Document E85R7BOdE9bXezmaNex8K1yb

1 FROM CICC omoaawMcnar eouMca Of OUKIRNU ImumOIm: 1tniSmv.fr** KM S*^vrw^0.CAtSr4 <#*) M2-t429 P.O 0> 2M7 SftCwrm.CAMtf* ga*aj#v Butter Kcaml Dm 01/2 f0| File BATEs Dccib*r 22, 19S5 FIOH; Dick 9i?l SUBJECTS Vide with Dr* Brace Aeee FORTOUrtWKrtUiATOM MCTHV1S r* Ul^"T'6 ** t> - 0 uwi . . ` 0c Friday corning, Peceaber 19, X apeut approximately an hour and tventy tlsutei vith Dr, Irset ius in hie office At PC Btrkilij, X had caked hi* for 15 or 20 Bisutsi to tell bis about current DC effort# to deal vitb eclcotiflc Illiteracy is tbc general public, Ky intention only-van to stimulate bia latcrcat isi participating Id the environmental public policy debate* u URL 04907 Dr. Aaea la veil ahead of aa oa that iaaua (ate attached lettere. He aade it quite clear that be la eery concerned about preeeat public pcrcaptio&a. Be vaa aoet conteaptuoue of "eavlroeaeatellen" aa It la nov practiced. After taping ay card la the alddle of a lined yellov cheat, be took acrlbbled notea aa 1 told hia about CEFUP. the Toxic Kick Information Center, the SEP. and the DC Toxic Subataaeaa teaaarcb and Training Center. Aa X catalogued various individuals ibvolvad in theae affortt, ha cede aueh commente aa. "That*a a good person". "1 don'taknov bin", "Mbum", After ny brief dlacouraa about our currant effort* at public education, ha pulled frop^hlfr-btleX^caae the draft of bia currant article for Seltaci rl$V For sore than an hour, ha vent through the articled atop--b^r axapT explaining to me hov ha arrived at bia conclualona. Dr, Aaea has aetabllehed computerised data base vhlch record* detail* of ever.y rat and alee bieaaaay be could find, Thle la eoependluB of data nearly an inch thick printed la vary fine print. Be hat aetabllehed that alee fail to pradict rata la A2X of the eaaaa, Bia comment, "If nice can't pradict rata any batter than that, hov can they pradict hunaaal" By plotting data on thoueaade of rata and nice (i*lD50| yMLD), ha drava tha conclualona that acuta potency In related to chronic potency. Further plotting* danonatrata tha doee raaponaa curve la pet linear but flattana at the lev doaa. Through etetlatlcel manipulation of potancy and exposure data, ha eetabllahee a potency score for hundreds of san-aade and natural cheaicala, than compere# thoee acorea ehovlug that aatural carclnogeo# present a vaatly greater rlak than do men-nada chealcele in the URL 04908 FROM 01/21/86 11:54 // environment. Soo exceptions are the current allowable levels ef toae occupational exposures standards. la thla caaa 1 could aot quit* follow hit reasoning alaca be equate* the burden resulting fro* inhalation directly vlth the burden fro* ingestion. X'a act aura that** biologically plausible* At each point in hi* discretion, be atreeaed that all of tbia la baaed on rat and alee date, and ha la (not) convinced tbia la really representative of the riaka to buaana* He kept repeating that be la convinead man-made ehealcela la tha aavlronaent preaente no aaaaurable rlak to humane* 1 naked hi* for m source*which cetelouguea the asn-*adc chealcala which have beeo detaralned to occur naturally* particularly tha chloronated hydrocarbon! (ay pete)* Be replied that ha knows of no euch definitive work but that wae something the chealcal Industry should be promoting. He added, "I do know that thousands of chloronated hydrocarbons ara produced by flora and fauna in tba ocaana". It la logical, be edded, that others are produced la land environment#. 1 brought up TCE in the American fiver, Hla raaponsa was that It ie probably man-made, but who knows? And who known whera It aight hav* come from, given the levs of thermodynamics. Horn important (ha sddad) what's the health significance? 1 showed hla a copy of tha latest California Guidelines for Carcinogen Sink Assessment. He said he hadn't read It, but askad me what was ay greatest objection to It. Vhen 1 said that It was too rigid in forcing sciantiflc decisions to coaply with political policy. He replied, "Exactly*. At one point be resarked that tha chemical industry should be conducting animal bloaesajs ef natural csrclnogtns. Ha aaid such data la badly needtd for coaparlson purpose*. Visiting Dr. Aaea in his office and laboratories (where everyone calls hla Bruce) la an experience all should have. Vhen 1 finally pleaded I was taking too much of hie tine, he gave a* a collection of Ms recent written statements to the press and government, and as we walked to the elevator, assured me that he wee very auch Involved with the public policy Issue but -- he accepts no consultancies (very pointed on that). According to Dr* Ames, his final draft paper la ready to go to his scientific colleagues "around the world" for review, then will be put In final form for Science. This asy take up to six month*. It appear* to ae this paper aey veil aark a watershed la the "cheaophobla" saga. It will be In the chealcal industry's beat Interest to assure wide dissemination once it la published. _ > _ FROM 0 1 .'Z 1 /86 1 1 s 5S P. 4 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA. BERKELEY MMOLTr *avu i*v iw aMcgju wnwc m etkoo ux imxeues ***** NPMtnttNT or uoosMimr KMZUY, CAUrOfOTU MtM Vova^tr It. 1965 |*V7 CTIL** Taatiaony of Frofaasor true* I. Aaaa. Chairman Rpirtaiat of Iloebialitry traiwarslty of California Barkalay, California 94720 *B D C1?1$8S Profasaor At* va* forsarly on tba Board of Biractors of tha Buttons! Canetr laatituta (Batioasl Csacar Advisory Board)* Ha la a aaabor of tha Batloaal Acadany of Selaneas. Ha va* tha raclploat of tba moat prestigious award for eanear rasaaeb. the Caaartl Xotora Gaaear Basearcb foundation Prise (1963). sad of tba highest award la aawlro&aaatal schleveaeat, tba Tyler Prise (1965)* Ha dota ao nonsuiting for tho ebaaioal. drug. or food industry. or for lav fir**. URL 04909 Tbo Honorable Art Torraa Cbairaao, Senate Coaaittoa oa Tozlea and Public Safety Kunaftaent State Capitol, ftooa 4052 $icrutato, Callforaia 95814 -* Bear Senator Torres* Tba carcinogens aad tosic ehasleala being found la Callforaia watar uppllaa *ra praaaat la extraordinarily tiny aaouat* aad. ozcapt la raro oasaa. art praaaat la trivial aaouata rtlatlvo to tha background laval of carcinogens la Batura. Z aa ooavlaead that watar pollution la Irralavaat to tba eauaa* of buaaa canoar. Tho aala currant fallacy consist* la thinking that carcinogen* arc rar* and that they ara aoatly man-aada ebaalcala. Hy ova ostlaata la that over 99.995 of tha carcinogens Californian* ingest ara natural (o.f. natural tozlo ehanleala in plants, sold csreiaogeas) or traditional (o.g.. cooking food, sacking cigarettes. aleohol). tviry naal 1* full of carcinogens and whan on# ooepara* tha laval of carcinogen* In oontaainatad watar (or pesticide raslduao In food) to tho loval of natural earelnocana. it la elaar that watar pollution rapraoaats o trivial risk. Every eonsea drink ooatalna carcinogens. I list a fav noureaa and FPv 0 1 .'2 1 '66 11:56 p. 5 URL 04910 The Honorable Art Torres Stftf levels of natural carcinogens belov, tad 1 eo&pare the* to thr Silicon Talley** eoataaiaatsd vollt to sn exaaple. 1985 a) Coffee contain* stout 1,000 ticroinai of hydrogen peroxide ( taova carcinogen) per eup (4,000 apbj ppb - porta por billion) oa soil os about 1,000 mlcrograas (4,000 ppb) of methylglyoxal, which bos recently beta ahova to bo s otret&0{ia b) tap vatsr aoatiiai tbs carcinogen chloroform at 63 miorograaa par liter ($3 pub H.S. average), which la generated from chlorinating tbs voter. a) Cola coat alas tbs carcinogen formaldehyde st 2,600 aicrogreae psr 12 ounces (7,900 ppb). d) gee* contain* aitroaaainee, formaldehyde (700 ppb), sad alcohol (50 million ppb), all kno/a esrelaogta*. Sthyl alcohol is a taova human carcinogen (35 of 0,3, cancer) as sail as s carcinogen la rats, a) Kilk contains a blfb percentage sf fat, sad bleb fat baa bvQ implicated la hu&aa breast sad colon oanctr sad rodant esaear (though silk is sa Important source of ealciua, vbleb sap bs important aa aa aatiearclnogea)| sad f) organic fruit juices sap bava various ssouats of oarcioogtnie sold toxin*. Vs an just completing 6 study vbsro vs eoaptre risks for humans du# to intake of carelftegtae. 2a this study vs adjust for tbs potsaoy of eaeb earclaegta froa rodtat data. Sbls adjustment is asetaasry because tbs potsaoy of carclaogsas vtrita ovsr a million-fold, og., cflatoxla, s sold carslaogea, prtasat is small aaouats la psaaut buttsr (2 ppb 0.6. average) or com products such as tortillas. Is about a silHon tints mors potsat so a esrciaogea than trieblorostbylsas, vbleb often .contaminate* vsll vstsr. I give saas eoaparitoas bslov. Contaminated vtter, The level of etrclaogtas la coataaiastsd vsll vtttr (e.g., Silicon Vallty or Vobura) oaly rarsly lavolvss a risk above tbs risk of ordinary tap vattr. Of 33 veils abut dova in Silicon Talley because of their supposed carcinogenic hazard la aa t?A study, oaly tvs vers of grseter risk tbsa ordinary tap water (vsll voter usually lacks tbs chloroform present la cblorl&eisd tap vatsr), and tbs seat polluted vsll (2,600 ppb trichloroethylene) is at least 1,000 tines less hazardous than aa equal volume of cola* bssr, or vine. Given that tbs eonauaptloa of tap vatsr it oal7 about 1 or 2 liters psr day, it attai unlikely that man-aade vats; pollution la causing aare than a ainisal hazard. This is la contrast to lahtlatioa, particularly la the workplace, vhert breathing la 10,000 liters of sir ccataialng a carsiaegea la a work day can result la appreciable doses and thus oould represent a significant hazard. Pesticide residues, Xta-sade pesticide residues present la oar food taouat to about 150 nierogramsMay on tbs averaget most of tbsso residues are eoaposed of aoa-earcinogeaie compounds. The oat significant man-aade pesticide carcinogenic residua la feed it likely to be &P&, a aetabollte of PM. The risk at tbe P& in the average 6.8. daily intake la equivalent to the risk due to chloroform la t glass of tap vstsr sad, thus. It is insignificant eoapared to tbe risk due to tbe high level of natural carcinogens la our diet. v*& aa occasional highly 606* at PCB-toataainatad fish (e.g., 100 tines the average level) vould contribute a risk that is snail eoapared to othsr very co&aoa minor risks sueb as a glass of bssr or a peanut butter saadvicb. FROM 01 *^21 /S6 11:57 P>V <491***^ rat Honorable Art Torre* -3 - *f SftvtVr 11, 1985 /f // Bature'a MitleliM# V* are ingesting natural pesticide* la our di*t la amounts at iTaat 10,000 tlaes more then nan-made pesticide residues. letural pesticides art astural toxio ehtaleals, which art present ifi all plant*, usually asking up $-105 of a plant's weight. They bar* an aaoraoua variety of chemical structures, though only a f*w art praaaat la each plant opeoles. Tbsir function la protection against fungi, l&aaet* and salntl predators. i major aapaet of evolution of plant* 1* ebaaieal warfare. There baa been relatively llttla interest 1a the toxicology or eercl&ogealelty of theae compounds until quite recently, and very few of the large labir prceeat la the huaaa diet have beta teeted la aalaal cancer bloasseys, dad only gone of theae testa are adepts for estimating their potency* Scat of thoee teeted are eareiaogtna* They include astragal# (la basil), aafrole (la herbs), symphitlne (la eo&frey tea), peoraleas (la parsley and celery), bydrasiaee (ia nushroo&s), aad allyl ieothiocyanate (ia mustard)* Calculations on the eereinegenic risk of these oeapeuads show that they completely overshadow the traces of man-made pollutants found la the dally diet, e.g., 5 basil leaves are 100 tlaes sore hasardous thaa the worst well la Silicon Talley (at least 5 basil leaves would bo lagestsd ia a portion of "pasta al paste"). Thousands sore of Vature's pesticides are present la the human diet and because many autegeaa are belag discovered aaoag then, many are potential earciaegen*. URL 04911 Skeotlcisa about extrapolating risks from rodents, ill risk oaleuletiona based on rat and aouss cancer tests, both ,?roa natural and man-nada oarcl&oge&a, are hypothetical* thus, thsy should bo taken with a great dose of skeptlcisa, mnlikvlaown huatn aarelnogeas such ss radioactive radon gas coning out of the ground into California houses or smoking (400,000 real deaths par year la the B.3.). There are aaay aew reasons for skepticism of low-dose extrapolation of risk to huaaas frea rodeat data, and for suspicions about linear dose-response extrapoletioai, which Z won't discuss here. I will dust aention one qualitative point. Of tbs oarclaogsns tested in both rata and ales la our database on poteacy, 425 of the chealeals were positive la the aouse aad negative la the ret, or vice versa. Thus, even two oleaely related short-lived creatures, the rat aad the aouss, don't predict very well for each other whether a substance la a carcinogen. Ve night possibly slialaats every trace of man-made carcinogen froa our water supply, but It will eost an enormous amount of California's wealth (wealth la rslatsd to health) aad be irrelevant to causes of husin cancer aad also night causa asv risks to arise that art worsa and distract health workers froa real, sore Important risks. Thus, ons can either chase after parts per billion of every aan-aade carcinogen that turns up or have sons feasible regulation about pollution. As ona of the world** nest enlnent epidemiologists has said* "But if AO explicit use la to be node of the degree of activity of each chemical, then instead of effective reduction of the total of all hu&au cancer the chief reeult say ba coaplete paralysis (slthtr of the regulators or of the 'regulates*')." [* ?eto, Epidemiological reservations about risk assessment, la Assessment of tlek froa Low-level 01/21/B6 11:59 ROM Tbi Roaorabli Art Torrti tovnbtr 11, 19Q5 Egpooun to Iidlitlon tad Cboalctlo, A, . C'Voodhoid, C. J. Sbolltbarctr, . ?oad7 tod A. HolltoadtrV tdi. (?l*aaa Frost, Vo* York, 1965), pp. 3. HO Yours truly, BBA/ask Brueo V* toot Frofossor and Cbiiraia to.cloiu.rti Cal Xonthly artielo eet Asooablyaas Bill Jetii [l u mfiiai a copy to Asaiablyaaa Bill Mil Vieiuit bt scat a copy of ill bill* Unfortunately, Z cianot appear to toitlfy coaeoraiaf it, but Z support tbs Idsa of rtasooabls itindirds. J URL 0491 01-^21 /8S 12:03 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA., BERKELEY wtMvtkrr Mvii. twvnvz im asous* fnautot MX msec ix mxoico S4MARa (ANT* Cfttl acrAJtTMcyr or noattMsnrr (utxcur, CAuroxu (n Jun* 5. 1995 URL 04913 Honorable Janes Scheuer, Claudia* Schneider and Poo tltten Coamlttee ea Science and Technology 232) Rayburn HOP Vasbington, P.C. 20515 Peer Representatives, Tour recent EPA authorisation bill baa taken an important stem by directing EPA to continue Ita work la Indoor Air Quality, If EPA (and Other concerned agencies) will put a reasonable aapbaalt cm radon clone* we can save several thousand lone etnear deaths aaob year* Thin number la comparable with ona estimate (aaa belov) of this total nunber of Uvat EPA could poseibly cava with ita entire $1,2 billion budget (budget tot Including the Super-find)* Ko'vavar EPA should update Ita priorities even further, via a study which should include CIAQ (Committee on Indoor Air Quality--the istaragancy group which eoordlnatee work on indoor air). EPA envisions ita role la to protect us fro* artificial pollutants, particularly those which tra being inflictad upon ua unfairly. be argua that tha US publle la such nora in need of protection froa natural and traditional pollution and toriaa. The aajor known pollution-ralatad daathc in tha US ara froa cigarette*, followed by indoor radon* Tha annual death rates aro roughly* Cigarette snaking (cancer, heart disease, etc*) Cancer due to man-nade pollution (This is 2t of 420,000 total cancers* Eatlaata by Poll I Pats (very uncertain numbers))* Indoor radon Paaalra (non-portlelpant) smoking (vary uncertain number) 350,000 6,000 10,000 t ,000-10,000 Tha annual deaths above era measured in units of thousands* By eontrsat, EPA spends moat of its surgical dollars on risks which involve 1-10 hypothetical deaths, or perhaps no prenature deaths st all* Va next diacusa separately I) air pollution and 2) toxins in food snd water. 1) One of t?A*a seder mandates Is sir pollution. Tha major'source of polluted air inhaled by humans la cigarette smoke which for smokers causes 350*000 preaeture deaths par year* Other aoufoee of sir pollution ara tulte titer by coaptrlnon* For axaspia, it takas s year of breathing to# Angelas sir to URL 04914 Honorable James Schcuer, Claudius Schneider sad Dos Ritter June 3f 1985 fat* two. inhalo ths eeao amount of pollution (burnt material) as smoking t tacks of cigarettes. Vs also ingest mors burst material is a da? from cookie* our food (which produces many known carcinogens) than ms *st la one year of brsathi&c Los Angeles air. Indoor air is mors polluted as average than outdoor air and vs spend aors than 75$ of our tins indoors* tsesntlj it has boon realised that a major source of carcinogen* is indoor air has boos unreeoi&issd* Radon, a natural volatile aoaree of radioactivity, la known to bo a bumao carcinogen (hundroda of dead uranium miners attest to this) and la present in millions of American hoses at exposure levels greater than those presently experienced by uraaiua Miners, and corresponding to a lifetime risk of 2*3$ for each occupant, kadon in US homes la likely to be eaueing 10,000 lung eancars oaeb year. (This is an CPt estimats and is m such note preeiae number than the usual hypothetical extrapolation from rats.) The radon eomes fro* the soil. In a very non-uniform distribution, and can also coma from veil water, It appears that 20*30$ of these 10,090 lung cancers cone from 2*3$ ef US beats (the alllion hoses sectioned above)* In half a million of these homes, tech occupant runs a risk of luog cancer from radon as grset as if ht/tho smoked 2 pecko of cigarettes per veek. St la inexpensive to locate many or even aost of these homes, and their occupants can be varned. Many home'ovaerm can modify their hoses fairly elnply to cleislse radon concentration* jg^addltlon, length of exposure is a critical variable] fer smokers, t peck day for 40 years Is mueh worse than 2 picks a day for 29 years* This accentuates the eoneern about radon, to which people are expoead from the time of birth* Xn addition radon and smoking are suspected to be synergistic so that, the risk for s smoker could be very sueh higher than for a non-smoker. finally there are risks and discomfort from other outdoor pollutants -- such as combustion products and organic chemicals -- which often oeeur indoors at levels substantially higher than outdoors, but whoso risks cannot yat be reliably quantified* Given this# facts, what is the government doing? Xti response to 550,009 cigarette-caused deaths (2 packs a day for 40+ years causes an average life shortening of 8 years) Is to subsidise tobaeco faraars, allow seductive sdvertlslng of cigarettes, and reduce the tex os cigarettes. Of its SI*2 billion aonuel budget, EPA spsods 230 million on outdoor air pollution and only 2 million on indoor air pollution or radon* The radon case is particularly noteworthy because it eeuld be solved relatively easily* 2) A second major mandate of CPA is pesticide and toxic chomieal residues in food and water. Xn feet almost all carcinogens and toxic chemicals we are ingesting are natural, not man-made, (See attachments)* Vatural carcinogens tend te be ignored by government regulators* for example, there are over $00 alcrogre&a of methyglyoxal, a autagen and a carcinogen produced by roasting coffee, in a single cup of eoffee* The total amount of poatieide residues we S16MW) Honorable Jiait Schautr* Claudios Schneider tad Don Bitter June 3, 1085 Fege Thras. at in 4 day 04 average is 60 aicrograns* mod moat of these are 44% carcinogens* 4 national turmoil vts caused by residues of B>B* 4 carcinogen la rat* aad ale* oad an essential fuaigtut for frala and fruit* BE1 hao aov boon banned by BPA* although vs do not bar* satisfactory alternative fumigants* Tho rlok created by EDB* however, la trivial relative to that duo to aatural toxic eheaieels la odlblo plants or natural pollutants aueh at sold toxins (oat attach*! tvo articles). For sxsaple* tho risk (to rata) from tho avtrag# amount of EDB roaiduo vo oat in a day from grain la about 100m tlnoa loos than tho risk from tho avsrago poaaut buttor sandwich* Peanut buttor is eoDtsalnatod with tho mold toxin* aflatoxln (an unusually potont natural carcinogen) at 2 ppb (V*6. avorago) and FDA allova 10m thin level In fool. Tho mb risk la equal to tho risk froa an avorago glaao of voter (water ehloricatlon prolueoa tho earcioogen chloroform: 64 alerofrons/lltor U.3* avorago)* All of thooo above risks, ovsn that from poaaut buttar aro likoly to bo trivial for human caneer. Sven tho most highly oontamioatod well vstors roportod appoar to havo trivial amounta of carcinogen* vhoo oonparod to ths background of natural earcinogona vo aro ingesting* For oxsaplo* drinking to quarts of tho moot highly contamlnatod voll vator in Silicon Valloy (roportod in tha novspapor a 1100 ppm trichloroethylene) mould havo o rlok (to rato) equivalent to that of 1 poanut buttar sandwich (with VS avorago aflotoxln contamination) Vhon EPA told tho public that BOB roaiduoa will eauaa 3 oaaoa of eaceor in 1000 pooplo, it vaa extrapolating from rata to pooplo* vhich la unjustifiable aciontlfically (it la roally based on tho Ides of prudence as vo don't know hov to do a quantitative extrapolation hotvoon species)! furthsrmoro* it vaa a worst*ease aotinato at ovary possible assumption* Zf ?1>A did tho osao calculation for a poanut buttor oandvlch tho roaulta voald ouggoot that poanut buttar la accounting for a good part of tho eaneor in tho eouotry (vhich no ana bsllovss la true). Perhaps tho various government agoseios could agree on a acalo of rlok* One can question the usefulness of those worst-ease, vary hypothetical calculations vhich metre tbs public and don*t put risks in perspective. It also seams important to calculate tho amount of aonoy spent eliminating risks in ardor to have son* comparability botvoan different regulatory agencies* and sons competition between these agencies and ths oelenttfle community for "risk funds"* This night give each regulatory agency some Incentive to aaxlnlto coot effectiveness and to address the more important risks* It it taking years from the first knowltg# of tho radon hasard to got anyone to pay attention to it* Vhat aosmo to be called for at this stag* of the lcoovlodge in the field is to try and sort the important risks out from tho very many trivial risks and to concentrate on very largo known risks ouch si cigarettes* and tom# smaller risks ouch as radon* oartsla occupational risks* and any others vhich surface* rather than to ebaoa after ovary trace of carcinogen at great cost and little effect* Vhat to 4oT Tho real problem lies not only with BPA, but' also with ths Congress* vhich needs to reconsider end update ths viy It funds and organises t -d miui f .. Honorable Jiom Sehouer. Claudine Schneider end Den titter -X June 3, 1985 Pip Pour. Gw- . ' S*-***'^-' ell the agencies that ere protecting our health. Agency budgets should he related to their potential contribution to oar well-being OTA hee underway a study of Technology tod the Aaerleen Economic Transition, which pcTtly addreaeea theae Issues, and ftr. Henry Kelly, the study director, eon offer oono relevant consents* fhii globally iaportmnt leaue deeervea Congressional hearings, and probably a study by the Hatioael Academy and/or OTA* Put year Ceaaltteo, which la resonslble for CPA* and hat Interests in indoor air quality, should not wait for lengthy studies* when aejor iaproveaents or# easy. As ve stated at the beginning of this letter. CPA and CXAQ sould convene a study to reprioritise fending within the related egenelea so that each dollar spent has a fair chance of contributing equally to iaprovlng our health and veil-being* This study should also consider the role of extrsaural funding* VXK dess internal research and ales sponsors external research, coaplete with oaeollclted proposals, thus helping to beep VXK on its tees* Ve vender if the aano competition and evaluation la at widespread is CPA and related agencies. If vs can provide any sore information, please lot us know* GaJ IZsitvi\u ^ Bract V. Ante Professor of Biochealstry (415) 642-51*5 Arthur H. tosesfeld Professor of Physics (At 5) *42-7031 Attachments: California QftA (Questions and Answersi Ants), California Monthly, Nsy 1935i Aces* Carcinogen paper. Science 221, 1254 (22 Septsabsr '85): Recasts. t set Senators Prank I, Lautenherg* MJ Robert T Stafford, VT George T Mitchell, XE i