachlan, President-Industrial and Consumer Products and Vice President, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; c) D.. L. Juhl, General Manager, RM Friction Materials Company, RaybestosManhattan, Inc.; d) J. L. Christian, Chairman, Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; e) J. Gifford, American Smelting and Refining Company; f) J. W. Weber, Jr., Amatcx Corporation; g) Nancy McGrath, American Society for Testing and Materials; h) Pamela Shenker, American Society for Testing and Materials. .2- President Kuzm.uk welcomed all delegates and following traditional procedure, asked each attendee to stand and state his or her name and company affiliation. U, Upon President Kuzmuk's calling for the reading of the Minutes of the 1974 /.nnual Meeting, it was moved by S. G. Dixit, seconded by E. A. Morris, and so carried, to dispense with the reading thereof. 5. In the absence of Treasurer M. J. Scanlan, the Report of Funds of the Insti tute as of December 31, 1974, was presented by President Kuzmuk. As of September 1, 1974, the ATI had a cash balance on hand of $14,051.44. During the period September 1 thru December 31, 1974, total receipts amounted to $2S,691.18, including two extraordinary items of $19,328.22 from sales of the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual, 3rd Edition, and $8,908.13 for the Litigation Defense Fund. Disbursements during the same four-month period totaled $15,332.21 for general purposes (including $12,000.00 for partial payment of the Test Manual printing bill) and $3,068.57 for expenses incurred as a result of the Tyler Litigation. This left a cash balance on hand at December 31, 1974, of 724,341.84 ($10,164.78 for general purposes, plus $14,177.06 for the Litigation Defense Fund). Adding assets of cash on hand together with accounts receivable and the nominal $1.00 value for furniture and equipment, the total net worth of the Institute at year-end 1974 was $30,001.74. For a breakdown of the Litigation Defense Fund which was established April 1, 1974, the cash balance on hand as of June 17, 1974, was $11,250.00. Following disbursements for legal fees of $5,981.19 and $3,480.16, receipts from Special assessment #2 of $11,250.00, and receipts from Voluntary Contributions of $4,221.88, the cash balance to date (February 5, 1975) is $17,260.53* (The complete Report of Funds is appended to these Minutes as Attachment I and will be filed for audit.) o. The Fiber Producers' Report was presented by E. A. Farrell, Sales Manager, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. In discussing the period January-October 1974, Mr, Farrell gave a breakdown of the 28,611 metric tons of spinning-grade fiber expoit- od from Canada -- by quantities and by countries of destination. He also more Page 3 ATI 1975 Winter Meeting 2/7/75 referred to the many difficulties currently besetting the Canadian Asbestos Industry such as the fire that occurred in December at the King-Beaver.Mill of Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; the landslide at the Jeffrey Mine Pit of Canadian Johns-Kanville Co. Ltd.; the pit problems of Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; and a possible labor strike at the Quebec mines. As a result of these many problems, Mr. Farrell reported that Group 3 fibers are in short supply. Also, Group 7 is available but Groups U, 5 and 6 continue in short supply. (See Attachment II for a copy of the entire Fiber Producers' Report.) 7. In the absence of C. S. Barnwell, Chairman of the Technical Committee, the report on the activities of that working group was given by Committee Member John li. Hawkins. Mr. Hawkins advised of the completion of the Round Robin tests on tubular sleeving, tape, cloth and lap and that reviews of and modifications to the following ASTM Specifications were made: D-315 on Woven Asbestos Tape, D'106l on Asbestos Lap and D1571 on Woven Asbestos Cloth. (See Attachment III for the complete Technical Committee Report.) ~ 3. A report on the Environmental Committee's activities was presented by Chair man L. E. Moody. Mr. Moody advised he was reporting on the first meeting of the Committee, newly-formed by combining the former Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee and the Environmental Health Committee. He advised that W. B. Alcorn, J ., Esq., ATI Legal Counsel, reviev/ed for the Committee the decision handed down in the IUD/CIO case. The group then proceeded to review OSHA Standard 1910-93a (See Attachment 137 for the entire Environmental Committee report.) _9. President Xuznuk addressed the membership-at-large stating he had a pleasant duty to perform -- and it was indeed a privilege to present an engraved, walnut plaque to a well-respected friend of long-standing of the ATI: Paul 0. Nicodemus. Mr. Nicodemus has impressive technical qualifications -- a B.S. in Chemistry from Penn State University and an M.S. from the University of Pennsylvania. He has had 33 years of service with General Electric Company during which time he has been most helpful to the Asbestos Textile Industry. Perhaps his greatest contribution is his many years of dedicated work with ASTM in setting standards for practically all of the asbestos commodities -- and most recently in working with the ATI Technical Committee in keeping all pertinent standards up-to-date. Mr. Nicodemus has not only made a technical contribution but he has also found time to work with various charities and social groups such as the Retarded Children's Instructional Bowling League; a Member of the Board of Camp Paul, which provides summer vacations for retarded children; and a former Grand Knight of the Knights of Columbus. In asking Mr. Nicodemus to cone forward to receive his plaque, President Ku.znuk stated it was with the greatest of pleasure, on behalf of the ATI, to present him with this token of the Industry's appreciation for his many contri butions over the years. Mr. Nicodemus was completely overwhelmed by the unexpected event -- but was most pleased and sincerely thanked the Institute f or the plaque. more Page 4 ATI 1975 Winter Meeting ~ 2/7/75 10. The report of the Ad Hoc Committee was given by Chaiman A. C. F. Finkbiner, III, Esq. Attorney Finkbiner discussed the current status of the Yandje and Kay cases insofar as ATI's involvement in the Tyler Litigation is concerned. He advised that a deposition of Dr. Lee Grant, Medical Adviser with Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, is scheduled for March 6-7, 1975, in Pittsburgh, Pennsyl vania, and that hopefully the ATI, by its next meeting, will know what decision has been handed down by the judge on its notion to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds. (See Attachment V for the full report.) 11. Remarks of Legal Counsel were presented by Attorney Alcorn. In essence he discussed several points relating to compliance with OSHA regulations. Addi tionally, he reviewed a recent development in the Telex-IBM litigation; the increase in the criminal sanctions under the Sherman Act; the stronger, more vigorous regional price-fixing attack by the U.S. Department of Justice; and, for the benefit of house counsel, he mentioned Senate Bill #356, enacted Decem ber 19, 1974, titled the Magneson-Moss Warranty and Federal "rado Commission Improvement Act (of interest to those companies that sell consumer products that have any kind of warranties, written or implied.) (The full text of Legal Counsel's Remarks are appended to these Minutes as Attachment VI.) 12. President Kuznuk reported that the ATI Board of Governors had unanimously -agreed that future Annual Meetings would be held as per usual and that the Executive Secretary was looking into suitable sites for the Institute's 1975 and 1976 Annual Meetings. When firmed, the membership will be so advised. 13. It was reported by President Kuznuk that Nicolet Industries, Inc., has gone out of the asbestos yarn business and, therefore, no longer qualifies for member ship in the Institute. As a result, Nicolet has tendered its resignation from the ATI as of December 31, 1974, but President G. G. Gabrielson, Jr., has advised of Nicolet's intent to continue to support the Institute in its defense efforts in the Tyler Litigation -- including active participation in the affairs and activities of the Ad Hoc Committee. 14. President Kuznuk stated that a new Membership Directors'- would be issued within the next two months, as soon as all necessary information is received, compiled and printed. 15. Following the announcement that the 1975 Spring Meeting of the ATI would be held June 5-6. 1975. at Stouffer's Atlanta Inn, Atlanta, Georgia, President Kuznuk entertained a motion for adjournment. It was so moved by L. E. Moody, seconded by P. E. Leclerc, and unanimously approved by the attending members -- and the meeting was adjourned at 3'00 p.m. Respectfully submitted Executive Secretary A '.ST jZ TLZTILE IMST-l JUTE Fiscal Year enaing August 31. 12 7.' Report of Funds Period; September 1, 1974, thru December 31, 1974 3alance on Hand September 1, General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund 1974 -- Total on Hand at 9/1/74 Receipts General Fund - 3ook Sales Magnetite Samples Reserve Fund - Test Manual Sales Interest to 12/31/74 Litigation Defense Fund Total Receipts .... $ 1,416.83 12,601.86 32.75 $ 19.73 5.00 19,328.22 430.10 8,908.13 Disbursements Legal Services/Expenses Secretary1s Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense Telephone Printing/Office Supplies Postage Revision of Test Manual Test Manual/Partial Printing Cost Rental of Office Space Accountant/Caruso/19 73-74 ASTM Dues for Year 1975 Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc. $ 821.20 652.00 35.96 394.57 217.00 120.97 235.74 172.91 133.80 12,000.00 135.00 300.00 25.00 88.06 Litigation: Legal Services/Expenses ATI Meeting Expense Telephone Printing/OfficeSupplies Postage $ 2,820.17 30.60 73.93 90.42 53.40 Total Disbursements $15,332.21 + 3,068.57 BALANCE ON HAND DECEMBER 31, 1974 Funds as of December 31, 1974 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 556.80 23,768.31 16.73 *TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS DECEMBER 31, 1974 . . Assets as of December 31, 1974 -- Total Funds as listed above Accounts P.ecaivable - Litigation Assessment #2 Test Manual Orders Furniture & Equipment/Nominal Value $24,341.84 5,625.00 33.90 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS . . TOTAL LIABILITIES TOTAL NET WORTH DECEMBER 31, 19-74 . . . . Total Available Funds 12/31/74: $24,341.81 Litigation Defense Fund: -14,177.06 Actual Net Worth: $10,164.78 $*14,051.44 +28,691.18 $42,742.62 -18,400.73 $24,341.84 $24,341.84 $30,001.74 $30,001.74 Att. I FIBER PRODUCERS' REPORT First Ten Months 1974 Presented by E. A. Farrell, Sales Manager, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., at the Winter Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute, held at Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania -- February 7, 1975. , The Canadian Asbestos Industry has suddenly become burdened with great diffi culties . . The first disaster was the fire in December that destroyed the Asbestos Corpora tion King Beaver Mill. This will result in a loss of 150,000 short tons of fiber in 1975, including a large tonnage of spinning fiber. This was followed in January by a serious slide at the Johns-Manville Jeffrey pit at Asbestos, Quebec. It appears that it will have some effect on the supply of their fiber since it will take six months to a year to clear up the matter. I understand that two large shovels were covered in the slide. Also, Cassiar Asbestos Corporation is having pit problems. We then have over-hanging these industry problems a possible labor strike at all of the Quebec mines. Negotiations are currently in a critical stage and the industry requests your cooperation and understanding during this difficult period. As a result of the afore-mentioned problems, Group 3 fiber is in short supply and Groups 4, 5 and 6 continue in short supply. Group 7 is available. Canadian spinning fiber exports from January through October 1974 were as follows: Country of Destination Metric Tons Country of Destination Metric Tons United Kingdom Austria Belgium-Luxembourg France Germany, West Italy Netherlands Portugal Spain Sweden Czechoslovakia Hungary Yugoslavia 4,356 11 202 861 1,879 836 626 60 989 21 74 120 510 Israel Turkey 129 220 India 213 Pakistan 330 Japan Korea, South 3,877 138 Australia 75 Argentina 256 Brazil 283 Colombia 50 Mexico United States 2,363 10.132 TOTAL 28,611 Metric Tons Att. II MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 6 & 7, 1975 . t IN ATTENDANCE: Anatex Corporation -- W. Maaskant American Smelting and Refining Company -- J. Gifford Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd. -- W. H. Smith Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. -- R. A. Kuntze Garlock Inc. -- S. G. Dixit Raybestos Manhattan Industrial Products Company -- J. W. Hawkins Southern Asbestos Company -- D. E. Childersj J. W. Echerd American Society for Testing and Materials -- Ms. N, McGrath; Ms. P. Shenker General Electric Company -- P. 0. Nicodemus In the absence of Chairman C. S. Barnwell, of Uniroyal, Inc., Mr. Hawkins served as Acting Chairman of the ATI Technical Committee. Mr. Nicodemus, Chairman of ASTM Subcommittee D13.14 was asked to chair the committee during this meeting due to the fact that ASTM Specifications would be under considera tion. Round Robin tests have been completed on tubular sleeving, tape, cloth and lap. It was acknowledged that assistance was necessary from ASTM to compile statis tical data from the results of the tests. Although the sleeving data diameter measurements were very variable, it was- decided that they should remain because in test the variations do exist. Based upon discrepancies and lack of clarity evident from the Round Robin tests, test procedures involved were reviewed. In Specification D-315 on Asbestos Tape the method of breaking was modified to insure the correct jaws are being used. The format for conformance, reports and precision also were modified. In Specification 1571 on Asbestos Cloth the weight section was rewritten so that the result of the weighing would be reported in the same unit measurement as that used in industry standards. It was agreed that Specification 1061 on Asbestos Lap should include precision and accuracy based on the original Round Robin test, even though wide variations were obtained. No work was done at the meeting on Military or Federal specifications. Respectfully subrdtted, John W. Hawkins, Acting Chairman Att III ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE February 7, 1975 Presented by Chairman Aaron C. F. Finkbiner, III, Esq., Johns-Manville Corpora tion, at the ATI 1975 Winter Meeting held at Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. . The court in Tyler, Texas, has before it motions filed on behalf of the Asbestos Textile Institute seeking to dismiss both lawsuits on the grounds that the court does not have jurisdiction over ATI because the Institute never was in Texas. The notions have teen sitting for more than nine months. The judge has not as yet taken action except to grant the opportunity to the plaintiff to take whatever discovery he wants. i:Discoveryn is a system whereby parties on both sides of the lawsuit can seek facts, identity of witnesses, documents, and other things from the opposing side. The plaintiffs in the Yandle and Kay cases have not really directed any discovery efforts toward ATI with an eye to proving that the Institute had sufficient connection with Texas to give the court jurisdiction. Me are perfectly content to lot that situation remain as it is. Therefore, the ATI has not taken any affirmative steps of its own in the litigation. Other defendants in the Yandle and Kay lawsuits have also sought to have the case dismissed at the outset. It is against those defendants that the plain tiffs have directed their discovery efforts to try to keep them in the suits. It is expected the judge should role on the motions on ATI sometime during the next three or four months -- but we will just have to wait and see. We are, however, getting into a more favorable position to suggest to the judge that we have been in the case long enough, the plaintiffs have had ample time to develop 'whatever evidence they want on the jurisdiction question -- and to get the judge to make a ruling promptly. We are still somewhat optimistic because of the plaintiffs' apparent disinclination to really pursue ATI on this question. For those of you who nay not be familiar with the Yandle and Kay lawsuits, in detail, they are cases which former employees of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation c'.-ought against that company, its medical director (Dr. Lee Grant), ATI, two .miners of asbestos that sold fiber to Pittsburgh Corning, etc., alleging various theories of recovery which are different as to each defendant. However, basically the plaintiffs are saying they were injured at the Tyler plant and are entitled to .money damages to compensate them for that injury. They are also o-omking punitive damages. In the Yandle case there are now 77 individual plaintiffs. In the Kay case ' there are 46. That is a total of 123 out of a potential of 570 former employ ees of Pittsburgh Corning who worked at the plant at Tyler. more Att.V/page 1 of 2 .'ml Ad Hoc Committee Report - 2/7/75 Dr. Grant's deposition will be taken in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on March 6-7, 1975* Certainly the court will wait until after that deposition to n$ke a ruling on the pending notions. Quite possibly the deposition nay open a whole new set of avenues that the plaintiff will try to pursue before he will agree that he has enough discovery. Then the judge can make an informed ruling on the jurisdictional question. Basically that is the situation. ATI is simply in a "wait and see" position. It is hoped that by the June 1975 meeting of the ATI we will have a report on what the judge did with our notions. The following question was asked by one of the attending members: Is there no limit the judge can set on the. time allowed for a plaintiff to seekdiscovery -- or does the time just go on and on? The judge can set a time limit. It is unlikely in a case of this magnitude that you will start to see the court pressing the attorneys for the different parties as to when they will be finished their discovery for a couple of years. Once the preliminary motions are set and decided, it would seem logical for the judge in this kind of case where there are so many plaintiffs and several de fendants that he would try to set some sort of orderly framework for the case to proceed. He will probably gather the attorneys together in an endeavor to determine how long they will need for discovery. The plaintiffs' lawyers will probably say a year and the defense lawyers will probably say they need years and years because of the many different plaintiffs. Probably the judge will at that time set some preliminary guidelines. It is probable that it will be several years before this case is ready for trial. It would be unrealistic to expect the case will be ready for trial in less than three years. In short, the case is going to be around for a long time, and that is why we want the initial motion of aTI to be ruled upon before the case gets into the real merits. -end- Att V/page 2 of 2 I IT U T TS 3 ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania February 7, 1975 The initial meeting of the ATI Environmental Committee was called to order by Chairman Moody, with representation from ten member companies present. The newly-formed Committee is a combination of the former Air Hygiene and Manufac turing Committee and the Environmental Health Committee. Members in attendance included: . Amatex Corporation H. H. Walter Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. I. Sato Atlas Textile Company V. H. Johnston Cassiat Asbestos Corp. Ltd. J . D. Christian Garlock Inc. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk Johns-Manville Corporation W. B. Reitze Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. R. M. Gordon D. L. Juhl J. F. Maclachlan R. T. Matthew I. H. 77eaver Southern Asbestos Company E. C. Bratt L. E. Moody TBA Industrial Products Ltd. H. J. Corson ATI Legal Counsel W. B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq. At the request of the Committee, a review of the IUD/CIO case decision was presented by Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., ATI Legal Counsel. The members of the Committee desired a legal opinion of the decision of the three-judge panel, c? the importance of the two items remanded to OSHA for consideration, and of possible future moves or actions that might result from the decision. As planned, the Committee spent the balance of the session reviewing OSHA 191C-93&. Each item or paragraph was discussed in an endeavor to determine interpretations among the Committee Members and to consider what possible interpretations might be presented by an Inspection Compliance Officer. la was agreed that should an Inspection Compliance Officer arrive at a membercompany plant to inspect that plant, the following "in-conaon1' requests would 1) that each sampling be an eight-hour sampling segmented by at least 16 filter changes of no more than 30 minutes per filter; more.- Att. IV/Page 1 2) that the location of the sampler tube be in the area of the nose-mouth (breathing zone), preferably by hard-hat-liver" mounting; 3) that a definition be given of an eight-hour, time-weighted average -- ceiling concentration and peak-reading duration. * In discussion each item and paragraph, questions were raised as to the meaning of parts, etc. In each area of questioning, each Member of the Committee was given opportunity to voice his individual views -- thereby enabling an agree able summation to be formed. The California OSHA law was briefly discussed. It was mutually agreed that this item should be investigated in greater detail as it will have some effect on all member companies of the ATI. The EFA waste disposal regulation, as it is presently recommended, was dis cussed. If the Regulation becomes law, it will cause difficulty to all asbestos products manufacturers, especially in the area of scrap disposal. Respectfully submitted, L. E. Moody, Chairman Att. IV/Page 2 of 2 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE February 7. 1975 Presented by Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., ATI Legal Counsel, at the 19^5 Winter Meeting of the ATI held at Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsyl vania . It is indeed a pleasure to be here. As I have said in the past, I enjoy the fellowship almost as much as giving my remarks of legal counsel. We have had a lot of developments in the past few months since our last meeting which I do want to bring to your attention. With respect to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), there are several points I want to make relating to compliance. There recently were a series of citations issued to the Old Ben Coal Corporation. OSHA has made an example of this company. It has levied a $70,000 fine for 70 separate violations of the coal dust standard. This is the heaviest penalty that has been levied to date for any separate series ofviolations. The maximum serious violation penalty under OSHA is $1000 per violation. Approximately 80$ of the OSHA citations that have been issued to date are non-serious violations. The administrative law judge who handed down the penalty against "Old Ben" said the company had flaunted its obligation to observe safety standards. It was cited 50 times in- the last two years for violating the same standard that it continued to violate -- and it showed no intention of correcting the situation. It had received a number of lesser fines in the- years past. The moral of the story is pretty clear. If you get a minor or non-serious citation, at least show good faith with the OSHA people and make an effort to correct the situation. If the situation cannot be corrected completely, keep OSHA informed through periodic reporting; ask their advice and assistance; coopserate with them as much as you can consistent with your own individual interests; and, above all, be diplomatic. THE OSHA GENERAL DUTY CLAUSE We in the asbestos industry have been concerned for quite a few years with the OSHA .Asbestos Standard. We tend to forget, however, that there is a general :atch-ali clause in the OSHA Act that places on the employer a very broad duty. It says that each employer "shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are caus- or are likely to cause death or serious physical ham to his employees."I I have reviewed the cases that have been decided to date under the general duty clause and have come up with several general rules I would like to discuss briefly with you. These rules are derived from the cases that have been handed more Att. VI/Page 1 of 6 ATI - Remarks of Legal Counsel - 2/?/?5 down 'under this clause. I think, however, that the principles that have evolved can te applied to any type of OSHA compliance situation. % No. 1, if there is a specific standard in effect it preempts the general duty clause; so if you have an asbestos dust problem, the general duty clause is not the method by which GSHA would proceed. It would proceed under the Asbestos Standard. The second thing is that the clause covers contractors and subcontractors. If you have someone who is contracting for you, his employees are covered 'under the general duty clause. If you are in a joint venture with another company, be careful because you may well be held liable ior something the other firm is doing without your knowledge. Separate workplaces lead to separate violations. If 3^ou have a spinning room, and another room at your plant, and you are doing the same thing in both rooms, it might lead to two citations for violations under the general duty clause. You are responsible for the safety of non-owned equipment. If you have leased or rented equipment, you must make certain it is safe. The mere occurrence of an accident does not prove a violation. Suppose a worker gets hurt at a plant and OSHA coties in and gives you a citation. If the facts indicate that you did everything within reason to prevent that accident and you had no cause to know the accident would occur before it did, then you can probably defeat the citation if it were given under the general duty clause. The standard of your conduct is "reasonableness." VJhat would a reasonable nan do in your situation. Foolhardy acts of employees do not lead to a violation. There was one case that was decided where an employee walked under a crane and pulled out the pins that held up the crane. The crane crashed down and killed him. The employer was cited under the general duty clause as not having provided a safe workplace -- and the U.5. Department of Labor lost the case. There may be a violation if the thing that you are doing is recognized as a hazard in your industry. A company can take certain actions and perhaps not recognise that a condition at its plant is hazardous, but if it is recognized in the industry by your fellow companies as generally being hazardous then this is something that does come under the general duty clause. Of course, some hazards are necessarily attendant to any work. For example, there was a case that was brought where some garbage men were picking up the garbage cans and the hydraulic tailgate fell on one of the workers, injuring him. .'.5HA cited the company that owned the garbage truck for violation of the general futy clause. It was ruled to not be a violation because it was something that '.fas necessary to the collection of garbage. People have to work under hydraulic tailgates. more........... Att. VI/Page 2 of 6 j.TI - F.e.marks of Legal Counsel - 2/7/75 Most companies have their ovm internal safety rules. The simple pronulgation or amouncerent of a safety rule to your employees does not mean that the thing you are endeavoring to prevent by establishing that rule is recognized by you to be a hazard. However, it is of some evidentiary importance. For example, if you issue a rule in your company that there is not to be smoking within 50 feet of a certain area, then if you are brought in under the general duty clause OSHA (or the Department of Labor) can cite your company's rule as having some evidentiary weight on whether that area was considered to be hazardous, in your thinking. The hazard that is covered under the general dv.'-- clause must be me that will probably occur unless corrective action or pro^- ' warnings are u.Jertakcn. A mere possibility does not suffice. There was a .aso decided who oc an OSHA inspector saw that some foundation work had been removed from bricks that covered an archway. The bricks were not loose and the mortar was sound; but the OSHA inspector said there was a possibility that the bricks would fall and hurt somebody. So he issued a citation -- but the company won. There was no probability of a hazard. Many of us deal with equipment that has rated capacity. TJe rido on elevators in hotels that aro capable of handling a certain number of pounds or tons. This is of some evidentiary value. For example, if you are operating a crane that has a certain capacity limitation or specification and a cable breaks or some thing happens where the crar.e swings around, hits somebody and injures him -- then you could well be held in violation of the general duty clause; and the specification on the crane could be introduced as evidence. But it is a fact question as to whether heed was paid to the specification on the crane; if a maximum load was intended; or if it was being used just for your own convenience in operating your business. There are some conclusions to be drawn from these cases. You do have a duty to warn of unusual or dangerous conditions at your plant. You must warn your employees of these. You have a duty to supervise inexperienced workers or workers whose duties are necessarily involved with hazardous activities. You have a duty to not bo negligent. You must act as a reasonable person in the. conduct of your business. There is a factual presumption before administrative law judges in favor of the injured worker, unless he acted in a gross or wanton manner in disregard of his own safety. There are many cases on the books where the supervisor advised a vrorker of a hazard and the worker did not pay heed. This is a defense to a citation given under the general duty clause. A case has been decided that was brought against .merican Smelting and Refining Com.par.y which is of particular interest. In essence, the case stands for the proposition that an employer must use sophisticated testing devices and methods to detect unseen hazards in the workplace. For example, in this particular instance the company undertook some casual monitoring to measure airborne load from a smelter. 3y the same token, the employer had a duty to make his employees wear respirators within a certain area. The employer undertook to more Att. VI/Page 3 of 6 ATI - Remarks of Legal Counsel - 2/7/75 nor.itor the air and if the air was allright , it would not make the employees wear the respirators. OSH.', cane in rad issued a citation for v:elation cf the general duty clause for failing to nrtnr ar.ployeos near the aspirators -- and the citation w:.j v.phelo . 03'4A c-.io y--... casual mon. wring p. eg. re was not sufficient. Z;ren if t:ic rr./ ir ,'n-rt char a r mo 'l~ *r ole ,.e?e c `r.tnt of the air on r regular ca;:w .. Chi. rari a ill.f lave ' .an.; - r-vfi:i the company for it:- filure to mam he enic -u. v :v - ..y-w ,r: . Sven though the situation is not recognizee w c p-vr.ari in the _rctvsiry, actual knowledge that a part of your plant or an aevi/my an your plant constitutes a hazard to the workers is svff-: .cm. to raim a duty ;nder this ywmicular clause in the OSH.. Act. You must warn red take corner,i v .ensures. The Secretary of Labor in an OSH., case under the g-;r.ercl duty clause must show the following things -- and it would be well to tour these in rind. First, he rust show that your company is in interstate corzarco or have substantial effect upon interstate commerce. .ill U.S. nenber coapanies of the ATI fall in this category -and, therefore, OSHA does have jurisdiction. Second, he has to show that a hazard existed -- a hazardous condition was, in fact, there. This can be a hazard recognized in your industry or one of which the employer has actual knowledge. Thirdly, the Secretary of Labor or his representative roust show that the condition was likely to cause death or serious bodily harm to your employee. Fourth, the burden is on the respondent in a case like this to show there was a specific standard that governed the case and that the general duty clause should not be invoked. THE TELEX-IBM CASS In November 1973 an Oklahoma federal district court judge had the bright idea to issue against IBM a damage assessment which was the largest in the entire history of ..merican jurisprudence. It was in a private, treble damage antitrust action under the Sherman Act. Telex was a competitor of IBM and accused IBM of attempting to monopolize and actually .monopolizing the market for electronic data-processing products. The amount of the damage award against IBM was $259.5-million. In the course of the litigation, IBM had counterclaimed against Telex and said they were pirates: ,:They stole some of our business secrets and used them for their own advantage." The judge found against Telex on the counterclaim and awarded a substantial damage claim against Telex. The case was appealed to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals and just recently, January 24, 1975? the Circuit Court overturned the lower court's holding against IE-1 and affirmed its holding against Telex. more Att. Vl/Fase 4 of - ATI - ?.i ^cuns.. 2/7/75 The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court's decision on two technical antitrust grounds. One was that the lower court had too narrowly defined the product market under the Sherman Act. Under the Sherman Act a relevant product market must be defined in order to judge the competitive effect that the conduct being challenged has had, to judge and identify the competitors in that mark'-a -and to evaluate the market shares held by competitors. The lower court had dofir^i the relevant product market as constituting electronic dataprocessing products which were 1 plug compatible'1 with ZliiA Central-processing units. rtS of new the Circuit Court has issued a brief written opinion on this, although a fully-detailed writing is expected shortly. But from the arguments made by IE-1's counsel before the court, we must assume that the higher court w-anted the product market drawn either along the linos of all electronic dataprocessing equipment or something between that which is "plug compatible" with IBM and the entiro electronic aata-processing field. Also the upper court said something that is most important, in my view, if it prevails, and that is that the practices of IBM that were challenged by Telex constituted valid, competitive practices and were neither predatory nor other wise violative of the antitrust acts. IBM now sits in the position of having no damage assessment against it. Telex, which is a much smaller company, has a total damage assessment against it of $18.5-million. The conclusion is pretty obvious. Telex will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court and try to get that body to hear the case. In view of the large damage award that is still prevailing against Telex and the loss of its damage award against IBM, it is likely that the U.S'. Supreme Court will take the case. There also is a chance the case will be settled before the final outcome is rendered by the Supreme Court. CRIMINAL SANCTIONS. PRICE FIXING & T.ORAHTIES The criminal sanctions under the Sherman Act have been increased. They had been $50,CCC -- now we are talking about $l-million for corporations and several hundred thousand dollars in the case of individuals. The U.S. I apartment of Justice has undertaken a much stronger arid more vigorous regional price fixing attack. It has put AO additional staff attorneys on the antitrust division price fixing task force. They are going out in the field and are looking at economic data rather than listening on the telephone and picking up correspondence relating to price fixing. They are looking at economic data in industries as an early warning device against price fixing -- to see if the prices charged by different companies have moved together, etc. more ..tt. Vl/Page 5 of 6 ATI - Remarks of Legal Counsel - 2/7/75 They have been authorized to use the FBI to a much greater extent than in the past. In a word, the antitrust division is moving very vigorously against regional and local price fixing arrangements. Another natter I 'would like to call to your attention, particularly for the benefit of your house counsel, is: If you sell consumer products that have any kind of warranties, written warranties or implied warranties, I would be happy to send your house counsel a copy of a recent Bill that was enacted and passed December 19, 1974. It is Senate Bill 356 and is called i:The Magneson-Moss Warranty and Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act." If your house counsel receives the CCH Trade Regulation Reports, it is a special print-out numbered 156156 that came out in December. The Federal Government, in a word, has laid down specific requirements that any written warranty on consumer product has to meet. If they do not meet them, they will be in violation of Federal law. Even if you do not have a 'written xwarranty, look at the Bill because it also has serious implications for implied warranties. It does not preempt in its entirety the warranty provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code, but it does have an effect on all warranties of that nature. -er.d- Att. Vl/Page 6 of 6 Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute SEP 2 7 1974 MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute September 26, 1974 -- The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia The ATT Air Hygiene Sc Manufacturing Committee met on September 26, 1974, with sixteen members and guests present, representative of nine Institute member companies, i.e.: * Amatex Corporation H. H. Walter Atlas Textile Company W. H. Johnston Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. A. C. F. Finkbiner, III (J-M) J. P. Power Garlock Inc. A. Kuzmuk Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell R. Lefebvre R. J. Muth (Asarco) Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. M. N. Brooks P. G. Dolan R. T. Matthew R. 0. Moebius Southern Asbestos Company E. C. Bratt L. E. Moody TBA Industrial Products Ltd. H. J. Corson Uniroyal, Inc. B. E. Carden A report on a recent OSHA inspection at a member company's plant wa discussed -- specifically concerning the weaving area where the dus level was measured by OSHA as being over "5", thus requiring the em ployees to wear respirators. Having received a request for their assistance and cooperation, the employees worked with management and were able to reduce the dust counts to a point low enough, for a period of three months, so that it was permissible for the workers to remove their respirators. After due consideration and a full discussion, the Committee res pectfully submits the following recommendations to the ATI Board of Governors for further action: 1) In order to improve the time-weighted average, it is the Committee's recommendation that a different method be used to obtain dust samples, i.e.-- a) In the taking of dust counts, the filter intake valve should be placed in the breathing zone area; c+ ca more Page 2 - Minutes/Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - 9/26/74 b) Dust-count checks on a time-weighted average should be based on a number of l/2-hour checks over an 8-hdur period; 2) Audiometric readings should be used to determine noise level L. E. Moody, a member of the Committee, presented a comprehensive and informative report on the work of the Standards and Technical Committee of the Asbestos Information Association/North America. A written account of his presentation is affixed as Attachment I to this Report. During the past two years it has been a real pleasure to serve as Chairman of the Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee. I had an outstanding group of people with which to work and my thanks go to the Committee and to the ATI for their fine interest, help and cooperation. Respectfully submitted, Buel E. Carden, Chairman Attachment I Minutes/Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - 9/26/74 RE: STANDARDS AND TECHNICAL COMMITTEE, ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION/NORTH AMERICA Prepared and Presented by L. E. Moody, Southern Asbestos Company Late in 1973, the Board of Directors of the Asbestos Information Association/North America decided to form a committee to assist them in matters concerning Standards and technical information. Accordingly, Edmund M. Fenner, of Johns-Manville Corporation, was assigned to chair the Committee and each AIA/NA member company designated a representative to serve as a Committee member. A Committee Organization Meeting was called by Mr. Fenner for Feb ruary 6, 1974, at Newark, New Jersey. At that gathering, the first major assignment was given to the Committee, i.e., working with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration; and more speci fically, working directly with the Standards Division of OSHA con cerning Standard 1910.93a -- the Asbestos Standard. The assignment was to include the preparation of "Work Practices" for the asbestos industry. The responsibility of preparing "Work Practices" for the asbestos textile industry was assigned to Larry Moody, with assistance to be given by C. Kennedy, the representative on the Committee from Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. At the February 1974 meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute, held at Charleston, South Carolina, assistance was also solicited from Hans H. Walter, of Amatex Cor poration, and from Buel E. Carden, of Uniroyal, Inc., to prepare information concerning asbestos textiles. Since Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Moody were geographically located near each other (Charlotte and Monroe, North Carolina), they met brief ly on two occasions before calling together the group of four at Charlotte on February 25, 1974. They soon learned that although they all had departments called Preparation, Carding, Spinning, Twisting and Weaving Departments, there were substantial differ ences in each area. They, therefore, prepared a "Recommended Work Practice," very general in nature but one that was adaptable to all methods known to be in use. Mr. Fenner called a four-member Task Group meeting in the offices of AIA/NA, at Washington, D.C., on April 9-10, 1974. The four in dividuals concerned were Messrs. Fenner and Moody, John P. McGinley more Attachment I - Page 2 Minutes/Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - 9/26/74 Re: Standards and Technical Committee, AIA/NA of Certain-teed Products Corporation, and Frank H. Zimmerman of National Gypsum Company. The Task Group discussed progress to date concerning the preparation of the "Work Practices." On the next day (April 10th), the Task Group met with John P. O'Neill and Harry Gilbert at the OSHA Standard Office. (Mr. O'Neill is Chief of the Division of Health Standards. Mr. Gilbert is the Project Officer in charge of the Asbestos Standard.) The purpose of the meeting was to review progress and to submit to Mr. O'Neill rough drafts of six typical "Work Practices" for his review and comment. It was understood that this was only rough material and was not to be considered as "submitted" work. Any work or material submitted formally would require the approval of the AIA/NA Board of Directors. Basically, the Task Group wanted to know if the material it was working on would be useful and was the type of information that could be incorporated into standards, if it were prepared in the proper manner. At the time, OSHA was con templating a complete revision of the Asbestos Standard 1910.93a, or at least was gathering all available information to that end. Another meeting was held April 24th in Washington, D.C., attended by the entire AIA/NA Standards and Technical Committee and by Mr. Gilbert. (iMr. O'Neill was ill at the time.) At the start of the meeting it was immediately apparant that a major change had taken place. On April 15th, the U.S. Court of Appeals had handed down a decision in favor of OSHA in the Industrial Union Department (AFL/CIO) suit. This court decision vastly decreased the emphasis on "Work Practices." The Asbestos Standard 1910.93a had been up held. Rewriting or revising the Asbestos Standard is not now deemed ad visable. There may be amendments made to the Standard, such as a reference to "Work Practices," that would apply to all segments of the asbestos industry -- housekeeping, entering fiber to process, waste or scrap disposal, etc. The AIA/NA Standards and Technical Committee will proceed with the preparation of "Work Practices" on a recommended basis. In all probability the writings will be recognized and/or recommended by OSHA, but will not be mandatory. It is possible that where a re cognized "Work Practice" is in use, less monitoring would be required. During the most recent meeting of the Committee, on September 10th, again held in Washington, D.C., a review was made of all written more Attachment I - Page 3 Minutes/Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - 9/26/74 Re: Standards and Technical Committee, AIA/NA material, recommendations, etc., that it had submitted to date. It was reaffirmed that the Committee would continue with "Work Practices," in line with procedures and methods of manufacturing asbestos-containing products and to provide information for cus tomers or users of asbestos-containing products. The Committee was invited to remain in D.C. to attend the Industry Government Conference, sponsored by the AIA/NA and held at the Mayflower, September 11-12, 1974. The format of the Conference was a series of speakers, with question/answer periods following each presentation. The speakers included: The Hon. John H. Stender, Assistant Secretary of Labor (OSHA); Sheldon W. Samuels, Industrial Union Department (AFL/CIO); Leo Teplow, Special Consultant, Organization Resources Counse lors; Paul Kotin, M.D., Johns-Manvilie Corporation; Ian C. Campbell, Quebec Asbestos Mining Association (and Vice President & Secretary-Treasurer, Asbestos Corporation Ltd.); Michel Lesage, M.D., Medical Advisor, QAMA; Maurice R. Eastin, Special Consultant to the Administrator (In dustrial Affairs), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Daniel P. Boyd, Ph.D., Director, Office of Standards, OSHA; Lloyd B. Tepper, M.D., Associate Commissioner for Science, Food and Drug Administration (HEW); Robert Join, Executive Director, Chambre Syndicale de l'Amiance (The French Asbestos Information Association); Wilfred P. Howard, Asbestos Information Committee (U.K.) (and Group Public Relations Advisor, Turner & Newall Ltd.); Noel W. Hendry, Vice President and General Sales Manager, Asbes tos Fiber Division, Johns-Manville Corporation; Richard B. Berman, Director of Labor Law, the Chamber of Com merce of the United States. There were many interested persons in attendance at the Conference representing other than the regular AIA/NA membership, i.e.: A/C Pipe Producers Association ASBESTOS Magazine Asbestos Textile Institute Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Commerce Clearing House, Inc. Frank C. Frantz & Company Friction Materials Standards Institute Government Research Corporation more Attachment I - Page 4 Minutes/Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - 9/26/74 Re: Standards and Technical Committee, AIA/NA Hill and Knowlton, Inc. Job Safety and Health Report National Association of Filter Manufacturers, Inc. Asbestos Information Committee (U.K.) Chambre Syndicale de l'Amiante (France) Department of the Environment (Canada) Quebec Asbestos Mining Association U.S. Bureau of Mines, Department of the Interior, Department of Labor, Environmental Protection Agency, Food and Drug Adminis tration, Occupational Safety and Health Administration -- and several members of the Press. The Conference was the first of its kind. It was, beyond question, a successful venture and it is hoped that meetings of this type can form a common ground whereby Industry, Government and Labor can define the problems they share and provide the possible means toward establishing nworking" answers. MINUTES FIBER RESEARCH & TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute September 26, 1974 -- The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia The Fiber Research & Testing Committee, ATI, met on Thursday, Sep tember 26, 1974, with the following members in attendance: G. F. A. Brink, Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; D. E. Childers, Southern Asbestos Company; C. E. Stiefken, American Smelting and Refining Company; W. H. Smith, Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd.; R. A. Kuntze, Chairman -- Ontario Research Foundation (Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.) The main subject discussed was the impending merger with the ATI Technical Committee. After considerable deliberation, it was agreed to Join the Techni cal Committee in the form of a sub-committee. This would retain the identify of the Fiber Research & Testing group and would permit the formulation of a suitable and meaningful technical program. After the completion of the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual, 3rd edition, a new technical program must be established and in this respect, any input from other ATI members would be appreciated. The first technical subject that has been submitted for consider ation is the poor reproducibility of the fiber count procedure via the membrane filter method. The Fiber Research & Testing Sub committee intends to concern itself with the development of better methods of identifying and counting asbestos fibers. However, the Subcommittee will not deal with hardware or with specification problems. The above approach has been discussed with John W. Hawkins, of the Technical Committee, and with Larry E. Moody, of the Environmental Committee, and there seem to be no objections. Respectfully submitted, R. A. Kuntze, Chairman M I NUT E S TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute September 25 & 26, 1974 - The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia IN ATTENDANCE: Ametex Corporation Southern Asbestos Company R/M Industrial Products Co. ' Uni royal, Ini.. '.fin, Maoskant J. W. Tcherd J. W. iawkins C. S. "'r.rnviell Comments have been received from the Editorial Committee of ASTM on the Asbestos Roving (D-375) and Asbestos Yarn (D-299). These will be reviewed at the October 16-17 meeting. The sample of lap being used in the Round Robin test has been lost between Southern Asbestos and Araatex. If net found, this test will be restarted. U. S. Coast Guard Specification Draft #164.009 on noncombustible ma terial was reviewed. Wm. Maaskant will advise the Coast Guard of our comments. The only change noticed in this draft from the orig inal version was the introduction of the metric system. The major work during this meeting was the revision of D-62S (Tubu lar Sleeving). This specification was completed and will be forwarded to the Editorial Committee. The Fall ASTM meeting will be held in New York, October 16-17. D-13.14 is scheduled to meet at that time. Special recognition will be paid to Paul Nicodemus, chairman. It was announced that the Fiber Testing Committee will merge with the Technical Committee and an agenda of interest to all must be drawn up for future meetings. Respectfully submitted, John W. Hawkins, Acting Chairman AD HOC COMMITTEE REPORT Asbestos Textile Institute Reported to the General Membership on September 27, 1974, by Alex Kuzmuk (Oarlock Inc.) for the Chairman, Aaron C. F. Finkbiner, III, Esq. (Johns-Manville Corporation). * The Ad Hoc Committee for the Tyler, Texas, lawsuits convened on Wed nesday afternoon, September 25, 1974. The meeting was chaired by Aaron Finkbiner and, of course, the status of the Tyler cases was the principal item on the agenda. A report from Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., ATI's Trial Counsel in the Tyler cases, was submitted to the Committee and formed part of the basis of the discussion. As you know, the Tyler cases are two lawsuits in which ATI is one of several defendants. Specifically, ATI is charged with "impeding the flow of information" about health hazards associated with the industrial use of asbestos. ATI has denied the claims of the plain tiffs and also has taken steps seeking to have ATI dismissed from the suits on the ground that the Institute is not subject to suit in Texas. in July the Court in Tyler held oral arguments on several matters of court procedure. Attorney Alcorn atfuno.od the sessions. The Court recognized that the cases could become quite complicated and, therefore, will issue an order shortly concerning the procedure to be followed in the cases. In the meantime, the Court has entered a stay order, effectively halting all procedures in the cases. Once the Court has entered its order on procedure, there are two pending motions awaiting determination. The first motion which will probably be decided is the motion by one of the plaintiffs to have the case proceed as a class action, with that plaintiff acting as the representative of all former workers at the Tyler plant. The next motion for consideration is ATI's motion to dismiss because ATI is not subject to suit in Texas. We believe the Court will al low plaintiffs some discovery (that is, steps taken to learn facts held by different persons or organizations) on this question. It was the consensus of the Ad Hoc Committee members that if a deposi tion (oral questions and answers taken under oath) of ATI is sought, the Executive Secretary of the ATI would be an appropriate witness. A ruling on these motions may not be forthcoming until the end of 1974. Wendell Alsorn will keep the Ad Hoc Committee posted on all significant developments. At the close of the meeting, the financing of the Tyler Litigation 'was discussed. The topic received further consideration by the ATI Board of Governors. It was decided that a second Special Assessment on the Regular Members of ATI would be appropriate and that Asso ciate Members would be encouraged to contribute in a like manner. REMARKS OF LEGAL COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute Annual Meeting September 27, 1974; The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia This morning, I wish to call your attention to a recent change in the legal relationship among employers, employees and third parties In 1970, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration was created and you are familiar with the national legislation that created it. We have had many discussions in the past concerning the effects of OSHA regulations upon the activities and conduct of the business of your companies. I. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION There is another aspect, however, of the OSHA legislation besides items such as inplant inspections, safety standards and asbestos dust exposure regulations. The 1970 federal legislation created a National Commission on State workmen's compensation laws. That Commission has made a study of workmen's compensation laws through out the 50 States of the Union and has come up with a final report. The Commission's report is not merely a piece of paper. Various State legislatures are changing their workmen's compensation laws on the basis of facts and recommendations contained in that report. One of the States that has acted is Texas. The reason I focus on Texas is because much of the asbestos-health-hazard litigation has been initiated in the State of Texas, has been decided by courts in Texas, and one of the landmark cases which was decided adversely to the Industry has been affirmed on appeal by the U.S. Court of Ap peals for the Fifth Circuit, which sits in New Orleans. The Texas law governing compensation of employees for injurres sus tained cn the job and for occupational diseases contracted in con nection with their work was changed substantially for the first time since it was enacted in 1913. Many of these changes are irrel evant in the context of the Asbestos Textile Institute, but there are certain pertinent ones which we shall review this morning. One major change was the broadening of the coverage of the Texas workmen's compensation statute. For example, under prior Texas law companies having no more than three employees were not coverod. Well, that is no longer so. Also, employees of State agencies and political entities were not covered. They now can be. There also are substantially increased benefits under the workmen's compensation law. An example: The maximum weekly benefit has been more Page 2 - Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 9/27/74 raised to $63.00 while the minimum weekly benefit has been increas ed to $15.00. Of perhaps greater long-term significance is the fact that there has been built into the Texas workmen's compensa tion law an inflation factor which will result in higher maximum and minimum weekly benefits as the Cost of Living Index rises. There is one very important change that is deserving of our spec ial attention. Prior to September 1, 1973, the insurance carrier, (that is, the one with whom the individual manufacturer or other type of business has its workmen's compensation insurance), had the right to choose the doctor and the medical facilities which would treat an injured or diseased employee. There were certain limitations which affected the right of the insurance carrier to make this choice -- for example, the worker had the right to choose a doctor to render first-aid in an emergency situation. But, generally, the sole choice lay in the insurance carrier. Un der the Texas workmen's compensation statute, as now amended, the employee has the "sole right" to choose the doctor and the medical facility. That's all well and good. However, there has been much criticism raised in the halls of the Texas Legislature to the effect that the employee's new right to choose will encourage the prolifera tion of what are, perhaps unkindly, referred to as "plaintiffs' doctors". The Texas Legislature also enacted significant changes in that State's compensation laws with regard to third-party actions. A third-party action is like the lawsuit in which ATI is involved in Tyler, Texas. It is an action not against the worker's employer but against a third-party entity -- such as a miner that supplies asbestos fibers to a production plant in Texas; such as a trade association like ATI which the worker claims impeded the dissemi nation of information about the health hazards of working with asbestos. Before September 1, 1973, an employee who allegedly had been harmed by such a third party could not pursue simultaneously an action against his employer and the third party. Now he can do so. He can bring a workmen's compensation claim against his employer in Texas to be decided by the Industrial Accident Board and, at the same time, he can file a third-party suit in the Texas Dis trict Court or the Federal District Court if the jurisdiction is appropriate. The third-party action would probably seek damages far beyond the maximum recovery allowed by the Texas workmen's compensation statute. This has affected the time when an aggrieved worker must bring a lawsuit. Under prior Texas law, the worker could file a workmen's compensation claim with the Industrial Accident Board, wait until more Page 3 - Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 9/27/7L that claim was adjudicated (that is, finally decided) and then, within two years, sue the third party -- the person who supplied the fiber, or the trade association, or whatever other entity might be connected with the particular industrial accident or oc cupational disease. The reason the employee had to sue within two years is that the general statute of limitations in Texas that governs the time in which one must bring suit after he has suffer ed a personal injury is two years. The effect of this on companies doing business in Texas is that a worker who now files a compensa tion claim in Texas and waits until that claim is finally adjudi cated, which may take over two years, and then seeks to bring a third-party action against a supplier, for example, is subject to being barred from pursuing that case by the applicable statute of limitations. It is possible under the new Texas law, which is not too dissimilar to compensation laws which have been adopted in other States, that the worker may sue a third party and choose not to claim against his employer. If the worker has already received compensation benefits from the employer's insurance carrier, the insurance com pany may be subrogated to the rights of the worker in the thirdparty action. Let us say, for example, worker John Doe had his arm severed in an industrial accident. He brings a claim for sta tutory workmen's compensation, which is allowed. He then sues the manufacturer of the machine that had the nerve to cut off his arm. He claims the machine was poorly manufactured and did not incor porate appropriate safety factors. The insurance company that paid the original compensation benefits can now intervene in the third-party lawsuit and take up the sword against the manufacturer of the machine. There is also an obligation under the new Texas legislation for compensation insurance carriers to undertake ''loss prevention ser vices". I predict that anyone doing business in Texas, or in another State that has adopted a similar provision, will learn about this in the very near future (if they have not already done co). The Texas Insurance Code,, in conjunction with the Workmen's Com pensation Act, has been amended to require carriers to provide accident prevention facilities as a prerequisite to writing insur ance in the State of Texas. This includes educational programs which the insurance companies must offer to insured employers and present to employees through field safety representatives. The State Board of Insurance of Texas has authority to enforce this requirement against the insurance companies. I think particularly in industries such as those producing asbestos materials and asbes tos products, insurance carriers are going to be very careful to present what they view as programs to help prevent occupational disease. The individual companies who operate in States more Page 4 - Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 9/27/74 that adopt this approach are possibly going to be at odds with some of the presentations which are prepared by insurance carriers. The term "occupational disease" has been redefined in the Texas workmen's compensation statute, pursuant to recommendations -by the previously mentioned OSHA Commission. Under the old Texas statute there were listed approximately 31 different occupational diseases (and, incidentially, asbestosis is one of them). The amended de finition is open-ended and, therefore, is subject to broad inter pretation. No longer is there a list of specific occupational diseases to which an employee must refer in order to file a claim for workmen's compensation benefits. Occupational disease is now defined as in cluding "damage or harm to the physical structure of the body occurring as a result of repetitious, physical, traumatic activi ties extending over a period of time." This means that anything which occurs in the workplace long enough that has any adverse, physical effect upon the body is compensable under the workmen's compensation statute. This, at least theoretically, does away with the requirement, which existed under the old law governing workmen's compensation cases, that the employee prove that the alleged occupational disease was the result of an "accident". II. COMPARATIVE NEGLIGENCE There is another subject I would like to address in addition to workmen's compensation. It is directly related to the cases pend ing in Tyler. The date September 1, 1973, has a good deal of significance for Texas lawyers because many legislative changes became effective at that time. In addition to the changes in the workmen's com pensation statute discussed previously, the State of Texas did away with the doctrine of contributory negligence. In the area of tort law, the doctrine of contributory negligence was developed in England many years ago. Essentially, the doc trine says that if an injured person who comes to the court as plaintiff is found to have contributed to the harm of which he complains, he is guilty of contributory negligence. Under the old English common-law viewpoint, it is somewhat analogous to saying that the plaintiff has "unclean hands" with respect to the parti cular accident -- and therefore should not be able to recover any of his damages from the defendant. That remained the law in Texas until September 1, 1973, when Texas adopted the doctrine of comparative negligence. more Page 5 - Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 9/27/74 The practical application of comparative negligence, among those of the various States which adopted it, varies greatly. There are several versions of comparative negligence statutes. Texas*enacted a modified comparative negligence statute and adopted a relatively conservative approach, compared to some other States. Generally, the Texas Statute provides: The plaintiff, in order to recover any damages, must be found to have been no more negligent than the defendant. That is, if both the plaintiff and the defen dant are guilty of 50$ negligence, the plaintiff can still recover. If the plaintiff is 51$ negligent (and bear in mind that this is usually a question for the jury) and the defendant is only 49$ neg ligent, the plaintiff is barred from recovery. Remember the commonlaw doctrine of contributory negligence -- if the plaintiff was 1$ negligent and the defendant 99$ negligent, the^plaintiff was barred from recovery. So the adoption of comparative' negligence is a big change. Where there are multiple defendants in a Texas case, such as the Tyler litigation, the plaintiff's negligence (for example, if he failed to wear a respirator after he had been instructed to do so), in order for him to recover, cannot exceed the combined negligence of all the defendants. If the plaintiff is awarded judgment against several defendants, each defendant must contribute toward satisfy ing the judgment in proportion to the percentage of his causal neg ligence. For example, assume a plaintiff is found to have been 30$ negligent in the cause of the subject accident; Defendant A was 15$ negli gent; Defendant B 15$ negligent; and Defendant C 40$ negligent. In this hypothetical situation, the plaintiff could recover and Defendant A would be required to contribute 15$ of the actual dam ages suffered by plaintiff, Defendant B 15$, and Defendant C 40$. If actual damages to plaintiff were $50,000, Defendant A would have to contribute $7,500, Defendant B $7,500, and Defendant C $20,000 -- making a total of $35,000. The plaintiff could not recover the remaining difference ($15,000 between actual and award ed damages) due to his 30$ causal negligence. This does not mean, however, that a defendant's liability for dam ages to the plaintiff is necessarily limited to his percentage of total negligence. The Texas statute retains the common-law rule that defendants are jointly and severally liable for the entire amount of the judgment awarded. However, the statute contains an important exception: If a defendant is less negligent than the plaintiff, he is liable only to the extent of his individual neg ligence. This exception to the general rule of joint and several liability of multiple defendants does not apply in cases where the more Page 6 - Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 9/27/74 negligence on the plaintiff's side is less than that of each defen dant. Obviously, the recent adoption in Texas of comparative negligence may have important significance for ATI as a defendant in the Tyler cases. We shall continue to keep you advised as developments in those lawsuits occur. Respectfully submitted, Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr.,Legal Counsel ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Annual Meeting September 27, 1974 The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia IN 'ATTENDANCE AMATEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant M. J. Scanlan H. H. Walter GARLOCK INC. A. Kuzmuk ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. G. F. A. Brink P. E. Leclerc ATLAS TEXTILE COMPANY W. H. Johnston BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. W. H. Smith NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. G. G. Gabrielson, Jr. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. N. Brooks P. G. Dolan J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew R. 0. Moebius M. Q. Scowcroft W. S. Simpson SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody UNIROYAL, INC. C. S. Barnwell B. E. Carden E. A. Morris CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO. LTD. A. C. F. Finkbiner,111, Esq.(J-M) J. P. Power CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kuntze (Ontario Research Foundation) LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell R. Lefebvre R. J. Muth (Asarco) C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson, Jr. ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE W. B. Alcorn, Jr.,Esq., Legal Counsel (Hull, Towill, Nor man, Barrett & Johnson) D. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary Total attendance during the three-day 1974 Annual Meeting was 50 people: 31 members, 1 legal counsel, 1 secretary and 17 spouses; representative of 13 member companies plus the ATI. more Page 2 ATI Annual Meeting 9/27/74 MI N U T E S 1. The 1974 Annual Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President Milton Q. Scowcroft at 3:30 a.m., September 27, 1974. 2. President Scowcroft welcomed the attendees to the 30th Annual Meeting of the Institute and following traditional procedure, asked each member to stand and state his name and company affiliation. i.. The following special delegates were welcomed by the President: a) William S. Simpson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; b) Carroll S. Barnwell, a new representative of Uniroyal, Inc.; c) Aaron C. F. Finkbiner,III, Esq., Johns-Manville Corporation; and new Chairman of the ATI Ad Hoc Committee; . d) Richard 0. Moebius, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Manheim, Pennsylvania; e) Robert J. Muth,.Esq., American Smelting and Refining Company, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Lake Asbestos of Que- f) William H. Johnston, President of ATI's newest member company -- Atlas Textile Company, North Wales, Pennsylvania; g) Robert B. Pilmer (not in attendance) was welcomed as a new representative in the Institute; he is General Manager of Garlock of Canada Ltd. 4. Upon President Scowcroft's calling for the reading of the Minutes of the last General Meeting, it was moved by Lawrence E. Moody and seconded by Charles E. Stiefken, and so carried, to dispense with the reading of same. 5. Treasurer E. A. Morris presented the Report of Funds of the In stitute for the Fiscal Year to August 31, 1974. On September 1, 1973, the ATI had a balance on hand of $16,113.56. Taking into account receipts during the year of $29,164.03, expenditures of $31,231.20 and nominal amounts for accounts receivable and furni ture and equipment, the total net worth of the organization at year-end was $14,066.76. The latter figure is somewhat misleading because included there in is a Special Assessment to cover the cost of the Tyler Litiga tion. The actual net worth of the Institute is $5,977.73. Looking at the projected budget for the new Fiscal Year, to August 31, 1975, the Institute can reasonably expect to generate an income of $15,350.00 from annual dues, book sales, bank inter est and other miscellaneous items. However, even with a realistic cutback in expenses, it appears the ATI will just about break even after necessary disbursements are made. . Combined with this are additional expenditures which must be. rade to cover the Tyler Litigation; estimated to cost in the neigh borhood of $12,000.00 through February 1975. This will necessitate more............ Page 3 ATI Annual Meeting -- 9/27/74 a second Special Assessment on the Regular Members. The first such assessment on the six (6) Regular Members constituted 125% of each company's regular annual dues. In addition, Johns-Manville Corporation voluntarily contributed a like percentage of the dues it would have paid if it had been a Class A/Regular Member. It must be obvious to all members that ATI will need all the financial help it can get toward proper handling of the Litigation Within the next few weeks, all members of the ATI will be receiv ing a letter from the President of the Institute requesting contri butions which will be applied against Litigation costs. It is hoped that each member will cooperate to the best of its ability. The complete Report of Funds for the F/Y 1973-74 is attached to these Minutes. Alex Kuzmuk moved that the Report be accepted as presented. The motion was seconded by Guy G. Gabrielson, Jr., and so voted, unanimously. 6. The Fiber Producers Report was presented by Walter H. Smith, having been prepared by William J. W. Smith and approved by all member companies of the Committee. Mr. Smith reported that demand for all grades of asbestos fiber, with the possible exception of certain Group 7 fibers, remains extremely strong. Although news accounts report some new orebodies will be put into production in the next few years, there is no indication that any of the mines will be producing Group 3 Spinning Grade fibers. The entire Re port is attached hereto. 2. The membership was afforded the opportunity to view the excel lent film entitled "Asbestos At Work," produced by the British Asbestosis Research Council and on loan to the ATI via the Asbesto Information Association/North America. The film covers a variety of work practices and situations involving asbestos, some textile and some other, drilling and stripping of insulation, etc. It graphically describes the effective use of dust extraction equip ment, vacuum cleaning, waste disposal, and so forth, and illus trates how proper housekeeping techniques ensure the safety and health of the worker who handles asbestos-containing materials. G. Upon confirming that much of the vital work undertaken by the Institute is accomplished by the Committees, President Scowcroft asked for Committee Reports by the respective Chairmen (a copy of each Report is attached hereto): Air Hygiene & Manufacturing -- Buel E. Carden, Chairman; Fiber Research & Testing -- Richard A. Kuntze, Chairman; Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual -- Charles E. Stiefken; Technical -- John W. Hawkins, Temporary Chairman. Following Mr. Carden's report, President Scowcroft presented him with a plaque as an expression of ATI's appreciation for the fine job he did as Chairman of the Air Hygiene & Manufacturing more Page 4 ATI Annual Meeting 9/27/74 Committee. Mr. Carden accepted the plaque, giving credit to the members of the Committee and stating it had been a pleasure and a privilege to serve as Chairman for the past two years. t . After the report by Mr. Stiefken, President Scowcroft presented him with a plaque, publicly recognizing his service as Chairman of the Fiber Research & Testing Committee. Especially cited was Mr. Stiefken1s outstanding work on the Test Manual, one of the most difficult and time-consuming chores of the ATI. President Scowcroft acknowledged Mr. Hawkins1 ably acting as Temporary Chairman of the Technical Committee over the last few months and thanked him for ''pitching in" during the interim per iod until a new Chairman had been secured. Due to illness, Lawrence F. Dieringer was not in attendance at the meeting. However, President Scowcroft stated that a plaque and letter of appreciation would be mailed to Mr. Dieringer for the excellent leadership he had performed as Chairman of the En vironmental Health Committee during 1973 and 1974. . President Scowcroft reminded the membership that the Ad Hoc Committee had been established at the last meeting to permit and, in fact, encourage a flow of information between Associate Members and the Board of Governors. A report on the initial meeting of the Ad Hoc Committee was given by A. Kuzmuk in the absence of Aaron Finkbiner, who had to leave the meeting early. The Ad Hoc Committee report is attached to these Minutes. 10. Wendell B. Alcorn, Jr., Esq., presented Remarks of Legal Coun sel. The full text of his remarks is attached hereto. In essence Attorney Alcorn discussed one of the significant changes in the relationship between employers and employees, brought about by OSHA '70; namely, the creation by Federal legislation of a Nation al Commission on State Workmen's Compensation Laws. 11. It was announced by President Scowcroft that the following Officers were elected by the Board of Governors to serve the Insti tute for the year 1974-75` President--Alex Kuzmuk, Garlock Inc.; Vice President--Edward A. Morris, Uniroyal, Inc.; and Treasurer-- Michael J. Scanlan, Amatex Corporation. 12. Also, Chairman Scowcroft announced important committee changes The Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee will be chaired by L. E. Moody and the new Chairman of the Technical Committee is Carroll S. Barnwell. It was further advised that following a long discus sion by the Board of Governors concerning possible changes in . ATI's committee structure to make it more meaningful and contribu tory, it was decided to combine the efforts of the Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee with those of the Environmental Health Committee. The resultant group will be known as the Environmental Committee. In addition, the Fiber Research & Testing Committee ha become a part of the Technical Committee; however, further thought more Page 5 ATI Annual Meeting 9/27/74 vri.ll be given to how the committee should be structured so that the Fiber Research & Testing group does not lose its identity. .11. President Scowcroft welcomed Atlas Textile Company, North Wales, Pennsylvania, as a new Class E/Associate Member. The official re presentative of the firm is its President, William H. Johnston. 1it.. President Scowcroft sadly advised the membership of the death of J. Carroll Johnston, Founder and Chairman of atlas Textile Com pany. Mr. Johnston is well recognized as one of the pioneers and early leaders in the asbestos textile industry in the United States. 15. It was regrettably announced by the President that S.A. Fran chise du Ferodo, Ferlam Division, Paris, France, had cancelled its Associate Membership in the ATI. 16. On behalf of the Board of Governors, President Scowcroft an nounced that ATI's Legal Counsel had been instructed to begin the necessary process toward incorporating the Asbestos Textile Insti tute. 17 ln the interest of economy, President Scowcroft announced that the Board of Governors had determined that future meetings of the ATI should be held in large cities. The necessity for the decision, of course, is based on the serious financial condition of the Insti tute and especially on the extraordinary expenses that will be in curred as a result of the pending litigation in Tyler, Texas. The President expressed sincere regret that, consequently, the ATI must decline the kind offer of the mining member companies of the Insti tute to host the June 1975 Spring Meeting in Quebec City. That meeting will be held June 5-6, 1975, probably in Atlanta, Georgia. Other sites cancelled are the 1975 Annual Meeting in Ponte Vedra Club, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, and the 1976 Annual Meeting at Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah, Georgia. IS. At this point in the meeting the gavel was turned over to Alex Luzmuk, the new Chairman of the Board of Governors and President of che Asbestos Textile Institute. Mr. Kuzmuk accepted the responsi bility with a great amount of pleasure, expressing much awareness of the legal and financial problems which the ATI is currently fac ing. 19. As his first official duty, President Kuzmuk presented an Atmos clock to Mr. Scowcroft, in acknowledgment of his two years of hard cork and a job well done as Chairman of the Board and President of -.71 for 1973 and 197A. Upon accepting ATI's token of esteem and ap preciation, Mr. Scowcroft expressed pleasure in receiving such a beautiful gift, read the inscription to the members present, and thanked all the members for the great friendships he has establish ed within the Institute. He said it had been a true pleasure to more Page 6 -- ATI Annual Meeting -- 9/27/74 work on Institute matters and that he would continue to attend meetings and to support the ATI in any way that he could. , 20. President KuzmukTs second pleasant duty was to present a token of appreciation, in the form cf a lovely terrarium, to "the strong woman behind a strong leader --- Carolyn Scowcroft." Mrs. Scowcroft read the note that accompanied the gift which expressed the sentiments of the member? of the ATI and their wives. She accepted the gift with pleasure, stating it would be a beautiful addition to their new home in Charleston, South Carolina. 21. The final announcement made by President Kuzmuk was that the next Winter Meeting of the Institute will be held February 6-7 197$. at Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 22_. There being no further business to be brought before the member ship, E. A. Morris moved for adjournment. The motion was seconded by M. J. Scanlan and unanimously approved by the attending members. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Fiscal Year ending August 31, 1974 Report of Funds - (Period: September 1, 1973> thru August 31, 1974) Balance on Hand September 1, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts Total on Hand at 9/1/73 General Fund - Dues for Year 1973 Book Sales Magnetite Samples Reserve Fund - Dues for Year 1974 Interest to 6/30/74 Special Litigation Fund QAMA Test Manual Deposit Total Receipts .................. $ 2,683.65 13,346.91 ^7.97 $ 125.00 159.13 25.00 14.250.00 1,233.15 11.250.00 2.116.80 Disbursements Legal Retainer & Expenses (to 6/30/74) Secretary's Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense (10/73, 2/74 & 6/74) Secretary's Meeting/Travel Expense Telephone (8/73 thru 7/74) Printing Supplies/Services Postage Office Supplies & Miscellaneous Revision of Test Manual (J.L.Tucker) Test Manual/printing deposit Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso - F/Y 72-73) ASTM Dues for Year 1974 . Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc. Insurance Litigation: Office Expenses Sec'y Travel Expenses (4/74) ATI Meeting Expenses (4/74) Legal Services (to 6/30/74) $ 5,755.93 2,100.00 159.12 1,737.39 619.85 607.22 484.61 547.51 215.14 171.84 2,100.00 540.00 300.00 25.00 307.24 125.00 215.13 149.39 7.18 15.063.60 Total Disbursements BALANCE ON HAND AUGUST 31, 1974. . . Funds as of August 31, 1974 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 1,416.83 12,601.86 32,75 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS AUGUST 31, 1974. . Assets as of August 31, 1974-- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable - Book Sales $14,051.44 9.32 Magnetite Samples Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) 5.00 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ...................................................... TOTAL LIABILITIES.................................................. TOTAL NET WORTH AUGUST 31, 1974 . . . $16,118.56 +29.164.08 $45,282.64 -31.231.20 $14,051.44 $14,051.44 $14,066.76 $14,066.76 Total Net Worth: $14,066.76 Litigation Fund: - 8.088.98 Actual Net Worth: $ 5,977.78 A FIBER PRODUCERS1 REPORT (Presented by Walter H. Smith, of Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., at the ATI Annual Meeting, September 27, 1974, The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia) Demand for all grades of asbestos fibres, possibly with the excep tion of certain 7 Group fibres, remains extremely strong. In groups 4, 5 and 6, producers are not able to fill all of the re quirements. While the demand in Group 3 fibres is also strong, requirements seem to be being met except in the very long spin nings. While the possibility of some recession in certain parts of the world has been mooted by some economists, fibre producers do not seem to have an indication as yet that this will have any marked effect on their shipments for the balance of 1974. By early 1975, this situation could change but here again there are no familiar indications that such will be the case. While we have no private knowledge concerning new orebodies said to be coming into production in the next few years, newspaper ac counts indicate that United Asbestos are anticipating first produc tion from their Midlothian Township Mine after mid-year 1975. Quoted figures are in the order of 100,000 tons, but spinning fi bres have not been mentioned as being part of this production. Some newspaper accounts would indicate that the Brinco Organizatio are close to reaching a decision to proceed with the exploitation of the Abitibi Mine in Northern Quebec, with the production of at least 100,000 tons. First production is indicated for some time in 1976 or 1977. Here again, there has been no mention of spin ning fibres. The new Australian mine is currently said to be producing but under receivership conditions. No spinning fibres have been re ported in this orebody. We understand that Pacific Asbestos in California is currently not producing but, of course, this mine did not produce any spinning fibres. In summary, then, it may be said that although new orebodies would appear to be going into production, so far we have not heard of any which would be producing Group 3 fibres. W. J. Smith, Vice President - Marketing Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile institute JUN 1- 1974 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE General Meeting June 7, 1974 ' Twin Bridges Marriott, Arlington, Virginia In Attendance AMATEX CORPORATION J. L. Rainey M. J. Scanlan GARLOCK INC. P. S. Hanke A. Kuzmuk NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. G. G. Gabrielson, Jr. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. W. A. Guenther M. Q. Scowcroft SOUTHERN ASBESTOS COMPANY E. C. Bratt UNIROYAL, INC. L. D. Lenihan (Arthur, Dry & KalishI E. A. Morris ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. P. E. Leclerc CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO. LTD. N. W. Hendry (J-M) R. B. Von Wald (J-M) CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. D. B. McDermott LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. K. Mori Y. Sato TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson HULL, TOWILL, NORMAN, BARRETT & JOHNSON W. B. Alcorn, Jr. (ATI Attorney) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE D. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary Total attendance during the two-day 1974 Spring Meeting was 24 people including 19 members, 3 wives, 1 staff member and 1 Legal Counsel; representing 12 companies, plus 2 representatives of the ATI. MINUTES 1. The Spring 1974 General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order at 9:00 a.m., June 7, 1974, by President M. Q. Scowcroft, of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. more ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Fiscal Year ending August 31, 1974 Report of Funds Period: September 1, 1973, thru May 15, 1974 Dalance on Hand September 1, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total on Hand at 9/1/73 Receipts General Fund - Dues for Year 1973 Book Sales Magnetite Samples $ 2,683.68 13,346.91 87.97 . $ 125.00 86.71 25,00 Reserve Fund - Dues for Year 1974 Interest to 12/31/73 Total Receipts ...... 14,250.00 793.27 Disbursements Legal Retainer & Expenses (to 3/31/74) Secretary's Gross Wages Taxes on Wages Paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense (10/73 & 2/74) Secretary's Meeting/Travel Expense Telephone (8/73-4/74) Printing Supplies/Services Postage Office Supplies & Miscellaneous Revision of Test Manual (J.L.Tucker) Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso - F/Y 72-73) ASTM Dues for Year 1974 Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc. Insurance Litigation: Office Expenses Sec'y Travel Expenses (4/74) ATI Meeting Expenses (4/74) Legal Services (1st Qtr 74) $ 4,805.98 1,448.00 123.16 1,444.85 469.05 471.76 406.81 394.84 138.09 96.99 405.00 300.00 25.00 63.34 125.00 189.05 149.39 7.18 9,965.09 Total Disbursements . . . BALANCE ON HAND MAY 15, 1974 .... Funds as of May 15, General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund 1974 -- $ 1,473.55 8,890.18 6.23 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS MAY .15, 1974 . Assets as of May 15, 1974 -- Total Funds, as listed above Accounts Receivable - Book Sales Magnetite Samples 1974 Dues Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) $ 10,369.96 6.46 5.00 375.00 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ......................... TOTAL LIABILITIES . . . TOTAL NET WORTH MAY 15 , 1974 . . $ 16,118.56 + 15,279.98 $ 31,398.54 - 21,028.58 $ 10,369.96 $ 10,369.96 $ 10,757.42 0 $ 10,757.42 Page 2 ATI General Meeting 6/7/74 2. President Scowcroft officially welcomed the small but select group in attendance. He stated that the reason for the lesser amount of attendees was, of course, that the subject of the meeting was the Texas Litigation and that none of the usual committee activities had been scheduled. He then requested that each in attendance rise and give his name and business affiliation. The list is as per page 1 of these Minutes. Upon calling for the reading of the Minutes of the last stated meeting, it was moved by E. A. Morris, seconded by G. G. Gabrielson, Jr., and so carried, to dispense with the reading of said minutes. 4;. The President called for the Financial Report. Treasurer Morris gave the report, briefly as follows and in detail as per the attached Report of Funds as of Mhy 15, 1974. Total on Hand as of September 1, 1973 (the beginning of the current Fiscal Year) was $16,11$.56; re ceipts from book sales, dues, etc., were $15,279.96; disbursements amounted to $21,026.56 (the bulk of which were for litigation costs and attorneys' fees); and the Balance on Hand as of May 15, 1974, amounted to $10,369.96. This figure should further be reduced by some $2000.00 for an unanticipated litigation expense which means as of today the net worth of the organization is approximately $000.00. It was moved by C. E. Stiefken, seconded by A. Kuzmuk, and so carried, to accept the Financial Report as presented. The report will be filed for audit. . It was reported by President Scowcroft that the 1974 Annual Meet ing of the Institute will be held, as scheduled, at The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia, Wednesday through Friday, September 25-27, 1974. The meeting will include regular committee meetings and reports and a Fibre Producers' Report. He further advised the Executive Secre tary will mail the meeting notices to the general membership earlier than usual since The Cloister has recently established the policy of requiring a $75.00 advance deposit for each room by mid-August. 6. The following matters concerning membership were announced by the President. Johns-Manville Corporation has changed its status in the ATI in that it has dropped its Class A/Regular Member classification, but the membership has been picked up by Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. C.J-M is now the ATI member company as a Class C/Associate, which is the category for miners of asbestos spinning fibers. The President expressed it was his pleasure, on behalf of the Institute, to welcome Asahi Asbestos Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, as a new Class D/Associate Member. 2. C. E. Stiefken informed the President that the Chrysotile Asbes tos Test Manual, 3rd edition, should be available in about six months' time. President Scowcroft said that further information will be at hand at the 1974 Annual Meeting on Sea Island. more., . Page 3 ATI General Meeting 6/7/74 8. It was announced by the President that the Board of Governors had voted to form an ad hoc committee. It will operate within the pre sent structure of the Institute and its function and sole purpose will be to provide a forum composed of representatives of Both Regu lar and Associate Members, including the miners, to consider litiga tion matters and to make recommendations to the Board of Governors concerning the defense of the pending litigation. This will give the Board the benefit of the thinking of the Instituted total mem bership. The President emphasized that such representatives who sit on the ad hoc committee will have an equal vote on that committee and that the recommendations passed by that committee will be made to the Board of Governors. It is planned that a meeting of the ad hoc committee will take place prior to each ATI Board of Governors' meeting. President Scowcroft advised he had appointed R. B. Von Wald, of Johns-Manville Corporation, as Chairman of the ad hoc committee, with E. C. Bratt, of Southern Asbestos Company, as Vice-Chairman. He then named the following member companies as having expressed the desire to have representation on the ad hoc committee: Amatex Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd., Nicolet Industries, Inc., Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd., Garlock Inc., Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., Southern Asbestos Company, TBA Industrial Products Ltd. and Uniroyal, Inc. He requested that each of these companies designate its representative to sit on the ad hoc committee and that other member companies who are interested in being represented on the ad hoc committee should so advise Mr. Von Wald, himself or the ATI Executive Secretary. As Chairman of the ad hoc committee, Mr. Von Wald said that the committee is designed as a means by which Associate Members can obtain information about the Texas Litigation and can provide input into the Board of Governors of any thoughts concerning the defense and posture of the case and actions they think may be necessary with respect to the litigation. The committee is designed strictly for the litigation and not for any other purpose. He hopes initial ly to make contact with everyone who is interested--or they may write him at Johns-Manville Corporation, Greenwood Plaza, Denver, Colorado 0217. He said the litigation is important to each company, even though it may not have individual exposure, and that it is a critical litigation for industry in general, as well as for the asbestos industry in particular. Following an inquiry from the floor, Mr. Von Wald concurred that the lawyers active on the ad hoc committee would represent ATI mem ber companies and would consider positions that ATI should take. In answer to another question, Mr. Von Wald stated it is not the intent of the ad hoc committee to supervise the litigation. The li tigation is supervised by the ATI Board of Governors. The ad hoc committee is designed as a medium through which the Associate Members can have a voice in what goes on and can get specific information about the litigation. Under the present structure of the ATI, the primary responsibility for the Institute lies with the Board of Governors only. Page 4 ATI General Meeting 6/7/74 9. President Scowcroft confirmed the information that previously had been sent to the general membership in that ATI has redesignated its legal counsel from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft to Hull, Towill Norman, Barrett and Johnson, or more specifically, to Wendel B. Alcorn, Jr. This change was made with the unreserved blessing of Cadwalader, the primary reason being that Cadwalader had recommended Wendell Alcorn as Trial Counsel for the Texas Litigation and that as that litigation proceeded it became clear both to ATI and to Cadwal ader that the substantial function of ATI's counsel, at least for the short term, would be to defend these cases. It became obvious that the most efficient and economical method of conducting the defense was through the retention of one law firm to act both as Trial Counsel and as General Counsel. On behalf of the ATI, President Scowcroft expressed delight in having Wendell Alcorn again working with us. 10. President Scowcroft reiterated that the 1974 Annual Meeting of the Institute will be held as scheduled. It is the intent of the Board of Governors to keep the Institute going but it must marshall its resources in order to be able to afford the cost of the litiga tion. 11. The President then turned the meeting over to Trial Counsel for a briefing on the progress of the cases pending in Tyler, Texas. His remarks are recorded in a "Memorandum of Attorney-Client Confer ence, June 7y 1974" and which is available for inspection by members of ATI at the Office of the. Executive Secretary. 12. There being no further business to be brought before the member ship, a move for adjournment was made by A. Kuzmuk, seconded by C. E. Stiefken, and so carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 a.m Respectfully submitted, Doris M. Fagan Executive Secretary Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute FEB 8- 1974 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE, General Meeting ^ February S, 1974 The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina In Attendance AMATEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant J. L. Rainey H. H. Walter GARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzrauk ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. P. E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. W. H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kuntze JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION J. P. Power (C.J-M) W. B. Reitze LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEPEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. A. M. Weisberg J. K. Whittaker NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. K. Mori Y. Sato H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. E. C,, Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody TEA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson, Jr. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. J. A. Bettes, Jr. P. G. Dolan J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew M. W. Oliver F. J. Puckhaber M. Q. Scowcroft W. S. Simpson UNIROYAL, INC. D. T. Austin C. S. Barnwell B. D. Bittinger B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer E. A. Morris ASBESTOS INFORMATION ASSOCIATION ' NORTH AMERICA Robert H. Mereness, Executive Director OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Cois M. Brown, Associate Assis tant Regional Director for Technical Support, Region 17- ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary GADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT E. J. Leff Total attendance during the twn-dav Winter Meeting was 45 people, including 37 members, 4 wives, 1 staff member, 1 Legal Counsel, and 2 guests; representing 16 companies or associations. Page 2 -- /ill General Me at i nr -- 2/8/7.'* MINUTES 1. President M. Q. Scowcroft, of Ravbestos-Manhattan, Inc?, called the General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute to order at 1:00 P.M. on February 8, 1974, following a luncheon of the general membership. The President welcomed those in attendance and asked each of them to rise and state their names and companv affiliations. 2. President Scowcroft introduced the following special guests: William S._Simpson. President, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., saying it was a genuine pleasure and a distinct honor to have him with us; John A. Bettes. Jr.. retired Manager of the Asbestos Textile Divi sion, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., citing the manv fine, productive contributions he had made to the ATI in the past; Robert H. Mereness, Executive Director, Asbestos Information Asso ciation/North America, expressing how pleased we were to have the opportunity to meet him. Mr. Merenessf informal comments to the membership are attached to these Minutes. 2. Upon presentation, it was moved by E. A. Morris, Uniroyal, Inc., seconded by P. E. Leclerc, Asbestos Corporation Ltd., and so carried, to dispense with the reading of the Minutes of the last stated meeting. 4. Treasurer E. A. Morris presented the Financial Report (see attached) stating that tota] assets and net worth of the Institute as of December 31, 1973, were $13,319.73*.` There being no questions, the Report was filed for audit. 2* The Legal Counsel address was given by E. J. Leff, of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft. His comments were concerned especially with the $100-million class action filed by Herman Yandle, et al., against PPG Industries, Inc., et al. The text of his remarks is attached to these Minutes. 6. P. E. Leclerc, Regional Sales Manager for Asbestos Corporation Ltd., presented the Fiber Producers1 Report. His complete comments are at tached hereto. In brief, Mr. Leclerc stated that total shipments of asbestos by member companies of the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association in 1973 increased 10.5% over the previous year. Sales of Group 3 Spinning Fibers were 24,354 tons, or 14.4% over 1972. There is a short supply of all long spinning grades and medium length spinning grades are not too easily available. 7. Committee Reports were presented to the general membership,.as listed below, and each of these reports is attached to these Minutes: Air Hygiene & Manufacturing - B. E. Carden; Technical - J. W..Hawkins; Fiber Research & Testing - R. A. Kuntze; Environmental Health - L. F, Dieringer. more Page 3 -- ATI General Meeting -- 2 '3 '74 3. J. W. (Bill) Echerd, H. K. Porter Compan'"', Inc., received a much- deserved Certificate of Appreciation, proudlv presented tv President Scowcroft on behalf of the entire ATI membership, for hi$ untiring efforts and excellent leadership over the last two years as Chairman of the Technical Committee. " 2* President Scowcroft announced that the Institute had accepted an invitation from the Asbestos Information Association'North America to become an Affiliated Association of AIA/NA. This decision was approved by the representatives of the Regular Members of the ATI. 10. It was announced to the membership by the President that Atlas Textile Company, North Wales, Pennsylvania, had been accepted as a new Class E Associate Member and that its President, William H. Johnston, was looking forward to attending future meetings and toward personallv meeting the members. 11. The next two meetings of the Institute were confirmed by President Scowcroft as follows: June 6-7, 1974 -- Twin Bridges Marriott, Washington, D.C.; Sept 25-27, 1974 -- The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia. 12. It was advised by President Scowcroft that Dr. R. A. Kuntze, Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd., had graciously agreed to chair the Fiber Research & Testing Committee through the balance of this year. C. E. Stiefken, the former Chairman, will continue to be responsible for the 3rd Edition of the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual until its completion. 13. The Guest Speaker for the afternoon was introduced by President Scowcroft. Mr. Cois M. Brown, Associate Assistant Regional Director for Technical Support, Region IV, Occupational Safety and Health Ad ministration, spoke about "The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture." He detailed the problems created at the fac tories by noise and dust and his entire presentation is attached to these Minutes. Subsequent to his excellent and comprehensive.speech, President Scowcroft expressed appreciation to Mr. Brown for giving of his time to speak before the membership and said that his comments were well presented and well received bv those in attendance. 14. There being no further business to be brought before the member ship, a motion for adjournment was made by E. C. Bratt, seconded tv E. A. Morris, and unanimously approved. The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Executive Secretary ASDrSTfUi Report of Funds Fiscal '..'ear ending .`.u^usi 31, 13 7 4 Period from September 1, 1973 thru December 31, 1973 Balance on Hand September 1, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total on Hand at 9/1/73 Receipts General Fund - Dues for Year 1973 Book Sales Reserve Fund - Dues for Year 1974 Interest to 12/31/73 Total Receipts . . . . $ 2,683.68 13,346.91 87.97 $ 125.00 41.49 375.00 793.27 Disbursements Legal P.etainer Expenses (3rd Qtr 1973) Secretary's Gross Mages (Net Wages - $508.00) (Fed Inc Tax 101.19) (FIC/i - 30.72) (Pa Inc Tax- 12.09) Taxes on Wages Paid, by ATI (FICA - $ 30.71) (Pa Unem - 5.25) (HJ/Year 72- 3.10) ATI Meeting Expense (October 1973) Secretary's Meeting Travel Expense (Oct 73 Mtg- $230.99) (AST.'l Mtg - 41.08) Telephone . Printing Supplies Services Postage Office Supplies Ilisc. Revision of Test Manual Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso - FY 72/73) ASTM Dues for Year 1974 Gifts/Flowers/Plaques, etc. Insurance $ 1,087.42 652.P0 39,.06 978.,10 272.,07 125,,60 168.,61 178.,69 74,,65 29.,90 135,,00 300.,00 25.,00 15.,32 60,,00 Total Disbursements BALANCE ON HAND DECEMBER 31, 1973 . . Funds as of December 31, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2,751.91 10,515.18 44.80 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS DFC. 31, 1973 . Assets as of December 31, 1973 - Total Funds, as listed above Accounts Receivable (Book Sales) Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) $ 13,311.89 6.84 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ................................................ TOTAL LIABILITIES . ................................. TOTAL NET NORTH ............................. $ 16,118.56 + 1,334.76 $ 17,453.32 - 4,141.43 $ 13,311.89 $ 13,311.89 $ 13,319.72 $ 13,319.73 COMMENTS TO THE GENERAL MEMBERSHIP Robert H. Mereness, Executive Director Asbestos Information Association/North America (Presented at ATI General Meeting, Felruarv g, 1974, The mils Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina) I'm new to the Asbestos Industry and I owe much of what I have learned to Doris Fagan, who has been ver- kind to me. I have read ASBESTOS Magazine backwards and forwards--going back 2 or 3 years. Most of you are acquainted with the AIA 'NA. You know what we are doing and I would like to say that we are doing our job, addressing ourselves to the problems that we have with regulatory agencies in Washington, D. C. As you know, the Association was located in New York City up until October of this year. It is now in Washington and we are trying to do a job for all of ^ou in the Industry--to recognize what's going on and what we have to do to be vigorous in our approach to doing the best that we can do for vou, under some rather difficult and trying times. I won't go into the public relations or governmen tal aspects, but they are all there and that's why we are in Washing ton and trying to do the job for you. One final note. Early this week a group of 14 of your colleagues (eur Technical Committee) met in Newark, New Jersey. Headed by Edmund M. Fenner, of Johns-Manville Corporation, we parceled out the jobs that have to be done with regard to helping OSHA in the rewrite of the Asbestos Standard. For me, as a neophvte to the group, to see the enthusiasm, experience and dedication of these men doing work on this very difficult task, was most rewarding. You all have received a copy this afternoon of the little green booklet entitled "What Every Employee Should Know About Asbestos and What You Should Tell Others1.1 It was prepared by J-M, with some input by us, and although similar to the OSHA booklet, we believe ours is perhaps a little more helpful. More copies are available for the asking, as is any service or information that we can give you on the work of AIA/NA and what we're trying to do for all of you. -end- FIBER PRODUCERS* REPORT (Presented at ATI General'"Meeting'February's, 1974, The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina) Total shipments from the QAMA member companies in 1973 amounted to 1,516,340 tons, an increase in tonnage of 143,663 tons or 10.5$ over 1972. Total sales of group 3 or spinning fibres were 24,354 tons as compared to 21,293 tons for 1972 for an increase of 14.4$. The sales of spin ning grades represent 1.6$ of the total tonnage sold in 1973. Although the final official year-end figures are not in yet, the total QAMA inventory is estimated at 120,000 tons as compared with 151,300 tons as of December 31, 1972, for a decrease of approximately 31,000 tons. Total inventory of all group 3 grades is estimated at about 10,000 tons at the end of 1973. The outlook for 1974 at this early period of the year looks favorable to the asbestos mining industry. Export orders are in, in most cases releases are for months and months ahead. The big problem is to se cure containers and bookings from the shipping lines. Some companies have stopped calling at the St. Lawrence ports during the coming season, other lines have cut off a number of ports around the world. Ocean rates are guaranteed for only short periods and surcharge costs can change daily. Now a word on the asbestos supply situation. All long spinning grades are in short supply. The medium length spinning grades are not too easily available. William Smith told me that both Bell Asbestos & Cassiar Asbestos have a specific shortage of long spinning grades. There is an acute shortage of group 4 grades, the supply of groups 5 and 6 is tight at this time and no doubt will get worse. Group 7 grades availability is better generally but not with all producers and especially in the more open or bulkier grades. The Bureau of Mines of the U. S. Department of the Interior, reports that, in the first 8 months of this year, the Republic of South Africa exported to the United States 13,200 tons of crocidolite and 8,900 tons of amosite. This is better than 200$ increase in crocidolite and 20$ of amosite imports over 1972. Paul E. Leclerc, Regional Sales Manager Asbestos Corporation Ltd. AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTER Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 197A -- The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina The Committee met with fifteen members and guests and eleven companies represented. However, approximately ten "extra" guests, including Cois M. Brown, of the Atlanta, Georgia, office of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, came in purposely for B. D. "Bill" Bittinger's special program. Members in attendance included: Amatex Corporation H. H. Walter Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. J. P. Power Garlock Inc. S. G. Dixit Johns-Manville Corporation W. B. Reitze Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell Nicolet Industries, Inc. A. M. Weisberg Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. K. Mori Y. Sato H. K. Porter Company, Inc. L. E. Moody Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. C. A. Kennedy R. T. Matthew TEA Industrial Products Ltd. H. J. Corson Uniroval, Inc. 3. D. Bittinger B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer B. D. "Bill" Bittinger, a. former member of the Committee, presented the following interesting report on his recent trip to Europe, which included visits to two textile asbestos plants in West Germany. In addition to showing slides and photographs of processes and equip ment, Mr. Bittinger answered many questions asked by various Commit tee members and visitors. Following is Mr. Bittinger's report on his visit to one of the German plants: "This is one of the cleanest plants I have visited. The plant, grounds and offices were clean and neat. The mill buildings appeared to be old buildings that have been modernized. The plant floors are terrazzo in opening and blending, concrete in the carding area and maple in the spinning area. /"This plant has Hergeth opening, blending, and storage equipment (spinnbau cards and spinning frames. "Asbestos in palletized bags is stored on hand-operated lift trucks at each hopper so that the bag to be used is always at the operator's waist level. They were using Asbestos Corporation's 3T fiber from Canada. The asbestos bag is placed into the covered conveyor tray before opening, and the empty tag is placed into an enclosed chu'.e so that it falls into a plastic bag for later disposal. more Page 2 - Minutes of the ATI Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - 2/8/74 "The blending conveyor behind the blenders is totally enclosed and has clear plastic windows to permit the operator to observe the blended fiber as it is conveyed to the transfer blower. "The fiber is transferred by air up to the Hergeth blending silo. The silo is composed of 10 rectangular boxes about 72"xl2"xl5, tall. The fiber is fed into the silo bins from the top by a traveling condenser. The condenser can be programmed to fill the silo compartments one at a time or any of several other variations to enhance blending. The compartments feed a conveyor belt that transfers the fiber to a blow er. The fiber is thus supplied to the card hoppers. "The silo will hold about 2-1 '2 shifts of fiber so the blending unit only has to be run one shift. The Hergeth feeder is equipped with a vibrating plate feeder. "The totally-enclosed double cards are set over an opening in the floor that is about the same area as the card. All drops and the waste ends fall down into this hole or pit under the card and a con veyor/blower system automatically transfers all this material directly back to the card hopper. There are access doors in the basement into each of these pits for cleaning. Each door has a picture of a face with a dust mask affixed to it. This is the only warning sign noticed in the plant. Each card had 12 ducts coming from it where dust and lint were being removed. The Carding assignment was one card per operator; however, each card was equipped with a 128 end condenser. Leather aprons are used on the cards and the average life is one year. The cards were running roving weighing 630 grams per kilometer at 55 yards per minute. The cheeses doffed weighed 500 grams' each. "The air filter system has blowers ahead of the filter bags and four bags are attached to a manifold that has a plastic bag attached at floor level making changing a simple task. They "shake" the filter bags once per shift and the plastic bags are changed when they are full. The exhaust air from the filter bags is filtered again as it leaves the room through a traveling filter media unit and returned to the plant. They also have several small filter bag units around the plant to filter product transfer air. Changes air in plant 18 times per hour. "The Spinnbau spinning frames have metal hinged (bifold) covers over the spindles and a suction system for each frame. The waste from each frame is accumulated in a plastic bag under the floor (in base ment). They have two older spinning frames (using fly frames) that are simply enclosed in a plywood enclosure with counter-weighted . access doors. These enclosures are exhausted to a waste collector in the basement, "Their looms are totally enclosed with clear plastic windows in the counter-weighted doors. These enclosures reduce the sound level at the operator's level by as much as 4db (94- down to 90 db) when the doors are closed. more Page 3 - Minutes of the ATI Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - 2/8'74 "Some additional facts concerning this plant: 1. Their reworkable fiber amounts to approximately 20%.* 2. They state that their waste amounts to 3 to 5$. Their figure is hard to believe since asbestos as received from the mines con tains 9 to 12$ dust. 3. Their blending line with 7 feed hoppers occupies an area 40 feet x 100 feet. Their cards are 15 feet wide and 30 feet long. 4. The ring size on the Spinnbau spinning frames is 140 MM. These frames are equipped with individual brakes and Pneumafil. A full spinning bobbin weighs 1 kilogram. They do not doff in boxes but onto a pin truck. The Spinnbau spinning frames have 80 spindles per frame. 5. The average yarn size is about 1000 TEX. (Grams '1000 meters 4.96 Cut) and they run from 630 TEX to 1800 TEX. The spinning doffs every 3 hours on 1000 TEX. A full spinning bobbin weighs 1 kilogram. 6. They have 4 new rapier looms manufactured by STAUBLI-TRUMPELT. Most of their fabric was about 7 picks per inch. The fabric is split in the middle on the loom. They are weaving from pin creels. Job assignment is 2 looms per weaver." SPECIAL NOTE: Mr. Bittinger made several dust counts in this plant with results on the high side. This is disturbing when you con sider the modern enclosed equipment and the cleanliness of the plant. L. F. Moody discussed his recent appointment by AIA/NA as chairman of a special committee to describe and set up a set of work prac tices (Asbestos Mfg.) for presentation to OSHA, Mr. Moody suggested that each plant should get this information as it applies to their operations. On receipt of this information, Mr. Moody and his committee will attempt to come up with the final set-up, but will get in touch with each plant involved before the report is released. Respectfully submitted, Buel E. Carden, Chairman MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE _^ ' Asbestos Textile Institute February 8, 1974 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina IN ATTENDANCE Amatex Corporation - W. Maaskant H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - J. W. Echerd Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - J. W. Hawkins Uniroyal, Inc. - D. T. Austin and C. S. Barnwell The Round Robin test on Asbestos Roving (D-375), Asbestos Yarn (D-299) and Asbestos Lap (D-1061) have been completed and data has been sta tistically analyzed by Johns-Manvilie Corporation. The results between the five laboratories involved were very good. This infor mation will be sent to ASTM D-1314 for incorporation into the new ASTM Book of Standards. A Round Robin test is currently underway on Tubular Sleeving (D-628). An attempt will be made to have this test completed prior to the March ASTM meeting. Additional Round Robin tests are being started on Asbestos Tape (D-315) and Asbestos Cloth (D-1571). Wm. Maaskant told the Committee that Paul 0. Nicodemus would like to have an ASTM meeting in the near future and plans are being formulat ed. This would be either in Williamsburg, Virginia, or Philadelphia, Pa. Recommended changes in MIL-I-3053-E Insulation, Electrical, Asbestos Fiber, Treated and Untreated have been submitted to the Naval Engi neering Center at Hyattsville, Maryland. J. W. "Bill" Echerd has been requested by the Committee to summarize the work that has been done on Military specifications over the last few years so that the Committee may know the status of the specifi cations and determine if additional work is necessary. No progress was reported on the J-M Tumbler Test for the determina tion of asbestos dustiness. Some doubts have been expressed over the reproducibility of this test and its value, and an alternative will be explored. It was recommended that the $500.00 allocated to this project be held pending a decision on the most useful test. The Technical Committee acknowledges the services of Tex Austin over the last eight years. His assistance at future meetings will be greatly missed. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins, Acting Chairman FIBER RESEARCH & TESTING COMMITTER Asbestos Textile Institute February o, 1974 -- The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, Sbuth Carolina IN ATTENDANCE: American Smelting & Refining Co. - C. E. Stiefken Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd. - W. H. Smith Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. - R. A. Kuntze H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - D. E. Childers The Fiber Research & Testing Committee considered throe items at its meeting on February S, 1974. Firstly, Mr. Stiefken has completed his term as Chairman of the committee as of this meeting. Dr. Kuntze agreed to act as Interim Chairman until another Chairman could be found. The committee wishes to thank Mr. Stiefken for an excellent job which culminated in the new ATI Manual. The committee recognizes the extraordinary workload and the difficulties associated with the preparation of this Manual. Secondly, Mr. Stiefken reported that the Manual is now ready for printing except for some editorial corrections. It is anticipated that the manuscript will be submitted to the printer by March. The book will have about 225 pages comprising 34 test methods of which 15 are in ASTM format. As mentioned previously, the book will be a green 5-ring binder with the title printed on both front and side. The price is estimated to be about $9.50. Mrs. Fagan will verify the orders placed so far once the final cost of the book is known. Fortunately, Mr. Stiefken has agreed to continue looking after all technical details until the book is available for distribution. Thirdly, the committee discussed at length its terms of reference, its future role or purpose, etc. It was decided to meet in the future together with other committees--primarily the Technical Committee--in order to establish better communication between . committeesi It is felt that without this communication and par ticipation, the Fiber Research & Testing Committee will no longer serve a useful function. Respectfully submitted, R. A. Kuntze, Interim Chairman MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 8, 1974 -- The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina The Environmental health Committee met for a 5'!' t-J.-:.; on Friday, February 8, 1974. In attendance were E. C, f.racr, 9. Porter ' Company, Inc. ; L. L". Dieringer, Unirova] , I no.; aAu W, 1. Reitz, Johns-Manville Corporaticn. The members also met for a short time with the Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee to hear 3. D, Bittinger's interesting presentation on his visit to various asbestos textile manufacturing plants in Europe. As of meeting time, tno following is the status of various proposed OSHA health standards of interest to member companies: 1) Asbestos - No Action. 2) Noise - The OSKA Uoise Standards Advisory Committee sent a recommended standard to the Assist&nc Secretary of Labor on January 11, 1974. Recommendations included adoption of present 90 dBA limit, audiometric testing for employees whose exposure exceeds 85 dBA, and a slightly more liberal interpretation of feasible engineering controls. 3) Heat Stress - The OSHA Heat Stress Standards Advisory Com mittee recommended a standard for hot environments to the Assistant Secretary of Labor on January 11, 1974. Briefly, the recommended st'andard is based on work practices to minimize the effects of hot environmental conditions on working employees based on WBGT values calculated by two alternate methods set forth in the standard. Recent articles of interest include: 1) The Health of Chrysotile Asbestos Mine and Mill Workers of Quebec. J. C. McDonald, et al. Arch Environmental Health 28:61, February 1974. 2) Dust Fiber Relationships in the Quebec Chrysotile Industry. G. W, Gibbs, et al. Arch Environmental Health 28:69, February 1974. Respectfully submitted, L. F. Dieringer, Chairman REMARKS OF LEGAL COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute General Meeting The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina February 8, 1974. As most of you may know, the Asbestos Textile Institute has be^n sued in Tyler, Texas, in the Federal District Court. ' Two complaints were filed in January. In the first, Herman Yandle and six others have sued ATI and a number of other defendants on behalf of a class which consists of all employees of the former Pittsburgh Corning asbestos plant in Tyler, Texas, and on behalf of survivors of employees who allegedly died from exposure to asbestos. In addition, thirteen other individuals have tried to join after the suit was brought initially. Secondly, there is a suit brought bv Lester Kay, which is not a class action. ' A class action is a suit brought by one or more individuals which, if won, would benefit all other people who fall within the category described in the class allegations. If these individuals are suc cessful, any of the employees of the Tyler plant would be able to claim damages, assuming the suit is permitted to proceed as a class action. The total claim for the class is $100-million. The basis of the claim is pulmonary diseases and deaths caused alleg edly by exposure to asbestos. The charges have been brought against Pittsburgh Corning, which operated the plant, against PPG Industries, Corning Glass Works, Inc.? Dr. Lee Grant, Industrial Health Founda tion, certain amosite mining companies (North American Asbestos Corporation, E. G. N. E. P., Ltd., and The Cape Asbestos Co. Ltd.) and ATI. I'd like to read to you the charges against PPG, Corning and Pitts burgh Corning. ''Defendants PPG Industries, Inc., and Corning Glass Works, Incorporated,have been aware of the conditions existing at the Pittsburgh Corning plant at Tyler, Texas, which gave rise to the damages sustained by Plaintiffs. Said corporations, although knowing of the dangers and hazards, and being in a position to correct defi ciencies at the said plant because of their beneficial ownership and right to control and manage Pittsburgh Corning Corporation have fail ed to correct such deficiencies or warn the employees thereat of the dangers of exposure to asbestos and the concentration present therein, such acts being of omission and commission and constituting negli gence and gross negligence and the cause of the injuries and damages alleged herein." The key, then, is failure to correct alleged defi ciencies or to warn of the existence of the alleged dangers. The charges against ATI, are: ''Asbestos Textile Institute.. .has _ carried on a practice of impeding the flow of information concerning the health hazards involved in asbestos manufacture and, as a result of such activities, has caused or contributed to the lack of informa tion by employees of the said industry...", and that this caused the damage. The key, then is stopping others from warning the employees. These are the allegations. more Page 2 - Remarks of Legal' Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/S/74 A recent development in.another case, entitled Borel vs. Fiberboard Paper Products Corporation, deserves mention in"connection with the Tyler lawsuits. The charge against PPG, Corning, and Pittsburgh Corning in Tyler is primarily failure to warn, which is similar to the charges that were brought by Borel. In the Borel case the em ployee won a judgment in the Federal District Court against six manufacturers of asbestos insulation which this particular employee installed over a period of 30 years. He was dealing with the pro ducts of these various manufacturers--one after another--each fcr a period of a few years. Borel claimed.that he was a victim of asbestosis and mesothelioma as a result of his exposure to these products. The Federal District Court granted judgment in his favor, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in September of last year. A motion for rehearing in that case is still pending. The courts held that the manufacturers of the asbestos products were liable for failing to warn users or ultimate consumers of their pro ducts. The theory was that the dangers associated with the products that these companies made were foreseeable. The courts held that there is a duty to warn users and consumers of the products. The courts' theory was based on strict liability, which means no showing of fault or negligence is required. The courts held that a failure to warn was all that had to be shown. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit said that as a minimum, a manufacturer must keep abreast of scientific knowledge and dis coveries and advances and is presumed to know what is imparted thereby. According to the findings made by the District Court, the dangers of inhaling asbestos were known to the medical community as early as 1924. The court found that the manufacturers did not issue warnings, recommend wearing respirators, or check to see if their products were being inhaled in levels that exceeded private health standards. Those are the extent of my remarks. I would welcome questions but I have to qualify that invitation to this extent. Because of the nature of this gathering, I cannot discuss the evidence in the Tyler case or any opinions I might have about the merits of com plaints or defenses in the case. Any information that is needed can be obtained through your representatives on the ATI Board of Governors or your house counsel. Questions from the floor: 1) Are you getting any help from the other companies involved? . Answer: Yes, indeed. In fact, there were discussions regarding ways in which cooperation between the defondants could proceed. Naturally, that's a goal to be desired. more Page 3 -- Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/S/7A 2) Could anyone be successful in obtaining suit against the source who supplied information for the complaints? Answer:,I went into this in extensive detail at the Board of Governors' meeting, yesterday and again this morning, and I don't feel it would be proper for me to comment here. (Interjection by President Scowcroft--Johns-Manville did not have a representative at the Board of Governors' meeting. I think that Gene Leff will take care of informing T, P. Jackson or someone at J-M and respond to that question.) 3) You use the term amosite but you do not use the terms crocidolite, tremolite or chrysotile. Is there any reason for that? Answer: The plaintiffs in the Tyler case have specified they are only going after amosite producers, in particular those who supplied asbestos to the Tyler plant. 4) Will you answer the question concerning liability at some future time, in your capacity as our attorney--or where will we get that information? Answer: I have already given it to the Board of Governors and, of course, will give further developments as each takes place. In addition, I welcome any inquiries, on an indi vidual basis, by mail, phone or otherwise, from any of the companies represented in ATI. 5) As a member of ATI, I'm looking to ATI to tell me of my liabili ties. We're in this together. Will ATI tell me my liability as a member? (President Scowcroft stated that this question was posed by an Associate Member, a category of membership that is not represented on the Board.) Answer: I prefer not to comment on the matter at this forum. May I be permitted to consider the appropriate way to handle the matter? I assure you of a response at a later time. 6) Will we get a copy of Legal Counsel's report (asked especially on behalf of an interested member who had to leave the meeting early)? Answer: The membership is assured that a complete copy of my remarks will be included with the Minutes of this meeting, which Minutes will be sent to the entire membership. The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 2 bystander rather than a participant. We are most interested to hear what industry has to say about polyvinyl chloride exposure. I might mention another thing in which you will be interested. Last May, we had two temporary emergency standards which lived the normal six months and then died a natural death. By artificial respiration, and heart massaging, the carcinogen standards have come back to life -- this time as 14 separate standards. This is something that you should look at because of the association of cancer with asbestos dust and these other cancer-producing materials. I recognize they are not one and the same, but still there is some relationship. Now let us talk about the way we should operate -- you as an industry, and we as an enforcement agency dealing with you. I'm not going to tell you any secrets, but I will tell you some ways I feel we can continue the good standing we have with one another, and yet get the job done. First of all, the OSHA Act came into being because of a fragmented participation of 50 States in a safety program. This will assure us, I hope, of a uniform program that will be enforced nationwide, pretty much with the same standards and pressures that cause things to be done. We in Region IV have four of our eight states parti cipating. We feel that the participating States will be looked at and will be expected to do exactly what the Act says -- and that is to carry out a program that is equally as effective as that which the Federal people were following at the time*they took it over. We will continue to monitor these people for some three years and if everything continues to go well, we will bid them adieu and let them deal with you. If things are not as we had hoped, then we will immediately re-engage ourselves into the program. So far, we have continually had good working relations with these people -- the same as we have had with you. We just this week met with representatives of six of the eight States in Region IV (all eight were invited to participate in a meeting in Atlanta). We sat down around a table and discussed a subject in which you and I are interested, and that is a uniform standard interpretation. Right now, a standard interpretation is being made by three different groups of people -- by the National Office of OSHA, by the Regional Office of OSHA, and by the State OSHA program. All three should be saying the same thing if we all are "telling it like it is." We believe that some headway is being made in this endeavor. Now I would like to relay how we feel we can enforce a program that will carry out the interest of the Act, which states that every working man and woman in the Country will have a safe and healthful more The OSH* net and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 3 environment in which to work. That's the entire justification for the existence of our programs. , There are two aspects of our program that apply to you and they are not something that we can take care of as we can the lights in the room, by turning the switch on and off. The situation did not happen over night and we are not going to solve it over night, just because we have some Federal standards axxd regulations that address themselves to the problem. We recognize this and try to set forth a program whereby we will be just as patient as you will allow. The only way that we can be patient is for you to continue to show sufficient progress in these fields so we can keep everybody on all sides happy. We feel if we approach the matter in this way, that everyone can live with it. We must think, first of all, about asbestos. I think it would be somewhat redundant for me to talk to you about the 1910.93c para graph of the OSHA Act. If I want to knew something about asbestos, I would come to you for the information. If anybody knows that por tion of the OSHA Act that addresses itself to asbestos, you do. Therefore, I'm not going to bore you by reading and discussing this standard with you. However, if you have a question about it at the end of this presentation, I'll try to answer it. If I cannot give you an answer, then leave your name and address with me and I will see that you receive an answer in writing. When we are thinking about asbestos dust, especially in the textile aspect, we recognize that we have a problem to deal with. For instance, it is difficult to card asbestos fibers where the whole purpose of the carding is, first, to remove foreign material and, second, to remove short fibers or fine dust so a good quality pro duct can be obtained. This, within itself, is a dusty operation. If we could just remove ourselves from having been involved with all of the machinery and facilities that we now have, and start over, I think that all of us would be interested in looking into some of the facilities like we saw from the slides this morning of a tour made by one of your members of a modern facility in Germany. The problem, of course, is that we are not starting at the beginning. We are. working with some facilities that do not lend themselves very well to effective control methods. For about 40 years we have been concerned with one thing, primarily -- turning out a good pro duct and at an economical price. Since 1970 we have had to be concerned with producing a good product at an economical price and in a safe and healthful environment. Now that another rule has been added to the game, we must inject another facet to the program. I face the same situation when deal ing with cotton textiles. The difference between a cotton and an asbestos textile operation is that perhaps you received some of more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 4 your equipment from the cotton textile manufacturer and apparently this equipment never wears out. In 196B I looked at some*brand new cotton cards that were placed right beside some 1900 models and the basic difference was the color that the machines were painted. The later models operate a little faster -- raising more du3t and gen erating a little more noise. Also, having worked as a young boy in the textile industry, I found the difference in the industry between the early 1940*3 and the 1970's is that we now have about one-third more machines operating but in the same amount of floor space. That, too, makes more dust and more noise. So you see that really for the last few years, you might say we have been working against ourselves in accomplishing that which we now desire. Recognizing we must start from where we are, we are willing to work with you in trying to accomplish compliance with the OSHA Act as expeditiously as you can, as long as you can bear it economically, and so long as you can accomplish it with the technology available to you. All of that is some fancy language to tell you that if you believe you have a long-range abatement program that will take over 30 days to accomplish, then we would be willing to work out a plan with you so that you could program it over an extended period of time. What we ask of you is that you develop a plan whereby you will accom plish this compliance and every 30 days you apprise us of what you have thus far accomplished, or what has been tried and proven in effective. We then would petition the Review Commission stating we think this is reasonable and that, at the same time, we feel we are getting compliance. There is a third party that occasionally enters into the picture -- the employee representative, or the union. They also have to be satisfied. I am not aware of any major problems in Region IV in satisfying the unions that we have taken a reasonable approach. They do not agree with the practice of fitting a man with a respira tor and then telling him he only has 20 more years to work, - "so wear the respirator for the next 20 years and then maybe 25 years from now we will have a solution to the problem". That may be how long he has to wear a respirator, but we call this an interim period. It might only be 20 months or 20 days that he will have to wear the Protective device until we discover a solution. At any rate, as an nterim measure we want this man protected. To elaborate just a bit -- I will remove your appendix for $30.00, but the local hospital charges $300.00. Is there anyone here who would like me to remove his appendix? No, you all want the $300.00 operation! Why? Because when somebody is to perform an operation on you, you want the best that money can buy. But when we begin to think about a respirator program, what do we do? We buy the cheap est respirator we can find. And when we buy that respirator, we then say we have a respirator program. But, that compares with a $30.00 appendectomy, not a $300.00 operation. What's the difference? more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 5 The difference isthe difference there is between major surgery and minor surgery.Think about it. If it's your life, you want the best that money will buy. But when we're dealing with that employee out there, we want the cheapest respirator that we can get away with. We feel that a respirator program involves more than just buying a respirator. This is all outlined in the Standard and there is no use elaborating here. So many times we talk to people who are buying personal protective equipment, but weare not talking about buying personal protective ewuipment at all. We are talking about buying a program of person al protection. There's a big difference. Sometimes when we become involved in (what we call) personal pro tective programs, we buy a respirator, hand it to the worker, and say that we ''hate to hand this to you but the Federal Government is requiring me to make you wear it''. Gentlemen, I believe you can buy a respirator that will protect a man eight hours a day against asbestos dust. I'm not convinced you can hire a supervisor who can make that man wear it eight hours a day. There is a limit to what a man will stand. I've worn respirators for six and eight hours a day and know just how uncomfortable they are. They weren't intended for wearing 6-& hours a day. There are a few things that will take us a while to engineer out, and dust control is one of them. So, for the time being, we may have to resort not to buying a personal protective respirator but to buying a personal protection program, issuing it to the worker and seeing to it that it is carried out. Remember that the initial investment may not be all there is to it. Therefore, the cheapest respirator, in the long run may not be the most economical one to buy. And I know it is not the best one to buy. I did a little mathematics for a company one time in this di rection and showed them that what they were buying was costing about twice as much as that which would offer proper protection. So, even the dollar figure was on the wrong side of the ledger. Now, back to engineering control. We know there are many things we can do to decrease the level of dustiness in the plants, maybe not as we see them today but as we look back on them as conditions were a few years ago. While we are getting these things done, we will have to resort to some interim measures. A personal protective program is one of the measures we believe in.I I recently received a call from a hygienist asking for some of my philosophies. He asked about a maintenance man involved in this type of thing. I responded they should face the facts. Obviously there is something wrong, or a maintenance man wouldn't be called in. If there ever was a man with respect to whom it would be sat isfactory to supply him with personal protective equipment andtell him''this is your personal protective equipment for this operation", more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 6 it is a maintenance man. Maybe he will be working only one hour, or maybe 15 hours. You know when he is called in to fix a machine that has broken down during production, you don't want him to leave the job until everything is right again. We don't know how long that man is going to be in there, but he may need to use personal pro tective equipment. Not only that, you know it's awfully hard to develop an engineering control for a maintenance man because it takes about as long to install the engineering control as it would for the man to handle the required maintenance. So, we don't expect it in instances such as these. But there are people working in the plants day in and day out, and we anticipate they should have engineering controls -- moving as fast as technology and economics will allow. I don't want to spend the entire afternoon talking about dust, but let me just close by pointing out that between 1940 and I960, our consumption of asbestos increased about twenty fold. It had reached the point where we had to have some asbestos In everything including the.cereal we ate for breakfast. Then all at once we recognized that something may be a little bit wrong with this. So, we saw the start of a movement that received considerable publicity. It now has come to the point where we read that if I'm standing on the street corner and there is a big truck coming down the street, and the light turns red, that I must flee for my own protection, because that truck is going to be stopped by asbestos brake linings and I'm liable to develop asbestosis because of standing out there. That sounds a bit ridiculous, but then again, think about the policeman who stands on the street directing traffic for long periods and dur ing rush hours--when lots of trucks are starting and stopping. Now somewhere between eating it for breakfast and not even being able to stand on the street corner where trucks stop, there must be a happy medium with which we as an enforcement agency, and you as an industry, can live. I'm convinced there is much said about asbestos that would be better left unsaid, and that there are lots of things that ought to be said about asbestos that have not been said. There is room for improvement in our industry insofar as asbestos exposures are concerned and I feel that with time we will accomplish great progress. Do you know what happened this morning? After #4 days, a crew of men has gone to the moon and come back. This is not the first time people have done this. Now you mean to tell me we have engineers who can develop a device that can go to the moon and stay that long a period of time and people can survive in a different atmosphere, and return to Earth, and everything still be all right? Just give us time and we, too, will effectively control asbestos dust. Be lieving this, we in this Region are going to be just as patient with you as you will let us be. more The OSH* Act and How It Relates to Hsbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown Page 7 We have many young lawyers on the staff who are anxious to earn a livlihood. When we get into the legal category, people play for keeps. Our attorneys are there to advise us as to what is and what is not legal. We want things to be done in a legal manner. (I've been told that I don't want justice, but that I just want to legalize everything--and that's partly right; I probably couldn't survive justice.) At any rate, let's keep this thing where you are making the progress that is required, expected and needed. As long as you are showing good faith, I think I would have to say that the lawyer representing the industry would have everything working in his favor when he went before a hearing judge. Another problem that you have is noise. It is a problem typical in the entire textile industry and not just in asbestos textile manufacture. I remember going into a Ford Motor Company plant a few years back that had a long-range, long-term noise and hearing conservation program in operation. After we were briefed on what they were doing, someone asked how long the plant had had a noise problem. The answer was "May 20, 1969". That's when the first na tional noise standards were promulgated. A lot of us didn't have a problem until 1970 and then we found out we had a noise problem. . This is another problem that will require technological develop ments, and probably some that we do not have or that is not being used to best advantage at this point. This problem, too, will pro-' bably necessitate a long-range program. I guess it depends upon whether we're talking about control or reduction. (This would be the case for noise or dust.) So long as you are making a signifi cant contribution to the reduction of noise, then we think you should proceed with your research. So many times, what happens at informal hearings with industries such as textiles, woodworking and metal stamping, is that a man sits down and asks what we want him to do. We tell him to knock 5 deci bels off the noise level. But, he says, "that's only 5 and is a long way from a 9-decibel reduction. Are you going to tell me I'm in compliance when I reach 100?" Well, you know, that's an interesting question. He isn't. But he may have done all he can do at the present time and perhaps he already has taken out about two-thirds of his noise, making a great contribution to noise reduction. Not only that, he probably has learned enough in accomplishing this 5 decibel reduction that if he's not careful he will discover he has reduced the noise level 6 decibels instead of 5. At any rate, we feel that that is what you should do. I am told that compliance is like pregnancy. There's no in-between -- you either are or you're not. But so far we have been able to get some of the "inbetweens." So long as a man can significantly reduce the noise level, we expect him to do it. If he has gone as far as he can, then he will have to resort to some interim measures such as personal protective devices. more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown page 8 Again it is easy to buy a 16 pair of ear plugs;-they come small, medium and large and can be available to the worker for a .quarter via a vending machine. You know the small ones are not nearly as uncom fortable as the large ones. So, what's the man going to get? My doctor tells me that because I need a size 11 shoe for my right foot, that I also need a size 11 for my left foot. But this is not neces sarily true with my ear canals and I might not need the same size ear plug in both ears. In some cases, a man might take a large ear plug in one ear and a small one in the other. Ear protection is just like respirator protection. We need to es tablish a continuing and effective hearing conservation program. As you will recall, the man now playing 1st fiddle for OSHA made a statement a couple years ago that no citations would be issued for the lack of audiometric testing. He was speaking as Deputy Assist ant Secretary of Labor. We believed him and have not issued any. That doesn't mean we haven't cited anybody who doesn't have an audiometric testing program. We use a little different wordage in our citation, saying "failure to have a continuing and effective hearing conservation program." How do you have a "continuing and effective hearing conservation program," without a way to measure noise? What do you do about soil conservation? What is done.about all the other conservation pro grams in existence? Those people or companies running these other programs have ways to measure the effectiveness of their programs. And, there is a way to measure the effectiveness of a hearing con servation program. It's.called audiometric testing. If you know of another way to measure, we would be glad to hear about it and to consider it. If it is better than audiometric testing, we will give you credit for it. However, if audiometric testing is better than your method, then that's the method we want you to follow to evalu ate your hearing conservation program. We anticipate there soon will be some new noise standards published. I have with me a copy of working draft #4 and I can tell you that audiometric testing will be required. Not only will this method be required, but you will be told where to take the tests, how to take them, and the person who gives them will have to meet certain requirements. As you can see, we will be removing a lot of the questions from our noise standards. I think there are a couple of other items I should mention, hur riedly. Both the dust and the noise control programs are recognized as having to be long-range projects. If you have good, fast-growing programs, don't relax. We want you to keep them moving. We also want you to know that we are aware that technology move's just so fast, and we do not want you to get more * * The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown page 9 into trouble by outrunning the speed of technological progress. Another program that I should mention to you is machine guarding. This is a program that you should get into immediately. You know what the standard says about machine guarding. Many of the machines have to be considered individually, but basically we have a barrel from which we can take a cup of machine guarding and we can tell where we stand. This is not something that requires a long-range program. Another item is our electrical program. We have adopted the new electrical code as our standard and that's what we are measuring by unless you have an old plant. It is up to you to look at the standard and determine whether or not you have to meet this electri cal code. These are four things that I believe we in OSHA would be looking at if we were in an asbestos textile operation today. These are four things in which I think you people can make much progress. In the last two, you can move rapidly toward compliance. With the first two, you can develop your plan and a program. We do not have any secrets. If you develop a research program, then be sure that you document it and get benefit from it. Another problem is caused by a lack of communication between corpor ate management and plant supervision. If we go into an asbestos textile plant and determine it has excessive dust and excessive noise, we obviously ask what the company has done about it. Do you know what we hear too many times from the plant managers? "Not a thing that I know of!" Well, you know, that's not even showing good faith. We've had two years to get something started on these programs. So, we feel we should cite you, and sometimes should cite you for a serious violation. But then when we sit down with the company, we are told about a fantastic program it has going. The problem was that they forgot to tell that particular plant about it. Be sure that you inform your plant managers that you do have these programs going and that you are planning to do something about it. I would even go beyond that. Be sure that the plant manager informs the first-line supervisors and that they pass it on down so that even the man who sweeps the floors knows about it. Doing this would re duce the amount of complaints we receive. (Prior to opening the meeting to answer questions from the floor, Mr. Brown distributed two pieces of literature to the membership. The Executive Secretary of ATI has a limited "surplus" supply on hand and will be glad to send a copy of each or both to any member who requests same. They are: 1) Target Health Hazards/Asbestos: Airborne Danger, reprinted from the Mav-June issue o! Sal'etv Standards. more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asoestcs Textile I'ianui'acture By: Cois M. Brown page 10 2) Card showing locations and telephone numbers of OSHA's Southeastern Area Offices together with toll-free numbers' for those calling from outside the area. It is for use in contacting your nearest OSHA Office for information about OSHA '70, Standards, en forcement procedures, and the like. This is a 24-hour information service. Mr. Brown advised that his Office is responsible for coordinating the small business activity. If you can show you are a small company and that to comply with OSHA Standard puts a financial hardship on you, you can borrow money at a low-interest rate and obtain what is called "disaster funds" to finance the programs required) QUESTIONS FROM THE FLOOR Question 1) L. E. Moody, H. K. Porter Company, Inc.--Would you con sider work going on within an organization such as the ATI, of which all of our companies are members, as part of all of the companies1 plans ? Answer: Yes, so long as all of the companies are participat ing in the work and so long as the information is made avail able to all the members so that when information is developed it can be incorporated into programs at all of their plants. This certainly should be.recorded and included in the com pliance plan. Question 2) J. W. Hawkins*, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.--Do you have any immediate plans for the State of South Carolina? Answer: South Carolina has been carrying out an asbestos dust program for about a year. The State can address any issue in the Standard, but it cannot take parts of an issue. The four of the eight States in Region IV that are carrying out OSHA programs are South Carolina, North Carolina, Kentucky and Tennessee. What we are doing is monitoring the programs to be sure they are at least as effective as OSHA programs. Question 3) R. T. Matthew, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.--Is it correct that so long as we have open Federal citations, the State will not step in? Answer: Yes. The State will wait until we have completed, after which we will turn it over to the State. The State may turn right around and decide to inspect that same company. On the other hand, the State may determine that since a Federal inspection had just been made, it will wait a year or more before scheduling a visit. That's their prerogative. On any more The OSHA Act and How It Relates to Asbestos Textile Manufacture By: Cois M. Brown page 11 open citations that we have, we like to stay withit and fol low the matter until it is settled. That's the only enforce ment activity, other than Maritime, that we will have in the State of South Carolina. Question 4) E. A. Morris, Uniroyal, Inc.--Is that the relationship between the Federal and State inspections in Georgia? . Answer: Georgia went through its plan about a year ago. The Governor said he wanted nothing to do with it. The State of Georgia has been preempted. They have no inspectors any more. They could inspect elevators under some State regulation that OSHA does not address. We started the same thing in the State of Florida and in Mississippi. The latter learned the general rule that it was unconstitutional for a State employee to en force a Federal Standard. As of January 31, 1974, the people in the State of Florida cancelled their contract with us. Question 5) J. W. Hawkins, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.--Referring to South Carolina only, am I correct that you would like to see that the State issue additional citations, rather than from the Federal level? Answer: Right, speaking strictly about South Carolina. IN CONCLUSION: Although OSHA is for real, at the same time it tries to be human and handle matters in a gentlemanly manner. Both the regional and area office people have been admonished to be sure that industry re ceives every possible benefit and still make industry aware of the fact that OSHA must fulfill its obligation to ensure a safe and healthful working environment. I would remind you that anyone from the industry level has the prerogative of an informal conference. We have had some industry people visit us who have been very upset about certain citations, but after an informal conference the matter was more clearly understood. One more thing. Be careful who handles your asbestos sampling. A case in point is an informal conference held about 3 weeks ago in Atlanta. A man came in with his defense and he had a set of samples that had not been properly collected, weighed and calculated as to the number of fibers on the filter paper. His sampling resulted in a fantastically low count, about four decimal points over and then a one. Of course, we challenged his figures and the man agreed, saying he had just talked with his corporate headquarters and was advised that his samples were erroneous. --Endr? Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute OCT 5 1973 /iSBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Annual Meeting October 5, 1973 VJychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts In Attenda11 -nc e" AM'.TEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant J. L. Rainey M. J. Scanlan H. H. Walter GARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION C. G. Guerin ' A. Morrill (C.J-M) J. P. Power (C.J-M) ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. G. F. A. Brink P. E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. M. Dora is W. J. W. Smith W. H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kuntze (Ontario Research Foundation) LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (Asnrco) NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. E. W. Russell H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd . L. E. Moody ' NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Sato TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. H. J. Corson AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS P. 0. Nicodemus RnYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. N. Brooks S. G. Ledbetter R. T. Matthew W. A. Mitchell M. VJ. Oliver M. Q. Scowcroft I. H. Weaver UNIROYAL, INC. D. T. Austin B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer W. C. Hitchcock E. A. Morris S. J. Peele H. E. Sunbury (retired) CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT E. J. Leff ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE D. M. Fagan GUESTS OF THE A.T.I. Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H. McGill University John H. Marsh, Asbestos Informa tion Association/North America Robert A. Clifton U.S. Bureau of Mines Total attendance during the three-day meeting was 6S people, includ ing 24 wives, and representing 19 companies or associations. more Page 2 hTI Annual Meeting 10/5/73 MINUTES 1* The 1973 Annual Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute w?s called to order by President M. Q. Scowcrcft at B:30 A.M., October 5, 1973. 2. President Scowcrcft welcomed the members in attendance and intro duced the following as guests at the meeting: Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H., Hssociata Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University; Robert A. Clifton, Division of Nonmetallic Minerals, U.S. Bureau of Mines; John H. Marsh, President of the Asbestos Information Association/North America and newlyappointed Director of Environmental Affairs for Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; and Paul 0. Nicodemus, General Electric Company, the liaison between the ATI and ASTM. X Following past procedure, each person in attendance stated his name and company affiliation. The entire list of delegates is given on page 1 of these Minutes. 2^ Upon President Scowcrcft's calling for the reading of the Minutes of the last stated meeting, it was moved by A. Kuzmuk, seconded by E. A. Morris, and so carried, to dispense with the reading of same. . Treasurer E. A. Morris presented the Report of Funds of the In stitute as of August 31, 1973. Not worth of the ATI as of the end of the Fiscal Year was $16,144.79. The full Report is attached to these Minutes. S. J. Peele moved the Report be accepted. The motion was seconded by E. W. Russell and sc voted, unanimously. 6. The President expressed genuine pleasure on the success of the meeting and on such a fine attendance of 6B in toto, including approximately 24 wives. 2- The President asked the members to mark their calendars and to plan to attend the following future meetings, as scheduled by the ATI: Feb 7-6, 1974 - Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina; Jun 6-7, 1974 - Twin Bridges Marriott, Washington, D.C.; Sep 25-27, 1974 - The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia; Feb 6-7, 1975 - Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia,Pa; Oct 1-3, 1975 - Ponte Vedra Club, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida Feb 5-6, 1976 - New Orleans Marriott, New Orleans, Louisiana. B. Subsequent to advising the membership that the Institute had. graciously accepted the generous invitation by the five ATI mining companies to visit Canada for the June 1975 General Meeting, Presi dent Scowcrcft called William J. W. Smith, of Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., to the podium. On behalf of Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd., Cassiar more Page 3 ftTI Annual Meeting 10/5/73 Asbestos Corporation Ltd., and Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd., Mr. Smith cordially invited the ATI to join them in June 1975 in Quebec City. Included will be a one-day side trip to Thetford to visit the mines. The meeting will be held on a Thursday and a Friday and fish ing arrangements will be made for Monday, Tuesday and part of Wednes day at some spot just north of Quebec City. The miners will want to know sometime in 1974 how many men are interested in the fishing trip 2* It was announced by President Scowcroft that the guest speaker at the February 1974 meeting in Charleston, South Carolina, will be Mr. Chain Robbins, newly-appointed Senior Adviser to John Stender and head of the new office of Occupational Health, OSHA. He will be accompanied by Lewis J. Cox, who recently was named special Assistant for Industry Liaison, OSHA. 10. Eugene J. Leff, of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, presented Remarks of Legal Counsel. The full text of his remarks is attached hereto. Mr. Leff discussed the recent decision in Telex Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation and the question of whether suits against monopolization penalize excellence of manage ment of large corporations. 11. The Fiber Producers* Report was presented by E. A. Farrell, Sales Manager, Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. Mr. Farrell stated that in 1972 the United States again was the largest importer of textile . spinning fiber from Canada -- 13,700 tons. The United Kingdom and Yugoslavia followed. Yugoslavia is a new large consumer of spinning fiber. Canada shipped 29,000 tons of spinning fiber throughout the world, compared with 30,000 to 22 countries in 1971. The supply of Quebec spinning fiber is good but long grades from Cassiar are in short supply. The complete report is attached hereto..............Mr. Farrell compared an AIA/NA report on the breakdown of asbestos usage in the U.S. vs a similar report from Industrial Minerals magazine giving world figures. In the U.S., textile fiber consumed 3$ of the total tonnage, floor tile consumed 1S$ and asbestos-cement products, 25$. A different distribution, based on world consumption, was given by IM and included a percentage of 10$ for floor tile and 70$ for asbestos-cement products (a really big difference from the AIA/NA figures). Following a comment from the floor by R. A. Clifton, U.S. Bureau of Mines, it was agreed the 70$ world usage of the asbestos- cement products category i3 quite high, although it could partly be attributed to the increase in construction in the developing countries. It was also stated that the 70$ figure was the same a.s that given last year by IM, leaving one to ponder if new percentage figures had been compiled for the latest IM report. 12. The following reports of ATI activities at Committee level were presented by the respective Chairmen to the general membership. A copy of each Report is attached hereto, i.e.: Air Hygiene & Manufacturing - B. E. Carden, Chairman; Asbestos Advisory - E. W. Russell, Chairman; Technical - J. W. Echerd, Chairman; more Page 4 ATI Annual Meeting 10/5/73 Fiber Research & Testing - G. E. Stiefken, Chairman; Environmental Health - L. F. Dieringer, Chairman. R. A. Clifton added to Mr. Carden*s report by stating that at present it does not appear that the Environmental Protection Agency has any great concern over any asbestos that may be in the water effluent from manufacturing plants. Also, there is no . proof that asbestos in water is harmful. 1. The following announcements were made by President Scowcroft: a. The ATI was deeply saddened by the demise of George S. Fabel, on Sunday, September 23, 1973; b. Re-elected as Officers of the ATI for the ensuing year were M. Q. Scowcroft, President; A. Kuzmuk, Vice-President; and E. A. Morris, Treasurer. c.. Asberit S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was unanimously approved by the Board of Governors as a new Class D Associate Member. d. The Asbestos Information Association/North America has relo cated to Suita 610, 1660 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (Telephone: 202 223 4S85). Its new Executive Director is Robert H. Mereness, formerly a public relations consultant in the Washington, D.C., area. Matthew M. Swetonic, the previous Executive Secretary, has joined Hill & Knowlton's Environmental Affairs Department in New York City. He will serve in a consulting capacity to the AIA/NA for a year or so. 14. President Scowcroft introduced, as the featured speaker, Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H., Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. He stated that Dr. McDonald has an educational and medically-professional background that makes one stand in awe. She is of British nationality and a Canadian citizen. Formal education includes the University of London Medical School, London School of Hygiene & Tro pical Medicine, and a graduate student and Research Assistant, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University. She holds seven ad vance degrees and is author or co-author of 45 papers. 15. The full text of Dr. McDonald's comprehensive and well-executed presentation, entitled "Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience," is attached to these Minutes. 16. There being no further business to be brought before the member ship, E. A. Morris moved for adjournment. The motion was seconded by A. Kuzmuk and unanimously approved by the attending members, and the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 A.M. Respectfully submitted Doi Executive Secretary AGEEZEOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE report, of Funds as of August 31, 1973 Balance on Hand April 30, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total on r<and April 30, 1973 Receipts To Reserve Fuad To General Fund (all Book Gales) Total Receipts ......................... $ 1,462.06 19,84 3,5*. 7.95 $ Disbursements Rental of Office Space (3 months) Telephone (4 months) Federal Income/FICA Taxes (lid Qtr 73) Pa. Unemployment Tax (And Qtr 73) Pa. Income Tax (2n 7J-' Secretary's Not Waver ' months) Postage Printing Services Office Supplies & Miscellaneous Items Revision of Fibre Tost Manual Legal Services/Expenses (lst/2nd Qtr 73) Secretary's Travel Expense (6/73 meeting) Expenses to ATI (2/73 meeting) Expenses to ATI (6/73 mooting) Advertisement in July 1973 ASBESTOS Petty Cash Vouchers #17-34 $ 135.00 12 8.4 5 152.02 5.25 3 3.05 SCfsAJO 1 *1 103!11 77,37 42.10 2,824.29 78.97 326.98 554.89 129.24 69.98 Total Disbursements .................... . BALANCE ON HAND AUGUST 31, 1973 .................... Funds as of August 31, 1973 -- General Fund v;eserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2,683.68 13,346,91 87.97 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS AUGUST 31, 1973 . . Assets as of August 31, 1973 -- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable (Book Sales) Furniture and Equipment (Nominal Value) $ 16,118.56 25.23 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ...................................................................... TOTAL LIABILITIES ....................................................... TOTAL NET WORTH AUGUST 31, 1973 . . <,,>- /C* NOTE: During the period 5/1/73 thru 8/31/73 -- 150.00 was drawn from General Fund for Petty Cash; 6500.00 was drawn from Reserve for General Fund. $ 21,316.9.' $97J2.1 $ 21,413.9: $ 5,295.37 $ 16,118.56 $ 16,118.56 $ 16,144.,? $ 16,144.79 JM' Respectfully submitted. Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary, ATI ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds for Fiscal Year/September 1, 1972, thru August 31, 19', Balance on Hand September 1, General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund 1S72 Total on Hand at 9/1/72 $ 3,992.64 9,313.41 ______ 100.00 Receipts To Reserve Fund - Interest to 12/31/72 Dues for Year 1973 To General Fund - Special Assessments Voluntary Contributions Book Sales Insurance Credits Total Receipts $ 233.50 14,250.00 750.00 250.00 311.78 37~. 00 Disbursements Rental of Office Space $ Telephone Secretary's Net Wages N.J. Unemployment & Disability Tax Pa. Unemployment Tax Federal Unemployment Tax Pa. Income Tax . Federal Income & FICA Taxes Printing & Office Supplies (9/1/72-1/2/73) Postage (1/2/73-8/31/73) Printing Services (1/2/73-8/31/73) Office Supplies & Misc. (1/2/73-8/31/73) Revision of Fibre Test Manual Legal Services & Expenses Secretary's Travel Expense ATI Meeting Expense ASTM Dues Insurance Accountant (Caruso/Year ended Sep 1972) Moving Expenses from N.J. to Pa. Gifts, Flowers, etc. Advertisement in July 1973 ASBESTOS Petty Cash Vouchers #629-664 & #01-34 __ 705.00 430.86 1,954.00 67.50 10.50 15.00 24.18 481.24 245.53 199.49 133.11 205.57 240.45 4,915.88 442.30 1,787.48 25.00 237.00 300.00 111.30 162.40 129.24 231.74 Total Disbursements BALANCE ON HAND AUGUST 31, 1373 . . more $ 13,406.0: $ 15,832.21 $ 29,238.3: $ 13,119.7' $ 16,110.56 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Page Report of Funds for Fiscal Year/September 1, 1972, thru August 31, 197 Balance on Hand August 31, 1973 .................... $ 16,118.5 Funds as of August 31, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2,683.68 13,346.91 87.97 . TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS AUGUST 31, 1973 . . $ 16,118.5 Assets as of August 31, 1973 -- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable (Book Sales) Furniture & Equipment(NominalValue) $ 16,118.56 25.23 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS....................................................... TOTAL LIABILITIES............................................. $ 16,144.7 ...................... . TOTAL NET FORTH........................................ $ 16,144.7 ^ Respectfully submitted, Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary, ATI ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ESTIMATED EXPENSES, INCOME AND BUDGET FISCAL YEAR -- SEPTEMBER 1, 1973, thru AUGU ST 31, 1974 INCOME: Members' Dues 1972 Interest on Savings Book Sales Special Assessments Voluntary Contributions Insurance Credits EXPENSES: Legal Services/Expenses Secretary's Gross Wages iricl FICA & NJ-Unera Taxes Unem/FICA Taxes paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense **Office Expense & Misc. Telephone Printing & Office Supplies Postage Printing Services Office Supplies & Misc. Petty Cash Revision of Test Manual Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso) ASTM Dues Gifts/Flowers/Plaques/etc. Insurance Tumbler Testing Machine Moving Expense Advertising in ASBESTOS Budget 1972 - 1973 Actual 1972 - 1973 Anticipated 1973 - 1974 $ 14,250.00 450.00 200.00 750.00 $ 15,650.00 $ 14,250.00 *$ 14,750.00 506.23* 550.00 311.78 300.00 750.00 250.00 37.00 $ 16,105.01 $ 15,600.00 $ 5,850.00 $ 4,915.83 2,824.00 2,400,00 447.00 152.42 2,500.00 1,787.48 450.00 442.30 1,350.00 430.86 245.53 199.49 138.11 205.57 291.74 600.00 240.45 900.00 705.00 300.00 300.00 50.00*** 25.00 150.00 162.40 108.00 237.00 111.30 129.24 $ 15,529.00 $ 13,119.77 $ 5,000.00 2,100.00 * 77.00 2,000.00 500.00 450.00 300.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 540.00 300.00 25.00 200.00 250.00 500.00 $ 13,342.00 >:cess of anticipated income over anticipated expenses -- or unanticipated or extraordinary expenses or Reserve .. $ 2,258,00 $ 15,600.00 *Mambers' Dues for F/Y 1973-1974: Class A..................................................... Class B..................................................... Class C ..................................................... Class D ..................................................... Class D (prorated 1/3 year)... 5@$150Q. 00 - $ 7,500.00 2@$ 750.00 $ 1,500.00 40$ 750.00 - $ 3,000.00 70$ 375.00 - $ 2,625.00 10$ 125.00 = $ 125.00 $14,750.00 . *Totals for breakdown of Office Expenses: Budgeted 1972-73 = $1350.00 Actual 1972-1973 = $1511.30 Budgeted 1973-74 ~ $1550.00 ***Included $25.00 for dues in the Industrial Hygiene Foundation ` Cm 41 FIBER PRODUCERS* REPORT (Presented at ATI Annual Meeting October 5, 1973, at Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts) '. In 1972, the United States again was the largest importer of 13,756 short tons of spinning fiber from Canada. The United Kingdom and Yugoslavia followed. Total shipments were down slightly to 29,000 tens, from 30,000 tons to 22 countries in 1971. 1972 Canadian GrouD 3 Shipments (Short Tons) United States United Kingdom West Germany Yugoslavia India Japan France Italy Mexico Netherlands Czechoslovakia Others J22L 13,756 5,329 1,449 1,800 1,492 1,308 709 977 559 28 99 27,504 1,686 1971 13,428 6,001 2,263 1,631 1,616 1,029 624 588 530 469 28,179 2.222 TOTAL 29,190 s.tons 30,401 s.tons The supply of Quebec spinning fibers is good but long 1 Asbestos grades are in short supply. The supply of fiber Groups 4 and 7 has been generally tight with Group 4 in short supply. Groups 5 and 6 are available. These conditions are expected to extend through 1974, in view of`a strong and growing demand from Europe and Asia. A recent survey of end uses of asbestos fibers in the U.S. issued by the Asbestos Information Association/North America shows consumption of fiber fer textiles to be 3$ of the total. The U.S. end-use break down is considerably different than the world breakdown as published in Industrial Minerals, January 1970. World & United States Asbestes End Use Distribution -- % Tons A-C Pipe & Building Materials Floor Tile Felts & Papers Friction Products Textiles Packing and Gaskets Miscellaneous World "70# 10 7 3 2 8 loo# U.S. 25?T 18 14 10 3 3 27 100# Edward Asa Farrell, Sales Manager Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. MI NUTE3 AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October A, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Hnrwichport, Massachusetts The Committee met with fourteen members and guests present and ten companies represented, as follows: matex Corporation H. H. Walter Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. Y. Sato Canadian Johns-Manville Co. Ltd. A. Morrill J. P. Power Garlock Inc. S. G. Dixit Johns-Manville Products Corp. C. G. Guerin Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell H. K. Porter Company, Inc. E. C. Bratt L. E. Moody Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. R. T. Matthew I. H. Weaver TBA Industrial Products Ltd. H. J. Corson Uniroyal, Inc. B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer The Committee had another good meeting and discussions included visits to four asbestos textile plants by the National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); plant inspections by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); and noise controls. The main purpose of the NIOSH visit was to observe and discuss en gineering controls and work practices directed at reducing the levels of asbestos fibers to which the workers are exposed in textile operations; also, to check fiber counts previously taken in all op erations plus any data relating to a particular control or practice that produces a definite reduction in fiber counts. While touring the plants, the NIOSH people made sketches of the various ventilation systems associated with the textile operations in all departments. The NIOSH group planned to take some air velo city measurements at major exhaust hoods and make some limited personal air sampling. However, this was not done at the Hogansville, Georgia, facility. It is the Committee's understanding that the NIOSH people have selected twe of the four plants visited to conduct approximately 600 dust counts derived from eight cne-hcur studies on fifteen people per day for one week. Additional one-week studies will be made in October following the initial week's visit. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, NIOSH has the responsibility of conducting research for new occupational safety and health standards. NIOSH's recommendations aro transmitted to mere P^ge 2 - Minutes of the ATI Air Hygiene &. Mfg. Committee - IO/4/73 the U.S. Department of Labor which has the responsibility for the final setting, promulgation and enforcement of the standards. While we cannot be sure, it is generally felt that NIOSfi is conduct ing the above-mentioned studies for use by the soon-to-be-constituted 15-member Review Board, when reviewing the existing Asbestos Stand ard. Hopefully, the result will be a more realistic Standard. From one recent OSHA inspection, machine guarding, exposed horizontal shafting and signs for electrical equipment were the only items listed for correction. This plant was given a period from one week to 30 days to make the proper corrections and received only two very light penalties. Only dust counts were made during an inspection at another plant. While it is generally felt that the initial impact from OSHA is behind us, we cannot afford to "let up" from doing everything pos sible to comply with the standards. However, OSHA is aware of the vast amount of improvement that is being accomplished by all plants toward the safety and health of their employees. Present noise levels above 90 decibels require the use of protective ear plugs. However, there is some indication the 90 decibel-level may be lowered to S5. This is an area where OSHA may take a closer look in the future. It is felt that more work will be necessary to reduce noise levels and to eliminate the use cf ear plugs. In one plant, an employee who is not wearing ear plugs in a work area with noise over 90 decibels is given an oral warning; the second time, a 3-day send-out; the third time, a week send-out; and the fourth time, a discharge. Respectfully submitted, Buel E. Carden, Chairman ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts IN ATTENDANCE: Amatex Corporation - M. J. Scanlan Garlock Inc. - A. Kuzmuk Nicolet Industries, Inc. - E. W. Russell Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - M. Q. Scowcroft Uniroyal, Inc. - W. C. Hitchcock , E. A. Morris and S. J. Peele Asbestos Textile Institute - D. M. Fagan There was considerable discussion by the Committee concerning the economic philosophy that exists today; that is, one of shortages and increased demands for all materials in the economy, the trend toward world demand and the ability to buy the materials and how these conditions affect the asbestos textile industry. The publicity that asbestos receives is always a topic of discussion by the Committee. There was a general consensus of opinion that in spite of the adverse publicity directed at asbestos, the demand for asbestos textile products is continuing to increase. However, the industry must continue to make progress wherever possible, not just to avoid further criticism, but to continually improve upon its products and to reduce industrial health and safety hazards for its employees. Respectfully submitted, E. W. Russell, Chairman TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 3-4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts t IN ATTENDANCE: Amatex Corporation - W. Maaskant General Electric Co./ASTM - P. 0. Nicodemus H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - J. \`J. Echerd Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - S. G. Ledbetter and W. A. MLtchell Uniroyal, Inc. - D. T. Austin, Jr. The Secretary of ASTM Subcommittee D13.14 reported that our proposed revisions to aSTM Standards for Asbestos Yarn (D299), Asbestos Roving (D375) and Asbestos Lap (D1061) have been approved by Letter Ballot. A Round Robin Test to determine Precision and Accuracy of these Stan dards is in process. Three of the five participating laboratories have completed the tests. All inter-laboratory testing is expected to bo completed by January 1, 1974. Revision of aSTM Standards for Asbestos Cloth (D1571), Asbestos Tape (D315) and Asbestos Tubular Sleeving (D62S) will be undertaken next. The Precision and Accuracy of each Standard will be determined by a Round Robin Test. ASTM Committee D-13 is scheduled to meet in New York City October 15 19, 1973. Subcommittee D13.14 will be represented by Messrs. P. 0. Nicodemus and W. Maaskant on alternate days. The Johns-Manville Tumbler Test procedure will be pursued as a means to determine the relative dustiness of various asbestos products. Five-hundred dollars ($500.00) has been budgeted for the project. A location for the Tester will be determined at a later date. J. W. Hawkins, of Raybestos-Manhattan Inc., will investigate and recommend possible sites. The Shaker Test was discussed as an alternate to the Tumbler Test method. No action was taken. Proposed revisions to MIL-I-3053E, Insulation, Electrical, AsbestosFiber , Treated and Untreated, were reviewed. Committee recommenda tions will be submitted to the Military Custodian by the Committee Chairman prior to October 15, 1973. Respectfully submitted, J. W. Echerd, Chairman FIBER RESEARCH & TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts IN ATTENDANCE: American Smelting & Refining Co. - C. E. Stiefken asbestos Corporation Ltd. - G. F. A. Brink Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd. - W. H. Smith Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. - R. A. Kuntze H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - D. E. Childers Work is progressing on the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual, 3rd Edi-' tion. Final typing of the new and revised tests, including the introduction (roughly 200 pages) is in process. This will be- complet ed in early December after which we will submit the entire manuscript to U.S. printers for estimates. Total estimated printed pages will be 375-400, or 200 sheets. Total tests will be 31, of which 11 will be in ASTM format. Some current printing estimates are as follows: Printing & Assembling Canadian/as of 10/73 $3.69 per manual U.S./as of 7/73 $3-17 per manual Binders (includes 5-ring binder, printing via silk screen process, printed ' front cover & edge) Spacers TOTALS $2.43 $1.91 $3.03 $2.00 $1.50 $6.67 Total manual orders placed at present are slightly over 2000. We an ticipate an over-run of about 300 copies. It was recommended that any future modifications to the manual be under the control of ATI (in the interest of continuity). Future work of this Committee will include the assistance to any other Institute Committee in the form of research projects. We again are asking for more representation among fiber consumers on the Fiber lie search and Test inguomitti'e, as we are heavily over balanced in the direction of fiber producers. Respectfully submitted, C. E. Stiefken, Chairman o ENVIRONMENTAL HE/XTH COMMITTFE Asbestos Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts No formal meeting of the Committee was held and the two members pre sent (E. C. Bratt and L. F. Dieringer) sat in on the discussions of the rtir Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee. as of meeting time, the following is the status of various proposed OSHA health standards which are of interest to member companies: 1) Asbestos - A Department of Labor Standards Advisory Committee has not been selected to consider revision to the present Standard There is some indication that the DOL will by-pass use of this Committee and publish a proposed revised Standard in the Federal Register and then follow with the usual hearing and enactment process; . 2) Noise - A revised standard is expected to be issued in the near future. It appears that the present 90 dBA limit fcr daily eighthour exposure will be retained, that hearing testing will be required whore exposure exceeds S5 dBA, and that the definition of engineering control will be changed to include practical and economic considerations. This indicated latter change is import ant and it gets away from the strict present concept that if the noise can b$ engineered out, it must be, without considering other factors; 3) Heat Stress - The Standards Advisory Committee is still consid ering a standard on heat stress. There are indications that because of the many controversies over the various provisions of the standard, it may be allowed to die on the vine. Of interest is a recent law suit in which an industrial workers law suit against six firms which manufactured the asbestos-containing products he installed, was upheld by a Circuit Court of Appeals. The case, Borel v. Fiberboard Paper Products Corporation, resulted from a suit involving a worker who died from lung cancer which the court said resulted from his work with asbestos over a 33-year period. The worker1s complaint was based on the failure of the manu facturers of asbestos with which he worked to warn that their product could be dangerous to the ultimate user. The judge, in the court opinions, said that since the dangers cf asbestos were known to the medical community since 1924, the manufacturers had a duty to inform purchasers and ultimate users of the product's inherent dangers, which they had not done. Recent articles of interest are: 1) ''Improved Techniques of Identification and Determination of .airborn Asbestos," L. Bartosiewicz, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 34, page 252, June 1973; 2) "Asbestos," National Safety News IDS, page 54, August 1973. Respectfully submitted, L.F. Dieringer, Chairman REMARKS OF LEGAL COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute Annual Meeting October 5, 1973, Harwichport, Massachusetts Two weeks ago the business community experienced a shock wave pro duced by a federal court in an antitrust suit. I suppose that busi nessmen have become amply aware of the significance of the law in business affairs. But when I.B.M. was ordered to pay Telex $352-1/2 million, even the lawyers were amazed. Judge A. Sherman Christensen, sitting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, ruled on September 17, 1973, that the International Business Machines Corpora tion illegally monopolized the market for "plug compatible peripheral equipment" comprising such items as memories, tape devices and printers that plug directly into the main processing units of compu ters. The suit by Telex is one of several brought against the giant of the computer industry. The Antitrust Division of the Federal Government is going directly for the jugular, suing I.B.M. in New York for monopolizing the market for general-purpose digital computers. Other suits have been brought by Controlled Data Corp., Greyhound Computer Leasing Corp., and others. One body of opinion considers this series of cases to be an unwar ranted attack on bigness itself. I.B.M. is being sued according to this view, simply because it has obtained a large share of the computer market, and the plaintiffs are oblvious to the natural and even praiseworthy reasons for I.B.M.'s growth. The law, however, does not make bigness alone illegal. The Sherman Act, Section 2, makes monopolization illegal, not the mere possession of monopoly power. "Monopolization" is a technical legal term which includes bigness plus an intent to acquire a monopoly. A suit based on monopolization can succeed only if it is proven, first, that the defendant possesses monopoly power in a particular market, and, second, that it has obtained or maintained this power through willful action, such as anti-competitive pricing practices rather than through the excellence of its products or management. To differentiate excellence of management from willful exclusion of competitors is, of course, extremely difficult. Professor Martin Shubick, an economist at Yale and formerly of I.B.M., has said that the question is so difficult in the Government's suit against I.B.M., for example, that if he were offered a high enough consulting fee, he would be willing to work for either side in the suit in "perfect comfort and utter objectivity." Nevertheless, the Supreme Court of the United States believes that the distinction can be made and that serious legal consequences may properly result. In the case of United States v. Grinnoll Corp., 3S4 U.S. 563, 570-71 (1966), the Supreme" Court stated that: more Page 2 Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 10/5/73 "The offense of monopoly under E2 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acqui sition or maintenance of that power as distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident." * This statement of the law reflects a very widely held sense of fair ness. Why should the enterprise that Thomas J. Watson, Sr. built up be penalized, and even split up as the Justice Department would like, if only the best business techniques were the cause of its success? In a letter to the Editor of The New York Times Magazine, printed on August 19, 1973, an anonymous I.B.M. employee wrote of I.B.M.'s record of technological achievement, stating that "... hard-headed businessmen buy I.B.M. products because cf superior performance and service. I.B.M. has been able to aspire to this kind of superiority and keep ahead of its competitors by motivating its employees tc regard excellence as a worthwhile goal. . . Why, then, penalize excellence by trying to 'break-up I.B.M.'?'' (p.64) Judge Christensen, for one, has reached the conclusion that I.B.M.'s success is due to some less commendable practices as well. He found that I.B.M. tried to "substantially constrain or destroy its plug peripheral competition by predatory pricing actions and by market strategies bearing no relationship to technological skill, industry, appropriate foresight or customer benefit." Situations of monopoly may arise in various ways. They may result, on the one hand, innocently from the supremacy of the monopolist as victor in a race of competition, by reason of his technical superior ity, or his ownership of an important patent. Monopoly may develop, on the other hand, from the absorption of competitors in an illegal merger. Or monopoly can emerge by driving competitors out of busi ness, by putting deliberate business impediments in their path, or by combining or conspiring with competitors. Clearly, an unlawful monopoly exists if monopoly power has been established or maintained by moans of restraints of trade which would in themselves be illegal under the Sherman Act. Also, if . there is proof that the defendant's business policy, his subjective intent, is to acquire or to keep a monopoly position, the law is violated. However, Judge Learned Hand has said that ". . . no. monopolist monopolizes unconscious of what he is doing." Aluminum Co. of America v. United States. 14# F.2d 416, 432 (2d Cir. 1945). Therefore, some business practices will lead the courts to conclude that the company involved must necessarily have intended to acquire a monopoly. In fact, it is very difficult for a company which possesses monopoly pewer to prove that it did not intend to monopolise. It is required more Page 3 -- Remarks of Legal Counsel - nTI Annual Meeting - IO/5/73 to come forward with substantial evidence that the monopoly was ''thrust upon" it. j-.lcoa raised this defense in 1945, but it was rejected by Judge Hand, who stated that: ,TIt was not inevitable that it (Alcoa) should* always anticipate increases in the demand for ingot and be prepared tc supply them. Nothing compelled it to keep doubling and redoubling its capacity before ethers entered the field." (148 F.2d at 431.) Very little indeed is required to show that the monopolist intended to obtain a monopoly. In 1953 the United Shoe Machinery Corp. was held liable for illegal monopolization. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Coro.. 110 F.Supp. 295 (D. Mass. 1953). afffd per curiam. 347 U.S. 521 (1954). Its monopoly of machines used in manufacturing shoes was found to have been obtained in part through a system of leasing and not sell ing its machines. The District Court held that the lease-only and certain other practices "... represent something more than the use of accessible resources, the process of invention and innovation, and the employment of those techniques of employment, financing, production, and distribution, which a corape` titive society must foster. They are.contracts, arrangements, and policies which, instead of encouraging competition based upon pure merit, further the dominance of a particular firm. In this sense, they are. unnatural barriers; they unnecessarily exclude actual and potential competition; they restrict a free market." 110 F. Supp. at 344-45. Some of the cases referred to above have been misunderstood at times to suggest that a company which has monopoly power may become liable for unlawful monopolization merely by being active, enterprising and dynamic. Such a view implies that the safest course for large companies is passive stagnation, with a gradual loss of market share -- a business policy directly at odds with the aims of antitrust law. This, however, is not the teaching of the cases referred to. Enter prise alone is not penalized; the maintenance of monopoly power by policies intended to discourage, impede or even prevent the rise of new competitors is where the courts have drawn the line. Returning to the recent judgment against I.B.M. for more than a third of a billion dollars, the court's opinion reveals that I.B.M. adopted certain practices which, according to the Judge, were "directed not at competition in an appropriate competitive sense, but at competitors and their viability as such." Among these were the bundling of prices of I.B.M.'s memories with its central process ing units, that is, charging a single price for both items, and more.. Page 4 Remarks of Legal Counsel - ATI Annual Meeting - 10/5/73 predatory pricing. Therefore, the District Court in the Telex case held the conviction that it was not penalizing excellence as such, or even bigness. Although the standards governing the illegality of monopolies are, in my opinion, fair and economically beneficial, their application to any particular company is a mystery to all outside observers because of the factual complexity of such cases. The number of dollars involved in the I.B.M. judgment is almost equaled by the number of documents, let alone testimony of witnesses, which are involved in this type of litigation. We all can take com fort in the fact that even though we do not have $352-1/2 million to lose, neither must we endure a suit based on monopolization. Thank you very much for your attention. Eugene J. Leff, Attorney CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT ABOUT THE SPEAKER Alison D* McDonald# M.D., is Associate Processor/ Department of Epidemiology and Health/ McGill Uni versity - - and on a part-time basis is Consultant Epidemiologist/ Hopital Riviere-des-Prairies. British born and a citizen of Canada, Dr. McDonald studied at the Medical School of the Royal Free Hospital, University of London; the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; and the Harvard School of Public Health* Her academic qualifica tions are M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., M*B, BS, DCH, D.P.H./ M.D.(Hygiene), and Certification in Public Health* The latest responsibilities during her 23 years of experience prior to becoming associated with McGill, were: Industrial Medical Officer with the Navy, Army and Air Force Institutes; and Research Associate and Senior Lecturer, Paediatric Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London Univ. The author of no less than 26 papers. Dr* McDonald also has co-authored 19 publications, including: Epidemiology of primary malignant mesothelial tumours in Canada; Mortality in the chrysotile asbestos mines and mills of Quebec; Malignant mesothelial tumours: Histological type and asbestos exposure; Health of chrysotile asbestos mine and mill workers of Quebec; Epidemiologic surveillance of mesothelioma in Canada* We are especially pleased to welcome Dr* Alison D* McDonald to the podium. The provocative title of her presentation is. * CHRYSOTILE - HOW REASSURING THE MINING EXPERIENCE? CHRYS0TIL2 -- HOW REASSURING THE MINING EXPERIENCE? By: Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H. Department of Epidemiology and Health McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Presented to the Asbestos Textile Institute at its Annual Meeting held October 5, 1973, at Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Mass. What are the health risks associated with working with asbestos In quantitative and qualitative terms -- What is the relationship between amount and type of exposure and amount and type of disease? Although a great deal of research has been done on the subject, the picture is still fairly imcomplete because the main evidence has to come from observations on man -- on people who are known to have been exposed to the mineral. Other investigations, such as animal experiments, do a lot to add to the picture but the evidence basically depends on what disease occurs in man and with what ex posures. It is complicated, as you realize, by the different varieties of fibers, and because each fiber type may affect health differently. But I will try to give you some picture of the present state of knowledge, which is, on the one hand, complicated, and on the other, uncertain. *Slide 1 shows the main types and quantities of asbestos pro duced and the time period over which they have been produced. It also shows the different uses for the mineral. The first hazard to be observed was asbestosis. In quantita tive terms -.- What is the risk of contracting asbestosis? How much dust exposure, and over how long a period of time, is necessary before there is a risk of getting asbestosis? The matter is still rather poorly assessed, except in the study we have been doing in Quebec where we do now have, for chrysotile mining, a fairly good picture of the amount of exposure which will give rise to asbestosis. It appears that all types of fibers and all types of processes (all industrial groups) are at risk of asbestosis. . The problem really lies in lung cancer. There are two main cancers that are associated with asbestos -- lung cancer, which is really indistinguishable from the lung cancer that smoking can give you; and mesothelioma, which is a very rare tumor that involves the surface of the lung and the lining of the abdominal cavity. A very definite connection has been observed between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma.* *The only slides available for reproducing in this writ-ben account are shown as Tables 2 through 9. more ?age 2 Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE I Main Industrial Groups and Fiber Exposure Mining Manu facture Insu lation Chrvsotile + ++? Not Known Crocidolite ++? Amosite ? Antho- * ohvllite + Mixes N/A Not Known Not Known ++ Not Known Not Known ++ ++ ++ Table I. Ifm proposing to look at this in three main industrial groups: mining, manufacture and insulation -- and at the fiber types concerned, i.e., chrysotile, the three main amphiboles, and mixed fiber exposures. Unfortunately, the latter group is the most common. When we started our studies in Quebec, it was known that very substantial risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma were found in the manufacturing processes and in people working with insulation. This is particularly true for mesothelioma which is very rare and only occurs in one out of a million population -- and yet a substantial number of cases are found with certain asbestos exposures. Substantial health risks in terms of mesothelioma and lung cancer have been well documented for mixed fiber exposures. When we began our studies in Quebec, there was little evidence of a serious problem in the Chrysotile mining industry. . It was, therefore, very important to look at groups of people who were exposed to only one type of fiber. So we started investi gating all persons who had ever been employed in the Quebec chrysotile-producing industry. The main objective, apart from studying pure Chrysotile exposure, was to determine the dose re sponse relationship; that is to say, to try to get some precise information about what exposures could be sustained without a significant risk to health, and at what level was there a significant amount of disease. As you know, the two main asbestos mining areas in Quebec are Asbestos and Thetford Mines. Slide 2 is a photograph of Canadian Johns-Manville*s Jeffrey Mine at Asbestos. Slide 3 is a picture of Smith Street, in Thetford, which is indicative of the extensive environmental exposure to people, locally. Slide 4. In starting our survey, we obtained personnel records of all of the people who ever had worked in the mines and mills. We documented all of their jobs, recorded as well as possible the amount of dust to which they had been exposed, and allowed for the time during which they had been exposed to these levels. We then divided all of those people into groups, according to the amount of dust exposure. more Page 3 _ Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE II Dust ExposureLevels and Numbers in each Analysis Dust Exposure (mpcf - years) -10 10- 100- 200- 400- 800+ Number of Men in Each Analysis Mortality Study 2 SIC 3329 1124 1007 837 585 Radiographic Study 1537 1522 1133 912 718 707 Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms 91 455 159 134 109 67 Smokers 69 3 SI 144 117 96 59 Non-Smokers 22 74 15 17 13 8 Total 9692 6529 1015 866 149 The above Table Il/Slide 5 shows the extent of the study. Look ing at the top line, we have six groups, ranging from a total of less than 10 million particles per cubic foot x years through 800 plus. If you take a lifetime of 50 years of employment, the last group on the right would be equivalent to exposure to an average of at least 15 million particles per cubic foot. This is a very heavily exposed group and, of course, such exposures have only happened in the past and do not occur at the present time. Dr. Graham Gibbs, of the Department of Epidemiology and Health, has been studying the corre lation between fiber counts and particle counts and we do not find sufficient correlation between the two to give our findings in terms of fiber counts. For this reason and because all epidemiological information is in terms of particle counts, we consider that these should continue to be used until fiber counts have been done for a long period of time. We do not have any direct information about fiber levels in terms of risks of disease. One of the three major studies we undertook was of all men born between 1891 and 1920, to study causes of death and whft their death rates were in various dust categories. We did an x-ray study in order to determine which dust groups showed an increased incidence of x-ray changes and at what level the increase started. This, of course, was important evidence of disease. Laboratory equipment was moved down to the mining areas and 1000 men were submitted to detailed lung function studies, again to see what the relationship was between the amount of chrysotile dust to which the men had been exposed and changes in their lung function. Slides 6 & 7 show the apparatus that was used to test th.ir lung functions. more Page 4 Chrysotile How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE III Age-Corrected Mortality by"Cause Per 1000 Men Born 1891-1920___ ~___ De_aths_ to December 1969 ~' ' riTT.7?" r\,___ ____-- mpcf - years All Causes Respiratory Cancers, including malignant pleural mesothelioma Abdominal -10 10- 100365 355 354 10.3 13.1 13.4 200313 15.5 400323 21.4 Cancers 18.0 13.6 18.7 11.6 26.3 Pneumoconiosis 1.6 1.5 O.B 4.9 4.9 "B00+ 395 32.1 28.7 23.6 Table Ill/Slide 8 shows the main results of the mortality study. Of all causes of disease, it was only in the highest dust group {BO0+) that there was a considerable excess of deaths. For respira tory cancers, which includes malignant pleural mesothelioma of which there were very few cases in the industry, a rise is clearly present in the 400 to 800+ dust groups with an exposure (to an average con centration of mpcf over 50 years). The rise probably does begin a little earlier. The highest dust group, which as we said was very heavily exposed, has about 3 times as much respiratory cancer as do the people with minimal exposure (the less than 10 group). The latter group includes people such as those working in clerical jobs and who have virtually no exposure to asbestos. But having informa tion for both groups gave us a population with which to compare the people whc were substantially exposed to dust. There was also some indication that abdominal cancers were related to dust exposure. You will see a higher amount of abdominal cancers in the 400 to 00 and the 800+ groups. The same experience has been observed in other studies. It is by no means certain that this is directly due to asbestos since there are ether possible explanations. You will see that the rise in asbestosis occurs at around the 200 dust level, indicating an equivalent of an average of 5 mpcf over 50 years. Table IV/Slide 9. What is thought to be significant disease is irregular small opacities of grade 2/1. For those cases we observed that a significant increase occurred in the 100 to 200 dust group. We conclude, that for a lifetime exposure, an average of 2 mpcf gives rise to radiological change indicative of significant disease in 1% of persons. Slide 10. In lung function tests in cigarette smokers and non smokers, the first change occurred in the capacity to breath inland this started with low levels of dust exposure. But a 10% deficit in breathing capacity occurred at about the same level as the radiolo gical changes that I just talked about -- at the l^vel of about 2 mpcf on average over a lifetime. more Page 5 Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE IV Radiographic Changes - Prevalent Rates {%) Standardized for Age and Years in Industry -- Males Aged 36-65 at time of Radiograph mpcf - years Dust Group -10 10- 100- 200- 400- 30C+ Thetford Mines Irregular Small Average Opacities - - - 1/0 1.3 3.3 6.3 3.7 12.0 17.2 7.6 . 2/1 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.9 2.4 9.2 2.0 Pleural ThickeningGrade 1 2.4 4.6 6.5 5.3 3.3 10.5 6.4 Grade 2 1.3 0.7 0.3 1.2 1.3 2.0 1.1 Asbestos Irregular Small Opacities - - - 1/0 6.4 3.7 6.3 5.0 6.8 7.0 5.1 2/1 0.0 0.4 1.5 0.3 0.6 3.9 0.3 Pleural ThickeningGrade 1 2.9 2.6 3.0 3.0 4.7 5.8 3.2 Grade 2 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.5 1.4 0.7 0.7 TABLE V Age-Corrected Prevalence Rates [%) for Bronchitis and Breathlessness by Dust Exposure & Cumulative Smoking Habits Dust Index mpcf - years -10 10- 100- 200- Bronchitis Never Smoked Up to 100 Cigarette Years 100-499 500-999 1000 10 18 41 32 100 19 0 28 38 47 19 12 21 44 45 46 0 33 28 55 400- 21 46 42 47 54 800+ 49 0 43 58 35 Breathlessness Never Smoked 0 14 24 31 13 44 Up to 100 Cigar- ette Years 0 12 39 21 41 43 100-499 16 14 8 20 42 18 500-999 9 19 21 19 14 39 1000 0 23 27 31 34 46 more Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? Table V/Slide 11. Lastly, the workers were asked to fill in a questionnaire about smoking. From the answers, we found that there was a relationship between breathlessness and dust exposure not apparently affected by smoking. But if you look at bronchitis and along the line for the "never smoked" and the two grouDs of smokers, you will note there wasn't any change in bronchitis which increased' asbestos dust exposure. Now, if you lock at the columns vertically you will see that smoking does a lot of damage in terms of bronchitis TABLE VI Distribution of Cases of Mesothelioma bv Year of Death ard 13 rcvince 11966-1970^" 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 196# 1969 1970 Annual Incidence Per Million Popu lation 1966-1970 Ontario 0 1 4 9 6 7 # 6 7 12 "69 .1.2 Quebec 6 4 3 # 7 14 13 1# 7 16 102 2.3 Other Provinces 9 3 5 7 3 5 9 6 7 6 -sf 0.9 Canada 15 10 13 19 17 19 31 25 32 25 --20 23E 1.4 Reviewed by Pathology Panel 57 #0 47 194 Accepted as Mesothelioma 71% U2% 57% 55% Table Vi/Slide 12 . The other study we did was to survey all mesotheliomas in Canada. At the outset, I should say we had just 5 mesotheliomas out of 3270 deaths in the mining industry. Although this may seem to you to be a small number, there should be no cases of mesothelioma in a general population. One of the problems about mesothelioma is the diagnosis. There is by no means agreement among pathologists about the diagnosis of mesothelioma; so our finding of 5, having searched pretty thoroughly for mesotheliomas, may well be an over-estimate, especially because they were particularly looked for in people with knotvn asbestos. dust exposure. Having found very few in the industry, we did a concurrent study -- locating all the mesotheliomas we could in Canada. We obtained from all pathologists reports about all known cases and feel we got fairly full ascertain ment. The ascertainment wasn't done until 1967-6#. If you look at the graph at the top (Table VI) you will see a gradual rise in the annual number of mesotheliomas across Canada up to 1966. This is more Chrys-: til _ -- How Hot souring one Mining wcporionc j ? probably due to poor memory and lack of knowledge about mesothelioma in these earlier years. We are continuing this surveillance, and between 1966 and 1970 there doesn't appear to have been any change. This is rather a short period of time and we obviously need to know whether this "no change" situation will continue. As you know, the big concern is the lengthy latent period for mesothelioma to develop and the widely expressed fear that we are now going to reap results from exposures which occurred 20-30 years ago and that the rate of mesotheliomas may rise. We now feel quite happy that a fairly good base line has been established for this surveillance and we shall be able to know within the next few years what is happening in Canada. If you look at the bottom line (Table VI), we looked to see whether mesothelioma occurred mere in one part of Canada than in other sections of the country. There was, in fact, more in Quebec -- over 2 per million population, compared with just over one in Ontario and slightly loss than one in the rest of Canada. But we must revert to the question of the diagnosis. When the mesotheliomas were submitted to patholo gists, a much lower proportion was accepted as mesothelioma oy the pathologists' panel -- not only in Quebec but in all of Canada. It looks as though, for cases that are accepted by the panel as mesotheliomas,. there is little or no difference in the various parts of Canada. TABLE VII Distribution by ,,ige of Cases and Matched Controls (Tho number in parentheses designates these successfully investigated, epidemiologically) (Years) Men Cases Controls 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 30-39 90-99 0 i-) 32 6 5) 12 (]L2) 3 3) 7 7) 2 2) 1 (1) Total Mean 39 (37) 53.7 Standard Deviation 12.9 0 i-) 2 2) 6 (6) 12 CLI) 10 (10) 5 (5) 3 (3) 1 (1) 39 (33) 59. 2 13. 2 Women Cases Controls 2 (2) 44 4 (4) 6 (6) 6 (6) 7 (7) 3 (3) 0 (-) 4 (4) 5 (5) 5 (5) 3 (3) 3 (3) 2 (2) 32(32) 53.9 32 (32) 59.0 13.2 15.2 Table VH/Slide 13. There are two objectives in this mesothelio ma study -- to continue to watch the incidence and to examine to what extent the mesotheliomas are caused by asbestos. Here you see that more than 2/3 of the cases are in males, as is expected, and more Page 8 Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Alining Experience? that the high rate occurred at the ages in which you would expect to find the results cf occupational exposure -- ages 50-70. TABLE VIII Average Daily Number of Cigarettes Smoked (Figures in parentheses represent percentages) Cigarettes per day Nil 10 or less 11-29 30 cr more Totals Men Cases Controls 7 (19.4) 6 (16.7) IS (50.0) 5 (13.9) 35* 8 (21.1) 4 (10.5) 17 (44.7) _| (23.7) ________ Women Cases 14 (45.2) 5 (16.1) 8 (25.8) Jt (12.9) 31* Controls 22 (68.8) 5 (15.6) 3 ( 9.4) _2 ( 6.3) 32 *Excludes 1 man and 1 woman whose smoking histories were not recorde Table Vlll/Slide 14. We compared the cases that we found with other cases of cancer from the same hospital, by inquiries to their relatives about their occupational histories. We then categorized the occupational histories as having either definite, probable, possible cr unlikely exposure to asbestos. For both males and fe males, the mesothelioma series and the control series represent what happened to the people who did not get mesothelioma but perhaps had a similar type of death. You will note that only 20$ of the male mesotheliomas in Canada had a definite or probable history of exposure to asbestos. There was no evidence that possible exposures were associated with mesothelioma because the controls included a similar number. For women who were found to have mesotheliomas, asbestos appeared to be almost non-existent as a causative factor. We simply do not know, as yet, what factors cause these mesothelioma Table IX/Slide 15. When we analyzed the occupations that in volved asbestos exposure, we again had cases and controls. You can see that in mining and milling there was an excess in the cases compared with the controls. However, we found the manufacture of asbestos products and insulation work in Canada appeared to be the main causes of mesothelioma. We found none of these occupations in the controls. Mining and milling of chrysotile was associated with mesothelioma, but compared with the other occupations (insulation & manufacture), it was unimportant. In view of the extensive neighborhood exposure, especially at Thatford, we inquired whether any people had mesothelioma who were not employed in asbestos pro duction but who were living in the area. We found no such cases. more Page- 9 Chrysotile - How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE IX Types o f O ccupation in which D e fin ite o r Probable Asbestos oo o ct O3 3 C' "O 3 Pft H> O 3 cn s: m O3 3 co ?r 3 m pj ft H* C 3 ^ Er 33 3 c>n 30 tr 3 O- CD 3C a P a ct O ft o ct co cn C 3 co t-1 3p. H- 3 3 09 09 Rp P- M -P- t-> II -P* I I l > 3 1 i IP 1 i I Ct 1--' 3 O 3 1i 1i 1i 1i i I i I 1 l l 1 1 ii 1 iI 1 l | ro t--< Hj tP | 3" *3 VP I Ct (- 3P co ct 3 r> O' 3 3 Po 33 P- co 3* 3 CO M l I I t 1 1 O' P 3 a Po cn co cn ooo 3 T3 /o"S 3 P OcHt* ct 3 3O P CO O P CO CD CO a o 3 co o cn o ct C3t HO 3 O M CO 3 CO 3 o p CO O CO o CO o 3 o p o ct c+ o H- W3 c3t O 3 3P Xo O3 o CD oM CO t--1 CO oSS 3s 3p CO CO 3 a o3 p co o cn O O 3 CO 3 CO CHt- ct o 3 O 1--* cn ?-g-' 1C Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? Table IX: If you.will look at the top line, you will note that we did find some indication of domestic exposure. There*were a few people who had been exposed to a father or a husband working with asbestos. The diagnosis of mesothelioma may be more likely to be made in such a situation, but nevertheless, this risk is probably rea.l and, especially for children. But there is no indication that the general population is at any risk. So we found that the mesothelioma study backed up what wo found in the mining industry, namely that there is a small excess of mesotheliomas in mining but it was manufacture and insulation that were mainly associated with mesothelioma in Canada rather than the mining and milling of chrysotile. This has been borne out in other studies of chrysotile mines in Cyprus, Northern Italy and the USSR. Although the information is somewhat imcomplete, they indicate a similar experience to that found in Quebec with regard to lung cancer and, in fact, practically no mesotheliomas. The evidence, insofar as the chrysotile-producing industry goes, is good in that the risks are lew, and probably controllable. Now, referring back to Table I -- I'm going to put a + for chry sotile mining. For anthophyllite mining in Finland, the picture is similar in that they find no mesotheliomas in that country. There does appear to be some lung cancer associated with mining but it isn't the high rate that appears in manufacturing and in insulation work. Our information about crccidolite and amosite mining is frag mentary because it doesn't depend on surveys of people working in the mines. It depends, rather, on a surveillance of all types of cases which come from the mines and surrounding areas. It does appear, however, that there have been a substantial number of mesotheliomas around crocidolite mines in the Northwest Cape. So, I'll put a ? for crocidolite mining (Table I) because the evidence isn't too secure, especially in regards to rates; i.e., how many cases in relation to how many workers and residents. Regarding the amosite mines in the Transvaal, there is a very minute + (Table I). There does appear to be some lung cancer but practically no mesothelioma -- which is very different from the Northwest Cape area. The relationship between mesothelioma and chrysotile has been confirmed in studies by the electron microscope -- studies in which fiber types in the lungs of cases of mesothelioma have been identi fied by Dr. Fred Pooley, of Cardiff in South Wales. In these studies, practically all of the fibers detected were of the amphi- more ... Page 11 Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? bole variety. So far it has not been possible to distinguish crocidolite from amosite fibers, but chrysotile can be detected. All the cases thus far examined have substantial amounts of amphibole fibers and relatively few chrysotile fibers. There are reports that persons exposed to chrysotile only in the manufacture of asbestos, have had similar rates of mesothelioma and lung cancer to those found in persons exposed to a mixture of fibers. The evidence isn't any too sure, in fact it's pretty doubt ful, that these men were exposed only to chrysotile. So, we must put.a ? (Table I) against the risk of cancer in the manufacture of asbestos products using only chrysotile. Some additional comments to the data in Table I: Dr. Selikoff reports a high rate of mesothelioma and lung cancer in persons ex posed only to amosite. Information on the manufacture of anthophyllite is unknown because single types of fiber have not been used in the process. Mixed mining is not applicable. And, we lack satisfactory information about manufacturing with pure crocidolite or with pure anthophyllite. As you know, there are differences in the nature of each fiber type but experimental work has produced some possible explanations of the varying effects. Chrysotile is a long, thin and curly fiber and there is some evidence that it easily gets held up in the larger airways and, therefore, does not penetrate so well as other fiber types which can enter the smaller airways and reach the pleural surface. In comparing crocidolite and amosite fibers, both are straight, rather than curly. However, when mined they apparently have quite different diameters; crocidolite having the narrower diameter and amosite being much wider in diameter. This fits in quite well with the findings from studies in the Northwest Cape. There are a lot of mesotheliomas in the Northwest Cape where the diameter of the fibers is small; whereas in the Transvaal area, where amosite is mined, and the fibers are broad, there appear to be practically no mesotheliomas. This doesn't fit with the story of the manufacture of amosite, and, frankly* I really do not know the reason. Fiber differences could be an explanation; but on the other hand, the big differences between chrysotile raining and the manufacture of asbestos products and insulation certainly cannot be laughed off. Seme of the possibilities for the differences between chrysotile mining and manufacture and insulation are ....1 1) It is possible that during manufacture the fibers may be ^ broken up into much smaller pieces and, therefore, lose thoir capacity to be caught up in the bigger airways, thereby penetrating further into the lungs. more .. Page 12 Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? 2) It is possible that the culprits are crocidolite and/or amosite. 3) It also is possible that in the process of manufacturing and insulation, that other carcinogens are involved. Smoking has been raised as a possible additional factor in causing cancer of the lung; but for mesothelioma it has been pretty clearly shown that smoking is not an added factor. ' If there is something else that increases the risk of mesotheliomas, it is not smoking. So I have to conclude that the chrysotile mining experience cannot really be said to be reassuring. It is certainly possible that if one were able to show that the manufacture of pure chrysotile gave cancer rates, similar to those in mining and milling, the pic ture would certainly be brighter. But, it isn't brighter at the moment! end [tdcUr 5, 1973 Annual, neeuim . October 5, 1973 Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts In Attendance amatex corporation W. Maaskant J. L. Rainey M. J. Scanlan H. H. Walter OARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION C. G. Guerin ' A. Morrill (C.J-M) J. P. Power (C.J-M) NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. E. W. Russell H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. V. Echerd L. E. Moody RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. N. Brooks - S. G. Ledbetter R. T. Matthew W. A. Mitchell M. V/. Oliver M. Q. Scowcrcft I. H. Weaver ' UNIROYAL, INC. D. T. Austin B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer V/. C. Hitchcock E. A. Morris S. J. Peele H. E. Sunbury (retired) ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. G. F. A. Brink . P. E. Leclerc , - BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. M. Dorais W. J. TrJ. Smith W. H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. R. A. Kunt2e (Ontario Research Foundation) LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (Asnrco) NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. T. Sato TBA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS. LTD. H. J. Corson AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS P. 0. Nicodemus CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT E. J. Leff ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE D. M. Fagan GUESTS OF THE A.T.I. Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H. McGill University John H. Marsh, Asbestos Informa tion Association/North America Robert A. Clifton U.S. Bureau of Mines Total attendance during the three-day meeting was 68 people, includ ing 24 wives, and representing 19 companies or csscciaticns. rv-ro MINUTES ! The 1973 Annual Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called.to order by President M. Q. Scowcrcft at 8:30 A.M., October 5, 1973. ' * t 2. President Scowcrcft welcomed the members in attendance and intro duced the following as guests at the meeting: Alison B. McDonald, H.D., D.P.H., Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University; Robert A. Clifton, Division of Nonmetnllic Minerals, U.S. Bureau of Mines; John H. Marsh, President of the Asbestos Information Association^North America and newly- . appointed Director of Environmental Affairs for Raybastos-Ifenhnttan, Inc.; and Paul 0. Nicodemus, General Electric Company, the liaison between the ATI and ASTM. 2,. Following past procedure, each person in attendance stated his name and company affiliation. The entire list of delegates is given on page 1 of these Minutes. /t. Upon President Scowcrcft's calling for the reading of the Minutes of the last stated meeting, it was moved by A. Kuzmuk, seconded by E. A. Morris, and so carried', to dispense with the reading of same. Treasurer E. A. Morris presented the Report of Funds of the In stitute as of August 31, 1973. Nat worth of the ATI as of the end of the Fiscal Year was $16,144.79. The full Report is attached to .those Minutes. S. J. Peele moved the Report be accepted. The motion was seconded by E. W. Russell and sc voted, unanimously. 6. The President expressed genuine pleasure on the success jf the meeting and on such a fine attendance c-f 68 in toto, including approximately 24 wives. 2- The President asked the members to mark their calendars and to plan tu attend the following future meetings, as scheduled by tho ATI: . Feb 7-8, 1974 - Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina; Jun- 6-7, 1974 - Twin Bridges Marriott, Washington, D.C.; Sep 25-27, 1974 - The Cloister, Sen Island, Georgia; Feb 6-7, 1975 - Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia,Pa; . Oct 1-3, 1975 - Fonte Vcdra Club, Ponte Vodrn Beach, Florida Feb 5-6, 1976 - New Orleans Marriott, New Orleans, Louisiana. 8. Subsequent to advising.the membership that the Institute had graciously accepted the generous invitation by the five ATI mining companies tr. visit Canada for the June 1975 General Meeting, Presi dent Scowcroft called William J. V.'. Smith, of Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., to the podium. On behalf of Asbestos Corporation Ltd., Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd., Canadian Johns-Manvillc Cc. Ltd., Cassiar n-ore. Asbestos Corporation Ltd., and Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd., Mr. Smith cordially invited the ATI to join them in June 1975 in Quebec City. Included will be n cne-day side trip to Thetford to visit the mines. The meeting will be held on a Thursday and a Friday and fish ing arrangements will be made for Monday, Tuesday and part of Wednes day at some spot just north of Quebec City. The miners will war^t tc know sometime in 1974 how many men are interested in the fishing.trip 2* It was announced by President Scowcroft that the guest speaker at the February 1974 meeting in Charleston, South Carolina, will be Mr. Chain Robbins, newly-appointed Senior Advisor to John Stender and head of the new office of Occupational Health, OSH/.. He will be accompanied by Lewis J. Cox, who recently was named special Assistant Tor Industry Liaison, OSH/.. 10. Eugene J. Leff, of Cadwr.lr.der, Wickershnm & Taft, presented Remarks of Legal Counsel. The full text of his remarks is attached hereto. Mr, Leff discussed the recent decision in Telex Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation and the question of whether suits against monopolization penalize excellence of manage ment of large ccrpcrations. _ 11. The Fiber Producers' Report was presented by E. A. Farrell, Sales Manager, Lake Asbestos of .Quebec Ltd. Mr. Farrell stated that in 1972 the United States again was the largest importer of textile . spinning fiber from Canada -- 13,700 tons. The United Kingdom and Yugoslavia followed. Yugoslavia is a new large consumer of spinning fiber. Canada shipped 29,000 tens of spinning fiber throughout the world, compared with 30,000 to 22 countries in 1971. The supply of Quebec spinning fiber is good but leng grades from Cassiar are in short supply. The complete report is attached hereto............. Mr. Farrell compared an AIA/NA report cn the breakdown of asbestos usage in the U.S. vs a similar report from Industrial Minerals magazine giving world figures. In the U.S., textile fiber consumed 37* of the total tonnage, floor tile consumed 18% and asbestos-cement products, 25$. A different distribution, based on world consumption, was given by IM and included a percentage of 10% for flocr tile and 70% for asbestos-cement products (a really big difference from the AIA/NA figures). Following a comment from the floor by R. A. Clifton, U.S. Bureau of Mines, it was agreed the 70% world usage of the asbestos- cement products category is quite high, although it could partly be attributed to the increase in construction in the developing countries. It was also stated that the 70% figure was the same as that given last year by IM, leaving cno to ponder if new percentage figures had been compiled for the latest IM report. 12. The following reports of ATI activities at Committee level were presented by the respective Chairmen to the general membership. A copy of each Report is attached hereto, i.e.: Air Hygiene !c Manufacturing - B. E. Carden, Chairman; Asbestos Advisory - E. W. Russell, Chairman; Technical - J. V.'. Echerd, Chairman; more Fiber Research k Testing - C. E. Stiefken, Chairman; Environmental Health - L. F. Dieringer, Chairman. R. A. Clifton added tc Mr. Carden's report by stating that at present it does not appear that the Environmental Protection Agency has any great concern over any asbestos that may bein the water effluent from manufacturing plants. .Also, there is no . proof that asbestos in water is harmful. 13. The following announcements were made by President Scowcroft: a. The ATI was deeply saddened by the demise of George S. Fabel, on Sunday, September 23, 1973, b. Re-elected as Officers of the ATI for the ensuing year -were M. Q. Scowcroft, President; A. Kuzmuk, Vice-President; and E. A. Morris, Treasurer. c. Asberit S.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was unanimously approved by the Board of Governors as a new Class D Associate Member. d. The Asbestos Information Association/North America h"s relo cated to Suite 610, 1660 L Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 (Telephone: 202 223 4885). Its new Executive Director is Robert H. Mereness, formerly a public relations consultant in the Washington, D.C., area. Matthew M. Swetonic, the previous Executive Secretary, has joined Hill k Knowlton's Environmental Affairs Department in New York City. He will serve in a consulting capacity tc the AIA/NA for a year or so. 14. President Scowcroft introduced, as the featu ed speaker, Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H., Associate Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec. He. stated that Dr. McDonald has an educational and medically-professional background that makes one stand in awe. She is of British nationality and a Canadian citizen. Formal education includes the University of London Medical School, London School of Hygiene k Tro pical Medicine, and a graduate student and Research Assistant, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard University. She holds seven ad vance degrees .and is author or co-author of 45 papers. 15. The full text cf Dr. McDonald's comprehensive and well-executed presentation, entitled "Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience," is attached to these Minutes. 16. There being no further business to be brought before the member ship, E. A. Morris moved for adjournment. The motion was seconded by A. Kuzmuk and unanimously approved by the attending members, and the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 A.M. Respectfully submitted, Dei ^ ... - -o-- 1 Executive Secretary Balance on Hand April 30, 1973 General Fund Reserve Fund - Petty Cash Fund , ' Total on Hand April 30, 1973 . Receipts . . To Reserve Fuad To General Fund (all Bcok Sales) Total Receipts . ........................... $ 1,462.06 19,045.91 7.55 $ 97. :o. Disbursements Rental of Office Space (3 nenths) Telephone (4 months) $ 135.CO 123.45 Federal. Incene/FICA Trx?s f.'vl Qtr 73) 152.52 Pa. Unemployment Tan (lud Gtr 73) 5.25 Pa. Income Tax (2.*.; Gtr -<; 3 2.<-9 Secretary's Met Wa-.-^r 'A months) ' 5C2.:0 Postage i:i.:-s Printing Services . 102.11 Office Supplies & Miscellaneous Items 77.37 Revision of Fibre Tost Manual 42.10 Legal Services/Expenses (lst/2nd Qtr 73) 2,824.29 Secretary's Travel Expense (6/73 meeting) 78.97 Expenses to ATI (2/73 meeting) 325.90 Expenses to ATI (6/73 racting) 55.4.09 Advertisement in July 1973 ASBESTOS . 129.24 Petty Cash Vouchers f-17-34 69.90 Total Disbursements ....................... BALANCE CM MAUD AUGUST 31, 1973 Funds as of August 31, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2,683.68 13,346.91 87.97 TOTAL AVAILABLE FUHDS AUGUST 31, 1973 . . .Assets as of 7*ugust 31, 1973 -- Total Funds as listed above 7.ccounts Receivable (Boo): Sales) Furniture and Equipment (Nominal Value) $ 16,118.56 . 25.23 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ................................ TOTAL LIABILITIES ................... TOTAL MET WORTH AUGUST 31, 1973 . . MOTE: During the period 5/1/73 thru 8/31/73 -- $ 150.00 vns drawn from General Fund for Potty Cash; 06500.00 was dravm from Reserve for General Fund. $ 21,316.92 $ 97.01 $ 21,413.93 $ 5,295.37 $ 16,118.56 $ 16,118.56 $ 16,144,7* $ 16,144.79 Pf'/l ......... -- - " Respectfully submitted, Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary, ATI .UanL.aj.uj - i-->- - l. Deport of Funds for Fiscal Yoar/September 1, 1972, thru August 31, 1973 balance.on Hand September 1, 1572 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 3,992.64 9,313.41 100.00 Total on Hand at 9/1/72 . . Receipts .. To Reserve Fund - Interest to 12/31/72 . Dues for Year 1S73 $ 233.50 14,250.00 To General Fund - Special Assessments Voluntary Contributions Book Gales Insurance Credits 750.00 250.00 311.73 37.00 Total Receipts . ....................... Disbursements . Rental of Office Space $ Telephone Secretary's Ilet Wages N.J. Unemployment & Disability Tax Pa. Unemployment Tax Federal Unemployment Tax Pa. Income Tax Federal Income & FICA Taxes . Printing & Office Supplier. (9/1/72-1/2/73) Postage (1/2/73-3/31/73) Printing Services (1/2/73-8/31/73) Office Supplies 6 llisc. (1/2/73-8/31/73) Revision of Fibre Test Manual Legal Services expenses Secretary's Travel Expense ATI Meeting Expense ACTI1 Dues Insurance Accountant (Caruso/Year ended Sep 1S72) Moving Expenses from 11.J, to Pa. Gifts, Flowers, etc. Advertisement in July 1973 A5DEST05 Petty Cash Vouchers *629-664 #01-34 705.00 430.86 1,954.00 7.50 10.50 15.00 24.18 40...24 245.53 199.49 133.11 205.57 240.45 4,915.83 442.30 1,727.43 25.00 237.00 300.00 111.30 162.40 120.24 231.74 Total Disbursements . . . . BALANCE CM 1171 AUGUST 3 1, 1273 . . r.oro t $ 13,406.05 S 15,832.29 $ 29,230.33 $ 13,119.7e ic,nn.5c 7.SBEST05 TEXTILE INSTITUTE . r0i= * Report of Funds for Fiscal Year/Sep tenter 1, 1972, thru August 31, 19"?3 Balance on Hand August 31, 1973 . * . . $ 16,113.56 Funds as of Jvugust 31, 1973 -- General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund ' $ 2, 03.60 13,346.91 S7,97 ` TOTAL AVAILABLE FUNDS AUGUST 31, 1973 . . _ 5 16,110.56 Assets as of 7*ugust 31, 1973 --- Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable (Book Sales) Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) ' $ 16,113.56 ' 25.23 1.00 TOTAL ASSETS ..... ........................... . TOTAL LIABILITIES......................................... $ 16,144.79 ..................... j. TOTAL NET WORTH * $ 16,144.79 ' ' .' --- -- .Respectfully submitted, Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary, ATI FISCAL YEAR -- SEPTEMBER 1 , 1973 , thru AUGU IT 31, l`J/4 INCOME: Members' Dues 1972 Interest on Savings Book Sales Special Assessments Voluntary Contributions Insurance Credits . EXPENSES* legal Services/Expenses Secretary's Gross Wages incl F-ICA & HJ-Unen Taxes Unem/FICA Taxes paid by ATI ATI Meeting Expense Secretary's Travel Expense Office Expense & liisc. Telephone Printing & Office Supplies . Postage ' Printing Services Office Supplies & !lise. Petty Cash - Revision of Test Manual Rental of Office Space Accountant (Caruso) ASTM Dues Gifts/Flouers/Plaquos/etc. Insurance Tumbler Testing Machine Moving Expense Advertising in ASBESTOS Budget 1972 - 1973 Actual 1972 - 1973 Anticipated 1973 - 1974 $ 14,250.00 450.00 200.00 750.00 $ 15,650.00 $ 14,250.00 506.23 311.70 750.00 250.00 37.00 $ 16,105.01 *$ 14,759.00 559.09 *300. CO $ 15,609.90 $ 5,850.00 $ 4,915.83 2,824.00 2,400.00 447.00 152.42 2,500.00 1,787.48 450.00 442.30 1,350.00 430.86 245.53 199.49 138.11 205.57 600.00 291.74 240.45 900.00 705.00 300.00 300.00 50.00*** 25.00 150.00 162.40 108.00 237.00 111.39 ' 129.24 $ 15,529.00 $ 13,119.77 $ 5,000.00 2,100.00 77.00 2,090.09 500.00 450.00 390.00 200.00 300.00 300.00 . 300.00 540.00 390.00 25.00 200.09 250.00 500.00 $ 13,342.00 Excess cf anticipated incone ever anticipated expenses ~ for unanticipated or extraordinary expenses or Reserve .. , $__ 2,258.00 $ 15,600.00 Members' Dues for. FA' 1073-1974: Class A..................................................... Class B ..................................................... Class C ..................................................... Class D ..................................................... Class D (prorated 1/3 year)... 5551500.00 - 5 7,500.00 25$ 750.00 = $ 1,500.00 45$ 750.00 * $ 3,000.00 7@5 375.00 * 5 2,625.00 1@$ 125.00 $ 125.00 S14,750.00 "Detain for breakdown of Office FxDenscs: Budgeted 1072-73 * Actual 1072-1973 Budgeted 1973-7''. $1350.00 $1511.30 $1550.00 Included S25.00 for dues ir. the Industrial Hygiene Foundation (Presorted ct ATI Annual Meeting. October 5, 1973 j at Vr'ychnero Harbor. Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts) In 1972, the United States again was the largest importer cf 13,756 short tons of spinning fiber from Canada. The United Kingdom and Yugoslavia followed. Total shipments were down slightly tc 29,000 tens, from 30,000 tons to 22 countries in 1971. 1972 Canadian Group 3 Shiaments (Short Tons) * United States United Kingdom West Germany Yugoslavia India Japan France Italy Mexico Netherlands Czechoslovakia Others 1972 13,756 5,329 1,449 1,800 1,492 1,308 709 977 559 28 ____ 22 27,504 1,686 1971 13,428 6,001 2,263 1,631 1,616 1,029 .* 624 588 530 469 24,179 2,222 TOTAL 29,190 s.tons 30,401 s.tons The supply of Quebc-c spinning fibars is good but long Cassiar Asbestos grades are in short supply. The supply of fiber Groups 4 and 7 has been generally tight with Group 4 in short supply. Groups 5 and 6 arc- available. These conditions are expected to extend through 1974, in view of a strong and growing demand from Europe and Asia. A recent survey of end uses cf asbestos fibers in the U.S. issued by the Asbestos Information Associaticn/North America shows consumption cf fiber fer textiles to be 3of the total. The U.S. end-use break down is considerably different than the world breakdown as publish_-d in Industrial Minerals, January 1970. World 4: United States Asbestes End Use Distribution -- Tons A-C Pipe & Building Materials Floor Tile Felts & Papers Friction Products Textiles Packing and Gaskets Miscellaneous ' World 10% 10 7 3 2 - 8 Too?* U.S. 255T 18 14 10 3 3 27 Too^ Edward Asa Farrell, Sales Manager Lake Ast .stos cf Quota:C T.td. ALE HIGiENi i: MANUrnt l urwu'iu ww.'un -- Asbestcs Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Hnrwichport, Massachusetts The Committee met with fourteen members end guests present and ten companies represented, as fellows: Am-atex Corporation H. H. Walter Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. , Y. Sato ' Canadian Jchns-Manville Co. Ltd. A. Morrill J. P. Power Carlock Inc. S. G. Dixit Johns-Manville Products Corp. C. G. Guerin Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell . H. K. Porter Company, Inc. E. C. Bratt L. E. Moody Raybostos-Manhattan, Inc. R. T. Matthew I. H. Weaver TBA Industrial Products Ltd. H. J. Corson Uniroyal, Inc. E. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer The Committee had another good meeting and discussions included visits to four asbestcs textile plants by the National Institutes for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); plant inspections by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA); and noise controls. The main purpose of the NIOSH visit was to observe and discuss en gineering controls and work practices directed at reducing the levels of asbestcs fibers to which tha workers are exposed in textile operations; also, to check fiber counts previously taken in all op erations plus any data relating to a particular control cr practice that produces a definite reduction in fiber counts. While- touring the plants, the NIOSH people made sketches of the various ventilation systems associated with the textile operations in nil departments. The NIOSH group planned to take some air velo city measurements at major exhaust hoods and make some limited personal air sampling. However, this was not done at the Hogans- villa, Georgia, facility. It is the Committee's understanding that the NIOSH people have selected two of the four plants visited to conduct approximately 600 dust counts derived from eight cne-hcur studies on fifteen people per day for one week. Additional one-week studies will be made in October following the initial week's visit. Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, NIOSH has the responsibility of conducting research for new occupational safety and health standards. NlOSli's re-cciamenda.r,ic.ns are transmitted to more the U.S. Department of Labor vhich has the responsibility for the .final setting, promulgation and enforcement of the standards. While v/e cannot be sure, it is generally felt that NIOSH is conduct ing the above-mentioned studies for use by the soon-to-be-constituted 15-member Review Board, when reviewing the existing Asbestos Stand ard. Hopefully, the result will be a more realistic Standard., Jron one recent OSHA inspection, machine guarding, exposed horizontal shafting and signs for electrical equipment were 'the only items listed for correction. This plant was given a period from one week . to 30 days to make the proper corrections and received only two very light penalties. . Only dust counts were me.de during an inspection at another plant. "While it is generally felt that the initial impact from OSHA is behind us, we cannot afford to nlet up" from doing everything pos sible to comply with the standards. However, OSHA is aware cf the vast amount of improvement that is being accomplished by all plants toward the safety and health of their employees. Present noise levels above 90 decibels require the use of protective ear plugs. However, there is some indication the 90 decibel-level may be lowered to 85. This is an area where OSHA may take a closer lock in the future. It is felt that more work will be necessary to reduce noise levels and to eliminate the use cf ear plugs* In one plant, an employee who is not wearing ear plugs in a work area with noise over 90 decibels is given an oral warning; the second time, a 3-day send-out; the third time, a week send-out; and the fourth time, a discharge. Respectfully submitted, Buel E. Carden, Chairman Asbestcs Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Wychnere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts IN ATTENDANCE: Amr.tex Corporation - M. J. SCanlan Garlock Inc. - A. Kuzmuk * Nicolet Industries, Inc. - E. W. Russell ' Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - M. Q. Scowcroft Uniroynl, Inc. - W. C. Hitchcock , E. A. Morris and S. J. Peele Asbestos Textile Institute - D. M. Fagan There was considerable discussion by the Committee concerning the economic' philosophy that exists today; that is, one of shortages and increased demands for all materials in the economy, the trend toward world demand and the ability to buy the rinterials and how these conditions affect the asbestcs textile industry. The publicity that asbestcs receives is always a topic of discussion by the Committee. There was a general consensus of opinion that in spite cf the adverse publicity directed at .asbestos, the demand for asbestos textile products is continuing to increase. However, the industry must continue to make progress wherever possible, not just to avoid further criticism, but to continually improve upon its products and to reduce industrial health and safety hazards for its employees. Respectfully submitted, E. W. Russell, Chairman '*4 JL 41 M TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 3-4, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Ma ssachusetts IN ATTENDANCE: - Amatex Corporation - V. Maaskant \ General Electric Co./-'`STM - P. 0. Nicodemus ' H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - J. Y.T. Echerd Rsybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - S. G. Ledbetter and V. A. Mitchell Uniroyal, Inc. - D. T. Austin, Jr. . The Secretary of ASTM Subcommittee D13.14 reported that our proposed revisions to ASTM Standards for Asbestos Yarn (D299), Asbestos Roving (D375) and Asbestos Lap (D1061) have been approved by Letter Ballot. A Round Robin Test to determine Precision and Accuracy of these Stan dards is in process. Three of the five participating laboratories have completed the tests. All inter-laboratory testing is expected to be completed by January 1, 1974. Revision of *STM Standards for Asbestos Cloth (D1571), Asbestos Tape (D315) and Asbestos Tubular Sleeving (D628) will be undertaken next. The Precision and Accuracy of each Standard will be determined by a Round Robin Test. ASTM Committee D-13 is scheduled to meet in New York City October 15 19, 1973- Subcommittee D13.14 will be represented by Messrs. P. 0. Nicodemus and V/. Maaskant on alternate days. The Johns-Manville Tumbler Test procedure will be pursued as a means to determine the relative dustiness of various asbestos products. Five-hundred dollars ($500.00) has baen budgeted for the project. _ A location for the Tester will be determined at a later date. J. V. Hawkins, of Raybestos-Manhattan Inc., will investigate and recommend possible sites. The Shaker Test was discussed as an alternate to the Tumbler Test method. No action was taken; Proposed revisions to MIL-I-3053E, Insulation, Electrical, AsbestosFiber, Treated and Untreated, were reviewed. Committee recommenda tions vnll be submitted to the Military Custodian by the Committee Chairman prior to October 15, 1973- Respectfully submitted, J. V. Echerd, Clmirmnn FIBER RESEARCH k TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October A, 1973 -- Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts IN ATTENDANCE: . American Smelting it Refining Co. - C. E. Stiefk*en Asbestos Corporation Ltd. - G. F. A. Brink Bell Asbestos Jlines Ltd. - W. H. Smith Cr.ssiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. - R. A. Kuntze H. K. Porter Company, Inc. - D. E. Childers blork is progressing on the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual, 3rd Edi-' tion. Final typing of the new and revised tests, including the introduction (roughly 200 pages) is in process. This will be complet ed in early December after which we will submit the entire manuscript to U.S. printers for estimates. ' Total estimated printed pages will be 375-LOO, or 200 sheets. Total tests will be 31, of which 11 will be in ASTM format. Some current printing estimates are as follows: Printing L Assembling Canadian/as of 10/73 $3.69 per manual U.S./as of 7/73 v3-17 per manual Eindcrs (includes 5-ring binder, printing via silk screen process, printed front cover it edge) Spacers TOTALS $2.43 $1.91 -$8.03 $2.00 $1.50 $6.67 Total manual orders placed at present are slightly over 2000. We an ticipate an over-run of about 300 copies. It was recommended that any future modifications to the manual be under the control of ATI (in the interest of continuity). Future work of this Committee will include the assistance to any other -Institute Committee in the form of research projects. We again are asking for more representation nneng fiber consumers on the Fiber 'Research and Testing "Comittee, as we" are "heavily over balanced in the direction of fiber producers. Respectfully submitted, C. E. Stiefkun, Chairman ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CC'-V-Ll i'l ` i Asbestos Textile Institute October 4, 1973 -- Vychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts No formal meeting of the Committee was held and the two members pre sent (E. C. Brett and L. F. Dieringer) sat in on the discussions of the Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee. As of meeting time, the following is the status of various proposed OSHA health standards which are of interest to member companies: 1) Asbestos - A Department of Labor Standards Advisory Committee has net been selected to consider revision to the present Standard There is some indication that the DOL will by-pass use of this Committee and publish a proposed revised Standard in the Federal Register and then follow with the usual hearing and enactment process; . 2) Noise - A revised standard is expected to -be issued in the near future. It appears that the present 90 dBA limit fer daily eight- hour exposure will ba retained, that hearing testing will be required where exposure exceeds 85 dBA, and that the definition of engineering control will be changed to include practical and economic considerations. This indicated latter change is import ant and it gets away from the strict present concept that if the noise can b? engineered out, it must be, without considering other factors; ,, 3) Heat Stress - The Standards Advisory Committee is still consid ering a standard on heat stress. There are indications that because of the many controversies over the various provisions of the standard, it may be allowed to die on the vine. Of interest is a recent law suit in which an industrial worker's law suit against six firms which manufactured the asbestos-containing products he installed, was upheld by a Circuit Court of Appeals. The case, Borel v. Fiberbonrd Paper Products Corporation, resulted from a suit involving a worker who died from lung cancer which the court said resulted from his work with asbestos over a 33-year period. The worker's complaint was based on the failure of the manu facturers of asbestos with which he worked to warn that their product could be dangerous to the ultimate user. The judge, in the court opinions, said that since the dangers cf asbestos were known to the medical community since 1924, the manufacturers had a duty to inform purchasers and ultimate users cf the product's inherent dangers, which they had not done. Recent articles of interest are: 1) "Improved Techniques of Identification and Determination of Airborn Asbestos," L. Bartosiewicz, American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 34, page 252, June 1973; 2} "Asbestos," National Safety Nows 1C8, page 54, August 1973. Respectfully submitted, L. F. Dieringer, Chairman RZM\RK5 OF LEGAL COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute Annual Meeting October 5, 1973, Harwichport, Massachusetts Two weeks ago the business community experienced a shock wave pro duced by a federal court in an antitrust suit. I suppose that busi nessmen have become amply aware of the significance of the law in business affairs. But when I.B.M. was ordered to pay Telex $352-1/2 million, even the lawyers were amazed. Judge A. Sherman Christensen, sitting in Tulsa, Oklahoma, ruled on September 17, 1973, that the International Business Machines Corpora tion illegally monopolized the market for "plug compatible peripheral equipment" comprising such items as memories, tape devices and printers that plug directly into the main processing units of compu ters. The suit by Telex is one of several brought against the giant of the computer industry. The Antitrust Division of the Federal Government is going directly for the jugular, suing I.B.M. in New York for monopolizing the market for general-purpose digital computers. Other suits have been brought by Controlled Data Corp., Greyhound Computer Leasing Corp., and others. One body of opinion considers this series of cases to be an unwar ranted attack on bigness itself. I.B.M. is being sued according to this viaw, simply because it has obtained a large share of the computer market, and the plaintiffs are oblvious to the natural and even praiseworthy reasons for I.B.M.'s growth. The law, however, does not make bigness alone illegal. The Sherman Act, Section 2, makes monopolization illegal, not the mere possession of monopoly power. "Monopolization" is a technical legal term which includes bigness plus an intent to acquire a monopoly. A suit based on monopolization can succeed only if it is proven, first, that the defendant possesses monopoly power in a particular market, and, second, that it has obtained cr maintained this power through willful action, such as anti-competitive pricing practices rather than through the excellence of its products or management. To differentiate excellence of management from willful exclusion of competitors is, of course, extremely difficult. Professor Martin Shubick, ar. economist at Yale and formerly cf I.B.M., has said that the question is so difficult in the Government's suit against I.B.M., for example, that if he were offered a high enough consulting fee, he would be willing to work for either side in the suit in "perfect comfort and utter objectivity." .Nevertheless, the Supreme Court cf the United States believes that the distinction can be made and that serious legal consequences nay proparly result. In the case of United States v. Grinr.ell Coro., 3Si* U.S. 563, 570-71 (1966), the Supreme Court stated that: more 71 The offense of monopoly under 12 of the Sherman Act has two elements: (1) the possession of monopoly power in the relevant market and (2) the willful acqui sition or maintenance of that power as ' distinguished from growth or development as a consequence of a superior product, business acumen, or historic accident." . This statement of the law reflects a very widely held sense of fair ness. Why should the enterprise that Thomas J. Watson, Sr. built up be penalized, and even split up as the Justice Department would like, if only the best business techiuques were the cause of its success? In a letter to the Editor of The New York Tines Magazine, printed on August 19, 1973, cn anonymous I.B.M. employee wrote of I.B.M.'s record of technological achievement, stating that . . hard-haaded businessmen buy I.B.M. products because cf superior performance and service. I.B.M. has been able to aspire to this kind of superiority and keep ahead of its competitors by motivating its employees tc regard excellence as a worthwhile goal. . . Why, then, penalize excellence by trying to 'break-up I.B.M.'?" (p.64) Judge Christensen, for one, has reached the conclusion that I.B.M.'s success is due tc some less commendable practices as well. He found that I.B.M. tried to ''substantially constrain or destroy its plug peripheral competition by predatory pricing actions and by market strategies bearing no relationship tc. technological skill, industry, appropriate foresight or customer benefit." Situations of monopoly may arise in various ways. They may result, on the one hand, innocently from the supremacy of the monopolist as victor in a race of competition, by reason of his technical superior ity, cr his ownership of an important patent. Monopoly nay develop, on the other hand, from the absorption of competitors in an illegal merger. Or monopoly can emerge by driving competitors out of busi ness, by putting deliberate business impediments in their path, or by combining or conspiring with competitors. Clearly, an unlawful monopoly exists if monopoly power has been established cr maintained by moans of restraints of trade which would in themselves be illegal under the Sherman Act. Also, if there is proof that the defendant's business policy, his subjective intent, is to acquire or to keep a monopoly position, the law is violated. However, Judge Learned Hand has said that . .no monopolist monopolizes unconscious of what he is doing." Aluminum Co. nf America v. United States, 148 F.2d 416, 432 (2d Cir. 1945). Therefore, some business practices will lead the courts to conclude that the company involved must necessarily have intended to acquire a monopoly. In fact, it is very difficult for a company which possesses monopoly power tc prove that it did not intend to monopolize. It is required more.. . to com 3 forward with substantial evidence that the monopoly was "thrust upon" it. Alcoa raised this defense in 1945, but It was rejected by Judge Hand, who stated that: ' * . "It was not inevitable that it (Alcoa) should always anticipate increases in the demand for ingot and be prepared tc supply them. Nothing compelled it to keep doubling and redoubling its capacity before others entered the field." (146 F.2d at 431.) Very little indeed is required to show that the monopolist intended to obtain a monopoly. ` In 1953 the United Shoe Machinery Corp. was held liable for illegal monopolization. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.. 110 F.Supp. 295 (D. Mass. 1953). aff'd nor curiam. 347 U.S. 52l"(1954). Its monopoly of machines used in manufacturing shoes was found to have been obtained in part through p system of leasing and not sail ing its machines. The District Court held that the lease-only and certain other practices "... represent something more than the use of accessible resources, the process of invention and innovation, and the employment of those techniques of employment, financing, production, and distribution, which a cc-mpo-- ` titive society must foster. They are.contracts, arrangements, and policies which, instead of encouraging competition based upon pure merit, further the dominance of a particular firm. In this sense, they are unnatural barriers; they unnecessarily exclude actual and potential competition; they restrict a free market." 110 F. Supp. p.t 344-45. Some of the cases referred to above have been misunderstood at times to suggest that a company which has monopoly power may become liable for unlawful monopolization merely by being active, enterprising and dynamic. Such n view implies that the safest course for large companies is passive stagnation, with a gradual loss of market share -- a business policy directly at odds with the aims of antitrust law. This, however, is not the teaching of the cases referred to. Enter prise alone is not penalized; the maintenance of monopoly power by policies intended to discourage, impede or even prevent the rise of new competitors is where the courts have drawn the line. Returning to the recent judgment against I.B.M. for more than a third of a billion dollars, the court's opinion reveals that I.B.M. adopted certain practices which, according to the Judge, wore "directed not at competition in an appropriate competitive sense, but at competitors and their viability as such." Among these were the bundling of prices of I.B.M.'s memories with its central process ing units, that is, charging a single price for both items, and TZ0T2 . predatory pricing. Therefore, the District Court in the Telex case held the conviction that it was not penalizing excellence as such, or even bigness. Although the standards governing the illegality of monopolies are, in my opinion, fair and economically beneficial, their application to any particular company is a mystery to all outside observers because of the factual complexity of such cases. *_ The number of dollars involved in the I.B.M. Judgment is almost equaled by the number of documents, let alone testimony of witnesses, which are involved in this type of litigation. We all can take com fort in the fact that even though we do not have $352-1/2 million to lose, neither must we endure a suit based on monopolization. ' Thank you very much for your attention. Eugene J. Leff, Attorney CAEWALADER, WICKERS HAM L TAFT ABOUT THE 'SPEAKER Alison D. McDonald, M.D., is Associate Professor/ Department of Epidemiology and Health/ McGill Uni versity - - and on a part-time basis is Consultant Epidemiologist/ Hopital Riviere-des-Prairies. British born and a citizen of Canada, Dr. McDonald studied at the Medical School of the Royal Free Hospital, University of London; the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; and the Harvard School of Public Health. Her academic qualifica tions are M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P., MB, B.S. , D. C.I1., D.P.H., M.D.{Hygiene), and Certification in Public Health. The latest responsibilities during her 23 years of experience prior to becoming associated with McGill/ were: Industrial Medical Officer with the Navy, Army and Air Force Institutes; and Research Associate and Senior Lecturer, Paediatric Research Unit, Guy's Hospital Medical School, London Univ. The author of no less than 26 papers, Dr. McDonald also has co-authored 19 publications, including: Epidemiology of primary malignant mesothelial tumours in Canada; Mortality in the chrysotile asbestos mines and mills of Quebec; Malignant mesothelial tumours: Histological type and asbestos exposure; Health of chrysotile asbestos mine and mill workers of Quebec; Epidemiologic surveillance of mesothelioma in Canada. We are especially pleased to welcome Dr. Alison D. McDonald to the podium. The provocative title of her presentation is. CHRYSOTILE - HOW REASSURING THE MINING EXPERIENCE? CHr.YSCTILE -- HOW REASSURING THE MINING EXrEEIia-- Ey: Alison D. McDonald, M.D., D.P.H. Department of Epidemiology and Health McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Presented to the Asbestos Textile Institute at its Annual Meeting held October 5, 1973, at Wychmere Harbor Club, Harwichport, Mass. What ere the health risks associated with working with asbestos? In quantitative and qualitative terms -- What is the relationship between amount and type of exposure and amount and type of disease? Although a great deal of research has been done on the subject, the picture is still fairly imcomplete because the main evidence has to come from observations on man -- on people who are known to have ' been exposed to the mineral. Other investigations, such as animal experiments, do a lot to add to the picture but the evidence basically depends on what disease occurs in man and with what ex posures. It is complicated, as you realize, by'the different varieties of fibers, and because each fiber type may affect health differently. But I will try to give you some picture of the present state of knowledge, which is, on the one hand, complicated, and on the other, uncertain. . *Slide~1 shows the main types and quantities of asbestos pro duced and the time period over which they have been produced. It also shows the different uses for the mineral. . _ The first hazard to be observed was asbestosis. In quantita tive terms -- What is the risk of contracting asbestosis? How much dust exposure, and over how long a period of time, is necessary before there is a risk of getting asbestosis? The matter is still rather poorly assessed, except in the study we have been doing in Quebec where we do now have, for chrysotile mining, a fairly good picture of the amount of exposure which will give rise to asbestosis. It appears that all types of fibers and all types of processes (all industrial groups) are at risk of asbestosis. . The problem really lies in lung cancer. There are two main cancers that are associated with asbestos -- lung cancer, which is really indistinguishable from the lung cancer that smoking can give you; and mesothelioma, which is a very rare tumor that involves the surface of the lung and the lining of the abdominal cavity. A very definite connection has been observed between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. The only slides available for reproducing in this written account are shovm as Tobins 2 through 9. more Chrysotile -- 'n' Reassuring the Mining Experience? . TABLE I _ Main Industrie! Groups and Fiber Exposure Mining Manu facture Insu lation Chrysotile + ++? Not Known Crocidolite ++? Amosite Anthoohvllite + Mixes N//T Not Known Not Known ++ Not Known Not Known . ' ++ ++ ++ Table I. ITm proposing to look at this in three main industrial groups:' mining, manufacture and insulation -- and at the fiber types concerned, i.e., chrysotile, the three main amphiboles, and mixed* fiber exposures. Unfortunately, the latter group is the most common. When we started our studies in Quebec) it was known that very substantial risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma were found in the manufacturing processes and in people working with insulation. This is particularly true for mesothelioma which is very rare and only occurs in one out of a million population -- and yet a substantial number of cases are found with certain asbestos exposures. Substantial health risks in terms of mesothelioma and lung cancer have been well documented for mixed fiber exposures. When we began our studies in Quebec, there was little evidence of a serious problem in the Chrysotile mining industry. It was, therefore, very important to look at groups of people who were exposed to only one type of fiber. So we started investi gating all persons who had ever been employed in the Quebec chrysctile-producing industry. The main objective, apart from studying pure Chrysotile exposure, was to determine the dose re sponse relationship; that is to say, to try to get some precise information about what exposures could be sustained without a significant risk to health, and at what level was there a significant amount of disease. As you know, the two main asbestos mining areas in Quebec are Asbestos and Thetford Mines. Slide 2 is a photograph of Canadian Johns-Manville's Jeffrey Jtine at Asbestos. Slide 3 is a picture of Smith Street, in Thetford, which is indicative of the extensive environmental exposure to people, locally. Slide A. In starting our survey, we obtained personnel records of all of the people who ever had worked in the mines and mills. \U documented all cf their jobs, recorded as well as possible the amount of dust to which they had been exposed, and allowed for the tine during which they had been exposed to these levels. We then divided all cf these people into groups, according to the amount of dust expo stir a. more Chrysotile -- Kow Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE II Dust Ex~dosure Levels and Numbers in each Analysis Dust Exposure (mpef - years) -10 10- 100- 200- 400- 800*+ Number of Men in Each Analysis Mortality Study 2810 3329 1124 1007 837 585 Radiographic Study 1537 1522 1133 912 718 707 Lung Function and Respiratory Symptoms 91 455 159 134 109 67 Smokers 69 381 144 117 96 59 Non-Smokers 22 74 15 17 ' 13 8 Total 9692 6529 . 1015 866 149 The above Table II/Slid e shows the extent of the study. Looking at the top line, we have six groups, ranging from a total of less than 10 million particles per cubic foot x years through 800 plus. If you take a lifetime of 50 years of employment, the last group on the right would be equivalent to exposure to an average of at least 15 million particles per cubic foot. This is a very heavily exposed group and, of course, such exposures have only happ'ened in. the past and do not occur at the present time. Dr. Graham Gibbs, of the Department of Epidemiology and Health, has been studying the corre lation between fiber counts and particle counts and we do not find sufficient correlation between the two to give our findings in terms of fiber counts. For this reason and because all epidemiological information is in terms of particle counts, we consider that these should continue to be used until fiber counts have been done for a long period of time. We do not have any direct information about fiber levels in terms of risks of disease. One of the three major studies we undertook was of all men born between 1891 and 1920, to study causes of death and whet their death rates were in various dust categories. We did an x-ray study in order to determine which dust groups showed an increased incidence of x-ray changes and at what level the increase started. This, of course, was important evidence of disease. Laboratory equipment was moved down to the mining areas and 1000 men were submitted to detailed lung function studies, again to see what the relationship was between the amount of chrysotile dust to which the men had been exposed and changes in their lung function. Slides__6_& 7 &how the apparatus- t-lir.t was used to tost-their lung, functions. core Chrjs - e --- K-v Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABIJLjn. Age-Corrected Mortality by 'Cause Per 1000 Ken Born 1891-1920 -- Berths to December 1969 T>ust Group mpef - years -10 10- 100- 200- 400- All Causes Respiratory Cancers, including malignant pleural, mesothelioma 365 355 354 10.3 13.1 13.4 313 15.5 323 21.4 Abdominal Cancers 18.0 13.6 18.7 11.6 26.3 Pneumoconiosis 1.6 1.5 0.8 4.9 4.9 800+ 395 32.1 28.7 23.6 Table Ill/Slide 6 shows the main results of the mortality study. Of all causes of' disease, it whs only in the highest dust group (800+) that there was a considerable excess of deaths. For respira tory cancers, which includes malignant pleural mesothelioma of which there were very few cases in the industry, a rise is clearly present in the 400 to 800+ dust groups with an exposure (to an average con centration of 8 mpef over 50 years). The rise probably dees begin a little earlier. The highest dust group, which as we said was very heavily exposed, has about 3 times as much respiratory cancer as do the people with minimal exposure (the less than 10 group). The latter group includes people such ?.s those working in clerical jobs and who have virtually no exposure to asbestos. But having informa tion for both groups gave us r. population with which to compare the people who were substantially exposed to dust. There was nlsc some indication that abdominal cancers were related to dust exposure. You will see a higher amount of abdominal cancers in the 400 to 800 and the 800+ groups. The same experience has been observed in other studies. It is by no means certain that this is directly due to asbestos since there are ether passible explanations. You will see that the rise in asbestosis occurs at around the 200 dust level, indicating an equivalent of an average of 5 mpef over 50 years. . . Table IV/Slide 9. What is thought to be significant disease is Irregular small opacities of grade 2/1. For those cases we observed that a significant-increase occurred in the 100 to 200 dust group. We conclude, that for a lifetime exposure, an average of 2 mpef gives rise to radiological change indicative of significant disease in l of persons. Slide 10. In lung function tests in cigarette smokers and non smokers, theTirst change occurred in the capacity to breath in and this started with low levels cf dust exposure. But a 10f deficit in breathing capacity occurred at about the same level ns the radiolo gical changes that I just talkr.d about -- at. tlio I.hvhI of about 2 mpef on nvoragp over a lifetime. c- Page 5 Chrysotil How Reassuring the Mining Experience? TABLE IV Radiographic Changes - Prevalent Rates {%) Standardized for Age and Years in Industry -- Males 'A_god_ 36-65 at time of Radicgreuh mpcf - years Dust Grouo____________ -10 10- 100- 200- 400- 800+ Thetford Mines Avereg Irregular Small Opacities - - - 1/0 1.8 3.3 6.3 8.7 12.0 17.2 7.6 2/1 0.0 0.2 2.2 0.9 2.4 9.2 2.0 Pleural' Thickening- Grade 1 2.4 4.6 6.5 5.8 6.3 10.5 6.4 Grade 2 1.3 0.7 0.8 1.2 1.3 2.0 ' 1.1 .Asbestos Irregular Small . Opacities - - - 1/0 6.4 3.7 6.3 5.0 6.8 7.0 5.1 2/1 0.0 0.4 1.5 0.8 0.6 3.9 0.8 Pleural ThickeningGrade 1 2.9 2.6 3.0 3.0 4.7 5.6 3.2 Grade 2 0.0 0.6 1.0 0.5 1.4 0.7 0.7 TABLE V Age-Corrected Prevalence Rates ($>) for Bronchitis and Breathlessness by Dust Exposure it Cumulative Smoking Habits mpcf - years Dust 'Index -10 IP- 100- 200- 400- 800+ Bronchitis Never Smoked 10 19 19 46 21 49 Up to 100 Cigar ette Years 18 0 12 0 46 0 100-499 41 28 21 33 42 43 500-999 32 38 44 28 47 58 1000 ` 100 47 45 55 54 35 Breathlessness Never Smoked 0 14 24 31 13 44 Up to 100 Cigar ette Years 0 12 39 21 41 43 100-499 16 14 8 20 42 18 500-999 1000 9 19 21 19 14 39 0 23 27 31 34 46 more - J 1 c -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? Table 7/Slide 11. Lastly, the workers were asked to fill ir. a questionnaire about smoking. From the answers, we found that there was a relationship between breathlessness and dust exposure not apparently affected by smoking. But if you look at bronchitis and along the line- for the "never smoked" and the two groups of stackers, you will note there wasn't any change in bronchitis which increased asbestos dust exposure. Now, if you lock at the columns vertically you vd.ll see that smoking does a lot of damage in terms of bronchitis ' TABLE VI Distribution of Cases of Mesothelioma by Tear of Death and Prcvir.ce . Tl9So -'1970] " Other I960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 - Annual Incidence Ontario 0 1 4 9 6 7 8 6 7 12 "59 Quebec 6 6 4 3 8 7 14 13 18 7 16 102 Provinces 9 3 5 7 3 5 9 6 7 -6 "55 ' Car.adi 15 10 13 19 17 19 31 25 32 25 236 Per Million Pecu lation 1966-1970 1.2 2.3 0.9 1.4 Reviewed by Pathology Panel 57 80 47 194 Accepted as Mesothelioma 11% U2% 57% 55% Table Vi/Slide 12. The other study we did was to survey all mesotheliomas in Canada. At the outset, I should say we had just 5 mesotheliomas out cf 3270 deaths in the mining industry. Although this may seem to you to be a small number, there should be no cases of mesothelioma in a general population. One of the problems about mesothelioma is the diagnosis. There is by no means agreement among pathologists about the diagnosis of mesothelioma; so our finding of 5, having searched pretty thoroughly for mesotheliomas, may well be an over-estimate, especially because they were particularly looked for in people with known asbestos dust exposure. Having found very few in the industry, wo did a concurrent study -- locating all the mesotheliomas we could in Canada. We obtained from all pathologists reports about all known cases and feel we got fairly full ascertain ment. The ascertainment wasn't done until 1967-68. If you look at the graph at the top (Table VI) you will see a gradual rise in the annual number of nesothulionas across Canada up to 1966. This is more- Chrysotile -- Hew Reassuring the Mining t-xpener.ee.' probably due to poor memory and lack of knowledge about mesotheliomas in these earlier years. We are continuing this surveillance, and between 1966 and 1970 there doesn't appear to have been any change. This is rather a short period of time and we obviously need to know whether this "no change" situation will continue. As you know, the big concern is the lengthy latent period for mesothelioma, to develop and the widely expressed fear that we are new going to reap results from exposures which occurred 20-30 years ago and that the rate of mesotheliomas may rise. We now feel quite happy that a fairly good base line has been established for this surveillance and we shall be able tn know within the next few years what is happening in Canada. If you look at the bottom line (Table VI), we looked to sec whether mesothelioma occurred mere in one part of Canada than in other sections cf the country. There was, in fact, more in Quebec -- over 2 per million population, compared with just over one in Ontario and slightly less than one in the rest of Canada. But we must revert to the question of the diagnosis. When the mesotheliomas were submitted to patholo gists, a much lower proportion was accepted as mesothelioma oy the pathologists' panel -- not only in Quebec but in all of Canada. It looks as though, for cases that are accepted by the panel as mesotheliomas, there is little or no difference in the various parts of Canada. . TABLE VII Distribution by Age of Cases and Hatched Controls (The number in parentheses designates these successfully investigated, epiacmiologically) Men__________ _____________________V7omen ge (Years) Cases Controls Cases Controls 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 0 (-) 32 6 (5) 12 (12) 8 (8) 7 (7) 2 (2) 1 (1) Total 39 (37) Mean 56.7 Standard Deviation 12.9 0 -) 2 o ?! 16) 12 (11) 10 (10) 5 (5) 3 (3) 1 (1) 39 (36) 59. 2 13. 2 2 !2! 44 4 (4) 6 (6) 6 (6) 7 (7) 3 (3) 32(32) 58.9 16.2 0 (-) 44 5 (5 5 (5) 8 (8) 8 (8) 2 (2) 32 (32) 59.0 15.2 Table VII/Slide 13. There are two objectives in this mesothelio ma study -- to continue to watch the incidence and to examine to what extent the mesotheliomas are caused by asbestos. Here you see that more than 2/3 of the cases are in males, as is expected, and more How Reassuring the -Miring Expiric-r.c; ? i oo OO SPf' Co r1 Hpr*O S u ae *o0 ?r h3 CcD .. 127 "3p>CO . DOC C Cl C *- p p* 3hC W n pf O f o pH- .Pf CO CO C s ho b-> 3H0t35-} C3T5 P" *- fO P- -F~ i 1< a t--1 Occn oo CD oc b3 O /* ph>5- t1 3r 3 C 3C P)-> CD t /.dlf: ix Typos o f O c c u p a tio n in w hich th o ro was D e fin ite o r Probable Asbestos Exposure 1 fa th e r 1 j! 11 |1 11 PO CoO ua o 3 o 11 oo 3Pf cpHofo 1o }-- CO o co O' CD o ) CO o J ii i Oo 3ty O3 oCppf p3(30-"> ii N) Hrchs u sc* C0ca3D)r I--' C(OD3a0D' SPO*1f' ii to fl pSO-rJ'I--1 II tI ac3o, rz ge 10 ^ " Chrysotile -- Hew Reassuring the Mining Experience? Table IX: If you will look at the top line, you will note that we did find some indication of domestic exposure. There were a few people'who had been exposed to father or a husband working with asbestos. The diagnosis of mesothelioma may be more likely to be made in such a situation, but nevertheless, this risk is probably real and, especially for children. But there is no indication that the general population is at any risk. So we found that the mesothelioma study backed up what wo found in the mining industry, namely that there is a small excess of mesotheliomas in mining but it was manufacture and insulation that . were mainly associated with mesothelioma in Canada rather than the mining and milling of chrysotile. . This has been borne out in other studies of .chrysotile mines in Cyprus, Northern Italy and the USSR. Although the information is somewhat imcomplete, they indicate a similar experience to that found in Quebec with regard to lung cancer and, in fact, practically no mesotheliomas. The evidence, insofar as the chrysotile-producing industry goes, is good in that the risks are lew, and probably controllable. Now, referring back to Table I -- ITm going to.'put a + for chry sotile mining. For anthophyllite mining in Finland, the picture is similar in that they find no mesotheliomas in that country. There does appear to be some lung cancer associated with mining but it isn't the high rate that appears in manufacturing and in insulation work. Our information about crccidclite and amosite mining is frag mentary because it doesn't depend on surveys of people working in the mines. It depends, rather, on a surveillance of all types of cases which come from the mines and surrounding areas. It does appear, however, that there have been a substantial number of mesotheliomas around crocidclite mines in the Northwest Cape. So, I'll put a ? for crccidclite mining (Table I) because the evidence isn't too secure, especially in regards to rates; i.e., hew many cases in .relation to how many workers and residents. Regarding the amesite mines in the Transvaal, there is a very minute + (Table I). There does appear to bo some lung cancer but practically no mesothelioma -- which is very different from the Northwest Cape area. The relationship between mesothelioma and chrysotile has been confirmed in studies by the electron microscope -- studios in which fiber types in the lungs of cases of mesothelioma have been identi fied by Dr. Fred Poolcy, of Cardiff in South Vales. In these studies, praotirally a'll of the fiborc rintmtod yam of the nmphi- more Page li Chrysotile -- How Reassuring the Mining Experience? bole variety. So far it has not been possible to distinguish crccidclite from amcsite fibers, but chrysotile can be detected. All the cases thus far examined have substantial amounts of amphi- bole fibers and relatively few chrysotile fibers. ' There are reports that persons exposed to chrysotile only in' the manufacture of asbestos, have had similar rates of mesothelioma and lung cancer to those found in persons exposed to a mixture of fibers. The evidence isn't any too sure, in fact it's pretty doubtful, that these men were exposed only to chrysotile. So, we must put a ? (Table I) against the risk of cancer in the manufacture of . asbestos products using only chrysotile. " Some additional comments to the data in Table I: Dr. Selikoff reports a high rate of mesothelioma and lung cancer in persons ex posed only to amcsite. Information on the manufacture of antho- phyllite is unknown because single types of fiber have not been used in the process. Mixed mining is not applicable. And, we lack satisfactory information about manufacturing with pure crocidolite or with pure anthophyllite. . As you know, there are differences in the nature of each fiber type but experimental work has produced some possible explanations of the varying effects. Chrysotile is a long, thin and curly fiber and there is some evidence that it easily gets held up in the larger airways and, therefore, dees not penetrate so well as other fiber types which can enter the smaller airways and reach the pleural surface-. In comparing crocidolite and amcsite fibers, both are straight, rather than curly. However, when mined they apparently have quite different diameters; crocidolite having the narrower diameter and amosite being much wider in diameter. This fits in quite well with the findings from studies in the Northwest Cape. There are a lot of mesotheliomas in the Northwest Cape where the diameter of the fibers is small; whereas in the Transvaal area, where amcsite is mined, and the fibers arc broad, there appear to be practically no mesotheliomas. This doesn't fit with the story of the manufacture of amosite, and, frankly, I really do not know the reason. Fiber differences could be an explanation; but on the other hand, the big differences between chrysotile mining and the manufacture of asbestos products and insulation certainly cannot be laughed off. Seme of the possibilities for the differences between chrysotile mining .and manufacture and insulation are .... 1) It is possible that during manufacture the fibers nay be broken up into much smaller pieces and, therefore, lose thoir capacity to be caught up in the bigger airways, thoivby penetrating further int>' the lungs. mare Page ?.2 Chrysotile -- Kow Reassuring the Inning Experience? 2) It is possible that the culprits are crocidolito and/or amosite. *t 3) It also is possible that in the process of manufacturing and insulation, that other carcinogens are involved. " Snaking has been raised as a possible additional factor in causing cancer of the lung; but for mesothelioma it has been pretty clearly shown that smoking is not an added factor. . If. there is something else that increases the risk of - mesotheliomas, it is net smoking. So I have to conclude that the chrysotile mining experience cannot really be said to be reassuring. It is certainly possible that if one were able to show that the manufacture of pure chrysotile gave cancer rates, similar to those in mining and milling, the pic ture would certainly be brighter. But, it -isn't brighter at the moment! end - i, m3 2 5 i AS PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT, . .. -2 - A- 000 112 dT/7/ 7^ . __ 77 /- - *e - `>4?. I era sure that many cf you have taxed yourselves, as I have asked myself, why has the asbestos industry reerunri' m been singled out as the prana target for so many assults by government, labor, the press, certain segments of the medical orofessior.. and by various environmental and consumer activist groups? Why us? Can asbestos really be all that bad? Are the products wa produce truly going to kill millions of Americans, as seme experts have predicted? Cr is there seme sort of nefaricu: conspiracy efcct to destroy the ascestcs industry? The answer to the cucsticn of "VTnv us' is both corns lex and simple. Complex because it :s a combination ei three interrelated but separate factors. Sim.nl e because each of factors is, when considered by itself, runs coy tour.. "-?** factors -ire (15 asbeusns cau-sts disease. (21 a spokesman srese to champion U:c noun :cr csi.-nccs centre1 3 and~*(3} a'cornucopia of new 5cvcrr.-a.-t agencies were-sec up. a: control things'that cause'diseaseLet us lock -at eaeh.cf chesa "factors in"turn.' ' ' ' - * *................. " ' ' ' Tirst, there is no doubt that the inhalation oi _ substantial amounts of asbestos can lead to increased rates c various types cf lung disease, including two forms cf cancer. These are facts which car.nct be denied, even if they do not apply"in'ail`circumstances and under ail conditions. ..The medical literature is full of solid evidence linking asbestos to disease. In tty office, I have on file more man 2, CIO medical papers dealing warn the health risks of asbestss and hundreds more are published every year. "- Secondly, the spreading of alarm ever the health ri of asbestos has as its prime spokesman one of the most talent medical publicists of the age------- 3r. Irving .*. Selikor.* 1: New York's mount Sinai Hospital. Not c.-.iy 13 Sr. Seiikc.'; capable of arousing the ire end moral indignation o: the :.;s; conservative reporter or .politician wi:.k- his graph.c descriptic: and p>re_d,iccipns of the ravages of asbestos, bar he has also surrounded himself with a group of similarly talented publicity conscious. associate* who have carried the yjcu.it Si.tei message ..to the far corners of the nation. ... Wh.ile Or. Seiikoff has, in his teal, unquesticr.ally painted a far darker picture than the facts warrant, we should .. always remember. an his defense that the insulation workers he 'has been studying for more than a decade were and still are dying frsa asbestos related disease at an appalling rata. this would be enough to cloud any .tan's thinking. finally, in the past decade there has been a tramandru: growth in public and governmental interest in environmental and occupational health matters, this interest has beer. translated into a stria* of far-reaching lawr affaotmg mdustrv 5 manner hithec-co_ urJcncyn -n this or any otr.e: country. ..-beiie>te-i t ai.S ac cura t e_ _to say that these new laws, sue.". jre--Cecupataonal 5 af ecv .and .Health .Act, the C-ean Air ac, cbe..C0n5vraef.?roteo;ion Act, and .o.thers, have forever altered the cor.cept.~ot the free enterprise system as it was known in this country, for a hundred and fifty years. . . Thus,in combination, these throe' factors created a. situation.in which a cadre of freshly created federal ager.cie; with strong. statutory authority, were prodded into assigning priority.status to asbestos by Dr. Selihoii and his fcilcwers, who used and in sene eases misused ch.e great wealth of negative asbestws-nealth data contained in the medical literat-ure to achieve these.ends. - . ... _ __ -r . In short, the asbestos industry was s .because, it was vulnerable to attach, because th a was semacne willing, almost anxious, to laad that -tuira. a because . -* Congress had graciously provided the vor.iciu* f such an assuu 6 How much of whit Cr. Sclihcff says accut asrestcs ; true, and the manner in which ha has abused the dv:;:>;U mss data in order to blew up an essentially occupational problem tr into a national calamity are topics which we shall examine a bit later. The background of industry efforts to deal with the asbestos-health problem as a national issue <gces back nearly a decade, to Sr. Selikoffs now famous 1964 seminar on asbest: disease at the New York Academy of Sciences. While this senin did such to pricX the industry's conscience about asbestos and * *' * health, the problea still remained one of limited public and press interest until around 1967, when the media barer. beacinc the medical bushes searching for scones that wo-ii rrap.-.i rally portray American industry's supposed complete disrrmard for the environment and for the health and safacy of its workmen and tho American public. The asbestos-health problem was found -7 - to be taiior-:tada for stones ar.d Or. Sel-:%cf: was hesitant in'catering-to the ser.saticnaiiot whirrs cf.tne press. ^s a~ result,, .smarting, with Paul Brodeur's infarcus New '.'crker of biauto.h .1963,_ .asbestos has since grown into an iter of major press interest. In these years, industry efforts to comat the spate of negative press articles on asbestos were carried on prana-roly by the Johr.s-Mar.viile Corporation, which set up a tasfc forte of specialists in various fields to do vhat it could to portray the-preblea-in .its proper. perspective, while scr.a rmcr successes were achieved, it was found that no one company acting independently could, adequately or effectively represent an en.tir industry in dealing with the press and with government official; *'* " As aresult, in lata 1970, eight companies gathered i: Nfcv Vor.V City to launch the Asbestos I.-.r'crr.ation Association of'North America, which was iranhly patterned aitar the I-ntish Asbestos Inform cion Ccr.mi rose, which hud teen esoatlis.-.ai sere three years earlier. In cur original concept, the Association would lint its activities to providing accurate, unbiased information cn astestss and health ts the press, to the public and to interested politicians and other government offiieals. It oust te remembere that at this particular tir.e, the enormous problems that would later develop with regard to OSKA and other Federal regulatory agencies were as yet on the distant horiron and basically unrecognised by the industry. Fortunately----- and properly------- the Association has tad the wisdom to alter its original limited concept of itr proper functions, and now endeavors to assume whataver activities and responsibilities it deems necessary ts protect the interests ` cf the asbestos .manufacturing industry m the United :a: as vis-a-vis asbrfstos-heaich. 9 From cur narrow initial public relmins the Association has ere^n in the list two years, into an organisation with priorities in eight rsajor fields_c: end These are: ...... . Medical Affairs . ..................... ~ Legal Affairs ,, - .Government-Affairs ' 'r;:........ Er.v r c nmcr. ta1 Ccr.trsl . .. Publicity and Public Relations . .. . 'Customer Relations' ' * ' Employee Relations, and Inter-industry Relations In briefly discussing AIA activities in each of fields, I vail leave government arfaars far last, not tec it has a lev priority within the Association----- in fact currently the me si important----- but because, it is the re complicated and requires the rest discussion. 0 To take our activities or.e at a time chan ............. medical affairs. It is an obvious fact that if an crcar.iccticn is to speak authoritatively on a medical matter, it muse r.ct only be seeped in the literature of that particular medical subject, but it oust also keep itself constantly informed of new discover and developments. This ve have accomplished in a number of ways for example, by sending representatives to important medical meetings,'such as the 1972 international conference on the biological effects of asbestos held at iycr. in Trance, which was sponsored by World Health Organisation _ Soth John harsh, the President of aha ATA, and : attended _that.conference.on behalf gf the Association. also meet on an irregular .basis, vim various medical experts in the field, both from the United Scites and asroid, to review and discuss recent develos-er.ts and discover:;.s. - 11 Our literature research is eased consideraciy by recei'eing. the.jtonthiy medical paper distribution of t:.e Inscitute..of Occupational aad Environmental Health tr. Montreal, which is .funded by she Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. _ 'This year, far she first rise, she AIA has elected to* k. sponsor medical research of its own. Currently- underway is a ** . .. completely AIA/NA funded study of chest sounds, which is being conducted by.Sr. Raymond Murphy of the Harvard School cf Public Health. The purpose of the study as to rand a new r.-.erncc o: determining an individual's potential susceptibility to ascestes disease t.. - :hc Association hi3 also recently decided to contribute to-.some very exciting research into a possible cure for mesothelioma througn electromotive treatment. stuty is -being conducted at Somerset Hospital in New .'ir sev. ..*. the legal affairs area, the Asscctit.tr. oarttot: in an aaucuo curst capacity tr. the law suit brought by the 12 Industrial Union Department of. the Acl/CIC agair.st the Occupational-Safety and Health Administration on the asbestos standards. --'In 'our brief which was considered by the Justice Department to he*the'best one filed, the Association supported OSHA a^air.st the ICO, somewhat of a ur.icue position for an ' )f industry to find itself in vis-a-vis a .governmental-regulatory-''- agency. Oral argument on_the_case vas held April 4 in Washington. While a decision has yet so he handed down hy the Court of Appeals, we are confident that the case will he decided in cur favor. II t fhe Association has retained the services of C. 2. Sheckler, with whom many cf you are familiar, as cur special consultant on environmental control affairs. At the prase.-.t time, Cliff is vomiting with the AIA/:.'A Invircr.mant.al Control u.;: !; : Suh-Committee on the development of a series of five Asccc.i--- compliance manuals on the OSHA standards. We e.voect to h a ve these manuals available wiemn a short period 0: time. 1'" 1 i \ 13 'last year,-trrcau'se c the~veii astonished u.-.reli xhe":rerbrar.'e: fii-'ter-'re'thcd'ts-a-r.OTvihOTtng tool irr 'he isiec s^"ihiftstfy, the" AIA-undertook th e- -s par.soith-ip- of a- study at a *research laboratory in. California to*" determine -the effect c; ' "" certain variables cr. the overall accuracy of the method. ?he -"Tre'suits of 'the s tut/ shaved an error factor of plus cr minus ':0 per cent under the .tost favorable of measuring cor.diticns# "these results were sent zo'bcth CSHA'and to the National Institute for Occupational .Safety and Health. A number of the recemne.-.da tiers- contained in the study for improving the accuracy of the method have been incorporated into a soa.-.-zo- bereleased revised NICSH operations manual on < V j -. T.n the customer relataar.s area, the total effect cf '"negative" press ?cbacity and government regulations i.-.iuszrv "* "customers 'is stall today rather poorly defined. c:.-.e nenuerr of the Association have raporzed saraaus prooler.s in this area where customer problems do exist, they normally : 11;----- into one of five categories. s" . first, the customer has thoroughly investigated his situation and has found that he can no longer afford to continue using asbestos or asbestos-containing products, either because the cost of control is too high or because he would have to raise the trice of his product to a level that-would maxe it ncn-ccmpetitive with non-asbestos containing substitutes. Second, the customer has not thoroughly investigated - * .. his situation and only things that he can no longer afford to continue using asbestos. vs customer has read c.-.o or mere negative articles on asbestos in the public press and has rude the s.-.ao decision that "we ought to get that dangerous stuff c at :: sur plant. Ofen, decisions of this na sura are forced cr. t;s - manages*.'it by ill-informed medical advisors or safety and health directors. - IS - Four, the customer has neither a cent: is he particularly afraid of using asbestos in his cun plant. However, he is fearful that those of his ccnpetitiors whose finished products da not contain asbestos will stress the adve: health effects of asbestos an trying to take business away froa hia. Custcaer fears of this nature are essentially *gut" reactions and hense extreaely difficult to deal with. And ... Five, the custcaer has none of these problems or fear but he has been advised by a government ofoicial or inspector that he would be better off if he quit using asbestos or asbest containing products in his plant. While this problem does .not aotear to be widespread, we have learned of a numrer cf situati where it has occurred. Actions cf this nature by gover.-_to.nt officials arc totally uncalled for ar.d should bo dealt vim promptly and decisively. The best solution is to obtain cot-: with.the offending official's immediate superior or with the (..government agency^involved.._ _____ ........................The Association;s first reaction to the overall . customer relations.problem was to approve funds for a . ries of four regional seminars at which industry customers would . be given a number of basic presentations cn the various aspect * .. of the asbestos-health problem. The seminars were tentatively scheduled.for the Spring of.this year. However, the experiences of a number of cur nether __companies shewed that general catchall type seminars c: the originally contemplated would.net be effective in dealing ;-. with the majority of customer relations problems. In order to do the job properly, it was found that customer ttrrasar.titio ..have to be tailored to the neecs and proclems o: the miividua custc: 17 As a result, the Assoeiaton cor. celled its schec series of seminars and instead elected to dovelcp a number of packaged slide presentations on s topics as "The Facts About Asbestos and Health," and "Br.d standing the OsHA Regulations," which could be used by ne. companies as part of a tailored presentation to individua oustoners. These slide presentations are still m the wo but should be available shortly. As wish customer relations, the Association fee that employee relations is a orcolem best handled by the in.di<vid*ua.l m. ember co mp.an ie> s. T. hus far, the Al.V s sole co button in this area of industry concern has been to trace the draft of an Employee Safety and Health Cuids on Asbest Health. The draft was made available to the meroer cornea for their own use and at least or.e, Raybestos-Manhitton, produced it in booklet form for distribution to all its 13 I personally believe that the employee relations aspect c: the asbestos-health problem is one that has been sorely neglected by most companies within che industry. I feel the this could develop into a major problem area in the near fut ""and that steps should be taken now to deal with it. We knew that Or. Selikotf and various organised labor groups are planning a full scale campaign to bring their interpretation "of "the asbestos-health problem to the attention of asbestos industry employees throughout the nation. e ir.dustrv permits this interpretation to be disseminated unchallenged, the consequences could be grave indeed. 19' . ............ Inter-industry .relations are best defined as keetr.-.g tie industry informed .about important new deveicpments cr. the governmental, medical and press relations fronts that affect Asbestos. This is accomplished within the AIA by periodic distributions of documents and indorsation to the member companies and to others cn our marling list. The value of this octroi tv con be gagued by ho fact that our overall mail! g list increased from apprcxrma ely a dosen names in 1971 to more than 60 a year later. Whi e we have hud to trim the 1 st somewhat this year for legis 20 reasons, we assume from the frecuenc request; we still :e:s;ve to be placed on the list that the material we send out is being read and is of considerable value to these receiving it. Next to government affairs, our public relations and publicity actitities constitute the single largest consumer os time, effort and money within the Association. These of you who are familiar with the treatment that asbestos has been * receiving in the public press over the years can readily understand why this activity ranks so high on our priority list What you may net understand are the reasons why cur extensive efforts in dealing with the nation's cress have been so _ unsuccessful to dace in producing the thecretica 'balanced" cr 'positive* story on asbestos and health.. 21 -.^..The sjjr.pl.-. .fact.;is that :ir-cn the standpoint cf ' ^ today1 s:ycur.?. accivist_:re?c-r.rgr, -industry- is the tad cay, and * --- ^.nothing we do, say or achimye: can ever change this impressicr.. tr:.~ ` id ve spend $100 million dollars on. environmental- control, jfc-. SE*J*: the pre-s--s** either sayswe ought, to have.done-it tan-years ago jtvT or that ye should.have spent 200 million. li ve sponsor medical research, they say ve are.trying to buy favorable 'results. Tf ve are opposed to ridiculously stringent standards, they say we. are in favor of .letting our employees die. A television executive in Minneapolis described this nev breed of reporter as being "so intent on demolishing the establishment that they.would, blindly destroy the credibility of the media in the bargain." Another TV executive, this time in Chicago, stated "they want to maXe moral and political and social judgments cn their assignments and then tax c sices. Never mir.d getting the facts straight. 1 22 ' ks 'a''result cf this-"industry is a. r.cnstor* philcsc asbestos will' fer.ilA a* hoc news item only so long cs the news is bad. The* *gccd*` that asbestos dees-in protecting lives ar. property is of no' concern to the pres*.- likewise, industry efforts to" protect workmen end the general public fren asbest exposure will'always be given minimal coverage, since such information is directly contrary to the portrait of an irresponsible industry producing a "killer* product.that is the sole element of hews worthiness in tho asbestos story. The press relations -battle will therefore be won, not when the media starts to print positive or balanced articles about asoestos, buewnen the press ceases to print anything about asbestos at all. As long as negative news an asbastos-health continues to be generated, the media will continue ~to eat it up. The media will only cease to carry .such stories when the generation cf negative news ceases ... 23 it is as sir.oie as shat. Positive or balanced :ses era a chimera, since they are, by definition, not newsworthy. Let me give you a very specific example cf this last principle in aeticn. As most of you already knew, the Association is currently engaged in an extensive campaign to interest the trade press in articles on the benefits of asbestos and on industry accomplishments in the environmental control area. The trade press, unlike the national or public media, is much mare receptive to articles of this nature and vc expect to be seeing a number of positive stories m the trade press in the next few months. In any case, ve also from time to time put out press releases on various subjects relating to asbestos-healtn. A few weeks i<ja,"va isstffod a release cn the report of the' advisory committee "on*asbestos cancers cf the World Health erranitatitn. brief, cha report concluded that the general public is r.ot in dancer from asbestos in the environment. Thus far, we have ir-'j 25 trade publications, radio ar.d TV stations, science writers etc across the United States. I have'brought'a'half-uccen tiles 2. * 2. ` * * - -- * along with ce that you can take'a look at'after the meeting. Basically, the file contains copies od the five industry position papers which were distributed'earller, as well as a number of important cedical papers and a pair of photographs illustrating the benefits of asbestos and industry efferts at environmental control. You cay- be interested to know that the itaa chesen to illustrate the benefits of asbestos is a fire-proof asbestos suit. While we don't expect our information file to change the whole attitude of the press toward asbestos, we are hoping that the xedia will make use of it to. accurately report the industry's position when doing stories on the subject. ir.d new, having heard the bad side of the public relations problem, it's time for the cccd news. 26 And the good news is .... despite ail the .negative articles on asbestos-health that have appeared in the trees over the past half-do2en years, very few people have Peer. ^y*ing attention. Let se explain. In February, the Association undertook a persona interview research survey of the American public to dstc -- i.-.a its attitude toward asbestos and its awareness cf the health issue. The survey was conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation during March and April. More than 2,0CC derographically selected Americans were interviewed. : have here with aa sufficient copies far all of you of a surrary of the resuits. ( COMMENT FROM.SC.'iMA.Vf } Before going on to describe cur activities in the government relations area, I think it r.ic.-.t ba intercaring at this point to take a very brief lech, at the .tanner m 7 which Or. Selikoff and his supporters have used his researr: results to dramatise and exaggerate the seriousness of the asbestos-health problem. Z have two slides whi.cn point thi: out 'rather conclusively. Si:OS 1 -------- RESEARCH DATA The first slide shews the actual results of Cr. Seli. four mortality studies of asbestos workers. The numbers i: parenthesis beside the figures for total number c: workers indicate these who have so far died from all causes. The percentage figures alongside the total number of deaths from asbestos!*, lung cancer and mesothelioma are based on the total number of deaths from all causes, not on the number c : workers in the study. The most important study of the lot is tnc sectn: from the top, showing the deaths from asbestos-related d-iseas among all members of the insulation workers union, regardless 2S of length of exposure. -ou will- note th & - per :er.: cf those workers who have died thus far have died from c.-.e cf the three asbestos-related diseases. . These, then, are the facts Dr. Selikoff works i:z~. This is what he knows frca his own investigations. New let us take a look at what he has done with these figures in order to dranatire the problem. - . SilDI 2 ------- PREDICTIONS * This slide shews Or. Selikoff's predictions about asbestos-related deaths in the Dnited States. Without going into details, Dr. Selikoff has arrived at his projections by the simple procedure of multiplying the percentage of deat.-.s from asbestos-related disease a.nong his insulation workers by the total number of employees in the entire industry. 29 You will Also r.c:e that ho has raises his projected death estimate to enormous heights ever the past year by si--ply increasing the base figure of employees exposed, while still retaining the prece.ntage multiplier of 24 per cent being experienced by the insulation workers. I might point out that this tactic, however improper and deceptive, has been an enormous success since each . * raising of the estimate has earned Dr. Selikcff correspondingly grater coverage by the media. So finer example exists of the total gullibility of the press than the manner m which Dr. Selikoff manipulated and played on their prejudices to gain publicity. I can readily envision the lot of them up there at Mount Sinai laughing themselves silly ever the ease with which they bambcotlad the press with these trumped-uo predictions Please don't get me wrong, gentlemen. : r.ivj litt.e . doubt.-that the insulation .workers are in fact dying as rapidly . . _a.j Dr-ieli^off says .they .are. The problem is he has translated. .. their Motility experience to the rest of the entire industry, . which is absolutely ridiculous. .In. the. .first place, the estti.-r.ated number of employees in the industry is too high------five tires too high to be precise. Even rare, important, according to an analysis by the . .Association of .mere than a doten mortality studies, inciudmg .those of Or.. SeliJcoff, cur prediction is that approximately 25,000 past and present employees in the asbestos industry have _died or will eventually die of asbestos-related disease. ^.This is less than one-thirteenth. of Or. SeliJccff's most recent estimate. la addition, our figures shew that '00 c; tha 05,000 deaths ----- or SO per cent -----win cccu: among :no s e - 31 - While these estimates should he reassuri.-.g sc :-;s saS^cSsEeesF~.1 0/ us in the mining and manufacturing areas of the industry. ve should not forget that 5,000 of our workmen are still going to die of asbestos-related disease and chat, all things consitdcred, there is absolutely nothin? that we can do to prevent it. The only thing we can do is to clean up cur plants to assure that those entering the industry in the future will not have cha'saae experience. irirj- SLITS 3------- GOVT^NMSNT ACINCIiS Within the past year a d a half, the rum thrust cf Association effort has shifted to the government affairs front. The principal agencies in Washington with which wo nave lean dealing are, of course, the Occupational Safety and Health jjjv Administration; the Environmental Protection Agency: the Feed and Drug Administration; the 3ureau cf Mines: and, to a lesser degree, the National Institute of Occupations! Safety and Maal-.h, 3 Alii the National Institutes os' Health, both of are mainly involved in research efforts. In addition,-a few weeks ago we were contacted by the Federal Trade Commission, which had received a petition from the Center cor Science in the Public Interest requesting an investigation of consumer uses of asbestos for the purpose of determining whether certain products ought.to be labeled as ha2ardous and whether warnings should be required on all ' advertisements for those products. On the basis of ny meeting with an investigator from the FTC I would say that we have little to worry about in this particular area. SI.IOS 4--------OSHA ' The Occupational Safety and Health Adornas era toon has bean of enormous concern to the industry over the past 13 months. Ac isost of you already knew, the Association exPc..dcc t.ca*tfous efrorts during the six month period 21 leading'to tho promulgation of last June's CSHA scar.aurdo on asbestos-.- I think it is a gauge of the effectiveness of t.-.e total industry involvement in this most crucial matter that 'of eleven main- requirements"in the standards, the industry position" vis' accepted totally by'OSKA on nine of the eleven', .-.bout fifty oercervt'-ch a ;torrth', *ar.d totally rejected on only one. i-Now, of course,- OSHA is planning to redo the standard package and we- are working closely with thorn on this project. The first step-will be*the-formation'cf'a IS man advisory committee-to review*'ch'e current standards and any additional data and. information that has been developed in the year si.nce the standards were promulgated. '. Working in cooperation with nine other trade associations, including your own, we-have selected four individuals as industry wide recommendations to CSHA for the" four so-called employer \ - 34 ! specs or. the advisory ecrr:::ie. The tour cccp-a solec-cd were Gey Cahrieiscn, President cf Nicclec; Ike v.'eaver c: Raybesees-Manhattan: Dr. Fred Pundsack, Vica President fer Research and Development o Johns-Kanville; and Cliff Sheckier. In discussing the formation of the advisory committee with John O'Neill of the OSKA Standards Davelcpment Section, ve were asked co add a couple of n&nes to the list so that - .- CSKA would have at least the se.mhlan.ee of a selection. This we have agreed to do. ^ The committee will he given up co nine months to complete tis deliberations and prepare for CSHA a revised standard package. This will he followed by public hearings, approximately a year from new. U'o do not expect to see a new atar.dard promulgated before the Fall af 1S74. I . 'I i !i < r ii I 1 _ U. It is cf course impossible so determine at this tire who; tie'.r.ew standard s will lock like, however, I would venture to say chat chey will certainly not be less strict than t.-.e ones we have today, although chey will probably be less contusing and leave less room for employer interpretation. Something will unquestionably be done to improve the current difficulties with the monitoring requirements. SUDS 5 ---- JflOSH ~hese slides, by the way, are merely simplified organisation charts of the various agencies with which we deal ia Washington. ' ?ho main function of the National Institute for "OceupYeional Safety and health is to conduct research and :u prepare so-called Criteria Packages, which are essentially recommendations to CSnA, for standards c.n various materials anc c..fisias. SwC.. a package on asbestos was tretared 36 by SICSH at the ci~e of tf.e OS".A proceedings list _ esr. hie;:-: wall ..not be preparing a r.eu or revised criteria package fcr the upct.tir.g review of the asbestos standards. ' Z do r.ot believe it would be unfair to say that of all the agencies in Washington dealing with asbestos, Or, SeliXoff has had his greatest influence on the ycur.g idealistic scientists and doctors at NlOSii. Consequently, . industry influence is weaXost in this agency. It was SICSK, after all, that made the original reccmer.dation for a two fiber standard in the asbestos industry. SLCCS 6--------?A Sext to OSKA, the Invironr.er.tal Protection Agency ha. the greatest potential of any federal agency for adversely affecting the future of the asbestos industry m this countrv. Not only is the IPA responsible for developing mi enforcing air and water pollution standards, but the Toxic Substances 37 Control Act, r.cw pending m Congress, wail also teccr-e an E?.\ function after passage. - ............. .................... For this reason, I am pleased to he able to say that the asbestos industry has an excellent relationship with the EPA. No finer proof of this- exists than the fact that there was r.o't a single major indu-stry recommendation or suggestion made to the EPA at the public hearings on the proposed asbestos emission regulations that was not accepted either in toto or in' principle* in the final-standards which, were published ir. early April of this year. We are presently worhir.g with the EPA cn the development of wastewater effluent standards for asbestos manufacturing plants. We fully' expect that these standards will turn out to be as reasonable as the air pollution regulations. The proposed effluent standards are scheduled to be published in the Federal Register m early duly. This will be followed by ' - 3S II VC * public hearings, probably ;n late July or August, with. rna final standards being prcnulgated in the Tall, perhaps as early as October. . We are also planning, in the near future, to rr.eet an Washington with representatives from the standards deveiepnen1 and enforceaer.t branches of the E?A to discuss with then questions of interpretation and compliance policy with regard to the r.ew air pollution regulations. We have already resolved cr.e interpretation question that is of special interest to the asbestos textile industry. Approximately two weeks ago 2 was asked by a neither company c the Association to find out whether the I?A was planning to require the manufacturers of asbestos safety clothing to register as potential emission sources under the law. i 1. 1I I 39 ' jn discussing she situation ever oho phone vim compliance officials,'T argued that the producers cf asbesccs safety clothing were not manufacturers as defined in the regulations'*6ut were instead only fabrication of an asbestos "product,"and as such,- should' noe have-to register as potentia eitiSsion sources." - - - - After our phone conversation ended, a brief treating was held anong the E?A compliance people. X was then called bach and informed that they agreed with me that the safety clothing producers should not be required to register. While this rather mir.br problem too* approximately an hour and a half and two or tr.ree chore calls to resolve, it is indicative of the type of day-co-day services that the Association provides for its mar-der companies. I - 40 - ' SLI'jE 7------- "DA * Over the past year the Food and Crug Admin5tragic has shown an increasing interest in asbestos as a possible hazardous contanir.ant in various foods, beverages and drugs Late in 1972 they set up an asbestos task force to review t situation and to propose regulations and guidelines where appropriate. . Thus far they hava concentrated their efforts in t areas----- on the use of asbestos-contar.ir.ated talc in food packaging and in cosmetics, and secondly, on the use of asb celuiose filter pads in the beverage and drug industries. In our first .-eating with the TZX task force last November on the filter problem, they demorstroced an appall ignorance about the health hazards of asbestos. Since then they have gotten or.e heck of a lot smarter, due at least in part to the tremendous amount of data and information w.-.ion 1 jjgl j 41 -- the Association has teen supplying to snem. As a ::::;:. tts f'JA is today less panicky about asbestos and :.'.::s:::; iBp- ' ipi __ less likely to propose foolish, ur.supportoble regulations. Spokesmen from the fCA have,in fact, defended the filter i against environmentalist attacks in the press and elsewher* 9BliPP ijWi ,:. recent months. This is, cuite obviously, a healthy sign. SLI3S 3------- INTSSTS? GROUPS Since our contacts with the National Institutes of ' Health have been quite minimal, ar.d since the health and lilj safety section of the Bureau of Mines is presently being reorganised, we can now proceed to take a brie; lock at the < various ineorest groups that have been in the forefront of hb the assault on asbestos. These are the groups and errant oat IplSl- . . ' that constitute "the other side.* IljBjll As you can see, there are a lot of them, and be twee them they con cnert powerful pressure on legislators o.-.d . administrators at all levels cf gevern-un;. v.WJ>\ BSI \ 42 Since time is not available to discuss each ci their activities and philosophies'in detail, I would like to say that we keep a close watch on all of them and are always prepared to take whatever action is appropriate when they step out of line. --. _ SLICC PROJECTOR err -------- LIGHT ON . Our activities in the area os Congressional relations have been quite minimal to date, although we are preparing for the upcoming struggle in Congress over workmen's compensation reform legislation, at which time asbestos is unquestionably going to be racked over the coals by Or. Selikoff and his compatriots in organioed labor. Unfortunately, the Association has neither the manpo.e nor the time to embark on a full-scale legislative information program. We have met on occasion with the legislative end legal assistants to various senator: who have attacked asicstcj - 42 however much .more. needs to'be dona-in this area-and I am afraid individual reader companies, are going, to have to be the prime ball carriers-and.not the-Association, r . - - - For essentially the saaa reason; our government 'activities at the state and local level have declined to essentially zero.over'the'past year ar.d a half. This has not been too serious-a deficiency as most of the authority of the cities and states in asbestos control has been usurped by .the .various Federal regulatory agencies. Nonetheless, mere individual company activity, is required at these levels of government. . .In conclusion, 1 thinJc we can all be justifiably pleased with what, we have been able to accomplish in the oast few years in resolving, the cornucopia, of interrelated problems that constitute the asbestos-health situation. - -u - ' 'Cuf-plants are -cleaner- and our warUncn bettor protected The general public -has- been- shown to: be in no danger iron asbestos,-lx it ever was.- While we have been regulated extensively, for the most part the standards that have been \ developed have net been as bad as we feared they night be, and in sone cases' they turned cut far better than wc ever dared hope. In addition, while we are still-talcing our lunps in the public press, the net effect of all this adverse publicity has-been shown to be-surprisingly snail. We have sweated a lot and we have groaned a let, but we are still standing and we are still viable. I sense today within the industry a greater feeling of confidence in the future than at any tir.a m the past few years. But we oust not' rest contented.- - 45 We must remember chat Cr. Scli.'-icfi has to cate teer. far 1ass successful than our industry has an influencing the decisions of the various governmental regulatory agencies. This will make him try harder. Just last week Z saw a speech \ _. of his in which he purposely misinterpreted some data by a distinguished British scientist in order to prove that ever. two fibers is not a sufficiently safe level for occupational exposure to asbestos. .` . ' The struggle is far from over. We must not only continue but indeed expand cur activities m the various areas of concern if we are to assure the future well-being of the asbestoi industry m the United States. Thanh you very much. ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE General Meeting June 7, 1973 Key Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia In Attendance 7MATEX CORPORATION W. Maa3kant M, J. Scanlan 11, H. Walter GARLOCK I1IC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION C. G. Guerin T. P. Jackson J. P. Power (C,J-M) W. B. Reitse V?. C. Streib NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. E. W. P.ussell j. K. t^ittaker H. K. PORTER COMPANY, E. C. P-ratt 0. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody IllC. PAYBESTOS-MANHATTiill, INC. M. M. Brooks J. W. Franpton, Jr. J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew ti. Q. Scov/croft 1. l!. Weaver "uMinOYAL, INC. W. D. Bittinaer B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringcr E. A. Morris ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. p. E. Leclerc HELL ASBESTOS MIMES LTD. U. ft. Smith LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. F.. A. Farrell R. Lcfebvro C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) 1tANUFACTURAS MULTIPLES F.P. R. Arnal Olivo CADVIALADER, UICKERSNAM & TAFT E. J. Leff M1ERICA" SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS P. O. tlicodenus ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE D. ft. Eagan, Executive Secretary GUESTS OF THE A.T.I. Asberit S.A. Marchello Cattaneo Adorno Asbestos Information Association/ North America Matthew M. Swotonic Industrial Safety Equipment Association Charles M. Fumwnlt, Jr. U.S. Bureau of Mines Robert A. Clifton Total attendance during the two-day meeting wan <1R people, including 10 v/oiacn and 3G mon - representing IS companies or associations. Pago 2 ATI General fleet inn C/7/71 m i v u t r: ?, 1. The General Mooting of tho Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President Q. Ccwcroft at 1:00 P.M., Juno 7, 1973. 2. President Scowcroft v/elcomcrt tho members anti guests in atten3ance and introduced four guests; namely, Matthew M. Swetonic, Executive Secretary, Asbestos Inforrmtion Asnociation/Morth America; Marchello Cattaneo Adorno, Asborit F.A.; Robert A. Clifton, Division of Nor.metallic Minerals, U.C. bureau of Mines; and Charles M. Sumwait, Jr., Secretary/Treasurer, Industrial Safety Equipment Association, and member of it3 Safety '..'oaring Apparel Product Group. 3. Following past tradition, President ^covcroft asked each nomber Tn attendance to rise and state his nano and company affiliation. 4. President Scovcrort called for the reading of the minutes of the last 3tatcd General Meeting. It war. moved by A. Muzmuk, seconded by T. P. Jackson, and, no carried, to dispense with tho reading of same. 5. Treasurer Z. A. Morris presented the deport of Funds of tho Institute as of April 30, 1973. C. r. qtiefk.en moved the report bo accepted. The notion was seconded by S. G. Dixit and so voted, unanimously. 7. copy of tho full Deport is attached to these Minutes. C. In tho absence of M. P. Alcorn, tho Iiegal Counsel address was given by Eugene J. Loff of Cadwalador, Wickershan f. Taft. The full text of his report in attached hereto. Mr. Leff discussed two cases -- one concerned v/ith the illegal division of the nark.et, and the other noting a connection between anti-trust violations and the private exorcise of governmental power. 7. VJ. H. Smith, Technical 6 Sales Representative, noil Asbestos Mines Ltd., delivered tho Fibre Producers' Report (see attached). Mr. Smith stated that crudes and ultra-long spinning fibers continue to be in short supply but medium and short spinning fibers from Grades 3F to 37. are in fair supply from most producers. Mo shortage in these grades is foreseen for the remainder of this year and a change in the situation is not indicated, at the present tire, for 1974. 3. Pursuant to calling for Committee Reports by the resooctive Chairmen, President 5co\;croft advised that C. G. Guerin had replaced I. Burnett on tho ATI Technical Committee. 9. The following reports of ATI activities at the Committee level were presented by tho respective Chairmen to the general membership. A copy of each Report is attached hereto, i.o.: Page 3 ATI General flouting K/7/73 Air Hygiene & Manufacturing - n. r. Carden, Chairman; Asbestos Advisory - r. W. Russell, Chairman; Technical - J. VJ. Ccherd, Chairman; Fiber Research & Tenting - C. E. Stiofkon, Chairman; Environmental Health - L. F. Dierir.gor, Chairman, * 10. It was related by President Scov/croft that recent technological breakthroughs in basic yarn production techniques have influenced the Institute to seek wider representation in its membership. It was reported that as a result, the ATI Hoard of Governors had approved a change in the Constitution and By-Laws of the Institute involving Associate Membership requirements. Article III, Para graph 2(c) of the Constitution has been revised no follows: "those weavers of asbcstos-containinq fabrics and tapes, for resale as such, who do not manufacture the asbestos-containing yarns used in same, shall be eligible for Associate Membership in this Institute." 11. President Scovcroft referred to the new identification cards tKat had been given to each momher in attendance, ashing that they be returned to the Executive Secretary for uso at future meetings. 12. As stated by President Scowcroft, there seems to bo some diffi culty with the postal process in that some reservation cards are not arriving at ATI headquorters. In an endeavor to avoid undue prohlems at future meetings, it was advised that each menber who nakos a reservation with the Executive Secretary would receive a brief acknowledgment within approximately ten days' tine. If sane doo3 not arrive in duo course, it would bo well to so advise the Secre tary . 13. The next General Meeting of 'the Asbestos Textile Institute will be held: October 3-f>, 197 3 Uyclinore Harbor Club, Marwichport, Massachusetts Guest Speaker will be L)r. J. Corbett McDonald, Epidemiologist, McGill University, and Medical Adviser to the Ouebec Asbestos Min ing Association. 14. President Scov/croft advised that every effort is bring made to oblige the wishes of the nenborship-at-large by scheduling, when ever possible, future General Meetings of the Institute so that they end on Fridays. Beginning in 197*1, future ncetings will be: February 7-8, 1974, at the Mills Hyntt House, Charleston, South Carolina; June 6-7, 1974, at Twin Bridges Marriott, Mashing ton, D.C.; Septenbcr 25-27, 1974, at The Cloister, Sen Island, Georgia; February G-7, 1975, at Holiday Inn-Independence Mall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Tentative future meeting sites include Tonte Vedra Club, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, in October 1975 and the Marriott in Mow Orleans, Louisiana, in February 197 6. 15. Before introducing the Guest Speaker, President Scov/croft re ferred to five booklets that were distributed prior to calling the Page 4 ATI General Hooting 6/7/73 mooting to order. Just off the press, the hook-lets were published by tha AIA/GA and aro entitled: The Asbestos Information Associa tion/North America, What Asbestos Is--Mow And tfhero It In Used, Asbestos And Health, Questions and Answers--Asbestos And Health, and Protecting The Asbestos Worker. Single copies of the booklets arc available from the AIA/MA, 22 East 40th Street, TJew York, 'lew York 1001C (bulk rates on request]. '* ' 16. President Scowcroft introduced the Guest fpeakcr: Matthew M. Swetonic, Executive Secretary, .Asbestos Information Association/ North America. Mr. Ewetonic (whose profile is..attached) discussed the AIA/HA, its formation, its history and the .vjork it is doinq on behalf of the asbestos industry in the United states. Ho also talked about the impact of OSHA and F.PA regulations to control the amount of asbestos dust in the atmosphere. He discussed the ques tion: Why han the Asbestos Industry been singled out by government, the press and various conservative groups? Ho stated that the industry is passing through a crisis period in the tJ.S. and that closer tics between trade associations would be beneficial. Ur, Swotonic advised that he has been talking v/ith the press about asbestos and health since 1968 and that out of 150-179 reporters, only 2 were over 35. V.'e are dealing with a young and idealistic group, he said. Prom a survey taken of the av/arencss and attitudes toward tho use of asbestos, it was discovered that asbc3to3 is relatively unknown to the general public. The situation changes little between urban and rural areas. It was interesting to note that the survey indicated that those in the 1G-25 age bracket knew little about asbestos but that awareness increased in those interviev/ed who were between 40 and 40 years of age. A copy of Mr. Sv/otonic's presentation, in its entirety, is attached to these Minutes. 17. There being no further business to be brought before tho membership, tho meeting was adjourned at approximately 3:00 P.M., as per a notion by E. A. Farrell, seconded by r. A. Morris, and. unanimously approved, by the attending members. respectfully submitted, Doris M. Pagan 9 Executive Seecretary NOTE: Enclosed herewith is your copy of the Constitution and By Laws of the .Asbestos Textile Institute, revised ns of June 6, 1973. Paragraph 9 of tha By-Laws (page 7) is subject to approval by the Internal Pevonuc Service. Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute JUN 7 1973 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE General Meeting June 7, 1973 Key Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia In Attendance IMATEX CORPORATION W. Maaskant M. J. Scanlan H. E. Walter GARLOCX IIIC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION C. G. Guerin T. P. Jackson J. P. Power (C.J-M) W. B. Reitze \1. C. Streib NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. E. W. Russell J. K. ITiittaker H. K. PORTER C0J1PANY, E. C. Eratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody INC RAYEESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. M. Brooks J. W. Frarapton, Jr. J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew M. Q. Scowcroft I. H. Weaver UNIROYAL, INC. W. D. Bittinger B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer E. A. Morris ASBESTOS CORPORATIC?! LTD. P. E. Leclerc BELL ASPrSTOS MINES LTD. U. H. Smith lake asbestos of Quebec ltd. E. A. Farrell R. Lefebvre C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) fIA17UFACTURAS MULTIPLES S.A. R. Arnal Olivo CADWALADER, UICKERSITAM & TAFT E. J. Leff AFRICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AMD MATERIALS P. O. Nicodemus ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE n. M. Fagan, Executive Secretary GUESTS OF THE A.T.I. Asberit S.A. Marchello Cattaneo Adorno Asbestos Information Association/ North America Matthew M. Swetonic Industrial Safety Equipment Association Charles N. Furrrwalt, Jr. U.S. Bureau of Mines Robert A. Clifton Total attendance during the two-day meeting was 48 people, including 10 women and 38 men - representing 18 companies or associations. Page 2 ATI General Meeting 6/7/73 M I IT U 7 E S 1. The General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute was called to order by President M. Q. Scowcroft at 1:00 P.M., Juno 7, 1973. 2. President Scowcroft welcomed the nenbers and guests in atten dance and introduced four guests; namely, Matthew M. Swetonic, Executive Secretary, Asbestos Information Association/Horth America; Mar.chello Cattaneo Adorno, Asberit S.A.; Robert A. Clifton, Division of Monmetallic Minerals, U.S. Dureau of Mines; and Charles H. Sumwait, Jr., Secretary/Treasurer, Industrial Safety Equipment Association, and member of it3 Safety Hearing Apparel Product Group. 3. Following past tradition. President Scowcroft asked each member In attendance to rise and state his nano and company affiliation. 4 President Scowcroft called for the reading of the minutes of the last stated General Meeting. It wa3 moved by A. Ruzmuk, seconded by T. P. Jackson, and so carried, to dispense with the reading of same. 5. Treasurer 2. A. Morris presented the Report of Funds of the Institute as of April 30, 1973. C. E. Stiofken moved the report be accepted. The motion was seconded by S. G. Dixit and so voted, unanimously. A. copy of the full Report is attached to these Minutes. 6. In the absence of H. 3. A.lcorn, the Legal Counsel address was given by Eugene J. Leff of Cadvalader, Wickersham & Taft. The full text of his report is attached hereto. Mr. Leff discussed two cases -- one concerned with the illegal division of the market, and the other noting a connection between anti-trust violations and the private exercise of governmental power. 7. w. H. Smith, Technical 6 Sales Representative, Dell Asbestos Mines Ltd., delivered the Fibre Producers' Report (see attached). Mr. Smith stated that crudes and ultra-long spinning fibers continue to be in short supply but medium and short spinning fibers from Grades 3F to 32 are in fair supply from, most producers. Mo shortage in these grades is foreseen for the remainder of this year and a change in the situation is not indicated, at the present time, for 1974. 8. Pursuant to calling for Committee Reports by the resoective Chairmen, President Scowcroft advised that C. G. Guerin had replaced I. Barnett on the A.TI Technical Committee. 9. The following reports of ATI activities at the Committee level were presented by the respective Chairmen to the general membership. A copy of each Report is attached hereto, i.e.: Page 3 ATI General Meeting P/7/73 Air Hygiene & Manufacturing - p. r. Carden, Chairrr.cn; Asbestos Advisory - E. W. Russell, Chaiman; Technical - J. W. Echerd, Chairman; Fiber Research & Testing - C. E. Stiefken, Chaiman; Environnental Health - L. F. Diaringer, Chaiman. 10. It was related by President Scowcroft that recent technological breakthroughs in basic yarn production techniques have influenced the Institute to seek wider representation in its membership. It was reported that as a result, the ATI Board of Governors had approved a change in the Constitution and By-Laws of the Institute involving Associate Membership requirements. Article III, Para graph 2(c) of the Constitution has been revised as follows: "those weavers of asbestos-containina fabrics and. tapes, for resale as such, who do not manufacture the asbestos-containing yarns used in same, shall be eligible for Associate Membership in this Institute." 11. President Scowcroft referred to the new identification cards that had been given to each member in attendance, ashing that they be returned to the Executive Secretary for use at future meetings. 12. As stated by President Scowcroft, there seer.s to be some diffi culty with the postal process in that some reservation cards are not arriving at ATI headquarters. In an endeavor to avoid undue prohlers at future meetings, it was advised that each member who nakes a reservation with the Executive Secretary would receive a brief acknowledgment within approximately ten days' tine. If same does not arrive in duo course, it would be well to so advise the Secre tary. 13. The next General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute will be held: October 3-5, 1973 Uyclmere Harbor Club, Marwichport, Jlassachusetts Guest Speaker will be Dr. J. Corbett McDonald, Epidemiologist, McGill University, and Medical Adviser to the Quebec Asbestos Min ing Association. 14. President Scowcroft advised that every effort is lining made to oblige the wishes of the membership-at-large by scheduling, '-rhencver possible, future General .Meetings of the Institute so that they end on Fridays. Beginning in 1974, future meetings will be: February 7-8, 1974, at the Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina; June 6-7, 1974, at Twin Bridges Marriott, Hashinqton, D.C.; September 25-27, 1974, at The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia; February 6-7, 1975, at Holiday Inn-Indopendonce Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Tantativo future meeting 3ites include Ponte Vedra Club, Ponte Vedra Peach, Florida, in October 1275 and the Marriott in Mew Orleans, Louisiana, in February 1976. 15. Before introducing the Guest Speaker, President Scowcroft re ferred to five booklets that were distributed prior to calling the Pago 4 ATI General Meeting 6/7/73 meeting to order. Just off the press, the booklets were published by the AIA/NA and are entitled: The Asbestos Information Associa tion/North America, ffhat Asbestos Is--Mow And Inhere It Is Used, Asbestos And Health, Questions and Ans*'ers--Asbestos Ard Health, and Protecting The Asbestos Torkar. Single copies of the booklets are available from the AIA/NA, 22 par,t 40th ctreot, Nv-w vork, "ew York 1001C [bulk-rates on request]. 16. President Scowcroft introduced the Guest fpeaker: Matthew M. Gwetonic, Executive Secretary, .Asbestos Information Association/ North America. Mr. Gwetonic (whose profile is attached) discussed, the AIA/NA, its formation, its history and the .work it is cloincr on behalf of the asbestos industry in the Unitecl States. He also talked about the impact of OGHA and EPA regulations to control the amount of asbestos dust in the atmosphere. Ha discussed the cruestion: Why has the Asbestos Industry been singled out by government, the press and various conservative groups? He stated that the industry is passing through a crisis period in the U.G. and that closer ties between trade associations would be beneficial. *lr. Gwetonic advised that he has been talking with the press about asbestos and health since 1968 and that out of 150-175 reporters, only 2 were over 35. Ue are dealing vrith a young and idealistic group, he said. From a survey taken of the awareness and attitudes toward the use of asbestos, it was discovered that asbestos is relatively unknown to the general public. The situation changes little between urban and rural areas. It was interesting to note that the survey indicated that those in the 10-25 age bracket know little about asbestos but that awareness increased in those inter viewed who were between 40 and 40 years of age. A copy of Mr. Gwetonic's presentation, in its entirety, is attached to these Minutes. 17. There being no further business to be brought before the membership, the neeting was adjourned at approximately 3:00 P.M., as per a motion by E. A. Farrell, seconded by r. A. Morris, and unanimously approved by the attending members. respectfully submitted Doris M. Fagan, w Executive Secretary MOTE: Enclosed herewith is your copy of the Constitution and By Laws of the .Asbestos Textile Institute, revised as of June 6, 1973. Paragraph 9 of the By-Laws (page 7) is subject to approval by the Internal havenue Service. FIBRE PRODUCERS' REPORT [Presented at ATI General Meeting, June 7, 1973, at Moy Pridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia] There has been an increasing demand throughout the world in 1973 for a number of fibre grades, notably in 4 Group and 7 Group. After the fall-off in 1972 in 5 and fi Group fibres, this market has begun to recover, although not to th sane extent as the previously-mentioned 4 and 7 Groups. Of main interest to members of the A.T.I. are the spinning fibre Group 3 grades. Crudes and ultra-long spinnings continue to be in short supply, but the medium and short spinnings in the 3F to 3Z range are in fair supply from most producers. Mo shortage is foreseen in these grades during ln73, although individual produ cers may be tight in some specific gradings. There are no indications at present that there will be a marked change during 1974 in spinnings; however, in short fibres, the current oversupply of 6D fibres nay be closer to balance next year. One or two new nines in Canada are scheduled to come into produc tion in 1975, but there is no likelihood that they will produce any spinning fibres. The same is true of new sources in Australasia. Via Iter IT. Smith Technical & Sales Representative Hell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 7, 1973 - - -'ey Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia The Committee met r'ith sixteen members and guests in attendance, representative of ten companies, as follows: Amatcx Corporation I!. H. baiter, Uorristowr, Pennsylvania Asberit 3.A. M. Cattcaneo (Adorno) , Rio do Janeiro, Brazil Cadwalader, bickersham & Taft F.. J. Leff, New York City Canadian Johns-Manvillc Company Ltd. - J. P. Power, Asbestos, Quebec Garlock Inc. S. G. Dixit, Palmyra, New York Johns-Manville Corporation C. G. Guerin, Manvillo, New Jersey W. B. Reitze, Denver, Colorado Lake A.sbestos of Quebec Ltd. E. A. Farrell, New York City R. L. Lefebvre, nlac?' Lake, Quebec II. K. Porter Company, Inc. E. C. Bratt, Charlotte, North Carolina L. E. Iloody, Charlotte, North Carolina Raybostos-Ilanhattan, Inc. R. T. Matthew, North Charleston, fiouth Carolina I. II. Weaver, tlanhein, Pennsylvania Uniroyal, Inc. W. D. Bittinger, Ninnsboro, Bouth Carolina R. E. Carden, Hogansville, Georgia L. F. Dieringer, Middlcbury, Connecticut The meeting included discussions in the following areas: dust (fiber) counts improvements, special chocking, etc.; and recent experiences with 05ILA inspections. When taking dust counts, one company now is using a method of placing the filter intake valve near the person's mouth and nose Page 2 - Minutes of the ATI Air Hygiene 6 Ufa. Committee - P/7/73 and in soma cases will use two units with the second on the employee's shoulder. Also, it was pointed out, again, that the height of the person being checked has some bearing on the dust count. Oust on fiber samples, when checked by different people, shows a difference or a variation of as much as 5 to 1 and an average of 40% variation, plus or minus, with more variation on higher counts. Spacing of equipment using a larger area and using a second unit to recirculate the air has shown sone rcau.tion in dust counts. 'Then stripping cards, use hoods placed as low as possible over the area and strip with a hrush attached to a vacuum. Pone plants utilize the Abington system when stripping cards. One plant reported the use of a light spray (T-E-X) on mixes using roughly 2%, while another plant sprays carrier only with a mixture of water and ban-set. Both plants report some reduction in dust as a result of using the sprays. In a recant plant inspection by OSHA, one company received several fines for the following items: 1) Some employees with no respirators; 2) Company had not provided protective clothing in required areas; 3) Citations resulting in two S700.00 fines for exceeding five (5) iibors in one area and a time-weighted average of over ten (10) fibers in another area. , In some recent cases the OCHA Agency has reduced dust counts by 25% before actually issuing a citation. Sone plants are using rental uniforms and lockers hoth furnished by the rental uniform people. The uniforms, two per employee each week, averages about $2.50 weekly. In most cases the rental unifom is a short-sleeved shirt and pants only, and this has been acceptable. Respectfully submitted, Duel F. Carden, Chairman MINUTES ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 7, 1973 -- bey Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: E. V. Russell, Chairman T. P. Jackson A. Nuzmuk M. J. Scanlan I. Q. Scovcroft D. M. Fagan, ATI Executive Secretary E. J. Leff, ATI Legal Counsel The Board of Governors of the Asbestos Textile Institute took action at its September 1972 meeting to change the Institute's Constitution and By-Lavs. The change permitted weavers of asbestos-containing fabrics and tapes, for resale as such, who do not manufacture the asbestos yarns used in same, to he eligible for Associate Membership. In light of this action, the .Asbestos .Advisory Committee was requested to determine a method of extending membership. After considering several alternatives, the Committee ac cepted the offer of !1. Q. Scovcroft to prepare a news release for insertion in the July 1973 issue of ACDESTOS magazine. The release will state the By-Law change and will publicly extend membership to those qualified and interested. T. P. Jackson of Johr.s-Manvilla Corporation will serve as Membership Chairman. Respectfully submitted, E. N. Russell, Chairman  i H I NO ? E S TECHNICAL COMKITTFE Asbestos Textile Institute June 6 & 7, 1973 - - Key Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia IN ATTEHDANCE J. l'. Hawkins, Raybcstos-Mnnhattan, Inc. M. Mnaskar.t, /matex Corporation P. 0. Uicodemus, General electric Company/AFTU C. G. Guerin, Johns-Uanvi.1.lo Corporation J. T. Ec'.ierd (Chairman) , !:. H. Porter Company, Inc. Carl G. Guerin, of Johns-Manville Corporation, was welcomed as a new member of the ATI Technical Committee, replacing Irvin Barrett. A special meeting of the Committee was hold on June *th to review the iASTM Standards for Yarn, Coving, and Lap. The Committee's proposed statements on precision and. accuracy were approved by the Editorial Committee of ASTf- 0-13 as being editorial. However, the statements were rejected by the AGTM Standards Editor who spe cified they must be put to letter ballot after assigning a schedule for intor-laboratory testing. The samples of yarn, roving and lap will be analyzed by Raybcstos-Manhattan, Inc., Amatex Corporation, General Electric Company, Garlock Inc. and I!. I'.. Porter Company, Inc. Testing should be completed prior to the Spring 1974 meeting. The Johns-ltan^ille tumbler-test procedure was discussed as a means to determine the relative dustiness of various asbestos products. J. U. Hawkins will determine if.this equipment is available for ATI evaluation. The faasibiiity of building a similar tester also will be considered. ASTM Subcommittee 013.14 has been requested by the U.S. Havy to change 0-315 Asbestos Tapes to conform with Federal Specification KII-T-17P2 so it may be used for direct procurement purposes. Re vision '-'ould require the addition of a quality assurance provision, a section on packaging and an obsolete table on tape styles. The ATI Technical Committee feels that this information should not be included in a "Material Specification." P. 0. t'icodemus 'fill re view the objectionable items with ASTI* before replying to the "avy. A draft of proposed Military Specification MIL-I-3053F--"Insula tion, Electrical, Asbestos-Fihor, Treated and Untreated" was submitted for approval. The Chairman was instructed to request an extension for comments until after the October 1973 Connittee meet ing. Respectfully submitted, J. U. Echerd, Chairman MI il U T E S FIBER RESEARCH fl TESTING COMMITTEE Ashostos Textile Institute June 7, 197 3 -- I'.ey Bridge Harriott, Arlington, ''irginia IN ATTENDANCE: '1, C. Etreib, Johns-Manville Corporation H. Snith, Boll Asbestos Mines Ltd, D. E. Childers, M. Porter Cor.pr.r.' . Tuc. C. E. Gtiefhun (Tiaiman) , Anericni siting Refining Co. The meeting vas totally devoted to discussions of the progress of the 3rd Edition of the Chrvsotile Asbestos Test Manual. It was noted that the AGFA (.Asbestos Cement Products Association) has become defunct and all references to that organization have been removed from the net' manual. It was decided that for future test deletions, a substitute page would bo inserted into the manual, containing the previous test number with an explanation of the reason for deletion. It would be indicated that the cost could be obtained from ATI, if required. Since ACPA. is defunct, the .ATI has, for the record, aarond to sponsor an original ACTA test -- Strength in Asbestos Cement Products, F-3. Test G-9, Tail Magnetic Rating, has been approved for snonsorship by the ATI. The Test Manual has boon assembled in rough form, requiring some editorial changes. This draft '.rill now be reviewed by the ATI Fiber Research & Testing Committee. Alien approved, the draft will be submitted to the printer for a reasonahly-accuratn cost estimate. All original typing, sketches and photographs will then be assembled for printing, hopefully by the end of this summer. It will be helpful for the membership to submit copy reouironents to Doris Fagan as soon as possible. Respectfully submitted, C. E. Etiefhen, Chairman M!rD7E5 Eb'VIROITIZNTAL HEALTH CO.'JMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 7, 1973 -- Key Cridxre Marriott, Arlington, Virginia No formal meeting of the Committee was held, unc1 the throe nemhers sat in on the discussions of the Air Hygiene & tlnnufacturinq Committee. As of meeting tine, the following is the status of various pro posed OSTIA occupational health standards "hich are of interest to ramber companies: 1) Noise -- A Department of Labor Standards Advisory Commit tee is meeting periodically to consider this standard. At its meeting in Boston on `lay 21, 1973, the American Confer ence of governmental Hygienists (ACCITT) recommended the adoption of a notice of intent to change the Noise Threshold Limit Values to C5 dRA for an C-hour-a-day, tine-weighted exposure. At the CEIL'. Standards Advisory Committee meeting in Washington, D.C., on .lay 32, 1973, Dr. V. II. Nildyard, Committee Chairman, stated that the level of -exposure to noise for employees will probably remain at 99 dEA. 2) Heat Stress - ACGIH also recommended at its Boston meeting the adoption of the Heat Stress Threshold Limit Values which were published as a notice of intent in 1972. It differs slightly from those recommended hy NIOSIT in its criteria package in that permissible work-rest regimens are specified. The status of the proposed standards is clouded by recent criticism that the IXCT index is not an adequate indicator of heat stress. Proposals have bean made that sweat rates and heart rates are more indicative of heat stress. Recent articles of interest from the Annuals of Occupational Hy giene, Volume 16, 1973, house organ for the British Occupational Hygiene Society, are: 1) Pages 1-5, Hygiene standards for Airborne Amosito Asbes tos Dust - "The subcommittee (on asbestos) has reviewed the information on human exposure to airborne Anosite dust and animal experiments. The subcommittee believes it has insuf ficient knot 'ledge of the relationship between airborne Amosite dust exposure an:l the ris): of asbestosis to permit an accurate statement of the degree of protection afforded by a specified hygiene standard. Nevertheless, on the basis of comparisons between the affects of Amosite and Chrysotilr dust on men and animals, it is recommended that the standards on Anosite should be no less stringent than those for Chr^so- tilo." ` 2) Page 7, Review of the Hygiene Standard for Chrysotile Asbestos Dust - Based on .i.nfomation of Quebec mortality and REMARKS Or COUNSEL Asbestos Textile institute General 'looting Junu 7, 1373, Arlington, Virginia At the: February General Mooting in Atlanta, Wendell Alcorn presented to you remarks of counsel dealing with illegal divisions of territory among competing sellers. The cases he referred to then dealt with explicit agreements in which the nap was carved un among the soiling companies involved on the principle of "on:: region one company". The decided cases have hold such agreements to be unlawful, with a few limited exceptions. A recent case has focused attention on the division of markets where the agreement or plan is not clearly spelled out. In Hobart Erothers Company v. Malcolm T. Gilliand, Inc., 471 F.2d 894 (5th Cir. 1973), cert, aenied-, 41 U.E.L.U. 31?.2 (:toy 29, 1973), a distributor of welding equipment was assigned by the manufacturer "primary responsibility" for d.istribution in Northern Georgia. Che natural commercial instincts of the firm, however, led it to begin selling in Tennessee, which was not only outside the Northern Georgia territory, but was "ithin an area supplied directly by the manufac turer. Eventually, the distributorship agreement was cancelled by the manufacturer, and the distributor sued the manufacturer, charging an illegal division of territories. Tho defense emphasized the absence of a written contract prohibit ing the distributor from selling in any particular area. Thera had boon such an agreenent years earlier, hut counsel had. remedied that problem by drafting new contracts assigning "areas of prirary responsibility", which did not on their face limit sales elsewhere. Tho courts nevertheless held the arrangement to be illegal. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that "A silont understanding can be shewn by the course of conduct of the parties." The chief damaging evidence was an intra-office nero from the Tennessee dis trict representative of the manufacturer to the hone office which reported tho distributor's sales in Tennessee and urged the manu facturer to "counter" by selling directly in the distributor's territory, Northern Georgia. One of the important teachings of this case is that compliance with the antitrust law3 - whether the issue is prices, distribution schemes, refusals to deal with certain companies, or any other sensitive trade regulation natter - is not achieved .by nerolv avoiding the obvious, spelled out forms of transgression. Gars muwt be taken not to lessen competition indirectly or through unexpressed understandings as well. Having mentioned violations of the law through more devious means, which seems to me appropriate at this gathering, so close to the Watergate building, I would like to note another connection tetween antitrust law and politics. Page 2 - P-orarlis of Counsol General ;'.noting - 6/7/7 3 Trade associations as vail as other commercial aroups can run afoul of the lav by assuming power in their private activities which proDerly belongs to the government. The early price-fixing cases reflect the viev that private parties should net be permitted to regulate so sensitive a feature of the economy as prices. Similarly, any joint action which excludes certain companies from important commercial benefits is viewed by the courts as the imposition of a punishment - which is a power reserved to the courts. In Fashion Originators' Guild, Inc, v. federal '"'rade Commission, 312 U.S. 45) (1941), for example, a combination of manufacturers cf women's garments and nanufacturors of textiles tried to prevent the copying of their fashionable clothes by so-called "style pirates". The fashionable clothes group refused to sell their products to manufacturers or retailers of garments who deceit with the competing "style pirates". The Supreme Court rejected the defense that such a practice was justified by the necessity of ridding the business of unscrupulous garment designers. The Court said: "... the combination is in reality an extra-governmental agency, which prescribes rules for the regulation and re straint of interstate commerce, and provides extra judicial tribunals for determination and punishment of violations, and thus 'trenches upon the power of the national legislature and violates the statute' [i.c., the Sherman Act]." 312 tT.S. at 4C5. So long as private companies retain their competitive individuality, however, and restrict their joint efforts to constructive objectives which reasonably serve that individuality, there is little danger of antitrust difficulties. rugene -T. T,cff, Attorney CAD'TAIADFR, UICKEF-SFAM & TAT ABOUT THE SPEAKER The names Matthew M. Swetonic and Asbestos Infor mation Association/North America are synonymous. It was Matt who developed the original AIA/NA Prospectus in the Fall of 1970 and who prepared the presentations for both the introductory and the organization meetings. Upon J-M's decision to move its corporate head quarters to Denver and Matt's electing not to make the move, he was employed as AIA/NA's first full-time Executive Secretary. For the first three months of 1972 he handled two jobs: Manager of Environmental Affairs for J-M and Executive Secretary for AIA/NA. During this time he orga nized the industry effort for the EPA and OSHA hearings and wrote for others or presented himself six major presentations in a period of 45 days, a record which he states he hopes he "will be never asked to break." Matt is 30 years of age and is married. He is a native New Yorker, was reared in Easton, Penna., and now resides in Manhattan. He holds a B.A. in Creative Writing and an M.S. in Journalism. Following a tenure as Feature Writer for The Eas ton Express, he joined J-M in July 1965 as Associate Editor of News/Pic, an employee maga zine. He was promoted to Editor in January 1967 and one year later was named Coordinator, Special Projects. This is the job that granted him the expertise to superbly fulfil his duties as Execu tive Secretary of the AIA/NA as the major respon sibilities included writing J-M asbestos-health position papers, preparing speeches on asbestoshealth for top J-M executives, working with J-M public relations counsel and learning asbestoshealth literature backwards and forwards. WHY ASBESTOS ? A Presentation Before the Asbestos Textile Institute Arlington, Virginia - June 7, 1973 By: Matthew M. Swetonic, Executive Secretary Asbestos Information Association/Morth America I am sure that many of you have asked yourselves, as I have asked myself, why has the asbestos industry seemingly been singled out as the prime target for so many assaults by government, labor, the press, certain segments of the medical profession, and by various environmental and consumer activist groups? Why us? Can asbestos really be all that bad? Are the products we produce truly going to kill millions of Americans/ as some experts have predicted? Or is there some sort of nefarious conspiracy afoot to destroy the asbestos industry? The answer to the question of "Why us" is both complex and simple. Complex because it is a combination of three interrelated but separate factors. Ginple because each of the factors is, when considered by itself, quite obvious. The three factors are (1) asbestos can cause disease, (2) a spokes man arose to champion the need for asbestos control, and (3) a cornucopia of new government agencies were set up to control materials and products that can cause disease. Let us look at each of these factors in turn. First, there is no doubt that the inhalation of substantial amounts of asbestos can lead to increased rates of various types of lung disease, including two forms of cancer. These are facts which can not be denied, even if they do not apply in all circumstances and under all conditions. The medical literature is full of solid evi dence linking asbestos to disease. In my office, I have on file more than 2,000 medical papers dealing with the health risks of asbestos and hundreds more are published every year. Secondly, the spreading of concern over the health risks of asbes tos has as its prime spokesman one of the most talented medical publicists of the age -- Dr, Irving J. Selikoff of Mew York's Mount Sinai Hospital. Not only is Dr. Selikoff capable of arousing the ire and moral indignation of the most conservative reporter or politician with his graphic descriptions and predictions of the ravages of asbestos, but he has also surrounded himself with a group of similarly talented associates who have carried the Mount Sinai message to the far corners of the nation. While Dr. Selikoff has, in his zeal, unquestionably painted a far darker picture than the facts warrant, we should always remember in his defense that the insulation workers he has be>n studying for Page 2 - tlhy Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/NA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 more than a decade were and still are dying from asbestos related disease at an appalling rate. Such a situation would be sufficient to make a crusader out of the most conservative of scientists. Finally, in the past decade there has been a tremendous growth in public and governmental interest in environmental and occupational health matters. This interest has been translated into a series of far-reaching laws affecting industry in a manner hitherto unknown in this or any other country. I believe it is accurate to say that these new laws, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Clean Air Act, the Consumer Product Safety Act, and others, have forever altered the concept of the free enterprise system as it was known in this country for a hundred and fifty years. Thus, in combination, these three factors created a situation in which a cadre of freshly created federal agencies, with strong statutory authority, were prodded into assigning priority status to asbestos by Dr. Selikoff and his followers, who achieved these ends through skillful use of the great wealth of negative asbestos-health data contained in the medical literature. In short, the asbestos industry was singled out because it was vulnerable to attack, because there was someone willing to lead that attack, and because Congress had graciously provided the vehicles for such an assault. The background of industry efforts to deal with the asbestos-health problem as a national issue goes back nearly a decade, to Dr. Selikoff's now famous 1964 seminar on asbestos disease at the New York Academy of Sciences. While this seminar did much to prick the industry's conscience about asbestos and health, the problem still remained one of limited public and press interest until around 1967, when the media began beating the medical bushes searching for stories that would graphically portray American industry's supposed disregard for the environment and for the health and safety of its workmen and the American public. The asbestos-health problem was found to be tailor-made for such stories. As a result, starting with Paul Brodeur's infamous New Yorker article of March 1968, asbestos has since grown into an item of major press interest. In those years, industry efforts to combat the spate of negative press articles on asbestos were carried on primarily by the Johns.Manville Corporation, which set up a task force of specialists in various fields to do what it could to portray the problem in its proper perspective. While some minor successes were achieved, it was found that no one company acting independently could adequately or effectively represent an entire industry in dealing with the press and with government officials. As a result, in late 1970, eight companies gathered in New York City to launch the Asbestos Information Association of North America, Page 3 - Why Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/HA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 which was patterned after the Eritish Asbestos Information Commit tee, which had been established some three years earlier. In our original concept, the Association would limit its activities to providing accurate, unbiased information on asbestos and health to the press, to the public and to interested politicians and other government officials. It must be remembered that at this particu lar time, the enormous problems that would later develop with regard to OSHA and other Federal regulatory agencies were as yet on the distant horizon and basically unrecognized by the industry. Fortunately -- and properly -- the Association has had the wisdom to alter its original limited concept of its proper functions, and now endeavors to assume whatever activities and responsibilities it deems necessary to protect the interests of the asbestos manufac turing industry in the United States vis-a-vis asbestos-health. From this rather narrow initial public relations concept, the Association has grown in the last two years into an organization with priorities in eight major fields of endeavor. These are: Medical Affairs, Legal Affairs, Environmental Control, Customer Relations, Employee Relations, Inter-industry Relations, Publicity and Public Relations, and Government Affairs. To take these activities one at a time, let us start with medical affairs. It is an obvious fact that if an organization is to speak authori tatively on a medical matter, it must not only be steeped in the literature of that particular medical subject, but it must also keep itself constantly informed of new discoveries and developments. This we have accomplished in a number of ways. For example, by sending representatives to important medical meetings, such as the 1972 Lyon, France, international conference on the biological effects of asbestos, which was sponsored by the World Health Organi zation. We also meet on an irregular basis with various medical experts in the field, both from the United States and abroad, to review and discuss recent developments and discoveries. Our literature research is eased considerably by receiving the monthly medical paper distribution of the Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health in Montreal, which is funded by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. This year, for the first time, the AIA has elected to sponsor medical research of its own. Currently underway is a completely AIA/NA funded study of chest sounds, which is being conducted by Dr. Raymond Murphy of the Harvard School of Public Health. The purpose of the study is to find a new method of determining an individual's potential susceptibility to asbestos disease. Page 4 - Why Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/NA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 The Association has also recently decided to contribute to some very exciting research into a possible cure for mesothelioma through electromotive treatment. This study is being conducted at Somerset Hospital in Hew Jersey. In the legal affairs area, the Association participated in an amicus curiae capacity in the law suit brought by the Industrial Union Department of the AFL/CIO against the Occupational Safety and Health Administration on the asbestos standards. In our brief the Association supported OSHA against the IUD, somewhat of a unique position for an industry to find itself in vis-a-vis a governmental regulatory agency. Oral argument on the case was held April 4 in Washington, While a decision has yet to be handed down by the Court of Appeals, we are confident that the case will be decided in our favor. The Association has retained the services of a special technical consultant on environmental control affairs. At the present time, he is working with the AIA/NA Environmental Control Sub-Committee on the development of a series of five Association compliance manuals on the OSHA standards. Last year, because of the well established unreliability of the membrane filter method a3 a monitoring tool in the asbestos industry, the AIA undertook the sponsorship of a study at a research laboratory in California to determine the effect of certain variables on the overall accuracy of the method. The results of the study showed an error factor of plus or minus 50 per cent under the most favorable of measuring conditions. These results were sent to both OSHA and to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. A number of the recommendations contained in the study for improving the accuracy of the method have been incorporated into a soon-to-be-released revised NIOSH operations manual on fiber counting. In the customer relations area, the total effect of negative press publicity and government regulations on industry customers is still today rather poorly defined. Some members of the Association have reported serious problems in this area, while others have experienced few or no difficulties thus far. Where customer problems do exist, they normally fall into one of five categories. First, the customer has thoroughly investigated his situation and has found that he can no longer afford to continue using asbestos or asbestos-containing products, either because the cost of control is too high or because he would have to raise the price of his product to a level that would make it non-competitive with non-asbestos containing substitutes. Second, the customer has not thoroughly investigated his situation and only thinks that he can no longer afford to continue using asbestos. . Page 5 - ^hy Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/?JA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 Third, the customer has read one or more negative articles on asbestos in the public press and has made the snap decision that "we ought to get that dangerous stuff out of our plant," Often, decisions of this nature are forced on top management by illinformed medical advisors or safety and health directors. Fourth, the customer has neither a control problem nor is he parti cularly afraid of using asbestos in his own plant. However, he is fearful that those of bis competitors .hose finished products do not contain asbestos will stress the adverse healch effects of asbestos in trying to take business away from him. Customer fears of this nature are essentially "gut" reactions and are hence extremely difficult to deal with. Fifth, the customer has none of these problems cr fears but he has been advised by a government official or inspector that he would be better off if he quit using asbestos or asbestos-containing products in his plant. tfoile this problem does not appear to be widespread, we have learned of a number <^f situations v'here it has occurred. Actions of this nature by government officials are totally uncalled for and should be dealt with promptly and decisively. The best solution is to obtain complete details on the incident and then to register a formal complaint with the offending official's immediate superior or with the government agency involved. The Association's first reaction to the overall customer relations problem was to approve funds for a series of four regional seminars at which industry customers would be given a number of basic presen tations on the various aspects of the asbestos-health problem. The seminars were tentatively scheduled for the Spring of 1973. However, the experiences of a number cf our member companies showed that general "catchall" type seminars of the type originally contemplated would not be effective in dealing with the majority of customer relations problems. In order to do the job properly, it was found that customer presentations have to be tailored to the needs and problems of the individual customer. As a result, the Association cancelled its scheduled series of seminars and instead elected to develop a number of packaged slide presentations on such topics as "The Facts About Asbestos and Health," and "Understanding the OSHA Regulations," which could be used by member companies as part of a tailored presentation to individual customers. As with customer relations, the Association feels that employee relations is a problem best handled by the individual member companies. Thus far, the AIA's sole contribution in this area of industry concern has been to prepare the draft of an Employee Safety and Health Guide on Asbestos-Health. The draft was made available to the member companies for their ovm use and at least one has produced it in booklet form for distribution to all its employees. Page 6 - Why Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/NA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 I personally believe that the employee relations aspect of the asbestos-health problem is one that has been sorely neglected by most companies within the industry, and that it could develop into a major problem area in the near future and that steps should be taken now to deal with it. V7e know that various organized labor groups are planning a full scale campaign to bring their interpre tation of the asbestos-health problem to the attention of asbestos industry employees throughout the nation. If the industry permits this interpretation to be disseminated without rebuttal, the consequences could be grave indeed. Inter-industry relations are best defined as keeping the industry informed about important new developments on the governmental, medical and press relations fronts that affect asbestos. This is accomplished within the AIA by periodic distributions of documents and information to the member companies and to others on our mailing list. The value of this activity can be gauged by the fact that our overall mailing list increased from approximately a dozen names in 1971 to more than 60 a year later. While we have had to trim the list somewhat this year for logistical reasons, we assume from the frequent requests we still receive to be placed on the list that the material we send out is being read and is of considerable value to those receiving it. Next to government affairs, our public relations and publicity activities constitute the single largest consumer of time, effort and money within the Association. Those of you who are familiar with the treatment that asbestos has been receiving in the public press over the years can readily understand why this activity ranks so high on our priority list. What you may not understand are the reasons why cur extensive efforts in dealing with the nation's press have been so unsuccess ful to date in producing the theoretical "balanced" or "positive" story on asbestos and health. The simple fact is that from the standpoint of today's young activist reporter, industry is the bad guy, and nothing we do, say or achieve can ever change this impression. If we spend $100 million dollars on environmental control, the press either says we ought to have done it ten years ago or that wo should have spent $200 million. If we sponsor medical research, they say we are trying to buy favorable results. If we are opposed tc ridiculously stringent standards, they say we are in favor of letting our employees die. A television executive in Minneapolis described this new breed of reporter as being "so intent on demolishing the establishment that they would blindly destroy the credibility of the media in the bar gain." Another TV executive, this time in Chicago, stated "they Page 7 - Why Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/NA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 want to make moral and political and social judgments on their assignments and then take sides. Never mind getting the facts straight." As a result of this "industry is a monster" philosophy, asbestos v/ill remain a hot news item only so long as the news is bad. The "good" that asbestos does in protecting lives and property is of no concern to the press. Likewise, industry efforts to protect workmen and the general public from asbestos exposure will always be given minimal coverage, since such information is directly contrary to the portrait of an irresponsible industry producing a "killer" product that is the sole element of news worthiness in the asbestos story. The press relations battle will therefore he won, not when the media starts to print positive or balanced articles about asbestos, but when the press ceases to print anything about asbestos at all. As long as negative nev/s on asbestos-health continues to be generated, the media v/ill continue to eat it up. The media will only cease to carry such stories when the generation of negative news ceases. It is as simple as that. Positive or balanced stories are a chimera, since they are, by definition, not newsworthy. Let me give you a very specific example of this last principle in action. As most of you already know, the Association is currently engaged in an extensive campaign to interest the trade press in articles on the benefits of asbestos and on industry accomplish ments in the environmental control area. The trade press, unlike the national or public media, is much more receptive to articles of this nature and we expect to be seeing a number of positive stories in the trade press in the next few months. In any case, we also from time to time put out press releases on various subjects relating to asbestos-health. A few weeks ago, we issued a release on the report of the advisory committee on asbestos cancers of the World Health Organization. In brief, the report concluded that the general public is not in danger from asbestos in the environment. Thus far, we have received nearly two dozen press clippings from trade publications that carried the story. To the best of our knowledge, not a single newspaper, nows magazine, radio or TV station, or any other segment of the public media ran the story, with the solitary exception of a French language paper in Toronto. As I said before, if the nev/s is good, the press simply isn't interested. Nonetheless, the Association has no intention of abandoning our efforts vis-a-vis the national media. We will continue to issuo appropriate press releases, cooperate with feature writers doing stories on asbestos, write letters to the editor when those stories appear, and in short, do all we can to present the press with a balanced view of the asbestos-health situation. Page 8 - Why Asbestos?, by M. M. Swetonic, AIA/MA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 Our most recent effort in this regard has been the preparation and printing of an Asbestos and Health Information File, which we have nailed to some 3,000 newspapers, magazines, trade publications, radio and TV stations, science writers, etc., across the United States. Basically, the file contains copies of five industry position papers on asbestos and asbestos-health, as well as a number of important medical papers and a pair of photographs illustrating the benefits of asbestos and industry efforts at environmental control. \/hile we don't expect our information file to change the whole attitude of the press toward asbestos, we are hoping that the media will make use of it to accurately report the industry's position when doing stories on the subject. And now, having heard the bad side of the public relations problem, it's time for some good news. And the good news is that despite all the negative articles on asbestos-health that have appeared in the press over the past half dozen years, very few people have been paying attention. Let me explain. In February, the Association undertook a personal interview research survey of the American public to determine its attitude toward asbestos and its awareness of the health issue. The survey was conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation during March and April. More than 2,000 demographically selected Americans were interviewed. Without going into enormous detail, the results show that only 22 per cent of the American public are aware of the health hazards of asbestos, and that 80 per cent of these consider it a hazard only to those who are occupationally exposed. A mere three per cent of those interviewed stated that they considered asbestos a health hazard to the general public, and less than one quarter of one per cent considered it the most dangerous material on the list they were given to choose from. Surprisingly, the college age youths of America are no more aware of the hazards of asbestos than their parents and grandparents. These results should be reassuring to those industry customers who fear that the general public will stop buying their products because they contain asbestos. Before going on to describe our activities in the government relations area, I think it might be interesting at this point to take a very brief look at the manner in which Dr. Selikoff and his supporters have used his research results to dramatize and exaggerate the seriousness cf the asbestos-health problem. I have two charts which point this out rather conclusively. Page 3 - rrhy Asbestos?, by rt. I!, Swetor.ic, AIA/TTA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - *5/7/73 The first chart shows the actual results of Dr. Selikoff's four mortality studies of asbestos workers. The numbers in parentheses beside the figures for total number of workers indicate those who have so far died fron all causes. The percentage figures alongside the total nunber of deaths from ashestosis, lung cancer and nescthelioma are based on the total number of deaths from all causes, not on the nunber of workers in the study. The most inportant study of the group is the second, from the top, shoving the deaths fron asbestos-related disease among all members of'the insulation workors union, regardless of length of exposure. You will note that 34 per cent of those workors who have died, thus far have died, fron one of the three asbestos-related diseases. These, then, are the facts Dr. Selikoff works from. This is what he knows from his own investigations. ??cv let us take a lock at what he has done with these figures in order to dramatize the problem. Chart number II shews.Dr. Selikoff's predictions about asbestosrelated deaths in the United States. T'ithout going into details, Dr. Selikoff has arrived at his projections hy the simple procedure of multiplying the percentage of deaths from asbestos-related disease among his insulation workers by the total number of employees in the entire industry. You will also note that ha has raised his projected death estimate tc enormous heights over the past year by simply increasing the base figure of employees exposed, while still retaining the percentage multiplier of 34 per cent being experienced by the insulation workers. I might point out that this tactic, however deceptive, has been an enormous success since each raising of the estimate has earned Dr. Selikoff correspondingly greater coverage by the redia. do finer example exists of the total gullibility of the press than the manner in which it allowed its prejudices to be manipulated and played upon in this situation. Please don't get me wrong. I have no doubt that the insulation workers are in fact dying as rapidly as Dr. Selikoff says they arc. The problem is that he has translated their mortality experience to the rest cf the entire industry, which is completely erroneous. In the first place, the estimated number of employees in the industry is too high -- five tines too high to be precise. Even more inportant, according to an analysis by the Association of more than a dozen mortality studies, including those of Dr. Seli koff, our prediction is that approximately 25,000 past and present employees in the asbestos industry have died or trill eventually die of asbestos-relatad disease. This is less than one-thirteenth CHART NUMBER I DR. I. J. SELIKOFF ----- RESEARCH DATA f < i NO. OF WORKERS DESCRIPTION OF COHORT TOTAL DEATHS FROM ASBES TOS IS, LUNG CANCER & MESOTHELIOJi MORTALITY STUDY OF TWO LOCALS OF INSULATION WORKERS UNION 625 (423) THOSE VTITH A MINIMUM OF 20 YEARS EXPOSURE 149 (35%) MORTALITY STUDY OF ALL MEMBERS OF IKStjLATION WORKERS UNION 17,800 (1092) ALL WORKERS ON ROLLS 1/1/67 368* (34%) MORTALITY STUDY OF WORKERS IN A WORLD WAR II AMOSITE INSULA TION PLANT 933 (484) EXPOSED ONLY TO AMOSITE ASBESTOS 107 (22.1% MORTALITY STUDY OF WORKERS AT JOHNSMANVILLE CORP. MANVILLE, N.J., PLANT * 689 (199) THOSE WITH A MINITOM OF 20 YEARS EXPOSURE 66 (33%) * 340 OF THESE DEATHS UERE AMONG THE 5,119 EMPLOYEES WITH GREATER THAN 20 YEARS EXPOSURE UNPUBLISHED DATA TAKEN FROM ARTICLE IN THE NEW YORK POST, MAY 1972 Page 9-A CHART NUMBER II DR. I. J. SELIKOFF -- PREDICTIONS NO. OF WORKERS DESCRIPTION OF COHORT TOTAL DEATHS FROM ASBESTOS IS, LUNG CANCER MESOTHELIOMA ARTICLE IN WALL STREET JOURNAL - 6/8/72 "STUDIES BY DR SELIKOFF... LEAD HIM TO PREDICT.. 250,000 ALL WORKERS CURRENTLY EMPLOYED IN THE ASBESTOS INDUSTRY 85,000* ARTICLE IN THE NEW YORK TIMES - 6/13/72 - (5 DAYS LATER) "IF OUR EXPER IENCES... ARE A GUIDE.. 500,000 ALL WORKERS CURRENTLY & PREVIOUSLY EMPLOYED IN THE ASBESTOS INDUSTRY 170,000 TESTIMONY AT TOXIC SUBSTANCES HEARING - 2/21/73 - "OUR STUDIES INDICATE.. 1,000,000 ALL WORKERS CURRENTLY, PREVIOUSLY & WHO WILL BE EMPLOYED IN ASBESTOS INDUSTRY IN THIS CENTURY 340,000 AP STORY ON TOXIC SUBSTANCES HEARING 1,000,000 (AS ABOVE) 1,000,000 (MIS-QUOTE) * ACTUAL QUOTED PREDICTION WAS 95,000, BUT THIS INCLUDED DEATHS FROM GI CANCER, WHICH I HAVE SUBTRACTED FROM THE TOTAL. Page 9-B Page 10 - irhv Asbestos?, ty M. Swotonic, AIA/!TA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 of Dr. Selikcff's most recent estimate. In addition, our figures show that 20 of the 25,000 deaths -- or 80% -- will occur among those in the insulation trades. Nhile these estimates should be reassuring to those in the mining and manufacturing areas of the industry, wo should not forget that 5,000 of our workmen are still going to die of asbestos-related disease and that, all things considered, there is absolutely nothing that we can do to prevent it. The only thing ,?e can do is to clean up our plants to assure that those entering the industry in the future will not have the same experience. Uithin the past year and a half, the main thrust of Association effort has shifted to the government affairs front. The principal agencies in Washington with which we have been dealing are the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; the Environmental Protection Agency; the Food and Drug Administration; the Bureau of lines; and, to a lesser degree, the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and the National Institutes of Health, both of which are mainly involved in research efforts. In addition, a few weeks ago we were contacted by the Federal Trade Commission, which had received a petition from the Center for Science in the Public Interest requesting an investigation of consumer uses of asbestos for the purpose of determining whether certain products ought to be labeled, as hazardous and whether warnings should be required on all advertisements for those pro ducts. On the basis of a preliminary meeting with an investigator from the FTC it would appear that we have little to worry about in this particular area. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has been of enormous concern to the industry over the past 18 months. A.s nest of you already know, the Association expended tremendous efforts during the six month period leading to the promulgation of last June's 05HA standards on asbestos. I think it is a gauge of the effectiveness of the total industry involvement in this most crucial matter that of eleven main requirements in the stand.ards, the industry position wa3 accented totally by OSHA on nine of the eleven, about fifty per cent on a tenth, and totally rejected on only one. OSHA is now planning to redo the standard package and we are work ing closely with them on this project. The first step will be the formation of a 15 nan advisory committee to review the current standards and any additional medical and technical data that has become available in the year since the standards were promulgated. forking in cooperation with nine other trade associations we have selected four individuals as industry-wide recommendations to OSHA for the four so-called "employer" spots on the advisory committee. Page 11 - Why Asbestos?, by II. I*. Ewetcnic, MA/NA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 In discussing the formation of the advisory committee >ith John O'Neill cf the OSHA Standards Development Section, '-re were asked to add a couple of names to the list so that OS!!A would have more of a selection to choose from. This we have agreed to do. The committee '-'ill be given up to nine months to complete its deliberations and. prepare for OSHA a revised standard package. This will be followed by public hearings, approximately a year from now. We do not expect tr 3ee a new standard promulgated before the Fall of 1974. It is of course impossible to determine at this tire what the now standards will look like, hoviever, I "culd venture to say that they will certainly net be less strict than the ones we have today, although they will probably be less confusing and leave less room for employer interpretation. `Something will unques tionably be done to improve the current difficulties with the monitoring requirements. The main function of the national Institute for Occupational Safety and Health is to conduct research and to prepare so-called Criteria Packages, which are essentially recommendations to OSHA for stan dards on various materials, chemicals and activities. Such a package on asbestos was prepared by NIOSH at the tine of the OSHA proceedings last year. T1I0SF will not be preparing a new or revise criteria package for the upcoming review of the asbestos standards. I do not believe it would be unfair to say that of all the agen cies in Washington dealing with asbestos. Dr. Selikoff has had his greatest influence on the young idealistic scientists and doctors at 1II0SH. Consequently, industry influence is weakest in this agency. It was NIOSII, after all, that made the original recommen dation for a two fiber standard in the United States asbestos industry. Next to OSHA, the Environmental Protection Agency has the greatest potential of any federal agency for adversely affecting the future of the asbestos industry in this country. Not only is the EPA responsible for developing and enforcing air and water pollution standards, but the Toxic Substances Control Act, now pending in Congress, will also become an EPA function after passage. For this reason, I an pleased to be able to say that the asbestos industry has an excellent relationship with the EPA. No finer proof of this exists than the fact that there was not a single major industry recommendation made to the EP7i at the public hear ings on the proposed asbestos emission regulations that was not accepted either in toto or in principle in the final standards, which wore published in early April of this year. We are presently working with the EPA on the development of waste water effluent standards for asbestos manufacturing plants. TTc Page 12 - "hy Asbestos?, by M. Swetonic, .MA/PA Presented to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - f/7/73 certainly hope that thane standards will turn rut to be as reason able as the air pollution regulations. The prop-sac' effluent standards are scheduled to be published in the Federal Aerister sometime this Sumner, to be followed by public hearings, with the final standards being promulgated in the Fall, perhaps as early as October. " V'e are also planning, in the near future, to meet in Washington with representatives fron the standards development and enforcement branches of the EPA to discuss with then questions of interpretation and compliance policy with regard to the new air pollution regulations. be have already resolved one interpretation question that is of special interest to the asbestos textile industry* Approximately tv;o weeks ago I was asked by a member company of the Association to find out whether the ZPA was planning to require the manufac turers of asbestos safety clothing to register as potential emission sources under the lav/. In discussing the situation over the phone vrith EPA compliance officials, I argued that the producers of asbestos safety clothing were net manufacturers as defined in the regulations but were instead, only fabricators of an asbestos product, and as such, should not have to register as potential emission sources. After cur phone conversation ended, a brief meeting was held among the EPA compliance people. I was then called back and informed that they agreed with me that the safety clothing producers should not be required to register. While this rather minor problem took approximately an hour and a half and two or three phone calls to resolve, it is indicative of the type of day-to-day services that the Association provides for its member companies. Over the past year the Food and Drug Administration has shown an increased interest in asbestos as a possible hazardous contaminant in various foods, beverages and drugs. Late in 1972 they set up an asbestos task force to review the situation and to propose regula tions and guidelines where appropriate. Thus far they have concentrated their efforts in two areas -- on the use of asbestos-contaminated talc in food packaging and in cosmetics, and secondly, on the use of asbestos celulose filter pads in the beverage and drug industries. In our first meeting with the FDA task force last Povenber on the filter problem, they demonstrated and admitted to an appalling ignorance about the health hazards of asbestos. Since then, they have gotten one heck of a lot smarter, due at least in part to the tremendous amount of data and information which the Association Page 13 - i'hy Asbestos?, by M. 11. Svotonic, AIA/NA rrcscnteu to the ATI at Arlington, Virginia - 6/7/73 has been supplying to then. As a consequence, the PDA is today less panicky about asbestos and therefore less likely to propose foolish, unsupportable regulations. dnekasnen from the FD7. have, in fact, defended, the filter industry against environmentalist attacks in the press and elsewhere in recant months. This is, quite obviously, a healthy sign. Our activities in the area of Congressional relations have been quite minimal to date, although we are preparino for the upccmino struggle in Congress over ^rorknen's compensation reform, at which time asbestos is unquestionably going to be racked over the coals by Dr. Celikoff and. by representatives cf organized, labor. Unfortunately, the Association has neither the manpower nor the time to embark or. a full-scale legislative information program. He have met on occasion with tho legislative and legal assistants to various Senators who have attacked, asbestos, however much more needs to be done in this area and I am afraid, individual member companies are going tc have to be the prime ball carriers and not the .Association. For essentially the same reason, our government activities at the state and local level have declined to essentially zero over the past year and a half. This has not been too serious a deficiency as most of the authority of the cities and states in asbestos con trol has been usurped by various Federal regulatory agencies. Nonetheless, more individual company activity is required at these levels of government. In conclusion, I think we can all be justifiably pleased with what wo have been able tc accomplish in tho past few years in resolving the cornucopia of interrelated problems that constitute tho asbestos-health situation. Our plants are cleaner and our workmen better protected. The gene ral public has been shown to be in no d.anger from asbestos, if it over was. While we have been regulated extensively, for the most part the standards that have been developed have not been as bad. as we feared they might be, and in some cases they turned out far bet ter than we ever dared hope. In addition, while vc are still taking our lumps in the public press, the net effect of all this adverse publicity has been shown to be surprisingly small. We have sweated a lot and we have groaned a let, but we are still standing and we are still viable. I sense today "ithin tho indus try a greater feeling of confidence in the future than at any time in the past few years. But we must not rest contented. We must remember that Dr. Selikoff has to date bo.en far less suc cessful than our industry has in influencing the decisions of the various governmental regulatory agencies. This vill make him try Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute FEB 9 1973 'A ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE General Meeting February 9, 1973 Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia In Attendance AMATEX CORPORATION H. H. Walter ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. P. E. Leclerc GARLOCK INC. S. G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk BELL ASBESTOS NINES LTD. W. II. Smith JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION C. G. Guerin A. R. Morrill (C.J-M) CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. Dr. R. A. Kuntze (Ontario Research Foundation) NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. E. W. Russell LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (Asarco) II. K. PORTER COMPANY, D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd L. E. Moody INC. NIPPON ASBESTOS COMPANY, LTD. Y. Sato RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, G. F. Ducker J. W. Hawkins R. T. Matthew M. Q. Scowcroft INC. TEA INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS LTD. II. J. Corson, Jr. UNIROYAL, INC. D. T. Austin B. E. Carden L. F. Dieringer R. C. Hunt E. A. Morris S. J. Peele, Jr. CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT W. B. Alcorn (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE D. M. Fagan (Executive Secretary) Total attendance during this two-day meeting was 43 people, includ ing 9 women and 34 man. MINUTES 1, President M. Q. Scowcroft called the General Meeting to order at 2:30 P.M., February 9, 1973, with a welcome to all in attendance. He stated each member of the Board of Governors is making every effort to strengthen the organisation and some ideas are in the making that Page 2 ATI General Meeting 2/9/7" will be announced in the very near future. He voiced it was an exciting experience to start out with a wonderful new slate, including the new Executive Secretary, Mrs. Doris M, Fagan. He hoped the Board will be innovative but will not try to be too revolutionary. He expressed a desire for the same support and cooperation from all involved with the ATI as has been received in the past. 2. Continuing the already-established tradition, President Scowcroft asked each member in attendance to rise and state his name and company affiliation. 3. Upon presentation, it was moved by A. Kuzmuk, seconded by E. A. Morris, to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the last stated meeting. The motion was so carried. 4. Treasurer Morris presented the Financial Report (see attached) showing total assets and net worth of the ATI as of January 2, 1973. As an up-date to the report, as of February 7, 1973, the Institute had received all dues fron the member companies and the total in the savings account as of that date stood at $21,346.91. S. J. Peele, Jr., moved that the report be accepted. The move was seconded by C. G. Guerin and so voted, unanimously. 5. The Legal Counsel address was given by VI. 3. Alcorn of Cadwalader, VTickersham & Taft. Since the current activities concerning CSHA requirements are being reviewed within the pertinent committees, Mr. Alcorn confined his talk to some of the basic principles of antitrust lav; which govern the distribution and marketing cf products. He reviewed four U.S. Supreme Court cases that have been decided in this area. The full text of his report, written as formal Remarks of Counsel, is attached to these Minutes. 6. The Fibre Producers' Report was presented by Paul E. Leclerc, Re gional Sales Manager with Asbestos Corporation Ltd. For the year 1972, total shipments of asbestos from the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association were 1,372,677 tons, 2.3% cr roughly 31,000 tons over those for 1971. The increase was mostly in Group 7. Group 3 ship ments were up only 154 tons. For 1973, Eastern Quebec producers' stocks of Group 3 Spinning Fibre are good and production should be adequate for any increase in demand. Mr. Leclerc then referred to Asbestos Corporation's activities, especially the new finishing mill at Hordenham, Germany, and gave a few remarks about the availability of certain asbestos grades from Cassiar Asbestos Corporation. A copy of the full report as presented by .Mr, Leclerc is attached. 7. Committee Reports were presented to the general membership, as TTsted below: Air Hygiene & Manufacturing, by Chairman B. Asbestos Advisory, by Acting Chairman E. A. Technical, by Chairman J. '7. Echerd; Fiber Research & Testing, by Chairman C. E. Environmental Health, by L. F. Dieringer. E. Carden; Morris; Stiefken; Page 3 ATI General Meeting 2/9/73 In presenting the Asbestos Advisory Comuittee report, Mr, Morris added his personal note by Sharking the members of the Institute for the Certificate cf Appreciation he received, in absentia, at the last General Meeting, He expressed it had been both a plea sure and his honor to have served as Chairman rf the Asbestos Advisory Committee over the past two years. Response from the floor concerning Environmental Health included the following comment by S. J. Peele, Jr. Even though it appears the pressure is off on dust count citations, companies would be well advised to get the obvious things corrected at their plants to avoid OSHA citations in other areas. L. F. Dieringer agreed and elaborated on the idea by saying when a citation is received, companies should be sure to request a reasonable abatement period within which to correct the situation. This will diminish the chance for a premature second inspection, the result of which could be a "willful" citation charge. 0. Addressing the Membership, President Scowcroft stated he wished to retain the flexibility of having a speaker at a given ATI meeting when it was deemed meaningful and important. He advised of the pro bability there will be a speaker at the next two meetings and requested that members suggest to others at their companies that they attend the meetings as the presentations should be pertinent and interesting. Tentatively, Dr. J, Corbett McDonald is being considered as a speaker at the June 1973 meeting and will be con tacted through the efforts of E. A. Farrell. A recognized expert on the medical aspects of asbestos and health and representing the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, Dr. McDonald is an Epidemiologist with the Department of Epidemiology and Health, McGill University. Also, ATI has been approached by L-he Asbestos Information Associa tion/North America who is currently in the process of establishing a program of capable speakers on what the AIA/NA is doing. Possibly ATI will contact AIA/NA for the October 1373 meeting. President Scowcroft praised the AIA/NA stating it is doing an admirable job of keeping the Industry informed. Ha specifically referred to an article by Robert Sherrill printed in the January 21, 1373, edition of the New York Times. In rebuttal, the AIA/NA wrote a factual, comprehensive Letter to the Editor of the "Times." The newspaper responded it would consider publishing the rebuttal, if^ it were reduced to 400 words from the original six-page typewritten letter. 9. The next General Meeting of the Asbestos Textile Institute will be held -- June 6-7, 1973 Key Bridge Marriott, Arlington, Virginia Other future General Meetings include October 3-5, 1973, at Wychmore Harbor Club, Harwichport, Massachusetts; February 6-7, 1974, at the Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, South Carolina; June 1974 in the Washington, D.C., area; September 25-27, 1974, at The Cloister, Sea Island, Georgia; and February 1975 in the Philadelphia or surround ing area. Page 4 ATI General Meeting 2/0/73 P. E. Leclerc expressed preference that the last clay of each meeting fall on a Friday so members may extend their stay into the weekend if they so desired. It was agreed this was the general feeling of Institute members and every effort will be made to oblige whenever possible. 10 President Scowcroft advised that the mailing of the Minutes of this General Meeting will include the new ATI Directory. 11. President Scowcroft expressed appreciation to H. E. Sunbury, the former Executive Secretary of the ATI, and to D. M. Fagan for being so detailed with the changeover, resulting in a very smooth transition. 12. As the new Executive Secretary, Mrs. Fagan thanked the members for their confidence in her capabilitiess She stated it is and will be a privilege and a pleasure to work with this segment of the Industry -- and an honor for ASBESTOS Magazine. She also expressed the appreciation of the Magazine for ATI member support to the pro posed reprinting of "The History of the Asbestos Textile Industry in the United States," by John A. Bettes, Jr., and regretted to advise the response was insufficient to justify printing costs plus other expenses that would necessarily be involved. In answer to a query from the floor, via E. A. Farrell, separate chapters of the "History" are available solely through the purchase of the individual issues of the Magazine in which they appeared. 13. There being no further business to be brought before the mem bership, the meeting was adjourned at approximately 3:30 P.M. via a move by E. A. Morris, seconded by L. F. Dieringer, and unanimous approval by the attending members. Respectfully submitted. Doris M. Fagan, Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds January 2, 1973 Balance On Hand at last report (Sept.1,1972) General fund $ 3992.64 Reserve Fund 9313.41 Petty Cash Fund 100.00 Total On Hand Receipts To Reserve Fund (Interest to 12/31/72) To General Fund (Special Assessments) To General Fund (Voluntary Contributions) To General Fund (Book Sales) 233.49 750.00 250.00 99.43 Total Received Total On Hand & Received Disbursements Legal Services & Expenses (3rd Qtr,1972) 1284.11 Secretary's salary (4 mos.) 938.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 3rd Qtr.,1972) 78.00 N.J.U.& Dis. Tax ( 3rd Qtr.,1972) 33.75 Secretary's Travel expense 188.14 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 A.T.I. Meeting expense (Sept.18-20, 1972) 905.61 Printing & Office Supplies 245.53 Telephone ( 4 mos.) 166.44 Insurance - #92.00; ASTM Dues-#25.00 117.00 Revision of Fibre Test Manual 171.45 Accountant ( Caruso, Year ending Sept.1972) 300.00 Moving expense (Office equipment to W.G.,Pa.) 111.30 Miscellaneous (Gifts, Flowers,etc.) 176.15 Petty Cash (Vouchers 629-664 inclusive) 129.71 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand as of January 2, 1973 Funds as of January 2, 1973 General ?und Reserve Fund (with interest to 12/31/72) Petty Cash Fund . Total Funds 1396.93 (*) 8096.90 (**) 100.00 Assets as of January 2. 1973 Total Funds as listed above Accts Receivable (Member's Dues,1973) Accts " (Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal value) 9593.83 14250.00 .18.71 66 1.00 Liabilities Total Assets 13406.05 1332.97 147 3^.02 5145.19 $ 9593.83 $ 9593.83 $ 23864.20 none Net Worth (*) $50.00 transferred to Reserve Fund on 11/18/72 (**)$1500.00 transferred to General Fund on 12/ll/72 $ 23864.20 Respectfully submitted. [Presented at ATI General Meeting, February 9, 1973, at the Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia] Following is a brief rej CO. t:'U :.ir.cs us :or 1972- Total shipments from the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association were up 2.3% or 31,000 tone. It should be noted however that the increase was in group 7 which is up c3 . COO tons. Shipments of group 3 were up by 154 tons and group 4 by 3,800 tens. Shipments of groups 3 and 6 were down 37,000 tons. Total shipments from the QAMA were 1,372,677 for the year. Now looking at 1973 and especially to the group that is of most in terest to you, stocks of spinning fibre from the Eastern Quebec producers are good ar.c production should be adequate to take care of any increase in demand this year, which we sincerely hope will materialize. Present stocks of groups 4, 5, 6 and 7 are good but there has been a stronger demand than usual for asbestos at this time cf year and customers are, on the whole, very optimistic as to their total requirements for the year. It could very well happen that seme cf these grades night be in short supply before year end. Talking about my own company, as you know, we have been miring in Northern Quebec and last year we started shipping ore concentrate to our finishing mill in Germany to start the mill production. Unfor tunately, the severe storm which hit Europe last fall was particu larly felt in the Nordenham area and some cf the buildings at our new plant were severely damaged thus delaying the start of our milling operations. We are at the moment in the early stages of production and at the outset the tonnages that are forthcoming from this plant will be solely for the asbestos cement industry in Europe and this should release extra Thetford fours and fives to the North American market. It is possible that at some time in the future, if the Asbestos Hill ore is found to contain sufficient lorg fibre, and if market condi tions warrant it at that time, some spinning fibre may eventually bo produced at our Nordenham mill. At the moment, however, only one, two or possibly three grades of asbestos-cement fibre in the four or five-group range will be made. Regarding Cassiar, Mr. W. J. W. Smith has informed me that grades AAA and AA are in short supply and that grade A and other shorter grades are readily available. Paul E. Leclerc, Regional Sale3 Manager Asbestos Corporation Ltd. M 7. I1 U T E n AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 9, 1973 -- Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia The following fifteen (15) members and guests attended, representing ten (10) companies: ' Amatex Corporation -- H. II. Walter; Garlock Inc. -- S. G. Dixit; Johns-Manville Corporation -- C. G. Guerin, A. R. Morrill (C.J-M), 77. B. Reitze? Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. -- E. A. Farrell; Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. -- Y. Sato; H. K. Porter Company, Inc. -- L. E. Moody? Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. -- G. F. Ducker, R. T. Matthew, I. H. Weaver; TEA Industrial Products Ltd. -- K. J. Corson, Jr.; Uniroyal, Inc. -- B. E. Carden, L. F. Dieringer, R. C. Hunt. The meeting included discussions in the following areas: recent ex periences with OSHA inspections, cleaning to meet OSIIA standards, protective clothing, lockers, etc., noise control, changes and im provements in manufacturing. OSHA inspectors usually spend two to three days on asbestos plant inspections. The number one item on the inspection list is dust counts, and is closely followed by electrical equipment and asso ciated controls. Also, warning and information signs. Good house keeping practices and properly marked aisles are also near the top of the OSHA check list. In all recent inspections, OSIIA's dust count is much higher than the company count, and in some cases it is from three (3) to five (5) times higher. The best effort or degree of accuracy in checking dust counts is a plus or minus 40% and in some cases has checked as much as plus or minus 300%. In view of these differences, some plants have used an outside laboratory to recheck their dust samples. The outside check correlated very closely with the company check. It was pointed out that weather conditions affect plant dust counts and counts are usually higher in cold, dry weather. Also, dust counts taken from machine to machine show higher counts. For exam ple, a count taken at number 1 machine will be lower than a dust count taken at machine number 3. This is caused by dust generated by machines number 1 and 2, some of which is picked up by the num ber 3 machine. Page 2 Minutes of the ATT Air hygiene & Hfg. Committee - 2/9/73 Some plants have a daily schedule of cleaning all cards while ethers clean twice a week. As far as cleaning and housekeeping are con cerned, the advice from those who have had inspections is to keep the plant in tip-top shape at all times, as "good" is not good enough for OGKA. In one recent inspection, protective clothing from head to foot was recommended by the inspector. It is felt that in all plants, wor kers in some areas will be required to wear some protective clothing. Companies should be looking closely for ways of lowering plant noise levels. The use of ear plugs is a temporary means of controlling noise. As discussed in this meeting, noise levels can be reduced by slight changes in some machinery and with better fixing and repairs. One plant eliminated the use of ear plugs in the carding department by making changes in the condenser section. This change reduced the noise level from 92 decibels to decibels. Respectfully submitted. Buoi E. Carden, Chairman MTMUTE 1 ASBESTOS ADVISOR- COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1973 -- Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, G eorgia IN ATTENDANCE: E. A, Morris, Acting Chairman M. Q= Scowcroft A. Kuzmuk E. W, Russell V7. B. Alcorn (Legal Counsel) ABSENT: E. C. Bratt T. P. Jackson M. J. Scanlan D. M. Fagan (Executive Secretary) Mr. Jackson was not able to attend due to a conflicting national sales meeting of Johns-Manville Corporation. He replaces M. S. Lindstrom on the Committee, due to renssigrments at Johns-Manville. Mrs. Fagan was attending meetings of the other Committees to famil iarize herself with their activities. E. W. Russell was appointed as Chairman of the Asbestos Advisory Committee for the remaining portion of the two-year term, a res ponsibility previously held by Mr. Lindstrom who is unable to serve in that capacity due to the afore-mentioned reassignment at Johns-Manville. Good wishes were expressed for Mr. Lindstrom in his new position with J-M, Of primary interest to the Committee was the progress made by the Technical Committee on the development of a meaningful test to determine the amount of dust generated by a given asbestos cloth when subjected to subsequent fabrication. An up-to-date status report on the development of this test is given in the accompanying Minutes of the Technical Committee. Respectfully submitted, E. A. Morris, Acting Chairman MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 8 & 9, 1973 -- Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia IN ATTENDANCE: J. U. Hawkins, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. D, T. Austin, Uniroyal, Inc. W. Maaskant, Anatex Corporation J. T*7, Echerd, II. K. Porter Company, Inc. Methods to determine the dusting characteristics of asbestos products were discussed at a Special Meeting on February 8th. Messrs. Hawkins and Austin reported on the availability of equipment for this test. After reviewing the properties of several abrasion and piling-type testers, the Committee decided that initial evaluation will begin with the "tumbler" method. Mr. Hawkins will request information on Johns-Ilanville's Tumbler Test. If the process appears adaptable, the Committee will seek permission to run test samples at Celanese's Physical Testing Laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina. The Committee reviewed a letter from G. R. Tucker of the General Services Administration stating there will be coordination between GSA and the Department of Defense on the disposition of Military Specification MIL-C-10316C as soon as Federal Specification SS-C-1783 is published. It is expected the Federal Specification will be in print about March 1973, A letter from Neptune Meter Company requesting information on laps and braiding yarns was presented to the Committee for comments. Mrs. D. M. Fagan was instructed to reply and advise that pertinent ATI member companies would contact them. ASTM Standards D299, D375, D1061 and D2100 were submitted to let ter ballot for reapproval without revision. Negative votes received for each Standard were reviewed. The basic objection of Messrs. T. R. Bainbridge and J. H. Raynolds concerned the lack of statements pertaining to Precision and Accuracy. Work on the revision of D299 was started by the Committee. Respectfully submitted, J. 11. Echerd, Chairman FIBER REr.EJ.RCH TEST I Nr. COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 9, 1973 -- Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia IN ATTENDANCE: C. E. Stiefken, American Smelting & Refining Co. D. E. Childers, H. K. Porter Company, Inc. W. H. Smith, Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. R. A. Kuntze, Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd. The Committee Meeting was devoted exclusively to work on the third edition of the Test Manual. The new manual, titled "Test Manual for Chrysotile Asbestos," will have approximately 400 pages containing 31 tests. It will be in lcoseleaf form and will-coot between 54.50 and $5.00, including a flexible binder. The Quebec Asbestos Mining Association will supply originals of three new tests and sixteen rewritten tests, including all photo graphs and sketches. The Asbestos Textile Institute will supply master sheets of twelve retained tests, and together these will be submitted in rough draft form to the printer for final cost estimating. The Asbestos Textile Institute membership is requested to submit to C. E. Stiefken, Chairman of this Committee, its required number of copies of the full manual and any separate individual tests desired. After discussion, the following Committee decisions were made: a) Elimination of the proposed Alpine Dry Screening test. The QAMA does not wish co sponsor this test and the ATI has insufr ficient background on the test to sponsor it at this time. b) It was decided to leave out of the index section the form in which the tests are written. c) The manual will be in seven sections, each section divided by a blank card page containing an edge identification tab. d) It was decided that where a teat was deleted from the old sec ond edition manual, a new test would receive that number, so that no blanks would appear in the test index, and numerical continuity would be retained. e) Summary descriptions of all tests would be written in both French and English. f) An acknowledgment listing of members of associations contri buting to the work of rewriting the manual would be retained. It was hoped that by the next meeting of the Association in Juno at Arlington, Virginia, that the printer will have the rough draft, and that by the October meeting the manual will be completed. Respectfully submitted, , C. E. Stiefken, Chairman MINUTES ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 9, 1973 -- Hyatt Regency Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia The Environmental Health Committee mat for a short time on Friday morning, February 9, 1973. Present were L, F. Dieringer and w. 3. Reitze, and at the Committee's invitation, Mr. I. H. Weaver. Discussion on asbestos centered mainly on problems associated with the method of measurement of airborne asbestos fibers. Cnntroversy surrounds the reproductibility of fiber counts on the same membrane filter samples. Various studies and round-robin fiber counting of samples have shown variations of up to three-hundred percent in fiber counts. The general feeling was that as a result of the controversy, there has been a slow-down in OSHA inspections for airborne asbestos exposures, and that citations are very possible where the ceiling concentration of ten fibers per cubic centimeter was exceeded and respiratory protection net provided. Other discussion centered around the NIOSH criteria for recommended standards, particularly for noise and heat stress. The proposed noise standard differs from the presently promulgated OSHA standard in that it is recommended that: (1) new installations be designed with noise control for a limit of 85 dBA and that after a time per iod determined by the Department of Labor, 85 dBA be the limit for all places of employment; (2) medical surveillance in the form of an audiometric testing program be carried out; (3) hearing protec tion be authorized only afe an interim measure until engineering and administrative controls and procedures are implemented. The proposed heat stress standards have many features which will be difficult to administer. It should be remembered that NIOSH, which is a part of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare, bases its criteria for recommended standards on a compilation of research and actual experience. Their recommendations are forwarded to the Department of Labor for consideration for incorporation in proposed OSHA standards. The Department of Labor has established standards advisory committees for both noise and heat stress, who held their initial meetings in February. It is difficult at this time to speculate when these standards will be issued. Respectfully submitted, L. F. Dieringer, Chairman RFF-ARiCS OF COUIJ5HL Asbestos Textile Institute General Meeting February 3, 1372, Atlanta, Georgia Last September in Absecon, Tew Jersey, I discussed with you one of the antitrust cases which was recently decided by the Supreme Court. That case was California Transport v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 50G (1972). It further refined what is known to lawyers as the "Hoerr Doctrine". Our discussion centered on the way in which that legal doctrine protects competitors from antitrust liability when they undertake concerted efforts aimed at influenc ing governmental processaes and obtaining governmental action. Today, I shall address nv remarks to another case roccrtly decided by the Supreme Court. This opinion was handed down on .March 20, 1972, in United, States v. Top so Associates, 405 U.S. 506 (1972), The defendants in Tonco consisted of about 25 small and. medium sized independent regional supermarket chains which operated in 33 states. Tonco Associates was organized in 1944 to combine the purchasing power of a fa'-; small food stores and small grocery chains. Individually, none had the volume of business necessary to market a private brand of food, stuffs. The individual companies formed an association that had an aggre gate volume of business sufficient to make a private brand marketing program feasible. Thin, Topco proceeded, to implement. However, the Topco associates did not feel that they should com pete against each other, bach aoraet! to sell their products only in a specific, exclusive territory. Only in a few cases did. such territories overlap. In addition to territorial restrictions, Topco did not allow any of its members to sell Topco products at wholesale without permis sion of other members. Ihm.n if permission wore granted to sell at wholesale, such sales were restricted to defined geographic areas and had to be made under conditions stipulated by Topco on an ad hoc basis. Over the years, what began as an association of small grocers and small food store chains grew dramatically in terms of its members' sales. The members of Topco Associates had aggregate retail sales in 19G7 of $2.3-billion. They were surpassed only by the nation's three largest food chains, AfiP, f.afc.way and I'rogcr. Hot all of the products sold by the members of Topco Associates were purchased through the association. Only about 19% of their total purchases were made through Topco. About 6% of the pur chases by the association's members ware of products bearing Topco's private brand labels. The government charged that the Topco marketing program involved restraints of trade which violated the antitrust laws, specifi cally Section 1 of the Gherman Act, 26 rtat. 299, as amended 15 Page 2 Remarks of Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/9/73 U.S.C. 1. The basis of this action vas the fact that the Topco associates had agreed not to compete with each other in the market ing of their private label products. In other words, comnetition among sellers of the sane brand (intra-brand competition) was restrained and leasened. Topco Associates characterized the restraints of trade involved in its marketing program as ancillary to an overriding main purpose which was to enable its members to compete more effectively v.Tith the large grocery chains. First, without the association's buying power, its members could not market a private brand. Second, the private label selling through Topco increased competition with such large companies as A&P. Third, however much intra-brand competition was prevented by the territorial agreements among the members of Topco, that was justified by the increased inter-brand competition with the large grocery chains which the Topco market ing plan allowed. And fourth, without the territorial and customer restrictions, Topco felt its private label program was unworkable and would fail, thus inter-brand competition with the large grocery chains would be lessened by the demise of the association. The trial court agreed with Topco's ancillary restraint rationale and dismissed the case. It recognized the restraints of trade involved but viewed the problem as one to be judged by the "rule of reason". That is, if the restraint in question is a reason able one under the circumstances, then it docs not violate the antitrust laws. 219 F.Supp. 1931 (M.D. 111. 1970). The government appealed to the Supreme Court. It argued that the rule of reason was inappropriate and that the Topco restrictions were illegal per se. The Supreme Court agreed with the government's position and held that the Topco marketing plan involved horizontal restraints of trade, that is, restraints involving the agreement or acquies cence of direct competitors. The territorial and customer restrictions imposed on members of Topco were illegal per se, thus making an inquiry into their reasonableness net only unneces sary but also irrelevant. <Jith regard to Topco's territorial restrictions which the associa tion tried to justify on the ground that they promoted intra-brand competition, the Supreme Court said, "Topco has no authority under the Sherman Act to determine the respective values of competition in various sectors of the economy." 405 U.S. at 610-611. Page 3 Renarks of Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/9/73 With regard to Topco's restriction on its members' right to sell at wholesale, the Supreme Court stated as follows: "* * *These restrictions amount to regulation of the customers to whom members of Topco may sell Topcobrand goods. Like territorial restrictions, limitations on customers are intended to limit intra-brand competition and to promote inter-brand competition. [But] the arena in v?hich Topco mem.bers compete must be left to their unfettered choice absent a contrary congressional determination." 405 U.S. at 612. Only Chief Justice 3urger dissented from the Supreme Court's re versal of the lower court's decision. To gain a better understanding of that reversal, a brief review of several past decisions is necessary. In 1963, the Supreme Court decided White Motor Co. v. United States, 372 U.S. 253 (1953). The defendant in that case had assigned exclusive sales territories to its dealers and also restricted its dealers from selling to certain customers, that is, government accounts. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the government, viewing both kinds of restrictions as illegal per se under the Sherman Act. 194 F.Supp. 562 (N.D. Ohio 1961). White Motor co. appealed the decision. It argued that the terri torial and customer restrictions were justified on at least two grounds: First, whatever lessening of intra-brand competition resulted from the challenged restraints of trade was offset by increased inter-brand competition. Second, without the territor ial protection afforded by White's scheme of distribution, dealers would not be willing to invest the substantial sums of capital required. The Supreme Court reversed the lower court's finding for the government. It remanded the case for trial because the record was insufficient to support a finding that the vertical restraints of trade were illegal. The White Motor Co. case v/as subsequently settled. The Supreme Court's decision on the appeal from the summary judgment was used as authority to uphold territorial restrictions by manufacturers in two cases: Snap-On Tools Corp. v. FTC, 321 F.2d 825 (7th Cir. 1963); Sandura Co. v. FTC, 339 F.2d 847 (6th Cir. 196-1). In 1967 the Supreme Court decided another case involving terri torial restrictions. That case was United States v. ArnoIdSchwinn & Co., 388 U.S. 365 (1967). The defendant, Arnold Schwinn Page 4 Remarks of Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/9/73 & Co., was a family business which accounted for only 12% of the bicycle market and faced large competitors. Schwinn bicycles were distributed through about 5,500 approved retailers with Schwinn service facilities. Between the manufacturer and the Schwinn retailers stood 22 distributors who, by agreement with the manu facturer, could not sell outside assigned territories or to unapproved retailers. Schwinn bicycles were distributed in three ways: by sales to dis tributors who resold to approved retailers; by sales to retailers by means of consignment or agency arrangements with the distribu tors? and by sales to retailers under which the distributors merely transmitted orders from the retailers to the manufacturer. This last manner of distribution was knot/n as the "Schwinn Plan". Under the "Schwinn Plan", bicycles were shipped directly to the retailers from the manufacturer. On such sales, the manufacturer invoiced and extended credit to the retailers directly, but it paid a commission to the distributors for taking the orders. The complaint charged several violations of the antitrust laws. Specifically, resale price maintenance by Schwinn? allocation of sales territories among the distributors; and a group boycott of unfranchised retailers. With respect to the Schwinn Plan of selling and with respect to consignment arrangements, the Supreme Court upheld the restraints of trade on the theory that the distributors in such cases were "undistinguishable in functions from agents or salesmen." It is significant to note that the trial court had found no evidence of price-fixing and that there was ample competition from competing bicycle manufacturers. However, where the manufacturer sold bicycles to the distributors who in turn resold them to retailers, the restraints of trade were declared illegal per se. The Supreme Court indicated that a per se test was applicaEle wherever title passed, while the rule of reason approach was appropriate where the manufacturer had not parted title with the goods: "Once the manufacturer has parted with title and risk, he has parted with dominion over the pro duct, and his effort thereafter to restrict terri tory or persons to whom the product may be transferred--whether by explicit agreement or by silent combination or understanding with his vendee--is a per se violation of 1 of the Sherman Act." 388 U.S. at 382. Page 5 Renarks of Counsel - ATI General Meeting - 2/9/73 The Court carved out two narrow exceptions in which territorial and customer restrictions might be allowed even though title passed. These two narrow exceptions are where the manufacturer is a new entrant and must depend upon such restrictions tc get a toehold in the market, or where the manufacturer is a failing company and the restrictions are necessary to maintain its existence. 388 U.S. at 374. In the same year that Schwinn was decided, the Supreme Court handed down a decision in United States v. Seaiy, Inc., 383 U.S. 350 (1967). The defendant in Seaiy was a venture organized by about 30 manufac turers in order to promote a national brand for bedding. The association, controlled by its members, owned the trademark, assisted with advertising, research, specifications, purchasing and, in turn, assigned each manufacturer a territory in which only it could sell the "Seaiy" products. The trademark licenses provided sanctions for violations of the exclusive sales territories. The sanctions were administered by the association of manufacturers. Despite the fact that a similar arrangement had been upheld in Denison Mattress Factory v. Spring-air Co., 308 F.2d 4*03 (5th Cir. 1962) , as a permissibTo restraint ancillary to trademark rights, the government attacked the restrictive aspects of the Seaiy market ing operation. On appeal, the Supreme Court characterized the Seaiy restraints of trade as horizontal rather than vertical. It noted that the licen sees themselves owned virtually all the stock in the trademark owner, which was the defendant in the lavrsuit. Thus, the marketing arrangement was really "a joint venture, of, by, and for its stockholder-licensees" and" "an instrumentality * * * for purposes of the horizontal territorial allocation." 388 U.S. at 353-354. Furthermore, the Seaiy trial court had found that the marketing plan included price-fixing. The Supreme Court in this context, treated the exclusive territorial rsstraints as part of "an aggregation of trade restraints" and struck the territorial arrangements down as "unlawful under 1 of the Sherman Act without the necessity for an inquiry * * * as to their business or economic justification, their impact in the marketplace, or their reasonableness." 388 U.S. at 357-358. The opinion in Seaiy did nothing to encourage the further develop ment of what is known as the "ancillary restraint" doctrine, treated in such cases as Gray Line, Inc, v. Cray Line Sightseeing Cos. Associated, Inc,, 246 F.Supp. 495 Tn.D. Cal. 1965). But m opinions subsequent to Schwinn, the Court hinted that certain re straints ancillary to the licensing of a valid trademark might be upheld. See, for example, Pema Life Mufflers, Inc, v. Interna Page 6 Remarks of Counsel - ATI General Ileeting - 2/9/73 tional Parts Ccrp., 392 U.S, 134, 136 n.4 (1968); Albrecht v. Herald Co., 3yu U.S. 145, 154-156 (1968) (concurring opinion). This was the status of the law when the Topco case came before the Supreme Court. The Topco Associates drew""sone encouragement from the fact that in its Sealy opinion, the Supreme Court had referred to the argument "that a number of snail grocers might allocate territory among themselves on an exclusive basis as incident to the use of a common name and common advertisements, and that this sort of venture should be welcomed in the interests of competition." Although the Court expressed no opinion on the merits of that argu ment in Sealy, it did state that the Sealy case presented a far different situation. 388 U.S. at 357. However, the Court viewed the Topco situation as being on all fours with the Sealy problem and thus was subject to the per se rule of antitrust illegality. The court pointed out in a footnote in the Topco opinion: "It is true that in Sealy the Court dealt with price fixing as well as territorial restrictions. To the extend that Sealy casts doubt on whether horizontal territorial limitations, unaccompanied by price fix ing, are per se violations of the Sherman Act, we remove that doubt today." 405 U.S. at 609 n.9. In summary, the restraints of trade, relating both to allocations of territories and restrictions on selling to wholesale customers, were viewed in Topco' as products of a horizontal combination and conspiracy among intra-brand competitors. The horizontal aspects of that fact situation triggered the per se rule. The restraints could not be justified as ancillary to vaTTd trademark licenses. Thus it has been reaffirmed that horizontal agreements resulting in restraints of trade cannot be justified by the argument that they are necessary to allow the combination of competitors to compete effectively with third parties larger than themselves. Fendall B. Alcorn, Attorney CADUALADER, DICKERSHAM & TAFT Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textife~ Institute SEP 20 1972 ) 1 : > -** ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES - - GENERAL MEETING Page -1 September 18 - 20, 1972 - SEAVIEW COUNTRY CLUB, Absecon, N.J. Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. Wm. Ma&akant M.J. Scanlan H.H. Walter GARLOCK INC. S.G. Dixit Alex* Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION M.J. Cowan C.G. Guerin M.S. Lindatrom J.P. Power (Canadian J/M Co.) W.B. Reitze C.L. Sheokler J.L. Tucker (Retired) ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED G.P.A. Brink P.E* Leclero BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Marcel Doraia Walter H. Smith Wm.J.W. Smith CAS3IAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. Dr. R.A. Kuntze (Ont.Research Fd LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LIMITED E.A. Farrell MANUFACTURERS MULTIPLES, 3.A. Rafael E. Arnal NICOLET INDUSTRIES,INC. E.W. Ruaaell J.K. Whittaker H.K. PORTER COMPANY,INC. E.C. Bratt D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd L.E. Moody NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.,Ltd. Y. Sato TURNER BROTHERS ASBESTOS CO.,LTD. H.J. Corson,Jr. ASTM COMMITTEE D13.14 P.O. Nicodemua P.J. Smith RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN,INC. J.W. Hawkins R.A. Jann R. T. Matthew M.Q. Scoworoft J.P. Wronski UNIROYAL, INC. D.T. Austin,Jr. B.E. Carden B.D. Bittinger L.F. Dieringer W.C. Hitchoock S. J. Peele,Jr. ***** Minutes1 CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT W.B. Alcorn (Legal counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Exeo. Secretary) Guests: Frank T. Gatke (Asbestos Textile Company) Note: Total attendance at this meeting was 65 persons - which included 21 wives and I4I4. men! 1. President Moody called the meeting to order at 8:45 A.M. Those in attendance were asked to stand and give their name and oompany. (continued) Hinu-dd - ATI jaaeral Meeting - continued:- Page -2 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion bj S.J.Peele,Jr., seconded by M.S. Lindatrom, it was voted unanimously to omit the reading of same. 3. Treasurer Kuzmuk presented the Financial Report as of Sept.1,1972, stating that the Annual Audit of the Institute's books had been made as of that date under the supervision of Mr. R.E. Jeffery, Controller, GARLOCK INC., and found to be in order. Mr.E.C. Bratt moved that the report be accepted - seconded by Mr. C.G. Guerin - and so voted unanimously. The report is attached. 1+. Legal Counsel Wendell B. Alcorn of Cadwalader, Wiekersham & Taft, referring to the permanent standard regulating industrial exposure to airborne asbestos dust which was published in June of this year, (OSHA) reviewed one area in which a trade association such as the ATI could take lawful concerted action aimed at influencing govern mental processes and obtaining governmental action with respect to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the new standard. The full text of his remarks is attached to these minutes. 5. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. Edward A. Farrell, Sales Manager for Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Limited. His review of the usage of Canadian Spinning Fibre by various countries during the year 1971 and current and anticipated developments in the asbestos mining industry, together with the present supply/demand situation for asbestos fibers of all grades, was most interesting. A brief resume' of his remarks is attached. 6. President Moody announced that the Board of Governors had elected new officers for the coming year:- President-M.Q. Scowcroft - Raybeatos-Manhattan,Inc. Vice President - Alex. Kuzmuk - Garlook Inc. Treasurer - E.A. Morria - Uniroyal,Inc. Also, the election of Mr.M.J. Scanlan, American Asbestos Textile Corporation to serve on the Board of Governors replacing Mr. J.W. ChristenDury who resigned last June. A new chairman for the Asbestos Advisory Committee - Mr.M.S. Lindstrom, of Johns-Manville Corporation.- was appointed as successor to Hr. E.A. Morris who has completed the normal two-year term. Mr. Morris, who was unaole to attend this meeting due to illness in his family was presented a Certificate of Appreciation "in absentia". 7. Mr. Moody announced with regret that Mr.H.E. Sunbury, Exec. Sec'y of the Institute for the past nine years, had submitted his resignation to be effective by the end of this year. A committee was appointed by the Board of Governors to make recommendations at an early date for his replacement. 6. Committee Reports:- The Chairmen of the committees listed below presented their reports. A copy of each is attached. Air Hygiene St Mfg. Committee - B.E. Carden, Chairman Asbestos Advisory Committee - M.S. Lindstrom, Acting Chairman Technical Committee - J.W. Echerd, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. Brink, Acting Chairman (continued) >1 Minutes - ATI >eneral Meeting - continued:Committee reports, continued:- Page -3- Environmental Health Committee - L.P. Dieringer, Chairman, was unable to stay for the General Session, and Mr.E.C. Bratt gave the report for him. Mr. Bratt said that every effort possible would be made to convince OSHA that the 5 fiber standard presently in effect should be permitted to continue in lieu of the proposed 2 fiber standard four years hence. 9. President Moody referred to Fiber Testing Committee Report given by acting chairman Brink in which Mr. Brink had suggested that the name of the committee be changed to nFiber Research and Testing Committee" in order to broaden the scope of activities for future years. Mr. Moody said that the Board of Governors had approved the suggestion, and the committee name would be changed accordingly. 10. Mr. Moody announced that the Board of Governors were planning to change the Institute's BY-LAWS to permit weavers of asbestos --containinj fabrics and tapes, for resale as such, who do not manufacture the asbestos yarns used in same, to be eligible for Associate Membership. 11. President Moody thanked the members of the Institute for the beautiful ATMOS clock that was presented to him the previous evening in appreciation of his outstanding leadership during the past two years. He expressed his sincere gratitude for the help and cooper ation from members in connection with his duties as president. 12. President Moody introduced incoming president M.<i. Scowcroft and asked him to take over the meeting. Mr. Scowcroft said that as Vice President of the Institute during the past two years it had been a privilege to serve under Mr. Moody's capable leadership and that he would try to live up to the high standard set by his predecessorl 13. The next A.T.I. General Meeting will be held on - February 8-9. 1973 ( Thursday & Friday) at the HYATT REGENCY ATLANTA. Atlanta, Ga. ll^.. The meeting recessed at 9ikS A.M. 15. Luncheon was served at 11:30 A.M. Curing the luncheon the Secretary was presented with a clock by members of the Institute in appreciation of his service during the nine years that have elapsed since he took office on July 1,1963* He expressed his most sincere gratitude for the gift, and for the splendid cooperation given him by the Board of Governors, Committee Chairmen, and Members of the Institute in respect to his duties as Exec. Secretary & Asst. Treasurer. Had faith that the Institute would continue to supply a vital need in the Asbestos Textile Industry in the years to come as it had since its founding back in 19Ulj-< 16. Meeting adjourned at approximately 12:k$ P.M. Respectfully submitted, Report of Funds ASBESTOS TEXTILE IJSTITUT. September 1, 1972 Balance On Hand at last report (May 1, 1972) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total On Hand Receipts: To Reserve Fund (Interest to 6/30/72) To General Fund ( 1972 Dues) To " (Special Assessments) To " " (Voluntary Contributions) To " " ( Book Sales) $ 1815.67 11173.74 53.77 139.67 250.00 2250.00 1375.00 54.92 Disbursements: Total On Hand and Received Legal Services ( 3 mos ending 6/30/72) Legal Expenses ( 3 11 " ") Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) F.I.C.A. Tax ( 3 mos.) 1T.J.U.A.D. Tax ( 3.mos.) Secretary's travel Expense Office rent ( 4 mos.) 973.00 165.66 938.00 78.00 33.7* 98.53 300.00 ATI Meeting expense ( June 7*8*1972) Printing & Office Supplies 394.94 179.84 Telephone ( 4 mos.) Insurance (Office contents - 3 yrs.) Revision of Fiber Test Manual Postage ( Minutes of June mtg.) Miscellaneous (Gifts, Flowers, etc.) Petty Cash (Vouchers 610-628 inclusive) 210.97 33.50 37.35 24.30 141.50 97.38 Total Disbursements Balanoe On Hand as of Sept.lst, 1972 Funds as of Sept.1st.1972 General "Fund~ $ 3992.64 Reserve Fund (with interest to 6/30/72) Petty Cash Fund 9313.41 (*) 100.00 Total Funds Assets as of Sept.lst. 1972 Total Funds as listed above Accts Receivable (Special Assessments) Accts "" (Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture <`c Equipment (iJoiiinal Value ) $ 13406.05 750.00 '4.78 10.48 1.00 Total Assets Liabilities: $13043.18 4069.59 17112.77 3706.72 .$ 13406.05 $ 13406.05 $ 14172.31 none Net Worth (-:-) > 2000.00 transferred to General Fund on 7/6/72 $ 14172.31 Respectfully submitted. IT.E. sunnrury. Asst_Jty*e*surer FIBRE PRODUCER'S REPORT Asbestos Textile Institute meeting Page -1- September 20, 1972 - Absecon, N.J In 1971 the United States was again the largest importer of spin ning fibre from Canada. The United Kingdom and Germany, followed. Total shipments were down slightly to 30,000 Short Tons from 31,000 Short Tons to a total of 27 countries, as listed below 1971 Canadian Group 3 Shipments United States United Kingdom West Germany India Japan France Italy Mexico Netherlands Czechoslovakia 13,428(Short Tons) 6,001 2,263 1.631 1,616 1,029 62k 586 530 469 17 Others Total 1971 Total 1970 28,179 2,222 30,401 31,231 Short Tons "" The 1971 slowdown of the European and Japanese economies has continued into 1972. This is reflected in the first six months 1972 Canadian shipments (total of all grades) which were 44,000 ST ( 2.5% less than 1971 ) in spite of strong U.S. business. All grades of fibre are currently in good supply except No.7 group is in tight supply. Many important developments occurred in the Asbestos World including 1. Canada - Asbestos Corporation plans to make their first ship ment of concentrate ore from Ungava, Quebec to Nordenham, Germany in September 1972. 2. Australia - Woodsreef Hines Ltd.,N.S. Wales,Australia ( formerly) Pacific Asbestos) controlled by Canadian Pacific Asbestos Ltd., started production in January 1972. The initial production rate will be 45,000 S.Tons per year with a capacity of 80,000 ST/YR. 3* Mexico - Freeport Minerals and uinerva Pegaso's Oaxaca mine is in the field evaluation stage. 4. Greece - Cerro Corporation's Zidani deposit near Kozani is ready for development. (continued ) Fibre Producer's Report - continued:- Pa^e -2- 5. The Nicolet Industries - Colombian Government mine-mill develop ment has been terminated. A new party may continue the development. 6. Brazil - The new mine at Cana Brava will produce about 20,000ST in 197^. Metas e Bases is also developing a mine-mill for 1973 prodn. 7. Canada - Abitibi Asbestos Mining Company's property near Amos, Quebec, will be explored by Brinco Ltd. A pilot plant evaluation of the ore and fibre grades is planned. Brinco has a 4 year option to put the property in operation and to purchase 51# of the shares. Exploration indicates one million tons of 4# ore. Brinco Ltd. is controlled by Rio Tinto Zinc Co. of England (49#) and Bethlehem Steel (4#) 8. Canada - HcAdam Mining Corporation property in the Chibougamau District of 'Quebec is in exploration by the Rio Tinto Canadian Explorations (Riocanex). Rio Tinto is a wholly oxmed subsidiary of Rio Algom Mines. Initial McAdam exploration indicates 90 million tons of 3*87# ore. 9. United States - Jim Walter Corporation acquired Glen Alden's Paneon Corp. which includes the old Carey Company asbestos mining, mill, and plants. Edward A. Farrell Sales Manager Lake Asbestos of (Quebec,Ltd MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MPG. COMMITTEE Page -1- Asbestos Textile Institute - September 19, 1972 - Absecon,N.J. In attendance Buel E. Carden, Chairman .. Uniroyal,Inc. L.E. Moody H..C. Porter Company, Inc Frank T; Gatke Asbestos Textile Co.,Inc. H. J. Corson Turner Brothers Asbestos Co Y. Sato Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. E.W. Russell Nicotex, Inc. L.F. Dieringer Uniroyal,Inc. B.D. Bittinger Uniroyal,Inc. M.J. Cowan Johns-i Ianville Corp. R.T. Matthew Raybestos-Hanhattan, Inc. S.G. Dixit Garlock Inc. J.P. Power Johns-iianville Co. of Canada H.H. Walter American Asbestos Textile Cpn. E.A. Farrell Lake Asbestos of Quebec,LTD C.G. Guerin Johns-Manville Products Cpn R. Amal Manufacturas Multiples,S.A. J.K. Whittaker Nicolet Industries, Inc. Minutes The meeting included discuss ions in the following areas: 1. Cleaning to meet OSHA Standards including Vacuum Cleaners and other methods of cleaning. One company has been very successful in keeping their equipment clean by using small lightweight, vaouum units for individual operators. Machine operators are responsible for keeping their machines and work areas clean and dust free. Usually, two operators are used with one on each side of a frame. This enables them to do a better Job of cleaning with less oleaning time. The larger vacuum units are used for floors, walla, and heavy cleaning. The use of a chem ical (Guardian) light spray is used on machinery, light fixtures, and walls which reduces airborne fibers and dust, making it easier to vacuum and wipe-off these areas. Another plant has greatly improved the dust and fiber count by eliminating their blending line and using a lap system as they have both breaker and finisher cards. This change has also reduced the amount of cleaning required in this area. 2. Dust Collection Equipment - Methods of Collecting and Frequency:- The Membrane Filter metod is now being used to collect airborne fibers. Counts are usually made after one or two hours. In a good many cases, two (2) pumps are used with one stand-by pump. A new method of weighing fibers rather than counting is under consideration but it is not definite that a change will be made at this time. (continued ) Minutes - Air Hygiene & iifg. Committee - continued:- Page -2 3. Respirators and Respirator Programs Respirators must be worn in all areas where the asbestos dust concentration is five fibers longer than five (5) microns per cubic centimeter of air. Only respirators approved by the U.S. Bureau of Mines with a rating of 21B, or valveless respirators providing an equivalent protection, shall be used. All respirators must be kept clean and filters changed as often as necessary. I4.. Protective Clothing Some plants are using rental clothing while others use a non-woven disposable type. Both types are available in one and two-piece uniforms and the price is about the same. Plastic bags are used for storing the work clothes with two sets of lockers - one for work and one for street clothes. 5. Recent Experiences with OSHA Inspections Two types of inspections are made: A. Guards, aisles, signs, and other conditions for worker safety. B. Dust and Fiber Counts. This is usually done with two (2) to three (3) pumps. On a recent inspection the inspector put a pump on an employee. The company also put one of their pumps on this employee. The Inspector's results showed a higher dust count as compared with the company count. However, in this case the company did not ag^ee that its dust count was incorrect and produced past records to prove this. In this particular case the company did not receive a citation. Respectfully submitted. Buel E. Carden Chairman Air Hygiene & iifg. Committee Minutes Page -1- ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTE - Asbestos Textile Institute September 19, 1972 - Seaview Country Club, Absecon,N.J. In attendance:- Mr. M.S. Lindstrom, Acting Chairman; Mr. M.Q. Scowcroftj Mr. Alex. Kuzmuk; Mr. M.J. Scanlan; Mr.3.J.Peele,Jr.; U.B.Alcorn,Attorney;H.H.Sunbury,Sec'y Absent:- Chairman E.A.Morris and Mr. E.W. Russell Mr. Morris was absent due to illness in his family, and Mr. Lindstrom, acting as Chairman, called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. The proposal by the Food and Drug Administration to ban shipment of asbestos-containing consumer garments from interstate commerce, except those which were bona fide protection devices, as mentioned at this committee's last meeting, was discussed. There was no new infor mation available regarding same. It was mentioned that a leading manufacturer of safety clothing had suggested that a cooperative program might be set up to determine the extent of any hazard that could develop from use of asbestos safety clothing (such as linting-off) and that McGill University might be a suitable place to have such tests conducted. Mr. Scowcroft said that if meaningful tests could be developed that he would think it worthwhile for his company to contribute to the cost of the program. The Secretary suggested that the ABRADO-FLEX machine, developed by the late Dr. Shaw during the time he was Research Fellow for ATI, might have possibilities for use in measuring linting characteristics of asbestos fabrics used in safety clothing. After some discussion it was decided that the ATI Technical Committee should be asked to devise a test method to determine the amount of airborne dust that may be released during normal use of asbestos textiles Chairman Echerd of the ATI Technical Committee was invited in to the meeting, and Hr. Peele explained the need for developing a suitable test method as an aid to the safety clothing industry. Mr. Echerd said that his company had an ABRADO-FLEX machine and he was familiar with its operation. However, his company had developed a device for flexing fabrics that he thought was better adapted for the purpose, and illustrated the principle by a blackboard sketch. Attorney Alcorn stressed that a third party, as for example McGill University, should certify the test (or method), NOT A.T.I. Mr. Scowcroft commented favorably on the bi-lingual folder entitled "ASBESTOS AND YOUR HEALTH" published recently by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association as a public information aid on behalf of its member-companies. Copies may be obtained by writing to:- Mr. John A. Gossip, Director of Information Services, Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, Room I4.I2, 5 Place Ville Marie, Montreal 113, P.Q.,Canada. Minutes Asbestos Advisory Committee continued:- Page -2 The Secretary reported that the ATI brochure "Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Fabricating Asbestos Textile Products" was given some publicity in the August 10th issue of PLANT ENGINEERING Magazine and has resulted in 265 requests for single copies. The requests come from Industrial Hygienists, plant engineers, plant safety personnel, insurance companies, etc. The names and addresses of those to whom the brochure has been sent will be made available to each member of this committee. Mr. M.J. Scanlan was welcomed as a new member of the committee replacing Mr. J.W. Christenbury who resigned to accept a position outside the asbestos industry. This meeting concludes the two-year term of Chairman Morris, and the undersigned has been appointed by the Board of Governors as his successor. Respectfully submitted. M.3. Lindstrom Acting Chairman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE SEPTEMBER 18-20, 1972 - SEAVIEW COUNTRY CLUB, ABSECON, N.J. IN ATTENDANCE: J.W. Hawkins D.T. Austin W. Maaskant J.W. Echerd P.0. Nicodemus P.J. Smith Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. H.K. Porter Company, Inc. General Electric Co. ASTM Messers P.0. Nicodemus and P.J. Smith represented ASTM Subcommittee D13.1U, Asbestos Textiles. Proposed Federal Specifications HH-T-1782 for Asbestos Tape and SS-C-1783 for Asbestos Cloth were reviewed by the Technical Committee along with the revised Military Sepcification MIL-C-10316C for Asbestos Cloth. Among the changes to be recommended is the deletion of all tolerances covered by ASTM Standards. A reference to the corresponding ASTM Standard should eliminate unnessary tables and simplify future revisions. Due to numerous other modifications proposed by the committee, the appropriate representatives will be invited to attend a joint meeting with our group. ASTM Specification D-315, Woven Asbestos Tapes, was reaffirmed as a stand ard without revision and will be submitted for letter ballot. ASTM Specification D-1571, Woven Asbestos Cloth, has been revised and will be submitted for letter ballot. The Board of Govenors requested our committee devise a test method to deter mine the amount of airborne dust that may be released during normal use of various asbestos products. Procedures covering weight loss and dust counts were discussed. Additional methods will be investigated prior to our next meeting. The following ASTM Standards are under possible revision for next year: ASTM D-1061, Asbestos Lap ASTM D-375, Asbestos Roving ASTM D-299, Asbestos Yams ASTM D-2100, Asbestos Textiles Used for Electrical Insulating Purposes. Plans are to hold a special meeting at the ASTM Headquaters in Philadelphia on November llith to decide what action should be taken on the above standards Respectfully submitted, Echerd Chairman MINUTES Page -1- Special ATI Fiber Testing Committee Meeting Seavlew Country Club, Absecon,il.J. 18th September 1972 In attendance: Members r-aG.F.A. Brink A/Chairman *D.E. Childers #E.A. Farrell #R.A. Kuntze *W.H. Smith #J. P. Wronski Other ATI Members: D.T. Austin,Jr. B.E. Carden S.G. Dixit J.U. Echerd J.W. Hawkins Wm. iiaaskant Asbestos Corporation Limited H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Cassiar Asbestos Corp.,Ltd. Bell Asbestos Mines Limited Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Uniro^al, Inc. Garlock Inc. H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. Visitors: F.T. Gatke Ralph Lanz Paul 0. Nicodemus #J.L. Tucker (Editor of Test Manual) Asbestos Textile Co.,Inc. Nicolet Industries,Inc. General Electric Company 3&1 Brook Avenue, North Plainfield,u.J. 07062 Mr. G.F.A. Brink acted as chairman in the absence of Chm. Stiefken. Business: 1. Chrysotlle Asbestos Test Manual 1.1 A special meeting of the Fiber Testing Committee was con vened at 3:00 P.ii. on the 18th September, 1972 to discuss the third edition of the "Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual". There were sixteen in attendance at the meeting. 1.2 A report on the present status of the thirty-three test methods being considered for inclusion in the manual was submitted by the acting chairman; and Ilr. J.L. Tucker re viewed some of the details associated with the preparation and compilation of the material for printing. Preference was still expressed for a loose leaf binder to allow for Insertion of revised test methods after printing. It was decided to obtain preliminary quotations from the printers on the basis of lj.25 pages to enable the various member com panies and other organizations to submit estimates for their requirements. 1.3 There were a number of worthwhile suggestions from those present; and it was moved and adopted that on account of the time limit involved, no additional new test methods be considered for inclusion in the manual. (continued) Minutes - Fiber Testing Committee - continued:- Page -2- l.lj. The acting chairman reported that although the original deadline for the delivery of completed QATIA Test Methods to ATI had been revised to mid-October, it was still hoped that it would be possible to convene a Joint meeting of the QAMA, ACPA, and ATI members involved to discuss the format, etc., of the new manual at the end of October. Minutes of the ATI Fiber Testing Committee - 19th September. 1972 There were six in attendance (Indicated by asteriisks in the attend ance list) at the regular Fiber Testing Committee meeting on the morning of the 19th September,1972. Business: 1. New TestManual 1.1 There was some further discussion on the new test manual eg: that the provision of a good quality loose leaf binder (seven ring type) should be reconsidered. 1.2 The opinion was expressed that the title of the manual should probably read,'Test Manual for Chrysotile Asbestos' rather than, 'Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual'. 1.3 It was agreed that, when the final drafts of the QAMA pro cedures were received, they would be circulated to the com mittee members for review and comments ( 10 to 20 copies to be supplied to the chairman for this purpose). l.U- A procedure for the Alpine Test, submitted by Johns-Manville Research, was briefly reviewed. Mr. Tucker was requested to forward ten (10) copies to the acting chairman for distrib ution to the Fiber Testing Committee and interested QAMA members for their comments and opinions as to whether it should be included in the new manual. 2. Test Methods in General 2.1 It was recommended that a list of the test methods submitted to the committee for consideration, but not accepted for printing in the new manual, be established so that copies could be made available to ATI members interested in a particular test. 2.2 It was agreed that criteria for the acceptance of new test methods should be established eg; supporting test data and doclaments. 3. Report to Board of Governors;- Ratification of the acting chair man's lttth September recommendations to the Board of Governors for the future working progress of the committee was requested, namely:- (continued), Minutes * ATI Fiber Testing Committee - continued Page -3- 3.1 Change the name of the committee to 'Fiber Research and Testing Committee1; and expand its scope to include R.& D. activities of interest to ATI. 3.2 Appoint subcommittees to work and report on definite projects etc., in the area of ATI's interest. 33 Prepare a display of typical asbestos ores and fibers vs man-made fibers for exhibit at a future ATI meeting with appropriate technical presentations by qualified speakers. 3*U> Place more emphasis on the presentation of technical papers within the committee and periodically to the Institute eg; annual review of developments in the state of the art of fiber testing. Respectfully submitted. G.F.A. Brink, A/Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee 6th October, 1972 Report of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute September 19 - 20, 1972 - Absecon,N.J. ?age The OSHA standard for exposure to asbestos continues to dominate activities in the field of environmental health. On July 28, the IUD (Industrial Union Department) of the AFL-CIO filed a petition in the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D. C., challenging the validity of the OSHA standard for asbes tos on behalf of 5 unions. The suit as filed contained no de tail on which sections of the standard that were challenged. It is expected that a full brief would probably be filed after Labor Day. The Asbestos Information Association plans to file a brief as a "friend" of the court. At a meeting on August 8 in Washington, OSHA personnel discussed problems OSHA was experiencing because of the lack of reliability of the membrane filter sampling technique. At the meeting, they expressed favor in changing to a gravimetric system of monitoring. A 15 member advisory committee is being assembled to study the many ramifications of the sampling tech niques and arrive at a solution. ; Three recently published articles may be of Interest to members: (1) "Pathology of Carcinoma of the Lung Associated with Asbestos Exposure" by M. Kannerstein and J. Churg, Cancer Journal, Volume 30, page 14, July, 1S72; (2)"Asbestos Air Pollution" by I. Selifoff, W. Nicholson and A. Langer, Arch. Environmental Health; Volume 25, page 1, July 1972; and (3) "Carcinogenicity of Amosite Asbestos" by I. Selikoff, E. Hammond and J. Churg, Arch. Environmental Health, Volume 25, page 183, September 1972. In their article Kannerstein and Churg say that they have confirmed through human lung cancer cases the theory that occupational exposure to asbestos enhances the cancer causing effects of cigarette smokers. Further, asbestos exposure by itself does not appear to increase the incidence of lung cancer among asbestos workers who do not smoke. Their data indicates that the incidence of lung cancer among cigarette smoking asbestos workers was 92 times as great than for non smokers not exposed to asbestos. They draw the conclusion that-it is as a cocarcinogen in combination with cigarette smoking, that asbestos has an effect. In their article. Asbestos Air Pollution, Selikoff et al, states that the oc curence of asbestos air pollution has been established, based on finding by others of mesothelioma among individuals liv ing in the vicinity of asbestos plants and thelF findings in a study on measurement of asbestos (chrysotile) content of am bient air in New York City and lungs of New York residents examined at autopsy regularly showing chrysotile fibrils. (continued) Report of Environmental Health Committee - continued:- Page -2 Based on a study of the mortality experience of a group of workers occupationally exposed solely tc amosite wheift excess lung cancer and mesothelioma were found, Selikoff, Hammond and Churg state in their paper that a serious health hazard is associated with the industrial use of amosite and that its continued use requires rigorous control. Since the June meeting, NIOSH has submitted published criteria packages for noise, carbon monoxide end hot envir onments to the OSH Administration. Members cf the Institute should become familar with the provisions of these proposed standards which may have an effect on some of their operations. At a meeting of the Georgia Textile Manufacturers As sociation in August at Atlanta, the Assistant Regional OSHA Administrator stated that as soon as the new noise standard is adopted, plant inspectors for Noise will increase in tempo with strict enforcement expected. He emphasized that (1) companies must show evidence that efforts are being made to reduce noise levels throuth documentation of any study whether the results are positive or negative; (2) hearing con servation programs be initiated; (3) hearing protection be used only as an interim measure; (4) companies start thinking in terms of an 85 decibels standard rather than"90 decibels; and (5) OSHA inspectors will base citations on their measure ments, not company data. LFDirg L. F. Dieringer Chairman Environmental Health Committ REMARKS OP COUNSEL Page -1 Asbestos Textile Institute -- General Meeting -- Sept. 20, 1972 INFLUENCING GOVERNMENTAL ACTION An organization such as ATI Is an association of competitors. As such, its activities must conform to federal and state antitrust laws. These laws forbid cer tain kinds of conduct, such as agreements to fix prices among competitors, allocations of markets or customers and so forth. In general, antitrust prohibitions, in the con text of trade associations, are aimed at contracts, combinations and conspiracies among competing companies, or suppliers and their customers which result in unreason able restraint of trade. It is Important to recognize, on the other hand, that the antitrust laws do not forbid all concerted action among companies. If the law were otherwise, there would be no purpose for which a trade association could legally exist. This morning, I shall review with you one area in which a trade association may take lawful concerted action. That is, efforts aimed at influencing governmental processes and obtaining governmental action. This should be of particularly vital concern during the coming months Page -2 with respect to the interpretation, implementation and enforcement of the permanent standard regulating industrial exposure to air-borne asbestos dust which was published in June of this year, and which will limit such exposure to two fibers not longer than 5 micrometers per cubic centi meter of air by July 1, 1976. Legal Criteria for Influencing Governmental Processes Broadly speaking, there have historically been two kinds of attempts to affect governmental processes through collective efforts of businessmen: first, attempts to influence the enactment and enforcement of legislation and,second, attempts to influence purely commercial activities of governmental agencies. Those actions de signed to influence the enactment and enforcement of legis lation have been held by the courts to be protected by the First Amendment's guarantee of the right to petition govern ment, and thus they do not violate the antitrust laws, specifically, for example, the Sherman Act. See, e.g.. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961). Conversely, concerted efforts to influence -2- Page -3- purely commercial activities of governmental agencies have been viewed as outside the protection of the First Amendment, and therefore such attempts may constitute antitrust violations. See, e.g.. Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide Corp.. 370 U.S. 690 (1962). The Noerr Doctrine -- In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight. Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961). That case arose when a number of trucking firms and their trade association brought suit against some railroads, an Hi* association ofRailroads' presidents and a public relations firm. The complaint charged a conspiracy to discredit truckers through a publicity campaign and to influence legislation in a manner purposely designed to harm the trucking industry. Id. 129, 133, 138. The lobbying efforts by the railroad interests were made through "front" organizations, ostensibly organized for civic purposes. Id. at 130, 140. The trial court found the defendants guilty of violating the Sherman Act, and this was affirmed by the court of appeals. However, the Supreme Court, in review ing the case, reversed in favor of the railroad interests -3- Page -4. and emphasized that the Sherman Act is intended to regulate "business activity" and not "political activity". Id. at 137 To allow the antitrust laws to be used to regulate political activity would "raise important constitutional questions" under the First Amendment. Id. at 138. In an effort to get around this basic constitu tional principle, the truckers argued that the railroads' "sole purpose in seeking to influence the passage and enforcement of laws was to destroy the truckers as com petitors * * *" Id. Also it was alleged that unethical means, such as the use of "front" organizations, had been used to state the railroads' position. Id. at 140. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court held that such purpose and such practices failed to nullify the railroads' constitu tional right to petition government. In explaining its holding in the Noerr Motor Freight case, the Supreme Court said that the "campaign designed to influence governmental action" was not illegal under the Sherman Act regardless of any anticompetitive purposes which may have motivated it. This, in spite of the fact that the means employed by the railroads fell "far short of ethical standards generally approved in this country". Id. -4- Page -5- Contlnental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide Corp.. 370 U.S. 690 (1962) -- The year following its decision in the Noerr Motor Freight case, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide Corp. This case involved an issue of legality concerning group activity designed to influence the purchasing practices of a governmental agency. Although this group activity was not conducted through a trade association, the holding is nevertheless pertinent to trade association activities. The. defendants included Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation and four of its wholly owned subsidiaries. The plaintiff. Continental Ore, alleged that defendants had engaged in monopolistic and restrictive practices which resulted in the frustration of Continental's efforts to enter and maintain itself in the vanadium business in the following manner: Continental had established a vanadium trade with a Canadian customer during 19^2. But when a Canadian subsidiary of Carbide was appointed by the Canadian Government as the exclusive wartime agent to purchase and allocate vanadium for Canadian industries. Continental was eliminated from the Canadian market, allegedly through actions by Carbide's Canadian subsidiary. -5- Page -6- The lower courts held for the defendants, relying on the rationale that the Canadian subsidiary of Carbide "was acting as an arm of the Canadian Government and we [the Court of Appeals] do not see how such efforts as * * * defendants took to persuade and influence the Canadian Government through its agent are within the purview of the Sherman Act." 289 F.2d at 9^, citing Noerr, supra. The Supreme Court reversed the holding for defendants and distinguished the Noerr Motor Freight case. Rather than engaging in protected political activity, the vanadium producers "were engaged in private commercial activity, no element of which involved seeking to procure the passage or enforcement of laws." 370 U.S. at 707. United Mine Workers v. Pennington. 381 U.S. 657 (1965) -- In 1965 the Supreme Court decided a case which involved a claim by several small coal operators that the United Mine Workers and a number of larger operators had violated the Sherman Act by concerted in fluence on government. Specifically, it was alleged that the defendants had persuaded the Secretary of Labor to establish wage rates for companies selling coal to the Tennessee Valley Authority at a rate too high for small coal operators to pay. 381 U.S. at 660. The alleged -6- ?a^e -7- intent underlying such action was to prevent small coal operators from competing for TVA orders and thereby to hurt nonunion coal operators. Id. The lower federal courts considered the Noerr Doctrine and ruled that protection afforded thereunder from the antitrust laws was applicable ''only to conduct unaccompanied by a purpose or intent to further a con spiracy to violate a statute'". Id. at 669. But the Supreme Court reversed and re-emphasized the teaching of the Noerr holding by saying that it ''shields from the Sherman Act a concerted effort to Influence public officials regardless of intent or purpose. * * * Joint efforts to influence public officials do not violate the antitrust laws even though intended to eliminate competition." Id. at 670. Limits on the Noerr Doctrine -- Since the decision in the United Mine Workers case, there have been limitations placed on the protection afforded group activity among businessmen in dealing with governmental bodies and agencies. In 1970, it was held by a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the Constitution does not immunize from the Sherman Act efforts to obtain restrictive product specifi cations. George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc, v. Paddock Pool Builders. Inc., 424 F.2d 25 (1st Cir.), cert. denied. -7- Page -d- 400 U.S. 850 (1970). In this case, the defendant was charged with having violated the antitrust laws by in fluencing product specifications used by a governmental agency for competitive bidding purposes with the result that only the defendant's product could meet the specifica tions. Id. at 27. The court held this activity unprotected from antitrust attack and said, "The entire thrust of Noerr is aimed at insuring uninhibited access to government policy makers * * * to influence the passage or enforcement of laws." Id. at 32. Protection from antitrust does not extend to purely commercial activity involving governmental administrators which the legislature itself has decided should be subject to competitive bidding. Id. at 33. A distinction has thus been drawn between actions designed to influence executive or administrative agencies in implementing rather than forming governmental policy. When efforts are designed to affect implementation of governmental policy, a showing by a plaintiff that the efforts were motivated by anti-competitive designs may result in a holding that the Sherman Act has been violated. For example, the filing of false forecasts of demand on which production quotas for gas fields were based was held unprotected by the Noerr Doctrine in Woods Exploration & Producing Co., Inc, v. Aluminium Co. of America, 1971 Trade Cases If 73,^22 (5th Cir. 1971). -8- >> Pasre -9- The most recent Supreme Court decision that has struck down group activity designed to influence the government involved two opposing groups of California truckers. One group sued the other claiming that defendants conspired to monopolize trucking in California by opposing plaintiffs' application for additional operating rights filed with the California Public Utilities Commission. The Supreme Court pointed out that Noerr recognized that "there may be instances where the alleged conspiracy 'is a mere sham to cover what is actually nothing more than an attempt to interfere directly with the business relation ships of a competitor and the application of the Sherman Act would be justified."' Quoting Noerr, 365 U.S. at 144. In the California Trucking case, the defendants had sought not to influence public officials but rather to bar their competitors from meaningful access to tribunals and usurped the decision-making process. And although Noerr indicated that unethical tactics did not necessarily spell antitrust violations, concerted activity which is intended to deprive one group of access to agencies and courts may violate the antitrust laws if intended to "build up one empire and destroy another". In writing for the majority, Mr. Justice Douglas conceded that the distinction between a -9- Page -10- political campaign (protected from the antitrust laws) and a conspiracy to prevent access to the political process may be difficult to draw. Nevertheless, that is a dis tinction on which the present state of the law rests. ' Conclusion -- Organizations of businessmen, whether in the form of trade associations or otherwise, can take comfort from the pronouncement and development of the Noerr Doctrine. In this time when governmental decisions and enforcement affect this industry's welfare so dramatically, the right collectively to petition and be heard by government is a precious one that should be Jealously guarded and exercised at every appropriate opportunity. Wendell B. Alcorn, Attorney CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT -10- ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES -- GENERAL MEETTWO June 8, 1972 The ley Bridge MARRIOTT Hotel, Arlington,VA. Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. _ _ASBESTOS _CORPORATION LIMITED Wm. Maas leant P.B. Leciare J.L. Rainey H.H. Walter BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Walter H. Smith OARLOCK INC. Wm.J.W. Smith S.G. DIXIT Alex. Kutanilc LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC,LTD. E.A. Farrell JOHNS-HANVTLLE CORPORATION C.E. Stiefken (ASARCO) C.O. Guerin M.S. Lindstrom NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.,LTD. K.A. Roberts Y. Sato J.P. Power (Canadian J/K Co.) CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT N1C0L5T INDUSTRIES Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Geo. Griswold ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.K. PORTER COMPART B.E. Sunbury, Exec. Sac'y B.C. Bratt D.E. Childers Guest-of-Honor (Luncheon only) L.B. Moody Carl A. Gnam Miscellaneous Metals & Min'Is Di RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. U.S. Dept, of Commerce,Wash.,D.C J.W. Hawkins R.T. Matthew M.Q. Sooworoft Other attendees: I.H. Weaver John H. Marsh (on June 7th only) UNIROYAL,INC. ' Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. D.T. Austin,Jr. B.E. Cardan B.D. Bittingar L.P. Dieringar W.C. Hlteheook B.A. Morris S.J. Peels,Jr. w Minutes eseew 1. President Moody called the meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. Those in attendance were asked to stand and give their name and company. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion of Mr. Scowcroft, seconded by Mr. Morris, it was voted to omit the reading of same. 3. Treasurer Kuzmuk presented the Financial Report. Mr. S.J.Peele,Jr. moved that it be accepted.Motion was seconded by L.F. Dieringer. So voted unanimously. The report is attached to these minutes. o ') Minutes - ATI General Meeting - cant. Page-2 -- 4. Legal Counsel Wendell B. Alcorn reviewed developments under the Villiama-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act that have occurred since our last meeting. The full text of his remarks Is attached to these minutes. 5. Mr.Wm.J.W. Smith,V.P.-Sales, BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED reported for the Fibre Producers. He commented that some of the very long grades of spinning fibers were still in short supply, but the medium and lower spinning grades were ample to meet current demand. In respect to other grades the No.4 and No.7 Group fibers are in good balance, in contrast to a alight oversupply of No5 and No.6. 6. Announcements:- President Moody enounced the resignation of Mr.C.L. Sheckler as Chairman of the ATI Environmental Health Committee, and the appointment of Kr.L.F. Dleringer, Industrial Hygienist, Uniroyal,Inc., as the new ohairman of that committee. Also, the resignation of Mr.K.A. Roberts as Chairman of the ATI Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee due to a change in his company duties. Mr. B.E. Carden, Uniroyal,Inc was appointed to succeed Mr. Roberts. Mr. Moody reported that the Institute was represented at the Public Hearing held in Washington on March 14, 1972 on "Proposed Standards for Exposure to Asbestos Dust" by Mr. Alex.Euzxnuk, who is a member of the ATI Board of Governors and Treasurer of ATI. The full text of Mr. Kuzmuk's excellent presentation is attached., * # 7. Committee Reports:- The Chairmen of the ooramittees listed below presented their reports. A copy of each is attached. Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - K.A. Roberts, Chairman Asbestos Advisory Committee - E.A. Morris, Chairman Technical Committee - J.V. Hawkins, (Acting Chairman) Fiber Testing Committee - C.E. Stiefken, Chairman 8. President Moody announced that the next A.T.I. General Meeting would be held on: September 18 - 20. 1972 (Monday - Wednesday) at the 8EAVIBW COUNTRY CLUB Absecon.N.J. (near Atlantic Clty,N,J.) 9. There being no further business to come before the meeting it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds May 1. 1972 Balance On Hand at last report (Jan.10.1972) ' General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 160.6k 9040.68 72.58 Total On Hand as of Jan. 10til, 1972 Receipts To Reserve Fund {Interest to 3/31/72) 133.06 To (1972 Dues) 2000.00 To General Fund (1972 Dues) 7500.00 To " " (Book Sales) 214.2.66 $9274.10 9875.72 Total On Band and Received Legal Services (16 nos.ending 3/31/72) 3437.00 Legal Expenses ( 6 nos. 11 3/31/72) 497.45 Secretary's salary ( 4 nos.) 938.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 3 raos.) 78.00 N.J.D.A.D. Tax ( 3 nos.) Secretary's travel expense 33.75 135.00 Office rent ( 4 nos.) 300.00 A.T.I. nesting expense,Feb.2-31972 A.T.I. Meeting expense,Oct.6-8,1971 225.71 23.66 Printing & Office Supplies 40.44 Stenographic 32.50 Telephone ( 4 nos.) 150.40 Travel Reimbursement (J.3.Gordon) 36.20 Flowers, plaque,etc. 65.60 Petty Cash (Vouchers 580-609 inclusive) 112.93 $19149.82 6106.64 Balance On Hand ae of Hay 1st,1972 - - - - $13043.18 Funds as of May 1,1972 General Fund Reserve Fund (with interest to 3/31/72) Petty Cash Fund $ 1815.67 11173.74 53.77 _ .. . . ____ Assets as of Lay 1, 1972 Total Funds Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable (1972 Dues) " " ( Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture at Equipment (l:oninal Value) Total Assets $13043.18 250.00 25.35 10.60 1.00 $13043.18 $13330.13 Liabilities none Respectfully submitted. //e H.E. Asst. lot i.orth $13330.13 minutes AIR HTQIESB k MFO. COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 8, 1972 - ley Bridge Marriott Hotel, Arlington, VA. In attendance: Chm.K.A. Roberta . . . C.G. Guerin . . J.P. Power . J.L. Rainey H.H. Walter . . S.G. Dixit E.C. Bratt LE< Moody R.T. Matthew . . I.H. Wearer E.A. Parrell . . 7a Sato . . . B.D. Bittlnger . B.E. Carden L.F. Dierlnger P.E. Leclerc . . . Johns-Manville Corp. a it a Canadian Johns-Manrille Co. American Asbestos Textile Corp. aa aa Oarlock Ino. H.K. Porter Comgany,Ino. Raybestos-Manhattan,Ino. a aa Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. Uniroyal,Inc. aa aa Asbestos Corporation Limited * * * Minutes * * * - 1. OSHA Standards for Asbestos:- Copies of the Pederal Register for June 7, 1972 containing the new OSKA Standards for Asbestos were distributed to those in attendance in sufficient quantity to permit reading and discussing. The committee spent the major portion of its time on the Rules and Regulations for exposure to asbestos dust. Methods of Compliance; Monitoring; Warning Signs, Record Keeping; Medical Examinations and Medical Records; as set forth in the Stan dards. There was general agreement that the asbestos textile industry, because of the nature of textile manufacturing operations, faced a real problem in trying to comply with the new regulation of 2 fibers per cubic centimeter! which are longer than 5 micrometers) of air, on a tine-weighted average, effective July 1, 1978, without incurring excessive manufacturing costa. 2. Vacuum oleaning equipment:- A good discussion was had of various types. A favorable comment was made relative to Nilfish equipment. 3* Other items discussed:- Dust collecting equipment Wet processing technique in spinning and weaving Protective clothing (under OSKA regulations) Respirators (as specified by OSHA) Respectfully submitted, K.A. Roberts, Chairman AoetoiUO AuviiOK^ COMMITTEE j MEETING W June 8. 1972- ') Key Bridge Harriott Eotel Washington (Arlington) D.C. Mr. President: Mr. Secretary: Gentlemen: The Asbestos Advisory Committee met this morning with all member companies in attendance. Our discussion this morning centered on--as I am sure most of the other committee discussions did--the newly published Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust. We touched on the various interpretations and the possible impact of the Standard, and I want to thank Wendell Alcorn for his succinct review of the Standard's content. In addition, the proposed banning rule of the Food and Drug Admin istration was also discussed. This rule, as presently constituted, would prohibit or ban the shipment of asbestos-containing consumer garments from interstate commerce, except those which were considered to be bona fide protection device*. Although professing to be on the side of reason, the FDA claims to be under pressure to issue such a ruling which is predicated on the infamous "asbestos coat affair. " ' Advance copies of the second draft of the proposed banning rule will be mailed to the ATI for review. In the meantime, however, the Chairman of the Asbestos Advisory Committee, representing the ATT, will meet with the appropriate members of the FDA and attempt to present a truer picture of the issue at hand. Since there was no further business to come before the committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 A. M. Respectfully submitted, Edward A. Morris Chairman ) J technical committee Asbestos Textile Institute - June 8, 1972 Key Bridge Harriott* Wash.,D.C In Attendance: j. W. Hawkins----------- --Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. William Maaskant------American Asbestos Textile Corp. D. T. Austin---------------------- Uniroyal, Inc. . Mr. J. Hawkins acted as chairman due to the absence of Mr. Echerd. MIL-C-10316B - Asbestos Cloth . Mr. Echerd has received a letter from Mr. Masson (Dept, of Army) stating that reference to ASTM D 1573, Heat Aging, has been deleted from MIL-C-10316B. ASTM D 1573 is being removed from the Book of Standards. Mr. A. M. Blank, Dept, of Army, Belvoir, Va., has advised some customers that MIL-C-10316B is up for revision. ATI or member companies have not been advised. Mr. Echerd will ask for a time extention so textile industry can recommend changes prior to the issuance of the new specification. MIL-C-82278 and MIL-C82249 - Herringbone Cloth Mr. Zemme of Natick has requested samples of 1.2 lb. herringbone cloth for their evaluation. These samples will have a rayon carrier fiber. If tests are satisfactory, rayon will be included in the new specifications. R/M will submit samples. . ASTM D 1118 - Magnetic Rating Edited copies of D 1118 from ASTM and Dr. Scroggie were reviewed. The Technical Committee was in agreement and minor changes will be passed to Mr. Nicodemus by Mr. Maaskant. The section on sampling was rewritten to clarify the procedure. It was also requested that D 2590 remain as a reference in D 1118. ASTM D 1918 - Asbestos Content Edited copies of D 1918 from ASTM and Dr. Scroggie were reviewed. Mr. Maaskant will pass comments to Mr. Nicodemus. Both D 1118 and D 1918 are presently complete and will be published in the next set of standards. A procedure on resistivity of asbestos products was submitted, it will be discussed at the September meeting. Respectfully submitted. John W.. Hawkins, Acting Chairman Minutes FIBER TE3TIBG COMMITTEE . Asbestos Textile Institute June 8, 1972 - The Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Arlington,VA. In attendance: C.E. Stiefken, Cha. . . . American Smelting & Refining Co. (Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited) D.E. Childers ...... H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Valter H. Smith . Bell Asbestos Mines Limited 1. The meeting vaa devoted to a discussion of the testing procedures presently available for use in the forthcosiing 3rd Edition of the "Chrysotlle Asbestos Test Manual".(See footnote) Letters have been sent to members at large, and to former chair men of the ATI Fiber Testing Committee asking for comments and suggestions applicable to the new manual. 2. The Chairman will welcome all suggestions relative to the makeup of the new manual - preferences as to publishing, type of binding, etc. These should reach him well in advance of the next ATI meeting which is to be held on September 18-20,1972. 3. There are thirty-three available test methods presently being considered for insertion in the new manual. Eighteen of these have been approved by both the QAMA and the ATI, leaving fifteen that have not been approved at this time. . ,_ 4. Ve are now at the stage of having to wait for QAMA and ACPA to submit their final approval on the residual tests. When same is received the ATI Fiber Testing Committee will be ready to evaluate all test methods for final printing. 5. A tentative time-table for the test manual project, based on present indications, would be as follova:- (a) June 30, 1972 - QAMA working deadline (b) September 15* 1972 - QAMA tests delivered to ATI (c) October 1972 - Joint meeting of QAMA,ACPA, and ATI to discuss format, printing, binding, etc. (Tentative - probably to be held in Montreal) (d) February 1973 " Rough final draft of entire new manual (e) March 1973 " All copy for manual to be delivered to the printer. Assuming the above schedule can be met it is estimated, based on allowing 8 to 10 weeks for printing, that the new edition of the Chrysotlle Asbestos Test Manual should be ready for distribution by June lst,1973 Respectfully submitted. C.E. Stiefken, Chairman (e) Rote: The first and second editions were titled "Testing Procedures for Chrysotlle Asbestos Fibre*. () o/o American Smelting & Refining Co. P.O.Box 127. So.Plainfield,H.J. 07060 -1 " " c --t 1,1 " i i. REMARKS OP COUNSEL Page -1 Asbestos Textile Institute -- General Meeting -- June 7-8, 1972 INTRODUCTION Last February in Charleston, South Carolina we talked at length about the Wllliams-Stelger Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 655) which has now been effective for over a year. This is the Pederal law which is administered by the Occupational Safety and Health . Administration (OSHA). Since the February meeting, there have occurred several developments with respect to OSHA which directly affect asbestos producers and users. These developments are the subject of my remarks today.___________ OSHA DEVELOPMENTS ___ On January 12, 197OSHA invited eonents from interested persons on its proposed ____ "Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust". Twelve days later, on January 24th, the Advisory Committee on Asbestos Dust was established to review this standard and make recommenda tions regarding it. The first meeting of the Committee was held February 3 (while we were in Charleston), at which Dr. Marcus M. Key presented the NIOSH "Criteria Document: Recommendations for an Occupational Exposure Standard for Asbestos". The final fruits of the Committee's work were -....... o -- -- Remarks of Counsel* continued:- ' J Page -2- scheduled to be seen in the form of a permanent standard for asbestos dust exposure to be promulgated by June 7th.', That, was yesterday, and has been the main topic of many conversations at this meeting. Thus* the development of a permanent asbestos standard is now past history and atten tion must be turned to present and future compliance. . It can certainly be expected that enforcement of the new permanent asbestos standard will be as vigorous as the limitations of OSRA personnel and facilities will allow. Great pressure will be applied in favor of strict enforcement by labor unions* as surely as such groups have lobbied in the past for a low standard of exposure to asbestos dust. In mid-March of this year* the Industrial Union Department of the AFL-CIO called exposure to asbestos dust "the most devastating environmental disaster yet perpetrated by any industrial nation" and announced that it planned to use as an example of the disastrous proportions of the asbestos health hazard the Johns-Manvllie Corporation plant in Manvllie. New Jersey. The reason the IUD focused on the Johns-Manvllle plant, according to a press statement* was "only because the facts are best documented in Manvllle and because these facts illustrate the need for stringent -2 I uT* Remarks of Counsol, continued;- J Page -3- control." (See Occupational Safety & Health Reporter. March 16, 1972, at page 967.) ' In April, the month following the IUD announce ment, there appeared a two-part article in the press directed at the alleged health hazards to which the workers in Manville have been exposed. The first part of the article bore the headline, "A Jersey Town is Dying -- Fast"; the second part opened with the heading, "A Man With 8 Months to Live". The article cited several cases of asbestos-related ailments and statements by Dr. Maxwell Borow and Dr. Irving Sellkoff. A short time later, an Inspection was completed at the Manville, New Jersey plant by industrial hygienists of OSKA. On June 1, the report of that inspection, which resulted in the citation of five violations, was summarized in the press. OSHA termed one of the violations at the Manville plant "serious" and the other four "minor". It said that the serious violation was found in the textiles building, where asbestos is made into yarn for weaving and carding. The four minor violations resulted from employees working v/lthout the required protective masks. The investigation and citation of the alleged violations at the Manville plant should be considered typical of future OSHA activities in the enforcement of the asbestos -3- Remarks of Counsel, continued:- u - Peg* -14. J standard. Following an investigation and citation of violations, OSHA is required to send a notice of proposed penalties to the company, which then has 15 working days within which to notify the Secretary of Labor that it in--c tends to contest either the citation of the violation or /L the proposed assessment of penalty. If the employer does not file such a notice, the citation and the assessment of penalty is deemed a final order of the OSKA Commission, and such a final order is not subject to review by any court or agency. It should also be noted that employees or their representatives may file a notice with the Secretary claiming that the period of time fixed for the abatement of the violation is unreasonable; in such case, a hearing is held by the Commission. '. Where the employer appeals from a notice of viola tion or proposed assessment of penalty, he is entitled to a hearing and review by the Commission or hearing examiners. This hearing is a fact-finding proceeding in which the Secretary*s citation or proposed penalty may be affirmed, t, modified or vacated. The Commission's order Issued as a result of such hearing becomes final within thirty (30) days. However, if an employer can show that the abatement require ments of a Commission order have not been fulfilled because of factors beyond his control, the Secretary may, after a hearing, either affirm or modify the abatement requirements. -ii- Remarks of Counsel,continued > Page -5 Where a notice of proposed penalty is.uncontest d or where an employer seeks no review of a final order of the Commission, automatic court enforcement is provided. If the employer fails to comply with this court order, he is subject to punishment for contempt. However, a final order of the Commission may be reviewed, at the option of the person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order, and the review Is by a United States circuit court of appeals. To obtain such review, a written petition must be filed In the court within sixty (60) days following the Issuance of the order. This court review is governed by the rule of substantial evidence, that Is, the findings of fact by the Commission are conclusive before the court If supported by substantial evidence. These court proceedings may result In an enforcement order, the non compliance with which would subject the employer to contempt proceedings. . ' CONCLUSION .. The promulgation of a permanent asbestos exposure standard has, of course, appeared inevitable for some time. The big Issue over the past few months has been the level of exposure which would be written Into the standard. That Issue has now been settled, subject to revisions which may -5- Remarks of Couo *1, continued Page -6 occur in the future. Companies in the asbestos industry, now face the task of meeting the new standard; and toward this end, OSHA can be expected to conduct inspections and Issue citations wherever warranted. The overall process of developing an asbestos exposure standard has involved the balancing of economics against health considerations. Vhile it is still arguable that many of the medical studies submitted in favor of a very low exposure level are distorted and misleading, the balance between economics and health considerations has now been struck. The cost of implementing the standard will be high; and in recognition of the difficulty of put ting into effect OSHA standards, the law provides that under certain specified conditions, an employer may obtain either a temporary or permanent variance from the standard. On the other hand, it may be expected that labor will vigorously oppose all applications for variances which cannot be Justified in every respect. The variance rule should be Invoked by employers only where a real need and Justification can be found. Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Cadwalader, Wlckersham A Taft -6- o. March 13, 1972 J Presentation on Proposed Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust on behalf of the Asbaatoa Textile Institute and its member companies. Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Hearing Examiner U. 5. Department of Labor Office of the Under Secretary Washington, D. C. 20210 Re: Hearing on Proposed Standard For Exposure To Asbestos Dust Beginning on March 14, 1972 Dear Mr. Goldberg: My name is Alex Kuzmufe. I am a member of the Board of Governors of the Asbestos Textile Institute. I am here today to officially represent and state the position of the Asbestos Textile institute and its member companies. We are in opposition to the proposed asbestos dust standards as published in the FEDERAL REGISTER, January 12, 1972. We are also opposed to recommendations proposed in the NIOSH criteria package, and by the Asbestos Advisory Committee. / The asbestos textile industry, which this association represents, includes over 4000 job opportunities in manufacturing, plus approximately 35,000 job opportunities in related product fabri cation and sales. The gross business volume for manufacturing alone is over million per year. The gross volume for related fabrication and sales is, therefore, many times this amount. Although this is not the largest segment of the asbestos industry, it is a very important one. Our product lines include the manu- .Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 2 facture of safety garments, insulations, clutch facings, brake linings, paper dryer felts, mechanical packings and gaskets, laminated plastics, and many other commodities essential to today's technological progress. In many instances, there are no known substitutes for asbestos textile materials. Subsequent to the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the threshold limit value for asbestos dust was reduced from 5 million particles per cubic foot of air to 12 fibres per milliliter, 5 microns or greater in length. We, in the asbestos textile industry, made every possible effort to meet the 12 fibre threshold limit value by re-engineering dust hoods and dust collection equipment on cards, spinners, looms, and many other types of equipments In addition, many of us initiated wet weaving and made extensive additional changes in processes and materials. When the further reduction to the threshold limit value for asbestos dust was published on December 7, 1971, we began all over again to study plans for revising equipment, processes, and materials, for which we had just spent thousands of dollars to install to meet the 12 fibre level. Many of us have not, and cannot, reduce our dust levels to the emergency and proposed 5 fibre threshold limit value. If engineering to a 5 fibre level were feasible on the complex types of machinery and equipment used in the textile industry, the cost of implementation would make it extremely doubtful that this industry could survive economically. We are presently being pressed to the wall by our competitors. The cost of a .. M Mr. Arthur M. Golooerg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 3 J program to meet the proposed asbestos dust standards could be the determining factor for removing American-made asbestos textiles from the market place. The competition to which Z refer will not be required to make extensive capital investments to change processes, provide "i&va^protsctlv+clothfng, provide medical examinations, and monitor ing. This competition is primarily from foreign imports. I, therefore, take this opportunity to ask this Federal agency whether it will take the responsibility of recommending equitable tariffs to prevent this economic disaster, if the proposed Asbestos Oust Standards become effective. Beyond the proposed asbestos dust standards published in the January 12, 1972 FEDERAL REGISTER, there are recommendations by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and the Asbestos Advisory Committee. These recommend further reduc- . tion of the asbestos dust threshold limit value to 2 fibres per milliliter, plus many additional requirements concerning . respirator equipment, protective clothing, monitoring, and others. . With the problems we are encountering in attempting to reach the present Emergency Asbestos Standard, it is unrealistic to even consider the feasibility of a 2 fibre standard. I would like to point out that Mr. Clifford L. Sheckler, Chairman of the Asbestos Textile Institute Environmental Health Committee, took the initiative in 1964 to request Dr. Lewis Cralley of the I) Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Rearing March 13, 1972 P*ge 4 ) United States Public Health Service to conduct an epidemiological study of our asbestos textile industry. We recognized then that a potential health problem existed and, therefore, we wanted expert advice and assistance to help us solve it. We have neither received 'the advice nor the assistance which we had hoped for. We opened our plants to the United States Public Health Service personnel for environmental studies, review of our records, and physical examinations of our people. Our member companies urged employee participation in the study, and a substantial represent ative group of workers were involved. We continually requested the United States Public Health Service to increase their efforts and provide interim progress reports. The Public Health Service Asbestos Study of which I speak has not been completed. A recent report, which is a primary factor in the recommendations by NIOSH and the Advisory Committee, was based on this incomplete study. The information provided in the report was based on opinion and speculation, rather than fact. Had the United States Public Health Service Asbestos Epidemiological Study been completed as continually requested by the Asbestos Textile Institute, we might now be in a position of having factual information as to what the safe threshold limit for asbestos dust really should be. One factor is pertinent to this point. The asbestos related o Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 5 :> disease involvement in the asbestos textile industry is being related to asbestos dust exposure levels as they presently exist rather than at the tine the disease was incurred 25-30 years ago. Such a comparison is invalid. All of the past monitoring for asbestos dust in American textile plants has been done using the impinger method for sampling. Today's proposed ^* standards are based on a fibre level using the Milapore filter . method for sampling. There is no accurate correlation of impinger counts versus Milapore filter counts established to date. There has been some work done by the United States Public Health Service, but the results are incomplete. This is but one area that dem onstrates the need for further health research studies and eval uations before unnecessarily creating an unrealistic standard that can be the demise of this industry and its related job oppor t unities. We respectfully urge the Secretary of Labor tot (1) Reconsider the establishment of asbestos standards; (2) reinstate the thres hold limit value for asbestos dust at 12 fibres per milliliter. 5 microns or greater in length for an interim period pending a comprehensive epidemiological study of the entire asbestos in dustry in the United States. I would like to point out that many comparisons have been made between the British and United States asbestos textile industry concerning health problems. The vast differences in materials, equipment and processes make such comparisons unrealistic. (3) Provide for representation of the Asbestos Textile Institute on future advisory and study o Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 6 ' committees. I would also like to point out that while many detailed require ments are included in the proposed standard, it is absolutely mute on the very important medically substantiated problem of cigarette smoking as associated with exposure to asbestos fibre He, of the Asbestos Textile Industry, have the greatest desire to prevent injury to our employees. We believe this can be accomplished without destroying the asbestos textile industry. Thank you for the privilege of appearing at this hearing today. V*j-v brulv vnnra. . Alex KySmuk Treasurer and Member of Board of Governors for the Asbestos Textile Institute aks je Minutes GENERAL MEETING -- February 9, 1968 Asbestos Textile Institute -- Hotel Roosevelt, New York, N. Y. In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. J.L. Rainey J .W. Christenbury H.H. Walter D.F.Quealy Wm. Maaskant GARLOCK INC. N.L.A. Martucci G.E. Houghton Alex. Kuzmuk TALLMAN-McCLUSKEY FABRICS CO. J.L. Mitchell UNIROYAL. INC. R.P. Clark A.C. Link D.T. Austin, Jr. E.A. Morris W.C. Hitchcock Dr. J.H. Y/olfsie R. Roderic JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. E.H. Wells E.A. Schuman W.C. Streib C.L. Sheckler R. Hindmarch P.A. Rogers N.W.Hendry (Can.Johns-Manville) W.S.Hough (Retired) ' H.K. PORTER COMPANY. E.M. Nesvig Geo. Bohrer L.E. Moody J.D. McCluer D.E. Childers J.W.Echerd G.J. Harris INC. ` RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN.INC. M.Q. Scowcroft J.P. Wronski L.C. Williams <J.W. Hawkins J.A. Bettes, Jr.(Retired) Dr. J.L. Goodman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury,(Secretary) A.S.T.M. P.J. Smith ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED M.P. Carson G.F.A. Brink P.E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm. J.W. Smith R. Dodds-Hebron C.H. Schoch W.H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION.Ltd. T.T. Tigert LAKE ASBESTOS of QUEBEC.LTD. E.A. Farrell TURNER & NEWALL. Ltd. B. Lincoln CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT P. Jay ^locken (Legal Counsel) GENIAL ELECTRIC COMPANY P.0. Nicodemus (Guest speaker) U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE Dr. L.J. Cralley TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.LTD. W.M. Deckman D.F. Roberts LUNCHEON GUESTS - Feb. 9th David A. Caruso, C.P.A. Mrs. T.T. Tigert Mrs. N.L.A. Martucci Minutes of the General Meeting: Page -2- 1. President Rainey called the meeting to order at 9:40 A.M. and asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. He expressed appreciation that so many company offi cials were in attendance. Special mention was made of the fact that two former presidents of A.T.I. were present, namely: Messrs. J.A. Bettes, Jr., and W.S. Hough. We were pleased also to have Mr. B. Lincoln, of Turner & Newall, Ltd., Manchester, England; and Dr. L.J. Cralley, of U.S.P.H.S., in attendanc e. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. It was moved by Mr. J.W. Christenbury that reading be omitted. His motion was seconded by Mr. M.Q.Scowcroft. So voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Mr.E.A. Schuman. It was moved by Mr.D.F. Quealy that the report be accepted. Mr. G.E, Houghton seconded the motion, and it was so voted. The report is attached to these minutes. 4. Mr. P.Jay Fiocken, Legal Counsel, reported on some recent liti gation under the Sherman Anti-trust Act. A brief summary of his remarks follows: Counsel reviewed a series of recent Advisory Opinions issued by the Federal Trade Commission, which differentiate between appropriate and inappropriate subjects for industry codes of behavior or trade association standards programs. He emphasized that both the antitrust agencies and the courts have been primarily concerned with the enforcement mechanisms utilized by businessmen to secure compliance with such codes or programs. In this connection, counsel also briefly reviewed industry or trade association price and profit reporting programs, standardization activities, and en forcement techniques involved in certain court decisions which have established the basic principles of permissible conduct. Counsel stated that the current attitude of the Department of Justice, as reflected by recent statements of the Assistant Attorney General, is doubtful of the good faith and the rationale of self-regulation by business and that the FTC's Advisory Opinions in this field have been very conservative and allow little room for variation from earlier restrictive decisions by the agencies or the courts. 5. The Fibre Producers Report was given by Mr. N.W. Hendry, V.P. & General Sales Manager, Canadian Johns-Manville Asbestos Limited. A summary of Mr, Hendry's fine report is attached to these minutes. 6. President Rainey introduced Mr. Paul 0. Nicodemus, Senior Insula tion Application Chemist, General Electric Co., Wire & Cable Dept., Lowell, Mass. Mr. Nicodemus presented an extremely interesting and most comprehensive paper entitled: "Asbestos Textile Electrical Insulations - Properties, Present and Future Importance." At con clusion of his talk Mr. Nicodemus was given a fine round of applause for his very excellent paper. Copies of his paper were distributed to those present. The Secretary has some extra copies and will honor requests for same on a first come first served basis, so long as the supply lasts. President Rainey expressed appreciation, on behalf of the members, to Mr. Nicodemus for his very fine paper. Minutes of the General Meeting - continued: Page -3- 7. The committee reports were given by the respective committee chairmen as listed below: Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - H.H. IValter, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - M.Q,Scowcroft, Chm. Technical Committee - J.W. Hawkins, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. Brink, Chm. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. 8. President Rainey announced that the date of the next General Meeting would be June 6th and 7th, 1968, and it will be held at the REGENCY HYATT HOUSE, Atlanta, Ga. This is a fine new hotel that opened last June. It has received national publicity for its unusual construction and fine accommodations, and we are confident that A.T.I. members, and their wives, will enjoy their stay at the Regency Hyatt House'. He announced also that the fall meeting of A.T.I. would be at the Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Pennsylvania, on October 3-4, 1968. 9. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for luncheon, following which the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted H. E. Sunbury Executive Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds, January 9, 1968 Balance on Hand at Last Report (September 11, 1967) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 832.97 24808.34 38.77 573.32 76.70 $ 25680.08 650.02 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer (3 mos ending 11/30/67) 500.00 Legal Expense- (3 " " " " ") 270,98 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos) 473.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (3rd Q.tr 1967) 33.00 Secretary's travel 250.00 Office rent (4 mos) 300.00 Revision of ASTM Specs.(Travel exp.) 69.25 Printing & Office Supplies 34.45 Stenographic (Labor) 22.00 Meeting expense (October 4-6,1967) 795.11 Telephone (4 mos) 135,28 Exhibit expense 129.20 Accountant (Caruso-Year ending 9/67) 300.00 Dues (I.H.F. and ASTM) 135.00 Dust Counting Equipment(Bausch & Lomb) 4814.00 Petty Cash (Vouchers 328-347 incl.) 78.92 $ 26330.10 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand January 9, 1968 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement of 1/9/68) Savings Fund (Interest to 12/31/67) Petty Cash Fund $ 498.17 17467.66 21.08 {*) Assets as of Jan.9.1SGG Total Funds General Fund ~" ' $ 498.17 Savings Fund 17457.66 Petty Cash on Hand 21.08 Accts Receivable (Book Sales) 65.09 Accts Receivable (Dues for 1968) 9000.00 Postage on hand 10.33 Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) 1.00 $ 8343.19 $ 17986.91 $ 17986.91 Liabilities (None) Total Assets 27063.33 Net Forth 27063.33 (*) Amounts transferred from Savings to General Fund were $2500.00 on 10/2/67; $600.00 on 12/14/67*04814.00 on 1/8/68. Respectfully submitted. H.E. Sunbury <-+-- Asst, Treasurer Minutes ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee February 8, 1968 Roosevelt Hotel New York, N.Y. Attended: Members: ' H.H. Walter, Chairman C.L. Sheckler L.E. Moody A.C. Link Dr. J . H. Wolfsie L.C. Williams - American Asbestos Textile Corp. - Johns-Manville Products, Corp. - H.K.Porter, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Absent: R.B. Smith H.M. Willingham K.W. Nelson - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - American Smelting & Refining Visitors:Dr. L.J.- Cralley R. Hindmarch R. Slocomb J.W. Brown - U.S. Dept, of Health, Education & Welfare - Johns-Manville Products, Corp. - Bausch Sc Lomb - Bausch & Lomb Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter The Bausch & Lomb Dust Counter - Model 40-2 was demonstrated to the committee by Robert Slocomb, Product Engineer of Bausch & Lomb. R. Hindmarch reported that some tests had been conducted with the instrument at the J.M. plant in Manville, New Jersey and comparisons had been made with test results obtained with the Midget Impinger. comparative studies have shown that the results are on the same level; but that a conclusive correlation between the two methods has not yet been established. The instrument was turned over to L.C. Williams, Raybestos-Manhattan, with the understanding that it will be passed on to another member company at the next meeting. The companies using the instrument will attempt to establish a correlation with the Midget Impinger and submit their findings to Dr. L.J. Cralley. Bausch Sc Lomb will also participate in this program. Environmental Health Survey Dr. L.J. Cralley reported on a meeting with the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Dust Control The committee suggests that the Board of Governors consider the advisability of wet weaving to eliminate excess dust during the operation as well as in the use of the end product. Minutes - Air Hygiene ard Manufacturing Committee cont. Page -2- Various other methods to reduce dust during the manufacturing process were discussed. The committee adjourned to attend a special meeting held by the Board of Governors to hear Dr. Cralley1 s report on the continuation and the progress of his environmental health study. H.H. Walter Chairman FIBRE PRODUCERS REPORT Mr. N.W. Hendry, Vice President and General Sales Manager,Canadian Johns-Manville Asbestos Limited, Asbestos Fibre Division, Asbestos, Quebec, Canada, reported for the Fibre Producers. Mr. Hendry commented first on business conditions, and said that 1967 was a pretty good year for fibre producers although a little below the exceptionally good year of 1966. Business was rather slow in England, and Western Europe has levelled off. By contrast Japan is "booming" and Australia is also good. Spain and Italy are doing well, as is South America. The future situation in the U.S.A. is somewhat in doubt as the political situation, credit restrictions and labor problems could affect many major manufacturers adversely. Speaking of the Textile Fibres, Mr.Hendry pointed out that there has been a marked improvement in quality during the past ten years, the producers now have a great deal more knowledge of what constitutes a good textile fibre, and work to produce even better fibre will con tinue. He mentioned that demand for textile grades is quite strong. In comparing total tonnages of asbestos fibre(all grades) produced in Canada vs.Russia, the Canadian mines for year 1967 produced about 1,443,000 tons as against 1,670,000 in Russia. An annual production of 2,200,000 tons by 1970 is forecast for Russia. World production in 1967 was in the neighborhood of 4,300,000 tons. New mines, namely:- Reeves in Northern Ontario, Clinton Creek in Yukon Territory, Aktrovak and at Kiembi Kazakhastan in Russia, and one in Brazil will add to world production of asbestos fibres. The Brazilian mine is 2CO or 300 miles north of Brasilia, and the production there is about 5,000 tons annually. In commenting on the Health Aspects of asbestos, Mr.Hendry referred to the fact that the Q.A.M.A. had established the Institute of Occupa tional and Environmental Health to conduct research into all facets of the production, manufacturing and use of asbestos and asbestos pro ducts. While the Q.A.M.A. has decided not to publish interim reports on research projects because they are not complete, there is no evidence of any risk to human health in exposure to, or use of manu factured products containing asbestos fibres. A great deal of research on the health aspects of asbestos is being conducted at many centers in the world, to which the Canadian producers are lending their support. Adverse publicity on asbestos has prompted Johns-Manville to get out a "Position Paper" in respect to effect of asbestos on Health, for the benefit of their own organization. While this is not for general pub lication, members of A.T.I. could probably get a copy by writing direct to President Burnett of Johns-Manville. In conclusion Mr. Hendry stated that his company, from present indica tions, would discontinue shipping asbestos fibre grades in loose jute bags due to the dusty condition resulting from this type of operation. Various types of bags can be substituted, such as multi-wall paper or polyethylene, both of which are dust proof. February 9, 1968 N. W. Hendry Page (l) of (2) MINUTES OF THE ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE FIBRE-TESTING COMMITTEE MEETING - 8Tl~F"EBRUARY. 1963 LOCATION; Room E, Mezzanine F oor The Roosevelt Hotel New York, N.Y. PRESENT; Members; G.F.A. Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Limited D.E. Childers - H.K. Porter Company, Inc. R.J. Dodds-Hebron - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited B. Lincoln - Turner & Newall Limited W.C. Streib - Johns-Manville Corporation T.T. Tigert - Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Lim-L-ted J.P. Wronski - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Visitors; C. H. Schoch W.H. Smith - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited - tt it nn BUSINESS; 1. The outcome of the Magnetic Rating Round Robin on three asbestos fiber samples at different laboratory locations and the con clusions based on the statistical analyses of the results were reviewed with members of the Technical Committee (6), Mr. Paul 0. Nicodemus, Chairman of Subcommittee A-4, ASTM Committee D-13, and other affiliated ASTM members (3) present, as follows; 1.1 Metallic influence can have a drastic result on the Mapes test, however, if the test is run correctly and the equipment zeroed properly, the influence of metallics can be overcome. Note 1 - During the course of discussion, it was pointed out that, due to differences in construction, it was not always possible to zero all models of the Mapes apparatus in the presence of metallic influence. 1.2 The continuing F x C interaction leads to the conclusion that fiber sampling and/or fiber conditioning is an important procedural technique to be improved in all magnetic rating tests. 1.3 From the Round Robin, there is no major evidence of superiority of T. Sc N. over the Mapes Test from a reproducibility stand point between companies. The advantages of the T. & N., how ever, are ease of operation, less susceptibility to magnetic influence, and its initial cost. 2. The recommendations of the joint session were as follows; 2.1 That the ASTM Magnetic Rating Test Method be rewritten indi cating a preference for the T.& N. apparatus and retaining . Procedure "A" of the present ASTM D-1118 procedure as an alternativ e. Page (2) of (2) 2.2 That the custody of the remaining standard magnetite Sample No. 29(a), or equivalent reference standards, now in the possession of Mr. Paul Nicodemus be -transferred to ATI for safe keeping; and that the Fibre Testing Committee take action to acquire a supply of suitable iron oxide for the preparation of calibra tion standards and arrange for its dispensation through the ATI Executive Secretary in the future (This recommendation was subsequently approved by the ATI Board of Governors). 2.3 That the Technical Committee, in conjunction with Subcommittee A-4, ASTM Committee D-13 members interested, organize a Hound Robin to investigate the performance and reproducibility of the T.& N. apparatus for the testing of textile products before the new Magnetic Rating Test Method is finalized (Round Robin to include the laboratories involved in the recent Fibre Testing Committee's Round Robin plus other ATI member companies interested). 2.4 That the Fibre Testing Committee carry out some exploratory testing with a natural crudy fiber to investigate the effect of the sampling procedure on the reproducibility of the Magnetic Rating Test (Three member companies indicated their desire to participate in this study). 3. Interest was rejuvenated in a test method for determining the undesirable rock and spicular content of spinning fibres (Two laboratories indicated that they were currently considering suitable approaches to this particular problem). 4. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical and ASTM D-30 Committees (Subcommittee III) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. 5. New Business.- The chairman indicated that an agenda would be mailed out one month in advance of the next meeting to stimulate interest in the Fibre Testing Committee's activities; and to assist in guiding its future program to best meet the require ments of ATI. G.F.A. Brink, Chairman ATI Fibre Testing Committee Page -l- Minutes ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Sales Promotion Committee February 8, 1968 Hotel Roosevelt - New York City Attending this meeting were Messrs. J.I,. Rainey and J.W. Christenbury of American Asbestos Textile Corporation, N.L.A. Martucci and Alexan der Kuzmuk of Garlock, Inc., E.A. Schuman of Johns-Manville Corp., J.L.Mitchell of Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, R.P. Clark of Uniroyal, Inc., P.Jay Fiocken,(Legal counsel), H.E.Sunbury,(Secretary), and M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Efforts to place the display cabinet owned by the Institute have now been exhausted. Raybestos-Manhattan offered to store the cabinets pending completion of their new office building in Manheim, Pennsyl vania where it will eventually be placed in their lobby. The committee voted to accept the offer and the matter was turned over to the Board of Governors for further action. At the meeting held in Hilton Head, S.C. last October the committee discussed a proposal presented to it by the Edward W.Robotham Company for an advertising program aimed at promoting the use of asbestos textiles in a general rather than a specific end product usage as an effort to combat the intrusion of alternate materials in many of our traditional fields. Between that meeting and the meeting held February 8th, generally discouraging reports came back from most member com panies. Because of the lukewarm reception at top management level it was voted to shelve the program t emporarily. However, it was recorded that most of the members of the committee felt that there was genuine merit in the program and that it should not be permanently set aside. The purchasing policies of the Government procurement program was discussed in detail. Rather than have legal counsel pursue the matter in an attempt to influence them to adjust this policy, it was agreed that the committee assign two members to visit the D.S.A. in Columbus, Ohio in an attempt to educate ourselves as to the reasons for these purchasing policies and to attempt to obtain relief from them. R.P. Clark of Uniroyal, Inc. and M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. were assigned this task. A full report will be submitted to the committee following the call at Columbus and prior to the next meeting. A detailed discussion was held concerning the hazards involved in the processing and use of asbestos textiles and the affect of adverse publicity concerning asbestos in the market place. While the subject of Health Hazards is of proper concern to the Sales Promotion Committee it was felt that anything we might do at this time in the form of attempting to set industry standards on what might be called "Dust Free" or "Lint Free" fabrics would introduce far more problems than benefits for the Industry. Information had reached members of the Institute that the U.S.Navy had eliminated the use of asbestos cloth as insulation aboard Naval Page -2- ships. This was thoroughly investigated and found to he entirely false. But it has been learned that one private shipyard has eliminated asbestos and replaced it with glass cloth in at least one popular style of cloth. Members agreed that a stepped up and con tinuing program of contacting the Navy Department in Washington is worth our efforts. Competition from Japanese cloth in the United States was also dis cussed in detail. It was suggested that Japanese cloth does not approach the quality of fabrics manufactured by member companies particularly in relation to their flame resistant characteristics and we are working up data to use as ammunition in this area. A specific application of rubber coated asbestos sleeving accused of being the culprit in a corrosion problem with air-frame manu facturers was discussed. No specific action was taken since it was understood that a member company was fighting this substitution with its own active task force. Respectfully submitted. M. Q. Scowcroft, Chairman Minut es Page -1- Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Meeting February 7, 1968 The meeting was held at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City. IN ATTENDANCE: Phil Rogers G.E. Houghton D.T. Austin Wm. Maaskant D.F. Quealy Ed Morris J.D. McCluer P.0. Nicodemus George Harris Paul Smith John Hawkins SUBJECTS DISCUSSED: J ohns-Manville Oarlock, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. American Asbestos Textile Corp. U.S. Rubber Co. H.K. Porter Co. General Electric Co. H.K. Porter Co., Inc. ASTM Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ASTM D 1061: The asbestos lap specification was completed at this meeting. The Editorial Committee of ASTM suggested several changes in format which were not acceptable to the Technical Committee. Other minor changes were incorporated into D 1061 and this speci fication will be published in October without further changes. ASTM D 628: This tubular sleeving method as presently published covers Test Methods only. The sections pertaining to test methods have been completely rewritten-. It was decided that in addition to test methods that this method would also include specifications and tolerances. These additional sections will be incorporated into the method after consideration by the committee. The Technical Committee met briefly with the Fiber Testing Committee to hear their report on the Round Robin test series on magnetic rating recently completed by that committee. These tests considered asbestos fibers only. A joint session was held between ASTM Committee A-4 and the Technical Committee on February 8. Mr. Nicodemus acted as chairman and matters of mutual interest were discussed. A Round Robin test will be con ducted on the magnetic rating of asbestos products - lap, roving, yarn, tape, and cloth. It wa3 also decided that when these tests are complete the specification on magnetic rating would be written up to specify the Turner Analyzer as the preferred method, and the Mapes as an alternate. The other remaining method to be revised is the Heat Aging Specification. Minutes Page -2- Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Meeting December 14th, 15th, 1967 The meeting was held at the Sheraton Park Hotel in Washington, D.C. IN ATTENDANCE; ` Irving Barnett J. D. McCluer Tex Austin Wm. Maaskant H. E. Sunbury Paul Smith John Hawkins - Johns-Manville - H. K. Porter Co. - Uniroyal, Inc. - American Asbestos Textile Corp. - Asbestos Textile Institute - ASTM - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. SUBJECTS DISCUSSED; ASTM D 1061: The 1st Draft of the Asbestos Lap Specification was reviewed. Suggestions by Mr. Nicodemus of General Electric were considered. 2nd Draft was completed and submitted to the Editorial Committee of ASTM. ASTM D 628: The 1st Draft of the Test Methods for Tubular Sleeving (woven and braided) was started. This was not completed and was to be considered during the February meeting. MIL-I-15349C: This specification on Thermal Insulation Tape was reviewed and weight changes acceptable for the amosite and chrysotile types were submitted to the Government. Proposed Aluminized Herringbone Cloth: The proposed specification was reviewed and it is essentially the same as MIL-C-82249A except for the Neoprene backing. Suggestions were submitted to Natick for review. JWE: ch John W. Hawkins Chairman of the Technical Committee ANNOUNCING A NEW PUBLICATION: "INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE HIGHLIGHTS" VOLUME I by the INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION A Message from the Managing Director: "This volume highlights a basic concept of INDUS TRIAL HYGIENE: that exposures below a certain thresh old are safe, allowing the engineer to incorporate human factors in the design of facilities, processes, and prod ucts to the optimum advantage. Fifteen highly competent Industrial Hygienists sum marize and comment upon the status of Industrial Hy giene knowledge and practice in the areas listed. By sponsoring this publication, IHF hopes to further progress in application of existing knowledge to the benefit of the public--especially those who are produc tively employed--while focusing attention of the scientific community upon areas in which further research is needed. This text is a must on the desk of everyone responsible for the health and safety of the work force." Robert T. P. de Treville, M.D. Publication Date: JUNE 1968 Important news about everyone's concern: The HEALTH & SAFETY of the work force What are we doing? What do we need to do? INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA, INC. 4400 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 Non-Profit Org. U. S. Postage PAID Pittsburgh, Pa. Permit No. 162 "INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE HIGHLIGHTS" VOLUME I EDITORS: LESTER V. CRALLEY Editor Chairman INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION, Engineering Committee Chief Industrial Hygienist ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA LEWIS J. CRALLEY Assoc/afe Editor Occupational Health Program National Center for Urban & Industrial Health PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, n-t.w. GEORGE 0. CLAYTON Assoc/afe Editor Consultant, Executive Secretary AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION CONTRIBUTORS: THEODORE HATCH . . . . , . . . Professor Emeritus, University of Pittsburgh .............................................................. Introduction LEWIS J. CRALLEY......................................................................................... Epidemiology of Occupational Disease Occupational Health Program, National Center for Urban & Industrial Health CHARLES P. BERGTHOLDT ................................................................................................ Closed Ecological Systems Environmental Hygiene, NASA Manned Spacecraft Center GEORGE D. CLAYTON..................................................... American industrial Hygiene Association ..............................................................Air Pollution RAY C. WANTA....................................................... Consulting Meteorologist ................................................................ Meteorology ROBERT G. KEENAN................................................................................ Analytical Chemistry and Instrumentation Occupational Health Program, National Center for Urban & Industrial Health BERNARD D. BLOOMFIELD....................................................................................................................... Bureau of Industrial Hygiene, Michigan State Department of Health Engineering HARWOOD S. BELD1NG y Dept, of Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health,! University of Pittsburgh . (.............................. Ergonomics-Heat and Cold BRUCE A. HERTIG I Physical Environment Unit, University of Illinois ' THOMAS B. BONNEY ..................................................................................................................................................Noise Aluminum Company of America HARRY F. SCHULTE.............................................................................................................................. Ionizing Radiation Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory ISAAC MATELSKY..........................................................................................................................Non-ionizing Radiation General Electric Company EMIL A. PFITZER ........................................................................................... The Kettering Laboratory, University of Cincinnati Toxicology WILLIAM A. BURGESS..........................................................................................................Personal Protective Devices Department of Industrial Hygiene. Harvard School of Public Health JOSEPH A. HOUGHTON..................................................................................... Health Hazards of Industrial Processes Liberty Mutual Insurance Company PUBLISHER: INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA, INC. Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 Who should have this TEXT: Everyone responsible for the maintenance of health and safety of the work force: Management Industrial Physicians Industrial Hygienists Safety Engineers Medical and Technical Libraries Schools TAKE* ADVANTAGE OF THIS SPECIAL PRE-PUBLICATION* OFFER INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION 4400 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania 15213 I wish to order the following: j | Copies of INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE HIGHLIGHTS--Volume I at *17.50 each: Pre-publication Price: $17.50 if ordered prior to May 31,1968 and accompanied by remittance Price after May 31,1968: $20.00 Total enclosed: %---- Name Title Company Address City State Zip Code V LA A < \ m* GENiF.AI, MEETING - - February 9, 1968 Asbestos Textile Institute - Hotel Roosevelt, Nevj York, N. Y. In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS textile corp. J.L. Rainey J.W.C hris t e ribury H.H. Walter D.F.Quealy 'Ym. Maaskant OARLOCK INC. N.L.A. Martucci G.E. Hcughton Alex. Knznuk TALLKAN-McCLUSXEY FABRICS CO. J.L. Mitchell UNIROYAL. INC. R.P. Clark A.C. Link D.T. Austin, Jr. E.A. Morris ' W.C. Hitchcock Dr. J.H. Uolfsle R. Roderic JOHNS-HANVILLE CORP. E.H. Wells E.A. Schuman W.C. Streib C.L. Sheckler R. Hindmarch P.A. Rogers N.W.Hendry (Can.Johns-Man-ville) W.S.Hough (Retired) H.K. PORTER COMPANY. INC. E.;i. Nesvig Geo. Bohrer L.E. Moody J.D. McCluer D.E. Childers J .Y/. Echerd G.J. Harris R AYB EST OS-MANHATTAN.INC. Li.vi. Scovjcroft J.P. V/ronski L.C. Y/llliams . J.W. Hawkins J.A. Bettes, Jr.(Retired) Dr. J.L. Goodman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.. Sunbury,(Secretary) A.S.T.M. P.J. Smith ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED M.P. Carson G.F.A. Brink P.E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm. J.W. Smith , R. Dodds-Hebron ' C.H. Schoch W.H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION.Ltd. T.T. Tigert LAKE ASBESTOS of QUEBEC.LTD. E.A. Farrell TURNER & NEWALL. Ltd. B. Lincoln CADWALADER-. WICKERSHAM & TAFT P. Jay Fiocken (Legal Counsel) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY P.0. Nicodemus (Guest speaker) U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE Dr. L.J. Cralley TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.LTD. W.M. Deckman D.F. Roberts LUNCHEON GUESTS - Feb. 9th David A. Caruso, C.P.A. Mrs. T.T. Tigert Mrs. N.L.A. Martucci Minutes of the General Meeting: Page -2- 1. President Rainey called the meeting to order at 9:40 A.M. and asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. He expressed appreciation that so many company offi cials were in attendance. Special mention was made of the fact that two former presidents of A.T.I. were present, namely: Messrs. J.A. Bettes, Jr., and W.S. Hough. We were pleased also to have Mr. B. Lincoln, of Turner & Newall, Ltd., Manchester, England; and Dr. L.J. Cralley, of U.S.P.H.S., in attendance. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. It was moved by Mr. J.W. Christenbury that reading be omitted. His motion was seconded by Mr. M.Q.Scowcroft. So voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Mr.E.A. Schuman. It was moved by Mr.D.F. Quealy that the report be accepted. Mr. G.E. Houghton seconded the motion, and it was so voted. The report is attached to these minutes. . 4. Mr. P.Jay Flocken, Legal Counsel, reported on some recent liti gation under the Sherman Anti-trust Act. A brief summary of his remarks follows: Counsel reviewed a series of recent Advisory Opinions issued by the Federal Trade Commission, which differentiate between appropriate and'inappropriate subjects for industry codes of behavior or trade association standards programs. He emphasized that both the antitrust agencies and the courts have been primarily concerned with the enforcement mechanisms utilized by'businessmen to secure compliance with such codes or programs. In this connection counsel also briefly reviewed industry or trade association price and profit reporting programs, standardization activities, and en forcement techniques involved in certain court decisions which have established the basic principles of permissible conduct. Counsel stated that the current attitude of the Department of Justice, as reflected by recent statements of the Assistant Attorney General, is doubtful of the good faith and the rationale of self-regulation by business and that the FTC's Advisory Opinions in this field have been very conservative and allow little room for variation from earlier restrictive decisions by the agencies or the courts. 5. The Fibre Producers Report was given by Mr. N.W. Hendry, V.P. & General Sales Manager, Canadian Johns-Manville Asbestos Limited. A summary of Mr. Hendry's fine report is attached to these minutes. 6. President Rainey introduced Mr. Paul 0. Nicodemus, Senior Insula tion Application Chemist, General Electric Co., Wire & Cable Dept., Xowell, Mass. Mr. Nicodemus presented an extremely interesting and most comprehensive paper entitled: "Asbestos Textile Electrical Insulations - Properties, Present and Future Importance." At con clusion of his talk Mr. Nicodemus was given a fine round of applause Tor his very excellent paper. Copies of his paper were distributed to those present. The Secretary has some extra copies and will honor requests for same on a first come first served basis, so long as the supply lasts. President Rainey expressed appreciation, on behalf of the members, to Mr. Nicodemus for his very fine paper. Minutes of the General Meeting - continued: Page -3- 7. The committee reports were given by the respective committee chairmen as listed below: Air Hygiene lc Mfg. Committee - H.H. Y/alter, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - M.Q.Scowcroft, Chm. Technical Committee - J.Y^. Hawkins, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. Brink, Chm. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. e. President Rainey announced that the date of the next General Meeting would be June 6th and 7th, 1968, and it will be held at the REGENCY HYATT HOUSE, Atlanta, Ga. This is a fine new hotel that opened last June. It has received national publicity for its unusual construction and fine accommodations, and we are confident that A.T.I. members, and their wives, will enjoy their stay at the Regency Hyatt House! He announced also that the fall meeting of A.T.I. would be at the Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Pennsylvania, on October 3-4, 1966. . 9. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for luncheon, following which the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted o ASBESTOS T SITUS INSTITUTE Renort of Funds January 9, 1968 Balance on Rand at Last Report (September 11, 1967) General Fund Savings. Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund (3ook Sales) $ 832.97 24608.34 38.77 573.32 76.70 $ 25680.08 650.02 Total On Hand and Received Dlsburs aments Legal Retainer legal Expense- (5 (3 nos n ending e 11/30/67) non j 500.00 270.98 Secretary's salary ( 4 nos) 473.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (3rd Qtr 1967) 33.00 Secretary's travel 250.00 Office rent (4 mos) 300.00 Revision of ASTI! Specs. (Travel exp.) 69.25 Printing L Office Supplies 34.45 Stenographic (Labor) * 22.00 Meeting expense (October 4-6,1967) 795.11 Telephone (4 nos) 135,28 Exhibit expense 129.20 Accountant (Caruso-Year ending 9/67) 300.00 Lues (I.H.F. and ASTIn) 135.00 Bust Counting Equipment(Bausch L Lonb) 4814.00 Petty Cash (Vouchers 328-347 incl.) 78.92 $ 26330.10 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand January 9, 1968 Funds . General Fund (Bank Statement of 1/9/68) $ 498.17 Savings Fund (Interest to 12/31/67) 17467.66 (*) Petty Cash Fund 21.08 0 8343.19 17985.91 Assets as of Jan.9.19"3 Total Funds General Fund "" ' V 490.17 Savings Fund . 17467.66 Petty Cash on Hand - 21.08 Accts Receivable (3ook Sales) 65.09 Accts Receivable (Dues for 1968) 9000.00 Postage on hand 10.33 Furniture L Equipment (nominal Value) 1.00 $ 17986.91 Liabilities (Hone) Total Assets $ 27063.33 l'et Forth $ 27063.33 Amounts transferred from Savings to General Fund were $2500.00 on 10/2/67; $600.00 on 12/14/67;..4814.00 on 1/8/60. Respectfully submitted, _ ,, tf' K.E. Sunbury <-4-- Asst, Treasurer o Minutes ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee February 6, 1966 Roosevelt Hotel New York, N.Y. _________________________ _ Attended: Members: H.H. Walter, Chairman _ C.L. Sheckler L.E. Moody A.C. Link Dr. J.H. Wolfsie L.C. Williams - American Asbestos Textile Corp. - Johns-Manville Products, Corp. - H.K.Porter, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Absent: R.B. Smith H.M. Willingham K.W. Nelson - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc. - American Smelting & Refining Visitors:Dr. L.J. Cralley R. Hindmarch R. Slocomb J.'ft. Brown - U.S. Dept, of Health, Education & Welfare - Johns-Manville Products, Corp. - Bausch & Lomb - Bausch & Lomb Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter The Bausch & Lomb Dust Counter - Med el 40-2 was demonstrated to the committee by Robert Slocomb, Product Engineer of Bausch & Lomb. R. Hindmarch reported that some tests had been conducted with the instrument at the J.M. plant in Manville, Nevj Jersey and comparisons had been made with test results obtained with the Midget Impinger. Comparative studies have shown that the results are on the same level; but that a conclusive correlation between the two methods has not yet been established. The instrument was turned over to L.C. Williams, Raybestos-Manhattan, with the understanding that it will be passed on to another member company at the next meeting. The companies using the instrument will attempt to establish a correlation with the Midget Impinger and submit their findings to Dr. L.J. Cralley. Bausch tc Lomb will also participate in this program. ' . Environmental Health Survey Dr. L.J. Cralley reported on a meeting with the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Dust Control The committee suggests that the Board of Governors consider the advisability of wet weaving to eliminate excess dust during the operation as well as in the use of the end product. Minutes - Air Hygiene ard. Manufacturing Committee cont. Page -2- Various other methods to reduce dust during the manufacturing process were discussed. The committee adjourned to attend a special meeting held by the Board of Governors to hear Dr. Cralley's report on the continuation and the progress of his environmental health study. H.H. Walter Chairman ) FIBRE PRODUCERS REPORT Mr. N.W. Hendry, Vice President and General Sales 'Manager,Canadian Johns-Manville Asbestos Limited, Asbestos Fibre Division, Asbestos, Quebec, Canada, reported for the Fibre Producers. Mr. Hendry commented first on business conditions, and said that 1967 was a pretty good year for fibre producers although a little below the exceptionally good year of 1966. Business was rather slow in England, and Western Europe has levelled off. By contrast Japan is "booming" and Australia is also good. Spain and Italy are doing well, as is South America. The future situation in the U.S.A. is somewhat in doubt as the political situation, credit restrictions and labor problems could affect many major manufacturers adversely. Speaking of the Textile Fibres, Mr.Hendry pointed out that there has been a marked improvement in quality during the past ten years, the producers now have a great deal more knowledge of what constitutes a good textile fibre, and work to produce even better fibre will con tinue. He mentioned that demand for textile grades is quite strong. In comparing total tonnages of asbestos fibre(all grades) produced in Canada vs.Russia, the Canadian mines for year 1967 produced about 1,443,000 tons as against 1,070,000 in Russia. An annual production of 2,200,000 tons by 1970 is forecast for Russia. World production in 1967 was in the neighborhood of 4,300,000 tons. New mines, namely:- Reeves in Northern Ontario, Clinton Creek in Yukon' Territory, Aktrovak and at Kiembi Kazakhastan in Russia, and one in Brazil will add to world production of asbestos fibres. The Brazilian mine is 2C0 or 300 miles north of Brasilia, and the production there is about 5,000 tons annually. In commenting on the Health Aspects of asbestos, Mr.Hendry referred to the fact that the Q.A.M.A. had established the Institute of Occupa tional and Environmental Health to conduct research into all facets cf the production, manufacturing and use of asbestos and asbestos pro ducts. While the Q.A.H.A. has decided not to publish interim reports on research projects because they are not complete, there is no evidence of any risk to human health in exposure to, or use of manu factured products containing asbestos fibres. A great deal of research on the health aspects of asbestos is being conducted at many centers in the world, to which the "Canadian producers are lending their support. Adverse publicity on asbestos lias prompted Johns-Manville to get out a "Position Paper" in respect to effect of asbestos on Health, for the benefit of their own organization. While this is not for general pub lication, members of A.T.I. could probably get a copy by writing direct to President Burnett of Johns-Manville. In conclusion Mr. Hendry stated that his company, from present indica tions, would discontinue shipping asbestos fibre grades in loose jute bags due to the dusty condition resulting from this type of operation. "Various types of bags can be substituted, such as multi-wall paper or polyethylene, both of which are dust proof. February 9, i960 N. W. Hendry ) Page (1) of (2) MINUTES OF THE ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE FIBRE TESTING COMMITTEE MELTING - 8TH FEBRUARY. 1968 LOCATION: - Room E, Mezzanine Floor The Roosevelt Hotel, New York, N.y. PRESENT: Members: G.F.A. Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Limited D.E. Childers - H.X. Porter Company, Inc. R.J. Dodds-Hebron - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited B. Lincoln - Turner & Newall Limited W.C. Streib - Johns-Manville Corporation T.T. Tigert - Cassiar Asbestos Corporation United J.P. Ir.ronski - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Visitors:C. H. Schoch W.H. Smith - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited n it ti n BUSINESS: 1. The outcome of the Magnetic Rating Round Robin on three asbestos fiber samples at different laboratory locations and the con clusions based on the statistical analyses of the results were reviewed with members of the Technical Committee (6), Mr. Paul 0. Nicodemus, Chairman of Subcommittee A-4, ASTM Committee D-13, and other affiliated ASTM members (3) present,sas follows: 1.1 Metallic influence can have a drastic result on the Mapes test, however, if the test is run correctly and the eo.uipment zeroed properly, the influence of metallics can be overcome. Note 1 - Luring the course of discussion, it was pointed out that, due to differences in construction, it was not always possible to zero all models of the Mapes apparatus in the presence of metallic influence. 1.2 The continuing F x C interaction leads to the conclusion that fiber sampling and/or fiber conditioning is an important procedural technique to be improved in all magnetic rating tests. . 1.3 From the Round Robin, there is no major evidence of superiority of T. & N. over the Mapes Test from a reproducibility stand point between companies. The advantages of the T. & N., how ever, are ease of operation, less susceptibility to magnetic Influence, and its initial cost. 2. The recommendations of the joint session were as follows: 2-1 That the ASTM Magnetic Rating Test Method be rewritten indi cating a preference for the T.& N. apparatus and retaining Procedure "A" of the present ASTM D-1118 procedure as an alternative. ) Page (2) of (2) 2.2 That the custody of the remaining standard magnetite Sample No. 29(a), or equivalent reference standards, non in the possession of Mr. Paul Nicodemus be "transferred to ATI for safe keeping; and that the Fibre Testing Committee take action to acquire a supply of suitable iron oxide for the preparation of calibra tion standards and arrange for its dispensation through the ATI executive Secretary in the future (This recommendation was subsequently approved by the ATI Board of Governors). 2.3 That the Technical Committee, in conjunction with Subcommittee A-4, ASTM Committee D-13 members interested, organize a Round Robin to investigate the performance and reproducibility of the T.& N. apparatus for the testing of textile products before the new Magnetic Rating Test Method is finalized (Round Robin to include the laboratories involved in the recent Fibre Testing Committee's Round Robin plus other ATI member companies interested). 2.4 That the Fibre Testing Committee carry out some exploratory testing with a natural crudy fiber to investigate the effect of the sampling procedure on the reproducibility of the Magnetic Rating Test (Three member companies indicated their desire to participate in this study).. 3. Interest was rejuvenated in a test method for d'etermining the undesirable rock and spicular content of spinning fibres (Two ' laboratories indicated that they were currently considering suitable approaches to this particular problem). 4. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical and ASTM D-30 Committees (Subcommittee III) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. 5. Hew Business.- The chairman indicated that an agenda would be mailed out one month in advance of the next meeting to stimulate interest in the Fibre Testing Committee's activities; and to assist in guiding its future program to best meet the require ments of ATI. G.F.A. Brink, Chairman ATI Fibre Testing Committee ) Minutes _ Page -1- ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Sales Promotion Committee February 8, 1968 Hotel Roosevelt - Hew York City Attending this meeting ;ere Messrs. J.L. Rainey and J.W. Christenbury of American Asbestos Textile Corporation, N.L.A. Martucci and Alexan der Kuzmuk of Garlock, Inc., .A. Schuman of Johns-Manville Corp., J.L.Mitchell of Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, R.P. Clark of Uniroyal, Inc., P.Jay Fiocken,(Legal counsel), H.E.Sunbury,(Secretary), and M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. . Efforts to place the display cabinet owned by the Institute have now been exhausted. Raybestos-Manhattan offered to store the cabinets pending completion of their new office building in Manheim, Pennsyl vania where it will eventually be placed in their lobby. The committee voted to accept the offer and the matter was turned over to the Board of Governors for further action. At the meeting held in Hilton Head, S.C. last October the committee discussed a proposal presented to it by the Edward W.Robotham Company Tor an advertising program aimed at promoting the use of asbestos textiles in a general rather than a specific end product usage as an effort to combat the intrusion of alternate materials in many of our traditional fields. Between that meeting and the meeting held February 8th, generally discouraging reports came back from most member com panies. Because of the lukewarm reception at top management level it was voted to shelve the program temporarily. However, it was recorded that most of the members of the committee felt that there was genuine merit in the program and that it should not be permanently set aside. The purchasing policies of the Government procurement program was discussed in detail. Rather than have legal counsel pursue the matter in an attempt to influence them to adjust this policy, it was agreed that the committee assign two members to visit the D.S.A. in Columbus, Ohio in an attempt to educate ourselves as to the reasons for these purchasing policies and to attempt to obtain relief from them. R.P. Clark of Uniroyal, Inc. and M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. were assigned this task- A full report will be submitted to the committee following the call at Columbus are! prior to the next meeting. A detailed discussion was held concerning the hazards involved in the processing and use of asbestos textiles and the affect of adverse publicity concerning asbestos in the market place. Y.'hile the subject of Health Hazards is of proper concern to the Sales Promotion Committee it was felt that anything we might do at this time in the form of attempting to set industry standards on what might be called "Dust Free" or "Lint Free" fabrics would introduce far more problems than benefits for the Industry. Information had reached members of the Institute that the U.S.Navy had eliminated the use of asbestos cloth as insulation aboard Naval ) Page -2- ships. This was thoroughly investigated and found to be entirely false. But it has been learned that one private shipyard has eliminated asbestos and replaced it with glass cloth in at least one popular style of cloth. Members agreed that a stepped up and con tinuing program of contacting the Navy Department in Washington is worth our efforts. Competition from Japanese cloth in the United States was also dis cussed in detail. It was suggested that Japanese cloth does not approach the quality of fabrics manufactured by member companies particularly in relation to their flame resistant characteristics and we are working up data to use as ammunition in this area. A specific application of rubber coated asbestos sleeving accused of being the culprit in a corrosion problem with air-frame manu facturers was discussed. No specific action was taken since it was understood that a member company was fighting this substitution with its own active task force. Respectfully submitted. 1 M. Q. Scowcroft, Chairman u) Minutes Page -1- Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Meeting ' February 7, 1968 The meeting was held at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City. IN ATTENDANCE; Phil Rogers G.E. Houghton D.T. Austin Wm. Maaskant D.F. Quealy Ed Morris J.D. McCluer P.0. Nicodemus George Harris Paul Smith John Hawkins J ohns-Manville Garlock, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. American Asbestos Textile Corp. U.S. Rubber Co. H.IC. Porter Co. General Electric Co. H.K. Porter Co., Inc. A STM Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. SUBJECTS DISCUSSED; ASTM D 1061; The asbestos lap specification was completed at this meeting. The Editorial .Committee of ASTM suggested several changes in format which were not acceptable to the Technical Committee. Other minor changes were incorporated into D 1061 and this speci fication will be published in October without further changes. ASTM D 628: This tubular sleeving method as presently published covers Test Methods only. The sections pertaining to test methods have been completely rewritten. It was decided that in addition to test methods that this method would also include specifications and tolerances. These additional sections will be incorporated into the method after consideration by the committee. The Technical Committee met briefly with the Fiber Testing Committee to hear their report on the Round Robin test series on magnetic rating recently completed by that committee. These tests considered asbestos fibers only. A joint session was held between ASTM Committee A-4 and the Technical Committee on February 8. Mr. Nicodemus acted as chairman and matters of mutual interest were discussed. A Round Robin test will be con ducted on the magnetic bating of asbestos products - lap, roving, yarn, tape, and cloth. It was also decided that when these tests are complete the specification on magnetic rating would be written up to specify the Turner Analyzer as the preferred method, and the Mapes as an alternate. The other remaining method to be revised is the Heat Aging Specification. Minutes Page -2- Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Comnittee Meeting . December 14th, 15th, 1967 The meeting was held at the Sheraton Park Hotel in Washington, D.C. I IT ATTENDANCE; . Irving Barnett J. D. McCluer Tex Austin Y/m. Maaskant H. 2. Sunbury Paul Smith J ohn Hawkins - Johns-Manville - K. K. Porter Co. ' - Uniroyal, Inc. - American Asbestos Textile Corp. - Asbestos Textile Institute - ASTM - P.aybestos-Manhattan, Inc. SUBJECTS DISCUSSED: ASTM D 1061: The 1st Draft of the Asbestos Lap Specification was reviewed. Suggestions by Mr. Nicodemus of General Electric were considered. 2nd Draft was completed and submitted to the Editorial Committee of ASTM. ASTM D 628: The 1st Draft of tho Test Methods for Tubular Sleeving (woven and braided) was started. This was not completed and was to be considered during the February meeting. ' UIL-I-15349C: This specification on Thermal Insulation Tape was reviewed and weight changes acceptable for the amosite and chrysotile types were submitted to the Government. Proposed Aluminized Herringbone Cloth: The proposed specification was reviewed and it is essentially the same as 3IIL-C-82249A except for the Neoprene backing. Suggestions were submitted to Natick for review. J7.:E: ch John V/. Hawkins Chairman of the Technical Committee ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - June 7, 1968 The Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. In Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. J.L, Rainey J.W, Christenbury D.F. Quealy H.H. Walter GARLOCK Inc. G.E. Houghton JOHNS-HANVILLE CORP. 2.A. Schuman ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED G.F.A. Brink P.E, Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm.J.W. Smith W.H. Smith CAS5IAR ASBESTOS CORP. LTD. J.G. 3erry T.T. Tigert H.K. PORTER COMPANY,Inc. LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUE3EC LTD. t.E. Moody C.E. Stiefken J.D. IlcCluer TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO. LTD. RAYBSSTOS-MAIIHATTAI'I. Inc. W.H. Deckman <T.A. Brown,Jr M.Q. Scowcroft CADWALADBR .WICKERSHAH & TAFT J.W. Hawkins P.JAY Flocken (Legal Counsel) L.C. Williams Dr. E.P, Stefl A.3.T.M. P.J. Smith TALLMAN-McCLUSXEY FABRICS CO. J.L. Mitchell U.S. Public Health Service Dr. L.J. Cralley UNIROYAL.Inc. Dr. G.R. Cuthbertson ASBESTOS TEXTILE IN 'TITUTE A.C. Link H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) E.A. Morris H.M. Willingham GUESTS Dr. G.C. Holroyd - Uniroyal,Inc. Marion Smith ------- Uniroyal,Inc. Earl Wells............-- Uniroyal,Inc. P.ji. Meyer ------------- Hicolet Industries,Inc. J.K. Whittaker --- Nicolet Industries,Inc. In addition, approximately thirteen wives of members were present at Social Hours and at the luncheon on Friday noon,June 7th. -x--;:-:;-.Minut e s 1. President Rainey called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. and asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company. He expressed particular appreciation that Dr.E.P, Stefl, Vice President of Raybestos-iianhattan, Inc., was in attendance. Also welcomed to the meeting were: Dr. G.R. Cuthbertson, Dr.G.C. Holroyd, Earl Wells and Marion Smith, all from Uniroyal,Inc.; and Messers P.A. Meyer and J.K. Whittaker of Nicolet Industries,Inc. Minutes of the General Meeting - continued: Page -2 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. It was moved by Hr. J/.'. Christenbury that the reading be omitted. This motion was seconded by Mr. 3.a. Schuman. So voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by the Secretary, ilr. J.A. Brown,Jr. moved that it be accepted, and Mr. G.3. Houghton seconded the motion. It was so voted. The report is attached . l(.. Mr. P.Jay Flocken, Legal Counsel, discussed several subjects, including carelessness in corporate writing or speech which, under certain, circumstances, may suggest antitrust problems which actual ly are non-existent; the Federal Trade Commission decision against American Brakeshoe's (Abex Corp.) acquisition of S.K. Welman Co. because of the adverse impact on competition in the manufacture and sale of sintered metallic friction materials; Department of Justice informal consultation with Canadian officials on enforce ment activities affecting each other's country; and the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission merger guidelines. Counsel reviewed the background and stated purposes of the enforce ment officials in issuing merger guidelines as well as the standards applicable to enforcement decisions with reference to horizontal, vertical and conglomerate mergers contained in the guidelines. It vras pointed out that conglomerate mergers, as currently defined and understood by the government, constitute a very sizeable portion of all corporate mergers today. The FTC, for example, esti mates that of 1^5 "large" acquisitions it counted in 1967, 83/ were of the conglomerate type. Counsel noted that the Department of Justice guidelines on conglomerate mergers are less well de fined than on horizontal or vertical mergers and that case-by case enforcement action will have to spell out further the meaninful law in this area. It was noted that the Department of Justice guidelines issued May 30, I960 have been preceded by three separate industry guidelines issued by the FTC on vertical integration in the cement industry, food distribution and food products. Counsel answered numerous questions from members, after his talk. 5. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. Mm.J.U. Smith, Director, Vice President & General Sales Manager of hell Asbestos Mines Limited. Mr. Smith said, commenting on the overall sales picture for asbestos fibres (all grades), that 1966 was a "good year", 1967 was slightly less, and that 1966 is moving toward the 1966 level based on year-to-date figures. Further, that the sales of spinning fibre grades are in step with the overall picture. In Europe, events of the past few weeks in France and other countrys, may have an adverse effect on progress, although there is still considerable optimism there. In England, a more hesitant view is taken. In Japan, which he visited a few weeks earlier. Hr. Smith found that a good start has been made, and they should have a good year even if money gets "tight" as some fear may occur later this year. Minutes of the General Meeting - continued: Page -3- 6. President Rainey introduced Dr. G.R. Cuthbertson, Technical Director of the Fiber and Textile Division, UKIROYAL,Inc., and expressed our pleasure at his willingness to be our main speaker at this meeting. Dr. Cuthbertson1s talk, entitled - "The ACCELERATION OF TEXTILE TECHNOLOGY" or How to take a Giant Step Without Saying "May I?11, was most constructive and of great interest to a most appreciative audience. We are indebted to Dr. Cuthbertson for supplying copies of his talk for inclusion with these minutes. president Rainey thanked Dr. Cuthbertson on behalf of the Institute and it's mambers. 7. The committee reports were given by the respective committee chairmen as listed below: Air Hygiene & Hfg. Committee - H.H. waiter. Chairman Sales Promotion Committee - M.Q. Scowcroft, Chairman Technical Committee - J.W. Hawkins, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. 3rink, Chairman The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. President Rainey expressed his apprecation, and that of the Insti tute, for the fine work of our several committees, and mentioned also the valuable assistance given the Technical Committee by iir. Paul J. Smith of A.S.T.M. in regard to the revision of ASTil Specifications for Asbestos Textiles. 8. President Rainey announced that the date of the next General Meeting would be October 1968, at Hotel Hershey, Hershey,Pa. This is a fine hotel, located in the interesting Pennsylvania Dutch country, with much to see and do. As is customary at our annual meeting each October, members are urged to make a special effort to bring thir wives to this meeting] iir. Rainey announced also, that the winter meeting of A.T.I. would be at the GRAND HOTEL, Point Clear, Ala.(near Mobile) and the dates are February 6-7, 1969. This is a very famous hostelry and those who have attended meetings of other associations there are sure that A.T.I,. members and their wives will greatly enjoy their visit to the GRAND HOTEL] 9. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for luncheon, following which the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted AS3EST0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds May 8. 1968 Balance on Hand at Last Report (Jan.9.1968) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund To Savings Fund To General Fund To General Fund To General Fund (Interest,4 mos.) ( 1968 Dues) ( 1968 Dues) (Book Sales) (Ins.Refund) $ 4.98.17 174-67.66 21*08 $ 17986.91 225.00 3000.00 6000.00 82.71* 29.16 (Est.) 9336.90 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer (3 mos. ending 2/29/68) 500.00 Legal Expense ( " " " " ) ---- Secretary's Salary ( 4- mos.) 4-78.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (4-th Qtr '67,1st Qtr '68) 66.00 Secretary's Travel 69.00 Office Rent ( 4- mos.) 300,00 Printing & Office Supplies 127.83 Stenographic (Labor) 90.00 Meeting Expense (Feb.7-9,1968) 861.99 Telephone (4- mos.) 77*09 Exhibit Expense 116.60 Insurance (Dust Counting Equipment,!yr.) 120.00 New Typewriter(for ATI office) 267.80 Petty Cash (Vouchers 34-8-359 incl.) 64..77 Total Disbursements $ 27323.81 3139.08 Balance On Hand May 8, 1968 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement 5/8/68) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Total Funds $ 31*56.61* 20692.66 35.23 ---------------- Assets as of Hay 8. 1968 General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage on hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) $ 34-56.8420692.66 35.23 24.65 11.42 1.00 Total Assets Liabilities (None) Net North (*) $ $ $ 24184.73 24184.73 24221.80 24221.80 () Includes $225.00 interest estimated for period 1/1/68-4/30/68 Respectfully submitted, H.S.' sunburyj Treasurer minutes Pace -I- Air Hygiene A hanufacturing Committee Asbestos Textile Institute June 6, 1963 - Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,C-a. In attendance: II.K. ./alter. Chairman L.d. hoody II.II. Jillingham L.C. Lillians American Asbestos Textile Corn. II.K. Porter Company,Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. Raybestos,Manhattan,Inc. Absent: R.L. Smith C.L. Sheckler II.I . Uelson a.C. Link II. A. beyard Raybestos-ilanhattan, Inc. Johns-uanville Corp. American Smelting A Refining Co. Uniroyal,Inc. Johns-hanville Products Corp. Cuests: Dr. L.J. Cralley - U..i. Department of Health,Education A /elf are. Lausch A bomb Automatic Dust Counter iir, L.C. b'illiams gave a report on the tests conducted at the Raybestos-.Ianhattan plant in Charleston,.:,.C. The instrument has performed to the fullest satisfaction and proven it's feasibility for spot checks as well as for the dU3t control (recording) over extended periods of time in connection with the Strip Chart Recorder. To find a correlation between the Impinger and the Sausch A Lomb Dust Counter, the instruments were placed approximately one foot apart and operated simultaneously over a period of cne-half hour. The strip chart was running at a speed of 12 inches pe~> hour, therefore charting the dust counts ever s. length of' 6. inches on Ho. 37-01-31 chart paper. To find the average dust concentration during the test period, the following method was applied: The highest and the lowest points between each pair of vnrticle green lines - selecting the ones touched by tre recorder pen were determined, subsequently totaled and divided by the number of readings, resulting in the averages of the high and low dust concentrations respectively. Then the average between the average high and the average low dust concentration was determined, result ing in the average dust concentration during the tesa period. The results were then compared with the ones from the Impinger.- A comparison shows that the figures are - with fewT exceptions very close towetlier. Variations between the figures do not show any clear pattern. A number of advantages of the Lausch A Lomb Dust Counter versus the Impinger lias evolved: 1. Dust concentrations can be shown and documented at any given moment over any length of time. . 2, The chart paper represents a permanent record. 3- -iy extreme dust concentrations cm bj traced to their cause, for example, opening of windows, increased vibration, broken ends.etc iy. The evaluation of dust counts is simple, and not readily susceptible to human error. Minutes - Air hygiene 1 life. Committee - continued: Page -2 5. The instrument can be used for continuous unattended monitoring, 6. The operation does not require a skilled technician, 7. One person can easily conduct 2$ to 30 tests per day, including the time needed for evaluation of the tests, 0. The dust counts can easily be broken down as to particle size. 9. The efficiency and simplicity of the instrument results in savings in labor cost. The instrument therefore should pay for itself in a relatively short period of time. For the proper use of the Bausch C-: Lomb Dust Counter the following points should be tmtehed carefully: 1. The air intake has to be protected by a screen in areas where many large fiber particles become airborne, to prevent the intake from clogging. 2. The instrument shall not be placed near a humidifier since it will record water droplets as dust. 3. The daily calibration requires special care and the instructions are to be followed closely. Ij., Use of a pushcart is recommended whenever a series of tests in various locations is to be conducted. 5. For the use of the instrument over a longer period of time in same location, the use of an electrical outlet rather than of the batteries, i3 recommended. The Dust Counter will be used at the Baybestos-Manhattan plant in ilanheim, Penna., until the middle of July; then will be shipped to the Uniroyal Plant in Mogansville,la. The instrument may be shipped without any danger of damage, in a sturdy wooden box lined with Styrofoam. Dust Control in__the Manufacturing Process : A member of the committee suggested that experiments should be conducted in wet spinning and/or wet twisting, since, due to proper enclosure the dust concentrations in the blending and carding operations are already reduced to a minimum. Although changes in the stucture and appearance of the woven material will be unavoidable, it appears to be advisable to experiment in that direction for the protection of our employees and those of our customers. The application of proper finishing methods should also be explored to restore or even improve the appearance of material woven with wet spun and/or wet twisted yarns. All committee members reported that their respective companies have discontinued the use of Lenox Anti-Ply 3D-5. Most companies con tinue, however, the use of standard mineral oil in their blending operation. Mfforts to find new spray in^. components to hold moisture in mixes are being made. Mnvironmental Health Survey Dr. L.J. Cralley, "J.3. Public P.salth Service, reported on the progress made in research of the influence of toxic trace metals in connection with asbestos fiber. Various important publications are to be expected in the near future. ilinutes - Air hygiene & i-ifg. Coiiiir.ittec - continued: Pace -3- Hygiene and Labor delations: All committee members present agreed that it seems to be imperative to improve working conditions, rest rooms, and the general plant appearance to an extent that the asbestos textile industry can compete successfully with other industries in attracting labor, inasmuch as a higher wage level does no longer mean a decisive factor in obtaining desirable operators. Air conditioning might become a "must" in the near future. Respectfully submitted, H. n. Walter Chairman Hinutes SALRh RROIIOTIOiJ CCh 'ITTLJB . Asbestos Textile Institute June $, 1968 - Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga. The Sales Promotion Committee met on June 6, 1963 with represent atives of four member companies in attendance. Many of you will recall past reports of' this committee which des cribed our concern of the threat of imported Japanese asbestos cloth. The latest reports obtained thru the Department of Commerce show that cloth imported into the U.S. from Japan increased 30m in 1967 versus 1966. Such a large percentage increase is alarming and the committee spent much of its time discussing v;eapons avail able to combat this threat. Some members feel that, because of the extremely low prices that this cloth is selling for, a possible charge of "dumping" might be leveled against the Japanese industry. We requested Counsel to investigate this possibility through an approach to the Board of Trade Commission. Many felt that an effec tive approach to the problem would be to attack in the market place since reports indicate that the Japanese are producing a generally inferior textile product. Since members reported a con flict in test results of Japanese cloth, it was decided to ask the Board of Governors to approach the Tec.mical Committee for a cooperative effort on correlating test data in this area, hope fully, this data will prove conclusively that Japanese cloth is demonstratably inferior and that this data will be available for the use of all members in the field. At our last meeting it was reported that the Government procure* ment policy was such that member companies were discouraged in bid ding, he felt that the Government procedures hindered us in submitting our best bids because of the excessive inverfogies that must be maintained in order to fulfill! their ofttines abnormal demands* hr. Richard Clark and I visited their.1 offices in Columbus Ohio, in order to ecu.- cate ourselves on the reasons for their pol icy and to ascertain whether or not ire could influence them to ch ange the procedure, he discussed this subject in detail at our meeting and arrived at the conclusion that as long as the system <?5#reeently employed was, in truth, working to the best advantage to the ''' '' Government. (though indeed net to the industry) we stood little chance of success to alter it. As has become customary, we discussed at length the problem of the hazards involved in the processing and use of asbestos textile products, he remain vitally concerned about the problem and seek avenues leading to cooperative efforts of the othercommittees. Many suggestions were made and discussed thoroughly but each seem ed to introduce more problems than solutions. However it does seem desirable to make a beginning in educating salesmen in the field so that they can answer queries concerning the health hazard. We feel that this should be the responsibility of each member com pany and it was decided that, for the time being, we should not try to approach the problem by collective action. Respectfully submitted, il.Q. SCO 'CR07T, Chairman MinutesTECHNICAL COMMITTEE Meeting* Asbestos Textile Institute April Ij.-5.1968 at the Sheraton-Park Hotel, Washington,D,C. In Attendance: William Maaskant - American Asbestos Textile Corp. G.E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. J.D. McCluer - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. D.T. Austin,Jr, - Uniroyal,Inc. E.A, Morris - Uniroyal,Inc. P.J. Smith - ASTM J.W. Hawkins < - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. (Chm) The minutes of the Washington meeting are being combined with the minutes of the June meeting, below. June 5 and 6, 1968. at the Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. In Attendance: Minutes: G.E. Houghton J.D. McCluer E.A. Morris D.P. Quealy P.J. Smith J.W. Hawkins H.E. Sunbury - Garlock, Inc. - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. - Uniroyal, Inc. - American Asbestos Textile Corp. - ASTM - Raybestos-Hanhattan,Inc. (Chm) - A.T.I. The Washington meeting was devoted to completing the draft of ASTM Standard D 628 on Braided and Woven Sleeving. This was accom plished and submitted to Dr. Scroggie for editorial comments. At the Washington meeting Mr. Irving Barnett of J/M was recommended to serve on USASI representing Sc.A-lj. of ASTM D-13 and Mr. William Maaskant would be sin alternate. The group will work on "Protective Occupation Apparel". At the Atlanta meeting comments from Dr. Scroggie were reviewed on ASTM D 628 (Braided Sleeving) .The k.th draft of this specification is complete and should be ready for a letter ballot before October. Work has been started on the 1st draft of the Heat Aging Specific ation D 1573. The round-robin test on asbestos textile products is underway and will be completed prior to the October meeting. A joint meeting will be held in October between the Fiber Testing Committee and the Technical Committee, also, a joint meeting will be held with Sc.A-lj. of ASTM D-13. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins Chairman i-IIi-:UTJ3b OF TH-: FIBER T-2bTIm> COaVITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute 6th June, 1968 - The Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga Present: ^embers: (J.F.A, Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Limited G.E. Stiefken (>) - Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited T.T. Tigert - - - Cassiar isbestos Corporation limited Visitors: W.Ii. Smith (*#) - Bell Asbestos *iines Limited J.G. Berry - - - - Cassiar Asoestos Corporation limited Replacing Mr. E.A. Farrell (-*-::) Substituting for Mr. R.J. Dodas-Hebron Business: 1. Magnetic Rating Test 1.1 Calibrating Standards - The preparation and use of calibrat ing standards for "the T.& K. Magnetic Rating apparatus, as well as other details relative to the new test method, were reviewed and discussed at some length. The chairman advised that 20 grams of the original U.S. Bureau of Standards mag netite ample Ho. 29a was being turned over to the ATI Exec utive Secretary for safe keeping ana future correlation work and that correspondence was in progress to locate a suitable replacement for 29a. 1.2 The chairman was delegated to write Mr. Bernard Lincoln con cerning the preparation of calibrating standards for the T.& H. apparatus, replacement of existing glass specimen holders with plastic cells;and the reproducibility of the test in the higher M.R. range. 1.3 The results of some preliminary tests to investigate the effect of sampling and conditioning on the M.R. results were reviewed. It was recommended that magnetic rating tests be performed on fibre samples in the "as received state11, ob tained by the normal sampling procedure outlined in the manual of "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre, 1966 Edition", rather than to specify any special preparational treatment; but that reference be made to the fact that magnetic ratings are affected by degree of openess, or part icle size, in a suitable preamble under the "Scope" of the test in the final write-up. 1.4 It was agreed that a tentative procedure for the Magnetic Bating Test in ASTM format be prepared for consideration at the next meetin.. The interest of ouucorcmittee III, ABTii Committee D-30, in the magnetic Rat in.., test vras Mentioned. Page (1) of (2) Minutes, Fibre Testing Committee, continued: Page -2-(of 2) 1.5 The possible need for a combined meeting with the Technical Committee, when the results of their current Round Robin on textile products become available, was expressed. 2. Objectionable Spicular & Rock Content Test.- Possible approaches to develop a test method for the determination of the undesirable spicular and rock content of spinning fibres were discussed at some length. It was decided that a wet procedure based on the use of hydrocyclones had better possibilities than any known dry classification method. Accordingly, it was agreed that some preliminary work be carried out with hydrocyclones and that the test data and fractions recovered be presented at the next meeting of the Fiber Testing Committee, 3. Recent activities of the QAilA Technical and ASTII D-30,Sub. Com.Ill of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. Ij.. Hew Business.- Although no new business was tabled, member companies were requested to submit any problems and ideas they might have on fiber testing to the chairman prior to the October meeting. This will assist in guiding the activities of the Fiber Testing Committee to meet the requirements of ATI and make future meetings more interesting and worthwhile attending. Respectfully submitted. G.F.A. Brink Chairman THE ACCELERATION OF TEXTILE TECHNOLOGY Or, How to Take A Giant Step Without Saying "May I?" Guest Speaker: Dr. G. R. Cuthbertson Technical Director Fiber & Textile Division UNIROYAL, Inc. Asbestos Textile Institute Meeting Atlanta, Georgia June 7, 1968 1 Gentlemen . . . As every schoolboy knows, Spencer Tracy invented the electric light . . . Don Ameche invented the telephone . . . Paul Muni became one of humanity's great benefactors with his development of pasteuri zation . . . and it is entirely possible that Elvis Presley will some day remove his agile fingers from a guitar long enough to accomplish the world's first successful transplant of the human heart. Now I'm sure you all recognize these very familiar names as those of actors who have portrayed ... or may some day portray . . . the lives of such men of genius as Thomas Edison, Alexander Graham Bell, Louis Pasteur and Dr. Christian Barnard. In a sense, the highly colored motion picture biographies have succeeded in corrupting our appreciation of just how the great developments in technology and science are really accomplished. Reason tells us that most scientific breakthroughs are the endproduct of distinctly unglamoroiis, long-drawn-out years of effort. . . with many people contributing bits and pieces of incremental knowledge to what may in the end become a major advance in any given field and the building of a technological pyramid. But . . . even though we know all this . . . even though we who have devoted years of work in the textile field are well aware of how much painstaking effort was required to develop and improve our own tech nology . . . still we cannot rid ourselves entirely of the romantic notion that innovations and inventions in other fields are accomplished . . .as the movies would have us believe . . . in a far more revo lutionary manner as a blinding flash of pure inspiration. And who's to say that they are not. Take, for example Einstein's Theory of Relativity. I have here in my hand a letter that Dr. Einstein wrote many years ago to his brother, Wilhelm. Let me read it to you . . . My dear Wilhelm . . . I think E equals M.V^. Otherwise, there's nothing else that's new. By the way, could you let me have another five dollars^ That plus the five I already owe you will make it an even eight. Your loving brother. Albert 2 I must confess that the letter I've just read to you is an invention of my own. I don't know if Dr. Einstein ever had a brother named Wilhelm. And if he did, I:m not sure he ever borrowed a red cent from him. But I do knowthat he did discover the Theory of Relativity . . . and that this was a basic and fundamental and revolutionary discovery ... as was Fulton's invention of the steam engine . . . Edison's invention of the light bulb. . . Franklin's discovery .of electricity . . Fermi's postulation of the theory of atomic energy . . . and in our own field . . . Charles Goodyear's discoveries of the vulcanization of rubber ... of the first poly styrene plastic by Simon in 1839 . . . and the first synthetic nylon fiber by Dr. Carothers. Very few inventions and discoveries belong in that category. For the most part, inventions are really improvements and embellishments of past discoveries. But since those of us in one field of technology always tend to believe that the grass is growing much faster and greener in another field, we in the textile business are likely to judge as revolutionary such developments as . . . heart transplants . . . laser instruments for denistry and for cornea transplants . . . computer technology . . . jet propulsion . . . antibiotics . . . television . . .communications via satellite. . .polio vacine and scientific farming. The truth is that a good case could be made to prove that each of these developments should be classified as evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Take heart transplant, for example. Despite the flood of publicity hearalding recent accomplishments in this field, it is by no means a revolutionary development. For heart transplants were preceeded by kidney transplants in humans, and before that by a great deal of experimentation in the transplantation of both these organs in animals. It took long, hard years of research to perfect the surgical techniques and to gain some measure of control over body chemistry before transplantation of organs in humans became feasible. And what about jet propulsion? We think of it as a relatively recent and revolutionary development. It is, in fact, a rather old one for which the patents have long since expired. The phenomenon upon which it is based is something we observed as children whenever we inflated a balloon and released it without closing the opening. Remember how it would jet through the air with remarkable speed! And as for Television . . . well the fact is that a major company had worked out all the details on TV broadcasting and receiving before 1935 . . . with the exception of the difficulty they were having in focusing the electron beams. and receiving a sharp image. This prevented them from broadcasting But they hired a young Ph.D. from the 3 Physics Department, of Harvard and assigned him the task of sol"ing this problem. Needless to say, he was successful and the company honored him by broadcasting his picture every five minutes in their TV exhibit at the 1939 World's Fair in New York. But what about color TV? Surely that was a revolutionary development. It was not until 1964-65 that the same company was broadcasting pictures of pretty girls in color at the World's Fair exhibit. So sorry to disappoint you, but laboratory work on color TV preceeded the intro duction by many years. All of the ooh-ing and ah-ing about color reminds me of an experience I myself had in this area as long ago as 1935. A friend of mine who also happened to be a reporter for the Boston Post called to tell me that a number of financiers in the Boston area had been contacted by an individual who claimed to have developed phosphors which, when exposed to the light of a match, gave off a glow of such magnitude that it provided sufficient illumination to read a newspaper in a darkened room for hours. My own reaction was one of disbelief. I recall quoting the theory that "energy could not be created or destroyed". . .and I told him that the light from a match would not be sufficient to accomplish what the inventor claimed. My friend then asked if I would be willing to discuss the subject with the inventor himself, the press and with some of the potential financiers. I agreed. So they all came to the Harvard Chemical Labs. . .where I succeeded in exposing the promoter/invenfor. He subsequently left town and everybody seemed happy. . But, about a week later, I got a frantic phone call from one of the financiers. To my surprise, he wanted to know how he could get in touch with the inventor. And when I asked him why he wanted to contact such an obvious fraud, he told me that despite the inventor's over promotion of the phosphors, it was possible that some profitable appli cation could be made of them. In fact, the financier himself had some great ideas on how the phosphors could be used in paints. He was sure he could make a fortune with them . . . and I had to admit that the phosphors I had seen were excellent ones that gave off beautiful colors when compared to the standards of that day. Now. . .if in telling you this story I seem to be suggesting that you should welcome the next scientific fraud you encounter with open arms . . .that's not what I had in mind. My point is that many of the scientific marvels that have become old and familiar and taken-forgranted with the passage of time. . .can sometimes find new and exciting and profitable applications in other directions. This was certainly true of phosphorescent and fluorescent materials. They had been known for at least a century. . .and all it took was the development of a mechanical marvel . . . the color TV tube and circuitry ... to take advantage in 4 still another way of their God-Given characteristics. With few ex ceptions, this is true of all progress in scientific research. It takes both revolutionary and evolutionary paths. . .with all sorts of criss-crossings between discovery, development and practical application. For the most part, of course, we can count on long years to elapse from the time when a basic discovery is made to the time when it is developed into an important practical application or put to profit able commercial use. There are times, however, when extenuating circumstances force an acceleration of the pace . . . with the result that the elapsed time between discovery and end-use is greatly compressed. This was certainly true with respect to Atomic Energy . . . which was both discovered and put to use with revolutionary speed. In this instance, the extenuating circumstance was nothing less than the second World War. At stake were our whole political system and freedom itself. Is there any wonder then that we were prepared to muster the country's top technical brains and provide them with the full backing of our nation:s resources to trans form atomic energy into the atomic bomb at revolutionary speed 1 During the same World War II period, the demands of modern warfare dictated another technical revolution that led to the quick development of a full blown synthetic rubber business in the U.S.A. With our natural rubber supply cut off and the subsequent shortage of truck tires threatening our mobility, American business . . . aided by an amazing degree of governmental cooperation . . . responded by developing syn thetic rubber which had been discovered 100 years earlier into an industry capable of 670,000 tons annually within the short space of two years. The lesson is plain for all to see. . .unless there is some extraordinary driving force. . .such as a war. . .or a national emergency. . .or seme great shortage of a vital product. . .our progress in research and de velopment is apt to be evolutionary. . .to move forward at quite a leisurely and unhurried pace. It might even be possible to express this as a formula. You could take all of the available information. . .such as existing patents . . .growth of population. . .labor statistics. . .research and de velopment activities. . .competitive pressures both domestic and foreign . . . the amount of investment required . . . et cetera. . . and putting all these factors together . . . you could probably come up with a good estimate as to the rate of progress that is likely to occur in product development and commercialization in any given field. It's entirely possible that you wouldn't even have to take all of these factors into account. It's possible that just one of them would so 5 overwhelm the others that no charting or weighing of factors would be required. Let me cite a case in point. You may remember that about eight years ago, the development of the air-car was announced. As a matter of fact, some versions of this car are now in use on a limited scale in swamp lands. Essentially, it is a car with a coated fabric skirt that's suspended above the ground by air pressure and propelled by jets or a propeller. Naturally, we were quite interested in this development. . .and for two reasons. First. . .because it meant that if this type of vehicle should replace the conventional automobile, it would open up a big market for coated fabrics. And secondly. . .because it would, at the same time, have a tremendously adverse effect on our tire market. So we hastened to acquire every possible bit of engineering and per formance data obtainable about the air-car. . .and it quickly became obvious to us that m spite of the manufacturer's claims . . .this type of vehicle could not. operate effectively on conventional highways. Wind and draft factors made it impossible for the air-car to travel at acceptable rates of speed and manage, at the same time, to stay in traffic lanes or even on the highways. So it was concluded. . .quite correctly. . .that the air-car was not usable on our present highway system. It became clear, too that because'Of the tremendous investment in both manpower and dollars required. . .it would take at least 25 years before suitable highways could be constructed. However, we were able to foresee that the air-car could be used in specialized situations. . .and, as a result, a coated fabric business for air-car use is evolving on a limited basis. The analysis of this particular situation was easy enough. But . . there are others that tend to be much more complicated . . . and m these cases it is important that we take every single factor into consideration. . Off hand, I can think of at least 8 vital factors that will undoubtedly influence whatever revolutionary and evolutionary developments are in store for American fibers and textiles in the foreseeable future. First . . . the pressure of foreign imports; Second . . . the demands of our own Safety Codes (especially with respect to Air Pollution in the manufacturing processes and Inflammability of product at the consumer end); 6 Third . the developments of Creative Chemistry- Fourth . the advances made m Automated Manufacturing Equipment- Fifth . industrial requirements for specialized fibers &, textiles: Sixth . evolving fads and fashions in Styling; Seventh . an insistence upon improved Household Performance (particularly in the area of wrinkle-free, permanently pressed and easy-to-mamtam fabrics) : And Eighth. the requirements of our Military Establishment. All of these factors. . .as well as others that you yourself may wish to include. . .are bound to have an important bearing on the progress of our textile technology. Let:s consider them individually. Most important of all is the impact of foreign imports. Unfortunately, this is one area in which most of us tend to be dangerously complacent. After all, the current le^el of apparel and textile imports consitutes only about 12% of our domestic production. But. . .that 12% figure is a deceptive one. In terms of sheer tonnage it adds up to a huge influx of foreign fibers and textiles. Bear in mind that no single U.S. textile producer accounts for 12% of domestic production, and that will gr-e you some idea of how many jobs and plant facilities could be added here m the U.S.A. if that 12% wasn't coming in from overseas. And the situation is likely to get much worse before it gets better. The recent agreement reached in the so-called "Kennedy Pound' of tariff negotiations at Geneva, Switzerland, could have serious consequences for our own industry. Under the terms of that agreement, tariff reductions are scheduled for some 6,000 products between 1968 and 1972. Among other things, the agreement calls for a sharp reduction m tariffs on spun yarns from both natural and man-made fibers, asbestos products, knitted fabrics, elastic yarns and tire cord. Passenger tires and polypropylene products competitive with those made m the U.S. will fall under the 50% tariff cut. These tariff reductions have been well publicized abroad. As a result, European producers have an intensified awareness of the tremendous market potential that exists here in the U.S.A. It is reasonable to expect that they are gearing up to take fuller advantage of it. Our own politicians are now giving some consideration to imposing import quotos m an effort to correct the situation. But this is, best, only a short-term expedient. It does not provide us with an answer over the long haul. at 7 What's more, the problem is complicated by the fact that many of these foreign imports are not only lower in price but of good quality as well. It's often mentioned that we're competing with much lower labor costs from abroad. For example, it averages about 50 cents an hour in Japan, and 25 cents an hour in South Korea as compared with a $2.00-per-hour average in the U. S. textile business. But lower labor costs are not the only factor. Very little has been said about the fact that U S. companies have sold American technology abroad. This includes both product and processing technology . . . and it is one of the big reasons why our foreign competition can make products of good quality through automated processes. Add that to their low labor costs and it's no wonder foreign competition is so rugged. And the big question that faces us is simply this: Aside from political maneuverings, just what exactly are we going to do about this threat from abroad? Kow will we meet the challenge? Well, for one thing, I'd suggest that we make much more effective use of the most powerful weapon we have in our arsenal . . . Research and Development. It happens to be a weapon that we in the textile business have been woefully laggard in utilizing . . . especially in comparison with the way it has been brought to bear by other industries. The figures speak for themselves. We in the textile business are spending somewhere in the neighborhood of .6% of sales for research and development . . . which is just about one-seventh of the per centage that all U. S. industry averages in R & D expenditures. In fact, U. S. industry as a whole is in a mood to do some tall R & D spending over the next few years. Surveys taken by McGraw Hill's Economics Department, as reported in the May 18 issue of Business Week, indicate that the top U. S. companies plan to in crease their R & D spending between now and 1971 by a full 25%. And they expect to see some substantial rewards for their efforts in the form of marketable new products. On the average, U. S. businessmen predict that 17% of their sales in 1971 will be derived from new, or substantially new, products. In terms of 1967 dollars, 8- - these U. S. producers are counting on sales of $121-billion from new products just three years from now. And how do we in the textile industry fit into that picture? The answer is, we don't! That same Business Week article charts the expenditures for R & D by 15 separate industries, producers of both durable and non-durable goods. And where do we stand on that chart? Dead last. We were last in 1966 . . . last in 1967 . . . we'll be last again this year . . . and it:s predicted that we'll have the dubious distinction of being last in 1971 ... as well. It's estimated, for example, that $50 million will be spent for research and development by textile mill product and apparel producers. Compare that with the six-billion three-hundred-andforty-seven million-dollars that the areospace industry alone will spend this year for research and development. Compare it with the $4.2 billion to be spent for R & D by the electrical machinery and communications equipment industry. By comparison, our expenditures are a drop in the bucket. And by 1971, the situation won't be much better . . . unless we decide to do something about it now. Business Week estimates our P & D outlays in 1971 at something like $62 million. The aerospace people will be up to $8.4 billion by then and the elect rical machinery and communications equipment people will be spending $5.3 billion. The total R U D in 1967 was $16,789 million which is 2.1% of the Gross National Product of $785 billion while textile and apparel R & D was 46 million or .25% of $18,700 million contribution to the Gross National Product. .25% is only 1/8 of the average industry rate. These figures remind me of another statement of facts which goes like this. The U.S.A. has 6%. of the World's population but does 50% of the work and consumes 40% of the raw material. Something to be proud of . . . but if what we read and hear is true, it is not because of textiles. Here we are on the defensive and must catch up,, The only way appears to be through increased R St D. That doesn't mean the picture is all bad. Despite the low level of expenditures, our R & D has already managed to offset foreign competition in some areas. For instance, a number of U. S. companies have developed a synthetic backing for tufted carpets that is making inroads into the use of imported jute. 9 We're also using synthetic fabrics to replace imported jute in the fabrication of sandbags for the government. And in the sophisticated tire cord field, American-made products are still holding their own. Even when the foreign competition is particularly tough, R & D ingenuity can frequently find an answer. One example that comes to mind has to do with the marketing of soft side bags. About 60% of the bags sold in this country come from Japan and Korea. They're indistinguishable from the U. S.-made bags . . . but they're not made in factories . . . they're put together from pre-cut parts in private homes by women and children. So despite the import tax, these bags can be sold in the U.S.A. for 25% less than the ones we make. It would seem that this presents American competition with a hopeless task. Yet one American company is managing to meet the challenge. Through their own Research and Development, they've come up with a 100% molded bag of good appearance. And it is selling. So there's no reason to doubt that we can ... by developing new automated production processes. . .challenge the imports in other areas as well. Automation is, in still another way, a major factor governing the acceleration of our technology. Here again, we find ourselves lagging behind our foreign competition. In almost every area of textile equipment development . . . for weaving . . . knitting . . . and false twist texturizing . . . you'll find that the most efficient equipment has not been developed in the U.S.A. Our own textile equipment makers are not as active as their foreign competition. But one thing is certain. All of the current developments in patents, lab equipment, pilot equipment and certain forms of production . . . reveal quite clearly that new automated yarn and new fabric-forming processes are evolving. This could literally revolutionize the textile industry within the next 15 years. And it points up the fact that there is a very pressing need for American companies to gain leadership in the development of automated equipment. Still another factor that will influence the directions in which textile technology must evolve is the effect of our new Safety Codes. As you know, the Federal Government is very much concerned about reducing the number of injuries and fatalities caused by accidents in our industry. This is particularly true with respect to accidents caused by flammable fabrics, including clothing, drapes, carpets, bedding, etc. I have no doubt that the Safety Codes dealing with inflammability requirements will result in major changes in our fibers and textiles. Since the objective is worthwhile . . . and the government's pressure unrelenting . . . these changes could be brought about at revolutionary speed. 10 A third factor influencing our technology will be the role played by creative chemistry. The chemist has discovered how to put together a multitude of monomers to make fiber-forming polymers. So it appears now that instead of a limited number of polymers being used m fibers, a great number will emerge and be used for quality and styling at lower cost. Perhaps you've already seen how one major fiber producer has been tantalizing the public with a mystery ad for a new fiber that is claimed to be better than the best we now have. There'll be many more new and better fibers. Our tremendous volume of over 8 billion pounds of natural and synthetic fiber can economically support large quantities of specialty polymers and fibers. You can look forward to the appearance of inorganic fiber-forming polymers as well as organic. It's feasible that asbestos will be replaced with a synthetic fiber . . . which could be a synthetic asbestos or a substitute that has the same characteristics of the asbestos fiber. It has been said that necessity is the mother of invention. The necessities involved m the military requirements of our Armed Forces will certainly affect our technology in. many ways. For example, our military people feel that there is a need to cut the weight of their equipment by as much as 50% without any loss in performance. In the fabrics field, they're pursuing a very agressive program to accomplish this objective. The process of developing lightweight, synthetic tentage to replace cotton tentage is well under way. Improvements in ballistic fabrics are being pushed ... as well as in fabrics for military clothing. What they're looking for are super fabrics made from super fiber. And since military requirements tend to be very urgent, in this day and age, you can expect developments in this area to proceed at a very fast pace. Demands on our technology will also be coming thick and fast as a result of new and varied industrial requirements. In addition to the demand for a chemical filter fiber, there's rising pressure for the development of special fibers and fabrics for use in both air and water pollution control. And the new field of oceanography is already making demands on us for both new fibers and fabrics. For example, a synthetic sea weed fabric has been developed as a curtain to protect harbors from storms and drifting sands. It is conceivable this will be used in tremendous quantities. One thing is certain. . . industrial requirements are going to be so far-ranging and varied that an entire speech could be devoted to the many ways in which this will make accelerating demands on our technology. 11 And who can doubt that we're going to be challenged by rapidly evolving fads and fashions in styling as well. We in the textile business live in a world of styling. Clothes, furniture, homes, automobiles and offices make great demands on our ingenuity for creating beautiful but durable fabrics. These demands will increase . . . and you can look for an even greater emphasis on colors. I wouldn't be surprised to see phosphors used for pigmen tation. Patents have already been issued and small samples of fibers with fluorescent and phosphorescent pigments have been seen. The timing is right for such a development . And, finally, you can look forward to stringent demands for improved Household Performance. The housewife wants much more than she's getting from our industry. She wants carpets that do not retain soil. . . and that are capable of keeping their good appearance for a generation. She wants drapes that don't fade and that resist soiling. She wants upholstery that has good abrasion and resists soiling. She wants sheets and pillow cases that can be washed and dried wrinkle-free. . . and still have a good feel to them. She wants all of this. . .plus inflammability . . . beauty . . . and lower prices as well. So it looks as if we've got our work cut out for us. There's a great deal that needs to be done. And I, for one, am proud to say that we at UNIROYAL are determined to do more than our share m bringing about an acceleration of technology in the textile field. And that's not all. There are many projects we're working on that I wish I was at liberty to discuss. Eut the important fact is not what we're doing . . . but that we've got to do much morel When we were children, there was a game we played in which we could only take a giant step by requesting permission to do so. We had to ask, "May I?" And if we didn't, we were penalized. We are not children now. . .and this is not a game we're playing. If we're really determined to face up to our foreign competition and assure a great future for our industry, we've got to meet the challenge by accelerating our textile technology ... by spending far more for Research and Development. Only those who wait and ask, "May I?" before proceeding will be penalized. For the others . . . for those of us who are determined to seize the Research and Development initiative. . .the opportunities and the rewards can be limitless. GcjoW G BOAJKS Of OOVEJUOR'S HSTIiiO O October 3* 1966 - 9:00 F.M., Botel Eershey, Bersbay,Fa. ( \ la attendance: J.L. Rainey - American Aabeatoe Taxtila Corporation Z.A. Sehvman Jotma-Hanrllle Corporation 7.A, Brown,Jr. - RaybeetoeManhattan,Inc. L.E. Moody - 8.Z. fortar Company,Inc. R. f. Clark - Cbxiroyal,Inc. F.Jay Floekon - Lagal Counoal, Cadvalader.Mckerehaa A TaXt B.S. Sunbury Secretary, A.T.I. ' Abaant: J.L. Mitchell - Tallann,IleCluakay Fabrica Co. 0.?. Vlaaa - Oarloek,Znc. Ouaata: C.L. Shacklor, Johns-.ianrllle Corporation --**. Minutes etwee 1. Fraaldant Ralaay called the aaating to order and deferred the regular order of bualneaa to permit Mr. C.L. Shacklor to addreaa the Board. 2. Kr. Bhaeklar explained what hr felt the A.T.I. ahould attempt to aoeompllah In tba way of lnduotry*wide offorta to reduee the duet hasard to operatlres. For axaaplo, "vet-wearing* ahould bo adopted Induatry wide. Stated that the Brltlah aabeatoe textile Induetry hare dona thla. Feela alao, that In the future there will be a lav eking wet-veering mandatory. TV. Sheeklor reoamaended that A.T.I. eat up an "Sirlronaantel Control Committee* and offered suggestions aa to lta membership. Be Tlauallaed that thla oonolttee would releaee newe on Health Problems, handle llalaon between eonpanloe on aratual probleae, and llaleon with other groups like Insulation Kfgre. Aeacclatlon. Be antloned that hie company waa now cooperating with Dr.Sellkoff, widely known for Me reaeareb work on health of aebeatoe plpeeoeerero, who hai recently been naaed to head an "Ina.letiGU Induatry Hygiene Research Frogram", a emiblnad effort inrolrlng an Internet* loaal labor union, Induatry, medical eeleneo, and the Federal Oov't. 3. Kr.J.A. Brown,Jr. Bored that A.T.I. aet up a committee ae recom mended by ilr. Sheekler. Motion waa aeeoaded by lir. L.l. Moody. Approval waa unanlawua. U. Freaidant Rainey 'offarad for eoaalderation a suggested resolution: * The Board of Oorernore of tha Aabeatoe Textile Institute, recog* nitlag that erery effort to control enrironaental duet probleae ahould be encouraged whererer feasible and aotlng on tha adrlee of tha Air Bygleno it imnufaeturlnc Conalttea, reeoosanda that all mar.ber cecpanlei of the Institute consider adoption of the vet-veering1 process with all deliberate speed.* Mr.R.F. Clark nored that the Resolution be epnrored, his notion waa eeeouded by J.a. Broim,Jr.,and approval was by unanluoue rote. (oontinusd) 3022 i t=n css pan Minutes -Board of Oovernors Heating - eontlnuad: Rage "2 5. tte minutes of tho laat meeting war# praaantad for reading . On notion nada by R.f. Clark, aaeondad by S.A. Sohinaan, it ni eoted to ealt tha reading of tba minutes. 6. Tha financial. Report aa of Septsnbar 10th,1966, was praaantad by tha Secretary. A.?. Clark mored that tha raport ba aeeaptad, and thla notion waa aaeondad by X.A. Sefciaan. So to tad, and tha Raport la attached to thaaa nlnutaa. Hr. Ralnay raportad that tha Annual Audit of tha Institute's booka had baan nada by Hr* Jaxaaa 0. talth, accountant employed by our nanbar company,0AR10W XVC.,and that ha had a lattar fron Hr. Smith datad Paptaobar 23,1966, stating that tha Raport of Saptaaber 10th,1968 aa praaantad by tha Saeratary, rapraaantad tha financial position of tha Institute an that data* A copy of tha auditor's lattar is attached to these ninutes. 7. Mr. J. A. Brora,Jr., Chairman of tha Sonina tins Coral t tea, raportad that ha had eanrasaad tha nanbar companies to determine who would represant than on -tha Board of Governors for tha earning year, and that tha following have bean deslpiated by thalr respect- Its oompaniaa: - John A. Brown,Jr. - Raybat.toa-Manhattan,Znc. R.f. Clark - Ualroysl.Inc. * J.L. Hitchall - Tallaao-iieCluaksy fabrics Co. L.Z. Moody - 8.S. Barter Company,Xno. J.t. Ralnay - American asbestos Textile Corp. X.A. Sehonan - JohnsNuriUs Corp* 0f. Vloss - Oarlook Ins* 6. Xlaetlen of Officers: - Hr.J.A. Brora,Jr., Chairman of tha Hominatinc Coralttea, submitted a alata of offlaara for tha earning yearifor fraaldont -- S.A. Sehunan * Ties fraaidant - R.f. Clark Treasurer - M.. Sooworoft (Raybaetoa-iianhattan) There being no othsr nominations it was norad by J.A. Brora,Jr., and aaeondad by L.Z. Hoo^y, that tha alata of offlaara aa auhmltted bo aeooptad. Deetion waa by unanimous rota. 9* Zt was agreed that tha reapeetlTe chairman of our four working eoaultteee should bo oontlnuoc for anothor year, in a much aa each has aomplstad only one year of tba normal two-year term. 10* tha Saeratary praaantad a auggeeted Znatltute Budget for tha roar 1969. fraaldont Ralnay deferred diaouaaion of aame ratll later in tha moating.11 11. fra aidant Ralnay road o lattar from Syraouee ttaiTaraity stating thoy had a throe year contract (or grant) from tho Dept.of EBk to study tba origin, quantities, and eharaetarlatlea of waataa which result fron production in our industry, and requesting tho cooper ation of his eoapany In supolylng tha naadad Information fcr their reeaareh, Several of tba members stated thoy also had reeelTed tha aama lattar from Syracuse OnlTaralty. 'Jo discussion or oeraants ware nada. (eontlnuad) 3623 /` t' ' j 'ft ..... .. ..... *~ - i A l * f f i > o f Minutes of the General liesting - continued: fiji -3_ 6. President Rainey Introduced Sr. O.n. Cuthbertaon, Technical Dirac tor of tba Pi bar and Textile Division, OiTIROlAL.Ino,, and axpraaaad our pleasure at hia willingness to be our sain speaker at this noetic;. Dr. Cuthbertaon1 a talk, entitled - "The `ACCELSUTZOM Of TECTILE TECHH0L0G7" or Bow to taka a Olaat Step Without Saying "Kit IT1*, waa coat cana truetire and of groat interoat to a aoat appreciative audlanee. Va are indebted to Dr. Cuthbertaon for supplying eopiaa of his talk for inclusion with theae alnutea. Traildent Rainey thanked Dr. Cuthbertaon on behalf of the Institute and It'a mambara. 7. The ceoalttae reports were chairman as listed below: by the respective committee Air Dyglene Hfg. Comnlttee - B.S. `.'altar. Chalman Salea Promotion Cocmittae - M.fc. Scoweroft, Chairman ' Technical Coscltteo - J.w. Bavfclns, Chairnan - * fiber Testing Committee - O.P.A. Brick. Chairman The full text of their reports la attached to these minutes, fraildent Rainey expressed his apprecatloa, and that of the Xnsti- tute, for the fine work of our several oomalttees. and mentioned . also the valuable assistance given the Technical Coxaittee by Mr. Paul J. Smith of A.3.T.K. la regard to the revision of ASTI! Speeifloatlcms for Asbestos Textiles. 8. President Rainey announced that the lets if tba next Oenoral Meeting would be October 3-k. 1966. at Botel Borshay, Berahey.fa. Thla la a fine betel, located in the interesting Pennsylvania Dutch oountry, with much to see and do. As is eustonary at our meeting each October, members are urged to make a special effort to bring thir wives to thla meeting! Mr. Rainey announced dec, that the winter meeting f A.T.Z. would be at the 0RA5D HOTSX, feint Clear. Ala.(near Mobile) end the dates are february 6-7, 1969. This la a vary ferrous hsstelry and thoas who have attended meetings of other associations there are sure that A.T.Z. members and their wives will greatly anJoy thslr visit to the ORAVD HOTEL! 9. There being no further business to came before the meeting It reoesseu for luncheon, following vhlen the meeting adjourned. Respectfully subsetted, H.3. Sunbury ^ --fb Seerstary *> 3624 -Tv SALiG ?70- :OTIO:' COM 'ITT32 Asbestos Textile Institute October 3, 1068 Hotel Hershey, Hershey,?a. Page -1- The Sales Promotion Committee met on October 3# 1968 with repre sentatives of four member companies in attendance. One area of concern of this committee is the very real threat of imported Japanese asbestos textiles. At our meeting in Atlanta last June, it was suggested that we investigate the possibility of insti tuting "dumping" charges against the Japanese industry. We requested counsel to proceed through an aporoach to the Board of Trade Commiss ion, Mr. Flocken has submitted his comprehensive report on the subject* It can be suiimarized briefly at this time by saying that we all feel that this aporoach has little chance of success. "Dumping" charges have been successful in a ratio of about 3 in 50. After exhaustive discussion, we feel that our complaint is indeed flimsy and the entire subject has been shelved. Many members have reported that Japanese cloth is demonstrably infer ior to cloth made in U.S.A. With this in mind, we obtained a roll of Japanese cloth and asked the Technical Committee to arrange phys ical tests on it by each company. At this time we wish to express our appreciation to the Technical Committee under the leadership of John Hawkins for the report on the results of this testing. The test results of each company were sent to John Hawkins who compiled and submitted them to this committee. In general, the physicals were standard. However, they do reveal two areas which we feel could be exploited in the market. Despite the fact that they have a high asbestos content-ASTM Grade "A"--it was reported that they failed to pass a standard flame test. Members felt that this was because they (the Japanese) used acrylic fibers as a carrier. The cloth also had a relatively poor warp tensile. This was particularly revealed and emphasized in the heat aging test whereby the residual tensiles after heat aging were decidedly inferior to standards maintained by all member companies. In addition, one company was able to determine that the Japanese seemed able to use shorter fibers in their cloth than we in this country, `nils contributes to their lower costs but, in addition, causes lower tensile strengths. Copies of the report were given to member companies in attendance and copies will be sent to those companies who were unable to attend. It was decided that no collective action would be taken as a result of these tests but each member can use the report as he sees fit. Me feel that the cloth does not represent an economic purchase in relation to its projected life and that the data can be helpful in proving this premise. (continued) Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -3- regulatory statutes. With careful qualification. Counsel ventured to predict that the election of either of the major party candidates would not fundamentally alter the nature or substance of federal regulation of business practices. Experience under the Eisenhower Administration suggests that antitrust enforcement would be at least as significant in another Republican administration as it has been under the succeeding Democratic administration. However, Mr. Plocken suggested that new legislative action on the "conglom erate" problem was more likely under a Democratic administration. 5. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by ilr. II.P.Carson, Vico President - Sales, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, Thetford ilines,?.Q. and his interesting and informative report is attached. 6. Guest-of-Honor, Miss Edith E. Cox, retired editor of ASBESTOS Magazine, was introduced by Mr. J.A. Bettes,Jr., a former president of the Institute. Mr. Bettes paid fitting tribute to Miss Cox for her service to the asbestos industry for a period of more than fifty years. President Rainey presented Miss Cox with a memento of the occasion, and there was a standing ovation in her honor. Miss Cox responded most graciously, and said she aporeciated very much the opportunity to attend the meeting. 7. President Rainey introduced Dr. A.G. Matamoros, Chief Economist of Armstrong Cork Company, A nationally recognized economist. Dr. Matamoros spoke on the subject: "Business Prospects and Problems in the Year Ahead". His talk was extremely interesting, and was foll owed by many questions from his audience. President Rainey thanked Dr. Matamoros on behalf of the members. 8. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: Air Hygiene & ilfg. Committee - H.H. Walter, Chairman Sales Promotion Committee - M.Q. Scowcroft, Chairman Technical Committee - J.W. Hawkins, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. Brink, Chairman The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. 9 President Rainey, following the report of the Air Hygiene Sc Mfg. Committee, stated that the Board of Governors had voted unanimous approval of that committee's recommendation in respect to adoption of 'wet-weaving' of asbestos fabrics, and had passed the following Resolution: - "The 3oard of Governors of the Asbestos Textile Inst itute, recognizing that every effort to control environmental dust problems should be encouraged wherever feasible and acting on the advice of the Air Hygiene 4c Mfg. Committee, recommends that all member companies of the Institute consider adoption of the 'wet weaving' process with all deliberate speed." 10. President Rainey announced that the 3oard of Governors had voted unanimously to set up a new committee tentatively titled "Environmental Control Committee", and asked Mr. C.L. Slieckler, Manager of Occupational Environmental Control, Johns-'anville,Corp., to comment on its purpose, ur. Sheckler mentioned that the new committee, as presently envisaged, would release news on Health Problems, handle liaison between companies on mutual problems, and also handle liaison with other groups like Insulation Mfgrs. Assoc., (continued) minutes - General meeting - continued: Page -I4.- as part of the activities of the new committee, and felt t'nat it would render a very important service to our industry. 11. President Rainey announced that representatives of the member companies now serving on the Board of Governors would continue without change, and also, that the members of the Board had elected new officers to serve for the coming year, namely: President - 2.A. Schuman, Johns-uanville Corp. Vice President - R.P. Clark, Uniroyal,Inc. Treasurer - M.Q. Scowcroft, Raybestos -Manhattan,Inc 12. iir. Rainey announced that the next meeting of the A.T.I. would be held at the GRAND HOTEL, Point Clear, Ala. (near mobile) and the dates are February 6-7, 1969. This is a very famous hostelry, and those who have attended meetings of other associations there are sure that A.T.I. members and their wives will greatly enjoy their visit to the GRAND HOTEL.1 13. The meeting recessed for luncheon, during which "Jack" Rainey, retiring president was presented with an Atmos clock in apprec iation of his outstanding leadership of the Institute during the past two years. Iir. Rainey than'ced the members for the gift and for their cooperation during his tenure as president, and received a fine hand and standing ovation following his remarks. lit.. After the luncheon the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted Report of Finds AnJ J tD'. T. -: x-j Lo;xiUi^ Sept ?nbe.r 10, 1968 Balance on Hand at last Report (iisy 8, 1968) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund ^3 3Jt.56.eii. 20692.66 35-23 Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest to 6/30/68) To General Fund (Book Sales) 252.28 28 - 80 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer (3 mos. ending 5/31/68) Secretary's Salary (4 nos.) F.I.C.A. Tax (2nd +tr 1968) Secretary's Travel . Office Rent (4 nos.) Printing & Office Supplies A.T.I. -Heeting Expense (June 5-7^1968) Telephone (4 nos.) Revision of ASTii Specifications Purchase of Imported Asbestos Cloth(Test) Petty Cash(Vouchers 360-372 incl.) 500-00 78.00 33-00 210.00 300.00 37.60 720.45 152.23 110,30 135.46 62.02 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand September 10, 1968 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement 9/10/68) 743.83 Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund 20544.94 37.98 Total Funds Assets as of September 10, 1968 General Fund Savi'.ng3 Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage on Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) Total Assets Liabilities Accts Payable as of Sept. 10, 1968 Net Worth 743.83 20944.94 37.98 18.03 2.83 1.00 824184.73 231.09 *24465.01 2739.06 $21726.75 *21726.75 - $21748.61 100-.00 $2.16+6.61 Respectfully submitted. H >\ C/ H.E. Sunbury Asst. Treasurer y- / ASL25T0S HEALTH seminar October 2nd, 1963 - 2:00 P.H. Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Pa. Sponsor: Asbestos Textile Institute Program Chairman: Hr. C.L. Sheckler AGENDA 1. Introduction J.L. Rainey, President of Asbestos Textile Institute Vice President, American Asbestos Ten tils Corporation C.L. Sheckler, Manager of Occupational Environmental Control, Johns-Manville Corporation 2. News Headlines and Public Relations W.P. Raines, Director of Public Relations, Johns-Manville Corp. 3. Biological Effects of Asbestos Dr. George W. Wright, St. Lukes Hospital, Cleveland,Ohio Chairman, Institute of Environmental and Occupational Health lj. Organizing and Engineering for Dust Control E.M. Fenner, Director of Environmental Control, Johns-Manville Co. 5* Asbestos Research Progress Dr. L.J. Cralley, Director of Epidemiological and Field Studies United States Public Health Service 6. Legislation, Litigation and Action Programs C.L. Sheckler, Johns-Manville Corp. 7. Question and Answer Period 8. Summary J.L. Rainey, President of A.T.I. Note: The program is scheduled for approximately three hours duration. AS3ZST0S FIjRE PZPGRT Page -1- October L)., I9bb 3y: Hr. M.P. Carson, Vice President-Sales ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, Thetford Mines,P.Q.,Can. " You might be interested to have an outline of 1967 production figures for chrysotile asbestos fibre from major producing countries U.G.S.R. Canada Rhodesia 1,750,000 tons 1,500,000 ri 200,000 11 U.S.A. Italy 130,000 it 100,000 tt South Africa Cyprus Swaziland 14.0,000 22,000 14.0,000 ti 11 11 Canada continues to be the major exporter of chrysotile in spite of Russia's position as the largest producer. Incidentally, it is doubtful that Russia is exporting spinning fibre in any quantity sind Russian exports of asbestos cement grades have remained relative ly stable over the past seven years at 250,000 to 200,000 tons per annum, with about 150,000 tons shipped to the free world. Reports Indicate that Rhodesian fibre is all being sold, although the market pattern has changed significantly since U.D.I. Of interest to A.T.I. members is the fact that spinning fibre shipments from Quebec production were running about 17% ahead of 1%7 at the end of August, and I believe this will continue through the balance of 1966 and possibly be higher at the close of the year. The U.S. market had not been a significant factor in this increase. Improved economic conditions in Western Europe, Japan, and greater activities in some of the Socialist countries of Europe have con tributed to the increase in spinning fibre shipments. It has been reported that Cassiar production has been reduced to 75,000 tons per annum and Clinton Creek is approaching full production. Nicolet has announced that its mine will be closed at the expiration of its labour contract on February 28,1969. (continued on Page -2-) ASBESTOS FI3RZ REPORT - continued: Page -2 Pacific Asbestos in California is reoortedlv back to a 6-day week, 3 shifts per day, for an annual production rate of 14.5*000 tons. Reports continue to appear concerning new properties in Quebec, namely Albitibi and MeAdam, but there is much uncertainty concerning the future of these Prospects. Western European economic recovery in 1968 has brought increased markets for all grades of fibre from Quebec. Although France was a serious question mark a few months ago, it is believed that the asbestos consuming industries in France will consume almost as much fibre as in 1967* The textile manufacturers seem to be less uncer tain at present time than they were a few months ago. Japan's improved economic conditions have meant increased consumption and the much rumoured expectation of a reduced rate of growth in the second half of 1968 has not materialized. The outlook for the remainder of 1968 looks favourable for all grades of fibre. The textile markets in Europe and Japan appear to be doing well and the expectation that the upward trend will con tinue is a good possibility. The domestic market does not convey as optimistic signs for 3-Group fibre. Price increases have been announced by a number of producers with S'fo the increase for textile fibres effective January 1, 1969. Cassiar has announced price increases averaging 6/Z. " In attendance: Minutes ?&& -1- Air Hygiene - -lar.ufacturing Comi.ittee Asbestos Textile Institute October 3, 1968, Hotel Hershey,Hershey,?a. H.H. Walter, Chairman L.E. Hoody H.H. Willingham R.C, Hunt L.C. Williams C.L. Sheckler W.C. Seeds R.B. Smith American Asbestos Textile Corp. H.K. ''orter Company,Inc. Uiiiroit yal, Inii c. Raybestos-Hanhattan, Inc. Johns-rianville Corp. ii ti ii Raybestos-Hanhattan,Inc. Absent: K.W. Nelson - American Smelting k Refining Co. Gue3ts: R.M. Billings - Johns-rianville Corp. Asbestos Health Seminar: The Seminar on October 2, 1963 was attended by all members of the committee and the topics presented there-in were subsequently discussed at the committee meeting. Bausch He Lomb Automatic Dust Counter: Hr. J.P. Wronski gave a report on the tests that were conducted at the Raybestos-Hanhattan plant in Manheim,Pa. The attempt to find a correlation between the Impinger and the Bausch " Lomb Dust Counter lead to the conclusion that little correlation between the two instruments exists, particularly in regards to large particle size as well as in areas of high dust concentrations. This phenomenon is due to the low trapping velocity of the Bausch & Loinb Dust Counter, which is therefore not to be con sidered as a replacement for the Impinger. However,the Bausch & Lomb Dust Counter has proven its feasibility as an excellent monitoring device. Mr. C.L. Sheckler reported on the Membrane-Filter Method and will present a paper on that method at the next meeting. Dust Control in the Manufacturing Process: Equipment designed for the reduction of dust in the various operations of textile manu facturing was extensively discussed: L. A bag opening, emptying and storage system, designed by Barkley !t Dexter, Inc. 2. A bag dumper, designed by the Wilkra Co. 3* Bag opening and handling devices, designed by the member companies. !(.. Various systems of moving blends to cards. 5. Balloonless spinning and twisting. 6. Wet weaving One member company reported on a balloonless spinning frame based on the woolen system. Balloonless spinning seems to be desirable inasmuch as the absence of a balloon results in a much lower dust count. Woolen type spinning frames operate usually at a considerable higher spindle speed than those now being used in the asbestos tex tile industry. As a result broken ends will stir up a great deal of dust. It is therefore imperative that the spindle will stop as soon as an end breaks. The manufacturer of the spinning framehas designed an automatic spindle stop notion and is at present experimenting . with such a device, which is similar to the one already being used on balloonless twisting frames. (continued) ?age-2Minutes - Air Hygiene & ilanui'accuring Committee - continued: It is hoped that top management will agree to an open exchange of health safety ideas, including designs, plans, photographs and visitors in areas of mutual interest in regards to the reduction or (if ever possible) total elimination of dust in the manufacturing process. The members of the committee agreed to have technical infor mation concerning health safety practices on hand at the next meeting. Members of the committee stressed the point that dry weaving of asbestos cloth presents one of the greatest health safety problems in the production of asbestos textiles. To achieve the tentative ACGIH threshold limit values of 2MPPCF of air or the alternate, 12 fibres per cc-5 microns*, engineering asbestos dust abatement in the dry weaving process is,it appears, an impossible task. Wet weaving throughout the industry, however, will achieve tremendous strides towards accomplishing the standards recommended by the United States Public Health Service and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. It is also essential to produce and manufacture a product that will provide the fabricator and user maximum health safety. Again this can only be accomplished by the process of wet woven cloth. This material (wet woven cloth) is less dusty and therefore leas hazardous. The Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee respectfully urges immed iate action by the Board of Governors to coordinate this matter with all ATI standing committees and follow up with specific recommendation for industry-wide action. Respectfully submitted. H.H. Walter Chairman MINUTES SAL33 PROMOTION COM ITTE2 Asbestos Textile Institute October 3, 168 Hotel Hershey, Hershey,?a. "A The Sales Promotion Comnittee met on October 1968 with repre sentatives of four member companies in attendance. One area of concern of this committee is the very real t:ireat of imported Japanese asbestos textiles. At our meeting in Atlanta last June,.it was suggested that we investigate the possibility of insti tuting "dumping" charges against the Japanese industry. We requested counsel to proceed through an aporoach to the Board of Trade Commiss ion. Hr. Flocken has submitted his comprehensive report on the subject. It can be summarized briefly at this time by saying that we all feel that this apnroach has little chance of success. ''Dumping" charges have been successful in a ratio of about 3 in 50. After exhaustive discussion, we feel that our complaint is indeed flimsy and the entire subject has been shelved. Many members have reported that Japanese cloth is demonstrably infer ior to cloth made' in U.S.A. With this in mind, we obtained a roll of Japanese cloth and asked the Technical Committee to arrange phys ical tests on it by each company. At this time we wish to express our appreciation to the Technical Committee under the leadership of John Hawkins for the report on the results of this testing. The test results of each company were sent to John Hawkins who compiled and submitted them to this committee. In general, the physicals were standard. However, they do reveal two areas which we feel could be exploited in the market. Despite the fact that they have a high asbestos content-ASTM Grade "A"--it was reported that they failed to pass a standard flame test, Members felt that this was because they (the Japanese) used acrylic fibers as a carrier. The cloth also had a relatively poor warp tensile. This was particularly revealed and emphasized in the heat aging test whereby the residual tenslles after heat aging were decidedly inferior to standards maintained by all member companies. In addition, one company was able to determine that the Japanese aeemed able to use shorter fibers in their cloth than we in this country. This contributes to their lower costs but, in addition, causes lower tensile strengths. Copies of the report were given to member companies in attendance and copies will be sent to those companies who were unable to attend. It was decided that no collective action would be taken as a result of these tests but each member can use the report as he sees fit. >/e feel that the cloth does not represent an economic purchase in relation to its projected life and that the data can be helpful in proving this premise. (continued) Minutes - Sales Promotion Committee - continued: Page -2- As has now become customary, the greatest proportion of our time was consumed in the discussion of the problems of air hygiene. Everyone was impressed with the impact of the symposium held on Wednesday, afternoon (October 2,1968). No one can be more concerned than the responsible members of our committee. And yet we are frustrated at our inability to come up with concrete proposals for collective action. We are not short on suggestions. But after thorough discuss ion# and excellent professional advice from Mr. Flocken (Counsel) we end up deciding that collective action would introduce far more problems than it would solve. Education of our sales forces and our customers seems to be the only constructive tool we have at this time. Finally, we discussed once more the purchasing procedures of the Federal Government and the hardships they impose on members. Though we made an attempt this year to try to have them alter the system, we were not successful. As long as the system works--as it does-- to the advantage of the Government, there is no chance here to alter it. Again, no collective action seems advisable and efforts will be discontinued. Respectfully submitted, M.Q. Scowcroft Chairman TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute October 3. 1968 at the Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Pa. In attendances G. E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. J. D. McCluer - H. K. Porter Co., Inc. E. A. Morris - Uniroyal, Inc. D. T. Austin - Uniroyal, Inc. William Maaskant - American Asbestos Textile Corp. I. Barnett - Johns-Manvilie J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Minutes: The Technical Committee, Fiber Testing Committee, and ASTM D-13, A-4 met in a joint session to discuss data recently obtained from the Round Robin test on asbestos textile products. The information was studied statistically and the conclusions were that there is too much variation between laboratories to consider writing an ASTM Magnetic Specification at this time, both the Turner and Mapes gave question able values. Recommendations were heard that a second series of tests be started and to have a representative from Bell Asbestos Mines, Mr. Walter Smith, moniter techniques and personally bring the samples into the member companies laboratory. This assignment should be completed prior to the February meeting. Magnetic standards were discussed and Mr. Lincoln and Mr. Nicodemus will consider using electrical techniques in the preparation and measurements of the proposed standards. The ATI technical group and ASTM A-4 met after the first session. Mr. Nicodemus acted as chairman and Mr. Harris as secretary. Mr. Nicodemus stated that a volume resistivity test would >.e of valun and that an ASTM method should be included to cover this type of test. Mr. Nicodemus will work on this method. The Heat Aging test was discussed and an additional Round Robin test will be necessary before working on this procedure. ASTM 1573, as written up, will require modifications. The data obtained from a Round Robin test on a Japanese cloth was reviewed and the variations between laboratories noted. It is thought that the Japanese cloth in general is inferior to most American made equivalents. The mercury contamination clause in several military specifications was discussed and the problems encountered by the manufacturer in complying. Respectfully submitted, John W. Hawkins Chairman Minutes FIB SR TESTING- COMMITTEE Page -1 Asbestos Textile Institute October 3# 1968, Hotel Hershey, Hershey,Pa. Present: Members: G.F.A. Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Ltd. D.3. Childers - H.N. Porter Company,Inc. R.J. Dodds-Hebron - Bell Asbestos Hines Ltd* B. Lincoln - Turner k Newell Ltd., Asbestos Fibre Laboratory C.E. Stiefken - Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited W.C. Streib - Johns-i-Ianville Corporation J.P. Wronski - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Visitors J.G. Berry - Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Limited S.G. Dixit - Garlock Inc. J.W. Echerd - H.X. Porter Company,Inc. Paul 0. Nicoderaus - General Electric Company BUSINESS: 1. Magnetic Rating Test 1.1 The outcome of the recent Magnetic Rating Round Robin on eight asbestos textile products at different laboratory locations and the conclusions based on the statistical analyses of the results were reviewed at a joint meeting with members of the Technical Committee (7) and A37M Committee D-13Sub A4|.(2) as follows: l.l.llhore is no discernible difference in results between the two test methods. 1.1.2 On either test, same participating laboratories got odd results on some samples. 1.1.3 test variation between companies may be due to differences in the products sent to each firm, or to differences in test procedures used; and/or to variations in the method of load ing the test speoimen in the cell. l.l.ll Before the present magnetic rating tests on asbestos textiles are really meaningful and acceptable, consistency in sample handling, machine operating techniques, and the like must be greatly improved. 1.2 It was mutually agreed that another joint Technical and Fiber Testing Committee Round Robin should be carried out under the supervision of a suitable trainer. The Bell Asbestos Mines people kindly offered to supply a gentleman for this purpose. The number of samples,etc., to meet statistical requirements will be investigated by Bill Streib and detailed instructions for the Round Robin will be issued by the Technical Committee chairman. 1.3 It was recommended that the primary standard for magnetic rating be defined in terms of a basic electrical measurement i.e., so many millivolts at a definite applied voltage Mr. Bernard Lincoln and Paul Nicodemus agreed to commence work on this specification. . (continued) Minutes - Fiber Testing Conroittee - continued: Page -2- I.I4. The preliminary work done since the June meeting to find a suitable source for iron ore as a secondary calibrating standard to replace MBS magnetic sample 29a was reviewed. A graph was circulated indicating that an almost perfect cor relation was possible, if an iron ore supplied by the Depart ment of Energy, Mines tc Resources, Ottawa, was ground fine enough. 1*5 The replacement of the present T.& N. glass specimen holders with a suitable plastic to eliminate breakage was recommended and the packing thereof was discussed. A specimen holder fabricated from Hylon 101 - Type 66 was circulated for exam ination. 2. Splcular & Grit Content of Spinning Fibers:- The results of preliminary experimental work to develop a suitable test method for measuring the spicular & grit content of spinning fibers were discussed. Fractions recovered by hydrocycloning were circulated for examination. The committee is faced with deter mining what constitutes an objectionable spicule,etc. It was agreed that exploratory work on this test procedure would continue. 3* Recent activities of the QAMA Technical (Dust study. Product Handling h. Colour Test) and ASTM D-30 (Sub III) Committee (Reorg anization, T.& N. Wet Classifier & Rotap Test) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. 4 The need for a better method for measuring fibre length was expressed by Joe Wronski. The work being done on this score at the QAMA Sherbrooke Laboratory was mentioned. As requested at the June meeting, suggestions from ATI members, especially fiber consumers, as to the test methods they wish to have the Fiber Testing Consnittee study would be appreciated to guide its activities. Respectfully submitted, Q.F.A. Brink Chairman 31st October,1968 i limited Page -1- GEMERAL MEETING - ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE October k, 1968 - Hotel Ilershey, Herahey,?a. In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. J.W. Weber J.L. Rainey G.o, Fabel H.H. Walter J.W. Christenbury Win. Maaskant GARLOCK INC. G.E. Houghton S.G. Dixit ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED il.P. Carson ?.E. Leclerc G.F.A. Brink BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Win. J.W. Smith R.J. Dodds-Hebron CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP..LTD. J.G. Berry JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. E.H. Wells R.M. Billings W.P. Raines E.A. Schuman C.L. Sheckler E.M. Fenner I.Barnett W.C. Seeds W.C. Streib N.W. Hendry (Can. J.II.Co.) H.X. PORTER COMPANY.INC. L.E. Moody J.D. ilcCluer D.E. Childers G.J. Harris J.W. Echerd RAYBESTOS-MAUHATTAN.INC. J.A. Brown,Jr. M.Q. Scowcroft J.W. Hawkins L.C. Williams R.B. Smith J.P. Wronski J.A. Bettes,Jr.(Retired) A.R. Patterson GUESTS LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E.A. Farrell C.E. Stiefken TURNER & NEWALL LTD. B. Lincoln CADwALADEH.WICKERSHAM & TAFT P.Jay Flocken (Legal Counsel U.S.PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE Dr.L.J. Cralley U1TIR0YAL.INC. IT. P. Clark R.C. Hunt D.T. Austin,Jr. H.M. Willingham E.A. Morris Dr.J.G. Wells ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) Mias Edith 3. Cox (Guest-of-Honor) Asbestos Mag'ne Mr. A.G. iiatamoros (Guest Speaker) Hr.D.R. Hollies, Asten-IIill lifg.Co. iir.C.J. Stover* Asbestos iiagazine In addition, approximately twenty-four wives of members were present at Social Hours and at the luncheon on Friday noon, October l^th. (continued) asbestos textile institute P age MINUTES - GENERAL MEETING - February 7, 1969 In attendance: GRAND HOTEL - Point Clear, Ala. AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP J. L. Rainey J. '//. Christenbury H. H. Walter . GARLCCK INC. G. E. Houghton R. E. Moore JOHNS-MANVILLE CORF. E. A. Schuman C. L. Sheckler W. C. Seeds W. C. Atkinson (Ret'd) H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. L. E. Moody J. D. McCluer RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. Q. Scowcroft J. W. Hawkins A. R. Patterson R. B. Smith Dr. J. L. Goodman TALLMAN-McCLUSKEY FABRICS CO. J. L. Mitchell ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P. E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm. J. ft. Smith w. H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CCRP.. LTD. Dr. R. Kuntze LAKE ASdcSTOS OF QUEBEC. LTD. R. P. Gagnon E. A. Farrell K. W. Nelson TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.. LTD W. M. Deckman TURNER & NEWALL, LTD. B. Lincoln CADWALADER. WICKERSHAM & TAFT H. C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel] ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H. E. Sunbury (Secretary) GUESTS UNIROYAL, INC. R. C. Hunt D. T. Austin, Jr. R. P. Clark H. M. Willingham E. A. Morris J, W. Frampton, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. C. D. Colson, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. F. C. Phillips, Uniroyal, Inc. J. w. Bolmeyer, E. I. DuPont deNemours Co. Minutes ** I. President Schuman called the meeting to order at 9:40 A.M. and asked each person present to stand and identify himself and his company. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion by Mr. R.P. Clark, seconded by Mr. D.T. Austin, Jr., it was voted to omit the reading. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft. It was moved by Mr. E. A. Farrell that report be accepted. The motion was seconded by Mr. G. E. Houghton, and so voted. The report is attached. .viinutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -2 4. President E. A. Schuman introduced .Mr. Haven C. Roosevelt of Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, who replaces Mr. P. Jay Flocken as Legal Counsel for the Institute. A brief summary of Mr. Roosevelt's remarks follows: "Counsel briefly outlined the antitrust activity of the Justice Department during 1968 and then discussed a problem which he termed the unreal security of governmental assistance in private stancardizaticn activities. Counsel noted that although the federal government may encourage and eventually approve private voluntary standards, the activities of a trade association and its members are not immune from antitrust attack by either the govern ment or private parties. He cited the case Structural Laminates vs Douglas Fir Plywood Association for the proposition that private standardization and certification activities may involve litigation from private plaintiffs. He also reviewed the recent case of U. S, vs Automobile Manufacturers Associat ion, et al and the position of the Justice Department with respect to infor mal standards developed by the Bureau of Standards and industry representa tives, noting that voluntary standards resulting from a cooperative govern ment - industry effort could involve undue or unreasonable restraints of trade. Counsel cited the Noerr doctrine and explained its impact as a major exception to vulnerability from antitrust attack on unreasonably restrictive standards." 5. The Fibre Producers Report was given by tor. R. P. Gagnon, Vice President, ASARCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Black Lake, Quebec, and who is also Direct or of Sales for Lake Asbestos of Cuebec, Ltd. President Schuman thanked Mr. Gagnon for his excellent report and same is attached to these minutes. 6. President Schuman introduced Mr. James W. Bolmeyer, Marketing Manager for "NOMEX", E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. "Nomex" is the trademark for DuPont's High Temperature Resistant Nylon. An abstract of Mr. Bolmeyer's talk follows: "The unusual behavioral properties of "Nomex" nylon, a high temperature resistant fibre and its industrial applications in 100$ form were covered. Also covered was the complementary role played by "Nomex" in fiber and yarn blend fabrics with asbestos as a means of opening new market opportunities for both fibers. Laboratory data illustrating the performance properties of "Nomex" was shown. Samples of industrial fabrics and protect ive garments were displayed." Mr. Bolmeyer's talk was very interesting, and he plans to send literature to those in attendance at the meeting. (The mailing list, including members who could not be at this meeting, was given to him by the Secretary.) 7. President Schuman reported the passing of Mr. R. S. Tallman, the pres ident of Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company on December 17, 1968, and Mr. John F. D. Rohrbach, Chairman of the Board, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., on December 25, 1968, asking that members stand for a moment in tribute to them. Both of these men were staunch supporters of the Institute over a period of many years. 8. President Schuman expressed our appreciation for the attendance at this meeting of tor. and Mrs. Wn. J.W. Smith of Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., who traveled over nearly impassable roads from Thetford Mines to Montreal (due to heavy snowstorm) in order to be present. Also, he mentioned our pleasure at having Mr. B. Lincoln present (who flew in from Manchester, England) and Mr. K. W. Nelson who journeyed from Salt Lake City, Utah. Other welcome guests were; Mr. and Mrs. W. C. Atkinson (Retired); J. Frampton and C. D. Colson of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., and F. C. Phillips of Uniroyal. Minutes - General Meeting - continued* Page -3- 9. President Schuman read a letter from Mr. Jesse T. Griffis, a former president of the Institute, who is convalescing at his home in Charlotte, North Carolina from a heart attack, in which Jesse expressed his apprec iation of the poinsetta sent him by the A.I.I. last Christmas. 10. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen as listed below: Air Hygiene & Mfg. Comm. - H. H. Walter, Chm. Sales Promotion Comm. - M. Q. Scowcroft, Chm. Technical Comm. - J. W. Hawkins, Chm. Fiber Testing Comm. - J. W. Hawkins (for G.F.A. Brink, Chm.) The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. 11. President Schuman announced that the next General Meeting would be held at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon, N. J. (near Atlantic City) on June 18-20, 1969. Also, that dates for future meetings following the June meeting would be October 8-10, 1969 at The Carolina, Pinehurst, N.C., and February 4-6th, 1970 at the Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. Further, that the possibility of holding a meeting at Thetford Mines in June of 1970 was being explored. He invited suggestions from members as to locations for future meetings. 12. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for a group luncheon following which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted, H. E. Sunbury Secretary AS3E3T0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds January 10, 1969 Balance On Hand at Last Report (Sept. 10, 1968) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest to 12/31/68) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 714-3-33 209144-. 94 37',.98 463.97 21.36 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer (3 nos ending 8/31/63) 500.00 Legal Expenses (3 nos " 8/31/68) Secretary's salary ( 4 nos) F.I.C.a. Tax ( 3rd lz 4th (^trs 1963) 217.65 478.00 66.00 Secretary's travel Office Rent ( 4 nos) Accountant (Caruso,year ending Sept.1968) 170.62 300.00 300.00 A.T.I. Meeting Expense (Oct.2-4*1968) Printing & Office Supplies Telephone ( 4 nos) Insurance on Dust Counting Equipm't(l yr) Dues ( I.H.F. and ASTM) 955.03 87.17 106.30 113.00 135.00 Miscellaneous (Gifts,flowers,etc.) 158.50 Petty Cash (Vouchers 373*395 incl.) 113.35 Total Disbursements $21726.75 485.33 $22212.08 3700.62 Balance On Hand January 10, 1969 $18511.46 Funds General Fund (Jan.10, 1969) Savings Fund (Dec.31*1968) Petty Cash Fund Total Funds Assets as of January 10( 1969 General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Accts Receivable ( 1969 Dues) Postage On Hand Furniture 3c Equipm't (Nominal Value) Total Assets $ 1025.57 17408.91 (*) 76.98 $18511.46 $ 1025.57 17408.91 76.98 1.34 9000.00 9.94 1.00 $27523.74 Liabilities ( None) Net Worth $27523.74 (*) $4000.00 transferred from Savings to General Fund on 10/7/68 Respectfully submitted, c--U/ H.E. Sunbury, AsstV/TFeasurer ASBESTOS FIBRE 3EFCP.7 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE POINT CLEAR, ALA. FEBRUARY 6, 1969 The asbestos fibre report this year will sound quite different from what you have been used to hearing in the past. The supply and demand situation has changed during the course of 1968, and we seem to be entering into a period where demand will exceed supply. The general booming economics throughout the world have brought in creased demand for chrysotile asbestos. This has been true in practically all types of asbestos manufacturing. At the end of 1968, the Q.A.iVi.A. inventories are at their lowest level for many years, reduced by 47,000 tons from that of last year. In ventories of spinning fibres have been cut in half from what they were in 1967. This will further indicate the different supply conditions our in dustry now faces. It would seem to me therefore, that the asbestos producers will have to take an entirely diffenent marketing approach in 1969. As it seems a distinct possiblility that a shortage of chrysotile fibre could develop during the course of the year. As a matter of information, I would like to give you a brief resume of the present outlook in the various areas. The United States market, as you all know, has been one of growth in demand particularly during the last six months. Outside the U.S., the United Kingdom and Continental Europe are our most important market. Their economies generally seem buoyant and it is believed that 1969 will be a year of continued growth in demand. The Far East, and more specifically, Japan is presently selling an unprecedented amount of asbestos cement sheets. One can assume that much of this growth is due to Expo 70; however, in Japanese business circles, it is believed that after the fair, there will be considerable emphasis 1 given to housing projects which should increase the demand for asbestos. Strangely enough, the countries that can least afford asbestos are those that require the product most. The underdeveloped countries are still very much in need of our product, and efforts must be made by both industry and government to find ways and means to insure a continuity of supply to these emerging nations. The number of inquiries for the supply of Canadian asbestos fibre being received from the Eastern Countries is constantly growing. The tonn age required is such that it is difficult to even consider their request. This would indicate that Russia will not increase their exports to the Satellite Countries in 1969. It is also felt that their overall export policy will not change to any extent in the coming year. In other words, Russian fibre will not have any alleviating effect on the supply/demand conditions expected to prevail in our market areas. As to production, we do not anticipate much increase over what was produced in 1968 although producers may endeavour to increase their out put with their increased demand. Therefore, in general, we can look for greater demand, a possible shortage and hopefully for all concerned, better revenues. R. P. Gagnon Director of Sales Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. Asbs3to3 Textile Institute February 6, 1969 - Grand Hotel, Point Clear, Ala. In attendance: *1 .1 alter. Chairman - American Asbestos Textile Coro. L. moody - K.-I. Porter Company,Inc. H. - illingham ;? r Aunt - Uniroyal,Inc. - Uniroyal,Inc. C L. Sheckler - Johns-Hanville Corp. u.c. Seeds - Johns-!.anville Corp. A 3, Smith - Raybestos-..anhattan, Inc. A. A. Patterson - Aaybestos-i.anhattan, Inc. II. Delson - American Smelting defining Co. Absent: - L.C. ; Uliana - Ra,, bestos-ilanhattan, Inc. Guests: Dr. J.L. Goodnan, Forth Charleston,b.C. Formation of the Hew .environmental Study Com.attee: The members of the Air Ay.'.iene 'i'"."CoiL:it~tee met "with* J.~L. Rainey of American asbestos Te::tile Corp.* Dr. J. Goodman,Aaybestos-Aanhattan Inc.; r. '.P. Clark, Uniroyal, Inc.; an1. n. D. Lincoln, Turner bewail LTD.; on February 5*1969 to hear a report from .n, C.C. Cheekier about the latest development of legislation and litigation in regard to occupational and environmental health. The objectives of the newly formed 'Environmental Study Committee were discussed. B-ausch a. Lor.ib automatic i.ust Counter: ilr% A. i. ' illingham reported about "his experience with the 3ausch Lonb Dust Counter. He found a rather consistent correlation between the midget Impimger and the liausch Lomb inist Counter. It was agreed upon to ex chan, e data, charts and reports concerning both dust counting methods between member companies and to forward the material to the chairman of this committee for distribution. It was also taken into consideration to forward said material to Dr. L.J. Cralley for further evaluation. Aenbrane-Filter lethod: The membrane-filter method was explained in detail Toy . r. Miechler, and a pacer distributed to committee members. This method appears the most suitable one for fiber counts. Dust Control in the manufacturing Process: One member company report ed about a totally encioYed blending Tine, vacuum cleaning of bags at the receiving point, use of ruboer gloves during the process of oag opening, and discontinuance of the use of burlap bags, another member reported about balloonless spinning and twisting frames equipped with automatic spindle stop motion. The 3ame company 'eportad also about humidification and exhaust systems. All member companies contributed openly ant. freely to a most valueable exchange of ideas in regard to dust reducing equipment and mfg. methods, humorous pictures showing a variety of dust reducing equipment were circulated amon^ committee members. Vet eaving: The necessity of wet-weaving to provide adequate dust control at that operation was a; ain stressed by all members of the committee. It is recognized that improved finishing methods are needed for wet-woven fabrics to obtain c\istomer acceptance. Respectfully submitted, II.II. alter - Chairman KIi'TJTZS - SALZS PROMOTION COi-LiITTSS Asbestos Textile Institute - February 6, 1969, Grand Hotel, Point Clear, Ala, The Sales Promotion Committee met on February 6, 1969 with rep resentatives of five member companies in attendance. This committee is concerned, as are all members of the Institute, with the problems of health hazards involving the processing and use of asbestos textile materials and the resulting publicity. As sales people, we find ourselves most frequently involved in responding to our own field forces and our customers. The committee was greatly pleased to learn that a new committee had been formed in the Institute headed by ilr. C.L.^heckler of Johns-hanville. This new committee will be called the Znvironmental Study Committee. We feel tliat the work to be performed by this committee can be immensely beneficial to our industry. It was suggested that the data gathered and presented in the form of a report could be used by member companies when res ponding to inquiries regarding health hazards. The impact behind an Institute report, it was felt, would be more impressive than comments from any single company. The problem of imported asbestos cloth from Japan was discussed. Between meetings, it was suggested to the committee that an effort be made to persuade the Federal Trade Commission to have asbestos protective equipment manufactured from Japanese cloth be so labeled. Counsel, both in and out of the committee, was consulted. The sum advice was that the chore of successfully attaining such lofty goals would be far beyond ' the scope of the Institute. One more made rec ently in this area was a letter written by the president of the Institute to the president of the United States Steel Corp. comp limenting him on his recent public statement whereby he urged that employees of his company purchase American-made automobiles to help preserve the position of domestic steel producers. Most will remember that the committee used to have the task of placing the ATI display cabinets in universities around the country. Some months ago, this asbestos display ( needing extensive refurbishing) was "retired" from circulation and placed in storage at RaybestosManhattan,Inc., lianheim,?a. R/il's new office building will be com pleted in October 1969, and it is planned to display the cabinets in the lobby of that building upon its completion. One major problem discussed in detail at our meeting was the serious shortage of better grades of asbestos fiber. The reason for existence of the Sales Promotion Committee is to find and exploit new markets for asbestos textile products. V-e wonder wether we are creating a sort of "Frankenstein'' when we develop such markets in view of the fiber shortage and we view with alarm information presented to this meeting this morning such as the report on fiber presented by a representative of the mining member companies. Respectfully submitted. M.Q. Scowcroft - Chairman Hinutes: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute February 6. 1969 at the Grand Hotel, Point Clear, Alabama In Attendance! G. E. Houghton R. Moo re J. D. McCluer E. A. Morris D. T. Austin William Maaskant J. W. Hawkins Garlock, Inc. Garlock, Inc. H. K. Porter Co., Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. ."'merican Asbestos Textile Corporation Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Minutes; The Technical Committee met with the Fiber Testing Committee in joint session to discuss the Round Robin test conducted by Mr. Walter Smith of Bell Asbestos Mines. In addition to Mr. Smith, others in attendance were - Mr. Lincoln, Mr. Kuntze, and Mr. Ed Parrell. The conclusions from the Round Robin test are; 1. Calibration standards in different laboratories were not the same. 2. The textiles being sampled had a great variation. 3. Using the identical standard with the identical textile sample, the same magnetic rating was obtained on all T & N apparatuses. 4. Many of the test instruments were not working properly and the instruments, other than the T & N, were constructed differently. Test data will be considered at the March 5, ASTM meeting prior to starting on Specification D 1118. Information will be sent to J/M for statistical study. Specification D 628 on Woven and Braided Tubing was reviewed, several changes were necessary for clarification on the speci fication. Several of these changes were suggested by the Editorial Committee. In June we will begin work on the Heat Aging Specification, ASTM D 1573. There has not been any activities on Military or Federal Specifications recently. Respectfully submitted John w. Hawkins Chairman Cw*. Xo , l t 6 T ) Minutes - General Meeting -2- O 1. President Schuman. called the meeting to order at 9i30 A. M* 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. R. P._ Clarlc moved the reading be omitted, seconded by J. L. Rainey, and so voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft. It was moved by R, P, Clark that report bo accepted* The motion was seconded by J. V/. Christenbury, and so voted. The report Is attached. i|. Mr. Haven C. Roosevelt, Legal Counsel, addressed the meeting,, and a brief summary of his remarks follows: nCounsel reported on the hard line taken by the Department of Justice in the antitrust field. He reviewed the FTC*s pre-merger notification requirements and recent remarks by Attorney General Mitchell regarding mergers* Counsel also briefly recited some of the reasoning and policy behind the Admin istration's hard line in attacking mergers and attempting to slow merger activity. He dealt primarily with one of the reasons - reciprocity, or other forms of unfair buyer-seller leverage - noting that reciprocity was a problem which almost . all businessmen encounter in one form or another* Covins el explained the recent complaint in the case against United States Steel and reviewed some of the terms of the proposed consent decree. He concluded that in order to avoid successful attack, all pur chasing decisions of a company should be made on the basis of price, quality and service rather than on the basis of whether or not a prospective seller is also a good customer of the company."' ' 5* At this point In the meeting President Schuman asked each person present to stand and identify himself and his company. 6* President Schuman announced that the Board of Governors had unanimously approved the application of Nicolet Industries, Inc., for Regular Membership in the Institute, and extended to that company a most cordial welcome to participate in our activities* 7. President Schuman announced that the resignation of Ta?,.inan-- McCluskey Fabrics Company from the Institute had been accepted due to the acquisition of that company by the H, K. Porier Company, Inc. 8. Our next meeting, to be held October 8-10, 1969, at Plriehur3t, H. C., will be the 2pth Anniversary meeting of the Institute and President Schuman announced that. Mr. J. L. Rainsy had boom appointed Program Chairman for that important occanion* Ho ask.co. that everyone make a special effort to attend, bringing their ccrri'-'I ' Minutes -- General Meeting wives if possible. Also that .we.-would -like-ar.larga attendance by company officials in addition to those who regularly attend our meeting. 9. The Fibre Producers Report was prepared by Hr.H.P. Carson,V.?.Sales, AS3.SST03 CORPORATION LI.:ITZD, Thetford Mines,Quebec, and \;as given by Hr. Paul 2. Leclerc, Regional Gales ilanager of Am3'! ,TOS CORPORATION LIHTT2D, as Hr. Carson was confined to his room due to sudden illness. The full text of the excellent report is attached to these minutes. 10. President Schuman introduced our guest speaker. Hr. 2dv/ard V/. Fisher, Supervisor of Product Engineering, GARLOCH INC.Palmyra, Hew York. ilr. Fisher talked about - "The Use of Asbestos Textiles in the Packing Industry". Speaking from a background of over 35 years experience in the Packing Industry Hr. Fisher gave a most interesting and informative talk on various forms of packings and the design principles involved in making them effective for a multiplicity of applications and operating conditions, iiany samples were displayed illustrating points made as his talk progressed, and at its conclusion copies of his paper were given to those in attendance. President Schuman thanked iir. Fisher on behalf of the Hoard of Governors and members and a fine round of applause was given iir. Fisher in recognition of an outstanding ' talk, lie are most appreciative of the cooperation of GARLOCK INC. in permitting iir. Fisher to give his fine talk!11 11. The committee reports were given by the respective chair men as listed below: Fiber Testing Committee Cr.r.A., Brink, Chrn. Technical Committee - -- Jb. Ilawkins, Chra. Sales Promotion Committee - H] .ivj. Scowcroft, Chra. Air Hygiene >. iifg. Committee IT.II. Vi'alter, Chm. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. 12. President Schuman asked *Ir. C.Ii. Sheckler, Chairman of the recently formed Environmental Study Committee, to give a brief report on the current activity of that committee, iir. Sheckler said that one major objoctive of the committee was to keep members of the Institute informed on legislation affecting our industry, and in this connection he urged everyone to read the revised kalsh-llealy act now in effect for public contracts in respect to environmental working conditions involving du3t counts and also noise levels. ilentioncc-. his current discussions with the U.3.?.H. Service in reference their policy and procedure on reporting significant findings of clinical examinations of employees to the individual's family physician, but not to the company physician, lie stressed the necessity for the company physician to Imou which employees are in need of medical attention. (continued) O Ilinutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -4 - ;Ir. Gheclcler reported that be liad uritten iir. C.A. Gnam, in the U.J. Dept, of Commerce, on hay 6, 1969, giving iir. Gnam on behalf of the Asbestos Textile Institute, comments pertaining to the proposed legislation HR 2503. Iir. Sheckler pointed out to Hr# Gnam that HR 2503 is too broad and non-specific in its provisions and as it related only to asbestos would vest all authority in the Dept. of HEi/, including inspection authority which would, in effect, duplicate the existing and proposed responsibilities of the Dept, of Labor. Hence a separate act, such as the proposed HR 2503 relating only to the asbestos industry, is unnecessary and also undesirable. . Hr. Cheekier touched on some miscellaneous medical scientific reports concerning the biological effects on animals of asbestos in conjunction with pulmonary diseases. In concluding his remarks Hr. She elder announced thata new member of his committee was Dr.J.il. Wolfsie, Corporate Medical Director, Uniroyal,Inc.. Other members of the Environmental Study Committee are:-Dr.J.L. Goodman, Raybestos-IIanhattan,Inc. at Worth Charleston,S.C.;J.L. Rainey,Vice President, American Asb estos Textile Corporation; and R.P. Clark, Sales Ilgr. for asb estos textiles,Uniroyal,Inc. ( Hr. Sheckler, the Chairman, is Manager - Accident Prevention and Health Administration, Johnslianville Corporation,Hew York City.) 13, President Schuman announced"these dates'for future meetings: October 8-10,1969 - The Carolina, Pinehurst, Worth Carolina February 4-6, 1970 - The Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga. June 10-12, 1970 - The hotel La Provence, Thetford Hines,Que. October 7-9, 1970 - The Statler Hilton Inn,Williamsburg,Va. In respect to the meeting scheduled for June 10-12, 1970 at Thetford Mines,President Schuman expressed the sincere apprec iation of all members for the invitation extended to the Institute by the mining companies, namely:- Asbestos Corporation Limited; Hell Asbestos ilines Limited;Canadian Johns-iianvilie Co., Ltd.;Cassiar Corporation Ltd.;and Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. 14. There being no other business to come before the meeting it recessed for a group luncheon after which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted. ;I.E. Sunbury Secrstary t oV ' Y / rJ O '.) ASBESTOS Til'TILI INSTITUTE "Report of Funds May 8, 1969 Balance On Hand at last .report _(January 10,1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Gash. Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest - if. mos.) To Savings Fund ( 1969 Dues) To General Fund ( 1969 dues) To General Fund ( 3ooh Sales) $ 1025.57 17ii.08.91 76.98 $18511.46 $ 275.00 3000.00 6000.00 79.7k (Sst) 9354.74 Total On Hand and Received "Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 7 mos. ending 3/31/69) 1250.00 Legal Dxpenses ( 7 n *' " 11 " li-3i+ - Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) 476.00 F.I.C.-.. Tax (First vitr.1969) 36.00 Secretary's Travel Expense 254*86 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 A.T.I. meeting expense (Feb.5-7,1969) 703.78 Printing h Office supplies 56.48 Telephone (4 mos.) 80,61 -Betty Cash (Vouchers 396-411 inclusive) 59.77 $ 27866.20 Total Disbursements 3652.44 Balance On Hand as of Ilay 8, 1969 $24213.76 Funds . . General Fund (Janlr Statement of 5/8/69) $ 4512.64 (*) Savings Fund 19633.91 (**) Petty Cash Fund ' 17.21 . Total Funds $24213.76 Assets as of liay 8, 1969 General Fund Savings Fund ? 4512.64 19683.91 Petty Cash Fund 17-21 .Accts Receivable (Booh Sales) 1.32 Postage on Hand 10.36 Furniture C: Equipment (Nominal Value) 1,00 ' Total Assets Liabilities (ifone) $24226.44 ITet Worth $24226.44 (a) )1000.00 transferred from Savings to General Fund on 1/16/69 {**) Includes $275.00 estimated interest for period 1/1-4/30/69 Respectfully submitted, A..:-, '-'i:- H.:1. Sunbury, Asot. Treasurer o J AS3EST0S TEXTILE institute IH1TUTZS - GENERAL MEETING - JUNE 20, 1969 Seaview Country Club, Absecon, N. J. In Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE COUP. J. i. Rainey J. W. Christenbury E. H. Walter C-ARLOCE BTC. G. E. Houghton I, E G. Dixit E. W. Fisher (Guest speaker) ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P. E. Leclerc G. F. A, Brink BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED W. H. Smith .C. H. Schoch CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP, LTD. JOHNS-HAUVILLS CORP. Dr. R. A. Euntze E, A* Schuman R. li. Billings C. L. Sheckler LAKE AS3EST0S OF QUEBEC LTD. C. E. Stiefken H . K. PORTER COMPANY, PTC. TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO., LTD. L. E. Moody J. D. McCluer D, E. Childers J. L. Mitchell J. W. Echerd ` RAYBESTOS-Il'AlTEATTAIl, IRC. M. Q. Scoweroft A. R, Patterson J. W. Havjkin? R. B. Smith W. M. Deckman ' * HICOLST INDUSTRIES. INC. Geo. Griswold, Jr. D. Frost CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT H. C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE UUIROYAL, II!C H. E. Sunbury (Secretary) R. P. Clark R. C. Hunt ' D. T. Austin, Jr. II. Fleming J. II. Wolfsie, M. D, GUESTS W. S, Ilough, Sec^y-Treas., Mech. Packing Association. J. L. Tucker, Consultant on Textiles B. E. Shirey, Raybestos-Hanhatton, Inc. Note: Those attending committee meetings the previous two days, but not the General Meeting, are listed on committee _ reports. uJ FIBRE PRODUCER'S REPORT Asbestos Textile Institute - June 2.0, 1969 By: il. P. Carson, Vice Pres. - Salo3f ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. Shipments from Quebec were down 6.7 percent at the end of Hay 1969 as compared with the five-month period in 1968. This was partly due to the unsettled labour situation.in the St. Lawrence River earlier in the spring. Shipping companies in many cases refused to place vessels in Hcntreal, Quebec and Three Rivers pending a settlement of disputes. The settlement was forthcoming in the ports and shipping at present has returned to normal* Host companies in Quebec have recently settled labour negotiations with unions* In our company's case, an agreement to the end of . 1971 has been negotiated. Thus, one can expect a period of stability* ' There are acute shortages of quality Group 3 fibre. While there has been no apparent change in shipments to the U. S. market as compared with last year, there appears to be a decrease in avail ability of Group 3* This decrease- in availability has beem re ferred to in past reports as far as British Columbia is concerned, and a similar situation has developed in Quebec. Overseas markets have been strong generally in Grpup 3* It is notable that the Q.A.H.A. inventory for Group 3 lias been* reduced by 10% since Hay 31st, 1968. In asbestos cement grades, strong demand continues for Groups !{., 5 and 6* Harket reports from various areas highlight shortages in quality I5. Group fibres. Group 5 and 6 are in quite short supply for a/c applications, although some quantities of brake lining 5's and.6's are still available. Shorts seea to be moving as well as in 1968, with some shortfalls reported. The closing of the Nicolet Iline earlier this year has reduced the availability of shorts. To attempt to satisfy part of the apparent demand of the next few years, our company is increasing production in the Thetford area. We are hopeful of adding 10% to last year's total production. Plans to bring Asbestos Hill into production at the rate of _ , 100,000 tons per year are progressing favourably* Mid-1972 is the target date. The ore will bo concentrated at Ungava, trans ported to Europe, where a finishing plant will complete the job. Hie Penhale orebody is under development. This latter will not mean additional tonnage, as it will replace Normandie, which will be depleted by 1974-* There are other prospects still under study in Canada and Australia, but these are not considered to be at the stage where future production can be anticipated. cont'd. Fibre Producer*s Report As Tar as one can confirm, Rhodesian fibre is still finding markets, and it is assumed there is no build-up of inventory there. Russia has made no new moves to increase its share of world markets and still retains about 250,000 tons, including shipments to Socialist Europe, Some Socialist countries in Europe are increasing their purchases of Canadian fibre, perhaps indicating some difficulties in obtaining more Russian supplies. o ') Minutea or the A.T.I, Fiber Testing Committee Meeting held June 18 and 19, 1969 at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon,H. J. PRES.STT: - Members : G.F.A. Brink, Chairman D.2, Childers W.C. Streib C.E, otiefken Asbestos Corporation Ltd. H.K. Porter Company,Inc, Johns-ilanville Corp, Lake Asbestos of Que.,Ltd. Visitors :E.V7* Fisher D.J, Frost C.H. Scboch W.H. Smith business: Garloclc Inc. Nicolet Industries,Inc. Bell Asbestos Hines Ltd. u n ii ii 1. Magnetic Rating Test , 1.1 The outcome of the recent Magnetic Rating Round Robin on three (3) asbestos fibers and ten (10) textile products, conducted under the guidance of Mr. Walter Smith at diff erent laboratory locations, and the conclusions based on the statistical analyses of the results by the Johns-Ilan- Corp. were reviewed at a Joint session with members of Sub A-4 ASTIi Committee D-13, and the ATI Technical Comm ittee on the 18th June. Eighteen persons were in atten dance at the joint session. The findings of the statistical analyses were as follows: . 1.1.1 The two test methods give essentialy the same average, but are not necessarily the same for each sample. 1.1.2 There was no difference due to company alone on either test. 1.1.3 Isolated odd results seemed to occur with both the asbestos fibers and the asbestos textile- products which could not be fully explained. However, in the case of the latter, these were probably due to variations in the magnetic content of the samples sent to each laboratory. 1.1.4 Although there were some erratic results, the Round Robin Test was an improvement over the previous one. 1.2 It was mutually agreed at the joint session that the new ASTIi procedure would be based on the T. & N. apparatus on account of its apparent advantages; and a motion to this effect was passed at the 19th Juno meeting of the Fiber Testing Committee. Work was commenced on the first draft of the new ASTii Method of Test for Magnetic Rating of Asbestos Fiber and Textile Products under the guidance of Hr. Paul iTicodemus, Chairman of Sub A-4# ASTii Comm. D-13* 1.3 A number of important items relative to the magnetic rating (continued) U ..) minutes - Fiber Testing Committee. - continued: Page -2 test were discussed at the 19th June meeting, and it was recommended that a list of these be submitted to the Chair men of the committees involved for consideration when viriting up the new procedure. 2 rlational Stockpile Purchase Specification Asbestos-Chrysotile P-3-Hli, Dated ltith Ifovember, 19"6'5 2.1 In response to a request from ilr. Carl Gnam of the Miscell aneous Metals fc Minerals Division (DSA) of the Department of Commerce in March, it was recommended that page (F) of Spec ification P-3-Rij. be amended to read as follows: *(F) Magnetic Rating: The following types of chrysotile asbestos shall qualify in terms of magnetic rating as follows; Magnetic Rating Recommended Use Less than 1.0 ----- Electrical. 1.0 but less than 2.0 -- Certain Electrical z General Purpose. 2.0 and above ---------------- General Purpose.' 2.2 The Technical Committee Chairman will advise >Ir. Gnam of the joint session's recommendation 3. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical (Colour Test) and ASTM D-30 (Sub III) Committees (Rotap : Moisture Content Tests) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. Spicular and Grit Content of Spinning Fibers l+.l The results of experimental work to develop a suitable test method for measuring the spicular u grit content of spinning fibers were discussed and fractions recovered from three hydrocyclones in series were examined. The Committee recommended that work on this score be continued; and that other appro aches such as the elutriation of the longer licllett fractions in the Crudy Content apparatus be considered as well as hydrocycloning. A progress report is to be submitted at the next meeting. Respectfully submitted, G.F.A. Drink, Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee Minutes: O; TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute June 13-19, 1969 at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon, New Jersey. In Attendance: Irving Barnett William Maaskant D. T. Austin J. D. McCluer G. E. Houghton J. W. Hawkins Johns-Manville American Asbestos Uniroyal H. K. Porter Co. Garlock, Inc. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. During the Wednesday afternoon session (June 18), Messrs. George Harris, Paul Nicodemus, Paul Smith, and Bill Eckerd attended as ASTM A-4 members. Also, members of the Fiber Testing Committee Messrs. Dewey Childress, Wm. Strieb, Walter Smith, Karl Shock, Donald Frost, and Sudhakas Dixit. Minutes; The first draft of ASTM Specification D-1118, Magnetic Rating of Asbestos was started. Information is being obtained from Mr. Lincoln of T & N on the electrical circuit to be included in the specification. Mr. Walter Smith is supplying information on sample preparation. The National Stockpile Specification P-3-R4 on Spinnable Asbestos Fibers was discussed; recommendations are being made that three categories be included - 1 MR and under, over 1 MR but less than 2, and fibers over 2 MR. '* MIL-I-3053, Insulation, Electrical, Asbestos Fiber, Treated and Untreated. This specification needed a lot of changes and the Technical Committee of the A.TI has offered to assist the appropriate representatives in the revision. MIL-P-16404 on Asbestos Packings was reviewed and several changes suggested. HH-P-41C on Asbestos Rope & Wick was reviewed and a tolerance on weight for this specification was recommended. MIL-I-24244 was reviewed and this specification is currently undergoing changes in the chemical analysis. A new technique for determining the asbestos content by the fluoroborate technique was discussed. The next ASTM specification to be revised will be D-1573 on Heat Aigeing. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins Chairman imiuTss SALES PHOHOTIOII COIEHTTEE Asbestos Textile Institute - June 19* 1969 Seavlew Country'- Club, Absecon, New Jersey The Sales Promotion Committee met on June 19th with representatives of five member companies in attendance. The major topic of discussion was the letter written on Hay 5th by the Naval Ship Engineering Center of the Department of the Navy, to, we presume, companies involved, or interested in high- temperature insulating materials* This letter said in part ... "The serious hazards of asbes.tos have recently received widespread, publicity and have generated a high level of interest concerning it3 use by the U. S. Navy as an insulating material." It went on to point out that the chief hazard existed wherever there was a ' possibility of dust evolution during fabrication, installation - and rip-out. Further, It said .. "In order to minimize the- hazards associated with the use of asbestos and therefore reduce the possibility of deleterious effects to the workers, a compre hensive study has been initiated by the Naval Ship Engineering Center, Ilyattsville, Kd, to investigate the feasibility of sub stituting alternate materials for asbestos used as lagging, piping and boiler insulation." Our committee discussed this problem in depth as it related to an important segment of our business - textiles. Several member com panies responded individually to the IJavy with letters of protest. There was no direct action taken by the committee itself.' A motion was passed to recommend to the Board of Governors that representatives of the Environmental Study Committee contact the concerned persons at the ITavy in Ilyattsville for a conference on the problem. We felt that our current concern is involved with learning as much as we could about their progress and the degree of their intent and that information could boat be obtained by the environmental Study Committee rather than the Saleg Promotion Committee In an effort to have information on the Asbestos Textile Industry get wider distribution, we discv.ssed the possibility of arranging free subscriptions to the trade magazine "Asbestos." Vie are thinking of engineering college libraries among other institutions. It was agreed to propose a program to the Board of Governors. A notion to do so was made and passed at this meeting. Two Years ago, we investigated the possibility of instituting an advertising program sponsored by the Institute. After some pre liminary work was accomplished, each member of the committee checked the subject with his corporate executives. The reports back at that time were lukewarm at best and tho matter subsequently was dropped. However, the Committee itself has not lost ita enthusiasm for the project. Because of the increase in unfavorable publicity on asbestos during tho ensuing time, members felt that their respective managements might be more receptive and that the program should be reinvestigated. The subject attracted spirited cont'd u -z- Minutes - Sales Pronotion committee discussion but no specific action was taken at this meeting other than to put the subject on the agenda for the October meeting. The meeting vras adjourned early in order that members could attend the important meeting of the Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Com mittee meeting attended by two representatives of the U, S. Public Health Service. Respectfully submitted. H. Q, Scoweroft Chairman U imrjiss - ai?. Tuc-iziis & >iAiropACTURr-T& coi-m utile Asbestos Textile Institute June 19, 1969 -- Seaview Country Club, Abescon, IT. J In Attendance H. H.V/alter, Chairman L. E. Moody II. Fleming R, C, nunt R. B. Smith A. R. Patterson S. C*. Dixit American Asbestos Textile Corp. H. K. Porter, Inc, Uniroyal, Inc, Uniroyal, Inc, Raybestos-IIanhattan, Inc, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Garlock, Inc, Bausch c: Lonb Automatic Dust Counter; . The members of the committee agreed to further pursue the develop ment of a method for correlating dust counts obtained by the Midget Ir.pinger and the Bosch h. Lomb Dust Counter, This attempt appears to be important in regards to the acceptance of datss from the Bosch & Lomb Dust Counter by governmental agencies as well as for the evaluation of such datais within the plants. The Bosch : Lomb Dust Counter will be transferred shortly from the Uniroyal plant in Hogansville to H.K, Porter. Mr. Earl Wells -- dust count technician of Uniroyal - will discuss his datas and ex perience with the tochnician of H.K. Porter. It is planned that at a later date the dust cotint technicians of all member companies get together, exchange their datas and experience end develop a method for the proper use of the Bosch e Lomb Dust Counter and a correlation to the Midgit Impinger. Vet Weaving; -' Samples of wet i;oven asbestos garment cloth before and after appli cation of a finish proved that a wet woven asbestos garment cloth, which without the application of a proper finishing method, would be unacceptable for garment use, can be finished in such a way that it shows the same as or even improved characteristics of dry woven cloth. Problems arising from rust formation as well as from clog ging, of heddle eyes and reeds in the wet weaving process can be overcome by the use of stainless ateel oval reeda and stainless steel heddle eyes. . ITo3.se Exposure; The problems of reducing the noise level, particularly in weave rooms, were discussed in regards to the "Revised Safety & Health Standards Under the Walsh-IIoaley Public Contracts ct". Copie3 of that act and ah .cmriycikl of. the revised standards will bo dist ributed to the committee members. cont1d llinutes -- Air Hygiene : Ilanufacturing Committee Dr. L.-J. Cralley and Dr. William W. Lainhart of the U. S. Public Health Service, the Enviro&'uen.ial Study Committee and members of the Board of Governors joined the committee meeting at 10:45 A,h. Dr. Cralley, Dr. Lainhart and Mr. C. L. She.elder discussed pro cedures for the continuation of the study of the asbestos textile industry by the U. S. Public Health Service. Respectfully submitted, E. H. Walter Chairman Oc Vo 10 \x H6 l C) -A ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE 1L-LJ Page -1- Minutes - BOARD OF GOVERNOR'S MEETING - October 9,1969 The CAROLINA, Pinehurst, North Carolina. In attendance: E.A. Schuman - Johns-Manville Corporation J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corp. M.Q. Scowcroft - Raybeatos-Manhattan,Inc. S.R. Zimmerman,Jr. " " " (Guest) L.E. Moody - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. A. Kurmulc - Garlock Inc. (Alternate for G.P. Wiess) J.K. Whittaker Nicolet Industries,Inc. E.A. Morris - Uniroyal,Inc. C.L. Sheckler - Johns-Manville Corp. (Guest) H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) - Cadwalader,Wickersham k Taft E.E. Sunbury - Secretary **** Minutes **** ' 1. Mr. E.A. Schuman, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 10:00AM noting that all Regular Members were represented. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. Motion by Mr.Rainey that reading be omitted,seconded by Ilr. Moody.So voted. 3. The Chairman stated that he had received a letter from Mr. R.P. Clark, Uniroyal,Inc., dated September 8, 1969, tendering hit resig nation as a member of the 3oard of Governors, also as Vice President of the Institute and the committees on which he served, to be effect ive as of Sept.1st,1969. His resignation, he explained, was due to a realignment of his duties at Uniroyal,Inc., because of which he would no longer be associated with their asbestos products. Mr. Rainey moved that the resignation be accepted with deep regret. His motion was seconded by Mr. Hoody. So voted. Chairman Schuman said that he had been advised by Uniroyal that Mr. E.A. Morris would be their new representative on the Board of Governors, and welcomed Hr. Morris to the meeting. Also welcomed to the meeting was Hr. J.K. Whittaker, representing our new Regular Member, Nicolet Industries,Inc. I4.. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scoucroft, who stated that the Annual Audit had been made by Mr. C.W, Briggs,Jr., of Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. President Schuman reported that he had been advised by Hr. Briggs that the statement dated Sept.9,1969 "presents fairly the position of the Institute as of that date". Mr. Whittaker moved that report be accepted, motion seconded by Mr. Rainey, and so voted unanimously. The Report and a copy of Mr. Briggs's letter are attached to these minutes. 5. Mr. L.E. Moody, Chairman of tho Nominating Committee, presented his committee's cecomnedations for committee chairmen to replace the Minutes - Board of Governor's Keating, October 9, 1969 Page -2- four chairmen who are now completing their normal two-year terms: Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - H. Fleming, Uniroyal,Inc. Technical Committee - S.G. Dixit, Oarlock Inc. Sales Promotion Committee - R.E. Carpenter, Garlock Inc, Fiber Testing Co.imittee - D.E. Childers, H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Regarding nominations for officers to serve for the coming year, fir. Moody pointed out that the President and Treasurer had another year remaining of the usual two-year term of office, and this left only one vacancy, that of the Vice President, to be filled due to the resignation of ilr. Clark. Mr. Scowcroft suggested that Mr. Moody be nominated for this office. Mr. Rainey movea that (1) the recommendations of the nominating committee for committee chairmen be approved by the Board; (2) that . Hr.Schuman (President) and Hr. Scowcroft (Treasurer) be re-elected to serve for another year; and (3) that Mr. L.E. Moody be elected to the office of Vice President. nils motion was seconded by Hr. Morris and approval was voted unanimously. 6. Treasurer Scowcroft presented the Budget for the coming year in the amount of $11,017*00, and moved that it be approved. 1-lr. Rainey seconded this motion, and approval was unanimous. The Budget figures are attached to these minutes. 7. Speaker for the next meeting, Feb. 6, 1970, is responsibility of E.K. Porter Company (by rotation) and Mr. Moody agreed they.would try to supply a suitable speaker. 8. Approval was given to locations for ATI meetings in 1970:February 4-6# 1970 - Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga. June 10-12, 1970 - Balmoral Hotel, Thetford Hines,Quebec October 7*9, 1970 - Statler Hilton Inn, Williamsburg,Va. 9. Tentative approval was given to meetings in 1971:* February 3*5, 1971 - Charlotte,H.C. June 2-4. 1971 - Cherry Hill, jJ.J. October 0-8, 1971 Savannah, Ga. 20. Suggestions for meeting locations in 1972 were:* February 2-4# 1972 - Florida (West Coast) June 7*9, 1972 - Seaview Country Club, Absecon,!!. J. October 4*6, 1972 - The Equinox, Manchester, Vt. Also, it was suggested that a return visit to Plnehurst,i!.C. in October of 1973 would be desirable.11 11. Mr. Scowcroft suggested that the name of the "Sales Promotion" committee should be changed to more properly denote its broad range of interests in such matters as public relations, new products, legislation affecting our industry, etc. hr. Moody said that he would recommend that all reference to "Sales" be omitted in selecting a new name for the committee. Mr. Rainey moved that the title "Sales Promotion" be eliminated , and that it be left to the members of the old committee to select a new name that would be properly ' descriptive of their field of activity. o .J Minutes - Board of Governor's Meeting, October 9, 1969 Page -3- Mr. Moody seconded this motion, and it was voted approval unanimously. The Secretary will advise the incoming chairman of this action, and ask him to take the initiative in recommending a new name for the committee. 12. Mr. S.R. Zimmerman,Jr., showed a series of three advertisements prepared by the Asbestos Information Committee, 10 Lardour St., London, England. These ads, to be published under the caption "WHO NEEDS ASBESTOS" will appear in certain trade papers beginning in November 19b9. Ilr. Zimmerman commented favorably on the makeup of the ads and felt it was a constructive effort to acquaint the public with the importance of asbestos products in today's world. 23. Hr. C.L. Sheckler, Chairman of the Sivironmental Study Committee, reviewed for the benefit of the Board several developments that have taken place since the last meeting. Be again stressed that his committee acts only in an advisory capacity. The highlights of his remarks, (unedited by Hr. Sheckler) follow:- Confidential Information is that the U.S.P.H. Service is preparing a Position Paper on health aspects of asbestos, and l-Ir. Sheckler has reviewed a draft of same. USPBS gives opinion that asbestos hazard can be controlled except for mesothellma. Question of what Threshold Value should be est is reviewed. British Standards of number of fibers )ers per ce have been suggested)- compromise may be Lch means one million particles per cubic foot. Doe IS paper will be published but thinks in about ly. In his opinion the asbestos industry should isociation rather ' than by an individual company Hr. Sheckler met recently wit > representatives of respiratory safety equipment epresentatives of the U.S. Bureau of Hines. An improved protective respiratory device has been developed but it will not be marketed until, or unless, it is approved by the U.S. Bureau of Hines. This might be next July - however the Bureau of Hines will not give specific approval for asbestos dust- but rather for silicates (?) which in Hr. Sheckler's view would be acceptable. He pointed out that the plant should have a respirator maintenance program, meaning a clean filter every day,etc This is more of a problem on construction Jobs than for in-plant workers. Several companies have prototypes of respirators, including J/M, awaiting U.3. Bureau of iiines approval. In respect to the Navy's search for a substitute for asbestos cloth as well as other asbestos products. Hr. Sheckler is under the opinion that the Navy does not necessarily want non-asbestos products, but elimination of dust is their primary objective. Corznenting on legislation - present and pending - Hr. Sheckler mentioned that compensation cases were not decreasing - quite the contrary in fact! Examination of the employees in J/lI's Harshvllle,N.C. plant is presently underway by the U.S.?.II.Service, and acceptance by the employees there has been excellent. u) Minutes - Board of Governor's Meeting, October 9, 1969 Page -Ij,- Mr. Sheckler raised the question of whether it would be desirable to have Or. Selikoff as the Guest Speaker at an A.T.I. meeting. Hr. Itainey felt that we should defer it as timing was not right. It was the concensus of the Board that any invitation to Dr. Selikoff should be deferred. Also that if, and when, invited to speak that Er. Selikoff agree there would be no publicity release in connection with his talk at the Institute meeting. The (fuestion of preparing a Position Paper on asbestos was discussed. Mr. Rainey thought that the restructured former Sales Promotion CoBmittee might undertake it. Hr. Sheckler offered to help but not to accept responsibility for the undertaking. The Position Paper,or booklet, would be for the benefit of customers, and by means of it all companies would be in a position to advise their clients, custom* era,and the general public, of the many uses of and recommended procedures for the safe handling of asbestos textile products. All agreed that such a booklet would be most desirable. Hr. Sheckler showed a booklet put out by NIIIA (National Insulation Hfgrs. Assoc.) saying that the format was excellent, and that a booklet on asbestos textiles might be modeled along the same lines. It was agreed that the idea of a booklet, or Position Paper, on asbestos textiles should be pursued at a subsequent meeting. lij.. There being no further business to come before tfce meeting it -was voted to adjourn. Respectfully submitted. A^STOS T2CTILE INSTITUTE ~) Report of Funds September 9, 1969 Balance on Hand at last report (Hay^. 1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund ' Roceipts To Savings Fund (Interest 4 bos.) To General Fund (Initiation Fee It Dues) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 4512.64 19683.91 17.21 $24213.76 300.00(Est.) 750.00 54.90 1104.90 Total on Hand and Received $25318.66 pi sbur s ements Legal Retainer ( 3 nos. ending 6/30/69) 750.00 Legal Expenses ( 3 nos. " M 6/30/69 Secretary's salary ( 4 nos.) 127.44 476.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr.-1969) 36.00 Secretary's travel expense 110.72 Office rent ( 4 nos.) 300.00 A.T.I. Meeting expensed June 16-20,1969) 707.58 Printing & Office Supplies 115.36 Telephone ( 4 nos.) Stenographic 127.31 32.00 Dues (Industrial Eygiene Foundation) 100.00 Fire Insurance ( Office contents-3 yrs.) 31.40 Revision of ASTil Specs. 38.01 Advertisement - Asbestos Hag.50th Anniver'y 40.00 Flowers 24.30 Petty Cash (Vouchers 412-424 inclusive) 56.65 Total Diabursements 3072.77 Balance on Hand as of September 9, 1969 $22245.89 Funds ' General Fund (Bank statement of 9/9/69) Savings Prod Petty Cash Fund $ 2218.63 19983.91 (*) 43*35 Total Funds $ 22245.89 Assets as of Sept.9. 1969 General /und $ 2218.63 Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture it Equipment (nominal Value) Total Assets Liabilities - Accts Payable as of 9/9/69 19983.91 43.35 16.21 5.60 1.00 $ 22268.70 --rjnir Het Worth $ 22255.56 (*) Includes $575.00 estimated interest for period beginning January 1st,1969 and ending August 31st,1969 Respectfully submitted. H.2# . WSun bury, 1AsstTTvFr--eas Rayb zsto s-Van mattan , NC. Uxnxs Statu Assures Dms;ox Manhrim, Pa. 17545 October 2, 1969 Kr. E. A. Schuaan Johr.s-Manvllle Corporation 22 East 40th Street Mew York, New York 10016 Dear Kr.Schuaaa: Subject: Audit of A.?.I. Books I have exaained the report of unds, assets, liabilities and net worth for the Asbestos Textile Institute for the 12 month period ending September 9, 1969. Bank balances as shown on the report were reconciled with bank records. lo ay opinion, the attached statement dated September 9, 1969, presents fairly the position of the Asbestos Textile Institute as of that date. The results of the operations for the 12 month period ended Septem ber 9th have been exaained by review of the check register and other reports as presented which conform with generally accepted accounting practices. All records have been returned to Kr. K. E. Sunbury under separate cover. . Sincerely, eg cc: Mr. K. Q. Scowcroft Raybcstos-Kanhattan, Inc. P. 0. Box 9140 Bridgeport, Conn. 06603 Kr. H. S. Sunbury Asbestos Textile Institute P.0. Box 239, 75 Center St. Pompton Lakes, K. J. 07442 it. fw *ai ei-eject T tm or vnrft. tair* m attire cit**ur.a. Mterarrrj troro r *xt > * w,' > *>. it ' e i>au't i* *%t >+ etai'fw.M'ik, r**e * re. * t *% r*e nrree*Mie *<r *, iwk ee*ee eMrire ween* etett. oe n.*.tre4 rn^eei Heft. e..-#. Oj ASBESTOS T3tTIL3 lilSTITTJTE BU1Xj3T FOR 1970 Item 1969 Budget Disbursements 12 Months ending 9/9/69 Secretary's salary (net) $11426.50 F.I.C.A. Tax 114.7*00 Secretary's travel expense 500.00 Office Rent 900.00 Legal tetainer 3000.00 Legal expense (Travel,etc. ) 500.00 Accountant (Caruso) 300.00 Meeting expense (3 mtgs.) 2700.00 ASTM and IHF Dues 135.00 Office expense 1300.00 Revision of ASTil Specs. 200.00 Insurance on 3.': L.equipment 110.00 Incidentals(Gifts.Flowers. etc)200.00 Fire insurance(Office contents) -- A.T.I. 2$th Anniversary exp. 500.00 $ H4.3O.OO 138.00 536.20 900.00 2500.00 780.03 300.00 2366.39 235.00 835.00 38.01 113.00 222.8031.40 Proposed Budget for 1970 $ 1428.00 144.00 500.00 900.00 3000.00 600.00 300.00 2700.00 35.00 1000.00 100.00 110.00 200.00 -- Totals $ 11918.50 $ 10l4.25.03 11017.00 Sourco of Funds to meet 1970 Budget Dues, Class "A" members -- -- 56 $1000.00 ..................... - $ Dues, Class "3" members ----2 J 500.00 Dues, Class "C" members ---- I4. 3 500.00 Dues, Class "D" members -- -- I4. J 250.00 Book sales to non-members ($156.00 in lasb 12 months) -- Interest on Savings Fund ( Estimated) ------By transfer from Savings fund --------------------- 5000.00 1000.00 2000.00 1000.00 150.00 700.00 1167.00 Total Breakdown of Office !tpense ( 12 months ending 9/9/69) $ 11017.00 Printing Office Supplies-------- $ 259.01 Stenographic Help ------------Teleohone ( 12 months) ----------- 314.22 Petty Cash. (Stamps,etc) -------- 229.77 Total $ 835.00 Prepared by: II. J. Sunbury Asst. Treasurer ASJ3ST0S T.i^riLS INSTITUTE Record of Committee Chairmanships (Ten ye*ar'period I960 - 196*9 inclusive) Year Air Hygiene & Sales Promotion Technical Fiber Testing Hffi. Committee CommitteeSfisyaitteeCommittee 1960 R.J. Smith (R/M) E.A.Schuoan(J/M) D.F.Quealy(A/A)I.Barnett(J/H) 2961 R.3.Smith(R/M) S.A.Schuman{ J/M) D.F.Quealy(A/A)I.3arnett(J/M) 1962 J.L.Mitchell(HKP) S.J.Peeletttei.) J.L.Tucker(J/M)IBarnet1(J/M) 2963 J.L.lIitchell(EKP) J. T. Griffis (HXP) J.L.Tucker(J/M)I.3arnett(J/M) 196k L.C.Willians(R/H)J.V.Christenbury Vta.Maaskant (A/A)I. Barnett (J/M) (A/A) 1965 L.C,Williams(R/H)J.W.Christenbury Vta.Maaskant(A/A)I.Barnett(J/M) (A/A) 1966 V.C. Atkinson (J/M) V.S.Hough (J/M) J.D.McCluer (HXP) J.Wronski (R/M) 1967 V.C. Atkins on (J/M) W.S.Hough (J/M) J.D.HcCluer(HKP) J.Wronski (R/M) 2968 H.H. Walter (A/A) 2969 H.H. Walter (A/A) M.Q.Scowcroft (R/M) M.Q.Scowcroft (R/M) J.W. Hawkins (R/M) G.F.A.Brink (Asb.Corp.) J.W.Hawkins (R/M) G.F.A.Brink '(Asb.Corp.) Company Participation (For ten year period 1960 - 1969 inclusive) Johns-Manville has supplied ---------- H4. chairmanship years(35*02) Raybestos-Manhattan has supplied ------ - 10 American Asbestos Textile has supplied - 8 H.H. Porter Company has supplied - 5 (25.0?.') n (20.0*) N (12.52) Asbestos Corporation has supplied 2 ( 5.02) Uniroyal has supplied --------------- -- 1 ( 2.52) Garlock.Inc. has supplied ------ 0 (oo.o2) Total 100.o2 H.E.s. 9/30/69 u ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ) BOARD OF GOVERNOR'S MEETING October 9, 1969, - The CAROLINA, Pinehurat, North Carolina Agenda; Call to Order - 10:00 A.M. - E.A. Schuman, Chairman . Minutes or the last meeting Financial Report M.<i. Scowcroft, Treasurer Annual Audit Report - E.A. Schuman Report - Environmental Study Committee - C.L. She elder, Chm. Resignation of Vice President R.P. Clark Approval of TJhiroyal's new representative on Board of Governors Report of Nominating Committee - L.E. Moody, Chm. Election of officers for the coming year Appointment of Chairmen for working cossaitteea ' (a) Air Hygiene & rtfg. (b) Sales Promotion ' 7 .i ' *. (c) Technical (d) Fiber Testing ` '. * Approval of.A.T.I. Budget for 1970 ... - Speaker for the February 1970 meeting (*) Approval of locations for .meetings in 1970 : -** '* . February 14.-6,1970 ,r Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga. (Firm) June 10-12,'1970 - Balmoral Hotel, Thetford Hines, Quebec (Firm) October 7-9, 1970 - Statler Hilton Inn, Williamsburg, Va. (Firm) Suggestions.for location of meetings in 1971 February - Chariotte.li.C.' or Atlanta,Ga. . June 1971 Cherry Hill,.J* or the .new Holiday Inn, Phila. Pa. October - Somewhere in mountains of Penna.,Va.,Uest Va.,`or Vt. * .i*` r* * . .v For February, 1972 - The new Disnoyland, Orlando, Fla. Other business ' Adjournment *" ' ' (*) By rotation it is H.iC. Porter Company's turn to sponsor a .. speaker. . Cfil i=) | o ) C* .w CO O ( n D 4 ta h g c Xa13o xwbd ouW osOo uaaC3>roHnOo 03 O 3 03 tc M 3 < a. of w o WCCXXX 0k43 EHh a e* 03 o H 8 3 < ao H&&& CSX co u s a X *rt rH Eh e- Cd nl SC "*O0 b Xa *w Co .10-t QO *5b L5 u o o o k3 ii X f>-t xCne rH b O Q<b rHxdOH wAa>Hi O 03 ,4(Oth*o eh ca M ft lo W r-1 eh a Q O Eh S3 sj O a *4 wen r? ux c * O rH xs 03 ftA: P *Xa , a |a b o B4>3 sro rH X ta ttac M ala s *:* CH Ubdo Saaa euw. d1 3 H; X hJ M X* rat %* O*n a S13 3 O w3 Ie w Eh 03 g O' # H x40 bo *1 I3 S > O W 40 e s* o, crH wI IEh a 8!8 b cc Eh 03 a ao a ba 31 a< 40 n X w*doso f_t ie o a b rH O e 9 oft X a o o o* i o S3 a a 0b (0 ac to 5 2 03 a aa X oH aa4a5 wao tow Cd h a 8 a - aa? o ba S ga 8 H aa ca bo o * a o a wub da Eoh aa b 0can 1 SacH,1 o a a c O O rH o a?o c ftflo 3 o d co <4 3 eft o t 0 fteas an* --wa *0 a 1 XCoo Sao wa>a ah(o3 adba cy 4 wC fat xa 3 5a a I 2a 35 a JH Eh o X M ao X o< a o o o 80 a1 +> aa co raH adba t3bos rdH rH rH 0a0 re 0Oo3 sa oao 1 60 co Q X>d3abe) aaa rH g s b rH H< Waa 0 03 XeO Eh JbaB rH a b rH aC> oo rH r<H a o>o oH ba Xo X3ob r0H r0oOH3 a i oaoo C63 racO3H aTb>0H31 Cf3hj *-3 rr4t ri 1 co raH oafot s- aaaaOO0aO XaKoaaOrrSa*oobO+rS X rs '-* r. n A d jo u rn m e n t ( ) p iro o to r,V ic o P ro a id a n t & Qan 3oiOBt Hgr B2LP A34B3TD3 MINE3 LXWIT3D fCWa " o 4 4K) ^* A 3 s-sS . o -C M SB 53 IA-B Sit iB < A44 f'a A 64 > B to si c <5 3 44 03 UH 03 tfoao o Ao s3 M 2N4 R, aos < o a if, I 6 03 n oo* < w < o % O' 1 efa o o OoS t 4 o 55 AC o to *o 5 0o3 4* ar X 8 9 Si hodotoi be2 A fa & W ) fa * *4 at <03 2e04.0f0a*fO4>a E4*&4.fCfl b d o b a 5. i-4 A B A b as b 1 tooo. to S31 (M 5 c5 4) O *3 s S3 C 4* M a a: A 0} 4* 14 o0 A 0 1 o 5 5- e fal o o e a So O *o4 r4 O 1 Q. BB aa 3 O' r4 b B A OQ. H b O. O 3 b c *o4 44 H as O B fi 3 3 as r4 b e Ao 44 O o O a O d31| A col H r4 tJ <1 d O A O 3 *3 4Of4a fi M O a A 3 *e4 X 3 3O o Oji iH f9i d a (b. j o b A O b A*4 fb A *A4 B B U eo > B B *c4 A d o 1o-4 b W8 08 ai a <M H 1 A B b *4 3. a 3 A fea <3 Ca oS. *o AB eo *4 A O. B A P AA o A d <3 BA 3 O O B as fS* 8*251 IU (O.4*14 - ` ! *------------------------- _ ii US_Ba_ aOb tOa. B n rto4 b I A U A BM IS d fa as o I *4 0 A G4 xd II O A OO *H4 M < cO o I A B 44 -( O O 0Q3. j!, .tsd A tK4 o*4b0( A as 54* 03 ! OH a 4a4t Rd 4e4 >C, >: b Ac 4O4 *fa* 3 "o m3 44 3 n A/ | J3OOOOo bj34*Oa4> d B 'SfeSSSts 4* ces o b*4 M 44 O *4 44 44 Vt d o a*3 ?*2S5 A *3 44 3 _44 das O a o *A to*4 3 a > b b *-- d d 344 *64 BSaa|*3_3_ dSaj fdi 0*4 ox o aa --44 Hh d fa tfa* 5b3*2*3- 0*4 b 3 O BA B 44 d a B B O >0 O C 3 o 44 * O A *4 d CftaJOo E*# 8 OSb b o ca b oa O *4 44 d >% 44 b^SOH44 d44 b o o Oo Ho "3 3s i*s * 44 3 a 0 44 4* <O H (E3 B bO cb BQ CH?H "3C Qft#.d B 0<V,rtSfH 4d> <M _*3 <oA ON 44 (M d 0 03 HJ "i 0*4 3O *4 H Ofoaht OdS* -B(bOAaHto AC r<4-* BOB O3B 55 H Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute JUN201S69 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES - GENERAL MEETING - JUNE 20, 1969 Seaview Country Club, Absecon, N. J. In Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. 'J, L. Rainey ' J, W. Chris tenbury H. H Walter ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P, E. Leclerc G. F. A. Brink GARLOCK INC. BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED G. E. Houghton S. G. Dixit W, H. Smith , : . I V .C, H. Schooh E. W. Fisher (Guest speaker) CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP, LTD. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. ' * Dr, R. A, Kuntze E, A, Schuman R. M. Billings C. L. Sheckler LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. C, E. Stiafken H , K, PORTER COMPANY, INC. TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.. LTD. L, E, Moody J. D. McCluer D. E. Childers J. L. Mitchell J. W. Echerd RAYSESTOS-IIANHATTAN. INC. M, Q* Scowcroft A. R. Patterson J, W, Hawkins R. B. Smith W, M. Deckman NICOLET INDUSTRIES. INC. Geo, Griswold, Jr, D, Frost CADWALADER. WICKERSHAM & TAFT H, C, Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) AS3EST0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE UNIROYAL. INC. H. E, Sunbury (Secretary) R. P. Clark R. C. Hunt D. T. Austin, Jr, H. Fleming J. H. Wolfsie, M, D, GUESTS W, S, Hough, See'y-Treas., Meoh, Packing Association, J, L. Tucker, Consultant on Textiles B. E. Shirey, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc, Note: Those attending committee meetings the previous two days, but not the General Meeting, are listed on committee _ reports. Minutes - General Meeting 1* President Schuman called the meeting to order at 9:30 A. M# 2* The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading* R* P. Clark moved the reading be omitted, aeoonded by J, L* Rainey, and so voted. 3* The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft* It was moved by R, P. Clark that report be accepted. The motion was seconded by J. W. Christeribury, and so voted. The report is attached* 4* Hr. Haven C. Roosevelt, Legal Counsel, addressed the meeting, and a brief suzmnary of his remarks follows: "Counsel reported on the hard line taken by the Department of Justice in the antitrust field. He reviewed the FTC's pro-merger notification requirements ? and recent remarks by Attorney General Mitchell regarding mergera* Cornsel also briefly recited some of the reasoning and polioy behind the Admin istration** hard line in attacking mergers and attempting to slow merger activity. He dealt primarily with one of the reasons - reciprocity, or other forms of unfair buyer-seller leverage noting that reciprocity was a problem which almost all businessmen enoounter in one form or another* Counsel explained the recent complaint in the case against United States Steel and reviewed some of the terms of the proposed consent decree* He concluded that in order to avoid successful attack, all pur chasing decisions of a company should be made on the basis of prioe, quality and service rather than on the basis of whether or not a prospective seller is also a good customer of the company*" f>* At this point in the meeting President Schuman asked each person present to stand and identify himself and his company* 6* President Schuman announced that the Board of Governors had unanimously approved the application of Nicolet Industries, Inc*, for Regular Membership in the Institute, and extended to that company a most cordial welcome to participate in our activities* 7. President Schuman announced that the resignation of TallmanMcCluskey Fabrics Company from the Institute had been accept3d due to the acquisition of that company by the H. K. Porter Company, Inc* 8. Our next meeting, to be held October 8-10, 1969, at Pinehurst N. C*, will be the 25th Anniversary meeting of the Institute and President Schuman announced that Mr. J. L. Rainey had beem appointed Program Chairman for that important occasion. He asked that everyone make a special effort to attend, bringing their * ccnrfcdi ' Minutes - General Meeting 3 wives if possible* Also that we. would like a-large attendance by company officials in addition to those who regularly attend our meeting, 9. The Fibre Producers Report was prepared by Mr.H.P. Carson,V.P. Sales, AoJ-ioTQo CORPORATION LI...ITS), fhetford Mines,Quebec, and was given by ilr. Paul 3, Leclerc, Rogional Sales Manager of AsS'C .TOS CORPORATION LIMITED, as Hr, Carson was confined to his room due to sudden illness. The full text of the excellent report is attached to these minutes, 10. President Schuman introduced our guest speaker. Hr. Edward W. Fisher, Supervisor of Product .`ngineering, GARLOC.C INC.Palmyra, New York. Hr. Fisher talked about - "The Use of Asbestos Textiles in the Packing Industry'1. Speaking from a background of over 35 years experience in the Packing Industry lir Fisher gave a most interesting and informative talk on various forms of packings and the design principles involved in making them effective for a multiplicity of applications and operating conditions. Many samples were displayed illustrating points made as his talk progressed, and at its conclusion copies of his paper were given to those in attendance. President Schuman thanked ur, Fisher on behalf of the Hoard of Governors and Members and a fine round of applause was given ilr. Fisher in recognition of an outstanding talk, we are most appreciative of the cooperation of GARLOCK INC. in permitting Mr. Fisher to give his fine talk! 11. The committee reports were given by the respective chair men as listed below: * Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A, 3rink, Chm. Technical Committee--------- J.'w. Ilawkins, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - M.ti. Scowcroft, Chm. Air Hygiene m rifg. Committee - H.H. halter, Chm. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. 12. President Schuman asked Hr. C.L. Sheckler, Chairman of the recently formed Environmental Study Committee, to give a brief report on the current activity of that committee. Hr. Sheckler said that one major objective of the committee was to keep members of the Institute informed on legislation affecting our industry, and in this connection he urged everyone to read the revised Halsh-Kealy act now in effect for public contracts in respect to environmental working conditions involving dust counts and also noise levels. Mentionsa his current discussions with the U.S.P.II. Service in reference their policy and procedure on reporting significant findings of clinical examinations of employees to the individual' family physician, but not to the company physician. He stressed the necessity for the company physician to know which employees are in need of medical attention. (continued) invites - General Heeting - continued: Page -4 - />r, Sheckler reported that he liad written lir. C.A. Gnam, in the U.3. Dept, of Commerce, on Hay 6, 1969, giving id*. Gnam on behalf of the Asbestos Textile Institute, comments pertaining to the proposed legislation HR 2503. hr. Sheckler pointed out to lir* Gnam that HR 2503 ia top broad and non-specific in its provisions, and as it related only to asbestos would vest all authority in the Dept, of HEW, including inspection authority which would, in effect, duplicate the existing and proposed responsibilities of the Dept, of Labor. Hence a separate act, such as the proposed HR 2503 relating only to the asbestos industry, is unnecessary and also undesirable. Hr. Cheekier touched on some miscellaneous medical scientific reports concerning the biological effects on animals of asbestos in conjunction with pulmonary diseases. In concluding his remarks Hr. Sheckler announced thata new member of his committee was Dr.J.H. Wolfsie, Corporate Hedical Director, Uniroyal,Inc.. Other members of the Environmental Study Committee are:-Dr.J.L. Goodman, Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. at North Charleston,3.C.jJ.L. Rainey,Vice President, American Asb estos Textile Corporation; and R.P. Clark, Sales Kgr. for asb estos textiles,Uniroyal,Inc. ( Hr. Sheckler, the Chairman, is Manager - Accident Prevention and Health Administration, Johnslianville Corporation,Hew York City.) 13% President Schuman announced'these dates for future meetings: October 8-10,1969 - The Carolina, Pinehurst, North Carolina February 4-6, 1970 - The Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga, June 10-12, 1970 - The hotel La Provence, Thetford Hines,Que. October 7-9, 1970 - The Statler Hilton Inn,Williamsburg,Va. In respect to the meeting scheduled for June 10-12, 1970 at Thetford Hines, President Schuman expressed the sincere apprec iation of all members for the invitation extended to the Institute by the mining companies, namely:- Asbestos Corporation Limited; Bell Asbestos Hines Limited;Canadian Johns-ilanville Co., Ltd.;Cassiar Corporation Ltd.;and Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. 14. There being no other business to come before the meeting it recessed for a group luncheon after which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted. Secretary 'yi ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds May 6. 1969 Balance On Hand at last report_(January 10,1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 1025.57 17L|.08.91 76.96 Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest - 4 raos.) To Savings Fund (1969 Dues) To General Fund (1969 dues) To General Fund (3ook Sales) $13511.46 $ 275.00 (Sst) 3000.00 6000.00 79.74 9354.74 Disbursements Total On Hand and Received $ 27866.20 Legal Retainer ( 7 mos. ending 3/31/69) Legal Expenses ( 7 " 11 " 11 " Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) F.I.C.... Tax (First ^tr.1969) Secretary's Travel Expense Office rent ( 4 mos.) A.T.I. meeting expense (Feb.5-7*1969) Printing f: Office supplies Telephone (4 mos.) 1250.00 I4.3J4-.9I4. 476.00 36.00 25*14. 66 300.00 703.78 56.48 80.61 Petty Cash (Vouchers 396-411 inclusive) 59.77 Total Disbursements 3652.44 Balance On Hand as of Hay 8, 1969 $24213.76 Funds General Fund (Janie Statement of 5/8/69) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Total Funds $ 4512.64 19633.91 17.21 (*) (**) $24213.76 Assets as of Hay 8. 1969 General Fund $ 4512.64 Savings Fund 19683.91 Petty Cash Fund 17.21 Accts Receivable (Book Sales) 1.32 Postage on Hand 10.36 Furniture `Equipment (nominal Value) 1.00 Total Assets $24226.44 Liabilities (None) Net Worth $24226.44 (-*) >1000.00 transferred from Savings to General Fund on 1/16/69 (*<0 Includes .>275*00 estimated interest for period 1/1-4/30/69 Respectfully submitted, / * s* y .l / r* /, T ` / * 1 t * *.. H.F. Sunbury, Asst. Treasurer PIERS PRODUCER'S REPORT Asbestos Textile Institute - June 20, 1969 By: II. P. Carson, Viee Pres* - Sales, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD. Shipments from Quebec were down 6.7 percent at the end of Hay 1969 as compared with the five-month period in 1968* This was partly due to the unsettled labour situation.in the St* Lawrence River earlier in the spring* Shipping companies in many cases refused to place vessels in Montreal, Quebeo and Three Rivers pending a settlement of disputes* The settlement was forthcoming in the ports and shipping at present has returned to normal* Most companies in Quebec have recently settled labour negotiations with unions* In our company's case, an agreement to the end of 1971 has been negotiated* Thus, one can expect a period of stability* There are acute shortages of quality Group 3 fibre* While there has been no apparent change in shipments to the U. 3. market as compared t*ith last year, there appears to be a decrease in avail ability of Group 3* This decrease iii availability has beem re ferred to in past reports as far as British Columbia is concerned, and a similar situation has developed in Quebec* Overseas markets have been strong generally in Group 3* It is notable that the Q*A*11*A* inventory for Group 3 haB been reduced by 70# since May 31st, 1968. In asbestos cement grades, strong demand continues for Groups 4-* 5 and 6* Market reports from various areas highlight shortages in quality 4 Group fibres. Group 5 and 6 are in quite short supply for a/a applications, although some quantities of brake lining 5's and 6's are still available* Shorts seen to be moving as well as in 1968, with some shortfalls reported* The closing of the Nicolet Mine earlier this year has reduced the availability of shorts* To attempt to satisfy part of the apparent demand of the next few years, our company is increasing production in the Thetford area* We are hopeful of adding 10# to last year's total production. Flans to bring Asbestos Hill into production at the rate of ^ , . 100,000 tons per year are progressing favourably* Mid-1972 is the target date. The ore will be concentrated at Ungava, trans ported to Europe, where a finishing plant will complete the job* The Penhale orebody is under development* This latter will not mean additional tonnage, as it will replace Normandie, which will be depleted by 1974* There are other prospeots still under study in Canada and Australia, but these are not considered to be at the stage where future production can be anticipated* coat'd* Fibre Producers Report -2- As far as one can confirm, Rhodesian fibre is still finding markets, and it is assumed there is no build-up of inventory there* Russia has made no new moves to increase its share of world markets and still retains about 250,000 tons, including shipments to Socialist Europe* Some Socialist countries in Europe are increasing their purchases of Canadian fibre, perhaps indicating some difficulties in obtaining more Russian supplies. Minutes of the A.?.I. Fiber Testing Committee Meeting held June 13 and 19, 1969 at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon,N. J. PRES.-IiT: Members: G.F.A. Brink, Chairman D.E, Childers W.C. Streib C.E, Stiefken Visitors :E.W, Fisher D.J. Frost C.H. Schoch W.H. Smith Asbestos Corporation Ltd. II.Porter Company,Inc. Johns-Manville Corp. Lake Asbestos of Q,ue.,Ltd. Garlock Inc. Nicolet Industries,Inc. Bitell Asbiet stos Mtiines Lntd. BUSINESS: 1. Magnetic Rating Test 1.1 The outcome of the recent Magnetic Rating Round Robin on three (3) asbestos fibers and ten (10) textile products, conducted under the guidance of Mr. Walter Smith at diff erent laboratory locations, and the conclusions based on the statistical analyses of the results by the Johns-ManCorp. were reviewed at a Joint session with members of Sub A-l)., ASTH Committee D-13, and the ATI Technical Comm ittee on the 18th June. Eighteen persons were in atten dance at the joint session. The findings of the statistical analyses were as follows: 1.1.1 The two test methods give essentialy the same average, but are not necessarily the same for each sample. 1.1.2 There was no difference due to company alone on either test. 1.1.3 Isolated odd results seemed to occur with both the asbestos fibers and the asbestos textile products which could not be fully explained. However, in the case of the latter, these were probably due to variations in the magnetic content of the samples sent to each laboratory. 1.1.4 Although there were some erratic results, the Round Robin Test was an improvement over the previous one. 1.2 It was mutually agreed at the joint session that the new ASTii procedure would be based on the T. & N. apparatus on account of its apparent advantages; and a motion to this effect was passed at the 19th June meeting of the Fiber Testing Committee. Work was commenced on the first draft of the new ASTII Method of Test for Magnetic Rating of Asbestos Fiber and Textile Products under the guidance of Mr. Paul Hicodemus, Chairman of Sub A-4, ASTii Comm. D-13* 1.3 A number of important items relative to the magnetic rating (continued) Minutes - Fiber Testing Committee - continued: Page -2- test were discussed at the 19th June meeting, and it was recommended that a list of these be submitted to the Chair men of the committees involved for consideration when writing up the new procedure. 2. National Stockpile Purchase Specification Asbestos-Chrysotile P-3-Rh Dated 10th November. 19S~^~ ~ 2.1 In response to a request from Mr. Carl Gnam of the Miscell aneous Metals & Minerals Division (DSA) of the Department of Commerce in March, it was recommended that page (F) of Spec ification P-3-Ri|. be amended to read as follows: (F) Magnetic Rating: The following types of chrysotile asbestos shall qualify in terms of magnetic rating as follows: Magnetic Rating Recommended Use Less than 1.0 --- Electrical. 1.0 but less than 2.0 -- Certain Electrical & General Purpose. 2.0 and above ----- ----- ----- General Purpose.' 2.2 The Technical Committee Chairman will advise Hr. Gnam of the joint session's recommendation 3. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical (Colour Test) and ASTM D-30 (Sub III) Committees (Rotap & Moisture Content Tests) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. 4* Spicular and Grit Content of Spinning Fibers 4.1 The results of experimental work to develop a suitable test method for measuring the spicular & grit content of spinning fibers were disoussed and fractions recovered from three hydrocyclones in series were examined. The Committee recommended that work on this score be continued; and that other appro aches such as the elutriation of the longer HcNett fractions in the Crudy Content apparatus be considered as well as hydrocycloning. A progress report is to be submitted at the next meeting. Respectfully submitted. G.F.A. Brink, Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee Minutes: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute June 18-19, 1969 at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon, New Jersey. In attendance: Irving Barnett William Maaskant D. T. Austin J. D. McCluer G. E. Houghton J. W. Hawkins Johns-Manville American Asbestos Uniroyal H. K. Porter Co. Garlock, Inc. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. During the Wednesday afternoon session (June 18), Messrs. George Harris, Paul Nicodemus, Paul Smith, and Bill Eckerd attended as ASTM A-4 members. Also, members of the Fiber Testing Committee Messrs. Dewey Childress, Wm. Strieb, Walter Smith, Karl Shock, Donald Frost, and Sudhakas Dixit. Minutes: The first draft of ASTM Specification D-1118, Magnetic Rating of Asbestos was started. Information is being obtained from Mr. Lincoln of T & N on the electrical circuit to be included in the specification. Mr. Walter Smith is supplying information on sample preparation. The National Stockpile Specification P-3-R4 on Spinnable Asbestos Fibers was discussed; recommendations are being made that three categories be included - 1 MR and under, over 1 MR but less than 2, and fibers over 2 MR. MIL-I-3053, Insulation, Electrical, Asbestos Fiber, Treated and Untreated. This specification needed a lot of changes and the Technical Committee of t*he ATI has offered to assist the appropriate representatives in the revision. MIL-P-16404 on Asbestos Packings was reviewed and several changes suggested. HH-P-41C on Asbestos Rope & Wick was reviewed and a tolerance on weight for this specification was recommended. MIL-I-24244 was reviewed and this specification is currently undergoing changes in the chemical analysis. A new technique for determining the asbestos content by the fluoroborate technique was discussed. The next ASTM specification to be revised will be D-1573 on Heat Ageing. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins Chairman llIifUTSS - SALES PROHOTIOII COiihlTTEE Asbestos Textile Institute - June 19* 1969 Seavlew Country Club, Abaecon, New Jersey The Sales Promotion Committee met on June 19th with representatives of five member companies in attendance. The major topic of discussion was the letter written on Hay 5th by the Naval Ship Engineering Center of the Department of the Navy.to, we presume, all companies involved or interested in hightemperature insulating materials. This letter said in part ... "The serious hazards of asbestos have recently received widespread publicity and have generated a high level of interest concerning its use by the U, S. l'lavy as an insulating material." It went on to point out that the chief hazard existed wherever there was a possibility of dust evolution during fabrication, installation and rip-out. Further, it said . "In order to minimi* the hazards associated with the use of asbestos and therefore reduce the possibility of deleterious effects to the workers, a compre hensive study has been initiated by the Naval Ship Engineering Center, Hyattsville, lid. to investigate the feasibility of sub stituting alternate materials for asbestos used as lagging, piping and boiler insulation." Our committee discussed this problem in depth as it related to an important segment of our business - textiles* Several member com panies responded individually to the Navy with letters of protest. There was no direct action taken by the committee itself. A motion was passed to recommend to the Board of Governors that representatives of the Environmental Study Committee contact the concerned persons at the Navy in Hyattsville for a conference on the problem. We felt that our current concern is involved with learning as much as we could about their progress and the degree of their intent and that information could best be obtained by the environmental Study Committee rather than the Saleg Promotion Committee* In an effort to have information on the Asbestos Textile Industry get wider distribution, we discussed the possibility of arranging fr?,e subscriptions to the trade magazine "Asbestos." We are thinking of engineering college libraries among other institutions. It was agreed to propose a program to the Board of Governors. A motion to do so was made and passed at this meeting. Two Years ago, we investigated the possibility of instituting an advertising program sponsored by the Institute. After some pre liminary work was accomplished, each member of the committee checked the subject with his own corporate executives. The reports back at that time were lukewarm at best and the matter subsequently was dropped* However, the Committee itself has not lost its enthusiasm for the project. Because of the increase in unfavorable publicity on asbestos during the ensuing time, members felt that their respective managements might be more receptive and that the program should be reinvestigated. The subject attracted spirited coritd -2' Minutes - Sales Promotion committee discussion but no specific action was taken at this meeting other than to put the subject on the agenda for the October meeting. The meeting was adjourned early in order that members could attend the important meeting of the Air Hygiene and Manufactiming Com mittee meeting attended by two representatives of the U S. Public. Health Service. Respectfully submitted. M. Q, Scoweroft Chairman imrjrss - air hygiene & mamufacturiitg committee Asbestos Textile Institute June 19# 1969 - Seaview Country Club# Abescon# N. J. In Attendance: H. H.Walter, Chairman L. E. Moody H. Fleming R. C. Hunt R. B. Smith A. R. Patterson S. G, Dixit American Asbestos Textile Corp# H. K. Porter, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc, Uniroyal, Inc. Raybestoa-Manh&ttan, Inc. Raybestos-IIanhattan, Inc. Garlock, Inc. Bausch <3s Lomb Automatic Dust Counter: The members of the committee agreed to further pursue the develop ment of a method for correlating dust counts obtained by the Midget Impinger and the Bosch & Lomb Dust Counter. This attempt appears to be important in regards to the acceptance of datsEs from the Bosch 3c Lomb Dust Counter by governmental agencies as well as for the evaluation of such datas within the plants. The Bosch & Lomb Dust Counter will be transferred shortly from the Uniroyal plant in Hogansville to H.K, Porter. Mr. Earl Wells dust count technician of Uniroyal - will discuss his datas and ex perience with the technician of H.K. Porter. It is planned that at a later date the dust count technicians of all member companies get together, exchange their datas and experience end develop a method for the proper use of the Bosch & Lomb Dust Counter and a correlation to the Midgit Impinger. Wet Weaving: Samples of wet woven asbestos garment cloth before and after appli cation of a finish proved that a wet woven asbestos garment cloth, which without the application of a proper finishing method, would be unacceptable for garment use, can be finished in such a way that it shows the same as or even improved characteristics of dry woven cloth. Problems arising from rust formation a3 well as from clog ging of heddle eyes and reeds in the x;et weaving process can be overcome by the use of stainless steel oval reeds and stainless steel heddle eyes. IToise Exposure: The problems of reducing the noise level, particularly in weave rooms, were discussed in regards to the "Revised Safety & Health Standards Under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act'1'. Copies of that act and an..a-3arf.yala-.0f. the revised standards will be dist ributed to the committee members. cont'd 2- Minutea - Air Hygiene L Manufacturing Comraittee Dr. L* J. Cralley and Dr. William W* Lainhart of the U. S. Public Health Service, the Environmental Study Committee and members of the Board of Governors joined the committee meeting at 10:^5 A.i'i* Dr. Cralley, Dr. Lainhart and Mr. C. L. Sheckler discussed pro cedures for the continuation of the study of the asbestos textile industry by the U. S. Public Health Service* Respectfully submitted. H. H* Walter Chairman Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute OCT 101969 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - October 10,1969 The CAROLINA, Pinehurst, North Carolina In attendance: AMERICAN AS3EST0S TEXTILE CORP. J.L. Rainey J.W. Christenbury H.H. Walter G.S. Fabel GARLOCK INC. G.E. Houghton S.G. Dixit A. Kuzm.uk ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P.E. Leclerc G.F.A. Brink BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm.J.W. Smith W.H. Smith LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC.LTD. E.A. Farrell JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. El. A. Schuman R.M. Billings C.L. Sheckler I. Barnett K.A. Roberts H.K. PORTER COMPANY.INC. L.E, Moody D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd TURNER & NEWALL LTD. Bernard Lincoln TURNER BROS. AS3EST0S CO..LTD. W.M. Deckman NICOLET INDUSTRIES,INC. J.K. Whittaker Geo. Griswold,Jr. D.J. Frost RAY3EST0S-MANHATTAN, INC. M.Q. Scowcroft S.R. Zimmerman,Jr. G.F. Ducker M.W. Oliver R.3. Smith J.W. Hawkins J.A. Brown,Jr. UNIROYAL, INC. B.T. Austin,Jr. R.P. Clark F.C. Phillips E.A. Morris R.C. Hunt CADWALADER. WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE fit.E. Sunbury (Secretary) 3^3 * J.T. Griffis, [Charlotte, N.C. " J.D. McCluer, H-.K. Porter Company,Inc. (Retired) W.C. Atkinson, Johns-Manville Corp. (Retired) W.H. Johnston, Atla3 Asbestos Company, North Wales,Pa. J.S. ilassenburg, Raleigh, H.C. (Guest speaker) Note: Those attending committee meetings the previous day, but not the General Meeting, are listed on committee reports. Page -1 Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - October 10, 1969 Page -2 1. President Schuman called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. and expressed his appreciation for the fine attendance of members(and wives) at this 25th Anniversary Celebration of the founding of ATI. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading.Motion by E.A. Farrell to omit reading,seconded by R.M.Billings,so voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft. Moved by J.L. Rainey that report be accepted. Seconded by K.a. Roberts, and so voted. President Schuman stated that the Annual Audit of the Institute's books had been made by Mr. Charles t/. Briggs,Jr.,of Raybestos-i-Ianhattan,Inc., and read Hr. Briggs's letter of October 2nd certifying that the financial report of Sptember 9, 1969 presents fairly the position of the Institute as of that date.R0pOrt attached. I4.. Mr. Haven C. Roosevelt, Legal Counsel, addressed the meeting, and a brief summary of his remarks follows| " In the past ti/enty-five years various representatives from my firm have outlined to you some of the activities which you may do and which you may not do jointly. With the rules for these activ ities we are all fairly familiar. However, what you may say to each other as opposed to what you may do together is an increasing ly difficult problem. In the recent Greensboro case a number of competitors exchanged information concerning prices charged or quoted to specific customers for corrugated containers. The trial court found that each defendant had exercised his own judgement with respect to taking orders and quoting prices. On appeal the Attorney General argued that the exchnage of infor mation might have deprived customers of some of the benefits of competition -- that absent the exchange of information a lower price might have been quoted. The Supreme Court accepted this argument. The court drew what it called an "irresistible inference" that the exchange of information had an anticompetitive effect. Thus it would appear that any statistical reporting plan having to do with recently charged or quoted prices is in jeopardy. If this type of exchange is suspect then what other types in the future may incur suspicion? Although prices are the most obvious mani festation of product competition other factors are important -- packages; a finish, color or feature; credit; terms of sale; freight; even new products. All exchanges of information should be carefully examined to determine if an "irresistible inference" could be drawn that customers and competition in general might be adversely affected." 5. At this point in the meeting ^resident Schuman asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company. 6. President Schuman announced that the Board of Governors, at their meeting held on October 9, 1969 had elected officers to serve for the coming year, namely:- President - E.A. Schuman; Vice President - L.E. Moody; Treasurer - M.Q. Scowcroft. New mem-, bers of the Board of Governors are:- J.K. Whittaker of Nicolet Industries,Inc., and E.A. Morris of Uniroyal,Inc. ilr.Morris re places R.P. Clark who resigned as Vice President of ATI on the first of September 1969. Mr. Clark's responsibilities at Uniroyal Minutes - GENERAL MATING - October 10, 1969 Page -3" having been realigned he is no longer responsible for that company's asbestos textile products. V/e regret that "Dick"Clark, always an active and popular participant in Institute affairs, is unable to continue attendance at our meetings. 7. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. lim.J.W. Smith, Vice President & General Sales iianager of BELL ASBESTOS MIMES LIMITED. Mr. Smith reviewed the present situation in respect to the supply of various grades of asbestos fibres, and stated that so far as the spinning grades are concerned the normal inventories maintained by producers have been depleted to such an extent that a serious short age could develop in the coming year. At the conclusion of his remarks Mr. Smith extended to the members, on behalf of the Canadian members of the Institute, a most gracious and cordial invitation to attend the ATI meeting to be held at Thetford Mines. Quebec, June 10-12, 1970. Hosts at that meeting will be:Asbestos Corporation Limited; Bell Asbestos Mines Limited; Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; Johns-Manville Co.of Canada,Ltd,; and Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. 8. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: Air Hygiene L iifg. Committee - H.II. Walter, Chm. Technical Committee - J.W, Hawkins, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - M.ti. Scowcroft, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - O.F.A. Brink, Chm. Environmental Study Committee - C.L. Sheckler, Chm. Their reports are attached to these minutes. 9. President Schuman presented Certificates of Appreciation to the retiring chairmen; Messers Walter, Haw;ins, Scowcroft and Brink, each of whom had served the normal term of two years, and thanked them on behalf of the Board of Governors and the members for their leadership and assistance in furthering the objectives of the Institute. 10. President Schuman announced that the new committee chairmen, would be: For Air Hygiene & Mifg. Committee - Mr.II. Fleming, Uniroyal,Inc. " Technical Committee - Mr. S.G. Dixit, Garlock Inc. " Sales Promotion Committee - Mr. R.E. Carpenter, Garlock Inc. " Fiber Testing Committee - Mr. D.E. Childers, II.-C. Porter Co.,Inc. Note: Currently under consideration is a proposal to change the name of the "Sales Promotion" Committee to more accurately denote its broad range of interests in such matters as public relations, new products, and legislation affecting our industry11 11. Mr. John D. McCluer, a former chairman of our Technical Committee was presented with a beautiful plaque by President Schuman as a trib ute to his many years of service in the asbestos textile industry, and his valuable contribution to the work of the Institute. Retired from the II.K. orter Co.,Inc., at the end of last August, Mr.& Mrs. McCluer reside at llj.22 Richland Dr., Charlotte,K.C. 28205. Minutes - GENERAL MINTING - October 10, 1969 Page -4- 12. President Schuxnan introduced Mr. George S. Fabel, who served on the first A.T.I. Board of Governors in 1944* was Vice President in 19l4.7-19lj.8> and President of ATI in 1949 and 1950. Mr. Fabel gave an interesting review of the progress made by the Institute since its founding in 1944* expressed his personal gratif ication that the organization he had helped to found had become of such value to the asbestos textile industry, and extended his best wishes for the years ahead! Mr.& Mrs. Fabel live at 6612 Sardis Rd,, in Charlotte, N.C. 28211. 13. Dates and locations of future meetings, as announced by President Schuman: February 4~6, 1970 - Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. June 10-12, 1970 - Balmoral Motel, Thetford nines,Que.,Canada October 7-9, 1970 - Statler Hilton Inn, Nilliamsburg, Virginia 14. The Gue3t Speaker, Mr. James S. Massenburg, spoke on the subject "Employment of the Handicapped". Mr. massenburg is Exec. Secretary of the North Carolina Governor's Committee on Employment of the Handicapped, and is recognized as an authority on the employability of the physically handicapped and what business and industry can do to utilize their skills. An Act of Congress has designated the first full week in October ( the present week ) a3 "National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week" and so we ware most pleased to have this opportunity to hear Mr. Massenburg, and to learn what industry can contribute to a most worthy cause. His address is 54l Caswell Bldg.,Raleigh,li.C. 15. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for a reception and group luncheon, following which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted. 'v X. / H.E. Sunbury Secretary institute Report of Funds September 9. 1969 Balance on Hand at last report (ilay 1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Roceipts To Savings Fund (Interest - 4 mos.) To General Fund (Initiation Fee & Dues) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ I4.5i2.6i4. 19683.91 17.21 $214213.76 300.00(Est.) 750.00 54-90 1104.90 Total on Hand and Received $25318.66 Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 mos. ending 6/30/69) Legal Expenses ( 3 mos. " " 6/30/69 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr.-1969) Secretary's travel expense Office rent ( It mos.) A.T.I. Meeting expense ( June 18-20,1969) Printing Office Supplies Telephone ( 4 mos.) Stenographic Dues (Industrial Hygiene Foundation) 750.00 127.44 14.76.00 36.00 110.72 300.00 707.58 115.38 127.31 32.00 100.00 Fire Insurance ( Office contents-3 yrs.) Revision of A3TII Specs. Advertisement - Asbestos Mag.50th Anniver'y Flowers Petty Cash (Vouchers I4.i2-lj.2i4. inclusive) 3140 38*01 40.00 2L..30 5o.65 Total Disbursements 3072.77 Balance on Hand as of September 9, 1969 $22245.89 Funds General Fund (Bank statement of 9/9/69) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2218.63 19983.91 ( *> 43.35 Total Funds $ 22245.89 Assets as of Sept.9, 1969 Gen-jral Fund $ 2218.63 Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) Total Assets Liabilities - Accts Payable as of 9/9/69 19983.91 43.35 16.21 5.60 1.00 $ 22268.70 HTHi: llet North $ 22255.56 (*) Includes $575.00 estimated interest for period beginning January 1st,1969 and ending august 31st,1969 . Respectfully submitted. H.E. Sunbury, A3st.VTreas Minutes AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 9, 1969 - The CAROLINA, Pinehurst, N.C. In attendance: H.H. Walter, Chairman - - American Asbestos Textile Corporation L.E. Moody - H.M. Porter Company,Inc. R.C. Hunt - Uniroyal,Inc. R.B. Smith - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. A.R. Patterson C.L. Sheckler -- Johns-Manville Corporation Guests: S.R. Zimmerman,Jr. - Raybestos-ilanhattan,Inc. W.M. Deckman - Turner Bros. Asbestos Co.,Ltd. G. Griswold,Jr. - Nicolet Industries,Inc. Minutes Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter:- Summarizing the experience of the member companies with the 3:L Dust Counter, the committee came to the conclusion that the Bc:L instrument is not to considered a replacement for the Impinger, or for the Membrane- Filter. However, it appears to be a most suitable device for monitoring air contamination over extended periods of time. It is suggested to have various areas periodically monitored over a period of at least a 3hift, preferably over a period of twenty-four hours. During the recording time all changes in the environment due to changes in humidity, temperature, air-flow, operation, etc, are to be reported as to their nature, time, and duration. Subsequently the strip chart from the B&L Recorder is to be evaluated in conjunction with the environmental report. It will then be possible to pin-point time, duration and extent of air contamination, and reasons for its occurrence over a full cycle of operation. Whenever periods of high dust concentration have been observed it appears to be necessary to follow up as soon as possible with a dust count by means of the Impinger or the Membrane Filter, at the same location and under the same or at least similar conditions. Most of our current programs are based on an industrial hygiene survey weekly or monthly. This interval of sampling appears to be too long to determine the effect of high concentration exposure of short duration as might be experienced under certain circumstances. The use of the B&L Dust Counter as a monitoring device, and the Membrane Filter as a fiber counter, supplementing each other, appears to be a most suitable way to pinpoint areas of high dust concentration and the reason thereof. Neither one by itself pro vides sufficient information. We are recommending that member companies utilize the B&L Dust Counter in this manner to supplement their current industrial hygiene program. It would be most helpful to our industry if unusual Rage -1- Minutes - Air Hygiene 2: ilfg. Committee - continued: Page -2- observations were brought to the attention of this committee. Using the B&L Dust Counter in the described manner and inasmuch as the Impinger seems to have become obsolete ( when the Membrane Filter is used in conjunction with the B&L Dust Counter) it is not necessary to develop a method for correlating dust counts obtained by the two instruments. Membrane Filter Method: Mr. C.L. Sheckler reported that the Impinger will most likely no longer be used and that the iiembrane Filter Method is going to be the accepted method for evaluating asbestos dust. At the present time 12 fibers per cc, fj microns plus, are considered to be the equivalent to 2 iiPPCF as reported by Hr.J.Lynch, U.S.P.H.Service. Cleaning; Procedures: Various methods for cleaning production equipment and rooms were discussed. A member of the committee reported on the use of the Abington System for periodic cleaning operations. Other member companies are using compressed air about twice a year for the removal of dust from pipes, rafters, ceilings, walls, etc. It appears to be most important that in this area major efforts are made to improve our methods and preferably prevent any excessive accumulation of dust. Dust Prevention in 31ending and Carding: The committee members exchanged ideas in regards to dust abatement in the blending and carding operation. Unclosed blending lines, use of plastic bags for mixes, enclosed automatic card feed, lap system and other devices were discussed. Respectfully submitted. H.H. Walter Chairman Minutes In attendance: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING - October 9, 1969 of the The CAROLINA Hotel, Asbestos Textile Institute Pinehurst, N.C. J.V. Hawkins,Chairman -- Raybestos-IIanhattan,Inc. I. Darnett -----------------------Johns-Manville Corp. D.T. Austin,Jr. ------------ - Uniroyal,Inc. J.D. McCluer ---------------- -- H.K. Porter Company,Inc. J.W, Echerd --------------------- H.K. Porter Company,Inc. G.E. Houghton ------------------- Garlock Inc. S.G. Dixit ----------------------- Garlock Inc. (Retired) The Technical Committee met briefly with the Fiber Testing Committee to discuss the ASTM Specification on Magnetic Rating. Sufficient data and guidelines are now available for the revision of this specification around the T & N Analyzer. Mr. Lincoln has provided schematic drawings and Hr. Walter Smith has written sample prep aration data that will be incorporated. Most of the Technical Committee's time was used in work on the ASTM Specification D-1118 for Magnetic Rating. Other specifications outstanding are a continuation of earlier work, and answers and revisions from government agencies are expected. These include: 1. National Stockpile Spec.P-3-Rij. on Spinnable Asbestos Fibers. A change in M.R. was requested. 2. HIL-I-3053, Electrical Insulation - it was recommended that this entire specification be rewritten. 3. MIL-P-l6!|.Ol4., Asbestos Packing - change suggested in the burnout procedure. ij.. HHP-I4.I-C, Asbestos Rope and Wick - change in weights and tolerance were recommended. The remaining ASTM Specification to be revised is D-1573* Heat Ag ing. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins Chairman MINUTES - SALES PROMOTION COiIi TTTEE Asbestos Textile Institute - October 9# 1969 CAROLINA Hotel, Pinehurst, North Carolina The Sales Promotion Committee met on October 9, 1969 with repre sentatives of six member companies in attendance. A portion of the meeting was devoted to the subject of the Navy's effort to seek substitutes for asbestos textiles. It was determined that the Naval Ship Engineering Center has not finalized its report on high temperature insulation, but steps were taken in the Commit tee to insure that the Institute is kept informed on the subject. At the last meeting, you may recall that we planned to investigate the possibility of arranging free subscriptions of ASBESTOS" mag azine to college libraries and other institutions. As we began to investigate this subject in detail, we were led into a more compre hensive discussion of the purpose of the committee. In view of the tremendous interest in the health hazard involved with the use of asbestos, it was felt that the Committee's aims should be broadened We began to probe in the area of public relations and new products. We feel that the scope of the Committee should be widened. It was agreed that the general work accomplished in the years past now seems to have been basically completed. We feel that a re-examin ation is in order and work will be done in this area before our next meeting. You may also recall that we were to investigate the possibility of embarking on an Institute-sponsored advertising program. This, also leads us into the scope of the Committee and convinces us that public relations is more descriptive of the areas that we should be concerned with. I believe that you will find at the next General Meeting that we will be able to more clearly define the work of this Committee. Respectfully submitted. M.Q,. Scowcroft Chairman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES - FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE MEETING 9th October, 1969 - The CAROLINA Hotel,Pinehurst,N.C. Present: Members: G.F.A. Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Ltd. D.E. Childers - II,K. Porter Company, Inc. E.A. Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited Bernard Lincoln - Turner 3c Newall Ltd. Visitors: D.J. Frost -a - Nicolet Industries, Inc, . W.H. Smith - Bell Asbestos Hines Limited. J/f Note:- Application made for membership on this committee, BUSINESS: 1, Magnetic Rating Test 1.1 The status quo of the Magnetic Rating Test was reviewed at a joint meeting of the Technical and Fiber Testing Committees, Fourteen (lip) persons were in attendance at the joint session. The main items discussed were as follox/s: 1.1.1 Sampling, specimen holders and method of loading cells, especially for textile products. 1.1.2 Warning note on limitations of test method. 1.1.3 A schematic diagram for the T.& N. 'Magnetic Analyser was distributed. 1.1.Ij. Part of the first draft of the proposed ASTM Test Method for Magnetic Rating was handed over to the Chairman for distribution to the Fiber Testing Committee members. 1.1.5 The Chairman promised to supply Mr. Bernard Lincoln with 50 grams of magnetite equivalent to NBS magnetite sample No. 29 for the preparation of secondary calibrating stand ards . 2. Splcular and Grit Content of Spinning Fibers; 2.1 The results of work done since the last meeting to explore the possibilities of developing a suitable test method for determining the spicular and grit content of spinning fibers were reviewed and fractions recovered from the elutriation of He -I4JI McNett fractions and hydrocyclone residues were circulated for examination. Page (1) of (2) Minutes - Fiber Testing Committee - continued: Page (2) Of (2) 2.2 Although the present approach did not give the desired results, it was decided to keep this subject on the agenda for future consideration. 3. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical Committee ( Static Particle Sizing i.e., fiber length and diameter by the Zeiss Particle Size Analyzer & Split Image Shearing Device and Colour) and ASTM D-30 (Sub-Ill) Committee (Ro-tap, Colour & Moisture Content) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed. I4.. Fiber Length Measurements:- This important subject was briefly discussed again; and the need for a more precise method of measuring fiber length was expressed. The Chairman promised to prepare a resume of recent known developments in this field for circulation to Committee members. 5. The Chairman thanked the members for their assistance and cooperation during the term of his office (two years) and urged them to. continue their search for improved and refined methods of testing asbestos fiber. Respectfully submitted. G.F.A. Brink, Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee 21st October, 1969 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY COMMITTEE Outline of remarks (unedited) by C.L. Sheckler, Cbm. at ATI General Meeting, October 10, 1969 1. Discussed a Position Paper (Special Report) to the Surgeon General from the Bureau of Occupational Safety and Health.Has reviewed a draft of the Paper but does not know when it will be published - per haps within the next six months. 2. Discussed potential revision of Threshold Limit Value for Asbestos Dust. Current ACGIH TLV is 5.0 MPPCP. Walsh-Healy Act revision is 12 fibers per cc, or 2.0 MPPCP. Proposed TLV at this time is 6 fibers per cc, or 1.0 MPPCP, meaning fibers over 5 microns in length. A fibre is defined as being three times in length of its diameter. 3. Referred to meetings with Captain Rosenwinkle, Commanding Officer of Shipyard Repair and Environmental Health, concerning the Navy's search for substitutes for asbestos-containing materials, and use of new asbestos products that generate less dust. Concludes that the industry needs to develop and present new products that are les3 dusty and also needs to project educational material, or information, concerning use of asbestos products. 4-. "Nader's Raiders" have been considerably involved in the Coal In dustry "Black Lung" occupational disease problems, legislation and litigation. This group and movement has now moved into the area of the Cotton Textile Industry in respect to "3rown Lung"(Byssinosis) an occupational disease caused by inhalation of cotton dust. There is reason to believe that the investigation into cotton textiles may lead Nader, or someone else, to the Asbestos Textile Industry. It is therefore essential that ATI be alert and prepared. One of the greatest assets that we have in our favor is the cooperative health program that the ATI has undertaken with the U.S.P.H. Service. This program is in its third stage, the clinical examination stage, and has and will contribute a great deal of knowledge relative to the health problems relating to asbestos. Stressed that members who have been cooperating in the USPHS health program have no reason to be apprehensive, as we have been forthright in recognizing our difficul ties, and we have been doing something about it. We must continue our efforts, and are currently making plans to do considerable work in the area of health information and education to the users of our products. 5. Reviewed current status of medical research work in conjunction with asbestos and mineral fibers. Mentioned participation by other manufacturing groups,i.e.:IAMA, NIMA, ACPA, and recently the MPA. 6. Pointed out that the Air Hygiene 6z ilfg. Committee of ATI was con cerned primarily with "In-Plant" conditions and problems, Tirhereas the Environmental Study Committee's primary objective was to act in an advisory capacity on matters affecting our industry, outside the plant, such as legislation, litigation, medical research findings, customer education efforts, liaison with other industry groups, etc. Stressed the need for constant coordination between the two com mittees. H.E. Sunbury Secretary Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute OCT 10 1969 s . Founded 1944 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE P. O. BOX 239 75 CENTER ST., POMPTON LAKES, N. J. 07442 U. S. A. December 15, 1969 / Phont: 839-2216 Area code 201 Mr. R.E. Carpenter GARLOCK INC. Palmyra,New York li|.522 \o Dear Mr. Carpenter: Committee Chairmanship We were very pleased to learn from Alex Kuzmuk that you are agree able to serve as a Committee Chairman for what has been called for many years our "Sales Promotion Committee". A proposal to change the name of the Sales Promotion Committee was approved by the Board of Governors at their meeting held on October 9, 1969. The new name, to be selected by members of that committee, is to be indicative of their wide range of interest in such matters as public relations, legislation, new products, cust omer information, etc., that are considered of importance to the asbestos textile industry. The next General Meeting of A.T.I. will be held February 4~6, 1970 at the Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta,Ga. Your committee will meet on Thursday morning, February 5th. It is suggested that the matter of selecting a new name for the committee should be discussed at that time, and a decision made. Several suggested names have been considered, such as: Public Relations Committee New Products Committee Product Education & Promotion Committee Asbestos Information Committee Industry Promotion Committee You may have noticed that the report of our 25th Anniversary Meeting that appears on Page 6, November issue of ASBESTOS Mag azine, states that you are the newly appointed chairman of the "Industry Promotion" Committee. For purposes of this publicity release it was thought best to drop the word "Sales" from the committee title, and, with a printing deadline to meet, the word "Industry" was substituted for "Sales". There has been no discussion of the name "Industry Promotion Committee", and no authorization for its continued usage. I look forward to seeing you in Atlanta next February1 Wishing you the Season's Best, I am. CC: M.y. Scowcroft I. A. Schuman Yours sincerely. H.E. Sunbury ixec.Secretary AS3EST0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - October 10,1969 The CAROLINA, Pinehurst, North Carolina In attendance: AMERICAN AS3EST0S TEXTILE CORP. J\L. Rainey J.W. Christenbury H.H. Walter G.S. Fabel GARLOCK INC. G.E. Houghton S.G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk AS3E3T0S CORPORATION LIMITED P.E. Leclerc G.F.A. Brink BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Win. J.W, Smith W.H. Smith LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC.LTD. E.A. Farrell JOHNS-MAITVILLE CORP. EJ.A. Schuman R.M. Billings C.L. Sheckler I. Barnett K.A. Roberts H.K. PORTER COMPANY.INC. L.E. Moody D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd TURNER & NEWALL LTD. Bernard Lincoln TURNER BROS, ASBESTOS CO..LTD. W.M. Deckman NICOLET INDUSTRIES.INC. J.IC. Whittaker Geo. Griswold,Jr. D.J. Frost RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN,INC. M.Q. Scowcroft S,R. Zimmerman,Jr. G.F. Ducker M.W. Oliver R.3. Smith J.W. Hawkins J.A. Brown,Jr. PNIROTAL. INC. B.T. Austin,Jr. R.P. Clark F.C. Phillips E.A. Morris R.C. Hunt CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Guests: li.E. Sunbury (Secretary) J.T. Griffis, :Charlotte, H.C. " J.D. McCluer, H.K. Porter Company,Inc. (Retired) W.C. Atkinson, Johns-ilanville Corp. (Retired) W.H. Johnston, Atlas Asbestos Company, North Wales,Pa. J.S. llassenburg, Raleigh, N.C. (Guest speaker) Note: Those attending committee meetings the previous day, but not the General Meeting, are listed on committee reports. Page -1 Minutes - GEflERAL HASTING - October 10, 1969 Page -2- 1. President Schuman called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.M. and expressed his appreciation for the fine attendance of members(and wives) at this 25th Anniversary Celebration of the founding of ATI. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading.Motion by E.A. Farrell to omit reading,seconded by R.M.Billings,so voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft, Moved by J.L. Rainey that report be accepted. Seconded by K.A. Roberts, and so voted. President Schuman stated that the Annual Audit of the Institute's books had been made by Mr. Charles W. Briggs,Jr.,of Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc., and read lir. Briggs's letter of October 2nd certifying that the financial report of Sptember 9, 1969 presents fairly the position of the Institute as of that date.Rep0rt attached. i|.. Mr. Haven C. Roosevelt, Legal Counsel, addressed the meeting, and a brief summary of his remarks follows | " In the past twenty-five years various representatives from my firm have outlined to you some of the activities which you may do and which you may not do jointly. With the rules for these activ ities we are all fairly familiar. However, what you may say to each other as opposed to what you may do together is an increasing ly difficult problem. In the recent Greensboro case a number of competitors exchanged information concerning prices charged or quoted to specific customers for corrugated containers. The trial court found that each defendant had exercised his own judgement with respect to taking orders and quoting prices* On appeal the Attorney General argued that the exchnage of infor mation might have deprived customers of some of the benefits of competition -- that absent the exchange of information a lower price might have been quoted. The Supreme Court accepted this argument. The court drew what it called an "irresistible inference" that the exchange of information had an anticompetitive effect. Thus it would appear that any statistical reporting plan having to do with recently charged or quoted prices is in jeopardy. If this type of exchange is suspect then what other types in the future may incur suspicion? Although prices are the most obvious mani festation of product competition other factors are important -- packages; a finish, color or feature; credit; terms of sale; freight; even new products. All exchanges of information should be carefully examined to determine if an "irresistible inference" could be drawn that customers and competition in general might be adversely affected." 5. At this point in the meeting Dresident Schuman asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company. 6. President Schuman announced that the Board of Governors, at their meeting held on October 9, 1969 had elected officers to serve for the coming year, namely:- President - E.A. Schuman; Vice President - L.S. Moody; Treasurer - M.Q. Scowcroft. Hew mem bers of the Board of Governors are:- J.K. Whittaker of Nicolet Industries,Inc., and E.A. Morris of Uniroyal,Inc. Mr.Morris re places R.P. Clark who resigned as Vice President of ATI on the first of September 1969. Hr. Clark's responsibilities at Uniroyal Minute 3 - GSTMRA L MJETINO - October 10, 1969 Page -3-. having been realigned he is no longer responsible for that company's asbestos textile products. We regret that "Dick"Clark, always an active and popular participant in Institute affairs, is unable to continue attendance at our meetings. 7. The Fibre Producer's Report v/as given by Mr. Nm.J.W. Smith, Vice President & General Sales Manager of BELL ASBESTOS MIRES LIMITED. Mr. Smith reviewed the present situation in respect to the supply of various grades of asbec.tos fibres, and stated that so far as the spinning grades are concerned the normal inventories maintained by producers have been depleted to such an extent that a serious short age could develop in the coming year. At the conclusion of his remarks Mr. Smith extended to the members, on behalf of the Canadian members of the Institute, a most gracious and cordial invitation to attend the ATI meeting to be held at Thetford Mines. Quebec, June 10-12, 1970. Hosts at that meeting will be:Asbestos Corporation Limited; Bell Asbestos Mines Limited; Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; Johns-Manville Co.of Canada,Ltd.; and Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. 8. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: Air Hygiene Hfg. Committee - H.H. Walter, Chm. Technical Committee - J.W. Hawkins, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - M.^,. Scowcroft, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - G.F.A. 3rink, Chm. Environmental Study Committee - C.L. Sheckler, Chm. Their reports are attached to these minutes. 9. President Schuman presented Certificates of Appreciation to the retiring chairmen; Messers Walter, Haw:ins, Scowcroft and Brink, each of whom had served the normal term of two years, and thanked them on behalf of the Board of Governors and the members for their leadership and assistance in furthering the objectives of the Institute. 10. President Schuman announced that the new committee chairmen would be: _ For Air Hygiene & ;ifg. Committee - Hr.H. Fleming, Uniroyal,Inc. " Technical Committee - Mr. S.G. Dixit, Garlock Inc. " Sales Promotion Committee - Mr. H.B. Carpenter, Garlock Inc. " Fiber Testing Committee - Hr. D.E. Childers, H.M. Porter Co.,Inc. Note: Currently under consideration is a proposal to change the name of the "Sales Promotion" Committee to more accurately denote its broad range of interests in such matters as public relations, new products, and legislation affecting our industry11 11. Mr. John D. HcCluer, a former chairman of our Technical Committee was presented with a beautiful plaque by President Schuman as a trib ute to his many years of service in the asbestos textile industry, and his valuable contribution to the work of the Institute. Retired from the II.K. ^orter Co.,Inc., at the end of last August, Mr.& Mrs. McCluer reside at llj.22 Richland Dr., Charlotte,IT.C. 28205. Minutes - GENERAL HINTING - October 10, 1969 Page -1+- 12. President Schuman introduced Mr. George S. Fabel, who served on the first A.T.I. Board pf Governors in 19l]lj-> was Vice President in 1914.7-1914.8, and President of ATI in 19li-9 and 1950. Mr. Pabel gave an interesting review of the progress made by the Institute since its founding in 194^, expressed his personal gratif ication that the organization he had helped to found had become of such value to the asbestos textile industry, and extended his best wishes for the years ahead! Mr.& Mrs. Pabel live at 6612 Sardis Rd., in Charlotte, N.C. 28211. 13. Dates and locations of future meetings, as announced by resident Schuman: February I4.-0, 1970 - Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. June 10-12, 1970 - Balmoral Hotel, Thetford Hines,Que.,Canada October 7-9, 1970 - Statler Hilton Inn, williamsburg, Virginia H4.. The Guest Speaker, Hr. James S. Massenburg, spoke on the subject ''Employment of the Handicapped". Hr. Massenburg is Exec. Secretary of the North Carolina Governor'3 Committee on Employment of the Handicapped, and is recognized as an authority on the employability of the physically handicapped and what business and industry can do to utilize their skills. An Act of Congress has designated the first full week in October ( the present week ) as "National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week" and so we were most pleased to have this opportunity to hear Hr. Massenburg, and to learn what industry can contribute to a most worthy cause. His address is 541 Caswell Bldg.,Raleigh,N.C. 15. There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for a reception and group luncheon, following which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted. ASS2ST0S 'TEXTILE Ii<Si.I. Report of Fluids September 9, 1969 Balance on Hand at last report (May 8, 1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Roceipts To Savings Fund (Interest - 4 mos.) To General Fund (Initiation Fee & Dues) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ i4.5l2.6i4. 19683.91 17.21 $24213.76 300.00(Est.) 750.00 54.90 1104.90 Total on Hand and Received $25318.66 Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 nos. ending 6/30/69) 750.00 Legal Expenses ( 3 nos. " " Secretary's salary ( 4 nos.) F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr.-1969) Secretary's travel expense Office rent ( 4 nos.) 6/30/69 127.UI4. 476.00 36.00 110.72 300.00 A.T.I. Meeting expense ( June 18-20,1969) Printing Cc Office Supplies Telephone ( 4 nos.) Stenographic Dues (Industrial Hygiene Foundation) 707.58 115.38 127.31 32.00 100.00 Fire Insurance ( Office contents-3 yrs.) Revision of ASTIi Spec3. Advertisement - Asbestos Mag.50th Anniver'y Flowers Petty Cash (Vouchers 412-424 inclusive) 31.40 38.01 40.00 24.30 56.65 Total Disbursements 3072.77 Balance on Hand as of September 9, 1969 $22245.89 Funds General Fund (Bank statement of 9/9/69) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Total Funds $ 2218.63 19983.91 43.35 (*) $ 22245.89 Assets as of Sept.9, 1969 General Fund $ 2218.63 Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable(Bool: Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture 8c Equipment(Nominal Value) Total Assets Liabilities - Accts Payable as of 9/9/69 19983.91 43*35 16.21 5.60 1.00 $ 22268,70 I3.H4 Net Worth $ 22255-56 (#) Includes $575.00 estimated interest for period beginning January 1st,1969 and ending August 31^6,1969 , Respectfully submitted. H.E.^Sunbury, AsstTvTreas. Minutes AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 9, 1969 - The CAROLINA, Pinehurst, N.C. In attendance: H.H. Walter, Chairman - American Asbestos Textile Corporation L.E. Moody - H.M. Porter Company,Inc, R.C. Hunt - Uniroyal,Inc. R.B, Smith - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc, A.R. Patterson - C.L. Sheckler -- Johns-Manville Corporation Guests: S.R. Zimmerman, Jr, - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. W.M. Deckman - Turner Bros, Asbestos Co,,Ltd, G, Griswold,Jr, - Nicolet Industries,Inc, Minutes Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter:- Summarizing the experience of the member companies with the B&L Dust Counter, the committee came to the conclusion that the B&L instrument is not to considered a replacement for the Impinger, or for the Membrane- Filter. However, it appears to be a most suitable device for monitoring air contamination over extended periods of time. It is suggested to have various areas periodically monitored over a period of at least a shift, preferably over a period of twenty-four hours. During the recording time all changes in the environment due to changes in humidity, temperature, air-flow, operation, etc, are to be reported as to their nature, time, and duration. Subsequently the strip chart from the B&L Recorder is to be evaluated in conjunction with the environmental report. It will then be possible to pin-point time, duration and extent of air contamination, and reasons for its occurrence over a full cycle of operation. Whenever periods of high dust concentration have been observed it appears to be necessary to follow up as soon as possible with a dust count by means of the Impinger or the Membrane Filter, at the same location and under the same or at least similar conditions. Most of our current programs are based on an industrial hygiene survey weekly or monthly. This interval of sampling appears to be too long to determine the effect of high concentration exposure of short duration as might be experienced under certain circumstances. The use of the B&L Dust Counter as a monitoring device, and the Membrane Filter as a fiber counter, supplementing each other, appears to be a most suitable way to pinpoint areas of high dust concentration and the reason thereof. Neither one by itself pro vides sufficient information. We are recommending that member companies utilize the B&L Dust Counter in this manner to supplement their current industrial hygiene program. It would be most helpful to our industry if unusual Page -1- Minutes - Air Hygiene !; Hfg. Committee - continued: Page -2- observations were brought to the attention of this coinmittee. Using the 3&L Dust Counter in the described manner and inasmuch as the Impinger seems to have become obsolete { tvhen the Membrane Filter is used in conjunction with the B&L Dust Counter) it is not necessary to develop a method for correlating dust counts obtained by the two instruments. Membrane Filter Method: Mr. C.L. Sheckler reported that the Impinger will most likely no longer be used and that the membrane Filter Method is going to be the accepted method for evaluating asbestos dust. At the present time 12 fibers per cc, 5 microns plus, are considered to be the equivalent to 2 MPPCF as reported by Mr.J.Lynch, U.S.P.H.Service. Cleaning Procedures: Various methods for cleaning production equipment and rooms were discussed. A member of the committee reported on the use of the Abington System for periodic cleaning operations. Other member companies are using compressed air about twice a year for the removal of dust from pipes, rafters, ceilings, walls, etc. It appears to be most important that in this area major efforts are made to improve our methods and preferably prevent any excessive accumulation of dust. Dust Prevention in Blending and Carding: The committee members exchanged ideas in regards to dust abatement in the blending and carding operation. Enclosed blending lines, use of plastic bags for mixes, enclosed automatic card feed, lap system and other devices were discussed. Respectfully submitted. H.H. Walter Chairman Minutes In attendance: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING - October 9, 1969 of the The CAROLINA Hotel, Asbestos Textile Institute Pinehurst, N.C. J.U. Hawkins,Chairman -- Raybestos-Hanhattan,Inc. I. Darnett -----------------------Johns-Hanville Corp, D.T. Austin,Jr. --------------- Uniroyal,Inc. J.D. McCluer -------------------- H.K. Porter Company,Inc. J.W. Scherd --------------------- H.K. Porter Company,Inc. G.2. Houghton ------------------- Garlock Inc. S.G. Dixit -----------------------Garlock Inc. (Retired) The Technical Committee met briefly with the Fiber Testing Committe to discuss the ASTM Specification on Magnetic Rating. Sufficient data and guidelines are now available for the revision of this specification around the T & N Analyzer. Mr. Lincoln has provided schematic drawings and Mr. Walter Smith has written sample prep aration data that will be incorporated. Most of the Technical Committee's time was used in work on the ASTM Specification D-1118 for Magnetic Rating. Other specifications outstanding are a continuation of earlier work, and answers and revisions from government agencies are expected. These include: 1. National Stockpile Spec.P-3-Rij. on Spinnable Asbestos Fibers. A change in M.R. was requested. 2. HIL-I-3053, Electrical Insulation - it was recommended that this entire specification be rewritten. 3. MIL-P-1614-Oij., Asbestos Packing - change suggested in the burnout procedure. Lj.. HHP-lj.l-C, Asbestos Rope and Wick - change in weights and tolerance were recommended. The remaining ASTM Specification to be revised is D-1573* Heat Ag ing. Respectfully submitted. John W. Hawkins Chairman MINUTER - SALES PROMOTION COiiilTTEE Asbestos Textile Institute - October 9, 1969 CAROLINA Hotel, Pinehurst, North Carolina The Sales Pronotion Committee met on October 9, 1969 with repre sentatives of six member companies in attendance. A portion of the meeting was devoted to the subject of the Navy'3 effort to seek substitutes for asbestos textiles. It was determined that the Naval Ship Engineering Cdnter has not finalized its report on high temperature insulation, but steps were taken in the Commit tee to insure that the Institute is kept informed on the subject. At the last meeting, you may recall that we planned to investigate the possibility of arranging free subscriptions of "ASEESTOS" mag azine to college libraries and other institutions. As we began to investigate this subject in detail, we x^ere led into a more compre hensive discussion of the purpose of the committee. In view of the tremendous interest in the health hazard involved with the use of asbestos, it was felt that the Committee's aims should be broadened We began to probe in the area of public relations and new products. We feel that the scope of the Committee should be widened. It was agreed that the general work accompfished in the years past now seems to have been basically completed. We feel that a re-examin ation is in order and work will be done in this area before our next meeting. You may also recall that we were to investigate the possibility of embarking on an Institute-sponsored advertising program. This, also leads us into the scope of the Committee and convinces us that public relations is more descriptive of the areas that we should be concerned with. I believe that you will find at the next General Meeting that we will be able to more clearly define the work of this Committee. Respectfully submitted, M.Q. Scowcroft Chairman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES - FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE MEETING 9th October, 1969 - The CAROLINA Hotel,Pinehurst,N.C. Present: Members: G.F.A. Brink, Chairman - Asbestos Corporation Ltd. D.E. Childers - H.K. Porter Company, Inc. , E.A. Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited Bernard Lincoln - Turner & Newall Ltd. Visitors : D.J. Frost * - Nicolet Industries, Inc. . W.H. Smith - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited. # Note:- Application made for membership on this committee. BUSINESS: 1. Magnetic Rating Te3t 1.1 The status quo of the magnetic Rating Test was reviewed at a joint meeting of the Technical and Fiber Testing Committees. Fourteen (lij.) persons were in attendance at the joint session. The main items discussed were as follows: 1.1.1 Sampling, specimen holders and method of loading cells, especially for textile products. 1.1.2 Warning note on limitations of test method. 1.1.3 A schematic diagram for the T.k N. Magnetic Analyser was distributed. 1.1*1). Part of the first draft of the proposed ASTII Test Method for Magnetic Rating was handed over to the Chairman for distribution to the Fiber Testing Committee members. 1.1.5 The Chairman promised to supply Mr. Bernard Lincoln with 50 grams of magnetite equivalent to NBS magnetite sample No. 29 for the preparation of secondary calibrating stand ards. 2. Spicular and Grit Content of Spinning Fibers: 2.1 The results of work done since the last meeting to explore the possibilities of developing a suitable test method for determining the spicular and grit content of spinning fibers were reviewed and fractions recovered from the elutriation of -H4H & -1)11 McNett fractions and hydrocyclone residues were circulated for examination. Page (1) of (2) Minutes - Fiber Testing Comr.ittee - continued: Page (2) Of (2) 2,2 Although the present approach did not give the desired results, it was decided to keep this subject on the agenda for future consideration. 3. Recent activities of the QAMA Technical Committee ( Static Particle Sizing i.e., fiber length and diameter by the Zeiss Particle Size Analyzer & Split Image Shearing Device and Colour) and ASTM D-30 (Sub-Ill) Committee (Ro-tap, Colour & Moisture Content) of interest to ATI were briefly reviewed, il. Fiber Length Measurements:- This important subject was briefly discussed again; and the need for a more precise method of measuring fiber length was expressed. The Chairman promised to prepare a resume of recent known developments in this field for circulation to Committee members. 5, The Chairman thanked the members for their assistance and cooperation during the term of his office (two years) and urged them to continue their search for improved and refined methods of testing asbestos fiber. Respectfully submitted, G.F.A. Brink, Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee 21st October, 1969 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY COMMITTEE Outline of remarks (unedited) by C.L. Sheckler, Chm. at ATI General Meeting, October 10, 1969 1# Discussed a Position Paper (Special Report) to the Surgeon General from the Bureau of Occupational Safety and Health.Has reviewed a draft of the Paper but does not know when it will be published - per haps within the next six months. 2. Discussed potential revision of Threshold Limit Value for Asbestos Dust. Current ACGIH TLV is 5.0 MPPCP. Walsh-Healy Act revision is 12 fibers per cc, or 2,0 MPPCP. Proposed TLV at this time is 6 fibers per cc, or 1.0 MPPCP, meaning fibers over 5 microns in length. A fibre is defined as being three times in length of its diameter. 3. Referred to meetings with Captain Rosenwinkle, Commanding Officer of Shipyard Repair and Environmental Health, concerning the Navy's search for substitutes for asbestos-containing materials, and use of new asbestos products that generate less dust. Concludes that the industry needs to develop and present new products that are less dusty and also needs to project educational material, or information, concerning use of asbestos products. Lf., "Nader's Raiders" have been considerably involved in the Coal In dustry "Black Lung" occupational disease problems, legislation and litigation. This group and movement has now moved into the area of the Cotton Textile Industry in respect to "Brown Lung"(Byssinosis) an occupational disease caused by inhalation of cotton dust. There is reason to believe that the investigation into cotton textiles may lead Nader, or someone else, to the Asbestos Textile Industry. It is therefore essential that ATI be alert and prepared. One of the greatest assets that we have in our favor is the cooperative health program that the ATI has uhdertaken with the U.S.P.H. Service. This program is in its third stage, the clinical examination stage, and has and will contribute a great deal of knowledge relative to the health problems relating to asbestos. Stressed that members who have been cooperating in the USPHS health program have no reason to be apprehensive, as we have been forthright in recognizing our difficul ties, and we have been doing something about it. We must continue our efforts, and are currently making plans to do considerable work in the area of health information and education to the users of our products. 5. Reviewed current status of medical research work in conjunction with asbestos and mineral fibers. Mentioned participation by other manufacturing groups,i.e.:IAMA, NIMA, ACPA, and recently the MPA. 6. Pointed out that the Air Hygiene <?: iifg. Committee of ATI was con cerned primarily with "In-Plant" conditions and problems, whereas the Environmental Study Committee's primary objective was to act in an advisory capacity on matters affecting our industry, outside the plant, such as legislation, litigation, medical research findings, customer education efforts, liaison with other industry groups, etc. Stressed the need for constant coordination between the two com mittees. H.E. Sunbury Secretary ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - February 6, 1970 The Regency Ifyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. In attendance AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. J.W. Christenbury ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P.E. Leclerc G.F.A.Brink GARLOCK..INC. G.E.Houghton S.G. Dixit A. Kuzmuk JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION E.A.Schuman C.L. Sheckler K.A. Roberts H.K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. L.E. Moody D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd RAYBBST05-MANHATTAN. INC. M.Q, Scowcroft R.B.Smith J.W. Hawkins G.F. Ducker I.H. Wbaver EELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED ttn.J, W. Staith W.H. Smith LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC. LTD. E.A. Farrell C.E.Stiefken NICOLET INDUSTRIES. INC. J.K. Whittaker Geo* Griswold, Jr. UNIROYAL. INC* E.A. Morris Dr. J.H. Wblfsie CADWALADER. WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTHE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) - Guests - Mr. Albert Simon, A.& R. Simon Co., New York City Mr. J.W, Guthridge, Ga.Institute of Technology (Guest Speaker) Note: Those attending committee meetings the previous day, but not the General Meeting, are listed on committee reports. **** Minutes **** 1. President Schuman called the meeting to order at 9<30 A.M. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion by C.E. Stiefken, seconded by S.G. Dixit, it was voted to omit the reading. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Scowcroft. Mr. L.E. Moody moved that the report be accepted, the motion was seconded by Mr. Roberts, and so voted. The report is attached to these minutes. 4. Mr. Haven C. Roosevelt, Legal Counsel, addressed the meeting, and a brief summary of his remarks follows: Minutes - General Meeting, continued i Page -2- "Counsel outlined what he referred to as the "bathtub conspiracy" or intra corporate conspiracy doctrine. Section I of the Sherman Act proscribes "every contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade". Thus Section I presupposes the existence of two contracting parties. In attempting to determine who are separate parties capable of conspiring some courts have been greatly confused. It is clear that common ownership or control will not insulate corporations from the impact of Section I. Thus, while a corporation cannot conspire with itself, it can conspire with its corporate affiliates or subsidiaries. Recently some courts have been called upon to decide whether a corporation can conspire with its own unincorporated divisions or affiliates for Section I purposes. In the Hawaiian Gee case at the District Court level, the trial judge told the jury that although Calvert Distillers Company, Four Poses Distillers Company and Frankfort Distillers Company are but three of the unincorporated divisions of the House of Seagrams, Inc., "nevertheless they are entities or units which, under the anti-trust laws are legally capable of conspiring among themselves Then this case reached the District Court of Appeals, that Court stated that if the theory that divisions or other purely administrative units of a single corporation can conspire together is accepted then there would be no rational basis upon which it could be decided that in one case there had been a conspiracy and that in another there had not. Counsel reported that it was exalting form over substance to say that unincor porated divisions cannot conspire while those same divisions if incorporated would be capable of conspiring. Counsel concluded that this area of the law was quite unsettled and would probably remain so for a considerable period of time in view of the fact that any new or definitive law would probably have to come from private suits which may well involve a long time." 5. The Fibre Producers' Report was given by Mr. Paul E. Leclerc, who is Regional Sales Manager for Asbestos Corporation limited, Thetford Mines, Quebec. His interesting and informative report is attached, 6. At this point in the meeting President Schuman asked each person present to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. 7. Mr. Schuman mentioned receipt of a letter from Dr. M.C. Shaw's widow in which she stated that she had remarried during the summer of 1969, and that she and her family were fine. Also he read a letter from Mr. J.D, Christian, President of Cassiar Corporation stating they were going ahead with plans to increase the capacity of the Cassiar' mill from a nominal 75000 tons per year to 100,000 tons per year, and hope to get this completed in 1970. This expansion will hopefully mean a little more spinning fibre in 1971. Mr, Christian expressed regret that no one from Cassiar would be able to attend this meeting as Messrs. Berry, Beguin, and Tigert were away at the mines, and he would be out of town on another trip. Friends of Paul J. Smith of ASTM, who has attended many of our meetings to work with our Technical Committee in revising ASTM specifications for asbestos textiles, will be interested to learn of his marriage last December 10th, to Mrs. Robert E. (Rusty) Gordon, in San Angelo, Texas, His home address is now 1102 Algerita Drive, San Angelo, Texas 76901, and we are sure he and "Rusty" would enjoy hearing from any of their friends in ATI. Minutes - General Meeting, continued: Page - 3 - 8, President Schuman introduced the Guest Speaker, Mr. J.VJ. Guthridge, Placement Director, Georgia Institute of Technology, His subject - "What the Student is Looking For in the Textile Industry Today", proved to be veryinformative and most interesting. 9, President Schuman announced that a new committee, to be known as the "Asbestos Advisory Committee" had been approved by the Board of Governors to supersede the old Sales Promotion Committee, and that Mr. M.Q. Scowcroft would serve as Chairman of the new committee. This committee has a broad range of interests in respect to public relations, new products, legislation affecting our industry, etc, 10. The. committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: Air Hygiene & Mfg, Committee - L.E, Moody (for H.Fleming, Chm.) Technical Committee - S.G. Dixit, Chm. Asbestos Advisory Committee - M.Q, Scowcroft, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - D.E. Childers, Chm, Their reports are attached to these minutes. 11. Mr. C.L. Sheckler, Chairman of the Environmental Study Committee, which functions in an advisory capacity to the Institute, reported on the situation pertaining to legislation, existing and anticipated, industrial relations problems, etc. Highlights of his remarks follow: Mr. Sheckler commented on the 1969 Coal Mine Health and Safety Act which is the sternest industrial safety law in American History, also on current Union activities in respect to "Brown Lung" i.e. (Byssinosis) which it is feared may result in similar adverse Federal Legislation for the Cotton Manufacturing Industry, and this could well include the asbestos textile industry. The 1969 Coal Mine Health and Safety Act "presumes" that a coal miner has a compensable claim if he has worked for a specified period of years in coal mines. The present Act, unless renewed by Congress, will expire in seven years. Textile Unions are making a strong effort to get legislation similar to the Coal Mine Health & Safety Act. Dr. Selikoff, well known for his activities in respect to research on asbestos in relation to health, apparently has agreed to work with Textile Unions on "Brown Lung" (Byssinosis) research. In Testimony before a Congressional hearing. Union representatives stressed byssinosis, Asbestosis, and Noise as major problems in the textile industry today. Mr. Sheckler referred to Ralph Nader's remarks about air pollution, at a Congressional hearing, in which he mentioned asbestos as an air pollutant. Under the heading of Student Activities, Mr. Sheckler said there will be a nation-wide demonstration in April 1970, against pollution of any and all kinds. He feels very strongly that this activity should not be underestimated in its significance for the future 1 Mr. Sheckler reported that Dr, L.J. Cralley, of the U.S.P.H. Service, who has attended many of our ATI meetings over the past six or seven years, Minutes - General Meeting, continued: Page - 4 - had presented a paper entitled "Identification and Control of Asbestos Exposures" at the International Congress on Occupational Health, held last September in Tokyo, Japan. In his paper Dr. Cralley makes the summary state ment "Asbestos can be used safely in modern industrial technology if adequate precautions are taken to prevent excessive and unsuspected exposures". Hia paper is a clear, concise, and up-to-date discussion of industrial asbestos dust control by a recognized expert, and covers all essential aspects of the problem, from monitoring techniques to waste disposal. It merits careful reading by every manufacturer and consumer of asbestos products. Mr. Sheckler recommended that the pamphlet entitled "Method for Determining Asbestos Dust Concentration" published by our Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee in 1964 be updated to include the use of the Membrane Filter apparatus (or method) for obtaining a greater degree of accuracy, J/M Corp, and Dr. Cralley will be glad to help on this. Also that the Institute,through its new Asbestos Advisory Committee, prepare an Information Booklet on the Safe Handling of Asbestos Products, for use of Consumers. He stressed the need for preparation of a history of what our industry has done during the past 25 or 30 years to safeguard the health of its employees. The facts must be accurate and well documented. After we get it done we either use it to publicize the progress made, or hold it in reserve for defense against industry attack. 12. President Schuman announced that tiro applications for Associate Membership in the institute had been approved by the Board of Governors} namely: NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD., Tokyo, Japan. ASBESTOS TEXTIL, S.A., Tulancingo, Mexico. He welcomed both of these fine companies to the Institute, stating that he visualized a long and pleasant relationship to our mutual benefitf A special guest at this meeting was Mr. Albert Simon, of A. & R. Simon Co., New York City, who represent Nippon Asbestos Co. in the U.S.A. 13* President Schuman announced that the next meeting of the Institute would be held June 10-12, 1970 at Thetford Mines, Quebec. Our Canadian member companies will be hosts at this meeting. Mr, Mn.J.W, Smith of Bell Asbestos Mines and Mr. Paul E. Leclerc of Asbestos Corporation Ltd. are in charge of the arrangements for the June meeting and will furnish the Secretary full details for mailing to members well in advance of the meeting. Members are urged to bring their wives to this meeting I The fall meeting will be held October 7-9, 1970, at Williamsburg, Va., and, this being the Annual Meeting, it is hoped that we will have our usual wellattended meeting by both members and wivesi 14, There being no further business to come before the meeting it recessed for a reception and group luncheon, following which it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Report of Funds January 9. 1970 Balance on Hand at last report (September 9th, 1969) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 2218.63 19983.91 43.35 Receipts To Savings (Interest to 12/31/69) To General Fund (Dues) To General Fund (Book Sales) 325.10 250.00 63.23 Total On Rand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 mos. ending 9/30/69) Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) F..I.C.A. Tax ( 6 mos.) Secretary's travel expense Office rent ( 4 mos.) A.T.I. meeting expense (Oct.8-10,1969) Printing 3c Office Supplies Telephone ( 4 mos.) Repairs to 'B.& L, Dust Counter Insurance - B.& L. Dust Counter Insurance - 3 year Bond Insurance - Workman's Comp. Accountant ( D.A-. Caruso, one year) AST1I & D-13 Dues File cabinet ( [(.-drawer,steel,used) Petty Cash (Vouchers 425-455 inclusive) 750.00 476.00 72.00 310.08 300,00 715.14 96.61 167.25 180.23 124.00 63.OO 21.00 300.00 50.00 15.00 110.24 Total Disbursements Balance on Hand as of January 9, Funds General Fund (Bank statement of 1/9/70) Savings Fund (as of Dec.31,1969) Petty Cash Fund Total Funds 1970 $ 1778.25 17309.01 46.41 (-*) Assets as of January 9, 1970 General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage on Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) Total Assets Liabilities (Accts Payable) $ 1778.25 17309.01 46.41 2.66 9.60 1.00 $22245.89 638.33 $22884,22 3750.55 $19133.67 $19133.67 $19146.93 963.40 (-*) $3000.00 transferred to General Fund on 10/7/69 (-::-) Does not include dues payable by members in year 1970. Net Worth $16183.53 ( Respectfully submitted, 'J - s* 'T Y H.E. Sunburyy, Asst./GTreasurer FIBREPRODUCERS' REPORT February 6, 1970 The industry enjoyed a good year in 1969 and there was a good general demand for all grades. Shipments from Quebec during 1969 were down 1.7 $ as compared to 1968, This was due to the closing down of one producing company early in 1969. The Quebec Asbestos Mining Associa tion's closing inventories at the end of December were at their lowest in years. Most companies have labor contracts signed for 1970 and 1971 at higher wage rates. As mentioned in earlier fibre reports and as you all know, there is a shortage of quality spinning fibres. The former very large inventory of Group 3 fibre was reduced to a relatively small quantity by the end of 1969. It is expected that this will disappear in 1970 and closing inventories at the end of this year will be minimal. There are just about no inventory stocks of Cassiar grades and no increase in production is expected this year. A mill expansion is planned for 1971 and this will provide some additional tonnage. There is also the possibility of Clinton Creek producing some spinning fibre in the 3R range in 1971* There appears to be a shortage of yam for friction products in Western Europe and the socialist countries of Europe as well as in some other areas. There exists a strong demand for asbestos-cement grades in groups 4, 5 and 6. Asbestos shorts or Group 7 grades are selling well although more readily available than the longer grades. To take care of part of the projected increased demands for the next few years, our company during 1969 increased its total production by nearly 20 % over 1968 and present expansion plans which are to be completed this year are expected to again increase 1970 production by more than 10 g. Atlanta, Ga. February 6, 1970 P. E. Leclerc Regional Sales Manager Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE February 5, 1970 Regency-Ryatt House Atlanta, Georgia Attending: Members: . Horace Fleming, Chairman - UNIROYAL, Inc, K, A, Roberts - Johns-Manville L, E, Moody - H, K, Porter Company I, H, Weaver - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc, R. 8, Smith - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. C, L. Sheckler - Johns-Manville Absent: R, C. Hunt - UNIROYAL, Inc. R. Morton - Nicolet Industries, Inc, K. W, Nelson - American Smelting & Refining Company A, R. Patterson - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc, H, H. Walter - American Asbestos Corporation Visitors: A, C, Link - UNIROYAL, Inc, Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter The Chairman reported that the B&L Counter had been in the following member plants since its purchase in October 1967: Johns-Manville Manville, New Jersey Raybestos-Manhattan Charleston, S. C.- Raybestos-Manhattan Manheim, Pennsylvania UNIROYAL, Inc. Hogansville, Georgia H, K. Porter Charlotte, North Carolina The members agreed not to further pursue the development of a method for correlating dust count obtained by the Midget Impinger and the Bosch & Lomb Dust Counter. Member companies are encouraged to make full use of the B& L Counter for continuous monitoring in areas of abnormal dust concentration, for the purpose of determining cause of same. Members agreed that it will at all times be available to any member upon request to the Chairman. Minutes - Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - cont. Page - 2 - Cleaning & Air Pollution Methods of waste disposal were discussed* disposal methods presently in use are: The following dust and waste 1. Seal in polyethylene bags before disposing to dump area, 2. Seal in 50 gallon drums and buried, 3. Pack in bale press before disposing, 4. Burn waste solvents in isolated area. All members agree that methods and procedures for waste disposal must be given serious consideration in view of governmental concern for air pollution. Noise Abatement: All member companies share a common concern for employee welfare in manu facturing areas of high noise levels. One company reported that employees were required to wear air muffs or ear plugs fitted by their Safety and Health Department. This is made a condition of employment. Asbestos Information Booklet: At request of the Asbestos Advisory Committee, the Air hygiene and Manufac turing Committee agreed to prepare a booklet for distribution to member customers relating to health hazards involved in use of Asbestos products. The booklet will suggest that normal or reasonable precautions be taken in processing asbestos products. Further, the booklet will reconmend that government standards be met which will result in no greater health hazard than are present in the majority of industrial operations. The Committee agreed to submit a draft of the booklet to the A.T.I. Member ship at the June meeting for consideration. To assist in preparing the booklet, Mr. C. L. Sheckler agreed to mail a copy of the N.I.M.A. booklet to all Air hygiene Committee members for use as a guide. Each member of the Air Hygiene Committee will submit to the Chairman of the Air Hygiene Committee his proposed version of what should be included in the booklet. Upon receipt of their recommendations, Mr. Horace Fleming and Mr. M. Q. Scowcroft will prepare a final draft. Respectfully submitted, Horace Fleming Chairman In Attendance: MINUTES OF TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE February 4 & 5, 1970 Regency Hyatt House Atlanta, Georgia s. G. Dixit - Chairman G. E. Houghton J. W, Hawkins w. Maaskant J. W, Echerd Garlock, Inc. Garlock, Inc. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp H. K. Porter Co. Minutes: Messrs. D. E. Childers, Geo. Griswold, Jr., and H. E. Sunbury attended the Wednesday afternoon session of February 4, 1970. The following subjects were covered during the meetings: 1. Proposed MIL Spec. 82249B a. The committee feels that the word cotton should be deleted and the word organic be substituted. b Reference should be made to ASTM Standard D1918 for per cent asbestos determination. 2. Final form of ASTM D628 was presented to the committee for their approval. One negative vote cast by Tennessee Eastman Company has been withdrawn. 3. National Stockpile Specification: The General Services Administration has been requested to change the magnetic rating of asbestos fiber from 0,75 to 1,0 for Class II type asbestos textiles, 4. The magnetic rating specification write-up was continued. A rough draft of the proposed specification will be submitted to members of the Technical Committee by its chairman. 5. ASTM Specification D1573 on Heat Aging: The conmdttee members recommended going to an outside laboratory for independent testing for economic reasons. It is planned to send samples of AA grade asbestos fabric to independent labora tories for heat aging and strength testing. This is being further explored and the cost and the program will be presented to the Board of Governors for their approval, 6. New ASTM procedure requires to include data on precision and accuracy. Our existing ASTM Standards will have to be modified. The work on these Standards will be taken up gradually* S. G. Dixit Chairman MINUTES ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (*) Asbestos Textile Institute - February 5. 1970 Regency-Hyatt Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia You may remember that we reported from the last meeting of the Board of Governors held in Pinehurst on October 9, 19&9 that the Board voted un animously to change the name of the former "Sales Promotion Committee," It had been agreed that the work accomplished by that Committee in years past had largely been completed and that the scope of this group should be widened. Yesterday, February 5 with representatives of six member companies in attendance, the Committee selected the name -- Asbestos Advisory Committee, The name was selected after a long and spirited dis cussion. It is a name which we think represents best the aims and purposes of the group. This may best be described as the voice, if you will, the communications link between the various committees of this Institute out into all industry; to aid in presenting to member companies a climate for expanding uses of asbestos textiles in larger and more diverse applications. We are not all in agreement that we have selected a perfect name, but it was selected and presented to the Eoard for approval. life then asked the members of the Air-Ifygiene and Manufacturing Committee to join us in a joint session. Prior to this and in other committee meetings, it was agreed that the sales forces of member companies needed education in the field of health protection involving the use of asbestos textiles. We felt that a brochure or pamphlet should be prepared by the Institute and made available to all so that sales representatives could have an intelli gently written sales aid to present to their customers when they are question ed concerning the potential hazards involved in the handling of asbestos textile products. The Air-Iiygiene and Manufacturing Committee graciously agreed to aid us in the preparation of such a booklet by gathering whatever technical data is necessary in the compilation of the booklet. . Work will be dene by the Chairman of these two Committees prior to the meeting in June of this year. We hope to have a rough outline ready for presentation at that time and, very hopefully, get final decisions made in June so that printing and publishing can proceed as soon as possible thereafter. It is an important part of the education of the public (meaning customers) and our own sales forces and implements the excellent program outlined by the Environmental Study Committee. * Formerly - "Sales Promotion Committee" Respectfully submitted, M. Q. Scowcroft I CHUTES OF THE ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE MEETING - 4th, 5th & 6th, February, 1970 LOCATION: Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Georgia. IN ATTENDANCE: Dewey E. Childers, Chairman -- H. K. Porter Company, Inc, W, H. Smith------------------------------- Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd, IT, C, Streib------------------------------- Johns Manville Corporation E, A. Farrell------------------------------Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd, C.E, Stiefken------------------------------Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. G. F. A. Brink----------------------------Asbestos Corporation, Ltd, 1, Magnetic Rating Test - Some time was spent reviewing the status of magnetic rating. Some present calibration standards were dispersed in a dry neutral powder and packed in the container. It was reported that segregation of the magnetite and the dispersing medium has occurred on some calibration standards. This segregation has produced lower readings than when the standards were first made. It was felt that this discovery will not affect the ASTM method which is currently being written. The committee wished it to be stated again that the ASTM method for magnetic rating will be based on the T & N. The Fiber Testing Committee and the Technical Committee jointly made recom mendations to Mr. Carl Gnam of the Miscellaneous Metals and Minerals Division (DSA) for changes in national stockpile purchase specification P-3-PA. It was recommended that the ,75 rating for electrical purposes be changed to 1.0, A letter was received stating this change will be made when the specification is revised. Grit and Spicule Content in Spinning Fibers - Everyone agrees there is an objectionable portion in spinning fiber which may be called grit or spicules. A great deal of work has been done by some of our members, but so far we have not produced a suitable method for separating this objectionable material from good fiber. The committee will return to this problem in future meetings hoping someone will come up with a more precise method. Fiber Length Measurements - Accurate determination of fiber length is important especially for the longer spinning grades. Mr. Gay Brink plans to prepare a summary touching on all that has been done in measuring fiber length. The Test Manual - The committee felt that we should now begin looking at some of the tests in the manual so that when the time for revision arrives we have a head start. The committee stressed the desire that on future meetings 4 d have more members from the manufacturers on the Fiber Testing Committee. Respectfully submitted, Dewey E. Childers, Chairman ATI Fiber Testing Committee I . *r ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - October 9, 1970 The HILTON INN, Williamsburg, Va. In attendance: Page -1- AMERICAN .AAnn.s.LA .TjKriLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED J.W. Chrfstenbury " ' P.E. Leclerc ~ GARLOCX INC. A. Kuzmuk S.G. Dixit G.E. Houghton JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION E.A. Schuman ~~ M.J. Covan X.A. Roberts I. Barnett H.K. PORTER COMFaMY,INC. L.E. MOODY'"" D.E. Childers BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED W.H. Smith LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC,Ltd. E.A. "Farrell * NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.,Ltd. K. Uchida TURNER BROS.ASBESTOS CO..Ltd. W.M. Deckman ASTM - Committee D- 11 P.J. Smith RAY33ST03 -MAi-UIATTAN, INC M.Q. Scowcroft ~ J.W. Hawkins NICOLET I)'DTJSTRIES. INC. Geo. Griswold, "Jr," ' E.W. Russell Ui: IROYAL, 13 !C. E.A. Morris H.M. Willingham CAD) .'ALADXR. NICKERSIIAH & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Logal Counsel) ASBESTOS Magazine (iirs.) Doris M. Fagan, Editor ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.S. Sunbury (Srecret*ary) Note: Those who attended committee meetings the previous day, but not the General Meeting were:- Dr.J.H. Wolfsie, J.L. Rainey, H.H. Walter, J.P. Wronski, R.D. Hindman, G.S. Fabel. Minutes 1. President Schuman called the meeting to order at 8:^0 A.ii. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion by Mr.L.E. Moody, seconded by .nr.Geo. Griswold,Jr., it was voted to omit the reading of sane. Mr. Schuman, commenting on the large attendance as listed in the minutes of the last meeting, expressed the appreciation of ATI members for the fine hospitality shown us on that occasion by the Canadian members; 3. Those present were a3ked to stand and identify themselves and ` their company affiliation. President Schuman said that it was very gratifying to have Hr.K.Uchida, of Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd., Tokyo, oapan, at this meeting. Hr. Uchida expressed his pleasure at being able to attend. , Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -2- L|.. Treasurer Scovcroft presented the financial Report, nr. muzmuk moved that it be accepted, seconded by Hr. Christenbury, and so voted unanimously. The report is attached to these minutes. Hr. Schuman stated that the annual audit of the Institute's books had been made by .*r. G. /. Barker, Division Comptroller of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. .North Charleston, S.C,, who reported that -"The statement dated September 9, 1970 presents fairly the position of the Asbestos Textile Institute as of that date." 5. The Legal Counsel Report was given by Attorney H.C. Roosevelt, of Cadwalader, VJIckersham & Taft, New York City. A resume* of his remarks, follows:- " Counsel discussed two recent cases which were related to Section ij. of the Clayton Act. :Ie noted that these cases might illustrate what will happen to some of the trad itional iterpretations of the antitrust lat^s. One is Billy Baxter vs Coca-Cola Company and the other is the Multi-District Anti-trust Litigation .Involving Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control Equipment about which he" spoke two' years ago*. ...... . Coca-Cola and Canada Dry the two defendants in Billy Baxter filed a joint summary judgement motion "suggesting" that Billy Baxter lacked standing to sue as a franchisor for its own lost profits on its franchisees* sales. Section of the Clayton Act, provides: "That any person who shall be injured on its business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the anti-trust laws may sue therefore ... and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorneys fee." "By reason'of"; the court in Billy Baxter said "expressly restricts the right to sue under this section. There must be a causal connection betxjeen an anti trust violation and an injury sufficient for the trier of fact to establish that the violation was a "material cause* of or a 'sub stantial factor* in the occurrence of damage." Although any anti trust violation "disrupts the competitive economy to some extent and creates entirely forseeable injury which may be shown to reach individual employees, stockholders, or consumers, it lias long been held that not all of these have the requisite standing to sue for treble damages and thereby take a leading role in the enforcement of the prohibition question." Consequently, a treble-damage plaintiff must allege a causative link to his injury which is "direct" rather than "incidental" or which indicates that his business or property was in the "target area" of the illegal conduct* In the Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control Equipment cases the facts are as follows: The present actions followed federal suits against the Automobile Manufacturers Association, General Motors Corp., Ford motor Co., Chrysler Corp., and American Motors Corp. The individual actions were consolidated in the California court by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Bach of the plaintiffs was sued in an individual, class, or parens patriae capacity after meeting with failure in their attempts to intervene in a civil antitrust suit against the automobile manufacturers filed by the Justice Department in January 1969. In that suit, the Justice Department obtained a consent degree enjoining the auto manufacturers from further conspiring "to prevent, restrain or limit Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -3- the development, manufacture, installation, distribution or sale of air pollution control equipment for motor vehicles." However such consent agreement does not constitute an admission of violation of law for the purposes of the private antitrust suits now pending. Private treble damage antitrust suits. Judge Manuel Read noted, require the determination of three issues: conspiracy, impact, and damage. The question of conspiracy is here common not only to the class within each separate action but also to all the actions filed. This is an issue which should, in the interest of justice, be litigated only once. As to the auto manufacturers ' attack upon the maintenance of these suits in the absence of a "commercial relation ship" between plaintiffs and defendants, the court emphasizes the fact that Section ij. of the Clayton Act gives the right to recover treble damages to anyone "injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust lax^s." Judge Real then notes that he is not here concerned with the "traditional legalistic approach defined by the cases cited by the defendants in their motion to dismiss", and asserts that a lack of such "commercial relationship" is not fatal where the source of injury can be shown to be a violation of "anything forbidden in the antitrust laws." In Billy Baxter the court narrowly construed the "by reason of language" in the Clayton Act and in the Automobile cases the court used an extremely broad test. It may well be that the anti-trust laws will now be interpreted in a much broader sense than in the past where issues like pollution are involved. This broad interpretation may then be applied' to all types of anti-trust cases. 6. The Pibre Producers Report was given by Mr. Paul E. Leclerc, the Regional Sales Manager for ASJESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED. Mr. Leclerc said that "the over-all market for asbestos fibre was good. Group 3 spinning fibre is generally available but not in all types and qualities. The textile industry in England and Contin ental Europe appears to suffer from a shortage of labor. The United States market is soft, and the rallying signs of last August have been obscured by the present General Motors strike. The brake lining and building materials markets are down from last year. The asbestos-cement industry is good in most parts of the world and business is booming in South America, Japan, Morea, Australia and Europe. The concensus of opinion is that business in 1971 will be better than in 1970, which has not quite lived up to expectations." 7. Committee reports were given by the respective chairmen:- Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - H.M. Willingham, Chm. Technical Committee - S.G. Dixit, Chm. Asbestos Advisory Committee - M.Q. Scowcroft, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - D.E. Childers, Chm. Their reports are attached to these minutes. Mr. Scowcroft, retiring chairman of the Asbestos Advisory Committee, thanked the members for their supoort during his service as head of that commit tee, and its predecessor (the Sales Promotion Committee) for a combined total of three years. Mr. Schuman thanked Mr. Scowcroft on behalf of the Board of Governors Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -ij.- for his service as Chairman, then announced that the new Chairman of the Asbestos Advisory Committee was Mr. E.A. Morris of Uniroyal,Inc. Q. President Schuman commented on recent developments in the Press regarding hazards associated with asbestos. Mentioned his company's "positive approach" in their nevr ads stressing the fact that asbestos brings safety and economy into the daily life of nearly everyone. Three current ads entitled "Fire at Sea", "Airport", and "Driving at Dusk" are appearing in H .1 S..BBK, BUS I. [ ESS WEEM, U.S. iO./S & WORLD REPORT, and WALL STREET JOURNAL. Copies of the ads were displayed. 9. Mr. Schuman introduced Doris M. Fagan, Editor of ASBESTOS Maga zine, Guest-of-Honor at this meeting. Mrs. Fagan said that she appreciated the invitation to attend, and that it was a real pleasure to do so. Mentioned the series of articles now appearing in ASBESTOS - "History of Asbestos Textiles in the U.S.A." by J.A. Bettes,Jr., which started with the August 1970 issue. Back issues are available for those who may have missed the first two or three installments of this History. She thanked the members for their support, both in advertising as well as subscriptions, and asked that ASBESTOS be put on each company's mailing list for publicity releases as the magazine is anxious to have all items of general interest to the asbestos industry. Pointed out that ASBESTOS Magazine was a good source of information, not only through its editorial and advertising pages but also by reason of the storehouse of data contained in its library and files. 10. President Schuman explained that the attendance at this meeting was less than usual because of an unfortunate conflict of meeting dates with the Q.A.M.A., which many of our Canadian members had to attend. Steps have been taken to try and avoid this in the future. Hr. Schuman announced that in recognition of the "austerity pro grams" now in effect by most member companies the Board of Governors had voted to grant a special discount of 20$ on. Members 1971 dues. Further, that the Board had voted to shorten the meeting schedule for the February and June 1971 meetings , so as to have arrival on Wednesday P.M. and departure on Thursday P.M. The Annual Meeting in October 1971 (to which company officials and wives are specially in vited) will have the usual schedule with arrival Wednesday P.M. and departure on Friday afternoon.11 11. President Schuman presented Mr. G. Ellwood Houghton, of Garlock Inc., with a plaque "For Outstanding Achievement in His Field" "Ellie" Houghton, as he is known to his many friends in ATI and in the Industry, is planning to retire as of November 1,1970 after over 1+3 years continuous employment in the asbestos textile and mechanical packing industries. He has contributed to the progress of ATI by serving on its Technical Committee and by his regular attend ance at meetings. Mr. Houghton expressed his sincere appreciation for the plaque, said he had greatly enjoyed his association with the ATI, and felt that the Institute was doing a most valuable work for the Industry, and was worthy of continuing support. Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -5- 12. Locations for meetings in 1971 were announced February 3-L|., 1971 - Red Carpet Inn, Charlotte,i)'.C. June 9-10, 1971 - Cherry Hill Inn, Cherry Hill, ii'.J. October 6-8, 1971 - Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah,Ga. 13. President Schuman announced that the Board of Governors had elected new officers for the coming year, namely:- President - L.E. Mo^dy, H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Vice President - M.Q. Scowcroft, Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Treasurer - Alexander Kuzrnuk, Garlock Inc. Exec. Secretary ?: Asst. Treasurer - H.E. Sunbury Also, that Mr. Alexander Kuzrnuk had been elected to the Board of Governors as Garloclc1s representative, replacing Mr. G.Parry Wiess. ( Mr. Kuzrnuk is President of Garlock1s Mechanical Rubber Division located in Palmyra, N.Y., which also includes their asbestos textile operations.) lij.. After announcing the new officers Mr. Schuman asked the new President, L.E. Moody, to take charge of the meeting. President Moody paid eloquent tribute to the fine leadership given to the Institute by Mr. Schuman during the past two years. There was a spontaneous burst of applause following his remarks, and a standing ovation for "Ed" Schuman who has contributed so much to the Institute over many years of service as committee Chairman, Editor of 2nd Edition of the Handbook of Asbestos Textiles, Treasurer, Vice President, and, since October 1968, President] His is truly an outstanding record in support of the Institute] 1$. The meeting recessed for luncheon, following which it adjourned. Respectfully submitted. Secretary / ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds September 9, 1970 Balance On Hand at last j?eport_( May 8, 1970) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Total On Hand Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund ( Book Sales) $ 2992.41 20589.01 32.11 $177.19 155.39 $23613.53 332.58 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 mos ending 6/30/70) $1137.00 Legal Expenses ( 3 mos " 6/30/70) 121.60 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) 952.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr.1970) 72.00 Secretary's travel expense 85.30 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 ArT.I. Meeting Exp.(June 10-12,1970) 774.03 Printing & Office supplies 81f..l8 Telephone ( 4 mos.) 152.80 Insurance (Workman's Comp.) 18.00 Dues (Industrial Health Foundation) 100.00 Miscellaneous (Gifts,Flowers,etc.) 129.95 Petty Cash (Vouchers l4.7O-l4.87 incl.) 83.06 Total disbursements Balance On Hand as of September 9, 1970 $23946.11 4009.92 $19936.19 Funds General Fund (Bank statement of Sept,9,1970)$ 653*05 Savings Fund ( Interest to 6/30/70) 19266,20 Petty Cash Fund 16.94 Total Funds (*) $19936.19 Assets as _of_ Sept.9, 1970 Total Funds as listed above Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage on Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal value) Total Assets Liabilities - (Accts payable as of 9/9/70 $19936.19 5^80 9.10 1.00 $19952,09 none Net Worth $19952.09 (*) $1500.00 transferred to General Fund on July 23, 1970 Respectfully submitted. H.E. Sunbury, Assistant Treasurer Minutes - AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE October 8, 1970 - The HILTON INN, Uilliamsburg, Va. In attendance: H.M. Willingham, Chairman ------ - Uniroyal,Inc. J. P. Wronski ----------------- -- Raybestos-ilanhattan, Inc. G.E. Houghton ------------------- -- Garlock Inc. R.D, Hindmarch ------------------ -- Johns-Manville Corp. M.J. Cowan ----------------------- __ ' " K.A. Roberts --------------------- __ i* it n D.E. Childers -------------------- -- II.K. Porter Co., Inc. H.II. Walter ........................... -- American Asb. Textile Cp. George Griswold,Jr., ---- -- Nicotex,Inc. K. Uchida ----------------------- -- -- Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd, W.M. Deckman----------------------- Turner Bros,Asbestos Co.LTD 1. Membrane-Filter Method for Doteraining Asbestos Dust Concentration The members of the committee appointed D.E. Childers, R.D. Hindmarch* and J.P. Uronski . to prepare an instruction booklet for determin ing dust concentration by the membrane-filter method. It was agreed that the booklet should be prepared as follows: a. The format would be basically the same as the instruction booklet issued by the Asbestos Textile Institute under date of October 1963 entitled "Method for Determining Asbestos Dust Concentration1'. b. A draft would be prepared using the best procedures of those member companies already using this method. c. The final draft would be submitted to management of the member companies for approval. d. After their approval, the U3PHS will be requested to make recommendations or suggestions before submission to the Board of Governors. The final draft will be submitted to the Board of Governors for approval at the February 1971 meeting. 2. Round Robin on Membrane-Filter Method; A report on the RoundRobin, comparing technique and reliability of the membrane- filter method was made by participating coiapanies. It v;as reported that there was little if any correlation of results between companies. There was also a sigiifleant difference in results between observers. It was reported that the specimens were in poor condition after having passed from one company to one or more others. 3. Manufacturing Procedure for Dust Control; All member companies contributed information as to their system and ideas as to the various means for dust control in the plant. It was agreed that each company would present a more detailed outline of their dust control system at the February 1971 meeting. Respectfully submitted, H.Ii. Willingham Chairman Ilinutes of the TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 8, 1970 - The HILTON INN - Williamsburg, Va. In attendance: I. Barnett --- Johns-Manville Corporation I.W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. P.J. Smith - - A.S.T.M. (Sec'y, Comm. D-13) S.G. Dixit - - Garlock Inc. ilinutes : A Joint meeting of the Technical and Fiber Testing Committees was held on October 8, 1970. Messers E.A. Farrell, and W.H. Smith from the Fiber Testing Committee and P.J. Smith from ASTM were present. The following topics were discussed: 1. Magnetic Rating (HR) Specification ASTM D-1118-57 a. Answers to the following questions will be sought before the next meeting: (i) Whether the average MR or maximum MR is acceptable. If the average MR is acceptable then what is the tolerable range? (ii) Is double normal sampling acceptable.? (iii) Should each reading be reported and whether it is necessary to do so. b. In view of the two types of instruments - namely, Mapes and Turner & Newall - and since the old ASTM D-1118 -57 is written around Mapes, it was decided to ask for a new ASTM number to be assigned to the new standard which is based on Turner and Newall instrument. A footnote will be attached for the old one for those who may still want to refer to it. Data showing correlation between the two will be kept in ASTM files. 2. Special meeting of Technical and Fiber Testing Committees* A special meeting has been scheduled for December 9, 1970 with the objective of completing the MR specification work. This meeting will be held at the International Hotel, located at J.F.K. International Airport, Jamaica,N.Y., starting at 9:30 A.M. 3* ASTM P-1573-61 on Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles U.S. Army Laboratories in Natick, Mass., have conveyed their inability to carry out testing. The D/right-p'atterson Air Force Base has not replied to our inquiry. So far only one Laboratory has agreed to do the testing as specified in ASTM D-1573-&1* Respectfully submitted. Sudhakar G. Dixit Chairman Hinutes Asbestos Advisory Committee Asbestos Textile Institute October 8, 1970 - The HILTON INN - Williamsburg, Va. The Asbestos Advisory Committee met on October 8, 1970 with representatives of six member companies in attendance. The members of the committee spent most of the time in attempting to speed the process of finalizing the copy for brochure concerning health hazards involving usage of asbestos textiles. It was re emphasized that the brochure would be non-technical in nature and should explain to end users that asbestos textiles can be handled safely as long as proper precautions are established. It was agreed that the initial draft would be edited and a conference arranged with the Chairman of the Environmental Study Committee by November 15. We needed his expertise in the preparation of this type pamphlet and his professional advice that we did not publish any inaccurate information. Also on the agenda was a suggestion that Mr. Morris of Uniroyal and Mr. Scowcroft of R/M would make a call at the Navy Department in Washington,D.C,, to determine the current status of the use of asbestos cloth on Naval vessels Mr. Haven Roosevelt contributed to a discussion on ways that we could publicize the contribution of asbestos to the general welfare of society rather than continually adopting a defensive attitude. The Chairman of the Committee announced that i-Ir. 2.A. Morris had been appointed the new Chairman, effective immediately, and he thanked the members of the Committee for their advice and cooperation during the three years he headed the group. Respectfully submitted. M.Q. Scowcroft Chairman FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute October 8, 1970 - The HILTON INN, Williamsburg, Va. In attendance; (Joint meeting Fiber Testing and Technical Committees] S.G, Dixit------------- Garlock Inc. P.J, Smith -----------Secretary ASTIi Committee D-13 J.17. Hawkins---------Raybestos-aanhattan, Inc. Walter H. Smith -- Bell Asbestos nines Limited J.P. Wronski ----- Raybestos-aanhattan,Inc, E.A. Farrell --------- Lake Asbestos of Quebec Ltd. D.E, Childers ------ H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Minutes Some members of the Fiber Testing Committee sat with the Technical Committee to help with writing the procedure for Magnetic Rating. A number of difficulties were encountered, method of sampling,etc. It was concluded that an additional (special) meeting would be held December 9, 1970 to resolve these problems before the Feuruary meeting. The Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee asked the aid of D.E. Childers to serve on a special group to discuss methods of counting air-borne dust and fibers. All members were using a version of the Membrane-Filter Method. We found little disagreement. Ralph Hindmarch agreed to write a tentative method for presentation at the next meeting. Respectfully submitted. D.E. Childers Chairman, Fiber Testing Committee Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute -JUN 101971 asbestos textile institute Minutes - GENERAL MEETING - June 10, 1971 Page -1- The CHERRY HILL INN, Cherry Hill, N.J. In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. G.M. Armstrong J.W. Christenbury C.O. Hodges Wm. Maaskant H.H. Walter GARLOCK INC. W.P. Brainerd S.G. Dixit ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED G.P.A. Brink P.E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS HINES LIMITED C.H. Schoch Walter H. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP.,LTD. R.A. Kuntze JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP. Barnett N.D. Brovin W.S. Hough (Retired) K.A. Roberts NICOLET INDUSTRIES,INC. Geo. Griswold,Jr. Wm. Keene J.K. Whittaker H.K. PORTER COMPANY,INC. E.C. Bratt D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd L.E. Moody LAKE ASBESTOS OP QUEBEC.LTD. E.A. Farrell C.E. Stiefken NIPPON ASBESTOS CO..LTD. Y.Sato UNIROYAL,INC. D.T. Austin, Jfr. E.A. Morris W.C. Hitchcock ASTM P.0. Nicodemus A.G. Scroggie P.J. Smith RAYBESTOS -MANHATTAN, INC. M.Q. Scowcroft E.P. Stefl I.H. Weaver GUESTS CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) Mrs. D.M. Pagan, Editor, AS3EST0S Magazine Mr. C.J. Stover, Publisher, ASBESTOS Magazine Guest Speaker on Wednesday evening was iir. Wm.P. Raines, Director of Public Relations for Johns-Manville Corp. Mr.Raines i3 Secretary of the new Asbestos Information Association/North America. A guest at the ATI Dinner on Wednesday evening was Mr.Robert Cowdrick, Supt.of Safety at the Bethlehem Steel Plant in Bethlehem, Pa. Present on Wednesday evening also were:- J.L. Rainey, President of American Asbestos Textile Corp., and C.L. Sheckler, Manager,Accident Prevention & Health Administration, Johns-Manville Corp. (continued) Minutes - ATI General Meeting - continued:- Page -2 1. President Moody called the meeting to order at 2:05 P.M. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion by Hr.K.A, Roberts, seconded by Mr. P.E. Leclerc, it was voted to omit reading same. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Mr.U.F. Brainerd on behalf of Treasurer Kuzm.uk, who was unable to be present for business rea sons. Mr.Roberts moved the report be accepted, motion seconded by Mr.S.G. Dixit, and so voted unanimously. The Report is attached. 4. In the report of Legal Counsel, Hr. Roosevelt interpreted the remarks of Assistant Attorney General McLaren in an address made on April 1, 1971. In summary, Mr. Roosevelt said that Mr.McLaren stated that, in efforts to improve our environment, industries should not employ joint efforts but should act individually unless there was a strong showing by the proponents that a collective approach and the exchange of research and feasibility information would yield substantial net gains. To quote Mr. McLaren: "This nation's economic policy favors the competitive rather than the joint industry approach". The Environmental Protection Agency was advised to evaluate the need for joint industry meetings before * in such in order to avoid a possible slowing down of efforts to obtain a cleaner environment which slowing down might, result from such joint efforts.( The word "participating"to be inserted here.) Mr. Roosevelt pointed out that the anti-trust rule is, and has been, that the actual or likely effect of a partic ular program determines whether participants will be sued or not sued by the Government. Judgement is based on whether.such actions result in some significant adverse effect. Any industry solutions to air pollution problems developed through the Asbestos Textile Inst, must be shared with all industry members, whether members of the Institute or not. Finally, Mr.Roosevelt advised that, in any discuss ion, the subject of costs be avoided. 5. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. E.A. Farrell, Sales Manager for Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd., who said:- "The demand for spinning fibre is strong, but the current supply is in balance. It is expected the supply will remain adequate. Fibre Groups 4#5 and 6 are in strong demand and supplies are tight. Group 7 is in good supply in spite of the fact that Flintkote Mines have announced they will shut down on December 13, 1971. Economic conditions around the world are in a state of flux as usual. Italy is in particularly bad shape with building sector off $C$>. Fiat has laid off 20/j of their employees and there are sporadic industrial and service strikes. The UK and German economies have slowed down, while France is doing well.# Japan has slowed down con siderably - from a growth rate of 15-1Q% to High labor costs have now caught up with Japan and they are now having some of thoir manufacturing done in lower cost areas, such as Korea and Taiwan. (continued) Minutes - General Meeting - continued:- Page -3 The market for asbestos fibre continues to grow at about 5# per year and production is now keeping up. In Canada alone there are five new properties under exploration, namely ABITI3I Property near AMOS, Quebec ASCOPS SX. LTD... VALDOR, Quebec (Adjacent to Abitibi) CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORF.LTD.and XUTCHO Creek Co. - joint property McADAMS Co. - Property at Chibougamau, Quebec GOLDEN GATE EX'S REX Property at Haines Junction,Yukon Territory. There are also twelve other countries where asbestos is under explor ation:- Greece, Brazil, Australia, New South Males, Columbia, Med ellin, Argentina, Bolivia, Mexico, Oaxaca, Ciudad, Victoria, Cypress Swaziland, Turkey, Union of South Africa, and Sardinia. As a matter of interest, Mr. Farrell gave the figures for consump tion of Canadian Spinning Fibres in the year 1967:- Country ^ Short tons (1967) U.S.A. United Kingdom V/. Germany France Japan Italy India Others . hS f 18 7 6.5 6 5 3 9.5 100.0# 16, 800 6, 600 2, 700 2, I4.OO 2, 200 1, 900 1, 200 3, 500 37, 300 6. At this point in the meeting President Moody expressed his pleas ure, and that of the Institute, in having the following persons at this meeting:- Dr. E.P. Stefl, Exec. Vice President, Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Mr. E.C. Bratt, Gen.Mgr.,Thermoid Div.,H.K. Porter Company,Inc. Mr. Y. Sato, representing Nippon Asbestos Co., Tokyo, Japan Mrs. D.M. Fagan, Editor, ASBESTOS MAGAZINE Mr. C.J. Stover, Publisher, ASBESTOS MAGAZINE Dr. A.G. Scroggie, ASTM Editorial Committee C-6 Mr. P.J. Smith, Secretary, ASTM Committee D-13 Hr. P.0. Nicodemus, Chairman, ASTM SC.A-I4. of D-13 Hr. V/.S. Hough (Retired) Mr.Hough was President of A.T.I. in 1961-1962, and Chairman of A.T.I. Sales Promotion Committee in the years 1966 and 1967. 7. President Moody congratulated Mrs.D.M. (Doris) Fagan on her election as President of The Philadelphia Club of Advertising Women for the year 1971-1972. Mrs. Fagan was installed as President at the 56th Annual Installation Dinner of the Club held on June 8,1971. Mrs. Fagan expressed her appreciation at being invited to our A.T.I. meeting, and said she was active in the Philadelphia Club of Ad-- vertisingUomen because she believes in advertising. Asked members to (Continued.) Minutes - General Meeting - continued:- Page -1+- send in news or other items of interest to help make the ASBESTOS Magazine even better. Has had a good response to the current series of articles by J.A. Bettes,Jr.,on the "History of the Asbestos Textile Industry in the U.S.A." and would like all those desiring reprints of same to get their orders in promptly. 8. Mr. VMS. Hough, president of A.T.I. in 1961-1962, and SecretaryTreasurer of the Fluid Sealing Association 1968-1970, said that in retrospect he now could realize more fully how very important a trade association is to an industry in view of the many problems that were of common interest. 9. The Committee Reports were given by the respective chairmen Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - H.H.Walter Acting Chairman) Technical Committee - S.G. Dixit, Chairman Asbestos Advisory Committee - E.A. Morris, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - D.E. Childers, Chairman Their reports are attached to these minutes. 10. Mr. C.L. Sheckler, Chairman of our Environmental Health Committee, who was unable to attend this meeting due to another engagement, gave the members a report following the ATI Dinner the previous evening. Mr. Sheckler discussed various aspects of the new Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, that became effective last April 28th. He recommended that members obtain copies of the following Safety and Health Standards issued by the Dept, of Labor. Presumably these can be ordered from the Government Printing Office in Washington,D.C. Federal Register - Volume 3l+ Humber 1 Federal Register - Volume 36, numbers 1-62,81+, 75* 91,10$ At the conclusion of his report Mr. Sheckler introduced Mr. Wm.P. Raines, who is Secretary of the newly organized Asbestos In formation Association/North America, 201 East i+2nd St.,Hew York,N.Y. (Zip)10017, c/o Hill & Knowlton,Inc. Mr. Raines discussed the objectives of the AIA/NA, and it is hoped that this positive step by the Asbestos Industry to meet the increasing need for a competent, reliable source of accurate information on the effects of asbestos dust on human health (or lack of effects) will provide an author itative channel of communication, publicly rebut irresponsible and inaccurate criticism, and publicize the many indispensable uses of asbestos in our highly technological society. 11. President Moody announced that MAHUFACTURAS MULTIPLES S.A. of CARACAS, VENEZUELA had become an Associate Member of the Institute since our last meeting, and expressed his pleasure and that of the Institute in welcoming this fine company to membership. (continued) Minutes - ATI General Meeting - continued: Page -5- 12. President Moody,commented on the two new pieces of literature now available from the Institute:- (a) Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Fabricating Asbestos Textile Products and (b) Measurement of Airborne Asbestos Fiber by the Membrane Filter Method. He thanked all those who had participated in bringing these two projects to a successful conclusion. 13* Locations for future meetings were announced:- October 6-8, 1971 - Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah,Ga. February 2-3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston,3.C. June 7-8, 1972 - Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Washington,D.C.(Tentative) The October meeting is our Annual Meeting to which company officials and their wives, also members' wives, are specially invited. The meeting schedule in October will suggest arrival on Wednesday afbernoon if possible, the committee meetings will be on Thursday morning, and the General Meeting on Friday morning followed by a Reception and ATI Luncheon. We want this to be our Biggest and Best Annual Meeting, and urge all members and their wives to be there! ll|.. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 3:05 P.M, Respectfully submitted. ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds May 10. 1971 Balance On Hand at last report (Jan,11,1971) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund Total On Hand Receipts To Reserve Fund (Interest to 4/1/71) To General Fund (Book Sales) To General Fund (1971 dues) , $ 1321.21 14992.49 22.32 187.24 38^52 7333*33 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Reteinert 6 mos ending 3/31/71) $2964.00 Legal Expenses( 6 mos " 3/31/71) 290.38 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos) 948.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (1st Qtr 1971) 78.00 Secretary's travel.expense 157.00 Office rent ( 4 mos) 3C0.00 A.T I. meeting expense (Feb.3-4#1971) 500.62 Printing and Office Supplies 40.16 Telephone ( 4 mos) 145*39 Dues & Subscriptions(D-13 & Asb.Mag.) 19.00 Flowers 52.79 Seminar fee (To be returned) 50.00 Petty Cash Vouchers 503-528 inclusive 72.75 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand as of May 10, 1971 Funds General Fund (Bank statement of 5/10/71) $ 3070.04 Reserve Fund (with interest to 4/1/71) 15179.73 Petty Cash Fund 27.25 Total Funds Assets as of May 10.1971 Total Funds as listed above Acots Receivable (1971 Dues) Aects " (Book sales) Postage On Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) $18277*02 400.00 10.60 9.11 1.00 Total Assets Liabilities Accounts Payable as of May 10,1971 Net Worth $16336.02 7559.09 $ 23895.11 5618.09 $18277.02 $18277.02 $18697.73 none $18697.73 Respectfully submitted, H.E. Sunbury Asst. Treasuri MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MANUFACTURING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 10, 1971 - CHERRY HILL INN, Cherry Hill, N.J. In attendance: H.H. Walter, Acting Chairman - American Asbestos Textile Corporation L.E. Moody H.K. Porter Company,Inc. D.T. Austin,Jr. - Uniroyal,Inc. K.A. Roberts - Johns-Manville Corp. I.H. Weaver - Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. C.O. Hodges - American Asbestos Textile Corp. G.M. Armstrong - American Asbestos Textile Corp. W.F. Brainerd - Garlock Inc. Guests: Y. Sato - Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. E.A. Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter: The committee recommends continued use of the B & L Counter for continuous monitoring to determine the cause of abnormal dust con centrations. The instrument will be transferred from the Raybestos plant at Iianheim,Pa. to the Garlock Inc. plant at Palmyra, N.Y. Occupational Safety & Health Administration Notice of Proposed Rule Making on Inspections, Citations, and proposed Assessments of Pen alties, dated April 30. 1971. was brought to the attention of the committee. This notice states in essence: 1. That Compliance Officers of the Dept, of Labor are authorized to enter without delay, and at reasonable times, any factory or plant. 2. That no advance notice shall be given with regard to inspection. 3. That the Compliance Officer may review any records and question any employee. I4.. That any employee shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult the Compliance Officer in private. 5. That any employee may request an inspection. 6. That every Employer upon receipt of a Citation shall post such notice on a bulletin board. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ACT of 1970 A thorough interpretation of this ACT was presented by Mr.L.E. Moody, All committee members reported that measures have been enacted, or are being enacted, to comply with the law. 1. Yearly X-Ray examinations of all employees are conducted by all member companies. In some states the the State Health Department provides for examination without cost. 2. Strict work rules and enforcement of same, continuous efforts to improve dust control measures, good communication between (Page 1 of 2 ) Minutes - Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - continued: Page -2- employer and employee, good record keeping as requested by the law, are essential to be in compliance with the law. Dust Control in the Manufacturing Process: Numerous ways and means of reducing dust were discussed: 1. Moisturizing of blends. 2. Wet carding being explored by some members at this time. 3. Wet spinning being explored. i. Wet. weaving being done by most members. 3>. Discontinuance of the use of compressed air for cleaning purpos being enforced by all member companies. 6. Use of vacuum cleaners or stationary vacuum systems for clean ing purposes is practiced by all member companies. 7. Improvement of house cleaning procedures. Wet sweeping. 8. Installation of impervious wall surfaces. 9. Use of polyethylene laminated burlap for wrapping. 10. Semi-automatic waste bagging. 11. Enclosed feed boxes in the blending operation. 12. Various types of card enclosures. Respirators: Various systems of respirator distribution were discussed. The use of disposable respirators is being explored by some member comp anies. Results are expected to br available at the next meeting. Noise Abatement: Efforts are being made by all member companies to reduce the noise level. Ear muffs or ear plugs fitted by a medical person are provided by most companies upon request of the employee, or wherever required due to an excessive noise level. Respectfully submitted, Hans H. Walter Acting Chairman MINUTES - ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 10, 1971 - CHERRY HILL INN, Cherry Hill, H.J. Minutes The Asbestos Advisory Committee met with five member companies in attendance, and one absentee. A most welcome guest was Mr. W.S. Hough, a former president of ATI (now retired). At our meeting we discussed the possibility of revising the present (3rd) edition of the Handbook of Asbestos Textiles, but after con siderable discussion it was decided that a revision at the present time would be premature, and that we should review this decision a year hence. The committee feels that the promulgation of its new folder entitled "Recommended Health Safety Practices for Handling and Fabricating Asbestos Textile Products" is a positive step forward, and we again want to thank all those who assisted in bringing this project to a successful conclusion. Each member company of the Institute should have its specified number of copies in hand by now, and additional copies may be obtained from the Institute. The committee members discussed several adverse articles regarding asbestos which appeared recently in Womans Wear Daily, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. Additional follow up stories have appeared in other periodicals. Unfortunately, these articles never delineate as to fiber type, quantity, length of exposure,etc. The reader is led to the conclusion that - "if it is asbestos .. it's bad." This situation is frustrating and perplexingl It was most encouraging to hear the talk by Mr.Wm.P.Raines, Secre tary of the newly organized "Asbestos Information Association of North America",yesterday evening. Here at last we have an organiza tion capable of carrying the story of the positive need for, and the truth about asbestos to the public! Accordingly, it is the recommendation of our Committee to immedi ately establish direct liaison with the A.I.A./N.A. in order that our efforts may be coordinated with their forward plans. It was the concensus of the Committee that the Secretary of A.T.I. should be responsible for liaison with the AIA/NA, and that should he require any assistance in this respect the Asbestos Advisory Committee stands ready to support him. Respectfully suomitted. E.A. Morris, Chairman Minutes FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 9-10, 1971 - CHERRY HILL IN1T, Cherry Hill,N.J. In attendance: D.E. Childers, Chm. - H.K,Porter Co,,Inc, G.F.A. Brink, Asbestos Corp, S,G. Dixit, Garlock Inc. C.E. Stiefken,Lake Asbestos I, Barnett, Johns-hanville Corp, Um.Keene,Nicolet Industries P.0. Nicodemus, General Electric Co. R.A. Kuntze,Cassiar Asb.Corp. Walter H. Smith, Bell Asbestos Mines Ltd. J. W. Echerd, H.K.Porter Co.,Inc. P.J. Smith, ASTM Wm.Maaskant,American Asb.Tex.Corp. Dr.A.G. Scroggie, ASTM Members of A.T.I. Technical Committee, A.T.I. Fiber Testing Committee, and Sub-committee A-Ij. of ASTM D-13, held a joint meeting. On the afternoon of June 9th, the chairman of the Fiber Testing Comm ittee reported to the Board of Governors a movement to revise the manual entitled " Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre1*. Mr. G.F.A. Brink, being familiar with a number of the necessary changes, was invited to express his views, and agreed that the manual needed revision, further, that his company would favor A.T.I. to be in charge of the project, same as was the case with the 1st and 2nd editions. It was the opinion of those present that it would be desir able for the A.T.I. to assume the leadership in revision of the man ual. The A.T.I. is currently seeking approval of the Q.A.il.A. and the A.C.P.A. who contributed to the former editions. Asstiming that all preliminaries are resolved, we hope to have copies of those changes which have already taken place in our hands by the next m't'g. Items discussed in the Joint Meetings!- (a) The 9th Draft of the specification for Magnetic Rating, ASTM D 1118-57, was reviewed in an effort to obtain final approval. Minor changes were made to im prove clarity. Mr.I.Barnett was asked to rewrite the section on Precision and Accuracy in accordance with ASTM's procedure. Test data will be analyzed by J/M's Statistical Department. (b) Mr.Nicodemus will contact the government in reference the specification Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles, ASTM D 1573-61, in an attempt to have it deleted due to the fact that there has been no reasonable degree of correlation between different laboratories. A letter ballot will be submitted to members for approval. (Voting m'b'rs', (c) In the proposed military specification for Thermal Insulation Tape, MIL-I-15314-90, a minor error in Table II of the proposed draft was noted, and the Custodian will be notified. It was suggested that the Board of Governors consider what action, if any, should be taken relative to the deletion of Amosite asbestos fibre as a filler. Respectfully submitted, D.E. Childers, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee Minutes TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 9-10, 1971 - The CHERRY HILL lira. Cherry Hill, N.J. In attendance : D.T. Austin, Jr..................................Uniroyal,Inc. I. Barnett ........................................ Johns- Manville Corp. S.G. Dixit (Chairman) ............... Garlock Inc. J.W. Echerd ...................................... H.K. Porter Company,Inc. to. Maaskant ................... American Asbestos Textile Corp. A joint meeting was held with the ATI Fiber Testing Committee, and present from that committee were Messers D.E. Childers (Chm.), G.F.A. Brink,Valter H.Smith, and C.E. Stiefken. Also present at the joint meeting were:- Dr.A.G. Scroggie, ASTM's Editorial Committee C~6, P.J Smith,Secretary ASTM D-13, P.0. Nicodomus,Chairman, ASTM Sc.A-Ll* Dr. R.A. Kuntze, Ontario Research Foundation, and Mr. to.Keene from Nicolet Industries,Inc. The following subjects were discussed (1) ASTM D 1118 - Magnetic Rating Standard The 9th draft of specification D 1118 was reviewed by the joint committee and final changes were made. The section on precision and accuracy is- being rewritten to conform to ASTM requirements,and even though the data on precision is not complete, it was decided to submit the standard to ASTM after making the necessary changes. (2) ASTM D 1073 - Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles In view of the difficulty in locating the right type of ovens to complete the round-robin test, and also because none of the member companies present are using this standard, it was unanimously agreed to drop this standard. Mr. P.0. Nicodemus, Chairman of ASTM D-13, Sub-committee A-4 has agreed to contact the Federal Agencies to inform them of our decision to withdraw ASTM D 1573. (3) MIL - I - 1^3490 - Insulation Tape, Thermal Reference to Amosite as felting or sliver in the core has been completely eliminated in the proposed specification. This subject will be discussed with the Board of Governors at the next meeting. Also, Table II, on Page 3 of HIL-I-15349C needs correction. The nominal weight for 5-1/2" x 7/8" tape is given as 11.60 lbs. per 25 ft. roll. This weight should be 10.60 lbs. as pointed out in our original comments. The Naval Ship Engineering Center will be advised of this error. Respectfully submitted, Sudhakar G. Dixit Chairman Oc\b Wy % v < '* l) 3 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE liinutes * General Meeting - October 8, The Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah, Ga. In- attendance; AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. G.H. Armstrong J.W. Christenbury G.S. Fabel Ha. MaaBkant J.L. Rainey H.H. Halters CAP.LOCK INC. S.G. Dixit Alex. Kuzmuk UNIROYAL. INC, D.T. Austin.Jr. B.E. Carden L.F. Fieringer R.C. Hunt E.A. Morris S.J. Peole,Jr. F.C. Phillips ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED . P.E. Led ere JOHNS-KANVILLE CORP. N.D. Broun ' K.S. Lindstrom K.A. Roberts C.L. Sheckler N.W. Hendry (Canadian J/M Co.) NICOLET INDUSTRIES. INC. Geo. Griswold,Jr. E.H. Russell H.K. Porter Company. Inc. E.C. Bratt D.E. Childers J.H. Feherd J.L. Mitchell RAY3FSTOS-MANHATTAN. INC. J.A. Bettes,Jr. (Retired) J.U. Hawkins K.W. Oliver M.Q. Scoucroft E.P. Stefl . BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Marcel Dorais Wniter H. Smith Wn. J.U. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP.. LTD. R.A. Kuntze .> . LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC. LTD. E.A. Farrell C.E. Stiefken KANUFACTURAS MULTIPLES S.A. Rafael E. Arnal NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.. LTD. Y. Sato CAENALADER .WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) Note: Total attendance at the Oct. 6-Sth meeting vas 65 persons, uhich included 23 uives and 42 tuenl ' ***** Minutes ***** 1. Vice President M.Q. Scoucroft called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M and explained that he was substituting for President Moody whose illness prevented his attendance at this meeting. J _>L ) Minutes - General Meeting - October E, 1971 ' Page -2 2. Introductions: - Each person vas asked to stand and give his name and company affiliation. 3. The minutes of the last meeting were offered for reading. On motion by Mr. Geo. Griswold, seconder' by Mr. H.C. Roosevelt, it was voted to omit the reading of same. 4. The Financial Report vas presented by Treasurer Kuzmuk, who stated Chat the Annual Audit of the Institute's books had been made as of n September 9, lv71 under the supervision of Mr. R.E. Jeffery, Controller, Garlock Inc. and found to be in order. Mr. K.A. Roberts moved that the report be accepted, seconded by Mr. S.J. Peele,Jr., and so voted unanimously. The Report is attached. 5* In his legal Counsel Report, Attorney Roosevelt discussed the economic freeze now in effect by Presidential order, and the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970 which authorized same. The full resume of his remarks is attached to these minutes. ' 6. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. N.V. Hendry, General Sales Manager, Canadian Johna-Manville Asbestos Limited. This is a regular feature of a General Meeting and we are indebted to Mr. Hendry for his comprehensive review of the world situation regarding production of asbestos fibre and the overall market. A resume' of his remarks Is attached. * 7. Chairman Scowcroft announced that the Board of Governors had elected officers for the coming year: - . President - L.E. Moody of H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Vice President - M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybeatos-Manhattan,Inc. Treasurer - Alex. Kuzouk of Garloek Inc. Exec. See'y - H.E. Sunbury C. Hew committee chairmen: Mr. Scowcroft announced that Mr. K.A. Roberta of Johns-Manville Corp. had been appointed chairman of the Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee; and Mr. J.W. Echerd of H.K. Porter Company, Inc. as chairman of the Technical Committee. Deferred temporarily was the appointment of a new chairman for the Fiber ' Testing Committee. 9. New Edition - Fibre Test Manual: - Mr. Scowcroft said that the QAMA had approved a Third Edition of. the manual entitled: "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre" to be sponsored by the Asbestos Textile Institute, Asbestos Cement Products Assoc, and the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. Preparation of the new edition to be under the supervision of the ATI Fiber Testing Committee. 10. Pending Legislative Developments: - Mr. C.L. ShecUler, Manager, Accident Prevention and Health Administration, Johns-1'anvills Corp., reviewed recent developments under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and activity related to the Environmental Pro tection Agency (EPA). During his informative talk, Mr. Sheckler (/) ht J MINUTES - GENERAL DIETING - CONTINUED Page -3 '^ mentioned chat it was presently uncertain what agency would establish a standard TLV (Threshold Llx.it Value) for asbestos. He Is very ap prehensive that an Impossibly low TLV will be adopted and so wake it impossible for asbestos manufacturers to stay in business if It is to be enforced. In respect to OSHA, confusion exists how to advise employees of standards, what records to keep, etc. Stressed the need for background data from Industry to use in fighting back against adverse publicity directed at asbestos-containing products. 11. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: - Air Hygiene & Kfg. Committee - K.A. Roberts (Acting Chairman) Asbestos Advisory Committee - E.A. Morris, Chairman Technical Committee - S,G. Dixit, Chairman Fiber Testing Conulttee - D.E. Childers, Chairman Their reports are attached to these minutes* Certificates of Appreciation were presented to retiring chairmen S.G. Dixit and D.E. Childers by Vice President Scowcroft who thanked them for their valued contribution to the work of the Institute during the past two years. 12. Chairman Scowcroft said that we were very proud to hqve four former presidents of ATI in attendance at this meeting, namely: - * Geo. S. Fab el - 1943 - 1,'50 John A, Dettes, Jr. - 1957 - 195U . Staton J. Peele, Jr. - 1363 - 1364 John L. Rainey - 19(7 - l.Jol All of these men expressed theiT pleasure in attending, and their gratification to know that ATI continued to be an important factor in our industry. "Jack'' Bettes, author of "The History of the Asbestos Textile Industry in the United States," now appearing serially in the ASBESTOS Magazine, expressed his appreciation for the historical cata supplied to him by many people (approx. 100) without whose help he woul*' have been unable to compile as complete a history. He spo'e most highly of the ASBESTOS Magazine, am recommended that It be given company advertising on a continuing basis in appreciation of the fact that it is the only media devotee; to the asbestos industry, and its files are a valuable store house of information pertaining to our industry. The magazine will have Reprints of "History" if orders warrant, anc! suggests orders be sent them promptly (he receives no profit from same). 13. Mr. E.A. Morris moved that Hr. John A. Bettes, Jr. be made "OFFICIAL HISTORIAN OF THE ASBESTOS TEXTILE IHPUSTRY" by acclamation, and this was done by a rounc. of applause am a standing ovation! : 'v.) liinutes - General Meeting - continued:- ) Page -1; ZL1|. Chairman Scowcroft expressed our pleasure in having a repre sentative of our newest member, MANUFACTURAS MULTIPLES S.A., Caracas, 'Venezuela, in attendance, and welcomed Hr. Rafael E. Arnal on behalf of all those present. 15. Loca'tions for future meetings were announced:- February 2-3, 1972 - The Mills-Hyatt House, Charleston, S.C. June 7-8, 1972 - Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Washington,D.C. 16. There being no further business to come before this meeting it was moved by ilr.K.i. Roberts, seconded by Kr. 3.A. Morris, that It be adjourned. So voted. Respectfully submitted. y [) ' . ~) 'ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE - Roport of Funda September 9 1971 Balance on Hand at last report (May 10,1971) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 3070.04 15179.73 27.25 Total On Hand Receipts To Reserve Fund (Interest to 6/30/71) $109.73 To General Fund (Book sales) 72*20 To General Fund (1971 dues) 400.00 To General Fund (Reimbursement) 50.00 Total received Total On Hand and Received Pi sburs ementa Legal Retainer ( 3 mos. ending 6/30/71) $ 878.00 Legal Expenses ( 3 mos ending 6/30/71) 59.99 Secretary's salary ( 4mos.) 948.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr 1971 ) 78.00 Secretary's travel expense (June ATI atg.) 50.00 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 A.T.I, meeting expense (June 9-10,1971) . 929.73 Printing & Office Supplies 92.64 Telephone ( 4 aos.) 167.24 Membrane Filter Instruction Booklet (1 M) 487.27 Health Safety Practices Folder ( 25 M) 1247.40' Insurance ( Workman's Comp.) 18.00 Petty Cash ( Vouchers 529 - 550 inclusive) 103.18 Total Disbursements ------ Balance On Hand as of September 9, 1971 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement of 9/9/71 ) Reserve Fund (With interest to 6/30/71 ) Petty Cash Fund Total Funds $ 788.54 12769.4o (*) 91.50 ' Assets as of September 9. 1971 Total Funds as listed above Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage On Iland Furniture -i Equipment (Nominalvalue) Total Assets Liabilities Accounts Payable as of 9/9/71 $13849.50 22.66 11.67 1.00 Net Worth $18277.02 711.93 $18988.95 5339.45 $13849.50 $13649.50 $13684.85 none $13684.85 (-*) $2600.00 transferred to General Fund on July 2,1971 Respectfully submitted, ''fcVE.'* Sun0ury - Asst. Treasurer^ uJ BEKARKS OF COUNSEL Page -1 Asbestos Textile Institute - General Meeting - October C, 1.71 The legal authority by which the President was able to put the economic freeze into effect is Public Law 91-379, as amendec-- the Economic Stabilization Act of 1370--uhcreby "the President is authorized to issue such orcers ant regulations as he cay :eeo. ap propriate to stabilize prices, rents, wages, anc salaries at levels not less than those prevailing on May 25, 1970." This is a limitation Imposed* by Congress anu means, simply, that regardless of what occurred prior to the freeze during tbe base period, prices are not required to be set at less than what they were on May 25, 1370. The level of prices prevailing on May 25, l':70, is rieteruined as follows: (1) the average (mean) price at which transactions were made on that day (as borne out by appropriate records); . (2) if no actual transactions took place on that day, then the average (mean) price at which transactions took place on the nearest day prior to May 25, 1970 may be taken es the "prevailing price level for May 25, 1970"; and (3) ceiling prices for goods not in existence on May 25, 1970 can only be calculated using the base period described in the Guide lines. , a A second limitation imposed unoer the Congressional grant of authority is that the President's authority to issue and enforce orders and regulations under the Economic Stabilization Act expires April 30, 1972. The President cannot continue the freeze beyond that date with out additional legislation enacted by Congress. If one is dealing in the American market, how then does one determine the price he cay charge? Under the. President's Executive Order, prices are stabilized "at levels not greater than the highest of those pertaining to a substantial volume of actual transactions" during the base period of July 1C to August 14, 1971. In cases where no transactions occurred in the 30-day base period, the base period, will be the nearest preceding 30-nay period in which a transaction eld: occur. A "30-day period" is cefined as a 30-cay block of time prior to July 16. Hence, moving back from July 1C, the nearest 30-day period would be June 1C-15, and preceding that, May 17-June 15, and so on. The ceiling price is the price at or above which ten per cent of the actual transactions during the base period uere mace, except that in cases of increases in postec or effective prices during the base period, the base period itself will be considered to have begun at the time of the increase in posted and effective prices. A transaction takes place uhen a seller ships the product to a buyer, not when an order is received. Each ca.imo(!ity is treated separately and, if shipments are i.ar<e to different classes of purchasers uncer different terms, separate ceilings arc calculated for each coumocity for each class of purchaser. ) REiARKS OF COUNSEL - COOTIHUED Page -2- The ceiling price is based on the recoitl of all the units of each com modity shipper! to each class of purchaser during the base period, anu is calculated as the highest price at or above uhich ten per cent of thd units uere shipped to a particular class of purchaser curing the base period. Under the terms of the Executive Order, the price freeze ap plies to the seller, not the buyer. The buyer is not required to police a seller's compliance with the Executive Order. But records must be >.ept of the highest prices charged during the base period, and r.ust be available for public inspection. If a product or service is "new", the ceiling price is deter mined by the seller applying the percentage Liark-up he received during the base period on the most nearly similar product or service to the direct unit or net invoice cost of the neu product or service. The ceiling price for a product or service that is new to the seller, but not to the mar':et, is the price realized on the 6ame or comparable product or service by the most nearly comparable competitor during the base period. He turn now to two specific problem areas: discounts and long term contracts. What is the selling price for a material if there have been dual price situations, i.e., a published price and a dis counted price at uhich actual transactions were made? The answer is that sales may be made at the highest price at uhich a substantial volume of actual transactions uere made during the 30-day period of time ending August 14. If products have been selling at a discounted price and not at the published price during the base period, the maximum price would be the highest discounted price at which substantial trans actions uere a.ade. Thus, assuming that during the base period bags of insulation were selling at the li3t price, and also at a discount of six sixes, if a substantial number of transactions uere made at the list price, then the list price, ant: anything below the list price could be charged, including a discount of four sixes, because the price freeze does not fix prices at their highest permissible level -- it prohibits sales at a price higher than the permissible level. Houever, if all sales during the base period uere made at the discounted price of six sixes and there uere not in fact substantial actual transactions at a higher price, then the price would have to be frozen at the six sixes discounted price, and it would not be permissible to decrease the dis count to four sixes, as that would raise the price over the highest level during, the base period. Where different prices are offered to different territories, or different :inds of customers, price ceilings are to be set on the basis of the nortal procedures used in establishing the market prices. Mar'cct price ceilings must be established at no greater than the highest price at uhich substantial volume transactions were carried out in the firm's individual normal pricing areas, regardless of uhether these pricing areas are national, regional, or individual. O j REMAR1CS OF COUNSEL - CONTINUED Page -3- If quantity discounts are offered, can a'custocoer who purchased large volumes and was previously eligible for the discount be charged the applicable higher price if he reduces the amount of his purchases and thus falls into a lower quantity and higher price bracket? In other words, may prices be changed so long as the rate structure on which they are based is not changed? The answer is yes. During the 90-day freeze, customers may be charged in accordance with rate of price schedules established in the base period prior to August 15, 1971. However, the charges applicable to the various categories of rates or prices set out in the effective schedules may not be increased. Further more, if it has been the practice to give discounts under certain cir cumstances, these discounts cannot be discontinued during the freeze. The rule with respect to long-term contracts is that if the contract was made before the freeze, and there are no deliveries - scheduled until after the freeze, the freeze does not apply. If any deliveries are to be made during the freeze period, the seller may* charge no more than his ceiling price determined by the price charged for deliveries made during the base period. If the shipment price on a contract made prior to the freeze and calling for delivery during the freeze is above the ceiling price, the seller may elect not to perform at all, but he is not permitted to perform at a contract price above the celling price. Nor may he force the buyer to accept ship ment deferred to a date after the freeze. If the seller does make delivery, the buyer is obligated to pay no core than the ceiling'prlce. Haven C. Roosevelt, Atty. Cadualader, Wicicershaa & Taft J ASfeESTfOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE PRESENTATION BY . VI. HENDRY FRIDAY. OCTOBER STH. 1971 Shipments of Canadian asbestos fibre for the first seven months of 1971 were .'lJ2,C(.4 tons or 3.3Z higher than for the same period in 1970. The availability of all grades of spinning fihre is good ant. this situ ation can be expected to continue for some time in the future. The application of the U.S. surcharge does not apply to asbestos fibret but indirectly the surcharge will affect sales of asbestos fibre to such countries as Japan and West Germany. Prior to the application of the surcharge some weakness in demand was evident in many of the Inter national markets. / World production of asbestos fibre in 1/70 was 3,C22,C40 tons versus 3,(3C',250 tons in lvGJ or an increase of approximately 5%. The problems related to asbestos and health are of continuing concern to the asbestos fibre producers. It is unfortunate indeed that the press representatives continue to ta .e statements out of context and to be r.iore interested in sensationalism rather than facts. * m Finally, the following comments are pertinent to the status of some new asbestos producers, viz: a) The new producer in Australia is forecast to be in production in early i;72 at a rate of 75,030 tons per year. b) The asbestos producer in Brazil, located north of Brasilia, is ex pected to be Increased from 13,000 to 27,000 tons. c) The Colombian asbestos fibre prospect could reach the production stage at a rate of approximately 25,000 tons per year. d) WorU is being continued to develop an asbestos producer in Central Colombia. If financing can be arranged the production rate is ex pected to be 25,000 tons annually, e) Wor : is being continued by Cerro Corporation toward the evaluation of an asbestos deposit in Central Greece. N. W. Hendry General Sales Manager Canadian Johns-Manvllle Asbestos Limited OJ AIR HYGIENE & MFG. COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Page -1- October 7, 1971 - Savannah Inn ; Country Club, Savannah,Ga. In attendance: K. A. Roberts - Johns-Hanville Corp. (Acting chairman) C.L. Sheckler - 11 " " (Chm. Environmental Health Comm.) G. il. Armstrong - American Asbestos Textile Corp. J.L. Rainey - " " "" H. H. Valter - " * "" L. F. Bieringer - Uniroyal, Inc. B.E. Carden - " " R.C. Hunt - ii n J.L. Mitchell - H.X. Porter Company,Inc E.C. Bratt - " M" E.A, Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. - Rafael E. Arnal - Manufactures Multiples S.A. (Caracas, Venezuela) . Sato - Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. (USA representative) ttiHKK* Minutes <hhkk> This meeting was, in part, held as a joint committee meeting with the Environmental Health Committee. The meeting was opened with a brief review of some of the environmental protection equipment being used by some of our members. * . Mr.J.L. Rainey presented a paper entitled "Moist Spinning Process" written by Mr. J.W. Weber, Chairman of the Board, American Asbestos Textile Corporation. Hr. Rainey discussed the data in the paper which indicates that a stronger, more dust free yarn is obtained when moisture, in the form of water or an emulsion, is applied at the rub apron of the carding machine. While the process was developed prim arily for the purpose of reducing the atmospheric dust count on the delivery end of the carding machines (where the greater part of the card-tenders time is spent) it has been found that other advantages result in subsequent operations as explained in Mr, Weber's paper which is included with these minutes. Committee members were most appreciative of Mr. Webers cooperation in supplying the results of his extensive experimental development work for the benefit of our industry.) Members desiring further information on this process may write direct to ilr. J.W.Weber, American Asbestos Textile Corporation, P.0. Box 220, Norristown,Pa. 194-01; (USA). Considerable time was soont in reviewing the Occupational Safety fis Health Act (OSKA) and the anticipated Emission Standards for asbestos soon to be established by the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. Sheckler urre<2 that the ATI member companies undertake to collect industry plant data and employee data that would be helpful to AIA/NA in testifying before sub-committee hearings in ;ashington,L.C.. At the present time our industry, as such, lacks the facts to refute or challenge statements 'so adverse to asbestos that have received such wide publicity in the last several years. It was therefore the joint recommendation of the Air Hygiene C: jifg. and the Environmental Health Committees that the Institute establish a program to obtain .' 0 -J IIrmtes - Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - continued:- Page -2- meaningful data for use in guiding national standards. It was sug gested that a start could be made by contacting Dr. Lewis J. Cralley, formerly in charge of Division of Epidemiology & Special Services, USPHS, Dept, of HEW, under whose supervision in-plant surveys of asbestos plants and employees were made by Federal authorities over a period of many years. Dr. Cralley is presently employed as a consultant to Harcus Key,11.D., Head of the National Institute of Occupational Safety ti Health. It is hoped that the data now in the Dept, of HEW files can be released for possible benefit to the asbestos textile industry. Following the meeting, arrangements Mere made to ship the ATI's Bausch i: Lowb Dust Counter to the American Asbestos Textile Corp. plant at Norristown, ?a. It will be shipped from GARLOCK INC. Respectfully submitted, . K.A. Roberts, Acting chairman MOIST SPINNING PROCESS by:- J.W. Weber Moisture is applied to roving at the rub-apron section of the carding machines'. The moisture may be in the form of water or an emulsion. Sufficient moisture is added to increase the total water content of the roving to from 5 to 7 percent. Since the moisture is applied by the rub aprons to the fibers at the surface of the roving, this process is particularly effective in preventing asbestos from flying off the roving and yarn during the following spinning, twist ing and winding operations. In relatively dry roving and yarn, the asbestos fibers adhering to the outside tend to becom airborne. The application of moisture to the outer surface of the roving also results in tlio retention of a relatively lofty yarn (x*hich is desirable),rather than the creation of the condensed condition of an extruded yam. While the process has been developed primarily for the purpose of reducing the atmospheric dust count on the delivery end of the carding machines (where the greater part of the card-tender's time is spent), and in subseqxient operations such as spinning, twisting, and winding, it has been found that this process imparts considerable strength to the roving and thereby results in greatly reduced roving breaks during spinning. This further redxxces the dust count at the spinning frames, since broken ends on the bobbins raise a virtual dust storm. We have found further that, since the moist roving is in a somewhat more compact condition when being wound on the card spools, considerably moro yardage can bo wound on spools of the same diameter than can be achieved with relatively dry roving. In order to determine the relative merits of moist vs relatively dry roving at the spinning operation, asbestos fiber counts were taken, results of which are indicated in the following table :- (Dee -nge 3) r- U ) Minutes - Air Hygiene ft. Ilfg. Committee, continued: i Page -3 ASBESTOS FIBER COUNTS Moist V3 Dry Roving FIBER COURT Spindle Speed: 4400 to 4800 RPM 9/25/71 Moist Roving, 13 Cut 9/25/71 Dry Roving, 13 Cut Spindle Speed: lj.800 RPM 9/28/71 Moist Roving, 13 Cut 9/28/71 Dry Roving, 13 Cut * Total | Longer than' Longer than , ! Fibers | $ Microns ; 10 Microns I ti J ' .-x j :; i 4-0 j'13.0 ' 1 j t 2.5 5.4 ` 1.8 j 3*8 ** . j 7.5 23.0 ii ! I j I I 1.7 9.1 j i I 1.5 S 5.0 >. The spinning was performed on balloonless spinning frames operating normally between 4500 and 5400 spindle speed, depending on cut and quality of yarn. AMERICA!! ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORPORATION (Signed) J.W. Weber Chairman of the Board ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE meeting October 7 1971 - Savannah, Ga. -skhk* Minutes **** The Asbestos Advisory Committee met with all member companies in attendance. The main topic of our discussions concerned the legislation which either, has been promulgated, or which is pending, regarding the use in certain applications of asbestos products. We are aware of the instructions which the Navy Department has . issued to its repair facilities regarding the use of asbestos textile products; and we are told that other, more stringent notices are awaiting issuance.! . The impact and effect of these instructions, adverse to asbestos products, is severe, and they present us with a most frustrating situation. It is frustrating because wo are forced to continually maintain a defensive position -- and we have very little evidence at hand to refute the charges which are levelled at the use of asbestos products. . However, such evidence possibly does exist. Some seven years ago. Dr. Letris J. Cralley of the Dept, of Health,Education : Welfare, undertook a study of the asbestos textile industry in an effort to truly measure the health hazards involved in the manufacture of asbestos products. This study has never been completed, and only fragmentary reports have been issued. Accordingly, the Asbestos Advisory Committee lias requested that iir. C.L. Sheclcler, Chairman of the ATI Environmental Health Comm ittee, meet with Dr. Cralley and try to obtain the following information (1) ^Jhat is the exact status of the Cralley Report? (2) 't/hat can the.ATI do to assist in completing it? (3) `ihat are the future plans regarding the effective use of Dr. Cralley*s report once It is completed? In addition we have asked Mr. Sheclcler to extend an invitation to Dr. Cralley to attend our next meeting which is to bo hold in Charleston, S.C. on February 2-3,1972. We look forward to the report of iir. Sheclcler1 s visit with Dr. Cralley with great interest.! Respectfully submitted, E.A. Morris Chairman o MINUTES ; TECHNICAL COMMITTEE In attendance: Asbestos Textile Institute October 7, 1971 - Savannah, Ga. D.T. Aus'tIn,Jr. S.G. Dixit (Chairman) J.V. Echerd J.'W. Hawkins V, Haaskant Uniroyal,Inc. Garlock Inc. H.X. Porter Company Raybestos-Hanhattan,Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp . In addition, the following members of the Fiber Testing Committee were present at the joint meeting: D.E, Childers (Chairman), R.A. Suntze, and U.H. Smith. The following subjects were discussed; (1) ASTH D 1118 - Magnetic Rating Standard . The tenth draft was reviewed by the joint committee. It was decided to recommend to ASTI-I that this standard be approved in the present form. ^ (2) ASTIl D 1573 - Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles . P.O. ITicodemus, Chairman, Sub-Committee A-lj., ASTIl has received verbal consent from Federal Government regarding dropping this standard in view of the difficulty involved in conducting heat aging tests that yield meaningful results. (3) MIL-I-l53lx9C - Insulation Tape, Thermal A decision regarding removal of Amosite in the core material is to be conveyed to Naval Ship Engineering Center. The thermal, insulation value, or **K factor**, has not been mentioned in the specification. However, all the committee members felt that it was not necessary that it be mentioned. The Chairman thanked all the members of the Technical and the Fiber Testing Committees for their excellent cooperation during his two-year term as chairman. Respectfully submitted Sudhalcar G. Dixit Chairman uJ AS35ST0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - FI3ER TSSTHJG COMMITTEE October 7, 1971 - Savannah, Ga. In attendance Dewey 3. Childers Walter n. Smith C.E. Stiefken R.A. Kuntze ------ (Chairmmaan) ------- n.K. Porter Company Bell Asbestos Mines,Limited Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Cassiar Asbestos Corp.,Ltd. A brief meeting was held with the Technical Committee to help review the 10th draft on ASTil D1118-57, Standard Method of Test for . Magnetic Rating of Asbestos used for Electrical purposes. The Fiber Testing Committee discussed the revision of the manual "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre", noting that formal approval of the project had now been given by QAKA. A number of changes and improvements have been formalized by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, but the tests were not available for review at this meeting. Since the October meeting the chairman has received ten (10) of the procedures from W.U. Foster, the chairman of QAMA"s Uniform Classification & Grading Committee.. Thus, in familiarizing ouselves with these changes, we can expect to have a considerable amount of work to do at the next several meetings. Some of the suggestions from QAIIA pertaining to the make up of the revised manual are:- (1) Those tests that are now in A3TM format should go in the revised manual in the ASTil format. (2) Those tests not yet in ASTI1 format would go in as now written so as not to delay the new edition too much. (3) The new manual should be in loose-leaf form. My chairmanship of the Fiber Testing Committee during the past t;jo years is now completed. I would like to express my appreciation to all members for their assistance during my term as chairman of the committee. . Respectfully submitted. Dewey E. Childers Chairman V* ' ?. Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute OCT 8-1971 AIR HYGIENE & MFG. COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute Page -1- October 7, 1971 - Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah,Ga. In attendance: K. A. Roberts - Johns-Hanville Corp. (Acting chairman) C.L. Sheckler - 11 " " (Chm. Environmental Health Comm.) G. il. Armstrong - American Asbestos Textile Corp. J.L. Rainey - " '' 11 H. H. Walter - " " "" L. P. Dieringer - bniroyal, Inc. B.E. Carden - "" R.C. Hunt - "" J.L. Mitchell - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. E.C. Bratt - " "" E.A. Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Rafael E. Arnal - Manufactures Multiples S.A. (Caracas, Venezuela) Y. Sato - Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. (USA representative) Minutes JHHKHfr This meeting was, in part, held as a joint committee meeting with the Environmental Health Committee. The meeting waa opened with a brief review of some of the environmental protection equipment being used by some of our members. Hr.J.L. Rainey presented a paper entitled ''Moist Spinning Process" written by Mr. J.W. Weber, Chairman of the Board, American Asbestos Textile Corporation. Mr. Rainey discussed the data in the paper which indicates that a stronger, more dust free yarn is obtained when moisture, in the form of water or an emulsion, is applied at the rub apron of the carding machine. While the process was developed prim arily for the purpose of reducing the atmospheric dust count on the delivery end of the carding machines (where the greater part of the card-tenders time is spent) it has been found that other advantages result in subsequent operations as explained in Hr. Weber's paper which is included with these minutes. Committee members were most appreciative of Mr. Webers cooperation in supplying the results of his extensive experimental development work for the benefit of our industry.i Members desiring further information on this process may write direct to Mr.J.W.Weber, American Asbestos Textile Corporation, P.0. Box 228, Norristown,Pa. I9I4.04 (USA). Considerable time was spent in reviewing the Occupational Safety & Health Act (OSHA) and the anticipated Emission Standards for asbestos soon to be established by the Environmental Protection Agency. Mr. .Sheckler urged that the ATI member companies undertake to collect industry plant data and employee data that would be helpful to AIA/NA in testifying before sub-committee hearings in Washington,!./. C.. At the present time our industry, as such, lacks the facts to refute or challenge statements so adverse to asbestos that have received such wide publicity in the last several years. It was therefore the joint recommendation of the Air Hygiene 2; iifg. and the Environmental Health Committees that the Institute establish a program to obtain ilinutes - Air Hygiene & Mfg: Committee - continued:- Page -2- meaningful data for use in guiding national standards. It was sug gested that a start could be made by contacting Dr. Lewis J, Cralley, formerly in charge of Division of epidemiology & Special Services, USPHS, Dept, of HEW, under whose supervision in-plant surveys of asbestos plants and employees were made by Federal authorities over a period of many years* Dr* Cralley is presently employed as a consultant to Marcus Key,II.D., Head of the National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health. It is hoped that the data now in the Dept, of HEW files can be released for possible benefit to the asbestos textile industry. Following the meeting, arrangements were made to ship the ATI's Bausch tz Lomb Dust Counter to the American Asbestos Textile Corp. plant at Norristown, ?a. It will be shipped from GARLOCK IilC. Respectfully submitted, K.A. Roberts, Acting chairman MOIST SPINNING PROCESS by:- J.W. Weber Moisture is applied to roving at the rub-apron section of the carding machines. The moisture may be in the form of water or an emulsion. Sufficient moisture is added to increase the total water content of the roving to from 5 to 7 percent. Since the moisture is applied by the rub aprons to the fibers at the surface of the roving, this process is particularly effective in preventing asbestos from flying off the roving and yarn during the following spinning, twist ing and winding operations. In relatively dry roving and yarn, the asbestos fibers adhering to the outside tend to becom airborne. The application of moisture to the outer surface of the roving also results in the retention of a relatively lofty yam (which is desirable),rather than the creation of the condensed condition of an extruded yam. While the process has been developed primarily for the purpose of reducing the atmospheric dust count on the delivery end of the carding machines (where the greater part of the card-tender's time is spent), and in subsequent operations such as spinning, twisting, and winding, it has been found that this process imparts considerable strength to the roving and thereby results in greatly reduced roving breaks during spinning. This further reduces the dust count at the spinning frames, since broken ends on the bobbins raise a virtual dust storm. We have found further that, since the moist roving is in a somewhat more compact condition when being wound on the card spools, considerably more yardage can be wound on spools of the same diameter than can be achieved with relatively dry roving. In order to determine the relative merits of moist vs relatively dry roving at the spinning operation, asbestos fiber counts were taken, results of which are indicated in the following table:- Minutes - Air Hygiene ft llfg. Committee, continued: Page -3- AS'JESTOS FI3ER COUNTS Moist vs Dry Roving FI3ER COUNT Spindle Speed: 4400 to 4800 RPM 9/25/71 Moist Roving, 13 Cut 9/25/71 Dry Roving, 13 Cut Spindle Speed: 4800 RPM 9/28/71 Moist Roving, 13 Cut 9/28/71 Dry Roving, 13 Cut I Total l Longer thani Longer than ( I Fibers \ 5 Iiicrons 10 Microns : 1---------------- ------------------------ i -- - . . - --... f! ; i 1|..0 j 13.0 ; 2.5 5.4 ~ i 1.8 I 3.8 4' ' I i1 i ' 7.5 23.0 ij11 1.7 9.1 1.5 5.0 The spinning was performed on balloonless spinning frames operating normally between 4500 and 5400 spindle speed, depending on cut and quality of yarn. AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORPORATION (Signed) J.W. Weber Chairman of the Board ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE meeting October 7, 1971 - Savannah, Ga. *hhhk* Minutes The Asbestos Advisory Committee met with all member companies in attendance. The main topic of our discussions concerned the legislation which either has been promulgated, or which is pending, regarding the use in certain applications of asbestos products. We are aware of the instructions which the Navy Department has issued to its repair facilities regarding the use of asbestos textile products; and we are told that other, more stringent notices are awaiting issuance.I The impact and effect of these instructions, adverse to asbestos products, is severe, and they present us with a most frustrating situation. It is frustrating because we are forced to continually maintain a defensive position -- and we have very little evidence at hand to refute the charges which are levelled at the use of asbestos products. However, such evidence possibly does exist. Some seven years ago. Dr. Lewis J. Cralley of the Dept, of Health,Education & Welfare, undertook a study of the asbestos textile industry in an effort to truly measure the health hazards involved in the manufacture of asbestos products. This study has never been completed, and only fragmentary reports have been issued. Accordingly, the Asbestos Advisory Committee has requested that Mr. C.L. Sheckler, Chairman of the ATI Environmental Health Comm ittee, meet with Dr. Cralley and try to obtain the following information:- (1) What is the exact status of the Cralley Report? (2) What can the ATI do to assist in completing it? (3) What are the future plans regarding the effective use of Dr. Cralley's report once it is completed? In addition we have asked ilr. Sheckler to extend an invitation to Dr. Cralley to attend our next meeting which is to be held in Charleston, S.C. on February 2-3,1972. We look forward to the report of Hr. Sheckler*s visit with Dr. Cralley with great interest.! Respectfully submitted, E.A. Morris Chairman MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE In attendance: Asbestos Textile Institute October 7 1971 - Savannah, Ga. D.'T. Austin,Jr. S.G. Dixit (Chairman) J.Vi. Echerd J.W. Hawkins W. Maaskant Uniroyal,Inc. Garlock Inc. H.X. Porter Company Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp In addition, the following members of the Fiber Testing Committee were present at the joint meeting: D.E. Childers (Chairman), R.A. Xuntze, and U.H. Smith. The following subjects were discussed;- (1) ASTM D 1118 - Magnetic Rating Standard The tenth draft was reviewed by the joint committee. It was decided to recommend to ASTM that this standard be approved in the present form. (2) ASTI1 D lf?73 - Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles P.0. Hicoderaus, Chairman, Sub-Committee A-lj., ASTll has received verbal consent from Federal Government regarding dropping this standard in view of the difficulty involved in conducting heat aging tests that yield meaningful results. (3) MIL-I-l53li9C - Insulation Tape, Thermal A decision regarding'removal of Amosite in the core material is to be conveyed to Naval Ship Engineering Center. The thermal, insulation value, or "K factor", has not been mentioned in the specification. However, all the committee members felt that it was not necessary that it be mentioned. The Chairman thanked all the members of the Technical and the Fiber Testing Committees for their excellent cooperation during his two-year term as chairman. Respectfully submitted. Sudhakar G. Dixit Chairman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Minutes - PI3ER TESTING COMMITTEE October 7, 1971 - Savannah, Ga. In attendance: Dewey E. Childers (Chairman) ----K.K. Porter Company Walter II. Smith ---------Bell Asbestos Mines,Limited C.E. Stiefken ------------- Lake Asbestos of (Quebec,Ltd. R.A. Kuntze ------- ------- ---- Cassiar Asbestos Corp.,Ltd. Minutes A brief meeting was held with the Technical Committee to help review the 10th draft on ASTil D1118-57, Standard Method of Test for Magnetic Rating of Asbestos used for Electrical purposes. The Fiber Testing Committee discussed the revision of the manual "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre", noting that formal approval of tho project had now been given by QAMA. A number of changes and improvements have been formalized by the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, but the tests were not available for review at this meeting. Since the October meeting the chairman has received ten (10) of the procedures, from W.H. Foster, the chairman of QAiIArs Uniform Classification & Grading Committee.j Thus, in familiarizing ouselves with these changes, we can expeot to have a considerable amount of work to do at the next several meetings. Some of the suggestions from QAIIA pertaining to the make up of the revised manual are:- (1) Those tests that are now in ASTM format should go in the revised manual in the ASTIi format. (2) Those tests not yet in ASTM format would go in as now written so as not to delay the new edition too much. (3) The new manual should be in loose-leaf form. My chairmanship of the Fiber Testing Committee during the past two years is now completed. I would like to express my appreciation to all members for their assistance during my term as chairman of the committee. Respectfully submitted. Dewey E. Childers Chairman ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds September 9. 1971 Balance on Hand at last report (May 10,1971) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 3070. OLj. 15179.73 27.25 Receipts To Reserve To General To General To General Total On Hand Fund (Interest to6/30/71) Fund (Book sales) Fund (1971 dues) Fund (Reimbursement) $189.73 72,20 400.00 50.00 Total received Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 mos. ending 6/30/71) $ 878.00 Legal Expenses ( 3 mos ending 6/30/71) 59.99 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) 914.8.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 2nd Qtr 1971 ) 78.00 Secretary's travel expense (June ATI mtg.) 50.00 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 A.T.I. meeting expense (June 9-10*1971) 929.73 Printing & Office Supplies Telephone ( 4 mos.) . ;92.61; 167 21 Membrane Filter Instruction Booklet (1 M) 4^7.27 Health Safety Practices Folder ( 25 M) 1247.40 Insurance ( Workman's Comp.) 18,00 Petty Cash ( Vouchers 529 - 550 inclusive) 103.18 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand as of September 9* 1971 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement of 9/9/71 ) Reserve Fund (With interest to 6/30/71 ) Petty Cash Fund Total Funds $ 788.54 12769.4 (*) 91.50 Assets as of September 9. 1971 Total Funds as listed above Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture "c Equipment (Nominal value) Total Assets Liabilities Accounts Payable as of 9/9/71 $13649.50 22,68 11.67 1.00 Net Worth $18277.02 711.93 $18988.95 5339.45 $13649.50 $13649.50 $13684.85 none $13684.85 (#) $2600.00 transferred to General Fund on July 2,1971 Respectfully submitted. Asst. Treasurer,/ REMARKS OF COUNSEL Page -1- Asbestos Textile Institute - General Meeting - October C, 1 71 The legal authority by which the President was able to put the economic freeze into effect is Public Law 91-379, as amendet-- the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970--whereby "the President is authorized to issue such orcers and regulations as he may > eei. ap propriate to stabilize prices, rents, wages, anc salaries at levels not less than those prevailing on May 25, 1-j70." This is a limitation imposed by Congress anc means, simply, that regarcless of what occurred prior to the freeze during the base period, prices are not required to be set at less than what they were on May 25, 1370. The level of prices prevailing on May 25, 1;'70, is ceteruineo as follows: (1) the average (mean) price at which transactions were made on that day (as borne out by appropriate records); (2) if no actual transactions took place on that day, then the average (mean) price at which transactions took place on the nearest day prior to May 25, 1970 may be taken as the "prevailing price level for May 25, 1970"; and (3) ceiling prices for goods not in existence on May 25, 1970 can only be calculated using the base period describee' in the Guide lines. A second limitation imposed uner the Congressional grant of authority is that the President's authority to issue and enforce orders and regulations unier the Economic Stabilization Act expires April 30, 1972. The President cannot continue the freeze beyond that date with out additional legislation enacted by Congress. If one is dealing in the American market, how then toes one determine the price he may charge? Under the President's Executive Order, prices are stabilized "at levels not greater than the highest of those pertaining to a substantial volume of actual transactions" during the base per lot' of July 16 to August 14, 1971. In cases where no transactions occurred in the 30-day base period, the base period will be the nearest preceding 30-oay period in which a transaction tic: occur. A "30-day period" is defined as a 30-cay block of time prior to July 16. Hence, moving back from July 16, the nearest 30-day period would be June 16-15, and preceding that. May 17-June 15, and so on. The ceiling price is the price at or above which ten per cent of the actual transactions during the base periou were mace, except that in cases of increases in posted or effective prices during the base period, the base period itself will be consioered to have begun at the time of the increase in posted and effective prices. A transaction takes place when a seller ships the product to a buyer, not when an order is received. Each commodity is treated separately and, if shipments are mane to different classes of purchasers under different terms, separate ceilings are calculated for each commodity for each class of purchaser. REMARKS OF COUNSEL - CONTINUED Page -2- The ceiling price is based on Che record of all the units of each com modity shipped to each class of purchaser during the base period, and is calculated as the highest price at or above which ten per cent of the units were shipped to a particular class of purchaser curing the base period. Under the terms of the Executive Order, the price freeze ap plies to the seller, not the buyer. The buyer is not required to police a seller's compliance with the Executive Order. But records must be tept of the highest prices charged during the base period, and must be available for public inspection. If a product or service is "new", the ceiling price is deter mined by the seller applying the percentage mark-up he received during the base period on the most nearly similar product or service to the direct unit or net invoice cost of the new product or service. The ceiling price for a product or service that is new to the seller, but not to the market, is the price realized on the same or comparable product or service by the most nearly comparable competitor during the base period. Ue turn now to two specific problem areas: discounts and long term contracts. What is the selling price for a material if there have been dual price situations, i.e., a published price and a dis counted price at which actual transactions were made? The answer is that sales may be made at the highest price at which a substantial volume of actual transactions were Qtade during the 30-day period of time ending August 14. If products have been selling at a discounted price and not at the published price during the base period, the maximum price would be the highest discounted price at which substantial trans actions were made. Thus, assuming that during the base period bags of insulation were selling at the list price, and also at a discount of six sixes, if a substantial number of transactions were made at the list price, then the list price, and anything below the list price could be charged, including a discount of four sixes, because the price freeze does not fix prices at their highest permissible level -- it prohibits sales at a price higher than the permissible level. However, if all sales during the base periad were made at the discounted price of six sixes and there were not in fact substantial actual transactions at a higher price, then the price would have to be frozen at the six sixes discounted price, and it would not be permissible to decrease the dis count to four sixes, as that would raise the price over the highest level during the base period. Where different prices are offered to different territories, or different cinds of customers, price ceilings are to be set on the basis of the normal procedures used in establishing the market prices. Mar'cet price ceilings must be established at no greater than the highest price at which substantial volume transactions were carried out in the firm's individual normal pricing areas, regardless of whether these pricing areas are national, regional, or Individual. I REMARKS OF COUNSEL - CONTINUED Page -3- If quantity discounts ar^ offered} can a customer who purchased large volumes and was previously eligible for the discount be charged the applicable higher price if he retuces the amount of his purchases and thus falls into a lower quantity and higher price bracket? In other words, may prices be changed so long as the rate structure on which they are based is not changed? The answer is yes. During the 90-day freeze, customers may be charged in accordance with rate of price schedules established in the base period prior to August 15, 1971. However, the charges applicable to the various categories of rates or prices set out in the effective schedules may not be increased. Further more, if it has been the practice to give discounts under certain cir cumstances, these discounts cannot be discontinued during the freeze. The rule with respect to long-term contracts is that if the contract was made before the freeze, and there are no deliveries scheduled until after the freeze, the freeze does not apply. If any deliveries are to be made during the freeze period, the seller may charge no more than his ceiling price determined by the price charged for deliveries made during the base period. If the shipment price on a contract made prior to the freeze and calling for delivery during the freeze is above the ceiling price, the seller may elect not to perform at all, but he is not permitted to perform at a contract price above the ceiling price. Nor may he force the buyer to accept ship ment deferred to a date after the freeze. If the seller does make delivery, the buyer is obligated to pay no more than the ceiling price. Haven C. Roosevelt, Atty. Ca'dualader, Wickersham & Taft ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE PRESENTATION BY N. W. HENDRY FRIDAY. OCTOBER CTH. 1971 Shipments of Canadian asbestos fibre for the first seven months of 1971 were 1.92,104 tons or 3.3% higher than for the same period in 1970. The availability of all grades of spinning fibre is good ant. this situ ation can be expected to continue for some time in the future. The application of the U.S. surcharge does not apply to asbestos fibre, but indirectly the surcharge will affect sales of asbestos fibre to such countries as Japan and West Germany. Prior to the application of the surcharge some weakness in demand was evident in many of the Inter national markets. World production of asbestos fibre in 1.-70 was 3,22,o40 tons versus 3,C3I ,250 tons in l>f.i or an increase of approximately 5%. The problems related to asbestos and health are of continuing concern to the asbestos fibre producers. It is unfortunate intieed that the press representatives continue to ta e statements out of context and to be more interested in sensationalism rather than facts. Finally, the following comments are pertinent to the status of some new asbestos producers, viz: a) The new producer in Australia is forecast to be in production in early 1972 at a rate of 75,000 tons per year. b) The asbestos producer in Brazil, located north of Brazilia, is ex pected to be increased from 13,000 to 27,000 tons. c) The Colombian asbestos fibre prospect could reach the production stage at a rate of approximately 25,000 tons per year. d) Work is being continued to develop an asbestos producer in Central Colombia. If financing can be arranged the production rate is ex pected to be 25,000 tons annually. e) Work is being continued by Cerro Corporation toward the evaluation of an asbestos deposit in Central Greece. N. W. Hendry General Sales Manager Canadian Johns-Manvllle Asbestos Limited ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ,, , i Minute* * benefal Meeting - October 8, 1971 Page -1 The Savannah Inn & Country Club, Savannah, Ga. In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. G.M. Armstrong J.W. Chriatenbury G.S. Fabel Wm. Maaskant J.L. Rainey H.H. Walters GARLOCK INC. S.G. Dixit Alex. Kuzmuk UNIROYAL. INC. D.T. Austin,Jr. B.E. Carden L.F. Dieringer R.C. Hunt E.A. Morris S.J. Peele,Jr. F.C. Phillips ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P.E. Leclerc JOHNS-MAHVILLE CORP. N.D. Brown M.S. Lindstrooi K.A. Roberts C.L. Sheckler N.W. Hendry (Canadian j/M Co.) NICOLET INDUSTRIES. INC. Geo. Griswold,Jr. E.W. Russell H.K. Porter Company. Inc. E.C. Bratt D.E. Childers J.W. Echerd J.L. Mitchell RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN. INC. J.A. Bettes,Jr. (Retired) J.W. Hawkins M.W. Oliver M.Q. Scowcroft E.P. Stefl BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Marcel Dorais Walter H. Smith Wm. J.W. Smith CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP.. LTD. R.A. Kuntze LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC. LTD. E.A. Farrell C.E. StlefRen MANUFACTURAS MULTIPLES S.A. Rafael E. Arnal NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.. LTD. Y. Sato CADWALADER.WICKERSHAM & TAFT H.C. Roosevelt (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) Note: Total attendance at the Oct. 6-3th meeting was 65 persons, which Included 23 uives and 42 men! ***** Minutes ***** 1. Vice President M.Q. Scowcroft called, the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. and explained that he was substituting for President Moody whose illness prevented his attendance at this meeting. Minutes - General Meeting * October C, 1971 Page -2 2. Introductions: - Each person was asked to stand and give his name and company affiliation. 3. The minutes of the last meeting were offered for reading. On motion by Mr. Geo. Griswold, seconded by Mr. H.C. Roosevelt, it was voted to omit the reading of same. 4. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer Kuzmuk, who stated that the Annual Audit of the Institute's books had been made as of September 9, lv71 under the supervision of Mr. R.E. Jeffery, Controller, Garlock Inc. and found to be in order. Mr. K.A. Roberts moved that the report be accepted, seconded by Mr. S.J. Peele,Jr., and so voted unanimously. The Report is attached. 5. In his Legal Counsel Report, Attorney Roosevelt discussed the economic freeze now in effect by Presidential order, and the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970 which authorized same. The full resume of his remarks is attached to these minutes. 6. The Fibre Producer's Report was given by Mr. N.W. Hendry, General Sales Manager, Canadian Johns-Manville Asbestos Limited. This is a regular feature of a General Meeting and we are Indebted to Mr. Hendry for his comprehensive review of the world situation regarding production of asbestos fibre and the overall market. A resume' of his remarks is attached. 7. Chairman Scowcroft announced that the Board of Governors had elected officers for the coming year: President - L.E. Moody of H.K. Porter Company, Inc. Vice President - M.Q. Scowcroft of Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Treasurer - Alex. Kuzmuk of Garlock Inc. Exec. Sec'y - H.E. Sunbury C. Hew committee chairmen: - Mr. Scowcroft announced that Mr. K.A. Roberts of Johns-Manville Corp. had been appointed chairman of the Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee; and Mr. J.W. Echerd of H.K. Porter Company, Inc. as chairman of the Technical Committee. Deferred temporarily was the appointment of a new chairman for the Fiber Testing Committee. 9. New Edition - Fibre Test Manual: - Mr. Scowcroft said that the QAMA had approved a Third Edition of the manual entitled: "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre" to be sponsored by the Asbestos Textile Institute, Asbestos Cement Products Assoc, and the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association. Preparation of the new edition to be under the supervision of the ATI Fiber Testing Committee. 10. Pending Legislative Developments: - Mr. C.L. Sheckler, Manager, Accident Prevention and Health Administration, Johns-Manville Corp., reviewed recent developments under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and activity related to the Environmental Pro tection Agency (EPA). During his informative talk, Mr. Sheckler MINUTES - GENERAL MEETING - CONTINUED Page -3- mentioned that it was presently uncertain what agency would establish a standard TLV (Threshold Lio.lt Value) for asbestos. He Is very ap prehensive that an impossibly low TLV will be adopted and so make it impossible for asbestos o.anufacturers to stay in business if it is to be enforced. In respect to OSHA, confusion exists how to advise employees of standards, what records to keep, etc. Stressed the need for background data from industry to use in fighting back against adverse publicity oirected at asbestos-containing products. 11. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen: - Air Hygiene & Kfg. Committee - K.A. Roberts (Acting Chairman) Asbestos Advisory Committee - E.A. Morris, Chairman Technical Committee - S.G. Dixit, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - D.E. Childers, Chairman Their reports are attached to these minutes. Certificates of Appreciation were presented to retiring chairmen S.G. Dixit and D.E. Childers by Vice President Scowcroft who thanked them for their valued contribution to the work of the Institute during the past two years. 12. Chairman Scowcroft said that we were very proud to have four former presidents of ATI in attendance at this meeting, namely: - Geo. S. Fabel - 1949 - 1J50 John A. Bettes, Jr. 1957 - 1958 Staton J. Peele, Jr. - 1963 - 1964 John L. Rainey - 19( 7 - l.>6t , All of these men expressed their pleasure in attending, and their gratification to know that ATI continued to be an important factor in our industry. "Jack" Bettes, author of "The History of the Asbestos Textile Industry in the United States," now appearing serially in the ASBESTOS Magazine, expressed his appreciation for the historical data supplied to him by many people (approx. 100) without whose help he would have been unable to compile as complete a history. He spoke most highly of the ASBESTOS Magazine, and recommended that it be given company advertising on a continuing basis in appreciation of the fact that it is the only media devoted to the asbestos industry, and its files are a valuable store house of information pertaining to our industry. The magazine will have Reprints of "History" if orders warrant, and suggests orders be sent them promptly (he receives no profit from same). 13. Mr. E.A. Morris moved that Mr. John A. Bettes, Jr. be made "OFFICIAL HISTORIAN OF THE ASBESTOS TEXTILE INTUSTRY" by acclamation, and this was done by a rounc of applause am a standing ovation! Minutes - General Meeting - continued:- Page -I4.- H4.. Chairman Scowcroft expressed our pleasure in having a repre sentative of our newest member, MANUFACTURES MULTIPLES S.A., Caracas Venezuela, in attendance, and welcomed Mr. Rafael E. Amal on behal of all those present. 15. Locations for future meetings were announced:- February 2-3, 1972 - The Mills-Hyatt House, Charleston, S.C. June 7-8 1972 - Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Washington,D.C. 16, There being no further business to come before this meeting it was moved by Mr.K.A. Roberts, seconded by Mr. 3.A. Morris, that it be adjourned. So voted. Respectfully submitted. } Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute FEB 3-1972 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES -- GENERAL MEETING February 3, 1972 - THE MILLS HYATT HOUSE, Charleston, South Carolina In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORPORATION J. W. Christenbury Wm. Maaskant H. H. Walter ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P. E. Leclerc G. F. A. Brink GARLOCK, INC. Alex. Kuzmuk S. G. Dixit BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED C. H. Schoch Walter H. Smith JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPORATION N. D. Brown K. A. Roberts NICOLET INDUSTRIES, INC. J. K. Whittaker E. W. Russell LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTD. E. A. Farrell C. E. Stiefken (ASARCO) TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.,LTD. H. J. Corson H. K. PORTER COMPANY, L. E. Moody E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd INC. TURNER & NEWALL LIMITED B. Lincoln NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Sato RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. Q. Scowcroft J. W. Hawkins, Dr. J. L. Goodman M. W. Oliver -. Puckhaber R. T. Matthews CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H. E. Sunbury, Exec. Secy. UNIROYAL, INC. E. A. Morris D. T. Austin, Jr. B. E. Carden R. C. Hunt S. J. Peele, Jr. Ellett ***** Minutes ***** 1. President Moody called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Those in attendance were asked to stand and give their name and company. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion of Mr. Kuzmuk, seconded by K. A. Roberts, it was voted to omit reading of same. Minutes - ATI General Meeting - cont. Page 2 3. Treasurer Kuzmuk presented the Financial Report. Mr. S. J. Peele, Jr., moved that it be accepted. Motion seconded by C. E. Stiefken, so voted unanimously. The report is attached to these minutes. 4. Legal Counsel Wendell B. Alcorn reviewed developments under the Williams-Steiger Occu pational Safety and Health Act since it became effective on April 28, 1971. The full text of his remarks is attached. 5. Mr. Paul E. Leclerc, Regional Sales Manager, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, in reporting for the FIBRE PRODUCERS stated:- "Due to a very heavy demand for asbestos in 1970 quite a number of orders remained unshipped at the end of that year and resulted in a backlog of orders that were carried into 1971. Shipments in the first three months of the year 1971 showed an increase of more than 8% over the corresponding period of 1970. As at June 30, 1971, total shipments by the Q.A.M.A. members in Eastern Canada, were up 11% over 1970. Then came the 6low months of July, August, September and October. While November and December showed considerable improvement over the previous four months, total shipments for the year were down 2% as compared to 1970. The demand for Group 3 fibres was lower during the past year and shipments were down 13.5% for the 12 months. This brings us into 1972 with fairly good inventories of all grades including Group 3, with the exception of crudes which are in very short supply. To sum it up, insofar as the members of the ATI are concerned, all grades of Group 3 spinning fibres are available and our friends in British Columbia are in the same position with the possible exception of Grade AAA. It is hoped that the expected improvement in business conditions in this country (USA) will materialize and the asbestos producers earnestly hope that the textile industry will have a very good year in 1972." President Moody expressed the appreciation of ATI members to Mr. Leclerc for his comprehensive report. 6. Announcements:- President Moody announced that the new chairman of the Fiber Testing Committee was Mr. C. E. Stiefken (ASARC0)* who has served on that committee for several years as a representative of Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. The appointment is effective at once. In anticipation that Chairman Sheckler of the Environmental Health Committee will tender his resignation in the near future, Mr. L. F. Dieringer, Industrial Hygienist, Uniroyal, Inc., was appointed chairman of that committee effective with the next meeting, June 7-8y 1972. Mr. Norman D. Brown, who has represented Johns-Manville Corporation on the Board of Governors for approximately one and one-half years has resigned due to a ' change in his job responsibilities. Mr. Malcom S. Lindstrom was elected to the Board of Governors as J/M's new representative. * ASARCO (American Smelting & Refining Company) parent company of Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Limited.) Minutes - ATI General Meeting - cont. Page 3 7. Committee Reports:- The Chairmen of the Committees listed below presented their reports, and a copy of each is attached to these minutes. Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - K. A. Roberts, Chairman Asbestos Advisory Committee - E. A. Morris, Chairman Technical Committee - J. W. Echerd, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - C. E. Stiefken, Chairman 8. President Moody informed the members that a plaque had been prepared for presentation to Mr. C. L. Sheckler at this meeting but that Mr. Sheckler could not attend due to other commitments. Mr. Norman D. Brown accepted the award for Mr. Sheckler. The plaque reads:- Presented to CLIFFORD L. SHECKLER of Johns-Manville Corporation Chairman -A.T.I. Environmental Health Committee 1969 - 1971 For his outstanding leadership in the field of Environmental Health ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE February 3, 1972 9. President Moody announced that the next A.T.I. General Meeting would be held on June 7-8, 1972 at the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Washington, D. C. (This is actually in Arlington, Va., convenient to the National Airport.) The Fall Meeting will be held September 18-20, 1972 (Monday-Wednesday) at the Seaview Country Club, Absecon, N. J. (near Atlantic City, N. J.). 10. There being no further business to come before the meeting it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds January 10. 1972 Balance On Hand at last report (Sept.9. 1971) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 788.5k. 12769.46 91.50 Receipts Total On Hand at last report To Reserve Fund (Interest to 12/31/71) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 271.22 98.47 Total received $13649.50 369.69 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer ( 3 nos. ending 9/30/71 ) $ 750.00 Legal Expehse3 ( 3 nos. " 9/30/71 ) Secretary's salary ( 4 nos.) 948.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 6 mos.) 156.00 Secretary's travel expense (Oct. ATI mtg ) 215.00 Office rent ( 4 nos.) 300.00 A.T.I. Meeting expense ( Oct.6-8,1971 ) 1505.20 Printing & Office Supplies 110.52 Telephone ( 4nos.) 193.32 Accountant (D.A. Caruso, one year ) 300.00 Dues - IHF and ASTM 50.00 Insurance - B.& L. Dust Counter (One year) 93.00 Stenographic 6.00 Petty Cash (Vouchers 551 - 579 inclusive) 118.05 $ 14019.19 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand as of January 10, 1972 $ Funds (as of January 10,1972) General Fund Reserve Fund (l.ith interest to 12/31/71) Petty Cash Fund $ 160,84 9040.68 (*) 72,58 4745.09 9274.10 Total Funds $ 9274.10 Assets (as of January 10,1972) Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable - 1972 Dues " " - Book Sales Postage On Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) Liabilities Accounts payable Total Assets Net Worth $ 9274.10 9750.00 47.96 11.40 1.00 $ 19084.46 1902.03 $ 17182.43 (-::) $3000.00 transferred to General Fund on 10/1/71 (*-) $1000.00 "" " " " 11/3/71 Respectfully submitted. REMARKS OF COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute -- General Meeting -- February 3, 1972 The Mills-Hyatt House, Charleston, S. C. BACKGROUND The Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 655) was signed into law on December 29, 1970, and became effective April 28, 1971. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was established to administer the Act under the Department of Labor. The expressed purpose of the legislation is "to assure so far as possible every working man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources . ..." To implement this purpose, provision is made for the pro mulgation of mandatory occupational health and safety standards, as well as related research, information, education and training functions. Machinery is also provided to assist and encourage the states to develop satisfactory programs to promote occupational safety and health. The Secretary of Labor is authorized to set three types of standards: interim, permanent and emergency. Whenever the compliance division of OSHA concludes that an employer (defined as a person "engaged in a business affecting commerce who has employees . . . .") has violated a standard, a citation is issued and the employer is notified of any proposed penalty. If the employer objects to the citation or the proposed penalty, the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Commission conducts a review and issues an order, which is subject to judicial review by a U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. OSHA, in cooperation with the U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, is proceeding to develop and carry out occupational safety and health research. HEW has responsibilities under the Act, and these are oeing met by the newly formed National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH is responsible for most occupational safety and health research, evaluation of hazards, toxicity determinations and manpower training and development. Also, it is undertaking special industry-wide studies of chronic or low-level exposure to hazardous substances as well as research into psychological, motivational and behavioral factors involved in occupational safety and health programs. INCREASED EMPHASIS ON HEALTH OSHA's increased concern with occupational health problems is prompted by the fact that about 60% of the complaints received by it have alleged health hazards. As part of its emphasis on health, OSHA issued an emergency standard limiting the exposure of employees to asbestos dust, effective December 7, 1971. The standard was adopted pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act following studies by NIOSH and recommendations by the American Conference on Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). It has been determined by both NIOSH and ACGIH that the former asbestos standard constituted a grave danger to employees exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average concentration and, thus, an emergency standard was required. The old standard for exposure to asbestos dust was promulgated under the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act on May 20, 1969. It called for no more than 12 fibers per milliliter greater than five microns in length or two million particles per cubic foot of air. OSHA termed this 12-fiber level of exposure "a grave danger to employees exposed to this 8-hour time weighted average concentration." Remarks of Counsel - cont. Page 2 NIOSH agreed vith ACGIH that the new standard would provide a substantial base for the protection of workers in contact with asbestos dust. It limits the 8-hour time weighted average airborne concentration of asbestos dust to which employees are exposed to no more than five fibers per milliliter greater than five microns in length. Con centrations above five fibers per milliliter, but not to exceed ten fibers, are permissible up to a total of 15 minutes per hour up to five hours In an 8-hour day. An emergency temporary asbestos standard of two fibers per milliliter had been re quested by the AFL-CIO in a letter to the Department of Labor. The union cited as evidence of the need for a revised standard a study conducted by Dr. Irvin J. Selikoff and the staff of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (in cooperation with the AFL-CIO and the Ad Hoc Committee on the Asbestos Hazard of the AFL-CIO Industrial Union Department). The five-fiber emergency standard was criticized by Lorin H. Kerr, M. D., chief of the Department of Occupational Health for the United Mine Workers of America. He stated that the standard "is appreciably higher than the non-hazardous level" called for in recent medical publications. Dr. Raymond Murphy of the department of physiology at Harvard, who has studied the effects of asbestos dust exposure on industrial workers, agrees with the union physician. Dr.MUrphy concludes that even a level of two fibers per milliliter, or one-thousandth of a liter, may be hazardous to health. Dr. Murphy and his colleagues found that lung disease developed in workers who sanded asbestos floor tiles and were chronically exposed to about 1.3 fibers per milliliter. Also, in a letter to Assistant Labor Secretary George Guenther, Dr. Kerr advised that the UMW is "equally concerned that this emergency standard is restricted in its applicability to construction workers," to the exclusion of coal milers (who are covered by the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act). Recent studies indicate that some strip miners may be exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos dust. On January 11, 1972, OSHA announced that, pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act, a rule-making proceeding was being initiated to consider amending the regulations under the Act (29 CFR Part 1910). Interested persons are invited to submit data, views and arguments concerning the permanent adoption of the emergency standard and additional proposed rules on subsidiary issues. The views must be submitted by February 11. In addition, oral data, views and arguments will be received by a hearing examiner on March 14. As proposed January 11, the temporary standard shall apply to "every employee . . . in every employment and place of employment... /covered by J 1910.12, 1910.13, 1910.-14, 1910.15, or 1910.16 of this Subpart B (of 29 CFR Part 1910)7 , in lieu or any different standard on exposure to asbestos dust which would otherwise be applicable (by virtue of any of those sections)." . The promulgation of the temporary emergency standard is in line with the increasing concern of OSHA with occupational health problems. Assistant Secretary Guenther recently suggested that more trade associations establish industry-wide committees on job safety and health. Their functions should be to analyze standards in order to determine which are specifically relevant to the particular industry, to recommend that trade association members participate in standards-making activities, to suggest new standards and to advise members of the trade on technical matters. On January 4, 1972, OSHA announced a "Target Health Hazards" program whose purpose is to reduce the health hazards posed by exposure to five toxic substances" -- asbestos, cotton dust, silica, lead and carbon monoxide. Mr. Guenther described it as the health counterpart to the safety-oriented Target Industries Program. Remarks of Counsel - cont. Page 3 In announcing the Target Health Hazards program, Mr. Guenther noted that asbestos can produce asbestosis and asbestos fibers in the lungs may lead to cancer. Urgent action to curtail this health hazatd is indicated by the fact that in the fields of insulation, manufacturing of products using asbestos, shipbuilding, construction and other industries, there are more than 200,000 employees who face risks from asbestos exposure. OSHA conducted an "Executive-briefing Special Session" on the Target Health Hazards program in Washington on January 26, which Mr. Sheckler of Johns-Manville attended. The briefing was aimed at informing employers of the details of the program. Yesterday, February 2, a general orientation meeting was scheduled for management, labor, government and professionals. On the state level, the Illinois Pollution Control Board, in January 1972, passed controls on asbestos which prohibit the manufacturing or the processing of asbestoscontaining products without a permit after June 30, 1972. Such material applied in construction or repair must be coated with a sealant and installed to safeguard against emissions. Emission from plants manufacturing such products will be limited to two fibers per cubic centimeter of air. Emission regulation is also applied to demolition projects, and all transported asbestos material must be enclosed. A ban was placed on the spraying of such materials or fibers as well as on visible emissions of nonasbestos fibers in open areas during construction, alteration and repair of structures as of March 31, 1972. The City of Chicago passed a similar, but less stringent, ban. CONCLUSION Since the Federal Act became effective, the emphasis by OSHA has shifted in at least two significant ways. During the early stages, the so-called "general duty clause" was the basis for many compliance actions. This clause is Section 5(a)(1) of the Act. It states" "Each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees." As evidenced by OSHA's enforcement actions, the general duty clause was not mere window dressing. However, as standards for safety and health have been promulgated and adopted by OSHA, use of the general duty clause has given way to the enforcement of these specific standards themselves. The second major shift in emphasis has been from the initial accent on safety, as evidenced by the Target Industries Program, to a concentration on occupational health hazards. This has resulted from statistics compiled by OSHA which show that most com plaints concern health rather than safety hazards. But it would be erroneous to think that either the general duty clause of OSHA's concern with safety conditions can be ignored with impunity by employers. Instead, the conclusion must be that now OSHA is equally concerned with health hazards as with safety problems and is moving forward to develop, adopt and continually improve standards for occupational health and safety, all in coordination with NIOSH. Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, S.C. In Attendance: J.W. Hawkins---------------------------------- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. William Maaskant----------------------------American Asbestos Textile Corp. D.T. Austin------------------------------------ Uniroyal, Inc. J.W. Echerd------------------------------------ H.K. Porter Company, Inc. The ASTM Asbestos Textile Standards approved in 1967 are up for revision this year. These include D1571, D315 and D1918. Most of the Technical Committee's time was used in work on ASTM Specification D1571 and review of proposed Revision "C" of MIL-C-822U9. The following recommendations were made: DI571, Woven Asbestos Cloth 1. That we investigate increasing the relative humidity require ment from 50 to 65 to agree with Specification D1776 for Standard Conditions. 2. That we issue a statement on Precision and Accuracy similar to that we used in Standard D628. MIL-C-822h9; Cloth, Coated, Asbestos, Herringbone Twill, Aluminized. Proposed Rev. "C". v 1. That the committee chairman write Mr. C.J. Zemme requesting the reference to cotton be eliminated in Item 1*1 and that "cotton fibers" be replaced by "nontoxic organic fibers" in Item 3.2.1. " MIL-I-2li2lh, Insulation Materials, Thermal, with Special Corrosion and Chloride Requirements - the committee recommends that producers cf material sold against MIL--I--2Li2UIl specify the material conforms to specification when shipped. Contamination in route may alter the chemical composition before it reaches its destination. It was reported that the following items were approved by subcommittee Ah of ASTM committee D-13. 1. Proposed revision of "Magnetic Rating of Asbestos Fibers and Textile Products" dated Iecember 3, 1971 (DlllS). 2. Proposed revision Section lh on Precision and Accuracy "Asbestos Content of Asbestos Textile Materials". (D1913). 3. Deletion of Standard "Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles". (D1573). The So ir.g Meeting of Committee D-13, Subcommittee A-Li will be held at the Belmor Plaza Hotel, Met* lor.-o, H.Y. on March 22, 1972. Cur Task Croup on Revisi n of Standards will meet at 9:30 A.M. The General Meeting is schedulecV. for 1:30 P.M. Hy submitted, JL_____ rr.-J. Echerd Chairman MINUTES Fiber Testing Committee Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House - Charleston, S. C. In Attendance: C. E. Stiefken, Chairman ................... American Smelting & Refining Co.,(Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.) D. E. Childers..............................................H. K. Porter Company, Inc. G.F.A.Brink .................................................. Asbestos Corporation Limited Walter H. Smith ......................................... Bell Asbestos Mines Limited Bernard Lincoln ......................................... Turner & Newall, Ltd. H. E. Sunbury ......................................... A.T.I. Mr. Sunbury, Secretary of A.T.I., opened the meeting, and announced that Mr. Steifken had been appointed as the new chairman of the Fiber Testing Committee at the meeting of the Board of Governors on the previous day. He succeeds Mr. D. E. Childers who has served as chairman during 1970 and 1971. Mr. Stiefken.is an employee of the American Smelting & Refining Company (ASARCO) and has represented their subsidiary, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., on this committee for several years. Taking over as Chairman Mr. Stiefken called attention to the fact that only one Regular Member of A.T.I. had a representative serving on the Fiber Testing Committee (Mr. Childers) at the present time and that this created an imbalance which should be corrected promptly. The Secretary agreed to bring this matter to the attention of the Board of Governors. ' The meeting was devoted exclusively to discussion of the setting up of a 3rd Edition of the manual "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre". Included in the discussion were revisions of tests adopted recently by the Q.A.M.A. The new edition of the manual, from present indications, will probably be con siderably larger. The present thought is to have it in loose-leaf form. While no cost estimates have yet been obtained there is every reason to believe that the new edition will cost substantially more than the 1966 edition, which was $1.89 per copy. The function of the A.T.I. Fiber Testing Committee in this endeavor will be to take the lead in assembling the newer tests, and revisions of older tests, into a comprehensive manual. This committee will have the final approval and will therefore have to review every test procedure. We anticipate a task force meeting of the committee with representatives of the QAMA Technical Committee will be advisable to expedite the work. This should be held in the near future at a mutually convenient place - possibly Sherbrooke or Montreal. Respectfully submitted. C. E. Stiefken, Chairman MINUTES Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, S. C. In attendance: K. A. Roberts, Chm L. E. Moody . . . E. C. Bratt . . R. T. Matthew . . J. E. Day, Jr. . Dr. J. L. Goodwin H. H. Walter . . . E. A. Farrell . . S. G. Dixit . . . R. C. Hunt . . . B. E. Carden .. . J. K. Whittaker . Y. Sato .................. H. J. Corson . . . ....................... Johns-Manville Corp. ....................... H. K. Porter Company, Inc. ....................... H. K. Porter Company, Inc. ....................... Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ....................... Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ....................... Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ..................... American Asbestos Textile Corp. ....................... Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. ....................... Garlock, Inc. ....................... Uniroyal, Inc. ....................... Uniroyal, Inc. ....................... Nicolet Industries, Inc. ....................... Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. ....................... Turner Bros. Asbestos Co., Ltd. * * * * * Minutes ***** 1. Waste Disposal Procedures - The most generally practical method of disposing of non-usable asbestos waste is to bag it, using plastic bags, and tie. The use of baling equipment was discussed, but same is felt to be unacceptable due to the fact that the final compressed unit is not wrapped thus leaving the asbestos fibers exposed. 2. Vacuum Cleaning Procedures, and Equipment used to Comply with the Ban on Dry Sweeping. - All member companies reported that they were working on programs to eliminate dry sweeping. Two companies reported that they have discussed the use of sweeping compounds and items such as "Endust" with the OSHA inspector. In both cases the inspectors indicated that using these sweeping aids would be acceptable. There was considerable discussion of the types of vacuum equipment in use. Reference was made to the following: Abington (central system) Atlas (55 gallon drum type) Batson Litter Gitter Billy Goat Clark(vet & dry) Huf fman Nilfish Tennent Walkie-sweeper (10 to 40 gallon shop-vac type) The company reporting on the shop-vac type of cleaners indicated that a portion of filter bag sewn to fit the external exhaust port on these vacuums gives added insurance against dust leaks should one of the internal filters fail. Minutes - Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - cont. Page 2 3. Dust Collection Equipment - There was no new technology in dust collection reported on; however, two companies did discuss their experience with recent installations of negative pressure and pulse-type collectors. Two methods of automatic bagging of fly or fiber were disucssed. Photo? of the installations were reviewed. 4. Wet Processing Techniques - All companies are using some form of wet processing. The area of most general use is in weaving. Considerable experimentation in wet twisting is being carried out. At least three companies indicated that they were working on wet carding techniques.' 5. OSHA - Recent Inspections - Only one company reported any OSHA inspections since the last meeting. General impression was that the inspectors were well trained and willing to help with interpretations of rules. They specifically stated that in situations of question you should ask them, or call the Regional Office if necessary, rather than take someone else's advice on interpretation. 6. Noise Control & Protective Equipment - In weaving some companies are experimenting with accoustical fiberglas panels to box in the ends of looms. Only moderate success to date. Major problem is that sound is bounced toward operator. Experiments with "Sound-Mat LF" and Plexiglas enclosure are promising for reducing braider noise. 7. Protective Clothing - One company is using disposable spin-bonded Oleifin garments. This material sheds asbestos well. v 8. Respirators - One new model was exhibited. Unit had replaceable cartridge housing and was approved by the U. S. Bureau of Mines. Respectfully submitted, K. A. Roberts, Chairman Minutes ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston,S.C. The Asbestos Advisory Committee met with all member companies in attendance. From time to time, the Institute receives requests from various outside concerns for pictures, graphs, and charts such as those which appear in our Handbook of Asbestos Textiles. The problem in fulfilling these requests is obvious -- you always run the risk of not getting the photographic plates or"cuts", back! To alleviate this situation the Committee has asked the Secretary to procure and maintain a catalog of glossy prints which can be used to fill these requests from qualified sources. The Asbestos Advisory Committee spent a great deal of time last year in the preparation of our brochure on the recommended procedures for the safe handling of asbestos textiles. Up until November 1971 the number of requests for this brochure was nominal. However, after a press notice regarding its availability appeared in two trade journals, the requests have multiplied significantly with copies being sent to shipyards, various heavy industries, the U.S.Navy, colleges, insurance companies, and -- the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. At our meeting last October our Committee requested that Mr. Sheckler, Chairman of our Environmental Health Committee,contact Dr.Lewis Cralley in order to determine the status of his report regarding the HEW study of in-plant potential health hazards to asbestos textile workers when exposed to an environment which contained certain quantities of asbestos dust. In December Hr. Sheckler reported that:"Dr. Lewis Cralley appears to out of the picture as far as the asbestos health study or activities are concerned. In fact, he appears to be out of that total area of responsibility. Dr. Wagner and Dr. Johnson have taken over the work. Both are young and appear to share the Selikoff opinions and approach." Commenting on the thought that Dr. Cralley might serve ATI as a "consultant'/Hr. Sheckler said:-"In that Lewis Cralley is apparently not a part of the present team, hi3 services as a consultant to ATI might be of little value and possibly ineffective." On December 7, 1971, the Department of Labor issued an Emergency Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust, the details of which were discussed in detail in our Legal Counsel's Report.earlier today. This new proposed standard will be further reviewed on the ll|th of March in Washington,D.C. The Asoestos Advisory Committee has asked Mr. Scowcroft to contact the AIA and determine just what type of presentation they plan to make, and to offer what assistance we can in the preparation of this presentation. Further, we are requesting that Mr. Sheckler attend the March li^th meeting as the ATI'3 repre sentative and make a report to the Secretary regarding the outcome for dissemination to ATI members. Respectfully submitted, E.A, Morris, Chairman u.a> 1 3,1^74 oJ asbestos textile institute MINUTES -- GENERAL MEETING February 3, 1972 - THE MILLS HYATT HOUSE, Charleston, South Carolina In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORPORATION J. W. Christenbury Us. Maaskant H. B. Walter ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED P. E. Leclerc G. F. A. Brink GAKLOCK, INC. Alex. Kuzmuk S. G. Dixit BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED C. E. Schoch Walter H. Smith JOHNS-MANVTLLE CORPORATION N. D. Brown K. A, Roberts LAKE ASBESTOS OP QUEBEC, LTD. E. A. Ferrell C. E. Stlefken (ASARCO) N1C0LET INDUSTRIES, INC. J. K. Whittaker E. W. Russell TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO.,LTD. B. J. Corson . K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. 4.. . Moody E. C. Bratt D. E. Childers J. W. Echerd * TURNER & NEWALL LIMITED B. Lincoln NIPPON ASBESTOS CO. LTD. Y. Ssto * RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. M. Q. Scovcroft J. V. Hawkins, Dr. J. L. Goodman M. V. Oliver -. -. Puckhaber R. T. Matthews - CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. f ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE B. E. Sunbury, Exec. Secy. UNIROYAL, INC. E. A. Morris D. I. Austin, Jr. B. E. Carden R. C. Hunt S. J. Peele, Jr. -. -. F.llett ***** Minutes ***** T. President "Moody called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. Those in attendance were asked to stand and give their name and company. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion of Mr. Kuzmuk, seconded by K.. A. Roberts, it was voted to omit reading of same. Minutes - ATI General Meeting ) Page 2 3. Treasurer Kurauk presented the Financial Report. Mr. S. J. Peele, Jr., moved that It accepted. Motion seconded by C. E. Stlefken, so voted unanimously. The report is tached to these minutes. 4. Legal Counsel Wendell 2. Alcorn reviewed developments under the Williams-Steiger Occu pational Safety and Health Act since it became effective on April 28, 1971. The full text of his remarks is attached. 5. Mr. Paul E. Leclerc, Regional Sales Manager, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, in reporting for the FIBRE PRODUCERS stated:- "Due to a very heavy demand for asbestos in 1970 quite a number of orders remained unshipped at the end of that year and resulted in a backlog of orders that were carried into 1971. Shipments in the first three months of the year 1971 showed an Increase of more than BZ over the corresponding period of 1970. As at June 30, 1971, total shipments by the Q.A.K.A. members in Eastern Canada, were up 11Z over 1970. Then came the slow months of July, August, September and October. While November and December showed considerable improvement over the previous four months, total shipments for the year were down 2Z as compared to 1970. ' The demand for Group 3 fibres was lower during the past year and shipments were down 13.5Z for the 12 months. This brings us into 1972 with fairly good Inventories of all grades including Group 3, with the exception of crudes which are in very short supply. ' To sum it up, Insofar as the members of the ATI are concerned, all grades of Group 3 -pinning fibres are available and our friends in British Columbia are in the same position with the possible exception of Grade AAA. It Is hoped that the expected Improvement in business conditions in this country (USA) will materialize and the asbestos producers earnestly hope that the textile Industry will have a very good year in 19/2." ' President Moody expressed the appreciation of ATI members to Mr. Leclerc for his comprehensive report. 6. Announcements:- President Moody announced that the new chairman of the Fiber Testing Committee was Mr. C. E. Stlefken (ASARC0)* who has served on that committee for several years as a representative of Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. The appointment is effective at once. In anticipation that Chairman Sheckler of the Environmental Health Committee will tender his resignation in the near future, Mr. L. F. Dierlnger, Industrial Hygienist, Uniroyal, Inc., was appointed chairman of that committee effective with the next meeting, June 7-8y 1972. Mr. Norman D. Brown, who has represented Johns-Manvllle Corporation on the Board of Governors for approximately one and one-half years has resigned due to a ' change in his job responsibilities. Mr. Malcom S. Lindstrom was elected to the Board of Governors as J/M's new representative. ASARCO (American Smelting A Refining Company) parent company of Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Limited.) General Meeting - -cont. J Page 3 sports:- The Chairmen of the Committees listed below presented their reports, each Is attached to these minutes. rglene & Mfg. Committee - K. A. Roberts, Chairman :os Advisory Committee - E. A. Morris, Chairman Leal Committee - J. W. Echerd, Chairman Testing Committee - C. E. Stlefken, Chairman ioody informed the members that a plaque had been prepared for presentation to ckler at this meeting but that Mr. Sheckler could not attend due to other Mr. Norman D, Brown accepted the award for Mr. Sheckler. The plaque reads:- Presented to . CLIFFORD L. SHECKLER of Johns-Manville Corporation Chairman -A.T.I. Environmental Health Committee 1969 - 1971 For his outstanding leadership In the field of Environmental Health . . ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE February 3, 1972 Moody announced that the next A.T.I. General Meeting vould be held on June the Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Washington, D. C. (This is actually in a., convenient to the National Airport.) 1 Meeting will be held September 18-20, 1972 (Monday-Wednesday) at the try Club, Absecon, N. J. (near Atlantic City, N. J.). - ing no further business to come before the meeting it vas duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted, ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds January 10. 1Q72 Balance On Band at last report (Sept.9. 1971) General Fund Recerve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 788.54 12769.14.6 91.50 Total On Band at last report Receipts TFo"Reserve Fund (Interest to 12/31/71) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 271.22 96.117 Total received $136^9.50 369.69 Total On Band and Received Disbursements legal Retainer ( 3 raos. ending 9/30/71 ) $ 750.00 Legal Scpehses ( 3 uos. " 9/30/71 ) ------- Secretary's salary ( 4 mos.) 948.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 6 mos.) 156.00 Secretary's travel expense (Oct. ATI mtg ) 215.00 Office rent ( 4 mos.) 300.00 A.T.I. Heeting expense (Oct.6-8,1971 ) 1505.20 Printing & Office Supplies 110.52 Telephone ( Ijmos.) 193*32 Accountant (D.A. Caruso, oneyear ) 300.00 Dues - IKF and ASTH 50.00 Insurance - B.& L. Dust Counter (One year) 93*00 Stenographic 6.00 Petty Cash (Vouchers 551 - 579 inclusive) 118.05 $ 14019.19 Total Disbursements 4745.09 Balance On Hand as of January 10, 1972 $ 9274.10 Funds (as of January 10,1972) General Fund Reserve Fund O.'ith interest to 12/31/71) Petty Cash Fund $ 160.84 9040.68 (*) 72.58 Total Funds $ 9274.10 Assets (as of January 10,1972) Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable - 1972 Dues " " - Book Salos Postage On Hand ' Furniture tc Equipment (Nominal Value) Liabilities Accounts payable Total Assets Het Uorth $ 9274.10 9750.00 47.96 11.40 1.00 $ 19084.46 1902.03 $ 17182,43 (>) 53000.00 transferred to General Fund on 10/1/71 (-) 51000.00 " " " " " 11/3/71 Respectfully submitted. H. 2. Sunbury, Asst reasurer REMARKS OT COUNSEL Asbestos Textile Institute -- General Meeting -- February 3, 1972 The Mills-Hyatt Bouse, Charleston, S. C. BACKGROUND The Villiams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 655) vas signed Into law on December 29, 1970, and became effective April 28, 1971. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) vas established to administer the Act under the Department of Labor. The expressed purpose of the legislation is "to assure so far as possible every verting man and woman in the Nation safe and healthful working conditions and to preserve our human resources .... n To implement this purpose, provision is made for the pro mulgation of mandatory occupational health and safety standards, as well as related research, information, education and training functions. Machinery is also provided to assist and encourage the states to develop satisfactory programs to promote occupational safety and health. The Secretary of Labor is authorized to set three types of standards: interim, permanent and emergency. Whenever the compliance division of OSHA concludes that an employer (defined as a person "engaged in a business affecting commerce who has mployees . . . .") has violated a standard, a citation is issued and the employer is tlfled of any proposed penalty. If the employer objects to the citation or the proposed penalty, the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Coomission conducts a review and Issues an order, which is subject to judicial review by a U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. OSHA, in cooperation with the D. S. Department of Health^ Education and Welfare, is proceeding to develop and carry out occupational safety and health research. HEW has responsibilities under the Act, and these are being met by the newly formed National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). NIOSH is responsible for most occupational safety and health research, evaluation of hazards, toxicity determinations and manpower training and development. Also, it is undertaking special industry-wide studies of chronic or low-level exposure to hazardous substances as well as research into psychological, motivational and behavioral factors Involved in occupational safety aad health programs. INCREASED EMPHASIS ON HEALTH OSHA's Increased concern with occupational health problems is prompted by the fact that about 60Z of the complaints received by it have alleged health hazards. As part of its emphasis on health, OSHA issued an emergency standard limiting the exposure of employees to asbestos dust, effective December 7, 1971. The standard vas adopted pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act following studies by NIOSH and recommendations by the American Conference on Government Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). It has been determined by both NIOSH and ACGIH that the former asbestos standard constituted a grave danger to employees exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average oncentratlon and, thus, an emergency standard vas required. The old standard for exposure to asbestos dust was promulgated under the Valsh-Hcaley Public Contracts Act on May 20, 1969. It called for no more than 12 fibers per milliliter greater than five microns in length or two million particles per cubic foot of air. OSHA termed this ' 12-fiber level of exposure "a grave danger to employees exposed to this 8-hour time weighted average concentration." Remarks of Counsel - cone. 0 .) Page 2 NTOSH agreed with ACC1H that the new standard would provide a substantial base for * protection of workers in contact with asbestos dust. It limits the 8-hour time weighted average airborne concentration of asbestos dust to which employees are exposed to no more than five fibers per milliliter greater than five microns in length. Con centrations above five fibers per milliliter, but not to exceed ten fibers, are permissible up tp a total of 15 minutes per hour up to five hours In an 8-hour day. An emergency temporary asbestos standard of two fibers per milliliter had been re quested by the AFL-CIO in a letter to the Department of Labor. The union cited as evidence of the need for a revised standard a study conducted by Dr. Irvin J. Selikoff and the staff of the Mount Sinai School of Medicine (in cooperation vlth the AFL-CIO and the Ad Hoc Committee on the Asbestos Hazard of the AFL-CIO Industrial Union Department). The five-fiber emergency standard was criticized by Lorin H. Kerr, M. D., chief of the Department of Occupational Health for the United Mine Vorkers of America. He stated that the standard "is appreciably higher than the non-hazardous level" called for in recent medical publications. Dr. Raymond Murphy of the department of physiology at Harvard, vho has studied the effects of asbestos dust exposure on industrial vorkers, agrees with the union physician. Dr.Mhrphy concludes that even a level of two fibers per milliliter, or one-thousandth of a liter, may be hazardous to health. Dr. Murphy and his colleagues found that lung disease developed in vorkers vho sanded asbestos floor tiles and were chronically exposed to about 1.3 fibers per milliliter. Also, in a letter to Assistant Labor Secretary George Guenther, Dr. Kerr advised that the UMW is "equally concerned that this emergency standard is restricted in its ''pllcability to construction workers," to the exclusion of coal milers (vho are covered the Coal Mine Health and Safety.Act). Recent studies indicate that some strip miners may be exposed to dangerous levels of asbestos dust. * On January 11, 1972, OSHA announced that, pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Act, a rule-making proceeding was being initiated to consider amending the regulations under the Act (29 CFR Part 1910). Interested persons are Invited to submit data, views and arguments concerning the permanent adoption of the emergency standard and additional proposed rules on subsidiary issues. The views must be submitted by February 11. In addition, oral data, views and arguments will be received by a hearing examiner on March 14. As proposed January 11, the temporary standard shall apply to "every employee . . . In every employment and place of employment... 7covered by 1910.12, 1910.13, 1910/14, 1910.15, or 1910.16 of this Subpart B (of 29 CFR Fart 1910)7 , in lieu or any different standard on exposure to asbestos dust which would otherwise be applicable (by virtue oi any of those sections)." The promulgation of the temporary emergency standard is in line with the increasing concern of OSILA with occupational health problems. Assistant Secretary Guenther recently suggested that more trade associations establish industry-wide committees on job safety and health. Their functions should be to analyze standards in order to determine which are specifically relevant to the particular industry, to recommend that trade association members participate in standards-making activities, to suggest new standards and to advise members of the trade on technical matters. On January 4, 1972, OSHA announced a "Target Health Hazards" program whose purpose Is to reduce the health hazards posed by exposure to five toxic substances" -- asbestos, cotton dust, silica, lead and carbon monoxide. Mr. Guenther described it as the health counterpart to the safety-oriented Target Industries Program. 5.em3rks of Counsel - cent. (.) ) Page 3 In announcing the Target Health Hazards program, Mr. Guenther noted that asbestos o -produce asbestosis and asbestos fibers in the lungs may lead to cancer. Urgent .tion to curtail this health hazard is indicated by the fact that in the fields of insulation, manufacturing of prodncts using asbestos, shipbuilding, construction and other Industries, there are more than 200,000 employees who face risks from asbestos exposure. . OSRA conducted an "Executive-briefing Special Session" on the Target Health Hazards program in Washington on January 26, which Mr. Sheckler of Johns-Manville attended. The briefing was aimed at informing employers of the details of the program. Yesterday, February 2, a general orientation meeting was scheduled for management, labor, government and professionals. On the state level, the Illinois Pollution Control Board, In January 1972, passed controls on asbestos which prohibit the manufacturing or the processing of asbestoscontaining products without a permit after June 30, 1972. Such material applied in xonstructlon or repair must be coated with a sealant and Installed to safeguard against emissions. Emission from plants manufacturing such products will be limited to two fibers per cubic centimeter of air. Emission regulation is also applied to demolition projects, and all transported asbestos material must be enclosed. A ban was placed on the spraying of such materials or fibers as veil as on visible emissions of nonasbestos fibers in open areas during construction, alteration and repair of structures as of March 31, 1972. The City of Chicago passed a similar, but less stringent, ban. C0NCU3SI0W ' Since the Federal Act became effective, the emphasis by OSHA has shifted in at least jo significant ways. During the early stages, Che so-called "general duty clause" was xhe basis for many compliance actions. This clause is Section 5(a)(1) of the Act. It states" "Each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees." - As evidenced by OSRA's enforcement actions, the general duty clause was not mere window dressing. However, as standards for safety and health have been promulgated and adopted by OSHA, use of the general duty clause has given way to the enforcement of these .specific standards themselves. The second major shift in emphasis has been from the initial accent on safety, as -evidenced by the Target Industries Program, to a concentration on occupational health hazards. This has resulted from statistics compiled by OSHA which show chat most com plaints concern health rather than safety hazards. But it would be erroneous to think that either the general duty clause of OSHA's concern with safety conditions can be ignored with Impunity by employers. Instead, the conclusion must be that now OSHA is equally concerned with health hazards as with safety problems and is moving forward to develop, adopt and continually improve standards for occupational health and safety, all in coordination with NI0SH. Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Cadwaladcr, Wickersham 6 Taft . MINUTES______ (_} technical committee Asbestos Textile Institute February 3 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, S.C. In Attendance: J.W. Hawkins William Maaskant D.T. Austin J.W. Echerd' --Raybestoe-Manhattan, Inc. --American Asbestos Textile Corp. --Uniroyal, Inc. --H.K. Porter Company, Inc. The ASTM Asbestos Textile Standards approved in 1967 are up for revision this year. These include D1571, D315 and D1918. Most' of the Technical Committee's time was used in work on ASTM Specification D1571 and review of proposed Revision "C" of MIL-C-822h9. The following reccnmendations were made: PI$71. Woven Asbestos Cloth 1. That we investigate increasing the relative humidity require ment from 50 to 65 to agree with Specification D1776 for Standard Conditions. ' 2. That we issue a statement on Precision and Accuracy similar to that we used in Standard D628. MH-C-822L9; Cloth, Coated, Asbestos, Herringbone Twill, Aluminized. Proposed Rev. UC". ' 1. That the committee chairman write Mr. C.J. Zemme requesting the reference to cotton be eliminated in Item' 1*1 and. that cotton fibers" be replaced by "nontoxic organic fibers" in Item 3>2.1. MH-I-2h2hh, Insulation Materials, Thermal, with Special Corrosion and Chloride Requirements - the committee recommends that producers of material sold against MIL-I-2h2bh specify the material conforms to specification when shipped. Contamination in route may alter the chemical composition before it reaches its destination. It was reported that the following items were approved by subcommittee Ah of ASTM committee D-13. 1. Proposed revision of "Magnetic Rating of Asbestos Fibers and Textile Products" dated December 3, 1971 (D1118). 2. Proposed revision Section lh on Precision and Accuracy "Asbestos Content of Asbestos Textile Materials". (D1918). 3. Deletion of Standard "Heat Aging of Asbestos Textiles". (D1573). The Spring Meeting of Committee D-13, Subcommittee A-h will be held at the Belmont Plaza Hotel, New York, N.T. on March 22, 1972. Our Task Group on Revision of Standards will meet at 9:30 A.M. The General Meeting is schedule A. for 1:30 P.M. - " bmitted, . Chairman Minutes ' ASBESTOS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute February 3 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston,S.C. The Asbestos Advisory Committee met with all member companies in attendance. ' From time to time, the Institute receives requests from various --outside concerns for pictures, graphs, and charts such as those which appear in our Handbook of Asbestos Textiles. The problem in fulfilling these requests is obvious -- you always run the risk of not getting the photographic plates or"cuts", back! To alleviate this situation the Committee has asked the Secretary -to procure and maintain a catalog of glossy prints which can be used to fill these requests from qualified sources. ' . The Asbestos Advisory Committee spent a great deal.of time last year in the preparation of our brochure on the recommended procedures for the safe handling of asbestos textiles. Up until November 1971 the number of requests for this brochure was nominal. However, after a press notice regarding its availability appeared in two trade journals, the requests have multiplied significantly with copies being sent to shipyards, various heavy industries, the U.S.Navy, colleges, insurance companies, and -- the Mount Sinai School of Medicine. At our meeting last October our Committee requested that Mr.-Sheckler, Chairman of our Environmental Health Committee,contact Dr.Lewis Cralley in order to determine the status of his report regarding the HEW study of in-plant potential health hazards to asbestos textile workers when exposed to an environment which contained certain quantities of asbestos dust. In December Mr. Sheckler reported that:"Dr. Lewis Cralley appears to out of the picture as far as the asbestos health study or activities are concerned. In fact, he appears to be out of that total area of responsibility. Dr. Wagner and Dr. Johnson have taken over the work. Both are young and appear to share the Selikoff opinions and approach." Commenting on the thought that Dr. Cralley might serve ATI as a "consul tant"rir. Sheckler said:-"In that Lewis Cralley is apparently not a part of the prosent team, his services as a consultant to ATI might be of little value and possibly ineffective." On Docember 7, 1971, the Department of Labor issued an Emergency Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust, the details of which were discussod in detail in our Legal Counsel's Reportearlier today. This new proposod standard will be further reviewed on the 14th of March in Washington,D.C. The Asbestos Advisory Committee has asked Mr. Scowcroft to contact tho AlA and determine Just what type of presentation they plan to malco, and to offer what assistance we can in the preparation of this presentation. Further, wo are requesting that Kr. Sheckler attend the March lkth meeting as the ATI's repre sentative and make a report to the Socrotory regarding the outcome for dissemination to ATI momoers. Respectfully submitted, E.A. Morris, Chairman MINUTES Fiber Testing Committee Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Kills Hyatt Bouse - Charleston. S. C. In Attendance: C. E- Stiefken, Chairman American Smelting & Refining Co.,(Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd.) D. E. Childers..................................... H. K. Torter Company, Inc. G.F.A.Brink ............... . ................... Asbestos Corporation Limited Valter H. Smith ................................. Bell Asbestos Mines Limited Bernard Lincoln .................................. Turner & Nevall, Ltd. H. E. Sunbury ..................................A.T.I. Mr. Sunbury, Secretary of A.T.I., opened the meeting, and announced that Mr. Steifken had been appointed as the new chairman of the Fiber Testing Committee at the meeting of the Board of Governors on the previous day. He succeeds Mr. D. E. Childers who has served as chairman during 1970 and 1971. Mr. Stiefken.ls an employee of the American Smelting & Refining Company (ASARCO) and has represented their subsidiary, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., on this committee for several years. Taking over as Chairman Mr. Stiefken called attention to the fact that only one Regular Member of A.T.I. had a representative serving on the Fiber Testing Conaittee (Mr. Childers) at the present time and that this created an imbalance vhlch should be corrected promptly. The Secretary agreed to bring this matter to the .attention of the Board of Governors. ` The meeting vas devoted exclusively to discussion of the setting up of a 3rd Edition of the manual "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre". Included in the discussion were revisions of tests adopted recently by the Q.A.M.A. . The new edition of the manual, from present indications, will probably be con siderably larger. The present thought is to have it in loose-leaf form. While no cost estimates have yet been obtained there is every reason to believe that the new edition will cost substantially more than the 1966 edition, which was $1.89 per copy. The function of the A.T.I. Fiber Testing Committee in this endeavor will be to take the lead in assembling the newer tests, and revisions of older tests, into a comprehensive manual. This committee will have the final approval and will therefore have to review every test procedure. We anticipate a task force meeting of the committee with representatives of the QAMA Technical Committee will be advisable to expedite the work. This should be held in the near future at a mutually convenient place - possibly Sherbrooke or Montreal. Respectfully submitted. C. E. Stiefken, Chairman MINUTES Ar Hygiene & Mfg. Committee Asbestos Textile Institute February 3, 1972 - The Mills Hyatt House, Charleston, S. C. In attendance: K. A. Roberts, Chm............................... .... Johns-Manville Corp. L. E. Moody ............. H. K. Forter Company, Inc. E. C. Bratt ........... H. E. Forter Company, Inc. R. T. Matthew ........... Raybestos-Kanhattan, Inc. J. E. Day, Jr. .......... Raybestos-Kanhattan, Inc. T>r. J. L. Goodwin ......... Raybestos-Kanhattan, Inc. H. H. Valter ............................................... American Asbestos Textile Corp. E. A. Farrell ........... Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. S. C. Dixit ... .................................... Carlock, Inc. ' R. C. Hunt...................... .......................... Uniroyal, Inc. B. E. Carden ............... ....... Uniroyal, Inc. J. K. Whittaker ..... .................. Nicolet Industries, Inc. Y. Sato ......................................................... Nippon Asbestos Co. Ltd. H. J. Corson ........... Turner Bros. Asbestos Co., Ltd. * * * * * Minutes * * * * e 1. Waste Disposal Procedures - The most generally practical method of disposing of non-usable asbestos waste is to bag it, using plastic bags, and tie. The use of baling equipment was discussed, but same is felt to be unacceptable due to the fact that the final compressed unit is not wrapped thus leaving the asbestos fibers exposed. 2. Vacuum Cleaninr, Procedures, and Equipment used to Comply with the Ban on Dry Sweeping. - All member companies reported that they were working on programs to eliminate dry sweeping. Two companies reported that they have discussed the use of sweeping compounds and items such as "Endust" with the OSHA inspector. In both cases the inspectors indicated that using these sweeping aids would be acceptable. - There was considerable discussion of the types of vacuum equipment in use. Reference was made to the following: Abington (central system) Atlas (55 gallon drum type) Batson Litter Gitter ' Billy Goat Clark(vet & dry) Huffman h'ilfish Tennent Valkie-sweeper (10 to 40 gallon shop-vac type) The company reporting on the shop-vac type of cleaners indicated that a portion of filter bag sc\m to fit the external exhaust port on these vacuums gives added insurance against dust leaks should one of the internal filters fail. 0 Minutes - Air Hygiene 4 Mfg. Committee - cont. t Page 2 3- Dnst Collection Equipment - There was no new technology in dust collection reported on; however, two companies did discuss their experience with recent installations of negative pressure and pulse-type collectors. Two methods of automatic bagging of fly or fiber were disucssed. Photos of the installations were reviewed. 4. Vet Processing Techniques - All companies are using some form of wet processing. The area of most general use is in weaving. Considerable experimentation in wet twisting is being carried out. At least three companies indicated that they were working on wet carding techniques." 5. OSHA - Recent Inspections - Only one company reported any OSHA Inspections since the last meeting. General Impression was that the inspectors were well trained and willing to help with interpretations of rules. They specifically stated that in situations of question you should ask them, or call the Regional Office if necessary, rather than take someone else's advice on interpretation. 6.. Boise Control & Protective Equipment - In weaving some companies are experimenting with accoustical fiberglas panels to box in the ends of looms. Only moderate success to date. Major problem is chat sound is bounced toward operator. Experiments with "Sound-Mat LF" and Plexiglas enclosure are promising for reducing braider noise. 7. Protective Clothing - One company is using disposable spin-bonded Oleifin garments. This material sheds asbestos well. - 3. Respirators - One new model was exhibited. Unit had replaceable cartridge housing and was approved by the U. S. Bureau of Mines. Respectfully submitted. K. A. Roberts, Chairman Minutes - GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute dUN 8- 1972 ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE MINUTES -- QENBRAL MEBTINQ Page -1 June 8, 1972 - The Key Bridge MARRIOTT Hotel, Arlington,VA. Attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED Wm. M&askant P.E. Leclero J.L. Rainey H.H. Walter BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Walter H. Smith OARLOCK INC. Wm.J.W. Smith S.O. DIXIT Alex. Kuzrnuk LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC,LTD. E.A. Farrell JOHNS-MAHVILLE CORPORATION C.E. Stiefken (ASARCO) C.G. Ouerln M.S. Lindatrom NIPPON ASBESTOS CO.,LTD. K.A. Roberta Y. Sato J.P. Power (Canadian J/M Co.) NICOLET INDUSTRIES CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Oeo. Griswold ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.K. PORTER COMPANY H.E. Sunbury, Exec. Sec'y B.C. Bratt D.E. Childera Guest-of-Honor (Luncheon only) L.E. Moody Carl A. Gnam Miscellaneous Metals & Min'Is Dl^ RAYBESTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. U.S. Dept, of Commerce,Wash.,D.C. J.W. Hawkina R.T. Matthew M.Q. Sooworoft Other attendees: I.H. Weaver John H. Marsh (on June 7th only) UNIROYAL,INC. Raybeatoa-Manhattan,Inc D.T. Austin,Jr. B.E. Cardan B.D. Bittinger L.F. Dieringer W.C. Hitohoook E.A. Morris S.J. Peele,Jr. <hhh* Minutes * 1. President Moody called the meeting to order at 2:00 P.M. Those in attendance were aaked to stand and give their name and oompany. 2. The minutes of the laat meeting were presented for reading. On motion of Mr. Scowcroft, seconded by Mr. Morris, it was voted to omit the reading of same. 3. Treasurer Kuzmuk presented the Financial Report. Mr. 3.J.Peele,Jr. moved that it be aooepted.Motion was seconded by L.F. Dieringer. So voted unanimously. The report is attached to these minutes. asbestos textile institute Report of Funds May lx 1972 Balance On Hand at last report (Jan.10.1972) General Fund Reserve Fund Petty Cash Fund $ 160.8k 90(4.0.68 72.58 Total On Hand as of Jan.16th, 1972 Receipts To Reserve Fund (Interest to 3/31/72) 133.06 To " " (1972 Dues) 2000.00 To General Fund (1972 Dues) 7500.00 To " " (Book Sales) 21^2.66 $927(4-10 9875.72 Total On Hand and Received Legal Services (.6 nos.ending 3/31/72) 314-37.00 Legal Expenses ( 6 mos. " 3/31/72) li.97.l4-5 Secretary's salary ( I4. nos.) 938.00 F.I.C.A. Tax ( 3 mos.) 78.00 N.J.U.A.D. Tax ( 3 mos.) 33*75 Secretary's travel expense 135.00 Office rent ( (4. mos.) 300.00 A.T.I. meeting expense,Feb.2-3.1972 225.71 A.T.I. Meeting expense,Oct.6-8,1971 23.66 Printing 3c Office Supplies (4.0.(414. Stenographic 32*50 Telephone ( (4. mos.) 150.14.0 Travel Reimbursement (J.B.Gordon) 36.20 Flowers, plaque,etc. 65.60 Petty Cash (Vouchers 580-609 inclusive) 112.93 $191(4.9.82 Balance On Hand as of Hay 1st,1972 - - - Funds as of Hay 1,1972 General Fund Reserve Fund (with interest to 3/31/72) Petty Cash Fund $ 1815.67 11173.7(453*77 Assets as of Hay 1, 1972 Total Funds Total Funds as listed above Accounts Receivable (1972 Dues) " " ( Book Sales) Postage On Hand Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) Total Assets * $130(4.3.18 250.00 25.35 10.60 1.00 6106.6((. $130(4-3.18 $13014.3.18 $13330.13 Liabilities none Respectfully submitted. Net North $13330.13 H.E. Sunbury WAsst. Treasurer y MINUTES AIR HYGIENE & MPO. COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 8, 1972 - Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Arlington, VA. In attendance: Chm.K.A. Roberta ............................... Johns-Manville Corp. C.G. Ouerin............................... " n n J.P. Power................................... Canadian Johns-Manville Co. J.L. Rainey .............................. American Asbestos Textile Corp. H.H. Walter............................... " " "" S.G. Dixit.................................. Oarlock Inc. E.C. Bratt ......... H.K. Porter Company,Inc. L.E. Moody................................... " " *B R.T. Matthew............................. Raybeatos-Manhattan,Inc. I.H. Weaver...................... " "" E.A. Farrell ........ Lake Asbestos of Quebec,Ltd. Y. Sato................................. .... . Nippon Asbestos Co.,Ltd. B.D. Bittlnger ....... Uniroyal,Inc. B.E. Carden............................... tt " L.F. Dierlnger.......................... " " P.E. Leclerc ......... Asbestos Corporation Limited * * * Minutes * * * 1. OSHA Standards for Asbestos:- Copies of the Federal Register for June 7, 1972 containing the new OSHA Standards for Asbestos were distributed to those in attendanoe in sufficient quantity to permit reading and discussing. The committee spent the major portion of its time on the Rules and Regulations for exposure to asbestos dust. Methods of Compliance; Monitoring; Warning Signs, Record Keeping; Medical Examinations and Medioal Records; as set forth in the Stan dards . There was general agreement that the asbestos textile industry, because of the nature of textile manufacturing operations, faoed a real problem in trying to oomply with the new regulation of 2 fibers per oubio centimetert whioh are longer than 5 mlorometers) of air, on a time-weighted average, effective July 1, 1976, without incurring excessive manufacturing oosts. 2. Vacuum cleaning equipment:- A good discussion was had of various types. A favorable oamment was made relative to Nilflsh equipment. 3. Other items discussed:- Dust collecting equipment Wet processing technique in spinning and weaving Protective clothing (under 03SA regulations) Respirators (as specified by OSHA) ^ Respectfully submitted, K.A. Roberts, Chairman Minutes - ATI General Meeting - cont. Page-2 -- 4* Legal Counsel Wendell B. Aloorn reviewed developments under the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act that have occurred since our last meeting. The full text of his remarks is attached to these minutes. 5. Mr.Wm.J.W. Smith,V.P.-Sales, BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED reported for the Fibre Producers. He commented that some of the very long . grades of spinning fibers were still in short supply, but the medium and lower spinning grades were ample to meet current demand. In respect to other grades the N0.4. and No.7 Group fibers are in good balanoe, in contrast to a slight oversupply of No.5 and No.6. 6. Announcements:- President Moody anounced the resignation of Mr.C.L. Sheckler as Chairman of the ATI Environmental Health Committee, and the appointment of Mr.L.F. Dieringer, Industrial Hygienist, Uniroyal,Inc., as the new chairman of that committee. Also, the resignation of Mr.K.A. Roberts as Chairman of the ATI Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee due to a change in his company duties. Mr. B.E. Carden, Uniroyal,Inc was appointed to succeed Mr. Roberts. Mr. Moody reported that the Institute was represented at the Publio Hearing held in Washington on March H4., 1972 on "Proposed Standards for Exposure to Asbestos Dust" by Mr. Alex.Kuzmuk, who is a member of the ATI Board of Governors and Treasurer of ATI. The full text of Mr. Kuzmuk's excellent presentation is attached.. 7. Committee Reports:- The Chairmen of the oommittees listed below presented their reports. A oopy of each is attached. Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - K.A. Roberts, Chairman Asbestos Advisory Committee - E.A. Morris, Chaiman Technical Committee - J.V. Hawkins, (Acting Chairman) Fiber Testing Committee - C.E. Stiefken, Chairman 8. President Moody announced that the next A.T.I. General Meeting would be held on: September 18 - 20, 1972 (Monday - Wednesday) at the SEAVIBW COUNTRY CLUB Absecon.N.J, (near Atlantic City,N.J.) 9. There being no further business to come before the meeting it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted. rofitaius ADViiUKif COMMITTEE MEETING June 8, 1972_____________ Key Bridge Marriott Hotel Washington (Arlington) D.C. Mr. President: Mr. Secretary: Gentlemen: The Asbestos Advisory Committee met this morning with all member companies in attendance. . Our discussion this morning centered on--as I am sure most of the other committee discussions did--the newly published Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust. We touched on the various interpretations and the possible impact of the Standard, and I want to thank Wendell Alcorn for his succinct review of the Standard's content. In addition, the proposed banning rule of the Food and Drug Admin istration was also discussed. This rule, as presently constituted, would prohibit or ban the shipment of asbestos-containing consumer garments from interstate commerce, except those which were considered to be bona fide protection devices. Although professing to be on the side of reason, the FDA claims to be under pressure to issue such a ruling which is predicated on the infamous ''asbestos coat affair. " Advance copies of the second draft of the proposed banning rule will be mailed to the ATI for review. In the meantime, however, the Chairman of the Asbestos Advisory Committee, representing the ATI, will meet with the appropriate members of the FDA and attempt to present a truer picture of the issue at hand. Since there was no further business to come before the committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 A.M. Respectfully submitted, Edward A. Morris Chairman TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute - June 8, 1972 - Key Bridge Marriott* Waah.,D.C In Attendance: J. W. Hawkins---------------------- Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. William Maaskant----------------American Asbestos Textile D. T. Austin------------------------ Uniroyal, Inc. Corp. Mr. J. Hawkins acted as chairman due to the absence of Mr. Echerd. MIL-C-10316B - Asbestos Cloth .. Mr. Echerd has received a letter from Mr. Masson (Dept, of Army) stating that reference to ASTM D 1573, Heat Aging, has been deleted from MIL-C-10316B. ASTM D 1573 is being removed from the Book of Standards. Mr. A. M. Blank, Dept, of Army, Belvoir, Va., has advised some customers that MIL-C-10316B is up for revision. ATI or member companies have not been advised. Mr. Echerd will ask for a time extention so textile industry can recommend changes prior to the issuance of the new specification. MIL-C-82278 and MIL-C-82249 - Herringbone Cloth Mr. Zemme of Natick has requested samples of 1.2 lb. herringbone cloth for their evaluation. These samples will have a rayon carrier fiber. If tests are satisfactory, rayon will be included in the new specifications. R/M will submit samples. ASTM D 1118 - Magnetic Rating Edited copies of D 1118 from ASTM and Dr. Scroggie were reviewed. The Technical Committee was in agreement and minor changes will be passed to Mr. Nicodemus by Mr. Maaskant. The section on sampling was rewritten to clarify the procedure. It was also requested that D 2590 remain as a reference in D 1118. ASTM D 1918 - Asbestos Content Edited copies of D 1918 from ASTM and Dr. Scroggie were reviewed. Mr. Maaskant will pass comments to Mr. Nicodemus. Both D 1118 and D 1918 are presently complete and will be published in the next set of standards. A procedure on resistivity of asbestos products wis submitted, it will be discussed at the September meeting. Respectfully submitted. John W., Hawkins* Acting Chairman Minutes FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE Asbestos Textile Institute June 8, 1972 - The Key Bridge Marriott Hotel, Arlington,VA. In attendance: C.E. Stiefken, Chm. . . . American Smelting & Refining Co, (Lake Asbestos of Quebeo Limited) D.E. Childers........................H.K. Porter Company, Ino. Walter H. Smith................... Bell Asbestos Mines Limited 1. The meeting was devoted to a disoussion of the testing procedures presently available for use in the forthcoming 3rd Edition of the "Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual"(See footnote) Letters have been sent to members at large, and to former ohairmen of the ATI Fiber Testing Committee asking for oomments and suggestions applicable to the new manual* 2. The Chairman will weloome all suggestions relative to the makeup of the new manual - preferences as to publishing, type of binding, etc. These should reach him well in advance of the next ATI meeting which is to be held on September 16-20,1972* 3* There are thirty-three available test methods presently being considered for insertion in the new manual. Eighteen of these have been approved by both the QAMA and the AVI, leaving fifteen that have not been approved at this time. 4* We are now at the stage of having to wait for QAMA and ACPA to submit their final approval on the residual tests. When same is received the ATI Fiber Testing Committee will be ready to evaluate all test methods for final printing. 5. A tentative time-table for the test manual project, based on present indications, would be as follows:- (a) June 30# 1972 - QAMA working deadline (b) September 15# 1972 - QAMA tests delivered to ATI (o) October 1972 - Joint meeting of QAMA,ACPA, and ATI to diaouss format, printing, binging, eto. (Tentative - probably to be held in Montreal) (d) February 1973 " Rough final draft of entire new manual (e) Maroh 1973 ~ All oopy for manual to be delivered to the printer. Assuming the above sohedule oan be met it is estimated# based on allowing 8 to 10 weeks for printing, that the new edition of the Chrysotile Asbestos Test Manual should be ready for distribution by June 1st,1973* Respeotfully submitted. C.E. Stiefken, Chairman () Notet The first and seoond editions were titled "Testing Procedures for Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre". (*) o/o'American Smelting & Refining Co. i P.O.Boi x 127. So.Plainf1 i11elJd- T.il.J. 07060 -- 1 Ji"- REMARKS OP COUNSEL Pag* -1- Asbestos Textile Institute -- General Meeting -- June 7-8, 1972 INTRODUCTION Last February in Charleston, South Carolina we talked at length about the Wllllams-Stelger Occupational Safety and Health Act (29 U.S.C. 655) which has now been effective for over a year. This is the Federal law which is administered by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Since the February meeting, there have occurred several developments with respect to OSHA which directly affect asbestos producers and users. These developments are the subject of my remarks today. OSHA DEVELOPMENTS On January 12* 1972i.0fl*A invited coeeeents fros - .... .'I"-;.- . > . (c/filrCJ/V* interested persons on its preppaed__ "Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust". Twelve days later, on January 24th, the Advisory Committee on Asbestos Dust was established to review this standard and make recommenda tions regarding it. The first meeting of the Committee was held February 3 (while we were in Charleston), at which Dr. Marcus M. Key presented the NIOSH "Criteria Document: Recommendations for an Occupational Exposure Standard for Asbestos". The final fruits of the Committee's work were Remarks of Counsel, continued:- Page scheduled to be seen in the form of a permanent standard for asbestos dust exposure to be promulgated by June 7th. , That was yesterday, and has been the main topic of many conversations at this meeting. Thus, the development of a permanent asbestos standard is now past history and atten tion must be turned to present and future compliance. It can certainly be expected that enforcement of the new permanent asbestos standard will be as vigorous as the limitations of OSHA personnel and facilities will allow. Great pressure will be applied in favor of strict enforcement by labor unions, as surely as such groups have lobbied in the past for a low standard of exposure to asbestos dust. In mid-March of this year, the Industrial Union Department of the APL-CIO called exposure to asbestos dust "the most devastating environmental disaster yet perpetrated by any industrial nation" and announced that it planned to use as an example of the disastrous proportions of the I asbestos health hazard the Johns-Manville Corporation plant in Manville, New Jersey. The reason the IUD focused on the Johns-Manville plant, according to a press statement, was "only because the facts are best documented in Manville and because these facts illustrate the need for stringent -2- Remarks of Counsel, continued;- Page -3- control." (See Occupational Safety & Health Reporter, March 16, 1972, at page 967.) In April, the month following the IUD announce ment, there appeared a two-part article in the press directed at the alleged health hazards to which the workers in Mdnville have been exposed. The first part of the article bore the headline, "A Jersey Town is Dying -- Fast"; the second part opened with the heading, "A Man With 8 Months to Live". The article cited several cases of asbestos-related ailments and statements by Dr. Maxwell Borow and Dr. Irving Selikoff. A short time later, an inspection was completed at the Manville, New Jersey plant by industrial hygienists of OSHA. On June 1, the report of that inspection, which resulted in the citation of five violations, was summarized in the press. OSHA termed one of the violations at the Manville plant "serious" and the other four "minor". It said that the serious violation was found in the textiles building, where asbestos is made into yarn for weaving and carding. The four minor violations resulted from employees working without the required protective masks. The investigation and citation of the alleged violations at the Manville plant should be considered typical of future OSHA activities in the enforcement of the asbestos -3 Remarks of Counsel, continued Page -ij.- standard. Following an investigation and citation of violations, OSHA is required to send a notice of proposed penalties to the company, which then has 15 working days within which to notify the Secretary of Labor that it in--^ tends to contest either the citation of the violation or ' the proposed assessment of penalty. If the employer does not file such a notice, the citation and the assessment of penalty is deemed a final order of the OSHA Commission, and such a final order is not subject to review by any court or agency. It should also be noted that employees or their representatives may file a notice with the Secretary claiming that the period of time fixed for the abatement of the violation is unreasonable; in such case, a hearing is held by the Commission. Where the employer appeals from a notice of viola tion or proposed assessment of penalty, he is entitled to a hearing and review by the Commission or hearing examiners. This hearing is a fact-finding proceeding in which the Secretary's citation or proposed penalty may be affirmed, modified or vacated. The Commission's order issued as a result of such hearing becomes final within thirty (30) days. However, if an employer can show that the abatement require ments of a Commission order have not been fulfilled because of factors beyond his control, the Secretary may, after a hearing, either affirm or modify the abatement requirements. Remarks of Counsel,continued Page -5- Where a notice of proposed penalty is.uncontest d or where an employer seeks no review of a final order of the Commission, automatic court enforcement is provided. If the employer fails to comply with this court order, he is subject to punishment for contempt. However, a final order of the Commission may be reviewed, at the option of the person adversely affected or aggrieved by the order, and the review is by a United States circuit court of appeals. To obtain such review, a written petition must be filed in the court within sixty (60) days following the issuance of the order. This court review is governed by the rule of substantial evidence, that is, the findings of fact by the Commission are conclusive before the court if supported by substantial evidence. These court proceedings may result in an enforcement order, the non compliance with which would subject the employer to contempt proceedings. CONCLUSION The promulgation of a permanent asbestos exposure standard has, of course, appeared Inevitable for some time. The big issue over the past few months has been the level of exposure which would be written into the standard. That issue has now been settled, subject to revisions which may -5- Remarks of Counsel, continued Page -6- occur in the future. Companies in the asbestos industry, now face the task of meeting the new standard; and toward this end, OSHA can be expected to conduct inspections and issue citations wherever warranted. The overall process of developing an asbestos exposure standard has involved the balancing of economics against health considerations. Vhile it is still arguable that many of the medical studies submitted in favor of a very low exposure level are distorted and misleading, the balance between economics and health considerations has now been struck. The cost of Implementing the standard will be high; and in recognition of the difficulty of put ting into effect OSHA standards, the law provides that under certain specified conditions, an employer may obtain either a temporary or permanent variance from the standard. On the other hand, it may be expected that labor will vigorously oppose all applications for variances which cannot be Justified in every respect. The variance rule should be Invoked by employers only where a real need and Justification can be found. Wendell B. Alcorn, Atty. Cadwalader, Wickersham A Taft -6- March 13, 1972 Presentation on Proposed Standard for Exposure to Asbestos Dust on behalf of the Asbestos Textile Institute and Its member companies. Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Hearing Examiner U. S. Department of Labor Office of the Under Secretary Washington, D. C. 20210 Re: Hearing on Proposed Standard For Exposure To Asbestos Dust Beginning on March 14, 1972 Dear Mr. Goldberg: My name is Alex Kuzmuk. I am a member of the Board of Governors of the Asbestos Textile Institute. I am here today to officially represent and state the position of the Asbestos Textile institute and its member companies. We are in opposition to the proposed asbestos dust standards as published in the FEDERAL REGISTER, January 12, 1972. We are also opposed to recommendations proposed in the NIOSH criteria package, and by the Asbestos Advisory Committee. / The asbestos textile industry, which this association represents, includes over 4000 job opportunities in manufacturing, plus approximately 35,000 job opportunities in related product fabri cation and sales. The gross business volume for manufacturing alone is over million per year. The gross volume for related fabrication and sales is, therefore, many times this amount* Although this is not the largest segment of the asbestos industry, it is a very important one. Our product lines include the manu- ' Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 2 facture of safety garments, insulations, clutch facings, brake linings, paper dryer felts, mechanical packings and gaskets, laminated plastics, and many other commodities essential to today's technological progress. In many instances, there are no known substitutes for asbestos textile materials. Subsequent to the enactment of the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the threshold limit value for asbestos dust was reduced from 5 million particles per cubic foot of air to 12 fibres per milliliter, 5 microns or greater in length. We, in the asbestos textile industry, made every possible effort to meet the 12 fibre threshold limit value by re-engineering dust hoods and dust collection equipment on cards, spinners, looms, and many other types of equipment. In addition, many of us initiated wet weaving and made extensive additional changes in processes and materials. When the further reduction to the threshold limit value for asbestos dust was published on December 7, 1971, we began all over again to study plans for revising equipment, processes, and materials, for which we had just spent thousands of dollars to install to meet the 12 fibre level. Many of us have not, and cannot, reduce our dust levels to the emergency and proposed 5 fibre threshold limit value. If engineering to a 5 fibre level were feasible on the complex types of machinery and equipment used in the textile industry, the cost of implementation would make it extremely doubtful that this industry could survive economically. We are presently being pressed to the wall by our competitors. The cost of a Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 3 program to meet the proposed asbestos dust standards could be the determining factor for removing American-made asbestos textiles from the market place. The competition to which I refer will not be required to make extensive capital investments to change processes, provide pgptemtiinmmlathing, provide medical examinations, and monitor ing. This competition is primarily from foreign imports, i, therefore, take this opportunity to ask this Federal agency whether it will take the responsibility of recommending equitable tariffs to prevent this economic disaster, if the proposed Asbestos Oust Standards become effective. Beyond the proposed asbestos dust standards published in the January 12, 1972 FEDERAL REGISTER, there are recommendations by the National institute of Occupational Safety and Health, and the Asbestos Advisory Committee. These recommend further reduc tion of the asbestos dust threshold limit, value to 2 fibres per milliliter, plus many additional requirements qqaeesning vv; respirator equipment, protective clothing, monitoring, and others. With the problems we are encountering in attempting to reach the present Emergency Asbestos Standard, it is unrealistic to even consider the feasibility of a 2 fibre standard. I would like to point out that Mr. Clifford L. Sheckler, Chairman of the Asbestos Textile Institute Environmental Health Committee, took the initiative in 1964 to request Or. Lewis Cralley of the Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 P^ge 4 United States Public Health Service to conduct an epidemiological study of our asbestos textile industry. We recognized then that a potential health problem existed and, therefore, we wanted expert advice and assistance to help us solve it. We have neither received the advice nor the assistance which we had hoped for. We opened our plants to the United States Public Health Service personnel for environmental studies, review of our records, and physical examinations of our people. Our member companies urged employee participation in the study, and a substantial represent ative group of workers were involved. We continually requested the United States Public Health Service to increase their efforts and provide interim progress reports. The Public Health Service Asbestos Study of which I speak has not been completed. A recent report, which is a primary factor in the recommendations by NIOSH and the Advisory Committee, was based on this incomplete study. The information provided in the report was based on opinion and speculation, rather than fact. Bad the United States Public Health Service Asbestos Epidemiological Study been completed as continually requested by the Asbestos Textile Institute, we might now be in a position of having factual information as to what the safe threshold limit for asbestos dust really should be. One factor is pertinent to this point. The asbestos related Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 5 disease involvement in the asbestos textile industry is being related to asbestos dust exposure levels as they presently exist rather than at the time the disease was incurred 25-30 years ago. Such a comparison is invalid. All of the past monitoring for asbestos dust in American textile plants has been done using the impinger method for sampling. Today's proposed standards are based on a fibre level using the Milapore filter method for sampling. There is no accurate correlation of impinger counts versus Milapore filter counts established to date. There has been some work done by the United States Public Health Service, but the results are incomplete. This is but one area that dem onstrates the need for further health research studies and eval uations before unnecessarily creating an unrealistic standard that can be the demise of this industry and its related job opportunities. We respectfully urge the Secretary of Labor to: (1) Reconsider the establishment of asbestos standards; (2) reinstate the thres hold limft value for asbestos dust at 12 fibres per milliliter, 5 microns or greater in length for an interim period pending a comprehensive epidemiological study of the entire asbestos in dustry in the United States. I would like to point out that many comparisons have been made between the British and United States asbestos textile industry concerning health problems. The vast differences in materials, equipment and processes make such comparisons unrealistic. (3) Provide for representation of the Asbestos Textile institute on future advisory and study Mr. Arthur M. Goldberg Asbestos Hearing March 13, 1972 Page 6 committees. I would also like to point out that while many detailed require ments are included in the proposed standard, it is absolutely mute On the very important medically substantiated problem of cigarette smoking as associated with exposure to asbestos fibre We, of the Asbestos Textile Industry, have the greatest desire to prevent injury to our employees. We believe this can be accomplished without destroying the asbestos textile industry. Thank you for the privilege of appearing at this hearing today. Very truly yours. .ex Treasuand Member of Board of Governors for the Asbestos Textile institute ak: jc /"etv uarv V !' V. u Agenda BOARD OF GOVERNOR*S MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute February 8, 1968, 3:00 pm. Hotel Roosevelt, N.Y.C. Call to Order - John L. Rainey, Chairman Introductions Dr. L.J. Cralley - TT.5. ?. H. S. Environmental Health Program Minutes of the last meeting Financial Report - N.L.A. Martucci, Treasurer Disposition of A.T.I. Exhibit (now in storage) A.T.I. Dust Counting Equipment: (a) Equipment was delivered to Johns-IIanville, Uanville, N.J. on December 4th, 1967. (b) Insurance coverage is by Inland Marine Policy No. 18CM 102086, expires 12-1-68. in amount 4785.00, annual premium 120.00 (c) Responsibility for repairs, if and when needed, schedule of rotation for use of equipment by members, and method of transpor tation between members, remain to be decided. . "Asbestos Worker's Health Protection Act" - Bill H.R. 12913, was introduced by Congressman Patten of N.J. on Sept.14, 1967. It has been referred to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Government Supply Contracts for Asbestos Textile Products (Hr. Flocken may have further comment on this subject) A.T.I. support far J.A.Bettes project:^History of Asbestos Textiles in U.S.A. Typewriter for A.T.I. office Speaker for the June 1968 meeting Approval of locations for future meetings: June 6-7th, 1968, Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. (Firm) October 3-4th, 1968 - Hotel Hershey, Hershey,Pa. (Firm) February 6-7, 1969 - Grand Hotel, Point Clear, Ala.(near Mobile) (Firm) June 5-6, 1969 - Open - suggestions welcomed. October 9-10, 1969 - Our 25th Anniversary Meeting, and a location suitable for the proper celebration of that event should be chosen. We have been offered these dates by The Carolina, Pinehurst, N.C. and the Secretary has to advise them if we will accept. Other business Adj ournment o Minutes BOARD OP GOVERNOR'S RESTING - February 8, 1968 Hotel Roosevelt, New York, N. Y. In attendance: j. L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corporation E. A. Schnman - Johns-Manville Corporation M. Q. Scowcroft - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. J. L. Mitchell - Tallxnan-McCluskey Fabrics Company L. E. Moody - H. K. Porter Company, Inc. Alex. Kuzmuk - Garlock Inc. R. P. Clark - Uniroyal, Inc. H. L. A. Martucci - Treasurer A.T.I. . P. Jay Flocken - Legal Counsel JL. E. Sunbury - Secretary A.T.I. ' Guests: E.M.Nesvig,V.P. & Gen.Mgr.,Thermoid Div.,H.K.Porter Co.,Inc. Dr.J.H.Y/olfsie, Medical Director, Uniroyal, Inc. A.C.Link, Uniroyal, Inc. C.L.Sheckler, Johns-Manville Corp. M.P.Carson, V.P. - Asbestos Corporation Limited R. Dodds-Hebron, V.P. - Bell Asbestos Mines Limited E.A.Farrell, Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. Dr. J.L.Goodman, Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc.,North Charleston,S.C. Dr. J.L.Cralley, U.S.P.H.Service, Cincinnati,* Ohio H.H.Walter, American Asbestos Textile Corp. * L.C.Yfilliams, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Minutes ****&** I. President Rainey called the meeting to order at 3:00 P.M. Stated that he had received a letter from Mr.G.P.Wiess, Garlock Inc., authorizing ?4r. A lex, Kuzmuk to represent that company at this meeting. Also,that he had a letter from Mr. J.A. Brown, Jr., of Raybestos-Man hattan, Inc.,authorizing Mr.M.Q.Scowcroft to represent that company at this meeting. Further, that he had been advised by Mr.E.M.Nesvig, V.P. & Gen.Mgr., Thermoid Division, H.K.Porter Co.,Inc., that Mr.L.E. Moody would henceforth be that company's representative on the A.T.I. Board of Governors. All of these gentlemen were extended a most cordial welcome. . 2. The regular order of business was changed for the convenience of our guests who were invited to hear Dr.L.J. Cralley report on the Environmental Health Study being conducted by the U.S.Public Health Service. Dr. Cralley, Scientist Director, has been a key figure in the Health Study since Its inception several years ago. Dr. Cralley reported on the progress of the Health Study to date,and plans for its continuation. Expects to resume plant studies in June of this year, but no firm schedule has been set up as to order of visiting plants. Mentioned that exposure to trace metals, as well as asbestos, was of interest as they are trying to find out if trace metals such as nickel, cobalt, manganese, etc., are hazardous and to what extent.  O 3 Minutes of the Board of Governor's meeting, continued: Page -2- In connection with the plant study a "profile" is to he developed on each person, and it is hoped that this can be correlated with the person's health. The past record study of individuals is con sidered important, even though there is considerable work involved to examine past records. Dr. Cralley suggests they micro-film as a minimum degree of expense to individual companies. Should be ready to start this very soon. The U.I.C.C. and Asbestos is Research Council will sponsor a Seminar in the.summer of 1969, and the tentative location is Cardiff, Wales. The British Occupational Health Association have set up certain standards, by fiber length, for M.P.P.C.F. Dr. Cralley feels that by good engineering practices the level of dust concentration can be kept at 5 MPPCF as a maximum, and this would mean safety for operators exposed to chrysotile asbestos fibre. For Amosite fibre, however, respirators should be used. Cliff Sheckler, of Johns-Manville Corporation commented that, while important progress has been made in dust control, it could well be that changes in manufacturing operations will need to be made in future, as removal of dust by air suction may not be sufficient. Johns-Manville is trying to find an answer to the problem of better dust control. He believes also that the asbestos industry must be prepared to answer their customer's questions as to what hazards, if any, exist in handling and using products containing asbestos fibre. Mr. Sheckler said that in his opinion we don't know the dose level as yet, that constitutes a hazard of exposure. A long discussion period followed the report by Dr. Cralley, President Rainey thanked Dr. Cralley for his attendance at this meeting. Our guests left the meeting at this point, and routine matters on the Agenda were taken up. ` 3. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. On motion made by E.A.Schuman, seconded by L.E. Moody, it was voted to omit the reading of the minutes. 4. In the absence of Treasurer Martucci (who had to leave early) the Secretary presented the Financial Report for the period of four months ending January 9, 1968. On motion by E. A. Schuman, seconded by J.L. Mitchell, it was' voted unanimously to accept the report. It is made a part of these minutes. 5. The Secretary reported that the Bausch & Lomb Dust Counting Equipment, purchase of which was approved by the Board of Governors at their meeting in June, 1967, had been received. Total cost was $4814.00. The equipment was delivered to Johns-Manville plant at Manville, N.J. on December 4th, 1967, and has been used by that company to a limited extent since that time. The equipment was brought to the Air Hygiene b. Mfg. Committee meeting on Dec. 8th, and demonstrated. It was turned over to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., at Manheim, Pa., for a tour of use at that location. o ') Minutes of the Board of Governor's meeting, continued: Page -3-.' The Secretary reported that he had covered the equipment with insurance, in the amount of $4785.00, by Inland Marine Policy No. 18CM 102086, expiring 12-1-68. Annual premium is $120.00. 6. President Rainey reported that The A.T.I. Exhibit, now in storage, was to be retired on recommendation of the Sales Promotion Committee. That it had been offered to the Q.A.M.Association, but they were not interested in it. That member companies had been asked to suggest what disposition should be made of the exhibit, and the only suggestion to date was from Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. A letter from Mr.J.A. Brown, Jr.,of that company, offered to store the exhibit without charge, with the Intent to use it in the lobby of their new office building in Manheim,Pa., when same was completed. Mr. Brown stated in his letter, that should the A.T.I. want the exhibit back at some future time that it could be returned to the Institute. Mr. J.L. Mitchell moved that the Raybestos-Manhattan offer be accepted. Mr. R.P, Clark seconded this notion. So voted, unanimously. The Secretary was instructed to arrange for irmediate shipment of the exhibit to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. at Manheim, Pa. 7. The Secretary reported that the Fiber Testing Committee had recommended that custody of the Standard Magnetite samples, turned over to Mr.P.O. Nicodemus of General Electric Co.,Lowell, Mass.,by Dr. Shaw, should revert to the Secretary of the A.T.I# as Mr. Nicodemus wished to be relieved of that responsibility. On motion made by Mr. J.L.Mitchell, seconded by Mr. R.P. Clark, it was voted unanimously that the Secretary should be responsible for the Standard Magnetite samples. - 8. The Secretary asked the Board to approve purchase of a typewriter, stating that the Institute had never owned a typewriter so far as he could determine, as Dr. Shaw, his predecessor, used his personal typewriter, and the Secretary has been using his own typewriter since taking over from Dr. Shaw in July of 1963. Mr. J.L. Mitchell moved that the Secretary be authorized to purchase a new typewriter at a cost not to exceed $300.00. This motion was seconded by Mr. E.A.Schuman. So voted, unanimously. 9. The Secretary Informed the Board that Mr. J.A.Bettes, Jr., (retired) a former president of A.T.I., had undertaken to write a "History of Asbestos Textiles in U.S.A.", that it was a very worth while project in his opinion, and asked the Board what, if any, support should be given this project of A.T.I. ' There was general agreement that it was an admirable project, but inasmuch as Mr. Bettes had not asked for any support from A.T.I., that it would suffice for the Secretary to inform Mr. Bettes that the Board had been informed of his project, thought it an admir able one, and commended him for undertaking it. 10. In regard to a speaker for the June meeting, scheduled to be held June 6-7th, 1968 at the Regency Hyatt House, Atlanta, Ga. JJInates - Board of Governor's Meeting - continued: Page -4- 14r. M.Q. Scowcroft, of Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., on learning that it was time, once again, for his company to accept responsibility for providing a speaker, offered to try and get one. Asked whether it was necessary to have a technical paper, and was assured that any appropriate subject would be acceptable. 11. Approval of location for future A.T.I. meetings: The Secretary reported that he had received confirmed reservations for previously approved locations, namely: June 6-7, I960 at the Regency Hyatt House in Atlanta, Ga.; and October 3-4, 1968 at the Hotel Hershey, Hershey, Penna. He asked far approval of February 6-7, 1969, at the Grand Hotel in Point Clear, Ala., saying that it had been very highly recommended by Mr. K.W.Nelson (Lake Asbestos of Quebea. Ltd) who had attended a meeting there a year or so earlier. A brochure was passed around. Mr. L.. Moody moved that the Grand Hotel be approved. Mr.Scowcroft seconded the motion. So voted unanimously. The Secretary then asked for approval of The Carolina, Pinehurst,N.C. as a location for our A.T.I. meeting to be held October 9-10, 1969, stating that this would be the 25th Anniversary meeting of the Institute, and a suitable location should be chosen. There was favorable reaction to the suggestion that we return to the Carolina Hotel at Pinehurst, N.C.(we held our meeting there in* Feb. 1965), and Mr. Kuzmuk moved that the Secretary accept The Carolina's offer to host our October 1969 meeting. Mr. R.P.Clark seconded this motion. So voted, unanimously. Still open for suggestions is a location for our A.T.I. meeting tobe held June 5-6, 1969. 12. There being no further business to come before this meeting, on motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn. Respectfully submitted H. E. Sunbury Secretary / Report of Fands o ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ) January 9. 1968 Balance on Hand at Last Report (September 11. 1967) General Fund Savings. Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund (Book Sales) $ 832.97 24808.34 38.77 573.32 76<7 $ 25680.08 . 650.02 Total On Hand and Received "Disburs ements .Legal Retainer (3 mos ending 11/30/67) 500.00 Xegal Expense- (3 " " " " ") 270.98 Secretary's salary ( 4 mos) 478.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (3rd Qtr 1967) 33.00 Secretary's travel 250.00 Office rent (4 mos) 300.00 Revision of ASTM Specs.(Travel exp.) 69.25 Printing & Office Supplies 34.45 Stenographic (Labor) 22.00 Meeting expense (October 4-6,1967) 793.11 Telephone (4 mos) 135.28 Exhibit expense 129.20, Accountant (Caruso-Year ending 9/67) 300.00' Dues (I.H.F. and ASTM) 135.00 Dust Counting Equipment(Bausch fc Lomb) 4814.00 Betty Cash (Vouchers 328-347 incl.) 78.92 $ 26330.10 Total Disbursements Balance On Hand January 9, 1968. Funds . General Fund (Bank Statement of 1/9/68) $ 498.17 Savings Fund (Interest to 12/31/67) 17467.66 (*) Petty Cash Fund 21.08 $ 8343.19 'v 17986.91 Assets as of Jan.9.19C3 Total Funds General Fund ~* $ 498.17 Savings Fund . 17467.66 Petty Cash on Hand - 21.08 Accts Receivable (Book Sales) 65.09 Accts Receivable (Dues for 1968) 9000.00 Postage on hand 10.33 Furniture & Equipment (Nominal Value) 1.00 $ 17986.91 Xi abilities (None) Total Assets 27063.33 Net Forth $ 27063.33 (*) Amounts transferred from Savings to General Fund were - $2500.00 on 10/2/67; $600.00 on 12/14/67;$4814.00 on 1/8/68. Respectfully submitted, Asst. Treasurer Co E*^ O E^i t3 co E-h i ^S 1 EV co Co O LU < 6 o o 1 5 1 5 3w 3 .-311 Scr> N X Ei o X H Hin 2 2 oi X Je Po X Q. Ed E- co Eo cu * O H CCcOsl * 3X 03 C<O o CQ cu X O P 2 0 EcZ-* X. Ed TM 6- * CO c 3t 1. O P g* P or' z: <* CU o Eco- Ed 03 & g g S u Ed u XO ---3 > X AO bra 2 . < 01 2 -5 co 5 CO 5 *5 O S <Z cs CU s c/i CQ p x Ed 2 Xo >< as S < a < Q O O p co p x >63* CO X J Pu 2 2 < 2 -3 -4 . 2- CO 2* O> > 2| XS QA E-jt *AB 2P e 5 X 0) A01 Oa CU CS o p co o 6 Eads C<O Q E2-* 12 .A CO P Ed 0 J021 A 3 CO a O Eh CO Ed ciT 01 c CQ S CO < J J Ed CQ a 6c"o* tifl a "CQ Ed in a) <1 Q to 3-s <5 c^ H2=* c 2 2g Ed jg X_ u Xv co y E--h* X X Q CU X O P CO O 8E' s X 2 ^ CO CO < p A A P o- o & Eh co CxO X C<O Ou XX s X. o Q * 3 Q X X 5X X a x5 So x CO < O' Ed O CO 0wQ1* 0) o3r p 2 <X " O E co jo*T X 2 X X 2 CO O <2 X X < X < -a Po o g " OT* 'u or p x g* X5 XM xe <" x eT xX ~7Sa E- O OX X X Eh co f0 ASBESTOS TE X TILE IN STITU TE oC C o >* 3 Pi EP 3 o C 3 C , O pAA CH d 02 3b B6G <60 > cd 0 < hKSsa. : a >a *85 o? 0> (E8 M Es) BC P (- iaH O* wcmd oo ..2 as *j tso lo c &o4 s.C**P2 u a -w r-l Pp <a a bMM P H a I* S >.6-0 95 TOJ *S o ca S *B B l Is a *J c MB P -X < 38 PJ CXO! 5< 3 OPO > SE P Cq 8 aa e* HaEH*-kOaf EMi 1 uo og-Cpo &p. %Jt3o * 3a StJ oM< nso Pu Xu 9*0 B".aSB B o r* ,M nj t-a> CP PC pn .aX 3a <a < i4 U^ *1 E OS 3> a pC OP bb* CB>tJns 5. fc. P 3H C SSS . aP o ^ nna teJaS! Oco i-3 < SOSSl-3.M f.co *j Po* tLo?n#*P3 PE C h Is c CQ < < a hZ e 0 h JO id axp S1 no nc c-5 c 2 EE** U Q B IISb^ OiO O a p O a C ti :4 oU P" M Jp jjfr? MCO f3 S'". . < . . E -O^ 6h 0 La* *- CQCQfl i p t< *> u u ap cca a cd a<o HMs >^.bp a p C nE s UEpl SOE. E-* a s: h c p ou a K ppp pa ScIonE ss. CHQ 10 aa *S E C oa na oCa- S a t-s sa n o a II pH O ee d x * ams hW uu o HC K M O A H H xS Oh rH 43 A S M X h *5 C O o o c x H X Eh cc o0 oo S O O xh . d H S3 h H O ns 43 hA uo X 4* Cu <H o H EH CO ij a <o 1 f *' > h A 43 43 pH h O g w o X 3 I tf >-3 * Sa n O X 43 < O X* 5 1 ^ *u aw g Hj o o *3 pH 43 O 43 X h CH Eh > 8 *4 h o B h 43 as 43 O 8 A43 h 33C*I .s < to 43 hA Oh i al.jgA 6Eh d a O EH^OC h 0> A S3 - A so t o 8 w s Eh o Cu 8 CQ 0 h d h o o e X c 43 o X Cl 4* o O d ' 43 o h S3 O A Oo S3 a C d o o n a0 43 Sgin1 h o d *8 43 . 3 flbal OH43 9 <3S'S 81 A 43 3 ^ 2* o I pH c s 43 o o pH EH O e pH d A a) 4* d O O 1 *3 o 43 c h h 43 33 :1s h c 43 CS c <u M c to X pH J H O hH pH g jXo X 43 o <C0 Eh A o e A O to Cl o tn i x 2c to 3g o CO K e 43 O0 ppHH X 01 h pH O I H 43 rt X J a 43 ha t tox x ea <a 2a Shu j MiJ pH> O' Z WjgA pH I CO has o X 43 co pj aa *3-* C> O s-g *2 *H A3 O O - >0 A< *d AC > O - E d x o Bn h X X 43 C| X O E A ooE O XQ O XU Uu as tee Cx o x *d Ox 43 O h pH W tO a cj H A pH CQ <o pH Ah C A pH 03 4 **.3* 5 C PH P-> I O oO C n ho C h 43 C *o o ItHHS C A dh n 43 A C o n O CO M n O X X ! h u3 E 43 JS O *> h pi 43 to pnH C pH h 43 fc, pH . O 3 CO C > O C C <PH ja o c < H Q iJ & 3 1 to X h Xx dW c n >> CX O X < Oh Cl ac h x o hO A o _ d JS 43 43 43 A pH "O 43 CJ E C pH JS pH E pH 0 0 0,0 p-?jC n OO JS rii n h O > h U pH s*o >a 43 C h > h A pH HOE Ch A O JS U 43 h pH _ o js 43 tO pH 43 C| C U pH < H 43 J O1 X |O XX h n C o Mt fl Oa'O 4^ A 1A n C n as d C n X O oxoxo C X Ac o n x On E x Oh X xx * OXX O x hX A o n to A pH 8 3 n C O <0 . _ JS O pH JS 43 JS 43 43 pH 43 43 Cl "H pH C h CO pHXJjSha-dpHo h -- 43 43 43 .C pH O pH & O A pH _ 'd h A pH C| JSX 0_ C 43 X o 43 X 43 -- pH O h 43 C a X 2 43 <0 O 43 o to *d C C 3 c 43 Cl C O r4 O E 43 d A E o dec X o A C *d *0 C 3 43 >H Ci A OpH O O O 43 OE h pH > U >43 O CT pH A c o > pH o >o C pH O pH OJS > pH O d pH to JS H3H C n pH 43 C pH pH 43 C pH A JS Ci pH h X o c c n 4> pH an O o 43 A pH pH pH O (p pH n A C C 43 *4 O JS n C h pH O IQ Cl 43 3 pH 43 AGct e 4H3 43 pH W 43 H. CO t>-H pH X E < > pH Ei CO pH Cl n CO X 43 O c< t-j X XE a ,, o o h X EH c 43 C A O 43 X CO a n 43 ' < E O pH h h> Eh O pH pH X X 43 pH O X O jj pH X nC h cX X CO *H XX O X 0 ra rH h 'O o CO pH d < Xhn A hO ca >>S O A c c to rO pH O M AX O rH pH h A 1 I * 43 o pH < - C0 A OC h A C 43 to O) OH 43 O d 43 E 43 43 pH t OQ uX1 Uc <oU X X n = pH 43 43 X *d ii pH X h o g go d O c O O E X 43 X C O p s O O a 43 x X pH Hut) x a se Eh X* h gE FHH E ci X X 22CO d o o OCX CO AU use tc h Vi D X pH C E Xh Eh x-fl'd m Ch xdO XX Cl C n Ox C E X x Oh CHO p X Xo OXX c >; X X ox mX x c 5 u OXx X CO Xmn o h nxX a n x - xo e Oxxx sspH X Ep X u s c ax xE O / Co 4 O E-^ 'O E-i S. ti co I ^s * < q co Co O \ CSJ 0- a o o udCS o > H H CD CO c O H CO tg Cd S Z Z uto O 6co3 S > tf <2 CU u 2 Ed s < c < oa 1 IQ 5E- *t 5 8~ c - co 12 O g-sJo3 s05 3 O O' a* C O u ta/>T e CoO <sH CO Cd S3 CO < E^JQ tstooo . co CO U CS?d u- =2 xv> 3 CO O 5 OT* 6g w -J c0o3 -Sa j 53 -W3 g CQ ^ gO CQ &3? Cd r cCoO <B. < .s Q 5* <5 o^ 2c CE-i -- W2H .c 0,,3 .o* 2 E2 G a CU os O oCO Eco- Ecad CO <* ^ 2 CCOO < u co on o- c u E- cd O' 03 CO _ <8 CSd ^ as CO . o 9M 2 E~ Q U CQ Cd oo Ci< o co ct3o CO U o3 O " ECO-1 s Cd 03 CO < ~03 Cd ca Eh Da Ed CO <! gC CD W 'C s ( ozz < Cd CO 8-0 gj ca co = <w coos _*3 Cd -a cr"- "o O OS cs a Cad s Ica 3 ooCO O E- . -->. () i- t ) i C=I p M 6- M 63 EMPh f63i Eh E2O3h XSO aHCO< tCHa PO l0O3 OM r*l 3ffatt a & >H *- O - 2O8 4rH-> 2 OO O> ] O0 r-i 4OJ C3O <> c 0 63 ri s0c 2*ao5 JC Eh O O Cr6-U): OCD CrH> m t* te*d 3*4 O Gb >cs* n0c0 *$9 * 0c P aft pM u0 x **s* Ea 00 M & 0 63 1 Mtco ccEj O t<o0 p00 VCSp. oM> E PpO rH EP O aE 00 to 1 CO >1 ft 3fat AO O ft & M a0 a X >1 M0 S AO0 M Ma c0 aa0 J(3C4 Eh CO Eh Ea 0wr i00n 0 p aE 00 0) t aE 00 lO e 6 0 a 40ncH MPOO0c E Oa ---- Ea a MA> POO E n Ac0 u0 >0 00 (O 1 Ei 0 pp M HTi 6 0 0 a0 a a 0a 03 a0 x r-i 4aH OO co 0E 0 CS c 0 Mn *0 | 0tcro-1ci O Ea 0to 0 1 JA3AOO1 a 2 r6MEHo3rhf M 6a:1 < Ha aa 1-- 5 c cOr-* O c to 0 <11 0 (Q1 01 m 1 00nE xOC0: CS 44 p C0 M<H ta_2 a(O4 Mc0 *>Ca3 P 0a 00 a c0tJ t3, On *<d > 0a pOna tn a I0U3S TD 6mc.. MC as O 0 a 0 p hPnctHo 00 0c to .0tJ jO3r0C. O +* o O E >cH 0cH 1. C tPOOOC4J O ua 0Q00$ 6OH3 C^OC *?C35 -4CJ >0 n0 4O0J ra-)l ASBESTOS TE X TILE INSTITUTE M C O a C > >> c 3 ft oc EP 3 O c 3 ft a 0 pa a c m a c b 3 a a co co < >* a a C ft3 63 4-3 i-jWSEft It1 1 t 11I1 I I1I t1 1I t t t III 1P I 1 1 C 1 1M IOI 1 c M I ->* aC P ft O 3 CO 0 0 ft ft co 0 a a. a rH 03 M n 00 0a 0 tao 0ft. >"H. &fht tXy a >t a a ft OM O^ s c ,a co c S JO c ft p H cc ca a c am a >0 0 ft a 1 3 0 "r-i A >iO 0 a 0 CO 0A ri a p a a a < K K6,3; 0 P > a % ft H M rH ca 0 ft phH Ps < p E a rl to M 63 H Eh A M Ch g c$ M* ss E ft H 0 n mo E a 0 a a 0 a x p to 0 A 0 5 hH a rH 64 ft X P M *rt tH p `ES g M CO0 63 rJ-Si a 3* *a OOH*S 55 *X MX p X aX X XX P ft M M < MO Ah aO PCO o41p <0 ft r3H O O >4 SM _ a Ap 0 g 3 X X ft Eh H 44 Eh a cb Ma 0 0 pr p O tb O n3 COM P hHX ft < ft O MX X a X 63 0 6s 603 < Eh U M ** AH PC p ^a <3 a s Eh E 05s u ft 6* a MA OM a XX Eh ac A CS P a * Eh E CM M ft ft *T-gf O 4-4 3 aa aa H m 0 A a e O 0 a 3 X p a p 0 O P M -H CO Hft ft X Eh 0 a O ft0 < a.; 0 p 0 3 is 63 X 0".^ a OM ?61? p< co CO y Is iMO if-t4j 4O3P A ft aa os ft ffl* < < M 1-3 JS 0A ft x 6E7h sc1 C >C g'E MCO .0C*) cO uO EMh -H CQ t-a o0,0 n P !X35Ig=ofot MC M ft t3 mm C-i'rx %j m 5 hH .!&< Hf2 *o w Sfaa. X M Eh lo M a 64 O *rl P ft 43 h (4 o ap A 6. to (4 Qf 4 4 C2 < O MW j Ja ft P Co cEo x 63%r 64. wpz (x. Eh. M|Ca to) j_C oo Prl Pf,MP a E MS63 H LOCO XQ P * ^p'55*^ **g oA Oa nn ofat ao ft. t-3 sa \v6 & J(') DIRECTORY Page -1- ASBZSTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE JANUARY - 1968 REGULAR MEMBERS American Asbestos Textile Corporation, Norristown,Pa. Garlock Inc., Palmyra, N.Y. Johns-Manville Corporation, New York, N.Y. H.K. Porter Company,Inc., Thermoid Division, Charlotte, N.C. Raybestos-Manhattan.Inc., Manhein,Pa. Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, St. Louis, Mo. Uniroyal, Inc., Fiber & Textile Division, New York,N.Y.. ASSOCIATE TONERS Asbestos Corporation Limited, Thetford Mines, Quebec, Canada Bell Asbestos Mines Limited, Thetford Mines, Quebec, Canada British Belting : Asbestos Ltd., Cleckheaton, Yorkshire, England Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd..Toronto, Ontario, Canada Hilados Y Tejidos De Asbesto, S.A., Toluca, Mexico Lakes Asbestos of Quebec Ltd., Black Lake, Quebec, Canada Societe Anonyne Francaise Du Ferodo, Paris, France Turner Brothers Asbestos Co.,Ltd., Rochdale, England ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE P.0. Box 239 75 Center St., Pompton Lakes, N.J. 07442 U S.A. Phone: 839-2216 (Area Code 201) DIRECTORY ASBESTOS T3CTILE INSTITUTE Page -2 JAirtJARY - 1968 OFFICERS . COMPANY AFFILIATION President -- J.L. Rainey, American Asbestos Textile Corp. Vice President - E.A. Schuman, Johns-Manville Corp.' Treasurer ------- -- N.L.A. Martucci, Garlock Inc. Exec. Secretary - H.E. Sunbury, Asbestos Textile Institute BOARD OF GOVERNORS COMPANY AFFILIATION J.A. Brown,Jr. --Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ,Manheira,Pa. R.P. Clark--------- ----------Uniroyal,Inc.,Fiber l: Textile Division, ' V.innsboro, S.C. L.E. Moody--------------- - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. .Thermoid Div., Charlotte, N. C. J.L. Mitchell ----- --------- Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, St.,Louis, Mo. J.L. Rainey ------------- - American Asbestos Textile Corporation, Norristown, Pa. E.A. Schnnan --------------- Johns-Manville Corporation, New York,N.Y. G.P. Wiess------------------- Garlock Inc., Palmyra, N.Y. legal counsel . P.Jay Flocken------- -- Cadv; a lacier, Y/ickersham ti Taft, One Wall Street, New York, N.Y. 10005 ACCOUNTANT David A. Caruso--------------- David A. Caruso, CPA 26 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 10004 !V /\ DIRECTORY ) Page -3- ASD2ST0S TEXTILE I1STITUTS JANUARY - I960 CO??4ITTZSS Air Hygiene l*. Mfg. Sales Promotion H.H. Valter, Chairman (1) K.Q. Deyard A.C. Link L.E. Moody Kelson C.L. Sheckler R.B. Smith L. C. Williams E.LI. Willingham li.Q. Scowcroft, Chairman(2) J.A. Brown,Jr. . J.V. Christenbury R.P. Clark H.L.A. Martucci J.L. Mitchell J L Rainey E.A. Schuman Technical Fiber Testing J.Y.'. Hawkins, Chairman (3) G.F.A. Brink, Chairman (4) D.T. Austin,Jr. I. Barnett G.E. Houghton D.E. Childers YYn. Maaskant R. Dodds-Kebron J.D. McCluer E.A. Farrell E.A. Morris J.VI. Hawkins D.F. Quealy B. Lincoln' Y'.C. Streib Fiber Producers (5) T.T. Tigert oT . Or. ri.nru.nn.sMKi 74.P. Carson J.D. Christian N.V'. Hendry M.J . Mess el w.v:. Oughtred F.P. Smith Yi'm.J.W. Smith Company Affiliation of Chairmen (1) American Asbestos Textile Corporation (2) Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc., Manhein,Pa. (3) " " ", North Charleston, S.C. (4) Asbestos Corporation Limited, Thetford Mines,P.Q., Canada (5) Spokesman appointed at each General Meeting 1) DIRCT0?.Y Page -4- ASBESTOS tactile institute J a ITUary - 1968 ADDRESSES - REGULAR MEMBERS AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. P.O.Box 228, Norristown,Pa.19404 Phone: 215-275-4602 J.L. Rainey J.Y.'. Christenbury V.'nu Maaskant M.J. Scanlan H.H. Walter J.U. Y.'eber . AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. Plant No.2, P.O.Box 156 Meredith, N.H. 03253 Phone: 603-279-4552 D.F.- Quealy GARLOCK INC., Palmyra, New York 14522 - Phone: 315-597-4811 G.E. Houghton; Alex. Kuznuk; N.L.A. Martucci; G.Parry Y/iess JOHNS*MANVILLE CORPORATION JOHNS-MANVILLE PRODUCTS CORP. 22 East 40th St. Kanville, N.J. 06835 Net: York,!.'.Y. 10016 Phone: 201-725-5000 Phone: LE 2-7600 (A.C.212) K.Q. Beyard R.ra. Billings J.J. McCarthy ' E.A. Schuman E.H. Wells J OKNS-MANVILLE RESEARCH tc ENGINEERING CENTER JOHNS-DANVILLE CO. of Canada,Ltd. Manville, N.J. 08835 P.O. Box 1500 Phone: 201-722-9000 AS3EST OS,P.Q,,Canada Phone: 819-879-5431 I. Barnett P.A. Rogers N.YJ. Hendry C.L. Sheckler K.V, Lindell V/.C. Streib E.H. PORT SR COMPANY,INC. Therr.oid Div.,P.O.Box 10516 Charlotte, N.C. 29201 Phone; 704-372-2880 D.S. Childers J.D. McCluer L.E. Moody H.K. PORTER COI^PANY, INC. Thermoid Division 1250 Porter Bldg. Pittsburgh,Pa. 15219 Phono: 412-3S1-18U0 3.11. Nesvig Geo. Bohrer o DIR SC? OR Y ASBSSTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ) Page -5- JANUARY - 1968 ADDRESSES - REGUT.AR MSI.EPS - continued; RAYBZSTOS-MANHATTAN, INC. Manheim, Pa. 17545 Phone; 717-665-2211 RAY32ST0S-MANTLATTAN, INC. 61 Vilet St.,Passaic,N.J. Phone:201-473-2000 J.A. Brown,Jr. R.L. IJoore M.Q. Scowcroft E.P. Stefl L.C. Vi llllams J.P. Vronski 5.R. Zimmerman,Jr. J.P.D. Rohrbach RAYB3ST0S-MANEATTAN,INC. Gen.Asb.Jc Rubber Division North Charleston,S.C.29406 Phone: 803-744-6261 G.P. Ducker J .Vi. Hawkins K.W. Oliver R.3. Smith Dr.J.L. Goodman TALLMAN-McCLUSKEY FABRICS COMPANY 236 E. Monroe Avenue, P.O.Box 3796 St. Louis, Mo. 63122 Phone: 314-965-1113 J.L, Mitchell R.S. Tallman Juergen Zaha UNIROYAL,INC., Fiber & Textile Division 1230 Avenue of the Americas New York,N.Y. 10020 Phone; Circle 7-5000 (Area code 212) V.Lindsay Wylie Dr. J.K. Wolfsie UNIROYAL,INC.,Fiber-fc Textile Div. P.O.Box 357, 350 Columbia Rd. Winnsboro, S.C. 29180 Phone: 803-635-4651 UNIROYAL, INC.,Fiber c: Textile Div. R.P. Clark Kogansville, Ga. 30250 G.R. Cuthbertson Phone: 404-637-8513 E.A. Morris 1 D.T. Austin,Jr. A.C. Link E.M. Y/iHingham u J LIRECTQRY Page -6- AS32ST0S TEXTILE INSTITUTE JANUARY - 1968 ADDRESSES - ASSOCIATE METBERS ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED, Thetford Mines, Quebec, Canada Phone: 418-335-9171 E.L. Alexander; G.F.A. Brink; M.?. Carson; A.W.G. Gibb'; A.S. Johnson,Jr.; P.E. Leclerc; V/.Y.r. Oughtred; A.L. Penhale; A.C. Steele BELL ASBESTOS 13IHES UiEETED, P.O.Box 99, Thetford Mines, P.Q., Phone: 418-335-5248 . Canada R. Dodds-Hebron; C.H. Schoch; F.P. Smith; Y/m.J.W. Smith; V/.H. Sroith BRITISH BELTING Sc ASBESTOS LIMITED P.O.BOX 12, Cleckheaton, Yorkshire, England Sir William C. Fenton; Charles K. Fenton CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED Suite 1001, 85 Richmond Street V-'est Toronto 1, Ontario, Canada Phone: 705-363-6237 J.D. Christian; T.T. Tigert Dr. R. Kuntze - Ontario Research Foundation, 43 Queen's Park, Toronto 5, Ontario, Canada HILADOS Y TEJIDOS DE ASBESTO, S.A. K.2 Almoloya De Juarez, Toluca, Mexico. Phone: 12-76-43 J.J. Mayer LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LIMITED Black Lake, Quebec, Canada. Phone: 418-423-4226 R.P. Gagnon M.J. Kessel K.V/. Nelson - American Smelting Sc Refining Co., 3422 South 700 Lest, Salt Lake City,Utah 84119 E.A. Farrell - Lake Asbestos of Quebec Limited, 120 Broadway, New Yor!c,H.Y. 10005. Phone:RE 2-.: F00 () J directory AS3Z3TCO TE'.TILE INSTITUTE Page -7- JANUARY - 19GB ADDRESSES - ASSOCIATE 71Z:SJSS - continued: SOCIZTE ANOIYME PRAHCAISS DU FFT.ODO 64, Avenue de la Grande Arnee, Faria 17 erne, France ?.!onsieur Tesniere Societe Anoryme Francaise Du Ferodo 10 Rue Blanqui 93, St. Ouen,(Seine) France Ilonaieur F. Casse1 lladane Goupil; Monsieur Odier Societe Anonyne Francaiae Du Ferodo Boite Poatal Ho.20, Conde-Sur-I!oireau (Calvados) France Monsieur Boiason ......................... TURIIER EROTEUiS AS3EST0S CO.,LTD., Rochdale, England T.R. Earns haw; D.Y;. Hills; JohnY/addell TJ.M. Dectaan, ttechanicsville, Bucks County, Pa.lB$34 U.S.A. Phone: 215-794-7338 B. Lincoln, Turner : Recall Lir.ited, Asbestos Fibre Laboratory, c/o Turners Asbestos Cer.:ent Co.,Ltd. Trafford Park, Manchester 17, England OTPET. ADDRESSES C'dwalader, V.'ickershan : Taft One Wall Street, Rot York,i.'.Y. 10005 Phone:212-425-3000 P.Jay Floclcen (Legal Counsel) David A. Caruso, CPA 23 Broadway, Hot York,".Y. 10004 Phono; Y?H 4-4554 (Area 212) David A. Caruso (Accountant for Asbestos Textile Institute) ASBESTOS TEXTILE IUSTITUTE ?.C. Bo:: 23S, 75 Center St.,?onpton Lakes, R.J. 07442 U.2.A. Phone: 201-339-2215 u ASEEST03 TEXTILE INSTITUTE PAST OFFICERS (1) 1945 - 1943 C.H. Carloush .................................. President G.W. Marshall,Jr............................ Vice President w.c. Scott .................................... .... Treasurer B.D. McKinney ................................ Manager 1947 - 1948 1949 - 1950 G.W. Marshall,Jr............................ President G.S. Fabel ......................................... Vice President w.c. Scott ......................................... Treasurer u.D. McKinney .................................. Manager M.C. Shaw ............................................ Sec'y t: Asst.Treas. (June 1948 ) G.S. Fabel ......................................... President A.R. Byrnes ... ............................ Vice President w.c. Scott ....................................... Treasurer M.C. Shaw ............................................ Sec'y c: Asst.Treas. 1951 - 1952 R.3. Cryor ....................................... G. 3. Fabel ....................................... D.W. Widmayer ................................ M.C. Shaw ......................................... President Vice President Tr sr. surer Sec'y t. Asst.Treas. 1953 - 1954 D.W. Y/idar.yer................................ President F.J. w'akem....................................... Vice President A.J. Scanlan ................................... Treasurer M.C. Shaw .......................................... Sec'y i- Asst.Treas. Kfl 1955 - 1956 F.J. J.F. J.A. J.C-. h.C. Yiakem....................................... Corcoran ................................ Bettes,Jr................................ Schoepf ............ ........................ Shaw ............................................ President Vice President (1953 Vice President (1956 Treasurer Sec'y c; Asst.Treas. 1957 - 1958 J.A. Bettes,Jr.................................. President J.T. Griffis ..................................... Vice President J.G. Schoepf ..................................... Treasurer (1957) T.C. McCluskey ................................ Treasurer (1958) M.C. Shaw ............................................ Sec'y c. Asst. Treas. 1959 - I960 J.T. Griffis ..................................... President A.J. Scanlp.n.................................... Vice President w.s. Hou.cti Treasurer M.C, Shssi ............................................ Sec'y C Asst.Treasure 1961 - 1962 W.s. President T.C. i-icCluakey................................ Vice President A. 3. Whitfield ................................ Treasurer h.C. Trcas ( continued ) AC32ST0S T-3'TIL2 II-'STITUTJ: PAST OFJICIT.S (2) 1963 - 1964 S.J. Peele,Jr................. J.V'. Y'eber ...................... J.A. Bro?m,Jr................. M.C. Shaw ..(To Aug.l ,1963) 2r.ec. Dir.C: Asst.Treas H.iS. Sunbury................. (?rc.n July 1, 1953) 1965 - 1966 J.A. Brown,Jr................. J.L. Rainey ................... 2.A. Scliunan................. .... Treasurer H.2. Sunbury ................. .... Exec.Sec'y Asst.Treas. 1967 - 1968 J.L. Rainey .................... E.A. Schuir.an................. tt.L.A. Ilartucci ..... K.2. Sunbury................. .... iiiec.Sec'y Asst.Treas. o ex- 1C16"? {_) Minutes GENERAL meeting Asbestos Textile Institute October 6, 1967 William Hilton Inn, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina In attendance: AMERICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORP. J.L. Rainey J.W. Christenbury Wm. Maaskant G. S. Fabel H. H. Walter garlock, inc, N.L.A. itartucci JOHNS-MANVILIE CORP. E.H. Wells E.A. Schuman W.C. Atkinson C. L. Sheckler W.C. Streib H.K. PORTER COMPANY. J.A. Gallagher J.D. McCluer D. E. Childers INC. RAY BE STOS-MANHATTAN. Vi.S. Simpson S.R. Zimmerman, Jr- J.A. Brown, Jr. G.F. Ducker M.W. Oliver J.W. Hawkins M.Q. Scowcroft R.ri. Smith J.P. Wronski INC. TALLHAN-MC CLUSKEY FABRICS CO. J. L. Mitchell : UNIROYAL. INC. R. T. Clark D. T. Austin, Jr. . H.M. Willingham S. J. Peele, Jr. F. C. Phillips W.L. Wylie . ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED M.P. Carson G. F.A. Brink P.E. Leclerc BELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm.J.W. Smith . R. Dodds-Hebron LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC LTD. E. A. Farrell K. W. Nelson CAOWALADER. WICKERSHAM ft TAFT P.Jay Flocken (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TETTILE INSTITUTE H. E. Sunbury (Secretary) U.S. Public Health Service br. L.J. Cralley ********* Minutes ********* 1. President Rainey called the meeting to order at 9:40 A.!'., and asked each person in attendance to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. He mentioned that it was particularly grat ifying to have the following company officials present at this Annual Meeting: Mr. W.S. Simpson, President - Raybestos-Manhattan, Incc; Mr. S.R, Zimmerman, Jr., Exec. Vice President, Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; Mr. E.H. Wells, Vice President A Gen. Kgr., Johns-Manville Corp.; Mr. W.L. Wylie, Vice President & Gen. Mgr., Ul.'IROYAL, INC. Also welcomed to the meeting were: Geo.S. Fabel, President of A.T.I. an 1949-1950; Dr. L.J. Cralley, U.S. Public Health Service; and F.C, Phillips, Marketing Manager of UNIROYAL, INC. Minutes_- General Tee^-ang - continued: Page -2 2. The minutes of the last me eting were presented for reading. Mr. J.A. Drown, Jr., moved that reading be omitted; seconded by Mr. N.L.A. Martucci. So voted. 3. The Financial Renort was presented by Treasurer Martucci. Mr. E.A. Schuraan moved that report be accented; Mr. J.A. Brown, Jr., seconded, the motion, and it was so voted. The Report is attached to these minutes. 4. Mr. T.Jay Flocken, Legal Counsel, discussed some of the legal aspects of voluntary product standards and certification programs. Hr. Flocken first analyzed the antitrust considerations relevant to individual company and trade association participation in the initia tion, formulation, and aprroval of voluntary standards. He stated that standardization or simplification have been attacked in cases alleging price-fixing where such a program was utilized as part of a broader effort to secure uniformity of prices or to limit production and to indirectly reduce price competition. The legality of a standards program does not depend upon the mere ex istence of an agreement to standardize but upon an appraisal of the program in the setting of all the circumstances, counsel stated. He briefly reviewed several cases including United States v. National Malleable and Steel Castings Company, The Douglas Fir Plywood Associ ation and Asbestos-Cement Pipe cases. Counsel also discussed two forms of certificati on, self-certifica tion by a producer that a product complies with a given standard and , third-party certification by a trade association or testing la boratory in conjunction with a registered certification mark under the trademark laws. Counsel discussed various specific certification marks registered under the Lanham Act and the provisions of that act providing for cancelation of a nark if the registrant discriminates or refuses to certify goods or services which meet the standards in volved. Counsel noted that two requisites for a valid certification program using a trademark are 'control'* of use of the mark and avail ability of the mark to anyone maintaining the standards which the mark certifies, whether or not a member of the certifying organiza tion. In this regard, the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Radiant Burners v. American Gas Association was noted. 5. The Fibre Producers Rep6rt was given by Mr, H.P. Carson, Vice President - Sales, Asbestos Corporation Limited. He mentioned that slow economic conditions in several countries had adversely affected total shipments of Canadian asbestos fibres in the first eight months of this year - down 8.8% - however, total sales of spinning fibres were up about 1% in that period. Group 4 fibres for use in asbestos-cement products were off, as were spinning fibre sales in Italy, France and Germany, Japan has made a good recovery. The em bargo on Rhodesian fibre continues. However, some Rhodesian is reaching markets thru a third country. 6. President Rainey introduced !)r. Clinton H. Whitehurst, Jr., HeadDept, of Industrial Management, Clemson University, Clemson, S.C.. who gave a most interesting talk entitled; "Operations Research Techniques". We were privileged indeed to have the opportunity to h^ar Dr. Whitehurst, a wellrknown authority in the fie^d of 1J Minutes - General Meeting - continued: J Industrial Management. An abstract of his talk follows: abstract - ''It is profoundly erroneous truism, repeated by all copy books and by eminent people when they are making speeches, that we should cul tivate the habit of thinking of what we are doing. The precise oprosite is the case. __ Civilization advances by extending the number of important opera tions which we can perform without thinking about then.". The above quotation by Alfred North Whitehead was both an introduc tion and, in fact, a summary of the address ''Operations Research Techniques" delivered by Dr. C.H. Whitehurst of Clemson University before the Asbestos Textile Institute at Hilton Head, South Carolina on October 6, 1967. In specific terms the address covered in capsule form ten OR tech niques that could be utilized in a typical industrial organization. Each technique was illustrated by a simple example designed to show its potential as an aid to management decision malting. Included were examples making use of linear programming, Markov processes, econometrics, multiple graphic correlation analysis, input-output models, matrix algebra, industrial dynamics, and a Monte Carlo simu lation model. In each case the relevance of the technique to com puter programming was emphasized. * The large number of techniques discussed was made possible by dis tributing handouts to the audience which contained the specific ex ample, relevant technique, and at least one library reference. The handouts together with explanatory illustrations on an easel board was successful in imparting the potential for OR analysis in a firm's operations. 7. Jack Christian, President of Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd., wrote the Secretary prior to this meeting that neither he nor Tom Tiggert would be able to attend due to the fact that their new Clinton mine, at Clinton Creek, B.C., was due to start production and they would be busy there. President Rainey asked Mr. Wm.J.W. Smith, Bell Asbestos lines Limited, sales representatives for Cassiar, to tell us something about the new mine. Mr. Smith said the Clinton Mine is 600 to 700 miles north of the pre sent Cassiar mine, close to the border of Alaska. Problem of trans porting fibre is somewhat similar to shipments from Cassiar. The type of fibre from the Clinton Mine is generally similar to Cassiar fibre, but there could be some considerable differences. There are both long and short fibres - but Clinton will produce primarily #4 Group fibres, and a secondary grade will be Group 5. Because yield from ore is never precisely known in advance, Mr. Smith stated tba/i perhaps grades may be produced, other than those presently antici** pated. ) Til nut eg - General Meeting - continued: Page -4- B- The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen as listed below; - Air Hygiene Sc Manufacturing Committee - W.C. Atkinson, Sales Promotion Committee - E.A. Schuman, Chm. Technical Committee - J.D. McCluer, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - J.P. Wronski, Chm. Chm. The full text of their reports is atta ched to these minutes. . 9- All four of the committee chairmen have now completed the normal two years service, and President Rainey expressed sincere appreci ation on behalf of the 3oard of Governors and Members of the Institute for the faithful and efficient performance of their duties, A review of the minutes for the past two years gives abundant proof of the great amount of work done by each committee under their capable leadership. 10. Mr. J.A. Brown,Jr.,Chairman of the nominating committee, re ported that the members of the Board of Governors for the coming year would be: J.A. Brown,Jr, - Raybestos-Hanhattan,Inc. E.A. Schuman, - Johns-Manville Corporation J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corp. J.A. Gallagher - H.K. Porter Company,Inc. J.L. Mitchell - Tallman-LicCluskey Fabrics Co. G.P. Y;'iess - GARLOCK INC. R.P. Clark - Uniroyal,Inc. ' 11. Mr. J.A. Brown,Jr.,inf orned the members that the Board of Gov ernors had met on October 5, 1967,and re-elected incumbent officers -to serve for another year, namely: President - J.L. Rainey Vice President - E.A. Schuman . Treasurer - N.L.A. Martucci 12. President Rainey announced that the Board of Governors had appointed new committee chairmen a^s listed below; Air Hygiene & Manufacturing - H.H. Walter, American Asb.Tex.Corp. Sales Promotion - M.Q. Scowcroft, Raybestos-Manhattan,Inc. Technical - J.W. Hawkins, Raybestos-J!anhattan,Inc. Fiber Testing -.G.F.A. Brink, Asbestos Corporation Ltd. 13. President Rainey informed the members that the application of HILADOS Y TEJIDOS DE ASBESTO,S,A., Toluca, Mexico, for Associate Membership in A.T.I. had been approved by the Board of Governors. This fine company is a leading manufacturer of asbestos -textiles as well as other asbestos products, in Mexico. Y/e are very pleased to welcome them as a new member of the Institute. 14. The next General Meeting of the Institute will be held at the Hotel Roosevelt, New York City, on February 8th and 9th, 1968. Registration is on February 7th. Y-e anticipate an interesting meeting. jUiuiaCS -- General : citing - continued l Pa^e -5 15. There beinp no further burin ess to come before the laecti ng f it xcccsscd for luncheon to rhich vives of rieir.bcrs had been invitedo There t.'ere ar>nroxir.;ately thirty ladies Present, nalcine the luncheon a most enjoyable affair. There vas a preat dual of favorable com ment on the choice of the .`illia'i ililt0:1 Inn at' location for this neetinp, and nany expressed the hone tuat -:e could return for some future meet inp. Pol loving luncheon tile cceting adjourned. lesnectfully suui icted. UJ ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Pprids September 11. 1967 Balance On Hand at Last Report (May 8.1967) General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts to Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund (Handbook Acct.) To General Fund (Book Sales) To General Fund (1967 Dues) 0 5924.20 19569.74 4.93 218.60 5218.01 151.47 500.00 Total On Hand and Received Disburs oments Legal Retainer ( 6 nos.ending 8/31/67) . 1000.00 Legal expenses ( " u M 11 ) 161.64 Secretary's salary ( 4 nos.) 478.00 F.I.C.A. Tax (2nd Qtr,1967) 35.00 S ecr et ary ' s trav el 160.00 Office rent ( 4 nos.) 300.00 Revision of ASTII Specs.(Travel Exp.) 312.14 Printing *: Office supplies 193.63 Stenographic expense 20.00 Meeting expense (June 1967) 1013.30 Telephone ( 4 nos.) 182.63 Handbook Exp. (Copyright) 6.00 Petty Cash (Vouchers 310-327 incl.) 61.23 $25518.87 4008.08 ft 29606.95 Balance On Hand Sept.11, 1967 Funds " . General Fund (Bank Statennt of 9/11/67)ft 832.97 Savings Fund (Interest to Juno 50,1967) 24808.34 (*) Petty Cash Fund 38.77 Total Funds ft Assets as of Sept.11. 1957 General Fund . $ Savings Fund ' Petty Cash Fund Accts Receivable (Book Sales) Postage on hand Furniture u Equipment (Nominal Value) 832.97 24603.34 53.77 31.71 5.49 1.00 Liabilities (Rone) Total Assets 0 ITet V/orth ft 3926,87 25680.08 25680.08 25716.28 25716.20 (-) $5900.00 transfered from General to Savings Fund on May 29, 1967. Respectfully submitted, / vs KJB. Sudbury, Asst; -Treasurer o Minutes ') ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE . Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee October 5, 1967 William Hilton Inn Hilton Head Island, S. C._________ Attended: Members: Absent: Visitors: W.C. C.L. Atkinson, Sheckler Chairman _ Johns-Manville || II Products, M Corp. * R.C. Smith - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. J.A. Gallagher - H.K. Porter, Inc. H. Willingham - Uni-Royal, Inc. H. Walter - American Asbestos Textile Corp. K.W. Nelson - American Smelting fit Refining T.D. McCluskey L. Garrison A.C Lank L.C. Williams - Tallman McCluskey Fabrics Co. - Garlock, Inc. - Uni-Royal, Inc, - Raybestos-Jianhattan, Inc. Dr. L.J. Cralley - U.S, Dept, of Health, Educa tion h Welfare Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter The Chairman reported that the order for the 40-2 Automatic Dust Counter had been placed including auxiliary equipment. The order was as follows: 1 - #379940-2 Dust Counter 1 - #370106-31 VOM-5 Recorder 1 - Plastic dust cover for VOM-5 Recorder 1 - 37-00-7643 VOM Recorder Carrying Case 10 - Rolls of chart papers recommended by B&L suitable for industrial dust counting in M.P.P.C.F. 2 - Sets of printed operating instructions $3,985.00 675.00 5.50 25.00 Delivery was requested to be in person by a B&L representative to W.C. Atkinson at Johns-Manville Products Corp., in Manville, W.J. Delivery is expected some time in December. In the event W.C. Atkin son is not available,'Mr. C.L. Sheckler will accept delivery. Upon delivery Mr. Sheckler will arrange to have his chief technician checked out on the instrument and at the February meeting he will instruct the other members in its use* Federal Legislation C.L. Sheckler discussed a bill introduced by JI.J. Congressman Edward Patten which \ould give the U.S. Dept, of Health, Education and Wel fare the power to "establish and enforce realistic standards to pro tect the worker by insuring safer working conditions and the public by producing safer materials". The bill has not yet been passed and there is some question whether it will be passed as written. Federal Legislation - Continued 1 A number of newspaper articles regarding claims against one member company were discussed, ' Environmental Health Survey Dr. Lewis J. Cralley discussed a paper on "Exposure to Metal in the Manufac re of Asbestos Textile Products" by L.J. Cralley, R.G. Kee nan and J.R. Lynch, which was accepted for publication in the Journ al of American Hygiene# The paper deals with the potential exposures of workers processing asbestos to hazardous materials other than asbestos. Investigation was undertaken to define the nature and extent of exposure to metals such as nickel, chromium, cobalt and magnesium in the manufacture of asbestos textile products. It was concluded that the relationship between these metal exposures and the increased pulmonary and other cancer observed in asbestos workers should be investigated and, that it is no longer tenable to look only for asbestos fibers or bodies in the biological tissue and by their presence assume a cause and effect relationship with the disease. It was announced that there will be a meeting in Antigua during the week of Thanksgiving Day, sponsored by the Q.H.a. and by special in i' vitation. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss toxic materials,, namely asbestos, and the effects of exposure# Dr. Cralley discussed plans for obtaining additional information needed to continue the Environmental Health Survey such as health profiles and employment records, and he stated that the cooperati. on of the members of the industry would be needed. It was the concensus of the Committee that the program and informa tion is desirable and necessary and recommends to the Board of Gov ernors that the A.T.I. continue to cooperate with the U.S.P.H.S. in continuing the clinical and environmental studies. Miscellaneous One company renorted that after 14 years of service a set of dust bags made of cotton sateen was still in good condition. Another company is experimenting with a totally enclosed carding machine to eliminate human exposure to dust. The possibility of exchange visits among representatives of member companies for the purpose of cooperative advancement in dist control was discussed. W.C. ATKINSON, Chairman O. J sales rurroricH coimttee ^ttj.kg ASBESTOS TETTILE INSTITUTE October 5, 1967 . At WILLI A* HILTON INN, HILTON HEAD ISLAI.0, S .C. Attending our meeting were iMessrs. J.L. Rainey and^J.W. Christenbury of American Asbestos Textile Corn., N.L.A. Hartucci of Garlock, Inc., J.A. Drown, Jr., I-.Q. Scowcroft and S.R. Zinmerman of Raybestos-Man hattan, Inc., J.L. Hit<h ell of Tallman-HcCluskey Fabrics Co., R.T. Clark and S.J. Peele, Jr., of UNIROYAL, INC., F.Jay Flocken (legal counsel), H.E. Sunbury (secretary), ane E.A. Schuran of Johns-Nanville The four display cabinets are currently on exhibit at Stevens Insti tute at Hoboken, N.J. Itr. Sunbury and myself examined the cabinets and found they were in need of refurbishing. The Committee voted unanimously to retire the cabinets as they are 10 years old and have served the original purpose. It was voted that we offer the cabinets to our Canadian miners. We had the Edward W. Robothan Co. submit a proposal to the A.T.I. on promoting asbestos textiles by A.T.I. magazine advertising coupled with mailed promotional literature. Preliminary ads were presented and created much interest. The Committee felt that tentatively a segment of the presentation may have merit and should be pursued. The cost for this rrogram would run approximately $19,000 a year. A tentative meeting was set for November with Hr. Robotham, but this was later postponed and the whole matter taken under further advise ment. It was reported that asbestos textile volume still comes in from Japan and this competition is felt to a small degree throughout the United States. The cloth prices quoted for Japanese material is in the lov* 70 lb. area. The members of the Committee were not pleased with the U.S. Govern ment's policy of ordering asbestos cloth. It is possible for the successful bidder to be required to supply double the quantity he bid on and to supply this material by specified time periods. On the other hand, there is no assurance that the Government at the end of the contract period will take the balance of the cloth inventory that was kept on hand to satisfy the requirements of the contract. Nr. Flocken, our legal counsel, suggested that we give him full de tails with specific orders and he would pursue this through his Washington office. EAS/p E.A. Schuman Chairman o 1 MINUTES: Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Report October 5, 1967 The meeting was held at William Hilton Inn, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina IN ATTENDANCE: J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. William Maaskant - American Asbestos Company D. T. Austin - UniRoyal, Inc. J. D. McCluer - H. K. Porter Company, Inc. ' H. . Sunbury - Asbestos Textile Institute t The Minutes of the meeting in Atlanta on August 17th. !t 18th. at Marriott Motor Hotel are combined with the current meeting. ATTENDANCE AT ATIANTA MEETING: J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. D. T. Austin - UniRoyal, Inc. W. Maaskant - American Asbestos Company G. E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. J. D. McCluer - H. K. Porter Company, Inc. P. J. Smith - ASTM H. E. Sun'oury - A. T. I. SUBJECTS DISCUSSED: Revision of ASTM Specifications D 299, D 375, and D 1061 At the Atlanta meeting D 299 was revised as the 8th. Draft dated August 17, 1967 and D 375 was revised as the 3rd. Draft dated August 17, 1967. These two were consequently sent to Paul Nicodemus (25 copies of each draft) for letter ballot and to Dr. Scroggie (7 copies of each draft) for editorial comments. During the interin a reply from Dr. Scroggie accepted these two drafts as written with very minor changes and he said the two drafts would be acceptable for printing with the changes he suggested. To gain time, a letter ballot was circulated to all members of the committee with the response that Dr. Scroggie suggestions would be acceptable. Without redrafting, these changes were retyped in the margins of the sheets and resent to Paul Nicodemus and Dr. Scroggie. For sll practical purposes this finalizes these two specifications. Also at the Atlanta meeting, D 1061 was revised as the 1st. Draft dated Augxst 18, 1967. This draft was circulated to members only fcr possible discrepancies. . At the current meeting, the committee confirmed acceptance of all the changes suggested by Dr. Scroggie in D 299 and D 375. D 1061 was reviewed and no sufficient changes made. Decision was made to send Paul Nicodemus a copy of this draft for his views prior to sending to Dr. Scroggie. 1 ) At the Atlanta meeting federal specifications Mil-l-l53U9c and SS-C-L66f were revised in the light of current industry practice, both editorially and in the dimensions and weights tables. Copies of these revisions were circulated to members only for possible discrepancies. At the current meeting, these two specifications were discussed again with further changes and decision was made to send revised copies to the appropriate government agencies, with a list of suggested changes in addi tion to the corrected draft. Copies of all ASTM specifications referred to in the drafts are to be enclosed for the benefit of the agencies. The revised drafts with suggested changes on the two above specifications will be sent to H. E. Sunbury for him to submit to the appropriate government agencies with the statement that these drafts supersede all prior recommendations sent in by individual companies. In conclusion, the comnittee, during the past two years, has completed revisions on specifications D 1571 - Cloth, D 315 - Tape, D 2100 - Electrical Insulation, D 1918 - Asbestos Content, D 299 - Yarn, D 375 - Roving, and partially completed revision of D 1061 - Lap. The specifications yet to be revised are: D 628 - Braided Tubing, 1) 1118 - Magnetic Rating, and D 1573 - Heat Ageing. J. D. McCluer Chairman of the Technical Committee -2 - oJ Minutes: FIBER TESTING COMMITTEE October 5-6, 1967 William Hilton Inn, Hilton Head Island, S.C. Attending: G.F.A. Brink D.E. Childers R. Dodds-Hebron E.A. Farrell W.C.Streib J. Wronski Asbestos Corp., Ltd. H.K.Porter, Inc. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. Johns-Manville Corp. ' Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Subjects Discussed 1. The Committee discussed the results of the round-robin magnetic rating tests. Ten companies participated in the tests. Analysis of the test data led to the following tentative conclusions: a) Magnetic rating values obtained by either the Mapes Analyzer or the Turner-Newall equipment are not significantly different for fiber samples containing magnetite in the range of 0.3 to 6.0 magnetic rating. b) Magnetic rating values obtained on either the Mapes or T-N units are not significantly altered by the presence of metal in the immediate vicinity of the equipment provided the units are properly zeroed prior to test and the units are not moved from their locations after zeroing. c) Readings on either the Mapes or T-N units are not significantly changed when the test sample is rotated in the unit. d) Mapes or T-N magnetic rating values reported on fiber samples in the 0.3 - 6.0 M.R. range will probably vary by about + 20$S between laboratories. Some of the laboratories want to re-check their values in the round-robin. As soon as this is completed more positive conclusions can be reached. 2. The Committee agreed to request approval from the Board of Governors to allow the QAMA to set up a schedule of charges on requests for working drawings of test equipment described in the Test Manual. These drawings were prepared by the QAMA at appreciable cost in time and money. Their dissemination to applicants also takes time and money. The actual charges agreed upon by QAMA would then be submitted to the Board of Governors for final approval. Respectfully submitted, J. Wronski Uv\vt_ 0\ \ \\61 0 \ J Minutes GENERAL MEETING Asbestos Textile Institute June 9, 1967 In Attendance Lucerne Motel, Montreal, Canada k\erica:? asbestos textile corp. J.L. Rainey Wm. Kaaskant D.F. Quealy ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED j!.P. Carson F.E. Leclerc G.F.A. Brink ' J.1'/. Christenbury G.S. Fabel DELL ASBESTOS MINES LIMITED Wm. J.W. Smith GARLCCK, INC. G.E. Houghton R. Dodds-iiebron Walter Smith G.W. Smith JOHNS-NANVILIB CORP. E.A. 3 chum an ` CANADIAN JOHNS-MANVILLE CO..LTD. W.C. Atkinson N.W. Hendry I. Barnett W.C. Streib LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUE3EC LTD. C.L. Sheckler ' E.A. Farrell ' R.F. Gagnon H.K. PORTER COMPANY. INC. J.A. Gallagher CASSIAR ASBESTOS CORP., LTD. J.n. r.icCluer J.D. Christian D.E. Childers . ' TURNER BROS, ASBESTOS CO. LTD. RAYBESTOS-11ANHATTAN , INC. W.i*. Deckman J.A. Brown, Jr. L.C. Williams TURNER & NSWALL LTD. J.T. Wronski B. Lincoln R.I3. Smith J.W. Hawkins TALLI'AN-i'cCLUSKEY FABRICS CO. . ."J.L. Mitchell UNIROYAL. INC. . S.J. reele, Jr. - CADNALADER. WICKERSliAK ft TAFT R.T. Clark * t.Jay Flocken (Legal Counsel)' D.T. Austin, Jr. Willingham ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE ii.E. Sunbury (Secretary) GUE3TS Norman L. Barr, Atlas Asbestos Co. J.A. Morton, Atlas Asbestos Co. T.J. Smith, A.S.T.I'. H.R. Lynch, Davis & Furber Machine Co. Geo. J. Harris, Harco Chemical, Inc. J.A. Bettes, Jr., Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (Retired) Minutes - General Meting - continued ********** Minutes ********** rage -2 1. President Rainey called the reeling to order at 9:45 A.M., and asked each re rson in attendance to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. He expressed, on behalf of the members, our deep appreciation for the kind invitation from the ''miners" to hold this meeting in Canada, and for their splendid hospitality and. superb arrangements for our group visitation to Expo 67 on the. previ ous day. Our sincere thanks are extended to Asbestos Corporation Limited; Bell Asbestos /-lines Limited; Cassiar Asbestos Corporation Ltd.; Johns-Manville of Canada; and Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd., for their most generous ''hosting" of the reception and luncheon at Expo 67 on June 8th. Particularly appreciated was the fine job.done by Mr. Wm. J.W..Smith, chairman of the ''Miners" sub-committee, in ar ranging the many details incidental to transportation of our members to Expo 67, free ticket of admission, and the grand reception and luncheon held in the Quebec Pavilion! It proved to be a most enjoy able and never to be forgotten occasion! 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. Mr. J.W. Christenbury moved that reading be omitted; seconded by Mr. W.C. Streib. So voted. 3. The Financial Renort was presented by Vice President Schuman due to the ahsence of Treasurer Martucci. Mr. Atkinson moved it be ac cepted; seconded by Mr. Teele, and so voted. The report is attached to these minutes. -4. The Fibre Producers Report was given by Mr. J.D. Christian, Pres ident of the Cassiar Asbestos Corporation. Mr. Christian, in commenting on the present situation, said that to day's high level of demand is catching up with the supply, and as a consequence some grades are "tight" in respect to certain of the spinning grades. Suggested that it would be advisable for spinners to check with their sources of supply about forward requirements for special grades of spinning fibres. 5. In lieu of a prepared talk. Legal Counsel r.Jay Flocken asked if there were any questions from the floor. This proved to be an inter esting innovation - quite a few questions were asked - and Mr. Flock en replied to each at considerable length. The success of this ini-. .tiel trial justifies its repetition by Counsel Flocken at some future meeting. ` 6. Mr. Harold R. Lynch, Davis 8: Furber Machine Co., North Andover, Mass., gave a Technical Talk entitled: "Researching a Fresh Approach for the Carding of Asbestos Fibers, and the Promising New Rubber De sign for Condensing Asbestos Roving." " Mr. Lynch said that his company had developed a carding machine for synthetic fibers that would produce more pounds per hour than wocle.n or worsted cards. Now have 275 units in operation on synthetic fiber Believe they have basic concept of right approach for asbestos finer, and his company proposes to give it top priority in their development and engineering work. Some details are still to be settled such as type of card clothing, speeds, number of rolls, doffers, etc., Did o Tlinutes - General I-*eeting - continued: J Page -3- encounter difficulty on trial runs of new card using asbestos fiber - experiments are being conducted at both North Andover, ilass., and Charlotte, N.C. Has one report of a very successful spinning test at a southern asbestos plant. His company solicits advice and coop eration of asbestos plants to help bring this carding machine devel opment to the most successful conclusion possible, and for the mutu al benefit of all. The second part of I'r, Lynch *s talk was devoted to the Rub Aprons used for dondensing the asbestos roving as it comes from the carding machine. The cost of the chrome tanned leather aprons is high there is a limited supply of suitable bull-hides and these have to tie bought at auction in Spain or other parts of the European conti nent; none are available elsewhere. Each hide has to be individual ly inspected before purchase. While price for chrome leather aprons is high, there is virtually no profit to Davis & Furber Co. in sup plying them due to the high claims for alleged defects, short life, or whatever. About two years ago Davis & Furber began to look for a satisfactory replacement for leather rub aprons - one that would not glaze too quickly, not be unduly affected by atmospheric changes, and be free from flat spots, glued laps, or hard "back-bone*1 area. At present it appears that a grooved apron is necessary, and diamond pattern of grooving is best. The number of grooves, and depth of grooves has some relation to the cut number of the roving being produced, at least that is the tentative thinking from experiments to date. There are still some obstacles, for example, pure asbestos roving {no organic content) and also the production of core roving, Mr. Lynch asked cooperation of the industry in furthering the test ing of nossible replacements for leather rub aprons, saying that only thru such cooperation could success be attained. In response to a question from the floor, Mr. Lynch stated that his company had tried to work with DuPont's CORFAH material, but found it unsuitable for rub apron use. President Rainey thanked Mr. Lynch for his fine talk, and many fa vorable comments were made about it by various members following the meeting. 7. The Committee Reports were given by the respective chairmen as listed below. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutesz Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - V/.C. Atkinson, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - E.A. Schuman, Chm. Technical Committee - J.D. McCluer, Chm. Fiber Testing Committee - J.P. Wronski, Chm. . 8. President Rainey extended congratulations to Mr. W.W. Oughtred, on his recent election as President of Asbestos Corporation Limited. Mr. r.p. Carson offered to convey this to Mr. Oughtred, as he was not present. * Minutes - General Meeting - continued: Page -4- 9. President Rainey paid tribute to Mr. Geo.W. Smith who retired from the presidency of Dell Asbestos I-dnes Ltd. last November, and expressed our gratification that he was in attendance at this meet ing. 10. President Rainey presented Mr. Staton J. Peele, Jr., with a "Certificate of Appreciation'* in the form of a handsome plaque. Mr. Peele, who served the Institute as president in 1963 and 1964, and as chairman 6f the Sales Promotion Committee for two years prior to that, will not be active in A.T.I. due to a realignment of his duties at UniRoyal, Inc. Mr. Peele responded to the presentation in a most suitable manner, and expressed his deep appreciation for the plaque, and his regret that he could n6t continue to be active in A.T.I. ' 11. There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was adjourned for luncheon, to which the vives of members had been invited. This proved to be a most enjoyable affair, enhanced by the thoughtful presentation of a corsage to each lady on behalf of the ''Miners", for.which the ladies were most apnreciative. Follow ing luncheon the meeting was addressed by President Rainey who thanked the "Janers" for their splendid and generous hospitality in entertaining A.T.I. members and their wives at Exno 67 the previous day. 12. Meeting adjourned. ' Respectfully submitted .i II.JU. iUnDUry, aer. rexary SSESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Report of Funds Ealance on Hand at Las~t Report, January 10, 1967 General Fund Savings Fund Fetty Cash. Fund v 447.64 19504.74 60.37 ?iav 8. 19 67 V 19332.75 Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest - 4 mos.) To General Fund (Book Sales) To General Fund (Handb o ok A c c t.) To General Fund (1967 Dues) 235.00 (F1st.) . 127.80 6327.72 8750.00 Total On Hand and Received Disburs ements Legal Retainer (3 mos ending 2/28/57) Legal Expense ( " 11 " ) Secretary's salary ( 4 mos) F.I.C.A. Tax ( 1st Qtr. 1967) Secretary's travel Office rent ( 4 mos.) Exhibit expense Handbook expense ( 3rd Edition) Printing : office supplies Stenographic expense Heeting expense" (February 1SG7 ) Telephone ( 4 mos.) ' Petty Cash "vouchers (289-309 incl.) 500.00 25.80 478.00 31.50 130.20 300.00 40.24 7051.98 112.01 100.00 803.99 155.24 75.44 Balance On Hand as of may 0, 1967 Funds General Fund (Bank Statement-May 8,1937) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund 5924.20 19589.74 4.93 (0 15490.52 0 35325.27 9804.40 25518.S7 Total Funds Assets as of Hay 8. 3.967 ' _ General Fund G> Savings Fund Petty Cash on Hand Accts. Receivable (Bool: Sales) "" ( Dues for 1967 ) " 11 (Handbook Acct.) Postage on Hand _ Furniture C- Equipment {`Fomina! Value) Total Assets 5924.20 19589.74 4.93 48.51 500.90 3210.01 4.50 1.0' Liabilities (Hone) 0 25518.87 i 29290.69 Let T.'orth C 29290.GQ () Includes v285.00 interest estimated for period 1/1/67-4/30/G7 13 7 Q,, m U Minutes D ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE _ Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee June 3, 1967 Luce me f to tel - Montreal, Canada Attending Members: W.C. Atkinson, Chairman C.L. Sheckler L.C. Williams R.B. Smith J.A. Gallagher H. Willingham Absent: H. Walter T.D. McCluskey L. Garrison K.W. Nelson A mC. Lank Johns-Manville Troducts Corp. it i 'i >i Raybestos-Manhattan Inc. II.K. Porter Inc. Uni-Royal Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Co. Garloclc Inc. American Smelting & Refining Uni-Royal Inc. Bausch & Lomb Automatic Dust Counter At the previous meeting the Board of Governors was asked to consider the purchase of a 40-2 Automatic Dust Counter for use by the member companies. The Board of Governors, in turn, asked for some detailed information on which to base a decision. '- The Committee reviewed the various advantages of the machine among which were its flexibility of use, simplicity - no training required, reproducibility - the counting is automatic and eliminates the human error. In addition, with the recording attachment it makes it pos sible to monitor a specific area over an extended period of time. It was decided that the Committee would control the distribution of the machine and it was understood, that all results from its use would be reported to the Committee. Arrangements for the transfer of the machine from one company to the next will be arranged between the two members. It was also decided that there would be no fee charged for its use by member companies. The Board of Governors, approved the purchase and authorized the Chairman to negotiate the purchase. Asbestos Textile Industry Health Regulations in Great Britain Mr. C.L. Sheckler read a list of proposed regulations for the manu facture and use of asbestos textiles in England. The list has been submitted to the industry for review and comment. In brief, they are proposing the manufacture of asbestos textiles shall be a totally enclosed operation in which the operators will never be exposed to any visible dust. All surfaces, building and machine, shall be nolished and resist dust accumulation. All Minutes - Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee Page -2- materials shall be handled and transported in sealed containers. Vacuum cleaners shall, not exhaust air into the building. The Committee found the recommendations impractical and extreme. However", there seems to be no doubt that the British government will attempt to enforce them. V/.C. Atkinson* Chairman iinutes SAL'S mcrirv Cf'J1 IT7EE ME-TING AWcSV'i TEXTILE INSTITUTE June G, 1967 At LUCEETE MCTEL, MONTREAL, CANA'IA ^ Attending our meeting were Messrs. J.L. Rainey and J. Christenbury of American Asbestos Textile Corn., . J.A. 3rov-/n, Jr. of Raybestos Manhattan, Inc., S.J. Peele, Jr. and R.r. Clarke of U.S. Rubber Co., J.L. Mitchell of Tallman McCluskey Fabrics Inc., P.J. Flocken (legal counsel), H.E. Sunbury (secretary) and E.A. Schuman of Johns-Manville. The four display cabinets are currently on loan to Michigan State University until October, 1967. At present there is no specific _ place to send them as yet at the termination of their stay at Michi gan State. The cabinets need refurbishing and whether money will be spent for this or utilized to better advantage in some other promo tional activity has not yet been decided. It was reported that the asbestos textile volume from Japan seems to be increasing. In addition to asbestos cloth, we now find asbestos tape coning into the U.S. The cloth and tape appear to be accept able products and sell for around 70 lb. There has even been some aluminized asbestos cloth for the safety clothing market come in from Japan. Some of us have even seen an asbestos metal reinforced yarn made by the Japanese using 5 grade fiber. The 3rd Edition of the Asbestos Textile Handbook has,been printed and distributed to all member companies. This handbook is self-supporting and no charges will be applied to the A.T.I. This edition had 12,534 copies printed at a unit cost of 66.3d whereas the previ ous 1961 edition had 15,125 copies printed at a unit cost of 72,Sd. The current edition is, therefore, 9% lower than the 1961 edition despite a smaller number of copies printed and general increases in materials and labor. Mr. V/.S. HbiigH and all others who worked on the handbook should be complimented on putting out a high quality book at such a reasonable cost. ` It was proposed that the A.T.I. buy extra copies of the Asbestos magazine and have them sent on a regular basis to prospective asbes tos textile customers. Mr. Christenbury of American Asbestos Textile Corp. is to contact the magazine and report to the Sales Promotion Committee at our next meeting. It was agreed that our Secretary, Mr. Sunbury, from now on will send in a monthly business condition report of the Asbestos Textile indus try to the Asbestos magazine. Mr. Staton Peele, Jr. is being reassigned by his company and will no longer participate in the asbestos textile branch of the busine^. In appreciation of his guidance and loyalty during the past few years the Board of Governors personally presented Mr. Teele with a yachting xvrist watch suitably inscribed from the 3oard members. Welcomed to the Sales Promotion Committee was Mr. Richard P. Clark, replacing Mr. Peele, as UniRoyal's representative. E.A. Schuman, Chairman uJ MINUTES: Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Report June 8, 1967 ' The meeting was held at Lucerne Motel Annex, Montreal, Canada niAATTENDANCE; William Maaskant Dan F. Quealy J.W-.. Hawkins I. Barnett G. E. Houghton D. T. Austin J. D. KcCluer Walter Deckman Paul Smith - American Asbestos Company - American Asbestos Company - Rsybestos-Manhattan, Inc. - Johns-IIanville Corporation - Garloclc, Inc. - UniroyalaPibuT Textile - H. K. Porter Companv, Inc. - Turner St News 11 limited - ASTM ` . SUBJECTS DISCUSSED: ' Revision of ASTM Specifications D 299 and D 37g Since the last regular meeting in February, the conmittee had an intermediate meeting on May 11th. and 12th. at ASTM Headquarter, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On the first day of this meeting, Thursday, further revision was made on D 299, Yarn, wherein the discussion was based on comments and recommendations from Dr. Scroggie's Sc-6 Committee, most of which were accepted, and bv way of this discussion, the 6th. Draft of D 299 was set up. Dr. Scroggie met with the conmittee on that day, and it was believed by all members present that this draft was a very acceptable version which would require very little editorial change. . On the second day, Friday, of this meeting, the committee set up the 1st. Draft of D 375, Roving. The reason for selecting Roving next was due to it's similarity to D 299. " Revision of ASTM Specification D 1118 Also, on Friday of this meeting, Paul Nicodemus met with the committee and D 1118, Test for Magnetic Rating, was discussed with Paul Nicodemus leading the dir-cussion Since this will be a long range project, it was decided to start the project with . 'round robin" test wherein John Hawkins, who is chairman of the Subcommittee, offered to prepare the samples. There were to be .two sets of samples, one set for the I-lapes Magnetic Analyzer, 10 gram sample, and one set for the T. & N. Magnetic Analyzer, 1$ gram samples. Samples were to fee prepared and sealed so that the samo identical samples could be circulated and tested by all memb?rs. Each cet of samples were tc be prepared from asbestos fibers of the following ' -^1 - MINUTES: TECHNICAL COMMITTEE approximate magnetic rating: 0.2?, 0.7?, 2.0, and U.O HR, it being understood that the samples in one set would not necessarily be of the exact HR as those of the other set. These were to be sent to all.merJbers of A.T.I. and Sub committee A-li who have the ASTM and/or T. fit N. instrunent(s). Members were to test samples, report to John Hawkins, and send samples on according to a pre arranged routing. Included in the series of tests were to be testing the set of standards furnished with the T. fit W. instrument and testing of a set of standards prepared by the late Dr. Shaw for the ASTM instrument. In attendance at the Hay 11th. and 12th. meeting were: William Haaskant.................American Asbestos Company......... J. W. Hawkins.......................Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc........... I. Barnett............................. Johns-Manville Research Center Phil Rogers........................... Johns-Manville Research Center G. E. Houghton.....................Garlock, Inc.................................... Gary Garrison.......................Garlock, Inc...........................j.... D. T. Austin.......................UnirpyaljFlbei-J.-TixllleFr J. D. KcCluer.............H. K. Porter Company, Inc.................... H. E. Sunbury.......................Asbestos Textile Institute.... P. Sraithl............................... ASTM..................................................... Er. A. G. Scroggie............ ASTM..................................................... P. 0. Hicodemus...................General Electric Company........... May 11th. fit 12th. Hay 11th. fit 12th. May 12th. 11th. 11th. & 12 th. May 11th. fit 12th. 11th. fit 12th. 11th. fit 12 th. ,Hay 11th. Si 12 th. 11th. Si 12th. 11th. 12 th. P.evision of ASTM Specification D 1118 At the committee's present meeting of June 8th., the Fiber Testing and Technical Committees met jointly for a brief tine and re-discussed the project on magnetic rating and "round robin" test. The decision reached at this joint meting was that since the Fiber Testing Committee had already sent out to all members samples for the T. fit IT. instrument with detailed instructions for the test, that it would be less confusing to follow through on this series o.f tests before embarking on a new series as planned at the May 12th. meeting of the Technical Committee. Samples were distributed to all member early in the year by the Fiber Testing Committee consisting of asbestos fibers over a range of M. R.s accompanied with instructions for testing the samples. Samples were to be tested by rotating 90, 1B0, and 270 to ascertain effect of sample position. Also the effect cf adjacent bodies was to be determined by placing a heavy steel pipe near the T. it N. instrument to see what effect this would have on the reading. oJ .MINUTES* TECHNICAL COMMITTEE Revision of ASTM Specification D 299 and D 375 Following the May 11th. and 12th. meeting, the 6th. Draft of D 299 and the 1st. Draft of D 375 as set up at that meeting were sent to Dr. Scroggie for comments. Replies on both were received prior to our present meeting. Most of the changes recommended were accepted in D 299 and by reason of the similar ity of the two specifications, the recommended changes in D 375 would be equally acceptable. These two will be rewritten as the 7th. Draft of D 299 and the 2nd. Draft of D 375 and after a circulation for possible discrepancies, will be submitted for. letter ballot to A-h prior to their fall meeting. Questions came up from Dr. Scroggie and Mr. B. Lincoln regarding the following: 1) Should separate columns be inserted in the yam and roving Tables for meters per k-Slogram and for tex numbers? Paul Smith consulted the latfest ASTM ruling and found that conversion factor in foot notes will suffice. 2) To use - 10% tolerance for yards per pound on single yam, on average of five bobbins and withdraw tolerance on individual test. This is in contrast to the current specification of i 8% on the average test and - 1$% on the individual test. The committee*s decision was to retain the present tolerance. ' 3) The suggestion that a new Note h be inserted vhich refers' to D 12hLt, Recommended Practive for Designating Yam Construction was not accepted by the committee. Committee^ decision was that it applied to cotton and not to asbestos. It would conflict and confuse. Li) Are the illustrations "S'* and "Z" for twist necessary? The opinion of the committee was that they are necessary and are essential to readers. The committee set August 17th. and 18th. as the next intermediate meeting of the Technical Committee in Atlanta. Paul Smith is making a meeting room reservation for these dated at the Marriott Motor Hotel. J. D. KcCluer Chairman of the Technical Committee 3 Minutes: V TBER TESTING COMMITTEE ' June 8 - 9i 1967 J Lucerne Motel, Montreal Canada Attending: G.F.A.Brink D.E.Childers J.D.Christian -R .Dodds-Hebron E.A.Farrell B.Lincoln W.Smith U.C.Streib ' J.Wronski Asbestos Corp., Ltd. H.K.Porter, Inc. Cassiar Asbestos Corp., Ltd. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. Turner Sc Newall, Ltd. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. Johns-Manville Corp. . Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Subjects Discussed 1. The first part of the meeting was held jointly with the Technical Committee members to discuss the Magnetic Rating test. The Technical Committee is currently considering re-writing this test for ASTM (D-1118;. The Fiber Testing Committee is also looking into the possibility of re-writing this procedure, which is given in the Test Manual and is essentially the same as the ASTM procedure. At the last meeting, the Fiber Testing Committee de cided to run a number of round robin tests to measure the degree of variation that exists between and within laboratories in tests measuring the magnetite 'content of fibers. The Technical Committee agreed that it would be best to await the results of these tests before pro ceeding with further efforts at revising the ASTM procedure. About half of the participants of the round robin have completed the tests and reported on them. It is anti cipated that all tests will be completed by the next meeting and that meaningful data from the tests will be available at that time for a critical evaluation of current methods for measuring magnetite content of fibers. 2 Mr. Christian suggested the need for including statements in the Testing Manual that would caution users on the limitations to be placed on interpreting results obtained from the tests. . He proposed to submit formal suggestions $t the next meeting 3. The Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemical Analysis is soon to publish a section in volume six on tests pertaining to asbestos. Raybestos-Manhattan was asked to contribute to this section. It was suggested that any A.T.I. member asked to contribute articles 'on asbestos testing in this publication in the future might first wish to present their contribution to appropriate committees within the A.T.I. for review. Such a review might produce suggestions that could result in a presentation representative of the views of the asbestos industry. Respectfully submitted, .T Oc ^ro Wy ^ f 1966 () ) Minutes SEVERAL TESTING Asbestos Textile Institute October 7, 1966 The Homestead, Hot Springs, Va. In Attendance: AFRICAN ASBESTOS TEXTILE CORT. J.W. Weber J.L. Rainey J.W. Christenbury D. F. luealy h.H. Walter G. F. Fabel GARLCCK, INC. E. W. Houghton JOHNS- I'M WILLS CORP. W.S. Hough E.A. Schuman W.C. Atkinson I. 3amett N.W. Hendry (Canadian Johns-Hanville) H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. J. A. Gallagher J.D. I-cCluer D.E. Childers RAYBESTOS-1'ANHATTAN, S.R. Zimmerman, Jr. J.A. Brown, Jr. i'.Q. Scowcroft J.P. V/ronski L.C. Williams J.W. Hawkins INC. ASBLLSTOS CORPORATION LIMITED '.7.1/. Ought red ;:.P. Carson G.F.A. Brink E.L. Alexander BELL ASBESTOS MINES Lli 1TED F.T. Smith l/m.J.W. Smith R. Dodds-llebron CASSIA!'. ASBESTOS CORr. LTD. J.D. Christian J.G. Berry LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUE3EC, LTD. K.VJ. Nelson TURNER BROS. ASBESTOS CO. LTD. V/.i". Deckman , TURNER & NSWALL, LIMITED B. Lincoln CADWALAOER, WICKERS HAM Si TAFT P.Jay Flocken (Legal Counsel) TALLTAN-i-E CLUSKEY FA3RICS CO. UNITED STATES RUBBER COMPANY S. J. Peels, Jr. D.T. Austin, Jr. ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE H.E. Sunbury (Secretary) ----- GUESTS ----- . T. J. Smith - American Society for Testing k riaterials ll.E. Shearer - FiC Corp. - American Viscose Division ****** minutes ****** 1. President John A. Broun, Jr., called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.r!. and asked each person to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were presented for reading. Mr. Pecle moved that the reading be omitted. Seconded by Mr. Schuman. So voted. Jlnutes - General -eeting - continued rage -2- 3. The Financial Report was presented by Mr. E.A. Schunan, Treasur er. i'r. Peele moved that it be`accepted, seconded by ;-x. Hough, and so voted. The report is attached to these minutes. 4. J!r. T.Jay Flocken, Legal Counsel, discussed the background, stat utory construction and means of enforcement pertaining to the Sher man Act, with particular emphasis on the pcr se offenses which have been established under Section I of the Act. 5. I-*r. N.W. Hendry, General Sales Manager, Canadian Johns-i'-anville Asbestos Limited, Asbestos Fibre Division, presented a most interest ing report on behalf of the asbestos fibre producers. The full text of his report is attached to these minutes. 6. Mr. Howard E. Shearer, Industrial Development Coordinator, FMC Corp. American Viscose Division, Marcus Hook, Pa., addressed the meeting. His subject, ''Some Fiber Relationships of Interest to the Asbestos Textile Manufacturer", was most informative. Assisted by photomicrographic slides, I-ir. Shearer explained the various steps in the manufacture of rayon and distinguishing features of the many de scriptions of staple produced by the American Viscose Division. It was indicated that the uniform diameters and lengths of a crimped rayon with a serrated cross section; and its cohesive and processing properties enhanced by the presence of a delustrant and special lu bricating finish, make such a stanle especially attractive as a car rying fiber for spinning of asbestos. President Brown expressed to Mr. Shearer our appreciation for his fine talk. ` 7. The committee reports were given by the respective chairmen as listed below. The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. . Air Hygiene & Manufacturing Committee - V/.C. Atkinson, Chm. Sales Promotion Committee - W.S. Hough, Chairman Technical Committee - J.D. McCluer, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - J.F. Wronski, Chairman 8. President Brown reported with deep regret the death of T.C. KcCluskey, President of Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, which oc curred on July 18, 1966. Mr. McCluskey was a most loyal supporter of the various activities of the A.T.I., and had served as its treas urer in 1958, and as Vice President in 1961 and 1962. President Brown stated that he had \i/ritten a letter of sympathy to Mrs. HcCluskey on behalf of the Institute, and the letter is made a part of these minutes. 9. Mr. Peele, Chairman of the Nominating Committee, reported that the members of the Board of Governors for the coning ye ar would be: J.A. Brown, Jr. - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. J.A. Gallagher - tf.k. Torter Company, Inc. E.A. Sc hum an - Johns-Manvi lie Corpcr ation S.J. Peele, Jr. - United States Rubber Company J.L. Mitchell - Tallman-M-cCluskey Fabrics Company J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corpa ation G.P. Wiess - Garlock, Inc. * uJ T-linutes - General ISeeting - continued Page -3- 10. j:r. Teele informed the members that the Board of Gcvernors had met on October 6f 1966, and elected the following officers to serve in the coming year: President - J.L. Rainey, American Asbestos Textile Corporation Vice President - .A. Schuman, Johns-i'anville Corporation Treasurer - N.L.A. Martucci, Garlocl;, Inc. 11. President Brown stated that the present chairmen of Air hygiene h I'fg., Technical, Sales Promotion and Fiber Testing Committees, all of whom have completed only one year of the normal two year service, would be continued for another year without change. 12. President Brown, retiring president, was presented with a hand some ATI 'OS clock on behalf of the members, by t\r. Peele, in apprecia tion of his leadership of the Institute during the past two ars. President Brown expressed his thanks for the gift \i th appropriate remarks, and said that it had been a most pleasurable and worthwhile experience to have had the opportunity to serve the Institute as its President. He thanked the members and the Board of Governors for the fine cooperation given him during his tenure of office. 13. President Brown commented on the fact that so many of the mem bers had brought their respective wives to this neeting (about 30) and remarked that the ladies had contributed a great deal to the so cial success and good fellowship so evident in the two clays preceding this General Meeting. 14. President Brown announced that the next regular meeting of the Institute would be held on February 9-10, 1967, at the CIJ-URY ilILL INN, Cherry Hill, ii.J. The Cherry Will Inn is well-known for its new and exceptionally fine accommodations. It is located near Cam den, N.J., just across the river from Philadelphia. It is convenient by TAXI to Philadelphia's trains and airports, and also is close to the Net* Jersey Turnpike for those who drive their cars to the meeting. 15. There being no further business to come before this meeting, it was duly adjourned. Respectfully submitted, /* H.E. Sunbury - Secretary Popart of ,-ur/ : I) -.sbxtcs T^'nii J So-a-:b .v 9, 19-- Balance cn H-.r.a at T-st Poport. Mr.y 9. 1966 Sensn] Fund Savings fund Potty Cash *-ur.d . 7415.41 19CC9.96 20.2a Receipts To Savings fund (Interest) To General fund ( 1966 Luos) To General Fund (Book Sales) To General fund (Assessments fibre Test 213.30 500.00 03.52 5'T6n.01 !'.nnu*'l) T>lsbur3 events Total On Hand and P.o c oiv jd Xegnl Retainer ( six nos ending 8/51) 1005.20 Secretary's Salary ( 3 nos.) 359.25 F. I. C. .Tax (2nd Ctr 1966) Secretary's travel 51.50 194.05 Office rent ( 3 nos.) 225.00 Exhibit expense 62.60 fibre Tost Manual iuxporso 5 4 43 Handbook expense (3rd idition) 999.00 Printing f: Office Supplies 173.00 Stenographic Meeting Jxperse (June 1966) 27.50 773.34 Insurance ( 3 year ren.xr.ls) 115.00 Flowers (T.C.McCluskey) 21.65 Telephone ( 4 nos.) 122.63 Petty Cash (Vouchors 239-266 incl.) ICS.10 Balance on Hand as of Sept .9,1966 Funds General Fund(Eank Statement of Sent.9,1966) 4067.S9 Savings fund Petty Cash Fund 19223.23 76.90 Total funds U2S453.6S 6565.73 <; .1019.33 9651.33 1 23368.05 (; 25360.05 Assets as of Sept.9,1966 General Fund Savings Fund _' Petty cash on hand Accounts receivable (Book S^les) Accounts Roceivable(F.Test Iaan.A3sessnt) Postage on Hand Furniture i* Iquipnant (Fomina1 Value) Total Assets Liabilities (?;one) Net Y^orth 4067.69 19223.26 76.90 96.03 251.52 (*) 4.50 1.00 \l 23721.10 i 23721.10 (-*) Paid 9/15/66 Resp ectfull? submitted nu/wr/j."cSTuncviry.-f.li?j'rL-'c-*st'.i>TVreasurer L VlDRE CO:'ITTE ~ RT.PvRT The year 1966 has been a difficult one for the asbestos fibre produc ers in that asbestos fibre shinments were interrupted for a five week period in i:ay and June by a stevedore strike at the St. Lawrence River ports. Secondly, a strike of the Canadian railroad workers oc curred in the latter part of August and early September for a ten day period. Inflation is of increasing concern on the Canadian scene with labour assuming more militant tendencies and demanding higher and higher wages. New asbestos mines under development include the Clinton Creek operation of Cassiar which is scheduled for production in 1968. The Asbestos Hill development of Asbestos Corpcr ation in the Ungava region of Quebec is scheduled, for production in 1970. These two mining operations will produce additional asbestos cement fibres to supply the growing market in this field where the demand is increasing throughout the world. Countries in the Far Bast and in South America continue to expand their production of asbestos cement products with the requirement for asbestos fibres. The demand for r.sbestos fibres in brake linings particularly in the United States continues at a high level and this demand is expected to continue at the same strength providing the automobile industry continues to pro duce at a record pace. Also, the many miscellaneous uses for asbes tos fibre continue in good demand and it is encouraging to note a broader usage of asbestos fibre from year to year. Production of asbestos fibre in Russia continues to exceed that of Canada although sales outside the borders of that country are limited to Europe, India and Japan at a rate estimated at 175,000 to 200,000 tons per year. Difficult times are being experienced by T. & N. in Southern Rhodesia whereby the asbestos fibre from that country is be ing embargoed in many countries of the world aid we see no early ger mination to the problems related thereto. The economy of North Amer ica continues at a high level and no indication of a slowdown in de mand for asbestos fibre is yet apparent although it is expected that the continuation of the tight money policy in the U.S. and Canada will have its effects in the near term. The currency problems of many countries in South America has lessened during the past two years and this has resulted in a higher demand for asbestos fibre in many of the South American countries. The economy of Europe contin ues at a high level with the exception of the United Kingdom where severe problems indicate difficult times for the year 1967. Certain ly, the problems in the United Kingdom will affect the asbestos in dustry in the near term. The demand for asbestos fibre in the Far East is continuing to grow at a rapid rate with the increasing pro duction of asbestos cement products. It is expected that these mar kets will continue to grow at a ranid rate providing currency prob lems can be solved and providing that external forces do not disturb the normal political situations. Concern has been registered regarding the possibility of asbestos as a health hazard such that it is pertinent to nention that the Quebec Asbestos Pining Association has embarked on a broad medical study which will involve the expenditure of substantial sums of money. Three very competent medical personnel have been retained to conduct basic studies on asbestos fibre from the standpoint of its effect on the health of human beings. Sufficient information is not yet at hand to provide the basis for any publication and it will be some time before such is available. IJWII/bh W.W. HENDRY, General Sales Pgr. Canadian JOHNS-DANVILLE Asbestos Ltd., P.O. l3ox 1500 ASOSSTOS, Frovince of Quebec, Canada 1) J MINUTES AIR HYGIENE AN1) MANUFACTURING COi 2 ITTEE OCTOBER 6, 1966 THE HOJESTEAD - HOT SPRINGS. VA. Attending: /^embers: W.C. Atkinson, Chairman J.A. Gallagher L.C. Williams II. Walter K.W. Nelson Johns-Manvilie Products Corp. il.K. Porter Co., Inc. Raybestos-'ianhatt an, Inc. American Asbestos Textile Corp. American Smelting * Refining Co. Absent: R.B. Smith A.C. Link C.L. Sheckler T.D. McCluskey Raybestos-/'anhattan, Inc. United States Rubber Co. Johns-Manville Products Corp. Tallman McCluskey Fabrics Co. Dausch and Lonb Automatic Dust Co :er Mr. Nelson of American Smelting and Refining Co. gave a demonstration of the Bausch and Lomb 40-2 Automatic Oust Counter. The Committee was impressed with its simplicity of operation and its versatility. It is portable and can' be carried around with ease, and requires no special training to operate. Maintenance is practically nil. By a simple adjustment the range of particle size to be counted can be changed. It also has the advantage that it gives instant and contin uous readings which, with the addition of a recorder, makes it possi ble to set the equipment ur> at a given station and monitor the atmos pheric conditions for extended periods of time. The present cost of the instrument is $3,800. plus $800. for the re corder. It was suggested, for consideration, that the A.T.I. purchase one which could be rented or loaned to individual Berber companies. There was also some discussion on literature received from the Union Industrial Eauipment Corp. which described the Unico Cassella Gravi metric Oust Sampler. This instrument still requires manual counting the same as the Greenberg Smith method. Environmental Health Survey A letter from Dr. Lewis J. Cralley was read in which he stated that they expect to complete the in-plant phase of their study within a year from this fall. . He also enclosed copies of the following papers they have written on the environmental phase of the asbestos study since its beginning. Additional copies may be obtained by writing direct to: Lewis J. Cralley, Scientist Director Occupational Health Research Si Training Facility Bureau of State Services 1014 Broadway Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 i'inutes - Air Itygiene and ; anafacturing Cornittee Fage -2- Pnvironnental Health Survey - continued 1.) Ayer, et al: A comparison of inringer and membrane filter techniques for evaluating air samples in asbestos plants, 2.) Ayer, et al: Relationship of inpinger counts to fiber con centrations by merbrane filter in asbestos textile plants. 3.) Ayer and Lynch: Notes and fibers in the air of asbestos processing plants and hygienic criteria for air-borne asbestos. 4.) Cralley, et al: Occupational health study of the asbestos products industry in the United States. 5.) Lynch: Asbestos study - Procedures and findings. 6.) Lynch and Ayer: Neasurement of dust exposures in the asbestos textile industry. "CI-nriCAL WEEK" Article There was a joint discussion with the Sales Fromotion Committee on an article printed in the September 10th issue of "CHEMICAL ViE-iK" entitled "Asbestos: Awaiting Trial". A full report on the actions to be taken will be reported in the minutes of the Sales Promotion Committee. Respectfully submitted, November 9, 1966 VS.C. Atkinson, Chairman Air Hygiene & Nfg. Committee 1 Minutes: SALES TRO.TTIOH CO. riTTEE asbestos textile institute OCTOP :R 6th, 1966 AT HOT SPRINGS, VIRGINIA ) . The Sales Promotion Committee met on f'ctober 6, 1966. All member companies were present except li.X. Porter Co. and Tallman-fcCluskey Fabrics, Inc. As a result of a direct mail campaign to a selected list of colleges and universities with Engineering Departments, we have had some re sponse in the matter of interest in using our A.T.I. Exhibit in their schools. The display has been sent to Alfred University School of Ceramics at Alfred, New York, assigned for the fall semester until February 1st, 1967. We have tentative assignment of the exhibit for Stevens Insti tute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey, from February 1st, 1967 to Jure 1st, 1967. We have possible interest from South Dakota School of Hines for some later date. At an appropriate time in 1967, we will send out a similar, direct mail letter to the remaining portion of the mailing list of universi ties. A report was made that a snail quantity of Japanese made Asbestos Cloth has been reported sold in the midwest area as low as 46q per lb. This situation is being watdi ed carefully. Final decisions on all copy has been made for publishing the Third Edition of the Asbestos Textile Handbook. We have coordinated in the Handbook all cf the ASTM specificati ons revised and approved by ASTM for our publication. Contract has been let for publication of 12,500 copies to Confort & Company, New York City, with an approximate six weeks' delivery prom ised as of October 17th, 1966. The Sales Promotion Committee agreed to recommend to the Board of Governors sending a cony of the A.T.I. Handbook to all important en gineering school libraries.. Discussion took place as to the advisability of expanding our inter member reporting of business levels of production and sales of indi vidual companies to suprlement Caruso reports. No decision was con cluded. . A supplementary meeting was held with all interested A.T.I. members concerning recent adverse publicity of asbestos products as written in Chemical Week Magazine. Members of the Asbestos Fibre Committee and the Technical Committee joined \dth the Sales Promotion Committee in this discussion. Sitting as a Committee Of The Whole, it was felt advisable to register with Chemical Week our concern of their irre sponsible article in the September 10th, 1966, issue. Jlnutes: SALES rRCVOTIOM COmiTTEE Page -2- Thru our legal counsel, we plan to register our dissatisfaction both verbally, and in written form. We rejected at this tine a plan of trying to obtain a written state ment from either Dr. Cralley or from the Industrial Hygiene Founda tion which could be used by sales organizations to refute adverse publicity. (Signed) W.S. Hough V/.S. Hough - Chairman J MINUTES: Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Report October 6, 1966 The meeting was held at The Homestead, Hot Springs, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. Irvin Barnett - Johns-Manville Corporation G. E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. ' D. T. Austin - U. S. Rubber Company Walter M. Deekman - Turner Brothers Asbestos Cor.pany D. F. Quealy - Kmerican Asbestos Company J. D. McCluer - H. X. Porter Company, Inc. Paul Smith - ASTM Herbert E. Sunbnsy - Asbestos Textile Institute SUBJECTS DISCUSSED; Revision of ASTM Specifications In order to give an intelligent report of the meeting on Thursday, October 6th., it is necessary to describe the activities of the committee since the June meeting. Following the June meeting, the connittee reviewed and reported discrepancies in the 1966 ASTM preprint on D315 D1571, and D2100. These were reported to Paul Smith, ASTM. In the meantime a conflict in use of terms was noted wherein the word "Type" was used in two places to imply different meanings. In D315 and D1571 Types 1 to 5 designate the various kinds of yam that can be used. In D2100 Types 11, 17, and VI designate the magnetic rating of various asbestos textiles. In order to avoid the conflict it was recommended that the word "Class" be used in designating the kinds of yarn used in D31? and D1571 and the word "Type" be retained in D2100. In order to give all members of the committee an opportunity to express confirmation of the change, a letter ballot was mailed by the chairman to each member with the request to vote for or against the change. The response was 100 for the change. This information was relayed to Paul Smith for proper changes in the ASTM draft and also to Bill Hough and Howard Bain for proper insertion in the new A.T.I. Handbook. This completed the committee's work in assisting Sales Promotion with the A.T.I. Handbook. Copies of the Uth. Draft of D1918, as set up at the June meeting were distributed to all members and a copy to Dr. Scroggie. Comments and re commended changes on this draft were received from Dr. Scroggie in July. Copies of his comments were sent tolall members prior to the August 18th. and 19th. meeting. -1- u) Meeting of the Technical Committee August 18th. - 19th., 1966 at ASTM Headquarters, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania IN ATTENDANCE: Irvin Barnett - Johns-Manville Corporation W. S. Hough - Johns-Manville Corporation J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. William Maaskant - American Asbestos Company G. E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. J. D. KcCluer - H. K. Porter Company, Inc. Paul Smith - ASTM Arthur G. Scroggie - ASTM Herbert Sunbuiy - A.T.I. On Thursday August 18th., the committee set up the 2nd. Draft of D299 yarns. Bill Hough, chairman of the Sales Eromotion Committee met with the committee that day and his assistance was greatly appreciated. On Friday Ausust 19th., Dr. Scroggie met with the conmittee and vith his assistance a better arrangement of the specification was formulated. Time did not permit at this meeting .the consideration of the various equations involved. ,, Following the August meeting several exchanges by correspondence have been made within the committee and with Dr. Scroggie on the equations involved in D1918, . At the present meeting on October 6th., consideration was given to D1918 and so far as the editorial script is concerned, agreement seems to have been reached between the committee and Dr. Scroggie1s committee. The equations are yet to be resolved. Due to the urgency of completing the revision of the specifications, the committee felt that an intermediate meeting should be held. Decision was to have this on Thursday and Friday, December 15th. and 16th., 1966 at ASTM Headquarters, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. J. D. KcCluer Chairman of the Technical Committee -2- uJ limites: ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE BIBER TESTING COMMITTEE October 5-7, 1966 Hot Springs, Virginia Attending: J. '..'ronski J. Berry G.F.A. Brink D.E.Childers J. Christian R.Dodds-Hebron B.Lincoln Raybcstos-Nanhattan, Inc. Cassiar Asbestos Corp. Ltd Asbestos Corp., Ltd. H.K.Porter, Inc. Cassiar Asbestos Corp., Lt Sell Asbestos Mines, Ltd. Turner & Newall, Ltd. Subjects Discussed 1. Mr. Dewey Childers of H.K.Porter discussed the present status of a test procedure he is trying to develop to determine the spicule content of milled textile grade fibers. So far, results have been inconclusive. By the time of the next meeting he hopes to know definitely whether his apparatus iiri.ll function well enough to do the job he wants. 2. Members of the Fiber Testing Committee representing both fiber producers and consumers plan to attend the next meeting of ASTII Sub Committee A-4 on Asbestos Textiles which meets in New York City the 19th of this month. One of the items scheduled to be taken up at this meet ing is the revision of ASTH test procedure D-1118, which is the procedure for determining the magnetic rating of asbestos. Since the magnetic rating test presented in our test manual is patterned very closely after the ASTi-i procedure, the Committee feels vie should follow any proposed changes in the ASTI! procedure very closely to see if the proposed changes might suggest any modifications to our own procedure. Results of the ASTM deliberations will be reported to Committee members at the next meeting. 3. The Committee discussed a situation that arose occasionally in which test values for fiber openness or surface area reported by a mine sometimes differed 'u .) appreciably from the values found by the fiber pur chaser on the same lot of fiber. It was agreed that this problem arose when the miner made his tests on fiber before it was packed in shipping bags and the purchaser made his tests on packed fiber removed from the bag. The effect of packing makes a big difference in fiber openness test values. This situation emphasized the need for both the miner and the purchaser to condition and prepare the fibers in the same way before any tests are made on them. At present the best procedure we have for this is outlined in the first test in our test manual under Method of Sampling and Preparation. 4. Mr. Gay Brink of Asbestos Corporation briefly reviewed for the Committee the results of the recent meeting of ASTM Committee D-30 on Inorganic and High Modulus Fibers. This is the committee established a few years ago to handle standards and test procedures on fibers and whiskers made of such materials as boron, carbon, aluminum oxide and other materials as well as on asbestos. Respectfully submitted, J. Uronski -2- AS3EST0S TEXTILE II'STIT'JTE July 26, 1966 Mrs. T. C. McCluskey 852 North Taylor Avenue Kirkwood, Missouri 63122 Dear Mrs. McCluskey: The sad news of your husband's passing was indeed a great shock to all of his friends and long tine associates in the Asbestos Textile Institute, and I want to express on their behalf our nost sincere sympathy to you in the loss of your beloved husband, and to Marilyn and Theodore 0., in the loss of their devoted father. Your husband served the Institute as its Treasurer in 1958, and as its Vice President in 1961 and 1962. his counsel and advice in its affairs and in rroblens comr:on to the asbestos textile industry were nost highly valued and respected by his associates, and he ti 11 be greatly missed. "Ted"McCluskey, as he was affectionately known to all of us here at the Institute, was a nan of splendid character, and those v.ho knew hin best are lastingly enriched by their opportunity for close ac quaintance vd th hin. I have instructed the Secretary to make this letter a part of the permanent records of the Institute, also to circulate it to the Board of Governors on which "Ted" served for so many ye ars. At our next General Meeting, to be held in October, I will inform th members of this official action. You nay be sure that our thoughts and best wishes will go out to you on that occasion. . . Itost sincerely. (Signed) John A. Brown, Jr. JOHN A. BROWN, JR. - PRESIDENT sag ccr Mr. Theodore D. McCluskey Mr. J.L. Mitchell I'inutes Doard of Governor's j'eeting Asbestos Textile institute October 6, 1966 The Homestead, Jot Springs, Va. In Attendance: J.A. nrown, Jr. - Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corporation V/.S. Hough - Johns-Manville Corporation S.T. Peele, Jr. - United States Rubber Company J.A. Gallagher - H.K. Porter Company, Inc. H.T. Schaefer - Garlock, Inc. E.A. Schuman - Johns-Manville Corporation (Treasurer of ATI) P.Jay Flocken - Legal Counsel H. E. Sunbury - Secretary, ATI ***** Minutes ******** I. The meeting was called to order by President Brown who stated that he had received-a letter from Mr. G.Parry Wiess, representative of Garlock, Inc., that b'x. H.T. Schaefer had "full authority to act on my behalf and to represent Garlock in the Board of Governor's meeting to be held on October 6, 1966". Welcomed to the Board was the netv representative, of H.K. Porter Company, Inc., I'x. J.A. Gallagher. The only member company not represented was Tallman-McCluskey Pab. Co. 2. The Secretary presented the minutes of the last meeting. Mr. Hough moved the reading of same be omitted, seconded by Mr. Rainey. So voted. 3. The Financial Report was presented by Treasurer E.A. Schuman. President Brown stated that he had received a letter from W.E. Eddy, General Auditor, Johns-Manville Corn., New York City, dated September 22, 1966, in which I'x. Eddy stated that he had examined the financial records of the Institute, and that the Financial Report dated Septem- aulifol's'Sede r There was considerable discussion of the report in view of the thought expressed at a` prior meeting that the strong financial posi tion of the Institute might justify a reduction in members' dues. Mr. Hough urged that a strong financial position be maintained, Mr. Schuman thought that we should consider needs for promotional work, and Mr. Gallagher favored a reserve for that purpose. Mr.Hough remarked that we should know more about where money will be needed in future before any action is taken to reduce income of the Institute. Mr. Peele moved that the Financial Report be accepted, seconded by Mr. Rainey, and so voted. 4. Mr. Peele, Chairman of the Nominating Committee, reported that he had canvassed the member companies to determine who would represent them on the Board of Governors for the coming year, and submitted the following list: (J ) Minutes - Board of Governors Meeting Toge -2- J.A. Brown, Jr. (alternate H.Q. Scowcrcft) Raybestos-Manhattan, J.A. Gallagher - H.K. Porter Company, Inc. .A. Schuman - Johns-Manville Corner at ion S.J. Peele, Jr. - United States Rubber Connany ' J.L. Mitchell - Tallman-I'-cCluskey Fabrics Comnany G.P. Wiess - Garlock, Inc J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corporation Inc. 5. Election of Officers. Mr. Peele, as Chairman of the Nominating Committee, appointed at the last meeting, submitted a slate of offi cers for the coming year: . For President - J.L. Rainey - American Asbestos Textile Corp. For Vice President - E.A. Schuman - Johns-Manville Corp. For Treasurer - N.L.A. Martucci - Garlock, Inc. At the suggestion of iir. Peele the above slate of officers was ac cepted by acclamation, and duly elected. 6. Kr. reele recommended that the Chairmen of our four working com mittees, namely: W.C. Atkinson - Air Hygiene i i'.fg; J.O. McCluer Technical; J.P. Wronski - Fiber Testing; and W.S. Hough - Sales Pro motion; be continued for another year inasmuch as they were complet ing their first year of the normal two year tenure. Mr. Rainey moved for approval of this recommendation, seconded by Mr. Schuman, and so voted. 7. A.T.I. Handbook - 3rd Edition. On motion made by Mr. Peele and seconded by Mr. Rainey, it was voted to pay Howard T. Bain a fee of $1000.00 for editing the 3rd Edition of the Handbook. This is the same amount as paid him for editing the 1st and 2nd Editions. 8. On motion made by Mr. Hough, and seconded by Mr. Peele, it was voted to give each Associate Member of the Institute 100 conies of the new Handbook without charge. This compares with the 150 free conies given them of the prior edition. 9. Number of Handbooks to be printed. The presently indicated re quirements for the New Handbook are: H.K. Porter Company --------------------------------- --- 1500 Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ------------------------------ 2000 Johns-Manville Corp. ------------------------ 2000 American Asbestos Textile Corp. ------------------ 1500 U.S, Rubber Company----- ----------------------------- -- 750 Tallnan-McCluskey Fab. Co.--------------------------- 100 Garlock, Inc. ----------- -------------------------------- (to be advised) Free copies to Associate Members --------------- 900 Purchases by " M ---------- -- 500 A.T.I. stock-------------------------------------------------------- 2000 Total 11250 On the basis of these estimated requirements, Hr. Peele moved that the printing of the 3rd Edition be limited to 12,500 copies. This motion was seconded by Mr. Rainey. So voted. \) ) Minuted - Board of Governors feting Page - 3 - 10 Pricing of Handbook. After discussion of estimated costs of the new edition as submitted by Mr. dough, it was moved by Mr, Gallagher that the Handbook be sold at SI.00 each to lumbers and Associate Mem bers. Others to ray $1.50. This is the same basis as used for the last edition, j'otion was seconded by Mr. Hough. So voted. 11. Modification of Membershin Oues. At the June, 1966 meeting President Brown had requested that the committee to make recommenda tions for possible modification in membership dues (Messers Peele, Chm. and E.A. Schuman) make final report at this meeting. Mr. Peele recommended that same dues be continued for 1967 as he and Mr. Schuman felt that we may be under the necessity to lend more ru prort for creation of an effective rebuttal to the bad rublicity such as ap peared in Chemical Week Magazine issue of September 10th entitled "Asbestos - Awaiting Trial". Mr. Peele moved that dues be continued without change, and Mr. Hough seconded the motion. There being no dissent, it was so voted. 12. A.T.I. Budget for 1967. The proposed budget for 1967 was pre sented by Treasurer Schuman. The total is $10,248.00 compared with $9,525.40 for the previous year. Expected income is $10,300.00. Mr. Feele moved that the proposed budget be accepted. This was sec onded by Mr, Rainey. Agreement was unanimous. A copy of the Budget is attached to these minutes. 13. The Secretary presented a letter from Mr. Frank G. Ruggles, of the Frank G. Ruggles Co., dealers in asbestos waste,' making applica tion for Associate M-enbershir in the A.T.I. Mr. Gallagher moved that the Ruggles application be denied by reason of a technicality (our By-Laws do not provide any classification that would be applicable) however, as Mr. Ruggles is well and favorably known thruout our in dustry, that he be extended an invitation to attend our meetings as a special courtesy. This notion was seconded by Mr. Hough. So voted. Some discussion ensued as to the desirability of amending our By-Laws to broaden the classes of membership, but no action was taken. 14. Nippon Asbestos Company, Japan. The Secretary stated that in response to an inquiry from A. R. Simon Co., New York City, for in formation on membership requirements (on behalf of their principals, Niopon Asbestos Co., Japan) that he had given them a copy of our Con stitution By-Laws plus some general information, and that they had forwarded this to Jaran. No further word has been received. Legal counsel was asked to render an opinion if A. & R. Simon Co., as sales agent for Nippon Asbestos Co., would be eligible to attend ATI meet ings in the event that Nippon was accepted for an Associate Member ship at some future time. . 15. President Drown noted with deep regret the death of T.C. ;ic- Cluskey, President of Tallman-McCluskey Fabrics Company, which oc curred on July 18, 1966. Mr. McCluskey was a most loyal supporter of the various activities of the A.T.I., and had served as its Treasurer in 1958, and as Vice President in 1961 and 1962. President Brown stated that he had written a letter of sympathy to Mrs. McCluskey on behalf of the Institute, and the letter is made a part of these min utes. .7-in irt es - Beard of Governor's F-eeting 16^ Hr. '1 .S. Hough moved that the Secretary send a letter to the family of W.E. Clark, who died, following heart surgery, on August 10th. Kr. Clark, during his many years as Vice President & General Manager of U.S. Rubber's Textile 'Division, was a staunch friend and supporter of A.T.I. So voted. 17. Speaker for February Meeting. President Drown suggested that anyone having a suggestion to offer should contact Mr. Rainey at an early date. 18. Fr. Hough recommended that the Board of Governors should author ize our Legal Counsel to draft a letter nrotesting the Chemical Week .article of September 10th, 1966, entitled "Asbestos-Awaiting Trial", and send same to the editor of Chemical Week; also to the proper of ficial in McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Further, that Legal Coun sel should attempt to set up a meeting with McGraw-Hill and/or Chemi* cal Week at which he, accompanied by three representatives of A.T.I., could register a verbal protest. Mr. Flocken agreed to try to set up & meeting as suggested by Mr. Hough, and also to draft the letter of protest. Final decision will be made as to how effective, or desir able, the proposed meeting with McGraw-Hill would be after Mr. Flock en has made a preliminary contact. 19. Date and location of the next meeting. It was decided to hold the next regular meeting of A.T.I. on February 9-10, 1967, at the Cherry Hill Inn, Cherry Hill, N.J. 08034. This is located near Cam den, U.J., and is convenient to Philadelphia. They have agreed to host the A.T.I. on the dates that we desire. 20. There being no further business to cone before the Board of Gov ernors, on motion made and duly seconded, the meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, a ~Foport of f'unc's ) asb^tos tjt. iruii ) S vi r t Balance on Band at T rst, T- snort. ?foy 9, 1966 General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund t 7415.41 1CCC9.S6 28.98 F ecelpts To Savings Fund (Interest) 215.30 To General Fund ( 1966 Duos) 500.00 To General Fund (Book Sales) 83.52 To General Fund (AssessmentsFibre Test 5760.91 Manual) Total On Knnd r.nd received Plsbur9 enonts Legal Retainer ( si* mos ending 8/31) 1005.20 Secretary's Salary ( 3 mos.) 359.25 F.I.C.-.Tax (2nd Qtr 1966) 31.50 Secretary's travel 194.05 Office rent ( 3 nos.) 225.00 inhibit expense 62.60 Fibre Test Manual 3b:panse 54; .-..43 Handbook expense (3rd edition) 999.00 Printing f: Office Supplies 173.00 stenographic 27.50 Meeting JScponse (June 1966) 773.34 Insurance ( 3 year rentals) 115.00 Flowers (T.C.McCluskey) 21.65 Telephone ( 4 nos.) 122.63 Petty Cash (Vouchers 239-266lncl.) 103.10 176453.65 *566,73 9 .'1019.33 9651.33 Balance on Hand ns of Sept.9,1966 Funds General Fund(Bank Statenent of Scot.9,1966) 4067.89 Savings Fund ` 15223.26 Petty Cash Fund 76.90 Total Funds v 23368.05 fc 23363.05 Assets as of Sept.9,1966 General Fund Savings Fund . Petty cash on hand Accounts Feceivcble (Book S^les) Accounts Receivablo(F.Test Ilan.Assessr.t) Postage on Hand Furniture {* Equipment (Mor.inr.l Value) Total Assets liabilities (None) Net YZorth 4067.69 19223.26 76.90 96.03 251.52 (--) 4.50 1.00 23721.10 23721.'JO (<0 Paid 9/15/66 Respectfully submitted ft.S. Suncdry - Asst. /ressurer / Johns -M an ville p. ;J / -r. v f I '.M.ON' : 1 r ' I L T r ---\ * r< otnnbcr 2?., l 'Gfa 2-ir. Jo'.ir. />. r.rcw., Jr., ?reritlot:*: Anber.t*'.". "io-cLle Institute c/n FaybesLor-M^nli.iLro.ri, incorporated >l3i'ht:in, i.vanin l7Vi5 Daev !ir. br.-..ti: Tiio rap^r-: r'l fi.n.l? an 1 balance nfio^t of Anbostoa ',,c*:tilo In*, t? trite nr of yeptr.-ber 1, 1'66 and activity for the fiscal yaar wore eairsiwv.:. IJsnV. bn lane r 7 a- thorn on balance r.hoct vere reconcile.' th berk records. The attached :: tnter.cn t rcprer.cr.tr the financial position of the' Institute nr. of Con terror f. If'fci'. Very truly ours cnc. ^ cc: C, M . A. ''cliu'.r.r rhr.'i-'V-r.v '1V-. Perearch Crnte limvillc, liov Jor-.ey tl. 2. .lunbury 15 Center Street Pcmtcn Z, ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE Budget for 1967 Item 1966 Budget Disbursements 12 months endine 9/9/66 Propo sect for 1967 Secretary's Salary $1149.60 " Travel 400.00 Office rent 500.00 Office Expense 1200.00 Legal Retainer 2000.00 Legal Travel or other tse 375.00 C.F.A. (Caruso) Meeting Expense (3 meetings) 300.00 1750.00 Exhibit Expense 400.00 FICA Tax 100.80 Fiber Test Manual Expense Handbook, 3rd Edition 500.00 Revision of ASTM Specs. 500.00 Fiber Test Manuals (A.T.I stock) 150.00 Incidentals (Flowers, etc.)1 200.00 Insurance (3 year renewals)> ASTM and I.H.F. dues $ 928.70 432.05 691.64 1265.42 2000.00 75.96 2065.74 331.27 274.05 5886.70 1424.03 219.00 208.91 47.35 250.00 35.00 $ 1437.00 450.00 900.00 1200.00 2000.00 250.00 300.00 2000.00 400.00 126.00 600.00 250.00 200.00 135.00 Totals $9525.40 Less: Payments received for Fiber Test Manuals (*) Includes $251.52 rec'd. 9/15/66 $16135.82. $10248.00 6020.43 (*) $10115.39 Expected Income for Year 1967 Dues, Class "A" Members --- ------------------------- -- 5 $1000.00 -- " " "B" -------------------------------------2 500.00 -- " " "C" " -................................... 4 Q 500.00 -- . "D" " ----------- ---------------------- 5 Q 250.00 __ Book Sales ($146.21 in last 12 months)--------------------------- (Est.) Interest on Savings Fund ---------- --....... -(Est.) $5000.00 1000.00 2000.00 1250.00 200.00 850.00 Total expected income $10300.00 Approved by Board of Governors October 6, 1966 o r .is; i'* f :% * w ii . . ;*!: .1 *i n* - I.* ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE July 26, 1966 Mrs. T. C. icCluskey 852 North Taylor Avenue Kirkwood, Missouri 63122 Dear Mrs. McCluskeyt The sad news of your husbandfs passing vas indeed a great shock to nil of his friends and long time associates in the Asbestos Textile Institute, and I want to express on their behalf our most sincere sympathy to you in the loss of your beloved husband, and to Marilyn and Theodore 0., in the loss of their devoted father. Your husband served the Institute as its Treasurer in 1958, and as its Vice President in 1961 and 1962. liis counsel and advice in its affairs and in problens common to the asbestos textile industry were most highly valued and respected by his associates, and he vi 11 be greatly missed. "Ted'^tCluskey, as he was affectionately known to all of us here at the Institute, was a nan of snlendid character, and those vho knew him best are lastingly enriched by their opportunity for close ac quaintance vi th him. I have instructed the Secretary to make this letter a rart of the permanent records of the Institute, also to circulate it to the Board of Governors on which "Ted" served for so many >ears. At our next General Meeting, to be held in October, I will inform the members of this official action. You may be sure that our thoughts and best wishes will go out to you on that occasion. * Most sincerely, (Signed) John A. Brown, Jr. JOHN A. BROWN, JR. - PRESIDENT sag cc: Mr. Theodore D. McCluskey Mr. J.L. Mitchell Founded 2944 ) ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE P. O. BOZ 239 73 CENTER ST.. POMPTON LAKES, N. J. 07442 U. S. A. 837-2216 hovember 19, 1966 Aj" m :'rs. IV. J, Clark 2f.O h.L, 19th ;venue Imperial Point Jort T nuderd&l e, .'la. r.'CcOo Tear Its, Clark: .-'t their most recent noetiny, the Board of C-overrors of the Institute voted the fol'ovin'- resolution- resolved:- 11 The Board of "overrors of the shertos i'er.tile Institute, l:rrir.'T learned, of the death of Uilliam I. Clark, hereby instruct the Secretary to convey to . rs, Clark and. other members of his r.mily, their very deop sympathy." Till Clark v&s a most loyal and enthusiastic supporter of the Institute for many years, and the creat warmth of his personality, as well r.s his valued advice and counsel, \ il1 be sorelv missed by our me -.hers. host sincerely, i :-Of3Tcr' Km Herbert E. Sunbury Ertocutive Secretary card, of appreciation for this letter has been received, from ' rs. Clark. ) O Co 1--i S-I o X90Ik 1 Co o LU O ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE P. 0 . Box 239, Pomplon Lakes, N. J. > oa.i O o 1a a . gs to c Pcto* 5|to aC2 -uc. SisCO o <2 Z 3 << so 5 a S 2 S< Z o 5 j* a. o >* d5 z >* a a* . az Oo o.' 02 3i s < ^ *>>< re. 2< *0J < S 2 to o z ~d 8z 55<~2 1 &H fS . -= a^> o z z` < z a o u CoO 5 CQ < a > a a to 3a ocj s4 to z< s J a < E- > z s o o a a a a 3 a - to o a > E-<- 5v to Z Q a H Z D Q_ "rDe H5 rnrae z' oHr< x,o<3V>L>1Zs O a a ou cy Oin C CO o Etao to o a <a & a a CO < aa a a to 12 - tS Q a p ca ^ T3 j| 5 S2 Q Z so 18 aCCU.5aOOre5^c ~ s u. < *> CO O > a -s Z a awCO Ml c g j*s*A oO) a < &3 a < -OCa* | Ca<^O a aOU to o o < hao ag a^ a S ,,*a >Z2 cre 2 co ,, re Oa '?g a re o M au 22 o '*" 3 - < or az a O O35 aE- a a aa aca are >re < a j. z a "Z a ^<. a rree o rer < o^a z a o o a Q s d o a o Eaa a a < croe "cSj a a a a "roe "Go o ci a a a a z a D H F I BRS COMMIT^:': i M,P. 0ai'3on, J .t), 0 1 :rijtic \n , *P,P. S m ith 'V.W. C u ^ h trc d jV /m .J .iV .S m ith , N.W, Hendry ASBESTOS TEXTILE A *"3M BirTl cc1-o-1 l~AC3* mAO5 c->nAdHs. <* bP* Ca cr3o y-<i >Azi JC-> c3o s-*3* 'riiCoOs-n. c>C3j> aw. II 9II II 1I o <P0Co AMA I UOt- -C>OO o0zcc1 3 0) * r-i A0OA1, Oo >t* d AOh o )WO< d tli rMH .rHOU cco hACEdHd r2hUschnonu (SCO ch> c 3o , *hAa co * 0ccp,|A1c -= > H <o o >*Ah c e co rt3 ( CSM3O MtA> EndH orMsoh lhrGA6rCHCt Q rCO E-hdhhoB. rrH-i S--1 co C!x5i Z <MS P OncC rl a Kl< C>O33 Ah h > K2cdH > PM^d * , h1 c- Pn 3 irOal r p*EH < :s co JpcoC r>H Ob3O d 3 v <y a-i. Q MEh o a OO 5 p ^Ma5C <nH AOA P .352* o< . * < Eh * ', TBi>dn3> Cd Xaddi pH tO-1 Ah S-oPi -rral BEeMh--IHi jcEdg DO i-Aj C .1 H 3 BE AH oU,;dr P C oo 3O fc A3dp CroO < EOH itc3D' < ^ a * 2&1 P: 3A S p c<o ,fcO : <*oH A>o CO 'Co m>C-unhp dr BSO Dc n A a s T'.CI hi O EO AH 5 p A C3 a no.pc iS u! rAUH fh. Eh 0 I-- C C U03 rl ota u AG < h M>d 3 ac* !3 E A.'Th >s o . ACOEOu 4O-P>Br CH cAd C'p is B E CC tC C o c k ta il a - 12:00 Noon Adjournm ent ASBESTOS T jX T IT E INSTITUTE > n c M E fS 6 tci Aa CO p --l 3 TO3 sc ro CO q ro Ei rC-OJ P2--tco?H: sO r E- S A. O(O oM OO C> IS po A XOJ 0cs o oPi . hcoH P 1 A O3 a ca a S a A Ptn too s ChOoGOH CCCO 0rH5 CO rOpAOocfl TJ>CfO3DZ*>l * PhoPQoEgH 2oco etc- Sd o "U*pH otCHo Po E >?< "A* <c ootO ooc oo hrUH oCo*S.I S ^ O6 -oP rrSEocoduHH->I r<r oto 05 PP|H 2OcO CrEcO EPtnchno CS^ApHui ooCrHM po -<: CCOOl PchpogEH oco 2 oc phCOcOEtH aa CMndO CrHJ po r < ooCO A* too CO I AonocA c>o Aoi CAoB3O Ah Co--l > po OO ID 1 u 3o Hc<oodar* *e CC0rHOO < oCO 0> e- t A JoPOOO g'MZ *S-j r*1 CTrcAul3 K< a ( -e- 1 O 1 t bb J4 u Minutes GENERAL HEiTING Asbestos Textile Institute June 10, 1966 Barbizon-Plaza Hotel, New York, N.Y In Attendance: A.'ERTC/iirASBESTOS TETTILE CORT. J.L. Rainey J.N. Christenbury GARLCXE:, INC. G.E. Houghton - - Olson ASn;STCS CORPORATION LTD. A.C. Steele u.L. Alexander (A.C.S. Ltd.) H.IC. PORTER COiTAi.Y, INC. AT. Gouveia J.D. McClure BELL ASBESTOS MINES LTD. Vim. J.V. Smith R. Dodds-llebron JC:niS-.' AiJVILLE CORT. VJ.S. Hough E.A. Schuman T.A. Rogers C.L. Sheckler 'J.C. Atkinson . CAS3IAR ASBESTOS CORT. LTD. T.T. Tigert CADWALADER, NICXERSHAT ft TAFT T. Jay Flocken (Legal Counsel) ASBESTOS TE'rTILE INSTITUTE K.S. Sunbury (Secretary) RAYBESTOS-i'ANHATTAH, J.A. Crown, Jr. J.A. Bettes, Jr. L.C. l.'iliiams J.T. VJronski R.-l. Smith J.W. Hawkins j Scowcroft INC. TALLi AN-IE CLUSXEY FABRICS CO. J.L. Mitchell Ted D. IcCluskey UNITED STATES RUB3ER CO; TAi-rt ft, C. Link S.J. Peele, Jr. E.A. Iorris Dr. J.H. V/olfsie V/.C. Hitchcock ASTI Headquarters Staff T.J. Smith U.S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE Dr. L.J. Cralley NICOLET INDUSTRIES R.r. Griffin Luncheon Guests Mrs. J.A. Bettes, Jr., Mrs. S.J. Teele, Jr., Juts. 17.C. Atkinson W.C. Hitchcock, U.S. Rubber eo., IJevr York W.A. Singleterry, U.S. Rubber Co., New York R.P. Griffin, Nocolet Industries JirjfES **** 1. President John A. Brown, Jr., called the meeting to order at 9:30 A.i. and asked each person present to stand and identify himself and his company affiliation. 2. The minutes of the last meeting were nresented for reading. 3*r. Peele moved that the reading be omitted, seconded by Mr. Atkinson and so voted. ' <) `iiinutes - General - eeting - continued ra^e -2- 3. The Financial Report vras presented by : r. E.A. Schuman, Treasurer, i r. Feele moved that it be accented, seconded by . r. Lough, and it was so voted unanimously* The report is attached. 4. P.jay Flocken, legal counsel, presented a renort entitled 'Some Aspects of the Legal Problems on Asbestos Publicity: Grounds for Possible Libel Action and Standing to Sue', i r. Flocken referred to a recent example of statements made on a radio broadcast and then discussed the general problems involved in bringing an action for label where the product or manufactured article has been named but no particular manufacturer has been named. Counsel discussed briefly the New York Court of Appeals1 rulings in Drug Research Corp. v. Cvrtis Pub. Co., 7 K.Y.2d 435. and Harwood rharn. Co. v. Nat. Ilroadc;.\.sting Co., 9 iST.2d <*60. In conclusion, it was stated that without either a specific and direct reference to a particular Plaintiff or necessarily implying plaintiff's fraud or deceit in putting a danger ous product upon the market, the probability of success of a libel suit in the circurastancesreferred to would be difficult to assure. 5. Mr. A.C. Steele, Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., presented an inter esting report, on behalf of the asbestos fibre producers, concerning supply and demand for raw asbestos fibre, he Mentioned the current shipping strike, which if long continued, could have a most adverse effect on nine operations. 6. Or. J.II. Wolfsie, Corporate vertical Director, United States Rub ber Company, was the Guest Speaker, and his subject was "Asbestos and Health". Or. Wolfsie referred to the alarming information that has appear ed in the lay press concerning the alleged deleterious effects of as bestos on the health of the public. Apropos of this, some of the highlights of the present state of knowledge on the effects of asbes tos on health were reviewed. Or. Wolfsie read excerpts from certain news releases, and said that he could find many weaknesses in the statements made. Or. v/olfsie described the development of a preventive medical program to protect the health of employees from possible adverse ef fects of exposure to asbestos, and gave a brief account of the devel opment of the present preventive health program in the United States Rubber Company for its asbestos employees. An extensive question and answer period followed Dr. Wolfsie's talk, and our members were most appreciative of the privilege to hear him. 7. The committee reports were given by the chairnen of their re spective committees as listed, below; The full text of their reports is attached to these minutes. Air Hygiene & Mfg. Committee - i/.C. Atkinson, Chairman Sales Promotion Committee - W.S. Hough, Chairman Technical Committee - J.D. HcCluer, Chairman Fiber Testing Committee - J,T.t V.'ronski, Chairman ' linutes - Generd. leeting - continued Page -3- 3. A "CERTIFICATE OF AIYRZCIATIOH" in the form of a Scroll was pre sented to j'r. John A. Bettes, Jr.t on behalf of the members, by President Brown. ir. Dettes, better ]:nown as "Jack" to his many friends in the as bestos industry, is planning to retire in July 1960 from his posi tion as i'anager, Asbestos Textile Division, Raybestos-i anhattan, Inc. Jack Bettes is a past president of the Institute, and has served it in many other capacities as well during his more than twenty years of faithful attendance at our meetings. In accepting the Scroll, Jack expressed his great appreciation for it and also for the most enjoyable private cocktail party held in his honor on Wednesday evening, June 8th, Jack stressed the value of the Institute as an aid to management training, and pointed out that getting to know each other is most important, as it builds confidence. He mentioned that the Institv.tr has been of great value in bringing the raining industry in close contact with the asbestos textile industry, to their mutual advantage. As a suggestion. Jack believes that our industry should spend more tine promoting new uses for asbestos, and less time in defensive tactics against competitors. Immediately after his retirement, about July 14th, Jack and his rost attractive wife, Helen, will leave for an extended auto trip to the far '.Jest. We will greatly miss his counsel and. advice on Institute natters, his leadership in our industry, and the opportunity for personal contact with him. Our members wish him a most happy'retirement I 9. The next meeting of the Institute will be held at The Homestead, Hot Springs, Va., on October 6th and 7th, (Arrival Cct. 5th). This is the Annual ieeting, and The Homestead was selected as being a delightful spot to bring the wives! Reservations are re quired thirty days in advance. So, plan to bring ycur wife, and help to make this Annual i'ieeting the Biggest and Best ever I 10. There being no further business to come before this meeting, on motion duly made and seconded, it was voted to adjourn. The luncheon that followed the meeting was made more enjoyable by presence cf several wives as our guests. Respectfully submitted, K.E. Sunbury Secretary Report of Furas ASBESTOS TiHTILH II'STITUTS Balance on Hand at Last Report, Jan.10, 1956 M?.y 9. 1566 General Fund Savings 'Fund Petty Cash Fund Receipts To Savings Fund (Interest) To General Fund (1966 Dues) To General Fund (Book Sales) To General Fund (-Expense Refund) ^ 1877.40 18798.19 IS. 02 211.77 8750.00 37.75 56.00 Total On Hand and Received Disbursements Legal Retainer (3 months ending 2/28/C6) 500.00 Telephone (4 months) 75.79 Meeting Expense - Feruary 1966 685.28 Fibre Test Manual Exp.(2nd Edition) 63.06 Handbook Expense (3rd Edition) 372.Cl Secretary's Salary (6 months) 569.45 F.I.C.A. Tax (Adjusted to July 1963) 220.60 Secretary's Travel 125.0C Office Rent (6 months) 383.22 Exhibit Expense 52.00 Printing U Office Supplies 73.75 Stenographic 99.50 Petty Cash (Vouchers 223-228 incl.) 71.72 ' Balance on Hand as of r.ay 9, 1966 .................. L20690.C1 9055. rr. v297-6. xl> 2292.43 ?,,'26455. 65 Funds General Fund (tank Statement of I'ay 9, 1966) Savings Fund Petty Cash Fund 7413.41 19009.96 23.28 Total Funds Assets as of Hay 9, 1966 General Fund Savings Fund Petty Cash on Hand Accounts Receivable (1966 dues) " " (Book Sales) Postage on Hand Furniture and Equipment (nominal Value) Total Assets C26453.65 v- 7415.41 19009.96 28.28 500.00 (*) 21.55 6.50 1.00 v26982.70 Liabilities (Hone) Pet T. orth v269B2.70 (<) Paia 5/1B/66 Respectfully submitted ' -A ^ L K.S. Sunbury easurer // v r.inutes J A!?. ilYGIEiffi AH'; i AiRJr.iCTUBiHG COi i ITTiiE June 9, 1966 Barbizon-Tlaza Hotel, Kew York, W.Y. Attending: I embers:' :J.C. Atkinson, Chairman L.C. Williams C.L. Sheckler R.B. Smith A.C. Link Ted 9. McCluslcey A.r. Gouveia H. Walker Johns-I anville Products Corn. Raybestos-iianhattan Inc. Johns-I .anville Products Cory , Raybestos-i aniiattan Inc. United States 'lubber Co. Tallman-VcCluskey Fabrics Co H.IC. Porter Co. Inc. American Asbestos 'fertile Crrp, Guests: Dr. J.II. Wolfsie Dr. Lewis J. Cralley Mr. Sands lx. Langlois United States Rubber Co. U.S. Dept, of Health, Education & Welfare U.S. Rubber Co. Garlock Inc. Absent: lie Ison American Smelting Refining Co Bausch and Lomb Automatic Dust Counter Due to Tr. nelson's unavoidable absence the intended 'demonstration of the 40-2 portable dust counter was postponed. There was some discussion on the merits of this counter and the con sensus v/as that it would he of narticular value in monitoring and quick checking operating areas after correlating with the Greenberr?Smith Impinger. Environmental Health Survey Dr. Lewis J. Cralley reported that the survey is progressing on schedule and that they are now in the areas of Friction Materials, Asbestos Cement Products and Insulation Materials. Control of Dust by Treating Stock Reports were given on the results obtained in control of dust by the amplication of oils and other solutions both to blended stock and to asbestos fiber. Two companies are experimenting with 3.D. 5 made by the Lenox Chemi cal Co. Preliminary controlled test runs indicate that it is possi ble to reduce the dust counts by applying un to 17. by spraying it on the fiber or on the stock. Further expe rine nt al runs will be w'; to determine the minimum effective amount to be used and its effect, if any, upon the products. Another company has been using a mineral oil sprayed on the stock with satisfactory results. There was sore discussion and er.change of ideas on how to control dust at braiders and narrow fabric looms. One corpany has installed vacuum ducts in the center of the braidere;:cept where they make braid over braid, here it is installed, at the perimeter of the braider, doth systems have reduced the oust counts considerably* Another company has succeeded in reducing the dust at weaving r mning the warps over a smooth pick-up roll running in a trough r containing a solution of 20% Velubra Softener GSE and 80% water. Toe softener is supplied by Amalgamated Chemical Corn., R.y:er ano Ontario Sts., Philadelphia, Pa The softener prevents the yarn from drying out by absorption of moisture from the air resulting in a smoother and less dusty yar~>- Proposal by the Industrial liyp.iene Foundation of America, Inc. Or. Robert deTreville and. Or. Taul Gross of the Industrial hygiene Foundation had been invited to attend, a luncheon meeting for tlE ''v.rpose of presenting to the industry, through the n.T.I., a propos al for a supplementary investigation of the Specificity of Asbestos Bodies and the biologic effects of trace substances associated with Chrysotile Asbestos* In addition to the speakers, 26 members and guests attended the luncheon meeting. It was suggested that a contract could be arranged between the Indus trial Health Foundation and a group of interested corporations who v/ould contribute the funds for the investigation \irtiich would amcv'rc to a total of $350,000; or it could be separated into two parts, the first of which would cost $150,000 (Phases 1 and 2), ana the second part would cost $200,000* The second part would be optional at the completion of part one* With the consent of Drs* deTreville and Gross, a copy of the present ation is attached to the minutes* Pamphlet on ret hod for %eterninimr Asbestos Dust Concentration Since February, 20 additional copies have been shipped, Ly request to companies in the U.S.A., Canada, England, The iJetherlands, Norway Sweden and Australia* In total, 232 copies have been shipped out. There are still arpra-.-i mately GOO on hand. The Secretary has a record of all shipments. Respectfully submitted, W.C. Atkinson, Chairman Air iiygiene i T.fg. Conn OJ iinusTKia ilYGiLr; FOUimTior. of a; erica, <ellon Institute, 4400 Fifth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213 jnc. June 1, 1966 Prospectus for An Investigation of: a. The Specificity of Asbestos Bodies and b. The Biologic Effects of Trace Substances Associated with Chrysotile Asbestos.* 1 2 INTRODUCTION Thomson (1) found that about 30% of1 the people that had died in hospitals in Capetown (500 consecutive autopsies) had "asbestos bodies" in the lungs. The same author (2) found a similar preva lence of "asbestos bodies" among the hospital deaths in f'iami, Flori da. Cauna, Totten and Gross (3) examined the lungs of 100 non-se- lected hospital deaths for which autopsy permission had been ob tained, and found that 40% of these had "asbestos bodies" in their lungs. Ian Webster (4) recently reported a 477. prevalence in Johannesburg. _ There is, at present, a reasonable doubt that "asbestos bodies" are specific indicators of the inhalation of asbestos fibers. Such bodies have been found in coal miners and talc workers where they have been called "pseudo-asbestos bodies". Recently Davis (5) and Collet (6) have demonstrated the intracellular development of "asbes tos bodies" secondary to amorphous material. Asbestos occupies an anomalous position in its ability to produce lung damage, causing diffuse fibrosis and possibly also lung cancer. It is anomalous inasmuch as no other silicate has been shown to pos sess this ability. The fibrosis encountered in talcosis is limited to the tremolite variety, which is asbestos-like. On the other hand the pneumoconiosis associated with the mining of mica (another sili cate) has not been investigated experimentally, and the fibrogenie activity of the dusts coexisting with the mica has not been evaluat ed. Other silicates may evoke either minimal or relatively slight inflammotory changes, and are incapable of producing lung cancer. Inasmuch as certain polycyclic hydrocarbons and trace metals known to be potent cancer-producing agents have been demonstrated in asbes tos, particularly nickel, chromium and benzopyrene, the possibility exists that the trace metals and/or the polycyclic hydrocarbons may be solely responsible for the observed pathogenicity. This possibility is supported by two findings: 1. The report of Braun and Truan (7) which indicated that the prevalence of lung cancer among Canadian asbestos miners was no greater than that of the general population. This was in contrast to the report of Doll (8) which indicated a greatly increased rick of lung cancer among British workers exposed to asbestos dust while fabricating the asbestos. 2. In a recent investigation in the laboratory of the Industrial Hygiene Foundation, lung cancers were found in rats exposed for 18 months to high concentrations of chrysotile dust.(9) Because rate exposed to chrysotile dust by other investigators failed to develop lung cancer, there is a good probability that the chrysotile dus-1: that produced lung cancer was significantly different from that which did not have this effect. It is possible that this difference is OJ In-Justrial Hygiene Foundation of Anerica, Inc. - 2- caused by a coating of nickel steel alloy ar- licet to the asbestos V dust particles during the continuous hanner rilling process used for rendering the dust respirable. This method has not been used by previous investigators, nickel lias been found capable of Reducing lung cancer in trace amounts. Although asbestos and glass are both silicates, the industrial health experience with workers of these two materials has I ecn vast ly different. No pulmonary disease has been reported inverkers ex posed to glass dust. Nevertheless, the dust of filamentous glass has been labeled as highly dangerous in the lay press by association witn asbestos. It is a fact that although the effect o* flake glass dust on the lungs of animals has been reported, no similar study has been made of the dust of filamentous glassviiich does not have anssociated resin or filler* mPTX'SAL Thase 1. It is proposed to examine the response of animals lungs to differ ent inorganic fibrous materials of contrasting chemical cot rosition, and to characterize the differences and similarities in the response* rhase 2. It is proposed to investigate the influence of trace minerals and polycyclic hydrocarbons (i.e., benzopyrene) associated with chrysotile ore or the subsequent processing on the bng-term response of the j lung to the dust. Another objective of this phase is to obtain definitive data 6n the long-tem effect of dust derived from filamentous gl?ss upon the lungs. Three varieties of such glass dust will be investigated.: 1. with the rhenol-fornaldehyde-type of binder 2. with the binders usdd in textiles 3. without binder. Phase 3. A comparative study of the three rain types of asbestos dust (chry sotile, amosite and crocidolite) is proposed to attempt to pinpoint the cause of biological activity - i.e., whether due to silicates per se or the associated trace metals or hydrocarbons. Positive findings would be a basis for identifying any possible health hazards and for suggesting specific engineering or other process controls to eliminate such hazards* I'ATHMaLS .u .'? i ET, iOD Phase 1* The following fibrous materials will be reduced to respirable par ticle size (3|-'.) and will be injected in amounts of 3.5 rg. to 30 mg. as aqueous suspensions: 1. chrysotile dust (Prepared by milling in Wright mill and with j demonstrated carcinogenic potential) j 2. Chrysotile dust (unwilled synthetic)* 3. Aluminum nitride 4. tricalcium Phosphate (filamentous) . 5. fibrous glass . a. with phenol-formaldehyde-type binder Industrial ifygiene Foundation of America, Inc. - 3- 5. b. vith binder used for textiles c. without binder , 6. magnesium hydroxide (brucite) 7. mineral wool 8. zinc oxide (filamentous) Synthetic chrysotile has been prepared at j.cllon Institute by 'Ir. William Granquist. Electron photomicrographs show the charac teristic tubular crystals. These materials will be injected intratracheally into hamsters un der ether anesthesia. Previous experience has deronstrated that as bestos bodies will form in response to chrysotile dust within five months. The animals will therefore be held for six months and then .killed. Asbestos bodies will be sought in lung juice as well as in the lung tissues. The lungs will be expanded with buffered formalin under a head of 10 cm. of water. 31ocks removed from these lungs will be sectioned at 6/-. after paraffin impregnation. These sections will be stained by different methods and photographed sequentially to provide means for studying more completely the tissue reaction to these various materials. Search for the so-called asbestos bodies will be made using routinely stained sections, and sections stained for iron. In addition, unstained cleared sections will be examined under dark- field conditions for asbestos bodies. The latter glow v/hen examined in this manner. ' j The differnece in tissue reaction bet\'een the synthetic chrysotile dust and that which is known to be fibrogenic as well as carcinogenic will point to the contribution to pathogenicity made by one or more of the various trace substances which may be associated with chryso tile asbestos dust as a result of processing. The development of "asbestos bodies", better termed Ferruginous bodies, to dusts other than asbestos would point to the non-specific ity of these structures and to the desirability of collecting such "asbestos bodies" from human lungs in order to subject them to elec tron-probe analysis. Such analysis could give information in regard to the chemical make-up of the dust responsible for the development of the Ferruginous ("asbestos" body). Phase 2. In order to explore the etiologic role of the various components of chrysotile asbestos in ~the production of lung fibrosis and lung can cer, six series of rats will be injected intratracheally with the following: 1. chrysotile dust known to be carcinogenic (9) 2. synthetic chrysotile 3. synthetic chrysotile plus nickel 4. synthetic chrysotile plus chrome 5. synthetic chrysotile plus nickel, chrome and benzopyrene 6. nickel alone or with carbon as carrier 7. chrome alone or with carbon as carrier 8. benzopyrene with carbon as carrier These rats will be held for two years and then killed. The lungs will be prepared for examination and sections cut in the same manner as in fhase 1. ' (> J Industrial Itygiene Foundation of America, Inc. -4- Three other scries of rats will he injected intratracheally with the following dusts: 1. filamentous glass *-;ith mhcnol-formaldehyde-tyre binder 2. filanentous glass with the binders used for textiles 3. filamentous glass without binder. These animals will also be held for two years and then killed. The lungs will be prepared and studied ?.s in the preceding groups, with* special attention to asbestos bodies in lung tissues or juice. The number of animals per series will be such that there will be no doubt regarding the statistical significance of the results. Phase 3. SUPTLEI'EITARY PKPFOSAL (Note: The following supplement has been added to the original proposal of April 15, 1966). INTRODUCTION Decause of the interest of a number of companies in biologic inves tigations similar to those planned for chrysotile asbestos, but using instead, amosite and corcidolite, an additional investigation is pro posed to be undertaken concurrently with the one proposed April 15, 1966. As in the proposal dealing with chrysotile asbestos, the purpose of the presently proposed concurrent investigation .rs to attempt to pin point the cause of the biologic activity of all three main types of asbestos dusts: whether this lies in the silicates per se, in the associated trace metals, or in the associated hydrocarbons. 3ecause neither amosite nor corcidolite is available as a pure syn thetic material, the investigation proposed for these two types of asbestos is necessarily different from that proposed for chrysotile. Nevertheless, in order to make the investigation complete, it is de sirable to include also chrysotile in the new investigation since different methods are involved. Inasmuch as the biologic activity of asbestos seems to have two components: (a.) inflammatory--responsible for asbestosis, and (b.) neoplastic-responsible for lung cancer and mesothelioma, it is ad visable to investigate both of them. This can readily bo accom plished within the four year snan contemplated for this investigation In order to determine whether the biologic activity of asbestos re sides in the silicate, in the associated trace metals, or in the as sociated hydrocarbons, attenpts \*ill be made to remove the trace met als and the hydrocarbons from their respective silicates and to com pare the biologic activities of such "purified" asbestos samples from itfhich these associated materials have been removed. TRiTCSAL As a prerequisite to any biologic testing (insofar as the lungs are concerned), it is necessary to reduce the asbestos to a respirable particle size. This will be done in the following manner: the :~iosite and crocidolite will be ball-milled and tnen fed into continuous hammer mills modified from a design by Holt and Young (10). The * dusts emerging from the hammer mills will be collected in electro-  () .) Industrial hygiene Foundation of Arerica, Inc. - 5_ static precipitators. This re thod has been used successfully by us to reduce chrysotile asbestos to a particle size, 707, of which was respirable. A sufficient quantity of finely divided chrysotile dust is available for the purposes of this investigation. All three types of asbestos dust vi 11 be deprived of the greater portion or of all of their hydrocarbon content in one of two ways: 1. by continuous extraction with various solvents 2. by heating beyond the decomposition point of the hydrocarbons- The trace metals will be reroved from the three types of asbestos dust by treatment with aqua regia followed by treatment with E JTa (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, a chelating agent). ' One batch of each type of asbestos dust will be subjected to both procedures, i.e., removal of trace metals and removal of hydrocar bons. >_ Accordingly, each of the three types of asbestos dust vi 11 consist of five batches, each with a different composition: 1. the unaltered dust as collected in the preciritators 2. the dust minus the hydrocarbons (heat-treated), here, it is anticipated that there may also have been some change in the chemical structure of the asbestos through loss of some molecules of water of hydration* 3. the dust minus the hydrocarbons (solvent extraction). Mere, it is anticipated that the extraction may not be 100% complete. 4. the dust minus trace metals 5. the dust minus trace metals then subjected to solvent extrac tion to remove most of the hydrocarbons* In order to investigate the inflammatory component of the van ous (15) batches of asbestos dust, these will be injected intratracheal- 1? into rats and hamsters. The lungs of these animals are expected to show definitive changes within one year after the intrapulmonary introduction of the dusts. In order to explore the lung cancer aspect of the neoplastic com ponent of the biologic activity of asbestos dust, additional rats will be injected with the same batches of dust as above and allowed to live out their lives. I'ost of the animals, however, will have died before the end of the third year. The other (mesothelionatous) aspect of the above neoplastic compo nent will be investigated by injecting the 15 different batches of asbestos dust within the pleural cavity of rats and hamsters and al lowing them to live out tlieir lives. Jost of these animals will al so have died before the end of the third year. For the investigation of the inflammatory component of asbestos dust, a large enough number of animals will be put on test to all^w sampling at intervals throughout the year and still have an adequate number remaining to represent the 12 month old lesion. A tabular summary of the protocol is attached. RE TOUTS definite trends in regard to the inflammatory component are expect ed to be demonstrable in animals that will be killed prior to the 12 month period (as indicated under footnote (b) in the Tabular Summary) An interim report covering the findings in these 420 animals will, therefore, be issued at the end of the first year. Because few, if any, tumors are expected to develop prior to 2<- months, no interim report on the neoplastic component will be issued until the end of the third year. The final report covering the ' Industrial liygiene Foundation of Anerica, Inc 6 entire investigation will be issued toward the end of the fourth year. This report va 11 probably be in .the form of several manu scripts suitable for publication. supervision Research will be performed under the direct supervision of Dr. Paul Grosst director of the Foundation's Research Laboratory. The Foundation's studies on asbestos presently are being conducted under partial support of the U.S. Government through a National In stitutes of Health grant and a contract with the U.S. Public Health Service, division of Occupational Health (Dr. Lewis J. Cralley). TABULAR SUi'iARY OF PROTOCOL t I tI t <0s->t*w3o i Q.> H>< t 4-On3 U JuC Oust Injected Intratracheally ! for ~ for J4oC3 1 L Inflammatory Component Lung No.,-. Rats(b) No. Hamsters Cb)i Cancer. 1 t 1 20 2 20 3 20 4 - 20 20 20 S 4 20 20 "P 20 20 1 20 20 * 1 5 20 20 20 : t 1 1i 44 . 2j 3i * !! o B "* 1 1 o 1 ** 43 2 o --4 uoo o 3 4* 5* is ! 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 300 20 i 1 20 20 i 20 20 20 20 20 ! j 20 20 20 20 20 - 20 20 20 1 20 i 20 11 20 20 fi "1 { 300 i 300 ! < i 4 11 i 1 i i Dust Injected Intrarleurally for f.'esothelioma (c \ No. , - Rats(c; Hamsters^0'' 20 20 20 20 ' 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 300 20 ; 20 ; 20 1 20 1 20 i 20 j 20 ! 20 20 20 ______________ i 300 ' (a) The following batches are identified; No. 1 = dust as collected from electrostatic precipitators No. 2 = dust extracted with solvents No. 3 = dust heated to decompose hydrocarbons ' No. 4 = dust treated with aqua regia and E'XTA No. 5 = dust treated as with No. 4 and No. 2 'U J Industrial Hygiene Foundation of America, Inc* - 7- (b) Two animals killed immediately after the dust injection Four animals killed 4 days after the dust injection Four animals killed 1 month after the dust injection Four animals killed 6 months after the dust injection Six animals killed 12 months after the dust injection (c) All animals allowed to live out their lives REFERENCES 1. Thomson, J.G., et al. Asbestos as Podern Urban Hazard. S. Afr. Ted. J. 37:77-81, 1963. 2. Thomson, J.G., et al. Asbestos as an Urban Air Contaminant. Arch. Pathol. 8^:458-464, I lay 1966. 3. Cauna, Dzidra; Totten, Robert S.; and Gross, Taul. Asbestos Bodies in Human Lungs at Autopsy. JA.-'A 192:371-373,ray 3,1965 4. Webster, Ian. Report of progress quoted in the Annual Kercx t of the Pneumoconiosis Research Unit of the South African Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. 1965. 5. Davis, J.r.G. Electron-;icroscope Studies of Asbestosis in .'an and Animals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Scie. 132:98-111, 1965. Collet, A. Personal Communication, 1965. ' 7. Braun, Daniel C. and Truan, T. David. An Epidemiological Study of Lung Cancer in Asbestos riners. AiA Arch. Inc. Health 17: 634-653, June 1958. 8. Doll, R. rortality from Lung Cancer in Asbestos Worters. Brit. J. Ind. Health 12:81, 1955. 9. Gross, T. and deTreville, R.T.P. Experimental Asbestosis: Studies on the Progressiveness of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Caused by Chrysotile Dust. To be published. ID. Holt, P.S. and Young, D.IC. A Dust-Feed P-echanisro Suitable for Fibrous Dust. Ann, Occ. Hyg. 2j245, i960. u) ~J7r:3 op t.2 3 alws pro: CT (V Oj: TTTE.2 Ailj~ 3'i'CS TE'.iILE li!3TITiTrE i EiT 1..VJ JUNE 9-10, 1966 A full comle1 icnt of all member companies was present at the Sales Promotion ."acting on June 9, 1966. We reviewed all 3:nown foreign conpetition situations feeling that it is quite inport ant to stay abreast with inroads that have been u.-de in the U.S.A. even though to date they night be considered minor in sales volume. The latest report from the U.S. Department of Comm erce, Washington, indicates the following ir.norts into the U.S.h. which are sizable enough to be of sone concern: ! larch 1966 1st 3 nos. 1966 AS3E3T0S YARN, Etc. United Kingdom Japan Canada Pounds 51,132 15,103 5.246 29,425 3,041 4.019 Pounds $ 119.230 49.043 9.. 095 96,044 26,505 8,089 Total 71,436 41,485 175,268 130,638 v/e have been unsuccessful in placing the A.T.I. display at the Franklin Institute Nuseun, Philadelphia, It was decided that the Sales Promotion Committee vrould issue a leaflet or mane available photos to be sent to a sizable list of technical ar.'' engineering schools soliciting the use of the display on their car-pus. */e discussed the Asbestos Fibre stockpiling program reporting that Arizona so-called Teirtile Grade Asbestos Fibre purchased tv the U.S. Government against recommendations by the A.T.I. resulted in no bids for resale at a recent opening in Washington, D*C. It was reported that North American Asbestos Co., Chicago, Illinois, is now marketing an asbestos felt as a fire resisting protective insert in mattresses for the hotel, motel and hospital trade. We completed a lengthy review of all copy and format for the third edition of the A.T.I. Handbook which will go out for bids in July and probably be published in the Fall of 1966. ASTfi approval was received to use 29 pages of AST:! specifications for a charge of $273. (Signed) W.S. hough w.s. ::ougi C. *Ax l* **N o) MINUTES: Asbestos Textile Institute Technical Committee Report June 9, 1966 The meeting was held at Barbizon - Plaza Hotel, New Yofk, N. Y. IN ATTENDANCE: Edward A. Morris - U. S. Rubber Co. C. E. Houghton - Garlock, Inc. J. W. Hawkins - Raybestos - Manhattan, William Maaskant - American Asbestos Textile* Corp. Irvin Barnett - Johns - Manville Corp. J. D. HcCluer - H. K. Porter Co., Inc. H. E. Sunbury - Asbestos Textile Institute Paul J. Smith - A.S.T.Mi SUBJECTS DISCUSSED: A.T.I. Hand Book. Confirmation of weight values on Tapes. The Technical Committee was requested to review and confirm the weight values of metallic and plain tapes, for reprinting in the revised third edition of the Hand Book. These values are presently shown in Tables Q and R respectively. The Committee made a detailed study of this and recommended the following: To recommend the weight values for decimal tapes as given in Military Sneci^ication Mil-C-3053D for .010", .015", .020" .025", aBd .030" since the industry usually inaKes these tapes to conform to the Military Specification and also since there is very minor deviation of the weight values in the Military" Specification from those in the current Hand Book. To confirm the present values of l/32", 1/16", 1/8" and l/>>" plain tapes and the present values of 1/16", 1/8", and l/)j" metallic tapes as accurant since all the weight values of these come within the tolerable limits of industry's values. To delete 3/16" plain and 3/16" metallic form the Hand Book since they are not popular sizes. Industry weight.values were found almost identical to Hand Book values with exception of 1/32" plain and the variation here was less than 10# as shown in the appended table. Conformance of MH-C-1053D with Hand Book is also shown in the table. The chairman will send a letter with the above recommendation on tapes to H. E. Sunbury with direction that he send this information to Howaad Bgla who is editing the Hand Book. J -1- Kil-C-103l6B. No action to date has been made by the e'ency on issuing an interim specificati&n correcting the thickness valurs. The last communication from the agency vas on October 29, 1965 at vhich time the agency agreed to make this correction as requests i by W. Maaskant , Chairman of the Technical Committee at that time. A follow up letter to the agency was made May L, 1966 by VJ. Me a s'.-.-.t The comittee found that the thickness values in Mil-C-10316A ar.s correct but the values in Mil-C-103l63 are incorrect. Consideration was given to two other items but action vas not i In SS-C-lj66e specifying as optional the use of .00o" nickel wir-- _ ^ or .008" monel wire in sewing thread, When this specification &**>/ cones up for revision. + Making a closer tolerance than - 1% on weirht of t;oven asbestos cloth when specification comes up for revision againi on D1571 Revision of ASTM Specifications D315,_D1571,_and D2100 At the February 1965"meeting the committee reported completion of the 3rd Draft of D315 tape and the hth Draft of D1571 cloth and that copies of these two were in the hands of Dr. Scro'-ie's Editorial Committee and Mr. Nicodemus1 A-li Committee. The committee haal reason to believe they would be approved and a favorable report vas given. The foilwring week the chairman received a letter from Dr. Scroggie*s committee making many changes in both specifications. The committee felt that making further revisions would not accomplish very much and that it would be more effective to allow representatives of A-lt eommittee to resolve the differences with Dr. Scroggie. Accordingly, on March 3, 1966 a meeting was held in Hew York between A-ls representives and Dr. Scroggie and at this meeting the differences were resolved. On the basis of the resolved differences, the Technical Comnittee drafted the Lth Draft of D31J> tape and the 5ti Draft of Dl571*01oth. Concurrently Mr. P. 0. Nicodemus revised D2100 on electrical insulation and submitted it with D215 amd D1571. These were satisfactory editorily so fat as Dr. Scroggie's committee was concerned, but a temporary set-back resulted when the editor of ASTM took exceptions to these three specifications. After explanation and assistance from Paul Smith of ASTM and P. 0. Nicodemus Chairman of A-b Committee, the three specifications were approved with very minor changes. On May 17, a letter from Paul Smith advised the chairman that these three would appear in the 1966 preprint of ASTM. On June 1, 1966, e copy of the preprint vas received and only minor chan|es were noted. Letter ballots are now out to all members of D-13 Committee on these three specifications. Results of the ballots have not been reoeived. (J Committee members vere requested to proof read these specification and report to the chaiman before July 1st. anv typographical errors or discrepancies. The chairman is to report these to Paul Smith if any are found. Howard Bain met briefly with the committee and agreement was mac-r that we would convey information on the status of tapes in the Hand Book within the next two weeks and that he would use information in the preprint on tapes, cloth, and electrical insulation for setting up the revised Hand Book. Revision of ASTM Specification - D1918 Asbestos Content At the February 1966 meeting the 1st. Draft on D1918 was made. Since that meeting two more Drafts have been made bv corresponds r*-, the 2nd. and 3rd. Drafts. At the*present meeting the 3rd. Draft was reviewed and minor changes and corrections made. This will new issue as the hth. Draft dated June 9, 1966 and copies will be sent to Dr. Scroggie's S-c* Editorial Committee and P. 0. IJicodemus1 k-h Committee with the request that they- review and respond in time for committee discussion at our next meeting August 18 and lCL*;. Revision of ASTM Specification - D299 Yarn A start was made on this specification and approximately half of it was covered. The chairman requested that each corr.iv.te member i continue this specification and also D375 roving ar.6 send in their comments on how these two should be revised. The several coments will be merged to form the 1st. Draft of D299 and 1st. Draft of D375 and these will be used as the basis for further discussion. Next Meeting of Technical Committee Sinee there are six more specifications to revise, the committee felt that progress on these would be too slow with one day meetings at the regular ATI meetings, especially in view of other items which come up. Accordingly the next meeting was set up as a two day meeting August 18 and 19th at ASTM headquarters in Philadelphia. At that meeting a decision will be made as to whether we will meet one day ahead at our October meeting. The comittee wishes to acknowledge and thank Paul Smith of ASTM for the contribution he has made in revising these specifications. J. D. HcCluer Chairman of Technical Committee 3 I) Appendix to Minutes of Meeting of Technical Comrdttee June 9, 1966 Table 1 1/32n Plain Tape WIDTH POUNDS PER 100 FEET 1 SUPPLIER 12 3 A.T.I. H.B. AVE. i/a .80 .70 .70 .80 .75 DEVIATION OF AV. FROM H.B. AMOUNT PERCEPT .05 6 3/h 1.18 1.10 1.05 1.18 1.13 1 1.66 l.bO 1.L5 1.66 1.5h .05 h .12 7 1 l/h 2.00 1.80 2.00 1.93 .07 3.5 1 1/2 2.hO 2.io 2.15 2.LO 2.26 .lh 6 2 3.10 2.90 2.90 3.10 3.00 .10 3 2 1/2 3.80 3.50 3.60 3.80 3.68 .1?' 3 i3 h.50 - Li.30 h.50 h.h3 .07 1.5 -h- U; Table 2 THICKNESS .010" .015" .020" .025" .030" Decimal Tapes WTETH POUNDS PER 100 FEET A.T.I. H.Bi. KIL-C-3053D AV. 1/2 3/li 1 1 1/U 1 1/2 .29 .UO .52 .66 .77 .2U .265 .38 .370 .U5 L85 .55 .605 .6U .695 DEVIATION 0? AV. FROM HAND BOOK AMOKJT .025 .030 .035 .055 .075 perce:jt . 8.6 7.5 6.7 8.3 9.7 1/2 3/U 1 1 1/h 1/1/2 2 .37 .U9 .61 .77 .90 1.15 .36 .365 .50 .U95 .65 .630 .79 .780 .93 9915 1.19 1.170 .005 .005 .020 .010 .015 .010 l.U 1.0 3.3 1.3 1.7 0.9 1/2 3/U 1 1 1/U 1 1/2 2 .U6 .63 .80 1.00 1.16 1152 .U5 .L55 .63 .630 .80 .800 .99 .995 1.18 11170 1.5U 1.530 .005 0 0 .005 .001 .010 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.7 1/2 3/U 1 1 1/U 1 l/2 2 2 1/2 3 .55 .BO 1100 1.28 1.50 2.00 22U0 2.80 .63 .590 .OLO .8U .820 .020 1.03 1.015 .015 1.33 1.305 .025 1.58 1.5U0 .020 2211 2*055 .355 -- - - - r. - 7.3 2.5 1.5 2.0 1.7 2.7 - 3/U 1 1 1/U 1 1/2 2 2 1/2 3 i.es 1.U3 1.80 2.13 2.86 3.U5 U.17 1.10 1.090 .010 1.U6 1.UU5 .015 1.77 1.785 .030 2.10 2.115 .015 2.78 2.820 .ouo - -- - -- 1.0 1.0 2.7 0.7 l.U - 5- ) I'.inutcs: ASBESTOS TEXTILE INSTITUTE m?I3ErRr *TrErcScT*TINrpG. pCnOMIl:iTlT'?IE7rEr June 9. 1946 Tcrbizon Flaza Hotel Lev York, N.y. 9:3C A.M. to 12:00 I con Attending: J.Lronski, Chairman H.Dodds-Hebron T.T.Tigert Raybesto?-! anhcttan, In Bell Asbestos i-v.rcs, 11 Gassier Asbestos Ccrp Subjects Discussed ' 1. The printing cf the new fiber testing manual was comple ted just about on schedule and copies have been distributed to all com^rries end groups that had previously placed orders for then. Of the 3113 conies purchased, 423 still remain and are stored in hr. Sunbury's garere. One hundred of these were ordered by the*Institute and arc earmarked for sale to parties addressing requests tor then to the Institute. T^a remaining 323 ere uncommitted. Of these, 210 rc-vulted from increasing the* original order from 2790 tc 3r'00 to take advantage of a Trice concession. The,re.r.lining 113 were the result of a printing over-run and were purchased at a greatly reduced price. 2. Further data on two proposed test procedures -- cr.e for the determination cf asbestos fiber frictional properties and the ether for determination of snicule content of textile grade fibers -- were tc oe pre sented at this meeting. However, the sponsors of these two procedures v/ere absent and discussion is deferred until the next meeting. 3. The committee sends its regards and hopes for ar. early recovery for Dewey Childers of H.K.Porter who was hospitalized at the tine cf this meeting. respectfully submitted J; P. '..rcr.ski FI"AT. COST FIGURES TESTING PROCEDURES FOR CEPYSOTTLZ ASBESTOS FIBRE (Second Edition) July 1, 1966 Incidental Expenses Editorial, travel, phone, etc. ------------- $ 895.32 Typing copy ------------------------------------------- 100.00 Shipping cartons ----------------------------------------- 98.25 Total fc,1093.57 Total pages Bound Manuals ---------------------------------- -- 669600 (95r ) Reprints of Individual Tests--------- 37 1 92 ( 55?) Total 706792 (lOOfT) Incidental expenses pro-rated on pages. Bound Manuals -- $1093.57 x 95s? -- (,1028.89 Reprints----------- -- *1093.57 x 55? -- 54.68 (,1095.57 Summary of Costs Item Bound Manuals Printing Incidental costs (Pro-rated) Freight on surplus copies (est) 5,4184.40 1039.89 31.45 R snrints .,750.00 54.68 Total Total orders received Unit cost '* 5,5254.74 2790 1.1.885 <1,604.68 5026 $0,160 H. E. Suribury " ~t~ Exec. Secretary