Document JowMDzxGRQa1aDRjB8pnEbx6
FILE NAME: Hampshire (HAMP)
DATE: 1993 Nov 23 DOC#: HAMP123
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Legal - Hampshire's Supplemental Responses to Requests for Admissions
llplAAftJuAjL ?
U m j f
is ra- /
119932 01
-
1929; 1935;
c. 1 9 3 6 - 1 9 4 0 ;
d.
e.
11 99 44 61 -- 11 995405 ;;
f. g-
119955 16 -- 1I 996505 ;;
h.
i.
1961 - 1965; 1966 - 1970;
jk .
1971 - 1975; 1976 - 1980;
1. 1 9 8 1 - 1 9 8 5 .
{
a / z y fo
ANSWER TO REQUEST NO, 44:
Admitted as to periods a through g. Denied as to periods h
through 1.
REQUEST NO. 45;
In the following time periods, John H. Hampshire owned stock in the United States Gypsum Company:
a. 1930-1935;
b. 1936-1940;
c. 1941-1945;
i
d. 1946-1950;
e. 1951-1955;
f . 1956-1960;
g - 1961-1965;
h. 1966-1970;
i. 1971-1975;
j- 1976-1980;
k. 1981-1985.
ANSWER TO REQUEST NO. 45:
Denied. Hampshire has no knowledge with respect to John
Hampshire's ownership of stock in United States Gypsum Company
LAW OFFICES rMOMAS L LIBOWITZ. P A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
FIFTH FLOOR OO N. CHARLES STREET IALTIMORE. MARYLAND
21201-^305
RE0UEST NO. 46:
Between 1921 and 1980 your company vehicles included:
a. Automobile ; b. Station Wagon; c. Van; d. Pick-Up Truck; e. Stake Body Truck;
103
$
ANSWER TO REQUEST NO. 46:
Admitted as to a through f. REQUEST NO. 47:
Between 1921 and 1980 your company name appeared on the following company vehicles:
a . Automob ile; b. Station Wagon; c. Van; d. Pick-Up Truck; e. Stake Body Truck; f. Tractor Trailer.
ANSWER TO REQUEST NO. 47:
Denied as to a through d. Admitted as to e and f.
REQUEST NO. 48:
At various times between 1930 and 1985, your company vehicles supplied, delivered and/or transported asbestos-containing products to the jobs listed in Part I, Request No. 3 above.
ANSWER TO REQUEST NO. 48?
Denied, except at various times Hampshire's vehicles
transported materials that may have contained asbestos to all
jobsites or jobsite types admitted in Request No. 3 to be worksites
where Hampshire may have used asbestos-containing materials in
construction of buildings, although Hampshire has no record of
working or transporting any materials to Maryland Shipbuilding and
Drydock or Allegany Ballistic Labs. Further, notwithstanding the
law o rric e s M AS 4 UBOWITZ. P A
ftOFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FIFTH FLOOR
0 N. CHARLES STREET ALTIMORE. MARYLAND
?<9 Q |-4 3 0 S
aforesaid, Hampshire objects to this request in the context of the claim of Mary Matilda Wilson (Case No. 92230504), as there is no record that Hampshire ever transported any such materials to a worksite where Charles Wilson was allegedly working, so that this
104