Document KR9bnbaBkX0nVVZKGBVeNbEeo
SA1-068-82-531
STUDY OF CANCER MORTALITY IN CHRYSOTILE ASBESTOS MINING COUNTIES
Final Report
By
Richard Ziskind Daniel Smith Daniel Baxter Gary Spivey
Energy-Environment Systems Division
SCIENCE APPLICATIONS, INC Los Angeles, California 90067
EPA Contract Number 68-02-3443
Project Officer
John Acquavella
Epidemiology Branch
HERL, US EPA
'
Research Triangle Park, N.C.
27711
7 April 1982
Health Effects Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27711
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION-HISTORY-SUMMARY 2.0 BACKGROUND REVIEW PROTOCOL ELEMENTS AND DATA GATHERING
2.0.1 Health Risks 2.0.2 Determination of Air and Water Ambient
Asbestos Levels 2.0.3 Case and Control Selection 2.0.4 Case and Control Matching System 2.0.5 Quality Assurance of Death Certificate
Abstraction and Coding 2.1 DETERMINATION OF STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS (SMR'S)
PAGE 1 5 5
6 19 29
29 32
REFERENCES
APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C
Description of Electron Microscopy Abstracting Forms and Codes SMR Data Bases for Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to implement key data gathering tasks of an epidemiological study protocol formulated as part of the intial program phase. These activities included the asbestos analysis of air and water samples and the identification and development of a study subject data base.
Initially, the ultimate objective of this program was formulated as the evaluation of the hypothesis:
Deaths due to respiratory traot cancer, mesothelioma, and cardiovascular disease are associated with the length of residence proximal to asbestos mining activities after controlling for the effects of cigarette smoking, occupation, and genetic susceptibility.
California death record tapes were secured for the period 1969 through 1978 for the two counties with the most extensive deposits of asbestos bearing serpentine mineral formations. County residents were subdivided according to cause of death as given by the three and four digit ICDA codes. Case and control groups were defined in order to investigate whether the geographical distribution of residence associated with particular categories (case group) differed from that of the control causes. Three case groups were developed for males and females with two controls for each case. Causes of death known to be associated with occupational asbestos exposure were generally taken as case categories whereas controls were selected with precisely the opposing criterion. Case groups were digestive tract cancer, respiratory tract cancer and heart disease with hypertension. Control groups were reproductive cancers, heart disease without hypertension and general categories.
In order to asssociate an inhalation and ingestion exposure index with each individual's residential history, ambient concentrations of asbestos were determined for airborne and waterborne pathways. The California Air Resources Board made available their archive of cellulose high volume air sampler filters from the early 1970 time period. Twenty two filters were selected for electron microscopic analysis. These encompassed the
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
geographical area of importance including the adjacent counties with areas
outside the serpentine mineral formations. All samples were analyzed for
chrysotile content by scanning electron microscope and several by transmission
electron microscope as a quality assurance measure. In the serpentine area
(TO
fi ?
fiber counts all exceeded 1.0x10 /m and ranged to 3.7x10 /m (12 samples
5
6.7x10 average). In the non-serpentine areas all fiber counts were less
53
43
than 1.0x10 /m and averaged 4.9x10 /m .
Water samples were gathered throughout the area and analyzed for chrysotile concentration. Eight samples contained chrysotile concentrations above the detectable limit of approximately 0.4x10^ fibers/liter. The highest concentration measured was approximately 20xl06 fibers/liter.
Examination of air and water asbestos concentration findings permitted the assignment of an air exposure index-high, medium, low- to each residence community. Water asbestos were insufficiently elevated and geographically coherent to support the definition of an exposure index.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to expressly acknowledge the cooperation of a number of individuals and agencies who provided us key support during the study. Dr. Gregg Wilkinson and Mr. John Acquavella, formerly of the Epidemiology Branch EPA/RTP, provided technical guidance and resources which were critical to the conduct of the program. Ms. Susan Twiss of the State of California Air Industrial Hygiene Laboratory and Ms. Judy Hodgkins, California Air Resources Board, researched and obtained the archived air sampler filters which were analyzed for asbestos. Mr. Roger Smith of the California Department of Health Services coordinated and expedited our obtaining computer tapes containing death records. Dr. James Mlllette of the Exposure Evaluation Branch, Epidemiology Division, EPA/CINC supervised the turbidity and asbestos analysis of water samples. Discussions with technical staff at Union Carbide Corporation (Dr. H.B. Rhodes and Mr. John Meyers) and Calaveras Asbestos (Mr. Michael Dell'Orto and Mr. Robert Hoylman) were quite helpful.
We further acknowledge the assistance of the local water districts throught out Calaveras and Tuolumne counties as well as the regional air quality managment district. Staff was provided quality assistance from the following individuals - Mr. Alan Miller and Richard Miller for data abstracting and coding, Mr. David Barsky for data base management and programming, Ms. Melanie Nelson for manuscript word processing.
Finally we extend our thanks to Dr. Carl Hayes for his assistance in project oversight during its final stages.
1.0 INTRODUCTION-HISTORY-SUMMARY
This report documents the second phase of a research effort concerning the association between ambient asbestos and cancer mortality. This segment was primarily a data gathering activity and consisted of air and water sampling for asbestos in the Calaveras and Tuolumne counties of California; collection and coding of certain categories of mortality data for the period 1969-1978; and asssignment of asbestos exposure indices to the study subjects. In addition standardized mortality ratios (SMR's) were calculated for somewhat broader mortality categories in the two counties for three years 1969-1971. These SMR values were compared with the expected number of deaths for each cause based upon three-year California rates.
In 1978 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency performed an in-house study of age adjusted mortality rates in asbestos mining counties across the United States. The results showed increased mortality ratios for buccal and pharyngeal cancer, respiratory cancer, urinary tract cancer and deaths from hypertensive heart disease. Relative risks for these causes of death ranged from 1.2 and 5.6.
One of the limitations of this study was that the exposure to asbestos was defined not on the basis of environmental measurements in the communities, but by census information on mining. The investigators concluded that further investigation was needed and EPA decided to contract (competitively) to fund a case/control study that would include measurements of ambient asbestos exposures. SAI was awarded the procurement in September 1979. The first steps of the program included selecting the most suitable counties for study (resulting in Calaveras and Tuolumne), designing the epidemiological protocol, and developing an air and water sampling and analysis plan. Calaveras and Tuolumne counties were selected for several reasons: A rich and extensive asbestos bearing serpentine formation traverses the western portion of both counties. These counties are rural and individuals tend to be exposed to fewer confounding hazardous emissions. The exposure of this population to asbestos was hypothesized to be significantly elevated in localized portions of the counties while at low background levels in other parts of the counties.
1
Computer tapes of mortality data were obtained from the office of the State Registrar of Vital Statistics for the two counties for the time period 1969-1978. The data were sorted into computer files according to cause of death (ICDA code), sex, age, and county of residence.** The epidemiologic protocol design was to identify three case groups each of males and females. Each case group consisted of a selected set of causes of death known or suspected of being associated with occupationally related exposure to asbestos. Two control groups were identified for each case group with their selected causes of death categories known to be unrelated to asbestos exposure.
The overall approach thus for each case subject is to identify by age and sex matching, two control group members and associate with each an asbestos exposure index based upon their residence location.
In order to investigate whether air and water ambient levels of asbestos were elevated and to determine their gradients across the county a sampling and analysis approach was designed based upon knowledge of the water distribution systems, populations, and air quality monitoring stations. It was predicted that roughly half the population in these two counties might have been exposed to elevated concentrations of asbestos in the air and/or water.
In September 1980 EPA approved the study protocol and SAI was issued a new contract to collect the mortality and exposure data. This report documents that contract.
The California Air Resources Board provided assistance to SAI in this study phase by making available their archives of high volume air sampler filters for the earliest time period still retained i.e. 1972 through 1974.* Twenty-two cellulose filters were selected for electron microscopic analysis. These encompassed all geographical areas of importance. Results were clear-
3 cut. In the serpentine area fiber counts all exceeded 100,000 fibers/m , ranged to 3,700,000 and averaged 675,000 for 12 samples. In the non-serpentine areas all samples (10) had fiber counts less than 100,000
* As opposed to county of death.
* It is most desirable to obtain past asbestos concentration information since this more closely reflects the exposure the subject popuation recieved
2
3
fibers/m and averaged 49,000. Blanks and duplicates were run as quality assurance measures.
Since no archived water samples were available, twenty four were gathered from throughout the two counties in order to comprehensively characterize the asbestos content in each distinct water distribution system. Eight samples contained chrysotile concentrations above the detectable limit of approximately 400,000 fibers/liter. The highest concentration value measured was approximately 20 x 10^ fibers/liter which may have been a local phenomenon associated with cement asbestos pipe transport. Unlike the airborne case, waterborne levels were neither significantly elevated nor geographically coherent to support the development of an exposure index.
In summary the airborne levels of asbestos found in communities in the serpentine formation areas are significantly elevated over non-serpentine areas and are more illustrative of occupational environments although the fiber sizes distribution is biased toward the fines. Importantly, of course, those exposed is a non-occupational population which is typically less hardy.
The following case and control groups with identifying cause of death codes (ICD, 8th revision) are being utilized for males and females:
Case Groups
Corresponding
Control
Groups
1. Trachea .Bronchus and Lung Cancer (ICD 162.0-162.9)
General Causes (various ICO numbers)
Reproductive Cancers (ICO 174, 185-187.9)
2. Digestive Tract Cancer (ICD 150.0-159.9)
General Causes
Reproductive Cancers
3. Hypertensive Heart
General Causes
Disease (ICD 400.0
404.9, 410.0, 411.0,
412.1-412.2)
Non-Hypertensive Heart Disease (ICD 410.9, 411.9, 412.3-412.4)
The total study population is 1382 individuals.
3
The study group was developed from the State computer tapes discussed above. In order to obtain the information necessary to support the mortality analysis, the death certificate hard copy was located, information abstracted, coded and placed on tape. The death certificate abstract form is shown as Figure 2.1-2. All necessary information has been coded to initiate the tracing of the surviving spouse or informant if that is ever needed.
Subsequent effort for this research would begin at this point. It would be appropriate to perform the analysis of this data base and test for associations between cause of death and the area of residence within the counties. Specifically the correlation between a case group, e.g. the 85 males deceased from the categories of hypertensive heart disease, and their airborne asbestos exposure based on residence history would be statistically contrasted with the 85 age matched males deceased from general causes and finally the 85 who died of non-hypertensive heart disease.
This approach was formulated as the most cost-effective procedure to determine if any categories of mortality correlated with asbestos exposure and to prioritize them.
The master plan for completion of the study, as envisioned by EPA, would be to perform a next of kin survey to Improve upon the Information base coded from the death certificate. A questionnaire was developed in the initial EPA sponsored contract which primarily obtains or verifies information on smoking, drinking and residence and occupational history. Next of kin Interviews would only be considered later for specific case group categories where a convincing association with exposure was found.
4
2.0 BACKGROUND REVIEW
2.0.1
Health Risks
Health effects due to the occupational exposure to asbestos has been studied particularly in the mining, milling, textile, and construction industries. In their review of findings, EPA researchers (Acquavella, et al. 1979) cited studies* of human cohorts implicating asbestos as a factor in increased mortality from several types of malignancy: mesothelioma, lung and laryngeal cancer (especially for smokers), and possibly GI cancer. Mortality from non-cancerous conditions of the respiratory and possibly cardiovascular system has also been related to chronic occupational exposure (Mancuso, 1967; McDonald, 1971).
Studies have examined the risk of increased mortality among residents in neighborhoods proximal to asbestos processing faciltiies, in areas with natural asbestos deposits, and in communities having identifiable asbestos fibers in public drinking water. Historically such studies have been equivocal. However, recently with the emergence of two key factors (electron mierosopy and cancer incidence registries) several studies undertaken have identified and quantified a risk factor among communities with elevated asbestos exposure to airborne and/or waterborne concentrations.
Specifically Graham (1977) demonstrated, through use of tumor registry data, residents in several Quebec communities had risks from 1.5 to 8.1 times higher than control communities for 10 different cancer sites among males and for seven sites among females. The most prominent excesses were found for cancer of pleura, small intestine, salivary gland, peritoneum, lip and tongue for males; and lip and pleura, salivary gland, kidney and melanoma for females.
* Kleinfield, 1967; Mancuso, 1967; McDonald, 1971; McDonald, 1974; Miller, 1978.
5
Kanarek et al. 1980, analyzed the asbestos content in the water distribution systems supplying the San Francisco-Oakland Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA). The dependent variable of interest was cancer incidence adjusted for age, sex and race. The major Independent variable was chrysotlle asbestos fiber content. Kanarek showed elevated mortality from cancers of the esophagus, stomach, gall bladder, and pancreas.
Acquavella et al., 1979 investigated the hypothesis that cancer as well as respiratory and cardiovascular disease mortality would be in excess In chrysotile asbestos mining counties across the country. Although national In scope, California figured large in this study since it accounts for over 70% of total U.S. asbestos production. Mortality data from the years 1969-1971 were obtained from the POPATRISK data base. Unfortunately this data base coarsely groups respiratory and digestive tract cancers and does not allow their subdivision into sub-groupings of more specific occupationally asbestos-related sites. Two critical features of the study protocol were that the county level was the smallest population breakdown and In a related limitation a localized source of emissions such as a plant or region of natural asbestos deposits could not be expected to affect the ambient air of an entire county. Thus the study would overestimate the population at risk and therefore dilute potential associations. The study protocol had no mechanism for considering occupational exposure. Control counties were matched according to population density. The results showed increased mortality ratios for buccal and pharyngeal cancer, respiratory cancer, urinary tract cancer, and deaths from hypertensive heart disease. Relative risk for these causes of death ranged from 1.2 to 5.5.
2.0.2
Determination of Air and Water Ambient Asbestos Levels
SAI undertook research to follow-up on the EPA effort discussed above. The purpose of the work was to design and execute an epidemiologic study protocol to further evaluate the hypothesis that asbestos related health effects have been observed among populations without occupational exposure. Two distinct California areas with extensive asbestos bearing serpentine formations were researched. One is associated with a deposit running through the junction of Fresno and San Benito counties (New Idria Deposit). The second is located throughout the western sections of Calaveras and Tuolumne
6
counties (herein referred to as the Calaveras Deposit). The preferable study area was determined to be that associated with the Calaveras Deposit. Selection criteria were three-fold: greater population base, evidence of elevated airborne and waterborne concentrations of asbestos, and the existence of archives (CARB) of useful ambient air sampler filters dating back over seven years.
Figure 2.0-1 illustrates the asbestos deposits in California. The New Idria and Calaveras Deposits are among the richest and most extensive in the state and contain the only active commercial sities. Figure 2.0-1 depicts the general area of Calaveras and Tuolumne counties.
The oldest measured ambient levels of airborne asbestos taken in the western county area was reported by the California Department of Health in 1965-1967 (California Department of Public Health, 1967). Ambient (upwind) asbestos concentration was measured by dust sample collection through impingers. Quantification was by optical microscopy. Ambient levels on two separate occasions were made and ranged between 0.1 and 2 million particles per cubic foot of air (mppcf). A federal study at about the same time of the area "Environmental Survey of Asbestos Mining and Milling in California " (December 1966, Public Health Service Division of Occupational Health) suggests the equivalence 10 total fibers/cc = 1 mppcf by impinger. In the cited ambient concentrations (from the NIOSH Recommended Asbestos Standards)
3 the levels across the country are summarized as generally <10ng/m with
3 occasional peaks as high as 100 ng/m (by electron microscopy). Using optical microscopy, ambient levels are generally less than 0.01 fibers > 5 ym/cc with peak values as high as 0.03 fibers >y5 m/cc. Using the Public Health Service equivalence 6 fibers > 5 ym/cc, 1 mppcf by impinger yields the mine area ambient (upwind) concentration range 0.6 - 12 fibers/cc.* Further using the NIOSH suggested equivalent 20 fibers > y5 m in length (as determined by optical microscopy) per nanogram of asbestos yields the mine ambient range 12
3 - 140 ng/m . Thus the ambient levels detected at upwind locations in the vicinity of a Calaveras mine/mill are at the extreme high end of surveyed range. A number of subsequent studies of the general area have confirmed that quite elevated concentrations of airborne asbestos exist. The most recent, of course, being the comprehensive analysis done of the area performed by SAI for EPA in 1980.
* Note the current NIOSH recommended standard is 0.1 fiber/cc for an 8 hour time-weighted average (as detected by optical microscopy).
7
Figure 2.0-1 Asbestos Deposits of California.
8
t>VU"\ jt StTZ[ c,,.'j
!*"NLY-l'Wv1*l/tlOH wp^ l /-<
UHC nnocH
..
a
LuIN"*ptCt*giOLJLLLA1\NOVCV..isv, ^tBbMw<o3H_ii ed_aUCj':f4o4tjJFtCfarjgj{'`^-)i.tvCrw'CtrwlVttN..".,,7\fi^(.^,si-a* i..
k -STOCKTONtW
ClMTCfl, Krf^W v-
MtlbMkS*-' PAKOA!
.^gR: - ^fli/-\rSI
*' tv-" ^
WltXftAt J**'*1 '
Figure 2.0-2 Serpentine Areas of Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties.
9
The California Air Resources board provided hi-vol sampler filters from geographical areas of interest. Available samples went back to 1972. Analysis of these filters provided an important basis for the determination of airborne asbestos exposure to the study population.
Filter selection procedure was to obtain 22 filters accounting for seasonal variation at significant single locations, coverage of the entire geographical region, and representation of suspected high and low suspended particulate values. In addition, all hi-vol filter flow traces were Inspected to confirm that regular flow rates occurred throughout the collection period and that no data tampering was evidenced.
Table 2.0-1 summarizes the results of the scanning electron microscope analyses. Fiber counts and other data should be read as follows for SAI number 81-1101 there were 3,251,00 fibers/m in the fiber size range of less than 5 microns length. Figure 2.0-3 and Table 2.0-2 can be used to explicitly interpret all sample locations. As can be readily seen from Table 2.0-1 the first twelve readings (sites 55922, 55921 and 22741) are significantly elevated over the remainder, i.e. serpentine deposit sites compared to non-serpentine. Furthermore the serpentine area concentrations must be assessed as extremely high by any measure and would be of note even in an occupational environment.
In addition to analysis by scannning electron microscopy several analyses were performed by TEH (transmission electron microscope) as a quality assurance procedure. TEH Analysis was' conducted using a Hitachi Hodel H-500 Scanning Transmission Electron Hlcrosope equipped with both SAED and Dispersive X-ray capabilities. Two grids for each sample were counted at a magnification of 10,000X and the diameter measurements were made at magnifications of 100,000X or 200,000X. The magnifications were calibrated using a carbon grating replica. Chrysotile fibers were identified according to morphology and/or selected area electron diffraction. Comparison of TEH and SEH analysis for 81-1116-2 (Sonora 55922 9/20/74) and 81-1235 (Van401ELD 09001 8/14/73) are summarized in Table 2.0-3.
The fiber counts for the TEH analysis are slightly higher due to the higher resolving power of the TEH.
10
Table 2.1-1 SUMMARY ASBESTOS ANALYSIS BY ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF STUDY AREA HI-VOL FILTERS
$A| Humber
Location
Site
Collection Date
flbers/m? <5|im(l0*' )
81-110! 81-1097
Sonora Sonora
55922 55922
08-08-73 10-25-73
81-1116 *31 -1094
81-1120
Sonora Sonora Sonora
55922 55922 55922
09-20-74 12-30-73 06-28-74
81-1099
Sonora
55922
09-25-73
81-1121 81-1118 81-1102
Sonora Sonora Sonora
55922 55922 55921
04-05-74 07-22-74 07-15-73
*81-1106 81-1110 81-1092
Sonora Sonora Mariposa
55921 55921 22741
05-24-73 03-23-73 07-11-72
81-1231 81-1232
Cam!no
09663
Placervllle 09664
04-10-73 04-10-73
81-1235
Van 401 ELD 09001
08-14-73
81-1199
Modesto
50557
07-26-72
B1-1204
Stockton
39252
07-25-72
81-1213
Leevlning
26772
09-20-72
81-121712
Madera
20001
11-20-72
81-1218 81-1197 81-1196
Madera Bridgeport Van 201 ELD
20002 26773 09301
03-13-73 04-07-73 06-15-73
Sample blank 129 (same ashed blank dilution as sample filters)
Sample blank 12 (10 fold ashed blank dilution as sample filters)
Sample blank 12 (10 fold aerosol O.T. and filtered water blank)
3251 232 704
247+145 106 388 231 153 378
1031+253 86 417 7.5 29 14 66 29
46 79 10 18
0.0
7.0
0.0
denotes filter variation within one sample filtration ^denotes sample variation between twn separately filtered samples
flhers/m3, >5i.m (10'J)
448 24 12
44+23 8.4 38 26 9.5 73
79+60 14 31 0.0 13 0.0 16 0.0
1.9 8.3 3.4 0.0 0.0
0.8
0.0
mass/m3 , mass/m3 5nm (10*3) >5i.m (10'3)
221 118 46 37+21
13 43 31 86 73 268+130
3.8 44
0.4 1.6 0.5 10 5.1
147
15 18 24237+33748 380 16 27 1461 202 435+214 103
7.2 0.0 7.5 0.0 160 0.0
1.3 3.1 0.1 11 0.0
0.3
0.0
11 2.8 39 0.0 0.0
3.4
0.0
Surface area/m3 Surface area/m'
<5iiiii (10'd
5gm (10*3)
2513
379 456 234+130
89 332 201 204 401 1305+106 45 360
4.5 15 6.3 59 40
1578 127 105
5205+6243 333 185 122 752 526
2100+183 216 104 0.0 61 0.0 232 0.0
21 38
2.0 33 0.0
4.4
0.0
37 23 74
0.0 0.0
9.6
0.0
Figure 2.0-3 Site Locations of Samples Analyzed for Asbestos
12
Table 2.0-2 Ambient Asbestos Samples-Site Designations
Site isiqnation
1 2A 28
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ' 11A 11B
Site Location
Mariposa Sonora Location #1 Sonora Location #2
Bridgeport Camino Placerville Van 201 Van 401 Modesto Stockton Lee Vining Madera #1 Madera #2
Sample Date
7/11/72 3/23/73, 5/24/73, 7/15/73 8/8/73, 9/25/73, 10/25/73, 12/30/73, 4/15/74, 6/28/74. 9/20/74 4/7/73 4/10/73 4/10/73 6/15/73 8/14/73 7/26/72 7/25/72 9/20/72 11/20/72 3/13/73
13
The surface area and mass values are slightly higher in the SEM analysis which is probably due to the apparently larger fiber diameters which result either from gold coating the filters or problems with resolution above magnifications of 50,000X.
Appendix A contains information on the procedures used for the preparation and analysis of the electron microscopy effort. The microscope facilities are described and additional remarks are made pertaining to the results and conclusions.
Analysis of the turbidity and asbestos content of water samples was conducted by the Exposure Evaluation Branch of the Epidemiology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory, EPA Cincinnati: Twenty three water samples were gathered by SAI staff encompassing the population centers and water distribution systems. Table 2.0-4 delineates the sampling sites and Table 2.0-5 summarizes the analysis results. The water distribution system location and types - both historic and current were discussed in the final report from the initial contract (Ziskind, 1980). Ten samples contained statistically significant amounts of chrysotile asbestos with three samples over 1 million fibers per liter. The highest concentration measured was at Groveland (20 x 106 fibers/1 iter) and appears to be due to aggressive water transport through asbestos cement pipe (Personal Communication B. Beaudreau, General Manager, Groveland Commercial Services District). The pH In the Groveland system decreases to approximately 6.0 after gas chlorination. Lime treatment is planned to raise pH to greater than 9 which should reduce the asbestos content in the water. In any event the system is localized and fairly recent ( 16 years).
It was concluded that asbestos concentration in water was neither particularly elevated nor distributed with a sufficient gradient to warrant creating an exposure index for use in the epidemiologic protocol. It was decided, on the other hand, that airborne concentration of asbesto fulfilled both criteria (sufficiently elevated levels and geographic gradient) and exposure indices were formulated. Categories of asbestos concentration areas in the two counties were defined as either high, medium and low according to whether they were less than 5 miles from deposits, between 6 and 10 miles, or greater than 10 miles. Deposits were readily located on the area geological maps and each community was labeled and coded for incorporation into the
14
57303 57304 57305 57306 57307
57308 57309 57310 57311 57312 57313 57314 57315
Table 2.0-4 ASBESTOS WATER SAMPLING SITES
Residency 270 High School Street San Andreas (Utility Sink)
Residency 151 Chestnut Street Valley Springs (Garden)
Residency 8288 West Main Mukelumne Hill (Garages)
Residency Main Street West Point (Garden)
Haags Store (Also Residency) R.R. Flats Rd. (Well Water) R.R. Flats (Bathroom Sink)
(No Filter)
Residency 429 Church Murphys (Kitchen Sink - No Filter)
Murphy's Hotel Murphy's (Bathroom Sink - No Filter)
Jackpot Gas Main Street Angels Camp (Bathroom Sink - No Filter)
Residency 1280 Bush Angels Camp (Garden)
Gold Rush Mobile Homes Parrott's Ferry Road Columbia (Bathroom)
Old Tuolumne County Court House Yaney Street Sonora (Bathroom)
Residency 33 Bradford W. Sonora (Garden)
Residency 514 Stewart Sonora (Garden)
16
57316
57317 -
57318 -
57319 -
57320 -
57321 -
57322 57323 57324 57325 -
Samples Samples
Residency 18415 Gardner Ave. Tuolumne (Garden)
(A little murky brown)
Residency (Apt. Bldg.) 22771 Twain Harte Drive Twain Harte (Garden)
Strawberry Store (Gen. Store and residency) Hwy 108 Strawberry (Garden)
The Square Nail Restaurant 18376 Bay Ave. Tuolumne (Bathroom)
Yosemite Bank Hwy 120 Grovel and (Bathroom)
Residency 121 (The Main Street) Copperopolis (Garden)
Same as 57321
Same location as 57320
Same location as 57306
Black Bart Inn - Garden Faucet 55 St. Charles Street (Hwy 49) San Andreas
57303 - 57322 were taken in October 1980 57323 - 57325 were taken in March 1981
17
Table 2.0-5 Turbidity and Asbestos Results for California Samples
Chrysotile Concentration Millions of Fibers/liter
Sample No. Description
Turbidity (JTU)
Cone.
95%Confidence Limits Upper Lower
57303 57304 57305 57306 57307 57308 57309 57310 57311 57312 57313 57314 57315 57316 57317 57318 57319 57320 57321 57322 57323 57324 57325 2551A
2551E 2552E 2562E
2561E 2581A
2601A
San Andreas Valley Springs McKellumme Hill
West point Railroad Flats Murphys Murphys . Angels Camp Angels Camp Columbia Sonora Sonora Sonora Tuolumne Twain Harre Strawberry Tuotumne Grovel and Copperopolis Copperopolis Grovel and
West Point San Andreas Blank Blank Blank Blank
Blank Blank Blank
0.6 2.1 3.3 1.6 2.5 1.4 2.5 0.3 0.7 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.5 10.0 0.3 0.9 0.7 0.5 1.3 5.5
-
-
-
0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
-
NSS (0.3)* BDL (0.1)**
0.4
5.5 NSS 0.1)
0.6 0.6 NSS (0.1) 0.7
BDL (0.05) 0.5
NSS (0.2) BDL (0.06) NSS (0.4) NSS (0.3) NSS (0.06) BDL (0.07
3.2 BDL (0.3) BDL (0.3)
20.1 0.4 0.5
NSS (0.05) BDL (0.05) NSS (0.15) BDL (0.05)
BDL (0.05) NSS (0.05) BDL (0.05)
0.5
-
0.8 6.9 0.4 1.1 0.9 0.3 1.0
-
0.8 0.4
-
1.0 0.5 0.2
-
4.2
-
-
-
-
0.2
0.4
-
-
0.2
-
0.05
-
0.05 4.0 0.09 0.1 0.3 0.02 0.4
0.2 0.01
0.3 0.05 0.05
-
2.3
-
-'
-
-
-
0.05
-
0.09
-
-
0.05
-
* NSS - Non-significant. While concentrations based on less than five fibers may show the presence of asbestos in the water, the actual val ue is not considered very reliable.
** BDL - Below the detectable limit shown . No fibers were seen in the analysis.
18
coding of the mortality data base. The flexibility was retained to assign numerical values of fiber concentration to each area. In the serpentine areas
3 fiber counts exceeded 100,000 fibers/m , ranged to 3,700,000 and averaged 675.000. In the non-serpentine area (all greater than 10 miles distance) all
3 samples had fiber counts less than 100,000 fibers/m and averaged 49,000. In addition to the residence of the deceased individual being recorded on the death certificate their length of stay in the county and in the state are recorded as denoted in Figure 2.0-3. Although without further investigation it would not be possible to verify their residence history in the county during that period, it does facilitate the elimination from the study of individuals with less than a minimal period of residence in the county. Furthermore it is thus possible to define an exposure index equal to the product of length of stay in the county and average fiber concentration in the area of residence.
2.0. 3
Case and Control Selection
The study group was defined as those individuals who died in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties during the ten year period 1969 and 1978. Approximately 4300 individuals, nearly all white, were found to be in that population. It was predicted that approximately one half of the population would have resided in the serpentine formation areas and therefore the counties would provide a useful distribution of residence (exposure index) for contrast among ICDA categories.
Both cases and controls were identified from the California state death tapes. The tapes are compiled monthly alphabetically by county of death. Thus it was necessary to obtain the complete tapes from Calaveras and Tuolumne counties and those entries from throughout the state of residents of Calaveras and Tuolumne counties who died elsewhere. These tapes have coded the basic information from the death certificate including the full name, date of death, sex, race, birthplace, date of birth, age, county of death and residence cause of death (4 digit) and local (county) file number.
The listings were sorted into groups according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for the underlying cause of death. A ten year time interval (1969-1978) was selected in order to gain a sufficient statistical base while not proceeding into the more distant past thereby complicating the study by introducing earlier revisions of the ICD codes.
19
Causes of death hypothesized as linked to asbestos exposure (primarily based upon the occupational literature) were delineated and case groups formed as follows:
20
c
e
r
t
Figure
if ic a t e o
DECEDENT PERSONAL
DATA
CERTIFICATE OF DEATH
Tfnniic numbft
STATE OF CALIFORNIA--DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
NAME OF DECEASED--FIRST NAME j 1. MIDDLE NAME
|lC LAST NAMC
I
____
I
I
SEX 4 COLOR OR RACE 5 BIRTHPLACE iSSIw?
6. DATE OF BIRTH
LOCAL BLCISTBaIION diSIRtCT ANO~CtWftriCMC~~Nui<litR
2a DATE OF DEATH--hohih ox. it J2 HOUR
_____
I I
7. AGE Aiut **
ir UHQtA I <C*A
\t UWOH ?4 HOUH
NAME AND BIRTHPLACE OF fATHER
______________YEARS
9 MAIDEN NAMC AND BIRTHPLACE OF MOTHER
10 CITIZEN OF WHAT COUNTRY 14. LAST OCCUPATION
II. SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
12- NARRlEO. NEVER NARRlEO WIOOWEO OIVORCIO i SPECIFY!
ID RUMItt OF l|U| IR ** OCCW'AftOh
16 NAME OF LAST EMPLOYING COMPANY OR FIRM
IF UtF lPLOi|0 10 Main
13 NAME OF SURVIVING SPOUSE <ir oiu. intib nbioin nbnii 17 KINO OF INDUSTRY OR BUSINESS
PLACE OF
DEATH
I8. PLACE OF DEATH--NAMC OF HOSPITAL OR OTHER IN PATIENT FACILITY ___________________________________
I8o CITY OR TOWN
[18*. STREET ADDRESS--IITH1T AND nuubia. OA IOCA1IONI
JlBC INSIOC cut CORPORAll UN:IS
I .SPECIFY *CS CR NO1
-
! ______________________ II_____________________
[18c. COUNTY
I I_________
[ I8f l(tM or ll IN [Mall Of HIN 1180 tlMCIM Of l. i*
I|
IYEARS IY`ARS
USUAL RESIDENCE
|T9a USUAL RESIDENCE--STREET ADDRESS I STREET AND NUUIEA OA LOCATION I .
(IF DEATH OCCURRED IN INSTITUTION INTER RESIDENCE BEFORE ADNISSIONI
I9c. CITY OR TOWN
--------IT!9o. COUNTY I I
I
19 INSIOE CITY CORPORATE LIMITS I ISPICIFf TES OR HOI I I
[I9E STATE
I I_______________
20. NAME AND MAILING ADDRESS OF INFORMANT
PHYSICIANS OR CORONER S CERTIFICATION
Ova DAM ISO PlCC >111(0 MCiYI FROM IM( autlt SUMO (LOW ANO IMAI I t*A( H((D OR (A.NS OF 0(CI*S(0 as tlOUiRlD ft LAV
21a PHYSICIAN: I MIRIM CIRUFf IMAI OlAtH OCCV'MI A (MI HOUR OAK AND P14CI ftlAMD 4*0V|
ROM INI CAUStft SUIID mo* ANO FliAl I AHIMDIO INI aici*ico
rOM TO
CNKR RORlM OAF l|lfl
I IASI SAM tMf
21c PHYSICIAN OR CORONER--iicraiur* ard DitRii c imi
21c. ADDRESS
12lo. DATE SIGNED
II
''Rlffi'AlVJS`&R*INiultfl "
FUNERAL DIRECTOR
AND LOCAL REGISTRAR
22a SPECIFY lUftlAl. ENTOMBMENT OR CREMATION
22a. DATE
23. NAME OF CEMETERY OR CREMATORY
24. EMBALMER--SIGNATURE ur loot kmralncoi LICENSE NUMBER
25. NAME OF FUNERAL DIRECTOR 10* PERSON ACTING At SUCH I
Sf *-
IF ROt CIRIIFIIO *f CORORIR MAS IMIS DIAIM RirOAHO 10 CORORIR*
27.
LOCAL REGISTRAR--SIGNATURE
SMOFI t$ OR ROI
28.
CAUSE OF
DEATH
29. PART I.
OCATH WAS CAUSED BY: IMMEDIATE CAUSE
(A)
ENTER ONLY ONE CAUSE PER LINE FOR A. 8. ANO C
CONDITIONS. IE ANY. WHICH GAVE RISE TO THE IMMEDI ATE CAUSE 4 A . STATING THE UNDERLYING CAUSE LAST
DUE TO. OR AS A CONSEOUCNCE OF
(B)
DUE TO OR AS A CONSEQUENCE OE
(C)
APPROXI MATE
INTERVAL BETWEEN
ONSET
AND OEATH
30. PART II: OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS-- <ririi*ro io mr*m ro *o riiaiir id imi fmriduk crwu omir m mr u OTIRAHTR k CfR *M*Vy
4). attic*** | aa. * lt
ti"->>:t'0*
Jfc *. #((< | Jt* f.ciaiP it n 'iR-*ih6
It CR MO* j Af* *' Dial-' * ." Mt CR NO
33 SPECIFY accioent sutciot oa homicide
34 rPilatCrcl oOFr iINhJiUuRitY f'VB|*t|cAnA(OMMitai afnar*tl*ial|cIi 0*FW| lUUDFRO lie t
INJURY
37a. PLACE OF INJURY istrect and nunser oh location ano ciit or town*
INFORMATION
35 INJURY AT WORK
1*1 C IF f t|t( kOt
h7i F'UU'*0 FIV10I J#R. MMI (Olltvtl .
| RI V*PIMil illM ID
_____________ |_______________________________
36> DAIE OF injury--t
j 36i HOUR
*a am (IMFIMI l|Mt ROM FOR MF(I J- OR Ipill (N|<ll|i|F|(tf| |t OR NO*
I
.I
I -NQ *1*1 I** *(.>! I|l| I Vtl FOR *>tCOl'
WKD* ill OR tOt
I MIUS
40. DESCRIBE HOW INJURY OCCURRCO iimm ittwud o> iln *)( titwm m nmii ! or rmr tHnuto ti imirio umiir if
f
2.0-3
DEAT
H
-C
al
if
o
r
n
ia
STATE REGISTRAR
A
0
c. 0. E ' F
Ml V I t AM ICM> VJ II
A. Case Groups (hypothesized associations with asbestos exposure)
1. Malignant Neoplasms of Digestive Organs and Peritoneum ICD 150.0 to 159.9
2. Malignant Neoplasm of Trachea, Bronchus and Lung ICD 162,0 to 162.9 3. Hypertensive Heart Disease ICD 400,0 to 404.9, 410.0, 411.0,412.1 to
2.2
B. Control Groups (no hypothesized association with asbestos exposure)
1. Reproductive Neoplasms (matched to digestive and respiratory cancer case groups)
Males: ICD 185.0 to 187.9 (Prostate, Testes, Other and Unspecified) Females: ICD 174.0 to 174.9 (Breast)
2. Non-Hypertensive Heart Disease (matched to hypertensive heart disease
case group) ICD 410.9, 411.9, 412.3 to 412.4
.
3. General Causes of Death (Matched to digestive, respiratory and hypertensive heart disease case groups). Includes all causes of Death, except:
a) Tuberculosis ICD 10.0 to 19.9 b) Malignant Neoplasms of Digestive Organs and Peritoneum
ICD 150.0 to 159.9
c) Malignant Neoplasms of Trachea, Bronchus and Lung ICD 162.0 to 162.9
d) Malignant Neoplasms of Breast ICD 174.0 to 174.9 e) Malignant Neoplasms of Prostate, Testes, Other and Unspecified
Male Genital Organs ICD 185.0 to 187.9 f) Malignant Neoplasms Without Specification of Site ICD 199.0 to 199.9 g) Mental Disorders ICD 290.0 to 315.9 h) Hypertensive Disease ICD 400.0 to 404.9 i) Ischaemic Heart Disease ICD 410.0 to 412.9 j) Cerebrovascular Disease ICD 430.0 to 438.9 k) Diseases of the Respiratory System ICD 460.0 to 519.9 l) Diseases of the Digestive System ICD 520.0 to 577.9 m) Complications of Pregnancy, Childbirth and the Puerperium
ICD 630.0 to 678.9 n) Congenital Anomalies ICD 740.0 to 759.9 o) Causes of Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality ICD 760.0 to 779.9 p) Water Transport Accidents ICD 830.0 to 833.9 q) Other and Unspecified Accidental Falls ICD 887.0 to 887.9 r) Accidental Drowning and Submersion ICD 910.0 to 910.9 s) Accident Caused by Firearm Missiles ICD 922.0 to 922.9 t) Suicide and Self-Inflicted Injury ICD 950,0 to 959.9 u) Homicide ICD 960.0 to 969.0 v) Legal Intervention ICD 970.0 to 978.9 w) Injury Undetermined Whether Accidentally or Purposely Inflicted
ICD 980.0 to 989.9 x) Injury Resulting from Operations of War ICD 990.0 to 999.9
22
These categories were eliminated from the general control causes of death because they included:
1. Other case or control categories (b, c, d, e, h, i) 2. Categories which could be associated with asbestos exposure and/or
the three case categories (a, f, j, k, 1) 3. Categories unlikely to contain records that would be age-matchable
to case records Cm, n, o) 4. Categories containing deaths due to recreational activities, which
could be related to length of stay in the county, or place of residence within the county (p, q, r, s) 5. Categories containing deaths likely to present difficulties in ob taining information from survivors due to their sensitive nature (g, t, u, v, w, x) All case and control subjects chosen were white, recorded as residents of either Calaveras or Tuolumne Counties, and died in years 1969 through 1978.
23
In summary, three case groups were selected which have been cited in the occupational or general epidemiologic literature as suspected of being asbestos related. We have selected specific concomitant cancer or heart disease control groups and a general control group. Table 2.0-6 provides the breakdown on the case and control group sizes.
The general control group included all categories except 1) those which could possibly be associated with asbestos exposure, e.g. digestive and respiratory diseases, 2) those likely to present difficulties in obtaining information from surviviors, e.g., suicides, 3) those likely to be poorly age matched with case groups, and 4) those heavily locale specific, e.g., drowning.
Table 2.0-7 illustrates the age and year of death breakdown of male case group 11*. Each case subject was then age and year of death matched with two controls- one from control group VI and one from the appropriate designated analog control group which in this case is group IV.
After all case and control subjects were identified, each Certificate of Death was located, reviewed, abstracted, coded and placed on tape. Figure 2.0-3 shows the California Certificate of Death. Additional information abstracted from the Certificate includes material vital to assigning asbestos exposure, e.g. residence and length of stay In the county; assisting in identifying confounding exposures, e.g. last occupation; useful in locating surviving kin; and verifying critical data such as the ICD number.
Residence information was recorded and also coded according to the distance from high asbestos deposit areas. Coding of occupation was performed and occupations classified into asbestos exposure potential as: definite, probable, possible and probably no exposure. Subsequent analysis of these data will focus on residence in the area so the primary measure of exposure and will treat occupational category as a covariate which will be stratified or adjusted for. It is readily acknowledged that death certificate listing of occupation is a poor measure. These other such confounding factors such as
* Numbers disagree with those above since a slightly different analysis was being performed which utilized somewhat different ICD categories.
24
Table 2.0-7
Male Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of Respiratory System (ICD 160-163), by Year and Age at Death,
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65--69 70-74 75-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
I
I I
1 I 1
I ! 1
I 1 I
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
3
1 2 2 4 2 l
16
1970
1971
1972
0 00
0 00
0 ..
0
0
0 ' . 1 v
- ; 0
000
0 00
000
1 00
010
30 1
221
1 20
`2 d 2
1i1
220
1 1* 1
001
13 . 7
1973 - .i
1974 * Ct
00
00
00
00
"0
u
00
00
00
u1
02
02
5
5
53
30
14
0 0
.
..
22
14 21
1975
-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 5 2 4 4 4 0 4
1
25
1976 . 'i
" ..........O' 0 0
........ 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 4 3 5 1 2 2
22
1977 .1
1978
00
00
o 7 t/7 . o
"''.-7 0
0
. 0"
u
00
00
00
01
21
: 3 .v
i
'2
i
62
i3
22
01
J0
19 12
smoking and drinking could be accounted for at some future time by means of next-of-kin interviews if the proposed analyses identified specific case groups with a significant elevated risk and there was sufficient interest to minimize additional possible confounding factors.
Figure 2.0-4 shows (in photo-reduced size) the computer generated form developed to record the abstracted information. For each subject decedent, data from the death tapes are filled in when the form is generated. These data are:
o Social security number o Name o Data of death o Birthplace and birthdate o Age at death o Marital status o Counties of death and of residence o Cause of Death o Whether or not an autopsy was performed o The qualifications of the certifier.
The data recorded by our abstractors from the hard copy death certificate were entered in the appropriate blanks. These are:
o Identification Number o Father's name and birthplace o Mother's name and birthplace o Name of surviving spouse o Last occupation and years worked o Name and address of hospital
The format for the death certificate abstract corresponding to Figure 2.0-4 is described in Appendix B. Coding for birthplace, occupational classification, occupational asbestos exposure, city codes (for exposure indices), and county codes are all provided in Appendix B.
27
m iimi tJ.'Ki if a;,iit iuiHiK.it;i
CARD NO 0 1 ID NO
01 02
03 04 05 06
STATE FILE NO .
LOCAL REG (III
SOCIAL SECURITY NO 07 08 09 10 It 12 13 ll iS
NAME
DATE (IF DEATH
16 17 18 IV 20 21 22 23 24 25 2A 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 3A 37 38 39 40 11 42 43 44 45
4A 47 <3 49 50 51
SEX
RACE
BIRTHPLACE
BIRTHRATE
AGE
52
53 54
55 56 57 58 59 60 61
62 63 64
CARD NO 0 2 ID NO
FATHERS NAME
BIRTHPLACE
01 02
03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
MOTHERS MAI DEW NAME
BIRTHPLACE
27 28
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36,37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
4V 50
MARITAL STATUS
NAME OF SURVIVING SPOUSE
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
CARD NO 0 3 ID NO
LAST OCC
YRS
COMPANY
KIND
01 02
03 04 05 06
.
07 08 09
1011
12
NAME AND ADDRESS OF HOSPITAL
CO OF DEATH
LENGTH OF STAY IN CO
IN CA
USUAL RES
CITY
CO
13 14
15 16
17 IB-
19 20
21 22
NAME OF INF
ADDRESS
23 24 25 26 27 28 2V 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 S3 54 55 56 57 58 59
CITY 60 61 62 63 64 65 66* 67 6B
STATE 69 70
CAUSE OF DEATH CODE
. AUTOPSY
71 72 73 74
75
CERTIFIER 76
PHYSICIAN/COKQNER NAME ADDRESS
PHYSICIAN LICENSE NUMBER
IMMEDIATE CAUSE(A)
DUE TO(B)
DUE TO(C>
OTHER SIGNIFICANT CONDITIONS
AIR ASBESTOS
X 10
77 78
79
UATER ASBESTOS 80
.. 1
Figure 2.0-4 Death Certificate Abstract
2.0.4 Case and Control Matching System
The system for matching control records to case records was established as follows:
o Controls were matched to cases of the same sex.
o Cases were categorized into 5 year age groups (<5, 5-9, 10-14, 15-19...,80-84, <85), and listed by year of death (1969 through 1978)
o For each case of given sex, 5 year age group, and year of death a control was chosen randomly from among all controls of the same sex, age group, and year of death. If there were no controls with the same year of death (or if the number of cases out-numbered the controls for a given year of death), a control was sought from the year of death nearest the case. All controls were chosen from the same age group as the case.
o An effort was made to choose unused controls for each successive case group. But if all controls in a given age range and year (e.g. digestive cancer), controls were used again for another case group (e.g. lung cancer).
For the Reproductive Neoplasms control group, the pool of subjects was so small (only 115 decedents), nearly all had to be used twice to provide matches for the Digestive and Respiratory cancer case groups.
Among controls taken from the General Causes pool, approximately 12% of the male controls and 9% of the female controls had to be used for matches twice.
The Non-Hypertensive Heart Disease pool was large enough that no controls had to be used twice.
2.0.5 Quality Assurance of Death Certificate Abstraction and Coding
As each death certificate was abstracted, the certificate was quickly check for (1) internal consistency, and (2) consistency with the information as coded by the California Office of Vital Statistics on the computerized records. Because of time limitations, this check could not be exhaustive, but nevertheless several errors were detected.
1. Errors in the State Vital Statistics Coding of Residence.
We discovered several instances where the county of residence coded on the state death tape was incorrect. One type of error was to assign either the Calaveras code or the Tuolumne code to the county of residence when the
29
city of residence actually lies in a different county. This error occurred fifteen times in our series.
Number 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
City of Residence Stockton Coulterville Knight's Ferry Oakdale Berkeley Oakland Acampo Linden Sutter Creek Santa Clara San Francisco
Actual County San Joaquin Mariposa Stanislaus Stanislaus A1 ameda A1 ameda San Joaquin San Joaquin Amador Santa Clara San Francisco
Since only decedents who were residents of Calaveras or Tuolumne Counties were to be used in this study, all of the aabove out of county residents were deleted.
Another error we discovered was the assignment of the Calaveras
County code to five decedents who were actually residents of Tuolumne County.
Number
City Residence
3 Sonora
1 Columbia
1 Tuolumne City
We corrected the county of residence codes for these decedents, and
kept them in the study.
We should not one feature of this miscoding in the state records. The decendents in our series were selected from the state tapes on the basis of their residence being coded as Calaveras or Tuolumne. However, any actual residents of Calaveras or Tuolumne who were miscoded as residents of other counties would not have been included. In view of the coding errors displayed above, this last type of misclassification probably did occur, although there were probably few of these since only 20 total errors were detected in roughly 1000 records.
30
We also found one instance where a coded age at death differed from the death certified age at death by one year, and so this correction was made.
2. Errors in Death Certificate Entries There were only two errors detected on the death certificates themselves. One was an incorrect year of birth (inconsistent with the year of death), and the other was an inconsistency of the length of stay in the county with the length of stay in California. These erros could not be corrected, since we do not know what the actual entries should be. 3. Errors in Vital Statistics Coding of the Cause of Death The information abstracted from the death certificate included the complete causes of death as well as the "other significant conditions". We checked the causes of death on the certificate against the Office of Vital Statistics 4 digit ICD code on a 10% sample. In a few Instances, the death certificates themselves were vague, and so the given ICD codes were necessarily somewhat arbitrary. But no incorrect ICD codes were found, so we feel confident accepting the codes as given. 4. Errors in Coding the Abstracted Data For quality control of our own effort--namely the coding of the death certificate data we abstracted--we recoded a 10% systemtatic sample of the certificates. One hundred and two records were checked, and 14 coding errors were found. Since each certificate contains 6 variables to be coded*, this translates into a rate of 2 coding errors per 100 variables. This was judged to be acceptable, and the records were sent to be keypunched.
* The birthplace of the decedent, the birthplaces of the parents, the occupation, the likelihood of occupational exposure, and the city of residence.
31
2.1 Determination of Standardized Mortality Ratios (SHR's) Standardized mortality ratios were calculated as part of this study
utilizing the California State mortality tapes. The purpose of this effort was to examine if the total observed number of deaths in the counties for particular categories of ICD codes were at variance with the expected numbers based on State of California rates. It should be noted that the exact residence of each individual within the counties was not factored Into the analysis. Therefore the analysis does not bear directly upon the key study question of whether individuals living in the vicinity of serpentine deposits, i.e. experiencing elevated ambient airborne asbestos concentrations, have different mortality patterns. Rather it examines the gross Incidence across the counties in comparison to the State of California. Since the counties are relatively rural in comparison to the significant state population centers many factors differ and remain uncontrolled in this analysis.
In order to compare the mortality of Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties to the experience of the State of California as a whole it is necessary to take into account the potentially confounding effects of age, race, and sex differences. We have calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMR's), adjusting for age, for whites only, separately for males and females.
The causes of death to be examined were grouped into six categories as follows:
A. Three categories of death from causes possibly associated with asbestos exposure:
-Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs and peritoneum (ICD 150-159*)
-Malignant neoplasms of the respiratory system (ICD 160-163)
-Hypertensive heart disease and hypertensive heart and renal disease (ICD 402-404) '
B. In addition, two comparison groups of deaths were looked at.
32
composed of deaths from causes that have no reported association with asbestos exposure:
-Malignant neoplasms of the breast (used for females only) (ICD 174)
-Malignant neoplasms of the genital organs (ICD 180-187)
C. Finally, we examined the total number of deaths from all causes.
The ICD codes included in these categories are broader than the ICD codes used to delineate the case and control groups. These categories had to be. used because the only published source of age, sex, and race specific numbers of deaths for California is the United States Vital Statistics,** and the causes of death were tabulated in these broader categories. Ischaemic heart disease deaths (ICD 410 to 412) were not included in the SMR calculations because the published deaths were not separated into hypertensive and nonhypertensive.
The SMR is a ratio of an observed number of deaths to an expected number. The observed number of deaths for each cause is the sum of the deaths for that cause in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties for three years, 1969, 1970, and 1971. The expected numbers of deaths for each cause were calculated by multiplying cause-specific three-year California rates (for whites, for each sex, and for each 5 year age group) by the corresponding 1970 subpopulation of Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties. The three year California rates used in the calculations were derived by summing the State deaths in 1969, 1970, 1971, and dividing by the 1970 population given by the U.S. Census.
The expected number of deaths in each 5 year age group were then summed over all ages to give the total number of expected deaths in Calaveras and Tuolumne counties for the three years in question.* *
* International Classification of Disease, 8th Revision * Table 7-6 "Deaths from 69 Selected Causes, By Age, Color, and Sex, Each
State"
33
The 95% confidence limits of the SMR's were calculated as outlined in Rothman and Boice (1979), assuming the occurrence of events to be Poisson distributed. For observed numbers less than 30, the upper and lower limits were found from the table in Remington and Schork (1970) (p. 394). For SMR's with observed values greater than 30, Byar's approximation given in Rothman and Boice (1979) was used.
For males, all SMR's were less than 1.00, l.e., there were fewer observed deaths than expected, based upon the experience of white males In California. Even the mortality from all causes was depressed (686 deaths observed vs. 728 expected). Indicating that (adjusting for age) white males in Calaveras and Tuolumne had a lower overall mortality than males in California for the years 1969 through 1971. The category of death that mosts nearly approached the expected figure was malignant neoplasms of the respiratory system.
None of the male SMR's was statistically significant at the &*0.05 level, since all confidence limits span the null value, 1.00.
For females, the picture is somewhat different. The all causes mortality was increased to 1.05 timesthe expected. Among the conditions suggested to be related to asbestos exposure, the SMR's were elevated above unity for cancers of the digestive system (SMR*1.07) and hypertensive heart disase (SMR*1.75). However, the number of observed deaths for respiratory cancer was less than expected (6 to 10.18).
Among the "dummy" conditions not known to be related to asbestos exposure, the malignant neoplasms of the genital organs among women showed an elevated SMR of 1.34. This result was unexpected. However, the recent study by Kanarek et al (1980) of asbestos in drinking water and cancer incidence in the San Francisco-Oakland area found an elevated number of deaths from uterine cancer.
Although none of the female death ratios reached statistical significance at the <*=0.05 level, the hypertensive heart disease SMR (1.75) had the largest excess of observed over expected.
One difficulty with a community study of an environmental exposure such as this one is that an observed excess mortality might not be caused by ambient environmental exposures, but by occupational exposures. Examining
34
deaths among males and females separately is one way to check for this possibility. If asbestos related mortality were higher among men than among women, exposure in the workplace might be the cause. In our data, however, males have lower mortality ratios than females for most causes, including total mortality.
The lower than expected overall mortality for males deserves some comment. In studies of males in an occupational setting, this observation has been called the "healthy worker effect." Occupational groups tend to be selected for the healthier, more vigorous individuals in the population. Consequently, even when adjusting for age, the overall mortality of a specific industrial group may be less than expected, if the expected mortality is based on the experience of all males in the general population.
It may be that the occupational and recreational activities prevalent in these two rural counties (where timber and mining are dominant industries) exert a small selective pressure on males, which accounts for a male population with a lower than expected mortality. The fact that the observed mortality was not lowered for females indicates that an occupational selection might be involved. On the other hand, it may indicate the presence of a factor which puts females at a higher risk.
One method to "adjust" for a possible healthy worker effect in occupational studies has been suggested by Tabershaw and Gaffey (1974) , Kupper et al(1978), and others. This involves the calculation of a "relative" standardized mortality ratio (RSMR) by dividing the cause-specific SMR by the all causes SMR. This results in a measure of risk that takes into account the lower underlying mortality of the study popuation..
Since for males the all causes SMR was 0.94, the calculation of an RSMR increases all of the observed to expected ratios. All cause spcific RSMR's tend to be closer to 1 than the SMR's, except respiratory system cancers, where the RSMR=1.04. However, this adjusted SMR is not statistically significant.
One reason for the general lack of statistical significance in this analysis is that many of these SMR's are based upon small numbers. These two counties combined had a 1970 white population of only 17,000 males and 16,000 females. Consequently, the number of deaths accruing in just three years is
35
not large. Our data set contains all deaths from 1969 through 1978. However, we have elected to use only deaths from 1969 to 1971, spanning the censal year, in order to use the 1970 census population as a denominator. The lack of age, sex, and race specific population figures during the middle and late part of the decade prevents us from making full use of our mortality data.
In order to use all of the observed county deaths during the 1970's, it would be necessary to get population estimates for these years. This would be possible by using the forthcoming 1980 census data. Intercensal populations can be estimated using the 1970 annd 1980 figures and estimation procedures, such as those given by Shryock, Siegel, et al (1976).
Finally, we must discuss the choice of a comparison population. The indirect standardization technique measures the experience.of the two counties against the experience of the entire state of California. We have restricted the analysis to whites, compared males and females separately, and adjusted for differences in age distribution between the counties and the state by standardization. But there may be other factors that confound the mortality comparisons. The expected values were derived from the death rates of the state of California as a whole. The state death rates Include deaths from urban areas such as Los Angeles and San Francisco. These urban areas may have increased cancer mortality over rural areas by virtue of greater air polluation, pollution of drinking water, occupational exposures, and smoking levels in the population. In short, asbestos related mortality in Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties may have been masked by comparing these counties to the state population, which is composed of subpopulations exposed to several other environmental insults that can produce the same effects.
A better comparison would be to use rural California counties near Calaveras and Tuolumne, with similar population densities and industries, but without serpentine deposits. This is not possible at this point in our study, however. Such a comparison would require mortality data from the comparison counties that are age, sex, race and cause specific. Data this detailed are not available from the published California vital statistics. We would have to identify selected comparison counties and access Calfornia death tapes the same way the Calaveras and Tuolumne data were acquired.
36
Tabl e 2.1-1 and 2.1-2 present the SMR results for males and females respectively. Appendix C provides the age specific mortality data for Calaveras and Tuolumne counties from which the three year study interval, 1969-1971 was taken.
37
Table 2.1-1 STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS - MALES
Obseryed deaths reflect Calaveras and Tuolumne County experience (1969-71) Expected deaths are Based upon rates for California 0969.-71)
Malignant Neoplasms of Digestive Organs and Peritoneum (ICD 150-159)
' 'Males
Observed Deaths
Expected Deaths
33 36.53
SMR IMI
0.90
SMR 95% Conf. Limits
(0.62, 1.27)
Malignant Neoplasms of Respiratory System (ICD 160-163)
Hypertensive Heart and Renal Disease (ICD 402,404)
Malignant Neoplasms of the Genital Organs (ICD 180-187)
Mortality from All Causes
42 1
11 68S
- 42.98
0.98
(0.70, 1.32)
3.06
0.33
(0.01, 1.82)
13.12
0.84
(0.42, 1.50)
723.03
0.94
(0.87; 1.02)
38
Table 2.1-2 STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS - FEMALES
Malignant Neoplasms of Digestive Organs and Peritoneum (ICD 150-159)
Malignant Neoplasms of Respiratory System (ICD 160-163)
Hypertensive Heart and Renal Disease (ICD 402, 404)
Malignant Neoplasms of the-Breast (ICD 174)
Malignant Neoplasms of the Genital Organs (ICD 180-187)
Mortality from All Causes
Observed Deaths
27
6
6
13
18
488
Expected Deaths
25.32
SMR (O/E)
1.07
10.18
0.59
3.42
1.75
18.18
0.72
13.43
1.34
464.04
1.05
SMR 95% . Conf. Limits
(0.70, 1.55)
(0.22, 1.28)
(0.64, 3.82)
(0.38, 1.22)
(0.79, 2.12)
(0.96, 1.15)
39
REFERENCES
Acquavella, J., Wilkinson, 6., et al. (1979) "Pilot study of cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality in asbestos mining counties." Paper presented at the 107th annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Nov. 4th, 1979, New York, New York.
California Department of Public Health, (1967), Industrial Health Study Wells Cargo, Inc,, Pacific Asbestos Corporation Mine Copperopolis, California, A.E. Lowe, California Department of Public Health, Study 2963, August 1967.
Environmental Protection Agency (1980) support document for Proposed Rule on Friable Asbestos - Containing Material in School Buildings. EPA 560/12-80-003.
Fleiss, J.L. (1973) "Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions." J. Wiley and Soncs, New York.
Graham, S., Blanchet, M., Rohrer, T. (1977) Cancer in Asbestos Mining and Other AReas of Quebec. JNCI 59, 1139-1145.
Kanarek, M.S., Connforti, P.M., Jackson, L.A., Cooper, R.C., and Murchio, J.C., (1980) Asbestos in drinking water and cancer incidence in the San Francisco Bay area. American Journ. Epidemiol. 112(1): 54-72.
Klelnfield, M., Messite, J., Kooyman, 0. (1967) Mortality Experience in a Group of Asbestos Workers. Archives of Environmental Health 15, 177-180.
Kupper, L.L., McMichael, A.J., Symons, M.J., and Most, B.M., (1978) On the Utility of Proportionate Mortality Analysis. Journ. Chron. Diseases 31:15-22.
Mancuso, T., Al-Attar, (1967) A Mortality Pattern in a Cohort of Asbestos Workers. Journal of Occupational Medicine 9, 4, 147-162.
McDonald, J., McDonald, A., Gibbs, G. (1971) Mortality in the Chrysotile Asbestos Mines and Mills of Quebec. Archives of Environmental Health 22, 667-686.
McDonald J., Becklake, M., Gibbs, G., et al. (1974) The Health of Chrysotile Mine and Mill Workers of Quebec. Archives of Environmental Health 28, 61-68.
Miler, A. Asbestos Fiber Oust and Gastrointestinal Malignancies Review of the Literature with Regard to a Cause/Effect Relationship. (1978) J. Chronic Dis. 31, 23-33.
National Center for Health Statistics, "Vital Statistics of the United States." Vol. II Mortality, Part B, 1969, 1970, 1971.
Remington, R.D., and Schork, M.A., (1970) "Epidemiologic Analysis with a Programmable Calculator." National Institutes of Health Publication No. 79-1649, Washington.
40
Rothman, K.J., and Boice, J.D. (1979) "Epidemiologic Analysis with a Programmable Calculator" National Institutes of Health Publication No. 79-1649, Washington. Tabershaw, R., and Gaffey, W.R., (1974) Mortality STudy of Workers in the Manufacture of Vinyl Chloride and its Polymers. Journ. Occupat. Med. 16:509-18, 1974. U.S. Public Health Service, 1966. An Environmental Survey of Asbestos Mining and Milling in California, Principal Authors, J.R. Eynch and O.L. Johnson, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Division of Occupational Health, Report SR-17, December. Ziskind, R.A., D.F. Smith, J.L. Hahn and G. Spivey, (1980), Determinants of Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in Asbestos Mining Counties of California, SAI Report 068-81-514 1 May.
41
Appendix A Description of Electron Microscopy A-l Description of Whatman #41 Cellulose Filters The filters shipped to Science Applications, for analysis by Scanning Electron Microscope were contained individually in glassine negative storage envelopes and appeared to be in good condition. Some filters appeared to have lost some material or were unevenly dispersed. These filters were excluded from the analysis. The filter dimensions were 8" x 10" with an effective filter surface of 7" x 9" or 63in2 (406.5 cm2).
A-l
A-2 Laboratory Procedures for Asbestos Measurement of Air Samples Collected Collected on High Volume Whatman 41 Cellulose Filters
t
Cleaning of glassware and utensils
All utensils and glassware are cleaned in a sonic bath (Bransonic model 220) using 2 rinses of Mi11i-Q water (.2 urn filtered) and a final sonicated rinse of reagent grade acetone. After cleaning, the glassware and utensils are stored in sealed plastic bags. All water is prescreened using, the Scanning Electron Microscope to avoid any asbestos contamination.
Procedure for ashing the filter samples:
Sections of filters no greater than 2" x 2" (1" x 2" is optimum) are excised from the original 8" x 10" Whatman 41 high volume filter using precleaned scissors and transferred into engraved precleaned glass vials (70 mm x 30 mm). For almost ail samples a 1" x 2" sample is excised. Each filter is placed in the vial with the top surface of the filter against the inner surface of the glass vial.
No more than 2 sample vials are ashed at the same time. The vials are placed into the Low Temperature Asher (International Plasma Corp. Model PM 104C) side by side and lying down with the top of the vial facing the door of the ashing chamber. This will minimize any effect of sample cross-contamination. After the samples are placed in the Low Temperature Asher, the power is turned on and the chamber is placed in the slow evacuation mode. In approximately 5 minutes the vacuum will reach 1 torr; at this time the chamber is switched into the fast vacuum mode and will pump down to less than .1 torr in a matter of minutes. At this point, the RF generator and oxygen flow are turned on and the ashing of the filter begins.
The filters are ashed for 4 hours at a vacuum of 1 torr, oxygen meter flow of 200, and an RF forward power of 20 watts. The reflecting power is kept below 1 watt by the fine tuning on the instrument console. Once ashing
is complete the RF power and oxygen are turned off and the vacuum value on the instrument is turned to the off position. The purge for the sample chamber is opened to allow the chamber to return to atmospheric pressure over a period of 30 minutes (any shorter time could result in sample loss or contamination). Before the samples are removed from the chamber, the power to the entire instru ment must be turned off to avoid turbulence caused by the instrument cooling fans. The samples are removed carefully and capped.
Sample dilution procedures:
All filter handling and filtration were performed in a laminar flow bench with a particle concentration at >_.5ym of less than 100 particles/cu. ft. A Climet Model 208 particle counter was used to monitor particle levels.
The capped samples containing the ashed filter are transferred to the laminar flow bench and the initial dilution is performed with the air fan turned off so that the dry ashed sample is not blown out of the vial during the first addition of aerosol O.T. dispersant. Exactly 20 ml. of .2ym millipore filtered .1% Aerosol O.T. is carefully pipetted into the sample vial. The vial is capped, shaken gently and then placed in a ultrasonic bath (Bransonic Model 220) for 5 minutes. The sample is removed from the sonic bath and exactly 2.00 ml of the solution is withdrawn 1 cm from the bottom of the vial and transferred to a clean plastic 15 ml. test tube with a screw top cap. Approximately 5 ml. of .2ym filtered deionized water is added to the test tube and gently shaken for approximately 1 minute before pouring into the filter assembly.
The 25 ran filter assembly (Nuclepore stock #410200) is made of borosilicate glass with a sintered glass support and has a funnel volume of 20 ml. and an
2 effective filtered area of 2.14 cm .
The asbestos samples are collected on a .2ym pore size nuclepore filter which is backed by a .45ym pore size millipore filter which aids in a more even dispersal of particles.
The sample contained in the plastic test tube is poured into the filter
assembly after 1 ml. of deionized water has been filtered through the funnel
to saturate the filter media. The test tube and cap are rinsed twice with
5 ml of deionized water into the filter funnel and a light vacuum is applied
to the filter to allow complete filtration within 30 seconds. When the
sample solution approaches approx. 1 cm in depth, the walls of the filter
funnel are carefully rinsed with 2-3 ml of filtered deionized water and allowed
to totally filter. 15 seconds after the sample solution has finished filtering
the pump is turned off and the filter is allowed to air dry for 30 minutes
before removal from the funnel assembly. The sample filter and the backing
filter are removed together with clean polyethylene forceps and transferred
to a clean plastic petri dish with a depth no less than 1 cm and taped in
place. The filter is ready for sectioning for the Scanning Electron Microscope
or the Transmission Electron Microscope analysis.
-
FILTER PREPARATION FOR THE SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
Using a clean razor blade, excise a portion of the taped filter section from the filter by pressing evenly downward on the filter and backing filter (it is not advisable to pull the blade across the filter as this may result in particle loss and filter distortion). Carefully remove the cut section and transfer to a clean sheet of 2" x 2" leucite or plexiglass (keeping the backing filter in place aids in transferring the filter section without warping). The backing filter is removed by carefully sliding the nuclepore sample filter laternally off the backing filter using a sharp needle. 4 mm x 4 mm sections are cut using a new razor and pressing with a downward motion only. The softness of leucite or plexiglass provides for a very even undisturbed cut. The razor blade and the 2" x 2" plastic are discarded after each filter is cut. The filter sections are transferred to aluminum specimen mounts backed with #465 scotch transfer tape and only the edges of the filter are gently pressed down and evened out using a sharp needle.
The samples are coated with gold using an ISI P-SI Sputter Coater Set at 40 ma, 2.5 kV, a vacuum of .1 torr, and coated for 2.5 minutes.
A-4
FILTER PREPARATION FOR THE SCANNING TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
The filters sections remaining in the petri dishes after SEM sample preparation are transferred to a vacuum evaporator and coated with 40 to 50 mm of carbon in bursts on the order of 5 seconds to avoid polymerization of the nuclepore filter.
3 mm x 3 mm sections are excised from the filter pad as described in the SEM filter preparation procedure and placed carbon side down over a carbon stabilized formvar coated copper grid (200-300 mesh).
The copper grids to be extracted by the Jaffe wick method (EPA 600/2-77-178) are placed on top of a section of Whatman #42 ashless filter paper that is over a square of polyethylene foam that has been triple washed and ultrasonicated in acetone. The entire extraction arrangement is contained in a precleaned 100 mm x 15 mm precleaned glass petri dish. Four grids for each sample are pre pared in the following manner. Approximately 10 me. of reagent grade chloroform is pipetted onto each 3 mm x 3 mm filter section using a syringe and the petri dish is carefully filled with chloroform to a level approaching the top of the foam support. The petri dishes are covered and placed inside a bell jar to maintain a high chloroform atmosphere and reduce evaporation. Each filter grid is allowed 48 hours for dissolution of the nuclepore filter. The grids are then transferred to a clean covered petri dish to dry before analysis by the Transmission Electron Microscope.
FILTER ANALYSIS BY SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY
The total counts of two separate filter areas of each sample are analyzed at a magnification of 10,000X in the slow scan rate mode with a beam current of 15 kV. The resolution of the ISI Super III-A Scanning Electron Microscope is checked prior to each sample analysis using an asbestos standard sample con taining many fibrils with diameters of .02 to .03ym. Actual sample analysis proceed only when fibrils of .03ym in diameter can be clearly resolved using the slow scan rate at a magnification of 20.000X.
Each sample filter section (two for each sample) is analyzed for a minimum total of 50 fields or 50 fibers (100 total) and the results are combined and totaled in the computer analysis. Chrysotile asbestos fibers are confirmed by morphology and the presence of magnesium and silicon using a Kevex 5100c dispersive X-ray system.
Fiber analysis for the purpose of this survey were placed into four categories; chrysotile, amphibole, ambiguous, and non-asbestos. Confirmation for chrysotile required both morphology and X-ray identification. Very small fibers (<.l urn diameter) which do not readily yield strong X-ray peaks were confirmed when their fiber diameters and length were very well defined or when they were found in the same field as another larger fiber confirmed to be Chrysotile by both morphology and X-ray spectra.
Amphiboles when present were confirmed by morphology and X-ray spectra. X-ray spectra typical of an amphibole must be well defined otherwise the particle will be listed as ambiguous.
The ambiguous classification contains all the fibers which have a questionable morphology or an ambiguous X-ray spectrum. The most common example in this category is a fiber which exhibits a silicon peak but no magnesium peak.
The non asbestos fiber category includes all fibers defined as having an aspect ratio of 3:1 but not having an asbestiform morphology. The second criterion includes all fibers greater than .lym in diameter that exhibit no X-ray spectrum or no silicon peak.
The final reporting of data includes fibers/meter3 , mass/meter3 (nanograms) and surface area/meter3 (ym2 ) expressed as total fibers, fibers <5ym, and fibers >5ym.
A-6
It is very important to emphasize the instrument parameters used in the analysis.
The accelerating voltage on the SEM was set at 15 kV for a number of reasons. Beam penetration at a higher kV range is much greater and decrease the ability to resolve individual fibers with diameters below .1 m. 15 kV is also the optimum energy range for X-ray analysis. The peak to background ratio for Magnesium Aluminum and Silcon is much higher at 15 kV than 20 kV or 25 KV also due to beam penetration (less area below the fiber is being excited). The working distance of the SEM was calibrated and maintained at a working distance of 8 mm and a stage tilt of 15. This provided for maximum resolution without compromising X-ray yield. The samples were prepared on .2 m pore size Nuclepore filters (particles on the shiny side) primarily because of their smooth background as compared to .1 m pore size or even the .45 m pore size filters.
A-3 Microscopy Facilities SAI's electron microscopy lab contains a scanning electron micro
scope equipped with a dispersive X-ray spectrometer and a dedicated micro computer for rapid and tailored data reduction of particle field counts, parti cle density and size distributions, and elemental abundances. The microscope is equipped with both a high angle back-scatter detector for atomic number contrast and a low angle back scatter detector for high resolution surface detail.
Adjacent to the SEM laboratory is a trace particle clean room which has been tailored for the handling and preparation of ambient air samples for asbestos and trace metals (see Figure A-l). The room is equip ped with a HEPA filtered air system producing a variable laminar flow inside the room as well as a positive pressure throughout both the main lab and the anteroom. This eliminates any possible outside contamination for trace metal or asbestos samples. In addition to the ceiling HEPA filter system, the room is equipped with a laminar flow bench.
Through a formal agreement with Scripps Institution of Oceano graphy, SAI utilizes the scanning transmission electron miscroscope facility located less than 2 miles away. This instrument is an Hitachi Model H-500 with a magnification range of 500,000x and a resolution of 1.4 A0, and is equipped with both Selected Area Electron Diffraction and computerized dis persive X-ray capabilities.
Instrumentation
SAI:
Model ISI Super IIIA Scanning Electron Microscope 70A resolution
magnification range 12-200,OOOx
A-8
1. Semi-clean transfer room (positive pressure to the outside exit).
2. Ceiling Hepa filter.
3. Floor exhaust with dampered control for variation in laminar flow over bench #4 and the posi tive pressure of the room.
4. Clean work table.
5. Bench for Jaffe-Wick prepara tion of filters.
6. Vented clean box for chloroform extraction of filters.
7. Laminar flow bench for filter sectioning and filtration.
8.. Polyethylene sink.
9. Particle tac mat.
W\
scale 1" * 4*
FIGURE A-l
TRACE PARTICULATE CLEAN ROOM.
7-4
- Standard secondary electron detector - High backscatter detector for atomic number contrast - Low angle backscatter detector (low loss) for high resolution
surface imaging and elevation measurement with a resolution of 500A. (Detector is used for measuring particle volume and photographing biological and low atomic number surfaces.) PS-I Sputter Coater AuPd and Au target Kevex 5100 c Dispersive X-ray System
2 30mm detector area 1.49 ev/channel resolution Motorola 6800 Computer System with dual floppy disc Scripps Institute of Oceanography: Model Hitachi H-500 Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope Transmission Mode - resolution 1.4A0, magnification range to 500,000x equipped for Selected Area Electron Diffraction Scanning Mode - resolution of 30A; magnification range of 1000 300,000 equipped with a Model 6230 Ortec dispersive X-ray system which includes the computer and dual floppy disc. Denton Carbon Evaporator
A-10
A-4 Results & Conclusions
Viewing the concentration summaries for Sonora and Mariposa sites
(Table 2.0 - 1)
reveals a minimum of at least one order of magnitude
differental in concentration for fibers/m3, mass/m3, and surface area/m3
in contrast to other sites assumed to be very low in concentration (Van 201 ELD,
Van 401 ELD, Camino).
Depending upon which parameter is viewed, large differentials can occur in concentration when comparing two samples. For example, comparison of Sonora sample 12-30-73 (SAI #81-1094) with Camino sample 04-10-73 (SAI #81-1231) yields the following conentration effects:
Total fibers/m3
Chrysotile Total mass/m3
81-1094 Sonora
291
24200
81-1231 Camino 7^5_______________________ _____________ (K44^5
Total surface area/m3 5450
Ratio: Sonora Camino
39
60500
1200
The fiber concentration in Sonora (81-1094) is 39 times higher, the mass concentration is 60500 times higher and the surface area is 5450 times higher This wide variation in concentration data should be considered carefully when relating to any epidemiological data.
The usual reporting of data includes fiber and mass concentration without reporting surface area. Theoretically mass and surface area do not differ in ratio only when the size distribution of the asbestos population does not change.
In the real world situation the size distribution changes greatly in chrysotile source rock areas with changes in meteorologic conditions. The percent of chrysotile fibers >5ym in the Sonora County samples varied from
' `\
1 to 19 percent (Table A-l) . This variation in the size distribution is responsible for poor correlation between fibers/m3 and mass/m3.
In actuality, the correlation between fibers/m3 and surface area/m3
i
is a much better correlation (Table A-2). The correlation of all parameters <5ym is fairly consistent with the correlation between fibers/m3 and surface area/m3 (.98) being extremely good. Above 5ym none of the parameters correlate and it is important to note how poor the correlation is between fibers/m3 and mass/m3. It is recommended that some further investigation of surface area/m3 as an included parameter in the reporting of asbestos data be considered.
A-12
SAI Sample #
81-1101 81-1097 81-1116 81-1094 81-1120 81-1099 81-1121 81-1118 81-1102 81-1106 81-1110
TABLE A-l
Sample Variation in the Percentage of "Occupational" Chrysotile Fibers (<5ym) in Eleven Sonora County Samples
Collection Date
%Chrysotile fibers .5um
%Chrysotile fibers >5ym
08-08-73 10-25-73 09-20-74 12-30-72 06-28-74 09-25-73 04-05-74 07-22-74 07-15-73 05-24-73 03-23-73
86 71 74 49 39 56 79 61 57 82 54
12 7 1 9 3 5 9 4 11 6 9
%Ratio of Chrysotile fibers >5um
14% . 10%
1% 18% 8% 9% 11% 6% 19% 7% 17%
A-13
TABLE A-2
Correlation of Fibers/m3, mass/m3 and Surface Area/m3 for Sonora sites
Compared parameters
Fibers/m3 (excluding 11-1094) mass(ng)/m3
mass(ng)/m3 (excluding 81-1094) surface area (ym2)/m3
Fibers/m3 (excluding 81-1094) surface area ym2/m3
Coefficient of Correlation
<5um
>5ym
total distribution
O1o
ro
.70 -.13
.83 .30 .98 .59
.22
.96
A-14
Variable Number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Appendix B
DEATH CERTIFICATE ABSTRACT FORMAT
Col umn Location
01-02 03-06 07-15 16-45 46-47 48-49 50-51 52 53-54 55-57 58-59 60-61 62 63-64
Field 1m.
F2.0 F4.0 F9.0 7A4.A2 F2.0 F2.0 F2.0 FI .0 F2.0 F3.0 F2.0 F2.0 FI .0 F2.0
Description
Card Number, 01 Identification Number Social Security Number:999-99-9999-blan Decedent (Last, First, Middle) Date of Death, Year (last two digits) Date of Death, Month Date of Death, Day Sex: 1-Male , 2-Female Birthplace (see State and Country Codes Date of Birth, Year (last three digits) Date of Birth, Month ' Date of Birth, Day Age Code: 0-100 years or over,1-years Age, years
B-l
Variable Number 15 16 17
18
19 20
21
22
DEATH CERTIFICATE ABSTRACT
Column Location 01-02 03-06 07-26
27-28
29-48 49-50
51
52-80
Field 1m. F2.0 F4.0 5A4
F2.0
5A4 F2.0
FI .0
7A4.A1
Description
Card Number, 02 Identification Number Father's Name (First, Middle, Last if different from decedent)
Father's Birthplace (see State and Country Codes)
Mother's Maiden Name (First, Middle, La Mother's Birthplace (see State and Country Codes)
Marital Status: 1-Married; 2-Single, Never Married; 4-Divorced; 5-Widowed; 9-Unknown/Not Stated
Name of Surviving Spouse(First, Middle, Last)
B-2
DEATH CERTIFICATE ABSTRACT
Column Location
Field
Type
Description
01-02
F2.0
Card Number, 03
24
03-04
F4.0
Identification Number
25
07-09
F3.0
Last Occupation (see Occupational Codes):
999-blank
26
10-11
F2.0
Number of Years in Last Occupation:
99-blank
27
12
FI .0
Kind of Occupation: 1-Definite Asbestos
Exposure; 2-Probable Exposure;
3-Possible Exposure;4-Probably No Exposure;
9-No Occupation (see exposure codes)
28
13-14
F2.0
County of Death (see County Codes)
29
15-16
F2.0
Length of Stay in County, years: 99-blank
30
17-18
F2.0
Length of Stay in California, years: 99-blank
31
19-20
F2.0
Usual Residence, City (see City Codes)
32
21-22
F2.0
Usual Residence, County (see County Codes)
33
23-40
4A4.A2 Name of Informant (First, Last, Middle)
34
41-59
4A4,A3 Address of Informant
35
60-68
2A4.A1 City of Informant
36
69-70
A2 State of Informant
37
71-74
F4.1 Cause of Death, ICD 8th Revision Code
38
75
FI .0
Autopsy: 1-No Autopsy; 2-Autopsy, results
used; 3-Autopsy, results not used;
4-Autopsy, unknown if results used;
5-Unknown if an autopsy
39
76
FI .0
Certifier: 1-Coroner; 2-M.D. or D.O.;
3-D.C.; 4-Unknown before 1975, Military
after 1975; 5-Unknown
B-3
01 - Alabama 02 - Alaska 03 - Arizona 04 - Arkansas 05 - California 06 - Colorado 07 - Connecticut 08 - Delaware 09 - District of Columbia 10 - Florida 11 - Georgia 12 - Hawaii 13 - Idaho 14 - Illinois 15 - Indiana 16 - Iowa 17 - Kansas 18 - Kentucky 19 - Louisiana 20 - Maine 21 - Maryland 22 - Massachusetts 23 - Michigan 24 - Minnesota 25 - Mississippi 26 - Missouri 27 - Montana 28 - Nebraska 29 - Nevada 30 - New Hampshire 31 - New Jersey 32 - New Mexico 33 - New York 34 - North Carolina
BIRTHPLACE STATE CODES
35 - North Dakota 36 - Ohio 37 - Oklahoma 38 - Oregon 39 - Pennsylvania 40 - Rhode Island 41 - South Carolina 42 - South Dakota 43 - Tennessee 44 - Texas 45 - Utah 46 - Vermont 47 - Virginia 48 - Washington 49 West Virginia 50 - Wisconsin 51 - Wyoming 52 - Virgin Island 54 - Outlying Possessions 55 - United States, Place Unknown
B-4
BIRTHPLACE FOREIGN COUNTRY CODES
56 - Asia (inc. India, Israel, Korea, Lebanon, Pakistan other Asia)
57 - Austria
58 - Belgium
59 - Central America (inc. British Honduras, Costa Rica, El Salvedor, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama)
60 - Canada
61 - China
62 - Czechoslavakia
63 - Denmark
64 - Eire (inc. Ireland, Northern Ireland)
65 - England
66 - Finland
67 - France
.
68 - Germany
69 - Greece
70 - Hungary
71 - Italy
72 - Japan
73 - Mexico
74 - Netherlands
75 - Philippine Islands
76 - Poland
77 - Portugal
78 - Rumania
79 - South America (inc.Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador,
Paraguay, Peru, Uraguay, Venequela, other South American)
80 - Scotland
81 - Spain
.
82 - Norway, Sweden
83 - Switzerland
84 - USSR (inc. Russia, Ukrania)
85 - Wales `
86 - West Indies (inc. Cuba, Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica, West Indies
Federated, other West Indies)
B-5
Page 2 Birthplace FOREIGN COUNTRY CODES 87 - Yugoslavia 88 - All others (inc. Africa, Australia, Azores Islands, New Zealand, other Pacific Islands 89 - Unknown Nativity
B-6
OCCUPATIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM
Occupation Code:
Professional^ Technical, and Kindred Workers
Occupations Code:
Professional, Technical, and Kindred Workers - continued
001 002
003 004 005
006 007 010 011 012 013
014 015 020 021 022 023 024 025 026
030 031
032 033
X
034 035 036
042 043 044 045 051 052 053 054 055
056
061 062
Accountants Architects Computer specialists
Computer programmers Computer systems analysts
063 064 065 071 072
Computer specialists, n.e.c.
073
Engineer
Aeronautical astroiiautical eng. 074
Eng. not specified (4 yxs.college)075
Chemical engineers
076
. Civil Engineers
Electrical 6 electronic engineers 080
Industrial engineers(incl: gas
plant engineers)
081
Mechanical engineers
082
Metallurgical 6 materials eng.
Mining engineers
083
Petroleum engineers .
Sales engineers
. 084
Engineers, n.e.c
085
Farm management'advisors
Foresters and conservationists
Home management advisors
086
Lawyers and judges
090
Judges
Lawyers
. 091
Librarians,archivists,and curators 092
Librarians
. 093
Archivists and curators
. 094
Mathematical specialists .
095
Actuaries
_ 096
Mathematicians Statisticians
100
Life and physical scientists
Agricultural scientists
101
Atmospheric and space scientists
Biological scientists
102
Chemists
103
Geologists
Marine scientists
104
Physicists and astronomers
105
Life and physical scientists,nec 110
Operations 6 systems researchers 111
and analysts
112
Personnel labor relations workers 113
Physicians, dentists, 6 related Practitioners
114 115
Chiropractors
116
Dentists
120
Optometrists
Pharmacists
Physicians, medical and osteopathit
Podiatrists
Veterinarians
Health Practitioners, n.e.c.
Nurses, dieticians, $ therapists
Dieticians
Registered nurses
Therapists
Health technologists $ technicians
Clinical laboratory technologists
: technicians
Dental hygienists
Health record technologists $
technicians
Radiological technologists 8
technicians, n.e.c.
Therapy assistants *
Health technologists g technicians
' 71 C C
'
Religious workers.
Clergymen
.
Religious workers, n.e.c.
Social Scientists
Economists
Political scientists
Psychologists
Sociologists
Urban regional planners
Social Scientists, n.e.c.
Social 5 recreation workers
Social workers (incl. juvenile
counseling)
..
Recreation workers
Teachers, college university
Agriculture teachers
Atmospheric, earth, marine 6 spac
teachers
Biology teachers
Chemistry teachers
Physics teachers
Engineering teachers
Mathematics teachers
Health specialities teachers
Psychology teachers
Business 6 commerce teachers
Ecomonics teachers
History teachers
B-7
(
Occupation Code:
Professional, Technical, and
Kindred Workers - continued 121 Sociology teachers 122 Social science teachers, n.e.c. 123 Art, drama, 8 music teachers . 124 Coaches 8 physical ed. teachers 125 Education teachers
191 . 192
193 194
Photographers
Public relations men publicity writers . '
Radio 8 television announcers ^ Writers, artists, 8 entertainers,
126 English teachers
.
n.e.c.
130 Foreign language teachers
195 Research workers, not specified
131 Home economics teachers
(incl. research director)
.
132 Law teachers
-
133 Theology teachers 134 Trade, industrial technical
Management and Administrators, Except Farm
135
Miscellaneous teachers, college 201
Assessors, controllers 8 treasurers;
university
local public administration
140 Teachers, college 8 university, 202 Bank officers financial managers
subject not specified (incl. grad. 203
Buyers 8 shippers, farm products
assistant)
205 Buyers, wholesale 8 retail trade
Teachers, except college 8 university 210
Credit men
.
141 Adult education teachers
211 Funeral directors
142 Elementary school teachers.
212 Health administrators
143 Prekindergarten teachers
. 213
Construction inspectors, public
144 Secondary school teachers
administration
145
Teachers, except college 8 univer 215
Inspectors, except construction,
sity, n.e.c.
public administration
.
146 Teachers, not specified
220 Office managers, n.e.c. -
Engineering and science technicians 221
Officers, pilots pursers; ship
3 50 Agriculture 8 biological tech
222 Officials 8 administrators; public
nicians, except health
administration, n.e.c.
<'
151 Chemical technicians 152 Draftsmen
. 223 224
Officials of lodges, societies 5--\ Postmasters 8 mail superintends.
153
Electrical 8 electronic engineering 225
Purchasing agents 8 buyers, n.e.c.
technicians
226 Railroad conductors
.
154
Industrial engineering technicians 230
Restaurant, cafeteria 8 bar manager
153
Mechanical engineering technicians 231
Sales managers 8 department heads,
156 Mathematical technicians
retail trade
.
161 Surveyors
233 Sales managers, except retail trade
162 . Engineering 8 science technicians. 235
School administrators, college
\ n.e.c. (includes trainee)
240
Technicians, except health 8 engineer
School administrators, elementary 8
secondary
.
ing science
163 Airplane pilots
164
Air traffic controllers
.
245 Managers 8 administrators, n.e.c. (
film producer, self employed)
246
Management trainee ; . .....
...
165 Embalmers 1/0 Flight engineers
.' Sales Workers
171 Radio operators
172
Tool programmers.numerical control 260
Advertising agents 8 salesmen
173 Technicians, n.e.c.
261 Auctioneers
174 Vocational 8 educational counselors 262
Demonstrators
Writers, artists, 8 entertainers
264 Hucksters 8 peddlers
175 Actors 180 Athletes 6 kindred workers 181 Authors 182 Dancers 133 Designers 184 Editors 8 reporters 185 Musicians 8 composers 190 Painters 8 sculptors
265 Insurance agents, brokers 8 under-
` writers (incl. insurance coordina'
270 Real Estate agents 8 brokers
271 Stock 8 bond salesmen
__
280 Salesmen 8 sales clerks, n.e.c. (i:
medical distributer, drugstor'^tl
281 Sales associate
'
Clerical and Kindred Workers
301 Bank tellers (incl. banking,proofer) 384
Telegraph operators
302 Budgetary control
385
Telephone operators
303 Billing clerks
390 Ticket, station 8 express agents
305 Bookeepers (incl. accounting, auditing
(incl. railroad station clerk)
clerk)
391 Typists
310 Cashiers
. 392 ' / Weighers
-
311 Clerical assistants, social welfare 394
Miscellaneous clerical workers (incl
312 Clerical supervisors, n.e.c. (incl.
service rep; general office worker)
det. head - office work, office
395 Not specified clerical workers (incl
manager)
Volt, Kelly)
313 Collectors, bill 8 account
396 Other clerical
314 Counter clerks, except food
.
315 Dispatcher 8 starters, vehicle
Craftsmen and Kindred Workers
320 ' Enumerators 8 interviewers
321 Estimators 8 investigators, n.e.c. 401
Automobile accessories installers
(incl. costomer's representative)
402
Bakers
323 Expediters 8 production controllers 403
Blacksmiths
325 File clerks (incl. filers, book
404 Boilermakers
store sorting)
405 Bookbinders
330 Library attendants 8 assistants
410 Brickmasons 8 stonemasons
(incl. library clerk)
411 Brickmasons 8 stonemasons, apprentic
331 Mail carriers, post office
412 . ^Bulldozer operators (incl. tractor
332 Mail handlers, except post office
driver)
(incl. mail clerk)
413 Cabinetmakers
-
333 Messengers 8 office boys
415 Carpenters
334 Meter readers, utilities
.
416 Carpenter apprentices
Office machine operators
'
420 Carpet installers
341
Bookeeping 8 billing machine oper- 421
Cement 8 concrete finishers
ators
"
422 Compositors 8 typesetters
342 . Calculating machine operators
423 Printing trades apprentices, exc.
343 Computer 8 peripheral equipment
pressmen (incl. print shop helper)
operators
..
424 Cranemen, derrickmen, hoistmen
344 Duplicating machine operators
425 Decorators 8 window dressers
345 Key punch operators .
426 Dental laboratory technicians
350 Tabulating machine operators
430 Electricians
355
Office machine operators, n.e.c.
431
Electricians apprentices
360 Payroll 8 timekeeping clerks
433 Electric power linemen 8 cablemen
361 Postal clerks (incl. postal service) 434
Electrotypers 8 stereotypers
362 Proofreaders
. 435 . Engravers, exc. photoengravers ..
363 Real estate appraisers
436 Excavating, grading 6 road machine
364 Receptionists
operators, exc. bulldozer
Secretaries
440 Floor layers, exc. tile setters
370 Secretaries, legal
441 Foremen 8 hammermen
371 Secretaries, medical
442 Forgemen and hammermen
372 Secretaries, n.e.c.
443 Furniture 8 wood finishers
374 Shipping 8 receiving clerks
444 Furriers
375 Statistical clerks
445 Glaziers
.
376 ' Stenographers
446 Heat treaters, annealers, 6 tempers
379 Administrative assistant
450 Inspectors, scalers, 8 graders;
381 Stock clerks 8 storekeepers (incl.
log and lumber
inventory)
452 Inspectors, n.e.c. (incl. telephone
382 Teacher aides, exc. school monitors
investigation)
(incl. school aide)
453 Jewelers 8 watchmakers (incl. jewe
383 Telegraph messengers
work)
B-9
Operatives, Except Transport - cont'd
Laborers, Except Farm - continued
656
Punch stamping press operatives ` 762
Stock handlers (incl. box boy, g-^Wgj
660 Riveters 6 fasteners
clerk, stock girl)
661 Sailors 5 deckhands
763 Teamsters
662 Sawyers
. 764 Vehicle washers 5 equipment cleaners
663 Sewers 6 stichers
770 Warehousemen, n.e.c.
664 Shoemaking machine operatives
780 Miscellaneous laborers
665 Stationary firemen
785 Not specified laborers (incl. factoti
Textile operatives
786 Sanitation man, sanitizer
670
Carding, lapping g combing operatives 787
Maintenance man, n.s. .
671 Knitters, loopers 5 toppers
672 Spinners, twisters $ winders
Farmers and Farm Managers
.-
673 Weavers
674 Textile operatives, n.e.c. (incl. 801 Farmers (owners and tenants)
miller)
802 Farm managers .
.
680 Welders 6 flame-cutters
681 Winding operatives, n.e.c.
' Farm Laborers and Farm Foremen
'
690 Machine operatives, miscellaneous
specified (incl. pottery worker)
. 821
Farm foremen
.-
692 Machine operatives, not specified
822 Farm laborers, wage workers (incl.
694 Miscellaneous operatives (incl.
farm hand, farm work)
miscellaneous handywork)
823 Farm laborers, unpaid family workers
695 Not specified operatives (incl.
824 ..Farm service laborers, self-employed
baker's assistant, paper miller, pie 825
Civilian Conservation Corp .
factory, auto factory, jewelry
factory, box assembler, aluminum
Service Workers, Exc. Private Household
window plant, factory worker, made
barricades)
Cleaning service workers
701 Boatmen canalmen
901 Chambermaids maids, except privi
703 Busdrivers
household
704 Conductors motormen, urban rail
902
Cleaners charwomen
.
transit
903 Janitors sextons (incl. custodi
705 Deliverymen 8 routemen
Food service workers
.
706 Fork lift 8 tow motor operatives
910 Bartenders
710 . Motormen; mine, factory, logging
911 Busboys . '
-
camp, etc.
912 Cooks, except private household (:|
711 Parking attendants .
cook, director, chef)
712 Railroadbrakemen
913 Dishwashers
713 Railroad switchmen
914 Food counter fountain workers
714 Taxicab drivers chauffeurs
915 Waiters (incl. barmaid)
715 Truck drivers
916 Food service workers, n.e.c., exc
private household
.
Laborers, Except Farm
917 Restaurants, n.s.
918 Hostess
740 Animal caretakers, exc. farm
Health service workers
750 Carpenters' helpers
921 Dental assistants
751 Construction laborers, exc. carpenteri 922
Health aides, exc. nursing (incl
helpers
asst., nuclear research lab work
752 Fishermen 8 oystermen
923 Health trainees
(
753 Freight g. material handlers (incl.
924
Lay midwives
fumiturs mover)
925 Nursing aides, orderlies attend
754 Garbage collectors
. 926 Practical nurses
755 Gardeners 8 groundskeepers, exc. farm 927
Health spa worker
760 Longshoremen stevedores
761 Lumbermen, raftsmen 5 woodchoppers
(incl. lumber)
B-ll
Craftsmen and Kindred Workers - cont'd.
Craftsmen and Kindred Workers - cont'd
454 455 456 461 462
470 471 472 473 474 475 480 481
482
483 484 485 486 491 492 495 501 502 503 504 505 506 510
511 512 514 515 516 520 521 522 523 525 530 531 533 534 535 536 540 542 543 545 546
Job die setters, metal
Locomotive engineers
.
Locomotive firement
Machinists
Machinist apprentices
Mechanics 5 repairmen
Air conditioning, heating 8 refrig.
Aircraft
Automobile body repairmen
Automobile mechanics
Automobile mechanic apprentices
Data processing machine repairmen
550
551 552 554 560 561 562 571 572 575 580
Structural metal craftsmen (incl. ire
worker)
Tailors
Telephone installers 8 repairmen
Telephone linemen 8 splicers .
Tile setters .
.
Tool 8 die makers
Upholsterers
Specified craft apprentices, n.e.c.
Not specified apprentices
Craftsmen 8 kindred workers, n.e.c.
Former members of the Armed Forces
Farm implement ' Heavy equipment mechanics (incl.
Operatives, Except Transport
>
diesel, factory mech, meter)
Household appliance 8 accessory
installers mechanics (incl. re
. pairmen)
Loom fixers
Office-machine
.
Radio and television
Railroad car shop
. Mechanic, exc. auto, apprentices
Miscellaneous mechanics repairmen
Not specified mechanics 8 repairmen
601 602 603 604 605 610 . 611 612 613
Millers; grain, flour 8 feed
Millwrights
614
Molders, metal .
615
Molder apprentices
.
620
Motion picture projectionists
621
Opticians, 8 lens grinders 8 polishers 622
Painters, construction 8 maintenence 623
(incl. contract) . 624
Painter apprentices
625
Paperhangers Pattern 8 model makers, exc. paper Photoengravers 8 lithographers Piano 8 organ tuners 8 repairmen Plasterers Plasterer apprentices Plumbers 8 pipe fitters Plumber 8 pipe fitter apprentices Power station operators Pressmen 8 plate printers, printing Pressmen apprentices Rollers 8 finishers, metal Roofers 8 slaters
626 . 630
631 .
633 634 635 636 640 641 642 643
Sheetmetal workers 8 tinsmiths Sheetnetal apprentices Shipfitters .
644 645
Shoe repairmen Sign painters 8 letterers Stationary engineers Stone cutters 8 stone carvers
650 651 652 653
Asbestos 8 insulation workers
Assemblers
Blasters 8 powdermen
Bottling 8 canning operatives
Chainmen, rodmen, 8 axmen; surveyini
' Checkers, examiners 8. inspectors;
manufacturers
.
Clothing ironers 8 pressers
'
Cutting operatives, n.e.c.
Dressmakers 8 seamstresses, except
factory
..
Drillers, earth
Dry wall installers 8 lathers
Dyers
Filers, polishers, sanders 8 bugger:
Fumacemen, -smeltermen 8 pourers
Garageworkers 8 gas station attenda-
.Graders 8 sorters, manufacturing
Produce graders 8 packers, except
factory 8 farm
Heaters, metal
-
Laundry -8 dry cleaning operatives,n.
Meat cutters 8 butchers, exc. manuf-
turing ' :
Meat cutters 8 butchers, manufactur
Meat wrappers, retail trade
Metal platers
Milliners
Mine operatives, n.e.c.
Mixing operatives
Oilers 8 greasers, exc. auto
Packers 8 wrappers, except meat 8
produce
Painters, manufactured articles
Photographic process workers
Precision machine operators .
Drill press operatives
Grinding maching operatives
Lathe 8 milling machine operative
Precision machine operatives,n.e.
B-10
Service Workers, Exc. Private Household, cont'd
Personal service workers
931 932 933 934 935 940 941 942
943 944 945 950 952 953 954
960
961 962 963 964
965 966 980
981 982 983 984
Airline stewardesses Attendants, recreation amusement Attendants, personal service, n.e.c. Baggage porters 5 bellhops Barbers Boarding $ lodging house keepers Bootblacks Child care workers, exc. private household (incl. n.s., juvenile detention) Elevator operators Hairdressers $ cosmetologists .Personal service apprentices Housekeepers, exc. private household School monitors Ushers, recreation 5 amusement Welfare service aides Protective service workers Crossing guards bridge tenders
Firemen, fire protection Guards 5 watchmen Marshals constables Policemen 5 detectives (incl. rail
road traffic officer) Sheriffs bailiffs Military Child care workers, private household (incl. baby sitter) Cooks, private household Housekeepers, private household Laundresses, private household Maids 6 servants, private household
996 Occupation not specific enough to code 998 DX
$40 - R.eTuc.cE>
Z(oO - U.NJSMfLC/cD 0 - l-toaeMAu^A- >
1-
, HfSS/AH- } AJCT d&Ofl-T^T^
B-12
Occupational Asbestos Exposure Codes
Category
Definite asbestos exposure - decedent employed by asbestos company
Probable exposure - including building, house construction, plasterer, automobile mechanic, cement worker
Possible exposure - including steel or metal worker railroad workers, house painter, longshoreman, PG & E laborer
Probably No exposure - including Farmer, Rancher, lumber worker, office or clerical, food service, health services.
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties City Codes
I High Asbestos Areas: less than 5 miles from deposits
Calaveras County
Tuolumne County
11 - San Andreas 12 - Altaville 13 - Angels Camp, Carson Hill 14 - Melones 15 - Valley Springs, Double Springs 16 - Copperopolis, Salt Spring Valley 17 - Burson 18 - Calaveritas 19 - Campo Seco
20 - Sonora 21 - Chinese Camp 22 - Jamestown 23 - Grovel and 24 - Jacksonville 25 - Tuttletown 26 - Big Oak Flat, Moccasin
II Medium Asbestos Areas: 6 to 10 miles from deposits
Calaveras County
Tuolumne County
31 - Milton 32 - Jenny Lind 33 - Telegraph City 35 - Mokelumne Hill 36 - Mountain Ranch 37 - Murphys 38 - Douglas Flat 39 - Vallecito
40 - Columbia
Ill Low Asbestos Area: More than 10 miles from deposits
Calaveras County
Tuolumne County
51 - West Point 52 - Railroad Flat 53 - Arnold, WhitePines 54 - Camp Connell 55 - Avery, HathawayPines 56 - Sheep Ranch 57 - Glencoe 58 - Wilseyville
60 Twain Harte 61 Tuolumne, Bodenhamer 62 Strawberry 63 Long Barn, Sierra Village 64 Soulsbyvilie 65 Standard 66 Mi-Wuk Village, Sugar Pine
B-15
01 - A1 ameda 02 - Alpine 03 - Amador 04 - Butte 05 - Calaveras 06 - Colusa 07 - Contra Costa 08 - Del Norte 09 - El Dorado 10 - Fresno 11 - 61 enn 12 - Humboldt 13 - Imperial 14 - Inyo 15 - Kern 16 - Kings 17 - Lake 18 - Lassen 19 - Los Angeles 20 - Madera 21 - Marin 22 - Mariposa 23 - Mendocino 24 - Merced 25 - Modoc 26 - Mono 27 - Monterey 28 - Napa 29 - Nevada 30 - Orange 31 - Placer 32 - Plumas 33 - Riverside 34 - Sacramento 35 - San Benito 36 _ San Bernardino
CALIFORNIA COUNTY CODES
37 - San Diego 38 - San Francisco 39 - San Joaquin 40 - San Luis Obispo 41 - San Mateo 42 - Santa Barbara 43 - Santa Clara 44 - Santa Cruz 45 - Shasta 46 - Sierra 47 - Siskiyou 48 - Solano 49 - Sonoma 50 - Stanislaus 51 - Sutter 52 - Tehama 53 - Trinity 54 - Tulare 55 - Tuolumne 56 - Ventura 57 - Yolo 58 - Yuba 98 - Out of State, Out of Country
B-16
Appendix C SMR Data Base for Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
C-l
Male Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of the Digestive Organs and Peritoneum (ICD 150-159), by Year and Age at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
YEAR
LT 1C 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45--4 9 50-54 55-59 60-64 65--69 70-74 75-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
1969
1970
1971
1Q72
1973
1974
19 75
__ T
' o---------------o--------- --------- o.... - ------------o -....------------o---------- ....0" ------ ------ Q
I0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I0 10
0 0 ......"
0 0"
0 0
0 0
0 0
"
-
0 - -Q -
10 0 0 0 0 0
1
I0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I0 I' 0
0 o
10 o- 0
0
3
... - o0
0 0
10 0 1 0 2 i 0
I1 1 0 0 1 2 1
I1 11
00 21
42 5 ........... 2 -----
2 0.
....
-
o2
I3 2 4 i 2 2 1
I3 2 2 i 0 1 0
(1 1 3 i 0 2 2
I1
1
1
0 *"
0 -
1
1
l 11
9 13 12 13 11
8
1976
-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
3
0 4 3 2 0 4 ... 0
17
1977
--0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 2.
11
1978
-U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
3
6 4 2 2 "0
20
Male Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of Respiratory System (ICD 160-163), by Year and Age at Death,
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65--69 70-74 75-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
I I
I I 1
I I 1
I 1
1
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 2 4 2 1
16
1970
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 0
13
1971
0 0 0 . 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 3 i 2 1 0
'13, ,
1972
1973
1974
1975
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l l 0 2 1 0 1 1.....
7 _____
0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
3
1 0 0 . ... .
14
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
11
25
22
54
3 ' ........ ` " 4
04
40
22
4 1~
21 25
1976 ' ,r)
1977
1978
00
00
00
o0
0 .0
00
10
00
00
12
3
: 3
42
36
51
12
20
2......
3
rv. .
0 0
o o
0 0 0 0
:1 - '1
1
1 2 3 2 1 0
22 19 12
Male Deaths from Hypertensive Heart and Renal Disease (ICD 402, 404), by Year and Age at Death,
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
AGE
01 .V
1969
YEAR 1970
LT 10 I 1 0-- I 4 I 15-19 I 2 0-2* I
25-29 I
30-3* I 35-39 1 40-4* I
45--4 9 " I 50-54 I
55-59 I 60-64 I 65--69 I 70-74 1 75-79 I 80-84 I
GE 85 "I
.......
TOTAL
I
O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 o 0
O
0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 ........0
1
1971
1972
1973 i.
" 0 0 0
00 0
000
000
oo 0
000
000
00 0
o0 o
000
00 0
00 0
00o
00 1
000
0 ..............0 -
-----------
0 0
---------------
00 ....
01 0
1
1974
1975
0 ~o
00
00
0 -0 -
0 0
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
...... 2... ' ...........1
'2
1
1976
1977
1978
0 U ..... 0
00 0
00 0
000
0u 0
00 0
000
000
"
0 ... ---------------o~
000
000
00 0
0~ 0
0
00 0
000
0 -o
-
0 0
--,------- 00-
000
Male Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of the Genital Organs (ICD 180-187), by Year and Age
at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20--? 4 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
1969
.
I0 I0 10 I0 I0 I0 I0 I0 I' 0 I0 10
I0
I0 10 I1 I0 Ii
I2
YEAR
1970
i.
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1
0 0 1
3
1971
1972
........... 0
0
00
00
00
00
01
00
00
o ' '"0"
10
00
00
0 ... "
1
10
10
21
" 1...... 0
6 .3
1973
: ..
1974
. ..
1975
VC
1976
.,
1977
>.
0
0
..... o............
0
0000
000 0
000 0
0U0 0
0000
000 0
0000
0
0
o ----
0
000 0
000 0
0
4
0
0....
- 01 -
0 1
020 1
3l30
"
1.
l..........'
3
0 -----.....
1
2
..... . ----------00 ---
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
2
1 2
1
2
0
9 ____ ____ 6 7 2 8
1978
.'
tr
0 0 0 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0
2
4 1 0
.2
2
11
Male Deaths from All Causes, by Year and Age at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
"AGE ?l cr> , ___J
--
YEAR
1969 .<% '
1970 r
TM"
" ' LT " TO"" 10- 14 I 15- 19 1 20- 24 I 25- 29 I 30- 34 1
6_ .............
0 4
3 0 l
3 0 3 5
4 3
35- 39 40- 44 45- 49 50- 54 55- 59 60- 64
65- 69 70- 74 75- 79
80- 84
GO 85
I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1
2 6 4 9
22 23 28 43 42 22 22
0 1 4
11 16 16 34
29 29 22
28
TOTAL
I
237
206
1971
1972 0
1973
-------8 - - --------3--------
01
35
5 1
_
5t -- '
23
53
54
12 .......... 8
9 10
. 13
22
25 27
38 33
31 . 42
26 32.
32 26
26 "
22 `
6
1 1 7 3
3 .2
3 lb 10 12 29
42 39 21 24
26
241
247
245
1974
1975
1.... ------
1 2 5
2
0 2 7 '7
10 16 27
28 ,
25
30 37 24
7-
0 1 5 4 4 4
2
a
12 15 24
45
40 23 22 20
224
236
1976
Z 1 4 a 7 4 3 1 8 16 16 37 42 46 31 25 16
267
1977
1978
4 ------------8 22
27 64
42
27 71 63 56 7 13 l 7 12 26 34 33 45 36 40
30 30 28 34 -- 38 " ----------29
253
274
Female Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of the Digestive Organs and Peritoneum (ICD 150-159), by Year and Age at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
dooodoood
AGE
9! i
.. ..J
1969
i YEAR 1970
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 3 0--3* 35-39 40-44 45 -- 49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65--69 70-74 7 5-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I. I
I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 3 2 l' 3
13
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 1
8
1971
1972
-o
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "'O' 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 -0
6,
O' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2
5
1973
*0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 1 1 2 4 1
02.......
11
1974
1975
1976
.... o------- -- ..... O'
00
00
00
.... o
0
00
00
00
o0
10
02
02
14
25
14
10
"1 .......
0
7 17
-a
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------- 0 1 2 3 r 1 1 l "2
12
1977
TT 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0
2
0 1 a 1 o
2 r
7
1978
1 0 1 1 0 1
3
T
8
Female Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms, of Respiratory System (ICD 160-163), by Year and Age at Death,
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
AGE
01
CO
1969
YEAR______________________________________________________________ s_________ __
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
LT 10 I
0------------------- O'-----------------0---------------------- 0------------------0--------------------0-------------------- 0------------------0---------------------- 0-------------------0~
10-141
0
01
00
0 O0
00
15-191
0
00
00
0 00
00
20-24 10
00
00
0 00
00
25-29 I-----------------0--------------------0-----------------0--------------`--0--------------------0---------------------0------------------- 0------------------0--------------------- O-------------------0"
30-34 10
00
00
0 00
00
35-39 100000000 0 0
40-44 1000000
1
0
1
0
45-49 I-----------------0--------------------0-----------------0
0------------------0--------------------1--------------------1------------------O--------------------1-------------------0"
50-54 10001 0000 0 1
55-59 10
21
l0
0 20
22
60-64 10
00
02
0 00
15
65-69 I----------------0--------------------0----------------- 1---------------------0------------------3------------------0--------------------0------------------0----------------------1-------------------1
70-74 II
0
0
0
10
2
2
l
1
75-79 10001012002
80-84 10
0 0.
O0
0 11
01
GE 85 "I-------------- 0
0-----------------0---------------------- 0------------------0------------- 0
0 " --------------1--------------------- 0--------------------0
TOTAL
1_______ 1
2
3______3___________ 6
2 ________ 9
4 ________7_________ _13
Female Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of the Breast (ICD 174), by Year and Age
at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
_YE A R 1970
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20-24
25-29 30-34
35-39 40-44
45-49 50-54
55-59 60-64
65-69 70-74 75-79 00-84
GE 85
I I I I I~
I I
I
1 I 1
I
I I I 1
1
TOTAL
I
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
3
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1
4
1971
1972
- -0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 3 "" 0 1 0 0
1
----------------0
0 0
(0j
. ............
0 1 0 0 0 l 0 9 1 0
1 0
.6 4
1973
1974
1975
1976
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1
6'
0 ........... 0 00 00 00 0 ............ 0 00 0 .0 00
1 11
1 1 1
02 00 10 01
68
.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 1 1 0 0 0 0
3
1977
1978
00
00
0 v. 0 00
O' "
0
00
00
00
1l
13
. 2 .
1
00
' 1'
1
32
00
00
11
99
Female Deaths from Malignant Neoplasms of the Genital Organs (ICD 180-187),
by Year and Age at Death, ' Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
YEAR_________________________________________________________________________________
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
LT 10 I
0
0
0-------------------- 0------------------0---------
0..........
0----
0---------------------- 0------------------0"
10-141
0
00
00
0 0 0 00
15-191
0
00
0O
O 0 0 00
20-24 100000000 0 0
25-29 I------------0------------------ 0------------------ 0--------------------- 0------------------0--------------------0 '............... 0---------------------0-------------------- O------------------- XS~
30-34 10
00
00
0 0 0 00
35-39 10
00
00
0 0 0 00
40-44 10001
01
00
1
0
45-4 9 I-------------0------------------ 0------------------ 1 ------------------ 0------------------- 0........
0
0---------------------0-------------------- O--------------------1~
50-54 11000 1 1200 1
55-59
I
I
1
0
00
10 2 00
60-64 10222021 0 0 0
65-69 I------:--1--------------------- 1-------------------0----------------------1------------------0--------------------- O------------------0--------------------2---------------------1-------------------2"
70-74 10
l
10 0 0 0 0
10
75-79 11
022
000
0
0
0
80-84 II
1
10000
1
1O
GE 85 1---------- 0------------------ 0------------------ 0---------------- 0-------------------0--------
1..........
0
0--------------------- O------------------- 0~
TOTAL
I
5
6
7____ ___ 6_______ _1_^
_____6___
3
5
4
4
Female Deaths from Hypertensive Heart and Renal Disease (ICD 402, 404), by Year and Age at Death,
Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
LT 10 I 10-14 I 15-19 I 20-24 1 25-29 ' 1 30-34 I 35-39 I 40-44 I
4 5--4 9 I 50-54 I 55-59 I 6 0-64 1 65-69 I 70-74 I
75-79 l 80-04 I
GE 85 " I
TOTAL
I
0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 i~
3
YEAR 1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
o ...
0 ........... O' ........... ... 0 ............... 0 .............. 0 ....
o
000 000 0
000 0000
000 0000
0
o
0
0"
0
0
0~
0000000
000 000 0
000
000
1
0
0
0
0 ..........0...
0
0
01 00000
01 0 0000
0 0
0 o
0 0
0 0
. ...
... 00
- .'
0 0
"
0 0
000 0 1 00
00 0 000 0
010 0 ..................O' ----------------0 -
0 t
-' --------------l0
.0 0 .............. 0......................0
030 1 20 1
197.7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- o
0
1978
0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
0
Female Deaths from All Causes, by Year and Age at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
AGE
o -- PO
/
1969
LT 10 10-1A 15-19 2 0 -- 2* 25-29 30-34 35-39 A 0 -- 44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 60-84 GE 85
TOTAL
I ............4 13 I1 I1 I0 I0 I0 I0 I3 I5 I 11 I 10 I 18 1 18 1 22 I 24 1 35
1 155
YEAR
1970
?
0 2 1 0 0 2 1 6 5 11 13 18 19 19 28 34
166
......... .
1971
"..........5 1 0 1 3 0 1 6 5
10 12 15 10 20 22 21 35
167
............. . . ,, . ___ ________ ... ............. ..... . ...... .. _
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
o...... .......... 6
...... 5....... ...........2 ' ........ 3"'
2
001 000
201 21 4
51 02 1 2
~2
'
3
0
0
o
1
001
020
22 1 1 1 4
4 4'
1 6 ''
3 4
465 5 -----------------5 " .......... . " 6 -
6 e 89 9 5
8 7 12 1 1 10 1 0
14 17 15 18 16
9
9
18
19 ,
23 ....... 20
14
10 23 21 25 15 21
20 .
21
24
23
20- 20
11 25 27 36 ~ ...... '38....... ........33-
26 22 29 41 ---------- ` 31 ............ 37
133
176
175
192
162
169
186
Female Deaths from All Causes, by Year and Age at Death, Calaveras and Tuolumne Counties
1969
LT 10 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 GE 85
TOTAL
1
1
I I I
1
1
I
1
I
1
I I
1
i I I
1
~1
...... ' 4' 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 5
11 10 18 18 22 24 35
155
YEAR
1970
..... 7 0 2 1 0 0 2 1 6 5
11 13 18 19 19 28 34
166
1971
1972
1973
""...........5" ........ 1 0 1 3
0 1 6
5 10 12
15 10 ' ' 20 22 21 35 " '
o........
0 2 5 2 0 2 4 4 6 8
194'". `
10 20 . 11 36
167
133
6 0 0 1 3 0 2 1 6 8 7 17 18
23 21 25 " 38
176
1974
19 75
1976
1977
5' .............. 2
10
12
02
00
10
11
3 4
45
89
12 1 1
. 15
18
..... ... 19 /
23
21 25
24 23
27 26
33 -- - 41
'
175
192
...... 3
2
00
14
12
01
20
14
65
-------5 ....... ---------- 6 "
95
10 10
16 9
....... 20
14
15 21
20- 20
22 29
......." 31 ' " ...... 37
162
169