Document G6aKae0mLmOr48wGrMVY67XY7
ABD00263455
PARTICULATE EMISSION TEST REPORT M-504 DRYER SYSTEM
CONOCO CHEMICALS COMPANY A DIVISION OF CONOCO INC.
5200 SOUTHEAST 59TH ST. OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73155
APRIL 30, 1981
ABD00263456
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction A. Source Information 1. Identification/Location 2. Contact/Submitter B. Testing Information 1. Personnel Conducting Tests 2. Dates of Tests 3. Location of Tests C. Process Information 1. Plant Process Description 2. Process Flow Diagram
c 3. Dryer Exhaust Diagram 4. Stack Dimensions for M-504
II.Emission Test Results III. Sampling Procedures
IV.Analytical Technique V. Data and Calculations A. Raw Field & Analytical Test Data B. Calibration Correction Factors for Dry Gas Meter and Orifice Meter C Sample Calculations
VI..Appendices A. Gas Chromatograph Results for Stack Gas Components B. Pitot Tube & Sampling Nozzle Configuration
C. Summary of Test Variables
Page 1 1 1 1
2 4 5 6
7 9 10 11
12 22
24 ` 29 30 32 36
ABD00263457
1
I. Introduction
The following report pertains to the particulate emissions test conducted at the Conoco Chemicals PVC Plant during the period from April 28, 1981, to April 29, 1981. This particulate emissions test is being submitted in conjunction with the operating permit application for the new M-504 dryer system.
Mr. James Milner of the Oklahoma City-County Health Department served as the Administrator during the emissions test.
A pre-test meeting was conducted on April 21, 1981, to review sampling procedures and requirements.
A. Source Information
1. Identification/Location
Conoco Chemicals Company PVC Plant 5200 Southeast 59th Street Post Office Box 15360 Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73155
2. Contact/Submitter
Mark C. Manion, Process Engineer Telephone No. (405)-672-4551
B. Testing Information
1. Personnel Conducting Tests
CONOCO
M. C. Manion
E. E. Dawes
Oklahoma City-County Health Department
Observers
Test Run Numbers
James Milner
504-1, 2, and 3
David Davison
504-1, 2, and 3
Don Soule
504-1, 2, and 3
ABD00263458
2
2. Dates of Tests
Date April April April
28, 1981 28, 1981 29, 1981
3. Location of Tests
Run Number 504-1 504-2 504-3
Conoco Chemicals Company PVC Plant 5200 Southeast 59th Street Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73155
Process Information
1. Plant Process Description
Vinyl chloride monomer is received at the Plant site in railroad tank cars and is transferred by pump and compressor to the VCM storage tanks. The VCM is then pumped to fresh VCM batch tanks which are located in the reactor area.
PVC is produced batchwise from the vinyl chloride monomer. The reactor is first evacuated to remove inerts and then is charged with VCM, water and a suspension agent. The reaction is initiated with a perioxide-type catalyst. When the polymerization is complete, the unreacted VCM is removed from the reactor in the recovery sequence
The recovery system is designed to recycle unreacted VCM. The recovery system utilizes pressure and vacuum phases. During the pressure recovery phase, VCM vapors are pulled from the reactor, compressed, condensed, and liquefied. The liquefied VCM is routed to the recovered monomer tanks. When the reactor pressure approaches atmospheric pressure, vacuum pumps are started and the pressure is reduced further. These VCM vapors are also compressed and condensed and the liquefied VCM routed to the recovered monomer tanks. The recovered monomer is subsequently charged to the reactor along with fresh VCM. As a part of the recovery operation steam is injected into the reactor to aid in the removal of residual VCM in the slurry. In the latter stage of this steam stripping/recovery step, the stripping vapors are routed to the EPA recovery system. The majority of the VCM is recovered and recycled. The inerts which eventually build up in the system are vented to an incinerator.
When the recovery step is complete, the PVC/water slurry is dumped
through a slurry screen which removes oversize material. The slurry is then pumped to blend tanks. After product dumping, the reactor is rinsed to complete the reaction batch cycle. The rinse solution is sprayed into the reactor and discharged from the reactor through a screen to separate entrained PVC.
The PVC/water slurry is pumped to a centrifuge in the drying area, and extracted water is discharged to the process sewer. Wet cake
ABD00263459
CONFIDENTIAL
is fed to a dryer and dried with hot air. The air and dry resin leave the dryer and enter a baghouse. The baghouse separates the PVC resin from the exhaust gases. An induced draft fan exhausts the drying air to the atmosphere.
The dried resin flows to a product sifter where oversize material is again separated and collected. Some resin is then pneumatically conveyed to a plastic pipe plant. The remaining resin is trans ferred from railroad silos to rail hopper cars or bulk trucks for shipment.
OKLAHOMA CITY, OICLA,
ABD00263461 5
I
travcrse Points
1
2
3! :
4
5
b
7
8
9
10
|i
12
13 ;
ia ;
IS @
H,
17 @
&
19
20 &
n
77
**
, 22.75
1'
<------------------------------ SV'SO" -------------------------------- >
.! J li
t 1
STACK tMSCUAfcGe
i
11.5
i A
DO OOO
i 7.5
'
13 LOWE . &sChASh J
FV SAMPLE PoS-TS Z" PIPE NIPPUB
STACK, ASA = ^.29 Z SQUARE ft.
i
EpJr/AuEWT DiAMeTES. = 2.2SQ FT.
FIGURE" Z
STACK. bi^EMSlO^S
DiiYFR. M- 504
OKLAHOMA CiTT PvC PLAMT
COKJOCO C.UEMICALS CO.
I
!
ji i-
i .
ABD00263462
ABD00263463 Date
c
SAMPLE- Popts>
ABD00263464
ENTV
STaC-K.
^Dt viEvy
i
BlowFR
C
STACK OuTlET BLOWEPL
flow
&A6. house
top view
F- 1 & U It- F 3 bR-VGfi- ^-y^AOCT \A6 2.A/vi
OKLAHOMA Cl TV tWC. FUNT
COHOCO CMf^'C^L'j Co
ABD00263465
t7
II. Emission Test Results
The results of the particulate emission tests are tabulated in Table I. The concentration of particulates in the stack gases are less than the maximum allowable level specified in Article II - Sec. 28-45 (Table 3) of the Oklahoma City Code. The post-leak and isokinetic sampling checks were all within the limits as specified by EPA in Method 5 (Federal Register, Vol. 42, No. 160-Thursday, August 18, 1977).
tJ.J t
ABD00263466
LU
Li-- 2:
C->
r-*. 1-- r-> cr CMOIOOO
CO r-- f-- CO Cn . CM CM
r- 1-- LO O O
co co
0 .
0
co
C\J
cr>
CJ
to O T-- CO
O
1--
0
O
0
o
CO
CM
O
CM
o
Z
OWON O to <3- CO to CTV
r^. ,_
c to 01 co co ^ r-- r-- r-- to CM LO
0 DC
CM
Lf> sr to 0 0 cn 0 co ct> to co 0 * 0
O O
O*
to*
O r-*
CO CM CM 1-- CO r-- 0 O O r- O 0
P0
CM CM
l/)
OO
0
CD
c
<o:
ce: *od-
*--4 LO
J-- I LU to
C<Oc
LU
Of
LU
>-
Cel
O
C<Cel
ID
CO
c
cn 0 0 CO LO ,--.
r-. 0
cn cn CM CO r-- ,----- CM
to O to 0 O
co 0 co CT) to j-- 0 O
co co 0 CM CM '------ r-- O
O
O
CO co
LO 0k
O CM
CD r-- Li
O eu
E
to 0
Li-
jQ CU
f--
01 s;
to
u_ O
XI
cn *
0
r--
E cu #> Li. P P
e to
to
CD
I-- r--
cu p
0
r
O. fd
r E
O tO
E 1--
CO cn
to 3
O 1-- >
to u
4- cu cn u
r-
* O 3: zn u_ a> 0 P
cu 0 to 2: E
r-- e e *>s% p LL. fO
C
Cl. 0 r-
n3 1--
e
0k p 0) 4-
0 cu Q-
e
O Ll. to . <0 CD
O 1-- to to
/--
E LU
cu
O
RJ +-> 3
e t-- r 4~ CU
<U| f--
r"* to u a * 3 *
O CT u
X
P
ea OJ O P > 0 O
eO
<o] 0
O. CO e 1-- e fO P to CU E E p E s
r* fO Lu 0 3 E r-* 1--1 _E O a> to cu c
E to 2: to a> O 0 1-- >
> J--
O
to
4--
O
10
to
OJ
0. B
rO_
<+O
P < 0 < r" <ca r--
0)
O E <0 e 0 CU
fO E
E
0
P cu Cu h- >> P cu P
P
E
a) O)
c _J E CU 3
E JX cu 1 a> E E
t--3
3 r--
0 fO
0
ItJ
O fO
O
ra
0p
e to
0 E
3 r--
r-- X
O O p p p p cu 0 O O fO >- > to CO co to a. 0. CU > z:
XraI
t*5n^
I CO
CU
o iCoD r
*-- 1--1
OJ
o pE
cu *0 0 cu
>>
p
*1-- cu
E 0 JC fO
r~~ P O
>>
XI
0 ai E r" 4a>
'D
to
<
a
ABD00263467
c9
III. Sampling Procedures
The sampling procedures followed were those set in EPA's Test Method 5.. Before performing the emission test, a preliminary velocity survey was made on the stack to be sampled. Barometic pressures stack tempera ture, and moisture content of the stack gases were collected. With this information, and measurements of minimum, maximum, and average velocity pressure drops, the appropriate sampling nozzle size was determined .
Stack gas analytical data from previous particulate emissions tests were utilized for the determination of molecular weight. The volume percents of the gaseous components were determined by gas chromatography (see Appendix A).
The dry gas meter and flow orifice calibrations were made against a calibrated wet test meter. The S type pitot tube was not calibrated. This calibration was waived because the pitot tube construction met the specifications set forth by EPA in Test Method 2 (See Appendix B). A pitot tube correction factor of 0.84 was used in the subsequent calculations.
The glass fiber, filters were kept in a desiccator for at least twentyfour hours. Fresh silica gel Was used for each test. The filter and silica gel were then weighed before transferring them to the sampling train. Normally, about 250 grams of silica gel per run were used. The silica gel and impinger were weighed as one unit. The glass filter was weighed in a petri dish with the gasket.
The sampling train was assembled and clamped together tightly to pre vent leaks. The nozzle was capped and a pre-leak check v/as made by starting the vacuum pump. The pre-leak test was performed to assure that the post-leak test would be less than 0.02 CFM.
After the sampling probe was located at the desired point and the probe and box temperature became stabilized, the proper orifice pressure drop for isokinetic conditions was calculated. The selected pressure drop was then set by adjusting the vacuum pump controls.
Two flasks were installed to the pitot tube hoses to dampen the pressure drop fluctuations.
Each traverse point was sampled for three minutes. This yielded over thirty dry standard cubic feet of sample gas per run. The probe was moved from point to point within a given sampling port without stopping the pump. The sampling rate was adjusted as quickly as possible to
BD0026346
I
10
return to isokinetic conditions after each move. At each traverse point the appropriate data were recorded.
At the end of the sampling period, the sampling train was checked for leaks. The sampling train was then transported to the laboratory for analytical work. This entire process was repeated for each test. A total of three runs were conducted.
Equipment
TEST METHODS
1. Sampling Train - Lear Seigler Manual Stack Sampler. (Model PM-100, meets EPA's specifications)
2. Probe Nozzle - 316 S.S. nozzle with tapered leading edge. (Size - 3/16")
3. Probe Liner - 3 foot heated pyrex liner with thermocouple.
4. Pitot Tube, Type S, 316 S.S.
5. Differential Pressure Gauges, Dwyer Airflow Manometer, Model 400-5L
C & 10L 6. Thermocouple Meter, DIGIMITE (Model B-1160)
IV. Analytical Technique
Analytical reagent grade acetone v/as used to wash the probe and nozzle. A blank volume of acetone was poured into a tared beaker. The acetone ^vaporated and the beaker was weighed on an analytical balance to within - 0.0001 grams. There v/as no contaminants or residue in the acetone. Hence, the correction factor for the acetone blank concentration was zero.
All containers used for determining the weight of particulates collected v/ere handled with rubber gloves and weighed on a Mettler Analytical Balance to the nearest 0.0001 grams. The water and silica gel impingers v/ere weighed on a Mettler Balance to the nearest 0.1 grams.
Prior to assembling the sampling train, the glass fiber filter and the gasket for the holder was weighed on a petri dish. Two impingers were filled with 100 ml. of water. These impingers, an empty impinger and the silica gel impinger were weighed separately.
At the end of the sampling run, the sampling train v/as returned to the laboratory for cleanup. The filter and gasket were cooled in a desiccator - prior to weighing them. The nozzle, probe and glass holder top piece were carefully v/ashed with acetone. The probe liner was cleaned with a bristle brush. The wash acetone was collected in a tared beaker and allowed to evaporate in a closed ventilation hood. The combined weight of resin from the acetone wash and the resin on
the filter was the total amount of particulates collected.
V. Data and Calculations
C C
ABD00263470
12
RAW FIELD & ANALYTICAL TEST DATA
ABD00263473
At*A UVT> CA L l^ATvA BOfJ - l
15
p/tV I TI f/lc
4-^g-Sl *3 `-Q O A VM
FULL fcr-'ft
SI67 s
S 23* IS'
4 tf.Ofe 673.sc 1
^HE2i3JsaL
S>2.o' S3O.BO
.
AW '*45.43 i : ?.fc.5|
440.. 14* 6SLlO~
*?1 '.:....li.o.8..-.. [. - * *^2S2l-' 4
j._-
(9 P3T&1 fclSH . + C.UE/.frJ PlltfcP-' Me,8G!4
'pSTi?.i *btS M '
1^- 1 0^
. CucvV > "-.LTfc.^
C= 7 ;
Q>
C
er.'.PTY PL^SIC + pA-^TtC. X /SC&iO.Or U3.387 ! EfmPrV FuASVC >o^'771 ; ; pA-}- ACtVa'O^ ?.o, o^'o
e 'ff\ fry
P/WmC-. ..EWrY f-la^K
pA^JTlC
10.3.3-77 3 *03.377 1
o. O002.
PcT&i V>l5V -f D\Tl' FiL-TcAPtfTf3 iMSiH
4 2.fcS67
3 2. **7 1 3 ^.7S4
t>ery f^ltbk. cL^'j filtfX-.
pA/LTlC
^.7>s4 _3j21LL
O.oooS
TOT7i L. i>AGTl C.U LA' l c
5=: 0.0002 + cJ.OOOZ r O.OOOS Gr4*
16
PCrTE-l TmsM
+ Cu=:/sO PiUrEft 7>E7* blSM r* ) " ; i_T:\
42.fc>5c*V ZZ.^'ZQ
<1 ,T034
(>
c
tilPTV FL/iSK f PA>iTlO * AC-ctT^F
i 27-20^7
EfwPtY R-AS1C 1Q^.IQ4Z
PA-fcnc. -{-.ACt^ave: . 24.;toz7
e^frr PL/ftt -1- P/vf^nc-. pV/^PTY FLA^^C PA^riC .
i<^.io<c )03- 10-2
o.^003
<>
PcT^\ t>tSv4
r DuVrv Fi'-Te/L per^-i b'.^n b^rJrV Fiiv~^
32.^^-17 <\.loZ><
btv^rY puxtZ PlCTe^
pA-fcrKL
T.705C ^.7054
0. OoO l
/{p
TOTTi L pA^Tt C.U lATST 1
c
0,000\ -V 9.0003 O.OOOCr-
.I 5
I`;
t
c
i
z
. .3 ; -- ^ \ yo-rA l
ABD00263479 BO.-4 - ~5
21
p4rr& . -nmt *
4-25-SL *1 :oo 4 ha
F>,\PrY
POLL
ASiEtSSilizlzaiL Sbl.Sfe 532,^4
440-*24
. &4:
ZVW . 44,61!; ..
n.S3;
l Jr '...__ : '-1 i 6&Oi-
62,54?:
&
7>H7foi t),.St-i
3Z4?>6
<?? 2 7
<)
C
t '.?
|2fl, 33^3" 102. 04 4-
+ Aeezw.
26- 2 30 i
6).
e^.prr pl/& * P-4-ZT' . ' ^w.prY .pA-en-ui.
f=>3. [04 7 JOt. 1 0^4-
0. 0003
<>
<E>
Peri t>ivi
r Duvrv fu-teAPtvrct PtUFF
l>terv PlLTclZ L_-?V^> PlLTfcr-
pArcnc
44. 34. 334 7
o1 . 7 12.3
7*2*5 7)'_7
O.OOOZ.
fey
c
ToT7i l. FA^ti clu la- t c
0.OOOZ -f- 3,0-DoZ O.0005-
. ABD00263480
22
CALIBRATION CORRECTION FACTORS FOR DRY GAS METER AND ORIFICE METER
C
ABD00263481
23
<1
*b %
t
rO . v9 m* CM
>0 >9
ro oo
P- 00
n9
nS
o
00
r;
rl
X 45
0
oo <r
n9
00
cr
rM C* cr cr o-
rvO cr cr
to cr
cr
0
c~
O 6 6 6. c o o
T e m p e ra tu re
0 ,^2 0 9
O
CD oX CD o
2
b; Id
H
\i Id=>
in
<
o
>* oc o
o *h- 2 ''
**
ro P- m
sr 00
on rn CD
o . ro \a to
o
c U)
CO (A O cr r~ G-
00 tsl cr CG r**
o
rcan
o > <
OJ
cn
2 -AU-
s; :?o-
<
to
cr 03
tP o
-i) ro
0" O
Vo
d o-
o o'
(n
X* Xoi <L 5 CD
t/> to oo
0 cr O m vS 0--
r- r- QP CO CP CO
>1_
o
o-> id -u. r: 3>o
0
*O
vt
K> r) cn
_4_>
to
a
VaJ
3 CD C~
-IL $o
QJ
ip r-
In r-
In p-
in o-
in
>1 s.
Ln r-
\p CJ
? ,1-j t-o
SO
O o -<*L > >vO U_
fJ
ISO
C5
_Q CL
0 0 o oo0
<T
s9 qro in
o c-` cv 4> r-
v> in o o d O
LlT
Is*GC
DC
s,, o ii 5 1,
CO > ^ cy LL
0 0
o
0
0 0
0 0
0
00 0
o o *0
oo
o
I Ld 10 o ^ DC ro ^
in in 0 6 o
o
CL O
PO
DC
htd
<u O
S o
^S?0
o CM
it: X
to o o o o0 o
Id
O q c: o <J ^ DC gto -
o i--i 04 C0 -sT in
<<
O CD
O
vO
^r
+
$
o O-I vD
nO +0 J*-*o mr--i
_Q
Q. X
5 <3
a
+ .O
CL
"O
Of
c ow 4J
rrtsJ
cr UJ
a>
r: `
<L> O
CM
f-t
X <]
TO
o vQ
+ CL o
*o
5:1 O |Q0
II o
M
If' 00 ZL
<
ABD00263482
24
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
ABD00263483
LEGEND
W
S
Ah
I
Ma Md Ms AP
St
Ti m
st
m
ms
Stack cross-sectional area, sq. ft.
Cross-sectional area of nozzle, sq. ft.
Volume fraction of water vapor in the stack gases.
Pitot tube coefficient, 0.84
Concentration of particulate matter in stack gases, gr/DSCF
Average pressure drop aicross the orifice meter, in. H20
Percent of isokinetic sampling
Total amount of particulates collected.
Average molecular weight of dry stack gases Ib/lb-mole
Average molecular weight of stack gases Ib/lb-mole.
Average of the square roots of the observed velocity pressure drop, square root of in. H20
Barometic pressure, in. Hg
Stack pressure, in. H^O
Absolute stack pressure, in. Hg
Standard absolute pressure, 29.92 in. Hg
Volumetric stack gas rate at standard conditions (68F & 29.92 in. Hq - dry basis), DSCFM
Total sampling time, min.
o
Average dry gas meter temperature, R
o
Stack gas temperature, R
o
Standard temperature, 528 R
Total volume of liquid collected in impingers and silica gel, ml.
Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry gas meter, cu. ft
Volume of gas sample as measured by the dry gas meter at standard conditions, DSCF
26
V - Average stack gas velocity, ft/sec V _ Volume of water vapor in the gas sample at standard
conditions, cu. ft. Y - Dry gas meter correction factor.
The following equations were obtained from EPA's Test Methods 2 and 5 for Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources as published in the Federal Register (Vol. 42, No. 160 - Thursday, August 18, 1977)
Dryer M-504 Test Run No. 1
1. Vms = (17.64) .* Vm * Y * (Pb+AH/13.6)
(Eq. 5-1)
m
(17.64) * (41.38) * (0.989) ^(29.93 + 0.768/13.6) ms (460 + 95.25)
Vms = -3--8--.-9--9- DSCF
2. Vws = 0.04707 * V1 = 0.04707 *61.36= 2.888 SCF
(Eq. 5-2)
3. Bw = Vws/' (vVws + Vms)' Bw = 2.888/(2.888 + 38.99) = 0.0690
(Eq. 5-3)
4. M$ = Md (1-Bw) + 18.02 * Bw Ms = 28.95 (1- 0.0690) + 18.02 * (0.0690) M = 28,20 lb/lb-mole
(Eq. 2-5)
5* Ps = Pb + (pg^3.6) Ps = 29.93 + (-0.626/13.6) = 29.88 in. Hg
(Eq. 2-6)
85.49 *Cp *AP 1/2* (TS/(PS * MS))V? (Eq. 2-9)
1 1/2(85.49) * (0.84) * (1.758)1/2 * (160.5 + 460)
_(29.88*28.20)_
= 81.71 ft/sec
ABD00263486
7. I = -0945 *Ts *Vms
(Eq. 5-8)
ps *VS * An *Ti *(1-BW)
I=
0.0945 * (620.5) * (38.99) (29.88) * (81.71) * (0.000126) * (75) * (1-0.0690)
I = 106.4
8. Q$ =
Q= s
60 0-Bw)*V$ * A *Tst * P$
(Eq. 2-10)
Ts *'Ps~t
60 (1- 0.0690) * (81.71) * (5.293) * (528) * (29.88) (620.5) * (29.92)
Q = 20,533 DSCFH
9. Cs = 15.43 ** Ma /Vms
C = 15.43 + (0.0005) = 0.000198 qr/DSCF s (38.99)
(Eq. 5-6)
28
VI. Appendices
ABD00263488
30
GAS CHROMATOGRAPH RESULTS FOR STACK GAS COMPONENTS
XW
SEPARATI
if ANALY
XT
i. TO l-k SAMPLE
/JaFFty}/) aJ - - ro 2
.ANAL. NO.. /9JT7JT - /y_T7^
nATF y-i-jr~7?
f~ LYSIS TYPE:
r&y___ ,GLC_X, GPC.
LC.
IIR___ , PYRGC___ , SA__ PV__
Other__________________ 4. ANALYSIS CONDITIONS:
TLC___ , Free Oil___Prep GC Rl___Coul____ % Active____ .
g/eo A
RESULTS:
Component
fti-Cbo
QUAl____ _ QUANT__ , SEM l-QUANT____
%C0NF. LIMIT -
v/ %
Conf. Interval
pa. 2<0
C/t0 a.
M-fo 2 Al>-
0.2.2-
\-
_____ __________________________________ 7?-Q-______________
______<2,2-3_______________________
5-55X3, 10*70
Prep GC -- preparative gas chromatography
IR - infrared
Other -- self-explanatory
r
c
ABD00263490
EN
32
PITOT TUBE & SAMPLING NOZZLE CONFIGURATION
" ' . COMPANY COMQCO
cNSVERSE E AXIS V
|
B|
FACE OPENING "H PLANES
W
SC Sg.03
PROBE LENGTH H pf
EE>^ A OR B (cl A SIDE PLANE
Figure 2*2. Properly constructed Type S pitot tube, shown in: (a) end view; face opening planes perpendicular to transverse axis; (b) top view; face opening planes parallel to lon gitudinal axis; (c) side view; both legs of equal length and centerlines coincident, when viewed from both sides. Base line coefficient values of 0.8 ! may be assigned to pitot tubes constructed this way.
TRANSVERSE TtfSE AXIS
a]
---------------------- LESS THAW 10
1a2 _______
o; /. 5a
bf. Q.o
LESS THAW 5
.0(4-L$S THAW .*,2cm[1fl")
.03
LESS THAW .eScm
Figure 2-3. Types ot face-open': '{ misalignment the; can result Rom field usd or im proper construction of Type S p. t tubes. These will not effect the baseline value of CpUi r-o long as ai and 0.2 < 10, [li andp2 < &. * <0.32 cm (1/8 in.) and w<
0.08 cm (1/32 in.) (citation 11 in Suction G).
f
STATIONARY SOURCES
f
34 121:1553
3.H Pcti'rmlns ()> sleek gas dry molecular Weight. K*k cuti.lxuiluib processus or |>io<'uj thut emit umullally COi, Oi, CO, and Nr, lu Method 3. Fur processes (-milling CAMsiilljJiy air. oil ofial, j'4 iitwt) nut W con ducted; uv. o dry molecular wtignl ot yj.o. Fur virus
other methods. subject O tins &|i|ovol oi tho A.li.ilil>inUor. must U used.
31 OLiMin lh molslur* content front Jlefarcnco Method 4 (ur equivalent) or from Method 6. ' >
3 b UsUrmluv the croai-aecUoivaJ ar<t of the stock ur duct at (tin sampling hM-alion. YVJiui>vur puoaible, pliyji.ully mriutuo th slock Oiii.tiiaions rather lhau Doing bhiepiitiU.
4. CWfArof.'urt
4.1 Typu U FlUit Tub*. Dt-fore its Initial uto, cm*fhy tiumiti* lh Typ* H pltnl tub* In top, aide, and t! views to verify that the tac openings of the tube aiu uligttud within the specUVatidftS illustrated In Figure 3-2 or 2 3. The pitot tube shall not be used it It fail* to meet these alignment i>cinc*Uoiis. * After vilifying the bee opening alignment, measure! ami tecotd the fullowlwg dlmwisloua oi the pilot tubo:
(a) Iti* evlernul inl.l.-;:
(dimension f),. Fi/ure
2-ib); ulill lb) tlui l a*.: Ur-.-;-i>n-r t-!i>C
(dnmuoiuiiS /*i and /', >;*v-"e - .:) II It, is between
0.4.1 and tl.tij cm (lie ami ;.j .-i.l a-.-l if Fi and F*Me
*i|tml amt between 1 Uiut:J 1
i are two povmle
Option*: (I) the pilot (`the (*> 1 <. abbramd a.r.>.'.t.ng
to Ito iVMciliui! vulhmJ i.'i -turns 4 12 ............-It
4.1 6 behw, or (1) a bicuVie ,;w:uU.t tube) cuclii.l
Vttluu of 0 hi limy bu S`t'.'iid U the (-.'tut tube. Note,
however, that if Die |.iiui lu*_< t pj>t of an assembly,
Colll.iMimi n-ay still he fe-l .:ivd. Oe-.pUe Wnowkdae
bf tha baseline vocllii lent rs-'tie bc Fix Hun 4.1.1).
lift, I'j,, end l'o lilcmliljr |l.r }-vilH>l limits, the
pitnl lul-e muitbecahbistcd as outlined in 4.1 2 through
4.15 below.
4.1.1 Type K Hint Tube A *wrdJic. Purlny sample
ami Vel'i-lly Iruv.-xsei, the bellied Tyi>e S pllul lube li
hot always
In many i_>: sieves. the i-ilvt lube is
Used In et.nihinafnot with iilinr aNlrv-ejjiui'lu.y cuml-on*
rnlj iif.r/mocoujitr, . utjjplh>< prohr. tu-irb-) as port at
0<i ".ca.-inlly." The pii'xm - -.4 uil-rf aamphni; emnio-
iieiits roh smnvtimi-a olf-xl n.< tieLw-hne volur.d iheTyiat
If I'Xor HilK-i'ovJlicii'itt
y rVet'Kii a); llu-irtuin
On b-aigned (ur vthvrwim h^>owi>i ImucUiw coelfuHeut
\uhm may or may not W valid ^a^ycl. uMwi.My. Ttw
b.to l,ne and ean,My r.- iJkn.l vol,me writ U
only when the retoiiv.: i.Wemmi | U,r
in
lh ivOKi.,. y l Sin'i Unit arrudyiiumic mi.-rt.-iru.-e efh- N err rllrphiafed. Figures l`-fi thrr.ugj, :-.v
lulrrnren"irit- i-mii|Hii(ct arrouut-iin-nls t>r *l'yiw S rniut tuh.-i having citrrnal tuhig dininrUrv t-.-tu.-ni O. 4Sq.i.!u ;iJc,,i <)( end Jf.).Tyta-ti t.iu.tulwo.^-m-
P. i-^ that f.!l to meet any or ul! f tl.e . iiWuii-ms r > igures a--, through 2-8 shall U calibmlrd a. ce.h.m U,
the prooeduie ouCiued ill Soctiun* 4.1.2 thnen-h I t u
PrW, and prior to Callbmtlou, U.e vutnvs a u,u hit.-:
component M.eclnn IplUrPiiOnlr, pUnt-thriiii-irtiui-b-
puul-ptobo sheath) M.ail be measured unit nco.[.-.'
Noth.--Do not use any Typs B pitot tube lusurnbly wfiuU Is conSlrucIcd uteb that thsiminm-t |vce*-eue v|e-t<hig pl.oie of the pitot lube Is below the entry phumof lh Doiria (vue Figure 2-Ob).
4.1.2 C&flbretiud Setup. 11 the Type S pltut tahr i r< be calibrated, one leg o( lb* Lube shall lir |<ruuuw'>liy
merited A.,iid Ibo other, t.CaMbiallun st^il Imid.eir. in
o liuvr system having the (ullowing rssri.lmt design features:
I
4-21-78
NQ221E. THE >!-'.?ACT '. ...VJRE C?6?ilG PLAUu OF TK6m0T TU3E Gii^u ee eve?:: vvjth or asove th
N0221E ENTRY ?LA?i.
Figure 2*6. Proper pitot tubs - sampling nozzfe connsuration to prc-l-enl aerodynamic interference; buttonhook - re nozzle; centers of nozzle and pitot opening aligned; Pt between 0.4S and 0.95 cm (3/16 and
3/8 in.).
published by THE LiUKlCAU OF .NAT,
A FJ*'AIKS. INC.. WANMINGTON', D.C. 200.17 [Am.cndiK At . t.r.
Figure 2-7, Proper thermocouple pfacementjc prcvei\t interference;
D{ between 0.43.a'mi 0.95 cm (3/J6 and 3/8 in,).
^
------ ~
i
Vjgur.e 2-8. Minimum pitot-sample probe separation needed to prevent Interference; Dt between 0.48 and 0.95 cm {3/16 and 3/8 in.}.
4 1.2.1 The flowing sm stream emit t>s conSntd to ft duct of dctimia crowi-ocujnal Weft, eittu. circular ot <r (angular. ior circular cross-sections, Uia mlnliuiita
Cri''WhISdnialmjilelKte,r tsbhsaWll bid-lb50[.>5 lclumU(!1s2idIne.));sltuadrlrlr>c*taOnLylouUart
i'. KIil (10 iu.). fl.J.J T& erc.*ee KoruJ area of tbo calibration duct t* comUnt over & distant'* of 10 or tr.ora duct
d.-ncet -,r1. For a rectangular cross-section, uo an eqnlvft*
t.:. *i- soler, tVwuUCed from i<> following wjiuliou, ti c.-ictii:>nc U.c umnbrr of duct dltiuelcrs:
Z>.
2 l.\V
(L+fV)
Vliclot /),* F.p.lvulent d.uiurtar A -- * rf-i t ti
H'-WMiU
Egimtioii 2-1
To tmuri tli# j.reumc of stable, fully developed flow' pattern* st the tuhbcnllou site. Or *'toa( sicllon," tli4 1I1-1 n.ii.t lie li.^tvd .1 l<aj( tight diameters downstream and two diameter* upstrc-im from t!io nearest disturb ance*.
Nmtk.--Tle r-;gbt- sod l wo-JI-WieW crltcila t doL fclrjdulti; other teit section locations may be ii.-axt (sub* 1-el to approval of the A.Ii.lnl.Ualor), providr.l thul the*
dt tf.s tr.: site <> stable cut! doiiOhitrLi/ parsUdi P>lh* dUrlaHs.
<.1.2.3 The flow sydvm shall have tha capacity to yui.ciute ft test-section Velocity .round OlS lu/iulil (3,Ui0*
ft/ndn). This veWily must tio couslaut with umc lo
KUaronteS itfmly flow during v.libriuloii. Ni-! that
TytM) 6 pitot lubiieucIlidcUU nhl ntii.nl by su'.glc-Vclucily
Caiibiation at !il5 ni/iuiu (3,000 ll/inl.ii will generally L>*
valid Lo within j-3 [mrteut for tbo im'u.-memei.t of
VtilocWlr* above 3u tn/min (l.bOo fl/iuin) ur. ! to within
:5 lo 6 /".iccnl for the tnea-.ureiiu.'nl of v.-u-.-nicj I-
twet`11 ISO fthtl 3dr iik/mtii (COO and I.IPO P..unn). If a
snore Lirccbo coiivbiiion bci\e.vn
and vchii>' is
tfeiirod. the fiotv
aboil bave tIn; cjc-wil) lo
Cciioratan* b-nst fui:/ il.'.met, 1 imc-bivdri.v.it lot-sccti.nl velocities ..m:;iin Hie \clocity rumio Imm W> to l.&2s
rn/tnln 0.11 to i.lvyTt/mln), and calibration tls'.a sboll
t>e Isliuit ul regular velocity Inirrcab ov<.-r ibis rangu
(sto Citations U and 11 in Section 6 for detail-).
1.1.2.1 Two entry ports, 01.a each fur t'.;o standard and Type H pitot tubes, shut! i.u cut In Ibe test si-cinui;
tho stuudard pilot entry f>un aball b locaicj slisljlly
duwnstrciua of ibe Type M purl, so tliat U.o standard
and T`> i- rf impact opsnimts will tie in lb.- satiMi crus>>
scctlouiii plui'o timing (rolibruciurt. To Ak'iI.IhIo ?>!;*;>>-
jncut of Ibe Pi tot liibtfiduiliiii calibrnlian, it ;-ad>i-ubla
tlmi lbs tf .l section in' cuiutructcd of plos'.:u ur soma
Olbor tiau-Vicrdt inutcilnl.
4.1.3 (bibbiullon 1'rucuduro. Nto that l'.:> i-rwedura
Jj a ycmoid 01U1 tr<d must not ! Used v;ti.uui I t.-l
ti'feriiiig to the sio cUl cvmstdun.tictis prcseidid m >'cc-
liut. 1.1.5. Nolo also that this pi'ic>:dur opi-!:<-s ui.lv t-j
Sinpl--VWocIty cobbrallul!. To obtain Ca!;`.-a:(Oii da!*
for Ibo A uiul U sidoa of tbs Typo 5> pltol lube, proewd
aft follows:
4.1.3.1 Jl'.it'i ruro thfit Ibe mono.'io-Ur pro;^-rty flll il and tliut tl. ini hfreo from cuiitm>iina:.saui>d i.-uf
lUc prup'r ib'ii'ilv. Inspect and tcuk-cbeilr al: piiul lm;
repair or replace if mccssury.
4.U.2 I.evct and aero lbs nuihoiii'-ti.r. T umi on ilm
fen and allow tbo flow lo stubilitc. Siu*. I bo Type ri cnli'y
port. 4.1.3.3 F-tisure (Tint tbo mmioniclrr tslevrl nnd r.-i.K'd.
I'usilfuu (be stm.'dotd pilot liilse at tbo culibinli'in (dulcriuiiu'd ic. outlmvd In Hclion i.l J*.l). and nlign ibe
t'.lW solbul ns !il> I. pointed diu-clly lulu Uni fluw. I'.nUvular cere .-li'-idj Pa tali'll fit aligtinig (Iu* ftil..- o. av.^.l y.vv and pinb angles. Make Mlrc llnxl tbc cnliy |ut sUirMuuliug tbc lube Is ptnpt'i'lV St-olcd.
4.1.3.4 iP ad np.u mu! rrcor.i its value b> n d.tliv l.d-l.t similar lo tbc unj shown in l-'igure 2-:i. ............... ll.n
sfai.datd {><lol rubefiOni Ibadlicl und iliscco.iHVi >1 liom tbs moiio>in-|<-r. Ctcol (lie slumlord entry poit.
4.1.3.5 Connect tba Typo 3 pilol I11W lo llie uiaiioiuCtrr. Ojh.ni (be Tyrw J>" cnliy jn/rt. t'luvl l)t ninin>iii. rt.-r level and r.-ro. InScii i.ud align (lioYypi- S jiiini ml>> so ll.nl ill A side Impact opridux Is al (be saino |<>in! at Woo Ibe slumlaid jiitot mbs and Is pointed ifm i-lly into the How. Mala sure Unit iho outry poll smiuUnding ilia li.l/e is pronvrly scuU'd.
4.1.3.0 !u-.ul .\/i, and enlrr Its Value in (be d.tt.i l.iblo. Ileinjvo Ilia Tyiie d pitot tubs bum tbo duel and i!ijconoivi il tri-in lbs juiomcirr.
4.1.3-7 liiprul slops 4.1.3.3 ibnnigb 1.1.3.1'. nl.uvc until tl.tco pairs of .\p leadings hovn b.n-ii obttdi.rd.
4.1.3.5 f<-j-at jrep-i * t.:.3 tbrongb 4.1.II.7 iilx-ro f..r tbo II sided ibe T>|-- S pitot Inlv.
4.1.3.0 iVilvtin csKnilutiuiih, u' do.-cribid lit Section 4.1.4 below.
J.l.l CalcUlatSour. 4.5.4.1 For i-ricti of tbe sir pairs of ftp reiuJings (l.o., thres froot Mda A und three from side ill ub!nlu<-i| tn
t'.-o'.ijn 4.1.3 above. cali'ii!uit> (be value of (lie Tyjai d piUrl lube O'/i'Uioicnl &y follows:
c
Env i iur>irt' nt Reporter
lAjipomliH A]
66
r
36
SUMMARY OF TEST VARIABLES
C
C
A
SOURCE NAME
CONOCO CHEMICALS PVC PLANT
DATE OF TEST April 28, 1981
PITOT TUBE, COEF. VELOCITY HEAD MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS (WET)
AVG. PRESSURE ACROSS METER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE AT METER *
N
TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER COLLECTED
m
TOTAL VOLUME OF LIQUID COLLECTED
STACK PRESSURE
ABSOLUTE STACK TEMPERATURE
TIME SAMPLED '
VOLUME AT THE METER
PROBE DIAMETER
STACK AREA AVG STACK VELOCITY; "(STACK CONDITIONS)
VOLUME OF H20 VAPOR (STANDARD CONDITIONS)
DRY GAS VOLUME (STANDARD CONDITIONS) % H20 VAPOR CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE IN STACK GAS CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE IN STACK GAS
EMISSION RATE % ISOKINETIC
37
RUN NO. 504-1
0.84 1.76 28.20 0.77 29.93 555.3 0.5 '61.4
620.5 75 41.38 0.152 5.293 81.71 '2.383 38.99 6.90
DIMENSIONLESS INCHES OF H20 LB/LB-MOLE INCHES OF H20 INCHES OF HG ' RANKIN MILLIGRAMS MILLILITERS INCHES OF HG RANKIN MINUTES CUBIC FEET INCHES SQUARE FEET FT/SEC CUBIC FT nCUBIC FT
0.000198 2.82 x 10~8
' GR/FT3, DRY LBS/FT3, DRY
0.035 106.4
LBS/HR
ABD00263496
38
SOURCE NAME
CONOCO CHEMICALS PVC PLANT
DATE OF TEST April 28, 1981
PITOT TUBE, COEF. VELOCITY HEAD MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS (WET) AVG. PRESSURE ACROSS METER BAROMETRIC PRESSURE ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE AT METER TOTAL PARTICULATE HATTER COLLECTED m TOTAL VOLUME OF LIQUID COLLECTED STACK PRESSURE ABSOLUTE STACK TEMPERATURE TIME SAMPLED * VOLUME AT THE METER . PROBE DIAMETER STACK AREA AVG STACK VELOCITY (STACK CONDITIONS) VOLUME OF H20 VAPOR (STANDARD CONDITIONS) DRY GAS VOLUME (STANDARD CONDITIONS) % H20 VAPOR CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE.IN STACK GAS CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE IN STACK GAS EMISSION RATE % ISOKINETIC
RUN NO. 504-2
0.84 1.83 28.30 0.81 __ 2SL9.3____ 566.5 0.4 53.1 29.87 624.0 75 42.87 0.152 5.293 83.46 '2.498 39.60 5.93
0.00016 2.23 x 10"8
0.028 105.4
DIMENSIONLESS INCHES OF H20 LB/LB-MOLE INCHES OF H20 INCHES OF HG RANKIN MILLIGRAMS MILLILITERS INCHES OF HG RANKIN MINUTES CUBIC FEET INCHES SQUARE FEET FT/SEC CUBIC FT nCUBIC FT
' GR/FT3, DRY LBS/FT3, DRY
' LBS/HR
4*.
SOURCE NAME CONOCO CHEMICALS PVC PLANT q DATE OF TEST April 28, 1981
PITOT TUBE, COEF.
VELOCITY HEAD
MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS (WET)
AVG. PRESSURE ACROSS METER
BAROMETRIC PRESSURE
ABSOLUTE TEMPERATURE AT METER
*
'
N
TOTAL PARTICULATE MATTER COLLECTED u
TOTAL VOLUME OF LIQUID COLLECTED
STACK PRESSURE
ABSOLUTE STACK TEMPERATURE
TIME SAMPLED Q . VOLUME AT THE METER
PROBE DIAMETER STACK AREA
%
AVG STACK VELOCITY (STACK CONDITIONS)
VOLUME OF H20 VAPOR (STANDARD CONDITIONS)
DRY GAS VOLUME (STANDARD CONDITIONS)
% h'20 VAPOR
CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE IN STACK GAS
CONCENTRATION OF PARTICULATE IN STACK GAS
EMISSION RATE
. % ISOKINETIC
39
RUN NO. 504-
0.84
DIMENSIONLESS
1.72
INCHES OF H20 . -
28.17
LB/LB-MOLE
0.75 29.93 557.0
0.5 62.4 29.89
INCHES OF H20 NGHE l0F Hg ~ RANKIN MILLIGRAMS MILLILITERS INCHES OF HG
521.2
RANKIN
75 MINUTES
40.85 0.152
- 5.293 80.99 -2,939 38.37
. 7-1J____ 0.00020 2.87 x 10~8
CUBIC FEET INCHES SQUARE FEET FT/SEC CUBIC FT . hCUBIC ft .
GR/FT3, DRY LBS/FT3, DRY
0.035
` LBS/HR
106.0
^
C