Document DGYRbpnMzK1rpLoYBwx3Qwj14
FILE NAME Quebec Asbestos Mining Association QAMA
DATE 1949
DOC QAMA029
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION QAMA Contract Incomplete
ra
Clause 25
This article discusses the duration of the Agreement It stipulates
that the Agreement comes into effect the first day of January of the
current year and will remain for a year's period
It will be renewed
thereafter automatically from year to year at least until one of the
parties informs the other between the sixtieth and thirtieth day
preceding the expiration date whether they want to amend or terminate
the above agreement
For this year this article presents some serious difficulties on
account of some circumstances of absolute necesnecessity sity or circumstances
outside of one's control which have delayed the drawing up and
publication of this decision We are discussing at the present time the
renewal of a collective contrfa orctt he year 1949. Now it happens that
this contract will be renewed less than a month before the expiration of
the above year
If the contract is renewed and signed by the parties
during the course of the month of December it will be automatically in
effect for the year 1950 because it would be physically impossible for one
days
or the other of the parties to denounce it thirty days days before its expira-
tion Furthermore it owuld seem futile and frivolous to sign a contract
that would last only a few days which would obligate
the parties to
immediately resume their negotiations for drawing up a contract which
would be in effect during the year 1950
The investigation in this case was long slow serious and thorough It seems to us that all the facts were brought to the knowledge of the
magistrates tribunal or court There probably will not be a change in
economic conditions that prevail at the present time and those which will
prevail in the year 1950 The cost of living has a tendency of falling We think then that it will be in the common interests of the contracting
parties to stipulate that the work contract which will be signed following
this decision will be automaticallyautomatically renewed for the yyeareayerar year 1950 1950 1950
Master Master Master Master Master Master
Lesperance dissents on this poipntoint
Clause 25 should then read as follows
25 This agreement after having been introduced in accordance with
the requirements of the law will be supposed to have been in effect since
the first day of January 1949 and it will stay in effect
until December
31 of the same year
It will then be automatically renewed for the
whole year of 1950. During the year 1950 one or the other of the parties
will be able to renounce it by informing the other party between the
sixtieth and thirtieth day preceding the expiration date A notice of amendment should contain as much as possible possible a list of
the suggested modifications for the renewal of the 1951 contract
The Union also asked to add to the Agreement two new clauses
First
the clause 26 which deals with the elimination of dust The Union asks
to include in the contract an article by which the Company would promise
would undertake to continue the outside and inside of the
to work toward the elimination of dust in
i
mills
with
the
most
short
delay
delay
possible
in using the best known resources means
It hasn't submitted any notes
to translate exactly its opinion This a subject for long discussion Eminent
question of asbestos
doctors were heard
dust makes The Union
produced as its witness Dr. Alexander Sirois of the Thetford The
Company heard Dr. Paul Cartier medical director of the Industrial Industrial Clinic
at Thetford The Court then summonedsubpoenaed as its own
foreman or head Dr. J.A. Vidal of Montreal specialist in tuberculosis
andand head of service at the Hospital of Coeur of Cartierville
For
deciding the question the Company then summoned Dr. Arthur John Vorwald
director of the Laboratory at the Trudeau Foundation of Saranac Lake
New York as well as Dr. Industrial Hygiene whose
Anhtony J.
Lanza of New
!
authority is recongized
York a specialist in throughout the world
In our findings upon the testimony evidence we are going to try
to define what is asbestosis what relation there is between this disease
and tuberculosis and silicosis
We will see what was done by the Company
to protect is workers from this disease
According to the unanimous
testimony of the doctors who were heard asbestosis is a fibrous reaction
of the lung caused by inhalation of asbestos dust
In order for
asbestos
fibers to affect the respiratory pathways the fibers must be relatively
long from 10 to 60 microns
They the doctors thethemsmelvesselves have found
fibers of 250 microns in an autopsy but this constitutes an exception
According to the evidence to contract asbestosis it is necessary to live in a concentration of dust containing five million particles or fibers
of asbestos per cubic foot of air
The exposure period varies
Dr.
Sirois claims maintains it could be for seven years while Dr. Cartier
it
is
is of the opinion that it is necessary to breathe this concentration of
dust during fourteen years
It is probable that the necessary time to
contract this disease depends in large part on the predisposition more or
less of each subject The state of receptivity susceptibility according
to the opoinion of Dr. Vorwald depends upon factors which are still
unknown
Asbestos fibers whiwhcich h which which get into the lungs cause an irritation
which produces a multiplication of cells like a defense phenomenon This
multiplication of cells diminishes the alveolar space and impedes obstruct
thethe the
transfterransfer
transfer
transfer
ttransrtferarnsafenrsfer
of
osygen osygen osygen
by
way
of
the
alveolar
inner wall
to
the arterial
blood
This This fibrous fibrous reaction covers covers the arbestos dust and destroys its
noxious character It follows according to the unanimous opinion of the
distinguished doctors who have been heard that asbestosis is not a
progressive disease because the irritation stops at the moment the
asbestos fiber has been completely covered by this fibrosing phenomena
The evidence discloses that asbestosis at a very advanced degree diminishes
the respiratory capacity until a certain point and the resistance to
other illnesses
Moreover
one
cannot deny
that
asbestosis
existsexists
as
as as
disease
it has been acknowledged as an industrial disease disease disease disease disease disease by by a law of the province
Asbestosis
nevertheless
is
far
possessing from possessing
the
seriousness seriousness
seriousness seriousness
seriousnes
of of
tuberculosis and of silicosis
It differs totally in its evolution and totally
its effeffecets cts effects
As we are about to say asbestosis
is not progressivperogressive
If as early as the first visible signs of asbestosis the worker who is affected with it changes job site and works in a place where the
concentration of asbestosi fibers is less strong the disease stops
evolving immediately The tissue heals scars and the worker
undergoes ( not none diminution of capacity nor any any pathological
symptoms The irritation caused by asbestos fiber is mechanical and
not chemical
Close observation of the state of the lungs of all workers
who work in high concentrations
of
of
asbestos
dust will
will
make
possible
seeing immediately the first injuries of the sickness sickness
That is moreover
the opinion expressed by Dr. Vorwald It thus seems relatively easy as
early as the beginning of the evolution of this phenomena of asbestosis
what will keep the worker in good health
By
By contrast
silicosis
is not at all of the same nature
It is
caused by inhaling particles of free silica from one to five microns
It produces a specific pathological lesion which is a
"
nodule
My
quotation
marks
The reaction caused by silicosis is
not mechanical but chemical
Silica established favorable ground for the
evolution and development of tuberculosis Silicosis by its own nature
is a progressive disease and its evolution generally leads to death It is proved that there isn't any free silica silica silica in the asbestos mines
and that silicosis could not occur in the workers employed at mining for asbestos minerals The radiographic picture of asbestosis and of
silicosis do not resemble each other at all and a slightly practised
eye can ascertain right away this difference
There cannot be any
on this subject As for tuberculosis this is a known disease that is produced
by inhaling tuberculosis bacillis called Koch's bacillis According to the testimony of Dr. Cartier 40 to 75 of silicosis
patients
subject
die of tuberculosis
That is moreover the
Conclusive studies have been made on this
opinion clearlyclearly exexppresed ressed byby the knowledgeabl opinion
doctors who have been heard in this case
For some time the index of
mortalities by tuberculosis was very high at Thetford due to the fact that there was a sanatorium for tuberculosis
This was
patients at
this town and all the mortalities mortalities that would occur at the hospital were
atrributed to the town of Thetford adding to the rate of mortalities
in a considerable way This faulty procedure was corrected and the
mortalities that occur in that hospital are now attributed to the place
of residence of of the patients with the result that the rate of mortalities
by tuberculosis at Thetford is no more high that in the small towns
of the same importance One confirms that in certain centers of the province of Quebec where there isn't any mineral industry and consequently no high concentrations of dust the rate of tuberculosis
deaths is high even higher than that in the
One confirms that more than in this town tubercular deaths were higher
in women than in men although women do not work in asbestos mines
The
rate is also higher in young people who work in offices than in those of
the same age who work in asbestos mines
The workers who are harmed by
asbestos are not more suceptible to contracting tuberculosis than those those
who do not work in asbestos mines
Moreover these statements were
confirmed by laboratory tests which were were relatedrelated in in detail for us by
Dr. Vorwald
The proof made in this case is conclusive
It indicates
clearly and absolutely that there isn't any relationship between asbestosis
and tuberculosis
The cases of asbestosis in the asbestos industry in the province of
Quebec are not numerous
One could say there are about 5,000 workers
who mine asbestos in the Quebec Province
From 1939 to 1949 1949
, only only only only 93 93
complaints claims were made for cases of asbestosis
Of this number
61. were refused 6 were still in outstanding and 26 were
awarded which makes an average of 2.6 per year out of a total number of
about 5,000 employees For the Asbestos Corporation Limited from 1942 1942
to 1949 36 claims were made 24 were rejected 10 were awarded and 2 are
still in abeyance
The question asked us is if we know asbestosiassbestosis
could could could
could could
give
give
give
give
give
rise
rise rise rise rise
to to ,
complicate or aggravate heart diseases There is nothing in evidence which
will allow us to affirm this
Moreover Dr. Cartier himself affirms there
isn't any objective evidence that asbestosis in its minimal state or
moderate state could cause or aggravate heart diseases
Dr. Vorwald was then then questioned about the relationship between questioned
asbestosis and cancer of of the lung
He answered us that in the current
state of science it was impossible to affaffirm irm if there is any relation
-6-
betweenbetween the two diseases Some studies meanwhile are being carried on
to explain the frequency of cancer of the lungs in adults even in those
who do not work with asbestos
We will see now what has been done at Thetford to protect
workers from asbestosis
In 1945 the companies who operated at Thetford organized a
clinic under the name of the Industrial Clinic of Thetford
It
opended in May 1946. Capital of 75,000 was furnished by the Asbestos
Company Limited and Bell Asbestos
Limited
It cost 32,000 to 35,000 per year to operate this clinic and
this bill was paid by the asbestos companies Dr. Paul Cartier eminent
specialist in lung tuberculosis is in chargceharge of this clinic
All the new workers submit to a serious serious examination before being hired Their application is accepted on the condition they are in good health Then each year all the employees who work in the asbestos
mines or in the asbestos mills are given new examinations Thirdly
the check examinations are given as often as necessary to all subjects
who might show a pulmonary anomaly Since June 1946 to July 1949
this clinic examined 1,713 new applicants it made 7,035 periodic
examinations of emp19yees of the companies and 578 check examinations
which makes a total of 10,226 examinations
Dr. Cartier tells us that
at the moment he ascertains a pulmonary anomalie in certain employees he asks the company involved to give this employee another kind of work which
will expose
him less to breathing asbestos dust
He also assures us
that that that that the companies yield with good grace to all these changes This This This This clinic clinic clinic cclinlic inic certainly will have an effect on diminishing the grave
cases of asbestosis by discovering the first symptoms when they appear
The clinic is not only interested in discovering cases of asbestosis but
--7-
it also
because
watches over all the workers from the point of view of tuberculosis
it is
necessary not to forget that workers
in the asbestos
mines are susceptible to
contracting tuberculosis like any other individual
who doesn't work in dust but not more
Besides this clinic which serves to protect the
Asbestos Corporation put into production a program to
workers the company company eliminate dust
dust
At
At King Mine
the
company spent 211,197.34
at Beaver Mine the elimina-
tion of dust cost to date 194,804.20 at the Canadian Mines thethe
company spent for the same ends 156,751.00 for a total of 562,752.54
This elimination of dust is a winded job The company began it and
asserts it will continue it
It now experiments with systems it installed
in these three mines It is perfecting them and just invented a mechanism
to eliminate the dust at the place where one getgs ets the hindrance
of asbestos This mechanism having been satisfactory satisfactory the company intends
install it in all the mills
It is evident that the situation is not
yet perfect and that there yct remains much work to accomplish The
and Company seems to have excellent arrangements it affirms that it will
continue the work begun
It recognizes that the dust is a nuisance and it
seems disposed to work towards its elimination as far as is possible
Even though the asbestos dust can affect the working conditions of of
the workers I think that settlement of this
question criticizes the
of
administratadministrationion of the company more than the work contract
It is an
important and difficult question to decide which are the best mechanisms
to eliminate dust in a given factory
The company
income permits it to make the nessary capital outlay
of these machines
it is up to it also whether it ought to
this time if its will be able to take the liberty of making
decide at
these outlays
www -8-
.
good In view of the
will shown by the Company until the
present
in coming to a solution to this
problem and in view of the results
certain already obtained
in the collective application
we do not think it would be
timely to include a clause work contract legally obliging the
company to put in
ways of eliminating the dust All that must be
to the discretion of the directors of
the administration of the the companycompany
All the same we are
asking that the following declaration
be
included in the contract Master Lesperance dissenting
The
company recognizes that asbestos dust is is a
nuisance nuisance nuisannuciseanncue isance
It
declares
that
it
is
disposed disposed
to
continue
work
already
already
alreadyalready
already
already
dust to the extent where it is possible and practical
started on eliminating
in the interioir nterior and
exterior of the factories The company received the Union's requests and
has reserved making a decision in its discretion of the best way to make
this occur
what sum the company could spend to this end and the place
where the money will be invested
The present clause should not be interpreted at obligation of the Company but only as an affirmation
with regard to the problem of elimination of asbestos
all as of its dust
a contractual
disposition
Montreal December 10 1949
Thomas Tremblay
President