Document JNZ799kex76XqnkGGQG3KaRGr

ifl! TO MftfiSHALL LABI ,eei Ill LID8ABV, ?ni/ j inn s nsi Hod0 , MlXm* , W U-* . iMWBQilp 3j S-w KV CViLaapert, tab. 0,. H. Bullitt, jfc? Exp* * < Milm Pate%t Seetloh* Ipb* tab,-''Mbr&?y (5) i8io . JffiPORf MO. Piot -Labomtory .1, ig$4- Bfs C, JOHNSON BACKGROUND 01 SOIA PE OIL IN HOUSE PAXHT This report covers bouse tests, field experience and studies of free chalking outside white bouse paint Bade with soya PE oil. Soya PE 11 offer improvement.' in tints and !Twc*Purpse tfhite as covered In Memorandum-Report-No &*66g This is .a separate, report because tbs material.covered is.not directly applicable to the .tints and Two~Purp8 House'Paint. However,- the experience with soya PE in free chaining' bouse paint is extensive and -doe supplement ur knowledge of soya PE vehicles Report No,. K66:9- is issued simultaneously with this report. StMMAHJT .& CdKJEOSlOMSs' , ' X . *< Soya PE oil um one of the vehicles studied in the x<$7> 1948, and 1949 house tests* ; ' 5300 gallons of soya' PE oil, #%0 Outside; White (301-882) were produced and sold, in a trial marketing program In 1.949 and 1.950 {per.Release .letter' !?. 1187).. The Sale Department kept a record of 62 houses which were painted with ''301-882. fhes houses are being reviewed* Tlier have * been' mo' adverse cemsmts on 301'8S2 soya PE #40 from customer. Sous difficulty was'encountered with the gloss and flashing e? soya PE paints -When made,. in the plant but this difficulty was cleared- up by reducing the' pigment volume 2$* A total of eight Sposiire studies?- hat, been expos?! ' over the past Bix years. ' cOol 4^ 00 00 Sofa PS oil and linseed are equivalent tor vwiMtyB* to fXaktag and etieefeiag# oXeanXitieea atii. tides# reelstance on red cedar In Delaware, Soys PS is flightiy 'better for flaking and &mktng w yellow plus is Texas* Altbcugh early exposures In #40 Outeidc White formulas aftoi?# that soya ?8 la better In clean** linees,# anbeoepcnft exposures and field tests did not show any difference# Soya ?l: f^a-oMlIiirig paints mj errode faster than linseed oil paints although quantitive data On crcr'on Ip .tct ainiilMils* Cm stability of three batches of 301-802 'has been ' determiised* Two batches are good aft .109 &0 and 125 KD aft 18 months* whereas* on batch is' higher at' l4o K0 but is not liverecL Settling is normal at it ontbs* mrntmi Emm Tests laboratory supervised The laboratory conducted bouse tests on soya PE oil in 1947* 1948 and 194.9# Of these* -three 1048 tests and fifteen 194*9 tests were active in the spring of 1953 -when they-were inspected and subsequently reported in Memosmtdum Report M628^ Sated 8/25/53# Soya PE la dual to linseed in cleanliness .and is better than 301-756 prewar #49 and equal to 301-864 (leaded sine oxide plus 20$ soya sill la film integrity* Differences in cleanliness of soya PE and linseed 11 paints are not' significant as shown by the following data* Cleanliness is rated 'by photographic standards on a 1-10 seals# 1948 house tests Difference is 0*07 0*5 (not significant) 1949 bouse tests Difference is 0*02 0*11 (not significant^ C%p;bcmerf. .houses foown to nm 301-882 The So 1st representatives in 'Youngstown* Obioi Miaxil and Mm Orleans collected the names and addresses of customers who wore tmmm to hm painted with 301-882 in 194$ and 1950 and of other customers who were known to hare painted with 301-875 in the summer pf 1;949 The houses in Youngstown mere Inspected in the fall of "1350 but the results sere Inconclusive at that vims* There has been so further foilosmp because* 1} The orice of linseed oil dropped from 29# in 1949 to 19# in 1950 . The corresponding casts of soya IX were la# la. 1949 sad 164 in 1950* The premium paid for linseed oil fell from 14#- to 3# is year* 2} xt was felt that test fence evidence was edemata to show ami soya FS la no,, poorer than linseed in dirt coXX-metics; 3) There are nob enough houses or food control houto pics up maalX diffe-rsneen in cleanliness* it m:$ riliw to itiSpo&t fcb@- -KmBSB ogiiiir: :> DUP030003635 PEOMCfioi mmmmmt la August of 1049 tern ft0.i Bigs hatches.of 301*882 *re* mads... Although 'laboratory batch had shown satisfactory gloss at 3Sgt pigment voiue.-th first ''plant hatch at 32$ -plg*- mnt volume was low in gloss m& war subsequently damped and rwortea, % adjusting'' the pigment volme.b'o 305. tb'gloss wm corrected* The refining'hateiiaa were mad at 30$ pigment volume and were satisfactory for gloss. It was first thought that low glass'was Inherent in plant produced' syh PE but this did not prove .ts^;:;t'he as, . . :'/ Result jRwsm jepQSB* studies .ap discussed under each weathering proj^^,;: '.- ', v-tV PLAKim, CmCKINQ AMD OEECEIlSt ; - . r . . ' *> * '-. - Dyiring the'gposures of the following studies in Dela ware no. incidents of flaking*"cracking or checking .cured, Series Age Exposure Comments 5 years SV Delaware 5 years 4 year Wo -, sv+ 4 years S months SV Delaware months SV Delaware 22 months SV Delaware De.la:ware R failure Ho failure So failure Ho .failure'' Ho- .failure Ho failure So failure CLEAHLXHB8S ARP .MILDEW RBSISJAHOBt Cleanliness Is rated by comparison with photograph standard which are graduated on 0*10 seal with.10 p&feet. Series Age Linseed, . Soya PE .9900 IO82O 11591 12268' 1056.2 28 mo b, Del, MV 8.1 4 1,1` 8.0 4 1.1 4 years Soya PlTpaints appear cleaner than Del. MV . linseed oil controlst 1? mos, . 6.5 + 1.0 7.2 4 1.0 PKIV 23'e, . - ?.S6 4 0.31 7.56 + 0*31 FlW * " MW* 21'ffios. 8.37 4 0.4 8.36 4 0.4 4 value.are 95$ reliability limits DUP030003636 MOISTORE BLISTERING; Exposure Series 20821, 20817 and 9001 study moisture blistering only* The tests were run during the 2948-49, end 1950-51 seasons. Blistering tests were run on Series 10S2I during the 1949-50 and 1950-51 seasons* Thus, in four comparisons covering three seasons the soya PE paint was tested against standard linseed oil paints* In all three studies the soya Pi paint was equal to the linseed oil control, EROSION: . ;'v' Conclusions on erosion should not be made yet because #108l6 is the only series listed below in which film thickness is controlled* Although first signs of bare wood are showing, we should wait ffer sis months or a year when erosion is advanced before drawing definite conclusione* However, in the other studies soya PB consistently erodes to bare wood earlier, and, to be able to make allowances in any future free chalking soya PE formula^ w are exposing a small study of TiPure R-610/ TiPure T ladders in series 13600 to determine what level of TiPure R-610 Is needed to obtain chalking equal to 301-9X8 #40 Outside White* ' Series Age Coats Status of Soya PB Paint 10826 OT & S? 4 years 2 10820 45`S. Del 4 years 3 First evidence of bare wood la showing* Slight erosion reported. 9560 45*S. Del 5 years 3 NV Del* 5 years 3 SV Del* 5 years 3 Soya PE shows more advanced erosion than linseed. First evidence of bar wood is showing* first evidence of bar wood is showing. linseed controls show no erosion failure except series 9560 at 45S, in Delaware. DUP030003637 Dt?RABiLm o h mioa vmt n t e ia s ? On yellow pine panels lb Texas soya PB appears to be better than linseed oil consistently, although the advent age is small; Series 9560 9900 10820 10816 &SSL 24 months 34 months 24 months 39 months Comment Soya PE paint is slightly better than 301-756, . ,- Soya PB paint is better (95$ reliability) than 301-756. Soya PE paint is very slightly better than 301-864, Soya PE paint is slightly better than 301-875 12268 24 months Soya PE paint is slightly better than 301-756 10562 29 months Soya PE paint is slightly better than 301-864 301-875 80/20 LO/soya zinc oxide formula 301-756 Prewar #40 301-864 80/20 LO/soya leaded zinc #40 0. W. PACKAGE STABILITY: Batch Initial 12 Months Viscosity; Viscosity 18 Months Viscosity Comment 86604? 94 KO 105 W 140* W 846570 93 102 109 884817 96 110 125 #6 settling * at 14 months * #6 settling is soft and.does not drain off a spatula rapidly, * MARSHALL SALES DETELOf^HT LABORATORY WCJtmlf 1/27/54 DUP030003638