Document EqYjXo1ezjjB4zDgVMD3Jo274
192
CHAPTER 10
1946 Guide
Table 4. Maximum Allowable Concentrations of Dusts, Fumes and Mists'*
Substance
Arsenic: arsenic trioxide..............
Cadmium, and compounds
Chlorodiphenvls. ......................
Chromic acid mist.................
Lead; lead carbonate; lead chloride; lead nitrate;
oxides; lead sulfate.
...........................
Manganese, and compounds.............................
Mercury, and compounds.TM............... ......................
Pentachloronaphthalene..............
Trichloronaphthalene.....................
Zinc oxide fume
lead
Milligrams per Cubic Meter, Daily Exposures*
0.15c . O.lc
1.0 0.1 0.15c
6.0C 0.1 0.5 5.0 15.0
1 milligram per cubic meter = 0.44 grain per 1000 cu ft. ^Adapted from: Manual of Industrial Hygiene, by W. M. Gafafer, et al, U. S. Public Health Service (W. B. Saunders Company, 1943); and other authoritative sources. ^Adopted by the American Standards Association (American Standard Z-37).
Table 5. Maximum Allowable Concentrations of Dusts2
Substance
Aluminum oxide abrasive Asbestos.__' .................. .. Carborundum (silicon carhide) Cement (Portland)........ .................................. Coal (less than 5 per cent quartz)
Dusts containing less than 10 per rent free. silica Granite (Barre)...........................' Gvpsum (hvdrated calcium sulfate) Limestone (calcium carbonate) Marble (calcium carbonate)..........................
-
Mica.__................................. Nuisance dusts (non-toxic, non-silica) Ouartz (silicon dinxidel. Sand (silica, silicon dioxide).- ....................... Sandstone...........................
Silica (free or uncombined silicon dioxide) Silicates (combined silicon dioxide) Slate....................................... Talc...................... Total (maximum concentration for mixed dusts)
Million Particles per
Cubic Foot of Air,
Daily Exposures'3
15- 50
15- 50 50-100 50-100
15-100 10- 20 50-100 50-100 50-100
10- 50 50-100
5 5 5
'5 15-100 15-50 10-50 50-100
Adapted from: Study of Asbestosis in Asbestos Textile Industry, U. S. Public Health Service Bulletin No; 241, 1938; Industrial Dust, by.Drinker and Hatch (McGraw Hill Book'Co/, 1936); Industrial Code Bulletin No. 35, New York State Department of Labor* recommendations of state and local industrial hygiene agencies compiled by -the National Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; and other authoritative sources.
(Includes only particles from 1 to 10 microns approximately, as determined by the light field microscope counting technic, using the 10 X objective. Dark field counts (and the corresponding allowable concen trations) are anywhere from 2 to 100 times the light field counts for the same sample, according to the proportion of dust smaller than 1 micron (See Industrial Dust, Chapter VII, by Drinker and Hatch, Mc Graw Hill Book Co.).
Flash point is a convenient method of expressing this property in terms of the temperature scale. It may be defined as the temperature to which . a combustible liquid must be heated to produce a flash of flame when a
small, flame is passed across the surface of the liquid. The higher the
Air Contaminants
193
j*
....
. .' '
flash point, the more safely can the liquid be handled. Liquids with
flash points under 70 F should be regarded as highly flammable.
The upper and lower limits of flammability of gases and vapors, and the flash points of the corresponding liquids are given in Table 6. -
Methods for estimating the flammable limits of mixtures of gases or vapors must be applied with caution; the reader is referred to other
publications for this information 12,13.
-
Design of equipment for the control of combustible anesthetics is outlined in Chapter 13. Construction of equipment for handling air
containing flammable substances, or operating in atmospheres so con
taminated, is discussed in Chapter 46.
It is customary to report the concentrations of flammable gases or vapors in per cent by volume, or volume per cent. Comparison with
concentrations on the part per million scale used in chemical, medical
or industrial hygiene literature is readily made by the conversion: 1 per cent = 10,000 ppm (parts, of contaminant per million parts of air, or
in other words, cubic feet of contaminant per million cubic feet of air).
It will* be noted in Table 6 that nearly all of the substances listed have lower explosive limits above 1.0 per cent, while the maximum allowable,
concentrations for gases and vapors in Table 3 are below 1000 ppm or
0.1 per cent in most cases. Therefore, control of toxic or injurious vapors in workrooms to levels below their maximum allowable concen
trations for health, usually requires much more effective ventilation than
for the prevention of a fire hazard.
COMBUSTIBLE DUSTS
A dust explosion is essentially a sudden pressure rise caused by the
very rapid burning of airborne dust. The primary explosion often originates from a small amount of dust in suspension exposed to a source
of ignition and the pressure and vibration it creates may be sufficient to
dislodge large accumulations of dust on horizontal ledges or surfaces of
the building and equipment, thereby creating a secondary explosion of
great force. Thus the air conditioning engineer is involved for two reasons; (1) to obtain a movement of dust-laden air into exhaust hoods or openings,
and through ventilating or pneumatic conveying ducts in a manner that
will prevent accumulation of highly flammable dust at points where it
could ignite inside the equipment; and (2) to so design process ventilation
as to prevent the escape of dust which might settle on horizontal surfaces
and become a potential source of disaster at some distance from the
dusty operations. (See Chapter 46).
The intensity of a dust explosion depends upon: the chemical and
thermal properties of the dust; the particle size and shape; the concen
tration in air; the proportion of inert dust in. the air; the moisture content
and composition of the air; the size and temperature of the ignition source;
and the degree of dispersion of the dust cloud. Investigations on the
explosibility of dusts require a determination of the maximum pressure
developed during an explosion of a known air concentration, as well as
determination of the rate of pressure rise. Investigators frequently
experience difficulty in obtaining dust suspensions of uniform dispersion,-
and this fact must be weighed when comparing results from several
sourcesM,
. . .-
The minimum explosive concentrations of airborne dusts already tested
range from 0.01 to 0.5 oz per cubic foot, or 10 to 500 grams per cubic