Document LK77Ov0oDVQoEBYbG9odDn8Xd

s ago, 20-day was Party jail never presidential kept records candidate, of his law court action which may ' . ' for contempt and force cite it,in t h* I t.-into'i11 r a nsi t nation's t.l'* - up in > ;js > c to report practice fees, a government wit May while ness testified yesterday. receivership. , '. 1 So me i 27 .000 ? ,d < : s The State Supreme Court re *27 000 w ho rt rr n. fused to intervene in the rase :-arro,.s the San Fra? tale unem- Richard A. Nessen, Interna! ion. Revenue Bureau agent, said Then Alameda County - Hu-:` t y in muav. She ha.s h t h'e ,<t a t e Hallinan received $12,168 from ip-erior Judge A . J Woolsry.j his jaw firm`practice in 1949 bu^dcnied thr eempsums rpoDOn to. filed a tax return of only $4850.idismiss his order rha: Key son*,; ' ~ * cause whv it should not ?><- .id.'in..coni*4. .Hallinan,. who. dc.fcnded..lIaroTrHrr5 afor 13. said she Tking a.s a telephones Vtvjan, on charges of evading p</ayment of $85.000 .in taxes; from 1946 through 1950. to restore scrv Key ha.s ,vA landed a C'our ing a writ ef 1r n ;}> 5o 1 nvv t'TOhlhi!- j a 1' v hv ,.e,n ' p *), p * rr\ . ., fr/'-m 11 v TTk a! e r Nrssrn said he based hi* rsil-1,^ Cs|1,forn^ ^:p;rrrm (v.,.r :he- organ!- mate of Hallman's 1949 law] W(v Ma*v hf.anng firm Income on an analysis of continue Vvtav isked wliaf|.hc firrn^ bank accounts lire - transporta-Si'vn money she star. Miss said-' "It's! unird for.'`j e part in aj r 'or.lv j.m- ^ employ-] hiiad'-lpbla h piciureii Lee Tr aey e Kremv," ff Wor kera" ; 'Ptv.ld 1^ ifo "YtifW-e s p ft (*' 4-*yC 2-3/ 3 P- I |