Document Eqy06o3y8zp9jJ0kGYJ2dqX5n

John W. Whittlesey COUNSELLOR AT LAW 270 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK. N. Y. 10017 r APR 2 7 19// Mr. Ralph M. Sarla 316 Woodlyn Drive Collegeville, Pennsylvania 1942b Re: Asbestos Dear. Mr. Sarla:-; ; ,;;3.r; ^ ^ . Mr. Thurber has referred to me^for replv^our letter : ; y of March 7,. 1977 in which you ask two major questions , ...as;follows:;C'^ _ v : }, v. . ' -* . 1.. Does Union Carbide Corporation have any connection-'-; *""' - with "the work now going on in development of early detection techniques . at Mount-Sinai School of Medicine? . ' -^- - 2. Does Uhion Carbide Corporation have a medical program. aimed at monitoring the health of current or former employees .4-:; v-.: : .: exposed to asbestos in the past. (I assume there is a program;v for currenti/employees now involved in asbestos manufacture; in response thereto, it is correct to say that we do riot have any connection with the Mount Sinai work on early detection :' techniques. It is also correct to say that we do not have a formal program aimed at monitoring employees previously exposed to asbestos dust. We do maintain such a program for employees currently exposed. As to your specific complaint, there Is not enough information con tained in your letter to enable us to say that the matter is asbestos related, or indeed to determine what is the cause of such complaint. I do know that asbestos has been found deleterious by inhalation . ; which means that its primary impact is on the lungs. It is not . . normally considered carconogenic. or a problem by ingestion. Because of that business, principle, there is not any evidence furnished to ' - . us which would enable.us to ascertain that your abdominal disturbance . ; is either carcinogenic^.in nature or in any way related to asbestos ' Accordingly^we;hav'e no basis for providing you with medical assistance JW: me ` ' - . 'r ^ -'T~ ^ John W. Whittlesey Senior labor Law Counsel Union Carbide Corporation Zt'r'~