Document DvezdKo3Vd01qJ2donxL8RRZO

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Spielvogel, Tamra [TSpielvogel@nahb.org] 3/22/2018 3:31:18 PM Beck, Nancy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=168ecb5184ac44de95a913297f353745-Beck, Nancy] Chai, Amy [achai@nahb.org] Re: Thank You & Follow-up Nancy, Thank you so much for the heads up, I know our members will appreciate the clarification. We look forward to continuing to work with staff on the emergency repairs conversation as opportunity permits and value the productive nature of the conversation as well. NAHB and our industry colleagues appreciate your time and follow-up on this matter. Best, Tamra Sent from my iPad TAMRA SP1ELVOGEL Senior Program Manager, Environmental Policy National Association of Home Builders 120115th Street, NW |Washington, DC 20005 d11111^J i l l " ] e: TSpieivogel@nahb.org w; nabb.org On M ar 21, 2018, at 1:53 PM, Beck, Nancy < 6eek.N ancv@epa.gov> wrote: Tamra, Thanks again for coming in and for the follow-up information as well. Its very helpful for us to hear from stakeholders. I wanted to give you heads up that hopefully by Friday (never know with the snow) the updated Q&As regarding emergency response will be posted on our webpage. It was good to hear that staff worked collaboratively with your team on ensuring we were addressing confusion that exists. If you should have any follow-up questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Regards, Nancy Nancy B. Beck, Ph.D., DABT Deputy Assistant Administrator, OCSPP P: 202-564-1273 M: heck.nancy@epa.gov From: Spielvogel, Tamra [maiito:TSpielvogel@ nahh.org] Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 3:07 PM To: Beck, Nancy <Beck.Nancy@ epa.gov> Cc: Chai, Amy <achai@nahb.org> Subject: Thank You & Follow-up Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 7 ED 002061 00046319-00001 Thank you for taking the time to meet with us and our colleagues yesterday. We appreciate your time and you attention to our issues raised concerning the RRP program, in follow-up to the discussion we wished to provide you with the information discussed regarding a number of individual items. Attached you will find a copy of NAHB's comments submitted in July of 2015 at the start of the public stakeholder engagement on the status of Sead-paint test kits, in it, NAHB references the language from the 2008 Preambie regarding the Agency's intended course of action should no test kit meeting the regulatory requirements be brought to market in the expected timeframe "if the improved test kits are not commercially available by September 2010, ERA will initiate rulemaking to extend the effective date of this finai ruie for 1 year with respect to owneroccupied target: housing built after 1960." (See the top o f page 5 o f NAHB's Comments.) As the Agency never acted on this commitment an economic analysis to reflect the proposed action was never completed and no economic analysis of the regulation reflects the lack of a test kit corning to market in year two of the program as anticipated. Also attached, is a copy of NAHB's comments to HUD in response to the request for comments relating to updating the Federal Strategy to Reduce Childhood Lead Exposure submitted in November 2017. Finally, attached for your information is a letter received by NAHB from ERA confirming the status of the Agency's commitment of resources to the development of a lead-test kit that meets both performance requirements. Please Set me know if you have any questions about this material. We look forward to continued opportunities to work with you and the staff at OCSPP on the RRP program moving forward. Again, thank you for your time. Best, Tamra Spieivoge! <irnage001.jpg> TAM RA SPIELVOGEL Senior Program Manager, Environmental Policy National Association of Home Builders 1201 15th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20005 Ex. 6 e; tspielvogei@nahb.org w; nahb.org We Build Communities <image002.jpg> <image003.jpg> <image004.jpg> <image005.jpg> NAHB courses LIVE online - get smart, right from your own home or office! " * "This electronic message, including attachments, may include information that is confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged, ft is intended solely for the use of the individualist named as recipients in the message. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or distribution is prohibited, if you are nof the intended recipient or heve received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender by replying to the e-mail and delete ali copies of the original message," * 4 Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 7 ED 002061 00046319-00002