Document G1xO82NjaRGOzbObxr81w2Xm

UJ ENT b y : XEROX Te.eccoier 7017! 7-30-93 I 4:2QPV I JUL-30-1992 15 33 FROM UEJw. LUIbMHL & ''THNUfca 2025385786- IU BRAD.EV AND MERrR.EvL*L! 2 W eil,G o t s h a l & M a n g e s a HQUJDiNO SA O ftA B iB N A l, C O s s p A A -ie x * F f 7 FIFTH A V t N U t * N tW YORK, N.Y. 10<S >-0' <4)i10*4000 FAX!<tit)4'0-*Q07 CABLE! WCOQMA TClCK:Aa*iAAww Ui (213) 10-8053 July 30, 1993 CALLAS HOUSTON m 6N l O ARK V A \ .L t* l MIAMI ^ A S m iNOTOH. D.C . RUM I I I UOAFKIY LONDON pbaguR W ARSAW VIA TELECOPIER t FIRST CLASS MAIL Joseph Yost, Esq. Edison Elsetrio Institute 1111 19th Street, N.w. Washington, D.C. 30036 Re: Nevada Power Company v. Monsanto Chemical Co., at el. Dear Joe: Based on the representations that you made on behalf of EEI In your July 30, 1993 latter, together with the copy of the 197$ Employee Injury Experience Report that you eent us, we agrae to withdraw Westlnghouses subpoena of EEZ, dated July 13, 1993. in addition, we will file a responee to BBI's motion to quash the subpoena in the District Court at the beginning of next weeh, indicating that the aubpoena has been withdrawn and that, accordingly, ESZ's motion is moots If any part of the above is not acceptable to you, please contact me immediately. Thanh you for your cooperation in resolving this matter. sincerely Laurie Basch LB:ap cct Irvin Kashin, Eaq. Konrad L. cailteux, Esq James fc. Shapiro, Esq. YPI07,.,:\M\e07*l\0l00\2554\LTI730W,$20