Document EqpbgY6Kn3na12jQqzoGk93wj

1 A Yes. Page 1830 2 Q Now, based upon the material that was sent 3 to you for your review by the plaintiffs, you are 4 aware, are you not, that Mr. Grewe had other potential 5 asbestos exposures than just to brake and clutch 6 work? 7 MR. IGNATOWSKI: Objection. 8 THE COURT: Sustained. 9 BY MR. WILLIAMS: 10 Q Now, Doctor, as your work as a pathologist 11 in this case, because you were unable to -- because 12 you were not forwarded any lung parenchyma, you were 13 unable to really determine exactly what types of 14 asbestos fibers were present in Mr. Grewe's lungs? 15 MR. IGNATOWSKI: Objection. Asked and 16 answered, Your Honor, I believe. 17 THE COURT: For the final time, he can 18 answer the question. 19 All right. Overruled. Go ahead. 20 A That is correct. 21 Q So just -- strike that. i