Document DdvyXOX4a0a3OywGY2DLGZNgO
3
r
v I :j
J
M `J
Mr.J.Eby
QggRTC igffigffQS vngjo ASSgranog
JOaotoa of Tlwtlrc of tbs t&dfoxa, Cltsrtfication & finding Owwrffet-- - Mar 23 .1967.
rroaqnbt
Dr.BJtavill, Xr.J.Bay,
* V.Undaay, G.?.2rnk,
W.H.Fotr
Mr.B.Dedia-Hbrec,
* &*Oals JL&OfobvrO, D.ftdrior.
BalasMi
(1) B Til.TWTtioo of tbs nwoHng of Jamuy 24th wn
' approved*
U) The Chainon stated that tbo ***<TMg of tbo wOiobtj
Acini Faloo Claaaificatina of iabstoo Cummfr ftbrea*
ad "Saggootad Controls for tbo Qaobeo Point fains
mT--Banaa to hsvo boon fttsxl satisfactory
by Q.AJf.JUOirootors bat bos not boon given final
ifjuonl* -
''
(3) Tbo
aaggootod that tbo Fibre Inspector bo
'aatborUsd to cony cot rmndaa visits to plants
(on s similar basis so soggostsd for P.T.Ccotiol)
sad carry cot aacpllng for tbo Q,S.Test on ahjppsnta.
It vu felt dosirails as! Q.A.K.JLDirectors will bo
00 Infcrnnd.
(4) The
of the Technical Caaclttoo rsvleMd
> tbo proposed prqgrsa of tbo S.H.Sob-CQBStttoo,
(5) Cm Cbaiaan sspldnod tbo adstak* in tbs Plbro
Inspector's salary sod proposod this bo oorrootod
to $676 par aentb offootiva July 1.1966. Agreed*
CcefcM*.
rv
:_
'1
'
i i. >
U n
- 2-
Baalnese (Ceet'd):
(6} Tbe Chatman tabled the proposed salaxy increases
for Shoafenpofee laborstojy Staff based on mt recant Gntreraity scales. The increases for the secretary and the technicians was fait to bo too
Mg*1 ad cut of line with industry. It ants decided tc rsccssssd as fellows*-
(a) The 8Krotu7 bo limited to $&/woek re&her than tho SlfiO^eek University cals.
(b) tho University techrrl elans eoalo to bo retired and an attaspb a*de to cover tho work adth four, rather than rita, technicians.
(e) thxLverslty aoalo for tho Director to bo reoonended. .
(?) Scss prelisdsarr
tsri;
es the
fl*tf**r
of Asbestos fibres'*dstod
Hajr X5A967, and seat to Cccedttoe seekers*
Meekers will review the ideas proaestod farther
for the next nesting.
(S) tbe seebsr fra C.J.H. stated that his occpaay would classify Spnybestoa, Hastibost and Psperbestoe grades under a Q.S. classification in fUboxe.
(9) In reply to tbe Cbaixnn'a enquiry regarding the nocosaity for a new 3 Group classification tbe general opinion was that arch work had been dcoe, and was being done* by large scientific staffs
. on this pnsULaa and that answers were still too Tqgoe
to be useful.
HHF/ttd.
V.R. Foster, Chatman
Of
..//