Document JNewxQk6qrweKbBJb1XvKeQ8a
Case: 14-72794, 07/18/2017, ID: 10511951, DktEntry: 65, Page 1 of 5
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITEFDOSRTTAHTEESNCINOTUHRCTIORFCUAIPTPEALS
NRIneorsroetuPhreAcstemsiecDridiecefaAe;ncNsteaiotCunorNuaneltcwilo, Irnkc.,
ADPeemsfeterinciscideae;CNAoacuttnuicorinla,NlIneRctew.s, ooPurerktictNieoosnretrhs,
v.
UA.gSe. nEcnyv,ironmental
Protection Respondent.
No. 14-72794 ORDER
FiledJuly 18, 2017 Before: Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, A. Wallace Tashima,
and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Attachments Prod 1
ED 002061E 00002042-00001
case: 14-72794, 07/18/2017, ID: 10511951, DktEntry: 65, Page 2 of 5
2 In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am. SUMMARY* Mandamus
filedTbhyePpeasnteicliddeenAiecdtitohneNmeotwtioonrkfNorofruthrtAhemr emriacnadaanmduNsarteulriaelf RtfShoteeoastdoeCsuotrEouclnneevscraiirDlno'csenefmaesdnemasnnetiadnClisPoctarruaonnttccieveiclle,tiaopwlnelhtAiirtceighogeninas,lctlrsyeaegt(ei"eokEdninPtghAoaft"to)at'rhsepedveeoUsnktinieacilitadeoldelf called chlorpyifos, was inadequate. ordeIrneda EpPuAblisthoedresoprodnedr oton tAheugCusotun1c0i,l'2s0a1d5m, itnhiestrpaatinveel pEdeePtnAiiteiodtnot.htIaenkeCa os"uufibnnscaeillq'ausceptnieottinpt"iuobbnlyioshnMeMdaraocrhrcdhe3r12,,9th,2e0210p17a7.n.eTl hdeireEcPteAd nwthehawetTtEhshaePefrAeCct'yohsulfodnirnecpdniyliiinaffilgolessw,dfaatohsnoeddinpmtaroedalseedeqrenautnnamctoeeasfnbimndeaaculmasudtusebseteemirrtmoetcviionoonakntteiaadois.nnseeadrtsinntoog pwTrhaeesvTippoharueensmeploaarnftduueerrlterhsh,eebarlnydhdietshlisdtausttihnsEuagPbtaAstht"aehfniaCtnidvaolecuornoemcsbippjleo'lscinetmsdieoawntnosidtttahohmetthuhpeseepmtEiatoPinotAeinol.''n"ss mdeanniadlatmedusbtyfisrtsattbuteem. ade through the administrative process
be*enThpirsepsaurmedmbaryyccoounrsttsittuatfefsfonrothpearctoonfvtehneieonpcienioofnthoefrtehaedceor.urt. It has
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Attachments Prod 1
ED 002061E 00002042-00002
case: 14-72794, 07/18/2017, ID: 10511951, DktEntry: 65, Page 3 of 5
In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am. 3 COUNSEL
PWaattsihAin.gGtoonl,dfmoranPeatnitdioKnerrisst.en Boyles, Earthjustice, Seattle, NEWJCWuroasoiatuctsuoinahcdrsaeiM,en,llgA.;WRtcZoUetaniislnsn,iohiogDutilenri.Ad,cCgeEst.Sso;snintfsvaDo,ttiareriDvonsRi.ntCseEmiAs.on;pentvtonM;ointrraoUdanlnreenkDmnyitteDeseGf.ndyeetnnanSseleetrraP,atSrelOo,escftEeftDiicncotevenipoi;roanoJrfnetAmfGmfgreeeeennnnytetcrHoy&a.,lf HWSteaainslmhleiaynng,Hto.na,nADdb.CraS.m,yfslovorinaA, mDGico.inCaCludorsiatCee.lDloMoew,cLAAegarrneon,stcKieaFntohcxleeseLLnLLCRP..,
ORDER NrEfsoffeoirofnlausreuvtpsadugItioanrrrhpnaoataewts2lntenesoR0mrdt,0iiretecaew7wsnidv,odoithmoutaePfihklrciecenmchEsePiatassPairlPltclnolDAreAidtafddeeo'taNesicfomvectNidAienhnuotAslecsnooerptlrtiCeetpiAoaoartycnoi,agktiunfiePfNnoonocnAonsceercw.citsNylwelwa(Neo(Icnditn"oArdthEgkhlecl2ePpeaN0dceAtna1htotgcii4"cervtee)o,tie.lnhoulUhacnyllAadyeT,nlvdr"mihiettiPnoenegteAhdgcirpisliiNsusctegrSsdaNtracuiteoottaAeaiiwtuoone""rnnndasa)t f[iint]a."l denial order . . . if that is how EPA decides to resolve ptoroPpOAonsNeANd uAogr'usfsinat da1lm0r,ienv2i0ost1cra5at,tiiowvneerpuoelrtediteoiorrenad. fEuInPllAraentdoPef"isnitsaiscluirdeeesepAitochnteisroen"a
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Attachments Prod 1
ED 002061E 00002042-00003
case: 14-72794, 07/18/2017, ID: 10511951, DktEntry: 65, Page 4 of 5
4 In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am. Nadedtwedo)r.kNW.eAlmat.e, r79d8ireFc.3tedd8E0P9,A81to4 "(9tatkheCfiirn. a2l0a1c5t)io(enm" pohnatshies NpetAitmio.n, 8b4y0MFa.3rcdh13011,42,011071.5I(n9trhe CPiers.t2ic0i1d6e)A. ction Network wRtfaoonealrdegsrE".inafnP1onua6Acrd,"te5hefds8iqeen1rumnaa(milAuteeddaspebtnrttedh.ebcae5reamm,pu2reuis0netes1ivati7troitioe)okc.lnneoiePdonfa.Ant,"sa"NMitnaoNeIsandsrwAec"hrhspntheiro2ntooh9gnrm,ete--rt2pwh0tcala1hsytna7loEfdf.ierlPptSeiyAyndefie'afisino8tmsds2doiefnFotnoigewoiosdannd".l wonorthdes--suPbAstaNnNceAo'sfmthoetpioentitfiaounl.t"ed EPA for "fail[ing] to act Api7cnoe9ltm8trihtPepoiFsoAlup.in3geNo.ddh"nNdwwaAiteniSt'gphes8re1oetc1ovouI;imnrPosopuAerrlsedeaNleyianNrPcsltsesoAbosn'aytdsir2ceir1psiimdvseueenUtiietn.AaidSogtc.EnCtao,Pi.uo"Atrnfhi'ednsN3oa"a4loeeg6tgrrwseeartsne(oepdgcpro)yiko(nt4uohsN)seoa(".AstdsoA)noe(motoilhianwi.ye)., (cdphernaolylvieinndgginitnhgge tphaeatptiteiosontniec"i)d.vea'lsidtoalgereannccyesreisspotons"eistsouea apnetoitridoenr AbneocfttoiTotrhneheeNusseesutbmwissatoanrwndkcaNheme.,tuAhosemfrpE.r,EoP7cPA9eA8e'sd'Fsir.ne3gdsdpseaolhatnay8sve1ei.3na(dS"rdeeTresehpseIosnonedndrelitynhPgeqeutstieomtisctiniitohdgnee, masauddabmmnsiidtnnaaiinmsstttirruvaasett.ii"vv)oee.bppjeeroctNitctioieoowsnnsswmtmhaaranurtdasntaEttsePfditArhsbetyehbsxaettsartaumoitsreasd.duieneSdaerteyhirtr2ose1umgUdehed.Snyi.taChole.,f PAN3N46Aa(igm)(p2l)i,cit(lhy)(r1e)c;og4n0izCes.Fa.Rs .much 1b7y8.a6c5k,no1w80le.3d0g(ibn)g.
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Attachments Prod 1
ED 002061E 00002042-00004
case: 14-72794, 07/18/2017, ID: 10511951, DktEntry: 65, Page 5 of 5
In re Pesticide Action Network N. Am. 5 tEhPaAt "[Af]dilminigniostbrjaetcotrioinss aanpdrearweqauitiisnigtethtoeirorbetsaoinluintigonjubdyictihael rpafeocovrtiininoetenwam."r"layoSyfeaeEwd5PeecAUac.'doSsen.f,Csiiin.tdahelra7rse0thsn4peo.owAmnsdleetorhintotoseutgwhohefhEapEtPePwtAiAteid'oosrnra."dgfegOirneenaddllyiitatsagthtoeetnhdecoalys.t DENPIAENDN. A's motion for further mandamus relief is
Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA
Attachments Prod 1
ED 002061E 00002042-00005
