Document JJLJQqV39GEYxakrx8ao82Zyv
ASBESTOS CONFERENCE TEXTILE FIBERS DEPARTMENT
NOVEMBER 17-18, 1983 RICHMOND, VIRGINIA
OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS
UP 1013098
DU 053584
OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS
Question 1.
Has your site dealt with an outside contractor in any aspect of asbestos handling (installation, removal, waste disposal, etc.)?
Cape Fear - Yes Waynesboro - Yes Cooper River - Yes Chattanooga - Yes Richmond - Yes Seaford - Yes Martinsville - Yes Kinston - Yes Old Hickory - Yes Camden - Yes
DUP 1013099
DU 053585
\
/'
Question 2. Describe briefly the job(s) handled by the contractor.
Cape Feaor Most asbestos related jobs are performed by Daniels Construction. \ Removal of 4 oil-fired boilers (involved gross asbestos removal) was performed by Central Salvage, Inc. Bala Cynwyd, Pa.
Waynesboro Demolition of acetate facilities. Insulation removal and repair - Brown and Root. Removal of insulation from salvage pipe.
Cooper River Renovation of a polyester exchanger and upflow prepolymerizer.
Chattanooaa Waste disposal.
Richmond Large scale jobs - boiler reinsulation, exhaust flue duct, etc.
Seaford Many jobs over the last several years.
Martinsville General insulation work. Insulation installation, fabrication and modification of piping, valves, ducts, and equipment.
Kinston Waste disposal. Transports dumpster to plant landfill and empties.
Old Hickory Removal and waste disposal.
DUP 1013100
DU 053586
Question 2. (Continued)
Camden Demolition of auxiliary power house. Spinning machine overhaul. Boiler overhaul. Stripping insulation from dismantled process piping.
DUP 1013101 DU 053587
%
Question 3. List the contractors and indicate your assessment of the contractor's performance.
Cape Fear
~"
Daniels Construction - Good
Central Salvage - Borderline, required excessive followup.
Waynesboro
Manchester - Poor
Brown and Root - Good now WNI Industrial Service - Borderline Cooper River Daniels Construction - Good Chattanooga BFI Waste Disposal, Incorporated Ric hmo n d Ford Brothers Insulation Company - Satisfactory
Sea ford
__
County Insulation - Very good
Tri State - Good Major Construction - Fair
Martinsville BWB - Satisfactory Star-Davis - Good Metro - Satisfactory
Kinston Carter-Hill Sanitation - Good
DUP 1013102
DU 053588
Question 3. (Continued)
Old Hickory Levy, Nashville, Tn. - Good
Camden Daniels Construction - Very good Boiler Tube Company of America - Good Camden Steel & Metal Company - Satisfactory, required close followup.
DUP 1013103
DU 053589
Question 4. How is liaison handled between the site and the contractor
Cape Fear
Contractor coordinates from the area with contractor management
Waynesboro
Engineering contract coordinator.
Cooper River
Engineering and Environmental Control Groups
Chattanooga
_
Contract coordinator
Richmond
Through Construction
Seaford
Contract administrator
Martinsvi11e
Du Pont has liaison assigned to coordinate contractor work on site.
Kinston Site contacts contractor via phone when needed.
Old Hickory Contract coordinator (Du Pont Area Contract Administrator).
Camden
Contract coordinator handles all communications with supervisor of contractor personnel.
DUP 1013104
DU 053590
Question 5. What role did the site play in dealings between the contractor and governmental agencies?
Cape Fear
_
Prepared notification correspondence and coordinated site visits by government as required.
Waynesboro
_
None.
Cooper River
Notification and disposal.
Chattanooga
None.
Richmond
None.
Seaford
Contact between Delaware Valley Purchasing, Contract Administrator, and contractor relative to OSHA requirements.
Martinsvil le .J.
None. Plant insists that contractor meets all Federal and State requirements.
Ki ns ton
Site handled all contacts.
Old Hickory
Followup on necessary contacts.
Camden
Handled correspondence relative to demolition, removal, renovation.
Arranged visits to site upon request of government representatives.
DUP 1013105
DU 053591
--W--
Question 6.
What information did the site give the contractor with
respect to the health hazards of asbestosgovernmental requirements for personnel protection, monitoring, waste disposal, etc.?
Cape Fear
Regulations, Du Pont Engineering Standard S4T, had contractor sign document that asbestos handlers were in medical surveillance program.
Waynesboro
_
OSHA and EPA standards.
Cooper River
Following notification. Complete packet. Trained their super vision on barricades, ventilation, disposal, labels, wetting, and respirators. Performed monitoring.
Chattanooga
Documented discussion with contractor and his responsibility to comply with Reg. 40 CFR 61.
Richmond
Told about the asbestos standard and that's about `it.
Seaford Complete review of Seaford Administrative Work Procedure.
Martinsville
Insists that contractor follow all plant procedures and OSHA guide!ines.
Kinston
Site covered contractor. Regional Purchasing covers the requirements.
Old Hickory
Includes a statement in the scope of work, what the material is and that he must follow the law.
Camden
Provided contractor with copy of OSHA and EPA standards for asbestos; contract coordinator reviewed requirements.
DUP 1013106
DU 053592
Question 7.
Did the site furnish the contractor with any equipment, either loaned or permanently, to use with the asbestos job? If so, list the equipment.
Cape Fear Nothing furnished.
Waynesboro Nothing furnished.
Cooper River Half-mask respirators.
Chattanooga Nothing furnished.
Richmond Nothing furnished.
Seaford Nothing furnished.
Martinsville " Nothing furnished.
Kins ton Nothing furnished.
Old Hickory Normally, nothing furnished. On one job, we supplied bags and tags for the asbestos waste.
Camden Gave Camden Steel and Metal enough disposable respirators for his employees involved with the job. Nothing furnished other contractors.
DUP 1013107
DU 053593
Question 8. ^-How was ccmanagement avoided?
Cape Fear \
With ynderstanding between Plant, Construction, and Contractor management prior to starting the job; interface with contractor management wars- through specific individuals.
Wavnesborfo
_
\
Contacts.with contractor supervision only.
Cooper River __
Plant support requested by Daniels. Worked with their supervision.
Chattanooga
Richmond
All dealings, comments, audit results were given to the contractor liaison.
Sea ford
Has not been a problem.
Martinsvi11e Plant provides guidelines, but contractor manages his people.
Kins ton
Contractor was made aware of the hazards. Management left up to contractor.
Old Hickory
Told them what to do, not how to do it.
Camden Told contractor, or gave it in writing if contractor requested, that if we were doing this job this is how we would do it. Emphasized, however, and made sure contractor understood that how he did the job was his decision. All contacts handled between site contract coordinator and contractor supervisor.
DUP 1013108
DU 053594
Question 9.
If the site audited the job while the contractor was performing it, list the segments of the job audited, how the auditing was done, and the frequency of auditing.
Cape Fear
Work practices were audited 2-3X per day by Environmental Group, continuously by Plant and Construction management. Air samples were taken randomly outside contractor barricade to insure Du Pont employees' safety.
Waynesboro
Air monitored outside barricaded areas.
Cooper River
On Day Shift by Environmental Control and Process Control (they did monitoring).
Chattanooga
Annual audit of pickup, transportation, and disposal.
Richmond
Not formally.
Seaford
Barricades, signs, removal methods, dust contamination, sampling, bagging, disposal, etc. Frequency of audits was daily.
Marti nsvi 11 e
__
Barricades Wetting down Protection to operating personnel
Waste disposal Personal protective equipment
Audits done daily.
,<i ns ton
Audited dumping of insulation in a hole. Annually.
Old Hickory
Daily on all phases.
DUP 101310a
DU 053595
Question 9. (Continued)
Camden Work practices audited almost continuously by contract coordinator; several times/day by SHEA, Engineering and Manufacturing (if work done in operating area). Auditing done by visual inspection. All aspects of the government requirements for handling asbestos were audited. Air samples for asbestos concentration taken outside barricade by Engineering'.
DUP 1013110
DU 053596
Question 10. List and explain briefly other items pertinent to outside contractor involvement with asbestos.
Cape Fear Hopefully from this survey, we can develop a list of the "best" asbestos handling contractors.
Waynesboro Biggest problem is cleanup of an area after contractor is done.
Coooer River . _ .
Chattanooga
Richmond
Seaford 6 mil plastic bags are furnished by Du Pont. Oisposal (off-site) by "Eastern Disposal". Arrangements through SHEA. Dust masks are being worn by contractors for removal of sheet rock.
Martinsville Generally, Contractors have been used at Martinsville to do non-asbestos work. There have been no contractors used to do strictly demolition type work. Plant forces have generally stripped asbestos insulation outside on pipes, valves, ducts and equipment that contractors have removed or modified prior to disposal.
Kinston Contractors used to remove insulation should take adequate safe guards to prevent exposure of Plant personnel.
DUP 1013111
DU 053597
Question 10. (Continued) Old Hickgry
You have covered the waterfront. Camden
Cheapest isn't always least expensive. A contractor we had for one job was totally unfamiliar with the hazards of asbestos and the myriad of government regulations and red tape involved with handling asbestos. His idea was to knock it down and haul it away. Plant personnel spent a great deal of time "Holding His Hand" so that in the end, although he was low bidder, the job cost more than it would have if we had gotten a qualified contractor originally. A contract should not be approved unless all areas involved are sure the contractor can do the work on his own.
DUP 1013112
DU 053598
SUMMARY
All sites have used outside contractors in asbestos work. Extent of contractor involvement ranqes from transporting
waste -asbestos to landfill to demolition of a major facility. Assessment of.-contractor performance from poor to very good. Liaison with contractor varies widely.
- Call on phone when needed. - Contract coordinator responsible for all dealings
with contractor. Six (6) sites handled required notification of governmental
agencies. t Information imparted by site to contractor re hazards of asbestos
and regulations ranges from simply telling contractor to comply with regulations to m-deoth review of regulations and hazards. Two (2) sites have furnished respirators for contractor personnel; one other has supplied bags and tags for waste. All sites avoid comanagement by letting contractor do the job without specifying how he does it; communications with contractor supervisor only. Auditing ranges from practically none to continuous. heed to develop a list of best qualified contractors.
DUP 1013113
DU 053599