Document DML73gx5bjxd7x1EDYV6G804Q

C* ^ C S CQ 3 Hj CD H> PH* HH- cn T aO CD CD CL oo Hj o 3 "O S3 *0 P' p 1-i P H- 4 H* P << c+ rtCfi s w H* 1 H* 1 h-> CD t--1 CO >i CD t* O 1P h j cn CO <D CD S H-1 CD rf* C7I 00 P O w }3 CL 1 C C Mr. E. K. Locher April 14, 1949 Mr. A. K. Chenault, Ethyl Corporation, 977 West Sixth Street, Los Angeles 14, California. Dear Mr. Chenault: The letter of Mrs. Victor Homey addressed to Shell Oil Company in San Francisco, copy of which 3ms come to my desk, presents something of a problem, vhich, in my opinion, should be handled in its initial stages by Shell. It vould seem not very difficult for them to trace this man and to find out something of the nature of his illness and the identity of his physician or physicians. If this were done, and if the matter were brought to our attention in that manner, ve could take the necessary steps. If tiie letter had been addressed to me by Mrs. Barney or if it had come to Ethyl Corporation, I vould have ansvered it directly, despite the difficulties of so-doing. Under the present circumstances , I should not like to take this course, if only for the reason that tills is the responsibility of the Shell Company, and if I were to get them into any complications, they could properly feel somewhat critical. I suggest that tills be worked out locally with the Shell people. If Ilr. Littlefield can obtain information on their behalf and be of assistance, he siiould do so. If then the matter is passed on to mo for handling,It siiould be with the approval of the Shell people. I feel quite certain that this will not be a very great problem, since the tone of the letter is such that one could feel reasonably certain that it is a straightforward appeal for assistance. e should be glad to provide any such assistance, even to the extent of making arrangements to examine Mr. Horney at a convenient time if this course should be necessary or desirable. Meanwhile if some one in the Shell organisation wishes to reply to Mrs. Horney#s letter as a matter of courtesy, they, could very properly point out in such a letter that, according to their best advice, there is no reason to believe that a service station operator could or vould develop lead poisoning in any form as a consequence cf his handling of leaded gasoline. It might be pointed out that in the entire history of the industry, no case of lead poisoning has ever been seen from this cause among the many thousands of filling station operators in this country. With best regards. Cordially yours. I.AK ef Fio'dert A. KehdeJ`M.' D." K ^.001602:1: