Document LGzaM3pQZQpkVnK3ZELBZqpz
35. If the answer to the preceding interrogatory is in the affirmative, state:
ished with.
(a) What information was the defendant furn
mation.
(b)
When the defendant was furnished the infor
information.
(c) By whom was the defendant furnished the
tion.
(d) Attach copies of such furnished informa
ANSWER:
See Response to Interrogatory No. 34.
36. Prior to 1972, have the defendants interchanged results of research, tests, medical studies or experiments regarding the state of the medical knowledge regarding the connection between asbestos exposure and the contracting of diseases including cancer and asbestosis since 1930?
ANSWER:
Abex objects to this Interrogatory on the
following grounds:
1. Burden
2. Overly Broad
3. Lack of Particularity
Abex further objects to the use of the word "interchanged", on
the grounds that it is vague and undefined.
37.
Prior to 1972, if the answer to the preceding
Interrogatory is in the affirmative, state:
(a) When these interchanges took place.
(b)
Who participated in these interchanges.
of studies.
(c) Summarize the content of these interchange
-24-