Document JrZ3Eq0y2Bn58bVx7eNDq3vr2

Colver Colver Green Energy [41 lnterpower Drive Colver. l'A 15927 I'el: (814) 748-7961 March 28, 2025 President Donald J. Trump The White I louse Office of the President 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, '`l. W, Washington, DC 20500 RE: Presidential Exemption: National Emission Standards for I lazardous Air Pollutants: Coaland Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review" (89 FR 38508; May 7, 2024) (MATS Rule): Colver Green Energy Generation Dear President Trump: In accordance with the terms of your Executive Orders and to Power the Great American Comeback, Colver Green Energy (Colver) here by requests a Presidential exemption for the Colver generating station with respect to compliance with the MATS Rule for a period of two years because the technology to implement the standard is not available and it is in the national security interests of the United States to do so, Emissions standards or limitations subject to the request This request is for exemption from compliance with the "National Emission Standards L'or Hazardous Air Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units Review of the Residual Risk and Technology Review" Length of compliance period being requested Two years. Colver notes that the two-years will cover sources beyond the original compliance date of July 2027, allowing an extension to July 2029 and that the statute allows for potential renewal. Justification to support the request As shown below the Colver facility is a Low Emitting EGI; (LEE) affected MATS facility. Mercury testing occurs annually, and particulate testing is conducted every three years in accordance with the Title V Operating Permit. Sierra Club FOIA 2025-EPA-04883 ED_018388_00000272-00001 SC_EVERSPLIT0012729 The plant continues to meet LEE criteria and are in compliance with not only the current PM emission limit of 0.030 lhs/mmhtu and would also be in compliance with "new" compliance limit of 0.010 lbs/mmbtu. F'ACILI'TY FADE!' PM ',WI'. Culver(been Energy 0.10 Ihs/inmhtu EPA MATS PM 0.030 lbsicurnbtu PA MATS LIMIT PROP()SIM 0.010 Ibs/nunbtu RECENT CESTI;.1) PM EMISSION VALUE (1.000313 lbs/minhtu Under the MATS Rule, there is a requirement to install PM CEMS. Colvcr submits that the technology to implement such standard is not available, installing relevant upgrades that arc needed to comply by the Rule's Compliance Deadline is not feasible, converting to Gas-fired Boilers is not feasible by the rule's compliance deadline, and that there arc various issues with PM CEMS that demonstrate a lack of technical availability by of means of demonstrating compliance with the rule. Colver believes that EPA significantly underestimated costs associated with a PM CEMS. Installation of a PM CEMS at a single unit, including site preparation and engineering activities, analyzer equipment and installation cost, and initial PS-1 1 correlation testing is estimated to range from $180,000 to over $400,000 (depending on vendor and brand). I Towever, Colver estimates that the installation of I'M GEMS at all three plants could exceed $350,000$550,000.00 and would include analyzers, engineering stack studies/port installation, upgraded umbilical collection lines, revise DAHS programming, daily calibrations, semi-annual RATA certifications, and annual maintenance. Another factor is that the CEMS parts need to be replaced over time. Manufacturers have stopped making CEMS replacement parts, making it necessary to replace an entire PM CEMS system more often. In addition, EPA did not account in its MATS Rule for the fact that PM CEMS needed to he replaced every 10 years or the cost of the replacement ($180,000 to over $400,000). Colver notes that ongoing PM CEMS correlation testing with injection of media in the effluent to artificially raise emission levels costs at least $250,000 per test evolution at one source, and testing is required by MATS once every three years. For some EGUs, annual costs associated with PM CEMS are estimated to range from $92,900 to over $154,600, whereas annual costs associated with stack testing are estimated to range from $24,000 to $32,000. During the comments period on the proposed MATS Rule, many commenters provided data showing that, by eliminating the LEE provisions which allow once per three-year emissions testing as an incentive to be a low emitter, EPA is forcing massive cost increases by the requirement of continuous emissions monitoring, record keeping, and reporting on the lowest emitting affected EGUs. Colvcr believes that PM CEMS cannot be used to demonstrate compliance with the new MATS Rule, The f-PIVI standards were lowered by 2/3rds. Starting in 2027, sources will be required to demonstrate compliance with a I'M CEMS on the more stringent IPM standards which are 0.010 lbs/MMBtu. Demonstrating compliance with emissions standards this low utilizing a PM CEMS is not a viable option. Some units have used PM CEMS for many years and have encountered Sierra Club FOIA 2025-EPA-04883 ED_Ol 8388_00000272-00002 SC_EVERSPLIT0012730 problems with operating their PM CEMS with regard to (i) meeting the Quality AssuranceQuality Control (QA-QC) criteria; and (ii) establishing the correlation curve. PM CEMS also fail to meet the QA/QC criteria. When a PM CEMS fails to meet the QA-QC criteria, the collected data are considered out-of-control and arc no longer considered valid. An owner/operator has no real time indication that its EClU might have failed the required QA-QC criteria until several weeks after the testing has been completed. This could result in hundreds of hours of monitor downtime being created retroactively after the QA-QC criteria failure has been identified and is required to be reported as a deviation under the MATS rule. Most states have minimum data availability requirements that could result in enforcement actions. At the more stringent 1PM standard of 0.010 lb/MMBtu, the likelihood of out-of-control periods increases. This downtime is not reflective of poor maintenance or operation but rather the difficulties associated with the quality assurance procedure at such low emission levels and is not accounted for in the EPA analysis. Finally, there currently is no calibration procedure available that can accurately verify continuous measurements of fPM at levels as low as 0.010 lb/MMBtu. Moreover, PM CEMS is not a direct measure of compliance with the applicable emission limitation; rather, emissions arc correlated and as such can be in error as much as -+-/- 25% when having to correlate to standards as low as 0.010 lbs/MMBtu. National security interests of the United States to provide the exemption Several of President Trump's Executive orders support the national security interest in granting this emption, including: ED 14156, Declaring a National Energy Emergency o "Our nation's current inadequate development of domestic energy resources... poses an imminent and growing threat to the United States' ... national security." o "The United States' in sufficient energy production, transportation, refining, and generation constitutes an ... extraordinary threat to our... national security." E014154, Unleashing American Energy o "ft is the policy of the United States... to protect the (Nation's) economic and national security... by ensuring that an abundant supply of reliable energy is readily accessible." o "I iigh energy costs... weaken uur national security." Executive Order 14213 - "Establishing the National Energy Dominance Council" Accordingly, Colver believes that a Presidential Exemption is in the national security interests of the United States. There is growing demand for electricity to support the grid. Many states need additional electricity supply due to data centers, artificial intelligence, and manufacturing. I'o Sierra Club FOIA 2025-EPA-04883 ED_Ol 8388_00000272-00003 SC_EVERSPLIT0012731 illustrate, the Department of I-:nergy recently released a new report indicating that domestic energy usage (and therefore demand) from data centers is expected to double, or even triple, by 2028. The power sector also continues to break daily peak load records due to extreme weather events and generation shifting. In sum, there is significant demand for electricity and a concomitant need to reinforce system reliability and capacity. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons Colvcr respectfully requests a two-year Presidential exemption from compliance with the MAIS Rule for Colvcr Green Energy. Mare CraWford,, Emtironniental/Manager Sierra Club FOIA 2025-EPA-04883 ED_Ol 8388_00000272-00004 SC_EVERSPLIT0012732