Document DvB6R6NXN4zzrRnkwYMLRZBkn

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS REPORT SRD - Dr. Schnizer BBQ - Mr. Clark BBH - Mr. Sutton BBR - Mr, Wood PPL - Mr. Hadfield Corporate Technical Center Bird & Son, Inc. Project No. 014 Report No. 1 Written byR.F,Jaaocki Date June 19, 1979 Project Title: ARIB (ARMA) WORK Subject: Program to Determine the Cause of Clawing Object: To analyze shingles from the FS test decks which were made of felts with various pH levels. These shingles were analyzed to determine the final pH and total acidity compared to the original. The purpose is to determine the pH and acidity changes after 17-1/2 years exposure at Shreveport. Conclusions: 1. The felt in shingles tends to move to a very acidic level during long weather exposure no matter what its original level when exposed. 2. Running felt in neutral or slightly basic white water will result in a slightly less acidic final level in the aged shingles. 3. Starting with very acid or very basic felt white water, shingles will result that show severe deterioration from clawing, failure in cut-outs, swelling of exposed edges and granule loss after exposure to the weather. Results: 1.Felt was run to four pH levels of white water at Phillips- dale's #1 machine in 1961 and processed into 3 tab MasterBilt (non seal-dowij shingles) at two machines at FB. The shingles were then exposed on the FS test decks as part of an ARIB (ARMA) program to determine the cause of clawing. BIRD 010825 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS REPORT ' ) Project No H1A Report No. 1 Page___ 3 Data: See attached table. Reference: 1. J. Doherty Notebook #335 pp 35-38 2. Memo from PBL to PSL - Mr. Potter, 12/5/61, "Samples for FS Test Decks'* 3. Original Data Sheets "Samples for Shreveport Test Deck" I RFJ/ac attach BIRD 010827 cn O ) H CO -(pd m O (0 >1 OP -P H f-H fi id *h co H rt* Pm <N in CO rj* CN rH 00 r- in in ooo o S 04-P i-H (U id 4h fi rt VtH Pm O o o rH ^3* ** <3* S3 U 04 <U +3 cn fi C3 rH -P <u Sn -P Id *r3 P fi S3 3 a CU M O rH o o CN T3 C<U >3 VIO cu fi <D cn fi 3 m r-t 03 O 1 -rH S3 cum 3 01 &O4n X 2 tn <D C id f>ii O -Op 0a1> a) tk rHo> pnl -fHi Q twtn.afii a o cn cn * in m r* 00 1Il1 CO rH o o -S* in 00 +1 rH rl 03 U d) -O cn id a <od H m CO CN r* rH o rH rH CN m in in in CN CN CN CN M3 \ o n \ o 0) rH ftni aC) *rl *iH rH fi fi 01 Oid a 04 ) 0Pm3 a 03 Cm S3 <U Z rH cn I H =#s CN o r- r- t CN CO VO a\ in in N* cn o ooo rH OH *P VO q. rpt o * cn cn m VO r- 00 1 1\1 00 fH o o VO r* 00 -u <u Q) ma Tcl <jj 3 rH 01 03 r H in VO CN cn cn CO in in m in CN CN CN CN rH VO \ VO rH * cn =t*= a 04 03 04 CQ rcHIn sac rH =* BIRD 010828 QCQ&A 9 AO 24M 8 o 7J Iply tea MEMORANDUM SHREVEPORT Pat* 12/5/61 From PBL7V. PSL- Mr. Potter SAMPLES FOR FS TEST DECKS____________________________ We are sending you a number of shingles in conjunction with the ARIB program of determining the cause of clawing. Shingles are divided into two groups: #1-31A made on FBPM#1 on 10/30/61, and #1-31B made on FBPM#9. Each one of these groups were further classified according to pH of the felt and to the lane from which the shingle came. The following data classifies each shingle: Hr!1A Reel No. a n rr tr tr Lane No. Felt pH 4.a - 5.0 rr It TT tr rr rr rt rr 12 ff J tt ) 14 n tr rr rr 2, 5,, i- 54 ,,^ O 6.1 rt rr tr rr 6.3 rr tr rt tt 7.0 tt rr tr rr 7.3 rt tr rr 16- rt rr rr rr l' *** 5^ 3.0 Tt rr rr rr 3.4 tr tr. tt n #1-3IB Reel No. a rr tt TT 12 TT Tt rr Lane No. |" jt 1 . 1Z5Y 2 - <3^ 2 - <2^30 4- -- 4-- Amt. Backing R (regular) H (heavy) R H R H R H Felt pH 4.a - 5.0 rr rr rr tr rr tr 6.1 - 6.3 n tr rt tt n tr w '0:' u i BIRD 010829 MEMORANDUM y**-- Date From, 2- To. Reel No, 14 if TT Lane 2 2 4 4 Wo. __ ^3^33 - -z~r - Amt. Backing R H R H Felt pH 7.0 - 7.3 tr r tf rt rr n 16 R 8.0 - 8.4 it H it Rit it tf ir H it n Analysis sheets will be sent later. Also included are a series of Fry 'shingles, 220#, 255#* and 290#. Best regards '& jiSHdf 3 ) ARA/rp ) BIRD 010830 Mill T. R. No. i-i>#-8~Y PS T. R. No. 0 Produc t SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK JaJjlaJ fc^tjfe^pate Manufactured by f'p* ~Date Manufactured JJ - _?d -6 / Obtained from Pnpm- / ANALYSIS OP MATERIAL *i-3iA-r- + (W-M 'emi, m.3<) -------------------------------------------------wt./sq. Pelt Dry Wt. 3.^ wt./iotr Pelt No. & Pelt Make >/* Sq. Pt. % Kerosene IF? % Voids Pilled <jb Sat. f`fz Condition or Sheet Saturation H-%,3 S. P. Pen. S.P. (Filled) fgemp. Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating f 7, X Temp. Filler 7.? 1st Filler \1,G Grade Material S.P. (Filled) Pen (Unfilled; 2nd Coating (f, f Temp. # Filler 2nd Filler 1st Surf. ,} 3)t,b Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No. Material Color Abrasion Loss Color 2nd Surf. 31. Mfr. Abrasion Loss Backing 3.5* Material Total (Ex. Pkg.) XA3*6 A.W.T. Test Slide Test Oliensis Exudation Less Cut-Outs Test Stain Test New Wt. Oliensis Spot Test Bdle. Wt.No. Shingles/Bdle.Gross Area Shingle_ Shingle Size: LengthWidthCut-OutsNo. Tabs_ Aligning Devices Patent Marks_______ Underwriters' Label Method of Packing BIRD 010831 ') --- Mill T. R. No. (2-7 PS T. R. No. ^ ^J^ SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Product ate Manufactured by________ Obtained from Fprrn-1 Date Manufactured Id - 30 - *( dM *1-31 A 7 ANALYSIS OP MATERIAL Felt Dry Wt. Saturation Wt./Sq. 2.TS St. 3 Wt./lOO Fglt No. sc Felt Make ;j>c Sq. Ft. Kerosene j!?7 # Voids Filled [o& % Sat. (tjf Condition of Sheet S.P. Pen. S.P. [FiTleci") M* 6.1-6.3 Ten^-. Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating / SS Temp. Filler frf.S 1st Filler tS72. Grade S.P. (Filled) Material Pen (Unfilled) 2nd Coating ll ,S Temp. $ Filler H'X.S 2nd Filler 1st Surf. /TV. 7 Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No. Material Color Abrasion Loss Color 2nd Surf. 22 Mfr. Abrasion Loss Backing 2.2. Material Total (Ex. Pkg.) 2H,7 A.W.T. Test Slide Test Oliensis Exudation Less Cut-Outs Test Stain Test New Wt. Oliensis Spot Test Bdle. Wt.No. Shingles/Bdle.Gross Area Shingle Shingle Size: LengthWidthCut-OutsNo. Tabs Aligning Devices Patent Marks__________________________________ Underwriters' Label_________________________ Method of Packing____________________________ General Appearance ... >_______________ Remarks_ (2j xttuu. 3 (f &t &<u<Q BIRD 010832 Will T. IU u; / - Jrrr ~ -7-v>. - PS T. R. No. p^7 /. SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Produc t Date_------------------------------------------------------ Manufactured by _________ Date Manufactured(d --,--Gf Obtained from .FR fttl- I- /f- ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL (A/; - M tBP+lj ----- -Felt Dry Wt. Wt./Sq. Wt./lOO Felt No. <7 Felt Make ?>^ Sq. Ft. Kerosene / f? $ Voids Filled jf}1/Sat. \<-U Condition of Sheet Saturation Htf.l s.p. Pen. S.P. (Filled) Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating 1st Filler /6. 5 / f Temp. Grade S.P. (Filled) % Filler *+7,3 Material Pen (Unfilled] 2nd Coating 2nd Filler 1st Surf. 2nd Surf. Backing / f, ^ ,f. b .TH-.O = %(f,X /, / Temp. Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No. Mfr. Material i> Filler *?7.7 ' Material Color Abrasion Loss Color Abrasion Loss Total (Ex. Pkg.) >2./<573 A.W.T. Test Slide Test Oliensis Exudation Less Cut-Outs Test Stain Test New Wt. Oliensis Spot Test Bdle. Wt.No. Shingles/Bdle.Gross Area Shingle Shingle Size: LengthWidthCut-OutsNo. Tabs Aligning Devices Patent Marks_________ Underwriters' Label Method of Packing General Appearance Remarks jtjutl (`fj 3 AtA/rt^Jk'A ^ jut-- Ac&Mnfai Lv<k$z c$(fx<AAw M i B C&u Slit c^wsi\^ BIRD 010833 Mill T. R. No. Z/-2. PS T. R. No. -72 } SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Produc t^c \JL AijbvJJuufcxfcftZ Date . Manufactured oy________ ppDate Manufactured[fi -- -6 / Obtained from p fi p-pl - ( f-- /f -- /< -- ^ ANALYSIS OP MATERIAL (7^` ~ 0$ti*(} fyjl) Pelt Dry Wt. Wt./Sq. 3L6.3 Wt./100 Pelt No. .5-5 Pelt Make j> p Sq. Pt. % Kerosene i M % Voids Pilled % Sat ^ YTo condition of Sheet Saturation 4^7 3 S.P. Pen. S.P. (Pilled) ~ Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating fJT> 8 Temp. io Filler `{k* X 1st Filler 13, 7 Grade Material S.P. (Pilled) Pen (Unfilled) 2nd Coating <f Temp. % Filler ffT, 2nd Filler 1st Surf. Jf,3 Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No. Material Color Abrasion Loss Color 2nd Surf. XU Mfr. Abrasion Loss Backing a, Si Material Total (Ex. Plcg.) SUi.f A.W.T. Test Slide Test Oliensis Exudation Less Cut-Outs Test Stain Test New Wt. Oliensis Spot Test Bdle. Wt.No. Shingles/Bdle.Grose Area Shingle Shingle Size: LengthWidthCut-OutsNo. Tabs Aligning Devices Patent Marks___________ - Underwriters1 Label_______________________________________________________ Method of Packing_____________________________________________ General Appearance_____ > Remarks_ ftltl [Gj &AH X JitUriito_________________________________________ 0(rj?'.T $ut-- 4<~ ^ jktf j?tt n u'Ujt BIRD 010834 >7 pini t. tt. m. PS T. R. No. qJi7 SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Product s>lro<iJU JsicPaaJ tyju&iitfGD&te in Manufactured' b- y _______ Obtained from_____ p p, I'OK -- (j D' ate Manufactured i !!-(- 6! ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL ('A/.- /M ten^! fyji) Felt Dry Wt. Saturation WT/Sq.--RTT7TDU" Pelt No. s? Pelt Make DT7" Sq. Pt. _______________ ft Kerosene / f # Voids Pilled Sat. Iff.& Condition of Sheet % . */_ S.P. Pen. S.P. (Pilled) v.f- (afSindk-1) Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating /5T7 Temp._________ jo Filler y 5T 1st Filler /3.4 Grade Material S.P. [Filled) Pen"(Unfilled) 2nd Coating 1.0,3 Temp.______________ j> Filler 2nd Filler 1st Surf. 2nd Surf, Backing JjL 53.6 n.o. u Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No, Mfr. Material Material Color Abrasion Loss Color Abrasion Loss Total (Ex. Pkg.)3/ Z? / / A.W.T. Test Slide Test Less Cut-Outs Oliensis Exudation Test Stain Test New Wt. Oliensis Spot Test Bdle. Wt. No. Shingles/Bdle.Gross Area Shingle Shingle Size: Length_ Width Cut-Outs No. Tabs Aligning Devices______ Patent Marks_________ Underwriters' Label Method of Packing BIRD 010835 Mill T. R. No. G-/2- 1/f PS T. R. No. 53/ SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Produc* fuifcJiinnate Manufactured by Obtained from pfi jZ'fi Date Manufactured U-6~ & / M.v4m AtiAiic/ Be^e'lSfc^alfisd #/--..?/ B -1%. ~~ JtA. ANALYSIS OP MATERIAL (fitfl ~ M*ij fy.Sl) Felt Dry Wt. Saturation Wt./Sq. UM.... . w^rrco' Pelt No. 5? ffelt Make 7yp Sq. Ft. ft Kerosene I f 7 ft Voids Pilled T6 ft Sat. /7? Condition of Sheet S.P. Pen. 'S.P. (Filled) C*/-- tf. .7 (tw$ Pen (Unfilled) 1st Coating / 6i Temp,_________ ft Filler W, i 1st Filler XU Grade Material S.P. (Filled) Pen lUnfilled) 2nd Coating 2nd Filler 1st Surf. LX i Temp.__________ ft Filler Grade Mesh No. Mfr. Mesh No._ Material Color Abrasion Loss Color 3 2nd Surf. IL Mfr. Abrasion Loss Backing JL. Material Total (Ex. Pkg A.W.T. Test Slide Test Less Cut-Outs Ollensis Exudation Test Stain Test New Wt. 01iensi3 Spot Test Bdle. Wt.No. Shingles/Bdle.Gross Area Shingle_ Shingle Size: Length _______ WidthCut-Outs No. Tabs Aligning Devices Patent Marks Underwriters' Label Method of Packing General Appearance Remarks Hjtt ^ JiX> pftl B Qr Jjtfcutkrt M j /<ca <ZirCt/ (h^th>y-jr ^ fitf tn dbtihfar -- CfM BIRD 010836 J Mill T. R. No. /-J/8-J6-1# FS T. R. No. 3.5*3 g- SAMPLES FOR SHREVEPORT TEST DECK Product SJvAaM^ LsLiJ yuiikiik&Da-te Manufactured by Date Manufactured ~6l Obtained from f'fi ^ ANALYSIS OF MATERIAL. ^ gg^ ^ }j) Felt Dry Wt. Saturation ' Wf.7Sq1 U,Lf' tffS Wt./lOO Felt No'. '53 Felt Make ~j?/> Sq. Ft. fo Kerosene iff f> Voids Filled gj/f f> Sat. iy<f Condition of Sheet S.P. Pen. = f6 -)'( Wl* irffc1) S .P.""[Filled) ... PerT(UnflIleaj 1st Coating 1st Filler m3. 1UL Temp.________ Grade S.P. (Filled) f, Filler Vv?, Material Pen \Unfilled) 2nd Coating 2nd Filler >) 1st Surf. 2nd Surf. 1A. ILL Temp.______________ fa Filler Grade Me3h No, Mfr. ___ Mesh No. Material Color Abrasion Loss Color Mfr. Abrasion Loss 5~ VA Backing Total (Ex. Pkg Less Cut-Outs New Wt. Bdle. Wt, .3/, 3 Material A.W.T. Test Slide Test Oliensis Exudation Test Stain Test -f Oliensis Spot Test No. Shingles/Bdle._ Gross Area Shingle Shingle Size: Length Width Cut-Outs No. Tabs Aligning Devices_____ Patent Marks Underwriters' Label Method of Packing General Appearance_ y> Remarks UJ j JAlA.I'U. AAvCt' .Jh-^UsS' ^nd iB cJU^y ALzt fauilft -- BIRD 010838 3P06A hi Reply to,, - Object___ MEMORANDUM Date. 5/4/77 From COST ESTIMATE: WIND SEAL SHINGLE BB.H BMGA- Mr. Jones BMGA- Mr. Bussiere To~^BQ~ Mr. Homan Please supply BBH and BBQ with cost estimates of the Wind Seal shingle made at Shreveport, La. The shingle constructions are flat and thick butt. The labor budget, RCD operating speed, finishing materials and size for both shingle constructions are the same. A. See standard card for standard thick bqft Wind eal shingle made at 'p|. B. Proposed flat Wind Seal shingle made at FS, Raw Mtls./sq. - 240 sq, ft. Net Felt, 55# x 48" 27, Q# Saturation, #14 1/2 (175%) 47.2 Coating, #21 1/2 38.8 Filler, 53% 43.9 Backing, Talc Pioneer 36 2.0 Surfacing, #11 Base Glenwood-Oiled 22.5 Surfacing* #11 Colored Oiled 52.6 Wind Seal Adhesive 1.8 Bradford Flakes 0.2 Total 236.0# Cut outs, 2,07 sq. ft. 2.0 Wt,/sq. 234.0# Finishing Materials 1.0 Shipping Wt. 235.0# Gross 30,2# 48.6 40 = 0 45.2 3.4 24.1) 56.3) 1.8 0.2 249.8# Net Ibs,/1QQ n.3# 19.7 16.3 18.3 0.8 31.3 0.7 - 98.4# CJPatenaude/rp -7T BIRD 010839