Document J33v6YgRkw8z33dvBmX94nqma
FILE NAME Manville JMA
DATE 1968 - 1970
DOC JMA052
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION Asbestos Research St. Luke's
Hospital Drs Wright & Gross Related Corr Grant Application &
Letter
CONFIDENTIAL
June 19 1968
Dr. George W. Wright ;
St. Lukes Hospital{
- --11311 ShakBelvrd.
Cleveland Ohio 44104
Dear Dr. Wright
Jack Solon related to
products
and I have discussed your interest
manufacturing handling machining
in the potential health pro and fabricating asbestos
;
As you are probably aware we have established an industry committee to @
possible health problems in this area and prepare recommended health safet practices These would be in booklet form similar to the NIMA publications
for asbestes and wineral fibers
Some of the specific M products used in the Building and Construction Industry are Asbesteboard Asbastocite - flat and corrugated Asbestone Flexboard Colorbestos Thermostone Transite flat and corrugated Asbestos Ebony
Chemstone Colorchip Transitop Asbestos Bulkheads Asbestos Extrusions - ACE Colorlith Asbestos Shingles - siding and Roofing Asbestos-
Cement Transite Water and Sewage Pipe Transite Air Duct Transite Cable Tray
Transite Core Plate Transite Conduit etc. Other manufacturerss produce similar
types of products
The composition of some of our asbestos products is approximately as
follfolaa oniia ileal
ins:
.
itos Fibre
= 45
Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre
Portland Coment
3. Corrugated Transite Chrysetile Asbestos Fibre
Portland Cement
Silica Flour
- 30 - 70
~ 40
- 35
-
25
Dr. George W. Wright
-2-
June 19 1968
4 Asbestos Roof Shingles Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre
Silica Flour
Fortland Cement
- 24 - 32 - 64
5. Transite Pipe Chrysotile Asbestos Fibre Crocidolite Asbestos Fibre
Portland Coment Silica
We are concerned with two sources of health problems related to this material One is in the manufacturing plants where the product made The other is with fabrication and application contractors
Most manufacturers are aware of the problem areas and have taken steps to control
exposures We are not however aware of either the extent of the health problems
or measures taken to control exposures among the fabricators and applicators Fabrication and application operations would include handling sawing drilling filing sanding etc. Our program vill therefore be simultaneously directed toward both manufacturers and applicators
In order to provide you with some idea of potential exposures encountered in machining asbestos materials I am enclosing several Industrial Hygiene reports from our plants You will note that the particle counts are high even with mechanical dust collection equipment in use Without exhaust equipment the concentrations would be substantially heavier
Ifthere is any additional information that you would like or if I can be of
. further assistance please advise
Sincerely yours
CLS ems
bec
F. J. Solon - GHQ
W. P. Raines - GHQ
N
H. M. Jackson - DHQ
File &
C. L. Sheckler Manager Occupational Environmental Control
siete
DIVISION OF MEDICINE
SAINT LUKE'S HOSPITAL
11311 SHAKER BOULEVARD CLEVELAND OHIO 44104
APPLICATION FOR RESEARCH GRANT March 30 1970
TO
Manville Corporation
Twenty Two East Fortieth Street
New York N. Y.
10016
Title of Investigation for which Support is Requested
To Further Explore the Relationship Between the Dimension of Fibers and Their Ability to Produce Pulmonary Tissue Reaction
Principal Investigator
GeorgWe. Wright M.D.
Head Dept. of Medical Research Saint Luke's Hospital
11311 Shaker Blvd.
Cleveland Ohio
44104
ae
Associate Principal Investigator
Marvin Kuschner M. D.
Professor of Pathology New York University School of Medicine New York City N. Y.
Institution Where Investigation Will Be Carried Out Saint Luke's Hospital
Make Checks Payable To Saint Luke's Hospital
Name Title and Address of Financial Officer to Whom Check is to be Mailed
Frank A. Oblak Controller
Saint Luke's Hospital
11311 Shaker Blvd.
Cleveland Ohio
44104
For the Period
July 1 1970 to December 31 1972
Amount Requested
7/1/70 - 6/30/71 7/1/71 - 6/30/72 7/1/72 - 12/31/72
46,167 34,900 17,810
Name and Title of Official Authorized to Sign For the
H Shoos
Script Script
Mr.
Supt of St. LukeHarpitel
send letter and check to
Signature
Investigator
Principal
Signature of Director of Division
Mee
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In contrast to the biological inertness of silicate
*
fi
particles fibrous silicate in the form of asbestos both py-
roxene and amphibole causes cellular reaction and fibrosis when
lodged in lung tissue In contrast to the effect of size
on the biological activity of free crystalline silica
fibrous silicate as represented by asbestos is believed by
1 Gardner
2 Vorwald
3 Webster
1
4
5
Klosterkotter and King to
become
less rather than more active as the fibers become progress-
ively shorter in length These investigators suggest that
asbestos fibers shorter than 5 microns in length cause little
or no tissue reaction
6
Holt is in disagreement with this
Be
a
view and
has
reported
data
interpreted
interpreted
to
indicate
indicate
that
asbestos fibers shorter than 5 microns in length are just as
diameter * A particle has a
ratio less than 3
* A fiber has a diameter ratio greater than 3
active biologically as those of greater length
The current and admittedly provisional or incom-
pletely established view is that fibrous silicates produce their cellular and fibrogenic effects because of mechanical
action rather than chemical or surface chemical activity
2
Vorwald
has reported that long
fibers of brucite
a fib-
rous form of magnesium hydroxide causes inflammation and
fibrosis and cites this as evidence supporting the view
that the injury is mechanical in nature In contrast
however is the fact that fibers of glass an amorphous
Seis ee
silicate ? more than 1 micron in diameter and up to 200
microns long are biologically almost completely inert
J
Electron microscope EM studies of airborne asbestos dust and of the lungs of men exposed to such dust reveal that asbestos fibers smaller than can be visualized with
the light microscope exist with and actually are more
abundant than the fibers large enough to see with a light
microscope This finding has raised the important question~
of what the role these EM sized fibers might be in the
overall biologic reaction to asbestos
7 Gross has reported
that synthetic chrysotile injected into guinea pig's lungs
does not cause inflammation or fibrosis He attributed
this lack of a reaction to the fact that the synthetic
fibers were free of those trace metals common to naturally
?
nos
occurring fiber While this is a possibility it is
equally possible that the absence of a tissue reaction is
explainable on the basis that all of the synthetic fibers
used by Gross were of a submicroscopic size and visible
only with the electron microscope
On the basis of the information now available the relationship between dimensions and shape of a substance and its biological effects remains moot This is especially true in the case of asbestos We believe this question deserves further study
PROPOSED STUDY
w=
8
It is possible to grow synthetic chrysotile fibers
;
to a size that mimics the spectrum of light microscope-
? ~
?
sized fibers found in the lungs of men exposed to naturally
ot| men
i e f e an
occurring occurring asbestos
fiber
Comparison of the biological
effects of synthetic fibers of this length to those of the
short or electron microscope would avoid the conflict-
ing effect of trace metals and permit further clarification
of the possible role of fiber length in the biologic
effects of asbestos We propose introducing synthetic
chrysotile fibers of three sizes into the lungs of guinea pigs by intratracheal injection and subsequent examination
300k
of these lungs to observe whether or not biological effects
occur to an equal degree in all three groups The animals
will receive 50 mg each of one of the following categories
of fiber Category 1 will consist of fibers all of which
are submicroscopic in diameter and less than 5 microns in
diameter asmat
name
consequently
soventualy consequently
soventualy consequently
and
length Category 2 will be composed predominantly of fibers
of larger diameter and lengths up to 10 microns Category
3 will contain predominantly fibers of still greater dia-
meter and lengths greater than 10 microns
sme! id
In Category 2
and 3 there will of course be some synthetic fibers of
fiberes
cynthetic
cynthetic will
the they
all but
submicroscopic size We propose also to study the effect of long and short natural chrysotile and crocidolite
prepared in a fashion designed to retain the physicalchemical identity of asbestos
Because of tracheal regurgitation and the spotty
distribution of the injected material during intratracheal
installation the dose of material relative to a volume
of lung varies greatly For this reason no attempt will
2
i
be made to use comparable total surface or m maass s s the
/? 6
different sized fibers Because of the technical difficulty
of being certain that areas of lung tissue will be examined that are identical to those where submicroscopic particles
have come to rest a marker of some inert light microscope-
sized material will be
oe
scopic sized fibers
injected
along
with
the
submicro-
9
Davis has recently referred to his unpublished data
10
suggesting that when glass microfibrils having a diameter
of less than 0.1 micron are introduced into the pleura of
experimental animals a severe inflammatory and fibrotic
reaction developes This is particularly true of the long
glass fibers in contrast to the short ones This finding
is in striking contrast to the relative inertness of glass
fibers of varying length but having a diameter greater
:
than 1 micron .. J We propose to study the effect of long and
short microfibers when placed in lung tissue by intratracheal
a
+
installation We propose to inject 50 mg of microfibrils having a length less than 5 microns in one group of animals
50mg
as heavy
?
in contrast to another group that will receive 50 mg of
microfibrils longer than 5 microns
Bee
better?
Suitable control animals for these experiments will be
established
|
All of the animals in the experiment will be
11
held isolated from other known noxious agents and appropriate numbers sacrificed at six months twelve months and
twenty months for examination Whole lung sections
will be examined by light microscope using suitable stain-
:
ing techniques and where appropriate electron microscope
studies will also be made
.
|
VALUE AND STUDY
APPLICABILITY
OF
INFORMATION
OBTAINED
FROM THIS
In addition to what might be considered the strictly
scientific dividends relating to such things as chemical
vs. surface vs. mechanical factors in the production of
biological effects there are two values of a more applied
oP a
ae
ne
nature that might come from this study The first of these
is that fiber technology is rapidly expanding and a better
understanding of the role of shapes and dimensions of fibers
12
as they may be related to the presence or absence of bio-
|
logical effects might well influence the total field of
fiber technology A second and perhaps more immediately
important value of this study relates to the matter of electron microscope particles At this time the
threshold limit value for airborne asbestos fiber is in
I
:
terms of light microscope fibers greater than 5 microns
in length With the recognition that submicroscopic
fibers are even more prevalent both in the occupational
and public environment than are light microscope
fibers it is only a matter of time before the relative im-
portance of the submicroscopic fiber will have to be
Latte.
There exists at this time some epidemiological
data which can be interpreted as indicating that the sub-
Co
microscopic fibers are not as important from a biolo-
gical point of view as are the larger fibers but more direct
13
experimental information would be helpful in arriving at a considered view of the problem as a whole
In these studies it must be recognized that we are speaking in terms of that biological effect of fibers which is characterized by the development of a cellular reaction plus fibrosis and we are not considering the matter of carcinogenesis
DURATION OF STUDY
It is proposed that this study be initiated July 1 1970. A preliminary report of the results of the studies
end of six months twelve months and twenty
months of intrapulmonary fiber residence will be made as
soon as practicable following each of the sacrifice periods
A formal finished report will be made by December of 1972
14
While the investigators reserve the right to publish the results of their study in an acceptable scientific journal they will submit a full report of their studies to the sponsor of these studies prior to submitting a scientific report to one of the scientific journals
Addendum 5/1/70
Further discussion of this proposal with Mr. Burnett
and Dr. Pundsack led to the suggestion that additional
asbestos and glass fiber dimensions could be prepared which
would broaden the scope of the information to be gleaned
from this study With the addition of these the study be-
notnot only an examination of the effect of fibre length
but alsoof diameter on the biological reaction of lining
tissue to fibres of asbestos and glass Contrasting the effect
of similar length natural to synthetic asbestos fibres will
provide additional information on the role of trace metals
fl
fl - Respo flns oo
A8021'80s 21's
BUDGET
(
PERSONNEL
70-6
12 mo
Time
s
^'
71-6
12 mo
72-12
6 mo
Time
s
Time
s
G. Wright
15
-
15
-
15
-
M. Kuschner
10
I
10
-
10
-
|
Animal Caretaker
100 | 9,250
100
9,500
70 |
3,500
|
| | | | Ass't Animal
Caretaker
40
3,000
40
3,200
| | | L. Grinnell
80 10,700
50
6,750 60
4,200
Research Ass't
j
S. Wise Res &
75
7,100
65
6,200
75 .
3,650
i
Histology Tech .
SUPPLIES
Guinea Pigs
Feed
:
Histology
Syringes
Etc.
NO
No.
500 | 3,000 ; 50
3,500
400
300
300 3,000
400
-
No.
-
-
1,000
400
-
EQUIPMENT
;
Cages Fe -
Services of Elec-
tron Microscope
Employee
Benefits
10
2,350 4,000 3,005
Indirect Cost
35 10,517
-_ ~
TOTAL
57,122
-
3,000 2,565 8,977
43,892
1
3,000 1,135
3,970
GRAND TOTAL
20,855 / 121,869
PROTOCOL
MATERIAL
LENGTH u
DIAMETER
1 Synthetic Chrysotile 1 Natural Chrysotile Coalinga
0.5 1
0.03 0.03
3 Synthetic Chrysotile 4 Natural Chrysotile Jeffrey
5 10
0.03 0.03
5 Synthetic Chrysotile Natural Chrysotile Jeffrey
10
0.03
7 Saline & Marker Control
8 Crocidolite 9 Crocidolite
Webster UICC
10
0.5
Chrysotile Jeffrey ) Chrysotile Jeffrey
7~
Glass Microfibril Glass Microfibril
14 Glass
15 Glass
'
Glass
17 Glass
10
5 10 5 10 5 10
0.5
0.05 0.05 1.0 1.0 3.0 3.0
18 Thermobestos
get:
?
5
In this study 25 similar aged adult guinea pigs will be injected intratracheally with 50 mgms of each material Five
will be sacrificed and prepared for histological examination at 6 months and 10 at each period of 1 and 2 years The suspension of those materials having a diameter less than 1 micron will also contain a biologically inert marker visible by the light microscope
15
REFERENCES
1 Gardner L. U. 1938 Silicosis and Asbestosis by Lanza A.J. Oxford University Press p 257
2 Vorwald A.J. et al 1951 Experimental
Studies of Asbestosis A.M.A. Archives of Indus-
trial Hygiene and Occupational Medicine Vol 3 p
3 Webster I. 1970 Personal Communication 4 Klosterkotter W. 1969 Personal Communication 5 King E.J. 1951 Thorax Vol 6 p 127
6 Holt O.F. 1965 Ann N.Y. Acad Sc Vol 152
:
p 87 <
7 Gross Paul 1967 Fibrous Dust Studies Progress Report No. 2 Industrial Hygiene Foundation
8 Pundsack F. and Speil S. Personal Communication
o
9 Davis J. Personal Communication to F. Pundsack
CLS
FILE
July 8 1970
George W. Wright M. D. St. Luke's Hospital
11311 Shaker Blvd. Cleveland Ohio 44104
Re
Fiber Glass Heat and Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers
Dear George
Attached is a copy of
an inquiry from the Alexandria the other day
the
Ky
letter which Paul Gross Local Asbestos Workers
wrote
which
in response to I referred to
Since we are desirous of keeping abreast of all
International I would appreciate it if you would forward
to the inquiry you received
activities of the
copy of your reply
Sincerely
HMJ md
Attachment
Hugh M. Jackson
Director of Industrial Relations
Giry
Giry
Return
COPY
JUN 3 1970
412 687-2100
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
:
5231 CENTRE AVENUE
FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC PITTSBURGH PA 15232
June 16 1970
1
Mr. Richard R. Wuertz Jr.
International Association of Heat and
Frost Insulators and Asbestos Workers
31 Wright Court Alexandria Kentucky 41001
weds
Dear Mr. Wuertz
rhe
Your letter of June 6 is at hand and I am writing to provide the infor-
aps
mation requested
wiolenn
In answering your question regarding health hazards presented by .
+:
trem
an
fibrous glass and asbestos lined ducts first let me point out that the bio- #
a
effects of these two materials have been carefully studied and that they are
ee
quite different in nature Asbestos can produce lung fibrosis asbestosis
*
and cancer in workers if exposure is sufficiently heavy and prolonged as
in asbestos textile manufacturing and also in the tearing out of old asbestos-
containing insulation for example For this reason the safe limits of dusti-
ness for asbestos dust exposure have been set at a very low level an average
of 5 fibers per ml longer than 5 ...with a ceiling limit of 10 fibers per ml
From experience in the asbestos textile industry in Britain and the United
7
States it appears that these standards will successfully prevent not only
fibrosis of the lungs but cancer as well in workers
and
In the case of fibrous glass dust despite extensive experimental
human observations of animals and individuals exposed the equivalent
ser -greater than 30 years the heaviest concentra- concentra-
fi.producible in the laboratory or in the largest manufacturing plant there have been no signs of such
lungfibrosis or cancer After reviewing all existing
T~
Intended threshold limit value TLV for inert or
nuisance dusts be applied to fibrous glass dust This value remains tentative
:
for a period of time to allow thosein possession of data suggesting need for a ;
change in the standard to present such facts for consideration the best of
-
3
my knowledge no such data have been forthcoming and therefore the TLV- TLV-
i
for fibrous glass as a nuisance dust may be considered technically sound and -
valid Obviously therefore one should not speak in the same way of hazards
of asbestos and fibrous glass dusts lest there be confusion and the recognized
pathogenic capabilities of asbestos dust be applied in error to fibrous glass
dust
AN ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIES FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF HEALTHFUL WORKING CONDITIONS
INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC
Mr. Richard R. June 15 1970 Page 2
Wuertz
Jr.
To proceed in answering your question we are aware of good data from the Kettering Laboratory at the University of Cincinnati which document that fibrous glass duct liner does not erode either under conditions of use or when subjected experimentally to air flows considerably higher than those
encountered in use
Because of the biological inertness of the glass fibers used and their incorporation into duct liner in such a way that erosion does not occur there
can be no hazard to health whatsoever involved under conditions of proper use
Regarding asbestos we are not aware of its use in duct liner It has been suggested by researchers who have studied containing mineral fiber spraying for fireproofing or decorative purposes that it is unsafe to allow air to pass through plenum chambers in which dust containing asbestos fibers may be added to the air intake of central building air conditioners A control procedure which has been suggested and is being tested involves over-
~~"
spraying of such plenums with a polyethylene coating are not aware whether quantitative measurements before and after have been made but if so we have not yet seen these reported in the literature As the degree of control of asbestos fibers community air purposes must be as nearly absolute as possible it will be necessary in the public interest to document that the air system is not adding significantly to the background level of asbestos contaimination in urban air Because of this thought is being given to substitution of asbestos mineral fiber spray materials which meet technical performance specifications Another solution proposed has
been the application of formed asbestos panels or coating of steel structural parts to eliminate completely need for the fiber spraying operation
In conclusion let me say that I hope the above information will be sufficient answer your question which was quite general in nature I shall be happy attempt to provide further assistance if you will be as specific as possible concerning the area in which your interest lies
Sincerely yours
PG
bcc Dr. Lee B. Grant
Dr. Jon L. Konsen
Mr. Hugh M. Jackson
Mr. R. L. Strickland
Paul Gross M.
Director Research Laboratory
DIVISION OF MEDICINE
SAINT HOSPITAL LUKE'S SAINT
LUKE'S
LUKE'S
i
-
i
11311 SHAKER BOULEVARD CLEVELAND OHIO 44104
(iy
August 11 1970
Mr. Clint B. Burnett
President
Manville Corporation
Twenty Two East Forticth Street
New York New York
10016
Dear Clint
Being required to make a statement and recommendation with respect to the potential hazard of asbestos fiber in
the public air and the need for controlling the same the National Air Pollution Control Administration asked the National Academy
~
of Sciences of the U.S.A. to designate a committee study this matter and bring in a report This committee has been formed and ultimately will report to a larger committee under the Chairmanship of Dr. Arthur DuBois and this committee in turn will make its recommendation to NAPCA The second meeting of this committee was held New York last Thursday By 1972 we are expected to have a fully developed and documented recommendation but prior to that time and it is hoped before the end of this year we are expected to make a recommendation as to whether or not an interim control procedure is needed and is feasible In the light of lack of knowledge and a wish to avoid prematurity we have been asked to not set any kind of standard in terms of a number It is possible however that something in the way of a number may actually come out in spite of this
From our two sessions thus far I gather that they
want to pinpoint the sources of public air contamination by
asbestos her and to obtain
controls are needed at these
a consensus
sources and
on whether or not some whether such controls
are feasible at this time Based upon what I know now I would think that all manufacturing sources and in this I would include
milling will be asked to reduce any output of fiber from the factory involved to the lowest level feasible taking into consideration the kind of ventilation and filtering devices currently
available Sources such as the actual mining operation disposal
Mr. Clint B. Burnett
-2-
August 11 1970
of solid waste road surfacing and similar uses of asbestos asbestos will
be far more difficult to control and I have the impression impression that
they will permit this to continue until further recommendations
are brought in in 1972. They may wish to make some specific
tech- recommendations about solid
nologies now exist that are
waste disposal and mining if of a conventional nature andmight
be introduced without undue hardship
The group seems to be well
aware of the fact that specific information on which to base
severe
do not
limitations or exist and will
permit continuance of the status quo
have to be obtained in the very near
simply
future
In this data on
regard I indicated that
these matters and that I
Manville had some scant would ask whether or not this
information could be made available
I think that it would be
well for the next
us to try to
two or three
of the factories with
get a little additional information in
weeks especially data in the neighborhood
and without control measures in cffect
On Friday of last week I attended a meeting in
Corning New York having to do with the question of whether or ~
not the public is being exposed in a hazardous way to fibrous
glass This meeting was called by a Subcommittee of the Committee
on Occupational
Health Dr. Lewis Cralley and
have Dr. Cralley indicated
of the American College of Chest Physicians
Clark Cooper serve on that Subcommittee Subcommittee
to us that he would like to
available
to him a statement about the likelihood of a public hazard from
fibrous
plagued
glass from an authoritative agency since
by requests for that kind of information
he is being
from a number
of sources A good many of us would agree with the desirability
of this but all of us fear a poor statement or on inflammatory
one that might be biased
It had been my understanding and that
of a number of others who were at the meeting that Dr. Scheppers
was going to present some data on the fibrogenecity in animals
secondary to contact with fibrous glass
He did not come to the
meeting however
The upshot of the meeting was that it would have been nice if no one had raised the issues but since it has been raised perhaps the committee that raised it might do something about it especially if it could he arranged to have individuals who actually know something about the problem as members of the Subcommittee This should not be interpreted that any of us wanted an unwarranted playing down of the question
I am sure that you recognize that this whole matter is in a large measure trumped up and supported by the jurisdictional
Mr. Clint B. Burnett
-3-
August 11 1970
problem of the Heat and Frost Insulators vs. the Sheet Metal
Workers
If they would drop the issue I am sure that we would
not be involved in the matter of some kind of authoritative
statement from the medical profession being needed
With best wishes
Sincerely yours
GWW
CC
Dr. Mr.
Tom Davison A.B. Marchant
Hugh Jackson
George W. Wright M.D.
wry
December 17 1968
Dr. Klosterkotter Ruhn University
Essen West Germany
Dear Dr. Klosterkotter
Dr. George Wright recently informed me of your desire for a bar made of chrysotile which you could use to supply fiber for inhalation exposures Under separate cover I am sending you a sample of chrysotile asbestos designated by our Identification No. 3778-83-1 This was made by slurrying relatively clean chrysotile fiber Manville Plastibest 20 casting the resultant slurry in a mold and then pressing it approximately 400 aq in The resultant sheet was then dried at 175C
Sah: o Bek
that this material will be satisfactory for your application and
ope
ild be very interested in learning any results that you obtain in your
Very truly yours
86 rs
CC
Dr. George Wright St. Luke's Hospital 11311 Shaker Boulevard Cleveland Ohio 44104
Dr. Sidney Speil Director Corporate Research & Development
bcc
H. M. Jackson - DH
F. L. Pundsack
S. Speil
Att J. P. Leineweber