Document DR65p2386gRDZjaGxaVDjgOo

Message From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Dravis, Samantha [/0=EXCHANGELABS/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=ECE53F0610054E669D9DFFE0B3A842DF-DRAVIS, SAM] 7/21/2017 5:42:57 PM Pagano, Peter A [peter.a.pagano@boeing.com] Gunasekara, Mandy [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=53dla3caa8bb4ebab8a2d28ca59b6f45-Gunasekara,]; Bolen, Brittany [/o=ExchangeLabs/ou=Exchange Administrative Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/cn=Recipients/cn=31e872a691114372b5a6a88482a66e48-Bolen, Brit]; Martella, Roger(GE Corporate) [Roger.Martella@ge.com]; Fitzpatrick, Michael (GE Corporate) [michael.fitzpatrick@ge.com]; Prowitt, Peter (GE Corporate) [Peter.Prowitt@ge.com]; Austeil, Theodore [theodore.austell@boeing.com]; Moloney, John M [John.M.Moloney@boeing.com] RE: Thank you and peer review request fyi Thank you for this information, Peter. We will look into this. Good to see you at the meeting. From: Pagano, Peter A [mailto:peter.a.pagano@boeing.com] Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 12:52 PM To: Dravis, Samantha <dravis.samantha@epa.gov> Cc: Gunasekara, Mandy <Gunasekara.Mandy@epa.gov>; Bolen, Brittany <bolen.brittany@epa.gov>; Martella, Roger(GE Corporate) <Roger.Martella@ge.com>; Fitzpatrick, Michael (GE Corporate) <michael.fitzpatrick@ge.com>; Prowitt, Peter (GE Corporate) <Peter.Prowitt@ge.com>; Austell, Theodore <theodore.austell@boeing.com>; Moloney, John M <John.M.Moloney@boeing.com> Subject: Thank you and peer review request fyi Hi Samantha, Thank you again for setting up the meeting with the Administrator for us and GE. We thought it was a very constructive discussion and look forward to working with you and the rest of the team in the future to advance aviation manufacturing in the US. I did want to take this opportunity to followup on one question that was raised regarding work on the aircraft proposal by OTAQ and make sure you were aware of a request sent to one of our engineers. Just to be clear, we have not had a face to face meeting with OTAQ since last Fall, but we understand that they have engaged a contractor (EnDyna) to facilitate a peer review of a technical report that was cited in the previous actions regarding aircraft that the program took in 2015 and 2016. We learned of this when one of our technical fellows was recently sent an email by the contractor asking if he was interested in participating in a document review. Unfortunately, he did not feel he was the right fit for this opportunity and declined. However, we believe if this type of work is proceeding industry should be represented in the peer review process. Although we have not been asked to propose names of possible alternate reviewers we intend to forward additional potential candidates (with and without a Boeing connection) for consideration for this activity. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns and we look forward to speaking with you again soon. All the best, Peter A. Pagano Director, Environment The Boeing Company Sierra Club v. EPA 18cv3472 NDCA Tier 1 ED 002061 00082317-00001