Document DGgjRBb3yJegG69yOqLm2o6pn

July 27, 1971 Mr. B. W. iVterwin, Cha'irman The United States Potters Association P.0. Box 63 East Liverpool, Ohio 43920 Dear Mr. Merwin: Thanks very much for writing to me about the deliberations of your Committee concerning the level of distinction between the acceptable and the non-acceptable content of lead leached out of pottery by the available tests. I should like to clarify the basis of my thinking on this matter and then undertake to express my views as to what the Potter's Association should strive for in its own interest. I am not preaching, but rather stating a principle. The problem of doing what is best for the long-term interest of Potters in the United States in this matter is bound up in the attitude of governmental agencies, insofar as they speak for the safety of the people of their country. This, in my view, is a responsibility of the industry. The governmental agency concerned (E.D.A.) is, truly enough, at the moment, the authority in the matter, but considering the trends in this Government, I doubt that you can trust it entirely to give wise decisions. The standard which was set on apples and small fruit during the period when lead arsenate was in vogue, is, I think, a case in point. The investigation made in the Winache Washington orchards, was not altogether satisfactory, in my opinion, and the decision arrived at on the tolerance, was, I think, unwise, even though it related only to the proportion of such fruit in the national diet. If such a standard were applied to foods, in general, a portion of our population would be ingesting the average asuafof 7 milligrams of lead per day - a highly dangerous quantity. I don't think any responsible agency dares to regard the "average" use of fruit in the diet of individuals as corresponding to the "national average" consumption. I regarded this at the time to be a very unwise decision, and I kept still about it only because the use of lead arsenate was beginning to lessen greatly because of the availability of the organic phosphorus for use in controlling the pests which affected the production of the orchards. With this view of this matter, I was appaled to learn thatthis same standard was being applied to the issue of lead in relation to tableware. The basic problem of testing the tableware is different, of course, and the potentialities for affecting the intake of lead by people generally is also very different, but to make a mistake of this type in an official agency, and then to follow it up with the acceptance of a false standard is the height of foolishness. My point is that your industry is in a potentially dangerous situation, when it bases its security on the opinions and decisions of a government agency which is capable of exercising bad judgment. The problem of khe health of the nation, in relation to your products is your problem - that is, the problem of an industry which has only itself to blame if it gets into trouble through lack of proper information with which to guide its performance. This sounds a bit like arrogance and the wisdom of the W. Merwin 1971 ''burning bush," with its message from God, but I think it fair to say that most of the industrial organizations in the United States are in that same situation. They mus know how to handle their own affairs. This is the essence of "free enterprise." In my view, you people should establish within your own organization a level of tolerance of your own. Naturally, it will have to be at least as good as that employed by F.D.A., but it should not be as much as they can be induced to permit, but should be as low as possible, with due regard to what can reasonably be accomplished unlimited by what will occur through innovations (which may have to be abandoned), but rather by what can be achieved through proper technical efforts to avoid the introductic of lead into American food. You will have seen what apprehension has developed on the use of lead in gasoline. This same hysterical action can be applied to any other source of lead in the human environment, provided the issue is raised by uninformed persons of good will, or of rabble rousers. You must prepare for this kind of action, by honestly protecting the public in every way you find possible. Incidentally, the test adopted by F.D.A. is an effort on their part to increase the severity of the testing procedure so as, more nearly, to determine what may happen when the articles to be tested are put into common use. You may conclude that this is not the best way to learn the facts, but there it is, ostensibly to determine the degree of public hazard. Their word in tnis matter is law, by which your people are bound. The question of the severity of the test is the question as to what happens, at worst, in ordinary life. It becomes, therefore, not merely a test, but a measure of public danger. Let me repeat, therefore, that in ray view, your Committee should adopt an internal regulation in this matter, which is as severe as the technical knowledge of your art will permit, and, within its own circle, it should hue to that mark with complete rigidity. This, I think, in the present state of our society, a s well as in matters of law and equity, is by far the wisest policy. Your people know what can be done, and a.ts what is likely to be done, by manufacturers in this field better than anyone else, and you should, I think, adopt the safest course that is feasible to achieve, for the sake of the welfare of your industry, and for the acceptance of your own responsibility. Sincerely yours, RAK:wb Robert A. Kehoe, M.D. Professor Emeritus of Occupational .\Jedieine P.S. Please consider that my seemingly evangelical attitude here is not that of a "do gooder," precisely, but rather that of a person who undertakes in advance, to meet the accuser in an official hearing, or in a court of law. RAK KiT 001246j Organized 1875 U N I TED ST A T ES P O T T ER S A SSO CI A T I O N P. O. Box 63 Telephone: 386- 4225 EAST LIVERPOOL, O H I O - 4 3 9 2 0 EXECU TIV E COM M ITTEE J. T. Hall Chairm an J. M . W ells, Jr. J. M . Pinney G. R. M allory J. George E. S. M orse jM-`i--Vtr oft'> 1Q'711 T3oKpr+ \ , Tohnil TjniTrers'ity -H Cir.-*in noti 7ht+..a v*hn.r LobonoHry Collo q p-p ' roHi r ine "qer. P. 77,yjnqqr '_-~r.-n.ioO O'r-'"\rnoti , Ohio ";i Vob^n OApyr;- S e 1 - o f I ? o no he' s s e r f w>-> q qp HTr q ro nn l p t 1 on n f . 1m q 7 1071 p pp r>or n i o r i b T m o xim u m f o n 1.-1 r.o r*p l p n r p T'V'On - 7 -Ar. V . Yn-.' r* 1 r* T.rpc; /-?4 o,pr ccp rl ob o n c-ip p p n pV, riftT)ft +.1 o p n .o p l-- i n g on J ' h Tr ' 0 7 1 op l b 1-5 Op rn'-on-L1,q p p-~.n on no vTi t-h r c u r Onn n- o n , T-'h en 'STM S~ pf," n d nyvH v-jpl h iph - q UOR^ , Ur7,rp von, rh^ n Ih o vr- /\ nt- o r P *ftTd vyv^ f",'o r>p1 "*' y 70 T rVi. n y*" Cco HOpH , ^CO.-3*1 t h e ? norn i 0 3 oroo ^ o rho t rq q 1 i q 1 - nr r fftft HWi l q p i o nn f h o 1,t t o r^ pbb od s y n.f...t i .n o* -lb v non p ^ b- ,, n- ; c;b r-\'.Tq o 1 pn^ vio l OClCq 0 ,c t o ? ,0 t i n o s hho 7 ,- r; " p l.e 0 SP nr f b n r?n ft **10l b (-*>/-? <-* t o t h e 'i.CT'f c ^ g n *vipIh o d . V p *| TnTT_0 ' n c 1 l b p f cv r r o ' i 1 I on o o ri*no r'v' em eo Oi--* -On a,q n A np *vt *1t rrjp -f* P *lp " .,*! iSiod o l0T,07T ri *1 t,,-4 4-h r r*T T T " nvft o b q l.tTp pn A ypp rl -'p l g ^ r o n r P-'^i lH- JTi't' b,,y/ *: Tub cj h ' - n v l b Pf' < rnciT.b 'OH T, C) ftpn n e t 1 p o '^ n T* q 1 g lb q o nprr) 1"TTriy 1,. Tr O r o n t o o n pH , Oho r i o ^ o s o f p i .~P ivilpyip niO AU,VI q-TTAT-p`* 1 7 *'n nnn. A"-vnr O pr* -ft VP 11 V>o l rvr.r ) q n t . 1 h /ypo np +,T.-- o v r n r l i ono , o rb - n Ob (C3,"Vpd b v t h e v-tm nof/ h od no i-re no o ] crp nr-'' r)>ft -pp 4j* "1"LIH 'Cj-n-f q' ' >'P.j 'V'' 'n' u n d , O V P r*'"d n 2 d ^ p p l *3 lb q nvia'i 'yTq o n P *nOpl n '"`O C O n p T,.ri l h of, t b p ^ / apop t, i~* 7 TTn li j n f*0T'T n.ontho n?ro (Jinodti "S-dopTJCod v on o in n '^ l^ rn0 r p riw ^ b I I ^n t*ox'<cn t/ ion oo.pp.p xp n lio n o d in the nvs hiftqoM0 1*TPrs o11r*ibn.ted tr> o*7qft?qs . ft,r. P ^/.rigornqnoo, vpmo littC n \-roOn pros 0r>p.<>Vfftry74qbpd on pTron^l07p r]qqnia ( ?TqT,, pH11q exten ri vp TTor u ^s b.oi.n/*` '1HftD on lbeft nmi.In tirn o r yroq, fbqr or 11. vp 0n1ryp nf1 3nv lend T*P1a;ftoq^ CAme headvny is bol np* niodp pnponr oof thp PPspnrnh Commit tr\o gqq*]0 P 0 th-*t the s problem vili bp r)\rcy"veq ftyft e re let! vel ir short ti.70 . ^ne pq 1m '0'^'7,rcriir V>P8 "]reefVv A.--T 00 '-,7lb -i flnx far mil at:-*n oqr deceC s r'n.o1 siVP P ppp,v>o Vftrntelv 0 aP71 7ctod T1P10ccn - rhen o1ap*V175 by the ^CA t th-d . 'Tbpft'' hove nto1rh pd P Pqi-r col nn p -pir,'-r th ftp fl ax onr2, prq 0tip'' ' nt-ftns to ".'l;'ipn Ine fio"5o t - >P r.^nrC1q-'> lb^t T r portie 17yr qq7qrnq f}oo ^nob1orr. n,, A7lv 7 .pon. nl ho uopi -.r1th ni 0/'1 C*. T-'vT,i(sypr -1 q on ndieot- ,A\p +e-t 0 P ol ntTpn 1 th q vrbftlr. nrcib*lqp| T.T' 7 ho P r . R o b e r t A.. Kehoe --? -- 7 / 2R/ 71 Since the 7bA chenfed the leechin? orocedere we feel that .Tr=vere luck"v that t.hev agreed to the 7 eon release whr '-r -lp-i t4si Tv o^nta cted them The 7 corn fi mss h^sed -^n a reoort that the ^on-rtment of Afri cultore reonircd lead, from or-'-pqirc; he removed from eool.es so Phot, the romei nir'' 1s cd would. not he more then this figure based on the weight of the nnnlg# I trust the above has presented our th in'eing at this tins and re will welcome any comments you Tr'sh to made. ''1*^V VOUv`S . 17 p n o y * fV '^ o rp iT v i ^ f (p p P'-ri;T/pi"} D. W. M sr win , Cha ir ?t ? n 00.12467