Document DQXeMXOQme7rd0DroNYBn2Qa

.% OCT ) b KM- UNION CARBIDE CORPORATIONP. 0. Box 8361 Engineering, Manufacturing, and Technology Services So. Chas., WV 25303 Central Engineering BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL September 30, 1986 TO: Mr. J. E. Sanders COPY TO: Mr. L. C. Calvert Mr. S. W. Clark Mr. G. B. Elder Mr. R. W. Engle FROM: C. C. Neely SUBJECT: Final Draft of Recommended CGP Program Phase-Out Use of Asbestos-Containing Materials in Work Place Chemicals and Plastic Group______________________________________ Attached herewith on behalf of the Special Working Group Is a copy of the subject document dated 9/29/86. It Is a slightly fine-tuned version of the 8/28/86 version which was transmitted to you under my transmittal also dated 8/28/86. The changes that have been made are of a clarifying rather than substantive nature. At this point, we have not made an effort to obtain broad, formal review of the subject program. However, Larry Calvert has discussed It briefly with the Maintenance APM's and Maintenance Managers. In addition, Stan Clark arranged for Its review by the Safety, Health Advisory Committee (SHAC), and your staff has reviewed it. Feedback indicates these groups to be supportive of the concept, but some have expressed concern regarding the January 1, 1989 date specified for the discontinuance of the purchase of asbestos-containing materials, believing It to be optimistic. Some of the concern relates to the following: 1. CED's ability to revise and reissue the V&P Specifications and the Valve Manual In time to support the deadline. The responsible CED specialists have carefully reviewed this matter and believe that reissuance of these Manuals by July 1, 1988 Is realistic. This date has not been published, however. UCC 022272 J Nr. 3. E. Sanders -2- September 30, 1986 2. Belief that field testing of new gasket and packing materials will be required. Such testing will not be necessary since the plan at this time Is to accommodate most of the substitutions by broadening the use of materials already In use, materials such as reinforced Teflon and GRAFOIL'". This plan has not been broadly disseminated, and we can fully appreciate the reluctance to agree to a purchasing cut-off date for asbestos-containing products without knowing what the substitutes are. We also appreciate that, once this material substitute plan Is known, there will be a natural resistance due to the higher first cost of these substitute materials. 3. Some belief that Installers will need special training to handle the new gasket and packing materials. For reasons cited In (2), we do not believe this requirement will be significant. 4. Perhaps lack of understanding that the January 1, 1989 date Is the cut-off date for the purchase of asbestos-containing materials except as approved by a variance. 5. "Is this really necessary* attitude. The Special Working Group believes that QSHA's recently revised exposure limit of 0.2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air (was previously 2.0 fibers per cubic centimeter) add significant Impetus to Implement the proposed Recommended Program. According to Terry Hanning's September 5, 1986 memorandum (copy attached), labor union representatives do not believe that controlling the exposure limit to this lower level provides adequate protection. The above concerns notwithstanding, the Special Working 6roup decided to submit the subject Recommended Program to you with the January l, 1989 date Included since we believe that, with proper communication with the key plant personnel responsible for its Implementation, along with management support, this date Is realistic and achievable. We are submitting under separate cover a proposed CEO Technology Program which Includes request for funds to cover the Important communications aspect of the understanding, acceptance and Implementation process. Please let me know how we can be of further assistance regarding this matter. CCN:mr 43191 Attachment UCC 022273 8/2B/86 DRAFT RECOMMENDED POLICY CHEMICAL AMD PLASTICS BUSINESS GROUP (C&P) SUBJECT: USE OF A58EST0S-C0NTAINING HATERIALSOhN THE WORK PLACE PURPQSE/BACK6RQUND The Corporate Charter (1.1) contains the following commitment to employees: "To provide working conditions, programs of training and education, and persistent review and appropriate modifi cation of facilities and practices to protect the health and safety of employees." It also contains a social commitment to conduct business "In accordance with all the applicable national and local laws and regulations." As a result of available evidence that airborne asbestos In the occupa tional environment had proven to be carcinogenic In man, all C&P Insulation Standards were revised In 1976 to specify only asbestos-free Insulating materials; and new or replacement Installations of these materials have sub sequently been selected accordingly. Additionally, a Safety/Health Standard designated SH-256 was prepared covering the safe removal and handling (In cludes disposal) of asbestos-containing Insulating material during renova tion and demolition. The requirements of this Standard equal or exceed those of current applicable government standards. OSHA's rule-making efforts relative to asbestos usage in the work place are mired In controversy. Hearings on the latest EPA proposal which In cludes the phaseout of all asbestos over a ten-year period are now In prog ress. The proposal states: "EPA Is considering banning the manufacture. Importation, and processing of asbestos construction products and asbestos clothing soon after the rule's promulgation with the category of asbestos friction products banned about five years later, and other asbestos products banned at a later time." Gaskets and packing that contain asbestos are In the category of "other asbestos products" that would apparently be banned after ten years. No peer company that we are aware of has a target date for removal of existing asbestos-containing Insulation, gaskets, or packing; however, one major chemical company has recently discontinued the purchase of asbestos-containing gaskets and packing. A cost analysis of pipe-sire gaskets shows that 6RAF0IL*. probably the most expensive of the acceptable gasket substitute materials. Is, in fact, cost effective when only the cost of mandatory work practices associ ated with the use of asbestos (e.g. wetting for removal or airborne fiber r*)Asbestos-containing materials" Include but are not limited to Insulation, gaskets, packing, welding blankets, and building materials. UCC 022274 DRAFT 2- - 8/28/86 exposure monitoring during removal, placing In labeled plastic bags after removal, landfill disposal, and record keeping) Is considered. The same conclusion Is drawn relative to valve packing when the additional considerations of Improved service life and sealablllty are Included. Consistent with the aforementioned commitments and the economic use of materials, CiP has concluded that positive actions relative to asbestos-con taining materials^) should be taken. POLICY Except as otherwise provided by applicable law. Chemicals and Plastics Business Group will: Continue to phase out the use of asbestos-containing materials: Asbestos-containing Insulation shall be replaced with asbestos-free materials as required to maintain structural and functional Integ rity. No asbestos-containing materials shall be purchased after January 1, 1989. C&P approved practices shall be employed for the Identification, removal, modification, and/or disposal of asbestos-containing mate rials. Evaluation of asbestos substitute materials shall Include considera tion of health effects as well as suitability for Intended service and cost. A variance approval procedure shall be employed to cover considera tion of uncommon circumstances. Approval must always Include en dorsement of C&P HS&EA management. SCOPE This recommended policy applies to all C&P operated/hosted facilities. Other components of the Corporation will be apprised of Its content, DELEGATION The assignment of duties and authority to carry out the policy defined herein Is delegated as follows: To Central Engineering Department Develop and maintain engineering standards covering: Identification of asbestos-containing materials; UCC 022275 DRAFT 8/28/86 -3- - Removal, modification and/or disposal of asbestos-containing mate rials; and - Use of asbestos-substitute materials. To Site Management Implement policies and practices for the Identification, removal, modification, and disposal of asbestos-containing materials. Use of CEO Standards covering asbestos substitute materials and the communication of service experience with these materials. To Manufacturing Services Monitor use of asbestos-substitute materials and the communication of service experience with these materials. To C&P HSbEA Audit compliance with governmental regulations and CED-developed standards relating to asbestos-containing materials and, where applicable, their substitutes. UCC 022276 C. C. Meely 2073M I i- UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION ENGINEERING. MANUFACTURING. AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Central Engineering South Charleston, West Virginia UCC BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL September 29, 1986 TO: Hr. J. E. Sanders COPY TO: Mr. L. E. Calvert Mr. S. W. Clark Mr. G. B. Elder Mr. R. W. Engle FROM: C. C- Neely SUBJECT: Proposed Technology Program In 1987 In Support of Existing Operations RECBjygu 0cr 1 Mb CLARK In am submitting herewith an additional program In the subject category, this one In support of the work associated with the Implementation of the proposed new Standard covering the phase-out of asbestos-containing materials In the work place. Our estimate of costs Includes the following: A total of approximately one man year of work relating to the selection of suitable non-asbestos gasket/packing materials as a function of service conditions, and revising the affected standards (or developing new standards) accordingly. This work will be conducted primarily In the Materials and Valve and Piping Skill areas. At this point we do not envision the wholesale use of new gasket/packing materials, but rather a broader use of currently used materials (e.g., reinforced Teflon, GRAFOIL"). Approximate cost: $64,500 Printing and distribution of the revised standards. Approximate cost: $12,500 Conducting on-site seminars at Institute, Seadrlft, Slstersvllle, South Charleston, Taft and Texas City to explain the basis for the revised gasket/packing material selection. These seminars are recommended In view of our belief that simply reissuing the various standards with revised gasket/packing materials will not result In timely understanding and acceptance of the revised gasket/packing material specifications. Approximate cost: $16,000 UCC 022277 Mr. J. E. Sanders -2- September 29, 1986 We would be pleased to provide additional Information If needed. CCN:mr 00021 Attachment C. C. Special Work 6roup on Phase-out of Asbestos-Containing Materials UCC 022278 PROPOSED CEO TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM FOR 1987 IN SUPPORT OF EXISTING OPERATIONS Work Associated with Implementation of CAP Recommended Program Phase-Out Use of Asbestos-Containing Materials In the Work Place Objectives: (1) To obtain understanding and acceptance of the Recommended CAP Program by key plant personnel. (2) To develop CAP Standard Practices covering: Identification of asbestos-containing materials Removal, modification and/or disposal of asbestos-containing materials; and Use of asbestos-substitute materials Brief Description: The primary means of obtaining U/A of key plant personnel would be by on-site seminars and written follow-up. CAP Standard Practices development work would proceed In usual manner. Results Expected and Schedule: Would promote smooth transition to non-asbestos containing materials. Host of CED's work would be complete by July 1, 1988. Best Judgment of Costs: $93,000 43071 UCC 022279