Document Eqbog52EGovgaEBvZMZKEBDRb
1 A Yes.
Page 213
2 Q Now Joe Mallia would fall into the category,
3 would not be in the -- I'm sorry, let me start over.
4 Joe Mallia would not be in the low probability
5 of exposure category?
6 A I wouldn't think so.
;
7 Q Okay. And so under the data presented here in 8 Agudo dude Joe would fall into a classification that 9 had an increased significant risk, correct?
;
ij j
i
j
10 A I wouldn't make that inference, no.
i
11 MR. LANKFORD: Objection.
12
THE WITNESS: You're taking a sentence out of
j
13 context and not looking at the data. I would look at
14 the data first and not try to generalize from the text.
15 BY MR. RUCKDESCHEL:
16 Q Have you done so?
17 A I'm relying on Goodman and Wong.
j
18 Q Okay. Let's turn to the next page, 163, and
19 there is a sentence in the left-hand column of the
20 text:
21 "The analysis on probability of
!
22 asbestos exposure was restricted to some
23 subgroups, subjects younger 55 years,
24 eleven cases and four controls, showed an
25 '
odds ratio of 10, confidence interval of
ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES (415) 288-4280