Document KnxdBJyZnkEy8g3xg0a8LRGw

FILE NAME: Scotts (SCTS) DATE: 1978 June 12 DOC#: SCTS002 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Memo RE Report on Air Sampling 917/1.00 uos>|U3 suoos 6899000-QS cl C 0 M M U N I C A TI O N ^ - V v v-V-.- . * y v , r.* :* PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT SCO-43 asp- To: hamberlain cc: Libby, Vermiculite D*: June 12, 1978 i - , ' a :; : j '' I now have Dick Gruenbaum's report on air sampling of our plant work environment for asbestos. This covers February 23 and 24, March 3 a Overall, we are below the present OSHA standard which allows for 2.0 ' '`Vi 100% Libby, and March 13 - 80% Libby, and 20% African. Results indicate that the Libby vermiculite definitely has more fibers than, the South - v . - i . ,Carolina ore. Less fibers seem to be present in the 80% Libby,,.and, 20% African test versus that of the 100% Libby. - . , *v K ' ' indicated we should see. improvement on air sampling of Libby , iore, due to process improvements.they have made at the mine since the y. - v.;V .first of year. Frankly, we have not seen any appreciable difference comparing last year to these recent tests. Dick's, comment is as follows:; ' ''Results indicates a slight improvement over the average results of the last year, however, results are not as good as those indicate in p \ p r P s P L r : f P p t e P r p P qulpnent l s showin8 more Consequently,, our results are inconclusive at, this point, in time, as it relates to Grace process improvements. The question of labeling (placarding) cars from Libby to Marysville has again been reviewed. Grace rational for ptitting labels on cars is legal. Reference "Federal Register #1910-1001, Page 513 Caution Label". Caution label .should be affixed to all raw material mixtures .scrap f1 waste, and debris, etc.. containing asbestos fibres, etc. The only way they feel they can ship cars without labels is to have a written statement from Scotts, stating the material will be used in a total V;yv;-. ier (written assurance the customer is meeting all requirements land ling). If we supply this written assurance, they will not '-'-iv; ih did a literature search EFA, DOT, and OSHA, and could find i why we could not respond to Grace to remove placards from .ck Gruenbaum reports we are under OSHA standard in work conment. Therefore, if there are no objections, I will write Grace we do meet all requirements in safe handling, and to remove the , fy'V rm i. V i..,.- \K& Si