Document JNXg6b1Ejg8xLJg7mnBOekDB2

(SPF Sante Publique - FOD Volksgezondheid) Objet: Lieu: working group 1&4 on TOR-QAR & MDIs Microsoft Teams Meeting Debut: Fin: lun. 25/09/2023 08:30 lun. 25/09/2023 09:30 Periodicite: (neant) Etat de la reunion: Acceptee Organisateur: Upon popular request, for those who can make it... Microsoft Teams meeting Join on your computer, mobile app or room device Click here to join the meeting Meeting ID: 332 942 946 314 Passcode: GTiaD8 Download Teams I Join on the web Join with a video conferencing device @vteams.tech.ec.europa.eu Video Conference ID: 123 537 882 2 Alternate VTC instructions Joining is available only from a Commission videoconferencing system. Learn More I Help I Meeting options From: Subject: AW: DE input group 4: AW: (CLIMA) shared "230906 draft decision QR" with you Monday 8:30h-9.30h would also work for me. Regards, 1 Von: Betreff: Sv: DE input group 4: AW: you (CLIMA) shared "230906 draft decision QR" with Dear , Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, I think it would be good to have a short discussion on the draft QA. On Monday I will be travelling to Brussels, so I am available 8:00 - 10:30 or after I landed in Brussel 16:30 - 18:00. As I am in Brussels I could join you in your office if that would work for you. Kind regards, Frn: > Skickat: den 21 september 2023 11:34 Till: Kopia: mne: RE: DE input group 4: AW: shared "230906 draft decision QR" with you Dear Thank you for the input, already well received yesterday. There is not much time before the NEM but I am happy to have a short call on Monday if people are willing and available. Let me know, From: > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 11:27 AM To: Subject: DE input group 4: AW: with you Dear and colleagues, 2 (CLIMA) shared "230906 draft decision QR" here some input for group 4 re TOR for Quadrennial Assessment: No 5 CRP 3 DD A Agenda item TOR for Quadrennial Assessment Potential areas of focus for the 2026 quadrennial reports, including the issue of synchronization with reports on alternatives to hydrofluorocarbons under decision XXVIII/2. Input Re Decision Draft [A], i.e. CRP 3 - General question: How does the Commission plan to proceed PFAS/TFA para? How can MS support with outreach activiti - Reminder of arguments: persistence itself can be a reason, no hazardous properties needed; precautionary principle; once in environment, substances cannot be recovered - Paras on knowledge gaps from EEAP 2022 report: o "Continued monitoring and assessment are neverthe advised due to uncertainties in the deposition of TFA potential effects on marine organisms" o "However, their atmospheric photo-degradation can persistent secondary pollutants such as trifluoroacet (TFA), whose ultimate fate in the environment remai unclear, requiring continued monitoring and assessm relative to other natural and/or anthropogenic sourc o "..., there is some uncertainty in toxicity values for T because of the limited number of marine species test - Suggestion: Outreach to China to explain PFAS-restriction pr focuses only on applications where alternatives exist - Fallback option should at least be the following para taken fro 2019 TOR decision: 4. To request the Environmental Effects Assessment Panel, in p its 20222026 assessment report, to pay particular attention to recent scientific information together with future, including looking projections and scenarios, and to assess the effect fro of changes in the ozone layer and ultraviolet radiation, interaction with the climate system, as well as the effects of br products from controlled substances and their alternatives o Comment on EU CRP on MDIs. DE supports the suggested MDI CRP, but would like to discuss implementation of such a decision within the EU: What activities will be initiated by COM/MS? We found the last short WebEx call (group 4) on draft decision QR useful. If there is the time, we could maybe briefly discuss in the group where we stand and the way forward? Best regards Von: 3 4