Document KGdwJqxeo1E5bRJNXVOGo0EzN
AIR M All
P.0, DOXJ037 PHONE CM/2h7 506 V/AINUT S7.
. Nfidimi. l!'/.\ 53701
Mr. Sam Rotrosen Montrose Chemical Co. 100 Disler Avenue Newark, New Jersey 07105
Dear Mr, Rolroscn:
'
Unclosed is a proposes 1 for an industry study of the Rake Michigan liasin to help to determine the magnitude and causes of contamination with chlorinated pesticides. We believe that the work proposed will add significantly to the information being obtained by Slate.and Federal, agencies.
We shall look forward to your early decision. If approved, we would intend to begin sampling on June 16,
If desirable, we would be glad to meet with the industry group, at your convenience, to discu deta ils
V `'
jjb/p Knc,
Jolin J. Rirdsall Vice President
cc: Mr. IX J. Keating, Stauffer Chemical Co. Mr. Rcrnard Dorant, Velsicol Chemical Co. Dr. M.J. Sloan, Shell Chemical Co.
DSW 162173
Wisconsin A,-'mni Research. Foundation Madison, Wisconsin
V
4
Proposal for an Industry Study of the Lake Michigan Basin
/
for.M t
DSW 162174 STLCOPCB4040778
Wisconsin jnrmi Research Founc'nJion
mcidison, Wisconsin
13 a c kg round
.
A great amount of information has been obtained concerning
*
'
the studies in progress or to be conducted by several State and
Federal agencies in the immediate future. These studies are
'
briefly outlined below.
-
, fJSDA: -- 731 soil samples are now being cbllected from the
1/ake Michigan Drainage Area. These samples are randomly selected
according to a statistical grid system. 117 will be taken in N or them
Michigan, 323 in Southern Michigan, 42 in Indiana, 1 3 in Illinois and
236 in Wisconsin. The samples will be analyzed at the USDA Gulfport
laboratory.
'
In addition, teams of USDA and state personnel are now surveying
pesticide formulation and other industrial plants throughout the Lake
Michigan Drainage Area. -The teams are using formal questionnaires
to determine pesticide types, manufacturing practices and times, waste
disposal procedures, etc. The questionnaires will be collected at the
USDA offices in Minneapolis where the information will be digested.
Some follow-up sampling of waste water from perhaps 60 plants is
anticipated.
_ It.is not known when analytical results' from either program will
be available but WARF Institute will be kept informed through Dr.
Paul Sand.
DSW 162175 STLCOPCB4040779
'
*
.
Wisconsin /`''mini Research Foundation
'
Madison, Wisconsin
, Lake Michigan Interstate Pesticides Committee
. This group is composed of representatives of the four states,
the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration and the Bureau
of Commercial Fisheries u/ith assistance from tlSDA and other ` .
agencies. The chairman of the committee is Dr. Donald Mount,
FWPCA, Duluth, This committee recommended a monitoring pro-
1*
.
.
gram in November, 1968 and this program is now being implemented,
. a) Water Sampling of Major Tributaries: Nine major tribu- . taries will be sampled continuously for three days, once each month.
The sites arc the following rivers: Wisconsin, Fox, Menominee, Mil--
waukee (?,); Michigan, Grand, Kalamazoo, Manistee, Muskegon, St.
Joseph; Indiana, Grand Calumet. These samplings are not under
way as yet but will be in a few weeks. These water analyses will be conducted by the State of Wisconsin and by the State of Michigan,
' The Grand Calumet will be sampled by Indiana but probably analyzed
by Michigan. This sampling will probably be done only through October.
, b) Lake Water Sampling: The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries will sample two open water sites (Northern Basin and Southern Basin)
with three samples of surface water taken three times each.year. ' The water intake of the Chicago Central District Filtration Plant
will be sampled weekly. The city of Chicago will analyze these samples
as well as those open water samples obtained by the BCF. Chicago
. is presently unable to take and analyze samples so the FWPCA, Lake
Michigan Basin Office is temporarily assuming this task.
I'
.
FOBM
f .__ DSW162176
STLCOPCB4040780
0 POrM t
Wisconsin
RoSOCll'ch Foundation
Mcidison, Wisconsin
c) fish sampling: The Bureau of Commercial Fisheries' Biological Lab at Ann Arbor will collect and analyze fish samples. At least four
species will be collected in April and October at four sampling stations:
Green Bay, Waukegan, Saugatuck and Charlevoir. 68 samples are.
planned at each interval. Males and females of alewivcs, yellow perch,
chubs and Coho salmon will be included.
* Other fish sampling is now being done by Federal and State (at
least Wisconsin) Sports Fisheries and Wildlife agencies. These groups
are taking samples of game fish such as smelt, Rainbow trout, German
brown trout, Whitefish and Lake Trout. The exact numbers of samples
and times of sampling are not known.
Additional fish sampling may be done by the State of Wisconsin
water pollution group in Green Bay this summer but on a very limited
basis. `
.
d) Biological sampling of tributaries: Living clams are being
placed in 68 streams, including seven of the 9 major tributaries which
arc being sampled for water. The clams will be removed and replen
ished at 3-4 week intervals at each site. Each sample is comprised of
3-4 clams. Samples of the clams have been pre-tested and found to be
very low in residue content.
The Wisconsin program is underway with the first samples to be
taken during the week of May 26-30. The other states have not yet
begun to our knowledge.
i DSW 162177
STLCOPCB4040781
Wisconsin /'ymni Research Foundation
Vititlison, Wisconsin
This program will continue as long as weather permits, probably
into October, if the clam supply holds out. Wisconsin and Michigan will
do the analyses.
.
The last committee meeting was on May 2. WARF Institute has
been invited to the next meeting in Chicago on June 24.
Prop6sal
'
To supplement the programs described above, it is recommended
that the following studies be considered:
1 Supplemental sediment, water, plsnktcn and fish sampling
and analyses.
It is proposed that, at each of the 68 biological (clam) monitoring
stations described above, six composite samples be taken in mid-June
and mid to late August. These samples would be a) bottom sediment
at the stream mouth, b) and c) plankton and water samples from
stream mouth to 1/2 mile directly out into Lake Michigan, d) and e)
plankton and water sampled 1-1/2 miles directly out into Lake Michigan
from the stream mouth and f) a 1 0 fish sample of fresh chubs from a
commercial fisherman working waters in the area, A maximum of
408 samples would be taken at each period.
These samples should relate nicely with the clam work and water
monitoring of major tributaries^
_
*
..
'
` . *
j
*
t
I
DSW162178
i
STLCOPCB4040782
rofr.i i
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Madison, Wisconsin
Other samples which could be taken would include water samples
at sites of non-stream waste outlets leading directly into the lake. These
can be spotted by boat and are not under investigation by other groups.
Water and/or plankton samples could also be taken along the shore at
sites of high population density (i. e., Milwaukee, Chicago) and at
sites of intensive agriculture (i.e., cherry, apple orchards). These
latter samples would not exceed 50-60 total.
All samples for the above would be taken by boat on two contin
uous trips around the lake. The sample collection should take about
2 weeks at a rate of 5 streams per day. Samples would be transported
to Madison by truck or station wagon every 2 days.
'
2. Investigative Sampling and Analysis
There are a number of possibilities for obtaining meaningful samples
which could help to confirm or deny possible sources of contamination.
These are listed below with an estimate of the number of samples which
might be taken:
a) Effluent from dry-cleaningestablishments
b) Overflow of sewer mains
60 40
. c) Formulators and other industrial plants
100
d) Water releases from lagoons and holdingponds . 50
. e) Municipal and other dumps
75
. f) Other samples suggested by
*
USDA Information
75
' Results of clam monitoring +
program 1
75
4754
DSW 162179
STLCOPCB4040783
Wisconsin /'Hmini Research Foundation ** Mcidiscn, Wisconsin
Considerable latitude is necessary to implement this investigation
program. The USDA lists of inclustrial plants will be carefully studied
and the USDA survey results evaluated thoroughly. Samples would be
obtained through contact with municipal officials to find water main
locations and assistance in sampling. If, for instance, we wish to
sample the water from Spic and Span Cleaners & Launderers in Mil
waukee, we would contact the municipal Sewer Construction and Mainten
ance official who would aid us in sampling from an appropriate manhole
near the laundry.
The Dake Michigan Interstate Pesticides Committee wouLd be asked
to participate in sample collection by reporting to us, through their
`
fieldmen, instances which suggest rapid sampling. The fieldmen would
be asked to phone us collect to report any overflows, excessive run-off
or other unusual occurrences. We would then decide if a sample should
be taken or nol. If yes, we would instruct the fieldman how to sample
and send.
This effort would be concentrated on areas where clam testing
and our own results would indicate excessive levels of input.
i
DSW 162180 STLCOPCB4040784
- 7 -
'
Wisconsin t >mni fiesocncll FounCiCiiion >. /L'.nclisc.n, Wisconsin
Costs
"
A. Lake study
1. Sample collection
z. Sample analyses
3* Plus PCB's on 20% o samples
Investiga tion study 1. Sample collection 2. Sample analyses
3. Plus PCB's on 20% of samples
$17, 000 29, 000
$46, 000 5, 000
$51,000
$10, 000 16, 000
$26, 000 3, 000
$29. 000
DSW 162181 STLCOPCB4040785
Arrt a 7 'v /.
25
Tributary Streams Reco'r.x.cnced for Biological Monitoring
Tributary Michigan
Location
Gallon River
LaPort Road, Rev? Buffalo, Michigan
Dr a in
SavTyer, Michigan
'
St, Joseph River*
U.S. 31 Bridge,.St. Joseph, Michigan
Pav7 Pat7 River Black River.
*. Above St. Joseph, Michigan \,
' ' U.S, 31 Bridge, South Haven, Michigan
Kaianazoo River*
U.S. 31 Bridge, Saugatuck, Michigan
Black River
' Ottawa Beach, Michigan
Pigeon River
- ` Lake Shore Ave., Port Sheldon, Mich.
Grand River*
Corps.of Engineers, Grand Haven, Mich
Muskegon River*
Coast Guard, Muskegon, Michigan '
Unite River Pentvs ter River
S. Channel wall, Whitehall, Michigan Coast Guard, Pentwater, Michigan
Pare Marouette River
Channel ares, Lucington, Michigan
Manistee River*
Maple St. Bridge, Manistee, Michigan
Betsie River Platte River
. Coast Guard, Rrankfort, Michigan . M-22, Benzie State Park, Michigan
* Water ncr.itoring station for oestici ce analysts,
DSW 162182
STLCOPCB4040786
^ic A cor*w.^i
(Michigan)
Crystal River
.
Leelanau Laxe outl&t
Boarcr.an River
Elk River
i.
Lake Charlevoix outlet
Bear River . '
Millecocuins Creek
Manistique River r
' Sturgeon River
Whiterish River
Escanaba River '
Ford River
Mer.cnir.ee River*
26
Bay Lane, Glen Arbor, Michigan
Leiand, Michigan
Traverse City, Michigan
Elk Rapids, Michigan
Charlevoix, Michigan
Petoskey, Michigan
Raubinvay, Michigan
'
'Manistique, Michigan
Kanina, Michigan
U.S. Bridge, Rapid River, Michigan
Wells, Michigan
M-35 Bridge, Ford River, Michigan ,
Breakwater, Menor.ir.ee, Michigan .
Indiana Grand Calumet River* Burns Ditch
Trail Creek
East Chicago, Indiana
Midwest Steel Catwalk, Burn Harbor, Indiana
Franklin St. Bridge, Michigan City, India:
* Water monitoring station for pesticide analysis.
DSW 162183
_J
STLCOPCB4040787
V.u scon am
.
Peshtigo Eiver
Cconto River
'
Penscukce River
Little Suarnico Rivet
Best River*
Suanico River
Mink River
Unnar.ec' Streams (7)
Annsn* ee River
Ivewaureo Rj-Ver
East Twin River
'west Twin River
'Manitowoc River
Silver Creek
Calvin Creek
Pir.e Creek
iOjL*C CC*v
V< uV p-'
* -54C
vC.N-
Centerville Creek
Sever. Mile Creek
Pigeon River
Marinette County Oconto County Oconto County Oconto County Brora County Brora County Door County Door County Kewaunee County Kewaunee County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Manitowoc County Sheboygan County Sheboygan County
27
DSW 162184 STLCOPCB4040788
Table 4 cont'd. (YMsccnsin) Sheboygan River . ul ac Cree.c Sauk Creek Meror.onie River Kinnickinnic River Oak Creak Root Creek Pike River Barnes Creek
Sheboygan County Sheboygan County Ozaukee Cc-ur.ty ` Milwaukee County Milwaukee. County Milwaukee County Racine County ` Kenosha County Kenosha County
23
DSW 162185 STLCOPCB4040789
GREAT LAKES DRAINAG1
Lckt Michigan brainoQt
. DSW162186
STLCOPCB4040790
STLCOPCB4040791
f
i
I
I 4 i i
i DSW 162188
STLCOPCB4040792
STLCOPCB4040793
WARF Institute, Jnc.
P.O. BOX 2037 PHONE 608/257-4Bit 606 WALNUT ST.
Madison. \Vis. 53701
SEP * *a69
1
September 3, 1969
Mr. J. O. King Manager, Agricultural Chemicals Sales Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company 300 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115
Dear Mr. King:
We certainly appreciate your company's support of the
study we are conducting of the Lake Michigan Basin. A
progress report is in preparation and will be forwarded to all supporting firms sometime next week.
Please note the attached announcement of the next
Interstate Committee meeting at which we intend to present
some of the findings to date. Also enclosed is a copy of a
press release which was issued on August 5th and did not,
to our knowledge, receive very much attention. We will,
however, keep plugging as the situation permits or
demands.
`"
Very truly yours,
JJB:vk Cc. to:
Dr. M. J. Sloan
Mr. S. Rotrosen Mr. B. H. Lorant Dr. E. P. Wheeler
John J. Birdsall Vice-President
DSW162190
j ; ! l I ! i
I i
j
I
!
, i
STLCOPCB4040794