Document LYgXq9RQ88ae82LEXdepvRrd

V* John l Louis October 16, 1969 \l Mr. r. bv stodges * ntooc - Mr* H* w* F&rrar KFAM r Mr, w* R. Rlctierds * UR1CH 1 V . Mr. E* F. Wheeler *'EkMSE . ./.: / : . / ' ... ' Up to t!te time, the rost recent Monsanto statement on the FOB situation was dated March 3, 1969# In the past seven twnths, wuveh new information haa been developed end it became apparent that we sliould update our position etaclient, Attached Is oreft IV, dated October 17, 1969. It 1 still a chronology of events statement end contains Much of. the B&ncs lnfott&atloa contalt*cd In Draft III* I have iv&rfced thoee paragraph which have been updated* Fleas review end- return with your comments os soon as possible. You will receive final copy wlven all returns are in. KVJ/stw Attachment DSW 164895 STLCOPCB4041157 STATEMENT FROM: MONSANTO COMPANY ST. LOUIS, MO. : Oct. 17, 1969 ' Late in February, 1969, a West Coast newspaper carried a major feature about "a menacing new pollutant" found in the San Francisco Bay area. The article was based on marine life research carried out by Dr. Robert Risebrough of the University of California. The article stated that residues of pesticides (DDT and DDE) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) were threatening the welfare of certain birds and posed a long-term threat to humans. Monsanto manufactures polychlorinated biphenyl and markets it under our Aroclor trade name. (There are other manufacturers in Europe and Japan.) We, therefore, would like to present some additional facts. The work done by Dr. Risebrough dates back to earlier research by other scientists who, while analyzing pesticide residues in wildlife, soil and water, encountered unknown or "interfering" substances in the parts-per-million range. :: -more- DSW164SS6 STLCOPCB4041158 --2 MONSANTO COMPANY Several years ago, two Swedish scientists at Stockholm University's Institution of Analytical Chemistry, Professor Gunnar Widmark and Soren Jensen, reported they had identified these other substances. They said some of the materials were polychlorinated biphenyl or PCB* Since PCB's are not "broadcast" or spread around the land as are pesticides, the scientists theorized that the source must be the industrial wastes of PCB users. In addition to the work of Dr. Risebrough and the Swedish scientists, there have been other studies which indicate the presence of PCB's in the environment. As yet, the source or sources of these materials have not been pinpointed. Monsanto is concerned over the situation and is cooperating fully with these studies. ; The common uses of commercial PCB would not normally lead to its release into the natural environment. A principal market for PCB is in electrical applications where they are used as insulating fluids for transformers and capacitors. In this use, the chemical is completely sealed in metal containers. Another market is for heat-transfer applications where the PCB fluid functions in a closed system. -more- DSW 164897 STLCOPCB4041159 --3 MONSANTO COMPANY PCB's are also used in several applications where the chemical is incorporated into a polymer as an integral part of the solid material. Such polymers are used in highly specialized applications as an adhesive, elastomer or surface coating. Polychlorinated biphenyls are not sprayed or dusted on crops, woodlai'.ds or any other areas, as are pesticides. To our knowledge, they are not used in tires, house paints, household products, epoxy resins or major vinyl plastics, as has beevi charged. . Therefore, conclusions as to the source of PCB found in the environment are difficult to make. Some qualified scientists, using the latest laboratory equipment, have correctly identified the substances as being PCB, However, most scientists are not yet willing to indict commercially produced PCB as a pollutant. It has also been implied that polychlorinated biphenyls are ''highly toxic" chemicals. This is not true. Just like other industrial chemicals and home products now in widespread use, PCB's are not hazardous when properly handled and used. During more than 30 years of U.S. production and use, cases of any toxic effect have been extremely rare -- and then only where the simple precautions recommended for use were not followed. -more- DSW 164898 STLCOPCB4041160 --4 MONSANTO COMPANY : Monsanto has research programs under way to identify the compounds, reported to be PCB, and locate their source. The programs involve precise analysis of environmental samples of water, air, soil and wildlife, including metabolic studies. Also under way are studies to determine the biological effects of deliberate dosage of PCB's on fish, birds, and mammalian animals. Special emphasis is being paid to endocrinological effects, mineral metabolism and reproduction physiology. Very early results of chronic toxicity studies confirm that PCB's are not highly toxic. In 90-day studies on rats and other normal laboratory species, there have been no adverse effects when feedings of up to 100 parts-per-million were administered. Monsanto has always cooperated on a regular basis with federal, state and university laboratories in their analysis of . chlorinated hydrocarbon residues. We will continue to do so. Additionally, Monsanto will continue to exercise the highest degree of control in its manufacturing, shipping and storing of PCB -- as we do with all products. In the functional fluids market, we have carried out a program for several years for the reclamation of used PCB's to reuse these valuable materials. The source, of the marine life residue identified as PCB is not yet known. It will take extensive research on a worldwide, basis, to confirm or deny these initial scientific conclusions. D IV -0O0- DSW 164899 STLCOPCB4041161