Document Lor7zb6Z87BBZZv7jQ8EOgZw7
prem ss
Siam iiel ante b
TT
pepe
thisheS aase
Drei
dT Rae
sa ERP ER ia
Lina: Star, Beanies
:
A
si
`Septaador28-26, 1958:
LE ey
Si
a
amare BSH
:BE
=
CT
PoE a ET mage Dopariaat of HOALER
`Divisionof
mentalSsnitation
Go A 5 ant
gos SHEL SR Re
11002200..00000011
i -Tab 3
Exhibit
1020
frctieriey
ESRIPY 3MA01933815
Purpose Sdope.
Jr----
BasFkgarsotusrdroIcnvfaosremsation Vesto Trestnent Fastistion
Previous svestigations Eaant Investigation
Sampling Stations and Procedures
Flow Measurement
2 Bacusesea of Remit
Zoxisdty of Wastes
F-- Riversurvey
AsnaamtplyipntgontStaRteimontss in
1
YE
1
2
3
i
1\ : 2i
2
|
5
A
.
]
.
i
5
I1o0
1.~
10
A
1u.w1
;
n
|
ables
1 Beseription of Samples
K
2 Primary Raw Waste, Nain Chemical Sewers
3/Lagoon Effluent - Composite Samples
4 Easollansons - stasle sunpien
5 Prisary Rew Waste
6 River Sampios
i
7 Pield Data - Composite Sampling
q
13
4
15
i
uw . 1166
:
1
i
20
1
a
hap Ars Rear of Sorsigsion o Tain
"
Sketeh Map of Waste Disposal System
2
af
Tab 3
11002200..00000022
anorssssts
3MA01933816
Se
NTRODUGTION
eoo
|
Irie Eurposs AI:
eAureAwaeCmade Rto deteerTmaineeShRe sehareasttesieHtivos
sand
|
ot1rh2eYreaCnhseimsnoaglttieotneiCPeolmuannettayonnfeaMeirninLeasnsgoit"oanslinaindng8foabnddeeetMeanrumfiancetutraiengsdGaonwpearny
SsopeFae survey consteta of phyetest shesrestions, nesremsat
of the w:-te volume, and collection of samples for physical,
rt Aree ae Sate ey res ep aa ae wee chemical, and blologleal examination. In conjunction with sample Laken tron the Kiesioeirps ives above snd below the peta of
--------
EE sein Acknowledgments ToslounSttg ma, SERS
rane Xeno A= React or FeRpweEEEIS SpAPAITRHRE
errr. vn son sn eee met At 5 eaige FoHTE
CR Sra
ree aaa Joorstnd workin
SMobaTOrAEeS nTote1htrTosri vae wtr eaared
Plant~ p~ovld~ ~inE q~r~er~ fo~ ~he fiel~ e~ and rend~
other v~u~ble sssis~ee.
------
y
EPllaanntt Processes
ant verse waives an bere 0 SHEET 18 $50 Wr
i
-1-
,iii', ::]' i, it I ,, '
asTab 3
11002200..00000033
3MA01933817
|
ee
o
oe o
a STII oxidation lagoon (See Pigures I and II for details).
un
lagoon was also dredged and enlarged to provide oxidation capacity
|
.
Tab 3
11002200..00000044
3MA01933818
l SEr
3
$
+
Bl :
y FR y
MAP
TO
ACCOMPANY
INDUSTRIAL
WRAESPTOERTDIOSFPOISNAVLESTAITGATION
OF
INDUSTRIAL WASTE OlSP0~.S..A=.L ..AT
MINNESOTA
MINNESOTA
M MIINNIINNGG AANNDD MMAANNUUFFAACCTTUURRIINNGG .CCOOMMPPAANNYY
seeTemnen 22-20 1988 CCOOTTTTAAGGEE GGRROOVVEE TTWWRR,, WWAASSHHIINNGGTTOONN CCOOUUNNTTYY SEPTEMBER 22-28,1~J58
Ny| wasmveron
. 8 Xe county
| \\
Ll ii
A4
7
[E
Joma
NF
ANY =
I
ETT aN NN.
ESo EEN
S,
8:
py EeFeEE TSR
i
RK
he
IY
1
oN
=
carn
NNNNNLF oaooxan \
vo~
m . e:ed .
FIs a A
DaKOTA COUNTY
FP Bl
[3-semoung Statien
|ie
HASTINGS
TT
i
SSeeesriuretems of
Tare
Tab 3
11002200..00000055
amaoreasete
3MA01933819
"mh
I
SKETCH MAP OF WASTE DISROSAL SYSTEM
SKETCH MAP OF WASTE DISP.OSAL SYSTEM
| CHEMOLITE PLANT, WASHINGTON COUNTY i
MMIINNNNEESSOOTTAA MMIINNIINNGG AANNDD MMAANNUUFFAACCTTUURRIINNGG CCOOMMPPAANNYY
CHEMOLITE PLANT, WASHINGTON COUNTY
i|i i
i
||
Cremeoresne BS eee |\esasoo ,
|1 i
wWm ee EET
| O==== |
wrel Hiwoene
|
!
NL
Hew
_--BE wy Jt
Sr7nsa yn
)
I
i
He
i
( Je
11002200..00000066
i,TFOGooWguofn| in
Tab 3
3MMAA001199333382200
|
I
eo
armors cara tnttnttons ware spoent on she mates ont in & pit on the plant grounds. Under the conditions of the plan :
vere aLertee sva,ses shou bu charge anti he phate estan (esttoo2rn,s y~aoee mteoin~taasley~veon%nut~tS~tleiacnnhaorsghree sswhenoituiildngnmwoo~it~nx,oteed 72,200 am
Bl rin a Sanita are reed
I contain more than 100 ppm 200 (5-day biochemical oxygen demand).
reessovneitnhetowrteFnrtetsoonmy oaf sncitatvhieonscien at st acne SsartoSnasmpsaoveasfigsahseisoangses asherced ren tne Chmetitn Fant rreeoanetvenCnsn saer sorilsB al0atpaseotf a8lgoumntdaed
Te eeemiatton vesen wt ev aoreion Fier sevens 1 %h~ ~tabili~ion I~o~ ~n~ %h~ act.arian ~me~ how~er, no
a ian eT oa ~Jor inv~sti~atlon has ~e~orts on the ~fflu~% gualAty
reset)
at. re~u.la~ in%orval~. ~e ~epo~ts have sho~, in gene~al~ vide
v~rlatlons in %he qualihy of th~ effluan~ especia~y in regard
EE
,
Tab 3
11002200..00000077
3MA01933821
oo ruse pmssosas o o
Te eetion SamplinggtationsandProcedures at shih santos wa
take~ ~d a desolation ~ th~ s~at~ons ts ~ive~. ~ Ta~l~ 1~
eeeeeveeaeo sonmoraewoTeosspeistnosn.eres s Le rervieeoeeeoenswwronwasAtoopnoevadnawaofe. ssacttoeismns
roves fot woaoroears asst 3 spans Ee aovotoivo etvaannstrotashetvswpetvor rwiionnd re corn oevaosa veto once ~ 8 hours and a p~rti~n at~ tet~s wate ~pl~ ae se~ a~ 0%h~ reoo oe season napsrweeeesnitgesox15gauta26swapnien
ee ae ea ine santos of 30
~oll~%ed ~n~e ~h ~ d~ring %he ~~ Single e~ples o~ the
emtos we sitteen stone noe vin
FlowNeasurment.
vA toe Cr eerkes To fsotlitate flow measu~e~ent dn~in~ the su~y period, the et eine leralzs vo ae Co~pa~ ins~ s ~po~ary re~t~~ weir in the m~n ee me ans sin eve onde vs ch~ ~ above the 8k!~ing b~sin. A l~el r~oPde~ ~s
"
----
Tab 3
11002200..00000088
3MA01933822
eo
eo eo
installed upstream from the weir to provide a continuous record . of the hydraulic heads
he flow rates at the skimming basin ranged from 375 te 1,000
spa (alles por minute), with an svesage of 620 gpma The total vaste diseharged from the main chemical sewer Luts the lagoon on
a datly bests vas 626,600(1), 810,000 and 938,400 gallons,
respectively, for the three days.
Pernanent facilities for sassuring the vaste flow st the
|
outlet of the lagoon have bom provided by construction of a
T-noteh weir at a point in the outlet line iumelistely above the oration flume. This weir ean be adjusted to control the liquid
level of the stabilisation lagoon, A level recorder installed in the approach channel to the weir vas used to make a continuous
ecord of the head on the weir.
The rate of flow from the lagoon ranged from 678 to 790 gpm
with an sverage of 740 gpm. Tho total vaste discharged was
936,000(1), 1,070,000 and 1,127,000 gallons, respectively, for
the tires anys. Sstimstes of the wastes discharged from Buildings 15 and 16
vers sade in manholes outside the building using a bucket aad & stopwaton at tho case time vhen the saxples wero talon. The disonarse rom Building 15 ranged fron 3.6 te 26 gpm (ares estimates made) while the discharge from Building 16 Tenged from 12 to 60 gpm
The wastes from Dulldinge 15 nd 16 together with the Ishoff tank effluent (estimated at 20 gpm) in conjunction with norsal measurement errors and the reservoir effeck of tho lagoon should
(1) 22 hours only
"se
-5-
53
Tab 3
11002200..00000099
3aMMAA001193333082233
|
| oo
oO
Account for tho apparent difference in the waste flow entering aannd~ ld~oaavviinn~g tthhee llaaggoooonn,s
Discussion of Results A domeription of the sampling stations is given in Table 1.
A deserlptlon of ~he sanplin~ s~a%Ion~ is Given in Table I.
Tho analytical data are tabulated in Tables 2, 3, and he Zable 5 contains a summary of the amount of BOD in pounds
calculated entering snd leaving the lagoon. The caloulated results prescated in Table 5 do not include the BOD represented by the waste rox Buildings 15 asd 16 and tio INEOLS tan. Sines the strength and voluse of these wastes were not considered signifiant in compariscn with the wactes discharged from the natn chemtoal sowors
Ao can be seen fran Table 5, the quantity of JOD in tha wastes Leaving the lagoon each day (5,895 lbs, 7,610 1bs, and
8,360 1bs.), was greater than the 30D entering the lagoon each
day (4,375 bes, 2,775 lbs., and 6,941 1bs.), over the same
period. Bepressed as concentrations, these values are 722 ug/l,
852 5/1, and 890 ng/". leaving the lagoon and 635 g/l, 386 Aafl,
and 740 mg/L entering tho lagoons
This anomalous situation may be explained in part by the
~is ~o~!ou~ si~uat/o~ ~
adfference tn the waste flow into
abned ~opultaoifn~theInlapgaortonb~andthethe
~ence In %he
rosorvoir affect,
waste flow into
and possibly to
~d ou~ o ~he
paor Teduotion
li~ngowoanste~dconce-
hteraltliioonn
iinn
tthhee
liasgsoooonn
s~add
ogood~
hhoouu~seekkeeeeppli~nkg~
PRACtices
practices
on
on
the
%he
part
of the Company Guring tho survey period. Another possible factor
may be basteriologioal action on sous waste constituent wich
~orYtbneariblayctmearyiovleorgite~14atcttloionoronnoeoo~xlsejwo~nstdeemacnodnsi~nutohuo~raw vaste
~rdinarily
Dut wileh,
na~fYterex8ertperliiotdtl~ofobrancotoorxiyogleognioda~lnsdtiaicnhthae
rtaiew
agen,
but
may
wbhsicflr~,agm~etnetreda ipnetorioadlloferbacptaerrtisowLohgiicch~!may~tbaechHorion
~rhemadily
~y be fra.~monted into ~aller ~rt~ Which ~ be noro r~dily
be
I------------------ Tos Tab 3
11002200..00001100
3aMMAAO011893333882244
|
oo
eo o
susseptible to biochemical action and say, therefors, vxert a
signtfieant oxygen demand in the lagoon effluent. ALL wastes fron the plant, szospt cooling water, flow down
the aeration flume which io located at the outlet of the lagoon,
Single samples of the wasts flow for dissolved oxygen analysis
wero collected twice above and below the flume ia order to estimate its aeration efficiency. The results of tho tests Te-
vealed fneresses of 3.5 ms/l and 3.7 mg/l of dissolved oxyzen in
tho aerated waste over the original values of 2.9 and 2.3 mg/l
found in the lagoon effluent, The increases found ware of a
transieas nature, however, beasuse of the high residual 30D of
the sfflusat and other factors. This is shown by the decresss in
%thhee
~dissssoollvve~d
oox~yEgeenn
coenntteenrt
ooff
tthhee
wasts
~81e
flow,
flow,
including
Includi~
cooling
oo~li~
water, to the value of 3.7 zg/L found halfway down the raviae and
~ter, 10 %h~ w~lue o~ 3.7 ~/1 foun~ ~
3.9 2/1 found at the irlot to the lower pond
nde~ ar
~thhee
r~ ivee r.
-
3.~
~/l
Tae
fOU~ at ~e !r~o%
lagoon effluent is
dt~iluttheed loawpep~ro~ ximatenl~yr t%whoe to
ome
by
tho
The l~n
addition of
effluem5 is ~iI~1~ ~pp~o~tel~ %W~ 1~
cooling water discharged at an estimated
roan~te
of
%he addition of ~oolln~ ~1~ di~har~ ~1 an est~%~ r~te
1,500 gps dato tho ravins below the Aeration flume. Analysis
ooff
tthhee
ttwwoo
VvaaOs~tOe
slu~spplle~s
=a0ollie1ct4e~d
iinn
tthh~e
ravine
T~
below
b~ow
the
%he
point
~In%
of
addition of the cooling water revealed 30D concentrations of
220000
2~2//I1
~andd
330000
=m~g//Il;;
ccoom~ppearrs~d
%too
lagoon
laEoon
effluent
~luent
concentrations
iinn
tthh~e
~raanng~ee
soff
6500C0
-
-
1000
lOOQ
m/l.
m~/l,
TThhee ~sapmlpl~ess oobbttai~nne~d ffaarr%t}h~eer~ ddoow~n tthhee rr~avviinnee~, aabboouutt halfway
4too
tthhee
river,
rlv~,
showsd
show~
30D
BOD
concentrations
conc~ntr~tion~
of
o
190
190
mg/l
~/i
and
~nd
325
32~
mg/l
wwhhiillee
aatt
tthhee
~inelett
ttoo
%thh~e
lloowwoerr
ppoonndd,,
the
the
BOD
BOD
concentrations
concentrations
!
vers 185 mg/l and 275 ng/l, indicating little, if any, further
woexrieda1t8i5onm~o/fl tahnedwa27s~te~/in!siteindtiruaavteliu~dowlintttlhea, ciofursao~,offutrhetherravine.
--?--
------------------------Tob Tab 3
11002200..00001111
33MMAA0011893333682255
|
oo
oo
ederwreeeninpotr1aenatsess tattave seorentein
from 0.088 to 0.26 g/l. At the inlet to the lewor pond, the
Tstorerasoewseaseve0t.e2ea4taesnodan0so.t0s68shomepg/aelmrfeonrmtaohetatttwosvsrvamtpvloeassOoutbtmaaainvreodm.11e0 to
te seorteasntevamaerrionorssmoSeemeaeoeto8ssrupoesrstenrnhpnits41
|
ees oe ons charge of fluorides, wort but the von Company was assvkeedioLno a hm sures include this
the fluorides concentration found ranged from 4.3 mg/l to 9.1 mg/l
B ce 1s se n mt eyee Ee tn tent or. on in the lagoon effluent samples, 3ad was he2 mg/l and 3.2 2g/l in on omens ope dan) tareations vse ae snd
oo vo a a sepa 1s ty ems
va conceatration ve san was found to vebe a350 sows vant raped mg/l and 390 rg/l in 0 8 35 the two
of 185 and 275 mg/l in the sams sasples, indicating a poor
|||
ves in the lagoon effluont samples appears to bo somewhat better
I1 III
"11" III ...... :~
Tab 3
1~002200..0000~122
3MA01933826
|
ooo
'oIY,o
Wt oebu~
&tetratatitA~aett~L,oeRatl
rebuntion e~aluation
bah~e
aotnot
yetyet
besmbeen
make
~e
0%o
determine dete~ino
ctsonaaregso oveerme tsntermoaminvsahteivioensss1e2erSseBu3tA doFhetdeubsoemviownaste S20
Lugoon ai staee Testor versie no nenvly must stereos
((ppHHi aappprpox~ioma~tetl~y 77..00))..
counytensthieghAnssoopnemstErFtLtsioontnssokfmptsehne,spboTroasosnhdonmittreogaevnewesreored ~d ~n the la~oon ~fluent s~ple~. ~ese ellen,s ~e eo~de~
rove, enh 32 anes 1 1h suceiving ateres
IORICITY OF WASTES
I
----
ATt sa Herd sin
ret vere onl
breesctoe
Htoee43oEesrenAttesamRmasrmatreastiroenrse
of Sh tagson ceo neers
nretre Ft Sealand Yak
osinrattonosnsetveorter,voe1e1
8 sores of ony Ts Son te owe for
Sahtraaeda#n5aSSeaetonthe
eTroeeattoem ssoomrnteeassimonn o1f2 shhee suanvtoiuerdyvpesettsramassrzmedn Ta10e be
re ete
stox pvetost
Toe Ooh Tau Tom ESSE snp ashen Sous vous ofa
VERE 90 shrine toc
ten.
vei tones ws toe wee Tomeet evi 18 08 8 SHE -
T~I:) 3
11002200..00013
3MA01933827
|
oo
eo
surkously fapalr the essential processes of the Fieh or ake it more susceptible to disease vhioh sould lead to fis doathi alse, after short periods of tine in the aerated vaste, the fish spperred
4totolo8sexitnhuetierssfeonrsethoef sfitsahbiltiotyr,egaiGneneitreallsyq,utlitibrrieuqauirsuedd bforoamble
46 win in normal fashion after being iaaersed in the sorsted
waste. During the testing, 1 vas also noted that the pastoral
and peivio finn and the EAL recions of the Fish betas ummewlly
Faendd,pionld~toonft~ inug ~eidthethre&~ph1ysirecl~oognieenlo~rethseponftsse~tobeo~ r eanudnrurmitua~tyion
frou the wast.
|
RIVER SURVEY
Flow oDmatsthe day that the river sasples vere sellestod, Wednesday,
|
September 2, 1958, the discharge fron the lastings dan vas 5,500
efs (mean daily flow). During the rest of the survey week, the
d1sctarge rates ranged between 4,700 and 6,000 ofss(1)
Tre | Sampli&ngtsottaaltioofnssix vater saaples were sellested above sd below
{ThieresJusnacatipohnasovfertshetwaaksetneonstareacmroavned-stohsotiMoinssaipspsEiOpIpEiALREiLveYr.300
!|
sess above and below the stress outler st stations approsisately |
are shown 1a Figure 10
|
(1) data btatnad from Gus. Corps of Engineers, She Tad offices
|
Data obtained ~m ~.~. C~rps o~ En~In~rs, St~ Paul offlee.
--1100 --
|
|
|
Tab 3
11002200..00001144
ownotessazs
3MA01933828
oooo
AnalytieovnT)hRtensu2l5ts20(STeeoWITEaTbHle386)50 SALA00 tbo H3e otis +100 0 nt anentAR ves 4. 490 Sent or Chee oF Che rivers Nowerer, 15 should be noted that 50 sampiee were estes 5 108 SRNR TLC 108 6m ten Sorte A aera alate aoneenctkes 57 wre elon oe soe ores Chat 17 the ante stress vas not semedintely dilated br fhe river isn 4h Yee Simian Sor F234 Sesion SCH TR6 CHEAL
ziorint simfermn pooeeen I wis Tes 2 TS 58 ~ne ia a ~n~ eim!la~ to a ~tr~ wire,in ~h~ riv~ itself, the
l~i%od ~i~ p~o~edure would not Be likely te r~eaI the
!
presence of the waste because of the distance between the stations.
somany
1+ foe survey Sntiostes thas the vaste fren this plant fn Cornet 3d 503 vas 20% mocking fhe renamed diacharge Stratton ssbREAROR By 0 Vere Topivssn Sete Foc Mewar to the Sesommeniations, the vaste as dissmarged shenha or eevee 1 wtf oF 308 58 on S510 0 Soe SveE F7S0Y 3
i
wtehreetfimoeunodfitnhethesursvaemyp,lesDODatctoinaclensttraattiioonn.s ofThe185comngc/elntarnadti2o7n5ofmg/l
|
the other major waste constituents did not appear to be excessive
So ate2.a
Ons Ht Sarin SOntavataBOrg~etbasfiosu,n
Sh tthhee
prpdBAHISR MSHA OF ThA Lrgron TATE From THAD $0 population equivalent of the
HERES pTl0a5~0t 0
with an average of about ~,00o ov~r the three-day sampling period.
eee-- iii Ill II1111/."1'i~._'-t_r'~'++: ~:.
--I]i'" i.r.i.i.| n.'.~ ... ;:"~.........;+~ ':'+'++~
Tab 3
11002200..00001155
3MA01933829
3. Actual measuresents of the quantity of cooling water were mot xade, Usin: deta supplied by company porsonnsl and the kaown dilution of the waste constituents after mixing wil: the cooling water, the discharge of cooling water was approximatel; 1,300 gpa
The 1,500 gpm of cooling water plus the TAC ipo average disenerge ron the lagoon constituted a total of approximately 2,200 gpm Aischarged to the river, which Ls within the recommended Linits,
he The tests on the soration flume indicated that the unit was providing a transient ineresss in the sxygen content of the
waste, bit the added oxygen was almost completely dissipated Bbeeffoorre~ tthhee ~ wase te flio~w ~recahch~edd tthhee river.
55.. TThheo ssttaabb!illiiszaatt!ioonn lLaaggoooonn ddiidd nnoott a&ppppeeaa~r t~oo bbee ffuunnccttiioonniin.~g e~ifffee~cttiivvaellyy aass ~aun oox~iadatt~iomn ~un1it aa~s ssanoowwan bbyy t~hhee B5O0DD aanndd bactariological saalyses, but appeared to ct principally ss & mixing basin whieh proveated surges of flow or Mslugs" of chexi-
coa.l~ss ffrrooms rre~aechhlinngg tthhee rr!ivveerr ~wi%thheouu~t mmilx~iinng~
6. Additional waste treatment or control facilities are
n~eeede~d
ttoo
pp~roovviiddee
eeffffee~cttilvvee
rreedduuccttiioonn
iinn
the
the
strosih
of
the
wwa~asttee~s
to
10
tthhee
rreec~oom~meenndde~d
levels.
levels.
jJP,.islGG.iocHHHiiellalleleststtna&d~Snginseriag Aide
Publlu E~!tn ~ngi~erlng Aide
ZPeubl0icTHheoamlatsh Biologist
~ubllc }[~a!t~h Biulo~i~t
AApppprroovveedd:: Harvey Go Rogers, Chief Section of Water Pollution Control 12 Tabs
11002200..00001166
33MMAA0011893333683300
fI
LJ
eo
yg
EEEEBEESE
:
fH 4d 334743337
sssees 33
BEEERE 85
JI yds Y3 TgzHgaTsIasTcaRnAanTnnEyEneSnBSLRELERRRRAaINVnYEtS
i:
11
gg; f
HH J4 d EEEEHEEHERf EFIT PETEEn LEC:
A pR rrraappafdEcEfE aEcaEfEasEgiTsTaEnaLaid
EEEEEEFEES9TIIIIREEERI5E3
fo i 8 finite fi 4 Fg iting 5 if i
513 oa EZi8;2 Siq g 2 2
BE Sf 7 Fa
Suu 32 4
pr ltann oT de dow,
adhtadiebde e t 5HaBa BRd gsasdB igugn uatgalgisgs
ELAmapesianenieeany
an BER 2 FFT ISS% BITS
Hid
FEE RHEE FH EER ELRE
i
SLE 4L0004
TaLd AEd AAd A AALld EdANddId LL4Gd
I I Ii I I I I t I t I I ! I I I
A
. -
----
11002200..00001177
awnorssssat
3MA01933831
T28H8LE
BrReEzE,
E
BEOf Lu
iHil oeJE It
sal I
ou
iE
i
ii
i
BREE
%
sed ff
fF
sil
i
oo
eo
11002200..00001188
awsotsasszz
3MA01933832
O BOD sunr--in0 O
1.........
uta damnit
Manessta Mtn gasmastastuSruissnerg Survey
ez 3Jars fox Neste, bass un
= GEonNneCtite samples
tal sodids
al Volatile rater
1,306 1,640 3,000 2,256 1,230 1,51C 910 1,230 1,040
20 330 1,00 M6 ON O 20 220 aml
pended Solids
a7 2
M0 wr 26 ae ae 130 VT
uspeadsd Volatile Ketter U0
Matty (seale wide) G6
7% 30
00
10 110 3C Ta
Ue a Me 75 so
823 Sw
ness
ty (ordetaty)
380 1% 36 #30 280 300 60 280 2007
350 40 Aeb20 AO Ake so 350 mo gs
[Culorides
tates [ravorscon
22 we
wow 12 Lh
1s
26
ume
Ld BE
13% 26
x Gd La
WLC 20 #7
cow mH Ls la 1
JAG eR mA acme se we we 1 ko as zen)
|Phosphorus
orgente stress smmcnts
a 4 id
Cee a BU eh BE
#50 Ti Led BY n 7
We 3 56 da Lb LS HE G0 eS TLE hed
uitrates
assesses Ghemtesi avin seams pi vaise Presoites
L04GSMOLCS Ta56 0402 a5 LOO LD4O5LC0US5 LOTS
0055 0ad3 ~ ez Gals + = = = 300- (20 S80 GK SEO 610 IO eye Sno 2s 3G = sek 5 96 Gs = a = me = =
ooxrsueCuneiEa/an3nsieunaddoosnfeeaxovsitaehtneetrswise wotsd
Tab3
Tab 3
11002200..00001199
amaoteases
3MA01933833
I
ee
oe
UE
DivSeiestiioonnooffEWmavtierremFeelnitnattioSnumCtotnattriooln Kinmensta Minitaasgsasstasguringcompany Server
Table 3
Detertmavin Lageon B0f01uenctdl= CoGmapzositoeuSsesplGeosl U3 G96 ET eas
Total Solids
1,000 1,020 970 1,600 1,050 1,300 1,086 1,060 990
Total volatile Matter 10 19% 10 10 zo 0 10 10 0 |
Suepended sold
wo am os 3 sw 6 6 wm
Suspended Volatile Matter TL 40 80 50 8 20 28 2 1 Turbidity (somle wits) 40 W050 6 66 12 50 6 50
Hardness Akalsasey
7 300 20 M0 2 300 M0 200 1805 00 170 180 180 10 120 200 200 WF
Chlorides
a sm os oe es 6 6s wm ei
svltatos Puertdes
3% 35 30 40 450 WMO IW 3M 30 67 62 66 86 3 Sl GT hE 9.6
Pilot STERIL 6(50O ~ws5 s~9e~ ~e5m0 mo L000 550 025 500
Phosphorus
0 18 25 35 ow 3% wna Wl
Organte Nitrogen
66.22 55.01 55.11 11.22 52 = GS Sb 26
Ammonta
2mO a17 226% 50 15 2 19 18 w
Nitrates
042 0u0 CO 0.28 0.40 uS2 0.36 OukS 0.20
Mitritos
00h 005 = 00..0066 00.0066 . = . = . = .=
Chemieal Gxygen Demsad
720
810
1,100 888800
1,100 1,100 1,000 ~
1,100 i#i00 i#~00--
800,5*00 .
PH value
as 68 7T.O0 7T,O0 -= T7.~372.2 173.3
Phenolics
0.088 =
00,.1122
00.177
00,.i5$
G0,2266
0.22 02h
0,22 O,2A
-
"is 2a/1 unless otherwise moted
~A~ .~/~ unless otherwse noted
|
ae
% TTaabbs3
11002200.00002200
aMAO1G33824
3MA01933834
IWva:tiopn pof bwaves Pelistion Control SJ
Kinaesote MiniSnopstaedaeKreuuHfoassttsuri3ng5Company Survey
Ta 4
re sssiisnsous = Single samplE es o EE
Teaperasare (57)
a es
ne sm 70
6~
62
58
66
Gobeirt/omim00oromu1p) Gresatans
6?
.
69
-
00* = - 4s00 2200
Tota sonses
oo me a0 am am a0 20
Total volatile Matter 260 Ge 10 10 mk &
suepended 011s
a wee 3 om ss
Suspended Volatile Matter 7 a wooo moa a
rubietey (seate watts) 20 08 3 5 5 5s
[--
30 ae a wo aw aw a0
Mlkalinity (or kotdity) Ae-2EC Ac00 Ae-LKO HG AU 180 20
Intortdos
Pa
PO
EO
surstes nnorides
n= Wo sme om
SE a2 sk se 23
Bosuhesatont Gergen demand a ow nw ae as 3.
Sasesved sizes Phosphorus
. -
1
1a owz hs Gu Gs 16 GaaB
[Rp -- Amnonse
0us6 Guis h0 con EMME
Owke Wop 1 uch Sa 0.08 G3
senate Mitrites
so ces 3s L001 GB 2 oes wa - Gus oan = -
Chesson vysen Demand
.
Si value
2s mz
-
a. a
3a 15 a5 18 50
Fhenolis
- - - oe
| reerxpaBteahnsLarbaetssofotuhnedrswise noted are Tavs. Tab 3
10200021
i020.002i
aworesssss
3MA01933835
ye .
MI)
DEPARTKENT OF HEALI
| -- e o--mpl-- nar n-- i"0-- )s `Temperature (oF) pm ~WPiH//1z0~0 m~1))
70 6
mn
- 52>02~0,o0o,0~o00~0...
6
72
52000000 -
63
Si
>2K00000 -
prHranoimtmissw eeT LLeeTle-- m e atee m ee Turbidity (scale units) 15 25
mrserssis mm mpooeww owmmowmn ewweon em e Alkalinity (or Acidity)
200 15
1177 2255
200 200
1122 2255 200 200
22%800 1300
Biochemical Oxygen Demand Ln 300
150 325 15 275 <<77000000
p--ieme. de r LrEe e me eE eas wa Nitrates
0422 041
0422 <C.O5TM* 0.06 <0.05
-
anpe mSoreeEn w e wjPoaeaDn weShm menne eawEemr: eaon SL mime oe
mm. we, |
20-
610oo
:;...%,~.%.-:.+._++ ~
Tab 3
11002200..00002222
I 3MA01933836
|
i23t Ii
igs ty .
By 4 8 3 3
35Iv as ia,mam slo
:borg I
a3R
4
boss
sad. a]
Boats
io :
i
i
*
if
Loagytan ta naan aEg
GREE BRE i
i
3
# FEMETIE LD TV NL iq
JJAae A EH ey &HE
_
il wrSaiaan HE NEE
11002200..00002233
3MA01933837
0 sSievcitsiioonnooff WNaetveirroPmomlelnuttalioSnanCiotnartoiyon
Haanesata Mtge sed Manasastaringcongas Surver
Tetermimiien
Temperature (F) Gol(iufroariao0Gromup5 organisms Total solids Total Volatile Matter Suspended so14de suspended Volatile Matter Turbiatty Total Hardness Aessnsey PH value Chlorides sulsates Fluorides Dissolved Oxygen
Tania 6 BReIVER smaaris 5 ad ws at
1 op
w
52,000 92,000 52,000 160,000 160,000 -
S00 33 0 30 30 a0 wo ume 10 wo ue an woe ans 58 wo 15 16 15 16 1 u 2 x x ow 2 1 mw awe mo wo 20 amo
wo 0 we ae 0 am
75 7s Te 7.8 80 80
757
75
me & oi 03 Geb ou Ba 63 Te Th
55 55 ous 0.32 sa be
Byhmiest Cvs demands
Ga Ga Gk Be se
[r----
0.2 01 oak 00 0.0 00..2222
Annonta
072 Gal Gash C0 Ld 13
Grsante Uitroges
Ls ae 2 a3 Le aa
Nitrates
0035 0.035 - - - -
Nitrates
Guz wc 032 G2 (02 Oki
Phenolice
(0.005 (0.005 C0.005 (iS 0016 CONT
[ALs mm g/1 unilesss nGoteed otherwise 0-20-
nr i Te :-" 2.
Tab 3
11002200.00002244
3aMMAAO011G93333883308
|'
CI
oe
eneonein brat ASASLAPISTARG SRP SNETOP
Fie erty
9/23/58 9/23/58 9/24/58 9/24/58
4100 PE 12:00 K Sans
9/25/58
aco yz bn 9/25/58 oe gp 0 9/25/58
9/26/58
PR
iv Waste trees TigoonEFfluen
6h - ?0
6.6 - iI.~
-
62 - S9
?.~ - II.0
6.9
~3 - 77
~.2 - io.~
6.8
62 - 69
~.i - io.~
7.0
5~99 .-" 6(8~
8,0 -= 1100..2
7?.~0O
wet 60 - && oot 60 - 64
~ - 71
meena &.O - 11,2
Gseie ra 6.9 - 12.0
7.2
9.0 - i0.~
7.5
-21-
11002200..00002255
Tab 3
3MA01933839