Document GL7r4o4OxO0eM6BB7gDJ3Z8m

FILE NAME: Early Asbestos Damage Suits (EADS) DATE: 1934 DOC#: EADS006 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: Documents from Case of Anna Pirskowski IDEA RIRSKOV7SKI -vsJOHHS-MAHVIDLE tCOIP UFONRITETDHESDTAISTTERSICDTI.STORFICHTEi7COJEURRSTEY The p l a i n t i f f , fo rm erly a re s id e n t; o f : S o m erv ille, Hew J e rs e y , and now r e s id in g in O il C ity ,' P e n n s y l v a n i a ``.~ oomplains of the above named defendant a co rp o ratio n , resid es a t M a n v ille , Hew J e r s e y , a s fo llo w s :- ' .si- 1. The p la in tif f waa in the employ of the defendant in L ie n v ille , Hew J e rs e y , a t i t s p la n t, in th e y e a r 1922 and fo r some tin e p r io r th e re to . 2. That th e sa id p la in tif f was a t -th at tim e an in r f8 n t named Anna U rb an ic k , in th e employ of th e d efen d an t who was engaged in the m anufacture of a sb e sto s, and th a t p a rt- - icles of said asbestos end other dangerous a rtic le s used in its business of m anufacture os afo resaid was inhaled by h e r, so th a t she became d iseased , sick and poisoned, end th a t the same perm eated h er system , p a rtic u la r ly h er lu n g s, and th a t her tody become in fected and weakened so as to cause her to su ffer perm anently w ith a m alignant disease. 3. The n eg lig en ce of the defendant com plained of is as follow s:- (a) In fa ilin g to provide tne p la in tif f w ith a s a fe ' place of work. Tn f a i l i n g to p ro v id e th e p l a i n t i f f w ith masks ;*T.'*>:- r.*r " .1 1 - f-r j - i . SU^ ->i*,i*.< 'i 4 , T h at by reaso n o f h e r su ffering:* i lin e s s Nand;,'.; diseased co n d itio n, due to the negligence of the defendant as afo resaid , the p la in tif f was obliged to q u it-h e r employ-" ' I K . /.* ment in the y ear 1922, and w ill be d isab led throug ho ut h e r life tim e . She h as, sin ce leaving her p o s itio n , been o b lig ed . to spend a la rg e sum o f money fo r m edical expense and w ill s u i f e r a lo s s in wages , a l l to h e r damage in the sum o f 50,000.00. I! The p l a i n t i f f demands the sum o f $5 0,00 0.00 as I1 damages from the defendant. K' < w > , AUliA PIRSKOH7SKX, P lain tiff VS J 0 H1TS-IIA3JVTTT 'R! TM vora a'Ptntt % UNFITOERDTHSTEADTEISSTDRIICSTTRIOCPTKCMOURJETRSEY Action. at Lav. t : AHENDHENT TO ANSWER t > *t : ':*v. *.D( Defendant file s the follow ing defenses in ; addition to those set fo rth in the o riginal answer herein* . FOURTH DEFENSE r` V, The in ju ry and the d ise a se a lle g e d in*the com plain; were due to one of th e ris k s of h er employment assumed by th e p l a i n t i f f aB p a r t of th e term s of h e r 'c o n tr a c t of employment. PIPTH DEFENSE The in ju ry and the d ise a se a lle g e d in the complain-;. were due to one of the risk s of h er employment assumed by the p la in tiff as p a rt of the term s of her contract of employment in th a t the p la in tif f knew, or by the exercise of reason able care on her p a rt should have known, th e alleg ed dangers of her employment. SIXTH D3PE1TSB The in ju r y and th e d is e a s e a lle g e d in th e com plain w ere caused by c o n trib u to ry n e g lig e n c e on the p a rt of th e p lain tiff. SEVENTH DEFENSE I The in ju ry and the d is e a s e a lle g e d in the com plain UFONRITETDHESDT#AISTTERSICDTISTORFICKTE7/ JERSGEOY U tt ,rt* - AI.7TA PHtSKCWSKI, JOHNS-MANYILLE vs. CORPORATION, Plaintiff Defendant . Action at Law. ORDER FOR DISCOXTIXUAXCE. ^/ff7 The above entitled oausc having been settled between the parties thereto; , It is ORDERED that the same be, and it is hereby discontinued, without cost^o either party . as against the other Entered June 13, 19 34 On motion oj' J j. Attorneys of ( i % defendant ^ Consent is hereby given to the mak ng and entering of the above