Document LJ8RaGdvxpZLZyqJvDqwwjJj7

RECYCLED \ 00 AR226-2620 DuPont Telomer Manufaturing Sites: Environmental Assessment of PFOA Levels in Air and Water - Appendix D (November, 2004) Appendix D AR226-2620 Supplemental Data Report to: DUPONT TELOMER MANUFACTURING SITES: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF PFOA LEVELS IN AIR AND WATER (September, 2003) Draft Page 1 DuPont Telomer Manufaturing Sites: Environmental Assessment o f PFOA Levels in Air and Water - Appendix D (November, 2004) Additional Data Note all data highlighted in yellow has been reported in the original report - DuPont Telomer Manufacturing Sites: Environmental Assessment o fPFOA Levels in Air and Water (September, 2003). All data presented here was collected as part o f the original data set collected for the September, 2003 report. Chambers Works and Washington Works Air Monitoring Data No air monitoring data was collected. Chambers Works Groundwater Sampling Table D -l is a summary of PFOS analysis from the original set o f groundwater samples collected between May 1 and June 19, 2003. All data was ND (<10 ng/1) for PFOS with the exception of two wells located at the perimeter o f the plant. Monitoring Well C-10 (see Figure D -l) had an average PFOS result o f 74 ppt. This well is located adjacent to the Delaware River. Monitoring Well R-8 had a PFOS result o f NQ (between 10-50 ng/1). This well is located on the eastern property line o f the Chambers Works facility and is in a location that has hydraulic gradient toward the manufacturing facility. No PFOS was detected in the interior monitoring wells or interceptor wells and PFOS results did not correlate to PFOA results. There is no history of manufacturing use of PFOS at Chambers Works. This is supported by the data. Chambers Works River Sampling Table D-2 is a summary o f PFOS analysis from the original set o f Delaware River water samples collected between June 9 and 10, 2003. PFOS presence was detected at NQ in 6 o f the 30 samples at NQ as shown in figures D-2 through D-5. These results did not correlate with the PFOA results. PFOS was not detected downstream o f the Chambers Works outfall during an outgoing tide or upstream of the Chambers Works outfall during an incoming tide (figures D-2 and D-3). PFOS was detected in two samples collected downstream of the Chambers Works outfall on an incoming tide (figure D-4). PFOS presence was detected in four samples collected upstream o f the Chambers Works outfall on an outgoing tide (Figure D-5). Three o f the four samples had one duplicate at NQ and the other duplicate at ND. This data indicates that the PFOS detected in the Delaware River is not associated with the Chambers Works outfall. Draft Page 2 DuPont Telomer Manufaturing Sites: Environmental Assessment o f PFOA Levels in Air and Water - Appendix D (November, 2004) Chambers Works Internal Sampling At the time o f the original study samples were collected at internal sample spots within in the plant to identify potential sources o f perfluorinated compounds. Figure D-6 is schematic o f the plant showing sample locations. Table D-3 shows sample results. The results highlighted in yellow were presented in the original report. The data shows trace levels of PFOS in the commercial wastewater (Sample 529 less Sample 803) and little to no detection of PFOS within the Chambers Works manufacturing facility, however, any positive results could be attributable to the commercial waste. Levels this low are not unexpected in commercial wastewater treatment. During the time of the study, commercial wastewater streams included cleaning residues and firefighting residues. The samples collected at 662 were analyzed as unfiltered and filtered. The data indicated the PFOS is associated with the solid phase consistent with reported literature. Note: Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is approximately 0.010 ug/L Limit o f Quantification (LOQ) for the procedure is 0.050 ug/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between LOD and LOQ. Result not quantifiable. Draft Page 3 New Castle Outgoing Tide ND ND ND ueiawaiTviemonai H iclg ND ND ND Outfall 001 1/2 mile downstream but before DMB '------ -1 mile downstream of discharge ND ND ND -------4miles downstream Infront of Penns Beach ND ND ND Pea Patch Island Figure D-2 10 miles downstream just before Pea Patch Island Pennsylvania Delaware ND ND '-- 13+ miles upstream Zone 4 Zone 5 Fox Point State Pk. ND ND ND '-- 4 miles upstream of discharge In Coming Tide < --------------------Outfall 001 Delaware Memorial Briqge Pea Patch Island Figure D-3 New Castle In-coming Tide M --------------------Outfall 001 4ND NQ 4 ND 1-- 1/2 mile downstream but before DMB Delawa e Memorial Bi idge '-- 1 mile downstream of discharge NQ ND ND '-- 4miles downstream infront of Penns Beach Pea Patch Island Figure D-4 10 miles downstream just before Pea Patch Island Pennsylvania Delaware NQ ! ND ND '-- 13+ miles upstream Zone 4 Zone 5 Fox Point State Pk. NQ NQ 1 NQ 1-- 4 miles upstram of discharge 1r 1 Out-going Tide Outfall 001 Delaware Memorial Bridge Pea Patch Island Figure D-5 Figure D-6 Delaware River Table D-1 Chambers W orks Groundwater Analytical Results Sample Location C08-M01B1 C10-M01B1 N04-M01B O05-M01B P06-MQ1B R08-M01B H11 K06 M-14 Q13-R01C Q13-R01D Aquifer B B B B B B C and D C and D C and D C D Well Type Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Monitoring Well Interceptor Well Interceptor Well Interceptor Well Interceptor Well Interceptor Well PFOA PFOS NG/L NG/L TT Sample Date Duplicate # 5/2/03 1 5/2/03 1 6/19/03 1 6/19/03 1 6/19/03 1 6/19/03 1 5/1/03 1 5/1/03 1 5230 1420 191 799 1100 815 8720 3040 5/1/03 1 46800 5/1/03 5/1/03 1 3200 1 354 PFOS (TRIAL) NG/L T ND 71.6 ND ND ND NQ ND ND ND ND ND ND 76.7 ND ND ND NQ ND ND ND ND ND Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is approximately 0.010 ug/L Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for the procedure is 0.050 ug/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between LOD an LOQ. Result not quantifiable. I Table D-2 Delaware River Surface Water Results Sample ID Sample location Date PFOA NG/L T Duplicate # PFOS NG/L T PFOS (TRIAL) NG/L T DRO01 DRO02 DRO03 DRO04 DRO05 DRO06 DRO07 DRO08 DRO09 DRO010 DRO011 DR012 1 6/9/03 2 6/9/03 3 6/9/03 4 6/9/03 5 6/9/03 6 6/9/03 7 6/9/03 8 6/9/03 9 6/9/03 10 6/9/03 11 6/9/03 12 6/9/03 1 NQ ND 1 386 ND 1 577 ND 1 NQ ND 1 134 ND 1 297 ND 1 NQ ND 1 101 ND 1 288 ND 1 50.7 ND 1 51.5 ND 1 200 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND DRI13 DRI14 DRI15 DRI16 DR117 DRI18 13 6/9/03 14 6/9/03 15 6/9/03 16 6/9/03 17 6/9/03 18 6/9/03 1 NQ ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 NQ ND ND DRI19 DRI20 DR121 DRI22 DRI23 19 6/10/03 20 6/10/03 21 6/10/03 22 6/10/03 23 6/10/03 1 NQ 1 NQ 1 154 1 56.7 1 141 ND NQ ND NQ ND ND NQ ND NQ ND DRI24 DR025 DR026 DR027 DR028 DR029 DRO30 24 6/10/03 25 6/10/03 26 6/10/03 27 6/10/03 28 6/10/03 29 6/10/03 30 6/10/03 1 238 ND 1 ND NQ 1 NQ NQ 1 ND NQ 1 ND NQ 1 ND ND 1 NQ ND ND ND NQ ND ND ND ND Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure is approximately 0.010 ug/L Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for the procedure is 0.050 ug/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between LOD an LOQ. Result not quantifiable. Table D-3 Chambers Works Internal Samples and QA samples Sample iD AD1 AD2 AD3-JUNE10 AD3-JUNE2-8 AD3-JUNE9 BD1 FILTERED BD1UNFILTERED BD2FILTERED BD2UNFILTERED CKBX1 CKBX2 CLL2 SUMP 1,2,3,5-COMP DU0E1 DUOE2 EAEA1 EAEA2 JTTE1 FSCF1 FSCF2 FSCR1 FSCR2 FSCU2 GRE1 GRE2 PFOA PFOS PFOS (TRIAL) NG/L NG/L NG/L T TT Sample lo c a tio n ate D uplicate # Sample 001 4/18/03 Sample 001 5/16/03 Sample 001 6/11/03 1 193000 1 102000 1 76600 382 252 161 410 254 159 Sample 001 6/11/03 Sample 001 6/10/03 Sample 662-filtered 4/18/03 Sample 662-unfiltered 4/18/03 Sample 662-filtered 5/16/03 Sample 662-unfiltered 5/16/03 Sample 529 4/21/03 Sample 529 5/15/03 C-landfill leachate 6/19/03 1 144000 1 97700 1 475000 1 474000 1 191000 1 279000 1 194000 1 26000 1 584000 121 147 96.7 664 NQ 546 2070 91.8 117 114 155 95.8 648 NQ 581 2090 93.3 108 Landfill Leachate 6/3/04 1 128000 Sample 803 4/21/03 Sample 803 5/15/03 Sample 101 4/16/03 Sample 101 5/14/03 Sample 883 4/17/03 1 331000 1 3390 1 3150 1 869 1 5330000 53.6 ND NQ ND 410 NQ ND NQ ND 385 Salem Canal finished water 4/16/03 Salem Canal finished water 5/14/03 Salem Canal intake 4/16/03 1 63 NQ 1 82.9 ND 1 59.4 ND NQ ND ND Salem Canal Intake 5/14/03 Salem Canal upstream 5/15/03 Del River background 4/18/03 Del River background 5/14/03 1 89.4 ND 1 ND ND 1 NQ NQ 1 NQ ND ND ND NQ ND GWEQBLNK1 EQBLNK1 FBLK1 FBLNK1 HF1-2 HF1 HF2-803 HF2-SALEM HF3-AD3-JUNE10 HF3-AD3-JUNE2-8 HF3-BOAT-DAY1 HF3-BOAT-DAY2 HR1-2 HR1 HR2-803 HR2-SALEM HR3-AD3-JUNE10 HR3-AD3-JUNE2-8 HR3-BOAT-DAY1 HR3-BOAT-DAY2 INTBLNK1 Equipment blank 5/2/03 Equipment blank 6/19/03 field blank 6/3/04 field blank 6/19/03 field blank 4/21/03 field blank 4/21/03 field blank 5/15/03 field blank 5/15/03 field blank 6/11/03 field blank 6/11/03 field blank 6/9/03 field blank 6/10/03 equipment rinse 4/16/03 equipment rinse 4/16/03 equipment rinse 5/15/03 equipment rinse 5/14/03 equipment rinse 6/11/03 equipment rinse 6/11/03 equipment rinse 6/9/03 equipment rinse 6/10/03 . blank 5/1/03 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 <10 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 NQ ND ND 1 ND ND ND 1 ND ND ND Limit of Detection (LOD) for the procedure Is approximately 0.010 ug/L Limit of Quantification (LOQ) for the procedure is 0.050 ug/L ND - Compound not detected NQ - Compound detected at a level between LOD an LOQ. Result not quantifiable. Del River background sample collected 14 miles upstream of Chambers Works.