Document Dywmo01g2LOYM8nDD49n5EZB

FILE NAME: Walter Campbell Company (WCC) DATE: 1970 Oct 6 DOC#: WCC017 DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION: NICA 15th Annual Convention Discussion Topics NICA: FIFTEENTH ANNUAL CONVENTION Discussion Topics: HEALTH AND SAFETY* Tuesday 6 October 1970 Team No. I. Surveillance and control of occupational exposures? Whose responsibility; Government? (Local? State? Federal?) Industry? Union? Pr ofess iona1 Ex perts? Others? Pros and cons for each type: Methods of selection: 1&1.1 Criteria for evaluation of discharge of such responsibilities: Avenues for appeals: Methods of surveillance; Methods of control: Techniques of Enforcements Other aspects. . The small contractor and his ecological control obligations: What are they? How can they most economically be discharged? What criteria should be invoked? What co-operative (NICA) services might be structured? What other sources of services ? might be developed? What other considerate on are essential? 2&12 ?. In what ways might occupational health exposures be removed as a "hidden" (delayed) business cost item at the competitive, 'contract bidding" , level? What might be the expected conse 3&13 quences of such proposed cost transfers? What impact on future developments will be generated by increased surveill ance of Environmental Protection Administration technical per sonnel? What other aspects need, to he constdered? A, Demolition, reconstruction, repair and sometimes ordinary maintenance seem to bni-ng along numerous occupational health hazards: Enumerate these: Indicate possible identificat- _____ions - detection - control - measures that might be invoked: * fopyright 1970 by Lindberg & Lindberg, W, Amityville, N.Y. 11701 A&1`1 1/1 ? . /n s> _ /(M U Include relative ocst estimates and expected relative efficiency of each suggested method: Indicate what other aspects need to be illuminated. "Hazard pay" concept has, at times, been used as an explana tion for coverage of occunati oral health hasards: How effect ive has this concept been +c date'7 How effective may it be in the future? What other job evaluation concepts,if any, might be invoked ? What other con si derni-*one might be useful , n ' n i l ini n + 1 p n n f t"h i* p T o b 'CP> 0 T U O ? T. X T X Qf} TJ .0* , * * CT' H J .V 4fU V J H n * ' > !or the 5^1-5 C u r r e n t c o n c e n t s f? C O G H '' 'h '? **worKTT~m c o m p o n g a t i on" a s t h e C n m o le tn "q u i d m r\ q 11Q11 pr\v* pvjy b h e p o r t o f t h o P IT-Ts^ f)r e*y'* * HT 1 1 i f " ihe K*a r*,1'0 0 : o i l i t '.P v a l i d i t y of t h i s or tr con- o e p t n o w ? How m ii'Vi f 1 `r Y '.n xn tibp f v i t n r e ? ' S h o r t te r m ? 6&! 6 Intermediate? Tong term0 ) What other aspects need to be illum ino ted? What are the major sources of occupational health hazards in the INSULATION INDUSTRIES? How ran each one of these sources be identified; - detected - control!ed Whot are the cost esti mates for *each0 Wha t is the relative efficiency of each? 7& 1.7 How can "good housekeeping" contribute to the attainment of improved health and safety performance in the .T.NSULAT7ON INDUS- 8&1 TRIES? How is an effective program: Initiated0 Maintained? Evaluated? Net Costed? Whet are the criteria used for its evaluation? What other aspects need to be illuminated? be what concents about "The Human Body and Health" need to_communicated to all members of the INSULATION INDUSTRIES? How con these communications moot effectively be transmitted? obeyed? and if necessary: Enforced? To what extent does personal ace- . ountability, for each individual, get involved? What other concepts need to be considered? What concepts about "Industrial Hygiene" need to be communirated t0 all members of the INSULATION INDUSTRIES? How can 10*20 these communicntiore. most effectively be transmitted? Obeyed? and if necessary: Enforced? To what extent does "personal accountability" (for each individual) et involved? What other concepts need to be considered?