Document EqZaj6Y9MKY9EV1Kk7X0vwgKN
WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
aprOfeSsiONAL CORPORATOR"
.j Cellar Drive : NJ07095-0958 paxL(7J32) 856-6117
____ .....
ZW4-a2i2t09
F7i3x2)753422)-449530-08387
W8S8Ml2PI)kS2ietre8Set7rteP^eltalz'afW'K'1fl01 Fax 212) 267-3328
htlp^/www.rawjereeylaiw.com
Please reply to "swYork
12) 267-3091
VkHARSNVWLVMUPIIZ MATTHIAS Di DtfiO
MOHRS BROWN*
MRJrRrOIConHPHeHNAeCAnR.MvDMHierPOI.jB-iFcUFAMtRMRfvMTACr*NAiarNiiNINIA mwcev.aoHEUD
VNC&JTP. MALTESE
ntvnMwrHTfw
ALAN M DARNELL G0R00NJ.G0UM
FfcRWANWKNMJ.-CBURfAflAjrHM' 4
TUARTA HOMRMNf1 Stephen a. apraR
MMBMIWIMP HM. PAOtiUMa1tO1
GHRBTMED. PETRUZZEIL ROGER* KAPUtf BRIAN JlMCUJOV RANEMILJI racHARDS
BoAigfluRYoTu.eAU. W
STliARTT.CQX.JR JOSEPH J.AUMOMM
NSTOEYVHB4TJA.NTNBIPAFN*
OSUSTOPteiM ftACTTELLA
JMAYTR*OUNURM06MRH1 AJAIMAENSWE.JTBRPAWMWJYIY AUNATUHROENBYJSJ.kPBAMNENTETLILA.JR-
WJECHmeUWtKRif&lErTT
MtCHASLF.eCHM**
AtfNsGgELjHO JiOoHsNbCFWALDI
PRANOS X JOUfMOX, JR. KEUMM. BERRY LOUMT OlLUCM N0B.S.T0NNPJAJ* FRANK MORTtT JOtM T. MLUr
Cw,KwBr#ACoTHoSoHnANrK*
JDNQ.KUPHJK PETER R. HERMAN*
HBMES8CMSJReORDHOTN..kKWAOfRlStOERIYD.E.JR
nOOCRTU.MUT2.M
VIOLAS. LCRDl'
JEFFREY K.BVnw' LYNNEM.MZM STEVEN F.kMPOHAiL DOUGLASVNKTSONLJJBC CHEffKtJ-OSEROORF uauLOOMr RUSSELL JinBHMNCf AMDHOmsr CHMILBSF.VLIQTTO.JR DONALDS, TAYLOR ,
MBARcRrYrRfl.SWUGMAHiM^AM
BETSYANN ROM-NBUMM YVONNE MARCUSE
uauMEacrooNOHue' eizuEixc.oat.'
Amrr nnrwerwn. ruwunwH1 *
RUTHOL MARCUS* ICTCMU. RAfl** RICHARDJ. BYRNES ROKRTT.HAEFU'
RnoHcHcAnRioDp&cPhAtMtsTbCH**
AAmLLaFAtRNtEJhO. BeMRw.OAmDNwYTH'bOsNsYm'an'
DARREN M. GUM*'
CUZABBTHtAMUsY MUWV NANCYA.6U3ME' JMCELPETSCHE KS1YA.BRHAADT*
q-iSSTOPIBIVXHAQER*
<IAMEBE.TOffSSY.Ji1 ANDREA WHITE GWEN* TMCTHYA OeNGUfr
DO*MAM.JBMMGS ELIZABETH SMOSAM PAULLfVNBQHN
RcejoiiOEonMVwoAGwwNNMrBaR.iHma.BRmeaMDatAo`MKAHur'
PCTBt A-QREENBMUM1 M. MMTIPWIWWOW*
JcORMCHJMOZHmUACNMMrLlrFTMUwUH.kOeWCTCuaHLI.KYMEiwrOAtaaTxUnOeD*NrB' ' CTOOUORO1eB.MLYEHC.WHA1NSEN' XX* U. CANTALueO1 XXWE.HCXUN'
February 23, 2001
VAUME A. JACKSON
UAUmELMema"
(APttSUUKT V. NUMLk
COMMA. MeSARROM
TDSHHAOANMMEALSHW.K.F.ZRCAEOPEPODOPM*EARNIV' *
DAMELRWA8P1 RAM SATTRAJU GTNmA A MUUA' OANBLA.HAOAN KAHEWT. ALSTON1 THOMAS J. BERNARDO JOFHB.BTTM
MJOASMBAPKH. ALNVABSATABSCIAtf'
JUrWF.MUMAXNA EDWARDJ. ALBQWKZ MATTHEWG. SROOERBCff ANNAI.MOTORTM LAURB1D.PVTUBM DAMDJLTREACY
4OrtMCMTrWAtowy OMMQMnMTMABMMY fr CMM MMtranM Atomy fCmtSidWtatesCgwpseMflPS ASonwy
* NMIwmICIBJCMTM8pmMM
1 AboMMtadhNV 2AIMBMMHRA
9 Also akrMsd In CT
4AklMMinOC
SAkoeSrMadfeMA
BAkoadmSadtnMD
TASoadrNMhVl
ftOr^MRiMhNY
BAboaMMtaOO
UPS-SATURDAY DELIVERY
Dr. David Egilman 9 West Street Foxboro, Massachusetts
02035
Re: Brahe Lining Manufacturer Association, Inc. Anti-Trust Litigation_______________________
Dear Dr. Egilman:
Please find, enclosed, copies of the three Indictments from the 1947 Anti-Trust Litigation commenced in the Southern District of New York against the Brake Lining Manufacturers Association, Inc. and its member Corporations. Also included is a copy of the reparation schedule as well as the Judgements entered against the defendants upon their pleas of nolo conterdere.
Ihiaa deouamfca were copied froa the originals which are
located in the National Archives' Northeast Region facility in New
York City.
"
FMSI-0012
5532857 (026103.002)
WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Dr. David Egilman February 23, 2001
Pag* 2
I trust these documentations satisfy your request. Zf Z
can ba of further assistance in this regard, please feel free to call.
DRW/ab Enclosures
iel R. Wasp
*5532857 (026103.002)
j: 3BAE2 IISIEO KiSDi'ACKrarBS* AssofiiiJrioii, nre. AMERICAS BfiflCE SHOE COUPAST ASBESTOS KinCPACTOHIBO COMPACT
* ri
BBEIX ATTATIOH COHPOJUnOB TLBPJ it KZBAI FBOXOOT3. ISC.
yiEESTOHS MBS ASS BOBBER COMPACT
aim cospohaiios
agbgsal motoh oohpoeatioh
CRIZ2LT KAJOTACTORIBO CQMPAST
TOHBSJusmxs coBPcsunos LA5C0 BEAKS PBODCOIS COBP., LtD. L. 1. KILET 00.
P2ABIS nss A BQHBX& 00. lunBsio&Junurau. lac.
RtfSSELL MAS07ACZDBISI. 00.
SOAEDIEAYIA 3ZL1IB& COKPAST
southehh rncraos materials cobp.
XBXWOZS 00.
WOULD BESTOS OOBP.
mo j. nor
HABBT SHOT e. q. skieh
l. v. rams
L. E. tlLSOS
I. . ITASHOLDS A. J. BCDOtR
J. A. BLASS
7. C. BIF3UES 5. 0. BiEJCOT T. L. OAHCS
Et 0. BffiHKILT
J. 0. 3B0VK
?, v. smioir
L. M, CASSIST
j, s. Doran
J. . GLAZmaOCZ C. H. JOBBEHSar
f Tv
f
T
____________ .
Li610E&S
T
H. STXDK nn hjbctati, a. i sins Ot
ZCBJBff S. SATIS WIIiliK H. DOSS H. OBOSHOTXB
hkmah ixds, n,
J. B. BOACH C. V. SACHS S. J. STHH05T j. a. hovu h. % um
G. tu KXUIJM8 h. S. SDXUTAI r. A. 3FZXA
HOMED SHDV T. & ALUB
a. i. cacrsKii>
H. T. SCHSCXLX&
USD . SCHLDTBt X. G gT8?sr,n>p
DCHAXDa. sriosa
mamuBTs
imcioii
I
Tbe Grand Jury aharges:
- wutrr uaa
MgmglOSB
1 Iha tan "brake linings* whsrsrer referred to is thi indictment, means asbestos brate linings used for replacement purposes in motor Tehicles and in Industrial stjiipmsnt.
wna nurffp^ros
2- Srjfc# hieing Kaaugactursra ' Association. Inc. (hereinafter referred to sb the Association) is hereby indicted and mad* a
to
LV610
T
defendant herein. She Aeeoclation la a nanberthlp ooTporation organised under and existing V Irtue of tho 1*. off tha Stat* off Xr Toit and has Its principal plan* off batinsss la Haw Toric City. It la a trade aaaoelatlon whose nenber* are aiiaf aetuxexs off friction naterlals, including brake linings.
3. The following aaad companies ara hereby indicted and aade daffesdasta herein. Bach off aald dafaadasta baa boon organised usdar and azlita by trlrtao off tha lava off tha atat a lndleatad below and each neb defendant baa ita principal offffloe and plaoa off buslaeaa la tba city designated. Ieoh off aald daffaadaata, daring all or part off tba period cowered tblo indictment, including tba period within the statute of limitation*, bite been engaged la telling brake lining! and bee been and la a neater off the defendant Association.
of 11UA rrtATBt.iAft
feerican Brake Shoe Company Asbestos Manufacturing Compaq? Bondlx Arlatloa Corporation Pitre a Metal rvodnote, Inc.
Delaware Indiana Delaware Californio
Tlraetone Hr# and Bibber Company Ohio
Oaike Corporation
Illinois
General Motors Corpcration
Delaware
Orltdr KunfwturUc Compere
California
Johne-Manrille Corporation Banco Brake Product! Corp,, Bee. B. J. Mil ear Co. Pharls lire 6 Batter Co.
Hew Toric California Illinois Obis
R^bestooJfanbattan, Inc.
Haw Carney
Principal Place
Detroit, Xlch. Huntington, Ini. Detroit, Mich. Downey, Oal, Akron, Ohio Chicago, 111. Detroit, Mldh. Bell, Cal. Hew Toric, H. T. Oakland, Cal. Chicego, 111. BSvexk, Ohio Pasiale, H. 3%
Bussell Manufacturing Co.
-
Scandinavia Belting Company Southern motion Material! Corp,
Iheraoid Co.
lforld Bestoa Corp.
Connecticut Maine J. Carolina Delaware Raw Jersey
Middletown, Conn. Bevark, H. J. Charlotte, IT. 0. Trenton, E. J. Paterson, N. J.
flolleotl v*ly ehs aheve-Baed defendant* are hereinafter referred to as the
corporate defendants,
4. The following Individuals are hereby lndiotod and node defendants
herein. Each is aseooir.ted with a defendant corporation in tbs capacity Shown below. Each said, defendant during all or a part of the period eovored
by this lndictaent. including the period within the statute of limitations,
has authorized, ordered or done the acts alleged herein to have been in violation of lavs
DeHinnninr. Pied. J. Kelly Harry Oeith
Corporate Defendant with which Associated
American Brake
American Brake
Title or Position
Address
Mgr. ' Detroit, Mich. Asst.Mgr. Detroit, Mich.
C. q. Snlth
American Drake
Asst. toms. Detroit, Mich.
L. V. L. E. Mil son X* >f. )!Aafiold
Avtiattu* KTifa Asbestos Mfg. Baodls Jkriatloa
T. free. Huntington, Ind.
Sec.A Treas . Huntington, Ind,
Aa8t8alos Mgr. Troy, 13. Y.
A. J. P.oeuor J. A. Slake
Bendix Aviation Jibre 4 Metals
Salsa Mgr. Troy, ff. T. 7. Pres. Downey, Cal.
T. C. Hepburn 2, 0. Serngan
Jirestone flatke
Brake* LIdp lnc Dept* Alrrrn, Ohio
Sec't.
Chicago, 111.
T. L. Oatke H. 0. Berkely
Oatke General Motors
Pres,
Chicago, 111.
Sales Ugr. Dayton, Clio
J. C. Brown 2, v. Shelton
Grizzly drizzly
Sales Ugr. Prilling, Ohio Paulding, Ohio
4
L. M. Cassidy J. 8. Doyle
Johnt-Manvllle John e-Mauri lie
T. Pres. Staff Mgr.
Hew Tork Hew Tork
J. H. Olasebroofc:
Johns-Iiaaville
Staff aeober Hew Tork
S. X. Jorgensen
LasCo
Sales Hgr.
Oakland, Gal.
X. Steder
W. J. .'Alsz
Sales Mgr.
Chicago, 111.
Pur'ser Marshall
Pharia
Pres.
Bldgeway, pa.
s G. 2. litter
Pharls
Sales Mgr.
Bidgsva?, Pe.
0. H. Cille;'
Ssybestoa
7. Pres.
Tknhelm, Pe.
Sot art j>. Bavls
Baybestss
7. Pres.
Bridgeport, Conn.
Vllllaa H. Cana 8* droejnl%<V.o
Eaybestss Banybestos
Qoa$t. Kgr.
Passaic, 8. J. Passaic, 8. J.
Homan Leeds, Jr. J. 2). Eeooh
Snybesto s Ragrbeeto s
Gen. 3oles Mgr. Bridgeport. Conn. Solo. Engineer M&ahein, Pe.
Ct. V. Sachs
Baybestos
' Ugr.
Manheia, ?&.
S. J. Sjmnott
Beybeotoe
Ugr.
Paeseie. U. J.
J, B, Howie
Bussell
Mgr.
Middletown, Conn.
3. Zennn
Rltssnll
Autanatlir* Dir. Middletown, Conn.
0. H. bllllaas
Bussell
Pri.
Middletown, Conn.
L. S. Sullivan T. A. Spina
Bussell Scandinavia
Mar. Treat.
Middletown, Oonn. JTewar.'r, IT, J.
Howard Snow
Southern Friction
Pres.
Charlotte. IT. 3.
S. 2. Ellen
Shemold
As3t. to Pres. Trenton, f. 3.
A. L. Goapbell s. SehecTcler Fred 3. Schluter
Ihemoid Tkeraoid Thermoid
Seise Dept. Mgr. Pres.
Trenton, M. J. Trenton, B. J. Trenton, S. J.
L. G. Eersgard Donald E. Soleer
World Bestos World Bestos
Pres.
Paterson, N. C. Peterson, 2. J,
3Zs:p-I??icc as ishustet j&> kctle car
vrzspsuss -mss iTBJtsssaa ettoltsp
S. The corporate defendants aanufseVjre acd sell approxirutely
95? of the brake Halage aanafactursd and sold In the Ur.lt *d States.
twocl-r
T
In 1946, their sales amounted to approximately $38,000,000. S. The corporate dafendsnta aall brake 11alasa primarily to
the following classes of customers! (l) other friction material manufacturers, including other corporate defendants; (3) motor vehicle and industrial equipment manufacturers; (3) distributors, jobbers and . dealers; (4) large consumers such as municipal, state and federal govern, meats and owners of large fleets. The bulk of the sales are made to cuataaore in clams 3; in 1946, sucni sales mounted to approximately $35,500,000 or 73p of the total sales of brake linings. This class of distributors, JoVbor osd dealers resell mainly to retailers who in turn resell to motor vehicle owners.
7, Ble corporate defendants menufeoture brsko linings In the Stales Of California, Connecticut, Ohio, Illinois, Isdir;!?., .'.'ichigon, TTev- Jersey Tew York, Forth. Carolina and Pennsylvania end bi? thsrofrcs te cus tomers In every state in tho United States.
coiniSitioE iru cttspibaot ' a w g>
-
8e beginning sometime in 1937, the exact date beta3; 091:001.01 to
the Crand Jurors, end continuing thereafter up to and including the
date of this indictment, the defendants mil other persons end corpo
rations unknown to the (brand Jurors have unlawfully combined and con
spired to fix, establish, maintain, control, manipulate and tamper with
the prices, terms r.i conditions in the marketing of broke lining* in
restraint of the aforesaid interstate trade end commerce,
9. The aforesaid combination end conspiracy has been a continuing
one, the substantial terms of which have been that the defendants agree tent:
(a) The Association prepare end distribute among
the defendants uniform price lists; (b) Each corporate defendant publish in its own
pries lists the prices contained in the
Association price lists;
(e) The Asaoelatioa prepare and distribute aaong the oefenoante auiifieatijns or oustoaere; .
(a) Hi* dissolution trp3xe and distribute aaong the dofr.daat uaifom dlaosunte, tai and eondltisn* of sail to be granted purchasere in aoh i-.au alasslfieatiaai
(e) 2aoh corporate defendant use the classifioatioas of oustoners, unifsna discounts, terns and conditions of sale in selling to purchasers;
(f) Each corporate defendant require its oaatoaers in their resales, to use discounts frcn the list prices identical with those oontainsl in the unifora discounts loserit si in subparagraph (!) above;
(g) Each corporate defendant require retailers to sell at the list prises;
(h) From tine to tine the price lists( classification of customers, discounts, terns end conditions of sale, sales and resale prices would he changed.
. .
, _
BT53T3 OF -35 OttuffilglQE ACT XrgCAJY
'
10* "he aforesaid combination und oonsulrec/ hereinabove alleged
has had the following effects with respect to brake linings as intended
by the defendants: (a) prices have teen increased at all levels of nale; '
(b) Prices have tended to become unifara at all levels of s-:le;
(e) She public ana other purchasers hr.ve been chnrged,
Algh oni tuirooaonaolo prioooi
(a) Substantially ell price competition.has been eliflinrteu.
7
7 r--
Hit'.
T
T
been foraed la _:r.rt and carried out in part within the Southern
District of Hew Tor's In the following Banner!
(a) Meetings hove teen held in aew lorn jity at
which the defendant* have agreed with each
other upon uaifor List -orioea* elaaoifice-tion t
of customer, dlacotmtt, torsi, condition*.
Alt jricoo and rotol* prieta;
(b) She Association has prepared In Ke\: York City
M uniform price Hate, classification of enstoaere,
discount, terns end conditions which it has sent
out to the defendants! t (c) Substantial quantities of brake lining have been I
sold in Hew York City at the fixed prioee. Including ) sales to the City of Hew York. *> r iV
L A T?-TjE HULt ;
)
I
Forenan
dhC it scu o. aum Attorney General
J0HH/1. 30HHE71 , A3Siyt^nt _ Attorner/Gi
Jcar ?. X. HcSCHEY
United States Attorne:
w/CCc, 3. JBATTCIS HATDZH / IBTI3G 3. aiCCFSLD, Joseph t. qrnnxAH SIAOT2, S, CAEN Special Assistants to the
Attorney General
EOlriES mBT-IDGS
oacias a. haddock Snecirl Assistants to the Attorney General
T
T
T
TT
t
' : .
:' .
F
iv tbb puiiEicr (base or xbe united maim wk tsb skwthehi sxsinci ovhsvttosx
%
l
JPCDSI TERM, 1947
HO. JO i -HVO< (is nec# ll)
A UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
V.
BRAHE LINING MUfUFACTirRESS' ASSOCIATION, INC.
AMERICAN KRAIS SHOE COWPANT
ASBESTOS UUraFACIUSXN'} COKPAHT
FIBEE & IETAL FNODUCIS, INC. -
SATKB CORPORATION
G3SERAL MOTORS CORPOHATION
CSIZZLT MANUFACTURES0 COMPACT >
XSHS-lUirVXUE CORPORATION
L. J. XILEX 00. -
RATBEST08-MAHHATTAN, INC. .
HJSSELL MANUFACTURING CO.
SCANDINAVIA BELTING OOUPAKT cxxmcKw Fmoricw MxnraxALo oonr.
TESRMDID CO/
7I0RLD BESTOS COEP.'
FRED J. uiill HASH? SXTTE
c. q. sicna
l. v, luma
L. E. WILSON
J. A. BLASE a. 6. BEUfSEM
.
T. L. OATHS -
H. C. BEBKELT
J. 6. BHiSM `
F. If. SHELTON
L. H. CASSIHT'
J. S. DOYLE
'
J. R. GUZEBROOI '
T
T
v. ram*
0. h owmROBERT B. HWT8 mjiXU h. nnm
s* anearorn
BOBOS USDS, JR. J. D. ROACH Ci W 8AQB8 8. j. smart
J. E. HSOX -
R. B. BUBS
C. M. mrj.Tiltt
L. 8. SJUJ7JB
7. A. 3KDU, BOWLED SHOT
t. B AIUB ' A. L. CAMPBELLH. I. SCBBCBUSS * FHSD E SCBUtTER -
1. C. EHSQAHD DCKALD E. 8IXCEB
DSFQtDAKTS
IHDICTUEHT
i I
2
T
T
o
*^gh--V
m
occur en
nsrannon
1 She tan "dutch faoinga* ifatnnr referred to in tide lnilataMA, mu Mtwtgi dntMh faoinga uaad for raplaoement {ufoni la motor rahlolas and la Industrial equipment.
mb nggamras
e. nrau lining Manufacturer#' Aeeooiation, Ino. (hereinafter
referred to ai tha Aasooiation) la barely iadlotad and mlda a dafaadaat
herein. Tha Aeeoolatlon la a aeaberahip corporation organized under and
oxiating fey rirtue of the lam of tha State of Haw Turk aid has ita
V principal place ef buiua in sew Tork City, It la a trade aaaooiatlon whoee aambara are manufacturer, of friction material# inoludlng
dutch facings.
3. Tha following-nanad companies are herohy iadlotad and made
dafandanta ha rain. Each of said Cefeadaafcs tmi naan organised under
and exiate by Tirtna of the laora of the atate indicated below and
each tush defendant hat Ita principal office end place or tuainaaa in
t
tha city designated. Each of aaid dafandanta, daring all or a part
of the period core rad ty thla Indictment, including the pe-io<i within
tha statute of limitations, haa been engaged in aelling dutch facing# and haa been and la a member of the defendant association.
<|f
Defendant iaarlcan Brake Shoe Company Asbestos Manufacturing Compsay Pitre & Metal Produeta, bio. Gatin Corporation
State of Incorporation
Delaware Indiana
California IlUnola
Principal Plaoe of Businas#
Detroit, tCLch* Binttnglon, lad.
Downey, Cal. Chicago, 111,
1
02y*u --aii'WdrW T
'' ` IF*
, ?-v. ..
r:r*i.#0i
'
v <v<v ' w . t 'J
'
'
r
' .
.. . ^taaeral lbtora Corporation
Crtsaly Ihmfeaturing Oowpaiy
' 'Oelaaure * California
Johna-Man-rille Corporation
Vow Tork
1. J. Mllay Co. Baybaetoa-lhnhettaa, Zna.
IUinoi* Bow Jaraay
Huesell Manufacturing Co. Soandimtla Baiting Coapany
Oomaotieut Main*
Southern Priotios Material* Coip. V. Carolina
xnarnold Co.
Delaware
Iforld Baatoa Corp.
Haw Jersey
' Detroit, Mich. Ball, Cal. Haw Tork. I.T. Chio*go. 111, Patsale, I.J. Middletown, Com. Hewark, H.J. Charlotte, V.C. Trenton, K.J. Paterson, 3f.J.
ColleotiTaly tha aboYa-caaad defendants ar# hereinafter referred to a*
th* corporate defendant*.
'.
4, Th* following indivi&uala ar* hereby indicted and nada defendant*
ho rain* Each la acaoolatad vdth a dafondant oorporation In tha capacity
ahown balow* Eaoh laid dafandant Airing all or a part of th* parlod
severed by thla indictment, Isolndlng tha parlod within tbs ttatuta of limitation*, haa euthoriacd, ordarod or dona th* acta alia gad horain to
Kara been in violation of lawi
Dafandant
SVod J. lolly
Eariy Saith C. Q. Smith L. TT. Tuttle z s* J. A, Blake E. q. Beragtn H. C. Barfcely
T. L. Gatks
Corporate Defendant
Title or
with idvioh associated Position
Jattrloan. BnOci
Mgr*
Address Detroit, Uieh.
Anarl can Brake iM!iohs Br^ko
Asst. Mgr.
Detroit, Htah.
Aset, to Pres. uetrolt. Hioh*
Aahastoa Ufg.
V. Prea.^
Huntington, Ind,
Atfceetoa Mfg.
Fibre k Hetala
Gatke .
Seat. & Tree*. Huntington, infl,
T. Pres. So Q11_
Downey, Cal. chi*so, in.
Seneral Motors
Salts Mgr.
Dayton, Ohio
Satka
Pres.
Chlaego, 111*
4
f f
T
IT
<****;, ' ' raxaiiV^u^-. c ' : .1-'. ,,.,
*
i ' ;' `X / .>* > * f. J *
'-^r, 0. Brown
;. ?m. ' : Qrlaaly
* Sale* Rp,
Paul ding, (Mo
r. w* siMito* a tt u* cuil^r
Orlesly Johns-UisTllla
7* Proa.
Penldtng, Ohio Sew Toric, S.T*
J, s. Doyle
Johna-lfcneille
Staff Mgr. SewTdrk,
J. H. Slniehrook
johna4fcnoilla
Staff neater Sew fork* B.T.
Vi st*in
i>* J* miajr
Salaa Mgr.
Chicago, 111.
0. H. ClUay Robart B. Da-rle
RaybeatD* 12grb*ioi
y mil Y. Proa*
Manhein, pa. Bridgeport, Conn,
miliaa H Dam 2* Gnpendrke
Raybeatoa Ray-baatoa
Conpt. . Mgr.
Bataaio, H*J* laeenlo, B.J*
Homan Leeda, Jr* J* D. Roach
Rybato* Bayboetoe
Son. Salaa Mgr*
Bridgeport, Com*
Salaa Sngineer Uanhein, Pa*
C. IT, Saoh*
Raytoato
Mgr.
Manhein, Pa*
a. J. syimott
Baybaatoa
Mgr.
Paaaalo, H.J*
J* R. Howie
Ruaaoll
Mgr.
Middletown, Conn*
fi* B* Xnuw
- raiaaoU
intomotiva Div. Middletown, Conn*
0. It, rnillana 1* S. SullLewii '
Ruasall Ibt*t*ll
Proa, ngr.
Middletown, Conn* Middletown, Conn.
7. X* Spina
Scandinavia
Troaa* .
Hewarlc, H.J*
Bmard Snow
Stotlum M*tUa Prae*
charlotte, N.C*
T, 8, Ulan
Thamoid
AeeR* to Prea*
Trenton, S.J.
X. 1. Caapboll
Thamoid
Salea Sept* Trenton, H.J*
B ? Soheoldor iron e* soniutor
Tharaoid Thamoid
Mgr. Proa,
Trenton, H.J, .1
Trenton, H.J.
0. Korsgard Donald B, Sfinr
World Baatoa rrorld Beatoa
Mgr. Prea,
Patareon, S.J. Paterson, H.J,
*
5* the MlfONtt bltalnte
4 call qjmwtllf 99f ,
of ths olutah facings aanafaeturad awl eold in the United States, la
1945, their sals* uDcuutad to approximately 17,000,000.
6, lb* corporate defendant* mU elutoh facings primarily to
ttao following classes of custom* r*t (1) other friction meterial w.
ufaoturere, including otbar corporate defendant* j (2) notor Tabled* ami
Industrial etjilpncnt aanufhotursrej (5) dlatributora, jobber* and declaret (4) large oonsumert auob as annioipal, atata and. federal governments and.
eneri of large fleets, the bulk of the tales are made to custotcer* it elaaa 5j In 1946, suoh sales amounted to approximately $4,600,000 or
85# of the total sale* of clutch facings, Shis data of distributors. Jobber* and dealers resell aaioly to retailer* wh in turn resell to
motor rehiole owners,
7, Xii* corporate defendant! manufacture clutch facings in tbs
States of Connecticut, Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Sew Jersey,
Ww York, UerCh Carolina ana rsmiaylrania Sad ship therefrom to customers
In every stats In ths Baited States,
COSBQUTICN J8D CCKSPEIUICT T[BraroTW"
a, Beginning sometime is 1928, the exact data being unknown to tbs Grand JUrors, and continuing thereafter up to and including the date of this indiotawoe, the defendants end other persons and corporations iy known to the Grand jurors have unlawfully oombine d and conspired to fix, establish, maintain, ooatrel, manipulate ana tamper with the prioee, terms and conditions in the marketing of elutoh facings in restraint of the aforesaid interstate trade amd mmorM,
190*1^
* *9DT*K8* SJTT 1hmTTrT t*j
T
"Cr- &;:gyt<tpat4 jfrjj
`
... .... ,.. eoatlaniag
. .. .
* -*j i 3C ,a
^ dbirii km haea that
tha dafsodants agrae that!
'x * *
(a) The Association prepare aad distribute aaau tha iafadmta tmlfora prloa lists:
(b) bah oorporata ^afuUat publish la lta aa price liiti tha prioa* aatalHt la tha Aaaoolstioa priea
,
lisle:
`
(e) The Association prepare aad distribute snoag tha
defendants claaiIfication* of oastoaeri; Id) Iha Aaaociatlon pnpara aad distribute mong th
.
defendants uniforu diaoounts, ten* aad conditions of aal* to he granted purchasers in each sueh classification:
.(a) law corporate dafaadaai use tha elasslfleatioas of ouatoaora, unifoxa diaoounts, tara* and conditions ef Mia In Iliac to purchaser*:
w Xaoh oorporata defendant ragolra it* customers la thair r* < Uaegwks tna tw mat prioaa Identical with thoaa contained la the aaifoa discoonto daaerlhad in nlpign|>h (l) aW|
(*} lech oorporata defendant require retailers to Mil at
the list prices:
-
(h) froa tine to time tha prloa lists, clasaifioationa of castoaars, dlsoounti, terns and mnditioae or cl., talas and resale prices would, he changed.
,
10, The aforesaid. eoablnatlcn end conspiracy hereinabove alleged has had the fallowing effects With rsspeot to dutch facings
.0 ; ' . 'JidVa * OOX*WSTT MJH PUWC-T W
T
w titriM by (? ' PrlM* barCTrtea'
ial *ictall laral* -af wlt
(>) Mm hara tMi^Mww ualfons at all
larel* of *4at
.
,\idAm9-'.-
() 9w publio and. otbar purohaatr* hara baaa chargad
t& .ai *C. . '>
hl^ and nnraaaonahla price*}
(4) Sobatantlally <11 prloa oeapatltlon baa ban ellalnated.
11. Sha coablnatlon and oonaplrjLoy hareihbafora allegad baa
baan formed la part and. carried out ia part within tha Southern
Biatriot 01 1m roifc la tba followingaaanart
'
< a} bastings bars beau bald la bar Tork 01ty at wbleh
tba defendanta bora agraad with aacb otbar upon '
unlfcm list prloa*, ciaaaixicationor onateaare,
aalaa prieaa and raaala price*}
(t) Oka lng>UM baa prepared iiaUan pries list.,
elaaiiflaatloa of outoaara aad discooatt la Saw
To*k City Usk it has son* sut t tba 4arftloskt
(0) fehatantlal qpaatltlaa of dutch facing* bar* been eld la Saw Torfc City M tha fired prlcaa, including . ala* to tba Olty of Saw fork.
A UDIHUII
josB i. gmous WJMJ1L S. CiBI
Ipsolad. AttU^tsift %9
Attorney Central
Special Aaalataate to tba Attorney Central
8
o
T
a tub manner carer or the mnrro states por the samur district or m rone
AUGUST TOM, 1947
(15 use, lay
raxmi STATES OF AMERICA
.
BRAKE LDH1IG MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATICM, IK.
AMERICAN BRAXB SBC COUPAHZ
ASBESTOS MASUFACTURINO COUPAMI -
BEMDXX AVIATION CORPORATION
TOTE t METAL PRODUCTS, INC,
7XRESKW riRB AND BDBBR 3XKSB CCUPANT
TZRESTOn TEE AMD BOBBER CCKPAHI
BASE CORPORATION*
GBHEtAL MOTORS CORPORATION
OBZZZLT UAWIPACWRUKl COMPANY
jobns-mamville msaunoHAL corporath*
JOBMS-MAHTILLJS COKPCBAIIOB
PHARIS QBE t BDBBSl CO.
RAXHESTOS-JttIHAXIAIf. IK. RUSSBJ, lUHUFACTOBIBQ CO.
SCAHDSfAVZA 8ELT1X0 COUPANT
THHMOID CO.
WORLD HESTOS OORP.
S. F. EBOWf
.
HABST SETH
a. B. BPBrCBR
L. W. TUTTLE
K. V. MASHObDS
A. J. BOOOR
J. A. BLAKE-
IT. BAraBQK
P. F. BULLET
T. L. OATXE 1
*
H. C. BERKBUI-
J. a. BBOW
E. y. LEHZ
B. ASPKR
E. 8. CROSBI
n
\ aw w <rw
'*011 '#61G 2^3
FUHBffi MARSHAT2. ROOT. g. SATIS
vu. h. cum*
H. G. VMBi a. k. kroans J. ?. D. BOBBBACB K. C. BUTTHWaKTH
0. U. WLUMS V. A. SPISA U. A. SATIS -FBH> *. OCHUTtBS
U 0. SBtSGABD
COULD H. SPICSE
SSPBrniMTS
XIDXCTKSIT
\ Am*f) wv*1*
ZWICS^S
>
r IT
Hn Qrand Jury cnargest
coarr an
1. Tin ter* "friction materials" wbersTer referred to in this indiotamt, means asbestos brake linings and olutoh racings used for replacement purposes in motor vehicles and in Industrial equipment.
SgPPBIPttlg 2, Brain Lining Hamifeotarers* Association, Tnc.,(hereinafter
referred to as tbs Association) la hereby indicted and nada a defaodast herein. The Association is a membership corporation organ!wi iindar and sadsting by virtue of the lam of ths Stats of Daw Tork and
baa ita prinoipas)lace of business la Hew Tork City. It is a trade association whose members are manufacturers of friction materials.
3. The following-named co^wnlea are hereby indicted and nada defendants herein. Bach of said defendants has been organised under and exists by virtue of the laws of the state indicated below and
.
each such defendant has its principal office and place of business in
the city designated. Each of said defendants, dozing all or a part of the period covered by this indictment, including the period within the statute of limitations, has been engaged In selling friction
materials in foreign commerce and has been and is a masher of the
defendant Association either directly or through its parent company.
Defendants American Broke Shoe Company
State of
Principal Place
Jtoftgsfflattfla--gjCJwtow
Delaware
Detroit, ICLoh.
Asbestos Manufacturing Company Bendix Awiction Corporation _
Indiana Delaware
Huntington, Znd.
Detroit, Mich.
fibre & Metal Products, Inc.
California
Downey, Cal.
Fireston* Tin and Rubber
Matport Ocaipcxjy
Kalne
Akron, Ohio
T
s
: j j ' t f:
! | : j | I
State ot
Principal Place
Firvccon* Tir* ana xumw coapaa^
Qatke Corporation
QmxmrmX Usitftt OorporKtioa
Gristly Manufacturing Company Juleie Vnsrin a Sttanutitnal Corporation
Obio Illinois , Delaware California
Delaware
JUtvottp Chicago, ILL. Detroit, Vieh. Bell, Calif.
WewTork, W.T.
T i
Johns-Manvilla Corporation Pbarls Tire k Bobber Co.
Weir fork Ohio
lev Tork, W.T. Newark, Ohio
Baybestos-Kanhattan, Inc.
Veer Jersey
Pessaio, H.J.
L\
Bussell Manufacturing Co.
Connecticut
Middletown, Conn.
Scandinavia Belting Company
Heine
Newark, K.J.
Themoid Co.
Delaware
Trenton, H.J.
World Bestoe Corp.
Hew Jersey
Patereon, N.J.
Collectively the aoave-aamed defendants are Hereinafter referred U> ee
the corporate defendants. !)< The (dloiilat Individuals ere hereby inddctad and node drfwtat*
herein. Each la associated with a defendant corporation in the capacity
ehoiei below. Bach said defendant during all or a part of the ported
covered by this indictiasnt, Including the period within the statute of UalUtion, has authorised., ordered or done the acts alleged hsrein to
have been In violation of law*
Defendant
S. P. Brown Barry Seith
'
J. B. Spencer L. W. Tuttle
X* 1, Naaholcfa
1. J. Roener
Corporate Befendant with which Aasodatsd American Brake American Brake American Brake Aabeatoe Mfg.
Bendix Aviation wendlx Aviation
Title or Position
Address
Dir.ofBxpts. Detroit,Mich. Aasfe.Sales Hgr. Dtroit,Micb,
V.Pres. V.Pres.
Detroit,Uicb. amtington.ind,
Asst,Sties Mgr, Troy,N.T.
Sales mgr. Troy, N.T.
4
\ AnwiojJ1T
e^a
1
bftrim j. a. sum V* Bahbeck
Cn*porate Bsteadaat Utla dr
Fibrs k Matal FtrestoM
T.Praa. Kspt.Dapt.
Dom*y,Cal, Akron,Ohio
- ?. P. Baillat 7. L. Gatfc*
Gatke Gatk*
Kxpt.Dept. Prat.
CMcage,HI. Chicago,IL1.
H. C. Berkeley ' J. a." Bront
Gafcaral Motors Grissly
SSL** Mgr. Sale* Mgr.
Dayton,Ohio Paulding,Ohio
~ S. If. Laos
Gtissly
Export.Biv.
Paulding,Ohio
- B. Aapar
Johna-Manrill*
V.Praa.
In Iork,N.T.
- I. S. Croaby
Jobns-Maawille
Praa.
Haw Tork,H.I.
Porter Marshall Pbarls
Praa.
Hidgmray,Pa.
Babb, B, Bawls
Bayteatoa
V.Prea.
Bridgeport,Ct.
ta. H. Oann
Rajtestoa
Coopt,
Paaaaio,N.J
' H. G, Farwall
Bayteatoa
Export .Dept.
Bridgeport,Ct.
G. N. Bightar, . Raybestos
ExportJigr.
Manhau,ra.
J. P. D. Bohrbaoh Bayteatoa - M. u. Butternorth Muaail
Y.Pr*s. sxpt.Mgr.
PaeeaiCjM.j; Kiadleto<m,Ct.
G. K. HaUiana
Boa**11
f.
T, A. spina
ScaraUnan*
Praa. Treaa.
Middl*tom,Ct. lemu'k|H*ir*
H. A. Dari* Frod.B, Schluter
Theraold Theraold
Erpt-Kgr. Proo*
7r*nton,lf.J. Treat oa,W.J.
L, 0. leragard
World Baatos
Mgr.
Patersoo.N.J.
I
Dcoald H. Spioer World Baatoa
Praa.
Pat*rsea,K.J...
i!
I
I
s
*
i
li
i
jf `V
5
\ tpofU *,w*rmwT `**3K >P*n *
xwios^s
:v;u*cyTo
WBRin 1M
mrmam-
6. tho Miforat* <fiatoto imifUtu* frlotion aateriolo la imril of tho Stotts of tho united Statoe and A If substantial qpoatltlos to foralga oountrioa. Bio corporate defendants aanufesrburo end loll approximately 97Jt of tbo friotian attarill* am> featured in tbo United Statai and shipped la foreign trad* oad oomeroe. la 1946, tholr foreli ealee mounted to approximately #,700,000*
uscoiibimiim
oosspi&ct a
TBtaoaBTi' Tssmnwr-
6* Beginning oartlao la 1982, tbo exact data being unJcnoto to
tho Grand Aworo, oad oontlaulag thorooftor up to and laolndlag tho
date of this ladiotaaont, tho dofoadoato and other peroau oad aorper a-
tlono unkaom to tho Grand Aaroro hare unlawfully ooufclaed oad aon-
opirod to fix, establish, aelatela, ocntrol, manipulate oad taapar
'With tho prlooa, tom oad oooditione la tho oolo of friotian notarial*
la restraint of tho aforesaid foreign trad# oad ooaaoroo,
7, Xho aforesaid ooobinatlon oad ooneplraoy hat boos a ecatlading oao, tho atbstaatlal torao of dhloh hor* boon that tho dofoadoato agree
that*
(a) Tho Asiooiaticn proper oad distribute ooaag tho
dofoadoato uniform prioo litto, discounts, tsra*
oad ooadltlcns of ooloi (b) Bach corporate defendant publith la ita on prioo
litto tho priooo contained la the JUoo oistlcn prioo
listsj (o) Booh corporate defendant not tho tinifam dioooaaeo,
torao, end oooditione Of Oolo in soiling to purohasoroi
(d) Won tlao to tiao tho prioo list*, diooounta, tra
tad condition* of solo, and solos priooo would bo ,
ohanged.
X
V
\ Amo*^ww*"*
xnscrs or tbs connmci -------UK flMBRBP3f----------
8. Tha aforesaid acatblaatlon and eonspiraoy hereinabore aliafed baa had tha following effoota with raapoot to friction aaterlals as intended by tha defendants
(a} Subatanttally all oo^etltiou In foreign eowaroa has baan elininmtedj
(b) tha earperato dafandanta haaa aada galas in foreign ooncaroe at uniform priosaj
(a) Ilea corporate h/MuluU have aada aaiaa .in foreign oonaaroa at loser prioas than they haaa in domestic lonarM.
VKHIBB
9. The combination and eoiuplraay horelnbefore alleged has baan fomed la part and carried out in part within tha Southern District of Yaw York in tha following wanner*
(a) Hastings hate bean hold la Var York City at whish tha defendants haws agreed with each other upon uniform list prloss, discounts, sailing prioas, terns and conditions or salt i
(b) The Association haa prepared in Bsv York City unifora prior lists, disoounta, torus and
eaadlfclon* of asla whlob It hu tset out
to tbs defendant!; .
1i
]
i i
}
7 v*-
\ mum vxirWlJ `'**'VQ`r ^-~=r
zwioe^iS.
(o) Snbatoutill funtitin of friction itcrlilo hit* boon ihlppod through tho Port of Xor fork*
'
A tsas BILZd
kf
:
ii 1
\
f.' *
vf/d ydc
\J. PttUTCIS EIDH / XHTHO B. GUCIFBUf
JOSSPH T. QUmU* BOlintL 8. CUB Spoolol Ajcirtints to tho
dttanwy OoBorol
( / wftTiwg BAIDK0X3
OBGRSE B. HADDOCK Bpooiol Aioiotoato to tho Attorney OomvoI
f
.u "i
H
x..
T
\ jtfjrrio tK V"** ***I'"*T
*In *!
T
T
T
ir
must
r
4fck Nt,Wi*--
jii
- ;>w't Ortal 9*Nrt>. a*.
.: " r Umt.fwk.rtatmU 0w. :
,i: ,
li;}. . ... CIm tMtarlt. Iita MMh twttini MittMt'hMdf Om*.
1,990. 7J0.
3,000. 900.. 1,909.
990. 2*990,
909. 409. 1,000. NO. NO. 400. 900.
<.* : -'
tojmi
TI*-"?*'..:. '.
1,900. WW
mi |^n .-
4,900. l,No.
AW* ;-*t 2|jN,
V0*
1*25'
Vi<:.lR* .
'Aft
LjflL
*&
............ 900. c-'V-;*., n-~r
4,000. 4,N0. 1,900. 4,900. UNO. 4.900. 1.900. 4>0.
**--<
Sscr^ttfc Mt t
400.
1,000.
* UOOQ. 900. 1,000. 000. 1,000.
900. Ht MMC 1,000.
,** fetdl
IN.E2B0B0.# M8BLHttLB
m.MQ. -
r
tr
ismmt
* >. '
' ` `L .* .4JllfiW*""*-
DISTRICT COURT Of TO OHITKD. 9XATS8
MR TBS
soctorb district or hbliqrk
' >\ t*:
United States of Amerloa
BRAS URn 1UMUFACIQAR8S AS80CUIICB, DC
/l /
Ho% oxaS/20>-2o6-ao7
Oa this
22ad
day of September,1943 jgc came the attorney
for ibe government and the defendant i|n<ew<i dlfpWMMWa
By leater D. Stickle*, Atty
- ite
It Id Adjudged that the defendant bso been oonvleted upon Mo plea
of nolo contenders By atty*
of the offense of oooepdlracy in aestralnt of trade mid cosnerce in friction Materials T. 15 See 1 DSC
as oharged it
\
and the oourt having asked the defendant whetberake has anything to
say why judgment snoula not he pronounced) nd no surriolent cause
to tha contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as charged and con-
TdOt*?d
*
Xt Is Adjudged that thd dafaaiaat ba flaad tha bub of #$000* oa Bach ladietronfc Total fins H59000 Fino to ha paid by 4 PK
V-
district poofer or ca m^ szms
tor THE SOOTHERH DISTRICT 07 -TPflMT
united States of America v.
AMERICA! BRAKE SHOE CCKPANI
0136/205-206-207
0a thia
22nd
day of Sfljtenber,l?4B
for the government and the defendant appeared
by KUbank, Tweed, Rope 4 Hadley, Attys
ooaaoaee tthhee aattttoorrnneeyy
It la Adjudged that the defendant has been convicted upon Ua plea o* nolo contendere by Attys
of ths offense of conspiracy in restraint
of trade and aoaaarec In friction materials T, If Sec 1 030
as oharged it and the court having ashed the defendant whether 4ft p*a anything, to say why Judgnent should not he pronounood, .,nd no oyrriclent cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Coprt,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant Is guilty as oharged and con victed-*
Zt Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the enn of 19000. on each Indiotaent Total fine $15,000. to be paid kjl>N
*
DIOTRJOT COUJft 07 IBS TOOT 9TATSS
ixat tbs
-
'
SCDTHKHH D1STSICT OF HH|_T0HK
United States or America JOHKS^UKTILLSCOBMBATlOa
/
no. 026/205 & 207
OA this
22nd
day or topttober,194D
for the government and the defendant appeared , _
to Darla Pollc WardsaU Sunderland A fundi, Attys
earns the attorney
lfce It Is Adjudged that the defendant has bean convieted upon tubs plea of nolo contendere 6y Attye
of the offense ofcoagpiraey in restraint of trade aadcoamree in friction naterlala T, 1$ See 1 use
ae charged <t and the court having asked the defendant whether fia has anything to say why judgment should not he pronounced, nd no suffloieat oausa
to the oontrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant Is guilty as cnarged and eonviot*d.
It Is Adjudged that tha
j* fin*d tte sum of $5000. on
each indietaent Total fine f!0,000, to to paid by 4 PM
^Let{ufyl&e.
- ;v..................... DISTRICT coon or 1KB UHXTBD 8TATB8
ramat SOinSERB DISTRICT OF HKK-TORK
United States of America T
J.3.D0J1*
J/
Ho* CU6/&5 4 2OT
On. this
day of *P***r.A* 19
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Darla Polk Hardsell Sondarlmd A Kisndl, Attys
came the attorney
It Is Adjudged that the defendant haa been convioted upon his plea of nolo contendere bf attye
of th'e offense of consp,iracy i,n res,,tra.in.t
of trad* aad *-->r* la friction aatorlalo t 1? Qe 1 TOO
as 0barged
and the court having asked the defendant whether he has anythitg to say why judgment 9hould not he pronounced, tnd no sufficient cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as Charged and nonviated.
It Is Adjudged that the
defendant be fined the sun of 12500.
on ooob ladlotosnt
Total fino $5000. to bo paid by A PH
.. 1
Dirausot un or tax muss atASza 90B SB
SOUTUEKH DX3XBJCT OT m TPWK
O&ited States of America T.
/Ha. C136/2Q6
JOUS-KMVXLLK WTSMUTiaUL
COKPOIUTIOS
e
On this
22nd
day of 3^tsAer,lWi8 ^g came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared twyiMHmi
by Deris Polk Wardeell Sunderland It Klendl. Attya
its It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been convicted upon lad* plea I of imla contendere by ettjs
of the offense of SMUpiracy in restraint of trade and cooneroe in friction eaterUle T. 1? Sec 1 DSC
as charged
and the oourt having asked the defendant whether he has anything to say why Judgment should not be pronounced, t-nd no sufficient cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to tne Court,
It Is Adjudged that tne defendant is guilty as charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the
be lined the sum of 15000.
r'ine to be paid by 4 HI
l
T
TT
0 I
DisTsooT court or tax win asms
ros THI 300THJ8H DISTRICT 0? WBLTDBX
United States of America axTBMTOa-juuKAmji, ac
/I/
No, 01^6/205-206-207
On this 22nd
day of 3*ptmtr,19M
for the government and the defendant appeared by Robert P. Patterson
came the attorney
Its It is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonrleted upon We plea of nolo contender* by atty
of the offense of eonsp&racy in restraint
of trade and oomree in friction aaterlale * 19 See i me
as charged j* and the oourt having asked the defendant whether Hi has anything to nay why judgment should not he pronounced, >nd no sufficient oeuse to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudges tnat tue defendant la guilty a oberged and conrioted.
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the sua of $5000. on each
imMat-iynt *Otal flat $19,000. to be paid by J FK
. .... -_/>li United State
.strict CQiflge,
T
SOUTHERN DISTRICT 07 NSlLYCRK
United States of America
v*
ROBERT B. DAVIS
JJ /
No.
0X26/205-206-207
On this 22nd
day of Se#fcanbar,1948 gp came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared l ii>inwHoama
Robert P. Patterson, Attjr
I It la Adjudged that the defendant has bean oonvloted upon his plea
of nolo contendere by atty
of the 0ffenae 0f conspiracy In restraint
of trade and c amerce in friction material* T. 15 Seo 1 030
as oharged
and the court having asked the defendant whether he has anything to say why judgment should not he pronounced, snd no sufficient cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the
defendant be fined the earn of #8000, on , each of
indictments C126/2D5 k 207 and *1000. on indictnent C126/206
Total fins 15000, to be paid bj- PU
>/
s
T
.'
.
*
-- ,
%
.
(
^
.
^
JktliM Jte>j8......
DISTRICT COURT 09 THE UH1BP MAXES 90S THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT 09 ULYUUC
V 4
|
|
j
United States of America thesmoid 00.
y/
NO, 046/205-206-20?
On this 22nd
day of September,1948 U came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Samel S. Isselcs, Atty
\ It I It Is Adjudged that the defendant has bean oonvioted upon k*m plea
of nolo contendere by atty
of the offense of conspiracy In restraint of trade end comeroe in friction materials t. 15 see 1 use
as charged
It
.
and the court having ashed the defendant whether he has anything to
say why judgment should not he pronounoed, i-nd no sufficient cause
to the oontrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tne defendant is guilty as charged and con
victed.
.
It Is Adjudged that the dafandant be fined the sum of 15000. on each indictment %tal fine $15,000. to be paid by 4 PH
T
T
.Jj " *1 r-ry-T?
DISTRICT coamt Of SB UKKSD BtJOXS FOR TBS
SCOSORS DISTRICT OF NBLTCHK
United States of America v.
A.L.CAMPSRLL
// Nof C126/205 * 207
On this 22nd
day of Septib*r, 1948 9
for the government and the defendant appeared li
ter Saul S. Iaaaka, Atty
oame the attorney
V I It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been convicted upon his plea
of nolo contendere by Atty
'
of the offense of conspiracy In restraint
of trade and coaneree in friction materials T. 1$ See 1 DSC
as oharged
and the court having asked the defendant whether be has anything to say why Judgment should not be pronounced; i-nd no sufficient oausa
to the contrary balng shown or appearing to the Court,
It la Adjudged that tae defendant Is guilty as oharged and eon-
7lctd
It Is Adjudged that the
dafanlmt be fined the eum of 12900.
on both Indiciasit* Total fine H *5,000. to be paid by A TU
United state'
ist^lot^jkidfce.
T
IT
-- >
....
DiaroioT own or ms mmi sums '
108 TH&
sotmnsat MSRIH 69 mLTCBi
.
United States of America
ASBESTOS HASUFACTUKOn COMPASX
/ // No/ C126/205-20&-207
On this 2ad
day of 3sptsaber,1948 lie
for the government and the. defendant appeared
by Sawl 3. leeeks, Atty
same the attorney
Its
* It is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvioted upon hte plea of nolo contenders by Atty Of the offense of ceiuplreay la restraint of
trade and coonsrc* In friction aaterlala T. 15 Ssc 1 USC
as charged 'jt
and the court having ashed the defendant whether he has anything to say why judgment should not he pronounoed. i-nd no sufficient oausa to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
Zt is Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the
defendant be fined the ana of
lljiOO, on each InUatssnt Total fins ft500* to be paid by a n
T
IT
mmto
........................................................
-
DISTRICT COURT 07 TSX tHXflB STAIRS
TOR TBB
,
SCUTHSRS DISTRICT 07 NBL1CSX
Baited States of America v*
l js.mxa
yJ
Ko* C126/205 4 207
On t&ls
asm
day of 9epteder,19W A9 oamethe attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared Saqannaak
by S--ml 3. Isaaks, Atty
'l it Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvioted upon his plea
of nolo contender* ty atty
of the offense of con*piracy In restraint
of trade an! eaanama in friction aatariale T. 15 See 1 S9C
as charged and the oourt having asked tbe defendant whether h# has anything to say why Judgment should not be pronounced, rnd-ao sufficient eausn to the oontrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It ia Adjudged that tn defendant la guilty an charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the aum of 1750, on each imUetaant Total fine 41500. to be paid by L PM
p
it
-*
4. district oomer or tbs othtsd statu
70S TBS
SOUTHERN DISTRICT 07 NBLtCRX
United States of America v
EBBXZ ATUTION COfiPOSATIOI
//
No, (026/206 k zrj
On this 22d
day of S*tawber,19W ^
fox the government and the defendant appeared
came the attorney
hr SahM, Hubbard a Mng, *tty*
Its It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvioted upon *Nti plea
-A
-
nolo contendere by Attys ot tb6 off,n0 of eonepiraer in restraint
of trade aoo oonoerae In friction notarial* T. 1$ See 1 DSC
as cbarged it
,
and the court having asked the defendant -whether i has anything to
say why Judgment should not be pronounoed, Mid no sufficient oausa
to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that the defendant is guilty as charged and con victed.
It la Adjudged that the defeadmt be Am the >un of 13000, on each indictment Total fine (6000. to be paid by A Hi
T
T
frttwift
........
i .......... wmiai ffti w
DISTRICT COURT Of TU OHITED STAIRS
TOR TEE
'
f
SOUTHERN DISTRICT Of HHL1DRK
United Stetae of America . **
QA3XS COVORUXOS
J ^^ No* C12&/205-206-207
On this 22nd
day of 5epWmber,196S 3) oame the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared jMuaounl
by OdCannor * Farter, Attys
v It la Adjudged that the defendant haa been oonvioted uponrtts plea of nolo eonteadare by ittye
of the offense of eonaplraey la restraint
of trade atri eeemsrce la irietloa material* T. li See 1 TOO 1
as charged
.
and the court having asked the defendant whether Tie has anythiag to
say why judgment should not he pronounced, * nd no sufficient oausa
to the oontrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It la Adjudged that tue defendant in guilty an oharged and con vict'd.
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the sum of H500. oa
each liiiinai 1
indictment Total fine *1500. tn be paid by A PH
T T
r
t(
i
*
v I
i .V DxaooDt coOkr oi m wrap mixes
id not
soitojkb biotuot or hhlres*
uaitea, states or Aaerloa T. L.OATB
/ // Ho, 0126/205-206-207
On this 22nd
day of S*ptbr,1.948 jg out the attorney
for the government and ths defendant appeared IjtoFtncnMtc
by oaConopr * Farbmr, Attyw
It Is Adjudged that tha defendant haa bean oonvioted upon bla plea
of nolo contender* by Attya of the offense of coopplrtoyr 1b rutitlnt
of trade and coaaarca In friction aateriala T. 15 See 1 DSC
as oharged . and the court having ashed the defendant whether he has anything to say why Judgnent should not be pronounced, i nd no sufficient cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
it Is Adjudged that tne defendant Is guilty as -charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the cfendant be fined tha aua of $500, on each lndietaant total fine $1500, to be paid by 4 PH
es^D'isprlcJt
;e
T
IT
i sA
s'
ir <i..ii> m"hi ....... ...... I sisnoot court or to uhito ctatss
SOUTOBS
TOB TO ' ..
_
DISTRICT Of MBLYGBX
*
*
ffiL
r
'
Us.it* d 9tata of Amerioa
BCSSBX lUWrJCTOHXK CO.
y //
No* 0136/205-306-207
Os. this
22d
day of Htambar,l%8
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Lester 0. Stlold,*ttjr
coame the attorney
v \
Its It Ib Adjudged that the defendant baa been eonvloted upon Mb plea
of nolo oontenasre by Atty
of the offense ofoonaplraar In rsatrmlnt
at trad* and ci--rns la MaUta eatarlals T. 15 Saa 1 DSC
as charged It ' and the oourt having ashed the defendant whether km has anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced, ni no aufflolent oause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It la Adjudged that tne defendant la guilty aa charged and oon7i0tM..
It la Adjudged that the darn(Unt b( On*d the sue T H500. on each ladletaent Total fine 14500. to be paid by 4 PM
A
bates
/h Z
<r (Widjfee i
TT
T
<p
TiHnirt
...... ~ DISTRICT COURT OT THS UNIT STAIRS
*'
SOUTHERN
TOR THE
.
DISTRICT OT RBLICRK
* ` _ i
Halted States of America v.
LBO 3. SOLLITAV
>
No, uS6/at>9A207
On this
2fcid
day of 3eptaMMr,19(R pgc came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared ^t***"'*"*'
Lester 0. 3tloklea,,Atty
't It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been convicted upon his plea
of nolo contendere by atty of the offense of cone draoy In restraint
f tMto end ooeMvee In Mrtiai Materials T. 15 See 1 DSC
as charged and the court having asked the defendant whether he has anything to say why judgment should not be pronounced, >-nd no sufficient cause to the oontrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It la Adjudged that toe defendant Is guilty *. charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the eue of 1750 on each
ladletaeat trial fine $1500. to ba paid by 4 PM
.
Mtti
v* 4 - J* * ymwia^M
DISTRICT 0000 Of SQI ONUS? StAJW
*'
. ,* , '* *'
TOR THE
"
scuthws district or hbliorx
United State b of iburloa BOBU) BKT08 GOV
y/ /
No, 0136/285-206-307
On this
22ad
day of Septbr,19/<B
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Israel B. Oases, Atty
oaiu the attorney
Its
It Is Adjudged that the defendant baa been convicted upon
plea
of aale contenders by Atty
. of the offense of conspiracy la restraint
of trade an) awn# In friction aafcerlsls T. 15 Sec 1 03C
as oharged it . and the oourt having asked the defendant whether M has anything to { say why judgment should not be pronounced, <-nd no sufficient cause
to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It la Adjudged that tne defendant Is guilty as charged and oon-
vloted,
It Is Adjudged that the tofrrrtt** be Hoed the eum of H500, on each ladiotwat Total fins 14500. to be paid by 4 Fit _
\
T
T
itfftKLl
DISTRICT OOTRT 01 38! UHITED STATES
FOR TBS
SOOTHERS DISTRICT OF KOLtCRX
United States of America t
^ // N 026/20^-206-207
On this
22nd
day of Septemh*rt19ft> U* osns the attorney
for the government end the defendant appeared fry--wau*
by Israel B. Oeeea, Atty
\ It Is Adjudged that the defendant haa been oonvioted upon his plea
of nolo oootraders by etty of the offense of eonapiraoy In restraint
of trade and eoaoeree In friction aeterlale T. 15 Seo l DSC
as charged
and the oourt having asked the defendant whether he has anything to say why Judgment should not be pronounced, i.nd no sufficient cause to the oontrary being shown or appearing to ths Court,
Tt Ts Adjudged that tne defendant Is guilty as oharged and con noted#
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the sum of $500. on each
ladletnent Total fine H500. to bo paid by 4 M
,
T
' tiaanpT 000*3 0*
YOB TBS
sweats
'
sovotrh district or hbltgrx
-*
limited States of Asrloa T;
Mbr 4 Kobal Prodmrts, IK
.
JJ NO*. 026/205-206-207
Oa this
22nd
day of 8tipUabwrtX9U^9 cams the aittoraay
for the government and the defendant appeared liywiHW1
by tester D. Stickles, Atty
its
\ I
It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvioted upon
plea
of nolo contendere by atty
of the offense' of conspiracy in restraint
of trade end oasrcs in rrlotim
*. 15 1 osc
as oharged it and the oourt having asked the defendant whether >8 has anythieg to say why Judgment should not be pronounoed, >nd no sufficient cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as charged and con victed.
It la Adjudged that the dsfsndaat be fined the sun of ifcOO. on eaeh <>wh C126/205 4 201 and (200. on 0126/206 Srtel Mm (WOO. to
be paid by 4 PR
M )u a >AA-J /
JJi'ted States T>striet Judge*
Tv T
siattact covsa or as* mantf
tor na
gcuvmx DISTRICT Of
United State* of America UflCO BUZZ PB0E0CT9 OORP
No.
y
U126/207
On this
82nd
day of Septa* hop 194S19 oame th
fop the government and the defendant appeared >nvww>wi
By Lester 0. Stickles, Atty. , -
. ita
It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvleted upon ffo plea '
of *'
ado ocwteadera
h_ .tty
of tAhkea offense oa#f ceoAnHsMpliaraacnyv i4nt rMeesf.tMraailnntf
or trade and min ia frtetloe aaterlela T. 15 See 1 BSC
and. the court having asked the defendant whether e has anything to say why judgment should not he pronounced, .nd no sufficient cause
to the oontrery being shown or appearing to the Court,
It IS Adjudged that tne dependant ia guilty e* charged and con victed.
It la Adjudged that the
defendant be CUd the sum of *1000.
to be paid by 4 M
V-
JjT-.
f'rttMl -
,, I ......in.....-i.nlBlJgi
DISTRICT COQRT Of TBI UNHID 8TATIS
fOR IKK
SOOTHERS DISTRICT Of NBL.TCRR
Daltad States of America *e '
i. j. icur oo
//
No, C126/205 4 207
On this
22nd
day of 3^>teher 19M H came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared hev--u*
by Letter S. Stlflklea, Afcty
lie It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvioted upon Mbs plea
of oolo contendere bar ettr ''
_ ^ ___
,,
,
of the offense of conspiracy In restraint
of trade and ooaaaree In friotloa materials T. IS See 1 BSC
as charged 14 and the oourt having asked the defendant whether mr has anythleg to amy why Judgment should not be pronounced, Mid no sufflolent cause to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court, .
It Is Adjudged that tae defendant Is guilty as charged and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the dafudant is fined the sum of I$00. oo
each Indictment Total fine $1000. to be paid by 4 FM
mma
mm
tuwumm
dmoop? war or one united man
job m
.
acwnaxB disimot or jqbltcjuc
United Stataa or America
# Pauls T 4 HDBSBB CO
//
Ho. <026-396 6 207
On this
day of 3eptber,194* 1* cane the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared;
by Spence, BotchklM, Parker * Duxyee, Attye
it*
It Is Adjudged that the defendant haa been eonvioted upon ba plea
of nolo contendere by atty
of the offense of co&Bfimr In restraint
of trade and eomaree In friction aaterlaLs T. 15 See l use
'
as charged it
.
and the court having asked the defendant whether lac has anything to
say why jud^aent should not he pronounced, >nd no sufflotent oauae
to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tne defendant is guilty as charged Bna con victed.
It Is Adjudged that the defendant be fined the rue of $500. on each
Indictwent Total fine *1000. to be paid by 4 PM
,o
/i
United States' District7-Judge,
a
j*, J-
r Ni
'* .V" ,>
> ' \
Diaaaar ooaet w` w* mm*D pirns
vo* in
ararats djsmiw or imlbk
JUI*.
v 1
flfcited States of Amrloa
o'
acjunmum BKurm cohpasi
' // Mo, 0126/205-206-207
On this
22nd
day of 3optaabar,194d
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Charles L. Cusuano, Atty
oae the attorney
Its It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been oonvlotsd upon m plea , of nolo ecstsndsre by atty
of the offense, of oooaplraqr in restraint
sf trade and eonaarea In frlatlon aaterials T. If See 1 DSC
as charged it and the court having asked the defendant whether Ufthas anything to say why judgment should not he pronounced, *nd no sufficient oause to the contrary being shown or appearing to,the Court,
It la Adjudged that t.ca defendant ia guilty an eharged and con
victed.
each It Is Adjudged that the dafondant be fined tha aua of |400,/on Indiataanta 0124/205 A 207 and 1300. oa <>126/206
Total fina fclOOO. to be paid by 4 HI
A
J^itei^tates^l/sfrict Ju^g2,
T
T
r.- .* <
annum Dfinsjor or .lone
United State* of Aaerlca
. *e SOOTHERS PHETIOE MAjwiTgjt OOBF
/' No, CU6/% . vert
Oa this 2ad
day of Septarter,!ft* It came the attorney
for the government and the defendant appeared
by Lester D, Stickles, Atty
l its It Is Adjudged that the defendant has been convicted upon M plea
of nolo contendere bf
,,_ of the offense of
m strain!
of trade and wJMeerce in friction materiale T, 15 see 1 DSC
as charged
it
and the oourt having asked the defendant whether fee has anything to
say why judgment should not he pronounced, >nd no sufficient cause
to the contrary being shown or appearing to the Court,
It Is Adjudged that tne defendant is guilty ao charged and eon-
vleted,
.
It Is Adjudged that the dafsmlant be fined the sub of #$00. on each Indict,went Total fine #1000. to toe paid tor A HI
I
T
T
r
\
edited Statea ot Jlaarloa T
iwmi. loioBs coapoRitn*
,, /) / Ho 0126^205-206-207
On till* 22nd
day of 8*pUrt,lW 0
for the government and the .defendant appeared by Oeorge A. Brooke, ty
oaae the attorney
It la Adjudged that the defendant has been eonvloted upon M^b' plea
of nolo eontendere
by etty
of the offenae of oontpiracy in reetraint
of trade eixl roeccxmb in frletion aetsrleli T. 15 sec l use
aa oharged
it
end the oourt having naked the defendant whether hoc has anything to
say why judgment should not he pronounced,. *.nd no sufficient oauae
to the contrary being shown or appearing to thd Court,
It la Adjudged that tae defendant is guilty as enargea and con victed.
It Is Adjudged that tha a,f*ndmnt be fined the bub of $WOMon each of indietaents CU6/2Q5 * f " *soo` * C126/206
T
T