Document LJLa6kRqDpom8Q0jMZBmrmjKQ

From: To: Cc: Subject: Date: Steve Davis May, Peter Navaro, Ann; Jorjani, Daniel; Jane Labanowski Re: Meeting summary Tuesday, January 23, 2018 6:05:55 PM Thanks. Yes, those comments were received on 12/12 and we responded with a January 4 submission. Were you able to review that document to verify that we properly addressed your comments? Thanks, Steve On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 5:39 PM, May, Peter <peter may@nps.gov> wrote: Steve, The additional information that is referred to in Paragraph 3 on Page 3 of Bob Vogel's letter is below. Almost all of this was decribed in the email/memo that I sent to you on December 12. Legal Description and Mapping DOI reviewers have identified several shortcomings in the preliminary legal description and mapping that was provided, which will need to be addressed before an appraisal may be requested. Generally: The legal description andplat should include all NPS lands requiredfor the project, including those in the District of Columbia and those connecting the main transit tunnel to the vents and/or points ofemergency egress. The legal description should be based on a survey plat prepared by a licensed surveyor. The legal description and plat should provide a verfiable acreage total with supporting calculations. The legal description and plat need to be better aligned so that reviewers can more easily reference one document against the other. The plat should incorporate the location ofBLM survey monumentation marking the exterior boundary of the Baltimore Washington Parkway. The BLM surveys, which were prepared during the period 2001-2004, may be accessed online here: https://glorecords.blm.gov/results/default.aspx?searchCriteria=type=survey\st=MD\cty= The plat should show individual NPS-numbered "tracts" and their locations. NPS provided a shapefile data that will helpfacilitate this. The plat should include index and/or vicinity maps that will help reviewers better understand the general location ofthe project and the location ofeach plat sheet in relation to the overall easement requested, the parkway, and the surrounding environs Please be aware thatfurther, iterative refinement offuture legal description and mapping submittals may be necessary. Let me know if you have further questions. Peter Peter May Associate Regional Director - Lands and Planning National Park Service - National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive SW, Washington, DC 20242 (202) 619 7025 peter may@nps.gov On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:31 PM, May, Peter <peter_may@nps.gov> wrote: Steve, I am planning to attend with the NEPA specialist on my staff, Joel Gorder. Can you send us the documents as well? Thanks. As far as your #4, we are compiling some information now and will respond later today. Peter Peter May Associate Regional Director - Lands and Planning National Park Service - National Capital Region 1100 Ohio Drive SW, Washington, DC 20242 (202) 619 7025 peter may@nps.gov On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Navaro, Ann <ann.navaro@sol.doi.gov> wrote: Steve - We'll meet in room 6342 on Thursday at 10. And if you could send me the docs you think are key, that would be great. I'll get hard copies for our team for the meeting. Ann Navaro Counselor to the Solicitor U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, D.C. 20240 202-208-3125 (desk) (b) (6) (cell) On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Steve Davis <steve@boringcompany.com> wrote: Thanks for meeting earlier...to summarize: 1. Peter to provide scope document 2. Dan, Peter, and Steve to schedule kickoff meeting. I am in LA from 2/2 until 2/12, so hopefully before then; I can also call in if remote and have other team members attend. 3. TBC to provide updated construction plans with spurs by Thursday 4. In addition to NePa, in Paragraph 3 of Page 3 of the NPS letter, NPS mentioned additional concerns w/ the legal description. Bob V. said Peter would be able to tell us what these were, as our team is not aware of any deficiencies. Peter, can you please help clarify? Did I miss anything? Thanks, Steve