Document GmpMv06RpkO0Q78zzXwBeVmdr

.X?1 '' " t tft F-S' r?Vr?1-1**' "t* *; , . v ,' ' r 7% # i ^xx.: Ju ly 18* 1 9 & D r. M. M#\-Shafe r -X. M edical Departments :iX--sX:XifSXf? !:?Sifil'tSi. 1;.- F rig ld aire Corporation Dayton, Ohio x& ' - I - ' *- XC s44`| Xpj.; i'j,' `'''X'W' fl'IilX D ear Dr* S h a fe rt -' `J ` b,vi+5m*r' m We a re e n c lo s r e p o r t on th e u r in e o f Mr* h erew ith analyfcloalBfe , --------- ^ 219 l 82#-r if<,y . In of the absence of any lead - . in th e specim en, I t would seam u n lik e ly th a t any acu te symptoms now p r e s e n t a r e r e l a t e d to lead* However, the sample i s ra th e r sm all and I f th e re has been a c o n s id e ra b le i n t e r v a l 6 to 8 weeks between h is exposure andthe c o lle c tio n of the samples, a fig u re - such as th e above 1b p o ssib le > I t might; be a good p lan to se cu re a . 2 * 1 /2 o r 3 l i t e r sample on th is m a n a f t e r he has been back a t work a week o r two, th a t I s , i f you w ish to estim ate the magnltude of h is exposure In the P ain t , Department* .> - . Very t r u l y yours , l* K. >. WFMjIS W illard' F. ^ c iiie /'li.D .; P .S . Ihe count of 12 stip p le d o e lla per f i f t y f ie ld s on the b lood smears I s n o t rem arkable and can not be considered as evidence of abnormal exposure# HZ 0016581