Document DMdO4D5MOxM6vGV55R90L1x6o
Bob Keller dictated these notes to outline our position as seen by Keller, Dietrich, Emery and Tucker after reviewing our analytical results and the published literature to date. This is our present "legal" position on PCB in wildlife.
It can turn out that Risebrough will .be proven
to be correct and hence wre are not ready for
an open challenge in the press if it can be
avoided.
'-
This .is for background information only, not for
publication.
ms Att.
W. R. Richard
DSW 388057
STLCOPCB4101250
ROUGH DRAFT R. E. Keller to Ur. Richard per phone hy
Stanley - 2/28/69
Publications in hand (.1,2) show that Risebrough has not made a
positive structure identification to presence of chlorinated
hydrocarbons (Biphenyls) let alone Aroclor products in material
he has worked with. His approach is not an absolute identification
procedure. It's based on similar retention times for 10 com
ponents eluted through a gas chromatography column. This measure
ment is not specific for chemical compounds in unknown mixtures.
Furthermore, the electron capture detector used to monitor sep
arated component is not specific for chlorine or even halogens.
Work in our labs shows at least 13 components in Aroclor 1242,
17 in Aroclor 1254 and l4 in Aroclor 1260 with different retention
times than those reported by Risebrough. More information is
needed about un-reported experimental chromatographic conditions
used by Risebrough to resolve differences between labs.
Risebrough. has based his conclusions implicating chlorinated
biphenyls on work by Holmes (3), Holden (3a) Widmark (4), and
Jensen (5). Holmes and Holt obtained similar gas chromatography
containing 11,13 and 7 peaks respectively for commercial polychlo-
'biphenyl resin. Holmes and Holden also did not make a positive
structure identification.
Widmark and Jensen in Europe (Sweden) obtained a similar gas
chromatography for eagle extracts. Chromatographic fractions
from this work were identified structurally by Mass Spec as higher
chlorinated biphenyls. Risebrough, in his reported work has
apparently made no positive identification of this type. His
implication of chlorinated biphenyls appears to be by reference
back to above work through similar chromatograms. ^ To the best
of our knowledge, no one has identified components structurally
in biological systems'as-chlorinated biphenyls in U.S.A. Work
is underway in our labs on an unequivocal structure identification
of unknown organic species in national products using gas chro
matography and mass spectroscopy techniques.
.
REFERENCES:
(1) Risebrough , R. W., Chem. Fall,,Qut, First Rochester Conference on Toxicity, in the Fred's (US68)
(2) Risebrough, R. W. Nature, Draft of Paper in Press
DSW 388058
STLCOPCB4101251
2- HOUC-K DRAFT
REFERENCES - Cont'd.
(5) Holmes, D. C. & Simmons, J.H., Tatton, J., Nature
216, 227 (1967)-
------------
<*
(5a) Holden, A.V. and Marsden, K., Nature 2l6, 1274 (1967)
(4) Widmark, G., J, Assoc. Off., Anal. Chem. 50, 1069 (19^7)
(5) Jensen, S., New Scientist, 32, 6l2 (1966)
from R. S. Keller per phone to M. Stanley
2/28/69
STLCOPCB4101252